HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 2000-05-03
.
.
.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA for May 3,2000
7:30 p.m.
District 1 - Brian Brown
District 2 - John Larson
District 3 - Len Cutuli
District 4 - David Hood
District 5 - Thomas Lyon
Department of Development Services
Lee Whittenberg, Director
Terence Boga, Assistant City Attorney
Mac Cummins, Assistant Planner
Carmen Alvarez, Executive Secretary
o
City Hall office hours are 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and
Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Closed noon to 1 :00 p.m.
o
The City of Seal Beach complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you
need assistance to attend this meeting please telephone the City Clerk's Office at
least 48 hours in advance of the meeting (562) 431-2527.
o
Planning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Seal Beach TV3. They are
rebroadcast on Sunday evenings, Channel 3 at 4:00 p.m.
o
Videotapes of Planning Commission meetings may be purchased from Seal Beach
TV3 at a cost of $20 per tape. Telephone: (562) 596-1404.
o
Copies of staff reports and/or written materials on each agenda item are on file in
the Department of Development Services and City libraries for public inspection.
.
.
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission. Agenda of May 3, 2000
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
The following is a brief explanation of the Planning Commission agenda
structure:
AGENDA APPROVAL: The Planning Commission may wish to change the order of the
items on the agenda.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission, only
on items not on tonight's agenda, may do so during this time period. No action can be
taken by the Planning Commission on these communications on this date, unless
agendized.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: Public Hearings allow citizens the opportunity to speak in
favor of or against agendized items. More detailed information is found in the actual
agenda attached. If you have documents to distribute, you should have enough copies
for all Planning Commissioners, City staff and the public. Please give one to the
secretary for the City files. The documents become part of the public record and will not
be returned.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar items are considered routine items that
normally do not require separate consideration. The Planning Commission may make
one motion for approval of all the items listed on the Consent Calendar.
SCHEDULED MATTERS: These items are considered by the Planning Commission
separately and require separate motions. These transactions are considered
administrative and public testimony is not heard.
STAFF CONCERNS: Updates and reports from the Director of Development Services
(Planning and Building Departments) are presented for information to the Planning
Commission and the public.
COMMISSION CONCERNS: Items of concern are presented by the Planning
Commissioners and discussed with staff.
All proceedings are recorded.
2
.
.
.
city of Seal Beach Planning Commission. Agenda of May 3, 2000
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
May 3, 2000 Agenda
I.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II.
III.
ROLL CALL
AGENDA APPROVAL
By Motion of the Planning Commission, this is the time to:
(a) Notify the public of any changes to the Agenda;
(b) Re-arrange the order of the Agenda; and/or
(c) Provide an opportunity for any member of the Planning Commission, staff, or public to
request an item is removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
At this time, members of the public may address the Planning Commission regarding any items
within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, provided that the Planning
Commission may undertake no action or discussion unless otherwise authorized by law.
V. PRESENTATION
1. Resolution No. 00-12 Honoring John Larson.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and are enacted by one motion unless
prior to enactment, a member of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public requests a specific
item be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
2. Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 19, 2000.
3. Minor Plan Review 00-2
1733 Crestview
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
Gary and Terl Myers
After the fact approval of a previously non-permitted deck in the rear yard
setback.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption of Resolution
00-5
VII. SCHEDULED MATTERS
4. Preliminary Landscape Development, Area "B"
Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center, Lampson Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
Bixby Ranch Company
To provide comments to Staff, receive and file status report regarding
preliminary landscape development in conjunction with the approved Bixby
Old Ranch Towne Center Project.
Recommendation: Receive and file, provide any comments determined appropriate, and
forward to City Council.
3
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission. Agenda of May 3, 2000
. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. Conditional Use Pennit 99-7and Height Variation 99-76 ~
Country Suites by Ayres, Northeast Comer of 1-405 Freeway Off-Ramp and Seal Beach Blvd.
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
The Ayres Group
To build a three-story, 104-room hotel with a 117-space parking lot,
landscaping, and other ancillary facilities on property located at the
southeast comer of Lampson Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption of Resolution
99-17 and 99-19, respectively.
6. Eucalyptus Tree Pennit 99-2
Bixby Old Ranch Town Center, Lampson Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
Bixby Ranch Company
To remove eucalyptus trees within the 40-foot windrow in conjunction with
the approved Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Project.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption of Resolution
99-20
7. Variance 00-2
13001 Seal Beach Boulevard
.
Applicant/Owner: Mr. John Koos (On behalf of Airtouch Cellular) I B&P Custom Building
Products
Request: To increase the height of cellular antennas placed on top of the roof.
Recommendation: Pleasure of the Planning Commission.
IX. STAFF CONCERNS
X. COMMISSION CONCERNS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
.
4
.
MAY 17
JUN 07
JUN 21
JUL 05
JUL 19
AUG 09
AUG 23
SEP 06
SEP 20
OCT 04
. OCT 18
NOV 08
NOV 22
DEC 06
DEC 20
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission. Agenda of May 3, 2000
2000 AQenda Forecast
Conditional Use Pennit 98-12 (Indefinite Extension) Vons Market
Conditional Use Pennit 99-5 Sav-On Drugs - 12-Month Review
CUP 99-9 Faith Christian Assembly - 12-Month Review
TO BE SCHEDULED:
o
o
o
o
Study Session:
Study Session:
Study Session:
Staff Report:
Pennitted Uses and Development Standards in Commercial Zones (5/6/98)
Seal Beach Boulevard (10n/98)
Anaheim Bay Villas (10n/98)
Undergrounding of Utilities
And Beyond
Calendar: CUP 98-6 at 12147 Seal Beach Boulevard (Yucatan Grill) Review (April 2001)
ADA Handicapped-accessible Restrooms (April 2001)
.
