HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2008-08-11 #G• AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 11, 2008
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: David Carmany, City Manager
FROM: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REPAIR AND
RECONSTRUCTION OF DAMAGED STRUCTURES
AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT PLACARDS
ORDINANCE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Introduce Ordinance Number 1579, amending the Municipal Code of the City to
establish provisions to allow for the timely repair and reconstruction of damaged
• structures and enforcement of posting of safety assessment placards. Instruct
staff to schedule for second reading and adoption at the next regular City Council
meeting.
BACKGROUND:
f~eoair and ~9econstruction of Daina4ed Structures
This ordinance, if adopted prior to a disaster, allows owners of damaged
structures to begin the repair process immediately. In turn, this minimizes the
amount of time that owners do not have access to their buildings.
From a disaster assistance standpoint for public facilities, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency ("FEMA") will only provide financial assistance to put
damaged structures back into pre-event conditions when appropriate codes and
standards are adopted and in place prior to the occurrence of the disaster event.
California Buildin4 Code ("CBC") Title 241ssues:
Currently, CBC Title 24 does not provide for damaged structures to be repaired
or reconstructed to a structurally safe level, accounting for upgrades in wind and
seismic standards. The inability to repair structures based upon the most recent
• industry knowledge, thus preventing or mitigating future unnecessary damage or
injury, is not in the best interest of the community.
Agenda Item G
Page 2
The adoption by the City of the 2007 CBC by itself does not necessarily •
constitute having codes and standards in place. The problem is that the CBC is
primarily a code for new construction. The proposed ordinance provides the
triggering mechanisms that will allow building owners to use the appropriate
sections of CBC and remain eligible for FEMA Public Assistance.
The triggering mechanisms proposed in the ordinance are similar to those used
by many jurisdictions to address buildings damaged by fires. Another key aspect
of this ordinance is the provision that allows a different level of repair to be used
if proposed in an engineering evaluation and approved by the building official.
This gives the design professional the leeway necessary to appropriately address
not only the specific damage but also the reason for that damage.
It should also be pointed out that this ordinance proposes more restrictive
requirements for essential service facilities than for other occupancies. This is in
accord with the provisions of the current CBC regarding the higher standards
required for such facilities.
This ordinance addresses historic buildings separately. This ensures that
Historical Buildings receive the treatment they are due in order to protect them.
Careful attention should be provided so that required repairs maintain the
integrity of the structure without adversely affecting its historic nature. •
Other sections of the ordinance address the types of buildings or structures that
are typically vulnerable to earthquakes. In some cases, these buildings have
been damaged several times and inadequately repaired in the absence of this
ordinance. Assuring proper repairs will reduce the likelihood of future damage.
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and EmerQency Assistance Act ("Stafford
Act"
The Stafford Act, as amended, authorizes the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) to fund the repair and restoration of eligible government and
non-profit facilities damaged in a Presidential declared disaster. Section 406(e)
of the Stafford Act requires that the repair and restoration be "on the basis of the
design of such facility as it existed immediately prior to the major disaster and in
conformity with current applicable codes, specifications and standards."
In 1998, FEMA interpreted this statute in Federal Regulations in 44 CFR
206.226(d):
"To the extent a code or standard requires changes to the pre-
disaster construction of a facility when it is being repaired or
restored, those changes will only be eligible for FEMA funding if the •
code meets the following five specific criteria:
Page 3
• (1) Apply to the type of repair or restoration required (standards
maybe different for new construction and repair work);
(2) Be appropriate to the pre-disaster use of the facility;
(3) Be found reasonable, in writing and formal/y adopted and
implemented by the state or local Qovernment on or
before the disaster declaration date or be a legal federal
requirement applicable to the type of restoration; (Emphasis
added)
(4) Apply uniformly to all similar types of facilities within the
jurisdiction of owner of fhe facility; and
(5) For any standard in effect: at the time of a disaster, it must
have been enforced during the time it was in effect."
