Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1985-06-05 SEA' .EACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGEND~ Clty Council Chambers 211 Elghth Street Seal Beach, Callfornla -- The Seal Beach Plann~ng COlll11lJ.ss~on meets ~n sess~on ever!J f~rst and th~rd Wednesday of each month at 7.30 P m If !Jou w~sh to address the Comm~ss~on on an!J part~cular publ~c hearJng ~tem, the Cha~rman w~ll call for publ~c test~mony f~rst for those ~n favor of the proJect, and second, for those who are not ~n favor. When you see that the speaker' s pos~ t~on ~n the center of the room ~s unoccup~ed, step up to the lIIJ.crophone and when recogn~zed by the Cha~rman, speak d~rectl!J ~nto the lIIJ.crophone b!J f~rst stat~ng !Jour name and address clearly and d~st~nctly for the records. State !Jour bus~ness as clearly and succ~nctly as poss~ble and then wa~t a moment to see ~f the COmmJ.ss~oners have an!J quest~ons ~n regard to your comments or quest~ons. If there are no other quest~ons or comments, return to !Jour seat so that the next person may address the COlll11lJ.ss~on If you w~sh to address the COlll11lJ.ss~on on matters other than publ~c hear~ngs, the agenda prov~des for that t~me when the Cha~rman asks for comments from the publ~c Address the COlll11lJ.ss~on ~n the same manner as stated for publ~c hear~ngs, always stat~ng your name and address f~rst. JUNE 5, 1985 NEXT RESOLUTION #1379 1. Pledge of AlleglanCe 2. Roll Call 3 Report from Secretary 4. Consent Calendar - At thlS tlme, members of the publlC may present testlmony to the Commlsslon as to why any ltem should be removed from the consent calendar for a full and separate publlC hearlng Unless a Commlssloner requests a full publ,c hearlng, all consent agenda ltems wlll be acted upon on one summary vote (A) Mlnutes of May 15, 1985 5. PubllC Hearlngs (A) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-85 C-ll Surfslde Resolutlon #1376 A request to permlt structural lmprovements to an eXlstlng legal non-conformlng resldence, located In Dlstrlct III (Surfslde). Envlronmental Revlew The proJect lS categorlcally exempt from Envlronmental Revlew [Callfornla Government Code Sectlon 15303(e)]. Code Sectlons. 25-506 (7), 28-2503 Appllcant Dorothy B. Hllton Owner Same (B) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8-85 12121 Seal Beach Blvd Resolutlon #1377 A request to adopt a planned slgn program for the Rossmoor Buslness Center. The submltted slgn program lncludes the use of flve 32 ft hlgh pylon slgns and one 24 ft. hlgh center ldentlflcatlon slgn, 12121 Seal Beach Blvd. _. EnVlronmental Revlew The proJect lS categorlcally exempt from Envlronmental Revlew [Callfornla Government Code Sectlon 15311(a)] Code Sectlon 28-1803, 28-2503 Appllcant Rossmoor Buslness Center Owner Century Natlonal Propertles, Inc (The appllcant has requested that thlS ltem be contlnued and rescheduled to a later date.) June 5, 1985 COMMISSION AGENDA e Page 2 (C) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9-85 1217 Seal Way Resolutlon #1378 A request to allow a second story addltlon to an eXlstlng non-conformlng bUlldlng, located In the R-3 (Hlgh Denslty Resldentlal) Zone. Envlronmental Revlew The proJect lS categorlcally exempt from Envlronmental Revlew [Callfornla Government Code Sectlon 15303(e)]. Code Sectlons 28-804, 28-2503 Appllcant Phllllp Allen Owner. Joseph Mueth/Wllllam Bennett (Agent) (D) ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 3-85 Resolutlon #1369 - A request to amend speclflc standards, crlterla and regulatlons on the placement and lnstallatlon of fences and walls. (Contlnued from May 1, 1985) Envlronmental Revlew Negatlve Declaratlon 4-85 has been prepared In lleu Impact Report. Appllcant Clty of Seal Beach (E) ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2-85 333 Maln Street (Char-o-Chlcken) A request to reverse an admlnlstratlve declslon seeklng the removal of a