The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBoeing Appendices Vol 1INALI'll'L L h i 17 ff SCH NO. 2002031015 op r i -. G 4 n� Administrative Draft EIR Completed: November, 2402 Draft EIR Completed: mr, : Decebe 2402 p -- - M EIR completed: April, 2403 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 02 -1 APPENDICES VOLUME 1 BOEING SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT SCH NO. 2002031015 Lead Agency: CITY OF SEAL BEACH Department of Development Services 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Contact: Mr. Mac Cummins 552.431.2527 Prepared by: RBF CONSULTING 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 9251 5 -2069 Contact: Mr. Glenn Lajoie, AICP 949.472.3505 April 2003 JN 10- 101776 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 15.0: Appendices Volume 1 15.1 Initial Study /Notice of Preparation 15.2 Traffic Study Volume 2 15.3 Air Quality Data 15.4 Noise Data 15.5 Biological Technical Report 15.6 Cultural Resources Assessment 15.7 Geology /Soils Analysis 15.8 Hydrology /Water Quality Data 15.9 NOP Correspondence 15.10 Proposed Boeing Specific Plan 15.11 Public Health and Safety Letters 15.0 Append mices 15.1 Initial Study /Notice of Preparation INITIAL STUDY /ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Boeing Headquarters Site 2201 Seal Beach Boulevard LEAD AGENCY: City of Seal Beach Department of Development Services 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Contact: Mr. Mac Cummins 562/ 431 -2527 PREPARED BY: RBF Consulting 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, California 92618 Contact: Mr. Glenn Lajoie, A/CP 949/472 -3505 March 4, 2002 JN 10-101776 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ■. w. rrrrewrarawrwwawarrwsrrr.■ reewrerwrrarwr Vegas* ereearaass. ram■ rrwrgrawrrearrararrraw■ waearwaraarrarasaar .rwasrarw•messarre. see rrrrI 1.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements .... w............■.......rr....•.. w..► ..............• ..............................1 1.2 consultation 1.3 incorporation by Reference ...................................................................... ..............................2 2.8 Project Description aerarrwawrrrvvwr■■ aeraraarrewr. varaararaarwwwwrwwrerrrrrwrrrrrarrrrrsrarrrrrrrrrrrrrwsrsrvrsarrerrrswawarwrewwrwrrrrrarra5 2.1 Project Location and Setting ........ ............................................................ ..............................5 2.2 Background and History ............. .............................................................. ..............................8 2.3 Project characteristics .......... ................................... r......................... r...... ..............................9 2.4 Project objectives .................................................................................... .............................12 2.5 Phasing ....................... ............................................................................. .............................12 2.6 Agreements, Permits and Approvals ................................................ rr..... .............................13 3.0 Initial Study checklist •raweg ■•rvwrrrs ■ ■.• ■rrsrerwr■ wow■■ rr■ ewgrrv•■ rearrwra■■ rwrrrwsrrrrwa■■ a•■ a. a. rrearaev ■ ■.rrraaw.ewwweeewrr.rrse.14 3.1 Background ............................................................................................. .............................14 3.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................. .......w.....................15 3.3 Lead Agency Determination .................................................................... .............................15 3.4 Evaluation of Environmental impacts ...................................................... .............................16 4.0 Environmental Analysis........ On smog 9Doseservesese.s■•w0*6*000606 am as Ocoee&* was 00004 006025 4.1 Aesthetics ............... ................................................................................ .............................25 4.2 Agricultural Resources ............................................................................. .............................26 4.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................ .............................26 4.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................... .............................27 4.5 cultural Resources ................................. w............................................... .............................29 4.6 Geology and Soils .................................................................................... .............................30 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................... .............................31 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................... .............................34 4.9 Land Use and Planning ..:....................................................................... .............................36 4.10 Mineral Resources ................................................................................... .............................36 4.11 Noise... ...................................................................................................... .............................37 4.12 Population and Housing ........................................................................... .............................38 4.13 Public Services .. ..................................................................................... .............................38 4.14 Recreation ................................................................................................ .............................39 4.15 Transportation!" Traffic ............................................................................... .............................39 4.16 Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................. .............................40 4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance ......................................................... .............................41 LIST OF EXHIBITS RegionalVicinity ................................................................................................ ..............................6 6 Site Vicinity ► .......................................................................►...................►..►.►...... ..............................7 3 Site Plan ................►........................................................................................ ............................... 10 LIST OF TABLES Developmental Statistical Summary ....... .......................................................... .............................11 Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) 1.0 INTRODUCTION Following preliminary review of the proposed project, the City of Seal Beach has determined that the proposed Boeing Space and Communications Headquarters (S&C) Site project is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CE0A) and the City of Seal Beach Environmental Gudelines. This initial Study addresses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with the Boeing Headquarters S &C Site project as proposed. 1.7 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 - 21178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the proposed project in order to identify any potential significant impacts upon the environment that would result from construction and implementation of the project. In accordance with Section 18083 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency, the City of Seal Beach, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be required for the proposed Boeing Headquarters Site project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the City of Seal Beach decision- makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental Impacts associated with construction and implementation of the proposed . p P project. Following completion of the Initial Study, the City of Seal Beach will make a formal determination as to whether the project may or may not have significant unmitigable environmental impacts. A determination that a project may have less than significant effects would result in the preparation of a Negative Declaration. A dEtermination that a project may have significant impacts on the environment would require the preparation of an EIR to further evaluate issues identified in this Initial Study. Based upon the potential significant environmental effects, the City will require preparation of an EIR to further evaluate issues identified in this Initial Study. Therefore, this Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) serve as part of the scoping process to determine the appropriate environmental analysis for the project. The Initial Study and NOP will undergo a 30- -day public review period. During this review, comments by the public and responsible agencies on the project relative to environmental issues are to be submitted to the City of Seal Beach. The City will reviewand Consider all comments as a part of the project's environmental analysis, using the comments to further determine the necessary environmental document, as required in Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines. The comments received with regard to this NOP and initial Study will be included in the project environmental document, for consideration by the City of Seal Beach. 12 CONSULTATION As soon as the Lead Agency has determined that an Initial Study would be required for the project, the Lead Agency is directed to consult -i Agencies with all Responsible A encies and Trustee Agencies that are responsible for resources affected by the ! ro'ect, in order to P obtain the recommendations of those agencies on the environmental documentation to be JN 10- 101776 1 Initial 5tudylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) prepared for the project. Following the City of Seal Beach's receipt of any written comments from those agencies,. the City of Seal Beach would consider any recommendations of those agencies in the formulation of the city of Seal Beach's preliminary findings. Following preparation of this Initial Study, the City of Seal Beach would initiate formal consultation with these and other governmental agencies as required under CEQA and its implementing guidelines. 1.3 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE The following references were utilized during preparation of this initial Study. These documents are available for review at the city of Seal Beach Department of Development Services located at 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, California, 90740. * 1997 Air Qualily Management Plan Final , SCAQMD, September 1997. 1999 Airport Environs _Land Use Plan, Airport Land Use commission for orange County, 1999. Air Installations Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study - Armed Forces Reserve Center Los Alamitos Army Airfield, Los Alamitos, orange County, California, Adjutant General, California National Guard, June 1994. Archaeological Survey of Western Portions of the Boeing Faciii Seal Beach Orange County,_Caiiforna, KEA Environmental, May 2000. Bixby Old Ranch Golf Course Development Plan Environmental Im act Re ort Volume i (SCH 91091 019 }, Prepared by EIP Associates, dated November 1994. Bixb old Ranch Towne Center Environmental Impact Report Volume 1 SCH 970910 , Prepared by Culbertson, Adams & Associates, Inc., dated April 1998. Bixby Old Ranch Towne center Environmental Impact Report Volume 11 Technical 6ppendices,, dated April 1998. CEQA: Air Quality Handbook, SCAQMD, April 1994. City and County Population Estimates, Table E -8, Department of Finance, January 1,1 1998. _ _.. ♦ City of Seal Beach General Plan, Elements updated on various dates. Final Extended Removal Site Evaluation Re art Installation Restoration Sites 40 and 74, Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, October 1999. ♦ flood insurance Rate Map (FIRM), City of Seal Beach Panel 060233- 0005C, Prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) dated September 18, 1985. JN 1 0- 101776 2 Initial Stud ylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) Geotechnical Feasibility Report — Proposed Industrial Development — 2201 Seal Beach Boulevard & 2600 Westminster Boulevard Seal Beach California, Sladden Engineering, March 27, 2000. Geotechnical Re ort Summa -- New Tank Boeing- Facili , Coleman Geotechnical, October 6, 1998. Heilman Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Volume 1 SCH 95121009), Prepared by P & D consultants, dated April 1997. i Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Volume 11 Technical Appendices, dated April 1997. i initial Stud /Miti ated Negative Declaration 00 -1 -- Pacific Gateway Business Center Tentative Parcel Map 2000 -134, prepared for the city of Seal Beach, February, 2001. Ne i 9-2, Boein S ace and communications Division -- Temporary office Facility, prepared for the city of Seal Beach. ♦ Negative Declaration 99-1 — Seal Beach Boulevard /1-405 Overcrossin Widenin Pro'ect prepared for city of Seal Beach by Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, July 1999. Negative Declaration ND -40 -01 Amendments to Local coastal Pro ram Area E and Planned Development ordinance PD-4 prepared by the city of Long Beach, February 7, 2002. ♦ Phase 1 Environmental Assessment-Update, Boeing Seal Beach Facilily, Area 1, Tait Environmental Management Inc., December 31, 2001. f Phase 1 Environmental Assessment U date Boeing Seal Beach Facility, Area 2, Tait Environmental Management Inc., December 31, 2001. ♦ Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Update, Boeing-- Seal Beach Facility,, Area 3, Tait Environmental Management Inc., December 31, 2001. Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Update, Boeing Seal Beach Facility, Lot 7, Tait Environmental Management Inc., December 31, 2001. f Prelirnina Hydrology Report for Boeing-Seal Beach Facili at Westminster and Seal Beach Blvd, Tait & Associates, Inc., August 11, 2000. Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (Regional Mobilily Chapter), SCAG, May 1995. * Regional Mobility Element (RME), SCAG, June 1994. ♦ Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). JN 10- 107776 3 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) Report of Foundation Investigation, Pro used Additions to Buildin 86, 2201 Seas Beach Boulevard, Seal Beach California for Rockwell International, Crandall and Associates, December 29, 1952. ..._,,. * Rockwell Ground Hell ad Noise Assessment, Myles Simpson & Associates, 1991. * Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside Coun ly Californic United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1975 Topographical Quadrangle, Los , Alamitos, United States Geological Survey (USES), California, 1981. * Vacant Lands at Westminster Ave and Seal Beach Boulevard — Review of Existing Conditions -- Biological Resources, Envicom Corporation, August 1, 2990. JN 10-101776 4 Initial Stud ylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seat Beach Blvd.) 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is located within the City of Seal Beach, County of Orange, State of California (refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity). The proposed Specific Plan area is located on the Boeing Space and Communications Headquarters complex at 2201 Seal Beach Boulevard (refer to Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity). The S &C complex is located between Westminster Avenue to the north and Seal Beach Boulevard to the southeast, comprising approximately 104.5 acres. EXISTING CONDITIONS ON -SITE The subject property is designated as Light Industrial in the Seal Beach General Plan and is zoned M -1, Light Manufacturing. The Boeing Space and Communications Division is a light industrial campus facility containing 11 major structures with 1,180,000 square feet of existing office, research, manufacturing and support services space. The site provides 4,110 parking spaces and approximately 50 acres of the site are currently vacant. SURROUNDING LAND USES The proposed project site is within the corporate limits of the City of Seal Beach and is located westerly of the Seal Beach Boulevard - Westminster Avenue intersection. Properties to the north, across Westminster Avenue, are General Plan designated and zoned for Service Commercial, General Commercial and Residential High Density Planned Development uses. Within the Service Commercial and General Commercial areas are located a service station, an approximately 87,000 square -foot neighborhood shopping center, and a United States Post Office facility. The Residential High - Density Planned Development area comprises the Seal Beach Leisure World retirement community, consisting of approximately 5,500 housing units within 525 acres. To the east, across Seal Beach Boulevard, is the United States Naval Weapons Station - Seal Beach, located within a Public Land Use General Plan and zoning designation. The Naval Weapons Station comprises approximately 5,000 acres and extends from the 1-405 Freeway to the Pacific ocean, between Seal Beach Boulevard and Bolsa Chica Road. Facilities most adjacent to the Boeing Space and Communications Division consist of the Research, Testing and Evaluation Area. This area consists of multi -story office and production buildings, parking areas, and various other above and below ground testing, evaluation and storage facilities. Between 1952 and 1973, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) utilized this area for the design and manufacture of the Saturn 11 launch vehicle for the Apollo Program. Currently, the facilities are used for storage, communications research, and office space by the Naval Weapons Station. To the southeast and immediately adjacent to the Boeing Space and Communications property is an existing industrial facility, Accurate Metal, located on approximately 3.5 a -ores, containing approximately 52,700 square feet of light industrial fabrication facilities. JN 14- 101776 5 Initial StudylEnvironmental Checklist LOS ANGELES ' COUNTY � s r ■r�r ■rr■ ■■r ■■■■r ■r� Brea0 1 � r t � Fullerton0 0 Placentia • g Rivers' --.ide ■ Cypress Anaheim � � Garden Villa r Grove Park � Garden rQum, 0 Orange Freeway Seal Tustin U5t n Beach �� Santa Ana ! 241 � Fountain �� 5 ��, Valley Dread 5:5 Huntington 0, �� 405 1 33 Beach 01 r a � Costa �-� *John o h n Wayne Mesa Airport Irvine Newport Beach 73 133 CU 0 C �� c � o Laguna Beach 0 46. -1 + 4D Not to Scale PF PLLANNING ■ DESIGN ■ CONSTRUCTION ■ 03112 JN 10-101776 CaNSULr NG 241 241 BOEING HEADQUARTERS SITE INITIAL STUDY /ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Regional Location Exhibit 1 CD memo ti +�A t 4 I Cl) Y• �a S i $ u LLI IP Q J 'r ► d Cu W W g • i W fs L� .} 'z All, . LLJ y 'i �' ' f r`' • J Cl) �:- . w ud z ui Ct 10. am f, C) C) may. vow Q v. z Cl i . C. •,'• 4 Q W r• .. F w .• Z f• •Iy } j C) /O/)F '+�•ti ., 4' Y Ir y{rr-• -7 ;or; +r A. 4{� •'; Q m # :;fib Al a # �::t - pp .rah, all y ,..�� _ ...... .. . CO IN cc `: n �1' . r •' �1� t :........_ ...,� -... "� � : f r n ,; � C7 JG7, �i I�� ,r� • ........- ..� . i_ V r' rr yr F f D ! - ........ - -- ..� r Ly �` •^� ` y 'tit ,_„'....r . i CD 4r 2 '� \ ,fir:- •:.l.. .. kk 'i : 1. i.. �.. IC i3 / �ir�. it i'� I�.�1 ..� �'J�• L i' ••f• '• >. - � � e � � t :��`' `' � (��Y ^ t r� 4 L� �ti � y' tit +J".`� ~ 1 �^ r• r �'� • '. all . 'j' . i + w . � � •• .� �fr� �- �' ;�! � "� ii i�'iI s �• ..� ti_....r-f: :: .fir,. �•. C - -: _: i .� . �.d a g r fl t .--f y ❑' CO) �-- r. �.a � � U7 �! n � �c ��. y °tiff' \. r_._: `�'•' (n � CD OZ � FI f k 1 ,• a goo Q bi � .�.. ... .. �. _ r' � ,• '• • /' +� �" � � x` i� p— �i •M1 \ � �•' is '��.'':3 s' .�� `i' • ... t w . / y fr it C�i •�i is r i�F•' * /J .��i f/ y► .�¢ri�r Vii;' • _ , 0 e s... _ a•;�: a `. `ft gf C �F� �Y ; r,' . �t _ \.• ' y" � _ \ ; �r�: �, � ;,� w �': ?'• , .. Y -... ..'-t� `a }� �(Ja."'� -j' lliiln� x S�L/rr. psi / /r1� �1•`ti �.f.• ° f /�1 y.d Z Exhibit 2 Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) To the south, across Adolfo Lopez Drive, are located the city of Seal Beach Police Department, corporate Yard, and Animal care center facilities. These properties are General Plan designated and zoned for Public Land Use. To the west, across a flood control channel, and adjacent to Westminster Avenue, is the Island Village residential community within the City of Long Beach and the Los Alamitos Retarding Basin (LARB), within the city of Seal Beach. The island Village community is designated within the City of Long Beach General Plan and zoned Planned Development 1, which is a specific plan zoning designation for residential land uses. The LARB is identified in the Seal Beach General Plan as Public Land Use. The LARB is within the Hellman Ranch Specific Plan, which designates the property for regional flood control purposes. The LARB is an existing facility providing collection and storage of stormwater runoff from a 5,000 -acre watershed. 2.2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY Boeing Realty Corporation ("BRC", a subsidiary of The Boeing Company), has previously submitted a Tract Map and site plan review request for a light industrial, research and development project (the "Pacific Gateway Project") adjacent to the Boeing Space & Communications Group ("S&C") Headquarters Campus facilities located at Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue (the "Property ") in the City of Seal Beach (the `City "). The Pacific Gateway Project consisted of the following: 4 The Pacific Gateway Project consisted of approximately 553,100 square feet of light manufacturing, research and development, and warehouse uses on 42.0 acres (as summarized below). The Pacific Gateway Project was consistent with the city's General Plan and zoning ordinance that designates the site for "Light Manufacturing" land uses, a designation that has been in place for approximately the last 30 years. Six low -rise, one -story plus mezzanine buildings were proposed, with an average Floor Area Ratio of 0.43. Building architecture consisted of preformed concrete panels with blue tinted glazing. ♦ Implementation of the Pacific Gateway Project would have required: grading; relocation of an on -site storage bin; removal of a small parking lot, exercise track, and tennis courts; and construction of buildings, roads, supporting utilities, and other infrastructure. Although the site is relatively flat, import .of approximately 154,000 cubic yards of material would have been required to create the building pads and foundations, the public street and internal circulation system and parking areas. A Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") was prepared and circulated by the city in March 2001 for the required 30 -day public review and comment period. Comments received from resource agencies raised the issue of whether three manmade drainage ditches constructed on the property in the late 1950's to early 1970's have characteristics of wetlands. Based upon the comments on the MND, BRC conducted site-specific biological and regulatory analysis of the drainage ditches on the property. BRC also performed feasibility and due diligence analysis of alternative land uses for the property. BBC's analysis has included consideration of physical, environmental, community, fiscal impact, financial, market, regulatory, political, and operational factors, and constraints associated with the JN 10- 101776 8 Initial 5tudylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2207 Seal Beach Blvd.) property. As a result of this comprehensive analysis, BRC has revised the Pacific Gateway Project to better respond to operational factors and other constraints identified above. 2.3 PROJECT C HARACTE R i STI CS The proposed project includes light industrial manufacturing and research and development uses for the western portion of the Property, and development of a hotel /retail area at the eastern portion of the Property. The Project takes into account the Property's physical and environmental constraints, and the operational requirements of S &C, which will continue to occupy the property (refer to Exhibit 3, Site Plan). S &C will continue its uses and operations on the balance of the property. BRC expects this planning process to be accomplished through the preparation and approval of a Specific Plan for the property (the BSC Specific Plan), coupled with a General Plan Amendment ( "GPA") (Land Use and Circulation), a vesting Tentative Tract Map, a Coastal Development Permit, and possibly a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permits and other approvals. The BSC Specific Plan takes into account the entire existing 1 04.5 acre BSC Property, southwest of the intersection of Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard. The Site was acquired by Boeing from Rockwell International in 1905, and is home to BSc's headquarters operations. Company administration offices and research and development functions are housed at the site. The BSC Specific Plan provides for four (4) planning areas within the Property, with the Project consisting of development in Planning Areas 2, 3 and 4 (refer to Table 1, Developmental Statistical Summary, for a breakdown by planning area). Planning Area 1 is reserved for existing S &C operations and land uses. The circulation concept is to provide a public roadway that would connect Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard, providing primary access to the proposed business and industrial park. The design and alignment of the proposed interior roadway may vary from the configuration shown in Exhibit 3 and alternatively may connect to Adolfo Lopez Road to the south instead of Seal Beach Boulevard in the southern portion of Planning Area 3. Final design and alignment of this roadway is not expected to result in an increase in the total building area in excess of the building area shown in Table 1. The following describes each planning area: ♦ Planning Area 1: Existin-q Boeing Space & Communications Facilities -- 42 +1.. gross acres, encompassing the existing Boeing S &C core campus use of the Property, including Buildings 80, 81, and 90, that orient toward Seal Beach Boulevard, and the surface parking fronting Westminster Avenue {also known as Parking Lots 3 -5 }. The existing office, research, and development and support operations and land uses in this planning area will be maintained. Planning Area 2: Proposed Light Industrial Business Park -- 8 +1- gross acres, encompassing a range of S &C facilities in the area immediately south of Building 85, including Building 89. The existing land use designations would be preserved and expanded, as provided for in the BSC Specific Plan for this area. The buildings and facilities in this area are expected to be relocated or eliminated. Planning Area 2 would be subdivided into at least two parcels, allowing for up to approximately 145,000 square feet of building floor area. JN 10- 101776 9 initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seat Beach Blvd.) Table I Developmental Statistical Summary 1'�rceis .. : ... - Y r .F►cres�rst e ezzan�ne Tatat y yams Planning Area 2 - Business Park 7 L Light Industrial 1 1501718 3 3.46 5 52,440 6 61000 5 58,400 8 L Light Industrial 1 193,406 4 4.44 7 791400 7 79500 8 86,900 Totals 3 344,124 7 7.90 1 131,800 1 13,500 1 145,300 Planning Area 3 3- Business Park 1 L Li ht Industrial 2 283,264 5 5.50 1 108,000 1 1000 1 118,800 2 L Li ht Industrial 3 319,695 7 7.34 1 122,000 1 12,240 1 1349200 3 L Li ht industrial 3 375,322 8 8.62 1 1419000 1 149100 1 155,140 4 L Light Industrial 3 3339524 7 7.66 1 1051000 1 10,504 1 115,500 5 L Light industrial 1 194,241 4 4.37 6 65,300 6 61530 7 71,830 6 L Light Industrial 3 300,489 5 5.92 1 117,200 1 11,724 1 128,920 LandsqppJn9 4 43,560 1 1.00 gp2n Space 2 217,800 5 5.00 Streets 8 Misc. 2 217,800 5 5.00 Totals 2 212811691 5 52.39 6 6581500 6 65,850 1 1 724,350 Planning Area 4 4 - Hotel/Retail Hotel 8 871124 2 2.00 1 120 RetaillRestaurant 3 35,400 0 0.80 1 10,440 1 10,000 Retail/Restaurant 3 35,900 0 0.82 1 14,004 1 10,004 RetaillRestau rant 4 40,000 0 0.92 1 12,500 1 12, 500 Totals 1 198,020 4 4.55 3 32j500 3 3Z, 500 1 120 Total Project: 7 71823,835 6 64.84 1 1 7701400 7 73,350_1... 9 902,150 1 1 120 Planning Area 3: Proposed Light industrial Business Park -- 50 +/- gross acres, encompassing the areas west and north of Planning Areas 1 and 2. The existing light industrial permitted uses would be preserved and expanded, as provided for in the BSC Specific Plan. • A substantial portion of this planning area is vacant land. Buildings 84, 85, 88, 91, 93, 949 95, and 100, and a fire system tank farm would be demolished. An electrical substation would be relocated. Construction of a road system, supporting utilities, and other infrastructure would occur in this planning area (as previously stated, the road system may alternatively connect to Seal Beach Boulevard or Adolfo Lopez Drive at the southern end of Planning Area 3). Three man -made drainage ditches would be incorporated into the landscape and water quality plan for the Project. Planning Area 3 would be subdivided into at least six building parcels, allowing for up to approximately 725,000 square feet of building floor area. Plannin Area 4: Proposed Hotel/Retail Area -- 4.5 +/- gross acres consisting primarily of Parking Lot 7 at the eastern end of the Property, between Westminster Avenue and seal Beach Boulevard. This area would be developed with hotel and/or retail uses, allowing for up to approximately 32,500 square feet of retail building floor area and a 120 room hotel. - JN 10- 101776 11 Initial StudylEnvi ron mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) 2.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES Project objectives are to be established for the development of properties within the BSc Specific Plan. The preliminary listing of objectives are identified below: Site Planning and Environmental Design i Provide for comprehensive land use and infrastructure planning, while respecting the physical constraints of the site. ♦ Create a cohesive identity for the Specific Plan area, and provide a consistent project theme, development standards and design guidelines that allow design flexibility to better respond to market needs. f Unify the Specific Plan area through the implementation of a strong landscape, architectural, and street scene program; and create a comprehensive signage system that includes identification, directional and informational signage, which is appropriate for both the Specific Plan area and the overall community. f Respect the biological conditions of the site through enhancement and restoration of the man -made drainage ditches that have wetland characteristics. ♦ Provide for water quality treatment of urban runoff prior to discharge into the Los Alamitos Retarding Basin. Land Use and Development Increase connectivity within the Specific Plan area, and provide a planning framework that responds to the physical and market driven aspects of future development opportunities. ♦ Encourage the expansion of a range of employment opportunities within the City of Seal Beach by combining light industrial, manufacturing, office and research and development land uses in close proximity to similar existing uses. Fiscal Benefits Encourage light industrial and business park uses that provide point of sale opportunities, and provide for a commercial planning area (Planning Area 4) allowing for the potential for hotel and/or retail land uses. i Encourage revitalization and reuse within the Specific Plan area in a logical, systematic manner, compatible with existing operations. 2.5 PHASING Rough site grading, demolition, and construction of the public roadway and required public infrastructure improvements to serve Planning Areas 2 and 3 of the Specific Plan area are anticipated to begin by the end of 2003 and be completed by mid -2004 in a single phase. JN 10- 101776 12 initial Study/Environmental Checklist V V 6 V Q N N c� O to ��CO) Y U) U C W w 2 CD CC U ODEON J Z Q W W 2i = Z �O Z CC wz OW m� 0 J Q Z z 0 M 0 F o U � 7 r � Z H N z U Z N N EJ ❑ ■ N Z_ Z z r J a W L9 �z to ' o r Z Q p Z ❑ Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) Building construction may commence by early 2004 for the portion of Planning Area 3 located adjacent to Westminster Avenue and continue in a southerly progression. Building construction in Planning Area 4 may also commence in early 2004. It is currently anticipated that all buildings would be constructed by BRC and/or sold to individual lot purchasers who would be responsible for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the approved development plans. occupancy is anticipated to occur as early as mid - 2004, with full occupancy expected by the end of 2006. 2.6 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS AND APPROVALS The city of Seal Beach is the Lead Agency for the Projectand has discretionary authority over the Project. To implement this Project, the applicant would need to obtain, at a minimum, the following discretionary permits /approvals: City of Seal Beach: ♦ Certification of Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ♦ General Plan Amendment —Land Use, Circulation ♦ Specific Plan ♦ Vesting Tentative Tract Map ♦ Development Agreement (if utilized) Other Agencies: California coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit Approval California Department of Fish and Came 1603 Permit Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 402 NPDES Permit - Waste Discharge Permit Coordination with the following adjacent jurisdictions, agencies, and utility companies may be required: ♦ Adelphia Communications ♦ California Department of Transportation ♦ City of Long Beach ♦ City of Westminster ♦ County Sanitation District of Orange County (CSDOC) ♦ Federal Aviation Administration ♦ General Telephone (GTE) ♦ Orange County Fire Authority ♦ Orange County Flood Control District ♦ Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department ♦ Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) ♦ Orange County Water District ♦ South Coast Air Quality Management District ♦ Southern California Edison (SCE) ♦ Southern California Gas Company JN 10-101776 13 Initial StudylEnviron mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) 3.0. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Sal BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Boeing Headquarters Site 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Seal Beach Department of Development Services 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mr. Mac Cummins, Assistant Planner (562) 431 -2527, ext 316 (562) 431 -4067 (fax) 4. Project Location: The subject property is located between Westminster Avenue to the north and Seal Beach Boulevard to the southeast. The project address is 2201 Seal Beach Boulevard, Seal Beach. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Gary A. Powley Boeing Realty Corporation 3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 500 Long Beach, CA 90806 £. General Plan Designation: Light Industrial 7. Zoning: M -1, Light Manufacturing 8. Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later phases of the project, and any secondary support or off -site features necessary for its implementation.) The proposed project consists of a Specific Plan, coupled with a General Plan Amendment ( "GPA") (Land Use and Circulation), a Westing Tentative Tract Map, a Coastal Development Permit, and possibly a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permit or other development approvals. The Specific Plan consists of: development of a business park on the western portion of the Property; and development of a hotel /retail area at the eastern end of the Property. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located westerly of the Seal Beach Boulevard- Westminster Avenue intersection. Surrounding land uses include residential, commercial, industrial, and public land uses. The United States Naval Weapons Station - Seal Beach is generally located to the south and east of the project. Additionally, the Los Alamitos retarding basin is located to the immediate west of the project site. 10. other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement). Refer to Section 2.6, Agreements, Permits and Approvals. JN 10- 101776 14 Initial Stud yfEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seat Beach Blvd.) 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a " Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics X Land Use and Planning Agriculture Resources Mineral Resources X Air Quality X Noise X Biological Resources Population and Housing X cultural Resources Public Services X Geology and Soils Recreation X Hazards & Hazardous Materials X Transportation/Traffic X Hydrology & Water Quality X Utilities & service Systems X Mandatory Findings of Significance 3,3 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed use COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in Section 5.0 have been added. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant ' effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2} has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required: but it must analyze only the eff is that remai be addressed. �/�/ City of Seal Beach Signature Agency Mac Cummins Assistant Planner Printed NarnerTitle March 4, 2002 Date X JN 10- 101776 15 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) 3.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: ♦ Aesthetics ♦ Land Use and Planning ♦ Agriculture Resources ♦ Mineral Resources ♦ Air Quality ♦ Noise ♦ Biological Resources ♦ Population and Housing ♦ Guttural Resources ♦ Public Services ♦ Geology and Soils ♦ Recreation ♦ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ♦ Transportation/Traffic ♦ Hydrology and Water Quality ♦ Utilities and Service Systems The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the CEQA Guidelines and used by the City of Seal Beach in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development's impacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the long -term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses: i No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental Impact on the environment. i Less Than Significant Impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. Potentially Significant, Impact Unless Mitigated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. i Potentially Significant Impact. The development will have impacts which are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. JN 10- 101776 16 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (7201 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10- 101776 17 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant Impact Impact Unless Significant Impact Impact Mitigated 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a. Have substantial adverse effect on a scenic .a vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air qualify management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air V quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality V standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? JN 10- 101776 17 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10-101776 18 Initial StudylEnvironmental Checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant impart Significant impact Impact Unless impact Mitigated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Callfomla Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines §15054.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ,r pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 1 5054.5? c. Directly or -indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? f fi. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: JN 10-101776 18 Initial StudylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10- 101776 19 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant Impact Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigated 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2} Strong seismic ground shaking? 3) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4) Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- .r or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1 -B of the Uniform Building code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not 'r availabfie for the disposal of waste water? 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a. create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65952.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a f safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? JN 10- 101776 19 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10- 101776 20 Initial Study /Environmental checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant Impact impact Unless Significant hnpact impact Mitigated f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production ,/ rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a ,/ manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of 'r surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 1 00-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or f other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood ,r flows? JN 10- 101776 20 Initial Study /Environmental checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10- 101776 21 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated Less Than Significant Impact No knpact i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? b. conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ,r conservation plan? 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels Of existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity ,/ above levels existing without the project? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? JN 10- 101776 21 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10- 101776 22 Initial Stu dy[Envi ron mental Checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant Impact Significant Impact Impact Unless impact Mitigated 12. POPULATION AND :'HOUSING. would the project: , a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public Services: 1) Fire protection? f 2) Police protection? 3) Schools? f 4) Parks? 5} Other public facilities? f 14. RECREATION. a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 15. TRANS PORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? JN 10- 101776 22 Initial Stu dy[Envi ron mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10-1.01776 23 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Leas Than No Significant impact Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigated c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns', including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water Supplies available to serge the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate, capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid I/ waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? JN 10-1.01776 23 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) JN 10-101776 24 initial Study /Environmental checklist Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant impact Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of califomia history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? JN 10-101776 24 initial Study /Environmental checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2209 Seal Beach Blvd.) 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The following is a discussion of potential project impacts as identified in the Initial Study/ Environmental checklist. Explanations are provided for each item. 4.1 AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Potentially Significant Impact. Although the project area is not within a scenic vista viewing area, as designated by the city of Seal Beach, long -range views across the site from adjacent roadways and nearby uses may be obstructed by on -site structures. Further review and analysis of project cross sections, sight lines, Specific Plan design guidelines, development regulations and perimeter landscape treatment is required. b] Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Potentially Significant Impact. The subject site is void of scenic resource features which include trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings. Although Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard are not designated as state scenic highways, Seal Beach Boulevard is designated as a Local scenic Highway by the city of Seal Beach and is a major link between coastal and interior portions of the city. Further review and analysis of streetscape and design information set forth in the Applicant's Specific Plan is required. c] Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Potentially significant Impact. Surrounding land uses that may be affected by the changes to the subject property include single -and multi - family residents of Leisure World to the north and the Island Village community to the west, as well as motorists utilizing seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Development within the western portion of the site, would result in new buildings with varying heights and massing, ornamental landscaping and paved surfaces. Along the eastern portion of the Planning area, the existing parking lot No. 7 would be transformed into a multi -story hotel facility. Thus, views across the site would be altered by developed conditions. Further review and analysts is required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Significant Impact. currently, the site is partially developed and contains on -site security and parking lighting. Implementation of the proposed project may create light and glare impacts in areas that currently have little or no such occurrences. The proposed project would include lighting for activity areas involving nighttime uses, parking, lighting around the structures (i.e.., security lighting, walkways) and lighting for interiors of buildings. Further review and analysis is required. JN 10-101776 25 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) 42 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance (Farmland)., as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? No Impact. The project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Thus, project implementation would not result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural uses. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use. There are no Williamson Act parcels located within the project area. In addition, existing agricultural operations to the east of the project site, within the U.S. Naval Weapons Station, would not be affected by the proposed project. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? No Impact. The project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in conversion of Farmland to non - agricultural use. There are no farmland uses on the subject property. Refer to Response 4.2.a. and 4.2.b., above. 43 AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Potentially Significant Impact. The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), an area monitored by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD). SoCAB is identified as non - attainment for Ozone (03), Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10). Further review and analysis is required to confirm the projects status in terms of compliance /conflict with current SCAQMD guidelines. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality Ok violation? Potentially Significant Impact. Construction and buildout of the project would result in pollutant emissions from three different sources, including: (1) short -term construction emissions, (2) long -term mobile emissions from trucks and vehicles traveling to and from the site once the project is operational, and (3) long -term stationary emissions from power and gas consumption and machinery and equipment on -site. JN 10-101776 26 Initial Stud ylEnvironmental Checklist C) Boeing iYeadquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) The greatest potential for air quality impacts from the project would be attributed to mobile emissions. The project's potential air quality impacts on a local and regional level requires an evaluation pursuant to the SCAQMD and California Air Resources Board (CARE) requirements and methodology. Additional review and analysis is required to quantify potential project - related air quality impacts (both short -term and long4erm) and potential mitigation that would be effective in reducing pollutant emissions. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds precursors) ? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.3(a) and 4.3(b) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? which the air quality for ozone Potentially Signiricant Impact. Sensitive populations (i.e., children, senior citizens and acutely or chronically ill people) are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than are the general population. Land uses that are considered sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, hospitals, convalescent homes and retirement homes. Sensitive receptors in proximity to the project site include existing residences to the north (Leisure World Retirement Community) and west (Island Village in the City of Long Beach). Construction and operation of the project would increase vehicle trips on area roadways and result in associated air pollutants. Grading and excavation operations may also have air quality impacts in the absence of mitigation. These impacts require additional review and analysis to assess levels of significance. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant. Commercial uses on -site may have the potential for creating odors. These emissions would be comparable to those anticipated with any type of commercial activity (e.g., food service facilities). Some businesses, such as restaurants with exhaust events, are considered "stationary, point sources" and may be subject to further regulatory requirement above and beyond any requisite CEQA mitigation. While the emissions from these activities are common and not identified as being particularly hazardous, they may be subject to permitting requirements that call for the use of "best available control technology" in order to eliminate .or reduce the levels of emissions. Any potential nuisance related to odor that may occur with these activities would be mitigated under the SCAQMD's permitting requirements. 4w4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Mould the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially significant Impact. The eastern portion of the Project area consists of existing structures, paved parking surface and limited ornamental vegetation. The westerly portion of the Project area consists of a disked field traversed by three east -west oriented, non -tidal man -made drainage ditches. Small areas of the following vegetation occur within some of the JN 10- 101776 27 initial Stu dylE nvi ron mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) ditches: wet meadow, emergent vegetation, ruderal vegetation and ornamental vegetation. According to a Biological Technical Report for the Pacific Gateway Initial Study, sensitive species or habitats identified as occurring in the vicinity of the project site include wetland habitats, raptor foraging habitat, and populations of the Califomia Native Rant Society (CNPS) List 1 S for the southern tarplant (centromedia parryi ssp. australis, FAC.) and CN PS List 4 for the wooly sea -blite (Suaeda taxifolia). Potential wetland habitat occurring within the Project area is limited to the three drainage ditches on site. Althoughthe Pack Gateway Initial Study concluded that no endangered, threatened, or candidate animal or plant species occurred on- site, further review and analysis of the three ditches and associated habitat is required for the current project. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially Significant Impact. The three manmade drainage ditches that convey runoff from the existing facility and adjacent surfaces may contain herbaceous riparian habitat. Further review and analysis is required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Potentially Significant Impact. Although no Federally protected wetlands have been identified, development within the project area could result in degradation of potential on -site wetlands and/or other wetland resources. A wetland delineation undertaken by the Project Applicant identified 0.07 acres within the centralized drainage ditch that exhibits artificial hydrology sufficient to support wetland vegetation. Additionally, the delineation identified 0.26 acres within portions of on -site ditches that have acquired the physical attributes of natural water stream courses. Further analysis is required. d) interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. No wildlife corridors or native wildlife nurseries are documented or known to exist in the project area. implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts in this regard. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Potentially significant Impact. The proposed project is subject to policies and regulations set forth by the city of Seal Beach, which is the identified local /lead agency. Based upon the review and conclusions rendered with regard to drainage ditch biological habitat, further review of project consistency with resource /conservation policies set forth in the City's General Plan and Development code will be required. JN 10- 101776 28 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Sear Beach Blvd.) f} Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. There are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans applicable to the subject property. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? No Impact. As a part of the cultural resources evaluation for the Pacific Gateway Initial Study, two historic period deposits were located and evaluated by KEA Environmental. It was their determination that 'The historic period deposits do not appear to have notable information to contribute to our understanding of local or regional history. No further research is recommended at these sites.' Thus, project implementation would have no impact on the significance of a known historical resource in the immediate project area. b) Cause a substanfial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? Potentially Significant Impact. Project implementation may have the potential to impact archaeological resources which have been documented by KEA Environmental in association with their review of the proposed Pacific Gateway project. An intensive survey of the land area associated with the Pacific Gateway site resulted in the identification of eight previously unrecorded archaeological sites. Sites B -2, B -31 B-41H and Locus 4 of B-6 have demonstrable subsurface components. Further review and analysis is required to determine the significance of impacts and potential mitigation. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact. ' Project implementation is not anticipated to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource. Should evidence of subsurface paleontological resources be found during grading and construction, operations will be required to cease and the City Department of Development Services is required to be contacted. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cerneteries? No Impact. Based upon the prior cultural assessment for the property, there are no known human remains that occur on -site. 1 Archaeological Survey of Western Portions of the Boeing Facility, Seal Beach, orange County, California, KEA Environmental, May 2000, page 40. JN 1 0 -1 01776 29 Initial StudylEnviron mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Sea! Beach Blvd.) 496 GEOLOGY AND SOILS, would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1} Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as defneated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less Than Significant Impact. No active faults are known to traverse the site and the property is not located within an Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (formerly referred to as "Special Studies Zones "). The nearest fault zone in proximity to the site is the north branch of the Newport - Inglewood fault, located approximately 2.1 miles southwest of the Project area. Hazards due to ground rupture as a result of earthquake movement is considered less than significant. Furthermore, adherence to standard engineering practices and design criteria relative to seismic and geologic hazards in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) is required. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? Potentially significant Impact. The Los Angeles Basin, which is underlain by an alluvial plain, is located in one of the most active seismic regions in the United States. Each year, low and moderate intensity earthquakes occur within or near the region. Southem California is likely to experience, on average, one earthquake of Magnitude 7.0, and ten (10) earthquakes of Magnitude 0.0 over a period of 10 years. There are several active and potentially active fault zones that could affect the Project area. Among ten (10) active faults identified within 52 miles of the site, three (3) faults are expected to generate earthquakes of potential significance: the Newport - Inglewood; the Whittier - Elsinore; and the Palos Verdes fault zones. As discussed in Subsection 4.6(a )(1), the Newport- Inglewood fault is located approximately 2.1 miles southwest of the project site. The maximum credible site acceleration is estimated to be 1.022g while the maximum probable site acceleration is estimated to be 0.549g. Thus, further site development may expose a greater number of people to seismic hazards. Due to the proximity to the Newport- Inglewood fault zone, further review and analysis is required to determine the significance of impacts resulting from strong seismic ground shaking. 3) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? Potentially Significant Impact. The site is situated within the San Gabriel Fiver basin which is identified as an area of holocene age young alluvium. The young alluvium consists of silt, sand and gravel with-varying proportions of clay. The proportion of gravel is generally low. Thickness of these surf vial deposits does not exceed ten (10) feet in most places. The deposits are generally uncernented, unconsolidated and have been historically flooded. In addition, groundwater has been encountered approximately 13 -23 feet below ground surface (bgs) within the vicinity of the project site. The location of the project site in an area of young 2 Geofechnical Feasibility Report — Proposed Industrial Development, 2201 Seal Beach Boulevard and 2600 Westminster Boulevard, Seal Beach, Sladden Engineering, March 27, 2001. 3 ibid. JN 10- 101776 30 initial Study/Environmental Checklist r Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) Holocene soils results in a potential for ground liquefaction during a seismic event. Further review and analysis is required. . 4) Landslides? No Impact. The project area consists of relatively flat topography and the surrounding areas are flat with no unusual geographic features. Impacts associated with landslides or mudslides are not anticipated. bj Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact clearing and grading for construction may expose soils to short -term wind and water erosion. Implementation of erosion control measures as required by the city and adherence to all requirements set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities would reduce these impacts to less than significant. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in an on -site or off -site landslide, lateral Spreading, Subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.6(a)(1) and 4.6(a)(3)). d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 78 -1 -8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Potentially Significant Impact. The dominant soil association in the project area is the Alo clay (9 to 16 percent slope, association). The referenced soil is overlain with fill soils approximately 5 to 6 feet in thickness. The Sladden Geotechnical report for the Pacific Gateway project indicated an expansion index of over 100 for the silty clays and sandy silts present near the existing ground surface, which corresponds with the "high" expansion category in accordance with UBD criteria. Due to the potential for seismic activity and liquefaction hazards, further review and analysis is required. Refer to Response 4.6(a). e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The project proposes to install on -site sewer lines. It would not be necessary to install septic tanks or other alternative types of wastewater disposal systems. No significant impacts are anticipated in this regard. 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a, Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous 4 Geotechnical Feasibility Report — Proposed industrial Development, 2241 Seat Beach Boulevard and 2600 Westminster Boulevard, Sea! Beach, Sladden Engineering, March 27, 2400, page 5. J 14- 101776 31 Initial 5tudylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) materials. It is noted that some transportation of hazardous materials does occur on Seal Beach Boulevard within the City which is regulated by standards set forth by the United States Department of Transportation for the safe handling and transportation of hazardous materials. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant impact. Future on -site uses would be required to comply with all requirements of the orange county Fire Authority for the storage and use of any hazardous materials utilized at a specific facility. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. It is noted, that the U.S. Naval Weapons Station, located adjacent to the east of the project site, is identified as containing several regulatory sites (i.e., leaking underground storage tanks). A trichloroethylene (TCE) groundwater plume associated with the historic storage of hazardous substances on the U.S. Naval Weapons Station has traveled in a southeasterly direction towards the Pacific Ocean .5 Due to the location of the plume and the reported travel in a southeast direction, no significant environmental impact is anticipated on the project site. C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No impact. The project site is not located within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. No impacts would occur in this regard. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 55962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Potentially Significant Impact. Multiple Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments were completed by Tait Environmental Management, Inc. on December 31, 2001 to determine if any potential contamination exists within the Project area. The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments concluded that past operations within the Project area have included: underground storage tanks (USTs), groundwater monitoring wells, water wells, a wastewater discharge line extending from the existing building operations to the San Gabriel River, piping connecting plating tanks, sumps /clarifiers, electric substations that utilized PCB- containing fluids, chemical and hazardous waste storage and an oil well. Due to the current and/or historic uses of hazardous substances on -site, further review and analysis of this potential impact is required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC) is located immediately north of the City of Seal Beach Corporate Limits, approximately two miles to the northeast of 5 Final Extended Removal Site Evaluation Report, Installation Restoration Sites 40 and 70, naval weapons Station Seat Beach, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering command, October 1999. JN 10- 101776 32 Initial Study /Environmental checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) the project site. Flight operations from the Reserve center generally Include a take off pattern over the city of Seal Beach, resulting in a potential for an emergency response, particularly in the event of an aircraft accident. Determining the significance of impacts associated with the aviation related air traffic is based upon the following standards: * Location of structures within a Clear Zone (Civil Runway Protection Zone) as described in FAR Part 77.2g. ♦ Location of incompatible land uses within the Clear Zones (CZs) or Accident Potential Zones (APZs) defined and established in an applicable Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study. No portion of the project site is located within the Clear Zone (Runway Protection Zone ), as described in FAR Part 77.28 and as applies to Military Airports. It should be noted that according to the AFRC Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) study published in 1994, Clear Zones are contained entirely within the boundaries of the AFRC. The AICUZ identifies no off -base Accident Potential Zones (APZs)! In addition, the project site is not located within the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Airport Environs Land Use Plan area and will not be reviewed by the ALUC for land use compatibility. Thus, it is concluded that no safety hazard impacts would occur in this regard. � For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. Private helicopter landing and takeoff facilities are located on the Boeing property. On a typical day there are approximately 1 to 3 helicopter flights between the hours of 7:30 AM and 7:00 PM. Helicopter operations have been conducted as part of the ongoing operational characteristics of the facility since 1991. There have been no accident or safety issues relative to the operation of this helicopter facility since initiation of operation.' Because FAA regulations and procedures must be followed as a matter of course, no significant impact are anticipated. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The site is located in an area where adequate circulation and access is provided to address emergency responses. Future construction of structures is subject to all emergency access standards and requirements of the orange county Fire Authority. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands ? Less Than Significant Impact. Project implementation would include the introduction of additional ornamental landscaping, which is not anticipated to create hazardous conditions 6 Air Installations Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) study - Awned Forces Reserve Center Los Alamitos Army Airfield, Los Alamitos, orange County, Callfomia, Adjutant General, California Nabonal Guard, June 1994. 7 Rockwell Ground Helipad Noise Assessment, Myles Simpson & Associates, 1991, JN 10-101776 33 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (22 4 T Seal Beach Blvd.) associated with brush fires. Furthermore, flammable brush, grass and trees do not currently exist on the proposed development portions of the site. 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. World the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Potentially Significant Impact. Impacts related to water quality would range over three different periods: 1) during the earthwork and construction phase, when the potential for erosion, siltation and sedimentation would be the greatest; 2} following construction, prior to the establishment of ground cover, when the erosion potential may remain relatively high; and 3} following completion of the project, when impacts related to sedimentation would decrease markedly, but those associated with urban runoff would increase. Urban runoff is expected to increase as a result of developing the proposed project site. The concentration of chemical constituents dissolved or suspended in runoff waters leaving the site would vary with the distribution pattern of rainfall events. Similarly, the characteristics of rain events affect the concentration of pollutants. Further review and analysis will be required with regard to compliance requirements with the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity which would prevent storm water pollution from impacting waters of the U.S. in the vicinity of the project site. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater fable level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) ? Potentially Significant Impact. Further review and analysis is required to determine the presence /absence of groundwater on the subject property and the Plan's potential impact to an existing supply, if any. c} Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site ? Potentially Significant Impact. Development of the site would involve the construction of impervious surfaces, which would lead to a decrease in ground absorption on -site, an increase in the quantity of surface water and possible changes to existing drainage patterns. The possible changes in drainage patterns, altered absorption rates, and the manner in which runoff from the site would be accommodated by existing or future flood control infrastructure improvements requires further review and analysis. - dj Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.8(c). JN 14- 101776 34 Initial StudylEnvironmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 sea! Beach Blvd.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storrnwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.8(a) and 4.8(c). 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Potentially Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project could result in short - term and long -term impacts to surface water quality. Short-term surface water quality impacts may occur from water erosion of soils during construction, with long -term impacts on surface water quality occurring primarily from the addition of project- related automobile trips which generate urban type pollutants (i.e., oil, tire particles, etc.) and landscape area development (i.e., fertilizers). The proposed project requires further review and analysis of best management practices (BMPs) in order to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater quality requirements. g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The proposed project does not involve the development of housing. The site is not located within the loo -year flood plain and project implementation would not involve the placement of structures within a 1 00-year flood hazard area. h) Place within a 700 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.8(g). i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. The City of Seal Beach has obtained membership in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Program. According to flood insurance rate maps published by FEMA, the Project area is not located within a 100year floodplain area. Additionally, no dams which would induce flooding are located in the vicinity. No impacts in this regard are anticipated. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. Due to the location and nature of the proposed project, approximately 1.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean and 0.5 miles from the San Gabriel River, the potential for inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow is not anticipated. 8 Flood Insurance Rate Map dumber 46059CD426E, National Flood Insurance Program, September 15, 1989. JN 10- 101776 35 Initial Study/Environmental checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) 4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The proposed project would not divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The project location is within the existing 1 04.8 acre Boeing Space and communications Division property, a 104.5 -acre site. b) conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project involves a Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment to the City's General Plan. The site is within the California coastal Zone and requires a consistency review in accordance with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. Further review and analysis is required. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. There are no applicable habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans within the City of Seal Beach. As a result, project implementation would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. As indicated by a 1981 geologic map of orange County, the project site does not contain mines, mineral deposits or other mineral resources. The nearest identified oil and gas fields are located approximately 9.5 miles southwest of the project site, on the Hellman Ranch properties.9 No impacts are anticipated in this regard. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.10a. 1999. Negative Declaration 99-2, Boeing Space and Communications Division — Temporary office Facility, City of Seal Beach, JN 10- 101776 36 Initial Study /Environmental checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) 4.11 NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Potentially Significant impact. Project construction and operation would result in both short -term and long -term impacts. Short-term impacts would occur during grading and construction operation and would expose adjacent uses to noise levels between 70 and 90 decibel at 50 feet from the noise source. Long -term noise impacts would be associated with vehicular traffic to /from the site (including employees and visitors), outdoor activities, deliveries and stationary mechanical equipment on -site. Both short- and long -term noise impacts require further review and analysis. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact. The project may include extensive earthwork and grading to prepare the site for installation of infrastructure and site development. Further review and analysis required to determine the significance of impacts. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer Response 4.11(a). d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant impact. Refer to Responses 4.11(a ). e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is not located within the Airport Planning Area of the orange County Airport Land Use Commission's adopted "Airport Environs Land Use Plan". Refer to Response 4.7.e., above. f} For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact. Private helicopter landing /takeoff facilities are located on the Boeing property. on a typical day there are approximately 1 to 3 helicopter flights between the hours of 7.30 AM and 7:00 PM. Helicopter noise measurements conducted in 1991 concluded that the city standard of one minute for the 85 dBA noise level was not exceeded, nor was the city standard of 90 dBA exceeded at any time by any operations from the helicopter facility. The city has not established interior noise standards for commercial and industrial uses. Thus, due to the nearby location of proposed uses to the existing helicopter facility and to Seal JN 10- 101776 37 Initial Stu dylEnvi ro n mental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2241 Seal Beach Blvd.) Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue, further review and analysis is required analysis is required to determine the significance of impacts. 4.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? Less Than Significant Impact. There are no residential uses proposed for the site and future development would not induce substantial new housing in the nearby vicinity. No significant impacts in this regard are anticipated. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No impact. The proposed project would not involve the displacement of housing. No impacts in this regard would occur. c) Displace Substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.12b. 4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES. a) would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 7) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Fire protection and emergency services for the City of Seal Beach are provided by the orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). Five of the CCFA's stations serve Seal Beach. Two (2) are located within the City and the other three (3) are located within the communities of Sunset Beach, Cypress, and Los Alamitos. The area surrounding the project site is primarily served by OCFA Stations 44 and 48. These stations are located approximately 1.5 and 2.0 miles, respectively, from the project site. Travel times are approximately 3 and 4 minutes, respectively. The OCFA will review all construction plans to ensure adequate emergency access and water for fire protection to the proposed project. Therefore, the overall impact upon fire protection services is considered to be a less than significant impact. 2) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of seal - Beach Police Department provides law enforcement and public safety services for the entire City. The police station is located at 911 Seal Beach Boulevard, adjacent to the project site and across Adolfo Lopez Drive. The Police JN 10- 101776 38 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Sea! Beach Blvd.) Department generally requires a response time of within 5 minutes, and that time can be met for the proposed project. A project of this size is not anticipated to require additional police protection resources. Therefore, the overall impact upon police protection services is considered to be a less than significant Impact. 3) Schools? Less Than Significant Impact. Since there are no residential uses proposed for the site and the development would not induce substantial new housing in the nearby vicinity, no significant impacts are anticipated to public school facilities within the Los Alamitos Unified Scholl District (LAUSD). However, the development would be required to pay fees as required by state law, to offset any cumulative effects of the children of the future employees who may attend public schools. 4) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact. There are no residential uses proposed for the site and the development would not induce substantial new housing in the nearby vicinity. Therefore, no impacts associated with parks are anticipated. 5) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. Due to the size and scope of the proposed project, the project would not significantly affect other governmental agencies. No significant impacts are anticipated in this regard. 4.14 RECREATION. a} Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. Refer to Response 4.13(a)(4). b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No lmpacf. The project would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, impacts in this regard are not anticipated. 4.15 TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project: a} Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the : existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections ) ? Potentially Significant Impact. Development of the proposed project would increase vehicular movement in the project vicinity. The project also proposes to construct a new roadway which would traverse the western portion of the project site, connecting Westminster Avenue to Seal Beach Boulevard. The design and alignment of a proposed interior roadway JN 10- 101776 39 Initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) may vary and alternatively may connect to Adolfo Lopez Road to the south. impacts resulting from increased traffic volumes and modified circulation patterns require additional review and analysis to determine significance. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.15(a). c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The proposed project would not affect air traffic patterns. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site plan is subject to review by the city of Seal Beach to evaluate the effectiveness of internal circulation in the parking areas and the driveways. Compliance with city standards would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.7(g). f} Result in inadequate parking capacity? Less Than significant Impact. Parking requirements for the project would be subject to City standards and requirements. g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) ? Less Than Significant Impact. Due to the nature of the proposal, no conflicts with any adopted policies supporting alternative transportation would occur. At the time of project - specific development application, the city would impose standard conditions regarding transportation facilities, which may include bus turnouts, bicycle racks, and electric vehicle charging stations. 4e16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Potentially Significant Impact The proposed project would utilize existing collection facilities currently operated by the City of Seal Beach, which are connected to facilities operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC). The wastewater would be treated at CSDOC Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. Further review and analysis is required to determine the impacts associated with the available capacity of the Huntington Beach treatment facility. JN 10 «101776 40 initial Study/Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) b) Require or result in the construction of new wafer or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact. Water service would be provided to the project site by the City of Seal Beach. water availability is adequate to serve the proposed project needs. However, the extent of modifications and upsizing required for water and wastewater facilities will require further review and analysis to determine the extent of physical impacts associated with improvements. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.8(a). d] Have Sufficient water Supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(b) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Potentially Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(b). � Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Potentially Significant impact. The proposed project would generate solid waste beyond existing conditions. The disposal of solid waste from the property would be provided by Briggeman Disposal Company. The project's effect upon the landfill capacity and consideration of the city's waste recycling programs requires further review and analysis. gj comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste ? Potentially Significant Impact. The project must comply with adopted programs and regulations pertaining to solid waste. Refer to Response 4.16f. 4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE, a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populationto drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact. As stated in Response 4.4(a ); further study is required. JN 10- 101776 41 initial Study /Environmental Checklist Boeing Headquarters Site (2201 Seal Beach Blvd.) b) Bees the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) ? Potentially Signiricant Impact. A review of cumulative impacts for each issue area that has been identified as potentially significant will be required pursuant to Section 15130 of CEQA. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause Substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Signircant Impact. The proposed project has the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Further review and analysis is required. JN 10- 101776 42 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist NOTICE OF PREPARATION To: interested Agencies and_9manizations (Agency) (Address) Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency: Consulting Firm: Agency Name: * Qy of Seal Beach Firm Name: RBF Consultin Street Address: 211 Eighth Street Street Address: 14725 Alton Parkway — City/State/Zip: _ Seal Beach, California 90740 City/State/Zip: Irvine California 92518 •� � ..�.rrr•.�.�i m i n� �. nri.�rrri...r.��w... ^nri.�rrr. Contact: Mr. Mac Cummins E -Mail: mcumm ins @ci. seal- beach.ca i us - -i- - - - -- Contact: Glenn Laioie AICP C ITY O F SEAL B EAC H will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an environmental impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location, and the potential environmental effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial Study (® is 0 is not) attached. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to person in your agency. ltliac C.ummins at the address.shown above. We will need the name of a contact Project Title: Boein Head uarters Site EIR Project Location: Seal Beach Orange City (nearest) County Project Description: Proposed Speck Plan provides for four (4) planning areas within the property. Planing Area 1 would maintain existing Boeing operations. Planning Area 2 allows for 145,300 square feet of new Light Industrial uses. Planning Area 3 allows approximately 725,000 square feet of light industrial uses. Planning Area 4 would be developed with a 120 room hotel and 32,500 square feet of retail. Project development would include an interior roadwa system along with supporting utilities and other infrastructure systems. Date: Signature: Mac Cummins Title: Assistant Planner Telephone: (562)431-2527 Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, (CEQA Guidelines) Sections 15082(a), 15103, 15375. Revised Orcrober 1989 Traff "Ic Study TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT BOEING SPACE & CONIMUNICATIONS GROUP P SPECIFIC PLAN Seal Beach, California E N G I N E E R S E N G I N E E R S ENGINEERS & PLANNERS ■ TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 1580 Corporate Drive, Suite 122 ■ Costa Mesa, California 92626 Phone: 714 641 -1587 ■ Fax: 714 641 -0139 December 13, 2002 Mr. Lee '4vhittenberg, Director of Development Services CITY OF SEAL BEACH 211 Eighth Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Uavid 5. 5hender, P.E. Jahn A. Boarman, P.F. Clare M. Look - Jaeger, P.E. SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT BOEING SPACE AN]] CONMIUNICATIONS GROUP SPECIFIC PLAN Seal Beach, California Dear Mr. Whittenberg: Linscott, Law &Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the Boeing Space and Communications Group (BSC) Specific Plan, a proposed light industrial park and a small hotel/commercial center within the Boeing Space and Communication (BSC) site. The project site is generally located south of Westminster Avenue and northwest of Sea] Beach Boulevard, in the City of Seal Beach, California. The BSC Specific Plan project will consist of 1,31 5,000 square feet (SF) of new light industrial floor area, a 55,004 SF, 120 -room hotel and 32,500 SF of retail/restaurant floor area, and the removal of 3453000 SF of existing office, manufacturing and research and development floor area from the Boeing Space and Communications site. The BSC Specific Plan project will be constructed in four major phases with an anticipated buildout by the Year 2005. This traffic impact analysis presents an inventory of existing characteristics and traffic volumes at twenty -one key study intersections and eleven roadway links within the vicinity of the project site, forecasts vehicular traffic generated by the proposed project, evaluates potential project-related traffic impacts on the surrounding street system, and outlines project-specific improvements as well as area -wide planned improvements. Pasadena - 626 796 -2322 ■ San Diego - 619 299 -3090 ■ Las Vegas - 702 451 -1920 ■ Founded 1966 • An LG2WB Company LINSCOTT Mr. Lee Whittenberg LAW CITY of SEAL BEACH LLG Reference: 2.02.2336.1 — BSC Specific Plan, Seal Beach AL December 13, 2002 E N G I N E E R 5 Page Briefly, based on the results of the traffic impact analysis, the proposed project will signif cantl y impact six (6) of the twenty-one key study intersections and one of the eleven (I . 