5
r~
"
'i
.: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of May 3, 2000
Chairperson Hood called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 3, 2000. The meeting was
held in the City Council Chambers and began with the Salute to the Flag.1
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson Hood
Commissioners Brown, Cutuli, Larson, and Lyon
Also
Present: Department of Development Services
Lee Whittenberg, Director
Terence Boga, Assistant City Attorney
Mac Cummins, Assistant Planner
Absent: None
AGENDA APPROVAL
Mr. Whittenberg requested that Item No. 3 be removed from the Consent Calendar
so that Staff might provide a verbal supplemental report prior to the Planning
Commission making a decision on this item.
MOTION by Cutuli; SECOND by Larson' to approve the Agenda as amended.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5-0
Brown, Cutuli, Hood, Larson, and Lyon
None
None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Chairperson Hood opened oral communications.
Mr. Reg Clewley commented on the newspaper article in the Press Telegram
regarding rabbits in Leisure World and stated that although the residents of Leisure
1 These Minutes were transcribed from audiotape of the meeting.
1
I
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
World voted to allow dogs in Gum Grove Park, they are now quite upset about the
rabbits in their neighborhood. He said that these same residents are now requesting
that it be permissible to use compressed air guns to "murder" the rabbits. He noted
that this slaughter of rabbits was the direct result of the new Bixby Project and the
removal of the eucalyptus trees at that location. He stated that the homes of these
rabbits had been destroyed and they are now seeking shelter elsewhere. He
encouraged City residents to contact the Seal Beach Police Department (SBPD) to
protest the killing of these rabbits. He said that he lives in harmony all year long with
rabbits in his back yard.
Chairperson Hood closed oral communications.
PRESENTATION
1. Resolution No. 00-12 Honoring John Larson.
Chairperson Hood presented the framed Resolution 99-37 that was approved in
October 1999 honoring Brian Brown for his chairmanship of the Planning
Commission. He also announced that this would be the last Planning Commission
meeting that Commissioner Larson would attend before his transition to the City
Council. It was noted that due to this transition, Commissioner Larson would be
excused from tonight's meeting, as his vote on any of the items presented tonight
might be challenged later when presented to the City Council. Chairperson Hood
then presented Resolution 00-12 honoring Commissioner Larson for his service on
the Planning Commission. Mr. Whittenberg also thanked Commissioner Larson on
behalf of Staff for his service as a Planning Commissioner. Commissioner Larson
excused himself from the meeting.
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Cutuli to approve Resolution 00-12 honoring
Commissioner Larson.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
4-0-1
Brown, Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
None
None
Larson
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of Apri/19, 2000.
Chairperson Hood reported that he would abstain from voting on this item as he was
absent from the Planning Commission meeting of April 19, 2000.
2
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Cutuli to approve the Minutes of April 19, 2000 as
presented.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
3-0-1
Brown, Cutuli, and Lyon
None
None
Hood
3. Minor Plan Review 00-2 (Removed from Consent Calendar)
1733 Crestview
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
Gary and T eri Myers
After the fact approval of a previously non-permitted deck
in the rear yard setback.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption
of Resolution 00-5.
Staff Report
Mr. Cummins delivered the staff report. (Staff Report is on file for inspection in the
Planning Department.) He stated that Minor Plan Review (MPR) 00-2 had been
continued from the January 19, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. He provided
background information on this item and listed the surrounding land uses to the
property as follows:
SOUTH, EAST
& WEST
NORTH
Residential housing in a Residential Low Density (RLD) Zone.
The Hellman Ranch Property and beyond that the Boeing
Property.
He reported that in 1990 the previous owner began construction on the deck. The
City became aware of the project and placed a stop work order on the construction.
The then owner stated that he would proceed building the deck whether the City
liked it or not creating the need for code enforcement. The owner was instructed to
apply for a Variance, which was subsequently denied by the Planning Commission
and the City Council. During this period the City also became aware that there were
several other properties in the area with illegally constructed decks. Staff was then
instructed by City Council to compose Ordinance No. 1419 dealing with construction
of decks. Mr. Cummins reported that Zone Text Amendment (ZTA) 96-1 was
considered by the Planning Commission in February 1999 and passed by the City
Council in May 1999. He stated that Ordinance 1419 allows for level extension of
grades for these decks and places a height limit of 12.5 feet for new construction of
3
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
decks. Mr. Cummins reported that for decks constructed prior to January 1, 1999,
the property owners could apply for a MPR and an after-the-fact building permit.
Regarding MPR 00-2, Mr. Cummins noted that the current property owners
purchased the property in 1995 and were aware that they had an illegally
constructed deck and are currently making application in conformance with
Ordinance 1419. He stated that the existing deck does meet the provisions of the
ordinance. He explained that on January 19, 2000, the Planning Commission heard
MPR 00-2 and agreed that it be continued as there were several code enforcement
issues that needed to be addressed before granting approval. Mr. Cummins stated
that the property owners have provided Staff with structural calculations and a
survey of the deck structure, which clearly shows that the deck does not encroach
onto the Hellman Property. The Director of Development Services also inspected
the property and found the owners to be in compliance with all of the conditions of
approval. Staff recommends approval of MPR 00-2 subject to conditions, excluding
the first 3 conditions, which have already been met.
Commissioner Questions
Commissioner Cutuli asked about the validity of calculations to ensure the structural
safety of the deck. Mr. Cummins stated that the plan check indicated that the deck
does meet the City Code requirements.