wrought lron ralllng WhlCh was constructed upon a Clty sldewalk. Code Sectlons. Seal Beach Munlclpal Code 14-9 Appllcant M.H. Bonakdar Owner Patrlcla Jones (Staff requests wlthdrawal of thlS appllcatlon) (F) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6-85 223 Maln Street (N1Ck's Dell) A request to permlt on-sale beer and Wlne In conJunctlon wlth an eXlstlng walk-ln/take-out restaurant (Dell) - (N1Ck's Dell). - EnVlronmental Revlew. ThlS proJect lS categorlcally exempt from Envlronmental Revlew [Callfornla Government Code 15301] Code Sectlons 28-1300 (a), 28-2503 Appllcant Domlnlc Zamplno Owner Charles and Vlrglnla Burroughs (The appllcant has requested thlS ltem be contlnued and renotlced In conJunctlon wlth an addltlonal appllcatlon for the June 19, 1985 meetlng). 1 June 5, 1985 COMMISSION AGENDA . Page 3 6. Scheduled Matters The publlC may speak at the dlscretlon of the Commlsslon A Clty Councll request for report pursuant to Sectlon 28-2513 upon Councll approval of Appeal 1-85 & 3-85 flled by Tlny Naylor's. 7. Commlsslon Requests 8 Oral Communlcatlon from the Audlence 9. Commlsslon Communlcatlons 10 AdJournment Agenda Forecast June 19, 1985 -Varlance 5-85 (Resubmlttal) Zember Constructlon - 550 Ocean -Condltlonal Use Permlt 6-85 Varlance 9-85 - N1Ck's Dell - 223 Maln St -Condltlonal Use Permlt 10-85 West Beach Llquor -Condltlonal Use Permlt 12-85 Varlance 8-85 Dan Sulllvan - 1510 Marlne -Zonlng Text Amendment 5-85 Zonlng Appeal Procedures -Condltlonal Use Permlt 13-85 Seal Beach/21 (Bay Motel) - 201 Seal Beach Blvd e PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 1985 . The Seal Beach Planning Commisslon met in regular seSSlon at 7:39 p.m. with Chalrman Jessner calling the meeting to order. Commissloner Perrln lead the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Jessner Commlssioners: Covington, Hunt, Perrin Absent: Also Present: Commissloner Ripperdan John M. Baucke, Dlrector of Development Services Dana Ogdon, Administrative Aide REPORT FROM SECRETARY Mr. Baucke, Commisslon Secretary, lndicated there were three ltems on the agenda that Staff would like to discuss. The first item, Conditlonal Use Permit 8-85, Rossmoor Business Center, the applicant has requested to continue thlS ltem at the Planning Commlssion meeting of June 19, 1985. Secondly, based on discusslon with the City Attorney's office, staff requested that Administratlve Appeal 2-85 be withdrawn and the abatement hearings to be set by the Public Works Department before the City Council for this particular item. The last ltem was a request for contlnuance of Conditional Use Permit 6-85, Nick's Dell, 223 Maln St., to the next Planning Commission meeting of June 19, 1985 per the applicant's request. It was staff's request to not open the public hearing for any of these ltems until the date continued. e Commlssloner Covington moved to continue the public hearlng on Conditional Use Permlt 8-85 to the June 19, 1985 Plannlng Commlssion meetlng. Commissioner Perrin seconds. AYES: Covington, Hunt, Jessner, Perrin NOES: None Motion Carried Commissloner Covington moved to withdraw Administratlve Appeal 2-85 as requested. Commlssioner Perrin seconds. AYES: Covington, Hunt, Jessner, Perrln NOES: None Motion Carried Commissioner Perrln moved to continue the public hearing on Condltlonal Use Permlt 6-85 to the June 19, 1985 Planning Commisslon meeting. Commissioner Covlngton seconds. AYES: Covlngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perrin NOES: None Motion Carried CONSENT CALENDAR There was one ltem on the consent calendar for the Commlsslon's consideratlon: 1) The minutes of the May 15, 1985 Planning Commission meetlng. The minutes were corrected as follows: Page 3, Item B, Line 8 after "additional language" correct spelling on "WS" to "was". Page 4, first sentence at top of page, amend "approved" to "approve". - Commissioner Covington moved to approve the