1) key study roadway segments. Participation in the City of Seal Beach Traffic Impact Fee Program and payment of a "fair - share's of the costs of the recommended improvements at the intersections located within the City of Long Beach will completely mitigate the impact of the BSC Specific Plan project. An Executive Summary sets forth. a summary of our findings, conclusions, and recommendations on the following pages. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. If you have questions or comments regarding the findings and recommendations within this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (714) 641 -1587. Very truly yours, LYNSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS Daniel A. Kloos Transportation Engineer Il Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Associate Principal ESSI o'� c.� 0 No. MM -a v 1,.2p.D3 0 EXP. mono `rl9Tc�AFF�G AL E N G I N E E R S W O V O W Si E N G I N E E R S TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE DESCRIPTION NUMBER EXECUTIVESUMMARY ..................................................................................... ............................... INTRODUCTION............................ .....................................,.................,............... ..............................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..................................................... ...........................,..3 EXISTINGSTREET NETWORK .. ........................................................................ .....................,........9 EXISTING AREA TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ...................................................... .............................10 EXISTING INTERSECTION CONDITIONS ...................................................... .............................15 Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU) Method of Analysis ............................................... 15 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) ......... 17 Roadway Link Capacity Analysis .............................................................. .............................17 Existing Intersection Level of Service Results ................ .......................... .............................20 Existing Roadway Link Level of Service Results ......... ............................ .............................20 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY .... ..... .24 ................ ............. ..... .... .. .. ............ ...... ........ PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................... .............................24 ProjectTraffic Generation ................ ............................... . ........................ ............................... 24 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment.............. ............................ ....._......................... .29 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ..................................... .............................40 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volume Conditions . .................................... .............................40 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................................. ............................... 44 AmbientTraffic Growth ............................................................................ .............................44 Related Projects Traffic Characteristics .................................................... .............................44 FutureTraffic Volumes .............................................................................. .............................45 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ....................................... ............................... 55 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................... ............ ................... 55 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios ........................................................... ............................... 56 E N G I N E E R S TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) PAGE DESCRIPTION NUMBER PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS ................................. .............................56 Year 2002 Traffic Conditions ................................................................. ............................... 56 Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions ......................................................... .............................60 PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ............. ................. .............................64 ROADWAY LINK CAPACITY ANALYSIS ........... ........................................... .............................66 Year2002 Traffic Conditions ................................................................. ............................... 66 Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions ......................................................... .............................66 AREA -WIDE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................... ............................... 70 PunnedImprovements...... ......................................................................... .............................70 Recommended Improvements ................................................................... .............................70 PROJECT - SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS ............... ............................................ .............................7I Recommended Circulation Improvements ...................................... ......... ..............................7 I PROJECT - RELATED FAIR SHARE CONTRIBUTION ................................... .............................74 City of Long Beach Intersection Improvements ....... ............................... ............................... 74 POTENTIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES ........................................... .............................76 City of Seal Beach Traffic Fee Program ......... ......................................... ............................... 76 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) ANALYSIS ............... ............................... 78 STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) METHODOLOGY .......................... .............................79 HCM Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) ............................... .............................79 Future Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions ................................................................. 79 Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions with BSC Specific Plan Project Traffic .....................82 ALTERNATIVE SITE ACCESS EVALUATION ...................... ....................... ............................... 83 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................ .............................90 Roadway Link Capacity Analysis .............................................................. .............................93 E N G! N E E R 5 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Existing Traffic Count Data APPENDIX B: Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) and Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Calculation Worksheets APPENDIX C: Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets APPENDIX D: Cost Estimates For Recommended Improvements APPENDIX E: City of Seal Beach Impact Fee Summary Excerpt APPENDIX F: HCM/LDS Calculation Sheets for Caltrans Intersections APPENDIX G: ICUILDS and HCMILDS Calculation Sheets for the Alternative Site Access Evaluation E N G I N E E R S LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE NO, DESCRIPTION NO-0 1 VICINITY MAP ............................................................................ ..............................4 2AEXISTING SITE PLAN .......... ..................................................... ............................... S 2BPROPOSED SITE PLAN .............................................................. ..............................8 3 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS .................................................. ..............................1 I 4 EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES .............. .............................12 5 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............... .............................13 6 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................ .............................14 7A PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR PA -2 & PA -3 (APOLLO COURT) ........ 30 7B PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR PA -2 & PA -3 (SATURN WAY) ...........31 7C PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR PA 3(ADOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE) ..........32 7D PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 7E BUSINESS HOTEL FOR PA- 4 ............. . .... ..... ... ......................... .............................33 PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN SHOPPING CENTER/RETAIL FOR PA -4 .............. .................. .............................34 7F PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR PA- 1 ........................... .............................35 8 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............... .............................37 9 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....... ......... .............................38 10 DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES . ................................. .............................39 11 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............41 12 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..............42 13 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ... .............................43 14 RELATED PROJECTS LOCATIONS ............. ........................ .. ..........,.,................45 E N G J N E E R 5 LIST OF EXHIBITS (CONTINUED) EXHIBIT PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION NO. 15 YEAR 2006 AM PEAK HOUR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........49 16 YEAR 2006 PM PEAK HOUR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............50 17 YEAR 2006 DAILY BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES . .............................51 18 YEAR 2006 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC ........................................................ .............................52 19 YEAR 2006 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHPROJECT TRAFFIC ........................................................ .............................53 20 YEAR 2006 DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHPROJECT TRAFFIC ........................................................ .............................54 21 FUTURE PLANNED AND /OR RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS..................................................................... ............................... 73 22 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION ................................... .............................84 23 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION ................................... .............................85 24 DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION..................... .............. .............................86 25 YEAR 2006 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION ................87 26 YEAR 2006 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION ................88 27 YEAR 2006 DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION ................89 E N G! N E E R 5 LIST OF TABLES PAGE TABLE DESCRIPTION NUMBER 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION. ................ ..............6 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .......... 16 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ....18 4 ROADWAY LINK CAPACITIES ............................................... .............................19 5 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY ..................... 21 -22 6 EXISTING ROADWAY" LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY ...................23 7A PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES/EQUATIONS ... .............................25 7B PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST ................... .............................27 7C PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST ................... .............................28 8 RELATED PROJECTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST ............. ..............47 9 YEAR 2002 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY ........ ............................... 57 -58 10 YEAR 2006 PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY ................. 61 -62 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ........................ .............................65 12 YEAR 2002 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY ......... .............................67 13 YEAR 2006 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY .................68 14 PROJECT FAIR SHARE PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS ............................... 75 15 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CALCULATION ................................. .............................77 E N G t N E E R 5 LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED) PAGE TABLE DESCRIPTION NUMBER 16 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .......... 80 17 YEAR 2006 PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCMILOS METHOD OF ANALYSIS ........................................ .............................81 18 YEAR 2006 PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY WITH APOLLO DRIVE CONNECTION .......................................................... 91 -92 19 YEAR 2006 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY WITH APOLLO DRIVE EXTENSION ....................................... .............................94 E N G I N E E R 5 �C a w a v E N G I N E -E R S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT BOEING SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS GROUP SPECIFIC PLAN Seal Beach, California Project Description and Tnv Generation Potential 1. The Boeing Space and Communications Group (BSC} Specific Plan consists of four 4 planning areas within the existing campus, with the Project consistin g P of development in all four Planning Areas (PA ). 2. PA -1 is approximately 41 acres and consists of the core BSC campus with 805,000 square-feet (SF) of office space and is reserved for existing Boeing Space and Communications operations and land uses. The BSC Specific Plan designates this area for the continued operations of the BSC facilities with requirements not to exceed the campus's existin g floor area. Since BSC's existing campus -wide floor area now totals 1,150,000 SF, the BSC Specific Plan Fo ro ses that P up to 345,000 SF of additional floor area be allowed within PA -1. For the purposes of this traffic P� c analysis, it is assumed that the additional floor area in PA -1 will consists of general light • g industrial uses. 3. The new development in PA -2, PA -3 and PA -4 proposed as art of the BSC Specific Plan P project will consist of 345,000 square feet (SF) of light industrial floor area in PA -2 628,000 SF of light industrial floor area in PA -3, a 55,000 SF, 120 -room hotel and 32,500 SF of retai Urestaurant floor area in PA-4. To accommodate all proposed general light industrial land . g g uses in PA -2, approximately 145,000 SF of office space, 155,000 SF of manufacturing, and 451)000 SF of research and development of the Boeing Space and Communications site will be demolished. 4. The BSC Specific Plan project is expected to be r J completed in four major phases with an P anticipated buildout by the Year 2006. The four major phases consist of the : followin g Phase I: Construction of a 628,000 SF industrial park in PA -3 by the Year 2004 • Phase 1I: Construction of a 55,000 SF hotel with 120 rooms and 32,500 SF of retail/restaurant space in PA-4 by the Year 2005 • Phase III: Demolition of existing floor area in PA -2 and construction of 345,000 SF of light industrial floor area by the Year 2006 • Phase IV: Construction of up to 345,000 SF of new light industrial floor area in PA- I by Year 2006 5. The new development proposed as part of the BSC Specific Plan project is expected to generate . � P .l p g to 15,350 daily passenger car equivalent (PCE) taps (one half arriving, one half departing), g P g ), with 1,639 PCE trips anticipated during the AM peak hour (1,376 inbound 2630 outbound ) and 1,821 PCE tips (344 inbound, 1,477 outbound) forecast during the PM Pe ak hour. Executive Summary Boeing Space A Communications Group Spec fc Plan, Seat Beach Page i E N G I N E E R S Study Area and Existing Conditions i mnirrr.rrinnirrr.r.iii•n rr.. 6. Twenty -one key study intersections, which provide both regional and local access to the project site, were selected to define the extent of the study boundary for this traffic impact investigation. They include: 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd St/Westminster Ave 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 3. Studebaker Road at SR -22 EB Ramps 4. Studebaker Road at SR -22 WB Ramps 5. Pacific Coast Highway at Main St/Bolsa Avenue 6. Pacific Coast Highway at Seal Beach Boulevard 7. Seal Beach Boulevard at Bolsa Ave /Anchor way S. Seal Beach Boulevard at Adolfo Lopez Drive 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 NB Ramps 12. Bolsa Chica Road at Westminster Avenue 13. Seal Beach Boulevard at Road A (Apollo Drive) 14. Road A (Apollo Drive) at Westminster Avenue 15. Island Village Drive at Westminster Avenue 16. Road B at Westminster Avenue 17. Seal Beach Boulevard at Road C 18. Springdale Street at Westminster Avenue 19. Rancho Rd/Hammon Place at Westminster Ave 20.1-405 SB On Ramp at Westminster Avenue 21. Pacific Coast Highway at Loynes Drive A midblock link analysis was conducted for eleven existing roadway segments, which include: A. Westminster Avenue, east of Studebaker Road B. Westminster Avenue, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road B C. Westminster Avenue, west of Bolsa Chica Road D. Seal Beach Boulevard., north of Pacific Coast Highway E. Adolfo Lopez Drive, west of Seal Beach Boulevard F. Seal Beach Boulevard, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road C G. Seal Beach Boulevard, between Saint Andrews and Golden Rain H. Seal Beach Boulevard Gvercrossing, between 1-405 NB Ramps and 1-405 SB Ramps 1. Pacific Coast Highway, north of Main Street/Bolsa Avenue J. Pacific Coast Highway, between Seal Beach Boulevard and Main Street/Bolsa Avenue K. Pacific Coast Highway, south of Seal Beach Boulevard 7. Six of the twenty -one key study intersections currently operate at an unsatisfactory Level of Service (LDS) E or F during the AM and/or PM peak hour. The six locations operating at an . P g adverse LDS are the intersections of Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue, Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at the 1-405 SB Ramps, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I405 NB Ramps and Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road. The remaining fifteen key study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. 8. Four of the eleven study links currently operate below the minimum link LDS threshold of D. The Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing (Link H) currently operates at LDS E, while Pacific Coast Highway, from south of Seal Beach Boulevard to north of Main Street/Bolsa Avenue (Links I, J and K) currently operate LDS F on a daily basis. The remaining seven key study roadway segments currently operate at an acceptable LDS D or better on a daily basis. Executive Summary Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Wage ii E N G I N E E R S Existin Pius Project Traff c Impacts 9. An analysis of "Existing Pius Project" traffic conditions indicates that the Boeing Specific . � g P Plan project will adversely impact six of the twenty -one key tud intersections. The six y Y locations forecast to operate at an adverse LOS are the intersections of Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I405 SB Ramps, P, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I -405 NB Ramps and Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road. The remaining fifteen key study intersections are forecast tooperate at LOS D or better under existing plus project traffic conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours. 10. On a daily basis for . "Existing Pius Project" traf c conditions, the Boeing Specific Plan project will significantly impact one of the eleven key study segments. The Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing is projected to operate at LOS E under "existing plus J ro' ect" traffic conditions. P Year 2006 Project Impacts 11. An analysis of the potential traffic impacts of the Boeing Specific Plan project within a . P P J cumulative (Year 2006) traf is setting indicates that the project will significantly impact six of . � y P the twenty -one key study intersections. The six locations forecast too � rate at an adverse LOS ' are the intersections of Pacific Coast Highway at 2 rid Street/Westminster Avenue, Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue Seal Beach Boulevard at the 1 -405 SB Ramps, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I-405 NB Ramps and Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road. The remaining fifteen ke y � stud intersections are forecast to operate at LOS I3 or better during the AM and PM P eak hours. 12. within a near -term cumulative (Year 2006) traffic setting, the Boeing Specific Plan project will significantly impact one of the eleven key study segments. This segment of Seal Beach Boulevard between the I-405 NB Ramps and I-405 SB Ramps is forecast tooperate at LOS F under - P the near term cumulative traffic setting However, with the Tanned improvements, the P P , project impacts are completely offset and the Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossin is forecast to operate g p eat LOS C on a dally basis. Proiec.,t Impact Sensitivit�t Anal`�sis w q�rgPl�Ygq■UA� 13. The results of the traffic impact " sensitivity" analysis indicate that completion and occupancy of . P P Y the 628,000 SF of industrial floor area in PA -3 (Phase 1) of the BSC Specific Plan in the Year . r pe 2004 will have a significant impact at Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street/westnlinster Avenue Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I405 SB Ramps, P, Seal Beach Boulevard at the I405 NB Ramps and Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road five of six impacted intersections). 14. In the Year 2005, the occupancy of the proposed uses in PA4 (Phase 2 combined with the proposed development in PA -3 (Phasel) will significantly impact all six intersections. The traffic generated by the 55,000 SF, 120 -room hotel and 32,500 SF of retail/restaurant floor area proposed in PA4 and the 628;000 SF of light industrial uses in PA -3 will have a significant . gni impact at Pacific Coast Highway/2nd Street-Westminster,) Studebaker/Westminster, Seal Executive .Summary Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page iii E N G i N E E R 5 Beach/Westminster, the Seal Beach/1 -405 SB ramps, the Seal Beachl1-405 NB Rams and We tmi P Westminster/Bolsa nsterlBolsa Chica. Project Specific „IMprovements 15. To mitigate the significant traffic impacts of the Boeing Specific Plan, the proposed project can be expected to pay a "fair - share" of the improvement costs to implement the improvements at the following six intersections. • Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street - Westminster Avenue (City of Long Beach ) — Widen Pacific Coast Highway to provide separate northbound and southbound ri g ht -turn lanes, and a second southbound left-turn lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. Y • Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue (City of Long Beach) -- Restripe the existing westbound right -turn lane on Westminster Avenue to provide an option throughlright --tum lane. Widen Westminster to re- install an exclusive westbound right -turn lane. Modif� signal accordingly. + Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue (City of Seal Beach) — Restri P a Seal • n Beach Boulevard to provide a 2 d southbound left -turn lane. Widen and restri p e Westminster Avenue to provide a 2 nd eastbound and westbound left-turn lane and a 3 d eastbound through lane. Widen Seal Beach to provide a northbound right -turn lane and widen Westminster Avenue to maintain the existing westbound right -turn lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. • Seal Beach Boulevard at I405 SB Ramps (City of Seal Beach) —Widen Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing to provide a third northbound and southbound through lane, plus a northbound auxiliary lane on the bridge, and a second southbound left -turn lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. • Seal Beach Boulevard at I405 NB Ramps (City of Seal Beach) — Widen Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing to provide a third northbound and southbound through lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. • Bolsa Chica Road at Westminster Avenue (City of Seal Beach/Westminster ) -- Widen and restripe Westminster Avenue, west of Bolsa Chica, to provide an additional eastbound through lane. Restripe existing westbound right -turn lane to a westbound through lane. . g Modify traffic signal accordingly. 16. To ensure adequate access and egress to the project site is provided and impacts to through P g traffic on Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue are minimized, we recommend the following improvements/intersection enhancements. Executive Summary Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page iv E N G I N E E R S • Seal Beach Boulevard at Road A (Apollo Drive) -- As part of the proposed intersection . P Po reconstruction project, restripe Seal Beach Boulevard to provide a 150 -foot northbound left- turn lane. Widen Seal Beach Boulevard to provide a 150 -foot southbound right-turn lane with a 90 -foot transition. We recommend that the eastbound leg of Apollo Drive at Seal Po Beach Boulevard be designed to provide two eastbound left -turn lanes and one eastbound right -turn lane, and one inbound (westbound) lane. Modify and upgrade the existing traffic u P� g signal accordingly. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the Boeing Specific Plan project. • Westminster Avenue at Road A (Apollo Drive) — Modify/reconstruct existin g median on Westminster Avenue to provide a 150 -foot Westbound left -turn lane with a 90 -foot transition. Widen Westminster Avenue to provide a I00 rn -foot eastbound ri ht -tu lane with g a 90 -foot transition. We recommend that the northbound leg of Apollo Drive at Westminster Avenue be designed to provide two northbound left -turn lanes and one northbound right- turn lane, and one inbound (southbound) lane. Modify and upgrade the existing traffic signal accordingly. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the Boeing Plan project. + Proposed PA -3 "Right -turn only" Driveway at Westminster Avenue — Widen Westminster Avenue to provide a 100 -foot eastbound right -turn lane with a 90 -foot P transition. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the BSC Specific Plan . project. + Seal Beach Boulevard at Adolfo Lopez Drive -- Install a three_ haled traffic signal. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the Boeing Specific Plan project. Traffic Impact Fees 17. Based on the current City of Seal Beach Traffic Fee Program, the ro osed Boeing Specific P P g P Plan project could be assessed impact fees totaling $1,778,463.22. This approximate dollar value represents the projects fair -share contribution towards roadway nd intersection y improvement costs within the City of Seal Beach due to the additional traffic generated by new developments. 18. Based on preliminary cost estimates, the Boeing Specific Plan proj ect's fair -share contribution towards the recommended improvements at the two intersections located in the City f Long g Beach and the one intersection partially located in the City of Seal Beach and City f Westminster total project's _ y nd s $732,633.25. The projects fair share at the Pacific Coast Highway and 2 Street/Westminster Avenue intersection would be $175,822.50. At the Studebaker Road and Westminster Avenue intersection, the project's fair -share contribution totals $ At the Westminster Avenue and Bolsa Chica Road intersection, the roJ ' ect's fair -share P contribution totals $381,717.50. Executive Summary Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page v E N G I N E E R S ►'7 E•. V 4 v Lam. E N G i N E E R 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT BOEING SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS GROUP SPECIFIC PLAN Seal Beach, California INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated with the Boeing Space and Communications Group (BSC) Specific Plan, a proposed light industrial park and a small hotel /commercial center within the Boeing Space and Communication (BSC) site. The project site is generally located south of Westminster Avenue and northwest of Seal Beach Boulevard, in the City of Seal Beach, California. This report documents the findings and conclusions of the traffic impact analysis conducted by Linscott, Law &Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the potential traffic impacts associated with the BSC Specific Plan project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at twenty one (2 i) intersections within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation of the proposed project and superimposes the project - related traffic volumes on the circulation system as it currently exists. In addition, the analysis forecasts future operating conditions (based on approved and reasonably foreseeable future projects) with and without the project, and where necessary, identifies appropriate intersection improvements /mitigation measures. This traffic report is intended to satisfy the traffic impact requirements of the City of Seal Beach, and be consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the current Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections made. Existing traffic counts were conducted at twenty -one intersections (2 1) and eleven 11 roadway segments in support of detailed intersection and link capacity analyses. Prior traffic studies have been reviewed and information concerning cumulative projects . p J (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the project has been researched. Based on our research, there are seven (7) related projects in the City of Seal Beach, and two (2) planned projects in the neighboring City of Los Alamitos. These nine (9) proposed projects have been included as part of the near -term cumulative background setting. This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for a near -term traffic setting upon completion and full occupancy the BSC Specific Plan ect J ro' p in the Year 2006. Peak hour traffic forecasts for the Year 2006 horizon year have been roJ •ected P by increasing existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of two percent ear er and p Y � adding traffic volumes generated by the nine (9) related projects. The twenty one 21 [ ) key study intersections were selected for evaluation based on coordination with City staff and through application of the "1% measurable impact criteria", which is defined as a project -- related increase of one percent (1 %) or more in the existing capacity of the potential study intersection. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Reach Page I E N G I N E E R S The Volume - Capacity (V /C) characteristics and Level of Service (LOS) investigations for the AM and PM peak hour at these twenty -one key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic - related impacts associated with anticipated cumulative growth in the study area and the BSC Specific Plan project. When necessary, this report recommends intersection improvements that may be required to accommodate future traffic volumes and restore /maintain a satisfactory Level of Service, and/or mitigate the impact of the project. The key study intersections provide both regional and local access to the project site and define the extent of the study boundary for this traffic impact investigation (See Exhibit 3 for study intersections). They include: 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd St/Westminster Ave 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 3. Studebaker Road at SR -22 EB Ramps 4. Studebaker Road at SR -22 WB Ramps 5. Pacific Coast Highway at Main St/Bolsa Avenue C. Pacific Coast Highway at Seal Beach Boulevard 7. Seal Beach Boulevard at Balsa Ave /Anchor Way 8. Seal Beach Boulevard at Adolfo Lopez Drive 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at I405 NB Ramps 12. Bolsa Chica Road at Westminster Avenue 13. Seal Beach Boulevard at Road A (Apollo Drive) 14. Road A (Apollo Drive) at Westminster Avenue 15. Island Village Drive at Westminster Avenue 16. Road B at Westminster Avenue 17. Seal Beach Boulevard at Road C 18. Springdale Street at Westminster Avenue 19. Rancho Rd/Hammon Place at Westminster Ave 20.1-405 SB On Ramp at Westminster Avenue 21. Pacific Coast Highway at Loynes Drive A midblock link analysis was conducted for eleven existing roadway segments, which include: A. Westminster Avenue, east of Studebaker Road B. Westminster Avenue, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road B C. Westminster Avenue, west of Bolsa Chica Road D. Seal Beach Boulevard, north of Pacific Coast Highway E. Adolfo Lopez Drive, west of Seal Beach Boulevard F. Seal Beach Boulevard, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road C G. Seal Beach Boulevard, north of Westminster Avenue, between Saint Andrews and Golden Rain H. Seal Beach Boulevard Gvercrossing, between I-405 NB Ramps and 1-405 SB Ramps I. Pacific Coast Highway, north of Main Street/Bolsa Avenue J. Pacific Coast Highway, between Seal Beach Boulevard and Main Street/Bolsa Avenue K. Pacific Coast Highway, south of Seal Beach Boulevard Finally, as now required by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the nine (9) state route intersections within the project study area [SR -1 (Pacific Coast Highway), SR -22 (Garden Grove Freeway) and I-405 (San Diego Freeway)), were analyzed on a AM and PM peak hour basis consistent with the recently published Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, [June, 2001 ]. Included in this traffic study are: Traffic Impact analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 2 E N G I N E E R S ■ Existing traffic counts, ■ Estimated project traffic generation /distribution/assignment, Estimated cumulative projects traffic generation /distribution/assignment, * Weekday AM and PM peak hour and Daily analyses for existing (Year 2002 ) conditions • Weekday AM and PM peak hour and Daily analyses for existing plus J ro'ect conditions P ■ Weekday AM and PM peak hour and Daily analyses for Year 2006 conditions without project traffic, ■ Weekday AM and PM peak hour and Daily analyses for Year 2006 conditions with BSC project traffic, * Project Impact "Sensitivity" Evaluation, • Area -Wide Traffic Improvements, ■ Project-Specific Improvements, and • Congestion Management Program Compliance Evaluation. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Boeing Space and Communications Croup (BSC) Specific Plan project site is generally located south of Westminster Avenue and northwest of Seal Beach Boulevard, in the City of Seal Beach, Califorrnla. Exhibit 1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the g eneral location of the campus and depicts the surrounding street system. The subject property is designated as Light Industrial in the General Plan and is zoned M-11, Light Manufacturing. The existing Boeing Space and Communication site is a us light industrial campus P facility containing 1 I major structures with 1,150,000 square feet (SF) of existin g office research and development, warehouse &. distribution, manufacturing and support operations space. The P P site provides 3,132 parking spaces and approximately 50 acres of the site is currentl y vacant. Exhibit 2A presents the existing site plan for the Boeing Space and Communication site which illustrates the existing BSC Specific Plan access locations, on -site parking and circulation layout, . P g and building locations. As shown, site access from Westminster Avenue is now provided b two . P y signalized driveways. At the discretion of the BSC Croup, the four existin g unsignalized alized site driveways on Westminster, which are restricted to "right -turns only", have been temporarily P Y closed. Site access from Seal Beach Boulevard is now provided by two signalized driveways and � y one unsignalized driveway; two unsignalized driveways have been closed temporarily b the BSC Group. P y � The BSC Specific Plan provides for four (4) planning areas within the Property, with the Project consisting of development in all four Planning Areas. Table 1 provides a summary pf existing and anticipated uses, with a breakdown for each planning area. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seat Beach Page 3 mowpuop zoaz -Lz- w woz:LI din oaP'flLo*9££z16►P/Kzzoz\omz\� Lw V3 Ls - r -d . 'Q 1, _46 -ski Aw OF .� N .0p .� . � � �. of rt or :�- �• .+rl t 4 ;RAIN s • ■ ss •sc somM_ _j - Ln 1 . _ �' Z}��j �- • ".R�y. �'_ r "� .- ....ri; l� '..fir - • - � •` w - ♦��ry �3 - ~ }' F3�73•��Y�ti�� i•�yS -,ti µ� sue.'.. -. . •� „[,• `t`- .!�� .± .tom'+': -'I. �•r �• �•►•. - 1pti At _r .*Sk` �iYir '.. i!r;:.i4•R•',ws�S,r.:. _•. _= n •� •.y�••��y�` [} tiN per% _4 ran' y_.� Ab 1 Aim - , - '~ I Ali - Ab -'' Ift 1 14 a 4V So f 1k.. .4 '0� N'. Ph' 1 hr , Q LLJ m LLLJI V / U z Q J a. i U W a_ V) 0- D 0 r1 V [/) m V3 z 0 Q C3 z D o w 0 m Q Q W Q C. ti! W z M w mp W J 0 th Z 0 Z Z Z W Z z W t� Z ��U W CMD E��f T 1 - - - - •� _ - , _ OD r`.. w a' e .K � _ • _ 2 rho � ►. - :� "• � � �''!' � ••• • any -�. '• - _+yu� A' •, �} - •r - - .. _ _ - -s f. sue'" _ � �i7 •r /•SLY. y -- •. - .l •. 7• -•r, •' ^'' .y•, -•.Sa yr:` Vii• �- 93 A 30 Lw V3 Ls - r -d . 'Q 1, _46 -ski Aw OF .� N .0p .� . � � �. of rt or :�- �• .+rl t 4 ;RAIN s • ■ ss •sc somM_ _j - Ln 1 . _ �' Z}��j �- • ".R�y. �'_ r "� .- ....ri; l� '..fir - • - � •` w - ♦��ry �3 - ~ }' F3�73•��Y�ti�� i•�yS -,ti µ� sue.'.. -. . •� „[,• `t`- .!�� .± .tom'+': -'I. �•r �• �•►•. - 1pti At _r .*Sk` �iYir '.. i!r;:.i4•R•',ws�S,r.:. _•. _= n •� •.y�••��y�` [} tiN per% _4 ran' y_.� Ab 1 Aim - , - '~ I Ali - Ab -'' Ift 1 14 a 4V So f 1k.. .4 '0� N'. Ph' 1 hr , Q LLJ m LLLJI V / U z Q J a. i U W a_ V) 0- D 0 r1 V [/) m V3 z 0 Q C3 z D o w 0 m Q Q W Q C. ti! W z M w mp W J 0 th Z 0 Z Z Z W Z z W t� Z ��U W .. rr . •r _r •.. r. ■a r i ti �� ,.ate � � r�� ► � �1 � _ � •mow `!..!� -=��• :: 1p SA e.�` ....��r -...+ RW- ` � ' � � iii � � _ ��. +•, fir,, +e�y,�ri t f 5 V a CQ am w� H E"r W H Q Z J "r T 1 � U U WWW 1.1.i a N CL 0 Ax 0 U N m N Z a _V 2 0 U AS W U a V) z 4] m Lai z� to W Z z • va 'c +' -- Z3 a E N G! N E E R 5 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION' Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Planning Area Budding Floor Area ('A) Land Use (SF) Existin-e Land Uses 1 General Office $05,000 SF 2 General Office 1451000 SF 2 Manufacturing 1559000 SF 2 Research &. Development 45,004 SF Total Existing Floor Area — PA 1 & 2 151509000 SF Pro ..Rosed Lana Uses 1 General Light Industrial 345,000 SF 2 General Light Industrial 3451,000 SF 3 General Light Industrial 62$,000 SF Subtotal — PA 2 & 3 9733000 SF 4 Hotel with 120 rooms 55,000 SF Retail /Restaurant 32,500 SF Subtotal — PA 4 875500 SF Total Proposed Floor Area — PA 1, 2, 3 & 4 1,4059500 SF Existing Floor Area to be Demolished — PA 2 -345,000 SF Total Floor Area for the BSC Specific Plan F2,210,500 SF Source. Site Plan, prepared by DeRevere & Associates. Existing office, manufacturing and research and development floor area within Planning Area 2 will be demolished to accommodate the future development in this Planning Area. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 6 E N G I N E E R S Planning Area I (PA-1) is approximately 41 acres and consists of the core BSC campus and is reserved for existing Boeing Space and Communications operations and land uses. As shown wn in Table 1, PA -1 currently supports 805,000 SF of office floor area that will be maintained. The BSC Specific Plan designates this area for the continued operations of the BSC facilities es with requirements not to exceed the campus's existing floor area. Since BSC's existin g campus-wide P floor area now totals 1,150,000 SF, the BSC Specific Plan ro oses that u 345 P P p to 345,000 SF of additional floor area be allowed within PA -1. For the u oses of this traffic analysis, ' PrP �t�s assumed that the additional floor area in PA- I will consist of g eneral light industrial uses. g PA -2 currently supports 345,000 SF that consists of 145,000 SF of space, 155 p 155,000 SF of manufacturing, and 45,000 SF of research and development. According o Boeing Sac g g P e and Communications, the existing office space in PA- I is currently 80% to 85% occupied, whit e So % of the office space, 20% of the manufacturing floor area, and 100% of the research and development space in PA -2 is occupied. As shown in Table 1, a total of 973,000 SF of light industrial floor area is ro osed in PA -2 and P P PA -3. PA -4 is proposed to be developed with a 55,000 SF, 120 -room hotel and 321,500 SF of retail /restaurant floor area. To accommodate the new building loor area in PA -2 345 000 SF f g o existing office, manufacturing and research and development floor area of the Boeing an g ace p d Communications site will be demolished. The BSC Specific Plan project is expected to be completed in four major phases with P � or p an anticipated buildout by the Year 2006. The four major phases consists of the following: g • Phase I: Construction of a 628,000 SF industrial park in PA -3 by the Year 2004 • Phase II: Construction of 55,000 SF hotel with 120 rooms and 32,500 SF of retail /restaurant space in PA -4 by Year 2005 ■ Phase III: Demolition of existing floor area in PA -2 and construction of 345,000 SF of light industrial floor area by Year 2006 • Phase N: Construction of up to 345,000 SF of new light industrial floor area in PA -I by Year 2006 Exhibit 2B presents the Conceptual Land Use Plan for the BSC Specific Plan project. As shown in Exhibit 2B, access to PA -2 and PA -3 of the BSC Specific Plan will be provided the existing signalized intersections of Road A (Apollo Drive) at Seal Beach Boulevard and Road A (Apollo . Drive) at Westminster Avenue, with secondary access to PA -3 provided b a proposed " - - _ P Y P P d nght turn only driveway on Westminster Avenue and a proposed driveway along Adolfo Lopez Drive. The exi. sting signalized and unsignalized driveways (now open) along Seal Beach Boulevar d and Westminster Avenue will provide access to PA- I. For PA4, it is envisioned that right-turn . only driveways located along Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard will rovide access s to small hotel/commercial center. However, given the site plan of this part of the BSC Specific Plan is still evolving, site access has not been determined at this time. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Reach Page 7 cvlz J E N G i N E E R 5 EXISTING STREET NETWORK Regional access to the project site is primarily provided by the San Diego Freeway (I 405), which generally runs in a northwest to southeast orientation in the vicinity of the project site. This 8 -1ane facility is a major highway that extends through Orange County and links Seal Beach with neighboring communities of Westminster, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, and Costa Mesa, as well as more distant locations, including Los Angeles and San Diego. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOB lanes are provided on the I405 Freeway throughout Orange County. Primary access to the project site is provided via the Seal Beach Boulevard/I -405 Interchange. The principal local network of streets serving the BSC Specific Plan J ro'ect consist of Seal P Beach Boulevard, Westminster Avenue, and Pacific Coast Highway. The followin g discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. These descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Seal Beach Boulevard is a north - south, six lane divided arterial that borders the BSC Specific . P Plan project site to the east. Seal Beach Boulevard is designated as a Major Arterial Highway on the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) and the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. At the 1405 Dvercrossing and south of Lam son Avenue Seal Beach P a Boulevard provides four travel lanes for through traffic, plus an auxiliary ram e lane. From P merge the 1-405 Interchange south to Pacific Coast Highway, Seal Beach Boulevard P rovides six travel lanes. Curbside parking is not allowed on Seal Beach Boulevard. The posted speed limit on Seal Beach Boulevard is 45 miles (mph) er hour p north of Westminster Avenue, 50 mph between Westminster Avenue and Adolfo Lopez Drive and 40 mph south of Adolfo Lopez Drive. According to recent traffic counts conducted in February and March 2002, daily traffic on Seal Beach Boulevard ranges between 20,666 vehicles er day P Y and 33,790 vpd on a "typical" weekday. Daily traffic on the Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossin g totals approximately 42,411 vpd. Westminster Avenue is an east -west oriented highway, which borders the B SC Specific Plan project site to the north. Westminster Avenue is designated as a Prima Arterial in the • Primary County MPAH and the City's Circulation Element. It is currently a four -lane divided roadway adjacent to the project site. Parking is not permitted along any section of this roadway n i the study area. The posted speed limit on Westminster Avenue is 40 mph west of Seal Beach Boulevard and 55 mph east of Seal Beach Boulevard. West of Studebaker Road, the posted speed limit is 50 mph. P p Weekday daily traffic on Westminster Avenue ranges between 231204 vP d, west of Seal Beach Boulevard, and 24,137 vpd, west of Bolsa Chica Road. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 9 E N G I N E E R S Pacific Coast Highway is a major state route that runs along the California Coast through Orange County and southern Los Angeles County. In the study area, Pacific Coast Highway has a north -south orientation. North of the San Gabriel River, Pacific Coast Highway is a six -lane divided mayor arterial, providing three travel lanes m each direction. Curbside parking is not . P g allowed on PCH within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit north of the San Gabriel River is 50 mph. PCH, south of the San Gabriel River is a four lane, divided roadway that is designated as a Primary Highway in the County MPAH and the City of Seal Beach Circulation Element. The posted speed limit on this section of PCH is 40 mph. Based on recent traffic counts collected in November 2002, daily traffic on Pacific Coast Highway g Y between 41,920 vpd and 45,422 vpd on a "typical" weekday Exhibit 3 presents an inventory of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. The number of travel lanes and intersection controls for the key area intersections are identified. EXISTING AREA TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the twenty -one key study intersections were obtained from traffic counts conducted by Transportation Studies Inc, in March 2002 and September 2002. Exhibits 4 and 5 present the existing AM and PM P eak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections for a "typical" weekday, respectively. Appendix A contains the detailed manual turning movement count sheets for the key study intersections. Existing estimated weekday average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on the eleven existing key roadway segments listed below are presented in Exhibit 6. A. Westminster Avenue, east of Studebaker Road B. Westminster Avenue, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road B C. Westminster Avenue, west of Bolsa Chica Road D. Seal Beach Boulevard, north of Pacific Coast Highway E. Adolfo Lopez Drive, west of Seal Beach Boulevard F. Seal Beach Boulevard, between Road A (Apollo Drive) and Road C G. Seal Beach Boulevard, between Saint Andrews and Golden Rain H. Seal Beach Boulevard overcrossing, between 1-405 NB Ramps and 1-405 SB Ramps I. Pacific Coast Highway, north of Main S treet/B o l sa Avenue J. Pacific Coast Highway, between Seal Beach Boulevard and Main Street/Bolsa Avenue K. Pacific Coast Highway, south of Seal Beach Boulevard Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 10 11 z�m 0 Q i� 2 J a� 0 LLJ "Z Q W CL guo a Ar- a L7 a x 0 cr m m 111 ml z 0 V Z M 0 . V W V a N V Z W 0 La 0 Z L/f � 2 D N �;5 R O wZ Z L&- 2 0-M � �W 2 G? pY ,S ;n z o a t � at Ir C40 a z 0 flf uj o z i� IL iJf � t � i Lo S W 41 0 CL U p i �� CL w Ln � av x x LLJ N � � ? Q44Z V � „ z3� 3SV 12 . 2 V_ y W U W yLAJ 0.1z r � � a Q; U H �+- L3 W D N x a xx M d� aU V) m .. En z x� � z W � O U w V d a V) 0 z W D m t Z U F Q � z 0 z V) w a 1 .-i to W U .�+ W E-4 m r-a W Z Q J w a V F � U Da m t� W aEn �m cn z 00 z� a U V� z C3 LAI V a CL V) c� z W m i.l Z w ❑ ~ v z z w J J L7 z c 2 w U W f..,t CO W H LI= U z w a Q; V U >-* W a R� C7 0 U m m z 4 V_ z a U W U a c7 z_ m v Lai n U Z Q y� t�1'1 w V "V Z _ in w Z �3� �5o E N G I N E E R S EXISTING INTERSECTION CONDITIONS Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICLD Method of Analysis In conformance with the City of Seal Beach and County of Orange CMP requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis. The ICU technique estimates the volume to capacity (V /C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time, and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. Per City of Seal Beach requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for left -turn, through, and right -turn lanes, and dual left turn capacity of 3,400 vph. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.05 (5 %) was added to each Level of Service calculation. For intersections within the City of Long Beach, the ICU calculations utilize a lane capacity of 11600 vph for left -turn, through and right -turn lanes; a dual left turn capacity of 2,880 vph, and a clearance interval of 0.10. The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The ICLJ value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range, as shown in Table 2. In the City of Seal Beach, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. In the City of Long Beach, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the peak commute hours, or the current LOS if the existing LOS is worse than LOS D (i.e. LOS E of F). LOS D is also the minimum acceptable condition utilized by the City of Westminster. The ICU method of analysis and LOS concept are described in more detail in Appendix B. Appendix B also presents the ICU/LOS calculations for all key signalized intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group SpecVic Plan, Seal Beach Page 15 E N G I N E F R 5 TABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS' Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Level of Intersection Capacity Service (LDS) Utili ration Value ICS Level of Service Descri Lion A 0.00-0-60 Free Flow; Very low delay, less than 5.0 seconqLper vehicle. B 0.61-0-70 Rural Design; Delay in the range of 5.1 to 15 seconds er vehicle. C 0.71-0.80 Urban Design; Delay in the range of 15.1 to 25 seconds per vehicle. D 0.81-0.90 Maximum Urban Design; Delay ranges from 25.1 to 40 seconds per vehicle. E 0.91 -1.00 Capacity; Delay ranges from 40.1 to 60 seconds per vehicle. F 1.0 1 Forced Flow; Delay in excess of 60 Seconds per vehicles. 2 See A end'x B for detailed explanation of ICU method and LOS Concept. Traffic Impact Analpis ,deport Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 16 E N G I N E E R S Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) The methodology in Chapter 17 of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 for stop controlled . P intersections was utilized for the analysis of the two (2) unsignalized study intersections evaluated in this report. This methodology estimates the average control dela y for each of the subject movements and determines the level of service for e each movement. The overall avers - g control delay measured in seconds per vehicle, and level of service is then calculated for the entire intersection based on the following equation:3 DAIVA1 +RA2VAZ +DA3V 3 +DA4V 4 D1 VAJ + V&2 + VA,3 + VA,4 where DA,X = Average approach total control delay on approach x (sec /veh); and VA,X = volume or flow rate on approach x (veh/hr) The HCM control delay value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range, as shown in Table 3. Appendix B also presents the HCM/LOS calculations for the two (2) unsignalized study intersections. Road«vay Link Capacity Analysis In addition to detailed intersection analyses, daily operating conditions for eleven roadway segments (links) have been investigated according to the volume -to- capacity (V /C) of each link. The V/C relationship is used to estimate the LOS of the roadway segment with the volume based on 24 -hour traffic count data and the capacity based on the MPAH classification of each roadway. Table 2 above presented the six levels of service corresponding to V/C ratios. LOS E or F conditions are considered deficient for purposes of the roadway segment analysis. The roadway link capacity of each street classification according to the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) is presented in Table 4. As presented in Table 4, the roadway capacities, in Vehicles Per Day (VPD), are only shown for the street classifications from Principal Arterials on down, which apply to the key study roadway links. 3 Source. Highxaay Capacity! Manual 2000, Chapter 17 (UnsignaIized Intersections). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plait, Seal Beach Page 17 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIGNS4 Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Level of Control Delay Per Vehicle Service (LOS) Iseconds/vehicle) Level of Service Descri tlon A < 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and < 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and < 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and < 35.0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 and < 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion IV Source: Hi ghwa y , Capacity, Manual 1000, Lhapter 17 (IJnsignahzed intersections ). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space cue Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 18 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 4 ROADWAY LINK CAPACITIES5 Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Source: Guidance for Administration of the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, dated November 1995 and Amended A ril 1998. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 19 Level of Service Criteria with associated Facility Number Roadway Ca aci vehicles per day) Values Type of Lanes A $ C D E F [Prnincipal 8 -lanes divided 4 51000 52,500 60,000 67,500 75,000 - Major 6-lanes divided 33,900 39A00 45,000 50,600 56,300 - Primary 4-lanes divided 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 371500 - Secondary 4 -lanes undivided 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 - commuter 2-lanes Undivided 7 ,500 57800 103000 11,300 12,500 - Source: Guidance for Administration of the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, dated November 1995 and Amended A ril 1998. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 19 E N G I N E E R S Existing Intersection Level of Service Results Table S summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the twen -»one key Y study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. Review of Table 5 indicates that based on the ICU or HCM method of analysis and the City's LOS criteria six of the twenty-one key study intersections currently operate at an unacceptable Level of . P Service (LOS E or F) during the AM and/or PM peak hours. The six locations operating at an P g unacceptable LOS are as follows: The remaining fifteen key study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better durin g both the AM and PM peak hours. Existing Roadway Link Level of Service Results Table 6 summarizes the existing service level calculations for the eleven existing tud roadway � Y Y links based on existing 24 -hour weekday traffic volumes and current roadway geometry. As � �Y shown, four of the study links currently operate below the minimum link LOS threshold of D. Based on the V/C method of analysis, the Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossin (Link gH) currently operates at LOS E. The segments of Pacific Coast Highway, from south of Seal Beach Boulevard to north of Main Street/Bolsa Avenue (Links I, J and K) current/ operate LOS F on a Y P daily basis. The remaining seven analyzed links currently operate at LOS A or B on a daily basis. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 20 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICU/LOS ICU/Los 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2"d St/Westminster Ave 0.9311E 1,000/E 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 0,9371E 0-818/D 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 0.9261E 0,907/E 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 SB Ramps 0.888lD 0,972/E 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at I-405 NB Ramps 0.706/C 0.989/E 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road 0.9501E 0.76910 SOLD ICU/LOS values indicate unacceptable service levels The remaining fifteen key study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better durin g both the AM and PM peak hours. Existing Roadway Link Level of Service Results Table 6 summarizes the existing service level calculations for the eleven existing tud roadway � Y Y links based on existing 24 -hour weekday traffic volumes and current roadway geometry. As � �Y shown, four of the study links currently operate below the minimum link LOS threshold of D. Based on the V/C method of analysis, the Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossin (Link gH) currently operates at LOS E. The segments of Pacific Coast Highway, from south of Seal Beach Boulevard to north of Main Street/Bolsa Avenue (Links I, J and K) current/ operate LOS F on a Y P daily basis. The remaining seven analyzed links currently operate at LOS A or B on a daily basis. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 20 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 5 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY6 Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach 6 Appendix B contains ICU/LOS and HCMILOS calculation worksheets for all study intersections. BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach, City of Westminster, and City of Long Beach LOS standards Traffic is Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications. Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 21 Time Control Ke Intersections Period Type ICU/HCM LOS 1' Pacific Coast Highway at AM 8� Traffic 0.931 E 2nd St/Westminster Ave PM Si al 1.000 E 2 Studebaker Road at AM 3� Traffic 0.937 E Westminster Avenue PM Signal 0.818 D 3 Studebaker Road at AM 3� Traffic 0.415 A SR -22 EB Ramps PM Si al 0.695 B 4 Studebaker Road at AM 3� Traffic 0.484 A SR -22 WB Ramps PM Signal 0.830 D 5 Pacific Coast Highway at AM 5� Traffic 0.624 B Main Street/Bolsa Avenue PM Signal 0.724 C 6 Pacific Coast Highway at AM 6� Traffic 0.771 C Seal Beach Boulevard PM Signal 0.769 C 7 Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 8� Traffic 0.340 A Bolsa Avenue /Anchor Way PM Si nal 0.394 A g Seal Beach Boulevard at AM One -Way 0.26 s/v A Adolfo Lopez Drive PM Sto Control 0.58 s/v A 9 Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 8� Traffic 0.926 E Westminster Avenue PM Signal 0.907 E 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 6� Traffic 0.888 D I-405 SB Ramps PM Si al 0.972 E 6 Appendix B contains ICU/LOS and HCMILOS calculation worksheets for all study intersections. BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach, City of Westminster, and City of Long Beach LOS standards Traffic is Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications. Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 21 E w G f N E E R S TABLE 5 (cont.) EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS of SERVICES Y' Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach I -405 NB Ramps 1 �. Bolsa Chica Road at Westnninster Avenue Seal Beach Boulevard at 1 Road A (Apollo Drive) 14. Road A (Apollo Drive) a Westminster Avenue 15. Island Village Drive at Westnunster Avenue M. Road B at Westmunster Avenue Seal Beach Boulevard at 1 �' Road C 1$ Springdale Street at Westminster Avenue 19. Rancho Rd/Hamon Placc Westminster Avenue 20. I-405 SB on Ramp at Westminster Avenue 21. Pacific Coast Highway a Loynes Drive Time Control Period Type ICUlHCM LOS AM 6� Traffic 0.706 TF PM Signal 0.989 E AM 8� Traffic 01950 E PM I Si al 0.769 C AM 3� Traffic 0.281 A PM Signal 0.310 A r AM 3� Traffic 0.442 A PM Signal 0.469 A AM 2� Traffic 0.512 A PM Signal 0.528 A AM 3� Traffic 0.457 A PM Signal 0.509 A AM 3� Traffic 0.276 A PM Signal 0.311 A AM 8� Traffic 0.492 A PM Si al 0.710 C at AM 5� Traffic 0.296 A PM Si al 0.432 A AM No Control 0.56 s/v A PM 0.95 s/v A AM 5� Traffic 0.817 D PM Signal 0.818 D '7 Appendix B contains ICU/LOS and HCMILOS calculation worksheets for all study intersections. BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach, City of Westminster, and City of Long Beach LOS standards Traffic Impact Analysis Deport Boeing Space A Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 22 Kel I Intersections 11 S Seal Beach Boule7ard�at Time Control Period Type ICUlHCM LOS AM 6� Traffic 0.706 TF PM Signal 0.989 E AM 8� Traffic 01950 E PM I Si al 0.769 C AM 3� Traffic 0.281 A PM Signal 0.310 A r AM 3� Traffic 0.442 A PM Signal 0.469 A AM 2� Traffic 0.512 A PM Signal 0.528 A AM 3� Traffic 0.457 A PM Signal 0.509 A AM 3� Traffic 0.276 A PM Signal 0.311 A AM 8� Traffic 0.492 A PM Si al 0.710 C at AM 5� Traffic 0.296 A PM Si al 0.432 A AM No Control 0.56 s/v A PM 0.95 s/v A AM 5� Traffic 0.817 D PM Signal 0.818 D '7 Appendix B contains ICU/LOS and HCMILOS calculation worksheets for all study intersections. BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach, City of Westminster, and City of Long Beach LOS standards Traffic Impact Analysis Deport Boeing Space A Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 22 '7 Appendix B contains ICU/LOS and HCMILOS calculation worksheets for all study intersections. BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach, City of Westminster, and City of Long Beach LOS standards Traffic Impact Analysis Deport Boeing Space A Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 22 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 6 EXISTING ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE SUMMARY Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 23 No. of MPA.H Existing Year 2002 Existin _Traffic Existing Arterial Capacity Daily VJC oadway Segment Lanes Classification at LOSE Volume Ratio to LOS A. Westminster Avenue, Primary elo Studebaker Road 4D Arterial 37,500 23,066 0.615 B B. ,'Westminster Avenue, Primary Between Apollo Drive/Road B 4D Arteri al 37,500 23,204 0.619 B C. Westminster Avenue, Primary w/o Bolsa Chico Road 4D Arterial D. Seal Beach Boulevard, Major n,lo Pacific Coast Highway 6D Arterial 55,300 20,656 0.357 A E. Adolfo Lopez Drive, Local w/o Seal Beach Boulevard 2U Coll ector 125500 1,389 0.111 A F. Seal Beach Boulevard, Major Between Apollo Drive/Road C 6D Arterial 56,300 26,975 0.479 A G. Seal Beach Boulevard, Major Between St Andrews /Golden Rai 6D Art Arterial 56,300 33,790 0.600 A H. Seal Beach Boulevard, Major Between 1-405 NB &. SB Rams 5D Arterial 463875 42,411 0.905 E I. Pacific Coast Highway, Primary No Main StreetlBolsa Avenue 4D Arteria 1 371500 449684 1.192 F J. Pacific Coast Highway, Primary N No Seal Beach Boulevard 4D Arterial al 37,500 45,422 1.211 F K. Pacific Coast Highway, Primary sla Seal Beach Boulevard 4D Arterial 37,500 41,920 1.067 F Notes: • D =divided arterial • U = undivided arterial • BOLD V/C ratios & LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Seal Beach criteria. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 23 E N G I N E E R S TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the BSC Specific Plan J ro'ect a P multi -step process has been utilized. The first step is traffic generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the ect J ro' P development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution that identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel P atterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to stud y area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time that may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operatin g conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site - specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one -way vehicular movements either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation factors and equations used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the Sixth Edition of Trip Generation, ublished b the P y Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington, D.C., 1997. The approach PP roach for estimating the trip generation potential of the BSC Specific Plan was based on information published in Chapter 3 -- Guidelines for Estimating Trip generation of Trip Generation Handbook, ITE October 1998 and input from the City of Seal Beach. Table 7A summarizes the trip generation rates and equations that were considered in forecasting the trip generation potential of the existing land uses at the BSC campus and the impact of the proposed BSC Specific Plan project. Trips generated by the, existing development were estimated using ITE Land Use 140: Manufacturing, ITE Land Use 710: General Office Building, g and ITE Land Use 760: Research & Development. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing space c& Communications Group Specific Flan, Seal Beach Page 24 E N G! N E F R 5 TABLE 7A PROTECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATESIEQUATIONS8 Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach ITE Land Use Code Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak dour Project Description 2 -Way In Out Total In Out Total • 312: Business Hotel T = 7.468 (X) — 101.921 T = 1.183 (X) — 89.275 50% 88% 50% 12% ElOccu led Room 7.27 0.34 0.24 0.58 0.37 0.25 0.62 • 831:Quality Restaurant • 140: Manufacturing (TE/1000 SF) Daily AM Peak T = 3.881 (X) -- 20.702 T = 0.83 1 (X -- 28.88 50% 77% 50% 23% E11000 SF 89.95 0.76 4.05 0.81 5.02 2.47 7.49 • 832:High- Turnover Restaurant Ln (T) = 0.768 Ln (X) + 3.654 Ln (T) =0.797 Ln(X) + 1.558 50% 88% 50% 12% • 760: Research & Development (TE/1000 SF) PM Peak Daily AM Peak (TE/ 1000 SF } 130.34 4.82 4.45 9.27 6.52 4.34 10.86 ITE Land Use Code Time Period E uations/Rates Percent Entering Percent Exiting • 110: General Light Industrial (TE/1000 SF) Daily AM Peak T = 7.468 (X) — 101.921 T = 1.183 (X) — 89.275 50% 88% 50% 12% PM Peak T = 1.433.-(X) — 163.421 12% 88% • 140: Manufacturing (TE/1000 SF) Daily AM Peak T = 3.881 (X) -- 20.702 T = 0.83 1 (X -- 28.88 50% 77% 50% 23% PM Peak T = 0.776 (X) -- 12.885 36% 64% • 710: General Office Building (TE/1000 SF) Daily AM Peak Ln (T) = 0.768 Ln (X) + 3.654 Ln (T) =0.797 Ln(X) + 1.558 50% 88% 50% 12% • 760: Research & Development (TE/1000 SF) PM Peak Daily AM Peak T = 1.121(X) + 79.295 Ln (T) = 0.824 Ln (X) + 3.135 Ln(T) = 0.875 Ln(X) + 0.883 17 %/0 50% 83% 83% 50% 17% • 820: Shopping Center (TE/ 1000 SF) PM Peak Daily AM Peak Ln(T -- 0.832 Ln (X} + 1.06 Ln (T) = 0.634 Ln (X) + 5.866 Ln(T) = 0.596 Ln X + 2.329 15% 85% 50% 61% 50% 39% PM Peak Ln(T) = 0.660 Ln(X) + 3.403 48% 52% TEII000 SF = Trip ends per 1000 square -feet (SF) of development Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (1997). Note: Daily traffic forecasts rounded to the nearest ten (I0) vehicles. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing ,Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 25 E N G I N E E R S The trip generation potential of the proposed development of the BSC Specific Plan were . estimated using ITE Land Use 110: General Light Industrial, ITE Land Use 312: Business Hotel, ITE Land Use 820: Shopping Center, ITE Land Use 831: Quality Restaurant and ITE band Use 832: High- Turnover Restaurant. Tables 7B and 7G present the trip generation forecast for the existing uses and the proposed land uses of the BSC Specific Plan. Review of the top portion of Table 7B indicates that the existing uses within PA -1 and PA -2 of the BSC Specific Plan have an existing trip generation potential of 9,470 daily trips with 1,400 trips ( 1,214 inbound, 186 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 1,399 trips (259 inbound, 1,140 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Planning Area 1 Review of the middle portion of Table 7B indicates that the 345,000 SF of eneral light g g industrial uses proposed within PA -1 is forecast to generate 2,470 daily trips with 319 (281 tri p s inbound, 38 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 331 trips (41 inbound, 291 outbound produced in the PM peak hour. Planning Area 2 The lower portion of Table 7B summarizes the trip generation forecast for PA -2. As shown, the 345,000 SF of general light industrial uses proposed within PA -2 is forecast to g enerate 2,470 daily trips with 319 trips produced in the AM peak hour and 331 trips produced in the PM P eak To provide a conservative and worse case analysis, a reduction in the trip generation otential for P proposed uses in PA -2 has been projected for only the existing occupied floor area that will be demolished within PA -2. As shown, the occupied manufacturing, office and R &D floor area in PA -2 have a combined trip generation potential of 1,526 daily trips, 136 AM eak hour trips and P P 151 PM peak hour trips. Comparison of these figures with that of the proposed uses in PA -2 indicates that the construction of 345,000 SF of general light industrial uses is forecast to result in an additional 944 daily trips with 106 trips produced in the AM s eak hour and 120 trips p produced in the PM peak hour. Planning Area 3 The upper of Table 7C shows that the 628,000 SF of general light industrial uses ro osed within P P PA -3 is forecast to generate 4,590 daily trips with 654 trips (576 unbound, 78 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 737 trips (88 inbound, 649 outbound) P roduced in the PM peak hour. The potential truck traffic generated by the proposed light industrial uses in PA -1, PA -2 and PA -3 have been converted to its Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) based on the methodolo gy in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000. For the purposes of this analysis, truck trips were converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE) using a factor of 2.0 to reflect the impact of large trucks (i.e., 18- wheel w13-50). The number of PCE's generated by the proposed light industrial facilities of the BSC Specific Plan are estimated to be ten percent (10 %). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Sear Beach Page 26 ENGINEERS TABLEM PROJECT -TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST' Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach ITE Land Use Code Daily AM Peak Hour P.M Peak Maur Project Description 2 -Way In out Total In out Total Exisrin �„ U_ ses • 140: Manufacturing (155,000 SF in PA -2) 580 77 23 100 39 68 107 • 710: General office Building (805,000 SF in PA-1 } 6590 861 121 982 169 813 982 • 710: General office Building (145,000 SF in PA -2 ) 11770 220 30 250 41 201 242 • 760: Research &Development (45,000 SF in PA -2) 530 56 12 68 10 Sg ,fig Total Trip Generation for Existin Uses 9,470 1,214 186 19400 259 11140 1,399 Pro used Develo meat PA-1 (Phase IV— fear 2006) • 110: General Light Industrial (345,000 SF) 21470 281 38 319 40 291 331 PA -1 Trip Generation in PCE 21720 309 42 351 44 3201 364 Pit -2 (Phase III —Year 2006) • 110: General Light Industrial (345,000 SF) 2,470 281 38 319 40 291 331 PA -2 Trip Generation in__PCE10 29720 309 42 351 44 320 364 PA -2 ffripCredits- occupied SF` • 140: Manufacturing (31,000 SF in PA-2: 20%) -116 -15 -5 -24 -8 -14 -22 • 710: General Office Building (72,500 SF in PA -2: 50% } -880 -110 -15 -125 -21 -loo -121 • 760: Research & Development (45,000 SF in PA -2: 100% ) -530 -56 -12 -68 -10 -58 -68 Total Vehicular Tri p Credit for PA -2 -1,526 - 181 - 32 - 213 - 39 -172 -211 Trip Credit for PA -2 in PCE -1,540 1 -183 -32 -215 -40 -173 -213 Net Vehicular Trip Generation Potential for PA -2 100 6 146 1 119 120 Net Trip Generation for PA -2 in PCE 0 1,180 126 10 136 4 147 151 Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (1997). Note: Daily traffic forecasts rounded to the nearest ten (lo) vehicles. iD Assumes Truck Traffic is approximately 10% of the total traffic generated by Light industrial facilities. Truck Trips were converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE) in this analysis using a factor of 2.0 to reflect the impact of large-(18-wheel WB- 50).trucks. Traffic Impact Analysis Report µ Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Reach Page 2 7 E N G I N E E R S TABLE X PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST (continued)" Boeing Space & Communication Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach ITE Land Use Code daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project Description 2-Way In out Total In Out 'Totai PA -3 Phase I -- Year .2004) • 11 D: General Light Industrial (628,000 SF} 4 7590 576 78 654 88 549 737 PA -3 Trip Generation in PCE 5,050 634 85 719 97 714 811 PA-4 (Phase H -- Year 2005) • 312:Business Hotel (120 Rooms) 870 41 29 70 44 30 74 • 520: Shopping Center (12,500 SF) 1 3790 28 18 46 76 83 159 • 531:Quality Restaurant ( 10,000 SF) 900 7 1 8 50 25 75 • 832:High- Turnover Restaurant (10,000 SF} 48 45 93 65 43 108 Trip Generation Potential for Planning Area 4 4,860 124 93 217 235 1$1 416 Pass -by Adjustment 13 --- - - -- ---- --- -76 -58 Net Trip Generation for Planning .434 Area 4 49860 124 93 217 159 123 282 BSC Specific Plan Trip Generation Summary Trip Generation for existing uses to remain in Plannin Area 1 g 6,594 861 121 982 169 813 982 Net Trip Generation for Planning Areas 1, 2, 3 & 4 in PCE 15,350 11376 263 11639 344 1,477 12821 Trip Credit for PA -2 in PCE -11540 -183 -32 1 -21 5 -40 -173 -213 "Total Net Trip Generation for the BSC Specific Plan 20,400 21054 352 27405 473 29117 29590 11 Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (1997). Note: Daily traffic forecasts rounded to the nearest ten (10) vehicles. 12 Assumes Truck Traffic is approximately 10% of the total traffic generated by Light Industrial facilities. Truck Trips were converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE) in this analysis using a factor of 2.0 to reflect the impact of large (18 -wheel WB -50) trucks. 13 Source: Trip Generation Handbook, published ITE October 1998. To account for trips which come directly y from the everyday traffic stream (i.e. existing traffic on Seal Beach Boulevard, and Westminster Avenue), the following Average Pass -by Trip Percentages were utilized in this report to estimate pm peak hour pass -by trips: Retail Shops:-34% uali Restaurant: 44% High-turnover Restaurant: 43% Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 28 E N G I N E E R S Hence, the proposed uses in PA -1 and PA -2 are each forecast to result in a total PCE of 2,720 daily trip ends, with 351 PCE trip ends generated during the AM peak hour and 364 PCE trip ends produced in the PM peak hour. The light industrial uses proposed in PA -3 are projected to . P J generate a total PCE of 5,050 trip ends, with 719 PCE trip ends generated during the AM P eak hour and 811 PCE trip ends produced in the PM peak hour. The potential traffic impact of the project PCE trip totals for PA -1 and PA -3, and the net additional project PCE totals in for PA -2 are evaluated in the traffic analysis section of this report. Planning Area 4 The middle upper portion of Table 7C shows that proposed 120 -room hotel in PA -4 is forecast to generate 870 daily trips, with 70 trips (41 inbound, 29 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour . P and 74 trips (44 inbound, 30 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. The 32,500 SF of retail and restaurant floor area proposed within PA -4 is forecast to generate 3,990 daily trips s with 147 trips (83 inbound, 64 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 342 trips (191 inboun d, 151 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Combined, these proposed uses are forecast to generate 4,860 daily trips, 217 AM peak hour trips and 416 PM peak hour trips. To account for trips that come directly from the everyday traffic stream on the adjoining streets � g (i.e. Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue) applicable pass-by reduction factors were incorporated into PM peak hour traffic forecasts of the propose retail and restaurant uses in PA4. The factors used in this report are based on information published in the Trip Generation Handbook, ITE October 1998. Hence, the resulting traffic generation P otential of PA -4 totals 4,860 daily trips, with 217 trips (124 inbound, 93 outbound) produced in the AM P eak hour and 282 trips (159 inbound, 123 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. BSC Specific Plan Triy Generation Potential As shown, the new development proposed as part of the BSC Specific Plan J ro'ect is forecast to P generate 15,350 daily PCE trips (one half arriving, one half departing), with 1,639 PCE trips P i i anticpated during the AM peak hour (1,376 inbound, 263 outbound) and 1,821 PCE tri s P(344 inbound, 1,477 outbound) forecast during the PM peak hour. The potential traffic impact of this project PCE trip totals are evaluated in the traffic analysis section of this report. Review of the last row of Table 7C shows that at completion and full occupancy of all P Y proposed development, the BSC Specific Plan is forecast to generate a total of 20,400 daily P PCE trips with 2,406 trips (2,054 inbound, 352 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 2,590 (473 triP s inbound, 2- 117 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment Exhibits 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E and 7F present the traffic distribution patterns for the BSC Specific Plan P project. Exhibit 7A presents the traffic distribution pattern for the general light industrial development within PA -2 and PA -3 that are located along Apollo Court and will rimari I P Y access the site via Road A (Apollo Drive) at Westminster Avenue. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Croup Specific Plan, Seal Reach Page 29 W U � ~ C) a J a. z U �+ W � � N Ada cr C]W cr C7 c� CQ t� m. z v a �u z La wQ V) z m _� W ) u� �CL w a CL o ❑z z xx xx v� W cz z3 c x VEZ-iW E-4 49 p„a=W H 0 J v a ZL) Q W i3ZAd 0 ce t3 m cn 00 G. Z z R. v 0 QQj wLLI CL _z W La V t �— Z 2j oaf cr U La cr a LO CL o oz Y j CID 2 x x x x YT W z iZ w zZ. W 0 � J W z z Q" N �Q Q� W � ;a1} �7 w Q Uzz L m � wz Z N � 0 as qu �q wa z W m Wzj 4, a ao zo = � m� 1 � x x x VT U Z, I _ Z ZSO a Lz=� vm x a. J s~ z pZ� U W a A m a U o Ir to Ew N m C] m W v Q a Z v c� W Q a a m 0 z m v m Lei n� zU c Wa ao oZ Y j m Z I I x xC IN Ll7 ` Z Q � it t i1.! z30 4cp �Su w W xa= c :R W Qri J H lz W fl�i a Do a � wo s■-e � Va3 Q 'L a r L3 cn N o o Q•E 2 M Cp.� W ialf 2 W CL QZ WW LJ [s � t tN L.7 V � w W 0.0 0z 8� m� t � xx x VT AL x �� Z z zS x ~ Q" O u ��z a�ZJ x CL L) a A w (r uz W a 0-4 W 0 F16q� U u7 m U z W o C? a p� v z LLJ Lv v� �'z � 2 �lu U LJ LJ a 0.0 nZ z v� 0 Mo ?v KK x x x x yr LLI D � d 2 r1] w V�Z x Z3� E N G I N E E R S Exhibit 7B presents the traffic distribution pattern for the general light industrial development within PA -2 and PA -3 that are located along Saturn Way and will primarily access the site via Road A (Apollo Drive) at Seal Beach Boulevard. Please note that the trip distribution P atterns illustrated in Exhibits 7A and 7B assumes that the extension of Apollo Drive, between Apollo P Court and Saturn way, will not be constructed as part of the BSC Specific Plan. The P otential benefit/impact of this connection has been evaluated and the results are summarized at the end of this report (See Alternative Site Circulation Analysis). Exhibit 7C presents the traffic distribution pattern for the general light industrial development in PA -3 that has direct access to Adolfo Lopez Drive at Seal Beach Boulevard. Exhibit 7D resents . P the traffic distribution pattern for the business hotel. Access to the hotel site in PA4 is assumed to be provided by a "right -turn only" driveway on Westminster Avenue. Exhibit 7E presents the traffic distribution pattern for the shopping PP g center /retail uses. Access to the retail /commercial component of PA -4 is assumed to be P rovided by the existing signalized driveway of Road C at Seal Beach Boulevard. Exhibit 7F presents the traffic distribution pattern for the proposed uses in PA- l . For the purposes of this traffic study, access for the potential development in PA -1 is assumed to be provided by the existing signalized driveways on Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard. Because a site plan for the potential development in PA -1 has not been prepared, it is . P P not .known which of the existing unsignalized driveways, now closed temporarily, will be utilized. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the site's proximity to major traffic carriers i.e. I -405 Seal Beach Boulevard, etc.); expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals; existing intersection peak hour turning movement volumes conducted at select project site driveway and study intersections, and ingress/egress . opportunities at the project site. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and daily traffic volumes associated with the proposed BSC Specific Plan are presented in Exhibits Ss 9 and 10, respectively. The traffic volume assignments presented in these exhibits reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Exhibits 7A -- 7F and the traffic generation forecast of the presented resented in Tables 7B and 7C. � Traffic Impact Anal psis ,deport Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 36 `b -2 � U W H � Q u� a � a V H � U W (L in a CL Ry o a � U) 0 x" 0 W � 0.� 0 c� .d W U a a V) 0 z 4i O m V Q � F � w �► NSW a J J L7 w 7S M *-A "UC)n y +�* mm-s► -al tr-ca«s ra-i irtowwaN r arlac�rlw r oniN �, �' 0 0 � t fI I r cn QjopSuudS I-0 r-fl # pa 04-%aa H 11-0f qd- r�] o t p r �� ts� �� t J I r-fs t 449 -V O�ca jr- ir 9Q ! 4 # } � `. ♦ I vao b 1 ev � jMoi31i8 •:` � ~ � � 920 " '�� Q f r � J hao n r I C w U L••♦ m a Q W � z J W a c.� U F W �N w ti 05 air cs r� in W 4 Q. _V Z 0 c� 4 W L] a c� z Lai z D F N "'' z py�Z.� Z z�w a JJC7 z w V W I17 Q CL E-9 W E U a. W Q CL a� �m m 4 3 N 2 1* C4 ON d M LJ Z� _ Z V z�4WiC Q �S V w E N G t N E E R 5 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The existing plus project traffic conditions have been generated based on existing traffic conditions and the addition of new BSC Specific Plan project traffic. The existing plus project traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the CEQA guidelines, which require that the potential impacts of a project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. Although the expansion project is expected to be completed by Year 2006, this analysis will identify the roadway improvements necessary to mitigate the specific potentially significant traffic impacts of the project (if any). Existing Plus Project Traffic Volume Conditions Exhibits 11 and 12 present "Existing Plus Pro j ect" AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the twenty -one key study intersections, respectively. Exhibit 13 presents the "Existing Plus Project" daily traffic volumes at the eleven key roadway segments. The traffic volumes illustrated in these exhibits were analyzed and the results are presented later in the "Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology" section of this report. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal .Beach Page 40 W V LLJ �] LG � v � > W W L!3 J a W p� t1 E'* W a x a Ir ca a� w LI'f Z • v U � wa +� V vz cri W Z a H � �z 2 w m W J Z a- 0 a Z z V7�W o ' JJo C\2 w V m W N a J a W E♦ U a W D W x a c� a� N A. N U� pz a� Q W �a N Cf) 2 W v m 70,% z_ z 3: LLJ 0 ziJC7 x lz 4' ) W U W m W H �r 2 W 4 J CL ch W U �i W a A a. B m C) �m m +� F •a a �l. U z U W V a cn 0 z 41 0 m 3 1 04 tr v 1* N v Y � �e Lei J t L] or Dri z ItA w U Z x Z z3� �� W a ENG`: EERS TUTLW TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Ambient Traffic Growth )Lear2006 Horizon year background traff e growth estimates have been calculated us ng an ambient growth factor, which is intended to account for -unknown future projects n the study area, as well as account for regional growth in traffic volumes and develo ment of ro'ects outside the stud p P J y area. For this analysis, future growth in. traff c volumes at the stud intersections y hay been calculated at two percent per year (2.Q% o yr). The ambient growt4 factor is consistent with City of Seal beach requirernents. Applied to existing Year 2002 traff is volumes results in an ei ht . g percent growth -in existing volumes at the key intersections to the Year 2006. Related. Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on- street conditions rior to com letion of the BSC p p Specific Plan. project., ,,the status of other known develo meat ro�ects (re lated roects, in the p P a P a } area has been researched. With this information, the: potential impact of the ro osed ro'ect can p p p a be- evaluated within .the context of the cumulative impact of all other. known development. Exhibit 14 presents the general location of the related ro'ects located in the 0t . of Seal Beach P a y and the City of Los Alamitos with .respect to the B SC S ecif c Plan ro' ect site: Based on recent Sp p a telephone discussions with the City of Long Beach staff, there are no related � ro'eets within the P a project study area in the City of Long: Beach. Seal Beach Develo ments According to City. of Seal Beach staff, the related projects to be .considered as art of the a p cumulative. traffic setting includes the Rossmoor Center Expansion, the vacant floor area or unoccupied development of Areas A B, C & D of the approved Bixby, Old Ranch Master Plan pp y , the Hellman Ranch Specific Plan, and a proposed 150 room hotel on 1st Street west of marina Drive. The Rossmoor Center Expansion. project includes the net entitled trips associated with 55 300 SF of vacant floor area within , the existing Rossmoor Center and a 22, 203 SF expansion. to the p . shopping center. The inclusion of the net entitled trips of Rossmoor Center is indicative of its traffli c activity based on full occupancy of the Center's existing (entitled) floor area. The 'Rossmoor Center Expansion. project is located irnrriediately west of Seal Beach Boulevard bounded by Bradbury Road on the north, Saint Cloud Drive on the south and other development that fronts Montecito Road on the west. Traff c Impact' Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Poge 44 oc v-4 t; W Fg m E--4 a CQ aLn ~ A a a W W W wCL 0 a D m L7 U m sn z F a z D c.� W CJ V7 V z W a m i ��in zw ail u z= ' �^ 3 W o =�M a c" z m LLY plowd m 0 a 4S AQ!A A"IDA a J W W &d uowwo}{ P?3 Oq*U°?3 Z a _ ti W W in A N � w N Pa VDNO vsp8 -1 M CD = O [D Q7 Al Q t m 0 a r r r r a v+ v a ti a a W La `J V t � D °v 0 o o a PMA a ?D- x x x m x tti m m m m oc v-4 t; W Fg m E--4 a CQ aLn ~ A a a W W W wCL 0 a D m L7 U m sn z F a z D c.� W CJ V7 V z W a m i ��in zw ail u z= ' �^ 3 W o =�M a E N G I N E E R S The Bixby Old Ranch Master Plan includes a 286,367 SF retail shopping center (of which 250,861 SF is currently occupied), a business hotel with 112 rooms, a 15,557 SF retail center (10,348 SF currently vacant), an 86,000± SF facility consisting of a 126 -unit Assisted Living and 23 -bed Alzheimer's Care Facility, a 37-tee public driving range, and a 78 single - family residential subdivision (47 units currently occupied). This related project is generally located' north of the I-405 Freeway, and east of Seal Beach Boulevard. (Source: city of Seal Beach). The Hellman Ranch Specific Plan consists of 70 single - family detached homes, and a 20,000 SF visitor /recreation/community commercial center. The Hellman Ranch Specific Plan is generally located south of the Boeing Campus, and west of Seal Beach Boulevard. (Source: Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report). Los Alamitos Developments Based on our research, the two related projects consist of the Los Alamitos Medical Center expansion (LAMC) and the Cherry Street Medical Office Building. The LAMC expansion includes the development of a third Medical Office Building (MOB III) with a total floor area of 60,000 SF. The LAMC campus is generally located north of Katella Avenue, between Cherry Street and Kaylor Avenue, in the City of Los Alamitos. The Cherry Street Medical Office Building development project consists of a 7,685 SF medical office building located at 10921 Cherry Street, directly west of the Los Alamitos Medical Center campus. Table S summarizes the trip generation potential for the nine planned and/or approved related projects on a daily and peak hour basis for a "typical" weekday. As shown, the nine related projects are expected to generate 1 0,731 daily trips, with 571 trips (346 inbound, 225 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 1,075 trips (506 inbound, 572 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 46 E N G i N E E R 5 TABLE 8 RELATED PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Related Projects Description 2 -Way in Out 'Total I In out Total 1 Rossmoor Center ' 1,591 25 17 43 SO S4 154 77,503 SF sho (inZcenter Area A - old Ranch Town Center 2. Net Entitled Trips (35,105 SF of 1 779 15 10 25 38 38 75 Vacant gLA} Area B — Lampson Center 3. (10,345 SF of Vacant GLA, 112 Room Hotel, 155 unit Assisted Living Facil,it,. - 4 Area C — Public Golf Driving Range (37 Tees) 5 Area D — Old Ranch Residential (31 unoccupied dwelling units) _ +6. Hellman Specific Plan Marina/ 0 Street Hotel �' 15 0 Rooms $ Los Alamitos Medical Center MGBI11(60,000 SF) 9. 10921 Cherry Street MOB (7,585 SF) TOTAL RELATED PROJECT TRIPS 23102 � 64 1 491 11311 141 1 1221 263 46311 14 47 10 296 6 91 18 111710 38 44 54 1,240 51 220 33 21170 116 30 280 15 4 10,731 346 1 225 24 24 92 84 145 19 571 20 27 47 20 11 31 91 65 155 48 44 92 50 160 220 8 21 29 546 572 1,078 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 4 7 E N G I N E E R S Future Traffic Volumes To develop Year 2006 traffic volume forecasts, distribution patterns for each of the related projects were developed based on the location of the trip attractors, type of land use, the related project site's proximity to major traffic carriers and freeways, and previously completed traffic studies. The traffic studies referenced in the preparation of this report include The Traffic Impact Study for the Bixby old Ranch Master Flan, prepared by LLG, The Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the Rossmoor Center Expansion, prepared by LLG, and The Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Los Alamitos Medical Center Medical Office Building III, prepared by LLG. VPnr ')001; Exhibits 15 and 16 present future Year 2006 AM and PM peak hour background (existing plus ambient traffic plus related projects) traffic volumes at the twenty -one key intersections, while Exhibit 17 presents the estimated daily traffic volumes on the eleven key roadway segments. Exhibits 18 and 19 illustrate future Year 2006 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the addition of the trips generated by the new development proposed as part of the BSC Specific Plan for weekday peak commute hour conditions. Exhibit 20 presents the "Cumulative Plus Project" daily traffic volumes on the eleven key roadway segments. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 48 � U Ci] H oQ 0" > W H U z a J a W W a V) CL �a xIx U Im t!3 i1? a0 x� 2 w� L m W Q Q Q Q C*j {1} Z W 0 [a 41 � � w z z3 is "!A PMe /sN•�•'i v 1 f r40C4 -iqL 1 - J� / 9� Z r 1 o is V c a a m Id lwtuwoN tS # Pb 04ou08 N ul)lerl% —1991 J I Aa o01ya ERZ 1 # r osioe 0i9t Q�� OK � �+co qw / e Q+ !� 4D CIO C%4 do po') °° 1 i r -sat e %N %%. a � ti � v f / 3r Road A o Y0 1 i �R 1 .�. ^�• } island N Dr lrllDr w C4 t Im to V W m E—o a -j 6-4 rn >La CL C.) E _ -o V W a z 0 v m x 0. v ce z� IL W zI z Z�ooff Q eo � y, rte• ■ ' 1 0 J t N� 1 �s i to —tie 1y N. * 1 sz i ss Z Z o� s 1 f 2 QG m U 1 t ` � 1 CftaD \6az n to V W m E—o a -j 6-4 rn >La CL C.) E _ -o V W a z 0 v m x 0. v ce z� IL W zI z Z�ooff Q ey �� mx -it-tt s+�7r�t gar+ �YN'�CCt'� 0 61opbupdS a U is IS A0!A A1090n. V Id .UOLUWDH PH 04*UID2! � PH "Na 08108 Cb. 0 0 L� 0 c E PATS 3 o. 090 `$£ co � v Road A o ojg v oa 4j Ins sQ� �+ for, Island l�iiage C3 Drrq m Ocno R� is )lagapn #S b 4•S17 v` Ar v 5� G� N b iA "Moi3i1v8 _ Qo .c .a co w u Fat < � m E--4 aHW 0" Q a W v U a W a V) a N m m z co a o P L U_ z 0 U W U 4 CL V) 0 z w O m Z V) H d z 0 -z (n .r ZQjr J J L� 0 E4 _ rf .+c+ W O] a � F cn W� � J Da =Q E-. a U 4] a a x a o ac c� W .-. m a � z a 0 v � � V z U W [3 a U) 0 z 0 m z �- Qc i �, a W Lf) z a6z ' ZQLLI o JJo � L) U ^ L2 W m J W F N] 0-4 L Z a r`7 J 0 a LL W M N a W 0 ym a Q U Z U Q +� c W U D a C*2N �z W m 3 r N M 0 z X c Lai N C r v z t W U � _ ' Z3 c o �Sc� x E N G I N E E R S TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The relative impact of the added project traffic volumes generated by the proposed BSC Specific • Plan project during the AM and PM peak hours was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the twenty one key study intersections, without, then with, the ro osed P P project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to- capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study y intersection. The significance of the potential impacts of the project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the LOS standards and traffic impact criteria defined below. Impact Criteria and Thresholds As mentioned earlier, the City of Seal Beach considers LOS D (ICU = 0.81 - 0.90) to be the minimum acceptable service level that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. However, an official definition of a "significant" project traffic impact has not been included in the City of Seal Beach General Plan. The City's Growth Management Element, Goals and Policies only defines "measurable" traffic, with no standard interpretation of significance. To remain consistent and build upon these criteria, the following definitions are used in this study: "Measurable Traffic ": "measurable" traffic shall mean a traffic volume resultin g in a 1.0% increase in the sum of the critical movements at an intersection. "Significant Traffic Impact ": In the City of Seal Beach, a "significant" traffic impact is defined as a 4.0 10 increase in ICU due to project- specific traffic, at a signalized location that currentl y, or in the future, operates at, or with the addition of project traffic, will operate at an unacceptable P P level of service (LOS E or F). Intersections that are significantly impacted are required to be P q improved to an acceptable level of service, or, at a minimum, to without project conditions. For intersections within the City of Long Beach, a significant project impact is defined in this report as an increase in the intersection volume -to- capacity (V/Q of 0.020 or greater at any location where the final (future) LOS is unacceptable. This is the criterion used by the City of Long Beach and contained in the Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County. The City of Long Beach considers LOS D (0.81:5 ICU 5 0.90) to be the minimum acceptable LOS for all intersections. For the City of Long Beach, the current LOS, if worse than LOS D (i.e. LOS E or F), should also be maintained. At key unsignalized study intersections, a "significant" traffic impact is defined as a P ro'ect that adds 1.0 second of delay at an intersection operating at LOS E or F. A project's impact on a roadway study segment is considered "significant" if the project's VIC ratio increase is 0.01 or greater and the resulting LOS is E or F (VJC ratio > 0.90). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page SS E N G I N E E R S Thresholds for Requiring- a Traffic Impact Analysis for CMP Based on our review of the CMP for orange County, all projects generating 2,400 or more daily trips require a Traffic Impact Analysis for CMP evaluation. If a project has direct access to a CMP link, the threshold is reduced to 1,600 or more daily trips. The analysis should identify the traffic assignments on all CMP roadway links until the impact becomes less than 3 percent of Level of Service (LOS) E capacity. According to the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP), LOS E is defined in as the minimum acceptable limit. LOS E is defined in the County of Los Angeles CMP as the minimum acceptable service level as well. Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios The following scenarios are those for which LOS calculations have been performed: 1) Year 2002: Existing Traffic Conditions 2) Year 2002: Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions 3) Year 2006: Future Background (Existing, Ambient Growth, and Related Projects) 4) Year 2006: Future Background with the added BSC Specific Plan Project Traffic 5) Scenario (4) with Mitigation, if necessary PEAK HOUR IN'T'ERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Year 2402 Traffic Conditions Table 9 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty -one key stud intersections for "Existing" Existing 7"1 traffic conditions and "Existing Plus Project" traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS values presents a summary of existing AM and PM P eak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 5). The second column of Table 9 lists "Existing Plus Project" traffic conditions. Please note that these two scenarios are based on existing intersection geornetncs, as presented in Exhibit 3. The third colunnn of this table shows the increase in ICU value as a result of the added peak hour project trips generated by only the proposed development of the BSC Specific Plan. This column also indicates whether or not the proposed project has a significant traffic impact based on the LOS standards and criteria discussed earlier. The fourth column of Table 9 indicates the anticipated operating conditions with implementation of recommended improvements or those programmed as part of the Seal Beach Boulevard Bridge g Widening Project over the I -405 Freeway. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Croup Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 56 qpwd Q a Q U � W a N r ■ LW LLJ r Z A-1 r cQ Gi .■r Ix s� Ca a 0 c O u CL 0 n w V V Q tCS6 h +V V •y a 6i �� NOW,N i qtt a � Q N "-4 v r- v t- O %D OG N U oa C; ON oo r• *so n C; C3 C C7 C7 Cs z ?1Z z z z z z z >9?*?"� w � c Co V � cd tC = t� 00 IT N OG C v c•'� �D r- � wG C IM n Ch C CC M GD aQ try .-� C! C> � •-- CQ c� O CQ Q c*� av er'7 '� Q , + p r� �o DQ N CC oo vc C) 6 C; C5 vQ av o� C; 04, ov �' +--a � �.r.�� WA QC3 QA nC� C�C3 00 OQ �� tr�L�•� � c c two �' 00 C t' C> C c%4 et v) N Z— CD C\ 'qr "' N N tn �4 m = U * a 0� 0 6- oo r- r— oo en 4 c\ v; o Cy 6 C) a � *•• .•� p .� C) o ww wA Q�u QA �C3 u Q¢ QQ = a ^ eq . o vow c Irlt o zr � �a = M � oo N N �a t• r— \D n a\ M r� �o 00 ty C� oo r- 0� O� oo Q, �''� a•� as acs C3 C; C5 C3 oo Qa vv vv �AK > 3 Q v m 'U D .... .0-0 .,d .� aQ �, a4 _ v, 10.0 •= o Q m a t� t x 0 . o A� a C4 = a� W o d o y 10 low 0 0 151 M co -v° u a v 1] V5 tf] CI] a cn cn Q 06 CP C n w V V Q tCS6 h +V V •y a V v r�� ib", Rn ONO T ' H u d 4 V W W a W !mot z V z V �i Cld c� D i.. .O �s Q o � u -c � ao cc cz a� �n � •� u w .r D � � L r� .•�.r c D ro Cr � wX 4), Co cq co cz a _ ....� V v � rte..• � w Q D > �d �G p■ �3 � O co V C j5 0 a r- c -C � a � D G t C3 F-< , oil �N Q L 00 fl1 n r1 tiD �D , : s OW C; C; ©C 66 QC7 Z> >4z ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ ZZ Z Z quo i cd c r c o M e,4 av n av CN C� ry CN �t n •-- c4 vo �n � —y n o n it sn a � c� Cry oo t� a C) --- v o v o c C:� C) c c v C; C Q C; C; C; C7 C C7 G C7 C7 C C7 C7 C; C? C7 p p 1*K Ln A�.�.�•A¢dG4tY7¢¢dGQd¢¢UQddQAA 0 o c� N - CN 00 �,c C7 N C7\ C� n cv G v`� C7� OG --• `p `p en v� CQ C`Z C7 [•7 �i DC w7 `D N C7 `d w +•-■ *.t t*7 �G CV N N Poo C7 «•K .gip 6666666 6 66 66 66 C� aC7 .� a p own U W W V¢ Q dQ ¢¢ ¢Q ¢¢ QV dQ QQ AA N � _ C L .:; a W •--, E s"0 `J 01 C> w C C7� wi \0 -- C] OQ N Qti q:T `D N 00 N r— 0%, v7 c � r, N CN m i� 00 "Z ,-.� L n d+ C� 11 N cr7 v to N r : �r n ry La sn Oa oa G C; C; C7 C7 c G C) O v p a 6 Q a O Q Q Q Q� d� Q� d�. Q� d Q� ¢a. dn. Qc dam Lwd C13 > .r > cz a, M 72 m a>i •v = > Q A = > _ _ > 0 0 v> o o> Q> >> E >> a� :z v, a� E COQ 0 O o ¢ Q ° ,� � e� < < v w r1s L� �_ Cd L� "C7 `"� _� _ r. _ "D tU �t' cc Q � � = . _ U A w ,._. TJ w.+ r.+ .� -0 = -*-1 U +-. M CX C4 End C4 r -- N r*; 1q 417 �16 [%: 04 C1 C; ..; .-- •-- .• .- .--t o � u -c � ao cc cz a� �n � •� u w .r D � � L r� .•�.r c D ro Cr � wX 4), Co cq co cz a _ ....� V v � rte..• � w Q D > �d �G p■ �3 � O co V C j5 0 a r- c -C � a � D G t F N G 1 N E E R S Exi stiniz Traffic Conditi ons As previously presented in Table 5, only six of the twenty one key study intersections currently operate at an unacceptable level of service based on the LOS criteria defined in this report. The six locations operating at an adverse LOS are as follows: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key Intersection ICUILDS ICUILOS 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd St/Westminster Ave 0.9311E 1.0001E 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 0.9371E 0.8181D 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 0.9261E 0.9471E 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps 4.888ID 0.9721E 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 NB Ramps 0.70610 0.989/E 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road 0.9501E 0.76910 BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate unacceptable service levels The remaining 15 key study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Existin Plus Project Traff c Conditions Review of columns 2 and 3 of Table 9 indicate that the BSC Specific Plan project will significantly impact six of the twenty -one key study intersections, all of which are currently operating at an unacceptable service level. The six locations forecast to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS with the addition of project traffic, and the peak hour in which the project has an impact are as follows: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Kev Intersection ICUILDS ICUILDS I. Pacific Coast Highway at 2" StlWestminster Ave 0.9881E 1.0081F 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 0.9711E 0.900/D 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 1.0261F 1.1201F 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 SB Ramps 0.9551E 1.0611F 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 NB Ramps 0.8411D 1.0091F 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road 1.0381F 0.8661D BOLD ICUILOS values indicate unacceptable service levels & Project impact is considered significant. The remaining 15 key study intersections are expected to continue to operate at a satisfactory . ry service level under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Review of column 4 of Table 9 indicates that implementation of improvements at the six significantly impacted intersections will completely offset the impact of the proposed BSC Specific Plan project. These improvements will be discussed later in the report. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 59 E N G t N E E R 5 Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions 'fable 10 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty -one key study intersections for Future Year 2006 traffic conditions. This table is similar in format to that of Table 9; the first column presents Existing traffic conditions, the second column presents Year 2006 Background traffic conditions, and the third column presents Year 2006 traffic conditions with project traffic. Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2006) background traffic conditions indicates that ambient traffic growth and related project traffic will adversely impact six of the twenty -one key study intersections. These intersections, reported below, are expected to operate at unacceptable LOS E or F during the AM and/or PM peak hour. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Key, Intersection ICU/LOS ICU/LOS 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd St/Westminster Ave 1.0111F 1.0911F 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 1.0111F 0.8871D 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 1.015/F 1.0121F 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at I-405 SB Ramps 0.9841E 1.1001F 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 NB Ramps 0.794/C 1.1401F 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road 1.02911F 0.8351D BOLD ICU /LOS values indicate unacceptable service levels & cumulative impact is considered significant. The remaining 15 key study intersections are forecast to operate at LDS D or better during the peak commute hours with the addition of ambient traffic growth and related project traffic. Year 2006 Future Back ound with BSC Specific Plan Project Traffic Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 10 indicates that traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project, in combination with existing and future background traffic will have a significant impact at six of the twenty one key study intersections, when compared to the City of Seal Beach LOS standards and the significant traffic impact criteria defined in this report. The six locations forecast to operate at an unacceptable LDS with the addition of BSC Specific Plan project traffic and the peak hour in which the project has an impact are as follows: Key Intersection 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd StlWestrninster Ave 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 SB Ramps 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 NB Ramps 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour .ICUILOS ICUILOS 1.0671F 1.0991F 1.0461F 0.9611E 1:1121F 1.2261F 1.0491F 1.1901F 0.929/E 1.160/F 1.1171F 0.9351E BOLD ICU/LOS values indicate unacceptable service levels & project impact is considered significant. Traffic ,impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 60 p V rD � 04 n rQ V V ti �r fi r� 4 0 aq � o � � ,.• a v L r7 �i` Q Q er �O #` N C7 C� n : 1 r 1 i e 1 f ■ 1 1 �` " Q� OQ 1 l � 7E iG i i 1 r r 1 i 1 ! t OQ OQ r- QQ Q C Q o 0 0 0 0 tz N 7 V1 co .�� 0" ►aoo env oov c{7c•z' —M �n v� nn n� �a sn v 0 C) m 4) c c v v o v o 0 0 0 o cx o v o o Q N a v vovc>000c�0o00o0oovvv© OWN 4w _ r.a c ¢ U ¢ ¢ Q ral I& �[ LTI PC •o► C64 � �. Q[ '� p r- Q �' eY7 O� --■ eh v� � -� � N �p C� Q �D G DG v) �p O - .. �**[ , 0: � n N vo r� CV [4 et OK Q C G � � n ir) C� n r- 00 00 qzr v N Q ... v� � •ui z rzrzr.�s�¢U¢C�=Un a¢¢¢¢r�.u.w�. _ � o ENO N = .. 3" U _ �• •• r• ev n r� ev ev v� �v -- ao n vn N p CC r "qr -- oo v� cn r— r+� M V-� ev C oom V as ` rn to oo 1^ n oo ac r7 �0 E� W --;..; 00 00 00 0c) 00 0Q .-�.� o•= �; = o Q W W W Ca ¢ C4 Q m U U U v � Q �W o C3 p f.. � o � ^- v, � ao m c .c n oo N e*� G t*; -- •-. C-4 ni n NC � � Ln `n N v x t- ...., as v 00 � \v Nr oo \o r— n n fn m •c ao G v v 6 0 6 00 6 0 0 0 0 0 C) C> � can OORK soft tz -a - `ti v a rn s > > u > > > a� ao a) = a) "c: v .2 Q d Q E o x a D Q a❑ D a 0 i - � G � � s� V �' -� '' pq ..]G� o o u u a t LLJ Z a L v�,a E,.�N�N v as c,Q cs o as'� ��. 4. .� CQ d 4. m N C-4 cv � Z �u D " N cn 4 =I7 �p t� 00 00 C � p V rD � 04 n rQ V V ti �r fi r� 4 0 aq V %mro,, Q w 04 C� H i�■t U U Cs w �t a i 7- V Z ui Cai tv Qi G ,o t� C U �s. 0 w= D A =?.a d? a � .-r C CT DON r r r r r a t a e e a w pp ON oC r [— 10 s a s ■ r r a r r a t r s a t r a >4 > Z z Z Z z Z z z z z Z Z z Z z Z z 4x V C %n C vo vs Q cn aN sn en en Wn n r- 'D \D b� ••� •-µ m N ao It N N t- CH — .-- n C n �n tiD IT � C7 G n C, C7 C r . D C G D Q Q Q C+ 0 G 6 Q C7 D C; C; C7 C7 C; D C7 C7 p C7 C � G war 9 �"'� GL v� Q N `D r An tr7 ov r- --- D �n .- C CN �n � "C3 � o0 0 ON m ON 1.D tr7 --- �D r- t— --- a � CN 1.D `f' "' oC r- 00 00 CT +-; •� CP%k 'IT %.D n sD vi %D v-� r• qzt up) w) oo m to ,D G o0 oC *� v•-� �o o6 6C; oa 6666 C,) C; C; C) `q • : CD, C5 D N �� D UUK A ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢U ¢¢ ¢¢ Ca❑ p Q a "G r^ N C G � CN !r N M CC Q" Wn n W) Cn +ra N ❑N Q c�`� {� G --- n to in .... .-- oC OJ Do rn rn rte'] %n t— M `Ct C7 � DG OD Ix Q •-�a �c C�a C�c� aoC; oC; C; - ac u�o D UW WU ¢ ^ � v Q OC tQ "-D a OC N C N Do r• C\ \D — N C) \D �n to W w7 qtr W) N M r -05 Q C7 D Q C7 0 C Q `n Ql C5 D C> C> l �a cz -C.r._ V= a M 0.. o > � o v > Q > > � � > � > � > .� E c;¢ v= �-¢ ¢ �Q�Q .. D V C D V D V y 0 Now i.r � w w � w 7 cu rr 0 73 cc to cz rr w � � O E a� v u � o �.? V � V V C/) o s�.., CO o C cn , `dam . i w C* -- u F? �. G .r . on co z--. .... P. c) o -N co .N to G D D D N ry n tv pU rC 1r �a fi V U V E N G I N E E R S The remaining 15 key study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours with the addition of project traffic. To offset the impact of the proposed BSC Specific Plan project, as well as future background traffic, intersections improvements will be required at these five intersections. The. improvements identified at the intersections of Pacific Coast Highwayl2nd Street - Westminster and Studebaker/Westminster are generally consistent with those recommended in the Tra �c 23 Impact Study for the Marina Shores Promenade . Evaluation of the Pacific Coast Highway and 2nd Street - Westminster intersection indicates that constriction of exclusive northbound and southbound right -turn lanes, and a second southbound left -turn lane on Pacific Coast Highway will mitigate the impact of future background traffic and gr BSC Specific Plan project traffic. Implementation of these improvements will require the widening and restriping of the northwest corner and southeast comer of Pacific Coast Highway at 2 n Street - Westminster. According to the City of Long Beach, preliminary engineering plans � gP have been prepared and the City is currently negotiating with adjacent roP e rty owners to P determine the feasibility of acquiring the right -of -way necessary to implement these _ P improvements. At the intersection of Studebaker and Westminster, an additional westbound lane, striped as an option through -right lane, on Westminster Avenue Will offset the impact caused b y future background traffic and BSC Specific Plan project traffic. our evaluation of this intersection indicates that the existing westbound right -turn lane can be converted to a third throu hlri ht- g g turn option lane, but widening of the northeast corner of Studebaker at Westminster will be required to maintain a separate westbound right -turn lane at this location. The improvements recommended at Seal Beach/Westminster, Seal BeacM -405 SB Ramps, as well as the Seal BeachlI -405 NB Ramps are consistent with the improvements identified in the current City of Seal Beach Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Current CIP P lans call for the widening of the Seal Beach Boulevard bridge overcrossing, from I-405 SB Ramps to I -405 NB P Ramps to provide two additional through lanes, auxiliary ramp merge lanes, a divided median, , sidewalks, and bicycle lanes. The improvements currently under design by the City of Seal Beach for the intersection of Seal Beach and Westminster, which are partially funded under the Measure M Intersection Improvement Program, call for the construction of additional southbound eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes, and a third eastbound through lane on Westminster. To accommodate the second westbound left -turn lane on Westminster Avenue, the existing westbound right-turn lane will be removed. 23 Traffic Impact Study for PCH @7a Studebaker (Marina Shores Promenade) Marketplace, dated Se P tember 27, 1997, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers for the Selleck Development Group, Inc. and the City of Long Beach. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 63 E N G! N E E R 5 However, our analysis indicates that, in addition to the above - mentioned improvements, a separate northbound right -turn lane on Seal Beach Boulevard and a separate westbound right -turn lane on Westminster will also be required to achieve a satisfactory service level at the Seal Beach/west ninster intersection. These additional lanes area art of the ultimate planned . P P improvements for this intersection, but are not a part of those being considered for construction by the City of Seal Beach. It is important to note that the additional northbound and westbound right- turn lanes are necessary to mitigate projected unacceptable service levels to acceptable conditions, whether or not any development occurs on the BSC Specific Plan site. Preliminary evaluation of the Bolsa Chica/Westminster intersection indicates that an additional eastbound and westbound through lane on Westminster will offset the traffic impact of future background traffic and project traffic. The implementation of these improvements will require widening and/or restrlping of Westminster Avenue, east and west of Bolsa Chica, within the City of Westminster and City of Seal Beach. PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS This traffic impact sensitivity analysi's has been prepared to determine at what level of occupancy /phase of development will the BSC Specific Plan project have a significant impact, especially at the two intersections located within the City of Long Beach. As indicated in the traffic analysis presented above, the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact at . P the following six intersections: Key Intersection 1. Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd St/Westminster Ave 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-445 SB Ramps 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1-405 NB Ramps 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road Table II summarizes the results of the traffic impact sensitivity analysis at the 6 intersections significantly impacted by the BSC Specific Plan project. As shown, the results of the traffic impact "sensitivity" analysis indicate that completion and occupancy of the 628,000 SF of industrial floor area in PA -3 (Phase 1 — Year 2004) of the BSC Specific Plan will have a significant impact at PCH and 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach and Westminster, the Seal Beach/I -405 SB ramps intersection, the Seal Beach/I-405 NB Ramps intersection and Westminster at Bolsa Chica. Only Studebaker at Westminster Avenue is not significantly cant/ � y impacted when compared to the LOS standards and the significant traffic impact criteria defined in this report. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 64 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Bold ICUILOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS standards. 24 Improvements recommended are required to mitigate future non-project (ambient/cumulative) traffic and/or project traffic.. Traffic Impact Analysis ,deport Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 65 (1) (2) (3) (4) Total Total Background Future Background Traffic Project Impact/ Conditions W/ Level of BSC Specific Plan Time Traffic With Project Significance Im rovements24 Occupancy/Key Intersections Period ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU Inc. YIN ICU LDS Year 2004 Phase I i . Pacific Coast Highway at 2d AM 0.977 E 0.998 E 4.021 Y 0.860 D StlWestminster Ave PM 1.055 F 1.059 F 0.004 N 0.953 E 2. Studebaker Road at AM 4.977 E 0.989 E 0.012 N Westminster Avenue PM 0.859 D 0.895 D 0.036 N - - 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.980 E 1.415 F 0.035 Y 0.843 C Westminster Avenue PM 0.977 E 1.097 F 0.120 Y 0.759 C 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.950 E 0.983 E 4.033 Y 0.690 B 1405 SB Rams PM 1.054 F 1.110 F 0.045 Y 0.754 C 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.769 C 0.844 D 0.075 N 0.731 C 1405 NB Rams PM 1.103 F 1.114 F 0.011 Y 0.923 E 12. Westminster Avenue at AM 0.992 E 1.037 F 4.045 Y 0.940 E Bolsa Chica Road PM 0.807 D 0.861 D 4.054 N 0.762 C Year Zoos Phase I & _rr I . Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd AM 0.994 E 1.426 F 0.032 Y 0.881 D StfWrestminster Ave PM 1.073 F 1.084 F 0.007 N 0.973 E 2. Studebaker Road at AM 0.994 E 1.014 F 0.020 Y 4.950 E Westminster Avenue PM 0.873 D 0.919 E 0.046 Y 4.849 D 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.997 E 1.057 F 0.060 Y 0.828 D Westminster Avenue PM 0.995 E 1.135 F 0.141 Y 0.785 C 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.967 E 1.010 F 0.443 Y 0.709 C 1405 SB Rams PM 1.083 F 1.142 F 0.059 Y 0.778 C 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at AM 0.781 C 0.863 D 4.082 N 0.747 C 1-405 NB E2M2S PM 1.122 F 1.135 F 0.013 Y 4.941 E 12. Westminster Avenue at AM 1.011 F 1.068 F 4.057 Y 4.966 E Bolsa Chica Road PM 0.822 D 0.885 D 0.063 N 0.787 C Bold ICUILOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS standards. 24 Improvements recommended are required to mitigate future non-project (ambient/cumulative) traffic and/or project traffic.. Traffic Impact Analysis ,deport Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 65 E N C! N E E R 5 The results of the sensitivity evaluation indicate that in the Year 2005, the occupancy of the proposed uses in PA -4 (Phase 2) combined with the proposed development in PA -3 (Phase 1) will significantly impact all six intersections. Appendix B contains the "sensitivity" analysis ICU/LOS calculation sheets for the six intersections impacted by the BSC Specific Plan project. ROADWAY LINK CAPACITY ANALYSIS Year 2002 Traffic Conditions Table 12 summarizes the Year 2002 daily roadway link Level of Service results at the eleven study roadway links. The first column of LOS values in Table 12 presents a summary of existing daily traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 6). The second column lists Year 2002 Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. The third column indicates whether the traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact based on the significance criteria identified earlier. Review of Columns 2 and 3 of Table 12 shows that traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact at three of the eleven study roadway links when compared to the City's standards and significant impact criteria defined earlier. The Seal Beach, Boulevard Overcrossing (Link H) and two links of Pacific Coast Highway (Links I and K) are projected to operate at LOS E and LOS F. under "existing plus project" traffic conditions. Although Pacific Coast Highway north of Seal Beach Boulevard (Link J) is forecast to continue to operate at LOS F with the inclusion of BSC Specific Plan project traffic, the project V/C ratio increment is less than the maximum allowable 0.010 threshold. The remaining seven roadway segments are projected to operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis. Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions Table 13 summarizes the Year 2006 daily roadway link Level of Service results at the eleven study roadway links. This table is structured similar to that of Table 13. The first column of LOS values in Table 13 presents a summary of existing daily traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 6). The second column lists Year 2006 background traffic conditions based on existing roadway geometry. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Rage 66 N Q N "NO N N N � L � G Q � o c v o c o � 00 0 0 0 � c � m 00 %40 �"� � W � 1 � r�7 c�7 r*7 an •-- �n vZ t7 �D r� c+'7 t� a 4! G r► lti3 LC !G it �_ ,� cl: Cd CZ o o E i•� r L ' � �L"" r . ��"' r •-j D � tC t: ,yam,, V � Gi /� r pL1 Z W N ►.p �p vl E ! t; F•i Q i •� N ' C+ cc u ca p fly 2 T m cc > a� cv �. �. > �- cn M , I CL) :3 fa tt a z u = v Q •o o x� s �n ��,, try ea sr too C.) = d v CG v Q cn v a o m tu oc 3 E o° � o a ° v v v •� U c l a° o Z 0 z r u E cis to v y 0 n. � 3 � o A � Y � � v � o �a = y � D 7 � u n � u " E u 7 � 3 � � U •o D -d Co Cc I o 't3 b •Co w Cis ' ❑ ❑ a d n � Q L7 ,V r rrx V U CM).�� z z z z z z > >4 z z V � Q y 0 00 ► �r w ww .v Q Q [ [r3 C> o --y , ,.... a o - v c c cv c v v o o 0 0 coo = v a a c c v v a o o v v o v v v v v v v d c a CG C C3 U U Q Q Q Q � �0 W W W W u uo w w cj a CIA Nr coo C i c o o o a a v v c c o o c c3 • •� • •.: . ..: ti i ti p�v 0 n � � 0 N N 0v 0 00 r r i n m V 000 in t to S Sri r r �1 w w� r•� � � e W � '' ° ey •n o o� n n .-• a a � ey • •� o oo �, � � L � � � �p � � r rZ �- � � � �p � �p . .•� ! !y . ...� CP Z ? ? o o c cn I INC 00 t n � � 0 000 N N e ev►� a d d o o n n� r r a a, n t-- n 0 z r u E cis to v y 0 n. � 3 � o A � Y � � v � o �a = y � D 7 � u n � u " E u 7 � 3 � � U •o D -d Co Cc I o 't3 b •Co w Cis ' ❑ ❑ a d n � Q L7 ,V r rrx V U D V V V � o ,V U V Q .G Q row � V � c `r' �' 4f) o ao o o Q v v a °a av v c a a o v c v c c c o c v c C U I A A Q ¢ Im L3 i "• u die Lu Lz El c en 110 N n •-• qq:r w o ov IT v *. a v rfn CA L 4J OG v o o a v c a .-� o � i u 7 v? N M Da OQ N �f3 OC 00 str CPA Uk x.:s V � i cc `" e a as N ° N en `n° fn (n %n • m in N •-� v as i v •a v n v -- an �D C t� e*� e+� e►s 7 oo ao m 00 cs .-- o o 00 n •r• N N N � •." u W Ca ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ W Ln L6 Lz LL > E � CL a L c to c o o a o c o cc .om 4w :1 00 .2 w ch w w w M u Ci •_ C N er'3 N � N a N �D N t r] e•"i N qT !! 1�} qw � Q -��-, o q Q a o �r•5 o 0 �r•S 0 0 Rn 0 0 rn 0 0 sn 0 0 rZ 0 o �n n oa a a o o o o Q U .� � ..� W cam, in --- u-� m oa �c k^ 4-1 v-3 T \o r1 eel en Q �. CO 0 saw 4 ¢ ❑.. ¢ G.. ¢ y c u 4. C = °. A A ❑ A Q ❑❑ `V A ❑ A � U CD I e� > < w V ^�} • •}�r w m 0 cc >w L t it ca a G �„ a� 0 v > i, ai ❑ _w �? c� 0 aF2 CQ a� op G N D O= D to CQ D W ¢ C4 C 41 v go 10 03 cc cc m 03 cc cn •G �i 11 I� • -- .0 V) .a�. crs. Ica.. a. a� ..\vllqrN �. D V V V � o ,V U V Q E N G I N E E R S The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2005 traffic conditions with the addition of BSC Specific Plan daily project traffic. The fourth column indicates whether the traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact based on the significance criteria identified earlier. Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 13 shows that traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact at three of the eleven study roadway links when evaluated within a cumulative traffic setting. Review of this table shows that the project will have an impact on the Seal Beach Boulevard overcrossing (Link H). This segment of Seal Beach Boulevard between the I405 NB Ramps and I-405 SB Ramps is forecast to operate at LOS F under the near -term cumulative traffic setting. However, with the planned improvements, the project impacts are completely offset and the Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing is forecast to operate at LOS C on a daily basis. In addition, the BSC Specific Plan is expected to have a daily impact two of the three study segments on Pacific Coast Highway; Link I and Link K. This section of Pacific Coast Highway is forecast to operate at LOS F on a daily basis under the near -term cumulative traffic setting. Although link volume thresholds are an indication of performance, they are typically superceded by an analysis of the local intersection performance. If the terminal intersections operate satisfactorily (and traffic moves at both ends), the traffic flow along l� the segment (in the center ) can flow satisfactorily. Hence, the daily impact of the BSC Specific Plan on Pacific Coast Highway, from Main Street/Bolsa Avenue (Link I) to south of Seal Beach Boulevard (Link K), including Link J, is considered insignificant since the "terminal intersections" of PCHISeal Beach (No. 5) and PCHIMain -Bolsa (No. 5) are forecast to operate at satisfactory conditions (See Table 10) under the existing lane configuration of Pacific Coast Highway. Hence, no "daily" project impact would occur this State Highway. The remaining seven roadway segments are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS on a daily basis. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 69 E N G I N E E R S AREA -WED E TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS For the intersections where future traffic volumes are expected to result in poor operating conditions, this report identifies improvements which change the intersection geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements usually involve roadway widening and/or restriping to reconfigure or add lanes to various approaches of a key intersection. The proposed improvements are expected to offset the impact of future non - project traffic and BSC Specific Plan project traffic, and improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range. Planned Improvements The improvements recommended at the intersections of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard and /1-405 SB Ramps, and Seal Beach Boulevard and I-405 NB Ramps are consistent with the improvements identified in the current City of Seal Beach Capital Improvement Program (CIP). According to information provided by the City of Seal Beach, current CIP plans call for the widening of the Seal Beach Boulevard bridge overcrossing, from I- 405 SB Ramps to I -405 NB Ramps to provide two additional through lanes, auxiliary ramp merge lanes, a divided median, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes. • Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue — Restripe Seal Beach Boulevard to provide a 2nd southbound left -turn lane. Widen and restri e Westminster Avenue to provide a 2nd eastbound and westbound left-turn lane and a 3rd eastbound through lane. Remove existing westbound right -turn lane on Westminster Avenue. Modify traffic signal accordingly. Seal Beach Boulevard at I405 SB Ramps — Widen Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing to provide a third northbound and southbound through lane, plus a northbound auxiliary lane on the bridge, and a second southbound left -turn lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. • Seal Beach Boulevard at I405 NB Ramps —Widen Seal Beach Boulevard Overcrossing to provide a third northbound and southbound through lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. Recommended Improvements In addition to the planned improvements identified above, the following improvements are recommended to offset the impact of project traffic and cumulative traffic at the intersections of Pacific Coast Highway and 2 °d Street/Westminster Avenue, Studebaker Road and Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue, and Westminster Avenue and Bolsa Chica Road. • Pacific Coast Highway at 2 °d Street - Westminster Avenue (City of Lon Beach — Widen g � Pacific Coast Highway to provide separate northbound and southbound right -turn lanes, and a second southbound left -turn lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 70 E N G I N E E R S • Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue (City of Long Beach) — Restripe the existing westbound right -turn lane on Westminster Avenue to provide an option through/right-turn lane. Widen Westminster to re- install an exclusive westbound right -turn lane. Modify signal accordingly. • Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue — Widen Seal Beach Boulevard to p rovide a northbound right -turn lane and widen Westminster Avenue to maintain the existing right-turn lane. These lanes are a part of the ultimate planned improvements for this intersection, but are not a part of those being considered for construction by the City of Seal Beach. • Bolsa Chica Road at Westminster Avenue (City of Seal Beach/Westminster) - Widen and restripe Westminster Avenue, west of Bolsa Chica, to provide an additional eastbound through lane. Restripe existing westbound right -turn lane to a westbound through lane. Modify traffic signal accordingly. The BSC Specific Plan project can be expected to pay a "fair- share" of the improvement costs to mitigate. its significant traffic impacts. The "fair- share" percentage and cost responsibility of the project at the three impacted intersections located outside the City of Seal Beach and the potential fees that the project could be assessed based on the current City of Seal Beach Traffic Fee Program is summarized below. PROJECT - SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS Recommended Circulation Improvements To ensure that adequate access and egress to the project site is provided and impacts to through P g traffic on Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue are minimized, we recommend the following improvementslintersection enhancements. • Seal Beach Boulevard at Road A (Apollo Drive) -- As part of the proposed intersection reconstruction project, restripe Seal Beach Boulevard to provide a 150-foot northbound left - turn lane. Widen Seal Beach Boulevard to provide a 150 -foot southbound right -turn lane with a 90 -foot transition. We recommend that the eastbound leg of Apollo Drive at Seal Beach Boulevard be designed to provide two eastbound left -turn lanes and one eastbound right-turn lane, and one inbound (westbound) lane. Modify and upgrade the existin g � traffic signal accordingly. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the BSC Specific Plan project. • Westminster Avenue at Road A (Apollo Drive) — Modify /reconstruct existing median on Westminster Avenue to provide a 150 -foot westbound left -tum lane with a 90 -foot transition. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Reach Page 71 E N G I N E E R S Widen Westminster Avenue to provide a 1 00-foot eastbound right -turn lane with a 90-foot transition. We recommend that the northbound leg of Apollo Drive at Westminster Avenue be designed to provide two northbound left -turn lanes and one northbound right -turn lane, and one inbound (southbound) lane. Modify and upgrade the existing traffic signal accordingly. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the BSC Specific Plan project. • Proposed PA -3 "Right -turn only" Driveway at Westminster Avenue -- Widen Westminster Avenue to provide a 100-foot eastbound right -turn lane with a 90-foot transition. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the BSC Specific Plan project. • Seal Beach Boulevard at Adolfo Lopez Drive — Seal Beach at Adolfo Lopez Drive is currently unsignalized. An analysis of this intersection indicates that the "permissive" turning movements onto Seal Beach Boulevard from Adolfo Lopez Drive experience delays indicative of LDS EIF conditions with the addition of project traffic (See HCM/LOS calculations sheets in Appendix B). This can be expected given the high volume of traffic that exists on Seal Beach Boulevard and the lack of sufficient gaps in the continuous north - south traffic during the PM peak commute hour. Thus, we recommend that a three- phased traffic signal be installed at this location. This improvement should be the sole responsibility of the BSC Specific Plan project. Appendix C contains the traffic signal warrant worksheet for this key study intersection. Exhibit 21 graphically illustrates the traffic improvements recommended at the key impacted study intersections and intersections along project frontage, as identified above. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Flan, Seal Beach Rage 72 IS ".A A0110A W r Z ° 1./ r � � 0 l ■`* S, 1 1 l J �d t � a 1i~ W „i 1 a .d. / CL � r n Ar+p =or —=i—si ft*7+9 ran !a! � W ri 00, �a� 'o"aZ 4;; fit -i W 1 � � Ole 1 , � • J 41'i \ oo� 73 t4 . I ►• 1 1 ►� a� m of El f v-4 2 L2 W CD E4 �...� 4 W ow J .. a W A � W � CL CL a v L3 U U) co Z A F u z D 0 p -3 U W CL Z Vo V] m z i� Z v, v U V1 a y Y [� CA N Z Q LJ U LLI W w Z 0 = Lq �Ix LL, a� ir z (EMZ3o�[ Q SU E N G I N E E R S PROJECT -- RELATED FAIR SHARE CONTRIBUTION City of Long Beach Improvements Table 14 presents the peak hour percentage of net traffic impact at the two study intersections within the City of Long Beach and one intersection located partially within the City of Westminster impacted by the BSC Specific Plan project. These fair share calculations are based on the recommended methodology contained on the Orange County CMP TIA procedures. As presented in Table 14, the first column (1) presents future ICU value at the impacted intersection with the addition of project traffic. The second (2) column shows the increase in ICU value due to the added peak hour project trips. The third (3) column indicates the forecast operating condition at the study location with implementation of future intersection improvements. The fourth (4) column presents a brief description of the recommended intersection improvements. The fifth (5) column indicates the added capacity at the subject intersection as a result of the recommended improvement. The sixth (6) column presents the project's "fair- share" percentage of the improvement costs. As shown in Table 14, the approximate monetary fair -share contribution of the intersection improvements impacted by the BSC Specific Plan project totals 35.7% for Pacific Coast Highway n y and 2 d Street/Westminster Avenue and 85.1 % for Studebaker Road and Westminster Avenue. At Westminster and Bolsa Chica, the BSC Specific Plan's fair -share percentage totals 85.3%. Based on preliminary cost estimates of the recommended improvements, the BSC Specific Plan project's fair -share contribution at the Pacific Coast Highway and 2nd StreetlWestminster Avenue intersection would be $175,822.50. At the Studebaker Road and Westminster Avenue intersection, the project's fair -share contribution totals $175,093.25. The BSC Specific Plan's fair -share costs for the intersection of Westminster Avenue and Bolsa Chica Road totals $3811,717.50. Appendix D contains the cost estimates for the recommended improvements at these three intersections. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 74 � 4 n � C+G �.. co� Tj vjv �Q. fi .o w 4 ��r .L ai I�7 �� LAC •j. p i Q•r � tiD few = K] r ! �..:: z 40 0.w aU o v a wl M � v�o � oho v va o v IM 06 W; 'D cQ v C% V D U) o cz p co Z CM I•■t 'V ¢ 0 co C qT W u w ..,� W u > C Q � v'� Qr _ o � i o\ C� 00 p C va p C w� Q •-- i'�i (�- ac G1 L M ow 9 = Q Q Q 0 0 CON Iwo � � o •d ai cq: U c rd u `r' a v Q 'G x p > < � Q < LLJ cz cts C.3 J 4" z ;6.@ ,w V) ro n co n En ._.. � 4 n � C+G �.. co� Tj vjv �Q. fi .o w 4 ��r E N G V E E R S POTENTIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES City of Seal Beach Program Table 15 summarizes the potential fees that the proposed B S C Specific Plan project could be assessed based on the current City of Seal Beach Traffic Fee Program. The fee structure is used to determine a "fair- share" cost for new developments within the City. These fees would a for . pay both roadway and intersection improvement costs due to the additional traffic generated b y these new developments. Appendix E contains a copy of the Transportation Program and Facilities Development and Application Fees that the City of Seal Beach currently charges. As shown in Table 15, the BSC Specific Plan project would have to pay a total of $1,778,463.22 in transportation development fees and application fees based on the current fee structure and project description. The precise fees will be determined upon issuance of project building permits. This dollar value represents the projects approximate fair -share contribution for those impacted intersections included in the City of Seal Beach Road Fee Program (i.e. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at the 1-405 S B Ramps and Seal Beach Boulevard at I -405 NB Ramps). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 76 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 15 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 77 Development Application Potential Pro'ect Dervelo ment Knits FeelUnit Fee[Unit IM act Fee General Light Industrial in PA -1 $11 97.48 per $1 66.53 per (3455000 SF} 331 PM Try P s PM peak P PM peak p $451,487.31 hour tri hour trip General Light Industrial in PA -2 651 PM Trips $1197.48 per $166.53 per and PA -3 (973,040 SF) e# PM peak PM peak $887,970.51 hour_tKip hour trip Business Hotel X120 Rooms 120 Rooms $636.64 per $94.3 per $87,680.40 room or suite room or suite Shopping Center (32,500 SF ) � 32,500 SF $9.41 per $1.40 per $351,325. 0 of GLA SF ofGLA SF of GLA Total $19778,463.22 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 77 E N G I N E E R S CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) ANALYSIS Orange County This analysis is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the current orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The CMP requires that a traffic impact analysis (TIA) be conducted for any project generating 2,400 or more daily trips, or 1 ,600 or more daily trips for projects that directly access the CMP Highway System (HS). Per the CMP guidelines, this number is based on the desire to analyze any impacts that will be 3% or more of the existing CMP highway system facilities' capacity. As noted in this traffic study, the proposed BSC Specific Plan project is projected to generate over 1 5,000 daily trip -ends, and thus meets the criteria requiring a CMP TIA. The CMPHS includes specific roadways, which include State Highways and Super Streets, which are now known as Smart Streets, and CMP arterial monitoring locations /intersections. Therefore, the CMP TIA analysis requirements relate to the potential impacts only on the specified CMPHS. However, the project would not add traffic equivalent to 3% or more of the existing capacity at any of the CMP arterial monitoring locations or at any of the CMP highway system segments. The CMP highway system arterial facilities and CMP arterials closest to the project site consists of the San Diego (1 -405) Freeway, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), and Bolsa Chica Road. The CMP arterial monitoring locations /intersections nearest to the BSC Specific Plan site include SR -22 WB Ramps at Valley View Boulevard in the City of Garden Grove, Bolsa Chica Road at Garden Grove Boulevard in the City of Westminster and Bolsa Chica Road at Bolsa Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. Based on project trip generation estimates and the trip distribution patterns presented in Exhibits 7A through 7F, the amount of project traffic using these CMP facilities would be minimal and less than the 3% threshold established by the CMP. Hence, it is concluded that the BSC Specific Plan project will not have any significant traffic impact on the Congestion Management Program Highway System of orange County. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space A Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 78 E N G I N E E R S STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) METHODOLOGY Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) In conformance with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requirements, existing and projected AM and PM peak hour operating conditions at the nine state - controlled study intersections within the study area have been evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM2000 for signalized intersections) operations method of analysis. In Chapter 16 of the HCM, only the portion of total delay attributed to the control facility is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. In contrast, in previous versions of Chapter 9 of the HCM (1994 and earlier), delay included only stopped delay. Specifically, LDS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service that have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range for signalized intersections are shown in Table 16. Table 17 summarizes the peak hour Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM2000 for signalized intersections) level of service results at the nine state - controlled study intersections within the study area. The first column of HCM/LOS values in Table 17 presents a summary of Year 2002 existing traffic conditions. The second column presents Year 2006 background traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry, but without any BSC Specific Plan project traffic. The third column presents future forecast traffic conditions with the addition of BSC Specific Plan project traffic. The fourth column indicates whether the intersection will be adversely impacted by the proposed BSC Specific Plan project based. The fifth column indicates the forecast operating conditions with intersection improvements, if required, recommended to achieve an acceptable Level of Service. Future Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2006) background traffic conditions indicates that the three State study intersections currently operating at adverse service levels (i.e., LDS E or F) will continue to operate at adverse service levels. As such, ambient traffic growth and related projects traffic will adversely impact three of the nine State study intersections. The three impacted intersections include Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street Westminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps, and Seal Beach Boulevard at I-405 NB Ramps. Based upon application of the significant traffic impact criteria established for this study, the deficient levels of service at these intersections constitute a cumulativelbackground (i.e., not project - related) significant traffic impact. The remaining six State study intersections are expected to continue to operate at adequate service levels (i.e., LOS D or better) during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 79 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 16 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Level of Control Belay Per Vehicle Service (LOS) (seconds /vehicle) Level of Service Description This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during A < 10.0 the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. This level generally occurs with good progression, B > 10.0 and < 20.0 short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than with LDS A, causin hi her levels of avera a dela . Average traffic delays. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or C > 20.0 and < 35.0 both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Long traffic delays At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable D > 35.0 and < 55.0 progression, long cycle lengths, or high vIc ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Very long traffic delays This level is considered by many agencies (i.e. DC CMP) to be the limit of E 55.0 and < 80.0 acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Severe congestion This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed F > 80.0 the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high vIc ratios below 1.O with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors to such delay levels. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 80 V � G �.V ti IRSC� r� V G VA C.3A t ^p � %aweN G L � kn ample en N V) V N Cd -°;CC�? �L Z; WW10 0 DD DD DD S w� DD DD ��zZZZZZZZ��.�ZZZZ L 1 6 _ wdd��v�C�AAts.wAwddt�A w � .� .�. �� nai c-4 c\ ooN ri c-i Nco •V iw Ix ' ww ¢d mm CQ U AA W w dd u _ � !"� Cc L 1'■"t 16K D oa ry c*� ev r op —� v� oo w) - r� d � � •Q logo UA D [� 00 'tT Q1 .� C� 01 '� OD �►'� N �D N D t r'3 W N R L it oo Qi 6 06 �--� [- oa �t rr7 O1 �i .-: cY'3 ['*7 � .-. ....� ..... N m M V� \C v � •� ."' IV d vo cn "0 tio �_ CIOD x D D a v7 ' CtA C MD Q x • t C� co 0 E 4 T [�I} game r W [d V m m = =[ j A V U O N v N V v [l] v Z CI) U v v ed it tti C7 C) V 1 ��.► (u 4.t N CJ] cn Cf) C/a C Ln J = V � G �.V ti IRSC� r� V G E N G I N E E R S Future Year 2006 Traffic Conditions with BSC Specific Plan Project Traffic Review of Column 3 of Table 17 indicates that the BSC Specific Plan project will contribute to the significant traffic impacts at three of the nine State study intersections. These impacted i nd � intersections include Pacific Coast Highway at Z Streetlwestminster Avenue, Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps, and Seal Beach Boulevard at I-405 NB Ramps. Please note that these three intersections were also identified as significantly impacted intersections, based on the ICU methodology (detailed above). To offset the significant traffic impacts of the proposed BSC Specific Plan project, as well as ambient growth and future background traffic, intersections improvements will be required at these three intersections. Based on implementation of the previously detailed improvements at these intersections, the service levels will be improved to an acceptable level of service. The remaining six State study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable service levels during the AM and PM peak hours, with the addition of project traffic. Appendix P presents the Year 2006 HCMILOS calculations for the nine State study intersections for the AM and PM peak hour periods. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 82 E N c i N E E R s ALTERNATIVE SITE ACCESS EVALUATION This section of the traffic study evaluates the potential benefits/impacts of the extension of Apollo Drive, between Apollo Court and Saturn Way, within the BSC Specific Plan. The extension between of Apollo Drive between Apollo Court and Saturn Way will provide a direct link between Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and daily traffic volumes associated with the proposed BSC Specific Plan, assuming the Apollo Drive Connection between Apollo Court and Saturn Way Plan, are presented in Exhibits 22, 23 and 24, respectively. Exhibits 25 and 26 present future Year 2006 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the twenty -one key intersections, assuming the extension of Apollo Drive is constructed between Apollo Court and Saturn Way in conjunction with the buildout of the BSC Specific Plan. Exhibit 27 presents the estimated daily traffic volumes on the eleven key roadway segments, and on Apollo Drive. As shown in Exhibit 24, the daily volumes on Apollo Drive are projected to range between 3,751 vehicles per day and 5,756 vehicles per day. These projections assume that up to 50% of the vehicles currently making either a northbound left -turn or an eastbound right- turn at the Seal Beach/Westminster intersection will utilize the Apollo Drive Connection as an alternate route to travel to and from their destination within the project study area. Traffic Impact analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Beach Page 83 +•w�+ moz�� -aa �rs�r� �m �rr� � o — t I op>pr>u!jds VS c� IS mQ4.A A290A ° 4 J }t r-o 1d uoWWDH 0 J } p Pa 04Ou08 0 1 0 P?! o�4D 0 i r m" U 85 1 _ �� l o r d � 0 to f cc Me P9 C*4 oi 1 a _ go on f �� off Dr o DG a D° �► Q �' 4 ID 4 °'a `q 1/ v' °� aS �o ► Island [., / r Q ollage � / C4 b I Dr 4 0��r .°� on � --, � �)l°aal'njs J } 1 �Q tj A ` �J 1 �r 1 to !8 1a*oU1la6 Q C) 4� } at i r WQ� C\2 Lu U �Z w o V' z Q a � a �+ W CL 00 cr- ;5� Q7 D F a � D D U W U a a m z W D m v sell z �Z 8 z W �3 c a m�u sw IS "!A a� P^1H / ago X-0 1 J j r� ; 0.��# J �o 1� 0 ! f t tii C14 / a v1vpbuudS ` f o i5 NL 1 v c T U } L r-o Id UOWUADH p j r pa NWON °v -� o $C4Pb � r 1 � - 1 D a:9 eX9 2%� # i0 0 # i ZL 4 $Z " ti � a 1 6� # r--OL 1 � loor V � r i� •-ter � I pli Dr L _ o D 0 L o a I n4 :° 0 r S 1 ` 1 °o # � v: I o Dr 0 85 CO WZ U C� w m +-a W z� u °z �Z J CL w � A 0 W CL C4% 0 V7 ir c� cn 0 v W 4 z Q•r � 0 W U Q a r� m U~ N � � ZI'► N ++� Z Z3� a -m)4ocpPnIS � I � r 1 _ o 4 ss 1 3Y Jamotplae ` f .J \ r � � } �� zr s= '-� 85 CO WZ U C� w m +-a W z� u °z �Z J CL w � A 0 W CL C4% 0 V7 ir c� cn 0 v W 4 z Q•r � 0 W U Q a r� m U~ N � � ZI'► N ++� Z Z3� a a e-- .111:44, cn z ^ 0 C 2 fi 0---* W � m � � J z W m z N UO �� r••e Q J a F� A v E W (y � a V) 005 0 0, gg!4 cr U a U Vi A CD a _U 2 D 0 U 4 W U d d t1] C7 Z r, t 3 n v v ri Y }p" R ia1 Q w N � r 2 4a ywj U Z z . Vy Lit - Zv� 87 to w x CQ ° W *E v W Z �a_ a� A v W CL 0 Q � xQ CL CL w n Q+e � mr z C4 � � 4 Q z F Z 0 w � 4; v lieu u a CL V) cs z L&J 0 m U Z vow W # m�U bi Cfl cri z x `2 Q W .m 6 '< �Z in �--� U Q CL CL LA- A c� W Val 0 a xQ � O C9 w .-. En a� V) z ° Q v cQ < z � Q w� W a N z 4! Q1 t U r z OW9 � w - z � Hoe ii Q C a w [D J W �u a M a AU W CL Qa a U m � z F 4 V Z U a +�3 c W Q v 0 a cQ N z W 0 m D V U � �V! w Z ^ � �� " U z w o ASV E N G I N E E R S Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Table 18 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the twenty -one key study intersections for Future Year zoos traffic conditions with the Apollo Drive Extension. This table is identical in format to that of Table 10. As shown in Columns 3 and 4 of Table 18 traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact at six of the twenty - one key study intersections. Assuming the Apollo Drive Extension is constructed, the six locations forecast to operate at an unacceptable LDS with the addition of BSC Specific Plan project traffic and the peak hour in which the project has an impact are as follows: ,Key Intersection L Pacific Coast Highway at 2d StlWestminster Ave 2. Studebaker Road at Westminster Avenue 9. Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue 10. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 SB Ramps 11. Seal Beach Boulevard at 1405 NB Ramps 12. Westminster Avenue at Bolsa Chica Road SOLD ICUILOS values indicate unacceptable service levels & Project impact is considered significant. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICUILOS ICUILOS 1.094IF 1.095/F 1.0611F 0.9611E 1.1081F 1.2221F 1.0491F 1.1901F 0.929/E 1.160IF 1.1171F 0.9351E Review of column 4 of Table 10 indicates that implementation of previously recommended improvements at the six significantly impacted intersections will completely offset the impact of the proposed BSC Specific Plan project. Mitigation measures that address the project's impacts without the Apollo Drive Connection between Apollo Court and Saturn Way will be sufficient to mitigate the BSC Specific Plan's impact with the Apollo Drive Connection as well. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seal Peach Page 90 cq .L. w fi fi V 4 s � _ O �N L C6 ►a ;n on vy a, v cv p o ON ON 00 q�r -- 'G s v t , , , 00 00 n 00 00 Q� c o co �z > z zz z z z z >> >$604 >>4 0 44M v V lu ... M t~„K i"'i DG v aD O �7 �- c*i •--• et ►-- o G C en N en N \Q � .•r tip Q1 ! �? N � C v Q C C v D v C v C a D e 4 C C� .� p ... G aQ 0= =0 Cc CC CC CC aC av av �v 6-.4 a H 0 Z, rr ,, C� LS.LT.r Gz.W QUQA �GUQA QQ QQ�Gti wW WG� '= cc �7m) ;.,,,� � o fed �` CL er ,n ...� ...� v n v �v a, --• c n n --y --• xa ey o\ v C, p C� CT �D ►•D oo kn \c G 0o G� sr`� �- n �p N C N Cti N tiD w "" U C C Q D� n v7 c n v0 0o cr] tt r� •� N p .� Q� ..K +�, n-i .••: p p p Q C7 0 O a C C Q O p r� .•i yw t■.i p L cu z W Z Z Li No Lo D �� .A dU QA �UACa QQ QQ LTM LTM WGz. Uw -' o 00 W >[� Q �" aD '" " �.. .-� n cv n n ry r•� �n A C U ,'� o0 n rn r4 � v v v � � ,-- a, w CN � c*� z— ch rn Vn ..-R a. v a v c oo Wn v a.� � `� ''" er n 0a "v c— 00 w M cs a v� ••.� n •.•� •.:�,�c ac Cc� va ca CQ Co W•.: c•-� p..: -.. Q-� .... 3 �� o�,Q� WWWQQ4dA[a� UUUQQQQt�.�WAWUW o -- � a Q .� _ •� At ENO W W Gi N p p �.. > > .••� C t— O0 W) W) C7 VT -- ON 0 er �D t- vo eV v e►} -- V-4 -� CN 00 m ry cv (- `D a• N o 00 t- a 00 t►� 7 4a t) .r. 00 et \10 qqr w \0 n n t- 42N w C� n Ch w C;0 CG CC C; C; CC vC Da Cc CC V...,. Q •� .0 td � � a3 co 7 tai 72 Q CL) r c i.r Oj V x oQv oEx a�� A Q =p. • -- a Q v o a ? Co7 G4 �a N w CD 4,4 �.. u w L) v � � � W u t`�� std � � r LLJ ic - .� rv� y •� �3 N •fl ty t� C� v 0.? C� Q 4 p q� "' � s GQ w N „� N �, u -P w � /� r �•4 /� /� /�� 7/GI� H/ /�� T`RV �`t /� rw�a N V1 V1 Vl V1 V1 7.r p., cn cn m ��n < =I} w •�' ' V t+� V1 L/l Mw� y� 0 pa w z w ni 00 a; ° .... .� ro eq N cq .L. w fi fi V 4 i••r rs W �A uj z z LLJ !►�' cl m Cq z _ OEM � H Q � � � A a r� � � o �D ci D ct o = N � v� 0 s Z- 4i t� >;ow Z z Z Z Z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z z z V L V a i p �D 00 � C7 !r7 �n try 0 00 00 n a 00 r+•R .-• C7 00 Q1 n C*� '1- � `D tiD + t r I I r I e I I s I t yr '""` *4 6 C7 C D 6 v C> C C7 v0' C5 C; C5 C5 C; C5 G a C 0 �,° � wW QQ L�CQ Qty Qf.� Q� QA QQ QQ AQ �;,� n V7 N v� cv n Q r*a N cy r- ►.D n o ` 00 r- `... C\ Ln r- r- (7\ C7 r- CT \�D 00 00 w m W� 00 00 �C C70 G� GO QC �Q CQ Ga C�N C7Q V_ E Z- •r � >;ow Z z Z Z Z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z z z V V a i p �D 00 � tir,r � C7 !r7 �n try 0 00 00 n a 00 � � .-• N M v, 00 G �D M n �o 'n r - zn in D� �n vir wi as � C7 C a, D C N . q*- N -- N r- D C? n m Q •-- wi ;n •...• •.• � AT D D n (7N O D , + v C> C C7 v0' C5 C; C5 C5 C; C5 G a C C7 C Q C7 C; C7 G C; p p 0 �,° � wW QQ L�CQ Qty Qf.� Q� QA QQ QQ AQ �;,� n V7 N v� cv n Q r*a N cy r- ►.D n o ` 00 r- `... C\ Ln r- r- (7\ C7 r- CT \�D 00 00 w m W� 00 00 �C C70 G� GO QC �Q CQ Ga C�N C7Q V_ E _ C {/] �•A QQ Q� QQ QQ QQ QV Q< Q<10 In O a i p �D 00 � � N C7 !r7 �n N CAN C) +-� Q1 C� •— ..- [} N M v, 00 G �D M r- �- +n 'n r - zn in D� �n vir wi D � M M r- M o ao 00 m m '"� �v cQ oc av v0' C5 C; C5 C5 C; C5 \.R C; C; � v D v ca v Ci] t lu wi co V cm cv 3 � � v � 3 � o � � V v = o � v s c v tj a = c D V aco � � s � a -o _ x a ... . o E m E C 0 �. v v-a a o L ca >�� Cq 40 . ;v a� a E .... a t7b tb co N N � �.E,E� x �-- .o -E as -� � V) Go C4 r o u a i~y •� 07 � En V r� V rO 1rr r� y w C6 %P .t 0 eq E N G! N E E R 5 Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Table 19 summarizes the Year 2005 daily roadway link Level of Service results at the eleven study roadway links, as well as the three segments on Apollo give, with the Apollo Drive Connection between Apollo Court and Saturn way. The first column of LOS values in Table 19 presents a summary of existing daily traffic conditions. The second column lists Year 2006 background traffic conditions based on existing roadway geometry. The third column (3) presents forecast Year 2006 traffic conditions with the addition of BSC Specific Plan daily project traffic and the extension of Apollo Drive between Apollo Court and Saturn way. The fourth column indicates whether the traffic associated with the BSC Specific Plan project will have a significant impact based on the significance criteria identified earlier. Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 13 shows that the seven of the eleven study roadway segments and the three segments on Apollo Drive are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better on a daily basis. Review of Segments H, I, and J of Apollo Drive in Table 19 show that daily volumes on Apollo Drive are projected to range between, 3,751 vehicles per day and 5,756 vehicles per day. The daily volumes on Apollo Drive, between Apollo Court and Saturn way, are projected to total 3,751 vehicles per day. Based on this projected traffic volume, the Apollo Drive Extension can be designed to the standards for an "Industrial — local a" street as indicated in the Orange County ty Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA) Standard Plan 1107 (i.e. 4044 foot paved street within a 60 -foot right -of way). As indicated earlier, the daily impacts of the project on Pacific Coast Highway are not considered significant based the results of the peak hour intersection analysis prepared for the "terminal intersections" of PCH/Seal Beach (No. 6) and PCH/Main -Bolsa (No. 5). Both these intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better under existing lane configuration for Pacific Coast Highway (See Table 18). N:12300120223361Reporcl2022336 BSC Specific Plan Final TiA dated December 13, 2002.DOC Traffic Impact Analysis Report Boeing Space & Communications Group Specific Plan, Seat Beach Page 93 ON a m Q LW Z 0 Z Lu as W" IX LT" CL r•r � � V1 Vl WW rrid� > r.+ z a V � Q � Q � � Q � V 93 C � � 1 r°►; _ � a Q a W � Z SEE Q Q Q Q Q rr�� { MM W r- r` _ v Q:.1 r u Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z L.7 0' Z ?■ z u u u C> w U •� as as e� o u o u o m �, , E u„ V v > V u U � 00 .� .: G ... et tip -� [� p v ao V) C+ D L 4 00 00 r11 a en --� C4 C4 o0 N �D !V +0--4 00 e+7 !� �O C tiD M D� to N � -e -4 � � r y a as v tia --� a v v, o C4 ne ry v a, 0 M eh v a = v a c a ra v p a c� v o a v v o Q Q �.. cc v � C> g kl co � v ^ � n m •�' � Ci U ❑ � Q � V � Q � w V � �.�. �. � � Q N Q C� = � iq u Cc 0 V M1 V V ri u CQ m 40 AT � V m en 0 V r4 IT 41 5..7 U v V !� rr H Q iV ' a o a a o Z v o 3 0 v �.' � n It L'C 3 v �o�r 3 n�Q 3to CLn, Q�i<.0< .� w L7 =2 "O. as +n as eh ao Q v N v+ e n Q+ %4w, N .• ; sa n t- oa -- �p n eh Q ac e+� C n e+� e+� %n H ` . ao c o a c a v Q o v v •� a .p Vol .: v ►a �.-i t� t1 r �y v in Ch `^ �G O+ �D 'r' ►0 ors vs r- dD Q e a 0 A ry C4 p QN 'IT - qv Z M^ �! Q Q Q Q Q rr�� { MM W r- r` _ v Q:.1 r u i., •�+ ° L; sec+ v •_ 1- ��+ •i.r .� o L.7 0' a� �_.-, u u u C> w U •� as as e� o u o u o m �, , E u„ V > V u U � .� .: G ... et tip -� [� p v ao V) C+ c Cti ..K ..r I F N 4^ G 140 v c nr fn� � C4 7 as �'n `' D i' �qu to r. tia n t --- 'n v a cv 00 a v t- m M eh n a o o � as 16 a v � a_ ate' ° Z a 'v Q Q �.. cc v � C> g kl co � v ^ � n m •�' .•. Q r� o v u C> � ni W � 41 ers Q, t w p � � Q N Q C� = � iq u Cc 0 V M1 V V ri u CQ m 40 AT � V Z M^ �! Q Q Q Q Q rr�� { MM W r- r` _ v Q:.1 r u i., •�+ ° L; sec+ v •_ 1- ��+ •i.r .� o L.7 0' a� �_.-, u u u C> w U •� as as e� o u o u o m �, , E u„ V > V u U � .� .: G ... et tip -� [� p v ao V) C+ Q Cti ..K ..r I F N 4^ G 140 v c nr o y AM V] 7ff 7 'O &W �'n `' D i' �qu to r. 4) o c `' n � v C5 3 0 a v o v v a o o � as 16 a v � a_ ate' ° Z a 'v Q Q �.. ¢" v N +� a kl �-. � r � > > � o V .•. Q r� o v u X01 W Q Q Q ni W � 41 ers Q, t w p � � Q ►D Q C� = � iq u Cc 0 V M1 V V ri u CQ m 40 AT � V m en 0 V r4 IT 41 5..7 U v V !� rr H Q iV ' a o a a o Z v o 3 0 v 4" �.' � n It L'C 3 v �o�r 3 n�Q 3to CLn, Q�i<.0< OW) A. =2 "O. is a. AC .OU So qT C14 d v J on Q .n %n ao %o 4n 4n C) %n j '� � ..� r� t� n � ni � .p cr ni n+ ►a �.-i t� t1 r �y v in Z _ v Q:.1 •� •�.. i., •�+ ° L; sec+ v •_ 1- ��+ •i.r .� o L.7 0' a� �_.-, u u u C> w U •� as as e� o u o u o m �, , E u„ V V u U � 1W.4 v v � �C7 N �D rD N N N 4^ G 140 nr o y AM V] 7ff 7 'O &W �'n `' D i' �qu to r. 4) o c `' n � > v � •� 47 � V � ew ° v a � o o .v N E E E C m p V a fi fi V .a r V .y a ao L.7 0' U G 140 a.. D 72 o y AM V] 7ff 7 'O &W �'n `' D i' �qu to r. 4) o c `' �° � > v � •� 3 0 .a era 3 �" 3 3 .� ,uo '� as A a v a a_ ate' ° Z a 'v Q Q �.. ¢" v N +� "•.` > > V ca w] M pR = u X01 W Q Q .'' in 03 W � 41 +w- C «4+ E_ .w. C G S V v � y — _ . G 0 G q1 _ C iq u w V V m 0 V M1 V V ri u CQ m 40 ♦r � V m i* , �v° 0 V V 4% v �7 4m 5..7 U v V !� rr H Q iV o a o a a o Z v o 3 0 v 4" �.' � n It L'C 3 v �o�r 3 n�Q 3to CLn, Q�i<.0< OW) A. =2 "O. is a. AC .OU So qT C14 d Z p V a fi fi V .a r V .y a ao E N G I W E E R 5 W U 0. 4 Q E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX A EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Transportation Studies, Inc. City : LONG BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203040 N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Suite 116 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/02 Client : LL&G page _ 1 a -\ ZURN I NG MOVEMENTS 1PCH 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE JFCH 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1Southbound lWestbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 . 1 jIntrvl. Time Right Thru Leftl Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Loe f tj Ri ht Thru Leftl Total 03/26/021 1 1 1 07:001 25 134 281 47 178 521 123 308 1061 87 346 351 1469 07:151 38 188 361 59 188 551 109 357 1261 94 351 451 1646 07:301 49 179 411 65 269 561 93 332 1621 93 362 581 1759 07-.451 54 184 361 68 233 711 95 358 1261 94 343 661 1728 Hour1 1 166 685 1411 1 239 868 2341 420 1355 5201 368 1402 2041 6602 08:001 78 177 391 47 260 1 681 94 339 1 1111 98 290 1 591 1656 08:151 58 177 291 45 192 861 118 258 1351 86 324 461 1554 08:301 63 151 271 33 183 721 142 269 1431 72 239 471 1361 08:451 67 165 M281 26 164 871 65 205 951 85 292 63 1342 Hour1 1 266 670 1231 1 151 799 3131 375 1071 4441 341 1145 2151 5913 [BREAK) 1----------------------- 1----------------------- 1 1----------------------- 1 1____---------------_-_-1---_-_- 1 16:001 124 272 651 53 235 831 77 223 771 100 273 841 1666 16:151 84 307 621 81 261 721 77 174 661 95 288 781 1645 16:301 98 300 541 62 257 821 80 239 951 103 290 891 1749 16-4SI 100 323 411 60 274 90 63 221 92 115 287 -.841 1750 Hour1 1 406 1202 2221 1 256 1027 3271 297 857 3301 413 1138 3351 6810 17:001 125 316 721 72 281 1 1031 67 243 1 681 108 268 1 1061 1849 17:151 132 331 671 61 304 1011 62 246 881 90 345 731 1880 17:301 121 365 631 60 299 731 56 252 1051 119 358 591 1930 17:45 129 318 70 64 335 961 65 213 94 112 283 801 1859 Hour) 1 487 1330 2721 1 257 1219 3731 250 954 3751 429 1254 3181 7518 Totall 1325 3887 7581 903 3913 1 12471 1342 4237 1 16691 1551 4939 1 10721 26843 Apr. 1 22.1 65.1 12.61 14.8 64.5 20.51 18.5 58.4 23.01 20.5 65.3 14.11 - Int. 1 1 1 4.9 14.4 2.81 1 # 3.3 14.5 4.61 1 1 4.9 15.7 6.21 1 1 5.7 18.3 3.91 1 1 - a -\ Transportation Studies, Inc. City : LONG BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203040 N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Suite 116 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/02 Client : LL&G Page : 2 A -Z TURNING MQVEME US 1PCH iWESTMINSTER AVENUE 1PCH 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1Southbound 1Westbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 11ntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Leftj. Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftj Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/26/02 to 08:45 on 03/26/02 Time 1 07 :15 1 07:15 1 47:15 1 07 :15 Vol. 219 728 1521 239 950 2501 387 1386 5251 379 1346 2281 PCt. ! 19.9 66.2 13.81 16.6 66.0 17.31 16.8 60.3 22.81 19.4 58.9 11.61 Total 1099 1439 2298 j 1953 High 08:00 07:30 07 :15 07:30 Vol. 78 177 391 65 269 56# 109 357 1261 93 362 581 Total 1 294 1 390 1 592 1 513 1 PHF 1 0.934 1 0.922 1 0.970 1 0.951 - 1 A -Z City : LONG BEACH N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Client . LLiwG Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Name: E0203040 Site Code : 00000922 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 3 A -3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1PCH INESTMINSTER AVENUE 1PCH 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE ]Southbound ]Westbound }Northbound jEastbound Start 1 I I I llntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left I Ri ht Thru Leftl Right Thru Leftj Right Thru Leftj Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/26/02 to 17:45 on 03/26/02 Time 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 Vol. 487 1330 2721 257 1219 3731 250 954 3751 429 1254 3181 Pct. 23.3 63.6 13.01 13.8 65.9 20.11 15.8 60.4 23.71 21.4 62.6 15.81 Total 2089 1849 1579 2001 � High 17:30 17:45 17:30 17:30 Vol. 121 365 631 64 335 961 56 252 1051 119 358 591 Total 1 549 1 495 i 413 1 536 1 PHF 1 0.951 1 0.933 j 0.955 1 0.933 1 A -3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : LONG BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKm ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AV'ENU'E Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G A Study Name: H0203041 Site Code : 00000922 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1STUDEBAKER ROA !WESTMINSTER AV ;WESTMINSTER AV !Southbound lWestbound !Eastbound Start l 1 1 lrntrvl. Time Ri ht Leftl Right Thrul Thru Leftj Total 03/27/021 1 1 1 07:001 140 811 94 1441 123 3791 961 07:151 181 831 99 1861 126 3941 1069 07:301 201 1001 118 1871 153 2841 1043 07:451 197 641 75 1431 139 3401 958 Hourl 1 719 3281 386 6601 541 13971 4031 08 :001 201 1 681 85 1 1281 109 1 3411 932 08:151 186 421 52 1531 110 2691 812 08:301 230 421 48 1411 144 3211 886 .S8:45.1 1B8 361 35 941 79 - 2331 665 Hourl 1 805 1881 l 220 5161 402 11641 3295 (BREAK) l--------__--___l---------------1---------____--1--__--- 1 1 1 16:001 282 1 641 114 1 1191 158 1 2101 947 16:151 290 741 108 1051 158 2711 1006 16:301 304 721 122 1411 150 2481 1037 16-451 328 901 116 90 196 2771 1097 Hourl l 1204 3001 460 4551 662 10061 4087 17:001 338 1 821 124 1 1571 178 1 3021 1181 17 :151 329 651 90 1291 201 2791 1093 17:301 317 861 74 1281 173 2701 1048 17:451 343 651 66 1111 153 2501 988 Hourl 1 1327 2981 354 5251 705 11011 4310 Totall 4055 1 11141 1420 1 21561 2330 1 46681 15723 Apr. 1 78.4 21.51 39.7 60.21 33.1 66.81 - t Int. 1 1 25.7 7.01 9.0 13.71 14.6 29.61 - A Study Name: H0203041 Site Code : 00000922 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : LANG BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 £/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G A -5 Study Name: H0203041 Site Code : 04000922 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS ISTUDEBAKER ROA (WESTMINSTER AV (WESTMINSTER AV (Southbound lWestbound jEastbound Start I I j lIntrvl. Time Ri ht Loeftj Ri ht Thru Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 Time 07:00 1 07:00 1 07:00 1 Vol. 719 3281 386 6601 541 13971 Pct. 68.6 31.31 36.9 63.01 27.9 72.01 Total # 2047 1 1045 1 1938 High 07:30 ! 07:30 1 o7:ls Vol. 201 1001 118 1871 126 3941 Total j 301 305 520 PHF 8.869 ; 0.857 0.931 A -5 Study Name: H0203041 Site Code : 04000922 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : LONG BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVE'S ISTUDEBAKER ROA IWESTMINSTER AV 1WESTMINSTER AV • Southbound 1Westbound lEastbound Start 1 1 1 llntrvl. Time I Right Left I Right Thru I Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/27/02 to 17:45 on 03/27/02 Time 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 Vol. } 1312 3231 444 5041 748 11281 Pct. 80.2 19.71 44.4 55.51 39.8 60.11 Total 1635 908 1876 High 17:00 17 :00 17:00 Vol. 338 821 124 1571 178 3021 Total 1 420 1 281 1 480 PHF 1 0.973 1 0.807 1 0.977 1 N-lb L9 Study Name: H0203041 Site Code : 00000922 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page 3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 3 1824 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : S7 C3D£HAK£R ROAD Suite 116 E/w Direction : SR -22 EB RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92745 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS 1STUDEBAKER RDA 1SR -22 EB RAMPS 1STVDEBAKER ROA 1Southbound lwestbound 1Northbound Start 1 1 11ntrvl. Time Thru Left Ri ht Leftl Ri ht Thrul Total 03/28/021 1 07:001 189 381 10 01 314 731 624 07:151 196 291 7 11 253 571 543 07:301 241 491 14 81 292 841 688 07:45 261 -7-0-1--- 18 4 263 1061 722 Hour1 887 1861 49 131 1122 3201 2577 1 1 1 1 08:001 249 371 13 61 227 1151 647 08:151 228 251 9 71 277 1091 655 08:301 237 191 5 31 249 921 605 08.-45[- 221 241 3 21 288 1071 645 Hour1 935 1051 30 181 1041 4231 2552 1 1 1 1 (BREAK) 1--------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- 16:001 344 1081 17 91 265 1611 904 16:15€ 375 871 14 111 277 1461 914 16:301 439 981 26 71 253 1721 995 �16-451 406 83L... 18 12 232 1541 945 Hour( 1564 376E 75 391 1027 6331 3714 1 1 1 1 17:001 448 971 22 81 267 1751 1017 17:151 463 1181 20 161 245 1831 1045 17:301 489 1271 17 161 268 1911 1108 17:451 447 981 24 ill 235 1521 967 Hour1 1847 4401 83 511 1015 7021 4137 1 1 1 1 Totall 5233 11071 237 1211 4205 20771 12980 % Apr. 1 62.5 17.41 66.2 33.71 66.9 33.01 - Int. 1 40.3 8.51 1.8 0.91 32.3 16.01 - 1 1 1 1 Study Name: H0203052 Site Code : 00400917 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : I Transportation Studies.. Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue NIS Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : SR -22 ES RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS ISTUDEBAKER ROA ISR -22 EB RAMPS ISTUDEHAXER ROA (Southbound jWestbound INorthbound Start I I j jIntrvl. Time I Thru Leftj Right Leftj. Ri ht Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:04 on 03/28/02 to 08:45 on 03/28/02 Time 07:30 1 07 :30 1 07 :30 1 Vol. 979 1811 54 251 1059 4141 Pct. 84.3 15.61 68.3 31.61 71.8 28.11 Total } 1160 1 79 1 1473 1 High 07:45 1 07 :30 1 08:15 1 Vol. 261 701 14 81 277 1091 Total } 331 1 22 1 386 # PHF 0.876 ! 0.897 1 0.954 I STLIDEBAI{ER ROAD 979 468 181 y T 1628 03/28/02 '� 54 07.30aM 28: 15a" 2 712 1319 25 � 1248 SR -22 EB RAMPS N 24 ?7 y T f 414 1604 1859 STUDEBAHER ROAD k-m- % Study Name: H0203052 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/w Direction : SR -22 EB RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS #STUDEBAKER ROA ISR -22 EB RAMPS ISTUDESAKER RoA (Southbound (Westbound (Northbound Start I # I lIntrvl. Time I Thru Leftj Right Loeftj Right Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:40 on 03/28/02 to 17:45 on 03/28/02 Time ' 17 :00 1 17:00 1 17 :00 1 Vol. 1847 4401 83 511 1015 7011 Pct. : 80.7 19.21 61.9 38.01 59.1 40.81 Total 2287 134 1716 High 17:30 17:15 17:30 j Vol. j 489 1271 20 161 268 1911 Total 616 36 j 459 PHF 0.928 0.930 0.934 A.'q Study Name: H0203052 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : 3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1824 F. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : SR -22 WB RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G 1STUDEBAKER ROA 1SR -22 WB l jSouthbound 1Westbound Start # 1 Time I Thru Left Ri ht 03/27/021 1 07:001 166 111 38 07 :151 125 71 67 07 :301 122 141 126 07-45 186 .171 135 Hour1 599 491 366 1 1 08:001 198 151 95 08:151 159 71 71 08:301 137 131 116 09-451 124 j! 1 5 nrmri�.r�i i � I= rn..