More recently, FEMA has issued several interpretations of the above regulations
paraphrased below:
1) Repair ordinances must apply "uniformly", that is to all occupancies
regardless of the funding source, the owner, or the regulator. FEMA
intends to play one disaster grant applicant off the other if regulations are
not entirely applicable or enforced uniformly. FEMA does not consider
Appendix Chapter 34 Division III of the 1997 Uniform Building Code
("UBC") to be eligible since it applies only to "natural" disasters.
• Therefore, FEMA insists that repair ordinances apply to both natural and
man-made damage repairs for funding eligibility.
2) Repair ordinances must also apply both before and after disasters
regardless of whether or not it is a Federally declared disaster. This
interpretation by FEMA could render in question any ordinance that is
triggered by a locally declared emergency for funding eligibility if FEMA
finds it does not uniformly apply or is unreasonable. Repair ordinances
that are triggered by locally declared emergencies have not yet been
evaluated by FEMA to determine if they comply with its regulations and its
interpretations. At this time, FEMA supports the intent of the International
Existing Building Code (IEBC), which applies to all repairs regardless of
the cause, or whether or not local or federally declarations of disaster or
emergency exist..
3) The reasonableness clause of FEMA's regulations has also been the
subject of FEMA's interpretations. FEMA recognizes IEBC because
FEMA has been actively pursuing code change proposals with it at the
national level, but if FEMA deems that a locally or state generated
regulation is unreasonable, FEMA reserves the right to initially deny
requests for Public Assistance funds on that basis. This has been the
case with some Disaster Service Reports (DSR's) that rely on the
• California Historical Building Code (CHBC) as a basis for determining
costs to repair damage to public facilities. FEMA has initially ruled against
Page 4
the eligibility of Public Assistance funds that use the CHBC on the basis of •
lack of reasonableness. Applicants have then been forced to appeal in
these cases. This creates in delays in funding and repairs.
The proposed provisions relative to this matter are based on a model ordinance
developed by the California Building Officials, and are set forth in Section 1 of
proposed Ordinance No. 1579.
SafetyAssessinent P/aca~ds.•
The City utilizes the Applied Technology Council (ATC) safety assessment
placards for designation of the safety of structures that have experienced
damage during a major emergency response event such as earthquake, fire,
flood, etc. These placards were first used in California after the Loma Prieta
earthquake in 1989. A panel was convened by the Applied Technology Council
to review ATC-20 and update the document based on the Loma Prieta
experience. One of the major revisions to come from that panel was to revise the
three placards. These revised placards have been included in the Post-Disaster
Safety Assessment Program, and are currently utilized as the basis for our
local placards.
Seal Beach has never officially adopted the safety assessment placards.
Technically, these unofficial placards represent only a recommendation from •
those who performed the evaluation. As a recommendation, the safety
assessment placards do not carry the weight of law and cannot be enforced.
Adopting the safety assessment placards by ordinance will make them official
and enforceable. In some past emergency response events in California, there
have been a number of reports of placards being removed from buildings by
owners or tenants. In other cases, there have been reports of the unauthorized
change of placards, usually from UNSAFE to one of the other categories. In both
cases, adopting placards by ordinance allows the jurisdiction to enforce the
posting with local law enforcement personnel if necessary.
It should be remembered that only authorized representatives of the jurisdiction
may place official safety assessment placards. For this reason, the Post-
Disaster Safety Assessment Program (SAP) recommends that the safety
assessment evaluators be deputized. If this is done, evaluators can place official
jurisdiction placards when they complete their evaluations. If evaluators are not
deputized, the jurisdiction must send out its personnel to post the buildings.
In accordance with Article 17, Section 8657(b) of the California Emergency
Services Act, local government is not financially responsible for providing the
volunteers with worker's compensation coverage if the jurisdiction deputizes
volunteers. The volunteering Safety Assessment Evaluators are registered with •
OES as Disaster Service Worker Volunteers and are provided worker's
Page 5
• compensation coverage by the State of California.
local government employees are covered by thei
respond under mutual aid agreements.