minutes of the May 15, 1985 Planning Commlsslon meeting as corrected. Commissioner Perrln seconds. AYES: Covlngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perrin NOES: None Motlon Carried Plann1ng Commission Meeting of June 5, 1985 Page 2 e PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-85/C-11 SURFSIDE Dana Ogdon, Administrative Aide, presented the staff report for the Commiss10n's cons1deration. He indicated that this item was a request to permit structural improvements to an existing legal non-conform1ng residence located in Distr1ct III, Surfside. Mr. Ogdon outlined the facts relat1ng to the subJect property. referencing dimensions and the various Code Sections which apply to this 1tem. He p01nted out that Surfs1de has its own set of zoning regulat10ns which are set apart from other residential uses in Seal Beach, and he made reference to those sect10ns. It was staff's recommendation that should Cond1tional Use Perm1t 7-85 be approved by the Plann1ng Commission, there should be a correction of the existing parking space in order to provide the required parking depth of 20 ft., 7 ft. he1ght and 9 ft. width in conjunction with any proposed enlargement of the building. Staff's recommendation was for denial of CUP 7-85 without prejudice, to enable the applicant to make corrections for resubmittal to the Planning Comm1ssion. . Cha1rman Jessner declares the public hearing open. Bill Bruton, B-61 Surfside, general contractor for the applicant, Dorothy Hilton, spoke on her behalf. He stated that the arch1tect made a good attempt to sat1sfy the requ1rements 1ndicated by staff, and that neither he nor his client wanted to have to come before the Commission on this issue. He d1scussed the various compli- cated 1ssues of this item with the Comm1ssion. Mr. Bruton explained the difficulty 1nvolved in the structural alterations that would have to be made in order to come into compliance. As no other members of the audience spoke in favor of nor 1n opposition to this proposal, Chairman Jessner closed the public hearing. Chairman Jessner requested clarification from Staff as to the requ1red depth of the parking stall. Mr. Baucke stated that staff did not have any obJect10n to the 8.5 ft. dimension for interior width. Mr. Jessner also expressed concern over this 1ssue being affected once ZTA 2-84 has passed. Mr. Baucke indicated that th1s amendment was not applicable to Surfside. Commissioner Covington stated tofue Comm1ss10n that their Judgement for th1s applicat10n must be based on the current code. The Comm1ssion cont1nued discussion of the utility area and requested staff's input as to what would be acceptable dimensions on the parking depth. Mr. Baucke stated that the 8.5 ft. 1nterior w1dth of the stall with a park1ng space depth of 20 ft. and 7 ft. height would be acceptable to staff. Commissioner Covington moved that CUP 7-85 be adopted and that staff prepare a resolut10n with the following conditions: 1) the garage space d1mensions would be 8.5 ft. w1de, 20 ft. long and 7ft. h1gh; 2) the area shown as utility be shown as a utility area portion of the kitchen and the sliding door that separates the utility area from the rest of the k1tchen is acceptable; and 3) the kitchen expansion 1S perm1ssible since it is an enlargement of the eX1sting kitchen. Mr. Perr1n seconds. AYES: Cov1ngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perr1n NOES: None Mot10n Carried e PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9-85 - 1217 SEAL WAY Staff report, presented by Mr. Baucke, 1ndicated that th1s item was a request by the app11cant, Mr. Phil11p Allen, to allow a second story addition to an existing non-conforming build1ng located in the R-3 Zone. Mr. Baucke presented specifications of the property to the Commission and expla1ned that the applicant requested this conditional use permit because a second story was necessry an ocean/beach