�rrr1 � T Hour1 618 441 387 1 1 [BREAK) 1--------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 1 1 16:001 266 271 79 16:151 240 111 44 16:301 254 181 64 16:451 234 15 BS Hour1 994 711 272 1 1 17:001 263 241 67 17:151 319 291 75 17:301 326 181 93 17-451 245 211 84 Hour1 1153 921 319 1 1 Tota11 3364 2561 1344 Apr. 1 92.9 7.01 31.1 } Int. 1 32.2 2.41 12.9 1 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS LAMPS 1STUDEBAKER ROA 1Northbound } lIntrvl. Lef t Eight Thrul Total 1 1 1131 14 491 391 1101 6 701 385 1341 10 loll S07 1441 6 1471 635 5011 36 3671 1918 1 1 1211 10 1181 557 961 12 1271 472 1321 11 1141 523 --11091 6 931 446 4581 39 4521 1998 1 1 --------------- #------- 1 1 2021 22 1731 769 2251 28 1981 746 2311 15 1471 729 2891 14 1761 813 9471 79 6941 3057 1 1 2451 22 1921 813 2401 16 1761 855 2761 12 2141 939 304-1 16 1681 838 10651 66 7501 3445 1 1 29711 220 22631 10418 68.81 8,8 91.11 - 28.51 2.1 21.71 - N--.ko Study Name: B0203053 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 43/27/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Gar=y Avenue N/S Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : SR -22 WB RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS ISTUDEBAKER ROA !SR -22 WB RAMPS ISTUDEBAKER ROA (Southbound lWestbound lNorthbound Start I f I j1ntrvl. Time I Thru Leftj Right Leftj Right--- Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 Time 07:15 1 07:45 1 07:45 Vol. 680 521 417 4931 39 5061 Pct_ 92.8 7.11 45.8 54.11 7.1 92.81 Total 732 1 910 1 545 I High 08:00 1 07:45 1 07:45 j Vol. 198 151 135 1441 6 1471 Total j 213 279 153 PHF 0.859 1 0.815 # 0.890 N " \%, Study Name: H0203053 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue NIS Direction : STUDEBAKER ROAD Suite 116 E/W Direction : SR -22 WB RAMPS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS ISTUDEBAKER ROA !SR -22 WB RAMPS ISTUDEBAKER ROA (Southbound lWestbound lNorthbound Start j I I - jIntrvl. Time Thru Leftl Right Loeft-1 Right Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/27/02 to 17:45 on 03/27/02 Time 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 i Vol. 1153 921 319 10651 66 7501 Pct. 92.6 7.31 23.0 75.91 8.0 91.91 Total 1245 1 1384 j 816 { High E 17:15 1 17 :45 17:30 1 Vol. 319 291 84 3441 12 2141 Total # 348 1 388 1 226 PHF 0.894 1 0.891 1 0.902 A- �t Study Nance: H0203053 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 3 City : SEAL BEACH (�ED N/S Direction : MAIN - SOLSA E/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Client : LL&G Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Name: H0203051 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 1 k -- %'3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1BOLSA AVENUE 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1MAIN STREET 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY [Southbound jWestbound [Northbound [Eastbound Start 1 1 - 1 1 ]Intrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Leftl Pi ht Thru Lsef t.1 Ri ht Thru Le-ftl Total 03/26/021 1 1 1 07:001 15 11 21 3 412 11 12 4 111 12 225 101 718 07:151 11 3 11 0 429 41 14 11 121 6 305 41 800 07 :301 16 7 21 0 455 71 14 9 121 8 314 81 852 07:45 14 10 51 2 444 131 17 11 161 16 313 91 870 Hour[ 1 55 31 101 € 5 1740 251 57 35 511 42 1157 311 3240 08:001 16 7 11 0 399 1 61 17 11 1 131 14 261 1 81 753 08:151 29 9 71 1 330 111 19 9 151 20 285 161 751 08:301 19 10 21 0 383 121 16 12 201 15 257 141 760 08:451 21 14 sl 0 334 21 15 13 21 31 247 171 739 Hour( 1 85 40 151 1 1 1446 SQ1 67 45 691 80 1050 551 3003 [BREAKI ----------------- - - - - -- ----------------- 1 - - - - -- ---- ------------- - - - - -- - -- ----- ---------- --- --�__ -____ 16:001 23 13 41 3 272 251 26 B 91 32 340 351 790 16:151 22 19 101 1 220 241 17 26 211 24 327 291 740 16:301 26 15 81 3 263 171 22 19 281 37 366 231 827 16:451 34 21 si 3 233 171 20 21 291 21 396 281 828 Hour[ 1 105 68 271 1 10 988 831 85 74 871 114 1429 1151 3185 17:001 34 14 91 5 264 1 281 15 20 1 261 24 464 1 351 938 27:151 28 23 71 2 294 231 22 27 181 24 453 271 948 17.301 31 18 41 8 311 291 22 15 281 43 470 281 1007 17:451 29 17 31 8 413 251 20 18 19 28 367 331 980 Hour[ 1 122 72 231 1 23 1282 1051 79 80 911 119 1754 1231 3873 Tota11 368 211 751 39 5456 1 2631 288 234 1 2981 355 5390 1 3241 13301 Apr. 1 56.2 32.2 11.41 0.6 94.7 4.51 35.1 28.5 36.31 5.8 88.8 5.31 - Int. 1 1 2.7 1.5 0.51 1 0.2 41.0 1.91 1 2.1 1.7 2.21 1 2.6 40.5 2.41 1 - k -- %'3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203051 N/S Direction : MAIN - BCLSA Suite 116 Site Code : 00000976 E/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/02 Client : LL&G Page TURNING MOVEMENTS 1BOLSA AVENUE IPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1MAIN STREET IPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY j Southbound (WV.) I Westbound Q t 1 Northbound Q Ea j Eastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrv1. Time Ri ht Thru Left] -Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Lefti Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07 :00 on 03/26/02 to 08:45 on 03/26/02 1 Time 1 07:15 1 07:15 j 07:15 1 07:15 1 Vol. 1 57 27 91 7 1727 301 62 42 531 44 1193 291 Pct. 1 61.2 29.0 9.61 0.1 98.1 1.71 39.4 26.7 33.71 3.4 94.2 2.21 Total 1 93 1 1759 j 157 1 1266 1 High j 07:45 1 47:30 1 07:45 j 07:45 1 Vol. } 14 10 51 0 455 71 17 11 161 16 313 91 Total 1 29 1 462 1 44 1 33@ 1 PHF 1 4.801 1 0.951 1 0.892 j 0.936 1 Transportation Studies, Inc_ City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Carry Avenue Study Name: H0203051 N/S Direction : MAIN - SOLSA Suite 116 Site Code : 00400976 £/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/02 Client : LL&G Page : 3 A - .s TURNING MOVEMENTS 1BOLSA AVENUE 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY IMAIN STREET 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1 Southbound t w 81 Wes tbound ( H g Northbound (, E 1 Eastbound (,St) Start 1 1 llntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left.j. Right Thru Lefti Right Thru Leftj Right Thru LeftTotal Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:40 on 03/26/42 to 17:45 on 03/26/02 Time 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 � Vol. 122 72 231 23 1282 1051 79 BD 911 119 1754 1231 Pct. 56.2 33.1 10.51 1.6 90.9 7.41 31.6 32.0 36.41 5.9 87.8 6.11 Total # 217 1 1410 1 250 1 1996 High 1 17:15 17:45 17:15 1 17:30 # Vol. 1 28 23 71 8 413 251 22 27 181 43 470 281 Total 1 58 1 446 1 67 541 PHF 1 0.935 1 0.790 1 0.932 1 0.922 1 A - .s City : SEAL BEACH ( D NIS Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD E/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Client : LL&G Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Name: H0203050 Site Code : 00000976 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 k— %%& TURNING MOVEMENTS ISEAL BEACH BOULEVARD ;PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY ;SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD ;PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY ;Southbound ;Westbound ;Northbound ;Eastbound Start 1 1 I 1 11ntrvl. Time Right Thru -Leftj Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftl Right Thru Lefti Total 03/27/021 1 1 I 1 07 :001 30 6 631 140 365 51 16 27 51 S 220 273 909 07:151 27 22 831 138 395 71 24 41 11 2 280 341 1054 07:301 25 10 601 150 463 61 17 48 21 6 299 271 1113 07--451 23 19 631 144 453 61 24 33 21-- 9 283 351, 1094 Hour] 1 105 57 2691 1 572 1676 241 81 149 101 22 1082 1231 4170 08:001 36 24 691 138 357 1 91 14 30 1 41 3 275 1 361 995 08:151 19 22 611 113 336 151 26 29 41 9 245 451 924 08:301 48 19 591 83 362 151 26 34 51 4 253 341 942 28.-.4 5.1 37 31 621 87 292 61 13 26 11 6 202 451 808 Hour; 1 140 96 2511 1 421 1347 451 79 119 141 22 975 1601 3669 zBREAK] --- --- ---- --- ---- -- - - -- ----------------------- 1 ----------------------- 1 1 16:001 52 28 921 74 175 211 17 35 31 10 306 461 859 16:151 63 26 821 86 207 61 13 34 21 9 315 341 877 16:301 57 55 1291 68 217 131 17 27 41 7 310 401 944 16-451 67 24 1101 50 210 121 29 22 51 13 275 55 873 Hour; 1 239 133 4131 1 278 809 521 76 118 141 39 1206 1761 3553 17:001 62 54 1221 65 277 1 181 21 14 1 11 7 341 1 571 1039 17:151 61 41 1241 75 276 181 40 1 01 8 460 551 3159 17:301 55 53 1451 82 315 191 22 29 31 4 360 441 1131 17:451 57 40 129A__ 83 312 161 24 41 21 11 425 .491 1189 Hour; 235 188 5201 305 1180 711 107 85 61 30 1586 2051 4538 Total# 719 474 14531 1576 5012 1921 343 471 441 113 4849 6641 15910 # Apr. 1 27.1 17.9 54.91 23.2 73.9 2.81 39.9 54.8 5.11 2.0 86.1 11.81 - 1; Int. 1 4.5 2.9 9.11 9.9 31.5 1.21 2.1 2.9 0.21 0.7 30.4 4.11 - k— %%& Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203050 N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00000976 £/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/27/02 Client : LL&G Page : 2 PACIFIC COAS 1788 <— 132 'T SEAL BEACH BOt1LEVE 111 ?5 2 75 854 1315 IIICHWC14 3077 1137 -4 20 7je 83/2 ? /02 07.15aM 108: Seam 4256 N 363 4 � T 133 152 L BEACH BQULEVA ON- xlr\ t-- 570 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1668 3757 (SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD PPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD PPACIFIC OAST HIGHWAY -- 1Southbound ��j IL 1Westbound tN S 1Northbound E !Eastbound Start 1 11ntrv1. Time I Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftf. Ri ht Thru Leftj Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07 :00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 1 Time 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 07 :15 1 07 :15 1 Vol. 111 75 2751 570 1668 281 79 152 91 20 1137 1321 Pct. 24.0 16.2 59.61 25.1 73.6 1.21 32.9 63.3 3.71 1.5 88.2 10.21 Total 1 461 1 2266 1 244 1 1289 1 High 1 07:15 1 07:30 1 07:30 1 ❑7:30 1 Vol. 1 27 22 831 150 463 61 17 48 21 6 799 771 Total 1 132 1 619 1 67 1 332 1 PHF 1 0.873 1 0.915 1 0.895 1 0.970 1 PACIFIC COAS 1788 <— 132 'T SEAL BEACH BOt1LEVE 111 ?5 2 75 854 1315 IIICHWC14 3077 1137 -4 20 7je 83/2 ? /02 07.15aM 108: Seam 4256 N 363 4 � T 133 152 L BEACH BQULEVA ON- xlr\ t-- 570 <- - 1668 3757 -- 1491 CIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203050 N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00000976 E/W Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/27/02 Client : LL&G Page 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS jSEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1 Southbound Q w g1 Wes tbound �., tit B") 1 Northbound (. e lS') 1 Eas tbound s g+ Start 1 I 1 11ntrvl. Time I Ri ht Thru Left.1 Left. Right Thru .-Left Ri ht Thru Leftl Left Right Thru Leftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/27/02 to 17 :45 on 03/27/02 j Time 17:00 1 17:00 1 17 :00 17:0p # Vol. 1 235 188 5201 305 1180 711 107 85 61 30 1586 2051 Pct. 1 24.9 19.9 55.11 19.6 75.8 4.51 54.0 42.9 3.01 1.6 87.0 11.21 Total 1 943 1 1556 1 198 1 1821 1 High 1 17:34 1 17:30 1 17:45 1 17:15 1 Vol. 1 55 53 1451 82 315 191 24 41 21 8 460 551 Total 1 253 1 416 1 67 1 523 1 PHF 1 0.931 1 0.935 1 0.738 1 4.870 ] N.\% Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203057 N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00000979 E/W Direction : BOLSA AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G Page 1 d —■a TURNI NG MOVEMENTS 1SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1BOLSA AVENUE {SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1BOLSA AVENUE 1Southbound 1Westbound 1Northbound lEastbound Start 1 1 1 1 11ntrv1. Time I Right Thru Left Right Thru Leftl Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 03/28/021 1 1 07 :001 19 111 11 8 0 31 2 231 31 2 1 311 402 07:151 19 107 21 7 1 41 1 225 01 4 1 361 407 07:301 20 138 41 10 1 11 0 243 31 6 0 371 463 07 :45 L 23 135 61 9 1 11 1 227 41 5 0 281 440 Hourl 1 81 491 131 1 34 3 91 4 916 101 17 2 1321 1712 48:001 23 116 61 9 1 1 61 0 217 1 11 5 0 1 361 420 08 :151 25 308 41 8 2 41 1 186 21 4 0 311 375 08 :301 21 99 51 11 1 41 1 182 01 3 0 311 358 08:451 19 101 41 7 1 51 2 175 31 7 ❑ 23 347 Hour) 1 88 424 191 1 35 5 191 4 764 61 19 0 1211 1500 IBREAK I ----------------------- ----------------------- 1 1 1 - ____ -- � 16:001 64 181 31 6 2 01 2 115 11 6 1 401 421 16:151 66 182 71 6 2 31 1 126 01 2 1 471 443 16:301 66 169 71 6 0 21 3 137 11 11 1 421 445 16:45 64 179 i 2 3 .-41 2 123 31 7 0 351 423 Hour 1 260 731 181 1 20 7 91 8 501 51 26 3 1641 1732 17:D01 73 246 31 2 1 1 41 3 131 1 11 5 0 1 421 511 17:151 68 256 41 3 0 41 4 127 01 8 5 331 512 17:301 58 235 31 2 1 31 4 118 01 6 1 291 460 17 :45 45 233 1 4 1 21 3 113 11 7 2 271 439 Hour1 1 244 970 111 1 11 3 131 14 489 21 26 8 1311 1922 Tota11 673 2596 613 100 18 1 Sol 30 2666 1 231 88 13 1 5481 6866 Apr. 1 20.2 77.9 1.81 59.5 10.7 29.71 1.1 98.0 0.81 13.5 2.0 84.41 - Int. 1 1 1 9.8 37.8 0.81 1 1 1.4 0.2 0.71 1 1 0.4 38.8 0.31 ! 1 1.2 0.1 7.91 1 1 - d —■a Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203057 N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00040979 E/W Direction : BOLSA AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G page : 2 SEAL _ BEACH BOULEUA95 TURNING MOVEMENTS [SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1BOLSA AVENUE ISEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1BOLSA AVENUE 18 [Southbound [Westbound [Northbound [Eastbound Start 1 1 1 [ IIntrvl. Time I Ri ht Thru Left], Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07 :00 on 03/28/02 to 08:45 on 03/28/02 1 Time 1 07:15 1 07 :15 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 Vol.. 1 85 496 181 35 4 121 2 912 81 20 1 1371 Pct. 1 14.1 82.8 3.01 68.6 7.8 23.5[ 0.2 98.9 0.81 12.6 0.6 86.71 Total 1 599 1 51 1 922 1 158 1 High 1 07 :45 1 08:00 1 07:30 1 07:30 1 Vol. 1 23 135 61 9 1 61 0 243 31 6 0 371 Total 1 164 1 16 1 246 1 43 1 PHP 1 0.913 [ 0.796 1 0.936 1 0.918 1 SEAL _ BEACH BOULEUA95 Tcm 496 1084 8I'5 18 1683 BOLSA AVENUE 97 83/28/02 � 35 � 08:00aM 137 � 4 255 1 730 72 1 � � 12 28 3 21 BOLSA AUENU N 1450 528 912 SEAL BEACH BOULEVA D Tcm Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203057 N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00000979 E/N Direction : BOLSA AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G gage ` 3 SEAL _ BEACH BOULEVA D TURNING MOVEM TTS 970 631 ISEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1BOLSA AVENUE ISEAL BEACH BOULEVARD JBOLSA AVENUE 244 (Southbound lNestbound lKorthbound lEastbound Start } I I # lIntrvi. Time Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftl Right Thru Leftl Ricjht Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/28/02 to 17:45 on 03/28/02 Time 17:40 j 17 :00 1 17:00 1 17 :00 � Vol. 244 970 ill 11 3 131 14 489 21 26 8 1311 Pct. j 19.9 79.1 0.81 40.7 11.1 48.11 2.7 96.8 0.3; 15.7 4.8 79.31 Total 1225 27 1 505 # 165 1 High 17:15 17:00 1 17:04 j 17 :00 1 Vol. 68 255 41 2 1 41 3 131 5 0 421 Total 328 ! 7 1 135 47 PHF 0.933 1 0.964 1 0.935 0.877 SEAL _ BEACH BOULEVA D 970 631 244 it y T 1856 BOLSA AVENUE 249 <— 63/28/02 � 11 : 05 45pM 131 F— 3 414 1922 60 $ '� � 13 26 33 BOLSA AVENII N 1514 y � T f 1809 489 S AL BEACH BOULEVA D Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/W Direction : AWLFO LOPEZ DRIVE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G R-z.Z Study Name: H0203056 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS SEAL BEACH BOU ISEAL BEACH BOU JADOLFO LOPEZ D JSouthbound JNorthbound J£astbound Start J J J Jlntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Thru Left[.- Ri ht Leftl Total 03/27/021 1 1 07:001 5 1311 292 of 1 21 431 07:151 7 1461 323 31 5 11 485 07 :341 5 2531 356 41 1 21 621 07:4 S 1 • � i niter. ri�i�m��rirrrniri. 8 mni. rr` �w+ 157 i r n�unriri. nnr�rrr_ 265 ir. ii�rrrrnnr�r 21 0 _iri�rrrr.�rrri..mw.�rrr 4 436 - ^ Hour) 1 25 6871 1236 91 7 91 1973 08:401 4 1 1401 298 1 11 3 1 31 449 08:151 8 1401 277 11 0 21 428 08:301 3 1941 147 11 1 61 352 08:451 1 144 148 11 1 4 295 Hour) 16 6141 870 41 5 151 1524 (BREAK) J--------- - - - - -- ---------------J---------------J------- J 16:041 2 J 2771 161 1 01 1 J 51 446 16:151 4 2601 222 41 3 41 497 16:301 7 3141 141 31 2 ill 478 ., 16:451 4 23.61 126 uui_n iririrr 4 1 nroi 2 +ni.n +ni nnr 5 3 7 7 Hour1 17 10871 650 111 8 251 1798 17:801 3 2681 148 01 7 41 430 17 :151 4 3141 131 11 0 31 453 17:301 5 2981 108 1J 2 91 423 17:451 4 38.11 162 1 0 3 551 Hourl 1 16 12611 549 31 9 191 1857 Totall 74 1 36491 3305 1 271 29 1 681 7152 It Apr. J 1.9 98.01 99.1 0.81 29.8 70.11 - Int. J J 1.0 51.01 1 46.2 0.31 J 0.4 0.91 J _ R-z.Z Study Name: H0203056 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/W Direction : ADOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G SEAL-BEACH _ BOULEVA D 24 1252 696 T 192 ADOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE 34 <-- 83/27/02 87:15aM 08:00aN lA � 53 1991 N 195 10 S L BEACH BOULEVA D A..-2 -MP Study Name: H0203056 Site Code : 00000939 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS ISEAL BEACH BOU ISEAL BEAM BOU JADOLFO LOPEZ D (Southbound lNorthbound (Eastbound Start I I - } lintrvl. Time Ri ht Thrul Thru Left Ri ht Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 Time 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 Vol. 1 24 6961 1242 101 9 101 Pct. 1 3.3 96.61 99.2 0.71 47.3 52.61 Total 1 724 1 1252 I 19 1 High 1 07:30 1 07:30 1 07:15 Vol. 1 5 2531 356 41 5 lj Total 1 258 ! 360 1 6 PHF 1 0.697 1 0.869 1 0.791 SEAL-BEACH _ BOULEVA D 24 1252 696 T 192 ADOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE 34 <-- 83/27/02 87:15aM 08:00aN lA � 53 1991 N 195 10 S L BEACH BOULEVA D A..-2 -MP Study Name: H0203056 Site Code : 00000939 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/W Direction : ADOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS SEAL BEACH BOU 1SEAL BEACH BOU 1ADOLFO LOPEZ n 1Southbound lNorthdound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrvl. Time Right Thrul Thru Leftl Ri ht Left-1 Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/27/02 to 17 :45 on 03/27/02 Time 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:04 1 Vol. 1 16 12611 549 31 9 191 Pct. 1 1.2 98.71 99.4 0.51 32.1 67.81 Total 1 1277 1 557 1 28 1 High 1 17:45 1 17 :45 1 17:00 1 Vol. 1 4 3811 162 11 7 41 Total 1 385 1 163 1 11 1 PHF 1 0.829 1 0.846 1 0.636 1 SEAL BEACH BOU LEU A 16 568 1261 1845 pDOLFO LOPEZ DRIVE 19 {— 83/2 7/02 05:00pM 85:45pN 19 � 47 1857 N ieaa T 3 SEAL BEACH BOIJLEUA D N. zy Study Name: H0203056 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 3 City: SEAL BEACH (ED N -S Direction: SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD E -1N Direction: WESTMINSTER AVENUE Transportation Studies, Inc. 1 820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92745 Total �** BREAK '""* 44:00 PM 44:15 PM 04:34 PM 44:45 PM 329 702 344 1 322 851 367 165 772 49 191 42 48 220 Groups Printed- Turning Movements 213 53 Southbound 229 70 westbound 210 61i Northbound Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Ri t Thru Left Right Thru Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 07 :00 AM 51 154 66 41 213 37 29 253 07:15 AM 51 174 66 63 283 81 39 253 07:30 AM 79 195 100 146 327 87 55 261 07:45 AM 71 242 102 82 318 80 49 219 Total 252 765 3341 292 1141 285 172 996 08:00 AM 100 213 85 92 247 136 ' 51 218 08:15 AM 78 155 74 118 226 81 40 207 08:34 AM 77 184 98 59 219 81 40 166 08:45 AM 74 154 87 53 159 69 34 181 Total �** BREAK '""* 44:00 PM 44:15 PM 04:34 PM 44:45 PM 329 702 344 1 322 851 367 165 772 49 191 42 48 220 63 55 213 53 68 229 70 90 177 611 35 65 158 601- 50 57 212 931 43 57 210 61i 46 172 188 189 159 Total 220 853 2281 269 757 2751 174 708 05:00 PM 55 221 94, 72 158 38 42 183 05:15 PM 50 226 73 58 240 46 66 225 05:34 PM 65 237 77 53 218 77.1 54 169 05:45 PM 63 203 691 45 232 51 ' 52 143 File Name : h0209014 Site code : 00000917 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :I E i atai Eastbound 313 x 228 Left Right Thru ' Left { Int. Tota I 1.0 1.01 1.0 420 ' 4973 Grand Total 6 4 134 201 1008 5 7 131 33 1196 411 7 151 361 1408 11 10 165 47! 1397 261 28 582 136 5009 20 9 164 48'; 1383 7 10 104 25' 1125 6 5 136 56 1127 12 4 101 371 961 45 28 505 1661, 4596 13 10 152 99' 1091 17 i 11 133 98 1111 9 12 176 121; 1233 10 19 184 94' 1207 491 52 645 412 4642 161 17 157 97 1150 10 i 17 196 114 ; 1321 101 19 216 113 ; 1305 5_ 1 17 218 99 1197 i atai Z66 68 1 313 x 228 848 212 214 720 41 70 787 420 ' 4973 Grand Total 1034 3247 1219 1111 3597 1139; 725 3196 151 178 2519 1134 19220 Apprch %n 18.9 58.7 22.3 19.0 61.5 19-51 17.8 78.3 3.9 4.6 65.8 29.6 Total % 5.4 16.7 6.31 5.8 18.7 5.9 ; 3.8 16.5 0.81 0.9 13.1 5.9 A-ts Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, GA. 92705 File Name : h0209014 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :2 but In Total ® I 1478� 1 3011 8241 353 r RQnt I hru Len L* r r r J i L ; --r, North �— �1;1- -� 12102 8 :00 :00 AM 2; H L Tufni Movements 0 ! o Left Thru Pjjht 124M UP n Crow Not Naffed A-, x 4 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I Start Time i Righ Thru Left App. Righ Thru Left App. Righ Thru Left App. E Righ ' Thru Left APP. Int. t Tota! t Total # Total t � , Total Total i Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08 :45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectio 07:15 AM n Volume 301 24 8 353 1478 343 117 5 384 1902 i94 961 40 i 1195 33 512 164 809 ' 5384 Percent 20.4 55.8 23.9 18.0 61.8 20.2 16.2 80.4 3.3 4.1 75.6 20.3 X7:30 Volume 79 195 100 374 106 327 87 520 55 261 4 320 7 151 36 194 � 1408 Peak 10-956 Factor High Int. 07:45 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 107:45 AM s Volume 71 242 102 415 106 327 87 520 55 261 4 320 1 10 166 47 223 Peak Factor 0.890 0.914 0.934 1 0.907 but In Total ® I 1478� 1 3011 8241 353 r RQnt I hru Len L* r r r J i L ; --r, North �— �1;1- -� 12102 8 :00 :00 AM 2; H L Tufni Movements 0 ! o Left Thru Pjjht 124M UP n Crow Not Naffed A-, x 4 Start Time 4 R'g Thru Left App' High t Left Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05 :45 PM - intersectio 04:45 PM It 1 n Peak Iof1 105:30 PM Volume 238 913 314 1465 Percent 16.2 62.3 21.4 736 05:15 Volume 50 226 73 349 Peak 74.3 4.6 58 240 Factor 344 66 225 High Int. 05:30 PM Volume 65 237 77 379 Peak 348 66 225 Factor 0.966 Transportation Studies, Inc. 1 820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Kig � Thru Left App' High Thru Left 33.5 341 17 196 Total It 1 Peak Iof1 105:30 PM 30111 19 216 110 240 826 222 1288 208 736 46 18.6 64.1 17.2 21.0 74.3 4.6 58 240 46 344 66 225 10 05:30 PM 05:15 PM 53 218 77 348 66 225 10 0.925 File Name : h0209014 Site Code : 0000091 7 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :3 E.a51bOUfld App' Righ Thru Total t I I Left ! App- l nt. Total a Tota l , 994 72 753 415 ; j 1240; 4983 5.8 60.7 33.5 341 17 196 114 327: 1321 1 1 10.943 105:30 PM 30111 19 216 110 345 0.822 = 0.899: A- 2IX SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N-S STREET: 1 -405 SB RAMPS/ It t13 DATE: 01/24/02 CITY: SEAL BEACH BEVERLY MANOR E -W STREET: SEAL BEACH BLVD. DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 0231007A AM Peak Hr Begins at 800 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 15 1360 272 466 1048 26 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED 1\-?..% 14 11 20 483 15 207 3937 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANES: Nl 0 NT 0 NR 0 SL 1 ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 2 0 0 1 0 1.5 0.5 1 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM t 261 44 84 161 3 2 1 5 82 2 30 7:15 AM 5 276 42 86 195 5 1 g 2 91 2 38 676 7:30 AM 7 309 58 102 240 9 6 3 3 109 5 34 749 7:45 AM 2 318 49 105 228 4 5 2 5 94 6 46 885 8:00 AM 4 339 62 96 264 6 3 1 6 116 8 42 864 8.15 AM 1 352 74 119 279 6 4 2 4 120 4 58 947 8:30 AM 5 324 71 135 248 5 1 5 7 117 2 57 1023 8:45 AM 5 345 65 116 257 9 6 3 3 130 1 50 sn 9:00 AM ggp 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11.30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES= NL 30 NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 2524 465 843 1872 47 28 23 35 859 30 355 7117 AM Peak Hr Begins at 800 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 15 1360 272 466 1048 26 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED 1\-?..% 14 11 20 483 15 207 3937 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: 1 -495 SB RAMPS/ DATE: 01/24/02 CITY: SEAL BEACH BEVERLY MANOR E -W STREET: SEAL BEACH BLVD. DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT* 0231007P ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED Ak---.XA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 4 0 0 1 2 0 4 1 0 1.5 0.5 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:34 PM 1 :45 PM 2 :00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2 :45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 6 346 87 114 281 3 8 7 11 103 4 122 1092 4:15 PM 7 379 95 131 301 3 10 5 12 135 6 •133 1208 4:34 PM 5 243 90 139 272 2 17 9 12 72 0 139 low 4:45 PM 11 355 100 171 341 3 15 6 12 131 0 174 1330 5:00 PM 8 367 103 114 305 7 24 8 8 115 4 166 1230 5:15 PM 11 333 78 156 353 3 12 3 9 94 4 154 1220 5:30 PM 4 271 98 161 341 5 12 9 18 99 1 151 1170 5:45 PM 3 269 81 149 322 4 16 8 16 87 3 149 110: 6:00 PM , 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES= 55 2565 732 1135 2527 30 114 55 98 836 22 1188 9357 PM Peak Hr Begins at 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES= 34 1337 379 602 1351 18 63 26 47 439 9 645 4950 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED Ak---.XA SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS AM Peak Hr Begins at 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 131 1042 451 311 1248 362 5 3 14 279 25 397 4268 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED K--lo N -S STREET: SEAL BEACH BLVD. (D HATE: 01/24102 CITY: SEAL BEACH E -W STREET: 1-405 NB RAMPS/ DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 0231006A OLD RANCH RD. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 6:00 AM 5:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 17 218 106 65 266 61 0 1 1 45 1 82 863 7:15 AM 20 221 112 76 279 77 2 1 2 59 3 100 952 7:30 AM 24 249 109 94 293 83 2 1 2 72 3 107 1039 7:45 AM 31 292 107 84 318 91 1 1 2 85 7 119 1138 8:00 AM 36 261 115 66 338 97 1 0 3 63 6 91 1077 8:15 AM 40 240 120 67 299 91 1 1 7 59 9 80 1014 8:30 AM 29 231 96 70 256 89 1 2 2 54 14 88 932 8:45 AM 23 225 90 64 251 82 1 0 0 58 22 102 918 9:40 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 1 0:45 AM 1 1:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL NL NT VOLUMES= 220 1937 855 586 2300 671 9 7 19 495 65 769 7933 AM Peak Hr Begins at 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 131 1042 451 311 1248 362 5 3 14 279 25 397 4268 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED K--lo 1 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS t Lr VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: SEAL BEACH BLVD. DATE: 01/24/02 CITY: SEAL BEACH L E -W STREET: 1 -405 NB RAMPS/ DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 0231006P . OLD RANCH RD. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM r 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 12 360 131 60 289 30 11 11 17 77 11 161 1170 4:15 PM 13 404 139 56 301 33 11 13 14 77 8 164 1233 4:30 PM 18 393 136 69 293 54 15 9 14 68 7 189 1265 4:45 PM 18 387 144 72 365 75 20 13 29 73 6 164 1366 5:00 PM 17 457 151 64 329 55 18 21 30 74 5 188 1409 5:15 PM 14 419 180 59 356 66 36 47 39 71 10 183 1480 5:30 PM 18 444 163 60 333 54 23 36 32 66 9 177 1415 5:45 PM 15 423 151 48 307 50 25 22 24 53 7 163 1258 6:00 PM 6:15 PM. 6:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES= 125 3287 1 195 488 2573 417 159 172 199 559 63 1389 10626 PM Peak Hr Begins at 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES= 67 1707 638 255 1383 250 97 117 130 284 30 712 5670 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED City: SEAL BEACH D N-S Direction: BOLSA CH ICA ROAD E -W Direction., WESTMINSTER AVENUE Trans WI t Stdiesy Im 1 820 E. Gary Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Groups Printed- Tuning Movements File Name : h0209015 Site Cade : 00000975 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :I ' Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Ri h# Thru Left Right Thru Left Rijo2t Thru Left Ri t Thru Left Int. Total i Factor 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0y 1.0 1.0 1.0 -1-01 1.0 07:00 AM 35 286 39 29 315 11 7 334 170 100 64 14 1404 07:15 AM 44 515 32 25 235 9 15 381 142 97 78 16 1589 07 :30 AM 26 406 22 16 341 11 10 298 141 104 117 29 1521 07:45 AM 25 538 27 14 167 8 10 273 134 130 108 281 1458 Total 130 1745 120 8a 1058 391 42 1286 5871 431 367 871 5972 08 :030 AM 35 473 72 13 208 36 14 296. 180 55 81 38 1 1501 08:15 AM 27 525 31 17 156 22 13 344 100 114 82 39 1470 08:30 AM 31 457 22 19 223 11 9 304 127 106 1 030 22 i 1431 08:45 AM 37 471 21 16 154 15 8 298 92 , 70 50 24! 1256 Total 130 1926 146 65 741 84 44 1242 4991 345 313 123; 5658 BREAK 04:00 PM 29 331 50 21 116 4 16 420 99 102 176 41 1405 04:15 PM 24 398 47 10 146 17 17 332 92 91 154 26 1354 04:34 PM 35 322 33 15 133 20 13 394 149 93 158 421 1448 04 :45 PM 28 374 69 f 14 129 31 17 350 108 102 177 25 ` 1424 Total 116 1425 1991 61 524 721 63 1496 4481 388 665 134E 5593 05:00 PM 34 323 32 14 110 15 20 369 130 91 195 60 1393 035:15 PM 42 373 92 13 100 19 15 368 152 95 191 421 1542 05:30 PM 31 377 56 16 94 21 42 408 158. 91 189 401 1523 05:45 PM 21 414 82 11 98 14 26 392 101 90 196 441 1489 Total 128 1487 262 54 402 69 103 1537 541 ; 367 771 186 5907 Grand Total 544 6583 727 260 2725 264 252 5561 20751 1531 2116 530 23128 Apprch % 6.4 84.2 9.3 8.0 83.9 8.1 3.2 70.5 26.3 36.7 503.7 12.7 Total % 2.2 28.5 3.1 1.1 11.8 1. 1 1.1 24.0 1 9.0) , 6.6 9.1 2.3 O.--3z Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 F. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 File Name : h0209015 Site Code :00000975 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :2 Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08 :45 AM - lntersectio 07;15 AM 18941 386 384 n 881 6069 2.6 65.9 Volume 130 193 2 153 2215 Percent 5.9 87.2 6.9 142 07:15 Volume 44 515 32 591 Peak Factor 0.955 07:15 High Int. 07:15 AM 07 :45 AM Volume 44 515 32 591 Peak 538 1 130 108 28 Factor 0.937 Peak 1 of 1 64 951 64 1079 5.9 88.1 5.9 25 235 9 269 07:30 AM 16 341 11 368' 0.733 App. Total Tnta! .` i 49 124 8 597 18941 386 384 111 881 6069 2.6 65.9 31.5 43.8 43.6 12.6 1 15 381 142 538 97 78 16 191 1589 0.955 07:15 AM 07 :45 AM 15 381 142 538 1 130 108 28 266 0.880 : 0.82 Out In Total 130 '1 19321 1 ru Lirwj L r 1 L»♦ CD j North I I -� CO 2' 1 W02-7: 15: 00 A-11F-j a -- U '?.,102 B::DB AM` 2° 0 ; Turni Movements 09. 1-11 CPO F+ # Left Thru R 6ht f ��Tff' out n LW BALSA CHICA ROAD A�3 Transportation Studies, Im 1 820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 File Name : h0209015 Site Cade : 00000975 Start Date : 09/1212002 Page No : 3 A-:3%\ rvrvr • v■ .rvn ►Vr1ij Southbound ■rV-a I MWOO i Qr% P%vC�YVC Westbound tvLbA L�"#I�� #'{VpIL] i • ■�STM� Northbound i Eastbound Start Time igh t Thru Left App. Total Righ t Thru Left APP- Righ Thru Left APP. Rig Left] APP• { int. Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05 :45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 To ta t Total t Total Total intersectio 05:00 PM � n Volume 148 128 7 262 1877 54 402 69 525 103 153 7 541 2181 367 771 186 132 4 5907 Percent 6.8 79.2 14.0 10.3 76.6 13.1 4.7 70.5 24.8 27.7 58.2 14.0 05:30 Volume 31 377 56 464 16 94 21 131 42 408 158 608! 91 189 40 1 320' 1523 Peak i f 0.970 Factor High Int. Volume 05:45 PM 05 :00 PM 05:30 PM { 05 :00 PM i Peak 21 414 82 517 14 110 15 139 42 408 158 608{ 91 195 60 346 Factor 0.908 0.944 0.8971 0.9571 A-:3%\ BEACH City SEAT. Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue NIS Direction SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/w Direction ROAD A Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS 1SEAL BEACH BOU 1SEA.L BEACH BOU 1ROAD A 1Southbound 1Northbound JEastbound Start 1 1 1 llntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru__f Thru Left Ri ht Leftj Total 03/26/021 1 1 1 07:001 3 1381 277 61 0 11 425 07:151 12 1441 327 111 0 01 494 07:301 7 1781 305 131 0 01 543 07:45 10 186 263 12.1 1 01 472 Hourl 1 32 6461 1172 421 1 11 1894 08:001 2 1 2521 282 1 41 1 1 01 541 08:151 3 2151 223 51 0 11 447 08:301 2 1771 202 41 0 11 386 08:45 2 241t.- 131 3 0 01 377 Hourj 1 9 8851 838 161 1 21 1751 [BREAK] --------- - - 1 - - -- --------------- 1 --------- - 1 - - - -- ------- 16:001 1 2791 208 1; 8 508 16.151 0 3171 146 01 5 51 473 16:301 0 2311 221 01 7 121 471 16:45 ❑ 272 197 0 8 51 482 Hourj 1 10991 772 11 28 331 1934 17:001 0 3651 226 0; 5 51 501 17:151 0 2871 157 01 8 71 459 17:301 0 3021 236 01 1 51 544 17:45 1 4 3131 179 01 2 41 498 Hour1 1 0 12671 798 01 16 211 2102 Totall 42 ! 38971 3580 1 591 46 1 5 71 7681 %- Apr. 1.0 98.91 98.3 1.61 44.6 55.31 - Int. { 0.5 50.71 46.6 0.71 0.5 0.71 - AL .--& W- Study Name: H0203055 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 43/26/02 Page : I Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/W Direction : ROAD A Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS 1SEAL BEACH BOU SEAL BEACH BOV 1ROAD A 1Southbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrvl. Time ..- . 1 Right , „ ,.Thrul._. Thru Le f t1.....�Righ.t�.Le f t l Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/26/02 to 08:45 on 03/26/02 Time 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 Vol. 31 7601 1277 401 2 01 Pct. 1 3.9 96.01 96.7 3.21 100.0 0.01 Total 1 791 1 1117 1 2 1 High 1 08:00 1 07:15 1 07:45 1 Vol. 1 2 2521 327 111 1 01 Total 1 254 1 338 1 1 1 .PHF 1 0.778 1 0.900 1 0.500 1 SEAL _ BEACH BOU LEV A 31 117? ?6A T 1968 ROAD A 63/26/A2 71 E- 07:15aM 98:00aN ?3 2818 2 �. N 1979 48 ?62 11?? StAL BEACH BOULEVA D N -.-5 t4 Study Name: H0203055 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 E/w Direction : ROAD A Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS A — -a [1 Study Name: B0203055 Site Code : 00400919 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page . 3 ISEAL BEACH BOU ISEAL BEACH BOU IROAD A (Southbound INorthbound jEastbound Start I I I lIntrvl. _ Time Ri ht Thrut Thru Leftl Right Loeftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/26/02 to 17:45 on 03/26/02 Time 17:00 1 17 :00 1 17:00 1 Vol. 0 12671 798 01 16 211 Pct. 0.0 100.01 100,0 0.01 43.2 56.71 Total 1267 j 798 37 j High 17:00 17:30 17:15 Vol. 0 3651 236 01 8 71 Total 365 1 236 1 15 PHF 0.867 1 0.845 1 0.616 A — -a [1 Study Name: B0203055 Site Code : 00400919 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page . 3 Transportation Studies, Ync. City : SEAL BEACH E 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : ROAD A Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G 1WESTMINST] iWestbound Start Time Thru 03/27/021 07-001 131 07:151 191 07:301 270 07:451 176 Hour1 768 1 08:001 152 08:151 154 08:301 191 08:451 144 Hour# 641 1 EBREAK3 1 ---------- 1 16:001 226 16:151 207 16:301 148 16:451 258 Hours 839 1 17:001 216 17:151 250 17:301 259 17:451 211 Hours 936 1 Tota11 3184 % Apr. 1 92.1 Int. 1 46.2 1 1 TURNING MC7VEME24TS 3PR AV 1ROAD A 1WESTMINSTER AV 1Northbound 1Eastbound 1 1 11ntrv1. Leftj Right Left Ri ht Thrul Total 1 1 1 341 1 11 20 1201 307 491 1 21 30 1681 440 361 0 11 15 1631 485 401 0 1 1 18 127 L 362 1591 2 41 83 5781 1594 1 1 1 271 1 01 13 1551 348 301 2 51 11 1531 355 201 3 21 11 1001 327 171 2 3 4 139-1 309 941 8 101 39 5471 1339 1 1 1 --------------- _ ____ __ ______ ___ _______ � 1 21 22 231 8 1771 458 41 24 211 1 1641 421 41 24 341 1 1771 388 _ -_ 31 37 2, 5 t 1 1.02481 572 131 107 1031 11 7661 1839 1 ! I 11 26 221 1 2251 491 li 20 231 1 2941 589 21 18 281 5 2631 575 21 14 141 1 20811- 450 61 78 871 8 9901 2105 1 1 2721 195 2041 141 28811 6877 7,81 48.8 51.11 4.6 95.31 - 3.91 2.8 2.91 2.0 41.81 - 1 ! 1 � 1 � R-3% Study Name: H0203043 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page 1 City : SEAL BEACH NIS Direction : E/W Direction-: Client : L,L&G ROAD A WESTMINSTER AVENUE Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Pt-3N Study Name: H0203043 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS (WESTMINSTER AV (ROAD A (WESTMINSTER AV 1Westbound ]Northbound j£astbound Start I i j lintrvl. Time I Thru Leftl Ri ht -Leftl Right _.__Thruj Total Peak dour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 Time 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 Vol. 789 1521 2 31 76 6131 Pct_ 83.8 16.11 40.0 60.01 11.0 88.91 Total 941 5 689 High j 47:30 , 07:15 07:15 j Vol. 270 361 1 11 30 1681 Total 306 j 2 198 PHF 0.768 1 0.625 0.869 Pt-3N Study Name: H0203043 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : ROAD A Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS }WESTMINSTER AV }ROAD A ]WESTMINSTER AV lWestbound }Northbound }Eastbound Start } } I }Intrvl. Time Thru Leftl Ri ht 'Leftf 'Left Right Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:08 on 03/27/02 to 17:45 on 03/27/02 Time } 16:45 } 16:45 } 16:45 } Vol. } 983 71 101 981 8 10301 Pct. } 99.2 0.71 50.7 49.21 0.7 99.21 Total # 990 } 199 } 1038 } High } 16:45 } 16:45 } 17:15 } Vol_ } 258 31 37 251 1 2941 Total 261 } 62 } 295 } PHF } 0.948 } 0.802 } 0.879 } N qffft %1k 0 Study Name: H0203043 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page 3 Total BREAK 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 44:30 PM 04:45 PM 0 1207 10 , 16 0 Transportation Studies, Inc. 3 7 0 0 314 1 4 0 t 5 7 1820 E. Garry Avenue 0 285 7 2 0 Total City: SEAL BEACH 1186 Grand Total Suite 116 4684 Apprch % File Name : H0209013 N-S Direction: ISLAND VILLAGE DRIVE 0.0 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Site Code : 00000975 E -W Direction: WESTMINSTER AVENUE Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Turning Movements Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time ± Right Thru Left Right Thru Left R jEtIj Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1, 1.0 1, 1.0 07:04 AM 0 261 2 0 0 7 1 107 0 378 07:15 AM 0 304 1 3 0 101 1 210 0' 529 07:30 AM 0 293 2 5 0 13 2 249 0 j 564 07:45 AM 0 301 2 4 0 7 1 333 0' S48 Total 0 1159 7 12 0 37 5 899 0 ; 2119 08:00 AM 0 321 2 1 0 6 1 220 01 551 08.15 AM 0 302 3 0 0 7 2 177 011 491 08:34 AM 0 339 4 10 0 9 2 146 0 510 08:45 AM 0 245 1 5 0 3 2 134 ❑ �cjn Total BREAK 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 44:30 PM 04:45 PM 0 1207 10 , 16 0 0 211 3 7 0 0 314 1 4 0 0 322 7 4 0 0 285 7 2 0 Total 0 1132 05:00 PM 0 242 05:15 PM 0 445 05:30 PM 0 258 05:45 PM 0 241 Total 0 1186 Grand Total 0 4684 Apprch % 0.0 98.7 Total % 0.0 54.4 25 # 8 3 8 6 181 17 0 25 6 I 3 0 10 13 2 0 4 1.3 1 0 12 1.4 2 0 61 7 677 0 s 1942 6 212 4 240 7 262 7 306 24 1020 2 29.5 4 261 4 206 4 2$2 251 8 0 321 14 1044 60 53 0 119' 50 3640 1.3 30.8 0.0 69-21 1.4 98.6 0.71 0.6 0.0 1.41 0.6 42.3 A — z . 0 # 447 0 . 556 0, 610 0 : 513 0 2236 0 558 0". 729 0.; 487 0, 535 0 ; 2309 0 8606 0.0 0.0 Transportation Studies, Inc. 1 820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 r P ■ r..I It .v s �a % r7 w �� w We5tb0lxld V�r. iti7i�.!'tiRiLJ r 6LUnVG V. Northbound f Start Time , Right,' Thru Left App' Right App- Thru Left ft Total Total { 49 Total 1012 0 10171 2292 Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 93.5 0.0 J Intersection 07 :15 AM 333 0 3341 648 Volume 0 1219 7 1226 13 0 36 Percent 0.0 99.4 0.6 ' 26.5 0.0 73.5 07:45 Volume 0 301 2 303 4 0 7 Peak Factor High Int. 08:00 AM 07:30 AM Volume 0 321 2 3231 5 0 13 Peak Factor 0.949 File Name : H0209013 Site Code :00000975 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :2 R -y-z r■i.v s ""C11 %%a i Gn nrG111%j G Eastbound App' Total Right I Thru Left 'I App- Total Total { 49 5 1012 0 10171 2292 0.5 93.5 0.0 J 11. 1 333 0 3341 648 0.884 07:45 AM 18 1 333 0 334' 1.681 0.761 il R -y-z Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, 0A. 92705 File Name : H0209013 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :3 Eastbound App. Right . Thru f Left App. j lnt. Total Total Total 39 61 13 0.750 20 1124 0 Westbound 1.7 98.3 0.0 Northbound Start Time Right ' Thru Lett ApP' Total Right 04 :45 PM Thru Lett Peak Hour From 04 :00 PM to 05 :45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 0 3131 Intersection 04 :30 PM I Volume 0 1294 33 13271 11 0 28 Percent 0.0 97.5 2.5 1 28.2 0.0 71.8 05:15 Volume 0 445 13 458 ` 2 0 4 Peak Factor High Int. 05 :15 PM 05 :00 PM Volume 0 445 13 45841 3 0 10 Peak Factor 0.7241 File Name : H0209013 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date : 09/12/2002 Page No :3 Eastbound App. Right . Thru f Left App. j lnt. Total Total Total 39 61 13 0.750 20 1124 0 1144 2510 1.7 98.3 0.0 4 251 0 265, 729 10-861 04 :45 PM 7 305 0 3131 0.914 0 North w 4 L� I- w '--� 12/02 5:15:44 PM rj N ` Turrung Movements on rr 3 i 4 .F+ Left ht zts, 11 1 92 ISLAND VILLAGE DRfVE A- ....1 ? Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : ROAD B� Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL6G TURNING MOVEMENTS 1WESTMINSTER AV 1ROAD B 1WESTMINSTER AV [Westbound [Northbound [Eastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrv1. Time I Thru Left Right Left Ri ht Thrul Total 03/26/021 1 07:001 202 321 2 31 6 1191 364 07:151 245 361 3 11 22 1521 459 07:301 232 451 2 11 14 1141 408 07:451 230 3 61 13 1641 4S3 Hour[ 909 1501 10 111 55 5491 1684 08:001 183 311 2 21 15 1431 376 08:151 192 161 0 41 11 1371 360 08:301 201 121 1 11 9 1171 341 08:45 1 170 ill 2 2 2 1641, 351 Hour[ 746 701 5 91 37 5611 1428 1 1 1 1 (BREAK) ---------------1 ---------- - - - - -1 ---------------1------- 16:001 198 21 64 141 6 1831 467 16:151 187 11 33 151 3 2001 439 16:301 195 31 46 191 9 2101 482 16-451 240 71 36 181 5 2311 537 Hour[ 820 131 179 661 23 8241 1925 1 1 1 1 17:001 183 11 56 201 5 2641 529 17:151 240 01 40 191 12 2591 570 17 :301 250 11 35 101 11 2551 562 17:451 243 1A 35 91 14 2531_ 555 Hour[ 916 31 166 581 42 10311 2216 1 1 1 1 Tota11 3391 2361 360 1441 157 29651 7253 * Apr. 1 93.4 6.51 71.4 28.5' 5.0 94.91 - % Int. 1 46.7 3.21 4.9 1.91 2.1 40.81 - 1 1 1 1 At -yam Study Name: H0203044 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : ROAD B Suite 116 E/W Direction = WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LLW TURNING MOVE CUUS WESTMINSTER AV 1RGAD B 1WESTMINSTER AV lWestbound 1Northbound (Eastbound Start I 1 11ntrvl. Time Thru Leftl Left Ri ht Leftl Right Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07 :00 on 43/26/02 to 08:45 on 03/26/02 Time ! 47:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 Vol. 890 1491 10 101 64 5731 PCt. 85.6 14.31 50.0 50.01 10.Q 89.91 Total 1039 20 637 High ( 07:15 07:45 07:45 Vol. 245 361 3 61 13 1641 Total 1 281 1 9 1 177 1 PHF 1 0.924 € 0.555 1 0.899 1 A - -& . AT, Study Name: H0203044 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : ROAD B Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 93705 Client _ LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS ]WESTMINSTER AV 1RDAD B IWESTMINSTER AV ]Westbound jNorthbound ]Eastbound Start I j 1 jlntrvl, Time I Thru Leftj Left Ri ht Leftj Ri ht Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/26/02 to 17:45 on 03/26/02 Time j 17 :00 1 17:00 1 17:00 j Vol. , 916 31 166 581 42 10311 Pct_ 99.6 0.31 74.1 25.81 3.9 96.01 Total 1 919 j 224 1 1073 j High 1 17:30 j 17 :00 1 17:15 j Vol. j 250 11 56 201 12 2591 Total j 251 1 76 1 271 j PHF 1 0.915 1 0.736 0.989 j A -Au Study Name: H0203044 Site Code : 00000975 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page . 3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Carry Avenue N/S Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 115 E/w Direction : ROAD C Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS SEAL BEACH BOU ISEAL BEACH BOU 1RGAD C 1Southbound 1Northbound jEastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrvl. Time Right Thrul Thru Left Right Leftl Total 03/27/021 1 1 1 07:001 20 2071 266 31 0 11 497 07:15] 40 1441 275 131 1 11 474 07:301 34 2531 255 201 0 01 572 07:451 31 2731 307 .121 1 11 625 Hourl 1 125 8771 1113 481 2 31 2168 08:001 27 1 1951 222 1 201 0 1 01 464 08:151 9 1521 240 51 0 21 408 08:301 15 1831 173 31 0 11 375 08:45 8 2061 193 81 0 21 417 Hour1 1 59 7361 828 361 0 51 1664 [BREAK) 1--------- - 1 - - - -- --------------- 1 1 --------------- 1 1 ------- � 16:001 4 I 3031 195 1 31 1 1 101 516 16:151 1 1881 203 21 1 91 404 16:301 3 2971 228 01 0 111 539 16:45 1 2941 230 21 2 81 537 Hour1 1 9 10821 856 71 4 381 1995 17:001 4 1 2801 230 1 81 0 1 121 533 17:151 1 2421 211 31 2 61 465 17 :301 3 3201 153 41 2 31 485 17:451 3 3571 227 21 0 31 592 Hour1 1 11 11991 1 821 171 4 231 2075 Totall 204 38941 3618 1 1081 10 1 691 7903 % Apr. 1 4.9 95.01 97.1 2.81 12.6 87.31 - Int. 1 2.5 49.21 45.7 1.31 0.1 0.81 - Study Name: H0203054 Site Code : 04000919 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue NIS Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 EIw Direction : ROAD C Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS 1SEAL BEACH BOU 1SEAL BEACH BOU IROAD C 1Southbound 1Northbound jEastbound Start 1 1 I 11ntrvl. Time Right Thrul Thru Left.j. Right Leftj Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/27/02 to 08:45 on 03/27/02 Time ! 07:00 ! 07:00 1 07:00 Vol. ! 125 8771 1113 481 2 31 Pct. 12.4 87.51 95.8 4.11 40.0 60.01 Total 1 1402 1 1161 1 5 1 High 1 07:45 1 07:45 1 07:15 1 Vol. 1 31 2731 307 121 1 11 Total 1 344 1 319 1 2 j PHF 1 0.824 1 0.909 0.625 1 SEAL BEACH BOU LEV A 5 125 1116 8 ?7 I T W 21.18 ROAD C 1 73 <-- 83/27/02 67. Wan 87:45aM 3 � 178 2168 2 N 2848 48 S L ?BEACH BOULEVA Study Name: H0203054 Site Code : 00000919 Start Date: 03/27/02 Page : 2 Transportation Studies, Inc. City SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203054 NIS Direction : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Suite 116 Site Code : 00000919 E/w Direction : ROAD C Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/27/02 Client : LL&G Page - 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS SEAL BEACH BOLILEVA D 11 844 1199 T 2054 ROAD C 2 'E— 03/2 ? /62 65:00pM 65:45pM 23 '� 55 2075 4 —::1. N 2841 y �1 SEAL BEACH 1? B011LEVA D [SEAL BEACH BOU [SEAL BEACH BOU [ROAD C [Southbound [Northbound [Eastbound Start 11ntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Thru toeftj Left Ri ht --Leftj Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/27/02 to 17:45 on 03/27/02 Time 1 17:40 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 Vol. 1 11 11991 821 171 4 231 Pct. 1 0.9 99.01 97.9 2.01 14.8 85.11 Total 1 1210 1 838 1 27 1 High 1 17:45 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 Vol_ I 3 3571 234 81 0 111 Total 1 360 1 238 1 11 PHF 1 0.840 1 0.880 1 0.613 SEAL BEACH BOLILEVA D 11 844 1199 T 2054 ROAD C 2 'E— 03/2 ? /62 65:00pM 65:45pM 23 '� 55 2075 4 —::1. N 2841 y �1 SEAL BEACH 1? B011LEVA D Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINSTER ' 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203048 N/S Direction : SPRINGDALE AVENUE Suite 116 Site Code : 00000976 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client . LL&G Page _ 1 A -so TURNING 14OVEKENTS 1SPRINDALE AVENUE [WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1SPRINDALE AVM4UE [WESTMINSTER AVENUE [Southbound lwestbound [Northbound [Eastbound Start 1 1 1 I 11ntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftl Left Ri ht Thru Leftj Left Right Thru Leftl Left Total 03/28/021 1 1 1 1 07 :001 19 126 381 25 171 421 89 31 111 30 122 51 709 07:151 14 159 581 30 164 511 66 55 211 24 155 81 805 07 :301 20 170 501 24 166 791 64 40 261 25 135 121 811 07:451 19 211 531 27 136 771 BS 40 24 42 157 141 88'5 Hour[ 1 72 666 1991 1 106 637 2491 304 166 821 121 569 391 3210 08:001 27 165 531 27 118 1 401 78 42 1 131 33 127 1 91 732 08:151 13 148 641 11 88 511 103 33 131 24 140 131 701 08:301 15 110 531 31 8Q 531 98 44 191 32 147 121 694 08:45.1 22 112 42 19 100 401 100 37 101 28 141 ill 662 Hour[ 1 77 535 2121 1 88 386 1841 379 156 551 117 S55 451 2789 [BREAK] 1----------------------- 1----------------------- 1 1----------------------- f 1 16:001 26 143 371 67 162 541 136 74 271 29 227 251 1007 16 :151 30 157 541 68 137 501 186 110 471 40 234 291 1142 16:301 27 121 481 84 132 651 205 111 321 28 772 291 1154 16:i451 28 160 _N621 66 122 491 210 117 .431 43 225 231 1148 Hour[ 1 111 581 2011 1 285 553 2181 737 412 1491 140 958 1061 4451 17:001 34 139 501 88 177 1 581 178 108 1 361 34 196 1 351 1133 17:151 29 145 831 143 149 451 157 117 401 40 258 301 1196 17:301 34 138 591 107 200 451 161 110 461 37 178 341 1149 17:45 45 157 641 93 219 421 153 92 431- 37 192 371 1174 Hourj 1 142 579 2561 1 391 745 1901 649 427 1551 148 824 1361 4652 Total; 402 2361 8681 870 2321 1 8411 2069 1161 1 4511 526 2906 1 3261 15102 Apr. 1 11.0 65.0 23.91 21.5 57.5 20.81 56.2 31.5 12.21 13.9 77.3 8.61 - Int. 1 € 2.6 15.6 5.71 5.7 15.3 5.51 13.7 7.6 2.91 3.4 19.2 2.11 - A -so Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINSTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: E0203048 N/S Direction : SPRINGDALE AVENUE Suite 116 Site Code : 00000976 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G Page : 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS ISPRINDALE AVENUE I ESITMINSTER AVENUE fSPRINDALE AVENUE (WESTMINSTER AVENUE (Southbound lWestbound tNorthbound lEastbound Start I ] I I jIntrvl. Time I Ri ht Thru Lef t Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftl Right Thru Leftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:04 on 03/28/02 to 08:45 on 03/28/02 Time 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 Vol. 80 705 2141 108 584 2471 293 177 841 124 574 431 Pct- 8.0 70.5 21.41 11.5 62.1 26.31 52.8 31.9 15.11 16.7 77.4 5.81 Total # 999 939 554 741 High , 07:45 07:30 07 =45 07:45 Vol. 19 211 531 24 166 791 65 40 241 42 157 141 Total 283 ! 269 1 149 213 � PHF 0.882 1 8.872 f 0.929 0.869 Trap portation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINSTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203048 N/S Direction : SPRINGDALE AVENUE Suite 116 Site Code : 04000976 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G Page 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS ISPRINDALE AVENUE 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1SPRINDALE AVENUE 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1Southbound 1Westbound jNorthbound jEastbound Start 1 1 I 1 11ntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left I .Right Thru Leftj Right Thru Leftj Right Thru Leftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/28/02 to 17:45 on 03/38/02 Time 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 Vol. 142 579 2561 391 745 1901 649 427 1651 148 824 1361 Pct. 14.5 59.2 26.21 29.4 56.1 14.31 52.2 34.4 13.21 13.3 74.3 12.21 Total 1 977 1 1326 1241 # 1108 1 High # 17:45 1 17:45 17:04 17:15 1 Vol. 45 157 641 93 219 421 178 108 361 40 258 301 Total 1 266 1 354 1 322 1 328 1 PHF 1 0.918 1 0.936 1 4.963 1 0.844 1 R Transportation Studies, Inc. City WESTMINSTER « 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203047 NIS Direction : RANCHO ROAD /HAMMON PLACE Suite 116 Site Code : 04000917 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/25/02 Client : LL&G Page : 1 e - M. - TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 HAMMON PLACE 1 WESTMINSTER AVENUE I RANCHO ROAD 1 WES'T'MINSTER AVENUE 1Southbound 1Westbound JNorthbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 1 11ntrvl. Time I Ri ht Thru Leftj Right- Thru Left Right Thru Leftj Ri ht Thru Leftl Total 03/26/021 1 1 1 1 07:001 0 0 151 4 137 421 26 1 111 6 123 01 365 07:151 2 1 191 5 172 261 17 0 51 8 113 81 368 07:301 4 3 i11 10 197 311 20 0 41 6 108 11 395 07:45 5 1 22 4 159 ---341 32 0 101 4 127 01 398 Hour1 1 11 5 671 1 23 665 1331 95 1 301 24 471 11 1526 08:001 2 0 131 6 131 1 271 26 0 1 41 2 342 1 01 353 08:151 4 2 161 2 113 251 21 1 51 6 128 01 323 08:301 0 3 271 4 107 231 30 0 21 3 116 11 316 08:45 0 1 181 11 82 24 36 1 '71 5 log 01 293 Hour1 # 6 6 741 1 23 433 991 113 2 181 16 494 11 1285 (BREA ) ----------------------- ----------------------- 1 ___________ ___ ___ 1 ______ I_----- ____________ -_..__ 1 � 1 16:001 4 2 251 32 127 351 59 0 41 8 212 01 508 16:151 4 1 141 23 154 301 65 4 51 6 225 11 532 16:301 2 0 101 29 132 471 74 7 81 4 203 31 519 16:45 0 2 341 21 151 401 62 3 121--- 10 216 2 553 Hour1 1 10 5 831 1 105 564 1521 264 14 291 28 856 61 2112 17 :001 0 3 181 24 170 1 471 53 4 1 141 13 196 1 41 542 17 :151 1 2 161 36 197 451 65 2 61 8 219 11 598 17:301 2 0 191 25 168 411 53 4 51 15 201 11 534 17 :45 0 3 141 22 181 21 41 1 8 j 12 727 0 530 Hour1 1 3 8 671 1 107 716 3.541 212 11 291 48 843 61 2204 Tota11 30 24 2911 258 2378 1 5381 680 26 1 1061 136 2664 1 141 7127 Apr. 1 8.5 6.9 84.31 8.1 74.9 16.91 83.5 3.4 13.01 4.1 95.3 0.51 - # Int. ( 1 0.4 0.3 4.01 3.6 33.3 7.51 9.5 0.3 1.41 1.6 37.3 0.11 - e - M. - City : WESTMINSTER N/S Direction RANCHO ROAD /HAMMON PLACE E/W Direction WESTMINSTER AVENUE Client : LL&G Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue Suite 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Study Name: H0203047 Site Code : 00000917 Start Date: 03/26/02 Page : 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS tHAMMON PLACE (WESTMINSTER AVENUE (RANCHO ROAD (WESTMINSTER AVENUE {Southbound lWestbound (Northbound jEastbound Start i jIntrvl. Time I Right Thru Leftl Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftj Right Thru Leftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 03/26/02 to 48:45 on 03/26/02 Time 1 07 :00 { 07 :00 t 07:00 1 07:00 � Vol. 11 5 671 23 1665 1331 95 1 301 24 471 Pct. 13.2 6.0 80.71 2.8 80.9 16.11 75.3 0.7 23.81 4.8 94.9 0.21 Total 83 821 ! 126 496 � High 07:45 07 :30 f 07:45 X37:45 Vol. 5 1 221 10 197 311 32 0 101 4 127 01 Total 28 238 ! 42 131 � PHF 0.741 0.862 1 0.750 1 0.946 1'i - s y Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINSTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203047 N/S Direction RANCHO ROAD /HAMMON PLACE Suite 116 Site Code : 00000917 E/W Direction WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/02 Client : LL&G Page 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1HAMMON PLACE 1KESTMINSTER AVENUE 1RANCHO ROAD 1WESTMINSTER AVENUE 1Southbound 1Westbound lNorthbound (Eastbound Start Clntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru -Leftl Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16 :00 on 03/26/02 to 17:45 on 03/26/02 1 Time 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 15:45 � Vol. 3 7 871 106 686 1731; 233 13 331 46 832 81 Pct- 3.0 7.2 89.61; 18.9 71.0 17.91 83.5 4.6 11.81 5.1 93.9 0.91 Total 97 965 1 279 1 886 � High 16:45 ! 17:15 16:45 16:45 Vol. 1 0 2 341 36 197 451 62 3 121 10 216 21 Total 1 36 ] 270 1 77 1 228 1 PHF € 0.673 1 0.867 1 0.906 fl .971 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : I -405 SB ON RAMP Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G N.Sks Study Name: H0203049 Site Code : 04000918 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : 1 TURNING MD 1WESTMINTER AVE 11 -445 SB ON RA 1WESTMINTER AVE 1Westbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 11ntrv1. Time Thru Left Right Leftl Right Thru Total 03/28/021 1 1 1 07:001 235 261 0 01 151 1091 521 07:151 244 141 0 01 101 1231 482 07:301 317 201 0 01 116 1501 603 07:451 187 23 0 01 119 2041 533 Hour1 1 983 831 0 01 487 5861 2139 48:001 183 1 271 0 1 01 110 1 2081 528 08:151 178 281 0 01 120 1921 518 08:301 154 161 0 01 90 2061 466 08:45 150 23 0 01 92 177_1_ 442 Hour1 1 665 941 0 01 412 7831 1954 [BREAK] -- ------- - 1 - - - -- --------- - - 1 - - -- --------------- 1 - - - - - -- 1 16:001 311 1 301 0 1 01 205 1 2531 799 16:151 247 471 0 01 200 3031 797 16:301 252 211 ❑ 01 171 3271 771 16:45 L 238 371 0 0 176 3041 755 Hour1 1 1448 1351 0 01 752 11871 3122 17:001 324 1 421 0 1 41 210 1 2601 836 17:151 348 231 0 01 179 2641 814 17:301 328 331 0 01 173 2631 797 17:451 338 161 ❑ ❑ 1 149 2091 712 Hourl 1 1338 1141 0 01 711 9961 3159 Total# 4034 1 4261 0 1 01 2362 1 35521 10374 t Apr. 1 90.4 9.51 - -1 39.9 60.01 - 'k Int. 1 1 1 38.8 4.11 1 1 - -1 1 1 22.7 34.21 1 1 - N.Sks Study Name: H0203049 Site Code : 04000918 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203049 N/S Direction I -405 SB ON RAMP Suite 116 Site Code : 00000918 E/W Direction WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date; 03/28/02 Client ; LL&G Page 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS IWESTMINTER AVE 11 -405 SB ON RA IWESTMINTER AVE lWestbound (Northbound jEastbound Start I I i lIntrvl. Time I Thru Leftj Right Left Ri ht Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 83/28/02 to 08:45 on 03/28/02 Time j 07:30 1 07 :30 1 07:30 1 - Vol. 865 981 0 of 465 7541 PCt. 89.8 10.11 0.0 0.01 38.1 61.8€ Total 963 0 1219 - High 07:30 07:30 07:45 j Vol. # 317 201 0 01 119 2041 Total 337 j 0 323 j PHF 0.714 1 0.000 0.943 1 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : WESTMINTER 1820 E. Garry Avenue N/S Direction : I -405 SS ON RAMP Suite 116 E/W Direction : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Client : LL&G TURNING MOVEMENTS IWESTMINTER AVE 1I -405 SB CH RA IWESTMINTER AVE lWestbound (Northbound jEastbound Start I I I jintrvl. Time Thru Left-1 Right Leftj Right Thrul Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/28/02 to 17:45 on 03/28/02 Time 16:45 [ 16:45 1 16:45 1 Vol. 1238 1351 0 0; 738 10911 Pct. 90.1 9.81 0.0 0.01 40.3 59.61 Total 1373 j 0 ! 1829 High 17 :15 17:15 16:45 Vol. 348 231 0 01 176 3041 Total 371 0 480 PHF 0.925 0.000 0.952 j K.S% Study Name: H0203049 Site Code : 00000918 Start Date: 03/28/02 Page : 3 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203058 N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWA Suite 116 Site Code : 00000929 E/W Direction : LOYNES DRIVE Santa Ana, Ch. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G Page 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS PAACIFIC OAST HIGHWAY 1LOYNES DRIVE 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1LOYNES DRIVE 1Southbound {westbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 1 IIntrvl. Time Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Leftj. Ri ht Thru Leftl Right Thru Left Total 03/28/021 1 1 1 1 07:001 2 157 61 24 23 201 5 350 131 57 59 01 716 07 :151 1 171 41 16 39 161 11 429 141 26 39 51 771 07:301 2 192 21 14 46 211 16 456 51 30 55 91 848 07:451 3 248 131 6 26 .411 487 91 43 46 121 942 Hour1 1 8 768 251 1 60 134 981 40 1722 411 156 199 261 3277 08:001 1 240 101 7 43 1 161 23 370 1 91 27 42 1 41 792 08:151 0 218 41 9 31 251 31 316 51 18 38 21 697 08:341 2 214 21 10 32 241 12 299 101 18 25 21 650 08:451 3 154 21 4 32 4.71 10 295 191 51 61 161 694 Hour1 1 6 826 181 1 30 138 1121 76 1280 431 114 166 241 2833 JBREAKJ1----------------------- 1----------------------- 1---- +__-------- - - - - -- 1 ________ _____ +--------- 1- - - - -__ 16:041 11 382 121 4 57 661 32 317 241 22 39 51 967 16:151 8 406 61 12 40 591 15 280 401 28 38 71 939 16:341 4 418 71 11 45 501 9 290 231 29 21 41 911 16:451 7 449 13.1 6 73 4.21 13 354 35.1 23 25 61 1046 Hour1 1 30 1655 381 1 33 215 2171 69 1241 1181 102 123 221 3863 17 :001 9 462 191 24 47 1 571 17 307 1 421 38 45 1 71 1074 17:151 7 460 181 19 101 551 27 318 421 27 57 71 1138 17 :301 3 411 161 20 108 741 19 301 461 16 57 131 1084 17:451, 11 386 121 11 129 551 28 270 27 39 75 51 1048 Hour1 1 30 1719 651 1 74 385 2411 91 1196 1571 120 234 321 4344 Totall 74 4968 1461 197 872 1 6681 276 5439 1 3591 492 722 1 1041 14317 Apr. 1 1.4 95.7 2.81 11.3 50.2 38.41 4.5 89.5 5.91 37.3 54.7 7.51 - Int. 1 _ 0.5 34.7 1.01 1.3 6.0 4.61 1.9 37.9 2.51 3.4 5.0 - Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203058 N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Suite 116 Site Code : 00000919 E/W Direction : LOYNES DRIVE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client . LL&G Page . 2 I. i TURNING MOVEMENTS 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1LOYNES DRIVE 1AACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1LOYNES DRIVE 1Southbound 1Westbound 1Northbound 1Eastbound Start 1 1 1 1 11ntrvl. Time Right Thru Left Ri t Thru Left Right Thru Leftj. Ri ht Thru L'eftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:04 on 03/28/02 to 08:45 on 03/28/02 Time 07:15 1 07:15 1 07:15 07:35 Vol. 7 851 291 43 154 941 Be 1742 371 126 182 301 Pct. 1 0.7 95.9 3.21 14.7 52.9 32.31 3.1 94.8 2.01 37.2 53.8 8.811 Total # 887 1 291 1 1837 1 338 i High 1 07:45 1 07 :30 1 07:45 07:45 1 Vol. 1 3 248 131 14 46 211 8 487 91 43 46 121 Total 1 264 1 81 1 544 1 101 1 PHF 1 0.839 1 0.898 1 0.911 1 0.836 1 I. i Transportation Studies, Inc. City : SEAL BEACH 1820 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H0203058 N/S Direction : PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Suite 115 Site Code : ❑40oo919 £/W Direction : LOYNES DRIVE Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/28/02 Client : LL&G Page : 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS jPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1LOYNES DRIVE 1PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1LQYNES DRIVE 1Southbound 1westbound jNorthbound jEastbound Start j ! jlntrvl. Time Ri ht Thru Left I Right Thru Leftl Right Thru Left -Right Thru Leftl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 03/28/02 to 17:45 on 03/28/02 1 Time 1 17 :00 1 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:08 1 Vol. 1 30 1719 651 74 385 2411 91 1196 1571 120 234 321 Pct. 1 1.6 94.7 3.51 10.5 55.0 34.41 6.3 82.8 14.81 31.4 60.6 8.21 Total 1 1814 1 700 1 1444 1 386 1 High 1 17:00 1 17:30 j 17:15 1 17:45 1 Vol. 1 9 462 191 20 108 741 27 318 421 39 75 51 Total 1 490 j 202 j 387 1 119 # PHF 1 0.925 j 0.866 1 0.932 1 0.810 j PACIFIC COAST HIGHW Y 1 719 1302 38 65 y T 3116 LOYNES DRIVE 572 <— 03/28/92 � 74 �` 055pM :4 32 <— 385 958 � 4344 1899 234 � 241 120 390 LOYNES ]DR IU N 3524 2888 1196 PACIFICiCOAS? H GHW Y Transportation Studies, Inc. 1824 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Day Total 10,618 Day Split 46.0 Ptak Hour 07:00 04:45 Volum 928 1,135 Factor 0.86 0.90 Uata fle: 12,448 54.0 23,066 07:34 03:30 07:00 04:45 1,259 1,227 21,170 2,288 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 Santa Ana, C.A. 92705 Location : WESTMINSTER AVENUE Site: SEAL BEACH Segment : STUDEBAKER TO SAN GA L RIVR Date: 09/10/02 Client : LL&G interval B4 12:00 AM 13 EB 33 PM 156 632 AM W13 PM AM Combined PM -74 Day: Tuesday 12:15 6 140 9 7 36 160 150 3153 21 13 jib 290 I V2 17 12:30 9 168 6 131 15 299 12:45 10 168 15 144 25 312 01:00 6 18 142 582 13 27 117 523 19 45 259 19,105 01:15 5 157 10 132 15 289 01:30 3 143 4 140 7 283 01:45 4 140 0 134 4 274 02:00 2 17 182 658 3 15 118 710 5 32 300 1,368 02:15 5 166 4 174 9 340 0230 7 142 4 176 11 318 02:45 3 168 4 242 7 410 03:00 5 22 171 841 2 15 239 1,145 7 37 410 19986 03:15 3 190 4 280 7 470 03:30 8 216 5 327 13 543 03:45 6 264 4 299 10 563 04:00 6 61 295 19040 5 50 298 1,151 11 111 593 2,191 04:15 12 234 11 303 23 537 04:30 22 247 16 280 38 527 04:45 21 264 18 270 39 534 05:04 28 228 315 1 9086 24 213 328 1 ,140 52 441 643 2,226 05:15 48 280 45 270 93 550 05:30 84 276 60 285 144 561 05:45 68 215 84 257 152 472 06:00 78 488 206 685 122 707 254 795 304 1,195 456 1,480 06:15 131 192 131 207 262 399 46:30 153 162 1% 172 349 334 06:45 126 125 258 166 384 291 07:04 206 928 124 408 306 1,242 136 400 512 2,170 264 848 07:15 240 100 292 94 532 194 07:30 270 102 308 84 578 186 07:45 212 87 335 86 548 168 08:00 197 670 83 300 307 1 ,100 80 247 504 1,770 163 547 48:15 147 67 308 60 455 127 08:30 178 82 739 54 417 136 08:45 148 68 246 53 394 121 09:00 130 477 64 239 228 764 51 179 358 1,241 115 418 49:15 124 74 190 50 314 124 09:30 121 58 174 38 295 96 49:45 182 43 172 40 274 83 10:00 108 469 40 131 133 546 28 123 241 1,015 68 254 10:15 124 36 149 42 273 78 10:30 111 33 136 34 247 63 10:45 126 22 128 23 254 45 11.00 131 540 17 60 172 683 12 52 303 1,223 29 112 11:15 114 16 162 21 276 37 11:30 133 14 178 9 311 23 11:45 162 13 171 10 333 23 1�5151 31956 6,367 5,399 TtO50 9,3.-w4 13,717 Split 423 48.6 57.7 51.4 Day Total 10,618 Day Split 46.0 Ptak Hour 07:00 04:45 Volum 928 1,135 Factor 0.86 0.90 Uata fle: 12,448 54.0 23,066 07:34 03:30 07:00 04:45 1,259 1,227 21,170 2,288 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 Transportation Studies, Inc, 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Location : WESTMINSTER AVENUE <iD Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Segn -cnt : ROAD A TO SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Site: SEAL BEACH Client : LL&G ; 49110 02 Interval Begi I 2:U0 AM 13 54 PM 148 396 AM PM AM Combined PM Day: Tuesday 12:15 19 162 w 6 29 161 152 613 21 25 83 309 314 IZug 12:30 11 122 7 144 18 266 12:45 9 164 10 156 19 320 01:00 11 25 156 582 7 19 122 537 18 44 278 11119 . 01:15 7 134 9 136 16 270 01:30 2 146 3 131 5 277 01:45 5 146 0 148 5 294 02:00 1 15 152 668 3 16 118 651 4 31 270 1,319 02:15 2 170 3 148 5 318 02:30 5 188 4 165 9 353 42:45 7 158 6 220 13 378 03:00 4 25 174 851 4 17 238 1,069 8 42 408 1,920 03:15 7 178 3 257 10 435 03:30 3 246 6 306 9 552 03:45 11 257 4 268 15 525 04:00 2 40 260 1.114 8 71 289 1,043 10 111 549 2,157 04:15 7 322 17 252 24 574 04:30 18 270 20 252 38 522 04:45 13 262 26 250 39 512 05:00 20 123 332 1,235 37 302 324 1 9070 57 425 656 2,305 05:15 24 332 66 233 86 565 05:30 44 303 101 277 145 580 05:45 39 268 98 236 137 504 06:00 44 364 238 793 148 816 230 743 192 1,180 458 1,536 06:15 74 196 163 182 237 378 06:30 112 206 212 181 324 387 06:45 134 153 293 I50 427 303 07:00 128 765 132 447 341 19421 126 383 469 2,187 258 830 07:15 195 107 308 92 503 199 47:30 219 108 384 87 603 195 07:45 224 100 388 78 612 378 08:40 170 656 86 316 358 1,248 67 232 528 1,904 153 548 08:15 156 84 347 58 513 138 08:30 152 72 249 58 401 130 08:45 168 78 294 49 462 127 09:04 122 478 61 244 229 812 47 179 351 1+290 108 423 09:15 132 68 228 47 364 115 09:30 104 65 176 45 280 110 09:45 120 50 1 79 40 299 90 10:04 92 428 42 137 157 559 35 118 249 987 77 255 10:15 128 32 146 33 274 65 10:30 114 30 134 26 244 56 10:45 94 33 126 24 220 57 11:00 142 560 14 63 171 635 9 41 313 1,195 23 104 11:15 141 23 154 17 295 40 11:30 126 13 168 9 294 22 11:45 151 13 142 6 293 19 Total Split 37.3 51.3 62.7 48.7 Day Total 10,580 Day Split 45.6 Peak Hour 07:15 05:00 Volum 808 1,,235 Factor 0.90 0.93 Data File: 12,624 54.4 23,204 07:30 03:15 07:30 04:45 1,477 1,120 2,256 2,313 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.88 Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Day Total 11,049 Day Split 45.8 Peak Hour 07:15 44:45 Volum 874 1,379 Factor 0.93 0.93 Vata File: D02 59 13,488 54.2 24,137 07:04 03:15 07:00 44:45 1,800 1,200 2,658 2,448 4.95 0.83 0.94 0.93 Santa a Santa AfU4 CA. 92745 Location :WESTMINSTER AVENUE VENUE E-3 ) Site: SEAL BEACH Segmrnt : W/O BOLA CHICA ROAD Date: 49114!02 Client : LL&Gr interval Begi AM EB PM AM WB PM AM Combined PM Day: Tuesday 12:15 14 125 5 154 15 279 12:34 6 175 8 130 14 345 12:45 6 144 3 130 9 274 01 :00 6 15 124 575 13 26 136 543 19 41 260 19078 01:15 4 156 8 133 12 289 41:30 3 146 4 116 7 262 01:45 2 149 1 118 3 267 02:00 2 11 158 650 4 13 130 649 6 24 288 1,299 02:15 5 170 2 124 7 294 82:34 1 168 5 171 6 339 02:45 3 154 2 224 5 378 03:00 3 12 204 19005 5 22 244 1,162 8 34 448 2,167 03:15 3 267 5 277 8 544 03:30 4 236 6 361 10 597 03:45 2 298 6 280 8 578 04:00 4 38 310 1,260 8 66 282 19033 12 144 592 2,293 04:15 8 348 14 228 22 536 04:30 16 306 18 257 34 563 44:45 10 336 26 266 36 642 05:04 18 117 369 1,358 38 342 286 1,045 56 459 655 2,443 45:15 21 354 ?0 258 91 612 05:30 46 320 106 259 152 579 05:45 32 315 128 242 160 557 46:00 65 379 274 800 166 1,068 192 628 231 1,447 466 1,428 06:15 76 192 244 173 284 365 06:30 113 196 316 144 429 344 06:45 125 138 382 119 547 257 47:00 174 858 129 420 436 1,804 107 364 614 29658 236 784 07:15 230 119 474 86 704 205 07:30 234 74 446 90 680 154 07:45 220 98 444 77 664 175 48:04 194 649 77 270 386 1,329 75 228 576 11,978 152 498 08:15 165 60 334 57 499 117 08:34 150 61 310 58 464 119 48:45 144 72 299 38 443 110 09:04 136 546 52 193 225 796 68 197 361 1,342 120 394 09:15 154 58 198 48 352 106 09:34 124 46 192 41 316 87 09:45 132 37 181 40 313 77 10:00 114 479 50 136 146 516 35 110 260 995 85 246 10:15 126 36 133 30 259 66 10:34 121 29 124 25 245 54 10:45 118 21 113 20 231 41 11:40 142 598 19 70 151 575 13 45 293 11.173 32 115 11:15 146 21 160 14 346 35 11:34 152 18 132 13 284 31 11:45 158 12 132 5 290 17 o Split 36.2 52.9 63.8 47.1 Day Total 11,049 Day Split 45.8 Peak Hour 07:15 44:45 Volum 874 1,379 Factor 0.93 0.93 Vata File: D02 59 13,488 54.2 24,137 07:04 03:15 07:00 44:45 1,800 1,200 2,658 2,448 4.95 0.83 0.94 0.93 Day Total 10,446 Day Split 48.6 Peak Hour 07:00 02 :15 Volum 987 666 Factor 0.90 0.90 10,620 51.4 20,666 07:45 05:00 07:15 45:04 609 1,024 1,548 1 ,647 0.86 0.98 0.92 0.98 ' Data File: D0203068 Transportation Studies, Inc. I820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Location • : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Segment NIQ PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Site: SEAL BEACH Date: 03126/02 Client LL&G interval NB SB Combined Day. Tuesday Bgi AM PM AM PM AM PM 12:00 19 55 134 616 22 48 149 587 41 103 283 1,203 12:15 15 152 9 168 24 320 12.30 8 174 12 136 20 310 1 2:45 13 156 5 134 18 290 01 :00 14 39 148 602 9 24 153 634 23 63 301 1,236 01:15 6 150 4 157 10 307 01:30 9 148 9 142 18 290 01:45 10 156 2 182 12 338 02:00 7 31 183 665 9 34 123 650 16 65 306 1,315 02:15 11 164 6 169 17 329 02:34 9 160 14 184 23 344 ' 02:45 4 152 5 174 9 336 43:04 3 23 184 612 5 28 162 759 8 51 346 1,381 43:15 8 136 5 191 13 327 03:30 5 156 8 206 13 352 03:45 7 136 10 210 17 346 04 :00 12 83 156 578 5 23 247 864 17 106 363 1,442 04:15 17 138 6 210 23 348 04:34 18 142 7 219 25 351 44:45 36 142 5 228 41 370 05:44 34 271 168 623 16 109 252 1,024 50 380 420 11647 05:15 52 158 22 262 74 420 05:34 78 156 34 254 108 410 05:45 107 141 41 256 148 397 06:40 118 657 138 547 64 321 238 938 182 978 375 1,485 06:15 149 123 66 266 215 389 06:30 182 161 95 226 277 387 06:45 208 125 % 208 304 333 07:00 228 987 115 392 120 560 204 632 348 19547 319 1,424 07:15 242 98 124 172 366 270 07:30 273 89 138 132 411 221 07:45 244 90 178 124 422 214 08:00 182 707 98 294 167 570 127 462 349 1,277 225 756 08:15 199 79 120 116 319 195 08:30 174 69 1" 108 318 177 08:45 152 48 139 111 291 159 09:00 144 590 86 278 112 448 110 356 252 1,038 1 % 634 09:15 154 66 105 98 259 164 49:30 162 64 111 74 273 138 09:45 134 62 120 74 254 136 10:00 129 526 58 205 122 544 74 249 251 1,066 132 454 10:15 128 54 139 62 267 116 10:30 130 50 137 58 267 108 10:45 139 43 142 55 281 98 11:00 134 554 30 111 147 647 46 143 281 1,161 76 254 11:15 154 30 134 40 288 74 11:34 123 26 174 29 297 55 11:45 143 25 152 28 295 53 Total 4,523 5,523 3,312 7,308 7.835 1 2,831 Split 57.7 43.4 42.3 57.4 Day Total 10,446 Day Split 48.6 Peak Hour 07:00 02 :15 Volum 987 666 Factor 0.90 0.90 10,620 51.4 20,666 07:45 05:00 07:15 45:04 609 1,024 1,548 1 ,647 0.86 0.98 0.92 0.98 ' Data File: D0203068 Transportation Studies Inc. 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Location ADOLFO LOPEZ ED Santa Aria, CA. 92705 : Site: SEAL BEACH Segment W/O SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Date: 03/26/02 Client LL&G Interval -- -- EB WB -. ��.,.,� Combined _ _.. Qay. Tuesday Begi AM PM AM PM AM PM 12:00 1 1 8 42 1 8 12 50 2 9 20 92 12:15 0 9 1 12 1 21 12:34 0 10 2 6 2 16 12:45 0 15 4 20 4 35 01:00 1 5 14 52 0 3 14 72 1 8 28 124 41:15 0 11 0 14 0 25 01:30 3 14 2 23 5 37 01:45 1 13 1 21 2 34 42:00 1 5 10 43 1 4 11 49 2 9 21 92 02:15 1 8 1 14 2 22 02:34 2 6 2 8 4 14 02:45 1 19 0 16 1 35 03.00 1 4 4 78 1 8 18 65 2 12 22 143 03:15 0 10 0 15 0 25 03:34 2 54 3 25 5 79 03:45 1 10 4 7 5 17 04:00 1 10 15 59 2 80 9 35 3 90 24 94 04:15 2 it 3 6 5 17 04:30 3 17 20 10 23 27 04:45 4 16 55 10 59 26 05:04 6 14 18 44 11 30 8 34 17 44 26 78 05:15 4 6 4 4 8 14 05:30 0 11 7 12 7 23 05:45 4 9 8 10 12 19 06:00 6 19 16 45 8 53 1 9 14 72 17 54 06.15 4 16 15 4 19 20 06:30 4 7 15 2 19 9 46:45 5 6 15 2 20 8 07:00 6 21 4 15 14 43 3 10 20 64 7 25 07:15 7 4 10 2 17 6 07:30 4 2 6 3 10 5 47:45 4 5 13 2 17 7 08:00 10 34 2 9 14 40 6 15 24 74 8 24 08:15 8 1 15 2 23 3 08:30 7 2 7 0 14 2 08:45 9 4 4 7 13 11 09:44 3 37 3 9 4 38 4 7 7 75 7 16 09:15 13 3 14 2 27 5 09:30 9 2 10 1 19 3 09:45 12 1 10 0 22 1 10:00 9 49 4 7 8 53 0 4 17 102 0 11 14:15 14 1 14 2 28 3 14:30 17 4 11 2 28 6 14:45 9 2 20 0 29 2 11:00 11 37 0 1 6 38 0 1 17 75 0 2 1 1:15 12 0 } 4 8 26 4 11:30 8 1 6 0 14 1 11:45_.._. 6 0 12 1 18 1 Total 236 404 398 351 634 755 Split 37.2 53.5 62.8 46.5 Day Total 640 Day Split 46.1 Peak Hour 09:45 Volum 52 Factor 4.76 749 53.9 1,389 03:30 04:30 02:45 04:30 02:45 90 90 74 147 161 0.42 0.41 0.74 0.45 0.51 * Data File: D0203069 --- - Transportation Studies, Inc. 1 820 E. Gant' Avenue, Ste 116 Location : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARDS Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Site: Segment : ROAD A TO ROAD C SEAL BEACH Date: 03126/02 Client : LL&G Interval NB SB C,Dmbined Day: - B�egi - -- AM PM AM PM AM Phi 12 :� 24 68 200 824 19 60 186 800 43 128 386 1,624 M -- 12:15 18 208 15 225 33 433 12:30 13 212 17 182 30 394 12:45 13 204 9 207 22 411 01:00 19 48 210 814 t0 28 187 777 29 76 397 1,591 01:15 7 206 5 181 12 387 01:30 11 194 12 198 23 392 01:45 11 204 1 211 12 415 02:40 9 34 227 976 10 38 209 864 19 72 436 1 ,844 02:15 9 258 8 224 17 482 02:34 11 260 13 215 24 475 02:45 5 231 7 216 12 447 03:00 4 29 217 856 3 32 229 11014 7 61 445 11,874 03:15 7 213 6 269 13 482 03:30 7 239 13 259 20 498 03:45 11 187 10 257 21 444 04:00 10 88 238 892 8 77 277 1,120 18 165 515 2,012 04:15 28 184 8 287 36 471 04:30 22 246 23 260 45 506 04:45 28 224 38 296 66 520 05:04 52 329 214 856 20 148 282 1,257 72 477 496 2,113 05:15 65 230 29 327 94 557 05:30 86 212 41 336 127 548 05:45 126 204 58 312 184 512 06:00 150 774 181 723 85 438 322 1,171 235 19212 503 1,894 06:15 168 173 88 293 256 466 46:34 203 203 117 284 320 487 06:45 253 166 148 272 401 438 07:04 242 1,128 150 524 184 859 210 746 426 1 ,987 360 1,274 07:15 286 134 198 201 484 335 07:30 284 128 231 184 515 312 07:45 316 112 246 151 562 263 08:40 245 883 133 394 192 742 166 592 437 1,625 299 986 08:15 240 96 180 142 420 238 08:30 222 92 180 146 442 238 08:45 175 73 190 138 366 211 09:40 178 745 110 359 128 596 117 419 306 1,341 227 778 09 :15 186 92 153 126 339 218 09:30 197 83 162 90 359 173 09.45 184 74 153 86 337 160 10:00 192 741 76 244 142 694 94 301 334 1,435 170 545 10:15 197 59 184 75 381 135 10:30 170 64 184 70 3.4 134 10:45 182 45 184 61 366 106 11:00 182 747 37 123 218 853 49 150 400 1,600 86 273 11:15 192 36 186 49 378 85 11:30 184 27 213 25 397 52 11:45 189 23 236 27 425 50 Tfltal 5,614 7t5&5 4,565 9,211 10,179 16,796 Split 55.2 45.2 44.8 54.8 Day Total 13,199 Day Split 48.9 Peak Hour 07:15 Velum 1,131 Factor 0.89 File: D0203067 13,776 51.1 26,975 02:00 07:15 05:15 07:15 04:45 976 867 1,297 19998 2,121 0.94 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.95 Bata Day Total 16,213 Day Split 48.0 Peak Hour 07:15 04 :15 volum 1,263 1,342 Factor 0.98 0.92 Data File : D0203066 17,577 52.0 33,790 07:15 05:15 07:15 04:45 1,327 1,427 2,590 2,672 4.92 0.98 0.96 0.96 Transportation Studies, Inc.., 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Location :SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD Site: SEAL. BEACH Segment : ST. ANDREWS TO GOLDEN RAIN Date: 03/26/02 Client LL&G 1 ntery al NB SB Combined Day: Tuesday Begi AM PM AM PM AM PM 12:00 21 87 241 967 27 69 270 19142 48 156 511 29109 - 12:15 32 220 14 302 46 522 12:30 18 268 20 270 38 538 12:45 16 238 8 300 24 538 01:04 23 59 244 992 13 38 241 11044 36 97 485 2,036 01:15 11 240 8 274 19 514 41:30 14 256 11 264 25 516 41.45 11 252 6 269 17 521 02:00 10 47 273 11149 13 46 290 1,285 23 93 563 2,434 02:15 14 289 12 386 26 675 02:30 15 311 14 310 29 621 02:45 8 276 7 299 15 575 03:00 6 29 301 1,189 4 40 313 1,251 10 69 614 2,440 03:15 9 258 7 348 16 606 03:30 8 326 18 293 26 619 03:45 6 344 11 297 17 601 04:00 14 96 332 1,335 10 91 331 1,271 24 187 663 21606 04:15 28 312 13 312 41 624 04:30 17 326 30 296 47 622 04:45 37 365 38 332 75 697 05:00 50 299 339 1 ,200 45 324 336 11401 95 623 675 2,641 05:15 47 302 63 339 110 641 05:30 88 297 95 362 183 659 45:45 114 262 121 364 235 626 06:00 138 781 240 926 138 747 362 1,285 276 11528 602 2,211 06:15 167 228 176 313 343 541 06 :30 222 244 192 306 414 554 06:45 254 214 241 304 495 518 07:44 290 1,245 180 654 23I 1,259 246 828 521 2,544 426 1,482 07:15 318 170 316 214 634 384 07 :30 322 168 352 182 674 350 07:45 315 136 360 186 675 322 08:40 308 1 ,019 154 493 299 1,077 178 651 607 21096 332 1,144 08:15 246 121 287 163 533 284 08:30 239 100 252 164 491 264 08:45 226 118 239 146 465 264 09 :00 199 890 128 439 198 843 143 470 397 19693 271 909 09:15 247 121 207 127 454 248 09:34 234 102 198 106 432 208 09:45 210 88 200 94 410 182 10:04 214 906 80 262 228 938 112 348 442 1,844 192 610 10:15 226 59 237 82 463 141 10:30 230 76 231 78 461 154 14:45 236 47 242 76 478 123 11:04 222 997 46 152 258 994 54 175 480 11,991 140 327 11:15 262 41 244 57 506 98 11:30 260 35 232 28 492 63 11:45.. -6, 253 _ 30 260 36 513 66 Total 455 9,758 6,426 11,151 12,881 20,909 Split 50.1 46.7 49.9 53.3 Day Total 16,213 Day Split 48.0 Peak Hour 07:15 04 :15 volum 1,263 1,342 Factor 0.98 0.92 Data File : D0203066 17,577 52.0 33,790 07:15 05:15 07:15 04:45 1,327 1,427 2,590 2,672 4.92 0.98 0.96 0.96 City SEAL SEAM Transportation Studies, inc. N -S : SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste. 116 Site Code : 000000000000 E -w ADOLFO LOPEZ Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/2002 Client : LL&G File I.D. E0203073 24HR APPROACH COUNT Pa e 1 Begin Toes. Time 03/26 NS SB EB Total 12:00 25 24 1 0 50 12:15 16 14 0 0 30 12:30 11 18 0 0 29 12:45 13 9 0 0 22 Hour Total 65 65 1 0 131 01:00 16 10 1 0 27 01:15 7 5 0 0 12 01:30 9 11 3 0 23 01:45 9 1 1 0 11 Hour Total 41 27 5 0 73 02-00 8 11 1 0 20 02:15 9 8 1 0 18 02:30 10 14 2 0 26 02:45 5 6 1 0 12 Hour Total 32 39 5 0 76 03:00 5 5 1 0 11 03:15 9 5 0 0 14 03:30 7 13 2 0 22 03:45 10 11 1 0 22 Hour Total 31 34 4 0 69 04:00 9 8 1 0 18 04:15 26 7 2 0 35 04:30 22 22 3 0 47 04:45 34 37 4 0 75 Hour Total 91 74 10 0 175 05:00 48 20 6 0 74 05:15 65 26 4 0 95 05:30 97 39 0 0 131 45:45 121 51 4 0 176 Hour Total 326 136 14 0 475 06:00 147 72 6 0 225 4615 184 76 4 0 264 06:30 215 97 4 0 316 06:45 246 130 5 0 381 Hour Total 792 375 19 0 1186 07:00 262 142 6 0 410 07:15 312 170 7 0 Ogg 07:30 324 189 4 0 517 07:45 310 218 4 0 532 Hour Total 1208 719 21 0 1948 08:00 262 175 lO 0 447 08:15 244 174 8 0 426 08:30 218 169 7 0 394 08:45 180 180 9 0 369 Hour Total 904 698 34 0 1636 N~ 94 N amity : b ^_o,,;,,. bk;Ath Transportation Studies, Inc. N -S SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1820 F. Garry Avenue, Ste. 116 Site Code : 000000000000 E -W ADOLFO LOPEZ Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/2002 Client LL&G File I.D. E0203073 24HR APPROACH COUNT Pa Se 2 Begin Tues. Time 03/26 NB SB EB Total 09:00 182 140 3 0 325 09:15 19S 142 13 0 350 09:30 190 150 9 0 349 09:45 172 156 12 0 340 Hour Total 739 588 37 0 1364 10:00 180 142 9 0 331 14:15 193 178 14 0 385 10:30 162 172 17 0 351 10:45 174 187 9 0 370 Hour Total 709 679 49 0 1437 11 :00 173 288 11 0 392 11:15 187 201 12 0 400 11:30 166 242 e 0 416 11:45 182 236 6 0 424 Hour Total 708 887 37 0 1632 12:00 187 208 8 0 403 17:15 202 217 9 0 428 12:30 219 166 10 0 395 12.45 195 197 15 0 407 Hour Total 803 788 42 0 3633 D1:00 207 192 14 0 413 01:15 196 172 11 0 379 01:30 184 199 14 0 397 01:45 203 218 13 0 434 Hour Total 790 781 52 0 1623 02 :00 198 188 10 0 396 02:15 227 248 8 0 483 02:34 245 204 6 0 455 02:45 211 224 19 0 454 Hour Total 881 864 43 0 1788 03:00 210 238 4 0 452 03:15 199 245 10 0 454 03:30 196 286 54 0 536 03:45 170 270 10 0 450 Hour Total 775 1039 78 0 1892 04:00 190 262 15 0 467 04:15 171 310 11 0 492 04:30 198 268 17 0 483 04:45 204 290 16 0 510 Hour Total 763 1130 59 0 1952 05:00 186 316 18 0 520 05:15 198 350 6 0 554 05:30 188 340 11 0 539 05:45 197 326 9 0 532 Hour Total 769 1332 44 ❑ 2145 Pt- n0 City SEAL BEACH Transportation Studies, Inc. N -S SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Ste. 116 Site Code : 000000000000 E -w ADOLFO LOPEZ Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 03/26/2002 Client : LL&G File I.D. : E0203073 2 4 HR APPROACH COUNT Page 3 Begin Tues. Time 03/26 NB SS EB Total 06:00 158 322 16 0 496 06:15 174 300 16 0 490 06:30 186 290 7 0 483 06 :45 148 264 6 0 418 Hour Total 666 1176 45 0 1887 Q7:00 155 232 4 0 391 07:15 126 222 4 0 352 07:30 114 186 2 0 302 07:45 109 156 5 0 270 Hour Total 504 796 15 0 1315 08:04 134 160 2 0 296 48:15 104 144 1 0 249 88:30 82 ISO 2 0 234 08:45 83 334 4 0 271 Hour Total 403 S88 9 0 1000 09:00 100 131 3 0 234 09:15 90 126 3 0 219 49:30 82 90 2 0 174 09:45 70 67 1 0 158 Hour Total 342 434 9 0 785 10:00 72 97 0 0 169 10.15 65 80 1 0 146 10:30 61 68 4 0 133 10:45 42 62 2 0 105 Hour Total 240 307 7 0 554 11:00 36 50 0 0 86 11:15 33 48 0 0 81 13:30 29 28 1 0 58 11:45 23 30 0 0 53 Hour Total 121 156 1 0 278 Day Totals 12743 13712 640 27055 Totals 12703 13712 640 0 27055 A -- rt N !` tZ —^Cb —i Z Leo ;%M7 HI.1 1 1" M"Z:,1- UK 1 H l 1 UN . t*, 1 UM 11. �i441 Transportation Studies, Inc. 1820 E, Garry Avenue, Ste 1 1 6 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Location ; SEAL BEAC14 BLVD Segment : 1A05 Na RAMP TO 1405 SB RAMP Client : Ll. G Interval Begin AM - SS PM •SB 13;oc� 22 62 326 13:15 21 336 13 :30 9 352 13:4$ 10 335 1:00 2 20 354 1.15 2 363 1:30 10 350 1:45 6 281 :tea S 26 343 2:15 7 316 2130 6 374 245 3S6 3:00 6 35 391 3:15 3 416 310 14 404 3.4.E 10 348 400 8 78 395 4.1 I 1 396 4:3u 28 398 444 31 373 S. -00 43 298 431 .4-15 64 406 5.30 76 420 5:45 115 474 6.00 162 875 349 6.15 218 348 6:30 238 334 6.45 257 278 700 0 276 1,381 27$ 7.15 344 254 730 370 204 745 391 198 8:00 360 1 ,233 192 9.15 302 190 8:30 294 161 1-0 276 177 4:IH1 283 19105 176 Q 1{ 287 173 430 260 110 Y-45 270 112 10,00 270 101S9 125 10 -15 292 so 10.30 328 84 10:4$ 299 72 11:40 288 059 $6 11:15 316 i6 11 -10 302 36 11:45 353 33 Total 7,560 13,479 Peak H ou 7:15 s:oo Volume 1.465 1,731 Facto 0.94 0.91 DayTota t 201,1949 Dfitf, File• ' 06 N` V1 1,352 1,348 1.391 I,SS9 1.552 1,731 1.309 934 720 571 361 7.01 P =35 SEAT. BEACH 02112102 Tuesday 02/26/02 TUE 09:56 [TX /Rj No 686a] Q o35 FEB-!&(D-ate 1 b : 1ay z U". "bra ntporta tiuu Studies, Inc. 1920 E. Garry Avenue, Ste 116 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Location : SEAL BEACH BLVD Segment : 1 -405 NB RAMP TO 1-405 5B RAMP Client : LL & G Interval Begin AM - NB PM -NB 12:00 30 91 363 12 -15 19 320 12:30 26 306 12:45 16 352 1:00 18 69 333 1.13 1S 344 130 13 316 1.4 5 23 351 200 14 35 312 3.13 7 337 2:30 d 406 3'43 6 389 3:00 22 75 332 115 18 413 130 14 392 .145 21 400 400 18 114 4S8 4 15 37 421 4 •111 35 447 .4 4$ 34 476 (N) 42 306 438 5 15 58 463 A.30 so 401 S45 118 423 6:00 134 919 320 6' IS 164 337 6:30 209 312 6.45 292 308 7:0[f 288 1.461 252 366 2S6 7-311 344 314 745 4 63 124 8.00 366 1,442 232 K. I s 378 187 8:30 336 133 11.45 362 174 350 1,356 140 41 15 372 139 44 -30 322 126 1Q:43 312 114 10,00 299 18290 98 IQ I i 310 99 10:30 348 82 1045 333 72 11:04 320 1.364 60 11.15 334 48 11:30 378 so 11.45 336 42 Total 5,422 130400 Peak How 7.30 4:30 VON= 1.551 1.224 Facto 0.84 0.96 DayTota l 2114:13 Uata i:tIc 11400 1,366 1'314 1.563 1.803 1.727 1,337 906 726 519 3$0 200 r M r7 G SEAL BEACH 02/12/02 Tuesday 42/26/02 TU 09:56 ITX /RX 140 68681 2036 ent By: KUNZMAN; JetSuite; Dec -4 -02 12 :01PM; Page 517 Average daily Traffic Volumns Prepared by: Soudfand Cw Counters Volumes for: -rhLu Way hia+r+ernbw 1+40 7,00Z Cam: i Bed Phv, apt - 02- 1440 -aN TOW VOL 9460 slot 0 a 05581 K . rt y 13040 16063 0 0 29UB M20 2ZI64 a o 44684 12/04/02 WED 11:32 [U/RX NO 88251 0005 tvcaW n: PCH & dtwn. Markm Dr. Saba Arne. CuSL Ref. v: Cad Mud - MB S AR fag _WS 22:0412:25 44 51 lZ:vo -L's3 3� 293 12:15 -12:30 30 41 iZ:15-UM 299 316 12:30 -12:45 34 46 1Z:39)--iZ4S 320 296 32:45.1:00 32 140 29 2651 9Q9 12:45.1: 367 13Q6 324 1331 2539 lava -i:l 27 29 314 ::1 s-1 :30 23 Z"3 i:ss -i:3ai 393 30 23 367 2" 1:4 -2.-oo 22 102 27 102 204 1 :45 -2;00 319 M4 331 MS 2w X2:15 24 21 Z*,WZ:LS 324 341. Z: LS-2:n 22 20 20 -75-30 307 354 230 :45 10 22 zao -2:45 320 347 2:45 -3;0o 1S 71 v 0 152 Z:45-3:00 313 1264 31B 1360 2624 3:08 -3:15 12 a 3;00 -3:15 M 388 3:1S -3:30 5 33 karr3M 334 396 3 :30-3 :45 8 33 3-.3x3:45 310 432 3:6"zoo 7 32 a 52 114 3 :45 -*rw 340 1278 538 1756 3034 4:00-4:15 7 23 4co4:1.5 324 510 4: 25-4:30 is 9 4:15 -4:30 344 498 4 :3a*.45 22 15 4.030-4-45 362 542 4 :4" :90 41 as 21 Go 153 4:45 -5 -00 396 1426 S11 2061 3487 5:0t &-15 44 25 5 :00 -5:15 354 620 5:15 -5:30 72 28 S: i5-S:30 419 575 5,30-5 :45 102 29 5.30 -5.46 440 $02 5:454:020 146 364 71 153 517 5 :45 -6 :99 396 1609 599 2355 3965 6:Da-4:15 174 75 6 :0":15 437 555 6:25-4;30 M '30 6:151 -a:3b 994 594 GM -x:45 370 140 6:30 -C-45 355 460 &4x7:00 424 1155 158 473 1638 61&945 -7:00 W 1526 424 2034 3560 7:o9 -7:15 482 230 7:w-7:1S 296 406 7:15 -7:30 539 279 7;15 -7:3Q 371 7/30 -7 :45 SSS 322 730~7.+45 245 32*3 7:454AO SSl 2157 303 t133 3290 7:4" -.00 224 1043 288 1386 2429 e- ov -a:ss s 3" 6 :00-tIS 220 235 6:154 515 337 4:1S -8 :30 168 230 s:3"AS 483 306 8:30-x:45 178 192 8:45-4:00 416 1940 294 1251 3191 8:4'-9:00 197 773 208 8S 1638 9.%W9:15 417 235 2:0x-9:15 170 162 9:15 -9W.3a 350- 200 2:15.9•.3a 167 741 930 -9:45 331 215 930-1r.45 161 203 9 :45-10:00 231 1367 200 SSG 2237 9 :45-10 :00 155 653 24 8015 1459 1o,W14: 33 247 214 10:00 -14;15 148 X14 10:15 -10:30 234 1" 10:25 -20:30 166 151 y 0 *3o -io =■s 224 177 10:30 -10 :45 138 155 10 :45-11:00 251 9S6 Its 804 1760 io :45-11:00 109 5.S 1 101 511 1 i ILM -11:15 Z29 737 11:W11 :15 107 100 11:1,' -ii :30 US 207 11:15-11:30 8g 113 11 :30 -11:45 247 213 U:3o-i1:45 71 92 12 :45 -17:00 340 1051 274 935 2017 i3:4rtZ. -W 78 345 56 351 706 TOW VOL 9460 slot 0 a 05581 K . rt y 13040 16063 0 0 29UB M20 2ZI64 a o 44684 12/04/02 WED 11:32 [U/RX NO 88251 0005 ent By: KUNZMAN; JetSuite; Dec-4-02 12:01 PM; Page 617 Average Daily Traffic Volumns Pr"red ter. Scut tand Car Caurneis volumes fnr: Thursday, Nowember 24' 2002 0ty: Seel Beach project #: 024 !-=a" PCi & b�+�r L Asa Ave. & Sea 1 Beach Blvd. Est Rif. �: � Sid toli FR Wa PLI i�:D4 -i�:iS 55 5D ii.-d�13~15 3?� V7 12:1512:30 42 46 32~irf2:30 307 313 12:30~ -IZAS 36 45 szo -1 45 307 338 12AS -1:00 54 187 41 !BS 377 1.45-L -w 352 1398 32B 1246 1100 -ri5 31 25 1:09.1115 269 335 i :15P1:30 30 30 m50-I a 20 32? i.-3o-i-645 36 36 t3o -1:45 332 318 1:45 -2:00 24 121 24 115 M6 1:49 -3:00 313 1303 331 1305 2--00-2115 34 33 Z WILS 304 317 2:15-3:30 29 20 2:152:30 2% 366 Z :3o -2:4S it 19 2:30 -2~45 M 360 2:45 -3:010 23 87 19 90 177 2457:00 259 1147 350 M3 7535 3 :00-3115 18 8 3:00-3:15 310 35S 3 :15 -3 :30 a 25 3 :15-3130 3D7 323 3:30 -3:45 10 46 3:30.3:45 316 403 3:4----4:40 14 50 14 94 144 3:454:00 313 1245 452 1533 2775 4100 -4:15 10 25 4V. "'015 300 312 4 :154 :310 10 12 4:15^4 :30 362 448 4 :30'4:45 17 19 4130 -4145 354 514 4:45 -3100 30 WON 67 36 83 149 *45*00 349 1365 473 1947 3312 5-.WS.-IS 44 36 S.'D sam 3A $41 S35 -St3o 65 26 5:&S-5:30 412 soy 5 :30 -SAS 96 35 3:W5:46 416 364 5:45 -•5:40 133 338 74 171 S09 S :454:00 426 1650 523 2533 3783 6:m4: t5 157 SD 6..w -6:15 440 571 GAS4 -30 3SZ 13.5 6 :15 -5:30 400 5n 6:30 :45 319 l58 6030 -6:45 355 4w 6:45 -7:00 446 1114 209 572 165+6 &45•7 :oa 366 LS61 399 1959 3520 7:04 -7 :15 �9�6 245 7100.7:15 311 368 7:15 -7:30 S26 343 7:15 -7:30 322 386 7 :30-7 :45 558 433 7:30 -7:45 264 294 7 :45 -8:00 592 2173 403 1424 3596 7 :45 -8 :00 238 1135 284 1352 2457 8100 4:xs S22 386 0100 -8:15 Zia 222 0115 -8:30 S06 391 9: 15--8.30 L97 232 8 :30-1:45 467 371 S"3":45 156 184 ;4r-ww.oD 442 1,937 312 1460 3397 4:45 -9 :00 1" 740 181 819 1559 8:Do-8 :15 400 2% 9.io -9:13 192 >8D 9 S-WJO 370 272 936-9:30 179 215 9 :3G -9:45 331 300 !;30--9:45 184 2w 9:45 -109'00 344 1395 259 1129 =4 9:45 -io:DV tw 705 161 744 1949 10:00 -10:15 383 IMOD -10:15 256 198 !0x15 -10:30 276 198 10:15 -10:30 139 172 10:30 - 13:45 276 204 10:30 -10AS 132 125 20:45 -11:00 287 1122 257 931 2053 10 :45P11:00 110 537 100 595 1132 i1:oo -11:55 282 275 11:00.11 :15 133 78 11:15 -11:30 294 280 11:1511:30 96 91 it :3c� -11:45 2� 253 M-30-11:45 79 98 11:45 -MOD 329 1175 272 1090 2265 11:45 -12:00 8S 373 62 334 707 TOW VOL 9755 7343 o a 17108 12953 15361 0 0 28314 DON► TaoiW - 227M 22704 O 0 45422 K - `1S ent by: KuNLMAN; JetSuite; Dec -4 -0-2 1 2: ❑2PM; Pale 717 Average DaRY Traffic Volumns Prepared bjr. Sow Car Countem Volumes fbr: TNMSdaY,, N 14, 2042 CRY: Beach Ad ftd29 NO SB : poi & 6/0 Beadh Of& WB PM 0,ML Ref. #-w Cali egjwd 11,00-12:1S 53 41 1hidw 21 -M 11,00 -12:15 277 1Z IS -12:30 37 47 115.12:30 250 265 13:30~12:45 30 48 12:3a -1Z:4S 284 265 12,.45-1:00 48 168 2L,176 346 12:45 -1 :00 365 1116 384 1077 31513 I:DQ -1:iS 31 25 L-0041.15 2� LAS-1:30 2'A 25 1 :10-1:30 224 259 1:30-JAS 307 2% 1:4SZ:04 31 116 25 106 2Z2 1 :45-2:00 395 1994 259 308" 2176 100 -LAS 22 29 z00 -2:1S 278 =54-030 23 19 Z:yS,7-im 266 324 7:30.1,45 14 23 &3a-Z:4S 2W 310 2 :45 -3:00 17 76 19 90 166 2:45 -3.oa 251 iris 310 1.242 2247 2.W3:1S 13 7 3:0 3:1.5 284 320 3:I5 -3.30 7 24 =r3:30 280 341 3:30~3:45 5 46 3:30 -3:45 281 391 39#4&4.-,00 16 41 131 3 :45-4= 314 1159 448 150[ 2659 ■:o0- -�: lS 7 26 4.10o-4:1S 3W 468 4:1.5 -4:30 10 11 *15"4:30 344 433 4:30 -4:45 17 17 4;304:45 323 401 4:45 -5:00 34 60 24 78 146 4 :45.5:00 3S8 132.5 473 1855 3180 5:00-5:15 41 35 5:00-5:15 373 517 5:15'5:3 50-4 25 S: i5-S:30 389 S12 5:30 -5:45 91 31 5:30 -3:45 4W 562 5:45 -i:00 116 3I2 - - 64 I55 4� 5:45-&:00 388 1578 S21 2112 36M 6 :00-5:15 167 78 6:06 -C ILS 437 540 6:15 -6:30 166 100 6:1.%-&-30 402 527 6:30 -fi:45 296 134 6'0'30-&,04S 350 461 G"46-7.800 430 1054 152 4g4 1548 6:45.7:00 338 1517 374 1902 3419 7:00 -7:15 494 218 7:00 -7 :13 269 382 7AS -7 :30 536 330 7: 15-7.30 269 349 7:30 -7:45 530 364 7 :30-74,'45 234 775 7:454:00 565 7125 377 1283 3414 7:45.8:00 M 958 250 1266 2254 e:0a- As 461 351 8:40 -e:15 154 210 a :158:30 493 35S 5:i5-S:30 181 193 8:30-0 :45 4B i 348 8:30 -8:45 137 182 8 :45.9:00 376 1831 2M 1350 3181 9:459:00 149 651 152 737 9:00-9:iS 389 274 9:04.9 :1S 144 155 9 :0-9:30 296 229 t1.5;t.30 161 194 930-9:45 267 254 90-30 -9:45 ISO 179 3:45 -10:00 264 1256 239 996 3257 9:4s imaa 131 595 148 577 1373 10 :00-10:1.5 266 209 10:WMIS 137 1,80 zo:10-1.0 :30 233 199 104#15- 1.0- :30 133 148 10:30-104045 2S3 176 10'.30 -10 :45 US 1u 10;,0-11:00 262 1014 197 701 1795 90:45 -11:w 96 481 95 545 1025 11:00.11:15 256 238 - ikWILiS 95 72 11:15.114V30 250 246 11:15.11:30 79 as 12,030-11.945 272 M 1130 -11:45 79 916 11 :45 -12:00 278 1056 Z53 993 X49 11 :45 -1Z.