Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1972-01-05 . . . .... e . MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1972 The Planning Commiss1on of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session in the Council Chambers at the City Administration Bu11ding. The meeting was opened at 7.35 p.m. by Chairman Knapp and Vice Chairman Ripperdan led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Present: Absent: Knapp, Lanning, O'Toole, Ripperdan Dunn IYIr.. Dunn's absence was excused due to a conflict with the Chamber of Commerce annual installat10n u1nner. Mr. Dunn is a member of the Board of Directors for that organ1zation. The m1nutes of December 15, 1971 were approved as presented. 1. Public Hearing A. Joni F1nch & Gladys WYnne (Joseph Davis), V-2-72 Applicant requested a variance to perm1t construction of a 10 unit apartment bU11ding on Lots 19, 21 and 23, Block 207, Stanton and Lothian's F1rst Addition. Variances requested include .21 of a unit over maximum dens1ty, m1nor encroachments 1nto the s1de and rear yards, size 9f parking spaces and some parking part1ally uncovered. Hearing open. Mr. Bill Maher, 317 8thsSt., the neighboring property owner, had no object1on to the plan, but requested that a wall be requ1red between the properties to avoid light nuisance and car damage. Charles Sherman; 1615 Electr1c, commented on the adequate parking and general good appearance of the design. Barney Howe, 315 8th St., felt the wall was needed but otherwise a good des1gn. Me. E. W. Sher1dan, att.orney for the owner, supported the plan and felt ~he architect had done a good job. No other comments, the hearing was closed. The architect expla1ned that the f1rst story roof would cover all parking area. Mr. Ripperdan moved to approve the variance with the stipulat10n that a six foot block wall be constructed on the property line and the eng1neer's conditions be met. Seconded by Mrs. Lanning and passed unan1mously by the members present. Resolution No. 597. 2. Oral Communications There were no oral communicat1ons. 3. Written Communicat1ons Information was ...'eceived from the League of California Cities regarding the Institute for Planning Commiss1oners to be held in San Jose. 4. Unf1nished Business There was no unfinished business. . . . . . 5. New Business A. Robert Hibbing (Thomas Menser), A-9-71 An appeal to the City Council of the denial of a variance was referred back to the Comm1ssion for reconsideration. Secretary explained the additional reasons furnished and the possible actions the Commission could take. In discussion, it was pointed out that the Commission cannot consider economic hardship. Mrs. Lanning felt it would grant special privilege and would not justify hardship as defined 1n zoning. Mr. Menser stated is was a problem for the entire tract and neighbors would hke to see ordinance changed. Chairman explained that this could not be considered under the appeal. After additional discussion, Mr. Knapp moved to reaffirm the denial on the bas1s of insufficient new material to justify reopening the public hearing. Mrs. Lanning seconded the motion and it passed unanimously by the members present. Resolution No. 598. Mr. Menser asked how to 1nst1tute an amendment to the ordinance and the Secretary explained the procedure. B. Determ1nation as to whether Service Station Lighter Boxes wi th Insignias const1 tute Sign~'Area A request has been received requesting a determination as to whether lighter boxes installed with insignias should constitute sign area. After discussion, it was the con census of the Commission that the total area would be included as sign area. C. Standard Oil Company of Cal1fornia (Atlantic Engineering, Inc.) PR-1-72 Applicant submitted plans for the installation of two lighter boxes with ins1gnia at the Standard service station located at Westminster and Seal Beach. The total s1gn area including this installation would remain below the maximum perm1tted. Commission complimented the appearance of this particular station. Mr. Knapp moved "to approve the plans as s.ubmi tted. Seconded by Mrs. Lann1ng and passed unanimously by the members present. Resolution No. 599. 6. Report from Secretary Secretary presented the progress report on Southern California Regional Aviation Systems Study. He pointed out that three alternate plans areepresented and that SCAG requests opinions from various agencies. In discussion, Plan A was felt to be unacceptable economically and ecologically. Plan B has some advantages and disadvantages. Plan C was the best proposal offered. Staff to prepare a resolution with findings endorsing Plan C. Staff to investigate financial arrangements by the City for Comm1ssioners to attend Institute for Plann1ng Commissioners. A question has arisen regarding ironwork fences exceeding the 42" height limit in the front yard. It was discussed whether they should be allowed, sHould be controlled by variance or an amendment to the ordinance. Areas to be considered would be the percentage of open area for visibility, enforcement, obstruction to visibility by landscaping. Staff directed to study and prepare a report. . . r,. . . A map was presented of proposed bicycle trails in the City. The Secretary explained those under consideration. Mr. Knapp asked about a structure built against the rear wall at 700 Coastline. Staff to invest1gate and report. No further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 P.M. ~~ Lois Arnold Recording Secretary