viewwhenthe e e e P1ann1ng Comm1ss10n Meet1ng of June 5, 1985 Page 3 berm lS 1n place. He stated that th1S property has several substant1a1 non- conform1ng lssues Wh1Ch set 1t apart from tYP1ca1 conform1ng propert1es. Mr. Baucke noted that these add1t10ns to the property would e11m1nate or postpone the necessary conformance of the property, and he went on to present these nonconform1ng lssues and the1r surround1ng res1dent1a1 1mpacts to the Comm1ss10n for the1r cons1derat10n. D1Scuss10n cont1nued between staff and the Comm1ss10n referenc1ng 1ntrus10ns 1nto the rear yard setback and street entry garages, both lssues Wh1Ch relate to th1S property. It was staff's recommendat10n that the P1ann1ng Comm1ss10n accept and approve one of the fo110w1ng opt10ns: 1) Deny CUP 9-85 as subm1tted; 2) Deny CUP 9-85 w1thout preJud1ce so that the owner may resubm1t plans w1th correct10ns; 3) Approve CUP 9-85 w1th the fo110w1ng cond1t10ns: a) The eX1st1ng garage be reor1ented so as to access the alley and not 13th Street. b) All rear setback requ1rements be met 1n conformance w1th Sect10n 28-801 of the Mun1c1pa1 Code. Cha1rman Jessner expressed concern about th1S app11cat10n and how the approval of ZTA 2-84 may affect th1S lssue. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated that based on the current code, th1S property would fall under the category of maJor add1t10ns Wh1Ch requ1res that the property be brought 1nto conformance. Staff 1nd1cated that the1r recommendat10n for den1a1 would be the same 1f ZTA 2-84 were to be approved. Mr. Hunt felt that the aesthet1cs d1d not really apply here; there 1S no street park1ng on 13th Steet currently because 1t lS red-11ned. Comm1ss10ner Perr1n stated that th1S lssue really comes down to the fact that th1S lS not code. Cha1rman Jessner declares the pub11c hear1ng open. Ph1111P Allen, 1015 Gay1ey St., Los Angeles, app11cant and buyer of the property, spoke 1n reference to h1S past exper1ence 1n the C1ty of Seal Beach. He presented to the Comm1ss10n the reasons for the structural a1terat10ns and h1S 11mtat10ns 1n trY1ng to come 1nto conformance. Mr. Allen addressed the safety lssue stat1ng that there was no traff1c/safety lssue here. It was Mr. Allen's op1n10n that th1S proJect w111 do more for the commun1ty 1n the long run and that there were spec1a1 C1rcumstances 1nvo1ved 1n th1S 1ssue. The subJect property lS one of two slng1e-fam11y, slng1e-story res1dences on the beach. It lS a beach front home and Mr. Allen stated that he would 11ke to have an ocean V1ew. He also 1nd1cated that should there be a repeat of the 1983 flood, he would want a second story on th1S corner. Mr. Allen then made h1mse1f ava11ab1e to the Comm1ss10n for quest10ns. Mr. Jessner expressed concern once aga1n regard1ng ZTA 2-84 and found 1t d1ff1cu1t to support th1S app11cat10n due to the fact that th1S proJect would st111 be 1n non-conformance should ZTA 2-84 be approved. W1111am Bennett, Century 21 Pac1f1c Coast Realty, agent for Joseph Mueth, owner/seller, spoke 1n favor of th1S proposal and stated that after rev1ew1ng ZTA 2-84, he found that the Comm1ss10n st111 has the power to grant th1S CUP. He exp1a1ned that Mr. Allen w111 not be able to acqu1re th1S property 1f 1t lS not econom1ca11y feas1b1e Wh1Ch 1t would not be 1f the CUP was den1ed. Mr. Bennett stated that th1S was a non-hazardous sltuat10n, and the eX1st1ng non-alley use lS the most pract1ca1. He also 1nd1cated to that there has been no Oppos1t10n heard from surround1ng res1dences or from the aud1ence here ton1ght. Mr. Hunt 1nd1cated that he went by the property before he came to the meet1ng to see what the sltuat10n was there. He not1ced several cars parked 1n the alley where there were legal setbacks. It was Mr. Hunt's fee11ng that th1S lS tYP1ca1 and that conformance for the sake of conformance lS not good unless 1t serves the general welfare. Comm1ss10ner Hunt was 1n favor of the