HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1972-06-07
.
.
.
e
e
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1972
The Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session in the
Council Chambers at the City Administration Building. The meeting was opened at
7:30 p.m. by Chairman Knapp and Vice Chairman Ripperdan leq the Pledge to the Flag.
Present: Dunn, Knapp, Lanning, 0' Toole, Ripperdan
Absent: None
The minutes of ~ 31, 1972 were approved as presented.
1. Public Hearing
A. Laura C. DeLacy (Richard Moody), V-22-72
Applicant requests a variance to permit projections of a fireplace flue 12 inches
into a sideyard and project of timbers (architectural feature) into both sideyards
at A-10 Surfside. Hearing open. Canmunication received requested a continuance
to perm t the Board of Directors of Surfside to review the plans and forward
their recommendations. Mr. Dunn reported that he attempted to view the property
and was unable to get admission to the Colony. He requested that passes be
obtained for the Commission as he would not vote on any application without the
opportunity to see the property. Chair ordered staff to request passes from
the Board of Directors for the Commissioners. In addition, the Chair ordered the
hearing continued to June 2l.
B. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. (Edward Heller et al), UV-3-72
Applicant requested a Use Variance to permit temporary operation of a rock crusher
on undeveloped R-l property located east of ~nes Steam Plant Road and north of
Marina Hill approximately 700 feet from the nearest residence. Hearing open.
Wayne Salyards of Sully-Miller was present representing the applicant. Noise from
the operation and its control was discussed. Length of time for the operation
wes discussed with Mr. Salyards stating they would be crushing only the material
presently on site and estimated about 10 dqs of operation. Secretary reported
the equipment would not be electrically driven but would still hold to the noise
restriction. Mr. Salyards also reported that the site would be restored 1n
accordance with their agreement with the Hellman Estate. Hearing closed. Mr.
Ripperdan moved to approve the Use Variance subject to the conditions outlined
in the staff report dated June 1, 1972, regarding noise, time of operation,
dust, etc., and with a three week limit on the cruShing operation. Seconded by
Mr. Knapp and passed unanimously. Resolution No. 641.
C. Mr. and Mrs. A. B. Jones, V-23-72
Applicant desires to add a covered porch to an existing nonconforming building
in the R-3 Zone at 210-212 6th St. Nonconformity in parking is 3 spaces in lieu
of required 5 and a 7 ft. rear setback in lieu of the required 9 ft. Hearing open.
No comments were received, pro or con. Hearing closed. Mrs. Lanning moved to
approve. Seconded by Mr. Dunn and passed unanimously. Resolution No. 642.
.
.
e
e
D. Mildred Creighton & Lucille Farr (Burgess-Donovan, Inc.), v-24-72
Applicant proposed the construction of a 10 unit apartment in the R-3 Zone with
less than prescribed lot area per dwelling unit and less than the prescribed
floor area in certain units at l19 7th St. Hearing open. Mr. Laughlin and Mrs.
Robinson asked for clarification on lot area per dwelling unit and number of
undersized units. Mr. Tolliver apoke against the proposal because the area is
already crowded. Others in the audience felt there was good reason for the
requirements in the ordinance and they should be maintained. Mr. Burgess pointed
out that the lot area provided for 9 2/3 units and the,y were furnishing all the
required parking on site. Discussion followed of possible revisions to make
all units meet the minimum size and also to provide additional parking. Mr.
Burgess also pointed out that consolidation of the property made the complex
more aesthecially pleasing and allowed a better parking arrangement. Applicant
to provide new plans showing these revisions. Chair ordered the hearing continued
until the next meeting and instructed the staff to readver~ise the hearing.
E. Charles & Rachel Sauerbier (Burgess-Donovan, Inc.), V-25-72
Applicant proposed the construction of a 14 unit apartment in the R-3 Zone with
less than prescribed lot area per dwelling unit, less than the prescribed floor
area per unit and more than 10 units on a single parcel at 121 7th St. Hearing
open. Burgess stated that undersized units would be revised to conform to code.
Members of the audience expressed their desire to have construction conform to
code in all phases. Lot size would allow l3.l units and it was felt there were
no causes shown to permit an additional unit. Discussion followed on minor
revisions to plans. Chair ordered hearing continued until the next meeting and
instructed the staff to readvertise.
F. Consideration of an Amendment to Ordinance 628 (Zoning) Amending
Article 2, Definitions, and Section lB35 of Article lB, Automobile
Service Stations; Performance and Development Standards
Secretary explained that the Council had not held a public hearing prior to the
adoption of this amendment and on the advice of the Deputy City Attorney, it
had been referred back to the Commission for reconsideration and recommendations.
Hearing open. Bo comments received, pro or con. Hearing closed. Mr. Knapp
moved to approve the proposed amendment and recommend its adoption by the City
Council. Seconded by Mrs. Lanning and passed unanimously. Resolution No.643.
2. Oral Communications
There were no oral communications.
3. Written Communications
A letter was received from Senator Dennis E. Carpenter aCknOWledging the Commission's
opposition to the Crosstown Freeway.
Carl Irwin provided a copy of a HUD Environmental Impact Report for the Commission's
information. Staff instructed to send a letter of thanks to Mr. Irwin.
. 4. Unfinished Business
There was no unfinished business.
e
e
5. New Business
.
A. Lakewood Rancho Be Los Coyotes Land Company (Robert S. Borders),
PR-9-72
Mr. Borders as authorized agent of the property owner presented plans for the
remodeling of an existing restaurant in the Rossmoor Business Center. All minimum
code requirements have been met. Mr. Knapp moved to approve the plans as presented.
Seconded b,y Mrs. Lanning and passed unanimously. Resolution No. 644.
6. Report from Secretary
Secretary asked for the Commission's opinion regarding alterations to existing
structures when parking is the only nonconformity. Many cases need improvements
but it is physically impossible to increase parking. Discussion followed with
the staff directed to draft a proposal for consideration.
Mr. Neprud reported on the open space element and that the first draft would
be provided for the June 21st meeting. It would be impossible to have final
adoption of the plan by the June 30 deadline, but the Deputy City Attorney felt
there was no problem as long as the adoption of the element was b~ing actively
pursued. Mr. Neprud also reported that A.B. 966 was still in committee at the
Senate. Letters to be prepared to Senators urging its passage. Recreation
Commission will consider the open space element prior to the next Planning
Commission meeting.
.
Mrs. Lanning reported that the wildlife refuge bill has passed the House with
an money appropriation. She suggested that letters in support be sent the
Senators from California.
Commissioners commended the staff and those responsible for the news releases
dealing with the restricted parking program.
No further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
~-4~
Lois Arnold
Recording Secretary
.