Commissioner Brown asked if the covered patio cover had been removed. Mr.
Cummins responded that upon re-inspection of the site, the cover was determined to
be out of the required setback area.
Public Comment
Chairperson Hood opened the public comment session.
Mr. Michael Zatara, attorney for the Myers stated that a letter had been forwarded to
the City stating that the applicant desired a final resolution to this matter, and had no
problem in having to apply for the after-the-fact building permit. Commissioner
Brown noted that neither Staff nor the Commission had received a copy of the
aforementioned letter. Mr. Zatara stated that the letter had been mailed and faxed to
the City Manager and the Director of Development Services on Monday, May 1,
2000. For the record Mr. Zatara proceeded to read from his copy of the letter.
Mr. Reg Clewley stated that MPR 00-2 should have been presented as a public
hearing item. He again noted that the applicant had stated at the January 19, 2000
Planning Commission meeting that she was "grateful" not "glad" that the City Council
had approved Ordinance 1419. He said that no approval had been granted for any
encroachments onto the utility easement of back yards in this area. He criticized the
photocopy quality of some of the exhibits in the Staff Report, and stated that it also
included fabricated documents. He stated that Ordinance 1419 first came before the
4
.' 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Planning Commission in December 22, 1989. He said that the gazebo at 1733
Crestview was also constructed without a building permit. He said that MPR 00-2
was both the first and last MPR that would ever come before the Planning
Commission under Ordinance 1419 as the one-year time limit expires next week.
He stated that approval of MPR 00-2 would be a "classic special privilege" to the
applicant. Mr. Clewley stated that Staff has repeatedly misrepresented the facts,
despite his objections. He noted that there were no studies of soil conditions or
archaeological studies conducted. He said that both the engineer's report and the
surveyor's report document that the northwest deck post is less than 4 inches from
the property line and does encroach onto Archeological Site CA-ORA-260. He said
the post must be removed by a qualified archaeologist in the presence of a Native
American monitor. He stated that this deck was not constructed as an extension of
the flat graded portion of the lot. He said that MPR 00-2 was inconsistent with the
City General Plan, as it interferes with the City's ability to ensure neighborhood
compatibility and orderly community development. Mr. Clewley said the deck does
not quality for approval under Ordinance 1419 and recommended denial of MPR
00-2.
Mr. Dave Bartlett, representative for the Hellman Property, expressed their support
of Ordinance 1419, and stated that the manner in which Staff has conditioned MPR
00-2 mitigates any concerns with regard to encroachment onto the Hellman
Property. He stated that the Hellman Ranch Company supported Staffs
recommendations.
Mr. Whittenberg reported that Mr. Reg Clewley had submitted a letter expressing his
opposition to MPR 00-2, most of which Mr. Clewley had read during his
presentation. Mr. Whittenberg noted that a copy of the letter was made available to
the Commission and to any interested parties.
Chairperson Hood closed the public comment session.
Commissioner Questions
Commissioner Brown asked if Mr. Clewley was correct in stating that this would be
the first and only MPR submitted for Ordinance 1419. Mr. Whittenberg responded
that it is the only one submitted so far. He said once the one-year deadline expires,
the City will then prosecute those decks in violation of the City Code. as it then
becomes a code enforcement and removal issue. Mr. Boga noted that Ordinance
1419 provided for a one-year period for property owners with non-conforming decks
to apply for the after-the-fact building permit, and that this is not the time limit for
acquiring approval. He also noted that the expiration date was not May 10, but
actually about 30 days after that.
Commissioner Brown confirmed that there are 3 or 4 other properties to which the
ordinance would apply. Mr. Whittenberg confirmed that this was what Staff had
ascertained. He stated that if no applications were received from these property
5
.'~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
owners, Staff would investigate and if they were found to be in violation of the
ordinance, then code enforcement would proceed to bring the decks into
conformance or be removed.
Commissioner Brown asked about the deck post that Mr. Clewley claims is
encroaching. Mr. Whittenberg responded that he had reviewed the survey
completed by R.V. Pearsall, Inc., and by Gregory Engineering and they clearly show
that the deck structure itself does not extend across the property line.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Brown commented that this issue had come before the Planning
Commission at 3 public hearings, and the Commission had voted it down 3 times.
He stated that although the current property owners did not construct the deck, the
City did not create the problem and it sets bad precedent to approve this non-
conforming deck, regardless of City ordinances or ZTAs to allow this. He stated that
he was disturbed by the fact that the Staff Report documents the applicant's refusal
to allow inspection of the deck until shortly before tonight's meeting. He said that he
would again vote to deny MPR 00-2.
Commissioner Cutuli stated that this was a messy situation that had gone on for too
long. He said the City was responsible for not having placed restrictions on the final
transference of ownership so that the non-conforming deck would not have been
carried over to the new owners. He noted that Commissioner Brown had often
stated that it is not the Planning Commission's responsibility to make the laws but to
attempt to interpret them. He said that unless he could be given a good reason to
deny MPR 00-2, he would vote to approve.
Commissioner Brown stated that in this case it is the function of the Planning
Commission to look at the long-term effects of its decisions. He cited one of the
conditions of approval for MPR 00-2 (clearing the underside of the deck) as one that
would not be enforceable. He also noted that the debris under the deck would then
serve as an "eyesore" to people visiting Gum Grove Park. He said that no matter
how you condition MPR 00-2, it would not happen. He said that when there is no
way you can enforce a law, it is a bad law.
Mr. Whittenberg interjected by stating that despite the fact that this has been a long-
running, difficult issue, City Council adopted the ordinance to allow these pre-
existing deck structures to come before the Planning Commission for a Minor Plan
Review with certain conditions. He noted that the primary conditions are that the
decks not encroach across the property line, that they are structurally sound, and
that there be no items stored underneath the decks creating a potential fire hazard.