slde entry off of 13th St. He stated he could not support den1a1 of th1S proposal because he d1d not feel there was a safety hazard 1nvo1ved. As no other members of the aud1ence spoke 1n favor of nor 1n Oppos1t10n to th1S lssue, Cha1rman Plannlng Commlsslon Meetlng of June 5, 1985 Page 4 Jessner closed the publlC hearlng. tit Mr. Covlngton requested staff to clarlfy a statement In the staff report under the sectlon tltled "Intrustlons lnto the Rear Yard Setback" whlch lndlcated that any structural devlatlon that eXlsts wlth thlS property to the requlred rear yard setback presents a potentlally hazardous sltuatlon to the surroundlng nelghborhood. Mr. Baucke substantlated thlS statement wlth a concern he had been made aware of by Joe Rlbal who owns the nelghborlng property. Mr. Rlbal lndlcated to staff that he had been almost hlt a number of tlmes backlng out of hlS rear alley access garage based on lack of vlsablllty due to thlS partlcular structure. Commlssloner Perrln moved to deny CUP 9-85 wlthout preJudlce. Mr. Covlngton seconds the motlon wlth the followlng preface: That all rear setback requlrements be met as establlshed In Sectlon 28-801 of the Munlclpal Code In any resubmltted proposal. AYES: NOES: Covlngton, Jessner, Perrln Hunt Motlon Carrled After the motlon had been carrled, Wllllam Bennett requested clarlflcatlon from the Commlsslon and staff as to the condltlons of the denlal. Mr. Covlngton conflrmed the wordlng of the denlal. e ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 3-85 Mr. Baucke presented the staff report for thlS ltem, a request to amend speclflc standards, crlterla and regulatlons on the placement and lnstallatlon of fences, walls and screen plantlngs and referred back to the May 1, 1985 Plannlng Commlsslon meetlng at WhlCh thlS amendment was orlglnally proposed. It was the concensus of the Commlsslon at thlS meetlng to postpone thlS ltem so to allow staff to conslder the comments recelved and declde lf any amendments to the proposed ordlnance should be made. Staff presented the revlsed ordlnance to the Commlsslon statlng that the amendment would address the concerns and comments recelved at the May 1, 1985 Commlsslon meetlng. It was staff's recommendatlon to adopt ZTA 3-85 as revlsed. Mr. Covlngton requested lnput from staff as to whether or not standards used In ZTA 3-85 were conslstent wlth other cltles. Mr. Baucke lndlcated that many of these requlrements were standard and noted others that were more restrlctlve than In other cltles. Chalrman Jessner declared the publlC hearlng open. No members of the audlence spoke In favor of nor In Opposltlon to thlS ltem. Chalrman Jessner closed the publlC hearlng. D1Scusslon contlnued between staff and the Commlsslon regardlng varlOUS sectlons of the revlsed ordlnance. Commlssloner Perrln moved to approve Negatlve Declaratlon 4-85. Covlngton seconds. AYES: NOES: Covlngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perrln None Motlon Carrled e Commlssloner Perrln moved to approve ZTA 3-85 by adoptlon of Resolutlon 1369. Mr. Hunt seconds. AYES: NOES: Covlngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perrln None Motlon Carrled - e e Plann1ng Comm1ss1on Meet1ng of June 5, 1985 Page 5 SCHEDULED MATTERS There was one 1tem scheduled for the Comm1ss1on's cons1derat1on: 1) C1ty Counc1l's request for report pursuant to Sec. 28-2513 upon Counc1l's approval of Appeal 1-85 & 3-85, T1ny Naylor's, Inc. Mr. Baucke presented th1S matter to the Comm1ss1on g1v1ng a br1ef background on the or1g1n of th1S 1tem. Staff's recommendat1on was to d1rect the Cha1rman to draft a response to the Counc1l on the appeals. It was the general concern of the Comm1ss1on that when the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on makes a mot1on to deny w1thout preJud1ce, enabl1ng the appl1cant to come back before the Comm1ss1on, many appl1cants are appeal1ng to the C1ty Counc1l Wh1Ch 1S