HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1973-06-06
e
.
.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1973
The Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session on WednesdSJ,
June 6, 1973, in the Council Chamber of the City Administration Building. The
meeting was called to order by Chairman Ripperdan at 7:30 p.m. and Vice Chairman
Dunn led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Present:
Absent:
Hammond, Dunn, Knapp, Lanning, Ripperdan
None
The minutes of the meeting of M8J 16, 1973 were approved as presented and the
minutes of the joint meeting with the City Council of May 21, 1973 were approved
as presented.
The Secretary explained the procedure to be followed during public hearings.
1. Public Hearings
A. Edward and Joann GrSJ, V-12-73 (continued)
.
This public hearing was continued from the May 16th meeting to allow the plans to be
reviewed by Surfside Colony Board of Directors. Mr 0 Neprud reviewed the application
and indicated Surfs ide had considered the plans and approved of the proposal. Hearing
reopened. Mr. Gray stated that he wished to construct a 27 square foot room
extension at the rear of his residence at B-81 Surfside similar to the additions at
the rear of his neighbors at B-80 and B-82 in order to provide enough room for
making an existing bedroom into two bedrooms for his children. He submitted pictures
shoving the type of addition proposed. No one spoke in opposition to the varianceo
Hearing closed. Mr. Dunn moved to approve V-12-73, seconded by Mrs. Lanning and
passed unanimously .~,. Resolution No. 747.
B. Les Stuko1off, v-14-73
.
Proposal is for the construction of a 4-uni t apartment with tandem parking -at .112
2nd St. Secretary pointed out two errors in the public hearing notices which
indicated variances for less than required side yard and less than required turning
r~ius. Hearing opened. Mr. Stuko1off indicated that the only variance being
requested was tandem parking which has been approved in the pasto No one else
spoke in favor of the proposal. Lawrence Peters, 211 Ocean, spoke in opposition to
the proposal indicating that tandem parking had first been approved to allow
construction of more than one unit on a typical 25 foot wide lot but tandem parking
should not be allowed on larger lots as hardship does not exist. Ken Coombs, 201
Ocean Ave., opposed the proposal indicating that all parking should come off the
two alleys rather than tandem parking off the rearo Ray Bazzeni, 111 2nd St.,
opposed tandem parking l1hen other options are available 0 Ruth Fleming, 209 Ocean,
is opposed to tandem parking. In rebuttal, Mr. Stuko1off indicated that tandem
parking was necessary to keep the building small and still provide sufficient
parking, and indicated that to put all the units above the first floor would impose
a hardship on his family since one member was an invalid and could not climb stairs.
Mr. Knapp indicated to the audience that tandem parking has been found to be effective
in Seal Beach and other coastal cities. Mr. Dunn asked that the definition of
hardship be read. Secretary read the Zoning Ordinance definition of hardship.
Public hearing closed. Mro Stuko1off indicated that he wished the Planning
Commission to act on his app1icatlon.
.
.
.
.
.
Mrs. Lanning moved for the denial of v-14-73, seconded by Dunn and passed
unanimously by members of the Commission. Resolution No. 748.
Applicant informed of his right of appeal.
C. Amendment to Lot Coverage Provisions of Marina Hill (rehearing)
Proposed amendment to establish a Zoning District V for Marina Hill (Tracts 1817,
2590, 2591) and increase maximum allowable lot coverage for the district to 45%.
Secretary explained that at the Planning Commission meeting of ~ 16, 1973, with
four commissioners present, the vote on the amendment was 2-2 and the Commission
by-laws require three affirmative votes to either approve or deny a motion. The
matter was readvertised by posting for a rehearingo Public hearing opened.
Dick Poirier, 900 Catalina, Wayne Cunningham, 600 Sandpiper, Ted Cushman, 745
MarVista, Mike McGlone, 604 Island View, Ted Coon. 1630 Emerald Cove Way, Larry
Weir, 626 Beachcomber and Mike Rossi, 1720 Catalina, all spoke in favor of the
proposed amendment stating that the amendment would allow a reasonable ground level
addi tion to the existing homes on the "hillo" Public heating closed. Mr. Knapp
asked for clarification regarding the recently approved amendment which allows
a 5% addition for patios in District II. Secretary explained that this recently
approved amendment would not apply to the proposed new district, District V 0 Mr.
Knapp pointed out to the Planning Commission the potential probems that could come
about by creating a new district for the Marina Hill area.
Mr. Dunn moved to recommend to the City Council the creation of a new district,
District V, encompassing Tracts 1817, 2590, and 2591 which would permit lot coverage
of 45% for enclosed structures. Seconded by Mrs. Lanning and approved unanimously
by all members. Resolution No. 749.
Do Amendment for Riding and Boarding Stables, Article 15, Unclassified Uses
Proposed amendment would allow the use Riding and Boarding Stables in any zone subject
to the issuance of an Unclassified Use Permit. Public Hearing opened. No one spoke
in favor or in opposition to the amendment. Public hearing closed. Mr. R1pperdan
moved to recommend to the City Council the adoption of the amendment, seconded by
Mrs. Hammond and approved unanimously by all members. Resolution No. 750.
2. Oral Communications
Janet Verga, 240 14th St., requested that the Planning Commis~ion cons1der making
the Pacific Electric right of vay a green belt and to oppose high rise building
in the Coastal District. Planning Commission informed the audience of the upcoming
public hearing to consider the Land Use Element scheduled for June 270
3 . Written Communications
Mro and Mrs. Roughton indicated a form for providing parking along the P.E. right
of way. Staff was instructed to answer the letter informing them of the public
hearing on the Land Use Element on June 27th.
.
.
.
.
.
4. New Business
A. Mariner.s Savings, PR-4-73
Proposal is to install three signs reading "Marineros Savings." The original
proposal was for 225 sq. ft. of signing but has been revised to request 153 sq. ft.
of signing. Two signs 58 sq. ft. & 60 sq. ft. would be single faced fascia signs.
The third sign of 35 sq. ft. would be a modified raised free standing sign. The
applicant indicated that none of the s1gns would flash or rotate or appear to
flash or rotate. Knapp moved to approve PR-4-73. Seconded by Mrs. Lanning and
approved unanimously. Resolution No. 751.
B. Dr. Scott-Richard Schanz, PR-5-73
Proposal is to erect a 32 sq. ft. roof sign reading "Pizza 29~ a slice" - "Pepsi"
at a walk-up/take-out food establishment in the Coastal District. Secretary
pointed out the apparent inconsistancy of the signing with the theme that was being
encouraged for Coastal District businesses. Mr. Schanz indicated that he needed
a roof sign to attract customers from the beach and pier. The Planning Commission
stated that the proposed wording of the sign resembled wording on carnival and
county fair signs and was not in keeping with the Coastal District image. Dunn
moved to approve PR-5-73 subject to the provisions that no price be included in
the sign and that other signs be removed. Seconded by Ripperdan.
Ayes:
Noes:
Dunn, Lanning, Ripperdan
Hammond, Knapp
Motion carried. Resolution No. 752.
5. Report from Secretary
Mr. Dunn reported on Planning Commission tour of Weapons Station and on a Coastline
Commission meeting he attended.
No further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
;%z4 dP-
Charles Antos
Acting Secretary