Evaluators who are State or
r respective jurisdiction and
The proposed revisions relative to this matter are based on a model ordinance
developed by the California Building Officials, and are set forth in Section 2 of
proposed Ordinance No. 1579.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is minimal fiscal impact to the City with adoption of the ordinance. The
ordinance provisions would have positive fiscal effects on owners of damaged
structures by allowing for possible FEMA reimbursement in a more timely
manner.
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive further reading and introduce Ordinance Number 1579, An Ordinance of
the City of Seal Beach Adding Section 9.60.130, Repair and Reconstruction of
Damaged Structures, and Section 9.60.135, Safety Assessment Placards, to the
Seal Beach Municipal Code. Instruct staff to schedule for second reading and
adoption at the next regular City Council meeting.
SUBMITTED BY: NOTED AND APPROVED:
e Whittenberg, Director
Department of Development Services
r/~
~1
David Carman ,City Manager
Darik Doggett B~Ikling Official
Attachments:
A. Ordinance Number 1579
•
Page 6
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1579, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL
BEACH ADDING SECTION 9.60.130,
REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF
DAMAGED STRUCTURES, AND SECTION
9.60.135, SAFETY ASSESSMENT
PLACARDS, TO THE SEAL BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE
•
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1579
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADDING
SECTION 9.60.130, REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF
DAMAGED STRUCTURES, AND SECTION 9.60.135, SAFETY
ASSESSMENT PLACARDS, TO THE SEAL BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE '
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Title 9, Public Property, Public Works and Building
Regulations, Chapter 9.60, Building Code, is amended by adding Section
9.60.130, Repair and Reconstruction of Damaged Structures, to read as follows:
°§ 9.60.130 Repair and Reconstruction of Damaged
Structures.
A. Purpose.
This section amends the Galifiomia Building Standards Code
as adopted by the City by establishing regulations for the
expeditious repair of damaged structures. In the event that an
amendment to the California Building Standards Code results in
conflict between this section and the California Building Standards
Code, the text of this section shall govern. In accordance with
Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7, express
findings that modifications to the Califomia Building Standards
Code are reasonably necessary because of local climatic,
• geological or topographical conditions are either already on file with
the California Building Standards Commission, or will be filed prior
to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter.
B. Definitions.
For the purposes of this section, the following definition
applies and is hereby added to Section 3402.1, Definitions, of the
2007 California Building Code (CBC):
"Substantial Structural Damage: a condition where:
1. In any story, the vertical elements of the lateral-force-
resisting system, have suffered damage such that the lateral load-
carrying capacity of the structure in any direction has been reduced
by more than 20 percent from its pre-damaged condition, or
2. The capacity of any vertical gravity load-carrying
component, or any group of such components, that supports more
than 30 percent of the total area of the structure's floor(s) and
roof(s) has been reduced more than 20 percent from its pre-
damaged condition, and the remaining capacity of such affected
elements with respect to all dead and live loads is less than 75
percent of that required by the building code for new buildings of
similar structure, purpose, and location.
C. Repairs. For the purposes of this section, the
~• following repair requirements are hereby added as a new
• Subsection 3403.5 Repairs, to Section 3403 Additions, Alterations
or Repair of the 2007 California Building Code:
Ordinance Number 1579
"3403.5 Repairs. Repairs of structural elements shall comply with
this section.
3403.5.1 Seismic evaluation and design. Seismic evaluation and
design of an existing building and its components shall 6e based on
the following criteria.
3403.5.1.1 Evaluation and design procedures. The seismic
evaluation and design shall be based on the procedures
specified in the building code, ASCE 31 Seismic Evaluation of
Existing Buildings (for evaluation only) or ASCE 41 Seismic
Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. The procedures contained
in Appendix A of the Intemational Existing Building Code shall
be permitted to be used as specified in Section 3403.5.1.3.
3403.5.1.2 CBC level seismic forces. When seismic forces are
required to meet the building code level, they shall be one of the
following:
100 percent of the values in the building code. The R
factor used for analysis in accordance with Chapter 16 of
the building code shall be the R factor specified for
structural systems classified as "Ordinary" unless it can
be demonstrated that the structural system satisfies the
proportioning and detailing requirements for systems
classified as "Intermediate" or "Special".