He stated that MPR 00-2 meets all of these criteria. Commissioner Brown asked
how Staff could be sure that the deck posts do not encroach across the property
line. Mr. Whittenberg responded that this was based on a signed plan provided by a
licensed land surveyor approved by a licensing body of the State of California, and a
6
~
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
form signed by a licensed structural engineer. He stated that regarding the issue of
the materials stored under the deck, the applicant has complied with the City's
request to remove the materials, and Staff feels that there should be a certain level
of trust that property owners will continue to comply with the conditions set forth by
the City. Mr. Whittenberg noted that because this was a matter of great pubtic
interest, the applicants have expressed they are not happy to have to go through this
process and want to minimize the number of times they have to appear before the
Planning Commission. He stated that should the applicants not be in compliance,
the City would then initiate code enforcement procedures.
Chairperson Hood noted that there was a lot of anger regarding this issue since the
previous owner basically ignored City policy, and the current owners bought into a
property that was defective. He stated that the applicants were wrong in refusing to
allow Staff to inspect the deck until today, making the issue appear suspicious. He
said that the Planning Commission must rely upon the capability of Staff and the
facts presented to them in order to try to make the best decision. He agreed with
Commissioner Cutuli's comment about it not being the Planning Commission's
responsibility to make the laws but to interpret them. He said that he found nothing
in the Staff Report to convince him to deny MPR 00-2.
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Lyon to deny Minor Plan Review 00-2.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
1-3
Brown
Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
None
Mr. Whittenberg noted that the motion should be made to adopt Resolution 00-5 and
amend Section 6 to eliminate Conditions 1, 2, and 3. Commissioner Brown stated
that the conditions should not be withdrawn. Chairperson Hood stated that
Condition No. 2 is the only one that has to do with future use of the deck and
recommended that this condition be retained. Commissioner Brown agreed.
MOTION by Cutuli; SECOND by Lyon to approve Minor Plan Review 00-2 and adopt
Resolution 00-5 and eliminate Conditions 1 and 3 in Section 6.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-1
Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
Brown
None
Mr. Whittenberg advised that the adoption of Resolution No. 00-5 begins a 10-day
calendar appeal period to the City Council. The Commissioner action tonight is final
and the appeal period begins tomorrow morning.
7
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.~~
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
47
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
SCHEDULED MATTERS
4. Preliminary Landscape Development, Area "B"
Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center, Lampson Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
Bixby Ranch Company
To provide comments to Staff, receive and file status report
regarding preliminary landscape development in
conjunction with the approved Bixby Old Ranch Towne
Center Project.
Recommendation: Receive and file, provide any comments determined
appropriate, and forward to City Council.
Staff Report
Mr. Whittenberg delivered the staff report. (Staff Report is on file for inspection in
the Planning Department.) He stated that this item was for review by the Planning
Commission for comments on the Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center Project. He
explained that Development Area "B" is the area along Seal Beach Boulevard
between the 1-405 Freeway and Lampson Avenue. He said that this landscape plan
had been approved by the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Mr. Whittenberg
noted that copies of the plan had been provided to the Planning Commission and
City Council members for their comments. He provided background information on
the project and displayed an area map of Development Area "B." He stated that
Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2 that permitted the removal of eucalyptus trees in this
area was approved in 1999, and specified that the eucalyptus trees removed would
be replaced with a new eucalyptus tree of a certain size. He said that this
landscaping plan does not deal with the actual number of eucalyptus trees to be
planted but reflects the landscape plans for the location of the off-road
bicycle/pedestrian pathway area. Mr. Whittenberg then outlined the conditions for
landscape requirements for this project. He stated that the landscape plan would be
prepared by a licensed landscape architect and would be submitted to the Fire
Department, Parks and Recreation, and to the City Tree Preservation Committee for
comments. He then presented photographs of the proposed landscape areas and
responded to questions from the Commission.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Cutuli asked if these eucalyptus trees were the ones being proposed
for the Lerp Psyllid Eradication Program. Mr. Whittenberg confirmed that they were.
He explained that the Lerp Psyllid prefers a certain species of eucalyptus tree, and
that the new eucalyptus plantings will not include this species of tree. He reported
that a variety of species of trees will be planted to prevent future infestation of just
one species of tree. Commissioner Cutuli recommended not planting the trees too
close to the walkways as the pods that fall from the trees can be dangerous to step
on and may cause pedestrians to slip and injure themselves.
8
.~
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Commissioner Brown stated that he was concerned about the right turn only exit
near the Country Inn Suites building turning onto Seal Beach Boulevard. He said
that this was a dangerous place to have an exit, as the trees might obscure traffic
moving at high speeds on the northbound downslope of the Seal Beach Boulevardl
1-405 overcrossing. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the site distance requirements
under CalTrans prohibit obstruction of the view corridor by trees or shrubs for cars
waiting to exit from a driveway. He stated that no trees would be planted at the
driveway entrances.
Public Comment
Chairperson Hood opened the public comment session.
Mr. Ron Bradshaw stated that the proposed landscape plan was devised based
upon the concept recommendations made by the Planning Commission and City
Council. He said that the intent was to maintain the design concept to be used for
the remodeled golf course. He reminded the Commission that with completion of the
Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center, Seal Beach Boulevard northbound was to be
widened to 3 lanes instead of 2 as it approaches Lampson Avenue. Mr. Bradshaw
also noted that a variety of species of trees were to be used for the replacement of
trees removed, to prevent widespread infestation of anyone species of tree. He
noted that the line of site corridor for cars approaching on Seal Beach Boulevard and
cars exiting the driveway would be unobstructed by trees or shrubs, and the
significant setback would make the car exiting the driveway more visible.