-W 75 329 55 321 650 raw VOL 9117 65% 0 0 15715 11889 14316 0 D Zfi2U5 Dally Tala0lr 21&16 2W14 0 0 41420 k- T1 li 12/04/02 W 11 :32 [TXIRX No 88251 a007 E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX B INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICI ) AND HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL (HCM) CALCULATION WORKSHEETS E N G I N E E R S EXISTING (YEAR 2002) PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS GCm C4 CNI Ca . ' � � .. V) 40rN !� Oa � rNC4 r�^ to !'} Ct -ODgt I► m � �Qi[f 880 Orr 000 C N"" civic Ctilr f- o cp c c; C5 v m rr Nqlr Nt2 .0 •& a � �• Nehr 94 0) [y Fir Ni7r r zz 2 NAM E A 0E- M9 V V y It �. CZr.N N l�"! NCEN fJ vvv vvv ova 40 00 ar� T �m� mg°i S co ov cv v c+� C4 cvO 0 M ovc ab W co c v w v N �f r i1f q r N IW r . L1iFfr NF?r _ E U ..r N rn ]P%- CM Cb NtiN tv o � tie°i � �- ry tV�N 61 r 00 0 o v 40 q o qr via N rr � � N � a Q�CD ' ��'1F7 CG 03rr S e7 vy cv ov o°a vivo o v N 42§ §g 0 Ca$ § E ?) to C N F? C] t ~ U') 40 Wi C7 C? iNNv- L�1i+�PP- 1[160 M r to [y t31 t'} t4'3 N to C%Q -> aa¢� moo+ vivo vivo 000 viva N �E '-o , V g' CD m � r ab 0) 0 •pi ac T.- vo o nr cm coo v •�-- r C; at y� v v 0 ao o ao g [V�t co co M� r 'R M o r F} v 44 en •r N rs .- to M m to as a� NA E3 N 0? N N,. Ooo coo ovo ovv �, m m v° H V �+ o N Cb J f �Q mS . "Q'� ' ^ g m �► :' .. vv vv 0MN Ooo orr civv t a W o c - Fi W s„ OD CD N� ~} Mew CC pt CL C �e ■ s 07 ••- W pQ �} qqpp 2 N F3 G r L"f C N !'] r iY Pi r D1 E LU j IVmN wl r� �❑ L} s+ 8 C; 8 0 N 04 m m 1C?�C7 in C-4 � rt�N lw�l ro� � C"4 PC N ill CQ 7 N0 N h�� V) c -ZI �^ aiZ 3 *- i �H� wo J ^t" vi� ai Jig WL�tlW a�� a) � m iC� � ZWati ZZ2 [f}fco(n � 20 04 N cm gC4 v v T t C 0 0 J L Q C �ag � v c N cm = t 1 q =T � � C aad J G ce Ir U Z W N _,�� W a N Z T �CD ZD� V73 2L a.LU'. TS-1. m � m N Z §o aZ t3 li c � c C� Cif M ■ N cm Z a Cl b� _o a r L r� c r' t E��C FAa am y oc c a T N w voo r (y! c; eR N oov T N CV ovv r v � 01 OW IL iV V (1t r CV +- N V w • Nl7r N!'7T NEyr • avv ava ovv coo p o o ,• ,. � « « ei r� a �n as m � was ao e�i � v C+1 va r oc T N � uoo w N M coca v D U. r Nqw *rte Nor* Nrw N V) C7 1-040 N om! N t" Sly {V V) l7N V3N�"! Q. N. osl7o Naav O�w ° y^ T ti =� c0 V) av N vac - Cy r- aca ,�- v a W Nl qr T CV qr T Ni w N C7 o T V) C7 Cm C* N M ... Ln IN► m S M !•7 M 1` Cv qw V) T (~'9 N i�V r e coo 00v vvo 000 S .Q �� ^ t'7Nao r r- V4 Ci vW vv on vaa cov a .= 9 �a�0a�v N q T f CV CY t++ C4m0 +'�0)0 N40)r NV)w Z• .. P, 1� Al�40 O r cN �L7 N v tq Nl 1-N -' vvv o00 vvo vvv 4 « « e� n nn f �mm w N T +� av c0 r ed vo0 r' CM �— C; T v � r� 4A 40 go CV q r 1-r N f �- N f ... z 40 NV* NMr S: -- l7 W N N c� qw 0 cm V 0) C4 CV qr- V 71- �2 a.ccm JAR �il� -�p J� JHL� Q iA i Z22 yAis WWW �3a va TS-1. m � m N Z §o aZ t3 li c � c C� Cif M ■ N cm Z a Cl b� _o a r L r� c r' t E��C FAa am y oc c a $$v 9c•,N a 0 0 0 W r v `a L c y asd C yd 7 Y CO sn a N t] 41 W Z lb J d � W N 0 Zw 'a cc W W �¢°°�C4 CO dm co cc C cis ❑ 0 .. C �.} °~ o oa Uo� vjsi? Z� J,�► ZWG.U. Q 0% c c 1 o$.- r O y40j v C �o a� �a ro N f3 ` co � C = L� vmi� YLL0m N qrN 4m vvv vv ' l`VN vvv v oW d coo §01 �g0 'D ' d* N N M f N 000 tv0N cm ero vvOe 40 40 C 0 CD ocsv voo vvo vvv aW c; c; c; c; �N vv C4(M aov r 1 v y N N cue CL it voo cwvN cr�ev oNt 'W� voo a�vr. fn c►��v v•-v, 4D 1 at ova —00 vmv $ r r• �W g v$•r � grl-0+� �' G� O �❑[N1f �m ON 1.- �i vv vvv vv vvo o v v ooa g0$c�o 00 �►I N N c'7 N[} r d �• W U to; �i ooa NNO v 0 v0 CO ot- MOD v 0O w i1 � l"i �• e`� Lei co t. � � r fl ovaa 000 o00 voo « a! r N qw .r §N 1` vv voo vv a❑a o W 0 _ ovv ° 2C° og !r7 r T _► DOO NQN NN0 0Nr W ovo a vn ra�v vco -M o0p ovo coo vvv ?1 �• :�G pp + qqpp � : :� v, W OO 000 ov Ov0 0 coo Jos Ego CV 0 ! 7 N 0 '000 N A N N No ON er coo S o r' l+? A en v 47 ^ j y: g ! .0aa 2 2 Z ao.Q V) in cr7 .o .C. W W W 3: L] J Q 0% c c 1 o$.- r O y40j v C �o a� �a ro N f3 ` co � C = L� vmi� YLL0m C4 C4 C%d (4� v 0 C O G a � CQ O J v 0 K fCLg � o c 3 Ae JC cc c U) IL Ia v 03 a v lu w _ � J Z �. W 18 o �N � *' r o W��$N lu tin Z 0 w - 0o S ZWau. g- y A C � t F.. Q? a a IE F 90 o? V t3 � e .s m �N V 2 w ' ♦A L Y+G r o t 2� a� m 52 25 N v � �+ �• cv 5� Im " �S CD b ov c; 16 r� crf vv ne. oaa a cap d c� oav ION 0 0r,� $S N C4 V) q N coo RV 0 C4 CV Cr O 0 W) 40 11! rt = OaC CD 0IN S7gv v�M . v•� o oav vvc coo ovo pO 01 N Im� g lw 0 v O • v • V Ch O N } c; c; coo C c; 40 E ado vo p ovo 11048 aacr Qv v oyZ r C4 NoN NNa 0Nr- oav 0004 40 so 40 �- �+t� 0 i 000 NO0 0 N 0 f p�N r �j — 4 g v N O INNS, g 25 , c� i ° � p vv ovv oo vva c a voa og c Igo vg SIC. N w W . v o o (4 0 C4 LV N 0 0 C4 0 o a r7 0 N cc to 0 v v e� avv vva voo Ovv �j � • a R i`a ao ovv cv oao o d a v v C O CCC'Nf p p p 0 C4 0) !O� 4 vav Corm (4040 0Nt z .., ova M 0 N r ovo CEO Cd si7 fZ ovv 1000 ovv 0 v0 *- too �5 0 of cy � CID coo vcr coo d v 010 0 °g $o v$ :v N Al z. :� � :� O D o c+� v cy cti c+r a o ni •- e"f oDO NON CC CD o 40i T 2100 M0 ZZZ[� W W W i V� g- y A C � t F.. Q? a a IE F 90 o? V t3 � e .s m �N V 2 w ' ♦A L Y+G r o t 2� a� m o O O C4 cv �i CY [V 0 r Q r r � V 'a ti 0 o a, O v U r.. �g E m W N N 0 co cr Ix x m a� UJ iV W brN,t U Z t- W c LU m N N CCi [3 3cc m co uj 4) N C u3 Z N�z y� Z�,► c17� s'o J•-~. 2WatL A w � � s r � o 0 0 co ov ccc vvo 0$° vva $o olN+- W. Nv oaa NoV- _ v... r V v a�$° t T oOV 0v� T T � non 00o a00 T g rG T' RJ a § § • I C; C; o0 'd 'd ccco # fC� o dQ o2 °o COOo 0N•- *ENO 0 0 C Nor V 8 CD . •�- :.EE °sn m 4D $° coo Nv� a r r 0 o N O Goa 000 + e 0. vo vv vvo v a v$ $$g° voo $a$ " -jw 0C4 ENO 000 N0� •• °QV) vv Oho °O0 M° _ 21, �+ a 000 voo COO ° 0 0 r Q .- A vv cc oav v ca °g $0 000 0v � oNr ��+v voo !'VOr •. OW &S qw P, vo voo �a v vao vvo oov ovv -,' of N = N a� v .� O� • G G • G T vo qt C . 6466 cc c; ocv a a O4 © QS�v vov v N N 0 OOa N ar E m m L *` °-W ch a°�°o ovv IN 4 9 cog D � 2 2 2'" 2 a a �. �W zzz )c vo WW 3� Li Yii e°� • • UV A w C4 N N 04 N r v aa� boCL v J L? �gg E� �a m W n 04 in .0 it in a W Z s Z W O 2 ?' 3 W N ox ��mN uu N rnUScoi U) (n ZCO tn33'o zwa.LL. $ 4� 0 vH c i . i . C C Q i w a� a U � C: .m E I IS Z2r- 'd cmn's U C� +_98 $ p r O N Q N� Op $ p G O G v ti �49 0400 4040 ' OO ' 4046 43 r 0. vU U v$v 000 v$v 0C4 CM CD 04010 cm .. 0M rt�o coo �ve� �.... qr In coo 404040 40 0 40 Ovv ! C NC! cm = =� 40040 4040 4040 O Gd 4000 r a 10+ d v$ � v vva cZo 40 N +r r N 0 40 40 0 CV 40 r �.. 40 0 �raao cav �oc� C) N via oao 0400 N r g M mm E 00 In r. � C)r NO C4 %q v 0040 6 a 4040 a o F, 40(6 0 v o$ $0 000 20co u ao N 40N� +ACV 0 COC Nor ' z 40�+n ti or-o qw 000 �ae� Zp D H } 40400 4000 0v40 000 a i p a • « • NAn , �w NO vC O O Q W, a m 4040 6 400 cc c; o v vev C40 0040 Na voW) 40A0 0400 X02 000 ovv 0400 0040 .°140,47 5� r �5 N40 N %q T a 0040 vv 46 40 ava id c; o 1 v ovv 101 N O N V r N 0 400 0 N 40 W- 3 2= a r te a . aax� Z Z 2 saaa w 0 .0.0.0 W W W 3- �J $ 4� 0 vH c i . i . C C Q i w a� a U � C: .m E I IS Z2r- 'd cmn's U C� +_98 to Z5 ce W ca Z 0 t� to W�qp 2' V 4 N W W CO a 'ca W) D � Z � � N §80 cV CV 0 v T c �o O U n Q O m v N N Y W � W C mt3.� f U Z7 40 m m N � � a V3 0 2 CL &L M Z � C 8 Cb C n n m z ry ph r C aG � m E n � n ■ 3 C r C C Qi 928 2" oC LL �►l7N •^ D e•!� $$ :�- oov o cV vo o C C; 4c; N�� vvo gar, +�y as ar�4 ergo oova '4g CC4 rl'VG oao neoW ILL .� 0 �0) ,agv vvv mo� coo avv coo coo �[5 N C r • C N ` cm 0 o o ov O vv i11 ova v o� e., av N oM� .-cvo 00o C40W W i4 d+ a+•ao N (4 G C00 e)0f4.. 4 .� Cro oNC vvv C> ao col Tv, 044 a wag o00 oa c; coo 'rQ v o Q R} vg Ego vvo § o C14 o N r r !V O v G a N v W Er W ASS M) ovo Cage 2 fl a vvo oov vvo ova ge wj N ry P7r • ON 0$ o °,v r 0a V °a, -IAI ovv ov vv vvo r v a v v Qv oav $o E G w !h T aaT`�5 �•, 04N rC4 vva NOW �► LL - o 0 C400 vvo � o� ovo ovv oov vvo t[! N �voN a !'7 r • vvc oc GC cc +O$ C; c; oc oc� �a avo ja v v !r3 T f^ !r3 (y acm C4 coo [VOLW c LL o E w �0v vao �o� iE _ 2 a �2 ° a 3 asap J .ova IE rr�a aaa ZZZ woo WWW - M Z � C 8 Cb C n n m z ry ph r C aG � m E n � n ■ 3 C r C C Qi 928 2" oC LL ca� W aZ z 05 a! � N' W w� 0,6 Ads o t. av w w v Z � w 888 9NN r O r C Y S s� a a 0 J O L3 h o`�ag m a 3 N c;r L17 CC. _ x � � � C N C 00. ��m 3 ill Vi Z WC ca ZWIL Ii • :• i �`�N',a ■ o�i Qr� 2525 r�r�Q c�� .t- � � . vov v v C o p a p p p • ag e'7 T o P voo Sol o � 0 N r r N 0 0 0 0 N a W U. U. 0 6N W) o avo v of a 00o coo 000 coo ti � • i ovv ov vv oov v v� • oQ� � v vvv cZo N Ax 0Nr V- Ovv N0W «- ONO 920 ovv toaaa =•Q� F r � off:. ONO ocva vvo goo 4 ova va vv vvv 0 'I 08r,� g$v 000 �o d �• a N T N C 0 v a N o W U. loss ��v aao voa L� w7 T T r Q, vvo avo 000 o v v Na 0 •Q vvo G l'7 vv va l�ry vvv �0 C; C; ag� c�go aoo �o r V- cti 0 N T N v v o v N 0 W LL ovv 00 r +lit vov vov 000 coo s 25C� i o m i• Q. �• vvo vv ao 00o v o v�� N N .� oN•- •-N0 000 Now oovv� •w r r t°1 %2 'Cm ; JHa Z Z Z l/3 to W W W ! -g O V Q %` V O 'o 0 � c $N � N a d7 �C C 45E c Q0Z n� §Lk g j • Y :u - � c3 ca ZS I LUa W s" N W W� .e l a o r. 0 �o oryca Z w N N N §8g v T v T C V �aa f a3 C] C 29 u,ao C ° m f = t q1 "rj. O CO C7 L: C'3 to c � r W aaa on 0 N A rn co 0 250 N U v V7 m p C C CL z 2LUCLCL - CD 0) o� ANN ['? N to ADD 0) ib • z co M ovv v o v, o00 , v, v, vvo v +o �"� r�r rrT TTY ENO r:V r Tyr rr+� ihNN tiW� 1�A�� Ne•]m _ o qp- vov vvo coo coo pp Q ' 40 0 WJ00 ' T $ Y'! iV to N !'] pp T V) 990 coo goo -.: vv 006 vov vvv --v 0 v Q• r T T r r N c T N r T T r r T r ++. pAN !�! C4 W M V A a 't V) CD in -w LD Q?p A l�1 LD A T s - 10 vvv 0 o vv a.ry via y 0 .,e p co 0 r, - rn �- aA 'QD an o mr- oU9 C!01 vva 000 00 000 coo aov v as mm U� oQ 3 CL Ac +► A n�•r• nr►n 9u a :V a r eq +- T w r r r .-- NCb't 'rm ON- 0C4,j0 CM 1SA � T r k o c 0 coo vac 000 v �i OD - U)CNv c r+nyr�i 'nmci van goC p� ov 0V5a aoo 000 cvo vvo v, a w�o,�p v V � t► � A � 1� �► I► A �► A A • a F A NCD10 aqrC CD N. r gvvo vvo vov vvo . O t Q' iQD r t + R 40 C Arm W) CO ft) QD r- aO N !7 Cl i v o or�N vov avv vov , C C vvc oan v T T t T T T f T a ' °N�' 40 V nlem vfI- n 2f, 20 20, �2 FEE aa.0 raam a i VQ 2ZZ USU)in Liu WW aQ v2 s C c q [V v zo $� M C CD Z _� 0 C OEI40 '20 IA 03� o a � G � ('4 M['V 0 T a r C 7! U 0 �ya8 O C L cm h .fix c a as d n 28 qr W �! q� 0 e W Q a W _ m N W ;y *d am c § gym z e� �8z v) Go W Li %—\o e' 80 C V 13 E E a C 0 a ri e �C44 0 c� t i4 a0� a e � « m�7 • !C►conIAC r ov,� i ��g � N cc ooco ovo 060 a cvv 88° 888 888 8 8 8 r[V0 Cgm- wrr TwT �CmN P1N.� A�1� Nr. r a� o C C 0 C o C v C 6 0 Q 1� CO N� • !C►� I*- o�T v, �v av 4000 coo 000 o v SSS 8$$ :g S A w N 40 r N 40 N e+'�rA�i� a Nam Al A-i� •- r ova x•4046 0fo 0 G W1� vw� w 040 vvv, coo 40c, 000 00,40 4000 o vd r-v 88° 888349 888 4988 • T N O T ty t T r r r T r- '► CDPN[Y (4 �OJ� Nr- N 0 40 0 0040 000 avo v C 0 14 ' NC40 r►�p V NC4 �? v n v o v v �` 4040 40640 a, ci, vcv vov a pft 4040 r. 88° 888 888 4900 8 . r (%d v T N w T w w f! f- T mi � N N A CT cm t, N t, N Q i.M T T a,�� 4000 0040 40400 4000 qw cr IN co o r► fo r rV C4 o�v vo 66.6 v,�� 4666 vov v vv r�•,v 88° 888 888 8849 N 0 f- N T T r r w w r •C tom_:' �7 ~llNR3 O N [�l�C cm r C C r• !7 NN N t• N T F� �F o �, iiz rfiu''n wwu� .0. :Uo %—\o e' 80 C V 13 E E a C 0 a ri e �C44 0 c� t i4 a0� a e � AU ? a a _m WH b N w Z 4y Wft W4 a d o Z CID w goo 09 v v r :r m 0 o� .r m a 0) Is 9 P T m d ma 4 as U n � m Roo l�3 _ �"�th OD a �" 0 co z t'] CL Z Lii �0 a� u dw C �a a a L ,A c L Z 7 �� c L5 Z me n isle -S z xu.8 f « 0V ��q mo w" q-'vr. m N nr P- qt 9) f► :g -- 250 vc�% a ova Colo loo c; C; .v- v� rniT rC4 o N 0 4N ��c°y °°gin vo0 ovv vao ova P . * . i 0 coo coo loo oov o0 88 °+8�0 888 . •� .� X47 � N1►!V w r �N W r �h r r ,t � r r v Cam vvo oov Nov M 3 d f mvi("! f m�r f r �o f �•r�7 t T v -W e) c; 46 000 civv vao v r�•,v o0 ova o a gS0 888 888 rl �i rNr r CM 0N° Nr r j N2qp/ M Y 7 e) el �NA� T #-�� C r y M a F� ov° vov vvo vvo 4 S Ql Cn vqwe) f P• e i t vMo f g r► i ov m f as ti vvv c; c; 0 lo, v v, cao r.v � o c 8848 888 °O° 888 IqII T" -A.) cm V- rNr vNa N�-r W . N co A lN�? pp 7 c11 0 A li t OD L rT 9) r N r �� 0 ovo ovo vvv ovo v '•' arch CDOm0 vao vvv vv c; c; o cv :. ` 88S 888 °S° $88 wAr r�+r A �r r a ....::. rNr rlY+- vcVC Nr� c lei c:7- Al p N �• 1V F� O iV CM N W 1C7 !► 1A U) r F. f� r- :.� 1A r T" 41- r Au ZZZ Wcn0 WWW �0 a� u dw C �a a a L ,A c L Z 7 �� c L5 Z me n isle -S z xu.8 f « 0V ��q C4 N cm 8 8 8 C50 T a qr- Z C }C d �1 �1. Is �Ca$ 0 a L CD h = 0 - tZ aad OMftb 040 v' us m Z� zm a lu L11 U aV' y co a z 0[�� ?�� m� o 8� �Z A �o 0z c 'G � C a CL 3 s = N Q �c W m 40 ; l: �... _ a Eppc as � ym� r N 1► tiA . r ip rto a a g$ ap C0 Q QT -7�f- a �pc Ov 6 4040 ' cGO c G� 888 888 080 g�g 8 18 � 4410 A Co m 1(� co vcv coo coo 000 a a a a + cm vov add d coc ov S 0 080 8 8 8 rr r"'t�lr �}r•r IF- V.. rNr QlV V N�•- .. i►$ v v c°+i ��ry ctil 0vAv oc0 coo N00 rt to wo a,r �4 41 e.++ff I'► N �D 2 ] r V) r �t0 v, 000 4000 00 ooh d I%. 0 8 888 0 c w ACM rC4 CN40 CV r� A P.- 0 � � � C N to Z r [11 ti�7 .� tit] .- N } !! ciE vv0 4000 000 40 0 0 0 t o p M . N r- va � � co $ r �_ co 1-: D : t 40400 G va r r 4000 a 1�► (� v 88r�S 8 Aj r [�7 r W- r t r r^[Vr C4 N I-- Ir►�!'3 r 40m� �ry tiN vov 000 000 000 � ... i {sue� • a �p N A 1�►• [rtil iG � 000 coo 00 coo D D 888 $88 °8° 8$8 r Xr rA r N V- r CV r ONO (4 4-- o w noim0) 1[f r N V- r �• a!3 2ZZ c ow m 8� �Z A �o 0z c 'G � C a CL 3 s = N Q �c W m 40 ; l: �... _ a Eppc as � ym� r 4e 3 ir z_m W h �U ti T W IX CO b CO L w w 0 i 7 z w J 4N cm C4 888 a 0 r is o a` 4 0 m U_ m Qa� a m � V U � a m � !0 N t � o �Qp�p CD O Z Z tip a cs v4 02 Z r C a m Cl a� U 'a 4a 5W� t C w C L� In ri o �� LL. �� oo' ac' c; c; vvc av va g�o ggo v o �i TIA r rrT C* ° ° r Q r r r AND coo voo coo :. ov oo vc ova o o� 8° G$C •' � �� r I9*. �W^ 40 r ^88 r r T �rcm rqw Ln �! .ft •� 0ODa r oN-W may vvv 3II T •�� 1� + rT + r�r�� + ~Nr f G a pC vv c; c; ov ovv o a IL rrt W '�? e) C) orC r�-r CO C4 N 40 �1C! 1'►+ro Nqr N � G o00 v0 voo coo o $ v v i�,dc co ac c; c; ovo v v V- v- �-�a rev aro T.-r — OD IN N 4 60 r � 40 r• •- o CM qr o 4q ry ovo ovv coo o°o In Q3 gC9 o { ac oo C5 C; oov C3, Q a c� LgL u7 r r T r z .•:__� r!r]o rt7° vrC rrr - 40 rN m rA''J~N �� an m N ! r +2 42 2 �2v warm► s�aa Z z z .0 MAC chch ) a .0 m WWW v4 02 Z r C a m Cl a� U 'a 4a 5W� t C w C L� In ri o �� LL. �� 21 W o Z� z C nl W vi v ` w Fs �v _ � w O � 8 ANN 0 w p r Y _o r-. t3 4 c 4a� o� O � W iad fS r S (3 a .o � c � O Q 19, Ci§ 21� Z y � m o ZW (L u. so i ■ zC*4 Z C e � m � T cc C4 0 CO ' QOG 0 O� 88° 88° °8° 888 wt"id req° V- 40 wrV- ...... Non -W .-rp a0 moT As w N T f .4 v40v oav ooa o00 40 g An y ov vv as vvv od • -' 4 v 88 8 a 8 o 0 888 10 T T ! w rl�l0 x-070 C•^0 rTT ed40 w w T8T �4D �7 1c t r fl M r T T 4 •H. � 0 ° 0CD1~- cm co moo 000 0 r $ `C4 8 cc C4 co °o, 0 g8 o � av c; c; cac oao co v •• o 88 v 88 080 888 4• TAO r" co) v 0 0 V_ iV Of Ile oo T w 40 (D N w m (D � N cr) cr) T .^ T Z � t 000 0 v0 0400 ooa • $� a « g + fta 0 0o oa 000 vd • a 8 8 pv 8 a opv pp 8 8 1.1. T 10 r 1A ^ r ^ T T N 4a •"�D rl+?O vrp rTT .419 Z �r oav coo 000 0400 0v oo vv 16 400 o dt 880 880 °80 888 V-4M0 tn40 0 v^0 TTr C Nl�t r0 IV rqm .-C r efe7r T r! �r N .. c r� Im- Ow � F JF a� a w te a ZZ pp ) a a _ L]a so i ■ zC*4 Z C e � m � W � v� Z � N' W � 0 � � w N N N CY 4N C7 t- a w d � a 13 CE c Cl) m as v C3 is N ag a- v _m t Lb t ami ami � cnaa N m 40 qr m OD v w. l+7 "'E 4040 N p� 0 w GC ° c a v �ay �iamz 0) V cn3-sai zLUa` u. A ■on go a� r7 � c m �4 m m N v r N r� r� 4� S Lc F §i Ism� M�� fr- n x m 9 �LLc� O N Q .2 aC �` C7 C] ' cs G ' G O v d A • c; C7 0 ggv c8c vgo vov •. � r 1D �C! T .- •^e'7v QV)0 0 Q coo rCv 094 oov ova vov ovo 4000 vov :32 40 8 ft $ c o ac vv ov vv -a o :•:V ggo !• r 080 r ogv vvv =► �ehv vov otv v0 SL WOO Ogg to ov coo 40 17 qr- rt v v o �nvT coo s,t � � z ! • ni, • w • a 1.- 21 vo va vc c; c; v o $4000 vgo vgv coo r r► CL E Ono ono coo oho cg,w avo N m rooCD c vao aoo voa voo 'a g! Cc 8N� r c� r �5v 5� �5v v °a 00 vo cv o c _ ggo voo vgv vav �uIV- 0 C4 0 c r vva) vvv e+e ovo vvv vvv oov - . , • -•, • w * 4r- w cad 41 . cc ac C5 ov a cQ Sego vgo vgv vav .Z +-m C) vgv a coo =e ONO vsry vacs vvv c°•► .. 40 ce 2~ F V20 J J J F J wu�sw a�3 _ AD v� oar) A ■on go a� r7 � c m �4 m m N v r N r� r� 4� S Lc F §i Ism� M�� fr- n x m 9 �LLc� I- $0 V � i17 a� m g CN d r fn ` C .r F t+� f c � C §t_� LL gvo C) (D $�C4 �o vN na 4040 • ac 40 C co o Q o t- ••• �$o 0$40 o�v vvv .V rAQ Cr)v 0 DOD a C •�° ° °'m �0� coo 0400 0040 coo 4000 "Na040 ao 40 40 040 ei a $ ego oho v$v 4000 V3 • � r 1!'i 1A r 3 r�40 04" o vvv va0 j °mco C4 ovo 4N Q tea$�n�o 0 0 c; C; oo va 0 v is a v a • ovo � d m rerfv C7e•70 orc 000 ro a� v v t CO 4V v ovv c�aa �.• sic 000 ovo coo ovv �q co v $• �?v 6 s.�Q 48 1°40 y °o vo vo ac v r� Q o v _'•• g�a 40$40 vgo 0400 L� f► r r 1t'7 T i17 � .- r ro v o en o a w- v v o v er+o�o vim Maas coo 4 � S 000 coo coo oov e� N W ::.• N 40 a • IN O w! Q ? � — -' � oa 400 vo 00 0 0 1► og0 40 o coo W N AJ r T !► W m oov W� +�-- �! 0. �7C70 CD 0 4200 COO c UZ _5 Z C Z�w V]�j' O -� � J,,pp� J a F J � Jam`^.. Z"W 4. Z Z ZN7 W W W B ` % I- $0 V � i17 a� m g CN d r fn ` C .r F t+� f c � C §t_� LL HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Sam -ex Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Traffic East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection Orientation: NS Major Street movements Study period (hrs) : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 10 1242 696 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 2 310 174 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1242 695 24 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- --- __ -_ Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 10 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 2 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conf i g L LR v ( vph) 10 19 C(m) (vph) 891 225 v/C 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.03 0.28 Control Delay 9.1 22.5 LOS A C Approach Delay 22.5 Approach LOS C i`tsqb 't._vdk--.� A_- s■ +-.0 -- - -- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers 4 2 Hourly Flow Rate ■ HFR Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Median Storage Intersection: Sam -ex +prof No Storage Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach RT Channe 1 i z e d? Units: U. S. Customary 0 0 Configuration Analysis Year: 2002 Worksheet 10- Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Plus Project Traffic Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive LR North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard v (vph) 14 25 r �� Intersection orientation: NS Study period v/c 0.02 (hrs): 1.00 0.15 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.52 Control Delay 9.4 Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 Approach Delay L T R L T R Volume 14 1408 730 64 Peak --Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 4 352 182 16 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 1408 730 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- ---- --- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 15 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 4 2 Hourly Flow Rate ■ HFR 15 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channe 1 i z e d? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Worksheet 10- Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LR v (vph) 14 25 r �� C(m) (vph) 836 169 v/c 0.02 0.15 95% queue length 0.05 0.52 Control Delay 9.4 30.0 LOS A D Approach Delay 30.0 Approach LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLC Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 8pm -ex Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Traffic East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection orientation: NS Major Street Movements Study period (hrs ): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 3 549 1261 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 1 137 315 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 549 1261 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- --- -_ __ Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 19 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 5 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade $ } 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane conf i g L LR v (vph ) 3 28 C(m) (vph) 550 140 v/c 0.01 D.20 95% queue length 0.02 0.74 Control Delay 11.6 37.1 LOS B E Approach Delay 37.1 Approach LOS E MIS Is% s LC� C s HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 8pm --ex +pro3 Jurisdiction: city of Seal Beach Units: U. S. customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Plus Project Traffic East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Major Street Movements Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 4 588 C (m) (vph) 1448 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 95% queue length 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 1 147 LOS 362 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 588 Approach LOS 1448 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 61 16 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 15 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 configuration. LR Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LR v (vph) 4 77 C (m) (vph) 465 91 v/c 0.01 0.85 95% queue length 0.03 7.80 Control Delay 12.8 187.9 LOS B F Approach Delay 187.9 Approach LOS F (10 0 V% 4% _% _... , 6 Q b Q C eY1 N :� .... '�NN 000 OQa G QG �ri�7N DaQ iD Q o tCi JUJ W V 4a 71 IX it �'�_g 888 880 888 V t 40 r �% q I T _ m�rr N(qr NeyC NNr cm co C4 IN OD Fos 0 a t.- Go mom boa ooa aoa oQV voa In v r r � 4D 0) W) er: G3 v 8 co C 4 ocoa vav COC] p r p} an Oil = IE � •.� � iii m's cm CN MGqw C4 to 1[7 eare� N� vW) n +►cvI errs hna ° r°v0) �.r is a p�o �Q4 NN ' pp�� m� co fog N h 1O �LU o oo C) c; C; c; vav o v :.• COa pppp Cc) (388 8 8 10 r *' in ID CV C4 CD T F 7i °vo ov v 0 40 O N o^ N r 00 to cm N N o 40 lz co T CDci r Q vcv oaa O W o v ppQ o 80T �v Ga ovg C)p^ W r.. '°►�Tp IllNrpp err m Fl► tr1 r +Mr vav aoo vvo oav N .� ID pNp cm to ° cm ■ 40 ' ( W �[ '+ ' 4W OD �Nf► v CV V.: m 0 t N N b m Z b 3 . •.• C, N CC OCO QCDC7 Coo lit Q O irJ C, 1888 a C4 �17 � O Z '� !"] C •r !rj f �- N r �- Cm — 11b u�iQm Z.R c� }' a o e~8 d �. W� SSONr ryas �re�7 oo to � fn c�Te` LZ 3 43 N co � --- o � o = oaf I E 8L 7+ r V ; � 2 J � 2 f, J � w 2 m a � � C � Z� �- �Wn JF-� fA3 O i► �.- �tuCL L a�oa ZZZ a � g f1] ��a WiilW alarm 3 .� �o �D V J RL YLL V « i $vv �V [OV {O+i O a o a o� V 0 h _ m m f �3 2 Z� z 4D W 4 1 8 , � $QV� UJ V - frA Z 00 J*-%.— ZWCLIi `ZZ H mW c -� m Colo Z v� ti C w ■ �Ng � N M 3 h l L� � C a 1'► QNQ��0117r 1Aqlp in a pp 7 Q�"� DOa v�`r COO �� v0 ' CNr- O- f• �S gSg 880 888 ry7+r` 40 V- Aw AAr ' .. . -.• r Pi r N 0) r h to 0 N N r rte• 4. .J eM3 r q&a r f► rFlILIp «.' •'' ,S r o) iV r �. r C Co r f C4 N 0 �:;�� avo Dao 00o vvC . v 2 « O h e ry �116 c; c; vv0 vao Ovc o : r 880 888 $S 8S r1l! r1Ar r r r r :r± O r !ri r T e f r r C4 V- 46 r�v 4q C4 40 Co L'ViDN NIO+t e7 v w N c°til� to N Q • [Y %a pp%Wp a1W N m ' 'r dr�yy N Lr3 w qp Ov rrr C►i[V r, -.Cyr t- �� vo vacs vvv o00 D o v SSS ASS 888 erlr W- Nr rNr 409 40 r qw V) in an N N cc 0 f► N V) co C N "q I%% N m N } v; coo coo avv vov �fl 0 fa d1 W S3 w co W) G , A N N !7 rt N N w- !V r c; c; vv0 ovo cavo o v :.� 880 88 888 888 ri7 t17r r r V- VII rNla V-00v- rNr r(yr �f► V- W � �N.. �N�yy O v 42 Q 9 (nAM It f► cl2ev OOO 0040 COD coo -12 O Fppr `. Qi� ' �D O 40 +-N r e)v- N P- ! q* !"'l � qw vv oco vov Ovc vv p 888 888 r Iq r r N r r (S f V- 40 co co '0w-cm �W)N. NNE - �• N ch O N +r r- N C 2€, ZZZ V�7aa WW 00 `ZZ H mW c -� m Colo Z v� ti C w ■ �Ng � N M 3 h l L� � C a N N N coo 0 ry M 0 0 T o} i6 v '8901 an f a= m C�] 0 Q 1 6 12 m Q O � a N a n 9 _m = �t0a cna¢ a0 N N .r Cb e W c ° ea a Z UJ o 2F IL � 1A Qa C+7 UJ C�CCY �= m Q C7 aamvsc�+ �� il] m cp N3 � 41 .� .J WiiCz - � p000 ti $ CV T R~"im 8 80 $�C4 -; C; OOC •- (4 CO ` 0 CG ' G r^ C °AO W �88 $a° $$° °S '••'•� r An IL r V) C41# r) 0 .- r 0 0 C4 LU ++ W r�� Nm V 0 rrN �W) , MN rN H v 000 coo 00° cOO OV qr T NP7 C° GEC 000 00 10 co 10cO U. CM C4 0 0 D N W uj W LL LL �dcn ��C4 d 1 V N N �Q�pp1171pp` z 40 i .' o V °aN Q v 000 f, GO N ' N ,~- �4 ,! _$ O) $tom 8 V T !W►C Nco COm $O OmN p p $r$ 00.0. 1040 100 6.6 C; v °O° O O $$° r; �C4 o oC4uj LU •�� LL Tie �+ K} C N r 4004- W CO CD LO qw N 0 r r N (n u7 Iti m r^ Q _; N v o rt N i c! voo COO ova 1100 I 41 $ c `rv° , � v m , �o ap Cri ° c; c; vv oQ r G? °co v ooa C) 0 080 corn a F ..� �� T C4 40 rrp °NW rN �N vO l o }vac 0400 voo 000 y � « $ SG « r m T s O7 0 p a ' 1101 C; C5 ca 10 0 0 rCq rC4 rrp 0C%lW C W Op �� M ° N @3i[iP� r C7 N _ • cn N r N y =: 2r- FE 2r 2t F 4w �a Z ;Z 2 M r/3 O M.0 W W W Z.0 I v D 0 to . vm 117 +v a► v ici W Ccc p C; v o �c p !�7 Q v o V. C a. N �o H m J = y IE Sr Ctrl �a c v �i a �V% p W E� � c a� V3 4 h 0a 170 $oJm� �Ecc '" —c,mz OX Y ii a� 8�8 r r L :� as CC � C L1J C3 9 aR y C v Y C ad N .r p = i Z W 40 oU 0 us C ci $� �-+ Z ❑ w -- 0� 1�- m a) m m Z U) C N 1010 t 90 av C S.� A $M C ANN p 'C • M = o r v n's x U- � a � ova 4646 6c vco v ov 888 08 r ili r 88° fD 88° r r ' N00 NW W U. N V m t 9 if coo 000 coo coo on a fo v_U. C4 Pk- en yr .r ccl a� vaa ac vo voo a- r rC*4 rcg0 rro 0NW U. ... c wt emom 4 rmoii� co a F- v� 40 o�v 6406 fnov 7 p fn P! a M CM m"r 0 V v6v C; c; c; c; *- vC; 0 o o Ch as W v " "9 888 880 880 08 r N r r N 0 r r 0 0 N W Ss �(M7!p►�l70r cn m co Nqw `r'p r +� o�0.3 a coo vvo voo vvo 1N. 0 N ( � F O� 8ei8 vvo cv dco v r 0 4666 0 v a► W v `$ °°8 88° 88° °$ v VIP V- r r " �Nr rCVa V- C) OCVW r• �� co s0) 0 1A .--..'.. .. 9,24 °00 40 0 0 40 400 40 0 0 K d a . ' w a a t o c� e7 fq fn N a c°n'• c `cicl 4146 v 25 � voo °c ov acv a. o ob tu ro 888 810 880 00 •- r� r r r r i- Nr VII (4 Q Grp 0NW ox �.:.�.: ��•aa t 7 Nam � N r c�m:. ti� oao�o e►7 +r • Q fC - V J a J i� FE ZZZ )C n www aaa o Va 1�- m a) m m Z U) C N 1010 t 90 av C S.� A $M C ANN p 'C • M = o r v n's x U- � a � 40 W Z� zp W a� � N W % ea 100 D Z h w CN N O r C Y y V m Y m Ir ZQv 0 v P t s � r°�aa m r _U �CV m_ z C; N'o zwaL=L ' g OF.Lf) r�vp ct 'N V)!�tf ao�n� � [+� N mNm pp � � -'i avo avv C O 006 cc -0 40 v o :W 888 88 U9 8 0 en f- T1rC3r r.r•r. rTr N CLIA8 .•a N t7 W N 0 ju .... TtA r r N �j �i tAerl� � ♦"�� p �� a 0 !�'� 1[? e7 000 000 000 000 -: .� W O 1N v 2 U.) Fi ris" V) N m 888 qr ■ Q r o p vvo avo 00 ° o • t�t� r�r Tyr tr� NNW tT V- •+ .- iC1 1fJ .- 0 N Menm r 0 � vm t7 V) h C9 +� r r to !� tt�rNCD 3 m 0) 0a0 °O [N V N ' a to t My � f va°�°°, ♦w CO :• M �cnCY CD N • 40 Q � ova G oov o0 v r• C,? o C; 8 °vim �"88 888 °v$° FI- a. !s NNW rtyr Trr rN0 r N +- rCqt r ttS N 11i t�Y we r to Ln f` NNeOri t7N9 N v v o O v 0 0 0 0 O O v _j -owl to coo kn cn OryC fn 1► M7 �V)C4 Mpp No 4pver CGt� ' N + to t7 O0C 6C5ci 000 rr GC tD tiV Q t; _ 00 C AAEA Q7 �� r!'i} r g o Try tv°. °v rl"7 D N N W r N T r r r r N a LL 0NW r v� t[3t"7v- I - cm(► N N 3 � V t7 T (+3 r) :M OGD coo vvv o00 • of CD g rpA Ql�3G l'7 M 4D to NN to + 1r 0 s vvo o°a CGG C; C; oc v o 888 4988 880 r$ Nl7 r r At�� l�titi Trr +►�j r N N `W U) T N r T r r r N p a IN C4 �J D m F- 2 S 2 oe t O° _5 Z Z 2 yea V] a) .oraa Lu W W CL. V.0 tg 4 az � c tl} 15 �i in 0 z :a .8 N v i3 LK o cm to v Y W r$� • L�3C7 aZS W it 2 � z� W ga ci W � �CO [7 e a r. U 9) C4 N N 0040 0010 rV"CV O 2 �y ►r v o c� s I ['3 za Rn ° a Y M 0 Cc CE wevc C% a I r D L7 m �p Z QO pg mZ tl? � zwa� $..Zto F chi to v, v 75 e vi b Z 7 JEW CAI C c #A • • � o O � C 04 N C4 p pp O Q ■ + « a CF) + . D 43 L�fR°1! c r a C) C) O!!7r a 0 a p0N 0 0a av p 0 c: vW v T guQg $oa vg° W° .. •�:�:� r� �s r� cp r � n r o � � :. +cW .� m NMv tit!O!T • �-!7r rM0 c .:. �-- mN`* 2� AVM r r L3 voo coo oov 00° IV- IB A n�eit + w a r + N Q3 r oNc"v ` r cc coo ' v vw Al cv acv coo 000 0 ,w • -u fig° .1� 8�g ��8 �� rr r�}T - 4 ' .•� X13 a; I �0 l'1N� .-D?T SW Vb rtM N T 40 4-0 v c � •. p ...t a v • ma`! « sn va ca M0 a 9-04 ■ co a co C f o 0 a) j' �C40 o �w ,WR vo ova 40vo cco 66 C; v o u �i in "� T*• r►s� e. r. ,a ra NMG NV2q -- TNT rNr WCY rQ]r T w4M Ln le a�aQ •� } 4-+c- 40 0 0 °00 000 voo �I gi •• ■ QD acv a ��m am0 a �0ti � M cc 0do s ° ° vv ova T(y voo 0NO ccv v a'iw a L% � r Cv 0) 0 C4 M f- r N .- .- N .- W) cm efn o C .3 r rr� r o 3 ire 0� 0 0 0 coo ° o ° 40040 a 40 F N OD •.:.� G W ,�� TN at7v, $Tni vrwo 0 o!W W Z . ao Ocv C7GO vCa a O a m W pp pp pp pppp � � . t3 e�r4n dry tli w �yyy � ;•.� C4 (n 0 N V) CM E � lu CO r Q E U �No a =:' mvV 40M c o�. :: o low 075 Iwo mc 2m 2m JF F J*`•.. ZWa.LL 22Z V9 U9 co WWW 3 �..5 a 888 v i C .. rp a 3 Z U m x ma$ � a c N 7 U= � G 3 15 N N W N , �� v, N LU ui 2 S440 ?--% H m W C cc 2� �j v a CL ro CS =- C NN r I~N o Cry Q7f D •- CV !Y rN a co vvo ov6 6v 0 o !-- aU 8810 888 888 880 4 to r T U) V ' Nl7a MMr- T� r rip vo v a CO � 4() c5 �qqr co «.: mq�ry il7v3r Ngrr (4 qqr a. ova voo oov ovv w ■A a ''•� • a r ■ 6N f3 • pN fN'� !!i7lr3 Ti"7 Ql�1�a �l4N Ora fl OQ oc avo ovv 0400 vo Sg° 8 8 8 8 8 8 Aj ;IA rQur��88 TXr rXT N e) a N l+3 T r cm r C4 Nt•R'7 LYf•M co 1W r �,, m o a W r T r F: O Sao vam mNt 10en pp O1 Qs R V !► N �l7 M r► 0 T (D N v,NO aro E,.>a vv 666 TMN 6646 octi v d P`- o 8 °466 8:8 8 8r 8 8 $r88 ;; u 7 � r r► 1• A !• ti � r.- • r Ali r r N cq 0 C4 Cq T (4 T [y r - r) v in '" s cc (�e SIN- 8 a a a ^ r T 1• c+3 qW 000 voo 04040 0 0 0 « v o a ti « oN r.Nto I%- to rmly a oN0 °c cm �r0 . C; 6466 006 Edo v oU 88° 888 888 r r V- �+y r (V4'r3a tee) rN.- C4 %- .J mmN �!� ��pp ma� Y7 r N t r r A F3 Re H 4 a � 000 40 040 coo 000 toy N N. aN� T�l�7 •- v cy v, 06 vav T N N ova �- v aoo a 00 ►• U 88$ 1A r r T r T TV*v cNVmnmi a� *- o to T =y r rr r► Li 2. 0 2 ° 2 ; °' 3. ��a �a�c2 �E � - .��-o� �3� v m 2ZZ NWCO W W W � U4 S440 ?--% H m W C cc 2� �j v a CL ro CS =- C b RK z � da W go N N W W :3 m ' _�� =j Q 0 O �! [Q !Q V V 0 r a c s� oa� 15 a V7 v V_ v o �e d A _ fi I im m � x � to a �Umc� N w o 2 C c Q SL z �: ca 2 w U. 0 az vo M r1 a pppN b � h d Z E c I So Ell �5 c neapV an r_ 'm tm� -4� OMm1� $$m N_$m p m g� av ON ov oG0 GC] c; c; va va coo .- ••� fIry W � T oO)a cm T coo j mmv n, QC4w "cv qr 000 ov s� n- - 000 oao voo coo • CD $$ QN • $$ GOS $$ AD 0 �!� Qo :O Mt °$° $ °$ coo +" Trio 0 0a �-o•- cov AM 31 r N m qt r coo O ° OD NON a Q o I N 3 i oa V od o a° 000 C5 C; c oQ voo Q iii � T [� !► � d � t3 a -Mo COMO r-v� 000 �v c�� ooiv ooa F � ev 000 voo voo vao i vo ov 000 ca cv _ $00 080 $0$ coo T T oM TaT 000 vu 0N. 0 o$cq voN coo r. p000 000 coo coo op $$ �: # ON oo •- acv co D NQ •'•� ovo 10 o $$o v o 0 ova on r r Z •�Tejo oc�c �-0T coo v¢ qr #- v a$V) coo ocq vov ;:} .tea �a �. =f ZZZ mN ��pp vQ WWW 0 az vo M r1 a pppN b � h d Z E c I So Ell �5 c neapV an r_ 'm tm� -4� � C Crs°u[V 0 5 0 ! ais at 0 r V y �a o v _a ca � � C co 0. a); W .� NJ Z 0 f {� O W a{ ago Zz nJ C,4 y � °° p +� CO cn a z V) to � z�r c�3o % -30 N qw 2 N O S2 a C C 0 m a� QN �G M q g a� Q �s C m� m e Yi U. cc C ■ Q N � C C a 6 p0 ' 6 a6 CC p pt �'!O ve70 IVCr- 0 °a VW�O a � 001* vav vov ovv aov o00 a. • Q^ + � M a N� G a va oav C O va O� d v� • a C° a° o O a C O a 0 �-esa omv vov qV +o oNIT v v 0010 a aSOD o�agr coo K °v,� �?N v 25 v Q .4 cv va o0o ao v o rn�o a$v 800 voo u r► T T o -a 00)0 •-oT 000 a •r o0a 0 m0 -a40 oav !� ry vav vav 000 aov R v ° a N k 1 N v g �$ ? +� oc vv vvo 0O o v :843 a$0 Fog 000 �i f► T r coo = 40 o vav n040 000 •o Q ovv voo oav vvo o �a 25c ov vo vcc 46 6 c :8 $a aga c808 ova qr- v 0 M v .- o •- coo = 0�0 ar•a •-aao N T aaa p20 2 a 2° 3 .tea cz .5�a ca zzz co WW W .0.0.0 3 -1 L % -30 N qw 2 N O S2 a C C 0 m a� QN �G M q g a� Q �s C m� m e Yi U. W 0 ZS Z m t7 � Wy U H N W uj +!i c f. gyp° co 4 r: 0 1 Z � w ...Ewe. N §88 M 0 r c �Y HE r s� N G U �Qo C3 n 4) iS Lo o = Z coa T U CID m C ¢c+i ca C*4 N �fc� ci �mz 2 ul LL P.- Z rl I v Vc 0 w 7 n h 4 �N v 40 o OR R r 40 N vat � a z n on • UU cc � a • Nei R a oAV C70 Oc cc a= dm 80� oov 0840 880 N o w coo ONO T N 0 ..i.. 9) vc �' coo a4D� OW- o o r N NE oov avo 000 coo t N i =.: vov o0 m oc e co a .v im v o 808 vov 0840 880 r r •-CD i coo ONO �N0 ... Wn0C r 4000 0d Na 0 3 0Ir- v pw 2 C40N r voo 0 8 W) 0 � t+i a ' •7 N g t OD C4 41 F Ci ao vo vv o0 o v 4. 808 coo 080 800 T w T ICL I TOT ooC] ONO rNG ' � M0C4 000 0vsso t�a)0 •" fi N CM - 4000 coo 000 000 0 46 t oo � � g g. ' 40 aQp N C) C; C; C C [0 O 00 0o ac o a 8408 T w 0400 080 880 T0T C3vv oneo Tcvv t']C]N 000 40C)CD cmN40 T oov coo coo o cc) o ` • • --too oov oc oc 040 o ca _' 808 4000 4080 880 Tor 0040 O"o *-NC e�ary vvo ooaso Cmfn0 o T- N T 48 •... � .. ...... . � , 3 � 2 cp a ¢ Z22 � V1{�3N ��F Wu u aria c s� P.- Z rl I v Vc 0 w 7 n h 4 �N v 40 o OR R r 40 N vat � a z n on • UU Dcm cm G d G T_ 0 r z C Y d c w U �r m� =a d �_ S Y aCL a"e S C K W " e r C7 m W fi c w O W Q m M c c W to o� NW Z ZWaLL. •- a CM a a W� a Cv Qt+7 R p O p �vr�a vvv 080 ggo ' m .w Not voo acvv �-Nv � vv N coo owe N rr a V) • � r o• vvo vca 000 vvv C4 r C4 p m abv C; C; c; c; GO O c7 r� o g coo 080 8 8 0 r r A r r0T- 000 OC40 rC14 If "43 q-, ova oC4 CL: �v t- O o,u o� vvv v ca 0�v eat ° o T R • 4 a « H • >� v o r0°r, � C; C; ac 00 oc c o 808 vvv 080 0000 U �0+- vov ONO No a vo oov o�co P- CD r r i vOV ovv vvv ovv v° 40 CM po 40 vov vv o0 av o 0 $vg 4000 080 8¢$o i �vr vov 0 N 0 tcvo 40$00 aOV vC4 r► o avvv vvo 000 coo 7R '�' a :�•�_ o�v 255 �� 000 O v 40 40 66 Q D gvg coo 080 $fro w T L'7 r s z � r v� vov v N 0 r 111 a c 40800 000 ohm Cb 0 rt- * T N r d .40 240 �2'Si C', 0200 F- N arn.0 ZZZ .0 a� !! 040 404040 W W W �� ❑ ■ —'S'L mo +r Z Q Z3 � U G a F P, n ■ �g zN m� 0 c 46 G V � alas °Cal pp 3 a .rte. G$ C a� a =mt Yu-� n v 0 � C S c _0 N fS n n N v M D V] ac am f EL 40 E 4m �LaP 0 C rn Y�c�� CM Q ..'. �V N N o CS C; cao co � +n a c� o o ova vnc�$o aT-O 000 vNT *-Na C on ova of-in �►�o CV cm ❑a ova coo coo • •..�•'�� ?::2` oo vv coo ac; o d4c C� 000 -:.4 Grp O00 ONT rNCi CD 0M 0 0 0 Odin 0 Cb � 7 ?` # ovo voo 0LC)0 0t-0 CD ao eh qqp T N � 8PC nQ v V :> ov av voo vv o v ogo ovo vg °v�v =u m C4- °�°cn . -.. r} ova 000 40 04•- •- C40 co 5 � coo oi ►v0 Ce X M Z G Z. v e�ac'S; CL � a ,a a 000 vvv vvv vvv 7 *- N a vv o ao � voo Om 040 ao oQv STS 000 C, og0 WN "'f eNLO aTa von vNv CM :: -� mve� voo vcv�n r•asv oao COO ovo 000 N � n lu ° r o ov oo coo ov v ca p� :LL'::: 40400 000 o 0 �*" C a) so g oTa COO 0 C T rNv W � 01 9 oQm N N c _� o r_n N Ovc•] 000 T•O)o � � ❑ � c cC �� 1ry 2 AJ C w 40(�a$��- a 2 v F 2 a 2 2 m F- m w .��n� L11 " Q] -i d' aaa -j F- �� .1 F d' r,�an � aa3 i L0 •ate-... 2W �L 2Z2 (A v7 WWW fa— 3's n v 0 � C S c _0 N fS n n N v M D V] ac am f EL 40 E 4m �LaP 0 C rn Y�c�� gv$ ANN a 0 r z 0 0 a v fag 3 y s Vr CL %D er os CD W � r' _Ilb W w � _ 0 N► O � d N v f y W W L7y � 0[►30 7 C aQ C R goy Jam%~.. 2W LL. srz%\ X o� v ti Z _1_1 :3 .r L C N a a ■ 8 N 4 S +a � � C � � o a m c • s R « s 4040 oc cov cc a o< v 4000 C" N a-' C, r � v •.- a v o v a N r- qe- o �mT 04040 a �OC� i vrvv t 000 000 4040 40 40 40 0 $ h 0' �e�o Na,� •°o,t i� vv 4040 4000 00 o v .• vr�v 404040 o�� o t� r VF) r r ar-40 40 0 0 0 r rN0 MO voo a voo 404040 v ^40 oav g nm � • �v � c'S�5 c5e�iv 40°� vv vv vac 40 vc o Q v •� o�v ova °C4� �$v r V7 40•-40 oav 0 I w(M0 ... mvr C1[ r 000 0 A a V) 000 oav 0400 ooa 0 $� � a ■ � r g � g e+ ■ }S0 vv 25ei,v vv Ovv v� 4040 ca 40 0 oov 10 v a a oov 0N Cm IDOr ODD 0 N r x+70 � w r cvov voo 404040 404040 49 Oc 46 c ao0 co vv o r coo 081 �'7 t- �S o V- e) -.2 40 000 aC% rNv -C o � v + 0010 vrrv�ii "r0 Sx �Fn =� $2° 02� r a .0 Jo .0 ZZ2 .0 .0 A co In 3 WW W .a .a �� VJ srz%\ X o� v ti Z _1_1 :3 .r L C N a a ■ 8 N 4 S +a � � C � � o a m c tn 00 z c fJi ■ 0 �v U� 0 N `.. Z � or .� .... C _�`� G � � a� C4C%4N ggg D oven ��vg to to " "`s �- r v 6n aov loci loci av o v4 o r goo voo oga ggo *-at vov vnra rerci C w :.: �>C (.55 1!7loN N 000 0� T- W9)0 15 - C r ry !� Q r H coo coo oov vov mo fa en U9 AD 4n .� ci ao ac 6 c cv o v gog 000 logo ggo r r ~ w �# 0 aov ONO r N v W MON coo Orr W) of) 0 .�. r N r 40 a r ~.: y .� � •�� MON r o loo Olt- goo CD M s i �Qvv tp C O 0008 v a 0' co CO r• °v o � v a s 4D c �,.. ,� vov gog vv voo oa coon o0 gga o v ac • '� r r IL ., c oov ono rN aov r r °mZS Min° IC Je e eo C }� oc a Q ce voo vov oov oov N 40 ;i � CO, § g$ 40Iw w< > 4; ova vv oa o0 o v gog vov vga ggo ❑ w •-or voo vnic rNo vov �- r• oov 0 OD a) W) +� ao �- A � 3 r .. vov oov ooa 000 N .� a N °' to °v, �5N f �� 00 IU to JU CD y_t voo C; C; ov loo a ca n� W g0C aov ogv $ °v° Cq v:*- ac'a !! •-ar- ciao a N 0 rN W uj < C7 d n op (n!> m� eY I O ! coo r f coo or• 0) 0 0 �0 a W� rcOr} n v %2fi CC 2 o ° 2 J !7C Z CO ZLLI�li :'' ,tea a WWW _ J* ZZZ V�)mw ft - .ft r tn 00 z c fJi ■ 0 �v U� 0 N `.. Z � or .� .... C _�`� G � � a� m 0 C C % a� re a� zN C m; I gi= � aim — E m c Cam is to 0 o � LL * + O C v 0 0 ' G Q ' p ' p O m L rv•- coo vne0 Na aoa vae• •r �naa C4 m N 0040 vvv coo coo .. o00 4040 Q vv c o $0$ 40 40 40 '080 g$o rvr a v v 40 N 0 r N 0 29 aois 40400 aSfkft N N a r r f► A aov acq m C4 0* 0 �5 U�$ o IN 0 1 $A 0 oaa 404040 4040 040 cvo v oa $40$ 4000 0 d lu eL r• � 4 C -a- v a v a N 40 r N G 000 402 N !"!m0 '� � s� 7 3 .-• t a v v v 0 40 40 40 0° v a o a w $ [Vtv s 404040 400 00 00 a V! v o $o$ 040 40 o$o $$v 40140 0 N 0 —No aoa� 04040 vane min a r P- COO a 0 0 0040 vvv 40 m ea � aNi r. � N0 Q A W lo ,r+ .. vvo 040 vo 4040 a, r° t o d 0,040 v o Z $o$ $ ° $$ = e� r• ti 4 9) epip rpm- coo a N 0 N0 W� to �2c21 y �N � e w w vN +�2=v 12 2o2a J*-•� 2WaZE 222 m[ cry wwLu m 0 C C % a� re a� zN C m; I gi= � aim — E m c Cam is to 0 o � LL z o c � Wy 18 N W � W � C9 0 co mn A p tr to � O � Z a w CY G O b cm 0 T LA r 88a` m CD 0 U�o � v r � � V ed m C cnaQ qw 19 ti t W z & � � �' m N 0 co m 2 2 W Ix ei V) qjrQ r = C 8 C ea e gN �s N ■0 m W n 0 AD M C h rD m Y : c c� N O N D -- vo ca O C O coo CG co D go �Ci v4( r�gv onav 808 vvv } 40 T � � t �crsv verso TQT coo Q�� r 0OOD oov • • r`ia - � iRRt T T H o.=s: o0o avv oov coo +' <yr ?• G N cv GO N oo O v cac GG c; C; a f _0 0 ago SOS coo rV)a ocr:o •-0T coo 0NC2 AL $�o 2C, T vvv r Val � �- [1111 T ey �i ° °Nr) f%-OW avv ea v Np .� � 10 000 v Q vv vo C5 c; C; c; v o 880 080 $°$ coo Ix t n n " r A. w AU vr)v raT oov M �mT0 o�� crsacl, coo ri T {D r c :01 ovo vvv coo ava vI -- CO ea °a, o ti acv cc vvv ov o a 2 -ss4 � r� ,- r- 1tJ T r• 1~ • . IA r T Teruo 0e'7a Tv� vvv � o v W) en C) C*4 coo 3 T T OD T ,ft voa vvv coo vvv .. a7 a] , g CD W'."' , p TT g g ' O 4D V •� `.: Qty 00 v DO C C Ci c; c; G C CO �4 !► Oa 080 gas coo T r �-er7a oeho ToT ova o ��o o�•to V) 0N oov T► N .. .. .•. - m JQ 2 co JR' 2 'cco Z �u 2 v w Q ��o.c ZZZCliin as aaa WWti! Ursa � � _j V) qjrQ r = C 8 C ea e gN �s N ■0 m W n 0 AD M C h rD m Y : c c� 0 �3 � c n i _li r 4 iN A t tv V 15 � 'S ace= h 1p C Z n §� a •st�c3 8�8 •rm o Q c vc vv cioo co o- v� r 8840 0 8 o 808 000 *-roc 0020 •-0 coo c COQ VZO Rom coo c cc T N T r coo coo coo 000 c� o va vo cc0 c; c; a v 880 080 808 000 ooc v-so qc coe• a oc0 r r► ca M ir• r 40 �- + • 7� OD t v 400 040 vv0 040 vc 8880 onto 0008 ovcc) - L* *fn0 400) 0 —o— vv0 m= v- C4 o O D D me c� vov 40408 vvv 40400 i vo 400 4040 0 vo o v4 $08 vov r�o COO T0� acv �*-v o8•� roov vcc Q T vov ovv ovv 000 C4 K V- C4 Cb may. y « y r + �► • v CpV g 0 s _ Q T Z c c 6 oo c oo Q �t d a 808 000 1 �,. ac°� �a Tl7o ve�7v •-ate coo UA ED C4 �r-0 10 now aav ❑ .. �,: J a JF FE r -i ZWatL 2ZZ U10) W W S-3% 0 �3 � c n i _li r 4 iN A t tv V 15 � 'S ace= h 1p C Z n §� a •st�c3 W U A� 2� Wh 2F8 0• N 91 w Z 4b W � n mN, �w v 880 �f N cm 0 r 0 C h C r 2 v a U CD C � o c V] d C .Y 0 � as 3 T V Q � N V3 co �y Z U) a. :•:�:� a to N N • !�} 1► A + R7 � v + !■] !'� • � !17 a °o0 Coq 0400 0,4- vv ■ 40 114 0400 in -46 v� 888 888 S +88 Cm CM CUNT Cpl 1"0 NCld� g V-n Nti� Nom° Vii..: o0O 40400 ovO Coo .per + �Dt a tnCfw a V) CD ■ + l�+qt a 40 M • 40vo CM 0400 o•- 400 verb vacs rim C; v 888 888 880 8S8 :� e�i �i ••- e� � T e�i 117 c� � +� CUNT tYcq C4 C'f0 NNr «• '� t- V3 t608j mRv � CV t- W) 0 lY C ..�._� T SV P%. C4 C4 W� Nmr { vav a0o 0�o vT0 3 a • a a . : cm .. :•:I i1 coo 000 oc °o v a v 8800 888 880 8g� NNE NNT N!"]C tvN� A M N "r 017 O a v [■7 qw q1t r f+ co f� 0 a f N r7 r N U1 a- 4 vav 000 vao 10 0 0 N- n�i�ti ovrn► e�of` i �� a �� t ova v - �••g ovo o.T 10♦-� era voc o0 oaa o v � 888 8`� v 0 88_ v 888 -.:•:. .Tr Ali AA T Ax �F !► Cm N +r N N Ctrl N +- '0 qr t,N +r D T N N 1- X) r (►l } r +car vov oov vao coo a cm t-. a • a a • - - vao vao c; c; oov a D 888 40 0 0 888 CV N+- cm C4 CIO C7o CVN•- N l cm r- li7 r IN .. 2� ' 2� �2�► vt°o JH cc 3 ...1F� ZZZ JF R� �C�OU) J � 3.' -0 e ilWW 0_j lk _z 9k m go` z 'G Q� C v, M N ap k� .20 in L Z C C v L to a •D E m z C a J° t y *a V V C x� 8 L D 8 8 I cm D 4 C �C D S 0 n 3 V �a n C N t C Y can a .�. 4 U, 3 074 15 UJ s 0� _S IL N UA `a N lz (A AS — 0 - cCO �i gamGO �3�z T 0111 _ CD �-• J++`, Cl. LL %.%kt co q- Q a= 0 C �a i si r N �N 8 $b C � � a m� a C �p rj fin 'a i a U Qf O N 0 03 C O� � e� �3 i- � .- QGG Q 0040 [4 CO ' O N N COO Q Id C; 888 88° 88 rrggrr8 NC4 NNE cmV)C) NNr «+' sl1f-0 �rt� �QfN C4 �mm �ww QODr T r0o0 Coo coo oao i a « a o� Oil ox9 oov oov av coc a v� 888 8888 880 88� r" [7 A t A Ili AA r C4 cm N N E "V) 0 N N •- ... D N S. �� O f'C CO � �.. r V N W) T r .- r Cf .- [7 e�. � ovo 00o vc�v o vov 7 pp 1�3 Q7 tG N iD 0 O r • ��pp N co !N- 1� ♦♦ 1l3 W- 0 -A 0V-0 oco vov OV- oc 0C4N °vv O da tiC3 sV N r C4 cq N F? O C4 CM 1!7 r OD er o00 vvv vvo ova y. �•- V9 v av vov cc 0C4N c; c; o ov tii3 888 888 8 g° 888 �r AA r 4p7 r CM C4 CM 44 NV)v (4 N,- iCl1•Q� F4 QFN t- qlr!D �� FF-CO) G Colo V'� v co v av N rn o SO' c; c; vacs o0 a c4 N oca v v r. � v 888 8849 8810 ;.v A A I AA l C4 N!Vf N 4"o NNr Mco .w W) cm �"� � N �7 r m r r �► rry .. a J J J 222 isco c WWW .nay 3� S2 -j %.%kt co q- Q a= 0 C �a i si r N �N 8 $b C � � a m� a C �p rj fin 'a i a U 888 O O w } L3 t � o �OQ C 3 V m _ m �¢a c �4 rl'S v ` V t � X C aa¢ to C � c� iu h Z 4 3 zh N W Q Mm W 7 [V cn cis zm•- vs� '••'D �00 �o + f coo 1040 0040 acv,o 0400 o a va •• °�� °�° 888 fig$ pr° wC" NNw r ... t'!w� ��r r►r N m eq w N coo °vv 0400 vvv 40 ::::'c f gr vs r ?: 0400 �5 vv .0 v ovo �i o ...:::•:::•�� 1088 pg° �gg �8g • p w v V- Cq w 4m N r VA fi•iAw rcm N vvv 40400 C) o v • � 40 40 4W oa o,c�s, g--c � voo vv 0040 vr-v, 6106 a •v er4a v CD CC pC10 CC 00 p u! A e• r► t► r. w r In en w J ••.�� 10 ,-p wNw NNw 0 W � W r r� N 0) W(�) r) �i nr C) CD vvv voo voo o ♦' en w c7 �- o v, ski, p vvv 100 v ocv o T a voo eD n°'i_ a a �$F 108° 888 Sgg IV. "' p Qrr Gwv wtyw NNw •�' oo w 1A V9 C1 /► W) f p r f- N in �G N 40 0 0 vvv voo 1000 0 Vw .� a o • � �• �•'�; � � a: ' r as r_ of r tn coo O© coo coo 9 40 4088 0810 888 888 pww °r° rNw 4404 �2S �2a 412626► 3 �aa ZZZ G��}tl]C� WWW �0 %am A\ 0 Ao C P o o 7. 8 C F � � o E �E a Q� T �$ *s cc NC4 N N 0 r a r 1�1pp c AS o a C 3 V c � v rL W C Cider � p Z 3 v� 8� UJ m Ze wav� W = ct m w� .e f-�c8 Zit- %. Nk-. 0a go v 2 �c a� fi N 1q g b � � a Ira C c 4p .2: Y LL 250 �a :• voo 4040 ,v coo coo o a� 0 r ° T N r N N •- l�i�E3 40 +�• o.� tY T T r �► r 000 oao 0 40 0 0 • via 8e�iv ovv vo 404040 acv v v °$$ °8° 888 888 T w• T r� r �� r C C rCV r NNT m coo oNV ve�° K �coo a cm °o 4" N 0to � $ n $� n O N o ' aoo 0o 40400 0 n► 0 day D ov rr LAI C4 N 04 N m 2p r •-- c °00 °co coo oao a 0 A �Nt7� • aC3C��Npp G r ° aac 6 c OWN N O oao O N G 000 O v f a v 088 ° 8 0 888 8 8 8 pT� prp t{rr NCyr ['1 OD qr- ert:• coo 0040 coo oca ■pp a�! O 0 IN �� . • kO • p� V N U? 0 N CO q- OQ 8 GNG . a• 000 00 coo 000 ri v °88 080 888 8858 w+R r rArr CVNr �• C co (� N qw � 41 12S ca 2 cm a Z.Z W W W Z l�I1V�]W 3�� VQ %. Nk-. 0a go v 2 �c a� fi N 1q g b � � a Ira C c 4p .2: Y LL HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL ( TWSC ) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 20am -ex Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Major Street Movements Study period (hrs ): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 754 465 98 865 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 188 116 24 216 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 754 465 98 865 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v ( vph ) 98 C (m) (vph} 579"'' v/c 0.17 95% queue length 0.61 Control Delay 12.5 LOS B Approach Delay Approach Los = I S 1�1 %.\ = Q - ISC.s . L. tS N HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL t TWSC i ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 20am -ex +prof Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Plus Project Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 769 505 98 1206 Peak --Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 192 126 24 276 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 769 505 98 1105 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak --15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig L v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 98 552 0.18 0.65 12.9 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC ) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 20pm -ex Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Traffic East/West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: 1-405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Major Street Movements Study period (hrs ): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 5 T R Volume 1091 738 135 1238 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 273 184 34 310 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1091 738 135 1238 Percent Heavy Vehicles --- --- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Vol ume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak --15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10-- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 135 C(m) (vph) 339 v/C 0.40 95% queue length 1.95 Control Delay 22.6 LDS C Approach Delay Approach LOS = I's "t 'q6.t 011on = (a . ak s , % Lfl S K HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLC Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 20pm- ex +proj Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Year 2002 Existing Plus Project Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1160 990 135 1301 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 290 248 34 325 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1160 990 135 1301 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- --- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 4 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v ( vph ) 135 �` 4 C(m) (vph) 254 v/c 0.53 95% queue length 3.23 Control Delay 35.0 - LOS D Approach Delay Approach LDS �L� §v az .r � C e E� F n N Z a v o ro n V H C V t; YLL. ma V a 8�n v, v o s 0 0 Ne" 000 acv v, coo 00 0v voo r m vp . :•�sg i5 &off V) V- T[VG TNr _ ':.9 ti Q� r po C4 p 40 m + i'} CD r W � vav 4000 vvo coo c�v0mi in 10 v-0 w- � An9C � N . ooa CPN c; C; o,o, 040 a o voo s' v iap d :s +"i7t wrr rPj rt+}r �(Vr T�jt rNV T[yr J :o 0M40 0400 eq 0 0 C 0040 >% qp- CO) rCD v,u a 4D P- 41 a�m� 000 S r► ap F 4000 o•r-v vc0 0C) 040 ovo r a CQ00 o 1I w qr- qp- r r qF-- V) Gy a' -C4 V-4nw wNC] wN T 1.NOD Cyr► N � CNco R'] !G !+� cc C = VIn � 4000 ovv vov vvo ;.. 40 Nrrtz 0 ODT� 0 Q)mcm vov « p !► wp }+" p'1 0 000 •-- ovv v o 040 ci ao rO o a fJ{ QD co 0 N N w T (+� •� T [+� r s N p w Rol r L e+t o o v o v o o v v COG to N ^ C) + V) 9w N o Al o voa ow voo vv vv vcia o,vo r 'o coo v Z _ _ W T �- r qw E7 T ° r� �w tC4 rV] rNO w{yrr- eel i] � p � m r lb Z �v p vyen 2 %2S c V3� m J9Q JF� JF� �FE J w 4 . 2W�LL .0 ZZZ a ininco WWW � o Z5 Q K — %kri §v az .r � C e E� F n N Z a v o ro n V H C V t; YLL. ma V 888 N N v T 0 T C >c O 4- m is v Y y rav 0 J Y A Ua V t r0 � x � aad W UJ _� re jW L] vq 1 ul =Um� cr. 40 c is ct IL m J Z Zoo zwaL=L "' %x A z 0 a Ca aU5 w r� N pp M 0 td � L Q c a •sc�c3 oqw o rIR7 � S v pr ��- a•- w Om in C4 ,- b a 0vd 0040 400 cvo yr C; u �� r� aSevo �� .•. T N T T E} r r CV 10 T N r^ - ANN C3CAe'7 Nm� ova 0040 0400 0100,. m 0 CID C4 vvv vacs 00 0cc as rNT rLriT rC40 rCyw �eNCRe�f C'7NN Ne0"�3r- v �• � cs�°,�o T vMo vvv ovo � 4 op I'► I,*- r 1Cp (a O •^ � T C !G v cry 0 10 M a: �� 0040 0 vvv C5 c; ava r vv g r C'i r C T � r- g40 T Crf S� r e•! ••- - TCVr TCyr T{y40 TNr N •^ N e'7 3 r T o *! ovo 4000 000 0 0 a « ap r I- (�}} r • ♦ eq A � N O C vc0 000 6 c w- W.- vv(6 " 00 400 u r� $Sge�40 a`Sge�o� .. T V) T qr r T T L7 r •' ^ t y r T er j r r N 40 T (1 j r r r r-_ lri cm C4 w T r C 01 vvv 000 vvv s s r • r 40era40eri° OT 0040 000 400 rra vvv r 10 by 0 Aj Z ' v ... so CD Qi a� ° Nr qe N�~ FE &C" 2 'S Fa 412 a-� 101010 * aaa� ZZZlI3sA �a a W W9 404 "' %x A z 0 a Ca aU5 w r� N pp M 0 td � L Q c a •sc�c3 E G N E E R S NEAR -TERM (YEAR 2006) TRAFFIC CONDITION ANN v v C Uc `v � aka �3 W m O c a J a L3 m c a C H 0) d 4) Q C N L CA 2 V) 2 u t rS qu co o CL qw T C v N C N ti J D W go U (} JU W a 26 � U V7 +� 'C ma r 0 0� W N a 0 0 CO V as g S m G L , C CL An Z p ve _ No� Cl) m 4) 00 3., .� . . _j zWa`Ui I&-. *AkN m -i (n m� C tiZ as a} a C 0 n N 0 �O N n t c v �t EL :..� ME t v n E on 2 LID C y �+ m =cc v h 010 x c � CL YLL �m • : U0 N ti r• O —co CVr) 60 0 OD mr�•r fG O 0 m fi f�- CA n+-CD O _v CCC v,rr oCC 0904 c►CC 0N•- v66 r,_ w vW .d Z 2 8 OH m 188 vi © Nqr Nqr C4 Nqr z ca W S N i'7 T (4 cq C4 (n N V) D .. :...; T f r► m N N in i[7 q1t f if A t M flo in r qW 47 M � !" 3 e- N r• N N N qw qr 'N N .. • va o vvo ovv aav .moo �cm+� �°p�o 4 vv o0 c; c; c;COC I a $ v vv iL :. ..•..AI Nib r� Nrfr Nqr .R rtf► ONN V qwr� OD %M (nr _ . a- -� C4 N+OtW C40 IN T �p !� M I C) 0 0 8 v 0qw d7 N 0+�^C'7 •- • r • a w . r Ili fn (D ow W) Os N 0 Nq aCV 00 C C GIN O o C C7 CV r C C C r o 0 I r 080 co v v 0 O C O G 0 j E N� � cc co CD C�Vcow W .;V Nm0 rV)0 C4 C4 GInN c +� VF- od G cn CD v co N �NQ3 co en Lo toAngw rCON Nqw l N0 C �o cn co rn O ao 0 o f%- v qw w v i a ■ -t- o } CO veN ° 0) m QN vo ovo c; c; o v _ 0; o°o a co � 0 � � 288 �g A: (Vqw r+w CO 00 to Nqr m CO C4 r CVC70 r1r90 CM V) 94 V) W ~ Ci iii rr+ i 4% +w le V d N! 'w f- N O N a` NTT NfDO 0 @0 O(DM 0 T r IA T « • • « « mQ + CD0 f- m GoC)le r cn o r Ca C4 CV Orr^ a r ey Oi W c; C; c; c; aCC 0C]C O C 8 19 iY :454 C4 qw 'r" 4w (N q cC4 q -� N M o en v N (q - N sn �- C M a[]CDr• CV co OD NNO) mCDIM N � �C)0 M iA N r r r- N 4N eq 40 m N Cif N V) c + _ p .0 M.0 22Z co co 0) WWW I&-. *AkN m -i (n m� C tiZ as a} a C 0 n N 0 �O N n t c v �t EL :..� ME t v n E on 2 LID C y �+ m =cc v h 010 x c � CL YLL �m • : U0 C14 em O C'4 cm v v r C Ci D � c�a O O C a a C N da °v, � N V C N A C U L� U = CL ci a •r LC m I S �o N N J � o r W z p Wro � o CL N C 0) V� m M W O�N CJ3 a 0 ■1► - Z� CL 2 H �Ao ,w J•--� Zwa� • • 89� V- C4 s �gN * CD Ch V2 a � NN i a a V" 1006 w!'"ien vvv V' [Ail�i 6 06 1060 r o vW ioD co Nfr N 9 r NV� Z IiF : N !+! r N !M7 N L'7 rr• N 0) � q N V � 'r 4r3 "t ! i �a �� -� 0610 ova 0010 0100 P « $ a a a •• . to a as rn qr V) ��• rime, '-� �cmi, �cmrlRNi, � o� c0 co 0ao 10 0 0 0 CO p °$ ' Au NV �5 rV a� s� CVVr m 40 NVV M NMa rM O NV) Cq%n IM ... a •hN P7 C AOd N el4wM7 mm �('7� r v V-N a V) M 1•+. F .. O o o P- o �• sa ill N r [y !► a r Q I%. CO ' V5 ' 10_700p qw MM N rlw %-" N+tir r v� y� vv cv ariv dao a r s co Da ava v tD �j � m °C a Np�i N N O0 co co tp CI 0, [Y C+7 0 *^ (n 0 [Y en r N M I 4 N" N avc°DV w NON M 0 A�•� co cis m v�CC4 e N N vNv v�CM en co o � i S O7N ; � N a* " r CO 4 04 r C4 r a U. vv av vov 6 0o c p 1 0 0W8 0 � G a N dsr� -W NIW ma Nqr A N 0 0 rM NCB tveyV- aa 0 l%w �t co n C4 NIV tA M 7 w � N � G thf- Natal vv Na oo �7 N N v 7 } • a � s • c; C; vcoa 666 o Ul •; no NI rqr CM +e•` NIA o � m mN �m� Q. l) Q1N N qr MCMIV F3NN 0. z 2Q 2a �2a o2OO 3 J � J � J FE J i•- � Q. airs a.an �a� ZZZ 117Ni1i W WW B -so cr m J X17 Co LI] � CiZ 1010 C; i � Ta V C _FM Ni pNp Z N � r 3 � a C � m C 'Ip M� p m C 0)'G o r X 808 Y LL. . Z ti W Z Q Z m a8 �N W W � � m •a 4 QC�m _ O o°oo� Cv C l v 0 C Vs L1 4 0 G IL m vo c v U 4� dap H N 3 J L c t7 � m c ina¢ r s e 1 C O � s C s U � c � 7 �'mr ` Ca C x L� Im C. V3�G7s NNa cn�oai ZWa.1i lu f r, r . aN p �C[rtie �S cN+e, cr4 p. GNN oo oov vv o00 W�� 7 vvv y a 000 808 c�o 0IS� � vav C4 Zan �2m JF-� 4i a o N m C14 N m qw N .:Z �� a] 000 NC)N C4 44,0 0U$Il7 RICVD ONE N .jW ':. OO 0 OA W 0 � 000 n r W) O r r► CO m CD in OD oov ovv 00a oov qr �••. O D o G 0 C; C; O C] O 000 goO 28° °S - V . m N 47 N C4 :� N m N V) M 000 NON NN0 GN+- W ;3 i ■ o r r C4 N t G [V . � O a or•.v +C 8 N A 0: �. a 000 °ti (nmo 0) 0 j a r qw N. n7 CD f c; LL co N oov p p o voo oN� 0 co oov N0N stirNV pl 00 p in0r Lin o° O � O Clq o Cy ov^ Q N el o0 c; C; co ovo 0 0 0 OD 0 N. MOO o co r . ovv 0OS n V) 000 ti c °oo cq -' tu O 0 0 N 0 CV N N o o N •- vav S0e0. mCY)Q 0r-CNi V { ^ qr CD co ur, F � to Q 000 mOul) r)�o 0Tr � 7� v o flW R r qw o i1cm uw 1► v W 4Y4 f r, CCa ' p �C[rtie ■ so p. GNN �j c; C; coo ov vvv y a 000 808 c�o 0IS� z2o, Zan �2m JF-� t 0 a o 1 rn q- �� a] n as 0coco 00 D MOCwE RICVD ONE 000 0- O qr goo o" O in OD p 31 000 CAO^ 0.OD0 0C■7r . Cv u] C3 r 40 r �� r ■ o r r C4 N t G [V . � O a or•.v +C 8 N A a 666 Q� c; �' Do Oo c; LL co N pp iD C7 0 Go p p o oov N0N stirNV 0 C W } 0 0 0 OD 0 N. MOO o co r v o flW R r qw o i1cm uw 1► v W 4Y4 ^ Tin ^ o D y w. z2o, Zan �2m JF-� t 0 a o 1 �� a] a�aa 2Z2 as 0coco z WWW v 0 Q —Ct am G " � m O V IE O W G � C] � 8 c C n n N 0 CO N n� L py � ea rn E en W C LZ to d Yampa • 003 CII 04 8S v `v T C }C _O _o o r U 0 c O ,, 0 0 c 8 N c .0 .x arm oy ?amic cnaa Q 0� m IU I Z o J W 0 Wf �Qmm W h m N t�7 x n � 0 v .� Cu to m;; rn3�z Q � _ rp JVft 2uj 0 a. U- t— S-L R ey C 4a Z °m C W o} t3 U � c t� a 46 M g h P as C3 � 0 v � � t o C.r � es S0 S m N U ]+ �LLMa • U[3 V � N N v old ova 6 O N oco o O ap d _ i� 000 o$ Q . N 0 co Cm qqr i�Y v t� a.- Ga0 N0(4 NNO 0W) C !V r •• r T vvv coo 000 000 vv coo 00 coo Oral 0 .•:�:::.� vvo 04 eV) t� (4004 C4C40 0C4 a►� 000 0 <4 v � r N m T� a 0 v N 0 0 O N 0 O N e a N' 0 ' H � Oqr aiv ym r>> w cc ca coa 6 coa c d ova �o8 CID o� 5 N ! i0Y iN'? C r W j M 000 [VON N[VO ONE s� 5� coo to0N W) CN 04C`i° 0300 v W- � m �► an Q ooa cAOO ryv ohm CD m E CO) �} N 6 Q r w oo 4WN v "Ii $ �p cc rvo0 ac vvo v d 000 E08 980 088 (j C4 CID N C4 N N") N fn F O G C C4 0 (4 C4 C4 0 G N P 000 Ol0P- CID O TI, CchN r C4 A ~j fa. OaQ 880 C1D� cmO0 r N' qu a Q r w b 0 • ■ r Q pNj� , w- C4 r qr V) N Cat !r] vov 6 ova o v ��NSS m CM [N r z o0o cYVN Nc+cv C) (4 sit vvo m 0 N 40000 o o 3 v J H J ca Z z Z [19 t/3 tJ] W W W V ...! t— S-L R ey C 4a Z °m C W o} t3 U � c t� a 46 M g h P as C3 � 0 v � � t o C.r � es S0 S m N U ]+ �LLMa • U[3 �U W m Z W Z� W 1IX CO aa �w 0 c� ?nom `gg�pQ��v �1 tv cv 0 v r ova` i t0 m ao c 0 O _a L3 �aa m � W N C0 se ` co L� ?aim V) CL a ci t m mw� � N y3:ev 2 W !l � . • ocvnr 1 cvr �� 8p$ f c vca cc co ovo 7 qr voQ oc gv oov 0 c%s � oc+rr ono o0 nrvT - vvo N0 qr w r r vvo coo vvo ono g�� ao ?. vco va avo 0o o a C, E"0 rgo coo go c� ��ffss N m R oC4 •-C4 vvv n40 r p c� W l' �. °ego m �► ac,rao o� m ovv �•vm cv m �° °! aTN vvo vov vov y 1 . 0 w3 C) ��4 c'3 rte? $v °o, CM C5 000 C4 r �v,Q oCV Oo C70 vvo LO C ' 0 0) o° °o ° vvv go E ❑ >� 49 4 ' im (m CD N F ' 0C4 rtVD Coo Nar v... °�v 0)c`000 vva �vam _ r •- � 3s r oU) ocoo voo vvo * o o- a� v • ev o cr) "n v v p pp cG� g G s m g v C5 do oc G r Q a , aoa� eq 0) aao ovv o o 0 w� a m C14 m S "' o mi oc � r1 vN•- -cvv voa c+ivr of•v v lw �rtr -v crI u7 vov +•vm cw to 0 fn 0 qwwv oov rvvv CD C4 ME q Ar- p .p avo vv ov vvo v v L 0 vn° vov my en co N aeq ENO avv NQ r ° *-� m�v vvo C4 �D tp) 4 c 3 fl ��ac -r�IX w zzz nc�i>v www �� v0 00 oz TT U � 'c a� h NQ t 8 C n� 0 C W 0 m 40 m C) � 0 R L � vI z cm L r L S 4 IV .0 c E N � CL xv �c�" Is 0 0 s N N g c°-e cv v v � c 0 oaa 0 ..J `v _a U E� �a m W N i Y 7 9) CL c m a � t W46 U _ s J N Z� a� W y � (cc 'm cc Wy� a N C ul v ZaD %` 's %.k O oZ v c �y N 0 .... N n v = C m c ■�= h om� ■.0 X LL v m N �. as v •- $ r. o aoo ao vv c; c; d o� ov�rn v vov � o vav v CL ! r� N pf i�• 0Nw- rCM 0040 CVar E 40 nc� �-a � o v o o � � 4000 coo 0900 0400 v' GN40 N� 8 coo 0 0v 40 vov c P-. dV 10 '020 oov c�0 y r gn N Q1 A 0 C CM 000 crow a � tor0 ovo to o a T v ONO 40 0 000 vao a > C ""� qr f O °ice ON -00 2' 0cN0 cyco c3 vvo r i*►v vcv 400 vv voa d v av $O 000 COQ) i t`ry'! •'^ N d � Qs Lid t] M 0(4- rN0 000 N o+^ _ v� uj00 fl- aoo Lnv� N cs H ., vi•ch ovo voo ova N 0 ONO N Nto 00 00 0 r 1�►(� vv0 vv vv ova va v g v o 000 0 ct $ N ■ F w �. aNr rte�eo vao Nor Z 3. oe- %as In kno Coo In +�+ e►a v ... v pp C70�7f U')�09 000 �Ot► NIn �'i N0 40400 av cv d o coo40 40 CQ gv coo go Ri !r] 407 r C7 N -- - C3 cY r +- N o v o v re a r C ov0 v �•a 0040 tiv va* 60 co � 2= b v ZZZ (nco(0 WWW �� VaJ %` 's %.k O oZ v c �y N 0 .... N n v = C m c ■�= h om� ■.0 X LL LU 15 z4) cz Z W z U 9)� ZL- Ul Z Wco O 0 668 m ti LO � 92 Z � � c +� + a C'4 ccvc dv covc o coa 0 r ogg ggO QC [V QC7O O R i ocm C4 avo NoW cIV &UL. U va vova� t- qqr o ❑a coo Coo coo vov �.SI�O V) c4 In N ' pN g g ' O pO yip'? NGOa 4 a 40 V) s❑ �:::� aaO CO OC oCi o00 d � p2 •S2 o g go E 000 g -- U R? CL N i0 N GD = :�► acvT •-N0 oav cmaW v[ti!N S'o Qav SOS . Q i ^ m c, v ory ONO ovo ocv c) o E_ U .r 0 �Qo :w • 0 cc 1N►. CY --o a V) cv7 r) f ocv pp G • CO m O Tv O r m N �• c; 16 c; c; cv C; C; o c NO G OO O G G C G 0 0 C cb o� cn co W O =4+ O N r N Q COO N O W r J� w LL �s� _ O�� p L�(n pC]p O40 V x U Z a zw ina4 0 IN O1nO ouzo coo voc N 13 o� >1 g a °o i cov ory a r) fn ° ° Oo ?v o � ar, g r ocv ON 46 c vo vvv o a ,coo Y 10 v cc� 0 g oav o v co cn °' G F oC4 Tejo vav N 0 W �Q W 3 OW cm cD 0 �t? Coo �NOO qr •v is r v g ovr� lr�a 0QO ,8 mvm ,,, �a O r v cn f e) c g .t X25 g q& Go c e� Q aao vo 00 ovv o v m Q, -�+ ooc°v $° COO m°a U a � ill c�7 e+a cv .0 c U 5 ~vim i7i Z •: mm�' a . o N NO oa o Naw ui m �� N .c rc �� ''3, LL O e � m a�iv Y1 LI y uscy 4) 0 o z c ccb ,N�ogv iD ovo t" v1*- Q Q w N r et N C Q N p pl a il]iAmZ cc D 4] N � � �► 2 � y � � 2 � 3 Tl] � D � m C 7U. U. Z�• L .U. M� ZZZ co V) 0 www � cc a : UU tu Z n� U� �8 d N w W 4 m r. 0 0 2 cz C4 N 0000 a a v o> 0 c�oa CD c a a U w N CL CD m N N rn IW N tl] a`s Y � � C read w � v U V �Lfl mO 0 N v° c'� zwaLf 16� 5 L& cs N V- D O v �S � c �i N ■s ea a w� C � n� CrP w coo 10 E 40 a an ca 0 w m 40 T c o ° C .- 2. `i C • U . V vvv 0 c vo avo v 0p y� _ 000 $00 O0O lost v N (D co N Qy O ore•- rNO coo NoW U. C)Cb co cr�o voo m0Vn � N r r r � F - coo ovo 000 coo .2 e°i, coo cv 0c 000 v' v vg� �$v voa boo N Fo N r r N v coo N o W tLi m � v vvv OD A =a M r 0 a IS I O N O O N O 0 0 0 v o o E v eV R,..1 0 0Lf) NN � ov 0 c 0 V) mr w 0 �>� c G c 66 66 o C 0 O Q r o$ $ v v o 0 0 0 00 OD +mss CO) am. m� eov a w� 004— r N 0 000 N o W U- 0 � IG s �N 0 COO e0 U7 m T- A 0 ° °a oe•v o00 0O0 rV) CO e E r vvo 00 00 46 c ovo 08 ? v ovo v CW) N p o N r r N C 000 RI o W = c ova $tea ova � v cn H� 0 00La r-N ovo m0 co co y 0 N a v cc v ca (n 0 0 r eo p occ ova cv L. OLG 8v Qov 80 rV �fn cc N Q 0 c +-cm vvv NOW LLt O O 0N t7C0 001 0 V- r th ° r v 2 a, 2 Q 2 c mt °-° 3 + jo ZZZ m .0 cnt.0 oU) W W W 16� 5 L& cs N V- D O v �S � c �i N ■s ea a w� C � n� CrP w coo 10 E 40 a an ca 0 w m 40 T c o ° C .- 2. `i C • U . V 4;;5 W to a� Wy U N W � s� g mti *Z W� o q� U � Z CO J V CV C%F co 9NCOV 0 w v r rr � U c v o � boa C± r 2 m d il? 0 U as a Q a �Q C N �y+ C Vl t Y � aa¢ if7 N m � `o U v U 3 v W nJ = octP j0 c a�mz zwau. 4k "v oZ v ) 23 n tN n� � 4 d Ca o .r D =� a 0 ce � �m_ =w a Z CO -0 �-0 x �. CL ro- U � in L] CL �-�c; c; c; c; vvv ovv v, C� T� T p} r +r T r r r r • �' -I N Q T CV T r r T r r .., . cm C4 m� t4k. cm 1%- 000) ie• 4000 OCC vvv o°v Q :- oo ovo m CD to T.. Cb v0 0v v icy vv C; C; 0 c; C; voo a v i wNC rt4 T�+r Trr .IFS NNN !h C7 4n OD CC V t` &0 W) CD C) V) r cn P.. F- 0' m ovv moo voo 0 m 0 r C7 qqpl 1 y' 1>2 • • r'mcmv e� o a Nm cm • V-een t in OD vo c; c o o ccv v v 40040 v, m Rp a v g °o° g�g �v°° °o °a °v . ❑ r �] r� r T r !^ w a r tv) l r we iW) qw w � ccl) 0 z r r 40 -CD 4W vn° rev amCD 0M CD 40 C Im ' v m eA m o o v0v t► iD Q A a 0 ci ao ovv 000 voo 40m ov 8810 $S °o 81008 888 2. vE ti� n�r► non nnn .R! v rNO rCM �-Tr rtrr Z W 3 ' �.. CV �l7 N to r CO t•1 N qr � V) t► 40 qv eD O 07 N r N eD m i • 3 vC _ 0 v0v goo , a 40 !b G ° v v° O C° p v LL G C p G G ° 0 0 �� fi A;t 1�A!► �titi rNO rC4 Tyr .-rr . i FINN N0)v em too D7C^ti :p W 6n v t y r OE ch J F- x 3 -j 0: J f.- O.' —1 a: nary p Do im jo 22Z anjo coca ) mJD a WW W 331. L] .J 4k "v oZ v ) 23 n tN n� � 4 d Ca o .r D =� a 0 ce � �m_ =w a Z CO -0 �-0 x �. CL ro- U � in L] CL 80 0 v w C y Q si a v V w m v C2 m Sao � N _c r _m = t L) ti M �aOie aa� v .19 .A cm �J 7 N N Ql m d! W■ z� a W 2 �o CL co z fm m m sa N yy � w �mN N a - v ± � °y a C mU5 a co z Z 00 N o J •'- �. Z W C. 11- 5...S% 8.0 ca C l a� i as 1 N V 8 ci t� m 40-40 f� E m O maas i h U m t; as m iCll � � V Yv W 3 a !► LQ co via p IA C"i It7 t a vv 000 Dav, 40400 Qom D vao a vv gg° v A -A) 40 +-N 1 wNw rwr wra- CP)Nlcm 'raA Im 9210 NQf� �.•r7 �`• P r� ovv vvo 000 000 , ov ovv ovv 6 6 0 o v SS° 888 888 888 • w� T� T r +r r f T T rN� fNT r-ww vwr • +. r� � �, C4 N N v as qr rr cy m Q� N W Q1 m � N Cb G7 CD a av0 f•vv asno 0in� v m� h� o 0 fa 4 r. ca a �- m an ,n co ug 8 oNa coo voce 000 coo coo 0 1°-,V 0 r � T [•7 r T r w � r T a .w �. eq v in N in v M � r� C4 m e) V) 4m W CO 0 0 V) N Cc e °a } to ev f o cr�a v► lv om� to 0 � f-. .. {� r �.� s a • Q • f► • � il'f f► W) ill 1[7 w 9 � 8v, 0to0 ovv, 0 0 >l oo acv vao oov o ev 8840 88+e�8 888 888 TI, !7 V- T T+ w r r r i T N 0 T C4 T r w w r T T Y r N CO) co N iD m N 1*► r � a m mcN 4000 1.40 1a NsD0 ■- a ■ w w AUl$ Q CO OC Q �t3 vv 0040 coo 0040 v c 880 Sag 888 Sa$ ,y P- r n � N. f• i. ti � • F- s :. • w- (40 +r-NT rr T r rw •: J to N M i•7 0 r- 0 m M N N v CO T � � r a� CO n. cy l► N .. L cm cm Fx _ & o a� zzz CO CO (Q WW W 5...S% 8.0 ca C l a� i as 1 N V 8 ci t� m 40-40 f� E m O maas i h U m t; as m iCll � � V Yv W 3 a 0 0 C Z �5 S a� p1 +0 g U N. z � c q LID �4 to CL t .v N ri u CD D a 4) an c x Y,.L0c • a kN CY ea $gig :- m r� m r V) (r) en �a c� O L� r i• � �a as �o a oa v �d W! vin ocvo acr>a C; vaa o. w vo c66 -v vp CO) r T r r T M T T N T O N O N C pp N N IA N O t[] In 49 N r► to f► w0C4 r► N Tmm r V4 It i7 qrl ;�.. oOV vvo vvo 000 - 7 ti a i o +ter:, v • o e i, T i $ '�` « qw c + 12 K, '- vv° a C; C; O GC °Q OCC 400 13 .-. 7�� V- Nr C4 V- ONO [Vr- -q- W an ' �r!'V 0Ul)w mNf- -W mrN Ow egmr a +� to o0 O vvo ava C7 IV 3 Q' T Nva _CD 7 ��2Q CD ["3 CO �M0 vtnm to er? er1 CD QD— a 1. of- v,v CD 0 qr CD aov O �A w �Qc ac c v(0)v ovv ao vco o a�,❑ Ov g�v g °�° °oa ° °8 r e� qr" c� •ts rCSIT W- CM 0 N0 C4 V-- v ` V . OTm m T cv CY0N Lp V) N 0 0tn e-- QD CQ f- l a co eT C3 7. j q— r � r co f Zcc c ai ;� � ova v�c•v oTv vT� W 45 N V. cn w • [C ■ • !X} Iq ti i on N asnm vav v,m0 avo ° ao voo acc o Goo 16 _ av 4 °4° g�°8 V- t � o$ n v � M ~ TNT rNT GNa NTH �C 3 Z � _W ... pp F3vW- ggrCVN 01m cmN C N tD r N r V - _m .�T(D NavoO •Q N N A n dy y � V �4D11 s • i i � . V m r i!'3 cn C CO N I- +- r 1� +r e U) sC le m 'C• t Im t► W �•• CC7O CGC GO a0 ©CC p �►(� Id C7 Z °v ° °v° z W �. m �q :cae1�g •R [7 W- •- qp- sg�� eh V- Z ~ ti � Z L� �N c,a� cad - �4N q- TN•- 0NO C4 W = m� c W wo W a m mcncy e�c: - .'- v aama n QD f• N�o e) V) cv mNnb Wn n %n to r- :• 3 0 v r c m m Z m err r N J �V�mZ 7 2 fm cn, Z+cs� �H� JF•� M.0 MX17 J ^� ZWCLU. I ZZZ cn(0co WWW .0 o to at -tea 0 0 C Z �5 S a� p1 +0 g U N. z � c q LID �4 to CL t .v N ri u CD D a 4) an c x Y,.L0c • a W oZ Zm .TWA. N � w W vi 4d' co g° 9:: 0 Z w J in � 888 0 r r a o as ON% U n wCLg m CV CD L N L w Y � CL a Q _r m d C r� U m �m CL Cl) co %--too t• r) O v, z gn m a _9_E zIE U� r� CD aC-0 3 h b m �N m� v C b � A c V o � y L a C WCOE E a m CL cm�r i Omw� La Y U. U in OD N W !r? N p g m co O v� A ti vac coo va cC4 vcv o �49 888 888 r- A114- N. Ar remit_" r �- w Z 2 rMr a-Nr ONG eYrr .+1 ^ N Wr 0 0 +� �. p7 T �y T RI r7 o.� coo coo coo coo v q V? A N C% a) ■ CO !'7R ?' voo rttl7 o cvv Q vo LON�r avo o p v r r w +^ !r3 r r :•w M TNr r(yr 0 M 0 t4 Id ��• f�� ►�]04M QO�Or 0Om = O r (") N r r t► C4 (14 �r avN vaa vaa ov a 7 w `o 7 � by rjMN • a s } W m t� N O co ■ e- *- O ri 7r 000 000 ov 000 p 0 0 �T g 8� ° ° °odo lu 9 tv� ` • w r i'J P . C4 V-- r. C4 C4 ... !► N ^ fie] ! V N m t� CO _ N cG V) NF] NTr? r 1d]CO�1COO v0N GO OV O en� 0N C4 Q 1p 1 N �ti w to ['7 w [+! ■ Ul G? Q1 CD to r► � er? r r 117 C7 6 C5 0 av q- 000 c a 88r�8 888 °g° 8818 i r [■i •- r � ,- � chi r r N ■ t N r r N r o N 0 N r r C Om �r- N Cm N� w-- 0 A 40 r MANN :. 40 V mNN • o�W �WM �n 3 app- �a Ph- CD 4w- Cc cq CD Pi ev oo° .-V- v- o. ,•V vca c; 46 civic o c �0 °0 . r Nc�r r *-N C N r r(n i 9 vi h° N (00 ° cr40c d r r r W - N a to :1�Or0.0 1 ZZZ �OMa co co 40 �DsMa WWW i v0 %--too t• r) O v, z gn m a _9_E zIE U� r� CD aC-0 3 h b m �N m� v C b � A c V o � y L a C WCOE E a m CL cm�r i Omw� La Y U. U en s� Z� w� aV N V N Liu W � �4 m� F m� Z Jw�., NNco gcv ti a 0 C � D V ooa L U m 3 r U C Q ¢¢o N h c CIO m m u d ` is �CD CO C L Y a 9) a. < m is V �cM <m lu vs CIO °m zwau. i] v 0 oz � C c v r►� LtiE C N n C 1� U 5 n S � � t _ E L�� C m 4m �a n -0 x ts �. Y M LL 2L 1�7 N f r f C a m (•5 [ti! t #A -42 C4 �.; 0 oc vo avv r3 vQ v v o v a ru'f r rr r a Z 'U +rr� .� Ct �r�v T(►�v acv TTT ...� WNN 0in0 VA 0)qw W.. Ui T N avo ovv vov o00 - ap C4 CN f m On g N v c c io v L7' '' g�v [�_$° ° ° g �g� ': ! f ir% W) PAW T T T r B ' F` :.•? .W .-�v rev o•-o T�.- .�ci d W C N v* :n a T +n � ry N m r m T 00 40 E T 1s t N g i, oav r q- (yT N 40 i a. v '-camo v,� goc�v r c o v o vo ovv a cy ? $o° 0000 vovo 280 qv �� r rr d � d' �V)0 tv)10 C rrT Ql N qp -- UD *^ N (r, C u o 'C CD 0 rt 0 0 a 0 0 a 40 g' ■ g i a . vac NV ,e -- v- C4 v •- go •- v o 0 .°n to o e� vv 6 c 6 c vav o a 00 o a °c�v _ ..f) > o M0 (''!0 2 W y a 4n +r- � rFi v D/► � r0N T r ° Lei :MAX G � 'Dti g� rq a v•- §v � v�e g00 ° 0 ov vd oo acv o 880 av a v vpp r ICJ T Ln V_ r -Ann rCO)0 °rp rv- v- OD�N m � MrN TV N3 C qw � O a; v { 3 n �0 ZZ2 cna)W WWLLI CL .. ■ ■ l i] v 0 oz � C c v r►� LtiE C N n C 1� U 5 n S � � t _ E L�� C m 4m �a n -0 x ts �. Y M LL 2L I Z in Wy is I N r+ W It CO 4 pp� V o z -•. Zr J � � 04 cv OS� 0 r c } m o �G a�a c� 0 _a U_ r c a Qag N ag 2 4 A CD _ L iD W L as G nab N a U '23 �d ci � � C COW Z W d LL vt w a Z Uc a� r �y ra 0 �g p� M C a� � � v m Lc to m 1° d v �~ 0 m h m �� Co n � E m U Y �2 .. ua co a vv ov o d ci ao a v� >a 880 8 8 v 080 880 CL U ch o T e� v o •- o .- *- cm m 40 co N M 0 m p M qr 0 r cy r� T G gp-} i ovo vov ovo vvv va 0 c 00 vvv da 888 CY 40 C4 amo owf- en o0 vov rrr 0 o MO oa p 4m r. 0 � v o � ao cv � 8 T- �. c' av vv pv vov c a 880 8v° °8° 888 CL !! rlryp rN?O CEO +r� � �- om N T p n m t�V rmr C4 v o C) 0mco a)va v Cc) Cc) �j 0 qqt C4 888 00 0 0C vvv da 880 8 g v v 8 v 8 v 45 ■ • 4v?0 [•7O Yi N47eC7 � r r M � 0 T v ■ • a��!} a • i a G�QOOf}}}}} o� ��jj r► [oore �y a N, G • O tiv ov O oc O �] voa 40 a a T vi T IA r T T x.. ■ a- (q 40 V-- 0 0 to r r W- N Q: Ltii 0 r T a T 47 cD [V e7 el *- T r go N a -- a 4 zzz 0) 0U) wu w O ° vt w a Z Uc a� r �y ra 0 �g p� M C a� � � v m Lc to m 1° d v �~ 0 m h m �� Co n � E m U Y �2 .. ua � V W Z 4 i� W h Z U � N d} r. W am �Qco 0�a �O Z � w J •- 04 CC 0000° � vNCv 40 0 r c ai U� 0 GGIL 40 m d C M co U m 02 jQ v a r ct m 'r x cn a m 3 E m C) a 3 M L] N � N �iafv 0 cio c�a�z d W CL U. .... � Qp�llpp'7 C r aQ Ir ac •�-- oo ■ C° c; c; VQ gga coo 0 ago coo . m x �7 AMC) 0 M o v -o vaa -- uatv)v '� W 0r� C4 oaor -w- r 4000 ovv Qvo ova °00 o� err qw m o :j 400 ao vv c; c; �0 0 0840 vov +� rrso ve■yc v*-v 0040 .� u7 co s� c a 0;;o v %n v •- 000 va 3.� Aro , qlr va U} 400 00 vv va o 0 n�c�o 40$40 0000 ovo • ;i f � :i7 {i� r Tt T�v 0 to t-00 000 m 0400 oCOv ovv aov N v �! 40 en CM to C%j V5 vv a 00 ov vo o v 400$0 40g0 080 000 --to %t3 •A Z1 O cn o Co 0 000 W 31 rr° QNtD x070 0040 }w Q OSCY �°r vav qr- an '* ° a 0 0 0c o0 oc C; c; g$o 080 Cr 0$o ovv � :.:I� rt�0 vc■�o v•-o vov :v 01No Orr OCOM vov u.ca 2 2o 2 3 ZZZ moo WWW 2 lu Ll H t- o cz 0 �3 Uc tm n o� z� Q C C o t � � t PL M to 0 SL Ito E m-0 i 0-0 CL U � YLL. =CL • s 83 (N N § 88 0 0 C V � a cl80. I a c m U ❑ .c QN1 a � o�g D N a 10 10 L r cr3 L L'3 W � C m c g` a w 40 0 CM n `4 Ott as U Ul g W � d N > m U to+- 0_ �o tLa 75 1-- 0) WC3 m MN a m o mom$ Qcoz LO v- %- zwaLL r Aso Ogg got.- coo o40� !Y ; o 00 vo ci cv ' at o 30 voo ° 08 ogo 000 I !^! Q I%%. r 1A qp- O �. r coo O o U ggv 0 40$0 000 � Cf 4W �-Mo OMO oq-0 000 v www r Aso Ogg got.- coo o40� v- � QD r ooa coo o 30 Cq 0 • S N , C O • � v • O !^! Q 4000 coo 000 coo O o �2� ggv 0 40$0 000 � Cf . i 04 25021 z z z v www �� -Ma Ct'!v Ora coo 0: .fit a r 40$40 orgv 404040 to Q CM It 4K . 00 coo 40 40 ov v v 4u ggo vgo 40$40 404040 aw ❑ � � or�v vgo 000 rc�0 COO C coo C6 � ° �'m04 ° w o w 404040 m m f.- co C4 0 r• ova CN �N • CN • CO GG ' GG , C 00 ci 1�•i� a 880 080 080 vvv -Ul r.- T ul t IL � �+r •-c�v ocrsO 40•-40 vvv r qr � *'"' C4 CV T v v v o40� v- a ■ E Of-0 Omv ooa coo ff -W 4.2 Cq 0 • S N , C O • � v • O !^! Q 00 a 0 00 O o �2� ggv 0 40$0 000 � Cf . i 04 25021 z z z v www �� -Ma Ct'!v Ora coo 0: .fit a %" %j "1 w r- 8 0 0 �-E U � a w N .� q a Cl . C M �C�p w� IL c m � t H 7 a r- to rj w Y W C Cc .: L) Cl -00 000 o40� v- 404040 V-- v- coo•- vvv 2= C* 2= ca �2= _j �2� a v .O1 � � Cf 5 i 04 25021 z z z v www �� vc 6d va 400 0: .fit a ggv 40$40 orgv 404040 . 4u 1 ��sv or�v vgo 000 %" %j "1 w r- 8 0 0 �-E U � a w N .� q a Cl . C M �C�p w� IL c m � t H 7 a r- to rj w Y W C Cc .: L) Cl c)�° o40� v- 404040 2= C* 2= ca �2= _j �2� a v .O1 � � Cf 5 i z z z Ul>C'O www �� ° �a %" %j "1 w r- 8 0 0 �-E U � a w N .� q a Cl . C M �C�p w� IL c m � t H 7 a r- to rj w Y W C Cc .: L) Cl HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Sam -cum Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2006 Background Traffic East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection orientation: NS Major Street Movements Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 11 1387 790 26 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 347 198 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1387 790 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 11 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Worksheet 10- Delay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig L LR v (vph) 11 21 C(m) (vph) 820 180 v/c 0.01 0.12 95% queue length 0.04 0.39 Control Delay 9.4 27.6 LOS A D Approach Delay 27.6 Approach LOS D X- 1 J Lr 's • ' 7 •%-.0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Spm -cum Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2006 Background Traffic East /West Street: Adolfo Lopez Drive North /South Street: Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection orientation: NS Major Street Movements Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 3 650 1445 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 1 165 361 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 660 1445 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- --- _- __ Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 21 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 5 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Worksheet 14- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LR B--uL v (vph) 3 31 C (m) (vph) 468 100 v/c 0.01 o.31 95% queue length 0.02 1.30 Control Delay 12.7 57,Q LOS B F Approach Delay 57.0 Approach LOS F V L.�� m N Co N Cb W� W � Z w W ta � to V_ W t7 a ¢gym C) 0 co rD �C7 � J C4 co vv °o °a° cv C4 C7 ° r } �T L3 G eU 7 a �a°o, N v d t L co t io e'''v c tea¢ c e e dc 7+ IOD 0 s� iri =Qm� aVuss =way A— is n eo co o vp h Q T + Q w7 0 o u. • Q 06 W o v s m Q c o v W �3 b v � Uq H J m W J � m C G 2 IE LI ElI J -,.' oco a C _0 N Z n C 0 N � Z C o OL rso n E 2 ce W n x 0 LL Im C R rt•+� �rrt Gir coo coo 0c vac :W _• N0)O NN r .:LLI M fl- CD aon mV) yrv, W) Q) 0)IDto i r T C" 4 10 %. Croy r COO Q 0 0 O 0 0 Q 0 o N cm fly 111.Nr) LNG Mq N floe coo 000 •.. .,- ,.•..�n .�}. r T T r r T T T [7 0 r !7 �- r N r r cm T 0 v en Qto0 mqr co Oi C4 4-- r r �' + F► e'7 ' Q N !► Im M cq r U) N T Q7 N O 04 v +� (N (p) N N C3 N voc coy ovc v° 8$8 o° (D v `c' 8$ 00 r`si] r1()!- rr r r n . •� T en Q r V) r T N [y T m(D q qIr to N V) co V_ V) menco co m e'] coNN N f%. t- o C4 en a, en To qIrTe7 ANT 0Nr N N MMU5 D +T T N � .21 f N t� m 40 qw t.- V- C]c GC7C c; CCC _ 0 gg g °08 go ° °� "�' °v °a �: . .• i f%� V t.- rm r- ••�� rl70 TeriT tryr r{yT cq qr M a r 0N 3 rcn ( w M �p eo G M P• W !►r m m v NeGN Vi 0 m r� ► r tN lr7Ql N • « • i OD 00 CO i 40 CD C4 - QN o0 ry�t ovv a�G vvco [ry1.1�N ooc LL 880 888 P°ti 8000 i4r- T o r :� -� «- e•a v T cn T r tw r «- ry Y- v C) Q% T m 112 ' 4%2° J J J ZZZ 0cn(1) WWW A— is n eo co o vp h Q T + Q w7 0 o u. • Q 06 W o v s m Q c o v W �3 b v � Uq H J m W J � m C G 2 IE LI ElI J -,.' oco a C _0 N Z n C 0 N � Z C o OL rso n E 2 ce W n x 0 LL Im C R °oov C-4 0 O r c`a c } o ©a` f3 ac v V a a a 4) h 7 C8 M f3 1 m L ioc�ac 0CL 47 to 9 ID N A m � ou U) _ W A Z 4 v _ �. 3 W U Y ry � C 4 �► A UA 0 to) �y mo m �n m cn�mz ZWCLii %.4% m J W G] to W � a m ca < C A CO 10 r_� N W c� .r V � �v a� L� A N r 1� Q C A oom E SL we L� Ea�c ca co v :D c YLL UG3 T r Co in 1%. co (� T r �►. 0 C4 .tNm V- v7 aN� 1r7 oov vvo 00 ci ao d vp Z �.42: �08 g$° $Op8 r°v`8g rsnr �IR7r �ju] �y�r d � A9 asnsa NNcn � O aav vao vaa vva a e N � y t O O a C4 r r r rVp) do in rrr 40 l'VNT MA0 W-NV- co coc acv ci 66 o r- 8810 898 8498 88+e�8 y " r) 0 T eq i+ r CM C4 r lie 07 � cn OT in ti N N N r) TOE e'7reri C07 iC V T e'7�7N +d °v c+z ti m N v M h 80 0) N a4 o m N m M m N r+t � 2 y ! Q H s a . « r N N ' lD Q7 O (D Ln M r �•- O h av� N N r vv N N C W) w r N T in O O tL ac ova oco occ v� -'7 00 0C) 000 0 GCO 01 A# l� "- r in ti r !► r- LO r i► A p. r r T� A [� r T d W `r'�nvi `0v tl° `° vg ni vcc o nim v cn't C4 U-) C4 Nhrv- 44 V ! 0 r C4 C4 `~ O N r r T itiI [ tii T N T^ D OI tN �� oo cove coo coo a d 8 °oa 8$8 888 A no, r trl O r- V-- V.- r- N r NY"iN n N 07LDA O!']!D Iw ONCE 7 cn cm CD N co N � OZ ti sl7 e+l O fn lD m m 07 N � } ! D r+ a a • • CO %n + toC7a v.-N rMT �. NOD p r O�v r r T qw N N N (n vv T N •- in v av ova voa c; C5 0,v tti 8S° 8498 88 888 t h T 7!7 T r r T T w cm T r eq rr � T►04 l V)07[4 VPft NmN �r--a �a 0NN .mac WWW� j —° ' a) =a 222 %.4% m J W G] to W � a m ca < C A CO 10 r_� N W c� .r V � �v a� L� A N r 1� Q C A oom E SL we L� Ea�c ca co v :D c YLL UG3 ova oe°hr' ' i �°tifNN o 1 vca co aci ONO va o a 1� o vU F. ° �} -g o Sao o a$ z(0 D �N :� r [•y w N V) 0 r r C� C7 N W :: W :kg L.? ...' qr cm N V CC4 r t C4 m O� •� �� In V) r 1A 40 r f► N u � to IM :�� aov vva o0o vaa e'"s a 9 cocoa ao oc G N C c; C; a v, LL r LU oY C, v o H 0_ ,-. (Nr rNp r*- v 0Nw Li c CJCL3 W LL =f CI7 Qv co to ,-.InN ,a, co co tiqr N to N N ��N cc ca °�°�i a IM = =i o W M � � � N o�°�� v 0 11 amv a°° �av + a s a + C) (D r opp�o pvp�eaprr pp � yQC N; CQ7 CC av O W 000 C Cppl v 6 Caa a � 0 0 C C° C C° d ime� IL IV � 0 rN•- rCyp rra vNW IM .. V } c°n'aQ � #, vu vC4M a oaa v° N v k a C � ��«pD� +e�t N r7 ' pG a 4M a D ' pOO a pp a p as G av Q +�-- i� Clams W oaa avo d 6 2 C0 C) 4800 o°v i D a� � .�c rd -w- rCV0 +era ocvW v u� LL r ..1 �.. CO 0) 4" C4 W) C4 M�CVAt qe N N r W) IN Q ' rN 'M rrN 0 .r� m QD % N to) n � + ■ s i► G �i+) h0 ,Q d oo C W Q dcD C G 0 O p O i N W Q A T Cv o _ � : v a CO L! ... C «-r r r■- G 2�8 ` IM N � C EL Zm 4) _-p wen �►y �3 rC4 rNp rfi° acNW W E 4�] MZV m � N = UJ a�iv x 3 W U S1 C w. �N > ci C •� !1! (4 A��N CN Q C �y� COp qw N C7:s w M 3 C eq C z , r r. Qa c0 di N T, W5 � c k v `D y co 2 m 2 v► 2 3► 3 g Zw°ti m3 o ai J� J� �pC aaa a� D Y� c m CL h L� 2WC.LL M .0.0 ZZ2 aaa ya)(1) Mxaao WWW s ,y. LUJ s + t) UU B rts • v (N N v `v C D V C _v o a s c� CIO ■ m c U 0° a LI] N v Y L r Cia U) CL 4c v 0 c � N 4 Z m p on W � •� Wmej C] C Co. �mch �0) ci0 i c cg�z � V� Oaz (n _�� a J■-- 2W0-ii %�T%6 H m co b F� mm Zy C N co W ° E � C C �a CL ■ C Cll E9# C, *Am V CM °v,Lr)$ oc` ryV5 �a v o o vov 400 av oov v vp 7� w $S° 88° °$ �i7r t�i17 rr- d � : ul ray„ Nt*C) rr40 ON UJ e) � � � CM ° L 4 C ka ei qp 0 40 40 1000 0040 40 4040 Cc 940 ' ' 4m co C; c; °40 C° $$$ $$° $$° °$ r► � r. r r �• A r� r r• r r� +r-Mr r•N° V- ONW !'�'�$ $V) o°vNm �vA = 40 vim vov coo r) vv v 9 cv $ L. 4 Nqt qT oto CO r °acove CAN T S a 8 :q O rLL voc vv on oov or g$$ 1%� v +� �cyr •-NV 0NW cr U- �• 1► �C c7 ;N �e3 +- 0 0 [V IM co r 0 [tit to to 0 cn CO — 4n r• v o cc v coo r` •-� v v r ° i�y t4 13 �. �j on NNR N N � 40m ' $�vp a" vov cc va 000 o .- 8 b Q g$° 8 8° 08 _ v r V- w r C7 ■ i.� •-tY+� 0 ENO 40c4 W cr U. w cn v �q � $n n %. •r 0 en 40 CO W N V C* ft qV - �- rt • . 4 qw o oW 0010 co 00 000 a $$$ $$° $$° 0$0 y 1►+Sh !►s �i'� r� A r- ['sir + + c7 r r L•i As rC4 rCM r►r0 QC4 uj C I= mP%l N�7m �cn LCNv V) • cn f r Rt 2 c% c 2 p 2 40 d� cm �IEa �Aa -iF fl.-a �.0na a ,0 a aa'a as0a o D ZZZ r1?i/ o WWW ! � .: %�T%6 H m co b F� mm Zy C N co W ° E � C C �a CL ■ C Cll E9# C, *Am V N NsD Nt. U} CN_ C[0 C4 (p"]NpO pp !7 b Q r m � Mp [Y CGO 44 oGO - cG0 er) c0 ' aQ V3 qr- .• g0 C> 00 °o�0 2 r r 40 T T T r f � .0 d . w l 10 I C4 LLI 4 c W _ Ix LL �. r A C1 1i3 M U) m A O7 v0o 000 vvo e►r .g p } cV in 0 fO0 Oe'"i0 v w in r-NM NON Vi ne m OOp •- fn r� ■ ae � !ri %n tnV9 Q7 G 0 0 000 ODC 000 er?r cv Q �1W o v fW v� ESE 888 888 880 - -r-y ■ !V !V W LU r tV r r T r r N 0 U au. Co —80 to to 47 !•7 iC7 as N m � C. P. 0) c I r cm W) qr m r 0 W �1 ~ 1.- -; 1 o�g ovv ovv ev vv CD IV N C4 LD oc' °v 0 0 to C14VN to) N (A °000 C) M e� qr Z¢°v 06 6 ccc oov cc a v 00C) 000 voo aoo a� vav ovv V- ICL a} Lai 13 Q] 75 a. Nt'V W rtyr .-r+r rCV 0 a) = � mt CDm tl]0�7G0] �� to fl 7 ' ,- y i 0ap co NCO voa M0N Cm �v � 4 Chi r to -W M0 CO `�D 0nm ■ N c Ovo t� ` A a Q cp to in gV70 —(n C4 00c7 rr 0 P, U pr� occ taco cvv ata o d r, 0 o o C) (DD 0 8 88 00 1� 000 cn T p^J ^°0 0 r r r r V- (� qr ri NcVW im r'N rrr rNO �. SU &L ++iiiA le co CO r inv)to rt- O7 V4 r4 Or -� w► o °mom c0�e8r0v o °r N M n n ry rQ ti � n QE o c�aQD vvo c$N i°d C !�[v w W w Q 0 0 C O C rcnN 0 0 0 O00 OO O rr t7 0 p }�(� d O ' O m W Z ID m =� N n LL 0 0 01 0 0 0� 00 � 0 0 0 �p U o � Q I W r ,C rG � cc Q d� a c a, a M �U v n cv tO Z. . .. tV tV Uj W C4 0 in E to in W W �ypC gcom aDo — Q' LL cw d (� ci ig � 4N .r- T_ OD N in m qt r 07 � ) A , C PL �2 Cip r�� lr)C*4Cv'i NNM 9 V 3° 'co E � 0 qu n mz : o T c .� vas m _ +�� w �„ C C C � 0�`° i�ia 3 X20, �H� �2� X20, owe— O t°;ny. 2� V- Vi r7'v`ai �H� �H� � �c U. 2W0 -4i& zzz wok? WWW 16 ~�, C4 C4 § 88 O T C _0 0 boa ilk Cl Co 0 U 0 Z v g 7 m m t 4 co a r T P m m N W 0 4 Z O xCm 3 W V O IL cc cc W� 9 2 p m C% ao z o Z; -� z my 300 ZWaUL H m W F Co 2 A 0 O LU 0 C C C MEN i8 I N Co C3 � Z''s 40 r 0Eea40 0 �'A Xv cU. ML R • 08 • T a, R �•o R NVer7 R ma) R o C7 0 C iNrl, C5 c c p Q Ci ° a N N CS a` 40 o a W G0C " C4 MU) .-Co rrr TNO LL ' •++• �� T A � - 2 � !7 iV C] N qr r r r !r! r t+1 LD 40 00 0 C Q 4000 0040 40 � ppp 01 e. C n m p e r Q�QS sC �q 000 NN eA o U. Cpi6 y r •. 000p00 O C vcvc d�� poov C 7 0� O O p N e4 W r CV T r T r T CM 0 W �.... N � ,mcc C- to to eN r _ H� NCD m0 Cn Co W. O r- N 0Co0 40040 0) 0 0 Q � � r 7 r 4 Na�0 m�� Co CoIV >42 v+n0 T-V 800 V-' C4 to o W. U. 46 640 <66 v 066 v° a $g9 g88 888 n8° � �� f A LW ■ N C4 W NV- r q- � r N O J LL CmV8 G l�lN *- r CJ u](pfl 0 N qw %nNgw � t'7 w- a� T e`]0N T TTY m ra v u 0 °cr �°� v r- v❑o �o� N -� R � R R • rN�f.- C40)�i A 1 C] Ci Co T� r �Npf�►m C 0 0 CM 0� Y. G C7 0 C O O C] C+ C3 66 O r IL N [�i W T CV r r �- •�- (V Q Cm vad W) o vcCD ° •r �pcCnto a T T io -- to C) 40 m0C e)N� v i Cq to (4 .- [V r eV 0.0 v r- y at a ev e• �• r. 0) QD e• CD T" � S v v r 0 40 0 V- " CP Co Ul 0046 cod 66 (S ca C; C; 888 r T 8S° T U .. N (4 W T C4 O 40, 40 �► 0 r to m r- e• N v r a �2° 02° vz�'�as ra na ZZZ .0.0a [nV]u3 ao�a W W W ana o vp H m W F Co 2 A 0 O LU 0 C C C MEN i8 I N Co C3 � Z''s 40 r 0Eea40 0 �'A Xv cU. ML R • 08 C v - N �[7 NN 4rm� i_7 m_ Q} LO N 00C4 +- 0 0CM +w p C-4 C-4 �. .= 4 a�T oC; co C; O CV ov Q "D c � �. q O qp- W v °a v gv a a �i y {+ �° y}a_ qr %W 04 ('70 CMMr rkv)T V- V)a C zi w c c .� :: � _� • .42 ... aa @ Rai MI) [ri m m a r- p N l0) C14 '1C m m COG r CM 0010 000 ovo coo • �� a N0 � oel- w C!vco V Tr + WMN r►qlr47 � r[.r qr P- qqet i Q � to r NN oRW T CTn4 omo o rLL 0W .► oc C; C; cco aoo c c; >- c �C? Rn� �r4ir try E � � C 4vei0 Cm rCM rNT V YJ De d ? rD N 470 r m co CnCG0) 0NCb m 0 qC0 QI 3 SG r 0 N CY - COQ{ r d Q V3 0 boo vv� T�r• vNo > rLn 0) t- CSD V r c Nm0 C a 40 !V S] r N 0�0 orty Cm O 0 LL H N (�; 0C voo C00 C0 V 4 r 'r= S °v° 8$8 ��$ S °a0 N p u' 4t► r►qr r. f.AP- d Uf > F, A' Ncn10 04 en Cyr U,c� r C'7 1D RCS Qi !'7 vas N v N CS r CS CO° p 4M w�� x 3 = z: l T- N m Q Q CQ �, CD CD N C7 v Cri @9 !V 47 W) p p N � IE r r • • �s� i evm i �nilw i vvv i n t r N C! 9R rNre O CR 00 vvv voo 000 v .- _ °°° v v 8800 8$8 V V ! � 1 Z. +a as M 47 r• v 0 47 P%- CA fl- m v N ;; W CD V T r C%l •� r T Q T � t v°o� V- C4 in °c�� D r N �� t m a 4 O • ►-R�i RAORD qr r.� �J['7i` N p0 acs p n C A JAM W T C4 00 0(n0 °-1-N 0(40 D o+W UJ vvc ova 060 v o ?� ZLL ❑ LL ppv v vvo G� v S 0 � G v v "" $ +C� !�? 1Ci rG� tr3 Rii t r r O r r 5 U3 t CG = Z U a a w - ac°' V) � <n L�U N� v NC•7 r rNr rC4 al E N W W Q m i7 ID' CO is �} �.� NCO 0 C O N ►+m0 F3V N Ancnf7 r m T�co r � Qt :' N ._ 407NV r 0) ,- r V) cn � ;o irs c CO.y .. Cc Cc ro cc coo 0 m O c m c_o 0 �mv� "' 2 �= % 2or S °' p �'�'_.y ,rte J� .a ZWa.L� ZZ2 NN3tto WWW � � L) _j • i UU ca %4Wg3 C4 cm I 88 9" 0 V_ C �c C _o _a i �c C 3 0 o* t] m C a � ma� � N C 3 V Lr. L Z � V V = FU x C � CL c.i T L V � ri C � z y� 7 to N v� W Z 0 W G6 N Z.. a a N ar c� qu °c v g4b � 40 m� o Q Z w cn a 3 ZWO,.ti S -V%y C 4 m W psi exi C m Vm a3 v v. Uc C 0 CL F N «a 0 c� La b t n c � m 0.0 h C .� T � m a Ya LL c� . UU ~ DC"7p rNN :: r cc csoa coo 0 o co op 880 8+�88 888 88° 4C7 1�'} Rt7 r r In r r 1C) NMr V.- V) r T er7v 04�1i r0►t4 -' r r Nor T C*!rf r 417 0 040 co ° 40 40 0 0 v v 1.4 in c , . m °h a000 °�° (M ° �` ro 41 7 v, �v, rc�icy •-o v aW 0 40 v co v odd doo o c S8° 88 8 88 8 888 4CJ I*- r A r r N C7 0 CV CO) r r N T r N r ss r••., 4,40%7 ava� 1n1n� rte. r N 0 r N r in 4400 00%0 V14 V- 0(n0 r r 4N y 10 S ~ 4ir0 MmN 0CVr` �1� r C N 9,-o >4. vv V) 0 cov r 404 cvo vacs 0 a O Q a _W 880 gob 888 888 W ;s W— MTV_ TAW" CL a N el C7 N !r7 r r CV r r N r IM (n 0 0 m r V (r7 OD B7 0 4n 0 4n N @ r- QD = Q z r r N to r N O4 qr V CD is c o t a} r- v v v N N N r• o co 0 �► �s � a UO �Q N T_ M 417 r Co 117 M V Co po0 ANN � Na C°G Ccics D16 C D 0 O 88° 888 80° °0 88 0 0 -to r r A �► r• f- r- N M 0 N0 rC4 rNr .. r N V_ N go 0 !�► � T r � lr7P7m qlr N r'M0 C14 r r %0 6N (D r C�1 0Nv C7 K qM 72 r T $ 0 Q Q1 lC4 ' r4. [V 11l f► tD m_ eV fit*? Cr40 C" 04 oc 6v6 rp Q rte_ 4000 cao d o 888 8188 C4 V) 0 N C7 w'" r CM T (4- rV)0 �coN rF*- W N* _j a _j ��aa �0 aaa ZZZ r» .a to i .0saa WWW VJ S -V%y C 4 m W psi exi C m Vm a3 v v. Uc C 0 CL F N «a 0 c� La b t n c � m 0.0 h C .� T � m a Ya LL c� . UU 888 0 a w c � �y o�aa t U v Q] D U Y. 9 ;r _o N L � t a ..CD L m x�� m C co CL tr] C m F Z m ea Liu W < Z i m W^ z c� J Q N w Om 0 Cc eD W ` Wf vUe) Cf eq Npacic� m� dOe�- n, m Z vvv ��a -A zWaE V" R is m W CD N a e� O¢ �- z v �a Q � m N t n 0 Cq ` a4) at m� Cc: F b E R CA C L� C.0-0 V) p W -2 � Co M z 44 o = CO YLL�ca t a c+�ara o � a 60) d 004 -- vv n vv ' coo,o o0o � vo v - ; r 0 V) yr � A - �-r►rG 000 Na•- vov $ �r v C30 QD n+ v e• coo N =' vvo ovo vov coo e? a • :D a a qe �j Cb cv Ga c; C; oc c;a • ��a v�o gvr� vvo Y? In r r 40 p, ... v el Ohm ;; rve%V coo Cb CD�o a40� vvo v �i tq DoT 00 v • c ' 0 r4 O e"7 �... �I vo 00 000 0o v ca � . •R r �'r 1[3 T r A W t? Ono v o o v o 0 00r von vvo 0 i w to O v CO 0 o C T 000 N G! ip • a oov va oo o _. ooca 0 00 �vog ovv •- rrr 0 v er) o r- C) 000 " OC4 � OCN OGC .. v m as v tI Mao C -[V coo GCO 0 Da >; o na w. 0C4 4 g vc� oa a c; C; vv v v LL ava $v? vvv erro orrC ta- CO v c ^v o8- vocm voo •ar S2 v2 S m2 HOC JAL' JF� JF� sra� ;�. N zzz in U) o www 2� V" R is m W CD N a e� O¢ �- z v �a Q � m N t n 0 Cq ` a4) at m� Cc: F b E R CA C L� C.0-0 V) p W -2 � Co M z 44 o = CO YLL�ca Q (14 C14 0 0 T [] c v a ID f to cS o� 0 N 0 a V oa$ o ne L f _o v z L7 eri r C a N � a qw � cr.V IS Z a 0 i� m W 40 gs '2 't W� 0U12 in lzy 4p > C L7 -c (no egg Oa j m,co J�amz H v z v VS 3' ii .J� -.r'.. 2Wau. S-Iv V7 l C►f z p 7 � U � a CL 3 w N Z g COD w 0 c� U� 0 � � L w 3 Y �i 3 c C O ' O D ' O C CP a go O o Svv v$o $ °$ 4000 V, � I- chi r C 0 4N 0 o v o t s� " 0 coo T ovv o� ;�1 04040 coo 0,00 04040 Q pp a m . r...r � O• gg M , N 09 oa vo ovo c; c; a o 880 080 $ a$ coo U. T T rt ++A 0sys40 +- a•- 0040 UA ° °fof C4 0 c°�i ovo o� c T ,roa CIO co Nva� ova �j ; s a i 5� 8' §N v° 0 0 00 a riQ 0 ov avv 6 c v $$o v$a $0$ 000 v w n t3� � ■r� +-�v vr�v �v•- 4000 �... aD4m0 0 0 Nom avv qw F 40 avv go moo v�v C) C) 000 v 7 � p to r S2 — i ■ f ■ f a 0 $ 17 0 N a 0 0 0 a n d vo (6 ci ovv ac a d $$0 0$40 $0$ 4000 f3 P� r r U3 r Y7 P- P. � r w T-e�o oc�a Tom ovv ONO Cc 0 0400 �a� F ac► 0110 0 C3 o c40r- coo y a •Q N v 25 00 oc 4000 a c a 8480 0$0 $o$ Coo T040 0V)0 •-0r 000 c 000 acv 4000 v NOCO T Q- 2 0 ce 4= 2° v 2° r CD � o J � FE .�'a oZ a s m ,v a M.0 .0.0.0 O VJ 2ZZ �V}[J7 WW W -3: L S-Iv V7 l C►f z p 7 � U � a CL 3 w N Z g COD w 0 c� U� 0 � � L w 3 Y �i 3 c m ro 0 U AD Q N C is �V N N v 0 orpw cY G V ADM qr 79 T C �a gN � v n CO a Wea iv U z p W a) W ¢ to N ix 7 elWb p 'o ❑ °v � lb ¢3:mz Z U .- to 3 e ai 71 OD ne o N z 0 C 8 cm es �N t 0 c � r o�aC> �D�0 c m e d C 0.0 0 CD is 0 N � ® = x Y;i pM . V L� •� av m OD v v v .ws 000 46 c vv Nor° cc • v sa C; :� gv$ 0040 vr�v �c�o :or C40 r 000 v N o .- ne v T0;o coo Cos e0 a0c 000 4000 000 p r� v co v . o �n "i i 250 vo c o vc �5c*a ca ni,v° v �� v vc o gv� 000 40 CD c?$o 4L �' =+ .�f for 4000 activ reVv W y�,y� .IL enoc�i r vvv O�� 0) qw 0 qr- ..L.0 •� T Im V �pN CD avo °"0 �ccn ID r (�f ere 3� ID ; 0 0 ° ° C C) m m� 40 P- 000 00, C V) tarp o qQ ccv ov cv oc vo vvog ovo v 0 gocv 0 u n r r r W ovo vc�eo rNo er}cc4 vva 00 (14 c �m CD �} 0 40 El vvv vvo vinv vma ji aN 80 rnm s°n in wI vov 00 c 0m vc0 00 16 vv a o 1008 vvv 0 0 8000 � T :r rar avo anew rCM L 0C)C4 vov 0InN �ni° io 40 0 0 v 010 40 OD QD N oo n y co o r? eo° ov 400 vv v . UL Avg vvv 0gv coo � _�J1111 r- r0•r- coo ocry ri4 0 K Ci eV V)o(4 0 40 0 000 cytn0 cm _. _. �. �o 3 rl J jp-0: Q '. .a a j zzz a.0 ecn M .o c wuw .0.0.0 o s..w ql v% OD ne o N z 0 C 8 cm es �N t 0 c � r o�aC> �D�0 c m e d C 0.0 0 CD is 0 N � ® = x Y;i pM . V L� N o Q 88 ,N t "Z'4 0 T a T C O, 0 ova F. 71� G U m � a L en m1 L ca r- ot� Q,i C a a. Q W* z � N RA1 _ pp 1i! Z o c t9 0 W CL (14 9) .. 4) CO M Z Q CO V) M 4uva ° g� 'co �mz CT Hpg �U] z4n vs3a'a ,,.� •- z w a ci 94 a& rx% 0 i` Q r c i� C a [f7 rP w N$ N D a a C c o L .c to Q C $z 8z' c IU6 OP) co N vov O cc aqr C6 c; O e av ■ O b' a am 04a paa CNa rNO vav o v V) � a � a Q o 0 O o coo v o v • C4 coo vv vv vo v v gob vvo v v 880 L4 ,N r r r M Tpr 000 OC40 rNv 1ag� vav v9V- 0Co G ' N r" T T Tod ovo o�aa �c�v r N fn rt =p a e S 253 f 25c vo as vv o Q v ncvg� vov vgo goo coo vlVV rNv �. goo vao 0 r r N +� L�7 r o� voa oov oma vao • o 'g' a a g� a � coo vv vo co oa �o� vvo vvo goo P T rn •-v•�- coo vn40 rN god coo v�oa mNa a t- *-mv V3 a so 00 vac ov av vv a 4c v 808 coo 080 880 -v•- ova ONO *-N0 C e�c CRvp 000 or-co F.- v r r 3. 2 ar �� 0 2 v os °° COMO) WWW a �p zzz 3: 94 a& rx% 0 i` Q r c i� C a [f7 rP w N$ N D a a C c o L .c to Q C $z 8z' c IU6 4n o a oZ U �cm a� to W) as N L my 'O v to Z CID QL} : _ 2 ..- C C.) C 2 0 .o 1 C LL C eC CL UV p �N r a • * p� r In 0N c co vv vvo co v oa v T v�G OoC p pNSG �!V O r t.. :"% g- : vvv vov CCm ♦-C4 cc C C. 0 ;tR =C coC vOG Or �e'f w@NNO boCL voo ova vvv vac Ma x;42 vv ov ci cc v a j v AL 0.= �i T e en X55 F 0-0 Coo O N E r N 0 _ m0T vvv own come CD d cn Im _ - a w C }` 7 �a vvv coo owo cm orlO Y ID a 7 C �Q°o ■ gvcv ■ ■ °o, �Q -12 ov o0 00o vo o c coo 000 00000 900 �j ? u � c� cat w V) m N cr7 IL *qqM 0�C oov Givt T-Cm cn v 000 O CIO u7 CD Uj 0 tea¢} CD v vvv vvv 04nv vcov 0 -6 ' IN >! .2 gch bnv $ + x v, v vo v vv c`�iC]v voo oa Q c a 2 r 3 a o v vvv 0800 `D 80 m v 40.:: oTv avv ocyr -: mov oov OV)%n co1%-v 'S 1/ v e� V rev•- ova vmo W-mov n N s [h U gv 025 arc 43 n W +o Q �,:" ov C; C; vav co 4i a� m v o coo CH vv W � C cc (V V111 w ? 008 �0V N N v r v` r L c} mm� ova D c G J v U_ m c m Via$ c N e IS 3 en t cm as L 5 L� r � � C �aa i r z b C N Cb W r ry V7 y.c m 43 cn W Q < UJ� CM- av t9 a = 4A c� ci Z�.