2. Forces corresponding to BSE-1 and BSE-2 Earthquake
Hazard Levels defined in ASCE 41. Where ASCE 41 is
used, the corresponding performance levels shall be
those shown in Table 3403.5.1.2.
TABLE 3403.5.1.2
ASCE 41 and ASCE 31 PERFORMANCE LEVELS
OCCUPANCY PERFORMANCE LEVEL PERFORMANCE LEVEL
CATEGORY FOR USE WITH ASCE 31 FOR USE WITH
(BASED ON AND WITH ASCE 41 ASCE 41 BSE-2
IBC TABLE BSE-1 EARTHQUAKE EARTHQUAKE HAZARD
1604.5) HAZARD LEVEL LEVEL
I L'rfe Safety (LS) Collapse Prevention (CP)
II Life Safety (LS) Collapse Prevention (CP)
III See note (a) See note (a)
IV Immediate Occupancy (10) Life Safety (LS)
Note (a): Pertormance Levels for Occupancy Category III shall be taken as
halfway between the performance levels specified for Occupancy Category II and
Occupancy Category IV.
3403.5.1.3 Reduced CBC level seismic forces. When seismic
forces are permitted to meet reduced building code levels, they
shall be one of the following:
75 percent of the forces prescribed in the building code.
The R factor used for analysis in accordance with
Chapter 16 of the building code shall be the R factor as
specified in Section 3403.5.1.2.
2. in accordance with the applicable chapters in Appendix A
of the Intemational Existing Building Code as specified in
Items 2.1 through 2.5 below. Structures or portions of
structures that comply with the requirements of the
•
•
Ordinance Number 1579
applicable chapter in Appendix A shall be deemed to
comply with the requirements for reduced building code
• force levels.
2.1. The seismic evaluation and design of unreinforced
masonry bearing wall buildings in Occupancy
Category I or II are permitted to be based on the
procedures specified in Appendix Chapter A1.
2.2. Seismic evaluation and design of the wall
anchorage system in reinforced concrete and
reinforced masonry wall buildings with flexible
diaphragms in Occupancy Category I or II are
permitted to be based on the procedures specified
in Appendix Chapter A2.
2.3. Seismic evaluation and design of cripple walls and
sill plate anchorage in residential buildings of light-
frame wood construction in Occupancy Category I
or II are permitted to be based on the procedures
specified in Appendix Chapter A3.
2.4. Seismic evaluation and design of soft, weak, or
open-front wall conditions in multiunit residential
buildings of wood construction in Occupancy
Category I or II are permitted to be based on the
procedures specified in Appendix Chapter A4.
2.5. Seismic evaluation and design of concrete
buildings and concrete with masonry infill buildings
• in all Occupancy Categories are permitted to be
based on the procedures specified in Appendix
Chapter A5.
3. In accordance with ASCE 31 based on the applicable
performance level as shown in Table 3403.5.1.2.
4. Those associated with the BSE-1 Earthquake Hazard
Level defined in ASCE 41 and the performance level as
shown in Table 3403.5.1.2. Where ASCE 41 is used, the
design spectral response acceleration parameters Sxs
and Sx1 shall not be taken less than 75 percent of the
respective design spectral response acceleration
parameters SDS and SD1 defined by the International
Building Code and its reference standards.
3403.5.1.4 Wind Design. Wind design of existing buildings shall
be based on the procedures specified in the building code.
3403.5.2 Repairs to damaged buildings. Repairs to damaged
buildings shall comply with this section.
3403.5.2.1 Unsafe conditions. Regardless of the extent of
structural damage, unsafe conditions shall be eliminated.
3403.5.2.2 Substantial structural damage to vertical
elements of the lateral-force-resisting system. A building
that has sustained substantial structural damage to the vertical
• elements of its lateral-force-resisting system shall be evaluated
and repaired in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Section 3403.5.2.2.1 through 3403.5.2.2.3.