Commissioner Cutuli asked if there was to be a wall along the shrubbery. Mr.
Bradshaw responded that there would be no wall, and that most of the shrubbery
would be planted along the Lampson Avenue side of the project.
Chairperson Hood closed the public comment session.
Chairperson Hood commented that previously people driving or cycling along Seal
Beach Boulevard could enjoy the windrow of trees in the public areas, but if
replacement trees are planted within the golf course, these people will no longer be
able to enjoy the trees. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the plan was to have the
majority of replacement trees planted in the public access areas.
MOTION by Cutuli; SECOND by Lyon to Receive and File Preliminary Landscape
Development, Area "B" and provide any comments determined appropriate, and
forward to City Council.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4-0
Brown, Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
None
None
9
.0 ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1'4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
47
Cfty of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Mr. Whittenberg requested a short recess to prepare the presentation for the first
public hearing item.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5
5. Conditional Use Permit 99-7 and Height Variation 99-2'
Country Suites by Ayres, Northeast Corner of 1-405 Off-Ramp and Seal Beach
Blvd.
Applicant/Owner:
Request:
The Ayres Group
To build a three story, 104-room hotel with a 117 -space
parking lot, landscaping, and other ancillary facilities on
property located at the southeast corner of Lampson
Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption
of Resolution 99-17 and 99-19, respectively.
Staff Report
Mr. Whittenberg delivered the staff report. (Staff Report is on file for inspection in
the Planning Department.) He provided some background information and stated
that the applicant was proposing to construct a 104-room, 3-story hotel. He reported
that this would include 117 parking spaces with 4 spaces designated for
handicapped parking. He stated that this would be an L-shaped structure and would
include a swimming pool and jacuzzi for use by guests. He said that the main
entrance to the hotel would be located off of Seal Beach Boulevard and would be a
30-foot wide, right in/right out driveway. Mr. Whittenberg noted that Staff was
awaiting the final plans for the street widening of the Seal Beach Boulevard/I-405
overcrossing. He also noted that the hotel project would share the location with the
Marriott Senior Care Facility. He explained that the hotel was designed in a Country
French style with a building height of 36.67 feet with several proposed architectural
projections up to a height of 43 feet 2 inches. He noted that the height limit within
this zone classification is 35 feet, but Section 28-2317(4) of the City Code does
provide for height variations for non-habitable architectural features. Mr.
Whittenberg explained that the architectural projections would add interest to the
design of the hotel as opposed to having a flat roof. He presented photographs of
other Country Inn Hotels within the County and stated that the Environmental Impact
Report for this project had been approved by City Council and he noted that after
mitigation measure were complete there would be no significant environmental
impacts. Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 99-7 and Height
Variation 99-2 subject to conditions. He reported that the proposed use is consistent
with the provision of the land Use Element of the City's General Plan; the building
and property are adequate in size, shape, and topography and location to meet the
needs of the proposed use; and the proposed use is compatible with surrounding
uses and not detrimental to the neighborhood.
10
.. ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Commissioner Questions
Commissioner Cutuli asked if a gated fence would enclose the swimming pool. Mr.
Whittenberg responded that per the requirements a minimum 5-foot high fence
would be provided. Mr. Boga reported the corrections to be made to Resolution
99-17 on Page 16, Section 4 and Page 28 Condition No.3, and to Resolution 99-19,
Page 34, Section 4.
Public Hearinq
Chairperson Hood opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doug Ayres of The Ayres Group stated that he was present to respond to any
questions from the Commission or other interested parties. Commissioner Brown
asked if the hotel would include conference rooms, and if so what the occupancy
would be. Mr. Ayres reported that there would be several conference rooms with an
occupancy of 65-70 people. Chairperson Hood stated that this appeared to be a
"canned design" that Country Inn Suites used for all of their hotel locations. Mr.
Ayres responded that this was not a canned design, but had been specifically
designed for the area requesting the design.
Mr. Reg Clewley stated that more handicapped parking spaces were needed. He
said the height limit requested by the applicant is unacceptable and architecturally
incompatible with the style of the building. He emphasized the importance of
consistency in maintaining the City's standards for height limitations.
Chairperson Hood closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Brown asked about he number of required handicapped parking
spaces. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the number of spaces provided in the plan
comply with the American With Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and provide
them as close to the public entrances as possible. He said that the ratio was 1
handicapped space for every 35 parking spaces.
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Cutuli to approve Conditional Use Permit 99-7 and
adopt Resol ution 99-17.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4-0
Brown, Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
None
None
11
.. ~
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Chairperson Hood stated that regarding Height Variation 99-2, the design of the
hotel was not French Provincial but an American Gothic style and to add on height
variation at the top does not make it French Provincial. He said that he would vote
to deny the height variation.
Commissioner Cutuli asked what the limitations were for recommending changes to
the plans. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the review by the Planning Commission
was generally to ensure that the project is in conformance with the criteria
established by City Council when the project was approved. He noted that the
Commission did have some ability to comment and condition the exterior
appearance of the structure should the Commissioners feel that it was totally
incompatible with the area and/or the City as a whole. Mr. Whittenberg then
reviewed the architectural plans of the structure and the proposed architectural
projections. He stated that Staff believed the height variation was not significant
enough to create an overpowering, adverse visual effect from the street. He said it
would simply provide additional character and interest to the structure.