► CJ7� o ii 2WaLL. S- %o �o vZ a _E � c o CL i N en 4 N 'C Ufa S h ~ c go 0.0 cs V) Vol 0?�.a Y 1i C bs CEO Ceti vv vv voo ov v vm 0 o ovv 08Q Q00 V- r 0 T v ova o N N a go C4 vvo 0 W0 ar r vQ oav vvo ovv ovv a• ••�� • • s . e ■ Q5� %-v �C �� y vv vo C vva veNe, vo a v F �N0 cvT 0400 a C4 env !r � 000 vvv otna vtno 7 , g ry .. .4 a . r • D ca ■ g G q- N r� $o �''' c �SC►f0 Cq %M (5 40 0 v v a 40 0 v v vCp�v 0400 oav i! �G cp 8 p000 400 N CL �- V) r 4 r vov 000 0N•-- rNv S c ON vvv o�N 0 0 =ate cm co r mc� vvo (D400 vcnv ONO v m E y spp .Q g ga a • N• .r y ; C v O, ai o 00 v v v vv 0 v 0 40 o�v oov o$� �gv v- Cry r r V) Q.. A o o Ova Q N r r N 0 LU 0400 vvn�a�v wv� N o r v v o v N en v ft."m 7 r is }--o V) 0 oqt V- vv va vvo va c; 'd 40 a ovv v$�S i io a H 0 -0 coo a +- rN0 c 3 c C*4 ovv a N o ry Mho v r � e a 2p Fa ary r ° � -j �a aMa .4000 ZZZ co co Cl) aaa WW W VJ S- %o �o vZ a _E � c o CL i N en 4 N 'C Ufa S h ~ c go 0.0 cs V) Vol 0?�.a Y 1i tn Oa T Z c Z� �IE � c 8 C m �i m an cm n � is 2 'Cep o L W R c 'C o `0 :E L� V n 'n a r x Sv a U. c 0. vvv r+i o h � � ;4 :NO ao as ' ° 0 000 as sva C7 r - ' :•.:.::� ov� oov oov $oo Q r40 000 ONO •-CV 0 cc c � } .. ovary ova o�,o V--fm0 cc m +- T " av T a coo 000 coo 000 m v age ' o go g N ' IP- a 'ap :. ooa C5 C; v ad T it] co Y7 d JN v 808 coo vnao 8$0 :: :_ •- o r o o v v car v T Cm o � '.. to 0M ovv °vio mN0 .� Or MO f- a o in0C4 coo 011�- goo � � o co T d� Ua°° d m Cd voc°a'v N 1 vvv o0 ov av v �a a v d , 000 v°o o$v r go m a cm ui H� TO vvv ONO s-N vim •fl co a) x S �j vov vov o0c) vcD° 7 .4 W 40 + r� v o C° vvv ov r� oQ 40 vv C) •r Q o 0 :V 80(s vov vgo $v e & r 0 T 000 O N V T N 0 To•- 0 0 o 0CR4m u 40 49D A0 4r- qqr -� � f o� 9 ? :o r-°r 000 04--40 corn° m o � f r .� f W _ '� Q ovv oa C; v© a W lb C; o v Z o := .::.:•: ovo or�o t7 0 3 U. °0vr� �gv � a r w f chi N S v > en Z W ft &U :2 < cn vo..' =+ Z C� m ctr]sy c ovv o00 0t-- vsarso qT co co a ter. $' �► c i�3t i 10 �m�2�02� �2a �2oa 3 ?+n^ to m J J H J r a J aa Q �Q AL7 d Li 1 aaa Z Z Z �.osa V7 d] V7 UJ W W .0 o �.} J tn Oa T Z c Z� �IE � c 8 C m �i m an cm n � is 2 'Cep o L W R c 'C o `0 :E L� V n 'n a r x Sv a U. c 0. 04 " § 000 v r 0 0 r c U � m oar .-% m v 4) n Q 4 Vl c mr� � X 7 G � � 'C m 40 8 N .p. cb UJ Z 0 z ■ �. �' W gyp+ t3 0• N d! �" � eef c�D ca M W Q N I r � W o 0 t� Sol co CM z Vl �Q Z��o J+►`. ZW (L L4 ~ %ox.� h 0 r Z c ?3 b Q C a �v CL a� o v U � $ 4 ed EL Lo f • + V a o r a • 8 � o f � 0. Coo va co ' cv b. ov > v v w V r O w a C o a N o N o �- ooch vvo Q°c°r+s U) C4 N t► O ovv voo coo ova ?V b 0 N N O 0 p vvo 00 oc co o v $vg voo vgv 880 ` v r0 coo QNV 'va IL ©vim ovo p `° Nv cry r+i i z• �0 voa 0(4ul) C4 ^o a j a 4 �vLn ;� CO.- O pr7 0 a (5 va vv vv cc o v 8080 vvo 0000 880 u r� e• � r. CL IL W f3 w •-o ovo 0(40 •-N0 # mao) rl-W voa a� r, v r !'] oov Coo Oho o�o ae" 7 O �a 0 e;)°oo o§ 88 �� oov 0 co M ca© c; C5 6 C C5 C5 ad 808 000 080 880 V- .- A r ■ i.� W. v w co C O 0 N 0 N 0 Z Q o n vao amV c�^ v q- N N } 4� +AAr) Cop Orom CIO } o U9Q 0 co 14 QD our 89 aov oo vc vo d" 0 r r r ■ Z AS' r a r 0400 o N o E N O •' C 202 vao o�CM "100 w r � o- • t ° �0 ZZZ [!iU][I] WWW R �J ~ %ox.� h 0 r Z c ?3 b Q C a �v CL a� o v U � $ 4 ed EL Lo f • + V �o I IN WpV- C; _ CJ c+ trt Q � O fp17 r C � > vo z _�0 t C OD E SL !C z '4) cm m W m ca v a Yei c=' S 0 N N co o�g r► a 0C4 o m o � a o o ao o - v° vv ovv ca v va v r °o °v° °$° $o$ vaa d Qt ��v vroo nor oov o .r r•r�o vvay Soo vvv a 000 0 O O O O 0 000 y••g 0N,e o a vo v v 42 oao vo °o °o° v$CD, $a$ °vv V !+ r r 1r vmo •-v•- 000 L ��o cri °.rN $vo ovv 3� N v W) (7)v v�qr 4n vOv IE W 'I Q on n o ¢g � o o 0 e°a N .:Cc ov o° vvo vv v v d lu A31 d W! qp. MC) 0(n0 vr vvv ` ..a i L: cvaoo UI)w 0 U11in 0m Mo(V oaa m ca x 9 N rn �- CD �• cr�aa � .o 45 CD s cy o °o, o s o C oc v v o0 o v° Q da av$o v$v $v$ oov t LCi Iii r r- o � �� c •-env vr�v rv,.. vvv Nov o?•tn covey ov0 is qlrcmv vvv vvO avv N ti?Q Q Nco O N o O M UJ o G 0 G O 0 a b Q 000 0 C o0 ?� -- LL pO a v a °vv JU 4D E - an an 2 I F dN a �t t] i9 Li co is �► �^ to 0 O co C -0- O O o x UA 7z N t WO CID� �Cy m v �v v� c�oey oov cc 0 CD z U 043 c 2 2 �� 2 �, a z�^ N '� Ix �� 0 Lb a- .0.0.0 ZZZ ra.a Cr3fJ w ,aa�a WW W %. %I �o I IN WpV- C; _ CJ c+ trt Q � O fp17 r C � > vo z _�0 t C OD E SL !C z '4) cm m W m ca v a Yei c=' S 0 co 8CY 08 �V C4 CV a _r O e Li 012 CE as m a Uao m ti C7 m =iv ivmc c�a¢ n a IN C 40; LU W a Z o JU CL W D !!1 o� � Ni j �' -' [NV cc 090 - 469 ct U v$ �w) v v � 40 c Z ��am .J .�.. 2 W 0 ti % .%A 9 ai IE L A r v is M U ❑ a C a w C4 3g c D CC Z C L aw� Stat r, w =� X a !U.t�r� c0 ACC 0 ov e7 co ccd a cri ' v v r, 04c o O o V 1A 1D w Z ■ �(n0 0 M 0 ovo �vco oov Q.: vvo oov 0 40 0 coo o O ' 400 40c cvv a. vv 0 ggv 080 8043 aoO •- c� a a e� v T O •- Q C Co) �� O o 'R 0C� vGQ l'! r *� r M (14 mod ovv AID z t r Wi Q ell :Ij a-Cc 0 cc v 000 Q G v v av�a o$v gv$ vvo l n r v. u. r; T-cgv 0M0 *-ate ovv - W J ;0 0CDey ;nor 000 2 a 0m0 vco 0 vvv ovv ■ . cc 0 00 vco vo 8 o 080 808 vvv _ cs %n f& w fc■7v ve7v rar vOv m e• v CO v en c4 M cm cn v a cm 0 0 0 p0 F- Q cl �v v�� nEOV ovv O r [AI o D r! �42 oc vc aov vv o 0 8480 40$o 8v8 coo on Z ;U rM0 0(n0 Or Oov OR" molw CCQ . v cm 40 2 co a � r 3 -j 9E M.0 m �c a .o m m m a 7i� VJ Z Z Z cn WU) WWW % .%A 9 ai IE L A r v is M U ❑ a C a w C4 3g c D CC Z C L aw� Stat r, w =� X a !U.t�r� l cm V W mZ 2 m W U ILc4 N W � b� a a to L r= aka 0 z w NNco �°V [°V N a 0 r- C } U = ooa` i C N O O A U d c a� 4a c v� a � L C x cn a 3 C .-. N V Q] C � � a m o G 7. U � v a Q3 M cn03�v CID yc cl- ❑ ��- rli��72 . -;; (r)CO � cn�vii ,ZWIL 1i Is. %% m oz co U � a �CD a� r, N C Z O N � L C C13 ci m v a � L Twit E �z m� d H C7 W 0 Q w Y +i a i UU }� CO ao v T qw N to Q7 fl to i vov voo vv acv o oa aao000 C) 00o v as va a v° N r NCV cmV)C NNr •,. T ! m � T r T QD dD qr fb q RQ co CQ C4 co _ o a o 000 v v o o v a S� O °, W) vNo v N °D m ch +•coca m 1 !► 0C:)r , C) in .'' vov coo 4D n°c e3 v 8S8 aa° 8a8 IX r8 �°°8 cm NNr cyV)0 NNr W aI -• �' r eo 0?C7� T r- (D Nti0 m r wm _ times 000 C O O o QD ° C� O O I i H .� N d � d .+ f►. to W [V 1n @ a 47 y r to N LO a +et r V- in a) p t� 01 La O e7 1A e+7 CDeg0 ar v�o o lira ��vo- vOC ovo oc cc❑ o a cs 1 a °v o° aa°va ag° a °o °a a EL �r�i r�� e�� c�r`t w• F Mi �i lVNr NNr N m 0 MNr' �E r r (p M- r r tD Co Ln Rw QMM PI- LO 1% cvv 9 ' Ntom co o 110 vov oov vino ono - a P%- tD m 9 � @ r LD N N • Co r a @ e0 O7 i• ea to p. S !V v- 0NOo or aro o cn ovc coo co oco cva _ °o °o °o as °v °oa° °o0Q°a a (W) V- F- �! NNr NNr Ne90 NCM ' Cb 0) cry 0 90 N ['�i to V) V) N t• cD r N QD r 7; a �o mc�° N N V .Q MN(N V)1•i. ° octiv en P- � cr)N� p ey ova a C) o avc o6ci o0 oov v vQ LL LL .� aaa 0 y 17w !r] e�en ['7� C4 C4 C-4 (4 cmv)o C4tm v �r-a �vc°n �t`t" qw va�v ti j �- N N r• +n � N V) .- e c . Q z2� w ��° w o - .1HpC c�a �� .:: •�� an,a 222 .aaa di co U) a�� WW W o > VJ Is. %% m oz co U � a �CD a� r, N C Z O N � L C C13 ci m v a � L Twit E �z m� d H C7 W 0 Q w Y +i a i UU 888 v r 0 r C nCS a 4D h C v 3 S U a a c o � Qag C7 N I C rt m 3 U t sl] m � co 0. m r Z _ N N co z� 3 � W � � d � m� L W � 4O N K m.- 00 nO oaC 3 CO X3 z � co p CA Z CO N ? O 0 ZWG tL co �o a� a a cv 0.0 A 4 b �C mcE m C �'ac w� LL V a N to te) Cr! .- a CD • M Ca �. 1► voo vda vo 6cici 4 vp 888 888 880 888 r T Ird r 4000 !C►N rtCm+'1O SON T 4v N fD N .^^ Cy CD It .� coo oov coo cvv X V i► NCV C-�� el IV*- ' Cram ' Ca -qp 0r0 ! NCNV_ 0 goo vvo aov vv ocv vv 888 888 8810 888 �A AAA Ao AAA NCV •- Chi C4 04 C70 Nt4- .� 1C► m 0 r!i► P► l UC] (4 qw 0) � 0 N CVCqqr Q7 TNT r oov coo ocm oA v a� 0 s `gvCYC vqa 0 -0 0 -4 U > lk- O A D C G C7 C o 066 0 ci 7 888 888 8810 888 CL cXiA pq"-, CrlA AWG rAA� 4 # NNr NNE NV)0 CVN+- CO Ph- D 0 C LO C'7 1%- N U) l► 0 C7 qw r ill m N 0 cr) N j� 7 = Q qw !► C4 rC r Nm+t 4W a cc coo o N O v cc o cQ � C4 Cq r rr $$ to 8 ' O ti go 0 q aTQ vav aC%d 0 NC44 0 pt Q vov vo coo 0 40 888 8008 880 888 w t� NNT NN•- e4 to) 0 C4 (4 ' cc r .- !•mO r r r► co 40 0) 1►NYf N m r A p 8 +�f O® �- CC •- WA W) N C$N N � F" y •V)- N!r- +-8 � • � -Cpl! } v i a) c cm Wn o � v � ore°�r, v�v 9•- ova ov on�n� oov o v La a 888 888 888 V r r x88_10 R'] 4-0 A ~ .' 04 r NNE NC'9O C4 - .:' of f� i O Cb N V. m & 0 - F:. q� 4 4 f rco Aa7 'ry .. . 0 2a F �2= H _3 a 2�, a. o. y GC OC H — p� 2ZZ Zoo ig GOWW .0.0.0 � �. U-i co �o a� a a cv 0.0 A 4 b �C mcE m C �'ac w� LL V 'o v, z v C � C IU) n co cm v z� ,.. N r} fl C o EL 42 In E l � � c n = a = x ❑ C: n �m� LL FL +c� 0 C C14 N co OGO §00 Cv CD VCK)— a '�o QNN oQo G cc OHO ova 0CY0 o vac va 25 °S° 8800` S$� r Qr Ryr NNr ....!V IV _ r.N ova po0 000 000 i N � , + r • O a a1 �.: o O tea• vcv0 Q �a ooa v° ooa vca v. v r... . V f17 C :M •�' O t r O f 0 rN NN r n W or IL sN7r0 N�f r OD V AN >r '_ l Cb ro 01 °a vvc a°v omv v —a m l 'n N a: c N ` ¢o y o vvv v vv v vo 0a, cy0 v e Q o N F a a v LU 008 000 coo CD � o ��r- a fg f0 ti's 0 Oro �Nr NN- v o 0 v 0 Q O O U) 0 V 0 C) 45 G� « a rr� * • + a v`0 X50 v°•W-o cc►o o Q ava cv ooa cov v. o °g °e^ 88 000 0 :�l " r• r r r8► r Ir- r... .0 Fpwr 0 0 r'Nr NCy+r (� r M r- W *" 0) N Co qqf � Co N Lo 5 +v c Now An0•- vmN (n C4 ;n ID b OS IAA ill} a • r • • C cc a U 0 0 opv v ca +- v o00 0 6cv a C4 t; C; Z p Z. ? °$$ ° ° 888 0 W r w r r r r 080 r V Q Nt 8 2 d^ gC ^ C lu Orr 0T-0 w[Yr (4 CM W to v L�cvI � as a`Qi c C7 v) N c o v :p ;_ OD r � m lb t%% mZ 3 o� .. •• to v �= 2� 2.c crs� vT Jw� zwa�,i zzz �a� aocncna www ts� %— %,r\ 'o v, z v C � C IU) n co cm v z� ,.. N r} fl C o EL 42 In E l � � c n = a = x ❑ C: n �m� LL FL +c� 0 C 403 UA" z� i� W � �+ N W 1% cc, 06q amp J m h 0V;8 2 CO °00"88 9N c� 0 T 0 T G O G c 0 G 0 C 7 a L C � N c m N C Q 3 s6 c 2 t� mr � V ='�V Za cy 0� a Z.: L; di IL i %Mo. %% °0 go o? 'G U� S C _a W C � N N D C � C �r� fA c C c► c cc c a C C W Y LL .: p [�N� vv,r pp a a CV)0 (r10 a[3+�to - fl °vo c; c; ooc vN0 vac v o vt r T i QrT 40-0 •^NT NNi� f" ' 43 ao c) 0 m Q 1�7 f� N v N T O 3 O°° 000 c o o 000 i o w Cb go a •g �p p . n�c� OGr a ° N O°C 0a 000 CCi° v Oa _:M aTt OTO rN� NNT ....._ qw C4 m !+y Q ' m N d� �`m� � DOD []00 Q�O a�0 CV z a v �Q t� '4• i a o of co Q N 9 on N Ca N co r► o v o 0 0 00000 C5 N Ovo C4 060 v o v 088 10 0 100008 8008 W FO rr o r0 rNw NN"r"' � 9 � (W) r :i J Q �i Q7 CV N �L7 as Q (Q r .- r► �� 0000 000 Owo aCOv � m .,. p i + w Ln U) OD SG� Q , g�N V) — LAG N Q 000 Qa rvO, o00 0(M0 0°0 o av 1i iM p r T O r a T N r N (4 r to c qt N co T a. = Q 7 !"irQ3 I►rp T�qw lw W) Q qV 0 } 00— D R N g"o Ln v W 0"o v e+i yea Ova cia v6ci Ovv cs v 888 888 z .. Qr.- a•^0 T(�T NCgT C v ii (c+i co mcn vm P IS C • - N co T (Q i• ■ C w �j cm O CD D v a�� _j a�a acv o vd Z 22 to(0co W W W �� 7■ .J %Mo. %% °0 go o? 'G U� S C _a W C � N N D C � C �r� fA c C c► c cc c a C C W Y LL .: HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL ( TWSC ) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2402 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 20am --cum Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: Year 2004 Background Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Major Street Movements Study period (hrs ): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 829 502 106 948 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 207 126 26 237 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 829 502 106 948 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 ltd 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak --15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L 8 -� v ( Vph ) 106 C(m) (vph) 525 v/e 4.20 95% queue length 0.76 Control Delay 13.6 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS -r. Is -to = 0 . tj p 3%..c_ La 5 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK 146 - -�_No C (m) (vph) 500 v/c Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers 95% queue length 0.80 Control Delay 14.1 Date Performed: 10/10/2002 B Approach Delay Approach LOS Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 24am -tat Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2006 Total Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs ): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 844 542 106 1189 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 211 136 26 297 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 844 542 106 1189 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- --- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade t} 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach.: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) - 146 - -�_No C (m) (vph) 500 v/c 0.21 95% queue length 0.80 Control Delay 14.1 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS 7= � 5 -v..� a„� : O. S �. s %. %.,. % L. o S A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 5/3/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 20pm -cum Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: Year 2004 Background Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North/South Street; I-405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Major Street Movements Study period (hrs) : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3. 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 1203 797 146 1365 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 301 199 36 341 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1203 797 146 1365 Percent Heavy Vehicles --- --- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10-- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 41 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 146 C(m) (vph ) 291 v/c 0.50 95% queue length 2.90 Control Delay 29.7 LOS D Approach Delay Approach LOS -Vo - \• "L*.J, .6 ,, L'13S 14, L HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL {TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 20pm -tot Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2005 Total Traffic East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Study period thrsj: 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1272 1049 146 1428 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 Peak -15 Minute Volume 318 262 36 357 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1272 1049 146 1428 Percent Heavy Vehicles --- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak-15 Minute Volume - Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade t } 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 146 218 o.67 5.30 53.3 F qft L" %-g1,.. n! N ('4 C4 v a r } tJ 5 aoa CD m 0 v V V v � ¢ N 0 J U C7 M ueoc aa¢ lw 19 crt e z cn W to C.3 Z 4c cq ct qu 0) r- CD M CJD 2...VM % Z � _Umch (y j Im N _j CE z U (n ti Z� w m` j•-t'. ZWaLL •:- :.. •: -.: Z. ...e � r � v o C 40 tL9 49 O o th N C3 1v24) �7 600 ova vti 4000 =To op 0 04 g �Q C4 As Z .:' .� 1. *_ N r T !r7 v- T N 0 T (N T V) fn fl,,- CD �a co o�4 O r r r r -' 10 40o 4000 coo vvo t a � rr e0 QQ a ■ 4 ■ t [V prpe�+Y NND N + en�kncv 0 0 0cm0 ar 8040 vcac vc c;66 v c root • L Tcrj T T v T T V T ri T :V. ACM Tt" TNO fNV 0V)fn Ir sD t1. CO i 4Q NIN- CD (''}0)M e+t�ca vTv �(' 6N0 000 o°v vvo o pp O ,�- eo rn rn o %n an v v rn cv 0 � N O7 C7 [V O7 a C� 6 �D ars iV 6ano oav, of v,qo �- r�op V 0 0 0 a o v 00 ° a a 0 40 .. .. ' ° pp pp OG6C° pp pp ihL ID O tD cm RG.N tD T N f 1 v- C4 rV) Tcy0 rC4 t .. 6 9 M vco w to in ry I► to in CD m CY cD m 0tov >� � ,o of CDC) aacv 000 000 0aEl g ul r- aop ;} ■ In as m a r N v v en cy 0 rvc�m cyMo "v mLO " v v 40•--40 cT 40406 vvo oav 0c 4666 vv °6 40 0 0 g °6 ° °� 3 LD TiNOD(D W [D" TL"m `:` Z _ TIN rC* Tcm0 TNT - •W v D 440 3� m c low +� (C IM V) 00 M T r r r o V)m N40 C4 in mr� $ fir` ' .•v c>;sm or v�v ooa a ,D ..a .0 6aa 16,66 66 Ca46o C! 6 U. LL is pp 00 C O gr- cn d pp rqwr pppp ° a 6 V- M pppp Q O S r;Nt�D rC4 r(n C4 10 rNT V) q* N~ (V7�N Oh q p :• !► qp- to T T t a► 2 a, r 2 4040 .0 ra� ZZZ a�a ml13N a WWW D s dw VS 0 ^p C Z rZ v U $ Fm n �pN z M c rA d ni LD U o cm` zm$� EL cc 2 L �La ~ cm C a Q? Q m 0 2L . S C]U r4 C48 0�11 C'4 C4 0 0 C �C O 0 0 G� cl CD c v U 0 ❑ CL 0 O a 7• 46 V o l as N �o N � r3 cm a Z p W� Coll � TJ 46 U D t7 i7 U ❑N� u�d►o 00 U)c- ' �N Z CO 0 Lu (L s 400N%k §o az Zr) if � c t a� C b ca >44 D C tee_ L� 402 a cp to 4_ b t A 22 z a ■ a a ��' 4000 0046 co 6406 a vp 08D C84 (80 C84 C814 Tcr) r T qw r Tcr) T R) -r- q- C4 qF.- TF?r V--N0 r[Vr 4Q► v !Q►. � c�i cce3 N !�3 VII w r ar 000 coo O00 0040 �y $ 4� W- r f a N (M ` to a qnt '070-0- 8 gAA2! v m2 400 �� caa Qac ao c�va c v w Nr re+) r q- rNT qw Go d o . T qr T a r N r N� F � � N j ago r 0-40 000 vvv 9 r C� vvv co 4066 vv C1 poco L4? N G7 09 [V v � iV CL d W r Y- N r .- en —040 r C4 ° � r- co cni ccv) 40 � VII IV 7. D H } r r oa vNV C4 vcav C4 0O0 000 «p D Tom► p o G � try- � 1�- N N r0 , r) 9 U9 g r . . vvv C 0 r cc r r 0 ooa !" v 2 � acv v V 884 t�a7� r�C4v 0CV� w r L'7 r e' f r Tcr) r �} r rNr rtn r TN a r Nr �N� A�[N7 ryi+7� F M ti 10 N M 0 0 a — to V Z a �#► rr��Q1 Qr ' r0m iDN9T r r r O Q c;ci 6 666; OQ oaQ o ci 8 8 g w r r M d T [V r �AC7� b 0 V- cN+f N q�A vr T 4� T Nr N� 2 cm J a �. 4 -jI LPL J�-AZ � 017 aa.0 ZZ2 an rliV1 www s 400N%k §o az Zr) if � c t a� C b ca >44 D C tee_ L� 402 a cp to 4_ b t A 22 z E N G I N E E R S YEAR 2045 SENSITIVITY EVALUATION Q Q �° 0 C C U. m ° y z co to §aa �� mao a 6. W Ns, C4 q IV cv f V- N R � s Q CV �N co o NV)0 +^M0 V4tn C4cq ' E al 2 La � y m o La �a v c'dlmc�v hnmir' C��10M �iu°7t��'i 'N ci�,c ii1 O Q %n IV) cn N N e•3 en N 0 N � 0.0 'p Im cc 4D Nc- 2a 2c op cm J ^� t►� a,aa r��a �m jo ara� Vp zwa.:i zzz 4WCoCo WUJ ...� a Ut3 B —g5 pNp(14gn F F a aorCy r rriC! ' '�QNo� F F, an iv = C3O0 o oCC7 0 C17R1 O ON ' '+�. 40 a *w ; ;;� C CO oa AL, o o o w � � 4 40$c� z m :a =� qw : z q 04 V) — C CV tw)r C CM V) N NF)r C C rz ca C C . .� ( : :. • 40 Cb I In N N N N r N m m e'7 N � �r .. ! !► O r O O N !7 Q Q W) N / /► Cpl ca �. D a • v vvv v vov v vva v vvv L co v r E! �F i oIODsgi c ca°vc°til a a�vc� I IM V- N N O On U) 2 G GCi G N 0 0 cn N C C CV r r r 0 O O LU L7 m m RD � R lw r rt C O N V r c CM V) 0 . .- eh v N N (r) r N N V) C " r a rn rUj0 1 1C)NN N NON 0 0C")N 40 VIV " "CDN N Nqwqr C C40N Q v v 0 0 v vNa v vl�m a ava> c Z Z+ v � � � a a w w • • s s + + 0 p } } C CD (n o o rt' c co Q� w 0 0-0 0 g g al 4) c ? • cry • •- N o o CU " 0 0 CV - r r a, W N C� H H� ? voo v vaa v v v c co � � p ' 'm o cc co r oo c coo 0 0 �N c N q - r C Cm � or >% a a v M M N Nch° � �e►,0 N N fl) t N Ner7r U L M1 G G f► 07 p p N N N 0 0 07 c") (n L� r V 9 4 4r7 tt It r COO1M V V � i' -r1,o O C CL < 1 o; � �mrn 0 0Oo0 v ve•T q qrC 0 Q o .g a w • • • • • • • • C]C C Co D Doc C C66 C C O _ v co°° O O °° ° °° OD °a0 v a ao co s s2 co as co m m CO co Nr►)0 r rCnC) 4 4N V) N NChr E l �/•csv r rnrN c cv r•N W Wn f. r) S 40 CC�qwqw N f3 q qjr My C CV! !r3 O Of cr1 r r C'7 1 1!7 �► to N.' N ca pN N QN N 0 i in 11 o osvt-- r r+ to M O O r C Ul m c 0 Al @ oo v vc o oco v vvc = r CR.W = N m c 0 880 G Q N a r C � o .- J v a as 5 � CL �v c N A ea � o C uritE x � CL. a. 40 p 40 N J � DI W u x0 % 0 O:z Z � v 3 W � < C V Zo CA N c) 3 �a 3 �N � b l� ed c a N Z Q8a ~?� N O^ [IAN Z CO w S J•-� ZWaN. g —g4,. m ..1 Co V} � to N Z I` gz a �3 �dE � C c� O� a� ■ NS � y z o a� Cb 40 m 0 �§ >. �Nf► CD V) pp ,~ CO -w I'! C4 vvc TC'JM C; c; rtN vc; (Cyr coo w o A vW ij. CO O7 Q3 to Cal C4 Nor CV�r Nqw * - � NP1�r NL"ir N!'!r N!r!r -C UV +� N WTI qr 0 N Cm40 0 n l►�TDi► lw @CJC qr e�') sin e� 0040 vov vav vvv � . y aQ • « « « � � • Os p • r � C! 1'► � +- RW CV N � N r O w O U. coo 40vo o •- •r V.. qr N V N .r NFfa •-M0 NC* N MT N0 N tl� raN aemco T W r cn qr u7 [+Tti 0) ccDD I'.- Oob0 O N •- e7c"!rr q Mer) d� l+'O C4 Over OeOV� 3 0 *pp a « r « VN �0� • TMNCq EN V- .�• 9q2 d 0 I 40a vv ovo coc a r I co �� 00 � * t3a�v V N N � M iV m 0 r C'7 0 N M r N cn :E �. C r e�i rte• o cti, cc W C4 le U) e y `) ° v m N l ei Q =y v T T m w T r n, T v•v� N o Tce"y� aMo o�C4 wo Z o a A ' T ' I• f► I• 0140 V)IDr► N r q T C4 N r N h v LL ao 0a caoci vov a +- CYV qw Nom•- Nor .s a v. N c+a O r V) C) N V) N ee r 40 f IN C4 em crsoN ey a N&0 mNN = o IE e'3 f ► IA N 40-4-- co (b V- O) +A m V- I► N N r) W) iV P► r � a D [� N I• ti * Or iC " rN r0) rC4 r(4 r vW 00 00 40 040 0406 o .� C, ISO CV qw r qr C4 qt *° N •- NV)0 —0)0 Cm V) C*4(n c P_ V) adN CO cm w C4 In Nqw 4n NN r AD X 2 0 2 m � 2 � 2 a j -j J a 2ZZ www 49.0 W g —g4,. m ..1 Co V} � to N Z I` gz a �3 �dE � C c� O� a� ■ NS � y z o a� Cb 40 m 0 �§ >. �a°o° cv c'4 v 0 OD Z ❑ ❑a r U m C a 0 U C d Q� �Q c nr x M �x to a �t 9 V4 m CV to ^ cv C n C) W m Z o U Z � W) •N' pf Z 4) � � r� W tea — !n N c m -le .Z W C o ❑ �° �° m342z V 1 CO U) Z Wl V? T ei ZWCLLL %QOM 9 cJ� �a v� U� c v a V m N Z ... iA a [3�0 °r m ca h m _a ea cy,� OW C r- EL ILL • s a +- v,v °a • v- oN oc; rC%l ao • tiN avv a w vW d.: vov 10 0 r,,� goo Q §g m 7G N (0) 40 eq nt er7 V N aav 4NON C4N0 CInIn ti m Nco •a aov coo vov coo 0 $ qlr t QI pp pp • m Cb en • QQ .- of S¢ f m 004 pl�-l- G�77 rGGN qqr!V GGCMcv) O&L 6 C vvo 6 Ci ao o r l 1 ovv OD v N co � .. r) !+! r ? ► ovv cm0N C4cm0 vcvr oaa IN to cm ° c � 1 .� �. V! COO 40v C�a C� N Aft. I G'v �tin°i coo vo �SiD cva ° a �W v t vvo c�vv 2$0 vc� CD co C4 CL ovv N0C4 etiNV ONr U 1 ova cvo&n rv- r.t•v v�-- m ~ }� i V Gov en ON cr3r0 Or qr Q � l°V g a 4 08 en eciap°c~}° i0 � °mc� vQ �C14m Ai oc —ON ovo �r aco r 00 c"uj c; c; vvo 108 08v vgg r_ 3 F3r Q � F voo cv0N NC40 vcv� • voo t- cC4 or�r�► _. O `3 F! A qw O t m LC! COO °� 0IN-r? N d7 [r70 r) � � «•p R ev vv cNV. aA0 rar, AC7 aOC a W a U- vov °oo 8o ago vao c�vcy ctsvv ON c °ov oat- V) ODo cM.r 4► rAi .= it °b �� v ��-.ac 2 Aa 2S �a 3 ��a� _a a� MO zzz cr]NN WWW VJ %QOM 9 cJ� �a v� U� c v a V m N Z ... iA a [3�0 °r m ca h m _a ea cy,� OW C r- EL ILL 888 s Cy Cy 0 C tv 5 ❑ *i o oaf Of C 0 J U a a c a �a ° up to c 0 x � t 0 x in a N M 40 W _° ❑ Z �. W 0 04 c �V �° W luy ioN v n Up8a NNE z0r�.. ill` W a LL swo %% c� ea p �3 m W �c • b a w NN 8 ci o ED h 0 o � m E C 0 2 Lo M L F 7 a m C S VC� qr qr ry � M M Q vo vov 00 c; c; v op v§g _ r N M C4 M v N GQV N0N N N 0 V) 40 CV � 4000 #- pUS a�� -- • eh � N m 12 vao 40 0v 000 000 aW I P- S . CO LO VCS o v C Q 0 0 0 N� 000 r D D 000 08 c$g0 0oc0 u Cv r�i co C14 M M ovo Nosy 4NN0 0N� vao -Wv� r��v vm�m cam: coo moo ov oav a -7 u4 � N Q°° c°�i +�r� ski co t� �N9 vv rGe oov vv ac0 t- 0 e0Q 0 N M CtiM M� V all vvv cyoN CyNa 0Nr ova Ln o An C7 T co � in coo m0Wn vIro 0Nm N�� § IV 4wN 0Q o v o 0 o O o C v 0 C D 0 40 0 800 8 O N C° p N !N NM c� 000 cyoN NNO 0Nr cm 820 0 IC04 iri ['7 � !� r► � G �• r w ovv �vc� a�vv vecq « g r o « �$° v ��C4 .7 +Gq1t 000 cicl o0 CC4cl r Iq p oo 0 v0 0 vov °v °$ Cyr em N L1 Lhr z 3 0400 N0N [yN0 0C4 C es coo C4 � C4�° ° ° cy C4 c� 3 CD -j Fa p� a�a .0.0. .0 .0 aa,n UJ Z2Z U}V30 LVuiw 3 swo %% c� ea p �3 m W �c • b a w NN 8 ci o ED h 0 o � m E C 0 2 Lo M L F 7 a m C S VC� Noo X00 C !•TQ m.-�r itit Nof!'�! Tveo �}`1) m9 2 4A .� ", o r c; c; �" N N cco r ac �- e�7 N vac Q ego o cp co J ILU T .•� .. �•.• '•' .. -j m C5 60 '''''3_C� 88_0 Of r r Z L: T" ►7 w 0414 V) N i'7 O CM C4 C V 0 C ... ti w tO► ID � 1A � r2 .: v (tit !" � G It qr- N iA R �'7 [ 7 o ©a c avv ciao vvo vvo _ ••= !►O * enUi mc"(n NviD !►TQ) Nv� e9f• NOsT r. in t!f o c+r ov N N cv ovv r tv o coo m ch c4 v6Q a o AL a w a .- o� 8g° 888 888 888 • �, r• r. r• ra r► 1-9110- �?' U c iN 3 �m� ^r•� do CO � to a� d _ : v N M 'C N 0 mo M V) tl3 � i n on Q7 to cm N v T W) q- t T N CO r} r) 4 T an v t co em , a a N a° 04 r. W ' N� NO e•3 m aC] NI- G) CS r N CC�N 1` fi r• qmr D r` e�q 0) �Qp �; [tit c; Nor C O0 TwO Ovv cvehN 666 Q Q�W N H �' Q p �ov 88) w- cn v TV)r rNr r[vr ► ' m r. v vvry o� N r► en r•- r` v o� v oN en en co0cn .-m to qw cm m Tv c 1 o CL < G ' i e']Wr U)enM TN (v M(ni19 O N w r r N - �i 4 ; a my N •w « vrW N r- W « 04 v cl) cv en(oV (W) (D w a o eD in r- oev evT-T rrQ Alm N a 0 U C7O vCp vCC GOO c; G $80 8€8 g$ °v 8008 i? • r► r r I'► rW) r+ qtr Pl- rp"yr T4 r�r AT� O r:riv rM r[yT rNT W S i qwr'c GN rrrP•� C)CK)c} �vcm 0vvc� 40 r(� qw M C � �� NW N �T 0) OD N'�T a C4 r�'7 tryrr N!►N n 40 m Q G} N N .. N � W e�if �._ • a a a ; V CD ' NN ON m N r! 0IDr. [til T r O Cs �iCD -4-- W CD N eav W ov acv 10 v ci ao [V�N ci ao Q OF W oo - �L a o � � q- 88,00 v U '$ L Z W w , f- rb- if) �T y O ac'� d ey 97 r- 7 U v y j r (W) C r h r ,- N .- r. ty V- so 0 M Im W _ is N W �' c E s3 --- ar o } > � (n . v T 3 qV 9V)OD IS CX �N M `eh � ?v m ci C . t4+t C E v= d x usN��c t v o 2 vti �2;� "c ? Ix JH� -0-010 �0 C Y� . W a LL t z z z w co (5 W W LLi r o� 00088 C4 C%4 D r O _om a c v Q L m�8 �a a 3 Ccc L L t CL 4r 19 CA W a L7 Z a z 3 W� dM �'F3 0 �° t Z �g 4c I X50 0� �� S�j ID P4% in 0 C l"7 ❑ w r U z co Jw� Zwa.LL S -Nav m c W 40 Cc 1- m W W 3 m Z Q:1 +t � v} r$ E C c —IS ..s cm y IL 0 4 N aC C4 IA g U '$ C. C � L a� " E o ca cm :2 LL 1 1 • • 1 a 0 r N 0466 W- N ■- 6ci46 r N co 0 C14 404646 v 1► vty 888 888 88° 888 U rM NC7r N0)C30 NC4 r � a� Me 4600 avv 4000 coo a a I �a ps CO G$ r0 OD ��U �m V- � r O N i1E 04 s- N r [1t r r U. 4046 oav 404646 vav o �- 8810 888 888 888 v n � I- � nA N. w N rVja ro rCyr rNr r 0 La !► N r W) Co r lrri r m ai CY a ~" © N-togw Q4004 4NM 10oC4 r4 0 0 y a • 4 i i ■ 1 1� 0 a t- W) o f4 c C4 04 c`r) N N a r C4 +°a 0 a W ? rvc c4646 64646 666 c o 880 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 a in r:7�- «-w rAr Al V- CV) v r (0) � .- C4 r C4 Q '� � •^- r 1UC! N CC +,1 CV N N rt 40 410 C44'� •o 6n pp��•pO �•ppp s s O � d1 Gf QS 4 � U*) �'a e■7 Car r r �- r7 CY N a Cai CN 0 a W 4' 4640 0 a 0 cvci ccc v v 880 888 888 Sorb C] • r!+?O rCr7r rCyr rtVr- ... 1C �N oafA �9~ NmN o -� 1011 ' � V- 11 i r CC4 1* un V- -r-- • � 0 {- : 1 1 ■ ■ C4 co • m � N N M f g vv cv66 cov0 C ;c46 o v 888 r3[y x117 r r r V+� r a o 0 + cf) r N r r CV r em m Atp m r_ M� W) s7 N Cm CD 0 e7: � e� N o o$ 04 Y�� N m N o c • � a ° 2 m n ) WWW �� Z Z Z �a S -Nav m c W 40 Cc 1- m W W 3 m Z Q:1 +t � v} r$ E C c —IS ..s cm y IL 0 4 N aC C4 IA g U '$ C. C � L a� " E o ca cm :2 LL %— to o t N Cq Lf) C��v • a 0) �C4 f f f � w� avo �V4 C* 0 o ac 000 -3d id cy tu mm :8 8 8810 ^8° °y$ Z� rSoV- �An .Q L ,.. jj] Ton Nfn0 rrp GN W 2] 2Z p/ _ p `� mNr rV"N rrr N AD V) r- r� UD i•7 to m m N i7 IE naaL o voo voa coo vvv a GG� a sspii Q U. 0V! v, �:� C; C; o0 c; C; cciv 'd r v SSa T g ICS ° SS° °S9 U r G. :M f" rNr rNQ rrp C) CV V rw a � Qa r N T0V) In 07 m a)�N ttf N r rTN R■7 tQ tr7 0Tccm ..40 cc a� co a vfn M 0900 vav Too �! v7 14 co 0) M � � v C) vv o m � v r► v Diu N H � F a °ov c°cFi vo vo voo 0 0 LO 0 qqr v! W CC' TNr ACV V rrQ CiNW GO sr. L m : QG In M rCO N in m co W) N •^ TrN r to V) C44n1[ d co C 4i]rq-N snag o 'o 11 W 40 CDM NCMo v°o 03 N � � .y. g! on V v $ N � n r +- sr, v r� CV os Im o •- GG o kn N p LO p o ad ao r� 0 o0 o0 00 GEC oov G anal o 0 fir• I_ o p p �7 xi; r� r► r. t• r� Cs rNt-' rNV e-rp GNW Z c W� ' td [V rVN rCY K}N■^ � *.. Cy iti!Q "Q ! _ 3! T qw r r �r N ^. T en CM N W ~• T T T N r r ■ 1 iq t G Q m 8� m m $o � N s'5r$ - CD W� m voo 0o vv oov v jN W � m LL r $ °° v v �� 3p° r` s8c T °� v o �tjr U �N w V TNr rNQ Try 0NW ui v ui W Z Q3 . � N fm�1 C7 °i �0 mmWo w� a ;:9 rN. wN °�N �r �v ``' r�Nn r[lE c Ifir,'° m� ;� ? CO _ co to m J m il) a xw v .. i �2fx �2v c2p, CO i J A . A �� IL LL ZZZ Cl) U) WWW VJ YLL eCZ e . : C]V %— to o t 888 T m 0 a n � C m a LO N O Y a L ■ OD E 4) `� m Y � naa qw v go kum � � N � Z ° a W � •� Z *- Z U) � W t ea ne t7 � c�mNnJ -� D U) ci z QD c'n p o %- `a Z m mm ZN VID � e !*7 N v W D > v CL i g C'dp U CD V to fA EL 0 g n � m c�Inft M i U V T r► m T v v co �• 4 �s oov ov o0 ovo v vv °$ Im v$S goo 880 vt w m T t w C uj ccc �p I � p NN p o �p 0*8 -woo 0 10o Colo 10010 0 0 C qr coo 888 8 S v 08 y. ^ 8° W V 1 TN V4 40 r-T0 aNW LL r) U7N 8 N 2 TCC ert o D 0!ri 7s v Q f► a v a �> �f ! vvO c r ac a� v oco co U- T tV 808 G° 000 tr ! T w� MY W V �- rNr► TNO W- V- a vNW UL [n 1R7 0 S r M cv m co �[? Pte► V a 10 Too �v o' � « T�� C04 I- s d va s$ o vri oo vcd 000 o ppv0 O d 0 000 00 a G d w a� V w rNr T[V0 0 vNW r. •� �C I- mNil7 iD0 cs 8 i3 cc �N!'3 ITcq V3 ■ « « « i o�c"'�% 0q 0 s $ 000 00 oco o a r` T T Crl r r TN.- ENO 0 vNW c � U. o r cqf- ti T as r 40 N 'w °i M +n 0 C. . � 3 w �2CD zzz www MU) U) %- `a Z m mm ZN VID � e !*7 N v W D > v CL i g C'dp U CD V to fA EL 0 g n � m c�Inft M i U V T4 —%o�k C11 N it7 C7GG • .- CV go vr) a tp O p C1►c7 ■ er! N O7 08a0 + �D lug r s in � � C4 cm ,e C LYi C 0CSC CYI N N 0 0 CaC N P.- CO p 1► v C3CO r .itt H p p Q Q_ p COO p O O 2 L :: RymiW T(+�!" rT TN O :r C .Z ;31 � ... ' r g N rWU') tC'7 IV U ❑ ❑ G. o.. .. ovo vov ovv N MNNM GSv to Nt ap pN o >vvNqw OC;a , COG O 0 C; c; aC7 c; p2 H0 N N W T N r r T T e- N° V 8 W LL C � i13 IL CC) .� 0+ } {{ mm, T r in U -) M V e) cne�T Mc(V we "ri 1 T r � o vo� °vaa 000 v°v U') v o; p, �n +n i� o r� v Iq m N er go a r. C' � 4 z¢ Cq cm o t• An N ID oov ovv ovo oc Co aU q 8 °a 88so S$8 8g° �! s° 9 9 r [7 r r T t r CL IL W �1 cn d� NNW rC4 a`rr- rNO m = + LL ` �� i rncn co � Nr �-0N mom r �r.o t in cn cn cna¢ �'! a 0 CO OD 40 coo in o v) N N Z i �j .� ! . r �[? in +r N O i C7S CG C ) Co N ■ !r] N C 0 p p • N ' 1-_ Cv3 � C] 'Q � v �ir70 tMCV vvv 0 vov rr cv p F►(� voo a o l� NNW C4 TTT rNG Z � W LL !O'7GP, CV)N� Y'3Fl� cm spN QNsNQ .� r�qe V) m r u n 0 CD etc . = n ti Gs � '_ a . i a ♦ � W) ? ms�or ODW en NO 8 rev a o v a !AN � W Q C; vov °oc o ovo rr CSC o Z v 0 V3 .. LL �"" �vn� i•o e• vev.v 0°ti e8. gv .� Wes4n r t r r •r- r =� Z v` tvJ` "., � ~ L7 •Li • Q 4 ea v Ow Z m �rh •.s1 NNW W TCyr Tra- rC40 E A] vj _= W Ix LL too tNwt W •-CVr V)g1t l? rmN r�W 0P)v T 0toP. �NQ1 7 C CID z$! rOQ Flrt7 N CE) H� oi. � c o co t .7 co e ' � v o tea`.° vs� j ! �2v�°° -°° �o �.C� OD `ef ZOD . , J J F d' J aj �a 2il1CL ci 22 Z �Nm W WW L?.J . : UU T4 —%o�k m N co N W to W " Z� i� W d ti W a Co m � ors v .r 2 h •• J � .�.. o v '�o N CV v C }C �O7 S3 a a, aca -a iI1 c� U N ma� N D IT m � � naa _ qw a r is 4 3 M Z a MW U) 30. vy LL 6 Z W G. % `oy CV m 0 *-fn m Goo W iCf Q r ,Q. a00 ovc G� oov TN 040 Q d ci U') a qlp I-- cvv a 0 V4 IL vc6 oho va yr 888 S$° m Z Q t T iRi •- 8$8 r- T r- .- � - (� LU TC�A WT U. !� T �- T .- �,. N v LL ■ a .. ~ N rt T T C� [N"? to a 1 r T Ci IE F � H M7 avv 0040 0400 vvv N i CpNg� Off] t[!0 •-qw T NOn to 0,�0 K m� + TN a 40 al 40 C M N rm N 0400 cvoo 000 ca v o>- `�. SS SSS SSS SS° t -u [7 L'7 n r► r► n i• r. A V C it NNW TC4 C40 --• S �. LL Q M !� n �• 0Am V) N[r7 n !• G �r C Cry N n > a� _G 0NN~NC �• V) O} r-p1. el G N C T � T 4 [M7 V R7.C�i o� F. a �2C& e:2 �2 V�ar 3�a. c40 � NrM 0(a0 40 00 N 00 D Z Z Z V) co U) jo W W W ■- i-, U J ca • r U U a 7 :4 r' 0 r► ! (D M SCI N W) ' O N 0400 r qw- GG0 �CC%i 0 rU. o� c; C; 0400 4000 (5 C5 o r SSW 888 Q S 00 880 w► i� f !'" T t^ rt r vQo� W i] N N W r N r T r r N O LL CD m to N OR— VII N C N IW N � O C 40 [o Q d N r w � � % `oy a ■ ■ a ■ N. co § r. (n An U') a qlp I-- cvv a 0 V4 IL vc6 oho va yr Q t LU LL .. ti CD P- (D N N 0 N s'S T T T C� [N"? to a 1 r 411* 5 M7 cm t 0 [co r 0 W) co A m w N m N i CpNg� Off] t[!0 •-qw T NOn to 0,�0 K m� + TN a 40 al 40 C M N rm N 04040 vvv ovv 00 0 0 =$ `�. s s s ° t [7 L'7 i7 r r+ r NN W m E.9 m c cr LL ~ 2A 12 M !� n �• 0Am V) N[r7 n !• G �r C Cry N n > a� _G V a 41 �2C& e:2 �2 V�ar 3�a. aaa �aa D Z Z Z V) co U) jo W W W ■- i-, U J ca • r U U % `oy %.%O s vNNp toO -N ONAn ulr1P► Cv Q 0 0°yg0 lw �I ,: ..w pp - Gw° OCC cvcq C; 6,6 0eq OC ' C 0 OW 10 r F- • Qp QQ G C C pp p pv C S O po pp po G O G pp pp R m W0 e� An e� 40 � U') O C � 4n v to MMO NP]+rt rL'7r +rl7p ._ _ C c pp ;9i - 0 ..;a t :M, voo ovv 0v0 000 R �N 0 N m r• pwN q w aCIVJ 00 vac cca ova a .- v�0- LL R C']irCi P]W 0 ;: C4 V) 0 M CO r r C14 r CV iJ FE W� d7 f3' W Cm in CYp co mfit]f► rNr OD O NaN r�qr CD Co C CP�LC r •� Q -h d "a - �[! 0 0 0 0 �► Q3 M to O O ;E =Y C Q d low I a OD C> • T- + OOm Rea • 0Nq* a c, 0 G i . QO N �' co cva 0 CV C; C;,6 CO70 ovv Q CU. o r ov v voQ OD A i'l �i W) t r r q- -'^ • W •M; N C4 O C4 M r CM r [V r � M LO C4 NO•^ 0 f4 OD C4 U en CCNLO wLOv NNr r4 v O0 z� rr c�a¢ C5 CDNV 0CYm cY�r,n 0vv0 o 0 .rl � q >! 1 00 co r. CO N r .r a as C) C to N v O O v %tr a O 47 b y •- cY o v v y r ry v cv v 0 0 W vti ava oao vov o r _ k �g° ° �a00 uk A�n� rc�t� rC�� CYM0 C4 V) rMr rCYr 41 ...'. C'?mN Opw 10 Nmm Ovm m#�CA r00 �OCmD Q r r N r r r it r 7 h }} 0 OD Cy N =Q C5 « + • a rN '�n� C° ��rpp' v CrCY ° $°° CD r Q cc ocv aca OCYO cov -C 4M co m� Ly W 0 �' LL y �00 CCC O0� COO 6w ` $ ��`- �r Zr a C !s 77 U Z Z E LL 67 '— Z 41) V 8e� � � {�� ff !Y !'! v M P7 r r C4 r r ry T r? E � in W W G < M m rD N ? m cyc°J' c occic�i �u�c 1~ �, C� N ry �T rClr rlylCrJ C� Im� cc � co m z 3 Cas6 v Ul) �-0 _ a s r r UV Nines ei 2 a 2 ae, 2 �t ° H anC 3 _ z ?�� m .. v�� v r.+ CC Sara -1 � � � � a�aa .� a .0 n o m 0 Z PL �trL Z" di ;•� ZZZ a as l/3CnC17 WWW 3 UJ + i UU %.%O s S-W 1ej 44 N cue 0 888 qr N �e� e4 v vehv N to O W-NN eh .- $ � �""'' ,Q vv vvv vvv vv v :. v 0* � c T m v g$v 888 8008 ��° - We i7 � eC7 r +r i!7 T r Y7 w CV l"!Q C4 V) re7T ren p C `� 1m W D N qw 04 ~ to e r- T M qw T Cal 0040 40 40 40 COO 0 0 0 • + qw N ' w N0, 0 a N pmp Os w m A s we7 V) ov 0tho 000 01 0 0 000 vv 402 8810 888 888 888 "r) _ - .:..�iA Aar rr V v F- N ev! 0 C4 eh T V- C4 T a` N W- U 8 V , a 4m CORE `0 V) � r) N Il �M'a q �¢ c *vC4 m •- �' r' � � 400 40 vvv C4 to � vv v �• CD U �7 m Q s ~ T N • 4 Tt'J eti C r _ 0c!40 _ -� 0) TeV" � O+r -v N O .o ddb •- N 0�A vv vC0 vvv vvv Q 0 C 0 0 8 pp pp 8 v 00 3 a � Lo V-- ��q- V- M C4 cn 0 N t"'3 (N N cl 0 0 Cc C tl- N W) ��ff �pIp Ql N O� +� L ei [Wp 'G r r co r- maa ~} Gn er�0 0 N ntLor• 0No CD 10 C4 a�7 « yr r Nvpv ve'70 . Wv03 04 • MLO r v r cc ovv CM vvv q- C) 6 64 ci ODo as 8 v° 0 °0 0 0 00 0 0 0 LO 40 m C4 N00 !VV)r rC4� wNr M ea 0 � m CD � I%. 1. 0 !7 0 r► t• 4L3 D +� in 4G C4 0 r eG en � F f• ? .� v-mm �C4 IA IA cq404 �qrti y S O G e4 0040 ti 0 -cC4CW T CO N * v A ° e+ C W = vv vvv + vvv 41 clv0 0 v v 'v 'o °OC °8$ _ W *�Iti+r- 980 888 vvv r T v r T IL N cc �►j r. eY en 0 CV M r r Nl T C%f r 4A W W Q N y v L t9 ,E 'co (n DI G r @"7 v N i• OD N Mr T- r r► t� eC'p3 W [V 0 C m L�pi cm Cc � m Z h p (34 �;.. �2a �2a X20 �� a ate. aaa nra ao�a D YU- JW)� *-. L ti ZWd Z Z co(A0 W W W 3: R., • L) J a; S-W 1ej 44 E N G i N E E R 5 YEAR 2004 SENSITIVITY EVALUATION pp GCG ■pp • ONN • Dt0V a$ T CN :d[r3N�t :E w CCO CCC aaC CCC o 0 =a J to m -. =m 0 co CD Zo N rt !D Q} eV 40 OD (0 N rt w- M z Au z ca Mle -ul N !) r M e") w- N C* r N F'3 r - c 47 a N (0) r r f• 07 u? o =-Irrqr rmne crlty Nc)N v co o ❑ ❑a vov coo coo coo 0 z Q3 + do ' mQrNiC�!! w NLI� dO4P C4 Co C4 CV Cm vi OC CCp aQC iO O G .. mR1� o � ��C§ mm V� C14 �G rqt Nrtr N•C r uj Z-1 1 a� C3 w L o V) — iDr IV qqr en r. m maN r► en -e mr+-- e in eh i► C1N 1 = a i�7 r fo N N I* 'w CV (7) N Q y r14 v -(40 OWW 0 v s' eh cr) Edo vv° W- 00 C14 r4cv 0C%j� MW 06 (5 oo 6 6 C; a a ti -3 pp vov 000 o o °S3 co 0 �7! W6 N"t tC m r.r m CD Nq+r co N V r �o W ; 3 ca N" :�; N tr7 O r C7 0 N m r N t'7 �-- U � � _ tr rn •- U-) an , m 0 CO u) � N c• t. m en 0 o IV cn f, V U) V qw r P- cm CV qw a C4 N a CL) a > O T�� vraa Gr�V_ V_ o� 7 . • pip ' a Q s L ON a N(D s Qtotn � 49 in C G[otii GNN Gtoii� r W C C C C C G 6 C o a V pC QQ CD �$ l Nl r a NV�tC N (•) �- � t+ 2 40 CM V o qw f'- a %n N >• 8 qr m c7 C to C? CO OD V 2 O ,! w rtiN NRw CV) N(7) M .p. W) O N W) to CM � r a � C] qlI V_ n G N co 0 N N J r r �U N 0 4D $0 in P_ via nmm m M mcs.r *- C c ±�+ W m [] V- r7 CC v o N tti a •- .- v, W .r an W h m a vv ccv oCC 0 o Sa _� LL -0 v I§80 co a cog vvv IS88 � a o �� ` W C CV v r qw N lw .- N 4R W- C Z �� F -■ �� Cr dN C Z CD dj w En CDi�o:l r 0 m Nc7D rNiC 94 r NM r "s E 4i 4) � W _ m N d � � to d�� Nt�C�'7 reqN ' ��C7 �' LUl �►t7 Ntr7 N0)N ar M �Co Q U g x U m �v� • � � p F � s � v pr}p� 1 J iY JQF-lY ��a �� Y�+- Jam: 2wo.u. ? �aara zzz mM.0 cncncn aJO a www UJ o CC • 46 UU 0 C D J a a V c a c a C N A f ; ca CL CD v °v° °v Q N N qr O r } oaa` 40 a N AU 48 ju ILN J � 4 CD Ul j = om� W y es cm V +`� a O 5 m }� � G a. N Z F J•-:. ZWa.U.. %70%,3% gr Qa J 117 m � CI] � �CD N Z as 0 Q Z U� Ca Q 0 �o N a� oft i a o�c �LLU � am v41) r 1� ti C17 to o M m a) r► r� C4 r C14 V) r 1► iA rN 0 0 to m rCy to a 4000 000 Do0 0040 ev dW �4 IL Cm qr r N q r N +r r N V r A z Ne'7r CV M*- CV Mr CyV)r J Cm r 4C7 A V- t r V)M Q 03 O7 •� SON NV eC1iN Q H � 40400 voo aao voo A m ` r ' 1A to P) CD Ql f► `V r M N r CM r a m 046 co coav coo v *- O O QSD S N! qr N'Wr Nor A NFlO rC'70 [V 4n+- N(nr ww IL Q. 1 It NN qro m SO 40 rrlp D --* �N(14 Nq cMMgr � ,tv aoE r• � o �o �n o o �- �- a r► c� �3 0 i a W) s. f • * Q(0 rtirn er)0w *" C4 r r,. Cy N T N T- t 0 CL 640 400 466 c 6646 v +�- -2 V Co iD n40v CC m 8 m Off] o$ cr R Nq NIV r GD Nor 4 N M C r 07 G N V) r N C7 r vr� °O°V c ° CID o$co v0N Nq'r [)e+» qr NN v� rC4 v cc 40 vaa �C4 a o } N N •-- 04 r Y- a 1L, oc C; coo ovo c t- Aj 409° 0 � N v r V N q r N q r Nc'f0 rR�O C4 V7r 04 N3+- 8 NQ� G e) C-4 in (n N� ow e-) �� 40 ��N C% 'a� s s son f- r-CY ri'} rNN r Nr r vW vC cCv GOO D r CD co N Nrlf- N4wT- z....... V- C Q P.- !�3 m m � N A V- t 7 Y? 0? O N N V) V e) cm qw r') N N - -r7 c `a. .. �2a X20 X20 �aa aaa r+�r� M.0 c o �0 Z Z Z ill co ill •-_ %70%,3% gr Qa J 117 m � CI] � �CD N Z as 0 Q Z U� Ca Q 0 �o N a� oft i a o�c �LLU � C4Nv coo Vev Cm 0 r c _V 0 Cj V AGd Wry. W 0 0 U �r a Qo CV c x m L .0 � co c cep a ¢ 73 ti N €j W ea m LU v � 3 W � at w� 'm 4) W �¢'mC.) NJ W N -V uN10 cc c JO -F p o� C'03: L 1f] a � w Rqr Z_m o ai W CL 1- %-%t% m 3 e� LD L N 100 o� a °'s n 00 �N z g O Of an C L] � La Le F �- 0 X Z 2L ca rN A c; C; coon qwN ov Cpl voo S us �a a coo 108 loo v000 qw W" N CN'i N V) .W D 110 Z ooa cm eti cy cm 0 0(n OTC " voo �o� c��v ova a .r � rr m te7 coo coo coo coo :41 A . rt a a ' i i $ �-$g� 10$10 NN C w ti O qw N N n ?: 1040 oao -0 0 GG voo coo $ o $ 0 N Igo N eN E"' ► voo Nvt4 emN0 0C4 lit coo sot— 8040 fl- coo N. ova Sao acv 4010403 �1. a Qu t-- �I $$ 210CP ma04�s � 8co&0 N ; wi Oo 7ON q+- QC4q r mW co 000 av coo 0 o ' 00O 208 080 08 0 � N N Cq CN7 CN'] .^ At W a' Coo NON NNC ON- coo %n or 800 OCDO i e^'7 ff- qw W T CD i 7 ?1 IV coo Cno+n mv)o 004W M M! a 0 t- 4 i a "} oo 400 0 cm ovv e 6 c N V) ccvci r v cb Ui C; 000 908 880 _ 0 CD N co N N '4* 0 0 10 N 0 N C4cm0 ON W j101010 ro1w N. 004 vN!8 m C) eo e0 40100 SON Igo OmCC4 .qr a A a o a pp � C • NC�N cc • QY� a C;o GCS OC COOQ O coo 0C 880 0 cv 04 tn co N cn e,i�5 07 ova Mom Cvcma oev 000 a�v� er7 Caim a � 00)q N: : t• �['j !- 0 C 2 _� C Q 2 OD cm J i7: � aria � Vj �� } ZZZ 000 �aa Www � �-! %-%t% m 3 e� LD L N 100 o� a °'s n 00 �N z g O Of an C L] � La Le F �- 0 X Z 2L ca C4 Cq 889 O r y a a ❑ L] a r 0 U a c n N c 3 V to x_ .0 cnaQ �D m aM zo 0 W m c m� en N y � � o m .v C N Z w =mw a73am i> CC�� t Q G N R7 N N Qf N C ICJ C7 [V p Q Ci off vv aov v° c; C; a ap R n C4 ra V �- W Ol 000 N0cV C4 0 0V) M v v o r 0 Im r• o o o un ce m M 0) r• w- nla H � vov vvv vvo °ov la ��Myyy •QQQ�� F appp- r IV � !� • N y vc oav 6 G !"] aao r d p o .� Coo N0 C4cm0 0Nr vao �appoo vvo iv(a(pp� o00 Vn0v accv CO— (n n M � v 7 g S f g. qr lwC4 c�,Ye� a'g'op cv 0o vv ovv v cs ovv go °o co CL r2l COG NON Ncm 0C4 . p vvav tio° to °"'x n ova Moto lw 0onw ROo IN D 7 g co g n$ co n r� c " 2� 0 qr Vi0 " "N m " p 00 ova °v ovv o0 coo §08 Ego 0g§ ii N N C7 [V N !7 N �S 0) r Ja ooa C4 CM NN0 ONr -.J oov go moo o.-r r- J;F °00 M0;N 4af30 oN V i q- v n g 0 o '� g (4 0 T- N t 1A 25 f � n vv [7oa v0 cm cv) CC?CZ 4 0 v 0 180 08 C4 m voo ey0 c (mN0 0Nr ovooCM o c°°go° N RR 20► 2Sm 20 2a 3 ZZ.G zzz ��W corn WLu % —% -vcs, 0 q 2 V � a r� O a� i n n 4 ppN M m � il7 $C �t m � 'AE� 13 v- c 40 ,$ ca 0 o n� YLL C .: v c3 S -%%\ NVa vaec°ioi CV W)� n a J � V4 C-4 qCr w T aao TNN cao QT co rN N coo -O v Q c; oo c SSS STS° SSS Nw c� _� ArA rCr�SS lhinr l+1Mi �T ev Z AL ,, .� •.. .••�. co L `! lu -0)- C4V)- N0ha NN f .� [A► � tN A N en crj OD N CO) O +r T m 4n e'7 eh L7 L o°v o0o aov coo • CO C4 (Nd f m � CD V) F! N is `� il! v rr i w : =�i 00 � ovo coo e9, cm avv +a LL o, a O C S O O SSS COG � .•.� T ici r in t T } r T t •. r` N) Q rfoV- TNr TNT Co 1g U. w� r•rrti ACN N+•N !Ar?D� an N � � tD -e pvp�N�p sAt�![+J a qZ N��m vA M"w cvIno 7 >� a O Cj O N C4 N�P.. m N v Q ¢ o � oc coo voc ocv a0 A W N 9 ; a° °v° GSO SSS SSS in r r T T V- V) 0 �!7•- TC4 N� sR9 !� SC e4 , �0N N a W NAM [�! u7 [ V �y� ccnCOMr, -to v t via¢ e'7 co r ie1 C4 q- IN N � M 1[} v N T..2 a 7 - •W CO 9V) m m rm9 o ,• v o4*" in Im o en U") r v W +- m •� v N CV T T T T o C4 M eV a co W oc voo coon oco o v °v° °O SSO SS °v SSS T An T T •" T T •o F U �,,,. •_ •� T4no TM r N T r N T W , .r Nqy N AAlr] +- ONA OD V) r cc L'i T V) NMI r�V)'7C4 ANT qw r! to O :NC ,... . �. Z .. N N t • � 'GOD � U ::'*"' , ' cN 9 P4 Q r Q N IM _ 0 0 v,v VII ooc vT0 o,vcv N��N e cov )a fl 42 W C; = � SS° SSv° SSS SSS v ;y p Cz W dmN '^ xx r aiNO W..... ct 4m S °0)Z C �$ _ 2r = '" ..� X20, Q ts x ��'� •.... Z � v7�a lt- � �aa� �� YLL .Jkn� �WaLL ZZ2 cocom WWW S -%%\ N N a v! NN ►r r a qr- 7C G � iti o cca m e� C3 a N r 7 o � cad CT �D N UA o � � MA o W �p Ur.- cuss ? Q 04 LU o to C cn 2 Uo m� Jam^.. i Lb IL ii %-Mo.%tat. g m c W 40 J to m c� m (N tv)�z N WT vY V � E -6a cr C/3 t si el a $N � N _w M t?�o m Ch a r � y �C3 Y. u- ■ = v v -*-M NT Tt o' ti °ov odo 00 oac o vv rcn NC'7T cmr)o NC4V- .� �Cr �O�pp ) rN 0CM Il3w NmC4 0400 0040 coo coo a IAa� OC7C► C+7�° 4A O tV 400 Cat C14 T 000 0) Cpl 000 r Cyr a do p d. u„ V- 880 4888 888 888 •w r M 0 T Cry T r LY T r Cy r —� o <0 I--P v e*yvC �c� N H� T a� C r( °cC+i{T° 10 �: ° 9 1► 4 ■ r 1[7 T► r Qf r r. � F? LA C! oo 666; 66 c coo a v UJ 880 00 S� v �0A� °488 QA� A N. ° l'"1 Zia t,7 F M' r L'7 a 'r Fir r (y +rte r (y r OD 04 NCN qw1 ` N�(14 �a r aUI)[I co N N N N +V- « b Nr ( w ■ ■ ■ « 0� • � m T W) V N 400 000 ry ova r N r 060 O a A yt a r T a- r .V ren0 r4nT TN+ rtyr fO►N N _ 3 cn P- N CO 04 f � NN07I%-a ��F7 CaVO �3 } Q O; PI- ON LnM0 V—C4 ren 4 CO C ! V- N r r r = ?� cae coo 6 6 o. of c 00° 880 88_8 888 4888 C* C) ■-0 rCyr TCyr :3 qw e7 co qp- V- V- cm cm w [►N F}Cf<4 qw 1►� NmN D t 33 �aa atta z z z .0 .0 00)(] WWW �a o t L30 J %-Mo.%tat. g m c W 40 J to m c� m (N tv)�z N WT vY V � E -6a cr C/3 t si el a $N � N _w M t?�o m Ch a r � y �C3 Y. u- ■ = O O 0 1 CV CV v T C Y C V �7 ,go a h sa t CL a y U a m Z V ca U in E ea m Q 1l'1 N a P V d m U m Y cn'a¢ qqr n d T. AD t o a r Cb z ° 0 z� 3 W o Q N W - �17r- to cn j Eme W it a`°ry auomCn� .� m co a g ter. coo L co m a 0 .. V X13 z co C/3 3 R— ■t":t H CD (n CD Z M N 10 ID as v m.r U� . °' CL a m N C U = p Cc $vi V) E in d v 4m �CLL, a 0 4r U a ma T► OpT- GGNr mtD oaf? m 8-0 enscpv §m O 0 �i a00 ACV 00 fl vo G voo om Z �..'... r•!7r N to) O •- rG ONW .. Elf. ... QDrAG 40N M-�N C��qe Y i�] N w N avo oao 000 00p A Cb co := :: v0a 0v oc aoa o W a 0 0 0 rCV r �'NO +rr0 GNuj r U. T rtC T § coN •-*-N ��pp 4�� . of-m 0 0) 0 000 in00 4 e` !D ' Q! Cx7 %n N 4n 0 000 p0 c; c; v6v o 0 gvvv 000 080 Ogg w/ r r T � T �i ,�V1 rC*4 t{yp rrG ONW LL LL -� erD0OD �GNN O �*-C4 T N V-- 4n N 1 C° E� oV C4�v vvv 00A O N cm a� co sG �n m m ys �yN N �rT- co cm Qg� 2' 6 00 00 CC7 C�v-0 0ov O v vo a Ogg 800 0 p 0 Ch r r q- 0 r r p C' C4 m qC M r r p ICJ p I► CD N it? T *^" *- r CY N LD �[7 O r «. qN "t O r N r�r (�Cm m OD S° =' ° m go C) ov vvo c; c; c; c; .o� v� ° a8° °S c} e` e- !- e` �• r• of T- IV+- W-N0 V-V-0 0 N W C W LL C4 0 W)G N TtnN mOLG qw �rO rrN er]l6nt- �rN v = 17! ter+ p r O J jFE JFL1' aaa M M.0 1 Z2= 0 to WWW �0 R— ■t":t H CD (n CD Z M N 10 ID as v m.r U� . °' CL a m N C U = p Cc $vi V) E in d v 4m �CLL, a 0 4r U a 008 QL°11CV a` r C � 'si a D fJ� / C2 0 0 co 2 ma N C? Y L ea y m � w L:� ea�c 0 C c o C4 u C 40(j Z a p i � g W x .� p 9) dV�m ui v � ao Y 90 to ZV -.~., ZWG.ti S-- xk%% !- J m [m Z AV G N 1010 Z:2 co W v� CL h ■ a ag �> Z' c cE 4nE°�'� cc a 7 �n c � m � m �z �] C e� r C14 oe�nr r C C mM + cl av « �'W� ci ao cc v '008 880 08 y 8 8 8° ZE LU LL in 40 4D � (4 to ry � 0� r- 400 0 10 00 coo 0 0 40 Q p r 1!! 1A C! 4n �3 !► 12 0040 CS c; 0a aco v- 888 88° 8$° °$ CL rNs rC4 rr 0 aC4W 3 U. to co Go �lDU9 wW) mN� V 40� =i v40cq o vqw40 000 X00 % Nl*itrl C� f !0 � ) 0 G 'W N cn qw 4 �.,r aC a c O C7 40 0 00 Q 4r- 0 000 a 10 Ott +� �- $g� g °o °9° cig� Ri A rt !► t► � 1� t� Cri A' r e'7 r r rt r � Oj W F�N ENO +-r0 a cvW � 3 413 lr1 r �qwqr r {► a wqw i► r► Cb CCN+r O z V N. F} d � V , , , om , m ° ° ° C4 a 2 o o Cal « ICJ v�Nv v� `2 $ y optic 40 v U. vv 060 .- pa 880 08 0 0 N W U. [�7� �0�N� of t r « . . >. 42 40040 010 6 I aCS v ra 8O° 88° °o$ � � ■ c� � � T- .- car ■ N N 40 40 a N W C LL l+iL f•Qf C4 OD mcDti a 0%a Q2ae 41 CM 112rS� 3 .o��o 2ZZ .aaa wow WWW S-- xk%% !- J m [m Z AV G N 1010 Z:2 co W v� CL h ■ a ag �> Z' c cE 4nE°�'� cc a 7 �n c � m � m �z �] C e� 40;5 ku W a 2 z z° W CO g8 eq NN W Ir to 46 ty �m 0 =°o� J � � °0°000 qr 0 r W c� o ei 0 U E Z¢ a ul) N 0 co L C7 Cx7 t m x � to C 0 IL � T E -& 0 a 72 >� V d to to &Z ci S co z zuwaaii . a « G �• iN vr0uv !� O �D c v e7 N M m m Nw �- coo v0 -6 e3� 2 - U2 S O SSG p pp pp G S G G S G p _ +� r !►rA to /�titi 1'► Z. ...... NSW r!"7�- rrT �No 'Z � @lo"3sQs qr�� i r r 'T A CNVCCr1Q Rw Q F }r}rr . El ovo voo coo 000 -ere xs � O D i!7 �0 e'7 iii m o C4 t5}qirN eph N m a00 m Qf e CVT C 0 An .0 cca vco voo C; C; 0 0 S °o o SSS r.�r► SSS �t►r_ SS° �A AL M lVcVw LLI rC4 N0 ju LL QD m it1 S � fez e'i V- N N � 0 qc V) 0�0 voo +-0o 1p I eat � 3 T om S , 0 eDV �• tvl�rJ[11 ° 6 TT a to :t o°° °00°O� voo SS 6G 0000 ca S ° v° c v I M eAi 9' P; P- r r e.FZ ti r r r � r } a/ & IS. M a W. NtvW TNT Trr r(yO Ix LL [W)LNC]r� � � 0 mr �NNr C �" 00 OD ca I%- (K) N v 000 i[7ao? 04 N 01 9 g, °°'v 8�N 000 �C*4 0) �; ar)o - Mcv coo rT o t.. (j cr vac vca vov co o a _ y S°v 0also gr0 gS° .-e�r 14- .-w� re � G 49 NN W rC4 a- a- r -(40 Z C Z W LL V too eMrt vGi %0 M 40 p N W- V 1 W) N m ev o v T •- m qt T r w r .- eq a G Leo? Dt"?C a e) r► m q-eu7N a eh N 40 i v �q- a Q ovo voo CCG ovo o0 1G+ i? 46 c '� .....� SS SSv° SSS S$° r r c• Ilk, e. T t r r LL T �1 NIVW rCyr rrw T IV o X LL W !ri r► C4 r ._- C? N 9t CD 4n e7 +W r 0 LA r► 44 NNE O C! �m C! J 2 m J - �a JE & �_� -i Q �13LI� WWW 173 L'3� ZZ2 Ir7 �o 0 v, z U � CLnus N z n ` N co- le W C In m m m c a0ri O tjm=3t ors x 0 �LLOa « a 8 8 9 qdl a r � D } O iiCS a i OR i4 CL c U mho za v Y a m � r C� epmc ci aQ ow N m � r .Fo Z e Q W � � IL N m Z w m cr ) W CM io N It � �m (nV .� _ &Zd U.5 a N. W D Ogg N Z m w Jam`. ZWCL LL T N o� lu ts _H :3 C a� f1J rs a v C �g al' a aEeoa+ m�LV �v CL Y�ca Ov OD SD Cis N vva tw) 1- 166161646 40 0 0 06d 66 ' caj tst: °° 888 888 88+�° r4Qr rr r r la N['7u% war Trr rcya U. w t►Om P- RC3 C4 GNi7 r r e� Nc'im !r! Pb. voa 000 ova vvv �! N�0p0 —88 0) TNa so • a�lv 0616 •^V vvv GO0 46646 r(4 166 Q o rIL .! r r r r r r- '' •. AS 4m •� lYNW rC'1tr rrr rIVC • O � ^ �1"+ r N p�� N?�N N 0Vccl Nmto �� rr r r►y �► 46 0 46 'co vvv a:oo v o E Y- N�3 y # 4A ld 0 4 f OQ^ �[?8 07CY0 OD ° v o $ * qr V- 0 0 0 � N O rLL �,, oav 16616 vvv cc �r: v Ni e�ic�i� r►�z.. r r r.e-e• ,- r- r r`� r �► � v 4i M C14 eq W r N .-- w q- r LLJ f...p P, r`�irN► W? cc`4Cl) a cia'co W. v �g Try oc� r NNN r 010 0 Coos) � � n 16°46cNV'� +8CMN u°irN• a�i f, C,4 � oo8 qt a ooc r- w 666 000 161616 V- CM coo v c vu. V- $88 88a v Tr r w w 0 w NNW LU rC4 rrr *'"ltii0 LL �► G r r CD ry � N o in •r sn sn r e� 1 a y •o o do a W 40 C4 v v v ,- b. C 0qW v13 INQD n Coo 6OO vo, a 460 v v 888 888 880 N N W r N r r r r r N O LL Q m 0 1► t&) Cb a7 M N • r N N r r r i IN a a. z z z aa a c co W W W 00 T N o� lu ts _H :3 C a� f1J rs a v C �g al' a aEeoa+ m�LV �v CL Y�ca 0080 Q"N Q r 0 r ey � V � ooa Pft t c vs W C3 Z v i13 v U_ m c ar to Q a� a c m U e�s � rn a 1d c O N N .r � � V Wcc n, m Q CO m W U W �¢com W , ,._ N tam rcco �co 16 Z 09a 05 CO ..� +- " Z LLi CI. 1L ... + N ■ r• V + +- 1n 0 . Qf Lrn , o a :• rcm C; c; T- ov0 00N Cacv 0cm c; C; v via, S °v° c�SS SSS S °o° :a e�+Ann e�u�� U) CV C7 0 CM cn r fq r Cl 0 ..rN 0 CO N r+ v r► enmm 000 c - vvo C 0 0 000 ovv 4 a .'.. o a • a • ar; N Q !'r7 r y r e'1� Cy l"7 0 O O IL 00 t e T qr- rFi r Nlhp C4 rNr rNr u CO r- 0) 0 T 0 r CO CO 1.— C) (� _ •vl r" T N T r •- � iE CbCV BC? ANN C7NC7 o � T O N L17 ' i► r Cs N 0 p �['} Cb to I A; rcv I eD e7e•) 0 to (N m 0TN m CJs m 0"0 Nd 0 M 01W v v C] 616 v v v 666 O G 1 80 SS1°o` ao °v Soo egi Ln chi �n .- e`i •� := cFi •- d Z M; N cn 0 N M .- .- cat .- r N �- rD M —0 rt e7 � Ef mNO v en N NtoLn ov v •fir • •7 pp ra e� r• a ao P► CO v •-- CM m G G QrN ON 0 O 0 0ui c� vv 000 vvo o6 v o ° SS SSS SS S °v °v °v _• + V 1 r Ln7hr r A 1` I r� A {{ 1% r e�� r r W r ii�� 01 M sn il7 r F%_ cn {- �g ID rSr rg� Q C4 (D P_ 4C! � in m ap r7 Q 0 m ' in M V Y (n 11- Q7 QifJ � NO. . �C Ca O ell v C7 0 0 ��eN�1, p C] 0 oCtiv C) IR �W 0 0 fl Q Sg° S$^ SSS 8SS CD -:; CVena NV)r rNT rNr W ��e pp ne+7 SON �uy 2c2c o2°°2ca .0a.0 aaaa D vJ ZZZ entnco WWW 3 } U10 s W e7 > �a �g C CD 65 W V M � v C � ir! �mn E m L cn��' �COm SOM G 8 C4 C4 a C Y � m 12 CE C ul 3 a c m Quo Sao c Ur maw m C O N cu N r ri Z e Q Z 1 3 N io °' vy m N 0 U�c$ F3 �40 m�m2 a �:.. za� � J•-�. ZWaLL H m 3 s W Ls a O v= rj C N z� Q N 4 _oL°ID erg ~> �j C a►a�� ok Y� 8 eqL « « L3 V cc a r C-4 o . d c; vvo N vca ov O o t- ov � 880 888 888 Nl+70 NV2r re+f r rC7° C s�l�tD0 N�[7r V- NO! r.. (0 a� r r qr 40040 coo ooa 0400 ,. - 040 0400 coo 0400 400 880 888 888 8+8�8 • �•� r�W V- Pa. s�ivar P- IPI- �e�r rl�ir !V ma iVC7r rtNr r;yr qr 40 o t4 s O7 V9 to 0 8 fN An C4 N0Co vvr Ul m N 000 y Q P. 4 0 v ' ° �T C3 &n V7 m N «^ m `,C4 or°7 v �NC4 � �v o atop > 40 aoo aov tivo a v 0000 �ov a°c � a°og d w Z r N["50 NM icy.- V- lyw fi m ti-qr C' r+- N r r rCOM ! Qlf•v r ne eA N T• ON G D % e+t a a °0V)),0 = �c`'�'�, V-`C4 C4 v -a v IL? vv °4040 cdo °cv v v °4040$ 88IODo` r�ke U) T- �eFiT- �$S .- g- Nl7c NV) wCm rNr r 0� NO�r p�1�7 l�� 1+3QGN n�3 t pp tl A ! « • « Cf N ' 1► N 0 df f%ft �D +w OD N iA N !► �► ° N r ! v V) co �NC V- CMN 40 40 40 coo 40 400 4040 c 8810 8 8 X88 888 C4M10 NtnV- (4 *- r(yr • 3 !�L r f► t'ri U) N f. a7 m *- ti !• C7 N t O i�7 r r lV r r T c�! ! �pp C +s �FE Fa im v?CaT1U) W W W aka V¢ z z z H m 3 s W Ls a O v= rj C N z� Q N 4 _oL°ID erg ~> �j C a►a�� ok Y� 8 eqL « « L3 V E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS r �9-14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UGHIIN G Traffic Manual VIM t a Figure 9-9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) ��t1 x CL j > 4400 �r � U p �a w � 300 CC e• to Q J cr w 0 200 � o } •� x 0 100 x 0 300 400 500 800 700 800 900 1 000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -- VPH * NOTE 100 YPH /IPPUES AS 7f{E LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACii WITH iW0 OR MORE LANES AND 75 YPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD YOUIttE FOR Q RSiNOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. one �� A�jpril }}�cX- Bort{, appr'oac�t�c. 1�or Sbrcc� � Z�°� \� Zoy3 9 -74 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UGHTtNG Traffic Manual 14"t Figure 9 -9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) 503 x CL y > 400 x P � w om 300 j CC CL ac w z D 200 a 0 0 100 404 500 800 744 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - Wli NOTE: 184 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLE ME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH W(TH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOW&IE FOR A M(NOR STREET APPROACHING W(TH ONE LANE. One... Z °� �{ �� 1pM ?,otti APp�-oach�c . ��r Sb� «� � zy'33 Vat.-asck W�vct AWro�cuet 7Lrx - ft �k E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX D COST ESTIMATES FOR RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS i CL tA ce LLI LLB z J z w IA 0 o = L 0 0 CL CD 0 C m LM L 0. � � � 0 °s�o Gi ❑ 3 (ADM w � n w � > CC0 m V �wrr U = w � .r. 0 0 qt — _ 0 N 0 }' s 4) C� C U) 3 = �L = n C i. C.i 0 U ,CD s .w. 0) CD I o E � � W CL Un E. 0 � 0 E w s C = _ CD CD CL z 0 C IA •� a� 4 � ❑ m a E to � 0 3 E LLi R � a 0 0 oumm C 0 � o � Vi 7 �— 0 0 v L N low s = V � CD to In N Q gn an I%. N N v � r m w c3 r w qt v �i r• r` av en ti r r P.- w Z V N 40 400- 4ff OR, o .. .. . . 0 i r• t- co �L co w ea a ♦" C ° w C> v z°n Z. LL CO C) — — w T - C) ❑ Co v CD CD CD C> ° ❑ av N r` N W 0 C. a 60 40 LL V .r v° U) ° v m a U cs M - v cc 40 a ° 0 ❑ � o LO ❑ ... .(D cV) r� CD CL 6f� d3 bg 0 °o C) CD o °a 0 � �p o- a L6 M L6 H U 0 ❑ a o N v .0 ❑ a C7 v, C) C�4 Z7 3 U-) L T- 0 v ❑ c� m L ❑ v t o � ° to!). 6 a m 0 C p , 2 ,e ,? w sl] N t" V °v 0 a °o N cn v et U �- C °` o lz T' x x x_ C UO D t -v ❑ m 0 o '0D "o -a •3 0) z N a ai ❑' W ca •L a, -3 '' m a� > m (A a a� -0 ❑ .o ❑ cn -L IM C � � .� .�' .0 co C !E cc Q �C p E i� 11f Q? C "� CV N tD N r r C to C Q !r co ❑ [Y] C [0 Co Q -+tea 0 a CO v 0° X k -tea 0 L C = N 3 Q n3 tL [!3 '= CD Q 0 L O C U Q Q V 3 ❑ n N n t i ��. ❑ D �.. v t _ c ca c = v' o a� C3 v "� r m �+ .• L L C > % = ■Q ca U = C3 N C ..r N Va �C v3 co .0 Qj X77 r� = C T3 a. J: 3: �? 0 = ❑ c a� s a � .c � E W Cl. a 'c n r m T C -0 -D o I-- D r 0 Z% U 0 C? Q V] yi01-0 CM 0 r E N G! !V E E R 5 APPENDIX E CITY OF SEAL BEACH IMPACT FEE SUMMARY EXCERPT rf- - `• 25--2002 � i 6 0+ r •T� �t Y , rte: b. c CITY CF SEAL BEACH C=prr-ha ivc Fa Rraoiuden Page t ( s) ....... Mobile Home S pace 1.40 Comae =ial - per square foot - ,-- .�._......._ ,r+ ....... .... .........._,.............,.. _.... r 3 .05 Lndusuial-per squaw foot - .,_-.__-- ................r ............ ......... .............................. 5 -ps Ys+i+4•. • 2• Delinquency Chargcw„Twcvey -five pemm of tax plus iaterest cost of 1.00% per month. 562 431 406? P. O� ,, D. En viranmen t1LReserve Tax 1. Fee on acw =Sidez"ial living unlit con=cua_ o L Fuss three (3) Boors of a coafo=ing uiiai (per squ 4► footr+-w�.a_ »HwrMwww....r... � �• b. First three (3) floors of a noneonforix ng =it (per square foatj�.�._.._____�..._.. S 0.35 E_ Non- Subdivision Pnrk send Recreation Fee9 l . Sin.&- Family Dwelling - A fee of S 10.000 is imposed upon the construction and occupancy of =4ch single - family► dwelling,, which results in net, increase to the City's bousing stock- Said fee is imposed to offset impacts to the City's exzng park and recreation facilitics eai:sed by the additional single family dwelling. ?. Other Residential uses - A fee of $5,000 is imposed upon the consiruction and occupancy of each midcatial dwelling unit, other than a single- family dwelling/ w}tich results in a net increase in the Ciry's housing stock. Said fee is imposed to offset impacts to the Ciry4s ,cxisting a:ic and recreation facilities causes by the 3ddkionsl dwelling unit SECTION 3. PlaoniQg Fees The follo,^ing fees are charged to individuals submming the described rcquz9ts io the City Dcvclopmew Scryices Dcpanment_ Payment in full is rcquucd br_forc issuance of neceswiry Craving, Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical or any other appropriatc pern it. A. Filing EM I. Conditiana3 Use Permit Actual Casts - S 500.40 deposit Varis:ice Casts - 3 5�.4] d -posit _....._.............._.... -• -- •------------ .- _._.____..._..... �...... Acn.'ai 3. 2-onc Change.. -- - -- -_.... , ...... Actual Costs - S I ,x.40 d cpo S t 4. Gencral P I m Arnendmeni Actual Cysts - S 1,400.00 deposit S. Panned Unit Dcvelopmcnt_... --------- ....�.._ ....�. Actual Costs - S 1,000.00 deposit 6. Minor Site Review Actual Cows - S 140.00 dcpostt a 7. Ma J Qr Site PI= Review deposit �c Costs - S �OD.00 8_ Concept Approval (CoPStal) -- --.--__-- .................._......_._... Actin Costs - S 104.00 deposiI a Specific Plan .....�.........._. ___ . . .......................� 1c Casts - yZp00_pp deposit 10 Appeal - Non - Public Hearing Matte ..__.._ �.... ................... .....r.w,_.r.,�---------- -_._ -- S 140.40 IL . Appcal - Public Rearm& ..•_• _ _.._ -- Actual Costs - S 5 00. 00 deposit 12. Pre- Application Cflnfese.-Ice Actual Costs - 3 1 aQ -00 dcpoMi 13. Property Prafilc ......_.........._....____..__- - - - - -• Aetufll Costs - S 75.04 deposit - .......... 14- 'Lannins Commission inrcrprciatioa -..._ ►• Actual Costs - S2 .0 B. Lnv:rnnmcntx1 Fcts 1. Minor Environmental Assessmernt (DettrmMi ation)......_�.. Actual Costs - S 10.00 deposit 2. Major Envirortmental Asscssmcm (1niri3.l Study3 Arrcal Costs - S'250.00 deposit 3. Negative D=L =tion _ _ Aahmd Costs - S500.00 deposit 4- Environrncnm� Impact Report ..■ ....�..._..___.____- __._....... Actual Costs -S 10,000. 00 0 deposit plus 101 /9 to Firc Dcpart.ment C_ Trans nrtatioe Facilities and Pro, -rams Develo ir=e t ccs E CITY OF SEAS. BEpCH �5 = 71 406 06nm C MPMh=Sive Fee Rrjslsstie. NEC 9 1. Shopping Center (up to 175,WO square fc-.0 S9.4 1 per square Foot of gross leasable 3r'Ca 2. Shopping Center {over 175,000 square feet) ..,......:,...9'...92 per s uam feat aF area - 4 gross le.ssble 3 Ccncrai 0fficc Buildin g---- -.._.. foot of gross leasable arcs 4. Quaitty R ta=.mt 57.24 ..._ ........... _�..____....�_----- ......____.. per �gwar -s foot of gross floor aria 5- Hates S636.64 /'� r�j�}� r � *� ........�_ +�. ._..... ...ter Y+-. ....y.... M..H �.�F....�M.._.. N.►.MM....... 636.54 Per room vi sWtc 6. Single F=Iily D=ched Housing 7. Multi Family .__....... ...................... »........ S 1,123.79 per dwci ling unit Attached Housing �.4partrnrnt� S737.46 per dwelling unit g. Multi Family Arch � ..,,....................... 9• P3xi. Chi Housing �Coruiaraisiiuxn� ..................» $615.12 pea dwelling unit • ..Nw.. _.....MM.. ....M....� ..'..M.M \....aMM...M.......�N ■..w....'....�wr__�y._._....... =3.679.45 per 10- Qtbz: 3.atid 1.lsc T p acre Yp� .. M......... .............. ................. S 1,197.49 per PM PC2K hour trip gencsatcd D_ Trani nrution Facilities and Pra rams Develo mcnt 4,pplic2rinn Fee Land -Usc 1. Snoaping Ccnter ( to 179 0� feet a:ra (up square ----- - --- -- S1.at7 per StluI ' foot of grtrss lc3snble t 2- Shopping Center (over' 175,000 sq=rc feet) S0.42 pC r SQvC foot of gross ie3S.. ble 3. CJG17eI`3: OffiCC Building --- - - ---- ........................ - ......... $0.46 per square foot of gross ituaNe 4 • Qu�Ity Rcst3uinrlt . - --- , .......... ..... .......,... :... ................ S 1. Q7 5�L181'e 5. Rotcl fact of gross f]oar arcs 6. ' - •.. .. ............................. 03 per room or suite SiZg}c Family Detached Heusinb ................. S 167.54 e ........ M.. ............... per dwelling unit �. Mutt Family Attached Housing (Apartment) . 8. �...._.....................- 5109.59 per dwelling unit Multi Famiiv Attached Housing (Candorninium) 9. City Parr .. -.. ..... ........ S91.77 per dwelling this Other sand � Types .__..._ - - -- -- - r acre 10. Oth Use .........• ._.._�_..._._........ - - -- ------- - "�1�56.53 -..- .PSG .pe e generated -- •__"....,...�-' Ac-" pct: hour trip E. MAin Strcet S ethic Batt Zone In . Lieu ParianLy Fees The following per yPQCe in -lieu parking fee is hereby established for uses on Co prceis located within the Main Street Specific Plan Zone; mmcrctally zoned 1- 53,500.00 per dcficicztt space for au such uses establisbcd on or aftr. Scptcmbcr fee shall be caicuiated �' multip�ving the Auinbet of parjd s tired l' 1990. Such nab pm��dod either on -rite or wit}titt lhrrac huncit�ad fcert 300 P far the use which are situated by S3,500.00. - of the pal an which th: `sc is 2. An annual fze of S 100.00 per deficient space for all m1ch u= =tabUshcd 1996 whit$ are current Y operating under an existing lard. -ux eahtls� rut wh�nor to September 1, approval the' ap1?hcgat .. ain as a condition of � P��p�c � tl�c CzCf's in lieu parking prv�� cxu�i for those ia= 9'Ovcmcd by Section 3 h=irmficr. Such annual fee shall be culiIt cd by rn u 1 p l ' . number vFparking spat *0s rCquirrd for the use which arc not provided either on -site P � sng �• Of the paz�cel as which the use is sinsatcd by 51,00.00. yr within 300 3. For sit such uses estabUshd prior to September 1, 1996 umu to a dev w►htsein the applicant agreed to - 1 tlopment 29reement deficicnx sp,�cc shill be a e p�'t:t�ztt in the City's is lieu parking progra= tide fee per P� specified in the Wfi able developm�t tgreerncnr for th; subiect perty. SECTION 4 - Police Fees A. Sr +r A licatioa Fees 6•Z TOWL F. 0� - =.� E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX F HCMILOS CALCULATION SHEETS FOR CALTRANS INTERSECTIONS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis tY Y Year 20 Conditions D2 Existing Traffic Cond�t�ons 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific Coast H12hway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions F .w a?w."R> wvl M S. .• w.-. : r. is ^.�•: •'wT•``; �i Lan e Conf � u rati n 5 +tt tti� • ea flow (pp1�0lC943 = 900 X30 9009(36 :1900 0 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4-0.. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.D 4.0 a . 4. 0 . 4.0 4.6 Lane MI. factor .: X3:97 .. .6 � .. .8 : s. °x.'91 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.06 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected r .�QO �D 3fl x'').95 x.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 3433 4805 1362 3433 5085 1.583 3433 4919 A 1770 4909 F#t Pern fitted � 0 .. A95, X30 AS5 1. Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 . 4805 1352 3433 508 5 1583 . 3433 49'19 1770 4909 Volume (vph) .228 .x•346 ti :: 50 : 950 - ;239 525 1 385 ' :387 1 a2 728 219 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.60 1. 06 1.00 1 DD Adj. Flow (�h) _'228 =1346 ! s/� �..�. _ ..... - x:87 :. _ :o 728 219 Lane Group Flow NO) 228 1345 379 250 950 239 525 1773 .12 . 0 a 152 947 0 Turn Type 'rot �p�v 'Prot • `Pemn Pmt Prot Protected Phases 7 4 5 3' $„ 5- . 7 6 Permitted Phases _ Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 34.0 56.0 10.0 31.0 31.0 22.0 45.0 12.6 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) -13.0 F35.0 - 7.0 A0.0 .0 32.0 22.0 47.0 12.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.29 0.48 0.08 6.27 0.27 0.18 0.39 0.10 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4, 0 '5.0 4.0 4.0 a.0 5.0 •4.L 5.0 4f0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1402 547 285 1355 422 529 1927 177 1514 vls Ratio Prot . c0-07 •c0.28 '0.11 CO.07 x.'19 :. 0.15 .36 0.69 0.19 vfs Ratio Perm 0.17 0.15 vlc Ratio -0.61 Z.96 0.59 µ 0.87 -0.79 .0.57 Z .83 '0.92 �1J. $6 0.63 Uniform Delay, dl 5'1.1 41.8 22.9 54.4 39.7 38.0 47.2 34.7 53.2 35.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 :1.06 1.00 :1.00 1.44 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.4 16.2 3.9 28.9 3.0 5.4 12.4 8.7 38.5 2.0 Delay (s) 58.4 58.0 �-':2608 _83.3 42.7 .43.4 59.6 43.4. 91.7 37.5 Level of Service E E G F D D E D F D Approach Delay (s) y 52.0 X9.9 47.1 45.0 Approach LOS D D D D 'j r/irt�t/A +•.. _ ,i� y :,�,' , Yi .,d iw'',;.;E' i i .a M �rtta y H .:..1 ..`-�''.0.yt. _ '..a <rr •k,A.vr • :a, .. . HCM Average Control Del ay 48.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio O ,02 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time � (s� ■ X7.0 �"5e Intersection Capacity Ublizabon � 93.E r� ACU Legal of service .E C critical Lane Group N:\2300\2022336\Synchro\2002 Exl1 am-ex. sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HGM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2666 Background Traffic Conditions ans 7. 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific coast H hwa AM Peak Hour Traffic conditions � -► 1!~ t 1 i i' N► l J N:L230M20223361Synchro12006 Cum11 am-cum.sy6 Synchro 5 Report 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 9 Lane configurations + Ideal Flow v h 90} k.. •.' ' .., K.':: °.•YA - . . X900. =°1 900 � ��o Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4 0 4 .0 4.0 4. 0 4 0 ..... . .M.'T. 4 0 :. /. :''►..• 4.0 ..v 4 0 '� 4.0 Lane C .. ?r 0 _ A.Y °,., �j tip, Frt. 1.00 •.: 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 1.00 "'71.: ., :c:•v`• 0.85 ........ ,'",'•.. •x... 1.00 -. •;;'• 0.97 .. -. • . i .09 .. 0.97 Fl t w ''fir: - �::. �- . 0� -= ::.. 40:1` : 00.. _ 0 Satd. Flow (Prot) ., 3433 4806 1362 3433. 5085 1583 3433 4918 1770 4 t Pe _ r . ,..�a.'•: M _ Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 1583 3433 4918 1770 4912 Volume y i� :e 46 � . �2 64 844 23 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 . 1.00 1.0 0 1,0 0 1 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 .. AdM 'r•y .' .. ... .. Lane .. •.•• r v . F•, - . 1 804, 237 Grou Flow {vph} 246 1461 423 284 1 032 258 580 1942 0 164 1041 0 Tum ,P }: ... ... _� �8 ��N� Prot ff. Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 . _ "Prot 5 1 6 Pennifted. Phases., 4 .y. Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 35.0 59.0 10.0 31.0 31.0 24.0 46.0 '11.0 33.0 Effective Gt�en, '6Q t'3 -'I € . �.4 ..- 4 = ::X4:4 7.I 11 *0 34.4. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.30 0.50 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.39 0.09 0.28 Clearance Time (s)-. 460 4.4 x .4 50 4.4 _ 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp cap (vph) 401 1442 681 286 1356 422 687 1926 162 1392 vds Ratio Prot co.0 -040 X4:12 "-:.-d0.0& -0-20. 0.'I 7 X0.39 c0.09 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.16 v/c Rath - -0.61' '01. .0,62 ,4.99.. . : 0.7 0.6'# 0 ' 84 1.01 'I.01 0.75 Uniform Delay, dl 50.4 42.0 21.8 55.0 40.5 38.6 46.2 36.5 54.5 39.1 Progress1*0n Factor 1.4 :.: -' r �# . - 00 1'00': 'l :.i :.'l :04 `'l 1.00 7.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 27.0 4.2 51.5 4.1 6.5 12.1 22.5 74.0 3.7 Delay (s) . 57.E 9.0 . 26 *0 1 06.4. X4.6 : - .45.0 58.11 128.5 42.8 Level of Service E E C F D D E .59.0 E F D proa Delay (s} :; ... :. 55.8 58.9 54.5 Approach LOS E E E D �.y.riY :Yi. .!a' .GPeMFr ")s '::.. .', � t,. •.�; r:i:'8:"^�" ;. HCM Average control Delay y 7.6 HCM Level of Service E HGM Volume to Capeci ra�a� • r.. � � .Ian, - . Actuated cycle Length (s) 1 20.0 Sum of lost time _ ' :. (S)20,0 ' Intersection capacity Dfirac w .. I! Level of Se C Critical Lane Group N:L230M20223361Synchro12006 Cum11 am-cum.sy6 Synchro 5 Report 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 9 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific coast High AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions 4N& t Lane configurations, M +tt I deal Fiow (vph.pl) :: 900 :w 1900 000 ; . 00 1190 � . � 1-900 1900 1 ` 900 1900 1.990 Total Lost time {s} 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor .07 x.85 . 5 • • " . 7 'x,91 1 .000.'91 Frt 1.00 1.90 0.85 1.00 1.00 . 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Rt Protected :•. -. .. '... • • :•.. 40 -/ .' \ . "i .L:,v . ♦ ••..'y\ '1^,00 r .. *� Y. "'S .._ .. 100 ,' .. • •• .... ". .0-95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4805 1382 3433 5085 1583 3433 '4918 1770 4918 Fit Permitted .95. :1 . .�5 1.00 x.95 '1000 Said. Flaw {perm} 3433 4805 1352 3433 5085 1583 3433 4918 1770 4918 Volume (yp�) �24 : Y 31 _ a� v 1 4 : 1 � : :� # 524 427 . � 244 944 237 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.09 • 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad' Flow • }5 _ " : :$ `8403 21 �1 54 . .427 X44 X44 237 Lane Group Flow (vph) 245 1485 431 284 1043 271 581 1951 0 244 1081 a Type -rot en +v Prot Term mot Prot Protected Phases 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 5 Permitted Phases .7 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 34.0 58.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 24.0 44.0 15.0 35.0 Effective Green, 9 (s) 11.0 -•35:0 59.0 . :0 33.0 24:0 45,0 15-0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.29 0.49 0.48 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.38 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 -4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.D � •5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 315 1402 570 257 1398 435 587 1844 221 1475 v1s Ratio Prot .0.07 c0.31 0.13 c0.98 '0.21 0.17 �c0:40 co.'s 4 0.22 vls Ratio Perm 0.19 0.17 We Ratio - ..0.78 1.06 0.64 .::1.11 D.75 0.62 :x.85 1M -1.10 0.73 Uniform Delay, dl 53.3 42.5 22.7 55.5 39.7 38.1 45.2 37.5 52.5 37.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 17.3 41.4 4.7 87.2 3.7 5.6 12.2 38.3 91.2 3.3 Delay (s) . 7D.S X3.9 2.4 42.7 X3.3 44.5 58.4 75.8 = '43.7 40.9 Level of Service E F C F D D E E F D Approach Delay (s) 71.1 -.61 \2 .7 1.8 59,9 Approach LOS E E E E HCM Average control Delay 57.3 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to capacity ratio 1. Actuated cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost times 15.0 Intersection capacity Utifizabon 105.2% =SOU Level of Service c critical Lane Group N:12300\20223351Synchro12005 Tot11 am tot.sy5 LlhlSCOCOS5 -FF51 F-3 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacfic Coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions t /Op Lane Configurations r 1 Ideal Flow vP : .. ' 900.1 wY : ._ 3:1900 . .. r . w... , . " ' 900= :. ' 9flt3 : 19tQ . . 194E # 1. 9a 1900 Total Lost time (S)_ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ...'" 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 Mme: .' Lane U ' H ri R r a�F. w0� ... .01 too Frt 1.00 1..00, 0. 85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 .... 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Pro test+ .. " .9 . A r .v _1_.00 M1.r ~ •• •% rr ..(.•. .. w. .. r { r .. w'Y' Y M. .. v x5085 `:t ASS. y. � Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4806 1352 3433 • ..... r .. 1583 ... .,..n:I: 3433 -::: 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitte : '0 .: -1. -0:9.5 �: :.. ;� 00 1 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Volume (vph2044`7: " K° : 2.. 148 ..: :: -1 7 :" 3 - • *:. 1524 ..1.00 ::� :427-, 244 844 237 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad' • Flow (V ph)- . J- p ." : TT - _� 284 :: . .' :. 1'524: 421 . 244 844 2 Lane Grou Flow (Vph) 245 1485 431 284 1043 271 581 1524 427 244 844 237 Tut • ■ . '€fit:: »• "••`'�['+. Prod.•. •�.r Q . •. : .: �r. Prot.. Penn Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 5 Permitt ed tease P s ... w / w Y Yew Fr+l. .:k Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 38.0 50.0 11.0 35.0 35.0. 22.0 42.0,1 42.0 11.0 ~,- 31.0 31.0 Effective Greed, g {s} . 1 � 39. -610 11' 0 . 3 3 - =~ 3 .Q 3 :. �4.3.0 , . 43. Q 11.0 32.0 32.0 Actuated gfC Ratio 0.12 0.32 0.51 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.18 0.35 0.36 0.09 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time 4.0 A;:.. 5.0 4.0 4.0 51 .0 4.0= 5.0 5.0 4,0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 441 1552 592 315 1525 475 629 1822 567 315 1355 422 vls Ratio Prot,. Q,07;.., .. C0.31 • 01T 00.08 . : f ;.. c0,'l ' x.30 0.07 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.17 0.27 0.15 ui c Ram " 0-61. -0-95 0.62 0.90, 0.58 'x.57 ` 0.92 0.84 .0-75 5 0.-i i 0.62 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 50.4 39.6 21.2 54.0 37.0 35.5 48.2 35.3 33.8 53.3 38.7 38.0 Progression Factor 1.0.0 100 � �:� 'l.Q� .: • 1.00. , 1.00 'i.DC� :. 1.00. .. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay_ , d2 6.9 13.7 4.2 30.9 2.5 4.9 21.4 4.7 9.0 16.8 2.2 5.3 Delay (4), 5 .3 . 5. . 84.8 39.5 - : 40.4 w 69.5 4000 42.8 70.1 40.8 43.3 Level of Service E D C F D D V E D D E D D Approach Delay (s). 43.2. 47.x' - 47.3 46.7 Approach LOS D D D D HCM Average Control Delay 47.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle a Len th (s) y g 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.4 y. l me motion Capaci Utirmafia� .... 89., 0. Lei f ens - a c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 M1t11 am- mit.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions l Lane Configurations Ideal Flow NOW) _ X00 o 9a� f .. 0 .1900 . X19.00 ' 1900 X900 9aa Total Lost time {s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 dY 4.0 .. 4.0 ^ 4.6 4.9 La _ ryetil. Factor :7 ... .. -r "��.0t� 7 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 .1.00 0.95 Fit P r+�tect x@,95.. . 0 X3.95 : HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2406 Background Traffic Conditions 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions � -► 1 ! '' t '1 t t �► l r -�Emu EM I '•. Ai.. . k i.x• �w � Lane Configurations �� ►��, .. .� .. �� Ideal Flow (vph 190 � . _ �. g,3• ..' 90 1340 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 lane 'F N w 'A Wa° •N• ' x. •. _ �. •• .. ... 3' - +fit- f.:..i: .yy � • + dS+a•.�N ' n ?1w'..0 4,.�nA''= :.••~," ' �:';.y:., w: s Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 .. , -n.e 1.00 1.00 • .. •. 0.85 aK: 1.00 - b.97 : 1.00 0.95 •r,' Fit Pro ,, 9 ..:�� .... ..r ...r : , I .:.�.:. .. ".:.:__ �:,..:� .. _ "... r "_ " : "� ...�.:.�_• � 1 . 0 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 ._. 1583 ......" " _ 3433 .. � 4924 ,... 1770 4884 Flt Perms 9 - •,..• - - y - '•• .5 .€ .. 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 4805 1362 3433 5085 1583 3433 4924 1770 4884 Volume (v.ph)''-343.. . . " ... ..- 422 1 282 234 1 464 526 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.40 Adj. Flow - v • _ •� _ 34~ :.1370 :-`333 .2-78':. :4n. " " 282: 294 '1464 526 Lane Group Flow (vph) 343 484 416 1333 278 422 . 1334 0 294 1994 D Tura T Q� . . . , r Perm".; erg � ". ry �?�vt : =: �: .. Prot Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 _ P erm �tted •P RK • Actuated Green,_ G (s) 13.0 30.0 44.0 14.0 31.0 31.0 14.0 38.0 20.0 44.0 Effective Green, 4. 3; ` ; . 33.E 20.Q 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.26 0.38 0.12 0.27 0.27 0.12 0.32 0.17 0.38 Clearance Tie �s} 4 :0 5 4.0 .0..... '.0 5. 0 0 5.0.. 4.0 5.4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1242 511 401 1356 422 441 1600 295 1832 vls Ratio Prot 0.10. �: 0, 1.. cO. 12 0.27 0.17 c4.41 v/s Ratio Perm" 0.24 4.18 We Ratio :. _ 0.92- 1.:10 0.95 1.04 0.98' 0.66 1.05 0.83 1.44 7.49 Uniform Delay, dl 53.0 44.5 36.3 53.0 43.7 39.1 53.4 37.5 50.0 37.5 Progression Factor i -00 - 1.00 i:00 '14100 :. 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 30.6 58.6 28.6 55.0 20.7 7.8 59.4 5.3 51.6 48.7 Delay (s) 83 f 10 3 1 65:0 108.0 '64.4 47.0. 112.4 42.8 101.6 86.2 Level of Service F F E F E D F D F F Approach Delay (s ) : 9'1:x `'l . :..., - e w . .Q 59.5 88.2 Approach LOS F E E F Vp HCM Average Control Delay 78.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume t0. Ca as ratio p .. ;:.. _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost times 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilrzatiob '107.3'3 .:..:. 1C� L.evet of Senace - ::. c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Cum11 pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F-tj Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection capacity Analysis Year 2066 with Project Traffic Condition 7- 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue .& Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions : _ i ...v x .`` 11 tft Lane Configurations``' Ideal Ftovvpp 900 0 w- ... n:90 ... 0 fl ry �9 1 ....:. :r 00 900 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ... 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan Utfl. e Factor �97 _4.0 k... A >f 1 Frt 1.00 7.00 0.85 1.00 1.001 D.85 1.�0 D.97 Fit Protected -`: r.0 � r - =:y ti k: 10. ._ .� � Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4806 13.62 3433 5085 1583 3433 4930 ri} - r 1770 4884 �trnar# - 0.5 0 1 a.. '3433'''4'930 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 1583 1770 4884 �alumevph .43 -1387 ! . :41 6. 11.360 r :541 10 X82 X470 526 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Add. � 7.I i 343 ' �7 .� . ..... " ,.... X54 "'':431 - �5. :2 Lane Group Flow (vph 343 1387 485 416 1360 , .. 354 _.... 43 . 1 1387 N 0 -9.47{ 319 1996 .526 0 `urn ` ype'at -�- v -'at. :::: 'errnt Prot Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 31.0 45.0 14.0 32.0 32.0 14.0 35.0 22.0 43.0 Effective Green, 9 (s) 13.0 "22.0 "1*0 33.0 33.0 14'b � .6 ;. .0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.27 0.38 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.12 0.30 0.18 0.37 Clearance Time Ls) ?4.0 : a:o �.{� �4.� ":5.0 � S.�D '4 ':� � � .a4.0 : .54,0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1282 522 401 1398 435 401 1479 325 9791 v/s Ratio Prot 0-10 ot3.29 r? :' : 0.12 -,roO -27 - 0.13 V2 8X0.41 vls Ratio Perm 0,25 0.22 v1c Ratio 0.92 :1:08 '- V.93 1� ().97 X3,81 '-1-,.'07 . - . • ��Q.9� x.11 Uniform Delay, dl 53.0 44.0 35.4 53.0 43.1 40.6 53.0 40.9 ,. 4$.8 38.0 Progression Factor 1.00 '100 1,00 -1.00 ,1.00 7.06 '1.00 :00 .00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 30.6 50.4 25.2 55.0 18.4 15.3 66.4 12.6 45.5 59.9 [delay (s) ,83.6 94.4 .:60.7 '108.0 "55.9 - 119.4 - • -53.5 �94.3 97:9 Level of Service F F E F E E F D F F Approach Delay (s) 85.3 = X9,6 69.2 97.4 Approach LOS F E E F � F�'*S-0-: - M*0 M.'-, - - �E-T RM 4 M HCM Average Control Delay 81.2 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to capacity r'abo Actuated cycle Length (s) 12000 um S of lost time s �3 12.0 Intersection capacity Utilization A-08-0/01 _. tcU vel Sew y " c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Totl1 pm- tot.5y6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F 00 rl Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7: 2nd Street/Westminster Avenue & Pacific Coast Hi hwa PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions lip. ---.SEEMS= Lane Configurations' •y w. Ideal. Floes . �P � . 1 . .. . . 1 =k :.. � <: .. . :� .. _- .. F _ � -.: � �: � : :" - � µ 9D � •� �D€� :'� 9 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 ........ 4.0 _ . .. 4.0 ... 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan i'.... f.. •.l :: Frt 1.00 1.00 0. 85 1.00 1 00 0 .85 1 00 1 00 . 0 85 1 00 100 0 • 85 .. - .. +, i'.. ..1sr.iC 1.JAC• ,; •.,. .. ... Y ,i..r.. Flt P .•K %• mow/ ..;k ... F .:M,• •s'N-- 'r: !. -• ` . >•.. i� .: • -r• y' J.: •..... _ _ _ _ 11i - -+' `• 0, .0 11ho.", 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 -- 1583 3433 5085 1583 r Flt P.e .r Satd. Flow erm 3433 4806 1362 3433 5085 1583 3433""6085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Volume (vph.):- .:.: X4:1. 36o .. 343• :w. 1 319 147 0' 526 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad' �'� :. • Fes: t• q 343 '1 .:��. 38 .. . 45r .: . a . M 4: :� 1 3� 43:: '�� 319 1470 526 Lane G rou Flow {vph } 343 1387 485 416 1360 354 431 1105 282. 319 1470 526 Turn T . • ... Pry � sw = s }'��d +off j ?F .ro :: .... , . � .. • Perm .. . _ P not . ; .. Perm Prot Berm Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Peffnitted Phases f r '.. .' ... .27.0 - 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 40.0 12.0 28.0 28.0 13.0 31.0 _ 31.0 12.0 30.0 30. o Effective Gre, g {a} 7.0 r 28.0 .41.t3 X2.!0 y� 29.0 3,0 3.0 • 320 72.3 31 r0 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.41 0.12 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.31 0.31 Clearance T"me 4.0. 5.0.0 4.0 5.0.. 5.0 4.C1 5.0 500 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 1346 558 412 1475 459 446 1627 507 412 1576 491 vls Ratio Pmt. • .. .. - Y.1 .. .w.• -. .- .. .. -eta. .. c.27 . • - '1 - R3 0.09 0.29 0 vls Ratio Perm 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.33 We Ratio _ os9't. �rD 3- 0• � •.•'...w_r0,•.�• t aC3.92 Val' 4 os�17 .. M•� 0. 5` f 77 • 0.93 1.07 Uniform Delay, di 44.0 36.0 27.0 44.0 34.4 32.5 43.3 29.5 28.1 42.7 33.5 34.5 Progression Facts 1.00. ,: ' ^ = 1, 00 1;00 1.00 1.00 .10 '00 1.001 1.00* 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.9 32.7 16.7 46.8 11.0 11.9 35.0 2.3 4.4 13.3 11.5 61.0 Delay (s). V 6' : 43.7 . 94.8 45.4 44.3 7$.3' 31:8 32.5 55.9 45.0 95.5 Level of Service E E• D F D D E C C E D F Approach Delay Is) ' 63 .: 541 43 0 58.0 Approach LOS E _ D D E Von M- ppo HCM Average Control Delay 55.3 HCM Level of Service E HCM . VolUme to Capacity ratio - . . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Int .Capacity u#ilolzation -N ::..,_ 96 ICU Level of Senesce c Critical Lane Group N:1230012022336\Synchro12006 Mit11 pm- mit.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 fi%W% Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existin g Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 EB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic conditions N :1230012022336 \Synchra12002 Ex \3am- ex.5y6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 ,'` •.ir,'r�' . � .ter. � w,,,.. � "",, , "- •',.j+= •:, .. Lane Configurations Ideal Paw (vphpD :1900 0o w 9 3t . ■`��yj� -ai - .�;.- - il0 yy Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan eti.F artar .� _ x =: ry. Frt 1.40 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 F Pr a R c to ted .. i � - ..i Satd. Flaw (prat) 3433 1583. 3539 ~1583 . 1 �'l0 � ,. _ '''9"4' 353 :::.. Fit Permitted w95 X30 4 y j Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume .2 54 R :59 .. - 81 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. flow �vp# 44:'59 X87 :97 :?.. Lane Group Flow (vph) 25 54 414 1059 181 979.: -..- Turn Types :. VFW ,Prot Protected Phases 3 1 - . Permitted Phases fee - wN Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 50.0 16.0 60.0 19.4 39.0 Effective Green, 9 (S) '12.0 X60.0. • .-1 1.0. 50.0 1900 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 1.00 0.28 1' .00 0.32 0.07 Clearance Time (s) .540 :5.0 4.0 .S.D Lane Grp Cap (vph) 687 1583 1003 1583 551 2359 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 .: D. 0:'i 0 x.28 vls Ratio Perm 0.03 0.57 vlc Ratio 0.(X D.03 '; V A I 0.67 ::0.32 x.42 Uniform Delay, dl 19.3 0.0 17.4 0.0 15.6 4.6 Progression Factor 1.30 1.00 1.00 .1.00 .1 woo Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 1.3 2.3 1.5 0.5 Delay �(s) 19.4 - 0.0 18.7 ::2.3 .1 5. . Level of Service S A B A B A Approach Delay (s) -S. -5.9 -7.0 Approach LOS A A A T02to �ffl? - ,, . M HCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity rabol 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost times 0.0 Intersection Capacit y (Utilization =1CU Level of Se�ce :a c critical Lane Group N :1230012022336 \Synchra12002 Ex \3am- ex.5y6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 EB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:\2300120223361Synchro\2006 Cum\3am- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -\o Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow V I1 .. � � - '� 900 90 . 's. Total Lost time (s} 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane eD .F c Q Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit - t Pro dt� , r . r. .. • . 'tea. .. r •-. Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770"'-3539 r..... •w, . Fit .P ern �tted•' 0:95 °• 1.00• e ��:00 . •1.0 0 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume (vph) 27. 58. '452 1-146,'-.: 195:, 1 Q6� Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow v 58. 452 • 1 146. Lane Croup Flow (vph) 27 58 452 1146 195 1065 ..:...• Turn Type re +Tree . i - Prot Q. ,,.'.. . Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 60.0 17.E 60.0 19.0 40.0 r Effective Green, g (s) 11.3 60.0 , ' '18.Q fi0.0 '� �.D 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.32 0.68 _ Clearance Time (s) -5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 629 1583 1062 1583 561 2418 vls Ratio Prat 0.01 0.13 0.11. 0.30 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 0.72 vlc Ratite 0.04 0.04,-. 0.43 0.72 0.35- 0.44....- Uniform Delay, d1 20.2 0.0 16.9 0.0 15.7 4.3 Progression Factor 1 1.00 1.00 1. Q❑ 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 1.2 2.9 1.7 0.6 Delay (s ) '20.3 0.0 1.8.1 2.9 17.4. 14.91 Level of Service C A B A B A Approach Delay (s). 6.5 7.2 608 Approach LOS A A q i •t• .' [� ,.�� ` `:.ra.C•.�pr,41r�4!.y�. n'y:.:!P'^"M- k ' 'x.'. -:y y 1V±V .• �1 , _'7• � .� 'j A ?fir- •r. �.. .;q� .s "' M [ r'b. _ ` - moo• N ;, i4. .f.iY �• �. .a. .: .qW""". %� CLs': : '� "`'' >' �^'e$•„ie >- ;yG"["'r'4� .. ,;.x .r'+h..h:i 4ai.c:t.'�: •�x.�"'c- HCM Average Control Delay 7.0 HCM Level of Service A HGM Volume tO.Capacity ratio : 0072 . . Actuated Cycle Lengt.h. (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 " Intersection Capacity lr�ation = : � : 39.4% ... W.. iCU t evel Of Seiv e c Critical Lane Group N:\2300120223361Synchro\2006 Cum\3am- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -\o Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2066 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 EB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions MAN, .. Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) X900 1,960 No Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0, . La a Utd. Factor Mt10, 5 . ~ x.95 a te Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 ." 0.85 1.00 1.00 ?ravteCted a . Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Y _ r:- fi Permitted r�� n .�5 , Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 it�lurr3e t 7 15 :453 770 3 46 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AJ mw NO) 7 95 .8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 58 453 1170 195 1186 Turn Type e gee Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases :- fee.- ,reie . Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 60.0 17.0 60.0 19.0 44.0 Effective Green, g (S) 7.1:0 .� 5.0 - 0:fl 19.' �41:�D Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.32 0.68 Clearance Time (s) - 5.0 - Lane Grp Dap (vph) 629 1583 1062 1583 561 2418 vls Ratio Prot.0 i 3 0. 0.34 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 0.74 vlc Ratio :0.04 -.0-04 0.43 .. 0.74 .0:35 OA9 Uniform Delay, d1 20.2 0.0 16.9 0.0 15.7 4.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 IM 1.000. I:00 .1:00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 1.3 3.1 1.7 o.7 Delay (s) 20.3 - .,:0.0 '1861 _3.1 A7.4 2 Level of Service C A B A B A Approach Delay �s =. 7:0 Approach LOS A A A � erage HCM Average ontrol Delay 7.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio . V.74 Actuated cycle Length (s) 60.9 Sum of lost times 0.0 Intersection Capacrty Uti&666n _ :��,80A cU Level -af Service C critical Lane Group N:1230012022336 \Synchro12006 Totl3am tot.sy6 LINSCQCGS5 -FF51 F--%\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 EB Ramps &Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations , Ideal Flow, (vphpl). • w• ............ _ Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.6 . 4.0 4.0 .. . . ..•. r4c.,;/i. -'s +: .. ..•`caw +:.3nt•.•:.•.: 4.0 .• ",..,s: Lane e t1�L 7'. • "4 sFy ".%a ja..,% +., �Y,' Frt 1.04 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit t Pr ecte�- of ^Y': "Yw. �;e'A.v �i ::+lam: -. 4''•!y ^•.a v]y:... .:: y°.`,• .: R6.• y, Mr .. Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3.539 Fit P ermitt ,.w jj -� ?fin "" Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 .: ' 1583 1770 3539 :' .... r• •W "�. ...+ .. _ A. Volume (yp .• 5 $3 70 14 440" .'4 -� 7 ; Peak -hour factor, PHF _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad' Flow (vph)-,, _ �S4 a Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 6_7'01 1015 , 440 ` 1847 - Turn T Y ,: Free R1yl= Fri:. :P Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases .. Free� .� F w Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 60.0 18.0 60.0 24.0 46.0 Effective Green, g (s.).. . a.6 60 t3 . 60 %6 •�4 0 _ .4 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.08 1.00 0.32 1.00 w . 0.40 0._78 .. Clearance Times .. V . . .4,... (!� - Lane Grp Cap (vph) 286 1583 1121 1583 708 2772 v/s Ratio Prod 0.0.' ^ 0:5 vls Ratio Perm 0.05 0,54 vlc Ratio ..0.1 6.65 0 M. o.64::: 0.62^ " x.67 : Uniform Delay, dl 25.6 0.0 17.5 0.0 14.4 2.9 Progression Factor 1.00- 1.00., l w . 1100: • 1.00 1,00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.1 2.6 2.0 4.1 1.3 Delay (s) 26.9 O.I 2001 2:0 :18.4 , :4. 2 . Level of Service C A C A B ,w . A Approach Delay (s 14.3 .... S.4 :7.0' Approach LOS pp B q _ .. ... .. A HCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio - 0.64 9 Actuated cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 ol me rsection Capacity U# 1 ICU ev of Se r� c Critical Lane Group �, N :12300120223361Synchro12002 Ex13pm- ex.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 F - \1.. Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: SR-22 EB Ram s & Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300\20223361Synchro12006 Cuml3pm- cum.sy6 LiNSCCCOS5 -FF51 F - N3 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 'r.. r. w. .. .Jyr •�+.•r - "� .. .'... •' �' .b0. var•+4' . Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vopI� x:900 940 ;900 X900 x:1900 M00 Total Lost time (s) 400 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 - .:. 4.0 Lane litil. ;Factor -, := .7 . =0 5 M0 V5 .. Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0-.85 _ 1.00 Fit Protected 0:95 00:� = ::`95 M.. Satd. Flow (prof) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1774 3539 . a. � r Fit Pe Do Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 , . .....r.. :;y:.... . 3539 Vol Mmeh : _ (vp4), 5 90 =754 X399 . '75 309 Pe ak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^ Adj_ flow h . -5 • ;VO U '7 099 :475 M�009 ... Lane Group Flow (vph ) 55. 90 764 1099 T475 2009 Tu m Type ee :. 'F IID6 Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases - 'Free Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 60.0 18.0 60.0 24.0 46.0 Effective Green, 9 (s) 5.0 X60.0 19.0 60,0 :24.0 47.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.40 0.78 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 ,_0 4 %0 5:0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 286 1583 1121 1583 708 2772 v1s Ratio Prot x.27D.57 vls Ratio Perm 0.06 0.69 We Ratio 13.19 0:06 -0.68 0.69 . -0.67 -0.72 Uniform Delay, di 25.6 0.0 17.9 0.0 14.8 3.3 Progression Factor 1.00 ` 1.00 1:00 1.00 • . 1 .00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.1 3.4 2.5 5.0 1.7 Delay (s) 27.1 °0.1 21.2 2.5 19.8 4.9 Level of Service C A C A B A Approach Delay (s) 10.3' 10.2 7.6 Approach LOS B B A UmiMar HCM Average Control Delay 8.9 HCM Level of Service HCM volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost times 0.0 Intersection Capacity 'Ufilization . X5.5% CCU te* I of Service C Critical Lane Group N:12300\20223361Synchro12006 Cuml3pm- cum.sy6 LiNSCCCOS5 -FF51 F - N3 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2008 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 EB Ramps & Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations► vi•k' . / Ideal Flow tvphpi I Pw_:_ Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 _ d k�f:y:'y oy,••C �. �:. _ .; �^ - ., +v, y a. ,,i-: win _ tiY: _ Ji Lan e u IF46 b , r�a�",1•' 'a'. ••�w s+i�`r4:�.`7'�';,':..•.- Frt 1.00 9.85 •��F:,r:: » ..'+h'r.:'„,'h.. 1.00_ 0.85 1.00 ryes . - . •:.X^y: aw.• ::vrer r,.~ •. - *t9C',xr•. _ _ 1.00 F ii P r 4 .IA 'lam -rt _ 1. -0, .... .. _ .. 0 .fN{ Satd. Flan (prot) 34.33 1583 , .. 3539 1583 1770 .: 3539 r :•Y " r' L.ie Fl • P t e� ^` '"�•' a r -'.... .. •n..e. ' M, _ _ :,, . N..: . Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 .. '•S'►'• ry.•: A 1583 3539 1583 1770 .' .. iYy �`titi.r; \i. r. •'.i.+!.['. „r.�'- ``.:e', M1n: Y• - :.L'•.MY •it+i...: 3539 Vol un e h �$ 44' - . .. ;T Peak -hour factor PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 � .1.00 Adj. Flow '.. 788 ' ..�...:.. . Lane Group Flow (v ph) 55 90 78fi 1228 ..: .. 475 2941 . Tura. Type M't Protected Phases 3 2 1 8 Permitted. Phases - F � •a, z, a�f r►i.:fi ems' •'`c4 ° +. .. - .. Actuated Green, G (s ... 4.0 80.0 18.0 80.0 24.0 48.0 Effective Greens g (s).: :0 0.0 y 66-0, Z4. - = 0 -: 47 .fl Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 1.00 4.32 1.00 4.40 0.78 Clearance Time (s .a a.0 � �.0 --- " 5.0 = Lane Grp cap (vph) 288 1583 1121 1583 708 2772 vls Ratio Prd .... : . •..r �: . vas Ratio Perm 0.06 ...., . __ - 0.75 We Ratio �� f .0f 018. :0.67: 0.74 _ Uniform delay, d1 25.8 0.0 _ 17.9 0.0 14.8 3.3 Progression Pacbr 1:00 :foo. 1.00 1.00 :1.()0 woo Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.1 3.4 3.8 5.0 1.8 Delay (s) 2 7:1 0:'# .3 3.8 : 'l 5.'# Level of Service C A C A B A Approach Denys - 1 'i 0 5 7. Approach LOS B g A . HCM Average control Delay 9.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity.' . .' Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 Intersection Capacity Ublizatlo w c Critical Lane Group N:12300\2022338tSynchro12008 ToMpm- tot.sy8 LINSCGCOS5 -FF51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existin g Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 WB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300120223351Synchro12002 Ex14am- ex.sy5 LiNSGOCOS5 -FF51 V:-%S Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lane Configurations ► Ideal "Flow (vphpl ) .1900 '1 0 A , -4.0 Total Lost time {s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane W. Factor 0.97 1.10 -.95 kw1.�30 x.00 x.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fu Protected •0a95 1.06 w00 :. "' a s ''t 0 A F Satd. Flow {prot} 3433 1583 3539 1583 '1770 3539 FIt Permuted ::A .�y0o - Satd. Flow {perm} 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume lvph} ., 493 • X417 fl13 Peak- hour factor, P H F 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1 .. .00 .. �. 1.00 1.00 Ad j. jow h 0 Lane Group Flow {vph} 493 417 505 39 52 . w:n 680 Tun T ype . F Perm �?nvt Protected Phases 3 2 1 8: .. Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G {s} 18.0 80.0 " 17.0 17.0 11.0 32.0,:: 2.0 , : ~ " Effective Green, g {s} 19.0 50.03 18.0 . - 18.0 ..11 0-0 .33,E Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 1.00 0.30 0.30 0.18 0.55 Clearance Time {s} 5.0 :5.0 -5.0 r4.{3 :: 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1987 1583 1 052 475 325 1948 vls Ratio Prot c0.14 x:0.14 0.03 �& 19 vls Ratio Perm 0.25 0.02 We Ratio 0.45 0.25 -DA8 0:08 0.18 0.35 Uniform Delay, dl 18.4 0.0 17.2 15.1 20.5 7.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 -41.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.4 1.5 0.3 1.1 0.5 Delay {s} 17.7 70.4 1807 .15.4 21.7 8.0 Level of Service B A B B C ►4 Approach Delay {s} 9.8 4 8.4 ,:. .... 9.0 Approach LOS A g A • •7,i 1 is n, a sn..:ar . v. ,y.a•- . HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 .� ,'.Ne . y !�� ,ny ,rte.: �• ^r ... .la i•'•:'.. . HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to capacity ratio :x.45 Actuated Cycle Length {s} 80.0 Sum of lost times 72.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.5°Yo -Ueyl of service A c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223351Synchro12002 Ex14am- ex.sy5 LiNSGOCOS5 -FF51 V:-%S Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 WB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions • Lane Configurations Flo w 9 0 .. 1930!deal : .. ... .,,. 9_ ., ... ..'!xC..•i:se .. ,. ... r _ . o-n: . ,.. r' r' .. -z',...'S'a:;i.,2Y":.t•'rv:: a.:..i *c••,;? ':ve.Sc'.:. .,4: Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 =: 4.0 Lane ut�c Al A.- .rye. Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 (� F! t PiV.t •1583 i Satd. Flow rot {p 3433 3539 1583 1770 3533' Fl t Permitted - it • Said. Flow (perm) 3433 15$3 3539 1 583 1773. 3539 Volume (VPh.',.',' a w 45fJ r - Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,. . Y•+wi.c%- ; "•4;::2 "�..... .. `.'.'"o6�MMS:. a;•.ve.` . ti- . ....,a:d..'7'V%'•'".,,+.;y:' . ..... .00 Ad j. F! ow . ' 53 6. . ". : .. �.. " Lane Group ! w p o (vp h) 536 450 551. 42 56 ..... ". r ". ....� ." ... , .. ' . . 739 Turn T r..... yam•. _ . A Pew _ - Protected Phases 3 2 1 x.. <: w Permitted :Phases :. i wA 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 60.0 18.0 18.0 10.0 32.0 Fffec a Greer, 9 (s). 19w' . 60. 0 9'.0 10.0 33: 0' Actuated g1C Ratio 0.32 1.00 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 5.0.E .a 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1 087 1583 1121 501 295 1946 vls Ratio Prot. c0.1.:6 . 0.03 c:0.21, vls Ratio Perm 0.28 0.03 vlc Ratio 0.49 ..0.28 = 0 -49 0.08 0.'#- 0.38 Uniform Delay, dl 16.6 0.0 16.5 14.4 '21.5 7.7 Progression Factor .1,90'. • 1.00 j s .,.--100 1.00 I.M. Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0.5 1.5 0.3 1.4 0.6 Delay (s) 18.2 .B : D:5 -q ' 8: �1, :Y '14.7 2.9 8. Level of Service . ...g• .... B ..... C A Approach Delay f s Approach LOS B B A y � *... ,fig:. ;," vv.� , ., N a"'.9?�,2'.. 4 •." ��'�7 r HCM Average Control Delay 11.8 HCM Level of Service B H Gl M61urie :to Capaci rate.' ;0A8 . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time ('s') h 12.0 intersection Papacity.Utilizatkm 4Z4 - : = . - 1 CU •Lev61 of Service A -� .... o c Critical Lane Group N :12340120223361Synchro12006 Curri\4am- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 V: -� k& Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 WB Ramps & Studebaker Road AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300120223361Synchrol2006 TotWam- tot.5y5 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -- lr� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 4Q gL:047' AM RIM Lane Configurations Ideal 'Flow v P Aoo :9QO 0 = Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ Lane Util. factor 39 =5 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 ^ 0.85 1.00 1.:00_ .. .w . R #protected I d - 0 . , Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Fft Fermi ted -x.95 : w ... Satd. Flow erm �p } 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Volume h 3 56 FV� .. • _ . r ... " - : . =4,. ..;�8��:,:.- : ... �: :. Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1 . � � :00 .00 1.00 , ..�.:,.: a ,.... _ . . 1.00 Ad j. flow. :: mss x w = : Lane Group Flow (vph) 656 450 552 42 56 � 741 Turn Type .a .... - :gat _ .,.. • Protected Phases 3 .. ..... 2 1 6 . Permitted Phases }v y Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 80.0 17.0r 17.0 9.0 30.0 _ ,.. Effective Green, .9 (s) i 21.0 � �� w �.. oat :S �3 -1 t� v Actuated gfC Ratio 0.35 1.00 0.30 0.30 0.15 0.52 Clearance Time (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1202 1583 1062 475 286 1828 v1s Ratio Prot "0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.03 vlc Ratio 0.55 x.28 A-52 -0-D9 1 .21 - ` -OAI Uniform Delay, d1 15.7 0.0 17.4 15.1 22.4 8.9 Progression Factor 1.00 .I -,Do ' J00 Incremental Delay, d2 Y 1.8 0.5.1.8 0.4 1.8 0.7 Delay (s) 1765 3. - 492 '15.5 ::-"24.2: 5 Level of Service B A B B C q 4 Approach Delay (s) •1.5 9,0 Approach LOS B B p.6 - -g ' 4411 L&E HCM Average Control Delay 12.6 w HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity radio :4,62 .: Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time , s i ) 12.0 Intersection Capaclt�r Utilization.. _ A == -: CU level ref er r. F :. c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchrol2006 TotWam- tot.5y5 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -- lr� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 WB Ramps & Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations I deal Flow (vphpQ.,�..:. 5 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 '4.0 4.0 4.6 4.4 ' 4.0 4'• Lan e. tfl. F actairr, v... �r wr " titr .M . Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.06 F Protected-,,:. It •1583 ��- - ::.M . . , _..... �..o.a.�.. � ti - Satd. Flow rat (p rot) 3433 3539 1583 70 17 . 3539 . .. _ ... r . . Fit P erm� tted fl.95� fl6:.wr .fly 026', . ... -.i x Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1776 3539 Volume (vp�)- ' D!5 • :75 66 A�:::�:�: ��v:• Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.66 ■06 1.00 1.66 1.00 1.66 1.06 .��. Ad'. Fiow- (vph)-, Lane Group Flaw {vph} 1665 319 750 66 92 1153 Turn T 9 ri. :Fri Protected Phases 3 2 Permuted P hase rep : -: Actuated Green G �s} 23.6 64.6 '17.6 17.6 6 ■0♦ 27.6 Effective Green, g (a) 24.0. 66.al* - X8.6 'f 8.€ f ." 28,D Actuated g/C Ratio 0 ■40 1.66 6.36 6.36 0.10 0.47. .�. Clearance Time (s) 5. } 5.0 5.0 4..o Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1373 1583 1062 475 177 1652 .r v/s Ratio Prot 31. �: . 0 05., :,o vls Ratio Perm 0.20 0 ■04 vlc Ratio !00 74,1 -fl a" 4 -0.52 Q ■�'0. ;: Uniform Delay, d1 15.7 6.0 18.7 15.3 25.6 12.7 Progression Factor 1.w 106 00 . Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.3 4.0 0 ■6 16.5 2.5 Delay (s),. �! r :; " V ■ 15.9 Level of Service G A C B D B Approach Delay (s). 15.6 -. i 71 -, :22:. �, 1 .7 Approach LOS B C g HCM Average Control Delay 17.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume .b Capacity rati - Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capactty L r�za um �:U �e Level of Se�B g c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12002 Ex14pm- ex.sy6 LINSCCCCS5 -FF51 IF ~ \% Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Ye ar 200 Background Traffic Conditions on s 7: S R -22 WB Ram s& Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:\230012022336 \Synchro12006 Cuml4pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-\C� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Laneonf ideal Pion �vp�p� ;� 900 =:� . ...... !Aj v. 00 : •• IWO � . , # _ • w • n =:� �:: "::�:•: Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . " 4.0 : " _- �.:" .� .:�r :�s: r� � :r- : " Lane ctvr A7 . �0 _4.0 :n'n Frt .o 0.85 1.00 0.85 r 1.00 w b 1.00 *� r' �o Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 158 3 '� 7lD w 3539 Fi# Permitted . , 0o � y � _ 1130 M. Said. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1553 1770 3539 Volume (vph) `1.153 ... _345 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 1.: . 0,.0 _ 1.00 I'M . _w.�.�: ry. ...:� .. � :: -. • Ad j. Flow. (vph) :4.153 : 45 17 Lane Group Flow 4vph) 11 53 345 817 71 99 1255 Turn Type Permt Protected Phases 3 2 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 210 80.0 17.0 17.0 5.0 27.0 Effective Green, 9 (s) 24.0 W.0. .• to 800 =6.0 " 8.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 1.00 4.30 0'a' .30 0.10 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 X5.0 r4 %0 Lane Grp Dap (vph) 1373 1583 1062 475 177 1652 v!s Ratio Prot -- x:0:34 ' .. f .23 y =V.06 x:35 v s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.04 vIc Ratio :0.84 :0.22 0.77 '-A 18 0.55 Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 0.0 19.1 15.4 25.7 13.2 Prog resslon Factor . �o 0 00 1`00 : T .00 "IM Incremental Delay, d2 6.3 0.3 5.4 0.7 12.2 3.3 Delay {s) 22.s :.A 3 24,5 15.1 _37.9 •15.8 • Level of Service D A C B D B Approach Delay (s) 17.5 •23.8 8.1 Approach LOS B C B ge trol Delay 19.2 �-� �w H C M Level of Service g HCM Volume #o capacity 'rasp 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s} 80•00 - Sum .. . m of lost time (s) g.0 Intersection Capad Utilizaib�n d �4o = 1L.:e►ei .bf Servi , Critical Lane Group N:\230012022336 \Synchro12006 Cuml4pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-\C� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: SR -22 WB Ram s & Studebaker Road PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations ► Fg Ideal Flow- t. Ohpo-.' Total Lost time i s i 4.0 4. 0 4..0 . . "4r '• :.' 0 4 1 .0 . . . i• '.+° . `Y"�r+c•:td. : r.. Lane V 9 y?A a' "..w +.a i..M+W1. *.J. *..` •.,•h .!,�••,r <,' 'M- Frt 1.00 ?Mih. 0.85 - w.':... '-:. a7'l wr. :vh.:- . 100 "'rellt••..syS'x- :+irw 0.85 'kw •. .w - .. 1.00 �f@2. �= �:d•.��.:.�..,��: ".. 1._00 _ Fit • : >. ed .c .„ r '":.,. -� r" fir; n : • x:i ^, _ • 1'M Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3539 1583 1770 3539 Fit P er� m ed':� _ Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3539 1583 .1770 3539 Volume (vph)",'.., ..PHF 1.1 : X45 T . ��:::: �� :�:... W . `1.00 425 .. . Peak -hour factor, 1.00 1.00 1.00 �• 1..00 .�r 1.00 Ad'. Flow (vph =183 8't :: :=� " 71.. _ g Lane Group Flow (vph) 1183 345 819 71 99 1257 Tum Type ." -. , ." .gee.x Rn p r Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s} 23.0 60.0 17.0 17.0 6.0 27.0 Effective Green, .s�, =4. = 16.0 tt 6.0 :. 28.0: Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 1.00 0,30 0.30 0.10 . 0.47 Clearance "€nee {s 5. 5. .3 4.D 3 5:0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1373 1583 1062 475 177 1 652 v/s Ratio Prot x.34 0-3 + r c0.36 vls Ratio Perm 0.22 0.04 vtc Ratio - 0 %8e .2 0.77. 0-IS 0.56' 018 Uniform Delay, d1 16.5 0.0 19.1 15.4 25.7 13.2 Factor-.' -00 , '1:0 '1.0 :. '1:00 '�:oo 1.QQ Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 0.3 5.4 9.7 12.2 3.4 Delay (s r 2308 0.3 24r6 �! . 1 6. 1 37.1a 16.6 Level of Service C A ,. .a C g D B Approach Delay (� ) 23:9 18.1 Approach LOS B C B HCM Average Control Delay 19.8 HCM Level of Service B F HCM V01UMe to Capacity raU `f Actuated s Cycle Length y g {) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 lnt .Capacfty- Ub14#q : -. ` 70:2 0 CU. Level of PeMpe. c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 ToMpm- tot.5y6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F: ----LA Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCNI Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast HI hwa AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions /000 I*p 44/ 1 ' Lane Configurations Ideal 0 How . h h : �w ....... � � �� 00 1 900 Total Lost time (s). 4.0 w.. 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 40 _.. 40 v 40 .. .... 4.0 4.0 4.0 w Lae Factor . a. - + i{.. L .: 7i'r [". •.. "�• •K... } ~• • ) 0 � 0.95 '�: 1. o� Frt 1.00 � 1800 0.85 1.00 . .. : 1.00 .ra1•.+� 0.85 . 1.o_ o ,T k.. .. • • 1.00 i"-.,p.:; . -." �Owr...... .. ..... ... 1.00 1.00 0.8 - � .y Fit Prote .95 n r r .. -� •n "V .•- " :ice' w ;• " . i .1ao 1.00 Satd. Flow (pro f} 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 w 1583 w 1770 �4: 3539 .1770 35 39 1583 r. Fft .P �#ed • .:" �. "• ;� n��= ::ice i73S ..r: -. ' x..00 ::�: o . ' . " . x '095 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1378 1863 1583 1359 1863 1583 1770 3539 " 1770 3539 1583 Volume w 3 42 .r 2 - ... 57 - : - .29 93 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •w ... 1.00 •. x1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad•ovP h r ,: Lane Group Flow {vph} 53 42 62 9- 27 57 30 1729 0 29 1193 44 Turn T Type :berm w. . : 'err�n?rt�n :. - �e F Perm Protected Phases 4 _ 2w 6 tied Phases Perm-4 ; .. ti• Actuated Green G ts) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 75.0 11.0 75.0 75.0 affective Green, 9 (s ) 1.0 : X1.0 : :.._� :7'6.0.0 x'6.0 75.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.63 0.09 0.63 0.63 Clearance Time {s} 5.0 .0 =�0 T: ...o.0 5.0 Lane Grp Gap (vph) 241 326 277 238 326 277 162 2241 162 2241 1003 vls Ratio Prot X3.02 ��`:y , �.0'� „:�co.02 A -�o.4V 3.2 x.34 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 .. 0.03 vac Ratio 0.22 .0.13 : -.22 -,'D .04 �D -08 ,0.21 '0.10 ; '017 0,18 -'0.53 0.04 Uniform Delay, di 42.5 41.8 42.5 41.1 41.4 42.4 50.4 15.8 50.3 12.2 8.3 3 Progression Factor -1.00.1 1:30 .00 : =1: 3� x:00 1-4, . 00 1 :00 .OD . 30 1.OD Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.8 1.9 0.3 0.5 1.7 2.5 2.6 2.4 0.9 0.1 Delay (s) -44.6 •42.6 44.4 41.4 ,41,9 44..0 ..5209 52.7 13.1 8.4 Level of Service D D D D D D D .18.4 B D B A Approach Delay (s) 44.0 - . . -43.2 _ 19 :0 13.8 Approach LOS D D B B nma- �:. HCM Average Control Delay 18.9 H^ CM Level of Service B ACM volume to Capacity ty ratio v .61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lostMtime s t } _ . . 12.0 Intersection Capacity '11til1zabon 6 7/o: -CUL va .of ice - Y . c Critical Lane Group . N:\2300\2022336\Synchro\2002 Ex \5am- ex.sy6 LINSCOCCS5 -FF51 F - -C.\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2406 Background Traffic Conditions 7: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions _5. Lane Configurations ' Ideal Flow Jvphply 1900:::: . ". ".. 90 ;M wa. .A.. w 900 ...:..4.0 . ". •• 1 Total Lost time s � ) " 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.4 4.9 4.0 • 4.0 4.0 • La ne 'r ■ A _ Frt 1.09 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 " 1.00 _ 1.00 0.85 Flt N o 'tedt 0.9 _ n :: 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 1853 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3539 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted . .. 0.74 1. .0'* t .■ # .Cn; - 09.5 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm 1372 1863 1583 '1352 1863 1583 1770 3539 1770 3539 1583 Volume b .. � 7. µ 7 :0 3� :6 3: 22 .1313 Peak-hour c or, 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 Adj. Flow (v 7 4 8 M V _ 3: .. . Y 32. 1313, Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 48 67 10 32 63 32 ' 1944 0 32 1313 4$ Turn i■ pe _ Y Perm .. : - ,.. Pe' Pe Pe rm: Y Perm Prat : e _`;.v Prot. Perm Protected Phases 4 g 5 w ' • Permitted Pb ases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.1 9.0 79.0 9.0 79.0 79.0 Effective reed, .9 s 1.9.0.11 . 9.0 9.0 19.0 - 19.E 8t1.9 ... 9.0 80.0 80.4 Actuated gfC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.67 0.08 0.67 4.67 Clearance Tme (s) •5.0 w 5.0 5..4 5.0 500 5,0 .4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 295 251 214 295 251 133 2359 133 2359 1055 vfs Ratio Prot x:03 " 0.02 c0.9 P0.54, 0.02 0.37 vfs Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.44 - 0.03 vfc Ratio 9.25 0.'16 0.27.r 0.05 - . 0•.11 0.25 €x:24 0.81 0.24 0.56 0.05 Uniform Delay, d 1 44.3 43.6 44.4 42.8 43.2 44.3 52.3 14.4 52.3 10.6 6.9 Progression Factor - .. 1.fl0 1.00 �� _1.09 '1.00 '1.00 'l .40 1.04 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 1.2 2.6 0.4 0.7 2.4 4. .2 3.1 4.2 1.0 0.1 Delay (s) 47.3 44.8 47.0 43.2 44,0 , 46.6 56.5 '17.5 .: 56.5 11.6 7.0 Level of Service D D D D D D E B E B A Approach Delay. 45.5 45:5 _ 18.E '12.4 Approach LOS D D B B •.r'i"#t...i -- "'yam y `, HCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM volume to Capacity ratio 0. .. Y Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of ' lost times 12.4 Intersection Cappcity'Utiltation 69.9 1C U Level of Service w _; c Critical Lane Group N:1230012022336kSynchro12006 Cuml5am- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -it Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 5 7: Main Street/Bol sa Avenue & Pacific coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic conditions Jig fy R Lane configurations Ideal Flow (vph'''1) l X00 :. Y ,900 M0 a4 0a 4.900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 '4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor y •.H, ....:..a.r •. .." . ..' " "- .:' :.a'. ..: '�..; '.yam 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 ...• 0.85 X•..' .,...r. ." ::' . 1.00 . n:'. .''.:. .: ". " 1.00 ";:.... ' ••.: ": . - :'.. `. 1.00 1. 00 0.85 �'�' I -� WteC . .�.4• ._ _ Satd. Flow (prot) • 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3539 1770 3539 1583 Fit P . aril tted 3. w :,... - sari .+.. .. - 0 100 - 3. 5 '4 x . 5 . .00 1.30 Satd . Flow (perm ) 1368 1863 1583 1347 1863 1583 1770 3539 _ 1770 3539 1583 Volume (vph):Y .:.� :. 7 5 73 J0 2 ' -�1 1 3'13 4 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 w 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 . Fvw v 7 1 phi ... r1.. 7 .• ^b .. `,:..{ �. 3 w. ' ",�'�'.. . ".. : ::- " �� 1313 48 Lane Group Flow (v h) 57 52 67 10 35 73 ... _ 32 1964 wt• 0 � 1 1313 4= . n Y yarn ,pe rrri r" R rrn ?er +. - K ;. Perm Protected Phases 4 g 5 2 1 6 PQrrn itted 'Phases a - . ....:.... Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.6 6.0 79.0 12.0 85.0 85.4 Effective Green, 9s rf5,0 "18►0.0 r'8 ■0S.Q X0.0 .00 ■0 12.0 85.0 85.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.67 0.10 0.72 0.72 Clearance Times .0 �5.0 .0 ::: .0 :5 ■0 5.0 -0 _ 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 248 211 180 248 211 89 2359 177 2536 1134 vls Ratio Prot X3.03 t3.fl2 Y3.020 ■54 X3.05 0.37 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 0.04 ' 0.01 0.05 0.03 vlc Ratio 0.31 =021 : x.32 V.06 -D.14 10.35 Z.36 A181 0.46 -0.52 0.04 Uniform Delay, di 47.0 46.4 47.1 45.4 45.9 47.2 55.1 14,4 50.9 7.7 5.0 Progression Factor 1,00 .00 1 ;0 o :�D 00 1.00.. 1.0 .00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 1.9 3.9 0.6 1.2 4.4 10.9 . 3.1 8.3 0,8 0.1 Delay (S) 51,5 ,48.3 t 0 .46.0 . :.':. _D - 47. �1 51,7 � 7.5 X9.2 X3.4 5.0 Level of Service D D D D D E .. B E A A Approach Lela s APP y 3 X0.3 ...... - .:9,9 f= 18.3 11.2 Approach LOS D D B B HCM Average control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service HCNI Volume to capacity .ratio ;` _ 7w74 Actuated Cycle Len y Length (s} 120.0 . ., ., r i:• ... . . Sum of lost time A. s`yr 12.0 #nt n Capad y Utillzahon . `70.5%p y CU Level of Sec NJ C. C critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro\2006 Totl5am- tot.5y6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -~'"L3 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue &Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions A%W t M-07,M"RE" Lane Configurations !deal Flow (vphpi)._ 9�0:.: - .9v0::: . �nd,.. ,. n A 4 v r , . ' - 1 19 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane _4.0 .a fir. w _ � ..':Z...K •. - r „4:`:°.ac. -r .-.. •'.'k • .. • � _ Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Pro ��. tecte T �; _ _ Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 .M 1770 1863 1583 1770 3 530 ^ - 1770 3539 1583 Pe nftd,. .. . . , . , . , . .JFt - 1.00 104 Satd. Flow {perm} 1304 1863 1583 1259 1863 1583 1770 3530 1770 3539 1583 Volume (vph),80 : 1 -.79 :.� ' -..1.1 23 ;' 72. Y 28 23:. ..,c .. rc .. -:,.. 423:' 1754 19 Peak-hour f ou actor, PHF 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 A . flow: (yph) . V 7. . .. 4i . n ,. . w �h.� •n• 2 :� _ $: 7�::.. 3 Y .79 2 3. 1 Lane Group Flow (v eh) 91 80 23 72 122 105 1305 0 123 1754 119 Turn T P of Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Pen Phases .u. : _ ~16.0 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 72.0 17.0 73.0 73.0 Effective Green, . 8. Q 1 8.0 � - ; 18.0 '� 5 � .� 1 7.0 74.0 74.0 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.61 0.14 0.62 0.62 Clearance Time �s.Q 5:0.:. 5.fl 5.0 ^�,0 4. 5.4 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 196 279 237 189 279 237 236 2147 251 2182 976 vrs Ratio Prat. D 04 �, -0-06. c0.37 . 4.07 c0.5t} vls Ratio Perm 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.08 0.08 v1c Ratio D.4 0.2 0.33 'Y. X3.12. .0-26. 0.51 :4144 0.61: 0.49 0.80 0.12 Uniform Delay, d 1 46.6 45.3 45.6 44.2 45.7 47.0 47.9 14.6 47.5 17.5 9.5 Progression Factor 1..00. 1.€30-. -1. 1.00•. 1.00 - 1.0Q = #.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 2.6 3.8 1.3 2.2 7.8 6.0 1.3 6.7 3.3 0.3 Delay Y 54.3. .47:9 _ 43..4,. 45.5 . 47.3 .r4RS X3.3, :�5.9 54.2 20 7 9 8 Level of Service D D D D D D D 8 D C A Approach Delay (s). Q „ 5 .3 ... 18.7 22.2 Approach LOS D D. r .. B C HCM Average Control Delay 24.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to acs Ca do P Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Irate a �G �LitAoi i Pay -. _. . 76.� y CU Level of S r�nce C c critical Lane Group N:\2300120223361Synchro12002 Ex15pm- ex.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F --zy Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: Main StreetfBolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast HighwaX PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions �-- Lane Configurations► Ideal :.Flow ��pl .. ..-. ....• .. ..." .: v!i,'- : ". ,... .... a ?• - x 0 r . ?: .:9001 '1000 _ j�/�] •• �►00 " ~ 4_900 1900 Total Lost time (s) Y 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . r .. <.. Lire - W. actor .Y' } p. • .a. ..0o rc 95 Frt im 1.00 0.85 i •DD ■ .00 0.85 1 ■DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit R teoted �.� 5 wi 1 0 00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3530 1770 3539 1583 ,' ." Flt `P rrr��tted x.65 . .... .. .: .••' •. .... .00 - 35 0.95 .00 !1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1216 1863 1583 1.175 1863 1583 1770 3530 1770 3539 1583 Volume 03 �. X85 �5 : �S �3 � 3 _'1 424 _ "',25 * 1 35 :1940 129 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d'.� (vph) J ( . 8 =: X93 Vs .. =:5 3 �... :3 " h °' -113 24 25 - 35 940 29 Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 93 85 25 86 133 1449 0 135 1940 129 `urn Type . . erm perm --P,.rot mr, Per Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Perms #led Pia Se5 N Actuated Green, G (s) 1600 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.E 73.0 17.0 77.0 77.0 Effective Green, 9 (S) 7U 7�O 7 :�7:f3 ,Q 1 �. `' ;3.3 4. X7.0 `S.0 78.D Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.62 0.14 0.65 0.65 Clearance Time � (s} =' . 5:0 = :D - 5.0 - "":5.0 4 :0 �5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 264 224 166 264 224 192 2177 251 2340 1 029 Ws Ratio Prod : x.05 =:x.05 L.6 x.47 0:D8 x.55 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.08 0.08 We Ratio :0.57 _ :0:35 .38 -0.15 - - 0.33 X0.59 D.59 0.�7 X3.54 ID -84 -0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 48.1 46.5 46.7 45.2 46.3 48.3 51.0 15.0 47.9 16.3 8.0 Progression Factor . 1OD 1.0� 1.0© 1 00 1 OD 1;DO OD 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.0 3.7 4.8 1.9 3.3 11.1 12.6 1.6 8.0 4.0 0.3 Delay (s) 61.1 -50.2 :.5145 47.1 49.6 :593 63.5 6.6 .55.9 20.3 8.3 Level of Service E D D D D E E B E C A Approach Delay (s) 54.5 54.7 0.0 21.7 Approach LOS D D B C any ~'� .. .+cy: ! .ti,w w�• •,: '.:.,, . 1... y�, a1' HCM Average Control Delay 25.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM volume to Capacity. ratio 3.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost times 8.0 .. .. #nersectiQnapactylizaon _ ` ::..0 .. dP Level oere w c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Cuml5pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-L5 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 1 7: Main Street/Bolsa Avenue & Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions -000 /Opp Lane Configurations ► ► � T�L- . Ideal Fk� v _. . . . .y . - •.�,:.. .r ., -..: .. . .. s 1.9.0 1 9 1:900 Total Lost time s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . ..:. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ian e�4 k.►.. -tii -. e .g .. - - aE.r r. :'ii• i Frt 1.00 1.00 0 ■85 1.00 1.00:. 0 ■85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 �. ms's .y"�}aL%r 0 .D0 +. �,,..- � � � 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1883 1583 - ..L...,,,, . 1770 • - mss, • • 1853 - .. evs'Y•s +.irr ar:+'.. ':o : .,i- 1.583 1770 ,.. , t T'e.': .. - ... 3530 ... ' . - e .. 1770 _. w 3539 1583 tP Pe ed rm�# _ 1: i Satd. Flow (perm 1187 1853 1583 1139 1853 1583 1770 3530 1770 3539 1583 Volume (vph)' �.. ..• y x _ . �� .. :` 9 . ...... :....:.,. .. .- - � � �- � '� � � - '# 9� -� 1 � �; ..� . .424 2��.� . 1 1940 129 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad ■. Flow (vph'J . .. 98 .. _ ... _ ... _ h-�= _ = ., 1� X424 5 142 1944 129 Lane Group Flow (v h) 98 99 85 25 91 . ., 195 113 A 1449 0 142 1940 129 Tutu T ] P� R�.. , .. ,.�F �.. _,. a : P :: Pry .. �.:w w "\.'r ,3 •r `.• ,.,. _ 'ti Prot Penn Protected Phases 41 8 . 5 „ . r 2 • s �tted Permitted � .. ,. . . r .. _ . k Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 1540 15.0 15.0 16.6 13.0 73.0 17.0 77.0 77.0 Effective Green, 9 'I7� ::'� 7. : ''. ` Y .# '7. �. �'7. 74.0 . 17.0 78.0 78. o Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.1 1 0.52 0.14 0.s5 0.05 Clearance Time (s) _ _ _ 5.0 _ • 5.0 • ,o :M . 5,0 5r0 /� _ 5.0- 4.1. _ _ 5rD 4.0 5.Q 5ro Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 254 224 181 254 224 192 2177 251 2300 102 v/s Ratio Prat �.......... . - :. .. .. 0.05: 0.0 c0 O.flS c0.5.5 vls Ratio Perm 0.48 0.05 0.02 . 0.12 0.08 vlc Ra'o $ 0 34�. 043 0.16 .0&34-... 0.8s -0.59' .- 0.67 0 ■57 0.84 0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 48.2 45.7 45.7 45.2 45.5 50.5 51.0 15.0 48.1 15.3 8.0 Progression Factor 1.O0 : x :00 : 100 ' 00 `� .00 - 1.00 '1.0Q '� . �3 1.00 7 . D0 1.Ofl Incremental Delay, d2 14.0 4.0 4.8 2.0 3.5 34.8 12.5 1.5 8.9 4.0 0.3 Delay (s) ;52.1 ' 50. ? � 5 1: 5 47.2 50.0 .. 85.E 5 'I 5.5 57.0 .20.3 8.3 Level of Service E D D D D F E B E C A Approach Delay (s), '. 54;9. - w -. N,ry� .. ,.. 71.9 . 20.0 219 Approach LOS D E B C HCM Average Control Delay 25.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio: x Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120 40 w Sum of lost times 8,0 Intersection Capacity L L�eI of S �#ce: c Critical Lane Group N:1230012022335iSynchro\2005 Totl5pm- tot.sy5 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F0 aw OIL" Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Seal Beach Boulevard & Pacific Coast HighwaL. AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions �SR Lane Conf guratians 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 Lane ��ctor • _ .:,: ..a . )DO. .t: 1.00 Frt 0.95 100 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 _ �..:� 0.85 1.00 0.85 FIt ot v •' :•. r +s .fir :�- 0 1 ., r t. ,•� ' -�.. ' .a+ v . atd. Flow (prot) 3358 3433 1863 1583 1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt �err�atked . .. :^ m .�v.95 .d _3539 l 0 �. �5 �� X30 A n { � Satd. Flow (perm) 3358 3433 1853 1583 1770 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Volume (vph).:9 ..... RY159 275 , .:.$ X1668 :=70 � 32 �� 137 20 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..... 1.00 .: ,::... 1.00 .. - .. 1.00 1.0.0 _ . 1. 00 '1-00 1.00 Ad j. Fow f y.ph r. Lane Group Flow 5 i': ' • 1668 . ,1.00 7 0 •� 32 _ 1137 20 (vph) 0 244 0 275 75 111 28 1888 570 132 1137 20 Tura Type :.Split lit =e?ot rvt 1?emn Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 r 5 Pe rm�tted Phases .w Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 6.0 63.0 63.0 12.0 59.0 69.0 Effective Green,s3 µw0 _. - 9.9.9. 0 : �:: X4.0. 70^0 70.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.05 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.58 0.58 Clearance Times} 5.t'3.t -5.0 `4.13 Y.3.Q�3.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 252 544 295 251 89 1887 844 177 2064 2 9 3 v/s Ratio Prot -: 3.07 ; 0.t�8 : � .04 -x.02 - :x.47 3: 37 D..32 vls Ratio Perm 0.07 , 0.36 0.01 We Ratio x.95 'l `0 5 (). 1 8 3; 8 J:75 x.55 0.02 Uniform Delay, dl 55.3 46.2 44.3 45.7 55.4 24.7 20.4 52.5 15.3 10.6 Progression Factor 1..00 1.00 1:00 1.00 � D '1:0t� °x.00 �.�D x.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 45.6 3.3 2.1 5.6 £ 9.0 6..5 4.3 24.6 1.1 0.0 Delay is3 "100.9 •498-5 -46.4 51:3 - , �2 .' .1 X46.4 10.6 Level of Service F D D D E C C E B B Approach Delay (s) 100.9 30.0 22.5 Approach LOS F D FC C of �no...�...r�.. �16 ��HCM Cotr elayHCM Level of Service �,,yAverage C HCM volume to Capacity rat�0 .8� - Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time s ' Intersection C t`l apacty ttzatifln 1. °fl .��Ce . C Critical Lane Group .,. _ .. N:12300120223361Synchro12002 Ex\6am- ex.sy6 L1 N SCGCGS5 -FF51 F-2-yx Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: Seal Beach Boulevard &Pacific Coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:\2300\2022336\Synchro\2006 Cuml6am-cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lane Configurations' WE " _g5jim M -W--NW. we�.. I tt . .:- tt d eaf ,F1 �w �' � y Y ^. ., w .: 4 :...,;y ;. ,.., v " ": ,...:.� ":li.:►, ,r ' !' ,..,.t .. w . +.,r.Y "•'� .. ''�•, ... � 90� 1900 '> -1900 19.10 Total Lost time e (s} .:.. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 . " . 4.0 4.0 i<. 4.0 4.4 4. 0 �� Lane'- � ,` w • ... r .. r.r. a:�s.0ir '.M;;_' .. . ..�:5 _ �. ! rk r ... rte:. ^.�' ~:A�1.;r,.+SyK�",:'3�"''' >.. .y. -�... � +: • �.. iAf 1-00 Frt 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 f" t P yy• 4 Fi-.00. ♦ w r. l!:al�'k•.tf� r "-Fw ..:. ... Vli^^ h.x. • . ... ' �•. : + �a•� -W x.00 at ow prat} 3359 3433 .....� 18.63 1583 .. 1770 .....k 3539 1583 :.:--. 1770 3 539 1583 t Pe 1W: "r _ ..3.� £ 1 Satd. Flow (perm) 3359 3433 1863 1583 1770, 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Volume v ,_, :. _ :� .7�7�►7' •'+rte;: _ 8 14 . , b .. r ' .. `1.00 26 s 162 1235 22 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1- 00 1.00...:1... .00 : , . 1.00 '� .00 1.00 1.04 A� - r;a;r y ; �; .z '14, ^ _ ,b 1235 22 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 260 0 307 82 147 30 1811 W 626 162 123 5 22 e. Tum w .. ^Ai T ., 5- x. '1 � � Pro�`� Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 .. 1 6 ww3~ Pe rmiiled Phais .r " . 5rrti / <" n . aiY•rr . ".K/:+,r .YY .Y.. 3rC..wn`. ... .. [ [ . " "'RY+ Actuated Green, G (s).- 7.0 1 8.0 18.0 18..0 6.0 64.0 64.0 12.0 74.0 70. 4 EME! cfive Gr 6R0 a .. 9 0 k . Q .�. 9 € .. �� 12t3 77.0 71 . Actuated g/C Ratio 4.07 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.45 T .. 0.54 0.54 0.10 0.59 0.59 C leararicL �" me (s} - 0 = 5:0 .5.0 :0 4 D 5.0 5: 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 544 295 251 89 1917 857 177 2094 937 vls Ratio Iron w: � 0#3.08 0P49 .. 0.02• w cfl 5 co.09 0.35 vls Ratio Perm 0.09 0.40 0.01 vlc Rafio ' .' # 0.-56 0.28 0.59 ,- . 0:34 0.9 0. -0.92. 0.59 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 56.o 46.7 44.5 46.8 55.1 25.8 24.9 53.5 15.4 10.1 Progressionacfa . '� ,0:: ...: 0 A , 4l 100.. , low ' \00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,,: d2 110.4 4.2 2.3 9.6 10.0 11.1 5.4 48.4 1.2 0.0 Delay (s), . y1 .... " 7 166:4: _...i.' .. .... ".. /i�� 50.9 .- ' . ....ac../ .. n _ X6.8 i :. 56 , ",., ■ 5 65.0 � 36.9 2P 3 101 R9 16-6 10.2 Level of Service F D D E E D C F B 8 Approach Deals }. ".. 66:4„: 51 . ." ." .. 3M :6 2C _2 Approach LOS F . ".. p _ ... _ . C N:\2300\2022336\Synchro\2006 Cuml6am-cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2066 with Project Traffic Conditions ons 7: Seal Beach Boulevard & Pacific Coast Highway_ AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations �� t`�'�` �� r'd'` Ideal F1vw :(vphpl) . : 00 l . P A 9 0 . d -.1 � 19( .1900 900 0 x.900 � 9vo Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0� .. :4.0 4.g . :' ' -4.0 . _ 4.0"''' .0 ' 4.0 4.0 4. Lane tail. Factor; DO V 95 1.00 Frt 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected .� .. :. �.... - : =•�Q .� x.00 x.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3359 3433 1.863 1583 1770 . -.. 3539 1583 1 770 3539 1583 F1# Permitted r. ;. �0 :t5 .. . - i . -�. ��.95 � .�0 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3359 3433 ... 1863 1583 ..... 1770 . - 3539 .. - .. 1583 '1770 . 3539 1583 Volume (vph) 0 ' 165 := .. =28. : :�. 2 ...,. N.. '1 11 X42 X52 X35 22 Peak-hour ctor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 .. 1.00 . , ,. _. 1.00 ... , - 1.00 .... 1.00 • .. 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 Ad'. 'Fi ova (Wh) Y4 ... .;- a y'� 2s .... ..(.� N : .i°•• .,.. . . � X235 22 Lane Group Flaw (vph) 0 260 0 328 82 147 . 9;._ti 30 r 1811 ... 742 , 162 1235 22 _ Tlit Turn Type ry . .. ?e a :�?erm r�'. rat berm Protected Phases 4 4 8 ... 6 Permitted hale P S ._ At } 6 Actuated Green G (s} 7.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 6.0 54.0 54.0 12.0 70.0 70.0 Effective Green, 9 ls} ` 80 Y. 6.0 5.0 '`2.0 .71.0 71.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.10 0.59 0.59 Clearance Time �s} .o : V .Q . 5.D 5.0 .0 :0 .0 .0 5.D 5.D Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 544 295 251 89 1917 857 177 2094 937 vls Ratio Prot 60.08 eCO.10 .0.04 :M.02 70 :51 00.09 0.35 vls Ratio Perm 0.09 0.47 0,0 vlc Ratio :16 A ` 3. . 8 0&'59 "'0.34 - .:O.14 0.87 0.92 0.59 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 56.0 47.0 44.5 46.8 55.1 25.8 23.7 53.5 15.4 10.1 Progression Factor '00 - 00 '1.00 '� :�30 � .00 1.t]0 1.0fl Incremental Belay, d2 110.4 4.9 2.3 9.6 10.0 11.1 11.4 48.4 1.2 0.0 Delay {s} 1 .4 : �1 X1.9 - •8 �S6.5 . 5.0 Mr9 '35,1 101.9 16.0 10.2 Level of Service F D D E E D D F B B Approach Delay (s), � X66 -4 42. :..' :7 X26.2 Approach LOS F D D C HCM Average Control delay 42.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume rafi o Actuated ycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Gapad'ity filiza � ! -- I. -1 bvVi of C Critical Lane Group . .w N: 1230U120223361Synchro12006 ToMam- tot.sy6 LINSCOCCS5 -FF51 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Seal Beach Boulevard & Pacific Coast H i hwa PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions .rNr Lane Configurations, Flog19.00--, . 1900, 0� 1 900 1900 Total Lo # time (s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 one-• C. .S' ,N. �:,' f.' 1.00 Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 .1.00 0.85 .vn. :W .�.i' .. .. •n.. ... ":k, "- ...,.n:i•- . �. y..aY.cf'w.. ^Y'1%'..:.n. -... Y rw .A �•t 1 00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof).. 3247 3433 1863 1883 1776 " 3539 1583 177 3539 1583 Fit P err��tte . :' :.:• .95 ,r.... ...._.. 0 .,. _ ._.. 00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3247 3433 1863 1583 .•... 770 1:770'.' ' ~Y 3539 ." 1583 1770 3539 1583 volume (vph), 6 .: " "..... ........... .." '235. . 305. 1586 30 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 _ ......... 1.00 _ ". 1.00 "�5: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d' . Flaw .. 1 ;ice ...:. ~: v ,::..w : ",..: - r • r -a 5 17 �� S2 fi .. 8 1 8 �. - 235: 7 1180" .206 1586. 30 Lane Group low (vph) p 0 198 0 520 188 235 71 1180 305 205 1586 30 Turn T'yp Split .. .�= S .. l :� - : Perm? P Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 g g 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases'. w Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 8' 0 52.0 - -- 52.0 20.0 64.0 64.0 Effective- Green, 9 (s) .0 s _ 3. : ._... X3.#3. 23 .0 �B,Q _ '53'0' 5300 20.0 65.0 65.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.44 0.44 0.17 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 = _ . 5:0 : ; 6.0 5.0 4 0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 658 357 303 118 1563 699 295 1917 857 vas Rao Prot'. 0 -0a0-4 cO 33 0.12 cn .45 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.19 0.02 vac Rao x.92 +9.79 .. 0.53 "'..'018 0 .0.75 0.44 0.69 0.83 0.04 Uniform Delay, di 55.7 46.2 43.6 46.0 54.5 28.1 23.2 47.1 22.8 12.8 Progression Factor r .= 1 DO .00 '# .04 1.00:,.. 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 42.8 9.4 5.5 17.5 20.7 3.4 2.0 12.7 4.3 0.1 Delay (s) 8. -55.6 49A 63.5 ,, ; 75.1 31.5 25.1 59.8 27.1 12.9 Level of Service F E D E E C C E C B Approach Delay (s). 32.2 30.6 Approach LOS F E C C �l' i�.,3 ��R•' 11yyrr1 A '� •. vv Rte,,., r,w.: ;, HCM Average Control Delay 39.5 HCM Level of Service D HGM volume -to capacity raffia. -: 0. Actuated cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization..'.'.',.,,._,,, : - 81 � ��C� L�e�rel �f Servidie � }.. c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12002 Ex16pm- ex.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 F'30 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2066 Background Traffic Conditions s 7: Seal Beach Boulevard & Pacific Coast Highwav PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions -OA will IF M M. M Lane Configurations Ideal.Plow (vphpD: . 0 1.906 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 �' 0 4.0 4.0 .. ... .._ ... 4.0 .. 4.0 .. . . .. 4.0 4.6 4.5 4.0 •- • . ' " .. _ Lane mil. �Pactor ... . , ; .s, �.. "" : •_'_w: x7. . ". . _ to ti'..'a.n 1'95 1.�� Frt 0.92 1 000 1.00 5.85 sk.:. .. 1.00 .. -• .vn .. 1.05 .. 0.85 1 R00 1.66 0.85 FA P�rtected.. J V0 y 2se - Dl ft. 0 � w 0 1000 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3252 3433 1y863 1 583 1770 3539 1583 177 0 3539 1583 .A,.. a. _ r A _ •ti a ': Satd. Flow (perm) 3252 3433 1863 1553 775 177';O':`3539' ,.3539 1583 1775 3539 1583 Volume (vph ) W2 n .T205 . .. X83 _ "77 84 X58 1 722 S2 Peak-hour ctor, PH F 1.55 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.45 1.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.55 1.55 1.50 Ad'. w J �0 � ... . .•. n .vim -:.. r v..! %,.' - r." 3 ti ' -�� -258 f -'1722 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 6 ,er,..: .. 582 , ....a.. 266 2 83 77 1284 .. 352 258 1722 32 `urn �' e . •.� �. y - _ ..�... . : :: ,�. . lit to# :erfl �: . errn f'ra t Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 .... 5 .. w . t 2 1 6 . ..x;i : vw'.. .. � i . y,++w....... Pe m7�e P r" d Phase :.r •...- . row.:... o.. 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 8.0 50.5 55.0 22.0 64.0 64.0 Effective Green,S�.t4,3 X24:0 24.E ';3 =51: 22.13 65.0 65.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.18 5.54 5.54 Clearance Time {s .Q 5.6 `5:0 :.0:5 -, 4- 5.0 `5.0 �4. 5. 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 190 687 373 317 118 1504 673 325 1917 857 v1s Ratio Prot A , X3.17.' 16 .04 .-,cO X3.15 c5.49 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.22 4.02 vac Ratio 1. 5 T 0.85 MR55 `i0.89 :0,65 � X3:85 •0.52 0.79 0.90 o.04 Uniform Delay, dl 56.5 46.2 43.2 46.7 54.5 31.1 25.5 46.8 24.5 12.9 Progression Factor r• . � 1.00 '1.00 I ,D0 . 1, goo 1.00 1 :o0 -1 000 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 110.6 12.3 5.8 29.4 24.7 6.4 2.9 17.9 7.2 0.1 Delay .�s} r 167. 886 49.0 76:1 79.4 '37.6 - - ;28.4 64.7 31.7 12.9 Level of Service F E D E E D C E C B Approach Oela � • APP ]� • s� :. 167.1 7.'5 X5.7 Approach LOS F E D •,� FtrolDelay .., . H M C Average 47.5 HCM Level of Service - D ••r••. HCM Volume to .Capacityao :2 " Actuated Cycle Length ts} 120.6 Sum of lost time s � } 16.0 . tterseconacty D�`izacn ,.. �: °l� 1C t..vel.ferrice c Critical Lane Group _ N:\2300120223361Synchro12006 Curnl6pm- cum.sy6 Synchro 5 Report Pa e 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 g F -3\ HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: Seal Beach Boulevard & Pacific Coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations' _ME ..... .... Ideal Flow v phpi Y "4'; Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 .0 4.0 4.0 _ Lane ,y Fr# 0 .92 1.00 1.00 0 85 1 00 1 00 8 0 5 1 1 00 . 0.85 .. Flt P 'may • ...•• rFr. ." xvayr:... na ... 'v '". ..:.yC`.'py.•:?y.Y•wy. . "Z'•.." ... C' "i,:�ibr• .... ..- .. . t .. ," .. +:`. •r.. '. •.j v'.... � 'Y.:: �.:.•.�V .r.� � \�.. •• �. V5 jj �/��* i �1R�f• ni/�! � . V V Satd. Flow (Prot) 3252 3433 1863 1583 ` ... " ",'.. ... 1770 3539 1583 1770 3538 1583 Ft n, � •l 'sue �++.[ y ' .1776. Satd. Flow (perm) 3252 3433 1863 158-3 3539 1583 1774 3539 1583 Volume v � , s ... r ,: v '' .. .... . " ,..ayIcw >. ~,.',^''.�': ..... •.: o+ .'..r ? r �8 b .x{36 �. ...-.. �3 ." • ; %. /f� '.: 2< ... 378 2� 258' 1722' 32 Reak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1,99 1.00 f.00" 1.00 .~:4 1.00 1.09 1.96 1.00 1.66 1.00 1.66 Ad - r d '. . :... : x ..: ?: :2 . ..:. 283. ? �$ : ; :. 378 2 58 1722 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) : 0 218 0 . 798 296 ~ _ 283 .: 77 1284 378 258 1722 32 Turn T SPIN.: µ Perm_-..,,..-. ,.-Prat �: �'em Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 g g` _.... r .. Permitted Phases. Actuated Green, G (s} 5.9 26.9 26.0 26.0 7.0`1' 50.0 56.0 26.0 63.9 63.9 Effective Green, - s} : : Y : 3 MT 27,.Q..- 270a 27.0 7.00 51.0.' 51.0 64.E 64.E Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.17 0.53 0.53 Clearance Time t5 _ ^ 5.v 5.0 500 4, 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 772 419 356 103 1504 673 295 1887 844 v/s Ratio Pmt.. :r # : C0.21 M .r= ,x.11 " .. :0,04 t.36 0.1 5 c0.49 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 .. 0.24 0.02 vac Ratio N ::w4 ., :� t ":::;0.92 .... np ...::: ._ .. 1.49.7 0.7 0.85 0.55 0.87 0.91 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 y 51.0 45.4 40.5 43.9 5.6 5'5- 31.1 26.1 , 48.8 25.5 13.3 Progression Faces- . T x: y . 1.00 1 .00 - +4.1 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 187.3 17.5 16.6 38.6 6.4 3.4 28.3 8.2 0.1 Delays « . , " 244.E -.. 6 .3 44.6 ' 60.5 •x#4::3 3 .5 29.4 77.1 33.7 13.4 Level of Service F E D E F D C E C B Aroach Delay = PP laY . }..3 � , � " ti . 59.2. � 38.3 38.9 Approach LOS F E D D HCM Average Control Delay 52.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM volume to Capacity ratio : 0 1 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time" (s 16.0 Intemection Capacit, t3tirr a o „ 9 : • �� ., =..K p. .. = ICt1 ev of Serve - 1. E C Critical Lane Group . . . .. .. . N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Tot \6pm- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -3Z Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions �." 4% �: •��n!• k1 '�.•1^t?ti: C;,- rr.`;..:;`..r-• sk'.,,,•, -o, :r ►^•,; yt, x. .. .r Lane configurations, Weal -Flow #o h 300 300 . _ - .. 0 '300 00 0 A-goo 1900 Total 1 a Lost time (s} 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lan . . e fii. Factor 30. .- .. �. - Y vM. A • •. w M .5 .:io Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.8-5 ... . Fit Protected .5 _ . _sa 5 . ;� Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1882 1681 1690 1583 1770 3539 ^1583 1770 3526 errnii#ed::. 3.5 _ ; ... .• .5 :98 :ADO _0 :9v tt Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1882 '1681 1694 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3526 Vol ume �vph . _ 11. 20 =X83 µ µ 60 7 466 =� 048 26 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .- 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 At3' ��l�rr h � w ::. 4 . ' .. . 0 483:: .. :. ,.- 5 ... .. 07 " ' X360. .. _ 272 6 ,. /f��f"�� 048 26 Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 31 0 243 .. 255 .e .. 6"_ .. 27 15 1360 272 46.6 1074 0 Turn Type split p . - _ - .. lit '- ree Perms • :trot Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 - 5 2 1 6 Permitted •Phases t . g. .2 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 '10.0 10.0 80.0 4.0 27.0 27.0 20.0 43.0 Effective Green, (s) '-o .0 :W . .fl ::4:0 ; X8.0 8:0 X0.0 44.0 Actuated g C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 1.00 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.25 0.55 Clearance Times .�, =.0 = .0.0.3.0.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 7 i 1 105 231 232 1583 89 1239 554 443 '1939 v1s Ratio' Prot x:01 .'x:0.02 X14 x_ 15 <: 0.01 'CO -38 :26 x.30 vls Ratio Perm 0.13 0.17 vIc Ratio. 3 :x.30 1 05 ;1 o 3 0. 17 : :3.49 535 Uniform Delay, dl 35.4 35.8 34.5 . 34.5 0' .0 36.4 26.0 20.4 30.0 11.8 Progression Factor 10 ' : 00 7 :0� X00 :000 :70 - 0D .0030 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 7.0 73.5 88.1 0.2 "'4.1 56.6 3.1 57.1 1.1 Delay (S) .37, 8 42.8 108. 122.8 0.2 = -40.5 - ., X2.8 23.E 87.1 12.8 Level of Service D D F F A D F C F B Approach Delay (s) •4'1.3 �� ."� � X2.5 35.3 Approach LOS D F E D . -.: .. #-�ICM v Delay A erage Control 59.2 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Ga aci ty ratio . Actuated cycle Length (s) 80.0 ^ Sum of lost time s � ) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization' . _ -X 3.9 °/� AC. U Level 0f .Ser r ca "': C critical Lane Group N :12300\202233615ynchro12002 Ex11 oam- ex.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 %= - -1 -M Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions 40e "�-- 4\ t Lane Configurations Ideal Flow.- l X900 v . �.:.. _. r ..... h 190G 1 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 w .. :.G Lane �'f .... .3..v•: .: •yt.., • .'".' - �a •did rt 1.00 0.90 9.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.04 Fi Pr t o t ems} ::: /� �f X y.w Satd. Flow (Prot) 1770 1682 1681 1690 1583 1770 3539 1583 17 70 3527 Fit Perm fed tax. f9 ~' • „` iFr1VAr +95: - YY •. Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1682 1881 1890 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3527 Volumew : ; • .4) k �A ' 2 T. .. .: %"..M wh�:r.. .. !e!G .... �: ~ .. :ilk. r, 6 :�.�- ... - 8 . . .. : w a . 5''12. . ,r 299, 524. 28 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 . 1.0 0 1.00 1.00 Acrj. FIow,(Vph).;:-`-.- . 5' _ .. 1 r 51 � 2 S4 2 Lane Group Flow (vph} 15 34 0 267 280 258 .. 16 1512 299 524 1192 0 Turn T - . •• ...rXF= "i" «.y... r. :Y4 ' : Pe • Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 2 9 6. Perm�tted..f�i�as s _ - tee:-: Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 19.0 43.0 30 Effective Green, 0 (s) .05 5.0 , .: �' 0 -11.0 80.0. 4.0 29.0- 29.0 19.0 44.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.06 0 %06 0.14 0.14 1.00 0.05 4.35 0.35 0.24 0.55 Clearance Times 5.0 :. 5.0 5r0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5:0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 105 231 232 1583 89 1283 574 420 1940 v s Ratio rot 0. 0.1 cfl.0 = 0116 .' € C0.3� 0.34 vls Ratio Perm 0.16 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.32 1-16 1.21 x.15 0.18 '� .18 0.52 1.25 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 35.5 35.9 34.5 34.5 0.0 35.4 25.5 20.0 30.5 12.2 Progression Factor .'l DO 1.00: 1I= I-W 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 8.0 107.7 126.4 0.2 4.4 88.7 3.4 129.9 1.5 Delay (s) 38.3 X3.9 .. 142.2. 160.9 - 0.2 40.8- 114.2 23.4 160.4 13.7 Level of Service D_ D F F A D F C F B Approach - Delay ........ .. M .. .." ... 42 103,2 98.7 . Approach LOS D F F E MIMI"•aA A � .:?'tin•. HCM Average Control Delay 83.2 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratiq,.,,. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity .Utilization • " 02.04f ICU Level of Servlce c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361SynchroL2006 Cum\10am- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F --3y Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic conditions 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:1230012022336kSynchro12006 Tot11 cam- tot.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 F - "s5 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 g Lane Configurations ' ideal Flow (vphpQ X0 0 4 0 .. . 4 o 90 900 Q n Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uhl. Factor • �:'. : :: ^- _�r�..; ,. X35 - :.:' Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected {. .. . r =:. + I'Do Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1682 1881 1889 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3529 R - Pem.itted 3.9 ., __ = r .. - x.95 _,_ "v' :x.35 ." MO _1583 " 5 1.00 IM '�D.�S 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1882 1881 1689 ��4 1770 3539 1583 177 0 3529 rn Volume e {h .15 2 :: : •1.00 :: -7 $a8 .1 X58. X24 448 28 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 � (Vh) a• .: i. 8 o� ... , -.. " " .." . ...... a8 ; ,.• S X558 4 -448 28 Lane r Group Flow {v h) 15 34 0 354 370 258 , ....- 16 . 1558 .. 326 „ .. 524 1476 0 Tura Type yP ,� lit � �� _ _ � . . M "lit .._ _ brat =pent Protected Phases 4 4 8 g ....ee. 5 2 1 s Pen �ted Phases' _ 'r M' Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 12.0 12.0 80.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 17.0 41.0 1.0 Green . ...t 3. ._ 1 3.0. ,�4.3 29:fl =�0 -42.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.16 1.00 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.21 0.52 Clearance Time {s} 560 -50 5.0 .0 4.o ,- 5:0 5:0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 105 273 274 1583 89 1283 574 376 1853 v/s Ratio Prot {x.01 x.02: . -.0 21 .� 1�.�01 - . 0.44 :�0.3D 0r42 vls Ratio Perm 0.16 0.21 v/c Rato Dr� i4air s . AoY r5.;r '06 . 1 8 • . ii7 1.19 Uniform Delay, dl 35.5 35.9 33.5 33.5 0.0 36.4 h 25.5 20.5 31.5 15.5 Progression factor 7 0 o . ` .bo :1.x.30 1,00 � ��0 � :0D ::� 00 1 .00 .1.�Qo Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 8.0 157.9 179.9 0.2 4.4 1 03.8 4.0 192.7 3.7 Delay (s) :°88.0 43.9 0.2 :0.8 129.3 24.5 224.2 19.2 Level of Service D D F F A D F C F B Approach Delay {s .. 2.9 ._. .. •ti � 4 7110.6 729 Approach LOS APP D F F .: E n" , M�1, _"Ra " _07AM ;_ I M, HCM Average control Delay 1 02.4 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity,rabo 4 r Actuated cycle Length {s} 80.0 Sum of lost time (s') 16.6 Intersection ,Capacity UtlizaWn AWAY � . D eyel of ewe c critical Lane Group N:1230012022336kSynchro12006 Tot11 cam- tot.sy6 LINSCGCGS5 -FF51 F - "s5 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2606 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations +tt r tO I ldealFfow(voh pb ` Y' 19t3t ; : ; : # 00` ~ # `��.r:.. a �: 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ... 4.4 .,; . .. 4.0 .. 4.0 " " 4.0 Lan e lit � . .1.m:...' _ -097 0.91 Fiat 1.00 0.90 1 .00 0.85 1.00 1.04 0.85 1.00 1.40 Fit Prat• ..ri: iAAi�� Satd. Flaw (prat) 1770 1682 1681 1689 1583 1770 5085 1583 3433 5071 Flt Permitted -0 1.00;.... . ".. ..... _ .'r:' . .. 9.: •� .., _ �::., ►.' r °.: ' -:ice.. 1 • Satd. Flow (Lerm) 1770 1682 1681 1689 1583"'1'770 5085 1583 3433 5071 Volume (vph),: 1 258 ; 32fi:: 52 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 r 1.00 1.00 Add . Few (vph) 18 - .. ..: 22 A 7Q . ti ; : = . " 58 =32 25 °.: :.4 :�u�Y 44 28 Group Fl Lane r yaw (vph) 15 34 0 354 370 258 16 1558 326 524 1476 0 Tum .]mow. f4 .. d _ ; � ,_: .... .. x.�•�� ;:��= ^�M :: :� w x . Pry Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 ..... .. 5 . w. _ .... 2 _ z a 1 6 . Permitted rmitted P u ses:. rye qv . , Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 18.0 18.0 84.0 4.0� ~26.0 26.0 13.0 35.0 Effective Greed, 9 (s3 " . 5.0 5. .. /]��, 19 .: /� � 0.0 - 80.Q 27.E 3.0� 36rC� Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.05 0.24 0.24 1.00 0.05 0.34": .0.34 0.16 0.45 Clearance Time (s) . 5.0 . 5. -50 _ 4` 5.D . ` . 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 105 399 401 1583 89 1716 534 558 2282 v/s Rates Prot :. 0.01. 00:02 +..... .. 0.2 ..1 .. 0 2 r .w Q%01. %01. i►�/r3 -. Y` W.15 • 0.29 vls Ratio Perm, 0.16 w 0.21 • , We Ratio 0.14 0.32 D:B 0.9 D.1 0.18 0.91 0.51 0.94 0.65 Uniform Delay, dl 35.5 35.9 29.5 29.8 0.0 36.4 25.3 22.1 33.1 17.1 Progression Factor 1".00. 1.00 't.� . # .00 , '# .DD '# ,0�: x .00 '#�00. 1.00 1,00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 8.0 24.1 29.2 0.2 4.4 8.6 5.1 25.7 1.4 Delays} 38.0 .43.9 : ;' 53, 5 w 68.9 � 4. 40.8 3t3. 27,E 58.8 '18.5 Level of Service D D D E A D C C E B Approach Delay (s) .42.' =` .:. -' . =, .32.5 - 29.4 Approach LOS D D �. D C WS Eli M HCM Average Control Delay 33.8.71 HCM Level of Serv.i_ ce MEN C 1111 1 its ._►: n HCM volu me to Capacity < . . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 -o lost time Sum f e 16.0 Capacity Utlatn .Intersection 818 Le# o �:.r ��.:� : C Critical Lane Group _. .. .. ..w .t rH;�:::k:.. .._ • . . N:\2300\2022336\Synchro\2006 Mit110am- mit.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 IF- -3v Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions ons 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic conditions -01, --- A, t KIM M-M-W Lane configurations Ideal F o �►Ahp 90 :.. 0 oo X00 1 t30 940 a 900 goo •x.00 4900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 Lane Vb1. F tpr 30 : . 1 .95 N M1.00 _ r00 1. inj ^3 Y 11.00 D-95 Frt 1.00 0.90 J 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 ."_1M0 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fft Protected :�� .,00 = _ D. 5 0 ,D. .00 .00 Satd. Flow {prat} 'Perr 1770 1.683 1681 1689 1583 1770 3539 15.83 :'1'770' 1770 ' 3532 Fit nitted 5 o . -..: xz 5 .95 �fl 3. 5 � 0 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1683 1681 . - -.5tio0 1689 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3532 Volume (vph) : X63 26 ; X39 X45 .4 a .: 337 : X79 X32 - 1 351 18 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ .- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad'. 9cp* v h _ p . _ . Lane Croup Flow X63 _ :�� - . y.: 7 X39 4 5 X37 � � 2 °, '1'351 � 8 (vph) 63 73 0 220 228 645 34 1337 379 602 1369 0 Turn Type .:sblit ri tit r+ee plot ?�e� Prot Protected Phases 4 4 8 $ 5 1 6 Permuted Phases v . .. Actuated Green, C (s) 4.0 4.0 8.4 8. .0 80,0 5.0 27.0 27.0 22.0 44. 0 Effective Green s -9 Z.0 .0 ,D -80.0 -`0 ,2 3.0 ;...28.0 _22.0 :,45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.11 1.00 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.56 Clearance Time (s) .5.0 X5.0 $�..0 �.� ^4.0 6.o 500 4-0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 To 5 189 190 1583 111 1239 554 487 1987 vls Ratio Prot 1 . 4 .0 -.01.3 :0.14 .Q ofl. 8 =c0.34 x.39 V/s Ratio Perm 0.41 0.24 vlc Ratio 0.57 0.70 a 1..1 • 1.20 0.41 -0.31 1 ;08 - 10.68 1.24 0.69 Uniform Delay, dl 36.4 36.8 35.5 35.5 0.0 35.8 26.0 22.2 29.0 12.5 Progression Factor :1:00 . 1.0D 1.00 X1.00 1.00 1 0 .0D :00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 19.4 31.8 i 16.6 129.5 0.8 7.0 49.8 6.7 123.0 2.0 Delay (s) :X5.8 �08f 5 X152.1 165.0 .$ -42.8 75.8 28.9 152.0 14.5 Level of Service E E F F A D E C F B Approach Delay (s F 2 :.55. 65.0 56.5 Approach LOS E E E E e� vera 6�on�ro�'4 HCM A a 9 Delay 61.6 7"n k :.!y`" HCM Level of Service HCM volume to capacity -ratio :1:06 E Actuated Cycle Length (s) MO Sum of lost time s � ) 72.0 Intersection opacitytiliza#�t�r�- - _ -9.�CU K ..1►ef Service c critical Lane croup N:\230M2022336\Synchro\2002 022336\Synchro12002 Exl1 opm- ex.sy6 LINSCCCOS5 -FF51 F -3q1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions ns 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Sea! Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions --.� 40e 44\ �rw' • x. ■i A r Lane Configurations, Ideal Fiow (y 0 90 ,�: _... .. 1 qo0 rig: v . ... .�;� ". � O 17 X00 19€ 0 '900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 "....+. 4.0 4.0 ......" . 4.0 .. . 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Lan l#t�_ + _ ''ir k :{' .j,. f.Nr +, o "x ••' �.. - ; - i �f�� • \r•'. +ti ��r. T: - "•,' "..• � • F� .. 100 .a.' "B+X�►wLw`...- 0 .90 . A.. 1.00 . M. 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 It Pr tedt�: :w 'v. k ' %• Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1582 1581 1589 1583 ~1770 3539 1583 1770 3532 Fit Permit: � Y� -ti�� .: ':D -95 OG r00 Satd. Flow erm) 1770 1682 1581 1589 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3 532 :� Volume (vp Peak factor, 5 :. M5 : . , . ..: 1.00 458 Y: - ? :1 :: A , : X527 e..:..: " 41F� : 595 1 541 20 -hour PH F 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad Flow, r ". .r . �95� 1541 2Q Lane Groue Flow (vph) 69 79 0 244 254 x 753 37 1527 ' 416 695 1 561 0 • Turn T Y . - :: ;:, S I .: T=_ :.: �w � �ti ::�r .:�� . ��? U ; '=o . Fes. :.�: ra _ Pew Prot Protected Phases 4 ..... .. . ".. p .. . + .. . 1 6 . rm�tted Pe Phases ti yl n • /rw loin.♦! . , ..' ,y ( .. ". . rep .. .Va � . Actuated Green, G ts} 4.0 ... 4.0 8.0 .. 0 .,, 80 0 4 0 27 .0 27. 0 22.0 45.0 Effective Green, .g ($) : ." 5.0 ~ 4 * , 0 r..K� .r. =fir' -L ... .. .. •.. •. - `,. © • ':. �/�j . 7f ... 7 M8r 0 22.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.06 0.11 0.11 .. 1.00 .. 0.05 .. , .. .. 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.58 Clearance Time �$� S.a r,,:- :�� :a .5 fl . � . 4,0 4 y � 5. - r5.a* 4 0• 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 105 189 190 1583 89 1239 554 487 2031 v1s Ratio Prat . 04 0.06 s .. .. ::: ... €3,f1.5 ." .: . 15 ��- . 00.43. �:0l39 0.44 vls Ratio Perm 0.48 • 0.25 vac Rates 0.52• ^ 0.75 .. ' : = 1: ; : , 0.48. A ' . 3 0.75 1.43 0.77 Uniform Delay, d 1 35.5 36.9 35.5 35.5 . 0.0 35.9 25.0 22.9 29.0 12.9 Progression Factor 1.00 _1 0 1.00 .- 1.00 - . •� .00 :0Q 1.00. fi .04 7.00 7.00 Incremental Delay, d2 23.4 38.7 154.5 182.8 1.0 13.7 111.8 9.1 203.8 2.9 Delay (s) fi0.3:.fi ::_ 200.:1.3 10 50 .5 -137.8 32.0 232.8 15.8 Level of Service E E F F A D F C F B Approach Delay " ," : :. �:a. 84.0 - 1 •' 3. 82-7 Approach LOS Appr . E .... � � � w F .. .. "w. _ w... F F �i *ref .�:, ��g� • % ^�.r` "i = „ yr° :t.y •.i' ."�x -.' HCM Average Control Delay 93.6 _ HCM Level of Service - CM volume to Ca aci rates n p ty 2:.. , :.'� Actuated Cycle Length (s) d.. '' '.. 'raw 80.0 ,`r4..• Sum .. ..M, .ip'••:: h. . of lost time ( s 1 Interseon Capacity U#lizabvn � A;.- - .t :: �� I of _S c Critical Lane Group N:l2300120223361Synchro12006 Cum110pm- cum.sy6 LINSCGCOS5 -FF51 F -I** Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: 1-405 SB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Tot110pm- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 'F -' s, Synchro 5 Report Page 1 �--- 4 Lane configurations Ideal Flow Plowvp1 .. Ott :moo got _ fl IWO-.. 900 1900 Total � Lost time ts} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 .. 0000 4.0 4.0 .. 4.0 4.0 4.0 e til. Factor 30 0 IM .aD.95 rt 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 '1000 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 F tecteC .. � w95 ... .. Y �•• 0 - .. �Y ..:...:... .. J•�•9 .x.95 .:., .. _ A1ao . ^ -':... .. �' .95 .;: +`A.. 0000 Satd. Flow (Prot) 1770 1682 1681 .. 1688 1583 1770 ..:::.'�•. 3539 ^:,::. :• 1583 1770 3533 F t PerMitted .53 x.95 x.95 .0 f Satd. Flow {perm} 1770 1682 1681 1688 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3533 volumeh . 69 8� 31 C37 -�81 ' 598 20 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 :00 1.00 Ad!• Flow v3 8 =1 ° X31 ^ 103 x•788 95 598 20 Lane Group Flow (V fig 79 0 266 275 753 37 1788 601 695 1618 0 Turn Type YPePl � -�. �� = �litee =fit - :.�. . berm rt Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases _ - =f ree , Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 80.0 4.0 29.0 29.0 20.0 45. 0 Effective n Green, 9 W 5•+0 5.0 V.0 -9.0 8 .0 : *'0 30.0 _ SC1,0 20.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.11 1.00 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.58 Clearance Times} 5.0 .5.0 .5.0 5.0:00 5:0 4,0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 105 189 190 1583 89 1327 594 443 2031 v/s Ratio Prot D3.�04 `0.05 : X0.160.1 S :: :39 X0.46 v/s Ratio Perm 0.48 0.3$ vlc Ratio 0.52 0.7 •'1.41 - - l .45 � 0.48 =x: .42 �� .35 1 -01 1.57 V. 80 Uniform Delay, d1 36.6 35.9 35.5 35.5 0.0 36.9 25.0 _ 25.0 30.0 13.3 Progression Factor '1.00 :0 '1.00 :1.00 3.0� .00 1:00 `1.00 -,-1,00 '1000 Incremental Delay, d2 23.4 38.7 211.8 228.3 1.0 13.7 161.4 39.9 266.7 3.3 Delay • {s} o.o 'x'5.6 2;47,3 .263.8 1,0 5fl.5 186.4 � 64.9 236.7 16.7 Level of Service E E F F A D F E F B Approach Delay (s) X8.3 107.5 -154.2 100.8 Approach LOS E F F F to pi M*.-.' U- m , MR HCM Aver Average y a e Control Delay 1 22.4 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.31 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost times 12. ■ • r Intersection capacity Ublrza n 0000 ., - ' 1 .6% 1cU eve1 'of Beane C Critical Lane Group N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Tot110pm- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 'F -' s, Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2005 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 SB Ram es & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions { N00 Lane Configurations ttt r 11 tO Ideal Flaw (vphpll), _g QO : g -1900 . '1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0_ 4.0 4.0 Lane Uhl. Fact or M i• .. Ay: �i � Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.04 1.00 0.85 1.00 4 . Fit Q Satd. Flaw rot 1770 1682 i HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing raffic Conditions ond�ti0ns 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300\20223361Synchro12002 Ex111 am- ex.sy6 LINSCGCQS5 -FF51 J= . %\\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 rf yn, -;yer .� rv44s :,..,, ,�•a�B� Lane Conf gurations '� � Ideal Forh.p -0 `r0.3 X98. - 900 :... :wt o s x.900 .boo 1900 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4 0 _ 9 . 4 0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane •til. Facto • - r .. _ .. '• 95 . "'ice '. •� woo �� +�� Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 .:C,,.. 1.00 0.85 e'' r 1.00 .:a: - 1.. .40 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 F Protece 0 _ �- C o 5 .11.00 atd. Flow (prot) 1770 1853 1583 1681 1627 1504 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Perrued 0F 6 : = .1.00 I.nn Satd. Flow {pem} 1770 1863 1583 1681 1627 1504 3433 1'-639 1583 . 1770 3539 1583 volume i� 3 _ 3 4 :2.9 s ;.. «. .ew r 7 t :.' ". X511 `1248 362 Peak -hour factor, PHF . . 1.00 1400 1.0 0 1.00 » -.. 1.00 1.00 - .... 1.00 '� .00 ry.F 1.00 . 1.00. 1.00 1.00 A w �o (,Oh) :. r .. e •: is •' • .. .- .. ... .:. .. w. ..; . :, � «r .. ... .i Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 3 14 151 153 397 131 1042 2 451 311 1248 352 Turn Type it n . , .. P lit w, = �t# Mt : � 1 v ree �rvt Perm Protected Phases • 4 4 8 8 8.1 5 1 6 Permuted Phases . _:::.... . s r. Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 10.0 10.0 29.0 6.0 28.0 •80.0 19.0 41.0 41.0 Effective Green, g ts3 50,0 A4.0 18:.3 = . D :19.0 `r: o. X9.0 42.0 42.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.38 0.08 0.36 1.00 0.24 0.52 0.52 Clearance Time {s) 5.0 5: 5.3 ,.5.0:#� + =:0.0 . .. . .4.0 -5 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 116 99 231 224 564 257 1283 1583 420 1858 831 v s Ratio Prot x.00 x.00 :0:09 x.09 :� 2 %:w, .04 x.29 �0. 18 x:0.35 vls Ratio Perm 0.01 : - 0.28 0.23 vIc Ratio .0.05 0.03 -14 11165 x:68 :' X4:51 .81 ", .28 x.74 0.57 0.44 Uniform Delay, d1 35.3 35.2 35.5 32.7 32.8 21.2 ,35 .6 ..M 23.0 0.0 28.2 13.9 11.7 Progression Factor 1.00 -.1.00 - •+ o �/�} �' .�o j/�� a V� -0 -.0 V • '' µ _ + + o �/�]7 . %+ .00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 3.0 13.5 15.6 .. 7.2 7.1 .. 5.7 0.5 11.2 ■oo 2.0 .� V 1.7 Delay (s) 36.0 :35.8 x:38.4 :48.2 '• 48.4 28.4 X2.6 X8.7 .5 =X9.4 5.9 1 3.4 Level of Service D D D D D C D C A D B B Approach Delay (s) �. .- ►6.6 X9.2 Approach LGS D .. _. _ D .. -► a.• ..-.. .. C • . . B LIMM r. HCM Avera a Control Delay 23.2 HCM Level of Service : G HCM volume to Capacity rabo - Y Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of Post •time . (s)-- 8.0 . Intersection capacity Utilization 1% ci vei of er c c critical Lane Group N:12300\20223361Synchro12002 Ex111 am- ex.sy6 LINSCGCQS5 -FF51 J= . %\\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2005 Background Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations tt Ideal Flow h .. ._ ". N .. f: , . A 41 -: . .. ......,�.�,... - " 190 /�{/��3R� 1 #0 14 Total L Lost time (s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0• 4.0 490 4.O 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 L ane l� . ,. .. : •a�^i.. ^ {' . n . ,:+. ,.ia•' • ." -.x .. "." ' ,r. r ., E ..,4i..e ::'s'i. .w . "V a -. •. � .. ':.:. x;;..r:::.b ;6w •:.•, s «- •.':.,...d!•_ .n. si: r.'•: . '.. ` r '_'". .... -�95,.. -•. •�. •: _ �}��]. ��I 7R: 'o X95 1 �0 ■ ■o1i Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 ". .. .. .. 1.00 . ". .. ... 1.00 .. .'... 0.85 7 ' 1.0Q 1.00 0.85 y J Y Fit Pr ote �fe" � y �-a : _0.85 .0 0. Satd. Flow (prot} 1770 1853 1583 1681 1527 1504 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 15 83 '. .. 4 Fit Pe rm�fte 95 � •� :V... 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1681 1527 1504 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Volume (yphy,-,.:.:''!. 3 ; 2 141 . . i 93 495 357 1395 399 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 ..v 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj_ Flow.(vph) ... 9 :;.. 3 _. r .. -' " 14 y 1193 .495:.: 357 '� 395 399 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 3 15 155 157 ... .. M 458 141 1193 495 357 1395 399 Turn T yFe -: Si p _ . Pr r w i :Spt :� �p #-oy .. ��. rdt Free I~'ro# Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 81 5 2 1 Permitted Phases. 4 R . ;. Q * ..yw.� 5 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 27.0 5.0 .: 30.0 80.0 18.0 43.0 43.0 Effective Green,, 9 (s). 5.8 10: :'.8.4 28.8 5th . 31- 0 80:0 18.0 44.0 44.0 Actuated glC Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.35 0.06 0.39 1.00 0.22 0.55 0.55 Clearance Time (s} 5.0 -5.0 5.0 5.a 5.€ .0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 115 99 210 203 526 215 1371 1583 398 1945 871 vls Ratio Prot 0. 00 ... ;.. :.. . :10 . 0. # 03 a. D4o 34 c0.20 0.39 vls Ratio Perm 0.01 :. 0.31 v c a : 00 x.03 .' .78 = 0.82 . = 0.S7 .6 x:87 .3" 0.90 0.72 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 35.3 35.2 35.5 34.0 34.1 24.3 35.7 22.6 0.0 30.1 13.4 10.8 Progression Factor - 1.00 1.00. : 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 400... 1:00 1:00 .7.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 3.2 25.5 29.9 17.7 14.5 7.8 0.5 25.4 2.3 1.7 Delay (s) 36.0 35.5.. 33.7, - :59.4 64..1... 42.0 .51.2 30.4 0.5 55.5 15.7 12.6 Level of Service D D D E E D D C A E B B Approach Delay (s). 37.7 x .- .3 23 21.7 Approach LOS D D C C �n�ei _ �k.r++•ri° . .. V HCM Average Control Delay 27.4 HC M Level of Service C HCM -volume to- Capacity ratio 0.80 Y Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost times 1 Intersection rapacity I tll�za o� .... 83.30 rr Le ►e df $ems : c Critical Lane Group N:12300120223351Synchro12006 Cum111 am- cum.sy6 Synchro 5 Report page 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F40W 'Ilkl� HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Project Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions qra! �� MR, Lane Configurations ea flow ivo l N 4 ... .. ,.. ..: . 'o0 900 9 00 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .0:.0.0:.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 M. . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor � 6 :{ .0.0.0_.0 •��0 x.95 . 100 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.40 1.00 0.85 1.00 ... 1 .000 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.85 M �.rotected s "a.. 5 , , . ^t • 00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 1853 1583 1581 1622 1504 3433 3539 ' 1583 1 TT0 3539 1583 Ftt Pemi`tted = : Q 95 ° .0 3 r, 0. e ..a. -^ . 30 A to -.to, .95 r00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm} 1770 1863 1583 1881 1522 1504 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 VOWme A .0.0.0.0 .- Z8 _ .. 77 "27 4:.. 458 1141 A 06 a� :557 . 455 399 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 ..- 1.04 1.00''- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj- Ftvw (vph)� 5� ....:,P:. , e'•.... s. .. 7 q�4 8 ,. F 9 -:57 4456 399 Lane Group Flow {vph} 5 3 15 275 279 ..- ..::�. 458 .. 141 ,.. 1206. ....� 529 357 1456 399 Tub` y - :-er K. . - - . -: ov _t tee .dot Perri Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 1 81 5 ..1 6 A PerTn1 t ied ��1a Ses r - '. ::'µ:Vi'.• M .. 6 Actuated Green, G ts} 4.0 4.0 4.0 13.0 13.0 30.0 5r0 27.0 80r0 17.0 39.6 39.4 Effective Green, i .D . 14.0 4 1.D :2 :{3 6�t3 17.0 40.0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.39 0.06 0.35 1.00 0.21 0.50 0.54 Clearance Times} 5.3 .0 Sr �.0 �� 4. . n 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 117 116 99 294 284 583 215 1239 1583 376 1770 792 vls Ratio Prot: 0;06 8 ' 7 `=3.'30 =,x:04 X0.34 X3.20 =3.41 vls Ratio Perna 0001 0.33 0.25 fJ v c Ratio M.05.7 X3.03 0. 5 _ ��D.94 .98 0.79 _ : 3= 6 _ X3.97 V. `0.95 //J�� or L- 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 35.3 35.2 35.5 32.6 32.9 21.6 36.7 25.6 -0.0 31.1 17 .0 13.4 Progression a Pr Factor 1. .0Q � : 1:0 1�0 00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 3.2 38.9 49.1 10.2 14.6 19.9 0.6 35.3 4.5 2.3 Delay Y 36.0 - =35.6 .38.7 � 71. B2.0 51.8 61.2 X45.6 6 66.3 121.5 15.7 Level of Service D D D E F C D D A E C B Approach Dela s P y _- - � � :7 -. ..0.0.0.0- X6.4 = . 33 Approach LOS D E C C HCM Average Control Delay 35.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Ca Capacity -ratio Y.85 t Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost times � } . . 12.0 .� Intersection C c utilization -.:. -.: -9. Silo .. .�� r �` G "r _ M �F::. l.3 gel of � c Critical Lane Group .v ., , ,- .. , N:12340120223361Synchro12006 Tot111 am- tot.5y6 LI NSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -y3 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2056 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions AP Lane Configurations f 1)► .. .. Ideal F NP .-... ... 5. ...r _ ... -: '., ." .'M1 ." '" : 1 }+...iL.'.?�..'.•' - x.,,' r w w Y'A4 -qc: y .. �." .�'yx:;•h i•pv...y ". r +L•'.. X900 .1... .: .•' :ti.: 'v. w �( ■ � - �• :, `. ...: ,��w}J} ' "'• - [ : :.a " ". � ?•• ... . "..: - fig•,,... .. .-: "':R - -.. :'�'"` +'•. : :.! '10W-1900.. 900 • Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . "....,.. 4.0 . •....M.+'wLw. 4.0 n .......R 4.0 ..n:. . • . 4.0 4.0 4. Lan cti iR•'•: �••K. ••'\.... ^+MtlC YY.►.' /XY' ••*y.,,n - r.. •n,.,, � wo�• 1.00 Fit r 1 00 .. .. .,^.^' .... a., .. .. .•. ..`�. • `:. 100 0 85 1 00 � 00 n .. 0 85 100 w. 1 00 .S 0 85 1.00 .�.9� f .00 0.85 Fit P •, � :.��i ;� :. :: 0.9�• 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (pr4) 1770 1863 1583 1681 1622 1504 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 FIS Permitted �SV tiF D.� V►. .. ........ �'.• .... _ oE�. ;: >� _ , :1►0� a. ' 0.9� 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1853 1583 1681 1622 r i'50_4 3433 ....k.•" 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 volume _ .. a Y • 8 : 8 , ...... '. v e ry ', . 12 ." 52957 : -.: 456 399 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad'■ Flow .. ... j -0: �w `- :. . ,r'!•,. ^' -,.. -•- t^`...' •..✓: ^.wa" .. ..,`+rdt & ", ^ ' ' .fig.•.. :• "•'a i : V ^458 '," .'w. S. _ �j} . !', > 1 �� .•'• ?�� 529 357 1456 399 Lane Group ow Lvph) 5 3 15 276 279 458 141 1206 529 357 1456 399 �,< -. Tyke : . ! "k'r. .. ` •.. ,,. <• r ^, �P tv : Pw .;/ ��- Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 81 5 2 1 g errnitted . " - .' i .M. `••�. _ ± r80.0 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 16.0 16.0 35.0 7.0 22.0 19.0 34.0 �4 .V fe ve ie 9 C � -0 3 ro , . ,23.0 Sa.o I9► 35rV 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.45 0.09 0.29 1.00 0.24 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (6)5•fl 5..D.0 4.3.0 5 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 116 99 357 345 677 300 1462 1583 420 2225 S 93 vas Ratio Prot r. " =:: 0.' + :+ .. ...<.. .,. w,. 0.30 • • . . v .. 0. c0.24 .. : • , . L�20 � 0.29 vls Ratio Perm 0.01 ... . . 0.33 0.25 We Ratio ^. 0.0� �. � � • .0.'7�'� �: 4.81 0.8� 0.33 o.g5 0.65 0.58 Uniform Delay, di 35.3 35.2 35.5 29.7 30.0 17.4 34.7 26.6 0.0 29.1 17.7 16.9 Progression Factor r 1x00 } 'i MoD 1 :: :00 ' ^ 0 : it .01 = 1X0 3. 1. .1-00 1.00 1.00 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 3.2 15.0 18.2 5.4 5.2 5.4 0.6 19.0 1.5 3.5 Delay Delay (s)- 36.0 .'.. _ _ 35.6 38.7 44•x" ' . 48-21,` 22.8 39.9 /� 32,Q orf 48.1 ■ 9.3 20.4 Level of Service D D D D D C D C A D B C Approach Delay (s) • - . 5 7'-:- : :' . 3 8 24.1 Approach App LOS D D ,r.: C C 1 1 lion HCM Average Control Delay 26.3 HCM Level of Service C H CM V m tv Ca a P� Yt ii+".:M � ,. v win yr • +.. , r " ✓, e K ". ... -1F Rn[.^,:. : :. r- .. Q I Actuated Cycle y e Length . .. ... -:,i r " .. r F - 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) _ .. w - 12.0 • ... Inters � .. .. .. r e�� Ca }L{ 70.7°x►: :.:. • Fi �o :•_F +�y.. '... , 1CU Lev •of sei .r1 . .. . " c Critical Lane Group N:1230012022336\Synchro12006 Mit111am- mit.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F -may Synchro 5 Report Page 1 FICM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existin g Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ram s & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions ' R Lane Configurations ' r 1) +t r + ideal Flow (vphpl) _ fl90fl e-A, 0 � x.900 0 . aQO 0 R 1900 X900 X900. 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0 Lane or act '!� y�� °. �» � i ' 'r wv 100. 0.95 n Frt 1.60 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 F rDt , acted �fl y .. .. Q ..._ �. ' -.... '"� � � -D0 Satd. Flow rot (p rot) 1770 1863 1583 1681 .. 1490 . 1504 , . ,. 3433 .. 3539 ... 1583 1770 3539 1583 Fit Pe riitti~d =: .;::, 14:1x6 :J x.99 :C ... ww95 n .6 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1681 1490 1504 3433 . 3539 1583' 1770 3539 1583 Volume (voh)-,97 1 � �:� 36 - ` 4 = 6 X712 ~ 7 X707 X38 255 1383 •250 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 . r 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow :(�) 1 � 3£ 84 =:= 12 ..6 ;. =..:'0 �3 X55 1383 250 Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 117 130 225 374 4 427 :, 67 1.767 638 255 1383 250 TurnType Split arrpit ... tv #►at =free 'rot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 81 5 2 1 6 Pertnitted P teases w A- .. : ! e r/6 �l Actuated Green, G {s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 10.0 10.0 21.0 4.0 36.0 80.0 11.0 43.0 43.0 Effective Green, 9 i$.0.0 = -: � 1.0 1,3 - x.2.0 � .4.6.3 110 44.0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 4.06 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.05 6.46 1.00 0.14 0.55 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 5,0 '5.0 $.0 - : 5.0 X5.0 4.0 A.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 116 99 231 205 414 172 1637 1583 243 1946 87 1 GIs Ratio 'ra# 0&'06 0&'06 '013 :' 0.25 X28 0.48 . 4 0_39 vls Ratio Perm 0.08 0.46 0.16 vlc Ratio ._-- 0.87 =I D1 1.31 ` ': V:�97 1:82 x.133 fl �9 1 Z4 -�.�4fl � 05 D-71 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 37.2 37.5 37.5 34.4 34.5 29.0 36.8 21.5 0.0 34.5 13.3 9.6 Progression Factor 4.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 X1:00 .00 7 40 71 M 1-00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 56.4 85.9 195.8 52.9 389.5 52.5 6.5 34.3 0.8 71.3 2.2 0.8 Delay �s) `9366 123.4 : 33.3 Z7.2 X424.0 .5 -' _43.3 .8 .8 ' 4�.8 15.5 10.4 Level of Service F F F F F F D E A F B B Approach Delay (s) 156.507.6 X0.9 27.0 Approach LOS F F D C 7e:T +tom. y�1�e�� ;)'r��]■°{�,,�.. �ipir,F May .r'', Y, -'i-.. 1•, yrr. ,;'i'n• y'.'J�°7,% v .rte : ;i... •c0 • 3`r :t .,W;t:_ff►R�'1F %y . `^ "'i ^..a' � ^ ; p ': .y( •R" : • -w. "'s K•YC.. - . . HCM Average Control Delay 73.5 HCM Level of Service E HCM volume to Capacity .rafio�20 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.4 Sum of lost times 16.0 intersection Capacity Utili�zaition ° 9 : ` o .... - -- `1�GU bevel f erarice c Critical Lane Group N:12300\20223361Synchro12002 Ex111 pm- ex,sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 'T- - %.%,S Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 0 ond�t�ons 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Conf guratians � � tt � !deal Flow v h 1 1�a 1�:..1 1 a ... Sao �' v 900 9oa Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 Lang UbL Factor- # .. '.. R V. : ,. ". X0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt �Prat�cte� . €x:95:: .. .. , 1.00 1600 1:00 Satd. Flow {prat} 1770 1863 1583 1681 1489 1504 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt PeimflifW, .. 11.000 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow {perm} 1770 1863 1583 1681 1489 1,564 3433 . 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Volume. Y�.:' '.: (yp ^ , : ? ^ Yr 140 . :.v- 5 .: :.r S.1 �2 8 4. 72 974 700 3'1 7 '1614 2.82 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1 . . .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (v . . A 40 --3115 Y.w :f 72 1 "974 700 317 '614 282 Lane Group Flow {vph} 105 126 140 247 427 487 72 1974 700 317 1614 282 Turn Type.: - - Split'. p ` : , _ .. _ .?e $ _ M , 6666 Prot Free Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 g g 81 5^ 2 1 6 Permitted P Phases . -4,0 ,Fr ee 6 Actuated Green, G {s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 w. 6666 20.0 37.0 80.0 11.0 44.0 44.0 Effective Green g (s) 5.0 10.0. 10.0 21.0 4.0 38.0 80.0 11.0 45.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.26 0.05 0.48 1.00 0.14 0.55 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 .5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 5.4 5.0 Lane Grp Cap {vph} 111 116 99 210 186 395 172 1681 1583 243 1991 890 vls Ratio Prot 0-606:-- _ 0.07 r ..: y 0.15 c42 0'32, 00 c0.56 c0.18 0.46 vls Ratio Perm 0.09 0.44 4.18 vac Ratio '.141 1. 18 2.30 1.23 0.4� 1.'17 0.44 '1.30 0.81 4.32 Uniform Delay, di 37.4 37.5 37.5 35.0 35.0 29.5 36.9 21.0 0.0 34.5 14.1 9.3 Progression Factor 1.00 i 01O. .1.00 1.00 'l .04 '1:00 .'� .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 71.8 108.6 235.5 117.8 599.7 125.0 7.3 85.1 0.9 163.6 3.7 0.9 Delay (s) 7 09.2 "1.4 .' �3. � 1 52.8 634.7 .154.5 ' . 44: 06.1 0.9 198.1 17.8 10.3 Level of Service F F F F F F D F A F B B Approach Delay (s). 3: - 330.8 77.6 42.7 Approach LOS F F E D ..c -�.� ,f „a. .r" •-- i•Y'r�4:sr. a! � r * 9' '..- ' c r: `' s%'.� r.. ^��. [ .d= 5 T `.✓. .. ,':". ^w-'.* -, f� HCM Average Control Delay 117.0 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capapity ratio.: f 9 Actuated cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost times {) • 1 S.0 . Inters�on Capacity Utflizatrvn :. 110.0*/ ICU Level pf 'Service: F c Critical Lane Group N:\2300120223361Synchro12006 Cuml11 pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -yam Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2666 with Project Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Sea! Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions d ons No. .wR :� Lan e Conf gu b ti•y. ideal flow(vp ,(VWP - ` ... .. aw+brx•' .rw • . < ..'F.t... _o T: n• - ...�. ,••:.o' v. .oa,.,.. ..;., •'o 9_00m: x.. .. ..ry. Total Lost time (s) �I. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _J1 4.0 . .w' 4. .. 4 0 4 4 Lane'U •P .,actor .. ...,, - • ,s: _ �0 ��r� n .a. N.M n.... fir: `` . ;`Ro o . Frt ,.... F P,tected �.95 5 _ 100 089 085 . . 1.00 1.00 085 �' 100 95 100 085 Satd. Flow iprot} 1770 1$63 . 1583 1681 1495 . A% 1594 .5 .... 3433 3539 . ... 1583 .. 1770 ��1�30 .. 3539 � .Q0 15$3 Fl.# Pemitted 5� :M a Mt 95 n w9 A _ �i ;::;p'� rVr .... © . :/ .{ 0 0 o Satd. Flow iperMj 1774 1863 1583 1681 1495 ^3« 1544 n 3433 3539 _ 1553 1770 .00 3539 7 583 Volume (vph) r . � � :,t..a. � 26 w� 4Q ° . .• X14 1 317 X633 Peak-hour factor, 700 100 100 100 1. 40 _ 1.00 7.00 1.04 1.09 7.00 1.04 .282 1.00 Adj. flow f�v'p�} *� � _ �� 4t3 F: 54 ;_ _! 317 1533 282 Lane Group Flow (vph) 'ern 105 126 140 271 422 507 72 2041 892 317 - 1633 282 . Type :split err PUtt+ov ?rot ree Tarot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 81 _ 2 1 Permitted :tted ses Actuated , .. 5 r een, �s} 4.0 4.0 4.0 10.0 10.0 21.0 4.0 36.0 80.0 11.0 43.0 3 0 43.4 Effective Green, g {s 5.0 r. ..3 `.0 1, 0 . 11; D _ 22.0 _ ; TT. iI 7.0 Bo, 0 11.0 y44.0 X4.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0006 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.05 0.46 1.0 0 0.74 0.55 9.55 Clearance Time s i � 5 � • -.�D ��5.0 5.f3 � �.{� � 4 .0 .. • t•5.0 :4.�D 5.t3 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 116 99 231 206 414 172 1637 1583 24 3 1946 871 �vls Ratio Prot x.06 '"'JO v 07 r . 0. 8 x:34 :: �02 •:� v0.5$ -00.18 OA6 vls Ratio Perm - 0.09 y . - . .. : w 0.56 . 0.18 v1c Ratio ` 44 .w 9 ' y1.A ,•,' . +• - �: -2.05 .22 �I.55 4.30 ,0.-84 ?n 0.32 Uniform Delay, dl 37.4 37.5 37.5 34.5 34.5 29.0 36.9 21.5 0.0 34.5 15.0 9.9 Progression factor 1.00 1400 . -1.�0 A.DO w1.-�0 "`1.00 1.�3D 4.t3o 1.00 �/�) �/�] 1.00 '1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 71.8 148.6 235.5 11-4.0 488.3 120.9 7.3 116.4 1.5 .00 163.6 4.5 1.0 Delay (s) A 09.2 146A .273.0 '14805.622.8 149.9 .- -4 - 1 37:9 - • 1.5 19$.1 10.8 Level of Service F F F F F F D F A F .19.6 B B Approach Delay (s ) 1153.5 x:280.7 X5.1 43,8 Approach LOS F F F . D h tw.r_.. HCM Average Control Dela Y 115.8 H �Io CM Leve f r F Y +r..• ...++• +' . ". . HCM Volume to Capacit ra�o '� "'Al Actuated Cycle Length (S) ... 80.0 Sum of lost time (s ) 16.0 Intersection ty a3a04 �1#1Zati n .. Na .. �° eve �f � � ... � Cf:. C Critical Lane Group .. , . N:1230012022336 \Synchro\2006 Tot111 pin- tot.5y6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 rZ ~QT\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 with Mitigation Traffic Conditions 7:1-405 NB Ramps & Seal Beach Boulevard PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations - Ideal Flow (vpb } 900 3 ;9{ .:.. . _ .' .. 1 9 f= 900 1904 Total Lost time ts� 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.4 4.0 4.0 .. 4.D 4.4 " 4.D .. 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtH. Factor 00 F,� - A.0 .. 