Ordinance Number 1579
3403.5.2.2.1 Evaluation. The building shall be evaluated by
a registered design professional, and the evaluation findings
shall be submitted to the Building Official. The evaluation •
shall establish whether the damaged building, if repaired to
its pre-damage state, would comply with the provisions of
the building code. Wind foroes for this evaluation shall be
those prescribed in the building code. Seismic forces for this
evaluation are permitted to be the reduced level seismic
forces specified in Code Section 3403.5.1.3.
3403.5.2.2.2 Extent of repair for compliant buildings. If
the evaluation establishes compliance of the pre-damage
building in accordance with Section 3403.5.2.2.1, then
repairs shall be permitted that restore the building to its pre-
damage state, using materials and strengths that existed
prior to the damage.
3403.5.2.2.3 Extent of repair for non-compliant buildings.
If the evaluation does not establish compliance of the pre-
damage building in accordance with Section 3403.5.2.2.1,
then the building shall be rehabilitated to comply with
applicable provisions of the building code for load
combinations including wind or seismic forces. The wind
design level for the repair shall be as required by the building
code in effect at the time of original construction unless the
damage was caused by wind, in which case the design level
shall be as required by the code in effect at the time of
original construction or as required by the building code,
whichever is greater. Seismic forces for this rehabilitation
design shall be those required for the design of the
predamaged building, but not less than the reduced level •
seismic forces specified in Section 3403.5.1.3. New
structural members and connections required by this
rehabilitation design shall comply with the detailing
provisions of the building code for new buildings of similar
structure, purpose, and location.
3403.5.2.3 Substantial structural damage to vertical load-
carrying components. Vertical load-carrying components that
have sustained substantial structural damage shall be
rehabilitated to comply with the applicable provisions for dead
and live loads in the building code. Undamaged vertical load-
carrying components that receive dead or live loads from
rehabilitated components shall also be rehabilitated to carry the
design loads of the rehabilitation design. New structural
members and connections required by this rehabilitation design
shall comply with the detailing provisions of the building code for
new buildings of similar structure, purpose, and location.
3403.5.2.3.1 Lateral force-resisting elements. Regardless
of the level of damage to vertical elements of the lateral
force-resisting system, if substantial structural damage to
vertical load-carrying components was caused primarily by
wind or seismic effects, then the building shall be evaluated
in accordance with Secticn 3403.5.2.2.1 and, if non-
compliant, rehabilitated in accordance with Section
3403.5.2.2.3.
3403.5.2.4 Less than substantial structural damage. For •
damage less than substantial structural damage, repairs shall
be allowed that restore the building to its pre-damage state,
using materials and strengths that existed prior to the damage.
Ordinance Number 1579
New structural members and connections used for this repair
• shall comply with the detailing provisions of the building code for
new buildings of similar structure, purpose, and location.
3403.5.3 Referenced Standards.
Standard
Reference Referenced in Code
Number Title Section Number
ASCE 31-03 Seismic Evaluation of Existing 3403.5.1.1, Table
Buildings 3403.5.1.2, 3403.5.1.3
ASCE 41-06 Seismic Rehabilitation of 3403.5.1.1, 3403.5.1.2,
Existing Buildings Table 3403.5.1.2,
3403.5.1.3"
SECTION 2. Title 9, Public Property, Public Works and Building
Regulations, Chapter 9.60, Building Code, is amended by adding Section
9.60.135, Safety Assessment Placards, to read as follows:
"§ 9.60.135 Safety Assessment Placards
A. Aaolication of Provisions.
The provisions of this chapter are applicable to all buildings and
structures of all occupancies regulated by the City of Seal Beach.
The City Council may extend the provisions as necessary.
B. Definitions.
• For the purposes of this section, the following definition
applies:
1. Safety Assessment a visual, non-destructive
examination of a building or structure for the purpose of
determining the condition for continued occupancy.