Chairperson Hood asked if the architectural projection at the front of the hotel were a
habitable area. Mr. Whittenberg responded that perhaps Chairperson Hood would
like to re-open the public hearing to allow the applicant to respond to this question.
Commissioner Lyon asked how an applicant could deliberately design a building that
does not conform to City requirements.
Public Hearinq
Chairperson Hood re-opened the public hearing.
Mr. Doug Ayres stated that this was not intentional. He said that The Ayres Group
submitted the design to the City for review and that was when they were told that the
building exceeded the height limit allowed by the City. Mr. Whittenberg noted that
the architectural feature might provide for higher ceilings on the third floor but the
projection itself would not be a habitable structure. Mr. Ayres noted that although
including the architectural feature increases the cost of construction, this building
design would be more visually pleasing than a building with a flat roof. He said that
he would be happy to eliminate the architectural feature if the Commission so
desired.
Commissioner Lyon insisted that designing a building that does not conform to City
requirements was not appropriate. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the Height
Variation allows the applicant to make a request for approval to the City. He said
that if the City should deny the Height Variation, the building would have to be
modified to comply with the City's height standards.
Commissioner Cutuli stated that he did not believe it would be advantageous to the
City to expect that the building have a flat roof.
12
..~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Mr. Ron Bradshaw stated that the City was concerned with placing a quality hotel on
this site, and he believes that the Ayres Group has designed a quality hotel that will
provide all of the best amenities to its guests.
Mr. Reg Clewley said that if this is approved, the Cpmmission is basically approving
across the board height variations up to the rooftop. He stated that although he was
not overly concerned about the hotel, there were many other situations in which
residents will receive approval for a height variation and wait until after the final
inspection to install closet space.
Ms. Sue Corbin stated that no comment had been made about the "butchering" of all
of the eucalyptus tress at the project location. She said that granting this height
variation would be a special privilege. She stated that none of the residents in the
development area wanted the project, and she did not believe any consideration or
special privilege should be allowed the Bixby Ranch Company.
Mr. Ayres rebutted by stating that the only portion of the roof structure that could be
extended up is the furthest most portion beyond the head of the building. He stated
that The Ayres Group has constructed 15 of these hotels and spends a lot of money
on design and furnishings to make it better than the average hotel.
Chairperson Hood closed the public hearing. He stated that he was concerned
about the issue of special privilege. Mr. Whittenberg stated that Staff feels that the
proposals for this project are within the overall volume of the structure, and feel that
the architectural feature is an enhancement to the structure. He said that as a part
of the approval for the commercial project, similar height variations for several roof
projections for the commercial buildings had also been approved.
S
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Cutuli to approve Height Variation 99-2 and adopt
Resolution 99-19 as amended.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-1
Brown, Cutuli and Hood
Lyon
None
Mr. Whittenberg advised that the adoption of Resolution No. 99-17 and Resolution
No. 99-19 begins a 10-day calendar appeal period to the City Council. The
Commissioner action tonight is final and the appeal period begins tomorrow
morning.
6. Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2
Bixby Old Ranch Towne Center, Lampson Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard
Applicant/Owner: Bixby Ranch Company
13
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Request:
To remove eucalyptus trees within the 40-foot windrow in
conjunction with the approved Bixby Old Ranch Towne
Center Project.
Recommendation: Recommend approval, subject to conditions, and adoption
of Resolution 99-20
Staff Report
Mr. Whittenberg delivered the staff report. (Staff Report is on file for inspection in
the Planning Department.) He stated that this item had previously appeared before
the Planning Commission in April 1999, along with the hotel project. He noted that
at the request of the applicant, both of these items were tabled pending a court
decision that required the City to rescind all approvals on the Bixby Project until the
re-evaluation of certain portions of the Environmental Impact Report was completed.
Mr. Whittenberg explained that the application deals with the existing 40-foot wide
windrow of eucalyptus trees along the east side of Seal Beach Boulevard, north of
Lampson Avenue. He said that the zoning includes a 40-foot landscaped setback
area assigned to the City, and the shopping center area and the golf course. He
reported that the proposal was to remove 67 of the 223 trees (30%) within the grove
that are subject to the conditions of the Eucalyptus Tree Permit. City Council has
proposed that 70% of the trees in that particular grove be maintained. He provided
an overview of the diagram of trees designated for removal. He noted that the
primary reason for the removal of the trees is to accommodate the entry and exit
driveways to the shopping center. He noted that 47 of the 67 trees designated for
removal are located in the shopping center area of the project. Mr. Whittenberg then
reported on the number of trees of the total 67 to be removed within each
development area. Mr. Whittenberg referred to the Tree Preservation Report
completed by Mr. Greg Applegate, the arborist evaluating the eucalyptus grove. He
reported that Mr. Applegate recommends removal of 46 percent of the trees as a
result of infestation. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission not follow Mr.
Applegate's recommendations. Staff would like to instruct the arborist to designate
trees for removal while staying with the recommendation of City Council to remove
only 30% of the trees. Mr. Whittenberg then briefly outlined the plans for tree
removal and replacement. He stated that Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2 is in
conformance with the standards of Section 7D of the City Code and with the
mitigation measures as proposed by City Council. He then reviewed the conditions
for approval and presented several photographs of eucalyptus tree groves in Seal
Beach and Irvine. Staff recommends approval of Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2.
Commissioner Questions
Commissioner Cutuli asked if there is a plan to provide for watering of the trees. Mr.
Whittenberg responded that the plan does require an aboveground irrigation system
for the eucalyptus grove.
14
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Chairperson Hood inquired about the Eucalyptus Windrow Preservation Plan. Mr.