0. ... ....��. .. " . .•.:�.:� ..91 1.00 Frt � �0 ■, 1.00 0 ■85 1.04 4.89 ..:.:.. 0.85 ... 1.00 1.00 .. 0.85 .. 1.00 1.00 0.85 w � Fft Pro eot t ed: �r XS .. 'I i.00 1.00 atd. Flow (prot) 1770 1883 1583 1681 1493 1504 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted T..' , 4 • Satd. Flow �._ 0 a s,.p..,T.a.� .� •.. .00 0 ._ a9 . pA�Q �w.i':i•` YY �o:�'. 1.00 {/�j � �o�/ sperm} 1770 1863 1583 1681 1493 1504"3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Volume (vph). :� . .'COY _ .. , _.... 8 : . 9 317 3. 33 282 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00r 1.00+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vpbh)- = 1 f `+ 126' 14th =. ' 84 z „ W .....:�:�:�� 2 7 '633 282 Lane Group Flow (vph) 105 126 140 285 . 390 .... 525 2 •: 7-2"-:': .. 2041 892 .. 317 1633 282 Turn Type Perm Rt o.. Pry: `.. Frei Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 81 5 2-: 1 6 Permitted Pha s . ; �.� Freek 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 18.0 18.0• 36 ■0 .. _ 5 ■0 .. 39.0 100.0 18.0 52.0 52.4 Effective Green, 9 (s). 7.0. 7.0. TO 19.0 � 37.9 _µ. 500.1.: 40.0 100.0 180 53.0 53.0 Actuated g./C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.37 0.05 0.40 1.00 0.18 0.53 0.53 Clearance Times 560 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,.0 4-0.:- 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 124 130 111 319 284 556 172 2034 1583 319 2695 839 v/s Ratio Prot 9.06 Ov I Jr 0017 c0,26 0.35., 0-02 W.40 : x:0.15 0.32 vls Ratio Perm 0.09 0.56 0.18 vIc Rao 0.85 _ 0. 9 �� 0.�9 X37 4.9 0.42:: 1. 0.56 0.99 0.61 0.34 Uniform Delay, d 1 46.0 46.4 46.5 39.5 40.5 30.5 46.1 30.0 0.0 40.9 16.3 13.4 Progression Factor.. , 1,00. 1.00. 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00-. 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 47.5 71.1 171.3 29.3 188.7 26.5 7.3 20.8 1.5 48.8 1.0 1.1 Belay(s)' • 9. '1174. :217-a. 68.9, 229 ■2 5 ?.' 53,E X4.8 'I : 89.8 17.3 14.5 Level of Service F F F E F E •D D A F B B Approach Dela y s 1 48.5 115.8 :.: 36.2 27.2 Approach LOS F F D C W�W : •: HCM Aver age Control Delay 53.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity rago 1.7 : Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time :s y 16.0 Intersectim CapaC#iy .Utlmatipn IOU L6vel of SaV C Crifical Lane Group N:12300\20223361Synchrot2006 Mit111 pm- mit.sy6 LINSCOCO55 --FF51 F'V� Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Westminster Avenue & 1-405 SB On-Ramp AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300120223351Synchro\2002 Exl20am- ex.sy5 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 YZ —'1i Synchro 5 Report Page 1 x . - .., .. . .��a;;� .. .. F' POO 12 u- '�V','7/+ss llhdk�ro� A-. ...w � ...:ia,` - +b...w.x 3i' . •N.. W��= i , cl�";T »'•y�,r", air.•. ., 4 "G.,%lk. :` : 4'c ✓'.,..:' ` . Lane configurations ++ Sign Control V .e = _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume me e�h: . 54 5 �r: - .. , Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ha u oW to ve f� -� r • }: Pedestrians w Y Len e Width d ft w ;W Walking Speed (ft/s} P a e n rce t Bi ocka e . . aN -: _ Right turn dare (veh} _ Medan -... erg` - ..,.... -a?. r •v "' F z M., w e Median t ) storage veh 1IC con 1 f�fct n vo u 2� 9 6 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol . Y vC2 stage 2 •conf vol g , tC, single (s) 4.1 5.8 5.9 tC, 2 stage (s) _ :. tF (s) 2.2 395 3.3 p0 queue frees :8 00 : : 00 cM capacity (vehlh ) 558 139 521 • Y :rte �' M3., r�,.w 7f a,,. r sN• „: Volume Total 377 377 485 98 288 288 288 Volume Left f3 =98 � o 1 3 0 Volume Right 0 0 455 0 0 0.- 0 cSH 1701 .17 ,00 1700......-..','W8 ..' 700 1700 :,1700 Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.22 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Queue Length {f#} - : :5 f3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 0.0 12.7 0.0 000 000 Lane LOS : Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 Approach LOS : Mir Average •• Delay . 0.5 . . Intersection capacity Utilization 40.9% ICU Level of Service A N:12300120223351Synchro\2002 Exl20am- ex.sy5 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 YZ —'1i Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unslgnalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2005 Background Traffic Conditions 9 7: Westminster Avenue & I-405 SB On-Ramp AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12340120223361Synchro12005 Cum120am- cum.sy6 LINSCGCOS5 -FF51 F - Sri Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lan e Configurations Sign Contra . Free: .,. .. •r....., . v .. :r w -r':. •'.rte= ^ ^i': Grade "... 0%' �% 0% Volume ve v. 502" Peak H our Factor 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Houk fibw � (yah/li), to ]�2 ..• 52 . M.. -• • } ? .: :R . . - - •.. {: Pedestrians 1�" Lane dth � : - Walking Speed (ftls} .. ... . .. . . Percent BI ocka .. .. '� .. Right um flare (veh) W. :•-ice• .. ..i n .. h .il.^.. -.: A .. ,pyYwy .: t?'A .M�taW'w•�•'`r :. :.ry„'�; :.. .. ." ter^ Median �wW Median storage veh vC conchn g . o�u rr�e: ...w . _ ;. V..:. ..w =w 5` :; :..�y' vC 1 stage 1 conf Vol ... . .. .. " . , ... . .ti.........•.� ... C2 stage 2 conf vot - tC, single (s) 4.1 5.8 5.9 .._. tC, 2 stage s _ . y tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 • pO queue free ado 4 7:9 : -rH _0 cM capacity (veh/h) 514 111 5$7 . • V1, y �r on,. Z-3-5 � Volume Total 414 414 502 105 315 315 315 Volume Leff .10 Q 0 Volume Right 0 0 502 0 0 0 0 cS H 1 700 1700-. 1 700:. 514- 1 700. 1700 1700,...- Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.24 0.30 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Queue Length (ft) : Q 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS w B. Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.4 Approach LOS . •....... " rjn 4foa,J8W,Ell �rR E�2�21 Y L A C!•, a . y, d °s Average Delay. 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service A N:12340120223361Synchro12005 Cum120am- cum.sy6 LINSCGCOS5 -FF51 F - Sri Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2005 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: Westminster Avenue & 1-405 SB On-Ramp AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Tot120am- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-5\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lane Configurations P Si n I IF .w gee a - Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume e ve .. Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Hourly flow .rate veh � .r:.' � ,'U2.: , ". 4 4 . 41-89 . - x ; Pedestrians Lane width (ft) .. _.... - • Walking speed (ft/s) .. , . .: . -- Percent is B ocka e a Right turn flare (veh) Median e . - .. A .. wNone Median storage veh} vC, con ictin 9 volum 385 452 <422 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol - _ 4 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 .. 3.5 3.3 pO queue free v!o - �' • X78 .I- 00 100 • cM capacity (vehlh) 490 95 584 NP Volume Total 422 422 542 198 395 395 395 Volume Left 0 0 _ 0 ... 1(k 0 ; Volume Right 0 0 542 0 0 0 cSH -1700 1700 .1700 499 1 709 -1700 1700 Volume to capacity 0.25 0.25 9.32 9.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 Queue Length (ft) .0 -0 -.0 -20 0 -0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane Los s Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.2 w Approach LOS 111 A t :. Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of service A N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Tot120am- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5-FF51 F-5\ Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignaiized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existin g Traffic Conditions 7: Westminster Avenue & 1-405 SB On-Ramp PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions "Nr 400" *"Mm 04� IAP. NK Lane Configurations ,Sign T y Opp .4 t{ :. = .iPh" :'f gib T �; :k - . ti.�'.ri• �-� ' q�A •a P.j(.rrk.- :..�e:+�. •.v .::iailli.�.•aA:i.T..'•. ,. •_-. �.�:.�•.n: �r:,s,- ...rid. ..�.. ..: •eM.. ^mil. w" Grade o��o � on 0% ..']�: V of ume x i. 00� r. FN - c Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..... ••.:,a 1.00 �:." .: S :' � yam, r _ ... -•.,,r 5 �,,,., .�. w - "�7'y�,'"a'..R '�� \a • " "' '." "�b;. •..�''�.r. �+c:.�0�"'r. ri. '.:.� ".:n�Y..:. ::. + a •..:' '•�'•'. `r'= 1.00 H curY �r ..... o� ' :x 3 yryx Pedestrians Lane Width,. . i - -� a.. ' "'''hw .. - ..+W��v � fl.ibti.... WyY "... �STe. ��•' -a : G' Walking Speed (ft/s) n " ..q.a Pr Y:wb cent o�ca � "F: " �'..a�..:iv' Right tum flare (veh) P • .�t r.. "b ii:f. wy�:r` Rw +MM +• �.!...�ti Jn.:'Y w.. �'.. .. +1"G rvi �A4K•.a •:fir .�. .nn _,��.�, -.. ".. v ." v �lin •1ti � v�'Y n �� •I, Median - y •9.'• Median storage veh }� vC conflicting. ' . vC 1 o stage 1 conf vol C2 2 conf VOL } stage Q - .� •�C ^ :%w: � yw• . tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC a 2 stage d µi .. . 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free < ... eM capacity tY vehlh i 330 ... .. .. 44 .. 482 FT Volume Total 546 546 738 135 413 413 413 Volume Left 0 ". :.. Q 35 0 3 Volume Right 0 0 738 0 0 p p cSK 170E ' 17.00 ' .700 33 .:::1 Cho 0 1X00 Volume to capacity 0.32 0.32 0.43 0.41 0.24 0.24 0.24 Queue Length (ft) .0.. .;4g : o 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane Lod C. Approach Delay (s) 0.0 ..h.: 2,3 Approach LOS ART". •,y;;,�,�:,�r.�'� :i��...'•'��= '•:�;�;: ,��,�; �' �:.�...;..; k :ter x � ,�, Average Delay .-�r Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of service ' A N:\2300120223361Synchro12002 Exl20pm - ex.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F- 52 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignaiized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2005 Background Traffic Conditions 9 7: Westminster Avenue & 1-405 SB On-Ramp PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N: Synchro 5 Report 12300i20223351Synchro\2005 Cuml20pm- cum.sy5 Page 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 9 F-53 Lane Configurations tt Sign Contra 9 ree _ a.. Grade 'lime (velift�) .203 r Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ouv H o' v to E-'� a�2 03 ►M i:e,'it Pedestrians .... w M...- ri.1RAY.wi.' .... ",•:y>w:.. :. K'•' Lane d� ft Walking g speed �ftlS } j t .w ...i • . ,s: ...r .." ". , .... v:"�r : '.`• n ^. yp. .fix.,; .�.. P eroent � ocka a ....... • .. .:. . Right turn flare (veh) . Median y :: A Median storage veh} q . onflictin volumeA .. w X50 fl2 _ , VC 1, stage 1 conf vol .. _... .... - " ... C2 stage 2 t�vr�f vol 9 f . = tC, single (s) 4.1 6 *8 6 *9 tC, 2 stage {s} tF isi 2.2 _ 3.5 " 3.3 ." p0 queue free °lo . :$ 00 00 cM capacity (vehlh ) 283 27 443 rn • ✓ J � +'°Zi1e.r x. .:':: - 5 ".i..,..�."�,.,..,. .. , .w. ' Volume Total n.•C' 802 602 ;° 797 140 455 'a;. ';ti sr. -,,a .x r. - .Y'• 455 455 Volume Left 0 AD. 1 .. n: r. _ Volume Right 0 0 ..� 797 0 ... p 0 0 �.. cSH 700 •1700 - .� 700 X83 X700 1700 =:700 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.35 0.47 0.52 0.27 0.27 0.27 Queue Length (ft) 00 fl 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 0.0 060 0.0 Lane LOS :. Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.0 Approach .LOS r Average Delay .3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.1% 1CU Level of SenNice g 0 N: Synchro 5 Report 12300i20223351Synchro\2005 Cuml20pm- cum.sy5 Page 1 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 9 F-53 HCM U nsig nallzed Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 -ro * a,.r Traffic Conditions 7: Westminster Avenue & I-405 SB On-Rame PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:\2300\2022336 \Synchro12006 Tot\20pm- tot.sy6 UNSCOCOS5-FF51 F -sy Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Alo Lane configurations Sign Cm, xy. -� Grade ❑% ❑% ❑ % r Q i LL n1e �h�1 .. �7 ^�42 ..�,:. Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 •. /. . 1.00 � � . ..�� : �.�:.��'. 1'^:..n?F�7`4n.v. .; 1-.. Y.. P:iPeak 1.0❑ Hourly QV �"dte.• vA eh 4 172 .y.d` •..,,o , .. t Pedestrians .7. .a`sw<.�gc "••fr La n e Wtdth (ft .ti N. Walking Speed (ft/s) ``may _�yn P e�ce �� t S ,'w, •:r: x T '-✓ � 'T'r. { .• !Y y ,.r � 1G:: 1.•.�''. -.T • -jam. - :,.,t.....�.• � "r,ry Y Right turn flare (veh) ir'.. ,�.'':::..- .- .'�W,:' • v...�➢7e':�w.,,. � �... :c 6L'i`.'FA' � . •'�!'' :,'' -r .: •+• M edian Median storage veh y vc con fiCttn Vo { N i _ D4� vc1, stage 1 conf vol M r stage 2 - •canf von _. �. :�. .... `�w� •. � tC, s single 9 ) ... ..... � .. w" 4.1 w. 6.8 .. ' ^ , .. � .. 6.9 ' tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p4 queue free ° �. r 10 cM capacity (vehlh) 211 15 421 Volume Total 836 536 1049 148 476 478 478 Volume Left ._ t3 _ 0 : r r Q 0 Volume Right 0 0 1049 4 ❑ ❑ .. 0 cSH 1 700: '1700, 4700- • 211. 1700 1 700. 1700; Volume to Capacity 0.37 0.37 0.62 0.69 0.28 0.28 0.28 Queue Length (ft) { .D : . 109 '0' 0 : a . Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 m. 0.0 LaneLOS- Approach Delay (s) 0.0 4.9 Approach LOS. Average Delay-... :.. Intersection .capacity Utilization 79.7% ICU Level of Service C N:\2300\2022336 \Synchro12006 Tot\20pm- tot.sy6 UNSCOCOS5-FF51 F -sy Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions f 7: Lo nes Drive & Pacific Coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Pl- Lane configurations ideal Flow hp! X00 w .. 9v1 .:; v0 : "".900', _9vD . ".: _ ... "�' . 40 '"; Y• -':.::: '" '+[:: ::`:: '+✓[,99:99.. x.900 mil. h' "" .91`3 :900 :" - .5;.. 0 1.90 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . .: "r " ":: 9999. .. 4.0 ::' -: "- ". "•: '• :. 4.0 . 4.0 La ne t t I. actor .'�5 w. { . :0 a r Frt 1700 0.94 1.04 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 4.85 FiM t Protected ^�a9 5 M 3 r 95 r •- •..:,,::! '00 f9�, 4.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3322 1770 3539 ... :... "9,999.. 15.83 .':... ,. 1770 . .,. >: :. "' 3522 9:':•:::_9:99. •......:: ... 1770 5085 1583 Pit t errr�itted 3 : 54 9999. :9999. _ .0C# . r Satd. Flow (perm) 1199 3322 837 3539 1583 1770 3522 1770 5085 1583 Volume {vh }0 82 . , ' - �� 54 3 z= 1742 8 9 :51 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 _:: "... 1.00 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 Ad'. Flow. (vph) ... ...A . ..� . ... ... "... ::.9 74 :8 51 7 Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 308 0 94 '154 _ 43 37 1804 . 0 29 851 7 Turd Type ?emn K berm Perm .�'�0t , . Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 g 5 2 1 6 Perm ' �tted Phases r a _ - Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 6.0 75.4 6.4 75.0 75.0 Effective Green, 9 {s} 26: 0 : :[ ::; .::.26.0 .26 0 : 0 76.0 0 7.0 76.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0,05 0.63 0.05 0.63 0.63 Clearance Time {s} 50 ,0: 4.0 5:fl 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 250 720 181 767 343 89 2231 89 3221 1003 v/s -Ratio Prot _ _ a v -!x.04 _ x.02 --4 0 ' 51 D.02 0.17 vls Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.11 0.03 4.00 vac Ratio .1 :x:43 0.52 =V- .20 X0.13 ;x.42 x:81 0.33 0.26 0.01 Uniform Delay, dl 37.8 40.6 41.5 38.5 37.8 55.3 16.5 55.0 9.7 8.1 Progression Factor 1.00 i 1.00 1._00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 1.9 10.3 0.6 0.8 13.7 ..1.00 3.2 -.00 9.5 0.2 4.0 Delay [s} Z8.7,'.'-4`2.4 .� 1 7 ��. � 38.6 IMO , 9.7 �4. � 0.9 .8.1 Level of Service D D D D D E B E A A Approach Delay (s) :42. : 43 a :1 20.7 11.7 Approach LOS D D C 8 L• a „r ry HCM Average Control Delay 22.4 HCM Level of Service M1 IN I C HCM volume to Capacity rati6 . ." k x:72 , Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time12.0 (s) . Intersection Capacity Utilization :9999. .. ,. °�� D L vei 3 f :Sete � . :: ::y. - ".. '... -: .. •... - . c critical Lane Group :. "... .... .. N:12300120223361Synchro12002 Ex121 am- ex.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F- 5s Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: Lo n es Drive & Pacific Coast Hi h way 9 AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions -Poo t Lane Configurations I +tt ideal Flow (vphpa, - s ,...,, ... ,", .. ... «- .:.%�..;«. -- ,.'mix'•. .-- ...'...,:k „s,•.. !_ • . ;• -' .. n .. X900' " 0 1 �o�, ��o� � 9�Q Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 „,.`,:,` 4.D 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,.. :o - 1 actor -- Lane _ Lae F 0. '0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 o.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt P• o `k r t J w „ •. N' �. ' � 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3322 1770 3539 1583 1770 3522 1770 5085 158 It Permitted., 4 ~0:52 0..06.- Satd. Flow {perm} 1164 3322 770 3539 1583 '1770 3522 1770 5085 1583 Volume (v ph Z;_1 7 : 13f :: € 166" ; 7 /_4� Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2� Adj. Fl (yph).,. �. -:.� . . ;' - �.k w � � 899 937 Lane GrouR Flow (v h) 32 333 0 102 155 45 . 40 1952 0 _ 31 937 8 Turn T YC3r',. -•. ? e ... ,,.�. x:.:::.. �• � - Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 v:��r:': - 5 .... 2 .. 1 6 Permitted Ph ase _ ..� .2'- ... r ` ^. •r+e ••o,•' , . -. Actuated Green, G (s) 2. 4 . 0 4.0 2.. 4 .0 .te0 24 24.0 7.0 77.0 • 5.0 75.0 75.0 EffectEve Greens „" 25.E 25.E:. �- 25.0 o .` • .:, . .... _ 25.0 ... , a... 25,E .. 7,0 78.0 5.0 75.0 76.0 . Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 . 0.21 0.05 0.65 0.04 0.63 0.63 Clearance Time (81 5.0 a.o . ` _r:. 540. 5 0 5.0 4. 5.4 4,0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 692 160 737 330 103 2289 74 3221 1003 W1s Ratio Prot 0.10 0 . - , �2 .. ',.60d c0.56 K 0.02 0.18 vfs Ratio Perm 0.03 co.13 0.03 0.01 vlc Ratio 0. 3 OA 8:-., 0'64. 0.23---.-,04,14 0.3q 0.86 0.42 0.29 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 41.8 43.4 39.5 38.7 54.4 16.6 56.1 9.9 8,1 Progression Factor _ 0 1,00 �J}y - S 100. V _ 4 1 00 1; 00 1.00 'I.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 2.4 17.8 w 0.7 0.9 10.7 4.4 16.5 0.2 0.0 Delay (s). - 30.8: x44.2 w .:. 61.2 40. .: r -3g.6 65A 21.0 72.5 10-1 8.1 Level of Service D D E D D E C E B A Approach Delay (s) 43:8 45.9 21.9 12.1 Approach LOS D D w::.. C B HCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service C HC v n� o� a tQ C' a ra o 91. o ►• 5 . •-'t ..Y . •:h• r Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time is M 8.0 Intersection Capadity Utiftatidn . e -- c Critical Lane Group . _. N:12300120223361Synchro12006 Cum\21 am- curn.sy6 LI NSCOCOS5 -FF51 r- -absks Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 ''o * a-\ Traffic Conditions 7: Lo nes Drive & Pacific Coast Highway AM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions . _...�m ..,.. Lane Configurations, If Weal Flow (vphpl) : - _ - fl ,..w OQ :1 0 r. .. r .... = 0 .. Soo 90 S00 :900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ . ... 4.0 - 4.0 .. - 4.0 4.0 4.0 l2ne AM. Factor Frt 1000 0094 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00.: _. 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fft Potected .5 ,. .. ... 4.00 Zo r b 0 �.�.rs5 �. w0� 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 3322 1770 3539 1770 3522 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted a.2� =Y ::: . _1583 M1 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1164 3322 770 3539 1553 - 1770 3522 1770 5085 1583 Volume .(vph 2 v 1197 y=�3fi 1'02 � : :4, 6 v 9 3 3 X57 Peak- hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. �. +v � 97 � `', x.02 °� X66 v : - " .5 A0 X23 3 X31 X057 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 333 0 102 156 46 40 1985 0 931 1057 8 Turn T e rm •r - Y ' ...._ r.. .. .. ern? Protected Phases � . $ . , . .. 5 ... 2 ... 1 .. . 6 ... r P�errn "y. �tte� �3aSeS y4 w r Actuated Green, G (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 7.0 77.0 5.0 75.0 75.0 Effective Green, �g (s) : 25V O ; - 2&Q, � .�.: � A �;. :25.0 " X5.0 25 :0 `�0 `�.0 `5. .6.0 76.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.65 0.44 0.63 0.63 Clearance Tjme js} 5.0 `500 - X5.0 -5:0 `5:0 X4.0 �S.0.0 5,0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 692 160 737 330 103 2289 74 3221 1003 �vls Ratio Prot - r .1 X0:56: 02 X3.21 vls Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.13 0.03 0.01 vic itatio 0.13. ::. A8 Y V .64 w0.23 =:x.14 . 9 'V..87 .42 0.33 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 35.7 41.8 43.4 39.5 38.7 54.4 16.9 56.1 10.2 8.1 Progression -Factor �1.�� :00 -1.00 1;00 :1 bo 1.00 1.03 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 2.4 17.8 0.7 0.9 10.7 4.8 16.5 0.3 0.0 Delays} .8 44.2 x#0.2 . 39.6 '65.'� 21.6 X2.6 40.5 8.1 Level of Service D D E D D E .. C E B A roach JDela Y s p� . _ . "° .: N r g .. 5 12.2 Approach LDS D p C B WA- ._ HCM Average Control Delay g y 23.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM volume to as rafio 7 - } Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 -Sum of lost time _ 8.o Intersection Capacity taon : w + DOo .... Dvelf service l- 3 c Critical Lane Group N:\2300120223361Synchro12006 Tot121 am- tot.sy6 LI NSCOCOS5 -FF51 F an. 5*1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2002 Existing Traffic Conditions 7: Lo nes drive & Pacific Coast Highway low PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions -- 4Sb- t Jill _MMi. Lane Configurations ► •� �► �: ...........:.. . Ideal Float ' 90 ? 90 : 90€Q �� 1 9.00' 190Q Total Lost time ts) 4.0 r,. 4.0 ........... _ ._ 4.0 y 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .904 4.0 4.9 ne. Facto 1.00 Frt 1.40 0.95 1.00 1.00. 0.85 1.00 0.99''';' 1.00 1.00 0.85 _ ..0 4,.. ,r. • .. f Flt Pro tech L � . - ., .. .. ... . . •.. " , . . " t'- "'. ... ," , p,^� a ., . fie... •ik.. .. 77 .,, ,. r .f." - • Satd. Flow (Prot) 1770 3359 1770 3539 "� 1583 17.70 - 3502 1770 5085 1583 enTi 1� �d' r 0,4� rya . 00�•" - r „ 09 _ 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 856 3359 902 3539 1583 1774 3502 1770 5485 1583 Volume 91.- : 65 " 1719 30 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 i. 4 ' 3' 3 :` 2 `^ �" .. " " . '7 .4. 96L 9�� 19 30 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 354 0 241 385•.: 74 c. 157 1287 0.. -65 1 7'l 9 30 Turn T Perms- . • ._ K 4 • -'• �" �: e :k .: ..�.. .. Prot r r Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Perm ifted. Phases Ph _ .... \ •K Vow. lam" ww . Actuated Green, G (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 15.0 55.0 7.0 47.0 47.0 Effective Green, .9 M. 45.0 45.0 , �': ri:• 45.05•.0 45_a 5.0 56, 0 7.0 48. D 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 4.38 0.38 0.38 0.12 4.47 0.06 0.44 4.40 Clearance Time (s) 5 0 ,'-6.0 :: 5.0 Y -;M``r .D 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 1260 338 1327 594 221 1534 103 2034 633 vIs Rao 'Prot .. .. �1'. 0 .4 ca.37 0.04 c0.34 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.27 0.05 0.02 vac Ratio #3: 5 : 0.71 0 :29 0.'l 2 .. 0.71, 0.79 0.63 0.85 0.05 Uniform Delay, di 24.3 25.2 32.0 26.3 24.6 54.4 27.0 55.2 32.6 22.0 Progression Facto' 1 .00 1.00 _ 1.00- 1.00 1 -00 1.00 .• . 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.6 12.1 0.6 0.4 17.6 3.9 25.9 4.5 4.1 Delay (s) 25.0 _26. 44W 26:9 25.0 63:0 30.9 81.1 37.2 22.2 Level of Service C C D C C E C F D C AApproach Dela pp X6.5 •C .. 38.5 Approach LOS .. ... C D • '1ii• � :�,± .: 'n�;. �-�^ nr.yr. .e `+;rte,,... HCM Average Control Delay 35.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM volume to Capacity.rabo ". 4, • •x.79 .,.:�.`..` .. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection ca 'a city tail" .p city mat n 78 r _ Ct el of S c Critical Lane Group N:M00120223361Synchro12002 Ex\21 pm-ex.sy6 LINSCOCGS5 -FF51 r--5% Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2006 Background Traffic Conditions 7: Lo nes Drive & Pacific coast Highway PM Peak Hour Traffic conditions ...... . ... : : . .. Lane configurations � �►'� tt r ttt ideal Fiov';hpl} :`940 " .4000 W :. '9fl00�0 900 • 900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. actor 0 .... .4 a5 r ~t aw ' .tw` ,. •are ..: .. s; ..;:" 400 . ,,/� 7� � Frt 1.00 0.95 1000 1.00 0.85... 1.00 0.99 _ . 1.00 1.00 Pr Fit Protected iwS M w w ` .. .r.::.. ..-..^ 5 , ... �° 0 "'..w., :,: �.95 IM 11.00 Satd. Flow 0 (Prot) 1 ■ 70 335.1 177D 3539 1583 1770 3502 1774 5085 1583 Ott Fit errs ed w .t3: w :�o .. . v .. 6 00 M. �,. ." .s . �95 x.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 813 3359 859 3539 1583 1770 3502 1770 5085 1583 Volume (v : 306D . 41� X70 314 8 0 1885 32 Peak -hour factor, PH F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 Ad' P� �„ 5 _ 253 30 5 04 ' 6 0 170. 1314 8 TO -1885 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 383 0 250 416 80 170 1412 0 70 1885 32 Turn Type _ Pernn :'ermertntry Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 s Actuated Green, G (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 0 44.0 15.0 55.0 7.0 47.0 47.0 Effective Green, s 4 •0 X45.0 - 45.0 .45.0 .0.{3.O.'D 48.0 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.47 0.06 4.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4' "0 4.0 5,0 5.0 Lane Grp cap (vph) 305 1250 322 1327 594 221 1 634 103 2034 633 vls Ratio Prot.': 1. ::x:40 D-04 c0,37 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.30 0.05 0.02 vlc patio :. :0.17 0.3D . x.81D.1 x.13 -77 - �:�.86 x.68 0 .93 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 24.5 25.5 33.6 26.5 24.7 50.8 28.6 55.4 34.3 22.0 Progression Factor :00 . .00 :. .00 1.:o a .00 0 =':o D 1:00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.6 19.2 0.6 0.5 22.3 6.3 30.5 8.8 0.2 Delay {s} '25.3 27.1 °52.8 27� 25.2 73.2 X4:9 . :-86.0 43.2 22.2 Level of Service C C D C C E C F D C Approach Delay (s) 26.9 35.8 r `39.1 44.3 Approach LOS C D D D 08UM Y'' ;l^r ry" . •h we y.. '.q . 5!r : . S'':. y:. L.V%'::"'a .n HCM Average control Delay 39.7 HCM Level of service D HCM volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 r Sum of lost time �s} _ 12.0 Intersection capacity Utilization 84.71 , _ c. U L �r6i bf Service - c critical Lane Group N:L2300\20223361Synchrol2006 Cum121 pm- cum.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F-59 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Year 2666 with Project Traffic Conditions 7: LO nes Drive & Pacific Coast HighwaX. PM Peak Hour Traffic Conditions N:1230012022336\Synchro12006 Tot121 pm- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -moo Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Lane Configurations a Ideal Flow v d ��• F '900_,- 1900. '� 900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 ",� 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.9 . 4.D 4.9 '. 4.D 4.9 Lane r. M ".• G• Y... r. wn'. k • "' ..e.. t r n .. ".• . "'.Y. ^.. .. r.,Y •;, 0.91 1.00 F rt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 ' .'.:. 1.00 .. .: F...2• e•v'^„vl' 0.99 ,• 1.00 1.00 0. F ..6 ! -.. r. ?:. .. -96' :1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1779 3359 1770 3539 1583 1770 3595 1770 5085 1583 Fit A3, 46 :ti•u•§A..e.. ... w x . ." . r ". .w� A15 I . 0'1r 1.00 Satd. Flow erm 800 3359 848 3539 1583 1770 ...... 3505 1770 5055 1583 Volume (vph) . � �! • 253' aka ".'. '.. �� ' 4� �' .��{. ^ . = -r. 1 -916 32 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Y1.00 ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad" Floe _(v h} p w F.. , 7t# 1915 32 Lane Group Flaw (vph 35 383 0 250 415 80 170 1542 0 70 1915 32 Turn Typo-Pew : Perms ? . Pew P Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4-- `: . Actuated Green, G (s) 42.9 42.0 4.2 42.0 42.0 14.0 58.0 6.0 50.0 50.0 Effective Green, g (s)" 4.3.0 :: 410r.. „ �N • 43.0 43.0 43. o . 4.0 " 6.0 51.0 51.0 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.12 0.49 0.05 0.42 0.42 Clearance Time s} 5.0 :5.0 500 5.0 5.0 4.0-- 5.0. 4.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 287 1204 304 1258 567 207 1723 89 2181 67 3 vls Ratio Prat 0 .12 . �.1 � 04.44 0.04 c0.38 vls Ratio Perm 0.44 co.31 0.05 0.02 We Ratio -: 0.1.2. 0.32. w .. , l ", ^ .. 0.8� 0.33 0.14 ,0.82 0.89 0.79 0.89 0.05 Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 27.9 35.6 28.0 26.0 51.8 _. _ 271 Y 55.4 31.8 20.2 Progression Factor . 1. ' : 'x .80 y : ' : ' :. 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1;00 :1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.7 25.2 0.7 0.5 29.3 7.7 49.3 5.8 0.1 Delay (s) 26.x' -28.6 60.8 •28.7 26.5 81.1: 35,3 105,5 37.7 20.4 Level of Service C C E C C F D F D C Approach Delay (s) 39.5 39.E 39.8 Approach LOS C D D D HCM Average Control Delay 38.8 HCM Level of Service D d. HCM Volume to Capacity rati o _ T Actuated Cycle Length (s) w 12000 Sum of lost time . {s} 8.0 intersecbm Capacity Utilizati ' -. 85. °YQ : ' ICU Level of Service p c Critical Lane Group N:1230012022336\Synchro12006 Tot121 pm- tot.sy6 LINSCOCOS5 -FF51 F -moo Synchro 5 Report Page 1 E N G l N f E R S APPENDIX G ICU/LOS AND HCMILOS CALCiJLATION SHEETS FOR THE ALTERNATIVE SITE ACCESS EVALUATION C*4 C4 cvN }- Z. :.o r r• r• N 7 N Q] m co p� CD r In r ;C 4m OD 0 Cf r v to p N '� e � vmN (DCq .- v, o voo Gav occ vvo c old a 0 CD mV) 05 0. oov °cc ovv m (D 088 Ovv N iy ! U� cc goo N 'rt +"^ a°D N err CD Go co [tii � r � co (D C%! � r � m N Z i . •.0 CM en cyMr N0)r NMr G J m 0 w 0 vd U Q O O 0 .;9 � fl 0 � �40N CCV qr+t t NO N r v m 0 t 2 IE m ❑Da �- e vov oov vao vov �° V = w o i ° p w CO r {n w 0) OD 0 s $ rt eh D4 CG QQO OGG O r OY c°0000 $ °a° cooao v°a°� m 0 � '. a OD co Nqr iD co rqr co m CD NVr m co 0 Nqw r � c0 tt c U CH 46 CmM0 —MO C4 V) Ncnr D LU e- cis �? a C hf► co N N ��r` cc O m cGerseh v a) CN ��N Go v r. Z p z InLO qr 0400 Nqr v CV 0[Y V_ Q v omo coo CCNa 0 04 v G .i CM •- E 2m 5 e o° G r 1n !'i f► _ V-N [D qq LO C] o r r �; NIV GC07CC%4 ON� r OLL �yQN w w -y 00 000 co g00 Oca avo coo coo a .! C4 w p Co 0 N� 0 � V no v o co w v a qw- N NT— a ui V 4 _� + cvcw) a M0 N to) r CYM — [..1 o cn P• v t` qr(DN �� V.c �p U } CO — N U*)M")q 40CDm OD 04 C14qw IV aoMLO N0CV aa¢ } OD CA 0cov CD fl- qlr vED0 e _; r r �f f` vs 0 Cb erg C2 v .- Co LO v v w vs A i r V) r [�+ GCS v m" (Dfik M W QC3G GCC G C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O CD q � mw Or z N N�W N V � V '40 cm m O r C'$ O N V) CM 0 r t m Co qr tGf%_ QD 1%C CD to O1 -7 � qw � fl.. CM N w w C4 0 C4 Aw F :10; r C� .6 0 NA T F p m 40 co O O CD 0 � .V r 0 ch N f► r !0 m ev m N ' d '. 0 N N �! ...7 G * w i so � m �` r .� N CA ' m m So f• i p� CA Cm 0 � A cc m � co C b Oo CJs w p r v (n � � � � W ov o r mW m m U 0C;c vvc cS v o Q o vvv ovo � Z� : Q U. ... craw Nq vv 40 co voa aao0 CD vvo cove �o Cs W C N "� dcNy c L9 :V acmes �r zw �� py 0� Z C4mo rcr)0 c" V) NB'7r eo a �Uk cc W = p ZD; = E a 4) C) x W mH L7 IV U o nr a U43cof- rococo acorn W) CV a=corn 000 o m . �. u: ds 0 a F v cn m r f` Cm Nv� CNI M cnu�m N CA CV a�.0 0.0-0 ❑ V3 Cm N � ■•- r � � n accvcaZ % o ��•; :fl ra x C? � 0 _ V5 w �] W= a O CA a Cn .r- J Go m CO -� •• J F m J � J Ix m Z c im •J•-� di a. ZZZ Q)CoU] WWW UJ pU } • 1 880 N N N L7 r O T L } L.? c 0 a c ooa t ■ 0 m CD c 0 v V a C 7 Q ° a aa� N v c N A Z m = r ac o 0 vL: � � m C aa� f3 ac a CD co 0 lo N. c D A r.. D LU Ia ID Z ■ � � a im > LU ZV To Q N 3 c z W = o M en W� enN iJ a v co 3 ❑ Cl) r LO aC-4 c)v yfn 0o MIV awaZE m m oa m� m N Z 1010 90 aZ +� w U a i a N 'C C as a 2 C . � o a V D a �m t ac 46 IL oE� e� Ca ° a �.MC CL LL Un nom Ar Ni► mines r0Ctrl CbC7cn rCC0 qr cncn eTcoN g W) 0 r N T- r en m c r N cn viva r N N vov ci oW 1 co cc avogvpp �0 aD 0 0 w w cc cv m Cp aD aD 06 NVr Nv* - C4"t CM tst ° Q V Z 0 N erl r N e+7 r N erl r N ery r �- c V ��..� V ON RC]wiin CV) r) qwMeWr7 H � w ova coo vav y m p e�- m CO) in 0 0 vo m (� �N p v ❑m W- C4 ni co Cm r 0U. va vv cvc vvo o r L1. co8O 180 coo C ao 0 L.- a N! rqr Nqr Nq� ■ aR F Nin •-M0 NMw N(h. - W •� J N 0 N N C7 CD O co N V co m co a■ _ C, qr T Cm r e) qr W) r m m v r TO (DD U7 it V) Cn r Q E vMv M amv vmco vim° Q o i Q r s • s . cn qT co 0 *- N •- r N M r CM T rvT 0 U. } cv vv coo vco a ,- coo vv�v coo co 0 p u lz aD cc etil co co r co ao cc N r ca cc to N `iT r c Ncn0 ^s)v CMcq C14 cn M J C4 N N C4 LO +r qr to 0)wC4 e7 ❑ w m co O qr 0 N CV qr in vti m m rMf. r (4 t ~ } C) ° 1*- cm � o co o W C4 a v E 4 r -a g G ve r°�� r N 6 C; N N .°��ti LL ccoo cvc o r cc 0 v ��$ _ v co08 ..' fli rt r V N q r N IV CM 4n 0 e- er) p N Cn r N (n .- Z .. _W in 00 C) rn r�- +r CD (D Cb cn " F) cr} cn m i► ap v r � .■r O N v il] !r7 !7 +r eh Ctrl � Q pp p 0 GO a E P%- N V) C7 O N z V o o vain a o V } rN rcn CO rNN en to rNs " GW ca vv cvc vov or U. •• �Quv $gv cc00 �qr NqWm ODD0 C°pv� NV- Z �_ F 0 N 0 0 Y- Cl a Ctrl C* Y- V) N � � c Q F.- � � N N• mC7N CVrw MC4 Rr r- m N G 0 0 WWW ME ZZZ UU)&nci m m oa m� m N Z 1010 90 aZ +� w U a i a N 'C C as a 2 C . � o a V D a �m t ac 46 IL oE� e� Ca ° a �.MC CL LL Un �- L- vvv long logo logo t? = h 3 rs. -u m ti a �m ot� a W cue N ch .- Z r ac�m ti ,8 r a oars ,� a GoC crvN rtcv0 CD 4N rs E ri Zm 4�or, + ��,a au Hamm ZZIr W cv yC C O 2! �40 a o my q �c V] tit o v a m o t` r) CO v v tm it 4D to C mr. r o CJ`, Eh co�mZ .a7. '+��m# tj uV�21 z 2r 0 2 2 as a Z, ZaOp �H-� JfF� J�-d' ••a Q' C - ]C V- a J►� 2LuIL '�� ZZZ Wccn00r9 WWW 0. f• ppppp a a � � s s' CD W D v v C) � coo C �OiJ [�Y N Gvc v �+ p o q q 000 0 000 0 080 o o 0.9 a� N N m N N m q qw N a 44 , ,am ui : o, v v v o c cr o 4N " "" v v v %n W) r co . ::c� c cr ... ;:. C CD (.7 = u u � � p � e en 0 C C on ti r r I m m c - ca � 1000 1 1000 a aloo 1 1000 0 0 p o o � �• � v � �n r� 4 4 pd :e's � �.- p p j� O C10 G GOG c c; G GGc; Q Q r p p� vvv 0 008 0 080 0 0 C) c�v u ue N s*) e e a a E r► v v v v r ry v cm e eV N 0 0 0 Cry r c c� W vvv . .-vvv r r7 .-o v vnr. sa r S 4 r• 0 0 r v v r 0 t t- C J 0 O v N C O l lo CQ O 0 0 t C O �� r N C r ti m U � � m • p ¢ r r rs • ¢o n ni v vvvg . r Ccc 144 0 o a C„ I IX v o t Qvo c cc v vvo v vvv � d s t ti m N Nm C C4 CD W L3 ID H o O O G V c cm O N N N CV V 0 0 CV �- 4) P t `q v vaO Y �OC) m m cv v vs �C4 Y _ _ cn r- w we CD go L[] CI? iLr } } oao m moo m mTv v vAW o° E o V � D a >1 00 l lw O N v v N v v m r- . .w 0 ovo 0 vo o 0O o ovv C Cr = a Qvv o ovc v vvv v vvv 4 N N r7 C CV m c cq V- i ii� O OGV N NQCV M MN0 l loNr W m 0OO i i•or 4 40w0 v vti� m n q qv 4V c c'"a 91 m 4 40 00 c c�ovti t time M Mmlw „ „ A _ � _C4 � Q 4 4D 9 9►7 Q m m N t G• T T N ' go � W t cc G ovv G 'r o0O o W h 4D 1 w > 4 G --y o �CC pp pp 7C r V s N r r N N N tit to Who 4040 040 40 C4 00 0N Coo 0~p o cop E .. Ck 4000 00 OD 40400 0o°g a w �. -. Go N 00 0 Go Nri 0 � m � N tu ■ m z 0400 N0C4 NNG 0 aA�1! L _ Z N r- D �} 0 m c G "r iY 40QV �0N c%jV - o m 000 G V) q! N m ti U E. 0040 Colo coo 0040 g � g r VCM � • �Nle r g a vW �C cc 0040 loo covco co 0 o> 000 4080 OOG N V) cm Nips aaa m E 40 x 0 N 0 N N N O 40 N r U c fE 4000 $orb N -0 011 co oav m r co w ° im ~ o oe 0400 cNco 0cm 0 OcroN U � � r T ... 0 i 7 m c Q U .-• a lo o N v N w a en Ul) r� cc Q N m r oD Q N Coo ov coo °o° ci avc a °o is 0 0. a N � coo�o v° 4 A N m +� 000 eVON N N 0 ON cc c D m `(� cc OOO Ul) N Ne7° 00 N cc r► (n CL `S r vov mnu� VMO a� ro v CD m E C4 -0 ° G7 N C v r° V C4 In rr C :r7 kn � Y7 r. 060 qw N G40 O N M OCG r 400 G O •w N m N [+7 r Q �•v 40 o0 N a N NN0 0NT m.• ova mar - wmv 0 cb CM .4� V N co n jo ° i a E avv co v0 � wo o An � an N t N N C7h ^ 0 } COV m w. G � � O r � 4L g W- ti § « !ate c W go ,., •- C N N m ? C O C Q O m pe 3 400Q 0O� °cC�O 000 Wrest Nei V� U 04 m rN70T V �P� .r-_ �- Q mL.. r:► L F fit+ 10 0 0cc �;. .. 000 NON NNG 0NT H E m tug 0Qoum c �� W� �oanN =ohm IX [y ea ow ::. , v coo cn 0 N N T co to 0 N IV v a a� 04 cg ft L QD o *; a m�� c o .•. us C/) 0 2 -- -- �. c ° aUrsUv1 ?ham cn3'� x�.n� p0 U. zLb �r�r� �zz W00 wluw o m G --y co M¢ vZ v as sg E E VC 8 !13 .a ao as N 1 8 b C � �0 o Ch U r mac In c c� � � Z I CL IR � O G1 m 40 a O n.6 $ � cc Y LLQ CL + s U U a ° v -- pp V 04 f- �D Q 000 to r C; c; d av C; C; V;, C; v T • c�v ovv CD & M m r M N 11 co � CNr rt�1G O°O NV+r- Z.; _ z vto� ov 0o vv od O � �_ ! s r r coo- . O G Q 0 000 0 0 0 O a c v s E' a >1 Q ' � N N � T' Gry ; N T Cri � a• 888 0p 0p Tp t b 0 � -;..�f vv v vv cv ooc d v� P °g 0) $o° °° v°rn �] +)CO �N 0a CL i e e ry 0) v1vT- rNO vov t4 C> W ... AR d °�° oov voO N °to .fir r7 qw w T r r T o to vY-� N v--v ova vov _j v v EE U Ovr cm (n 00 ' °C CbC1r °G0 0 N 0 �Q°v 000 cc co oa v ,- c N m � o � °vcn v °°° v vvv cc Cb ry p cn rn m ° CL � � v acvw —N° OOa Nvr � Q � O -w D Cb co O 0 O N 0 co usa¢ a vto cv OCCO ovv coo a� go Nm o °v v°oo v �1 C]•`G rC7 aO OCD t d a vcc 6 vc vov o v Z% ovM °vv° coo 0000 m0 � M on = Cb m `y co .a} C) C4 -NO vvv N0 � W J; m i G t =0O GOO NOeaD Z F �l OM� IWCDv ovv NOV v v F" � �. !y IV � q 3 Cb O in �.� �a W saa v � Oao vv co vov v v C7� Q CO o vvv coo Ovm Z m `o cm Ch =" W o �� VU v ? V v� ,- �v n m m +� o r —"0 v v a N a •- Z m N _ lei W w uu o °� , o no oov �v 0 IV C4 Ca (p N O r G7 O Eb N co CD Z �7 3 *= v rJ uy cis o °' Go�'et .� Cl} 3 D �F-L� �HLL' JH� JNIr �7 A Ap J T n a. LL "r i m M.0 ZZZ a woo a WWW ��` IN V J co M¢ vZ v as sg E E VC 8 !13 .a ao as N 1 8 b C � �0 o Ch U r mac In c c� � � Z I CL IR � O G1 m 40 a O n.6 $ � cc Y LLQ CL + s U U W � Z Z +� W cv as W � •� t It S. h 0C3 fl Z � w J r► � NCV D a r 0 e o c�na t U cm a 0 U .1 a. o m N W N N N Cr 4 Y � Y � road w 4 a � v U � co ,Ym°17c° cJ+ co W p N C c�7 i13 in Z Cl) r� - Al v v0 oz m� U� c o� a as wgN C cv ri A6. D = 3 v a c L] m t; in n "o x moo YI o a + V U `�a' °v � v t+ v cv o v a 0 Q C t► D OO, V GC c; a C7G0 Q 0� vg ��° vvv -9 9 . C4 CD co er) W r co) C) Z.. v CV r r C4 0 0040 C4 '` 4 F' vmCD m�v vov ulivv to N !► N F. v O Z C4 v� ovo vvo 4D C) 000 � v � Q ter? r QG NO ■ Co lV) CtiFto � p . O r pp A � .. -•� vco co v cv o�G coo ±^' fp►� a v • v m $ v avv vvo n tu.. .:.w N � V) N w �i aCVr �cwo ovv Nor � - °wry ?,- ova � vcn _ I'► N r 'V N � aN v mv vov E IN ovv a v Q o 11;- gNV f• co ' • $ 'm r f. g ) � iL Gva Nt`uo, vv cgva° Gvo �U 9 vv v v coo g$v vvo vvag d u N w t� CV 0 co w ILU cn C r t" i N CD CL .* V Cb ..•. Fr ' .•t ° rNC Ov° NOr v0Cb °av In tip _ 7 r^ vg° Cy o� vf•� vov vvv ovv v o E Q �x�ctio O r f� !►7 NiGv D { D7 v ,- h ovo cv C; C; Ogg vvc c v 080 Qu$° vvo °vaa V N M m N co ■ cn m r eh 0 iA ' w 0Nr v ovv INN ,w p�^9� to 0 coo 0pco ie E r•v vaa t- vim 0cc 0 vvo aiE V v m o cvv � ti N0 v �g 't- C> sn � as °pvo CC] QC7 Qp8 �m Qa° o C CC� g °a COO OCR V N W SD N 0 a _ ma4 rm C4 ct L'1 � Z vNr .-c*ry vao cvvr C °r°►v ova Avg N � r lwa�C r iO• 0 to G +� p ' E �r cm 2 m a oz °' 3 IS ce o a� 2Z2 V7co&n W 2 W W r� - Al v v0 oz m� U� c o� a as wgN C cv ri A6. D = 3 v a c L] m t; in n "o x moo YI o a + V U wu W 0 a z W h ZU dN W � m ti E A KIiO� °°a v v !E�NN O D r L v� vt ID -E oaa` O� C a J D U on a � Q m N CV fJ3 r� J9 .0s Y cn i tG � p+ U Q 0 3 G U � m N x m W G v c; c � �C 0 Sl UicI3mZ V1 D 0 XL U. G —r% 9 0) •r D v vz f C �¢e�o t U_ ❑ co A A �SN� Z �y r C IG b C � �c 0 N t _ A a E SL m As n C CL cc t 0 40m v r- cv • in m m gg R arv, orv, c� v R. W vov cv oa 40400 vow vgc� 800 coo oom N OD co N c cm CD ++ 0 C +-CM oOo cvcW _ 40 nN cv 4000 �v�o a s vvv 40 00 vvv vov N _00 p elm mac W)N CC%i G ecpop+pp0 _g c WQ vvv 400 C4 r C; C; c; c o pGa aC7a CCV C> C) U. 0 C4 � c+G cm m 46 • •A e t4 O w CpCM N0 acv c4 0W W '� U U. OLo NV 40 A vov 40 QD V v•-v O[HO vvv �vCp N 3. 0NOD p G , 1l] r G ti' pp G r pp G pp T 7 000 CC7 L? DC G CC D C ci vavo 000 vco cva) m A' �c,D 40� N ¢ A W V �s, 4 CIV•- rNC CD00 NpW LL U s � � C) C4 (0040 vvv CC400 fn 0 v +n r• u� � v y Caoc 0400 000 Vvv �r W [l- N 00, r) m 00 av un v Un pp An v -a 0 C 0 C 4000 v0 C C r in vvo co vv vvv C; C; 08 0 0 Soo ao0 0000 D7 Cu N �i ai 0 r *-[VV vvv NpW F LL 40 rtf inmC 4000 f4 re�77 1� U!] vOe+] 0 vG0 0a V r l�7 V • co V 1Ci N rG en •- �N � � e► � v r a o � •� vvco 040 4040 coo .16 oQ vv° Cv p i cc CV) m n°0i - 0C*4 rN0 ovv NGL67 C. W W,�j; it v em Nm° vvv to) 01- .N t m V qr s� •3 .. a 2 cm J _j --i F` c p ZZZ nv) n WWW G —r% 9 0) •r D v vz f C �¢e�o t U_ ❑ co A A �SN� Z �y r C IG b C � �c 0 N t _ A a E SL m As n C CL cc b N 9D N CIO cV W 0 a� Z W LU W �y mC O Qp9 " U U _ r O C4 9 NCVv v v r V � 0 aoaa r tr ev 0 m as c v w 0 U r� W�v MCa Co C+ N N y V m � m c rnad 79 d p U J U_ � =x 0 m 0 0 mm M � � ca C4 U) 3 �$ cC.) NN z N;.� idiCL Uff EONO ONO vov 000 dj v pp In qr C4 ■ CC) as act vo � �pa t ° o v vctiv coo vv vv oaa d op c a v V °a °v $ov ovv ovvco i cv co M r vv av 0vO N Cs a. ■ - 0 $v 0oa co 0y AD C 04 aN vov co a o 2 c, t7 JLL ■ N Os LL v ��a� -j �� a -� � v a O N r N v 000 M O W � G �o�n ar U w o CC W) e► C 0 vov too 0 v40 ID. Or-O vvv vvv cnvv ON E r z r cm (s CO 0 a §§ 1 MSS$ coo 000 000 vvv W acgvaa C% V 7 vvv 00o(M " N tD co [fit CID cc Q� c r r S'4 N Q7 oa N v C4 M so en C) N +F-N0 y� adv vv Ov qr o v C5 � d vp v00 0C cv v co N N p� Gf CL A 14 0 C rN0 coo cvaW C cr. J U. qG v M v coo r7 a 0 = a m N � V) EONO ONO vov 000 dj p ■ to to N vo � �pa � c+i M � o rr v, � o v o v v v v c a v V °a °v $ov ovv ovvco i cv co M r w N [*] 0vO N Cs a. ■ as W V AD �... i 0C4 rC14 vov NOW a o 2 c, 2 m JLL ■ c� LL v ��a� -j �� a -� � v G *� v �� vvv 70[7 � �o�n to o CC W) e► C 0 vov too 0 v40 ID. Or-O vvv vvv cnvv ON E p Och0 vcr�L NGf � vo � �pa L`e vN �O M o ova vc vv ova s °v°© g°v° vvv ovvco i cv co M r w N [*] cco Q. O AD �... i 0C4V- rC40 0O0 NaW a o 2 c, 2 m W c� U. v ��a� -j �� a -� � v G *� 0) voa 70[7 to o CC W) e► C 0 vov too 0 010 0.0 cc cue .0 ° cm (s CO 0 a §§ 1 MSS$ vvv 00 OC vGC7 W acgvaa 800 vvv 00o(M " N tD co [fit CID cc Q� c r r S'4 N Q7 oa := C) N +F-N0 vov NaW N r mp d v t c� d dQ s v a oa .. 7C LL °1[7°taG ��G 000 in va AD a o 2 c, 2 m 2 0, c� v ��a� -j �� a -� � v z z z cco(nw G --% 9 m N a oZ ) cm E E G a "5 m N DL O � N a C am C o U 1� 70 0 ft- 0 t G ma = mq°z� C O YLL 8a 980 N N � 2; t-- C VII C 4D � C 0 e 0 ooa f Lfl m m W 0 U m c m N `v M L{1 N C LO L� H v U iv IM a; � m � m qt c W m v U L7 7,e V Q W G 3 _� ate. o < r o mot- 00,0 mQD m X'5 M M wLj �COiv N �i cmy w v �❑ i�N Cq LD 90 [r7 a2mz V N Z p . � hu ;p c y3 v qj- �. 90 oz E E c D CL` a N 0 0 C !4 U >� otm Q i arm$ 6.0-0 0 0 Cam n x Y U. riD w LD v- 40 q1t r 07 MMer) CO •- N 0N■r o co Ac eD fl otd7 c; ' Ong Coo Goa Goo COO Coo w -Q ci gg v vv � gP_� t-ga rL17 r•� r rr r t- rrr �i *" N O r C4 r r r ++ yr r 4K N N !V M co r• N T► 0 An N �. LLV en •- on to Q0 •- n � y vvo coo coo coo :Z a i el 1.21 .o Ql0 ' cCcCv 0M0 tnMen W N N 800 iii w _ 00 004 coo vvo ova o Lam o0 080 888 00_88 8800 w :Q rC7 rC7r rrr rrr U ~ �► rNq +"Nr rrr rrr W '� NNN �8 04Mco n � r►Nn 0toC4 to ov 000 voo 0gto 0MCo p �}a DSgLa vcDM LDat� 0 N co 0 M 0 a 0 0 ovv v wm 00 000 000 ovo 00 000 00 vov ova vov coo ovv ava 0 �•vI- r r►nn T r r r►nn r T r ►F�Ij � rN v rNr rrr w-r r ct 1 I cmNcv cNcneo ncor• aNM r M o 0 0 �� vnv r;nv N vr�o oL1°Jr N 'D zb C) m Cb to n 0 0 CO 40 os vi orn-,v vvo 8000 v Qm p� a0 000 0 0 a ovv a a _ vv a vo v 8$a $S$ $ga c nqw n.rr• rM t•nn rr+-- r►nn rrr p a r N a •- N r rrr r r ++ F W m • N 47 N r co co !► N n 0 LA N i s a RcD enmv Mqw LD rNLD ,� - NCOa N�-W IVM%a rC4 C E r - mg RUC C4 er)CC4M G� N W? C('7o Coq V- q q q 4 4Dm -: 00 coo ovo 000 o0 .LL �00 °o °vg$o ° °� v Ml n� r`Rri non rL4+- titan rrr nnn rrr ' r LV 40 r N r r r r r r r N t- C4 Cben w 0LEIN and p V) N N CA +rt 40 qw LD N 0 fl 'u i•- it m J .J _j H �o zzz a.0M carom .0z w w w �� V J 90 oz E E c D CL` a N 0 0 C !4 U >� otm Q i arm$ 6.0-0 0 0 Cam n x Y U. 9 to i7 E v0 vZ CID c m a U � CL a b as N .� �i C Q� Q C O y 0 a: m a 40 E m . w O C m y CL � C w to m ce C C v a i3 i LL • v w i CO n # as co � « ob v cv 1 ry ac vv c v v° 40 , a v t• o"`N vvc cav ava v a� r pp pp pp pp pp oo v �► � n � r- r� r. r` n s. r. :•.� r N G T N r r r r r ,r r C to C �- CV) qw te) v v as as ad k-) C T Ctii CV T gn a N w r Cb CI as N Cf m m o ovo avo avv coo �. n m m N T �• n n CD oa O v in to to L'7 ►+ r- v v C? Ql a v'r aW)0 coo 00 r cc vcao vvv vvc u o � n n� n�+� ntiti nnn CL V T coca0 W) C4 c a N r Co C) 40 N oo CO v 0 Qvv oc�v vsao v4n0 a ow m >0 a � N + afreo ti r► n i oo�l7r� Ln • ersvm ■ a m m y av nyy v 0 vov .- LO r- oq w v tV N C Ly vc vac vvv ova v o .' C °° va °$$ °v0 vv °C° vao Q u a mr r► r+ n r- r T V- 7. d CD Cb F M r CV O �-• N r r r q", O c7 V V3 il] CO V) Ul Ul CO el r- CV " m N m m m " m eh C V- r 0 �. •� aad °CD v N�v onv voo• - v s E M a p i ■ non to # conso nv • •-•ug vvv i >�wo # o as oov a e�,V vvv vac vvv o 0 coo °v °v v° °o °v °v °v y r� � n o n r► r► n n >• n TNQ rC4 +r rrr rw- T W L0 _ TInM CO cn Cf cc mtli 07 !D 0 W)ccN N f• !'7 r M T CO rN. a cc Cl) N avo nmOD crvv v*_+� --► rs V N qe Ds i * # + ; {15C "' Q N r co Q co r +t r• tq N 0 c vvv ova ©cG o ov Z a ., vvpp oo pp pp cp ~co) � r W- r r A a 55 F - . ; O.n Q� z 0�lN .. .. rNa w- Trr Trr Z m =a vey Wy (a C4 �. a e gov yc ! on 03r�g0 Toas �"7NN ci p E [�V N � t► rr• C7 07 n N r• T .. aim z CJ is ;.; :.: • r r 2 t Q CO o o v co J~ am`. z:ua f �.cm zzz �aa 0w0 �aa www i7 3� 0� } ZLJ 9 to i7 E v0 vZ CID c m a U � CL a b as N .� �i C Q� Q C O y 0 a: m a 40 E m . w O C m y CL � C w to m ce C C v a i3 i LL C 0 Z V co gZ °p a E U� v �m ad N a �. N Q� L � >oc, a m � o E� ~ 7 CL 0 � 0 m a� � W 'D YW pp3 a • VU oo C 'ei • cvCD r CO f f vvcov co t � in av C14 D G G oa o vco c oa vaa o ap v T . a G C p 0 O O C a i0► .0 rNT .rC1fT QN0 NrT m 4� c> C+rN m V- qr NM1N � M a4nV1 T m CO coNr+ to rN r coo. o. o00 000 oav coo I vrnM vCO — 81- c°co on In vcv vov ov vvo 00 novv vOQv C n 090 'V f- ti P0• 0 4 m iL .. � T � r �" � T � � r• T • • o T N T N ONO N T T o� NO a�� ccNi- M v m ' ;a a T a vva vOO �-0a o o El oMT .- C" 75 0 CD •. a r a i ! mc'7CO .- r7 to Lo rn co T pr- ' Qco W O km mQV 0 v° �� v+nc� C7chv, p i► 00 Cf CQ ovv @ o w❑ m c„ vv vva vv o00 o c rn � vo vc�v g vvo }- RW P- �► WW ii CV GCVO 04 r vi C7 V � = p�N C*4400to 1- ► U @ CD N co@ v @Nfv r- aad so cz vvv 0 w0 oy-O v•-r� - N a @N a r cn 'W-- a to ' ! f a�C8 04nc�] Dent pOp Gp GGG O coo �� oC70 vva C5 C; C7C]v Q o a v v coo °v °$0 800 _. �i c�g f►� � .,�aG0 rr ,-- ttie T TNT p N v N t •� W � o T ao !'9G@ m co N v sn r�m r► .- o -' C4 C'V � N AD N[r?� rC4 iG G v T TAN NCa le L3 C6 C m Cb V) r► P3 N C!ciC7 c ti vv T 1R7 vo O r W m W �, n R"otci coo coo av oov -o C; ° 8 v v � v W �po V) C a �C r� v �► T r�? +� �• � r- cq � A a�►�� x _�,o im CO W cn TN,-� .-CyT oNV C4 = c c W � � � J. n Mvo v (7!�j H -, I v cocoa tVc-0 G?lVco U)Inr .� . a v Gm_� 11 ti cv co t► corn m m N T� acs �- f- f- .- N T- 3❑ �! u �mt.cgCy °I = L c av)mz vV`D CD �aa �•• - a" J a' �. z tLl .JIB -iP0: 17�L� C ..t LL ti z z z V7 co co W W W _. J C 0 Z V co gZ °p a E U� v �m ad N a �. N Q� L � >oc, a m � o E� ~ 7 CL 0 � 0 m a� � W 'D YW pp3 a • VU vNV U*) 40 �a� m 00 w o ` �`'� o o e►� tv oov •- �r o o v N T r- v e v o V � 0 o 0 ov ado c o p r r T 0° g v a v$ g ..Tj Z. ■ r N T r•Nr CN 0 CV rr C m � G � �' �TC► t7 �CNV cs] C4 0 G0c O■ w~.. w r r► N N _ cog aov vvo coo 40 0 40 00 eV v J a �' �f►ev V) C4 snC� • CO t"J o t- D v T it o oo° C14 p p v f. voo va coo v v CZ m �r�� ► �v ° ° °° a m u w r• r� r• qr � r` t%- r- a= ia w M r-NT TNT vcav NTT U J a cn A fm N v � m ea ves a go SL rte.. 61CI CCD ccm m �!? N T +" fl- C14 C4 a - vocNO °vo 0va ccvv W cue ' r- p R r++ iti 0 r• - 0 C4 cc C b %n A r o 0 •- T QD t► N LQ 0 oa 1A (n ffiao m t�1!'"7N °oo Trop coop 0 T r 000 a mp N cmn ��42 n -- °oo ° ° °v Soo vo O °o° °o°v� 0 0 � � a;r U Ul cn ~ rNr rC14V- 0N0 C4 a�A p V L: � J V T� N OD N N 0 CO CD tD CV cn r• to (n LO N M N C r .- = 0 co sfi N Ctrl T u co aaC ��■ o a E °vN cna�v vvo v(nc) N N o en +n oMr o V v rho v c� °v u, o m T_�r v r• o p 0000 voc o0o vv voo vv +' 0000 °d° g °v °0 °�° v °$o° r► IV r. T !'7 T � V r► r 00 q-- � [� +"N*' TNT 0N40 CV rT 4 as � C4 m r e•7 V) N �► tO cAl lO C r tNt�� p W) f1 rr .a = V_ A �['7 N N f3 of N 04 a al o V•: -9 ,.. v T �^ 4 .r m NtiC rGpW COD tnv- C cm IV W vi i � a U oo� acv vo o a r• a 00888 888 0$0 $ °v °v > >� v N W i1�' r+ .r �• TC7r �► r► rRr7 r ► r. �y #rT o shy Cgj t L3 a. c m oG a) Q�7 ai rC4 r�N r QN 0 N rT a m Lug CO) = 0Go(n _ W � �3 � eat ov m ccZ D U - �4 j as co j p .,. v sn t• ao p �n ca 0 v = r►] C4 4n CO Ln r� aD 0 r a as to N OD m W TN > d -- -M � sy !c�'i ii 0.0 LO CL CO m Z -40 '' c S b u-5 3 Co L C] cm G $ o NCB co = J H p A C m s' ZCO v9" o 2W4.LL v tta W W W aaot �o a YLLU�n Z Z 2 {� cam►! }' V J w s 6n N0 oz C g, b Ya n �a �Np t N C 11a 7 p �? o m m G M ss CL a a a ,..... Z3 m es Z CD 90-0.0 1 000 0 so z lop YLL Z a . 8 0 im p pp pp G O V ,c ;[7 CV 8CNV r m Co 4C] co mp C14 G � 117 e�"v o = ov � .� va 0 oc e�0 °vN v, vvv v, ry o uQ v a ago o 00 U 00ev QI &0G lfyrCM cq r [1j - v r .- r.. r 10 ❑ ❑ CL • �. :i ooa vvv vav ovv "~ g N o, v 0 cvv .°n 0) vv vco vv o a acv a fn a v vvv 8cCRv C 8 C� 008 L1 A r 1► r 0 m C7 = i _ LLI t!7 G I" p M N 0 0 W r N r V CCO to -�! vmv v�c� N r Vvv voo � ?� m C a 1l7p + °v rr + Qt+7 • pMN °ao p T aT v 4n N � F. V. vv ov vv vvc o 0 S C, a °co v�° g °o o v � t`r rL[7 Ar r1f3 A r Al- fl- rrr d � W 7 �i i ~. 101 �`�v rt�v oro rr�. m L v � � QSmM cbIV w te]rn�'t ��--IV to mU m c = 0 LO w- w 0 w a. . >1 9 .. to on°iv v� �vQ vvo v° e F C4 V =f to 0 c rem rN vo ov coenN avcv v ra ui to ei or C ?� v,r vvo a M< vo vti vo avc va ov 080 v v oov a t Ln r- o -40 � •.: v m CDCCDDN �[ p •?� �rt N V . eq -�c��7 .40 rAC rp}► °N rQtry IE 3 rr ID in V ee _ t• a a tiJ eb + a A r +� + r r. Q !+'! + }t► CM r -40 0 W m G u 41 Gr Qr QQ D Qp DD �D e� W v1 �. GQ C7v CC vvv o a a a :. gsoc�° vg° og� W C � � �� r� � err Fit dey 7� : .:.•.. Cri t- to (D •- e+] p r l*i v v r- p r .•- r 2 j oa&°� i .. LU m N e@ N J a � _ ID Q j� ¢ p N . ..: 40NN r- 40 In r m tirCl P9 N N'�?e17 r e+y p`jp p : ;:. eh v r ..- p con F C! 2 a 2 1.0 r J � r- •r z w a. U- z z z U) en (1) uI w w .. 6n N0 oz C g, b Ya n �a �Np t N C 11a 7 p �? o m m G M ss CL a a a ,..... Z3 m es Z CD 90-0.0 1 000 0 so z lop YLL Z a . 8 0 im C H 0 0 vz a c V ca n m ■ �Nvv M a C ce c o m �E r w. r U me n W n� Y u a . S3 pvv G° G pN °. Y' p� pOqr cDN1� 00 8 0 IN v or'N vc 4040 co c; C; a v� .- v r 42. - CL W) a ti Z . .� t'C"7C rC7C Cry r- rw C lz N 0 W) C4 f► cc pp m qw CV) N ❑❑a 000 0 40 0 4000 coo CP c � 0 CV •° , r * jo ti 1 00 oc 4040 G G p tovo 0 -0 v v� • 0 v v v m A •-C"70 rl7v Cr Q r r r 'a UA o �q-•V- q-NN �°'c°QV`�w a Nc7 r _ ' C)(D0 Of cn cove v°v i 0 ■ E r a° • *- . ° " • o ao o '0 �o vg a c; 46 vc °av 4 cv o m 0 ov O°°go ° v v 0 u mr r- f` r ii7 r+ rl_ r r T g W V rcn0 0+-0 is N 0" t C I%- �C'1 O N r v- (a L d -' ill N r (n 0. Evto v Q, MOO vov ry -a a `o ( :.. r ' 00 • f► !► ° Ctir 0C4 . pv Ln ' O0 . cc N f- . 0 r Nn fib' DC CMG O � CC GOC Ov6 Q qt C O V v C 0 C 00 00 V i V-M0 V) 40 W J. N Coy r v� CA CC-4 r r a!7 O N r v`nim �r-eq •'-ar .. o V- cY V 7 N Z } ry 44e G` • N co C4 LU y �. 0 O0 C� G6 ov G civ c; Z Q W D j vov 4040° vvv° t� r accq 7 U Co CD is rn� � �o� EI, •- r)o ��v or0 r+-r- W amm Wy m � —N m Q V] p Ge 1. i E N C} r ° IT [ 7 °Q C*4 rr- �4 m my 40: z ON r o Cc � to C... �� o�°' s r �r ?J•-� _5 -a o 2 uwau- z z z .0 .0 (ncncn .0 .0 www a� Q S. �-- _ . C H 0 0 vz a c V ca n m ■ �Nvv M a C ce c o m �E r w. r U me n W n� Y u a . S3 No v2 v �g v _E E � C a ch n N O C a C d6 � a � > >� vi U p CL r m co m o o.0 c a owl c j3 YLL o a + : 00 CppV iV CO N ;fl M Lo 40 cm �r �G g g � � N .r a C ' ptl ° G ' a V) C; C Soo oov Dgo vvo :g � :� *-r�o via voo vvv •. [� r Ul lw 0 oNg coov� 00 0 � w i» r vvv vvo Q o ova a vo c; c; vv v ro e oao ogo vvo �L. : f r w!7 in omo v•- v coo d �o voo cove vov +� v d ' qr no 0N0 vvT vvo 0 4D �f 0 .� Gs CP $ � vv °,nni, a ° ov °v, o na o N � �� F, �::� ao oc v o v 00 v o V _ ovv oov 0000 ovv m m W V' F - •�e� :t rcav vov ovv 0ov m t 4 CT m .-r.v �c ooi° vv coo m� m n CD is can a d 000 vov a acv ov cv v, c� >!Y cv vv ov ov v a Z v °vov vov 0000 vov T mp� _I T o � o —Mc) Omo v+-0 ovv W -r� E !7 d D � m .v o Tgv vuc�tiv vov C � U 6 v o v 00 c o 40 G W N v T v 0 og fn a W cv ov v o A v Cd c ? m 3 L _ �a agv ogv vvv W H i W W r ici r U dN r Z ora.- _ acv Z D e7 Tr�v or�a C) C> vvv W ZOmN t9 t 0 m C J �vs� v "o vice°N vvw vvo m = CM g C4 ry o dmr. ..� E, ca o U5 v � mom.. o °' o O° o OQ � flC co • - J ^� ZWdLL• Z Z Z (ncm(n WWW No v2 v �g v _E E � C a ch n N O C a C d6 � a � > >� vi U p CL r m co m o o.0 c a owl c j3 YLL o a + : 00 eq C4 8 8 0 (14 C14 o` c �`6 ooa CL a 0 c a ec ■ 0 U m "C O N .� ae v J O o � 0 a m pM m : m x � cano.d 4 to N o C4 W o at U W `+ O g -20 N m 7 UA 0►3 �- .c es sa oC?�ii CD —N E Sol o c; ■ �� ` �a my E� cn¢anZ p Q .. �v'^ �cn Z�� cn 2 m G —i, Ls 90 oz Z U� b �N v zv °c `m j > 0 40 C rn OM r s cme CL cc � � L 7 0m o3� r� r � YLLaC U C) , 8 M C14 § " § 1 § 80 to I% �o av av Qo vv 0 a q* ca �Ali agv v�o 000 $oo 4 • U � .� rr�v vc�o vTa 000 vvv cam cn0t- 000 m m a vva vav aa0 000 p �. ' p pN to $ cy $ �. p cf) aQ vv vG vO O a ..: ..... CR g o Qgv a8o 0040 r W T TM0 Gov vvo vov a� a00aM vr- � a v v s m qv v 0 v i � C't� a Q �rpsQ [n in b . oN � ' Cpp ' aT ;� ice C5 c; CNC a0 vv CG ov v v V vvv v�v 0000 oav N t- CL a ■ W 0 C 0(11)0, vvv 000 aV C4 0Ca o ? T viE 040 v � 0 o vv vvv 7► O G C �.w N m % m_ ' pp 0,p ' 0,r ONG OG 0 e7� �� Ga flG v(6 Q Ca Q °via ar�v 00o0 oav t7 w Te+�0 0en0 40•-0 4000 � •J m om Nov avv o ? V0 0'v 0oT spa*- CoQ cp o .E T . v .a . m p sv 5? 8•- g tia T N %* r vo vv cc vv v v Q 8 0 0000 vvv Z.. or) 0 v+ra vvo c v �, �(aa 0mCCO CD aco 0a0 vN o tj C 7 3 .. o v ivz �_� v J H J �- �- -� o0, C a .0.0 ZZZ M.0 .0 cn0)cn M ace WWUJ a� a v� � G —i, Ls 90 oz Z U� b �N v zv °c `m j > 0 40 C rn OM r s cme CL cc � � L 7 0m o3� r� r � YLLaC U C) C Nr� N - rNn qr CO f• In 40 CD (n C4 so t- aNgC C4 = 4w. Q vvo ovo qr CV p OD "� 00 ooc o cp r- W m °vo °o m U) C) C) vo° °o C4 en -Ez 3E m 0 _o TT Nc7T 04 C4o CVNr C i do W G - O o y - m � V o a E r�pp qr r' GoNgo _ n °m nWe� v _ ;.0 ? r r c, IE cov vac o o� { Nw r- N en NAcc t'7 Q1 c7 MG co r V) C4 +3, p vN C o cy C%i 0 0 0 r CV0 666 t?rN Q � W CW G o o G o o 0 C) o 0 vo $ v co 49 Ftwo •-C'7 t- C4 w-- .- CVT U V cm a0 m 'GI _ C'Dmc0 Ri AL {{ �I rN CriNqw C) Cl) NP- 1N-(Dti InqT C7 AD Z, T T r ; ppN •: CNN NMCG 0 oc° �[Y� ovo V- C4 oC CCV oCV c dp m c v a zva� `L r tu mom Co' $ 888 $$� vvQ N m }, CL $ cn N a .■ •"fr CV Mr N m 0 MNw- c G co �� v m D N •r Ii? r r cn � s s r !'7 1► O N v FE ;,o Qoa coo coo coo N 2 �y ■ cn C) vorom osrN m�0 +°n r4 va] v N N N Ch V5 0 +r- N r C (M L6 N W oo vvv oco vco d �r; o� # rli7 rbr r�r rehr �� 1 r+ CO o r t`7 r t4 U* .. C CD Q+ ` Q'. 2 .- t7 4 a70 [■i iy] r gn Grp to M [l co C MCN D �f� O J ti a v o? � co m C t- co Cb qw M° � +O � C4r rN m 4 7 Q .. CD CV N' (n r m m O co CA 0 0 [- V qw in M r N co 0 D N ■0 r a ; C) N pp CV N r ooC N N D 6 +� N r p p N oar (3 ci COOO 0 r 3 v°$° $ °v$ $$0 °o °v °Ca v Q► r► r r {17 r► •- r► r N r n r- r- cn V- tiqw r. r M V- r N N r � ap CD m� In N N IC7 et �N eh 0 qw CO U3 c•7 P- r OD ers � e*] tO 07 f� mM W ..�. m0N 'cm N90 co v °:E qt V- r�N co f NNr 7 c►� man an 10 CM 0 to m qw �' N N v rD LO 0 in to *. y C7N rr-r NNV rCM 0 cm�j,� C o C7 C6 a C7 C G C 46 A $v c CL c■7 r r r C'y C7 �• !r3 *'" w C4 r N r J m •- ...E N040 u7C-bN 000 1► r�a7u7 mC+lm lw .-" C]NCh vaa� !► N [7 Da CV qw Co N co N qr°�°n Cnr)a - N ?N. +- C V')7 t QD o craan C4 .-. ... ya 0' V as ; CD 6!7 C4 GO ° r t!7 M O @!+qw +r r N 'W C4 r [■i r• Mgr V Q r.. M2 O C to Q W p L o0 V- r r 000 N � Coo N ok W 0 O � O N Q Q0CD [r > -- CSI > Z vo 3 I- -^ v �mr�� W V r 1[? r qrg o 0 cri � Iv a 0 Lg i,� as �t {� po i a r � 0 Z r l7 C� w C7 r r C4 r- r N r .2 0 E 0� Z a > @ � co 4 C Co N 1A mF -NCO m ci v • coNG I- N vmcc C�70CV mC4 ti� NCDO NCNDi�V > a�,� N ; V 0 �� h J� Z ° a o O uU °� �usis 2 a 2 0, cm _ 2 co Cc � G'� -j �FCZ � � a o c a J*� -��.. N� o Zii(LLr ZZ2 [�1?u�3V�7 WWW m n ❑ l N C4 to o°°r' 80 04 �t+g o vNN V- CM cv rte- � m voc vc ccc c av •� v Z 8880 Ov°p° 0800), Z� �in � �t �°' �cm e�+�u7 L: (n V- Of 0 t7 N W LLI Z LL m od wr 1 E mCD Q raCiN to m vaoCC NON � v Ili CYN rrN eomm C • —to ❑ x " = r �- t• N cs aaa :,Q vvv oOV vav coo a v N a � y • .. o, • v CO N TLOv « 40 w 0 c r vs v �v r 0 m V) °o•c`vv a a to o vW �7 � y ccc c; c; co a w vcv r a} S2 o0 0 0 0 0 o�° goo 0000 t u ti qr t- f- mr 1- r. rn as E L) c a ~ w E- T N r r N° r r C O N W w V G] W •.-in I�r-L ti . -. oCcoW �pc0 MI) NN tDtDOD CL ID C' Timm V)Iq rrN f0--N CD = w 3 r r o Q -o �< °ar�v 4D oov �vo 04 M =1 ; N r V1 a E r f c4 o �iY] p D to CO Cb o pp �G7 to f3 w � oo Mt7 CD QC tT o 0 O —o O a� W 4!7 ° cc 6 C5 7 a c G° CD 00 0 0 p 0 G° Q 0 cn ii .. a 1 r cn 7^^ T cn T T m C) Cb �3 V- C4 TNO rr-v °CMW m J; U. .� i � W r r N CD �- W" 0 W) N " W C4 1[] cn 1[] N ciy a ¢ >1 �cn vvo oa v IN V v g �cN � �� O7N 0V v N %I +° cac cc vv cco Im v c , oov a°o 800 0 oo ° v _ coo NT Q? A l e T T CP Jul • �� rNT �-NO TTp GNW m .. O Q tW V) IN co in tV N TrN tai O � NTCV IV eq r lip* 9) T N rvcN�a N rrN CbrT � N 4 Ch y a w �U m � . -: � o rr r • tic rtit . °D to � + �mN �� s a 40 a 40 p � cm � ; cco � ci v o v .- i m m U vv pco o a o `tm ov v WC �ty+�- Cb �O OL a ZC] � ❑ cy° � : cep m mgt d cti; CL CM a- > U L7 :ii Z W ,o d dy w Z" A D ca O on r N r r CV p r r Q G N W w �— W y m C4 N _ J W � �w_U _ M M �v ... CD Q rWP- CD co w-V-04 Crp > �G �DN �°v H!N qr a v N 3 Lo .� i Q min or go to aoZ 3 m w C C C7 � m is o r °' : 2 �r f - - J t- CC _1 m _j � �a IID 2WLLLL �! ZZZ V�}V3N WWW 3� v L3 .Y it J r SQO c%lin r� t77cc p N [4 c�a avv vv ov ci ao v op o Z� � mm 88 8810 ��° °gam ICFL f0-- 0r rt7117 rr �c MN 1O v CL n- ■ reri�„ C4r)0 rrO loNW w C C. U. 01 _ W CD c 10 N _ 0 [4 10 M k* - y 7r .. a aSL E C 40 a 0 H Goo Colo COO coo IF.. p�p dlaw o W) c'� � � g � G7 � � V] y� vov co vv G ova 0 a tIML v r vW v> 18800 SrGC 8A° °C J X► r A R ■ 0 N0 w F N rtir rNC rro vlVW V N J LL cm n`r mti0 �=N w"117 10 V)Gr147 cc m N O 40 r 0 LO) (0 co N r 0r-0 G°° [''y°G lw U Ot �} a a * C �a t3 No117 Nmr qlr +mac o&D to a (0 go -v + � p caN vov v,� cl o v U. ry vo vv vvv �? v v o° goo ° a$ 4m v �. 1� rcc r► v rcr7 r• r cis V) cn � d m m m � v r C4 V. r cy v r° v ty W c g � j LL to �A� �� MN- UM � 0 ° (0NW7 OD -U) mm Nab } o -v E °cnr• 0 v•r- rav v000 C4 g 41 • + C4 4N 0 m04 • F CO cl)v a °�� ° . ��8 8 a to v o� >K vva av vo ocv o �- 888 �$° $°°v O°vCob) u r• r• �. �► r. Cry CD ■ � v �N CM0 +-�v on1W LL. _ is i► qr 0 � a) am r m CO r m LV 117 r v ti � r co = 4 J r! � r 1G � r .-. o "ice° vvr 11)NV 0 C4 a qO Cb q Li VVVlll Q � o c%tmN 11 0 egg ei`� ` °veNr,°c� • +oa rte. d �sry c 0Mcv ov n cv ara vvv v aW o o $ g iCoo = ��, o, =Au S88 $u° $ ^a v8cal zt U d C C - ° Qy o � z dN 7rU Z m.rc� o►�•- o ccm � rcid C14 •-rlo oC4W n E 0 +� W j OD N m c LU w � N C m � � u. o .c CO gin c 8 f*�c 03 eh C4 CO m M r M(D X0117 • •' � Or 7.0 a cm m r. m o rJ`, v CM co m 0 N:� cn o�cm (43.0 p o a ��a ZWali ,oaa ZZZ ,a .0n u?oo r0 .0� WWW p0 i.7J Y� o N N CD v °o o N t.- to 0040 0 Ln in $ °vo Nry vc s`�I"ccm ocv �r v o m o � � vv v vp vy p W _ m CL M II ::� W N !r7 W r ;+y r r r r t N p o LL U r m Cb 'tC°vi1NC! in co cry Ln r ao t.- m C4N0 v, •:. p'= le � L] aoa 0vv vvv vvv N •.may �-'i a� O [V to LO �WC G aD 1n [ti1qrN mp NNp 0p) 888 .- [+7 • Q 0 AW �e] �W vcc vao cvv 4n 6 c v .� v c� Cb ��rv°`gv �� °o{ ° U. � ��Cb t'] ado to C� ICL v NNW V- C4% rrr r!V 0 V i] � W :J LL I [I� •- Cb 1- co o) 4n m in co t� g co om� o�v cv° cvvv v IV c4 N U � rvr E CD ..► Ln ■ LO v o Ll1 rrcv) M N ce GQ0 v en CD w w ai Z Q 0 m o ocv N 4w c vocoo coo cr o LO a v .°r v0CD �vv vvv 0000 u �°�� 1► T vcv�v r► w 7 -#e IV LVNW w- C4 rrr rNv J i U. 0 � CD L _� f l r !'� tR7 Q� m r• Ll7 Q� to cm m Ln [rs L[7 T N co Y 3 = �y l "a I oa.< v o E °cop tr►aO N vvv Unvm N CM r L[? v m CD cD c� v a ro er7 [V M v a r• v 1• a cs C mQ •-MN Oov rr v, e•V oov vvv ocv cv v o _ °v°vm 8 °o °v Gv° °v v °o° qw V 0) r qw t- r• N. f. I• v o H NNW rNr 4r-rVII V- C4 0 m r t.- CO 40 h m Ln r .- t• Qs N w �+ 4 .� 1 r r r m qe _.• Q3 W cm N�° ° '"- N N E n w ciao M Cm vco 666 vc o $ E ? -: cv� cm �� 0 LL ° vas °'i 080 ° vvv o [] W o z LU va o r ..�r0 Z C3 V o -s a� > t3 _~ z = ae .1-° OD n c E Z m W m to r+s C W 3 ...... '0 _ UJ� 12 mN O U. �il� gig d m fAd o LM ert •:• ;' ' : = o - :. r N r e� ..tt�� .- OD N .� .r 0 an m qw r od an � r- N 0 7 a a > a -- ❑ u l*] N ..: •w r r ■ 0 co p cm cc CD U5 go z a5coZ s o�ao �2a, arm ter°' 3 S13 mQ �� o JFE Fx _j JH� JN� D D C ttf %.- ,_ ZWali � ��oa �a� .o�� .0-0.0 o �0 -Y LL ZZZ tf wo WWW �� ?" VJ * 0 L7 (a NNCD 00 cm v r G r } 8 C `o 0 coa eo CL [1'1 co v Go tl� m N v U �g E ZCL N 4N v Y 7 m a m r � Y � cc ar C ud A". N ca a Wm a z� � _� g U c � N > am W U} CO 0 ON cr go •� D Z g C.)o inm Z� co J r- Z W iL ti CDO 0 W v>- U � a `5 �3 .a m M g N = rAp C4 a =z m o'� 2C= m& � E m 9S.0 M' m 3 0 v ■ : U L3 w C7 p a 0�4 m W Q �W v V vM 0 ° r v a. 0 00a vco ooC; ca v vW r ttl W �°vCb 888 80408 $80 9:. rgi+n9 �V r F. V- d: 0 N CO) W T c7 r r r r r N G U. LL . t- cb O P- 0) coo c'7 CON O co v rrw 1C7 cm CrJ Go Q 4 vvo vav 000 coo 00 nF V �a � N m� � N �� ' A O S? 8 V- qr r f~►m G 0 [Ii N cOD r iL O 66 a 6 6 G O O a o Sg°' 888 888 880 T r T r �.. CVNW W r(M T TTr I- ;.0 :.; .d U Q; n C) N c0 N in (D C) 0 T N V 7 40 C4" R"i r .[V CV) Go CD 40 ?1- Owv 40 0 0 coot Cr► .Z o T f g 4 a . • s T a ppn n v Cv v m in Im Q� v o O v N �; vod r 4000 000 do v v r� G G C 8 Coo 0010 p n w w C) M M C3 n-w e- w C07 V- r• n 6. r w r. r ,�Ayy ul W 2 : NNW rCVr- rTr TNO q C � J U. N - ¢ �onvn n N w7 to p W7 C4 -W ■ c7 ON °T � cn cc vdo C4 C7N 000 covLn C� al q-. T e r r 4qr C4 Iz v �7 O la v r iD v UL _Q . C4 f- C40 Ql �N�ppqr C7 0 t ' O38 �0� 8CC mN vao 404040 ocv ov c� °avg� 888 8r0r� CA A N N W r N T w T r w N o A: LL nib N -W N -.N- - � tr3m f0► F. a nt n NV- N aaWO NNW , W . a ON QI►1. nWOV f►W + G ��ffr33 q r 0 � N .� :.- 404040 ova 0 vao 6 0 cv , W �NQs +C'7r N rrr r �;. NCVW rCV Np LL W v I- AD N M N N ti o u c s2= �2cm r X 2CD a J H R j J F- � J FE - �0 Z2Z cnco(r) WWW S2 _5 CDO 0 W v>- U � a `5 �3 .a m M g N = rAp C4 a =z m o'� 2C= m& � E m 9S.0 M' m 3 0 v ■ : U L3 OD co o W oY t am U � ob Ml E Nv Z M v� C Ri n n �'0 co [3 a 0 0 s�a z a C Rp ` ml ID ro � m � � a n � Y U. d N N ID p C N a!] QA ao v v Frr oo Ln N 1 Qto r un qw m .'6 an to O C4 C'4 NN Gv 0gcV- Cl C4 on , O vJR oC r- OGC Ci66 Cid � rW G r .. o v �g8 o 881 vv 8v r • fir qT Cr7 f 7 r fly r r to - r! N m O N e+: Cry C O (] CD e■7 COM >Xb Cyr �NN Cry m alb C1 N ab �qrq �CC4 - ? coo. ':•a: ovv vvv ovv vvv ._ .- O w 0 P%- w W" q- • �qr UC1 w ♦♦!+r � F- -42 o0 ovv vvc OM� ovv G r:W a .- [[. SC °o CCC CCC C: 3 21 4. •a r +� r A eylnr A �► r*+ A '� I► rear n o y; M [V!'3o LY!"9r rNr• r�1/r 's T 4D en co M M rr- M go Co vb N 0 cvum'3`n �CN qq� cvN Co m t►3 . a C V .m ovv Coco 1t7 A 1[j ovv _ -v r : U as o � a � ■ O� A r y r Cc w 1% N v w d G v r 1!7 CV OyQ� ai �.d' C7qw o orCv Oc']G O OW Cy Oo oC70 GCG C7°G C r T W Coo a o CCC CCC °vC 0 ar - . 1n v� n 0 T^ A ["7 fly r T► qr A A ti d +a tu F ti CgM0 Neer rC4 rNr 8 = C rom 1!7C)M NvCV ammo _ r N r o .m CDN0 o%Neh N MI) 1!] ory CM w 0W ' rn n • CcMm v v co ■ recto e• N V a rcmr .r v v � O N 80 N rn+ aqr o o•-N Ono O U. co coo oav ovv a ♦- 8 °v° CC °o °oC °v °v °o _ qw1~n� �vti r• .0� Q rviu� i'7r rc�y� v 15 �• .0 C4MC) C4 rtyr rC4 Z .... C} 0+�qrW) CoCCDDge NV- V.- WAm �(4 m C tDm r°r w"` qr � 0 ?� * CD ul) v °b N A b V 3 a... A !► 1► w �p r N [q m rN omo vrN M 0 C o Ip 117 v W W y m o c o ocoo vvv oco .v a a .� 0C ov ova a� ZW $$o Coa Co ° �' psi 1q i7 1 z V- A I%- f% 9) V CC � Z.. .� NC*0 44M r`Cyr rCM W �Qm� :+7 0 °° nNe W "' � t G N V G4 C :p .411 O : E P- CO m i!7 N 1t] el7 ° r r iD Cb CD - q �. r.y N ' - . .- r Cb „- r V) M 40 pm 4D C in Z 17�.t LI3 R --j C v.0.0.0 r» �0 •+J��. 2Wtx.LL ZZZ M.0.0 G►3[Atli a.a WWW 3 Y �J OD co o W oY t am U � ob Ml E Nv Z M v� C Ri n n �'0 co [3 a 0 0 s�a z a C Rp ` ml ID ro � m � � a n � Y U. d ins lz tuft zra Wg N 03 r- W ,..� LIS 4n a .r. moQ Z CO 880 �V N cm v a C a O aaa 0 b c O D C3 cig 0 m 0 N a U 0 CD 7 Qua maw p N C 0 Ut m W C m° a. 0 0 ■ v N r a 0 3 t�3 � o�m �¢ N Co0o c o 2 ZWCL tt 0 }W" v coo a�a U ��Cy L3 d a cc N CL° .r N D� b U >� o0�� G _ Q r_ m m 0 — r- a cc �L°o -07s v,mol C 0 p 0 a U m @ CO) Co r 0 c r w d oc ' cvc ,ANN vov A oc v, a v op ov � 0 M 40 r w {n T 7-0 41 �U N m 0 NcnV- r•l+)w V- 0 . ' r 40 � �•� � cc w [@tir CD r r@V r w � o vaa voa vav ovv ft « [p G 41 1%% « 40 r e a te+� @ a a ■ v l a •- l�7 CM c, •- o o a W y 40v vvv ci voo v a Coll i4.1ti [714-- pw wl+ar w�w M N!"70 Nl+lr T- r wlyr W •.: 1Lr 49 mi@pr M0in @~t7 N@ w m0 IRr co Go IV N� lLn tn w !►Nn r[} w VII oo� ovv ooh lANw vcv) v�E 0CM qqr Qa V CD ' A Cn @ N v Co M N ti � C4N 4 CO It a wv p 40 v ova coo co ou 0 81008 00 'COD 8SCOD a � W V � ..r cn r• .- 0 ce M v v CD •-- I ec el) v cn 0 Utz N W r. rn cr7 =ate 170 Clio Nccv � N @ Cbf-0 0YN Ntor• 0NC 04 E o. !„ N r. ti CO r CO Ql70 so cn M r V 0) CV v ao N t 7 a m Ill H �� vc voo q-. N acv vcvo @Q o a 000$00 $g0 000 •:. -u .- do cn 1C] V+ V) w coo t- A r- r r �SS w r ■ a°$ �m� C4 CO C� N@(r! ' - .CO2, �r Mni°D vr°Q �40C4 0°m C4 le O . y C 0) N * 0 N f+Ntl? mI%- w 0 N *- « r @N le M 0 @ 3:. V-M GMG ••- NN 0 0 v �V o c ovv vvv v o v o a _ 88° 888 8800 u �@ x888 rA r r trj w 1: N c7 0 N eq t r N «- .- N .- o * E wr•� cr, v Nti@ CD as CY @wFl- co r` m cm© � C14 ^w C4 "r V- c " C. .10 E :•• �2 J= c2Q, a�� 2 Z Z 9) (1) C0 W W Llut t? � 0 }W" v coo a�a U ��Cy L3 d a cc N CL° .r N D� b U >� o0�� G _ Q r_ m m 0 — r- a cc �L°o -07s v,mol C 0 p 0 a U 9 a IEvQ a v o vz CL _E _ Im U7 av N v .= v ... N a� c ees U� *4m _fa ot�� r 4— z C CL 0 x CL c c O �Z Y U- a • : UU $v °v v°N� N cm m 'p N `� o'N av ci vvc vv c� T �n$v vc�v gCO 000 r m In CV) o crier 000 w v en�0 0P- to as N0cc V) avv e avv 4000 oov 0400 �•o o N v `o) cm Coo .a �•.:� .° CG CG cvac Cfl O o� a ?v 808 Cvv S2 t! !► r• r N. CL V- r •- a v e) o '- a r v C a W J _ -. in Lo qr Cr•ea N0c17 t"] � O cc) fl � I m m to v 'v rN -�°n° °%n coo to) vCv N .� N � Z cv D ,ab Q a f `c a- V� v[v p� ` p °pa0 pp O� a°A v F E ©•- co 000 Gv C m Dacri Oo CCC C5 c G G O 0 0 0 C o C coo � t tii IB r r � 4. ev W U 0 0 C m � � J Q rf�G OQser� Ul) m co CveC] 000 cna¢ G W ca O Cm C er7 over] coo a m E, ttii .- s 0 C ' G N . v Co v� p0 0 0 G � p ch N vc 66 4066 6 a c O j X00 vvv V �► w, r I- a rev oer�v ror 000 m e tr]TC �N arCr] a0N 000 12 E3 t� a" "ry ooN COO COG � n � N of 3 12 , + No v N n •- $vpp G C s o o ne m � av vo ovv cG a c c �° 3 gg° °$° $ °g Coo Z ... uj as . -. � � }� r r 1n r W t► ti r- r Z•- o�`m!° �::.:':� •-c* v aeho rvr vvv U m m =f g N J Q a O ec C to 40 °m? CON 00O m V. 3qt � °$ g CN �� mZ- 0 t � '~ink ��p, r � � 2Q, c: 3 go _ 'n o ° r. J ^� ZWdi% �i ,o �o ZZZ 0cl)(1) WWW A 9 a IEvQ a v o vz CL _E _ Im U7 av N v .= v ... N a� c ees U� *4m _fa ot�� r 4— z C CL 0 x CL c c O �Z Y U- a • : UU C4 cm acv C4 0 T v r r � 0 o� oaa F. LIN, m 0 m coo� 0 a U m 7 z 0 T m O m N m &( I" U o � Z lb U w tti IL N v ca W � $ cc eq vy � > m n° 0 ° c 4WD� Cam! Q ZO� Qm �� m W a sip. r, ."Jf- °q § 00 a$ v � 0 ov O� vo 0C, cvv ov v vt OD W s- vvv r K7 0 c� +- M m ■ V re7C CDM0 M r coo G r:+ cm $ a vq-cn $ coo r � ono H � F coo ooa vav coo N � � 1y ::45 In Cb in Go g 5� § v >s� vc ac ccv oo v v v� Tt3 r le7 h r *-!'7a 40V)M rGr GG V r) v�nv ovco $v$ vov IL _11 o .� vim• °:�v vLOM °N vvv = Goo r cv v o t� A v4 " C4 �CO vT- Cp� �aN C .,.� cc ON vv ovv, vov a vc a sn� v c L $v °o v$v $vov vvo ° ac U') w IL w 10 a. W-00 vrvv t0T vvv G z J N Cb v ° In G N O M 000 CD a` cc vcnv 00- vov E. C4 N v o i a$ to •'" w co °N er} v r p $ C o .- p rs ■ Oc GG V v0 0 p0 O c $$° °$° $°$ CD, coo � � r Q •V �. r["70 Oehp r°r OOa O NN a ° co G N u t- 0 G v oov Nom vvo w a m r N • In o v CY va 8 o v DIE v v -49 vv vo 0O V oo a a o cm 0840 o v O 10 vva U o 5if33 040 p C Q ac co Z.. `? as •• = rlrf G Ct7 v r° r Cva 4m r e -• c Z� o 0 8v ccoa nvaro vvv a�T� C 'A r a� ca o� to p 21, HR Y� -2 �M.0 Z2Z .0am U)0)0 M .0 .0 WWW � .3i �J « � SU r, ."Jf- cv [v co 0CV T v t!7 OO V �e�•7, to � :� ODD C� Civ DG eggw DD ' � iD Cm r � a m T Z • •� nog vvv agv vva � ■ z:.. N G T coo v N Q +^^N0 D: g ovo N vva 0Cb v a,v �m Jlp T- N !r] [+] L] 0a F CL C a v a C a 000 vov O b..p p Q41W •— N +n � T • • e■s e� i v N r "4 0 coo m C4 v C4 z 0o vv va v Bog Cl C) acv ggv LL T T qlr V) Y- a w w T0T ova vcvv ENV — s° W . Cs d7 . -: .:� �v�m vvo vov �icva° m io G wvv T N vvo vvr• o evov L■7 [''] N !V M �q-- 0 ' L) ' + H �tA m o as w �. m Q G y � rp ccc G D r� � z vv vo cc c; c; o ' — a°vg ovv vco aoc�a a ••� � r r !Vi r e� � r Ta•- 000 ocyv C4 m C%l vvv v0ns voav °x � •r ao v m rM $CL Q CD v a 0 0 vvv C) T vaov T •� 4N 0 V- C O p G g p a ■ O a co O a 0 40 m m qt v oo vv ac v oa r gv coo vcvoo V JW N v Q: - tr7aN vav cNm clv vvv coo 04vw TCOv a nr N � � � ca • • • a i .,. v m ) N v .- 8FD .- Co v co rms o ry a s c 40 W N o av Z d a c LL ;A C v G coo ogv oov v o W a U ....� r C 0 e7 Z= ar�� 4� '� �aT vvo vNO $,� m •-cvo E W j Qm C.� CT] ��ao WisHo Y cio :nr •, sevN ovo ov�sfl c+��o a � > .2 lcc�J. CO -.: t cream .�fa go UU� -� +.'il] .. us .�i mot_ v a` �+n-- a-0 � a a � � +J w a ZZZ m m m !I]W O ,a .0 .0 www ��3 fl VJ 5[ m a 2 V cc K7 r0 r Z v aka U CL .Q ■ ■ IC) aN O C p � C >;�ED v�3a 0= V c � to C = ' 0.0-0 C m■� � 40 C4 N ao 000 m 00 coo $ $ W- New 040 p o In 40 CC4C14 N v a ovr- vvv cs v, Gv vv a vm 0 • c�o0 vvo 4000 0040 _ � ■ No•- coo OC40 TN U q9vim vvv 0T 4omo V) si .& �. 4 cm c+i qr coo. t..� ��pp •• 0040 vov vva vvv MID a YV NC4 T r o +r 0 QD m vvv vv av vv o v u 0400 coo 0040 0080 tL fa r T c�3 T cT AM W Y •-or 000 0N0 rCM0 oN vvv oqw 0 m c�c° ` i E ^v� coo or-O 000 a T N n a 0 to °q vao 400, o v v to 04 CC 000 ov vv 6 a v a - o` n 0000 vvv 0000 080 v r• n T V 0 z c vvv 0CS10 No > o C� 0400 000 0000 COw0 C = 0 T T cc ci �a vvv vvv amo aC40 ev v :3 �j o v c� Soo 00 vo T i C4 N sa $c°vCM C c D i r 0 AL t7❑Q m m m as _ 0 J 0 i3 m m a' d c a y Z m C 5 C C N m R7e W U U dC o Q �V V mCO c°g a CV) m� CDmov �7E cg ❑ -- Lpp� p3mz Q o a�vr- mN zwati • r • a � v, v in !-3 ea , vv cv ooa vo c v � vQv 0100 080 c880 T N[°G RDN g: Cr-C 1000 oNT rNO CbCww 0aa ONW) m m C .0 c� ell Q coo vvo vov avo °0 N V z � o o c �0 25 N r) V: cn N a L� o oD vv Co 000 .- =p 100 40 0 vz .. : -. v�o vov o 0 ii. •0 N 0 co N m OTo OQC O[Vr rN V U p; ... C! o qw cn v O 0 o O N cn co It O �., . cgn 0 vov avo vIW 0 0 C a -e z N v ft . e CD M v a ti o va 0010 0v o v a�v • ooa o0o °v°va C) C N W co N lu V 4 Mp C� 0 coo oCq +^C4 rnvv ['� r 1000 00tH com0 �- > o z o, 000 ova 0100 ocoo a 3 r°l .g vom 0,a v° Nay in vo vo vva co C; c; 040 0 ova 0800 $ °a° :� f r sv to co N Q � OT-0 OCO C) N rNp Cb o� 1000 0 �sn a 0 iv e"?vr 1000 COO qp-0 *-40 10 �o N V •9� �{ �N [C) =qK 010 ov vvo vv ,- in Q a c ID > ch ci On�v tip 0010 0498 CV [a g$° O N >�h v o 0 3 r- cn .�- T cry .0 t 0 0-0 C O O o N r T N o v co 0m coo Oran I%-m0 ate= S .0 C4 :; A3 0) a's0 c so r o cm A °� a WW zzz momW !V N co (14N a v T �Y O ova m v C O O a a c m a z 0 O m 5 V c m N � qw Ili W U r ce W pZ J z■ IL W � � 9) w oa�N � a�vamov c$ vs ❑ cam! 0 `co 3mi 0Q� Z Co *-*_ ZWO.tL SN QS T T, Ncl7 in v n va 6 c 'w v vvv a+Nn cc v— ro �i am ' _ •.0 vov vov og�g c�go T M � TT MR ■ 0T0 vov ontr- ENV c :. cove vva v�N °c�rO°►° 40 U - 000 vvv coo vvv cw g�j pm le 0440 � O r ar �C! m !►0 v OO OGV0 vvv O � cs vz vo ov v vQQ GCO 088 SSO k �i NoD co 4N v —o vvv vcyr- rN0 V � c m - v! CL avN m r coo COSH co00 nP o �. Z NN H [V a� cio 00 0 w $ ?� 250 v�v vv n� vv vo vvv 0 c vv u1 0$ v v O v o Q vn S Oo 0 Q N CD so cv 4 s U 0-0 1000 ONq- TN ■ v 0004 vvv ovN C0 v ■ C4 tv = o � T H� W .• i vvv vvv O (no O N o a° 0 E eN = Z « co" s * OG7 qlr vv � *- w NA ' O� s Q to O v O v O�'?O v O v 66 r An p d ,. OSa Oav OGg CiOa WN :�,:•� v TO va0 CN*" t-NC7 � • m vCp O op C7�p NN cr 0T 01010 vcv er, a CD' n v .� �} T V �S �N = s s ♦ w w r C 7 c crs ,- r $ C cc m va oo vvo as vvL c �v 10100 ag SS° •'b) T N•r W C4 a� m 0 N0 E � caa oa o r- o O v o v a 4N n ca v m 0 ca c •- erc •i p 2 Od �r.Q1 �L? = OZ � � 3 � C .� A � ..� 4- [!C _5 H o ay o C c ■ 2Z Z 0cnc� WWW a co as m n0 vz C � m � C U� Ice 9N N 0 z° .. N €410 V r vs _JCL O� Z m� 9 r a 8 z- YLLV 0 °ov°CD ''� T �ano 000 oc�v r�gv As r T ccri Q "0 «-0*- v°o 0N0 TiVO Woe*) 4000 008 l.- Cbo Ei �_ � 11 0 ❑ iL va0 000 oov ovv 0 N -� I - C vp g� t- e � o M m %n fl in 4000 00 040 C; c a gac� ovv vc�v a H Tp� C7oG oNa C4 C) V r W .:. vor� r N vov vao N t.0v •� _ 48 NI- W ON OOC7 ON 0 Ei T C+� m ft =i rev 0 �1 Co D � • r + et C'oo Gp Cp GC C �M w c 000 00 0r� oa o v,d o M �,,. �# coo 4040 ao ov o a z c ' 00000 coo v v 0ov a' 0 r- w m en r cn d .� m t � V E 1 F. pt •-0T vvo vivo No o �� °� coo OMM 0rnv Cc tea¢ -ro$ vvv vov vino vmo 0 E T r N � a; U �' cg0co cc 00 0000 a N R u,� o ' v v 0 oov 00 400 c° 040 Ov va vv coo vov CD, z A!08 0$0 � Vk 000 ONC? TNC Z C, W 000 Odom T�p 0 av Cb � �^GT 4000 0�0 Npp m m C4 °° IV 40 :. 'vov • 40 V- av v �a Z .S: v oo 00 040 Oo v a `v LL _ $vg vov o$o 8000 x g -01 dCNA �_ z Tv N v >men :_ _ Buoy CD c avv ovv a1�-;s moo 3° � 'a �_ O � N m .- .j m '■ to 0 �3mz a� z Lx It �� a m m u o� m � 2 °' 4%2= 1% Co Z m J�`�.- ZiLLLu. �? ZZZ rwni"iCo WOW } C3B a co as m n0 vz C � m � C U� Ice 9N N 0 z° .. N €410 V r vs _JCL O� Z m� 9 r a 8 z- YLLV 0 M N A W � Q� = e Z AID N W � �y �lb f4k. m 0 z CO N o AG NN a v T C O U� 0 O Q � A ea a 0 Z Va� O N c 0 Q rD m r � � m C mad rt A � m T CD ID � U o � V a � o co Q CM 00 m - c g vmg�g`y oC�c�Z ZWaUi - TccM co avv cgs tnkno o t7' vav vv ov v,� oo o v .o c; 0� O000 coo v v °vO . oli W0r Coo Ola" cri Ctiv � tj 0 v �. .0 Tor coo vNV rCM 40 ;ter, � � vv,r vo Crr vr) v in X00 0040 a�$ ira�av v ci ..II 44 coo v�v �v 0 VJ F a T r M d a CL L vov 0040 vov vvo ca • �-a.- ovv 0NV TC4 i � J « g 5 C ;' C4 a4 c; 46 vv vv oo vv oa m = O 7 ooh coo vvo �v 'A vav vvv omo ONO f,7 '� •r *-v+- oav acv T nev - TccM co avv cgs tnkno w ° C4 6) c7 eP-•7 0� O000 ova vmC4 MCOo . oli W0r Coo Ola" cri Ctiv � tj 0 eat j 2. t3 een0O0 g� vp� 0 40 ;ter, � � vv,r vo Crr vr) v in avv va vv vv v ci ..II 008 coo v�v �v 0 VJ me N T r M d a CL L c �-a.- ovv 0NV TC4 i � J ma^ Coo CTAn (n"rC) = O 7 •- r vav vvv omo ONO s as C*=0 Q s ey] G O v T GG C G v, G d D t*s N G c i v o �R7 ie ?AC vvv vv av vv o a 6 ovg vvv vc�v arvv Lb �-vT vvv vnev •-n�a Cw...qwA-Z _ 9 A C H e ti �Q �z v U� °3 cm QN Z M... i C �. C �; o ar 0 ,c0 r A E C C o mL it 9 cm O "D U- �oc� vav vm4 � No C 0� O000 ova vmC4 MCOo . oli W0r Coo Ola" cri vav � tj 0 173 qr CQpap co Spp • p]co • 40 O � � GQO QQ �7r�7 pNl Ce�3 p M7Q vQV acv 0C cc v a ..II r�v� vov vgv g v 0 VJ Cw...qwA-Z _ 9 A C H e ti �Q �z v U� °3 cm QN Z M... i C �. C �; o ar 0 ,c0 r A E C C o mL it 9 cm O "D U- vov oNV Trrio C 0� O000 ova vmC4 MCOo . N T T r .- T � tj 0 c 2 v :: a, c 2 �, a v a a a -M .0 40 2 ZZ m a 40 i!]COco 40 a m W 0 VJ Cw...qwA-Z _ 9 A C H e ti �Q �z v U� °3 cm QN Z M... i C �. C �; o ar 0 ,c0 r A E C C o mL it 9 cm O "D U- W D Z U N' W� lu W v lh �w VU� vi o zap C44 to N C%l N C7 G r o� U = ooa` ca m 9) m ca m m v U_ Ua ,v v CD a V 3 d m m CD i to m � 3C c°n a .W ti T V 4 c Lu om� IM CD U CD °v cm in x Z U� ILL so vz U = c� f S c cm V] n to ppN w cV fD o f r �� 0 v o�m M_ ac �s nE co 5 I m ■ UU a f► f► vti + N eri g [V 0250 a Q N a 0 •v -W gvo v$o 808 vvv T T _ v° ooONv�v ova v�= vvv aov ovv vvo :El ■ a a a o 08 o v ...,.A; c; c; C; C; vov cc v a ggo 0 S 0 gvg coo LL, �� r In in r r :� Tr�c ac�o tom o00 W . - .J AL ' Imo ova woo vvv lo �� qw �o o Baca vov mqw Q C4 vv a C N v vv °A; v eq a Aj 00 o 0 uj 800 000 800 vvv � Ill r r CL W Li o0 m 0 Apr vvv CYcov 0W) mm M0" vvv . 1 T 0) r ai a (Do 0=0 vov vvo C) El � � ° v c 00 f co a 0C4 ne a cm Q acv Cv v o 8vov 080 ncvvc vvv _ f► r r t~ I of r IL7 Y7 r r •a G Z Cl lu m ' m �� v N v � r�acr� 0 00 w .� Z z V e- yy . ~ o 000 vov 000 otCO a m as + N a C4 0p pa Qp.- pp Q N CC GC GC] � C7 C7 AL 880 v$o $og o00 'y f► r r r- H .� 0 en ° a� r� a v v �• uy I%- C4 M a N v o v v l�til r m r .. 0 ��° �2�, 0F_ ova, ka J •3- D �. .0.0.0 a M .C� o v� ZZz 0inin WWW �� :: �J so vz U = c� f S c cm V] n to ppN w cV fD o f r �� 0 v o�m M_ ac �s nE co 5 I m ■ UU m 400 V_ Z v Tga E Uc s CL w ■ N G C � i W � c3�❑ C (0 N ac or to `G ?L E ZZ =v c o ■ � ~>0 c �'or- LL C .sc�c, v N L0 i ri C"7 r in 0 C4 Cm v ::o v a c v l�7 v o vov vo a in a of v gov vnaa vvonv vvo �q v i]f �s+�v ac►iv r0r vvv .: to c o ;r C14 oe�u r V ova N vvv C: 4 coo coo coo vvo ft a • 0Ne° a 25 v �°nt sr vv vo vvv vv +v a to pry t Ai T- M v v eFJ v r- o r- coo IZ � V v CWM °� ovv 0 O v EV N vqv N °� v vvo � m � o y 0 U S �� °° L) a a �! vv o a �� 00 c; 40 vvv ov o0 Im aC 00000 Cosa crag ovv . AX. m m • -e�►�a aCg0 co J v � U'� 0 v CO v C ~� ■ oar crs a 3 ::• �.❑* ONO v @v vva vo° a• r Tto yr v �$ �, �$ • o N v �X vv 0 ov cog 00 e a vov vv v a �c�a v�v v0ag avv .►-ro° vMV •-vr vvv m ... X00 °ter C4 vvv ❑ v C4 S -1 +�,so aa, C40a vvv � M � r vm � �voQu,N rr v W h oo N av vvW oa v Q aav UJ v3 1A r+ CS �,� oN �� ;� Ta*v vrav W %` cry o o m r] IY �3U ■° ��cr�cy = �o voa� e-so� vva Cep � ' 00 � W Q W) r�xmz vt�� _� z2� Z °� Vs3 a = a �a �I--CC v J� z � vn! azai w W W �� J m 400 V_ Z v Tga E Uc s CL w ■ N G C � i W � c3�❑ C (0 N ac or to `G ?L E ZZ =v c o ■ � ~>0 c �'or- LL C .sc�c, �v L7 � Z2 W � a � N CL CV a) f- Z. w � q m �v 0 it t. Vi C Y^ Z 4W) o00 v r- v T a c v C 0 p m ooa Q C 3 D U v v r_ V c m @ E co CD Cca �[ Cn a w 3 v � v a U v P¢m� N m�cis cn m z to0Z f i6 2 W LL ti v vs IE m �D v Z Uc a� *o m 0 N C] T N Q� C W L � cm CL C C .2 Z C @ ely t a D Comm ° pad 8 Y1i C a : U N uQ'i co N to � N CO C�pb m D �? O 0 T N G C rrD G N Q W7 vvv ovv vv vvv v v� $ rrqw I- IW qwSr- a x. :+ C4C4 NNr- eVr7v NNE F •e Q�s"7 �O�C'i inter E NfQ►� fC r N CO r = fl Ovv 0 0 C C>vfl DOD -ems • v •I p .... �•Wm N ill co v0 inter iV 47 N Corm VD � o v w t► :2 6OV Gav C vC7 N vva Q on e id v C 0O C) S C 0 S o LL eV3e�tr!'?ri eC+�� Vii] C7 r� > M NNr NNr NL'1a NM t? �" CO r T tD NtiQ CD V wmm t► to t- MCC r- N m r v vvv vov oN0 v v o N fl e^Viaco °°cw vlrn �� a�or�7W o v 00r -cvv, v� acv o n �.. ovv vvv vv vvv v va i3 • W o0CD vov avv ovv vov vv vvv ovv Avis rr7 ;; e y r�3 emirs 4!n d ui fAi m: NNr V4 r Nr)0 egC4 _ ci .J r- r rD G707� r- .- RD N!Q►CO rD Ln Q qTmcn 1► Ln t%. 04to 4b vvo vov 0400 aVv 7' T r 3 D 40 .1 • P_ (D eq to Go • co VT- • IV co . mrav i o x vvv 48 N vov vv vvc 0 ��v 00 °o° .n !'7 T cn C"7 00 v° �aC0C) QM V- 4n !7 N] r NF CM r NNr Nt`7Q NNr' W ID Q)G7 to N m 0 v IV t• rD t7r = fQ►Q N m r v.. ►►Tti � CO c+)apv �r ot+a NAT - CV 41 iC! N N CGr �er]7 t• • !'�] !► • e'7 nr Q . N r�f vvv CND vvo O+V'- Co C) ovv va LL $� o °v vo Sv v Sqr� V n r- CL ~ C MM M N r CM CM C4 (n 0 N CV � o a �Cb 40 •trrcq�e -v�v N -•. l M"N Nr- iL7r N117T :o v+FLL' ot� �� J � r•G J H .0.0.0 M.0 �a ZZZ (n0)cA WWW v vs IE m �D v Z Uc a� *o m 0 N C] T N Q� C W L � cm CL C C .2 Z C @ ely t a D Comm ° pad 8 Y1i C a : U C4 C4 88§ C r D a 0 o sa m C: 0 3 a U m pa � � S �a c N 0 a :ci CA Wad UA Q a W � U_ o IL (A ui acs 00 m CaN ❑ n C dam 06 J �h� z VU� Cn�Zi �V7w Ll1�'�O v0 Lo Q vv U c C a� t 1� a w pNa a C �y�vo o c o �a c �Ea w Iro 0 LL a « t UU N m ne vV- qr � 0W.0 � .r v i m °ic�+i v o �• a o vcv 000 vv vaLa v op T i7 T iA 01 NNr IN C4 04 C70 NNr '• C �co 0 CD to r--(1h -wm QOac4f rnCf► Cm 40 rCyr T NmIV �•� 0 C o coo c o o o L7 C7 o i 00 1 * ■ NtoCM aC N ac; avo vn CM ciC; d v gi+�g egg ° Qua$ • r�r R�lAG' A7) _ NNr NNr C4cn0 NNr 40 rI- ca o mind PV*4 0 ti{►❑ qw m ca to to 04 v Cb cm T+WT► Nis wr V- N[D rt 7 aav 0 CI vNv 0 m 0 ht 17 to i p O i • ■ ■ 1[7 LG CO CM [ � OCr NN r� v vp ro Cv ap 6 v o Ir k- v w rqjr «qW 1p,_ lqrrs �e7 ttNT c+7 r- d ■ tl• F.,.■ C4 C14 C4 r cvma CMr4r ODrr f► co C 0tocn r%. CV W) r•UlC q .- to 47MN ° m N r- f• N CD r r- C7 r N W • • vov oov vv � vv V v a E o C4 wo a c c7 Q N m N r- ° !► OD 10 M r � s10 G4 �p C7T� G+^C CV OCC4C4 ovv ood co ©vo oa cn CO ,- ski An NC14 1VNT cmm0 NNr m •; f%% � nr 0 o 1w to 0 0 42 O � r V 1` N CO r r 10 r- C4 N m V f is r N iRi N +r r rt- Lp r .- Cfl C+3 qV 0 d O ■ CA CQ N 40 0 v •- ' LAC m !l- f- �•.' � O O C C3 C7 D O R7 G 0 0 O !� gCc, �v [�7 r LWi A �' +� 173 VIE A A r Z -: CV [V r N N r CM CO) 0 N N +- - wCw J o. U4?A(a mNI OCAN QD qt m vW)r r In+�•� C4 tO T 0 C v r m r mqw C@ T 1► C* ° 2J a °° 02� w 2 2 C a. Ac J H a J 'D J Q m.0.0 z z z U) (n WWU! J v0 Lo Q vv U c C a� t 1� a w pNa a C �y�vo o c o �a c �Ea w Iro 0 LL a « t UU Nv� $Nn Q r 0 V ❑ ❑a i C -�C C 0 r O U 0 c m w m c Mc 3 � m U a C W D Q O L ... a It CL A � s� 46 W i 3 Q n � SS � v Z >me�i W�j +�panN IK C a C o $ Lh ��mz 081 V� Z Cc ca to J.4 V- %. ZWa.OE 00 a s vz m � V � CL V C%l FL 8 [Y cc 0 ;? =0 t aC �� CD on 0, w at � � v C LL o a + U 0 s 0N� s 0 C ■ tl7 wN cm � b vo•- � s�v vN0 a 93 a �.r vc6 oa 0 46 46 00o v at :v vs8 o8a 84008 0988 AU :rr Q r r 04-0 r N r N N T ,E c�•,�r �40a* aam5; r- r+le N N r m m r a40v o00 0040 coo CAI40w� a a a ■ s ■ 11 pQN'W G O B 00 8 C O 0c�cCM 0 M 0 U'J4Wm G N G a in y�• vvv ac 4666 ov6 o a L) a T t T T T T M QTT 0x0 rNq- NN�- L3 (aqr cv r 41 mr) (0Q� wc� V CL N N 7 3 .00 000 vov 0C4 c 00 M 0 a . E cn � � v 7 � o a • 4• a a ■ g o� 467 o cv � �n N ad �n ca �• �a � o N0 vNav o v va 046 0 oa 4666 0046 46 c 460° °0 °v° 00 °v °v _ ❑ u +� r� ti n In c� v v r► a r 0 r N T N ry r J N- 0 � CO C'7 � N in m Q V �_ ■� N H c a coo 000 oNo 0WO A oE e� Z � 0 N G 0 N co 4p0 L��tippi ' in a� C7 ifs 417 I� y 0 G •- G> 8" 0 a N O O �� vov vv cv6 vvo va C`r T T l ■ c9 ! v T T 40 cm N N E z W . •..J ! 41 40 a C4 cc V T r r G T a cw ' O sr- ti a• an in e� .- N N p G N F7 aY7 qw cm t[! G 8 re! fn vticy 00 vvca coo a v v$ v8v V • • T r- T T t•? r � ('� r •w TC4 t4Nr :CC 1�i R'3 e+? cn 1- t► M m N m ch iD (0 C T Q W T� 0 M 0 9 �F=- is a o An rt a U) W-- :..:a: -3 ::�• � 3 y v G 00 a s vz m � V � CL V C%l FL 8 [Y cc 0 ;? =0 t aC �� CD on 0, w at � � v C LL o a + U 0 $o cv $ cv _r►°iN C Q r c 0 o ona i 0 ir- T D O U m i Q c E h u 3 ca _m d ea Ix ❑ U C tC N % Cb p � O W a U 2 � d uca z a� d N O uam m 0 to 04 C9y IX 9ch° Q o cl; JJ LO w) a�3mz 0 �hV. co -� •- : z w a it �o v gcn v &D cy ca v: o a an 4m •�i o� cov av � °v �ry vvv an°0i•v acv g prr pro rNr CA C4 ca .r cm Cr mn N [� �7 +WN qr I- N IE vov ovo ovo vvv •'' vv N co �Q g u7 OG rvsn r• .- Or-C Nm�n ce � CV o a an M T 11--o °ppGV vp pao GGC c+ ci fl pZ pGC i� r• f� 1� 'et f� � � f► � t 'U 4 r prr► oro rNr iVNr J W ... CM 4N Ul Cm r- .- 0 0 CD cn Lo 1 N CO N vvo vvv coo vr0 m N N �l U + ONtD ova C2 r j0 gwq- v- 0N0 O Q� o r,a cvv vo vv ry vac voo d ci v °OO° v° °v °v v °v °v D v�° ter- r- f- qr I- vvr• a4j a Tr r r CV) r- ['7Mr- uj V� c� 0 TNW- NNr - iV fi (+7 cm to CN V.- qr " Ln C4 N C41p) N _ 4� �I p vvo vvv °U)0 °� ° °o r F 1 ev r .-- �k i wov v°-�` vv G ry N0 G voa oo vov 4s vvo m cs ° °vv °$v 88°° v° °o °v v .. � r- T r r- f �► v r- r"^ Ci T- A qw t- � •U r p+rp rlyr- NN r .0 m ''• NT r r- r!pv� tAM V @ICS t ti N Aw [YCai If}pr p�N ��N to a N � pp CO {Ci Qs r Q! e per m tp !r] Cf r Q Ip aD Cb �6 b � Cry v 4N ova ov voo voti c v 0oaa LL ° °v °v °OV° °vg °o °v °o� rr r e v n p in t ❑ F r[�jr t'?L"3r C m 0 t C7 r'Nr NNr - E CL� C D C _ ca f.- OrN er, o r -1-7Y- m •- rrqt r• N e■7Lo m to cv D Co q m 4WD 3 t Cp -•: o 40 z' ID 8 a - z z z co v) u7 w w w cam + V C3 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: 20am -- tot -wac Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2005 Total Traffic -- With Apollo Connection East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 Major Street Movements Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 5 T R Volume 844 542 106 1189 Peak --Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 211 136 26 297 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 844 542 106 1189 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak-15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, H FR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 106 C {m} (vph) 500�� v/c 0.21 95% queue length 0.80 Control Delay 14.1 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DAK Agency /Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 10/10/2002 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: 20pm- tot -wac Jurisdiction: City of Seal Beach Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: Year 2006 Total Traffic - With Apollo Connection East /West Street: Westminster Avenue North /South Street: I -405 SB On Ramp Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 Major Street Movements Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 1 2 3 4 L T R L 5 6 T R Volume 1272 1049 146 1428 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 318 262 36 357 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1272 1049 146 1428 Percent Heavy Vehicles --- --- 0 -- --- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, H FR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channel ized? Lanes Configuration Worksheet lo- Delay, Queue Length. and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 146 ` C(m) (vph) 218 v/c 0.67 95% queue length 5.30 Control Delay 53.3 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS (IS , k--(S S r V4 N to coo N N N c o D .T. oaa L m v c v J O V Div Ian c v J 3 L �1 N o ° U L a IL R6 Q cc = ju m v Q n� m UJ 2 �N 2 V~ CM m CO W Ir co j it N Cr [] 0 V? cy O L] Ch ° m ti 0 a °mZ o �a Z�w co p O ••� 1" �• 2 W a ti f• C) Z do aka r U m aN L v .,� v 0D r �a .� c dD ri C 0L17 is = �Az� 0 � a v C D eo Z CL 0.0 1 CO, � o a i s V (3 a v o a V ch N ao p cc to Ab CO) OCR 0 [4 N46 0 CY C) NC 0 V- W) C14 � 0° C r ni eo = 000 660 106 666 cvp .� Ax 'D a 8 °v °vv g�o v 0 cv to w w cc co ctrl m r l co 0 rV)q- rQr V-M V-M V- :W •W :.0% rN r Ttrir C4 C? TNT - W !+]03 r!►m Ntico NtDW rroNo !r7o c'7(hv) ocrov vvv vvv vvv vo46 i /Q i • R i Ie7 T O4 n p Ul) Cy V m C4 Cb "' vcao -41 606 0"o 666 Or Q6 C00 66G r Li op p •''';', G ��M (D 0ND� U. a,+ !hr rQr rM toD rM�- �l r rC4 rcq rND *^N r :4 � OM V) -W cv a r.- co `no Nf►sD co0m NCDo vwQ i 40 vqv 6460 4660 1066 0 is £� r T o a Q m v In M o ' Cv> N 0) " Cl) m ' cusa ns 0 0 a�10 N a cr CO In " avo 9 r as oap 666 avo 06 666 c v 3 P4, °0S°v °a °o °v 0 °v °v °o 0 °, Q► � to C4 co r i`] r co ca cD r Q t C) ca cv r t� w cv co r' �7 r CL 4 ui v 0 rNr Ten C4 (D .-Nr Ci J}0(MM :E Q m co I OD ra o N fl- o ry r CYWto o cn 'v ,o vmv 00040 000 acv a v .7 o In Inaom QrUn oQ (n04a v c v 0 V ov goo o � 7 vvv 4666 66 4666 cd °o °o a °v g ° o °o °° _ V ce04W c avaOc0 v° CD C4 v° oNW cq r r N 0 T cy �+ m �• OrlY7 V oo r0Cd Me- Nf+m MaM NmtO viGQ cc CA r r r r � a lT In Cm CO N S A 40 N m rIi = co I T +Q t p d A rr R s i r e7 ' CD CD m ' moo f.- rF r r 1!3 C4 07 ti o N :�� CD 0 bra 0 0010 4". Coo at =00 c. C; vv C; c; a LL 0 0 C) �} QD C4C cn �CD r F .Il- ri'rlr rNa IN x N O f- NCD C`7mr all Qtr f� NLn ON(D N M IAtt 3 s 2 vo c 2 rn o OK *�! .0.0.0 m.0.0 d ZZZ 0)00w WWW � V� f• C) Z do aka r U m aN L v .,� v 0D r �a .� c dD ri C 0L17 is = �Az� 0 � a v C D eo Z CL 0.0 1 CO, � o a i s V (3 N N G NNC4 v r v r w '0 Q � ooa s u eo 0 m as c v .J C.] O 7 Cam$H 9. 40 tV J t IM a aad A W ZIM h Z m Q Z■ a 3 a Z =Um ulvj � mN CN D C G t*7 � a E;; a-j z o 0 NN ZCO v)3pc JV-`- zWaLL. .:: p'pp OK7r T-� r qt m0 e+7 v, s N� s x'700 rG ' .. M. 1► do t� W o ova 0 cv 0r oc V- cav o vp 0 CL 090 a CL to .. w Q � Z . r C4 r 0) r RI C? r N r a p 0 CD n V- M a) c ° c+i0cr7 tit Y+ �m oo co N qr •��• vav vvv voa vva n f a N v ns v " e a�"07,D yr ccoo Mo $ ccC - vvo vov vc ccv a v 988 880 M rNr rt+7r rCm rCm w�w J oVm oaon cncho CD (00 1-Mr nCD MN ti q� c0c00 ova vav ova At 3 41 r v r 40 D s s s s rrvN e4° r0 a fn �T we a M 0 G G t., ova C; c; cc cva o v nc�e� aoo pp00 coo .0 toNto mcoto tGN �CpvW CL�-- 4 R ul r N r r (n r r N 0 r N r C - • o 10 0 n V-- CD cq v to N ncoM CD kn M O V7toM N ! O to 0 WrOD qw 42- 6 ONO vNV vaa 0 v0 l � o �> g o7 cssr rn0 C4 (M s 0i rq8 c5M0 0r mro r 40p SRC: aoo vac dd aaa 6 v I0008C8 8s'02 8Nm r t+7 r r qw r r- !"7 r en r ■ • rtltr V) V- rawly rNr- J m •. ... aNco n v a) vnIN n to V) V)0)0 r7 In Cl Om0 co r- CO Z N r W r M •^ N RW f+ � eo C v ( n r to as (4 r cn m v r r cQ �- c•7 �pp r * ��p • s M,* w ti'} N N m cn r 0 r %n V- v- O 0400 vca 0C) 0040 Id Q SEE 8 8 0 v r eh r .- qW r .- M r cn .•- rlyr V) V- rC4 v- C4 vv n�p t cn as v cwt o r >n q to CD W (q V* tiC4 NGo n *� r Ll7 IF r °' 2 C& m o °0 o �P� 0 a o= JH� .�� a I a.an .93 .0a � o (A =Q z z z (1) V) ) W W W 3 Li J §0 vZ ii t t U= C !]4 N M 0 M o CE C v >�� D t 'M CL w�$ too C a y m C � O 0 Y si Ca • t �U