C. Safety Assessment Placards.
1. The following Safety Assessment Placards
shall be used to designate the condition for continued occupancy of
buildings or structures.
a. "INSPECTED - Lawful Occupancy
Permitted" shall be posted on any building or structure wherein no
apparent structural hazard has been found and shall not mean that
there is no damage to the building or structure.
b. "RESTRICTED USE" shall be posted on
each damaged building or structure wherein the damage has
resulted in some form of restriction to the continued occupancy.
The Restricted Use placard shall contain a general description of
the type of damage encountered and shall clearly and concisely
note the restrictions on continued occupancy.
c. "UNSAFE - Do Not Enter or Occupy"
shall be posted on each building or structure that has been
damaged such that continued occupancy poses a threat to life,
• health, or safety. No person or persons shall enter a building or
structure on which such a placard has been posted under any
circumstance except safety assessment teams or persons
authorized in writing by the Building Official. The "unsafe - Do Not
Enter or Occupy" placard shall not to be used or constnaed to be a
Ordinance Number 1579
demolition order. The individual who posts such placard shall note
thereon in general terms the type of damage encountered. •
2. Every Safety Assessment Placard shall cite
this section number, and include the City's name, address, and
phone number.
3. Once a Safety Assessment Placard has been
attached to a building or structure, it shall not be removed, altered
or covered except by an authorized representative of the Building
Official. ft shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to
alter, remove, cover, obscure, or deface a Safety Assessment
Placard unless authorized pursuant to this section.
4. The form of Safety Assessment Placard shall
be substantially the same as follows:
(Intentionally Left Blank) •
•
• •
INSPECTED
LAWFUL OCCUPANCY PERMITTED
This structure has been inspected (as indicated Date:
below) and no apparent structural hazard has been
found. Time:
^ Inspected Exterior Only
^ Inspected Exterior and Interior
Report any unsafe condition to local authorities;
reinspection may be required.
Inspector comments:
Facility Name and Address:
(Caution: Aftershocks since inspection
may increase damage and risk)
This facility was inspected under
emergency conditions by:
City of Seal Beach
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 431-2527
Inspector I D/Agency:
Do Not Remove, Alter or Cover this Placard until Authorized by the Building Official
(Municipal Code Section 9.60.135)
DS -Ord #1579 - Repair and Reconstruction - Placards.2
RESTRICTED USE
Caution: This structure has been inspected and
found to be damaged as described below:
Entry, occupancy, and lawful use are
restricted as indicated below
^ Do not enter the following areas:
^ Brief entry allowed for access to
contents:
^ Other restrictions:
Date:
Time:
(Caution: Aftershocks since inspection may
increase damage and risk)
This facility was inspected under emergency
conditions by:
City of Seal Beach
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 431-2527
Inspector ID/Agency:
Facility Name and Address:
Do Not Remove, Alter or Cover this Placard until Authorized by the Building Official
(Municipal Code Section 9.60.135)
DS -Ord #1579 -Repair and Reconstruction - Placards.2
• • •
• •
UNSAFE
DO NOT ENTER OR OCCUPY
(THIS PLACARD IS NOT A DEMOLITION ORDER)
Caution: This structure has been
inspected, found to be seriously damaged
and is unsafe to occupy as described
below:
Do not enter, except
authorized in writing
Seal Beach. Entry
death or injury.
Facility Name and Address:
as specifically
by the City of
may result in
Date:
Time:
This facility was inspected under
emergency conditions by:
City of Seal Beach
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 431-2527
Inspector I D/Agency:
Do Not Remove, Alter or Cover this Placard until Authorized by the Building Official
(Municipal Code Section 9.60.135
DS -Ord #1579 -Repair and Reconstruction - Placanis.2
Ordinance Number 1579
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, •
clause or phrase of this ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be
invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance or any part hereof. The City Council of the City of Seal Beach hereby
declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision,
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one
or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or
phrases be declared invalid.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the day of .2008.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, California do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading at a meeting held on •
the 11th day of Auaust , 2008 and was passed, approved and adopted
by the City Council at a meeting held on the day of 2008 by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
And do hereby further certify that Ordinance Number 1579 has been published
pursuant to the Seal Beach City Charter and Resolution Number 2836.
City Clerk
C