Whittenberg reported that the plan has not yet been prepared, but would be
prepared once the Planning Commission and City Council approve which trees are
to be removed. Chairperson Hood stated that his Council person has requested that
if possible, some changes be made in the locations of some of the entry/exit
driveways for the development. Using the overhead projection of the landscape plan
Chairperson Hood pointed out the driveways proposed for relocation and discussed
the reasons for relocating these entry/exit driveways. Mr. Whittenberg noted that
this particular Site Plan with the 4 driveways in the locations as they are proposed at
this time had been approved by City Council by a 4-1 vote. He reported that based
on the site plan approvals granted by both the Planning Commission and the City
Council, plans are presently being drafted for the Sav-On Drug Store to be located at
the southerly end of the commercial development. He remarked that much
consideration has been given to the issue of how much flexibility is given to the
mitigation requirement that the City maintain at least 70% of the trees. He stated
that should the Planning Commission approve removal of more than 30% of the
trees, Staff would have to produce some kind of supplemental environmental
document that would have to be circulated. He said that this was why Staff had
been very careful to ensure that applications for this development are in accordance
with the approved mitigation measures.
Public HearinQ
Chairperson Hood opened the public hearing.
Mr. Ron Bradshaw stated that the tree removal plan was exactly the same as it had
been when it was reviewed in April of 1999. He stated that 67 trees had been
proposed for removal to accommodate the street-widening portion of the project. He
reported that 317 permits were issued for all of the areas of removal with the
exception of the historic windrow, and 316 of those trees have been removed. He
stated that 456 eucalyptus trees have been replaced by now. Mr. Bradshaw said
that 1,425 eucalyptus trees have been planted on the golf course. He stated that by
the time the golf course planting was complete, all of the requirements for
eucalyptus replacement would have taken place. He reported that approximately
800 to 1,000 trees had been planted along Lampson Avenue, essentially creating
another windrow along this street. He stated that 297 other types of trees that had
been removed would also be replaced, for a total of more than 3,000 trees planted in
the area. Mr. Bradshaw noted that when the project began there were 1,133 trees,
and currently there are 2,176 trees, and there will be 700 to 800 more trees planted
before the project is complete. Commissioner Cutuli asked how many new trees
were to be planted in the windrow. Mr. Bradshaw responded that based upon the
arborist's recommendation, the windrow trees would be replaced as they succumb to
natural attrition. He noted that the lerp psyllid eradication program had begun and
the arborist would provide monthly status reports on the health of the trees.
15
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Ms. Sue Corbin stated that this was a very sad situation. She stated that widening
of the Seal Beach Boulevard/l-405 overcrossing would mean that more of the
eucalyptus trees would have to be removed. She said that she found it incredible
that the trees slated for removal because they had been "topped," had in fact been
"topped" by the City. Ms. Corbin noted that previous to the approval of this new
development project, the Bixby Ranch Company had no concern for the health of the
eucalyptus grove trees. She stated that the whole issue was just "a big lie."
Chairperson Hood asked how many trees would be removed to widen the Seal
Beach Boulevard overcrossing. Mr. Whittenberg responded that seven (7) trees
would have to be removed.
Commissioner Comments
Mr. Whittenberg reported that an unsigned letter was received stating opposition to
the Bixby Ranch Old Towne Center Project. Chairperson Hood read the letter into
the record.
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Cutuli to approve Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2 and
adopt Resolution 99-20.
MOTION FAILED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
2-2
Brown and Cutuli
Hood and Lyon
None
Mr. Boga stated that a Resolution to deny Eucalyptus Tree Permit 99-2 will be
brought before the Commission for consideration, and may be reconsidered and the
permit approved by a two-thirds vote.
7. Variance 00-2
13001 Seal Beach Boulevard
ApplicanUOwner: Mr. John Koos (On behalf of Airtouch Cellular) I B&P
Custom Building Products
Request: To increase the height of cellular antennas placed on top of
the roof.
Recommendation: Pleasure of the Planning Commission.
Staff Report
Mr. Cummins delivered the staff report. (Staff Report is on file for inspection in the
Planning Department.) He provided background information on this item and listed
the surrounding land uses to the property as follows:
16
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15'
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
SOUTH & WEST Residential housing in a Residential High Density (RHO) zone
within Leisure World.
NORTH The 1-405 Freeway
EAST Naval Weapons Station.
Mr. Cummins reported that the applicant stated that this application was made
because the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has mandated that
Airtouch Cellular attempt to mitigate radio frequency waves (RFW) that may have
adverse affects on the health and safety of individuals. After researching the matter,
the consultant for Airtouch Cellular recommended constructing some type of
physical barrier with radio frequency caution signs attached, or raising the transmit
antennas. Airtouch does not feel that the physical barriers will provide enough
safety and would like to raise the antennas. He stated that currently there is a
parapet on top of the 35-foot high building from which the towers project. He said
that moving the antenna 8-9 feet above the height limit of 35-feet would create a 43-
foot antenna. Mr. Cummins stated that several requests have been made for
cellular telephone antennas and the usual height of these antennas is 40 feet. He
stated that if this application for a 43-foot antenna were granted, it might set a
precedent for future applications for "safety reasons." He reported that the City does
not have an ordinance regulating cellular telephone towers, and stated that the FCC
Bulletin provided to Airtouch on this issues states that it is in NO way a mandate or
regulation but is only to advise of guidelines and suggestions for evaluating
compliance. He listed the provisions for granting of a variance as follows:
1. The variance will not adversely affect the General Plan.
2. Special circumstances applicable to the property somehow deprive the property
owner from enjoying the same privileges enjoyed by other property owners within
the same vicinity and zone.
3. The granting of such a variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges.
Mr. Cummins presented photographs of the property and stated that Staff makes no
recommendations at this point, and believes that whether or not this property has a
unique safety characteristic is at the discretion of the Commission.
Commissioner Questions
Commissioner Lyon stated that based upon what the FCC has stated on the plans, it
appears that the applicant has no choice but to increase the height of the antenna.
Mr. Cummins responded that the FCC has stated that the RFWs "might" be
dangerous and is recommending that the cellular telephone towers be placed in
areas where the public will not be exposed to them. He stated that Staff is
concerned about setting a precedent and may begin receiving requests to place
antennas at a height of 43 feet.
17
.' ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Commissioner Brown reviewed the two recommendations for protecting the public
from the RFWs. He clarified that based upon the consultant's report, the physical
barrier could be used instead of raising the elevation of the antenna. Mr. Cummins
confirmed that this was so.
Chairperson Hood asked Mr. Boga what the potential for liability for the Planning
Commission would be in making a decision taking the safety issue into
consideration. Mr. Boga stated that there were no liability concerns as this was not
a City Facility. He noted that the FCC Bulletin dated August 1997 states that this is
not mandatory. He said that he had not had an opportunity to review the FCC
regulation cited by Commissioner Lyon, but the Planning Commission can still vote
on this issue.
Public Hearinq
Chairperson Hood opened the public hearing.
Mr. John Koos stated that Airtouch is happy with the current transmit coverage but
did want to take the FCC Bulleting seriously, and do have concern for preventing
exposure to RFWs by roofers or other maintenance personnel having to access the
roof of the building. He stated that as far as aesthetics are concerned, currently
there are 21 antennas projecting from this building, and with the change in antennas
not only will the technology be improved but also the number of antennas will be
reduced to 12. He noted that a fiberglass fa~ade could then be placed in front of the
antennas to help obscure them from view. He noted that an Airtouch engineer was
also present to respond to questions.
Mr. Koos stated that with regard to a physical barrier, Airtouch has found that unless
the barriers are a specific height, people will ignore them and attempt to climb over
them. Also Airtouch feels that the screened barriers would not be very attractive and
it would be safer to raise the antenna height. Commissioner Brown asked if the
screens were radiation screens or people screens. Mr. Koos responded that they
would be people screens. Commissioner Brown asked how many Airtouch
antennas there were in Seal Beach. Mr. Koos reported that currently there were two
with plans for a third antenna.
The Airtouch engineer addressed concerns about other cellular service carriers
wanting to exceed city height limits. Mr. Koos interjected by noting that there were
very few tall buildings in Seal Beach, so he did not see how approval of this
application could set a precedent.
Commissioner Brown asked why the tower at City Hall could not be used for the
antenna. Mr. Whittenberg noted that were already two installations in the tower
walkway railing.
18
.
.
.i ~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.46
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
Commissioner Lyon asked if placing the antenna atop the City Hall tower would
provide additional coverage. Mr. Koos stated that it would, but Airtouch would
probably have to make modifications to reduce interference from other transmission
lines.
Chairperson Hood asked the applicant how many sites were located at California
St~te 'University at Long Beach (CSULB). Mr. Koos stated that he did not know.
Chairperson Hood stated that he would be curious to know what CSULB is doing
regarding this FCC regulation. Chairperson Hood noted that because no individuals
other than employees would be on the roof to perform repairs, the screening of the
antennas should serve as sufficient protection. Mr. Koos stated that Airtouch was
concerned with protecting the public health in general. Chairperson Hood asked if
the antenna is mounted on the outside of a building, will it affect the people inside
the building. Mr. Koos responded that it would not. Chairperson Hood then asked if
it would affect individuals on the outside of the building. Mr. Koos responded that it
would.
Chairperson Hood closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Brown noted that although he was against approving this variance,
he said that it appeared that this is one of the only structures within the City where
this would be an issue. He asked Staff if this was correct. Mr. Whittenberg stated
that he believed that there were cellular antennas on the Bixby Ranch Office
Building. Commissioner Brown noted that he would support this variance based
upon the safety issue.
MOTION by Brown; SECOND by Lyon to approve Variance 00-2 and have Staff
prepare a Resolution.
MOTION CARRIED: 4 - 0
AYES: Brown, Cutuli, Hood, and Lyon
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Mr. Whittenberg advised that the approval would be effective after adoption of the
Resolution, which then begins a 10-day calendar appeal period to the City Council.
The Commissioner action tonight is final and the appeal period begins after approval
of the resolution.
i
STAFF CONCERNS
None.
19
"
1:.. -
... .
,
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
.
City of Seal Beach Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes of May 3, 2000
COMMISSION CONCERNS
Commissioner Brown stated he had received telephone calls on the status of the
patio at O'Malley's. Mr. Whittenberg reported that use of the patio has been
approved for food service. He stated that the owner has complied with all conditions
and that parking agreements with two other business owners have bee completed.
He noted that the patio had been approved approximately two weeks ago.
Chairperson Hood asked about the status of Mr. K's American Grill. Mr. Whittenberg
responded that the City Manager had been in contact with the owner who confirmed
that funding for completion of the restaurant was now available. He stated that he
would look into the matter. Chairperson Hood also noted that on Page 13 of the
Minutes of April 19, 2000, the record should show that Vice-Chairperson Cutuli
adjourned the meeting. Mr. Whittenberg noted that he correction to the Minutes
would be made.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Hood adjourned the meeting at 11: 15 p. m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Carmen Alvarez, Executive Secret
Planning Department
APPROVAL
The Commission on June 14, 2000 approved the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of Wednesday, May 3, 2000. ~.
20
---~