defeat1ng the purpose of the publ1C hear1ng port1on of the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on. Mr. Cov1ngton made a request that the C1ty Counc1l agendas referenc1ng these appeals be prov1ded to the Comm1ss1oners so that they may attend the Counc1l meet1ngs and address the 1ssues expla1n1ng why such a course of act10n was taken. It was the concensus of the Comm1ss1on and so d1rected by Cha1r for staff to prepare a resolut1on for th1S 1ssue and that 1t be brought back to the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on at the June 19, 1985 meet1ng. Cha1rman Jessner quest10ned what the bas1s of T1ny Naylor's appeal was. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated there were 2 maJor factors Wh1Ch happened after the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on's act1on: 1) the land ownersh1P dropped h1S protest of the appl1cant's proposed landscape 1mprovement as rev1sed and 2) the appl1cant presented a rev1sed landscape plan conta1n1ng the maJor concepts of the pr10r plan, but rece1ved the property owner's approval. It wasthe Cha1rman's recommendat1on that each 1nd1v1dual member of the Comm1ss1on subm1t a letter to h1m w1th1n one week so that a report summary may be comp1led and presented at the next meet1ng. Th1S would allow t1me to prepare a response for C1ty Counc1l. Cha1r d1rected the Comm1ss1on to prepare a response by the follow1ng Wednesday, June 12, 1985, and 1f a response was not rece1ved, 1t would be assumed that the Comm1ss1oner d1d not w1sh to make one. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated to the Comm1ss1on that C1ty Counc1l has requested the C1ty Attorney to amend the port1on of the code sect10n 1nvolv1ng referral back on appeals Wh1Ch spec1f1cally removes the referral back request presently 1n the code. Mr. Cov1ngton requested that staff prov1des the Comm1ss1on at the June 19, 1985 Plann1ng Comm1ss1on meet1ng mater1al that w1ll prov1de the Comm1ss1on w1th the follow1ng: 1) the state's requ1rements for general law c1t1es 1n th1S area 2) a reasonable survey of what the procedures are for surround1ng c1t1es on th1S 1ssue. COMMISSION REQUESTS Comm1ss1oner Cov1ngton requested a status of ~he Hellman Property. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated that there are some developers st1ll negot1at1ng w1th the Hellman fam1ly. There was a meet1ng held w1th two Hellman fam1ly members, the1r attorney, f1nanc1al adv1sor, Mr. Baucke and Allen Parker. At that t1me, 1t was agreed that pursuant to what the C1ty des1red, a development constra1nt analys1s would be prepared based on env1ronmental factors so to determ1ne the feas1b1l1ty of development of the property. Mr. Cov1ngton and Mr. Baucke d1scussed the 1000 un1t l1m1tat1on and the status of the rev1sed spec1f1c plan. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated that the zon1ng text amendment request to adopt the spec1f1c plan procedures and spec1f1c plan regulat10n zones w1ll go before the C1ty Counc1l on June 24, 1985. Cha1rman Jessner d1scussed w1th staff the 111egal curb park1ng 1n Safeway Center 1n the f1re lanes and requested a status of the efforts be1ng taken to enforce the laws regulat1ng th1S. Mr. Baucke 1nd1cated that the present veh1cle code and f1re code requ1res the placement of s1gns and the Orange County F1re Department e e e Plannlng CommlSSlon Meetlng of June 5, 1985 Page 6 has requested the Center to do so. Staff noted that the Flre Department wlll be reportlng to staff on the status of the efforts that are belng taken. Mr. Covlngton stated that he would llke to have thlS report by the next Commlsslon meetlng so that lt can be lncluded wlth the flnal report sent to Councll on the appeals. Chalrman Jessner moved that staff lnvestlgate the State, County and local flre lane requlrements wlth the flre and pollce departments for the Seal Beach Center and asslst those departments In establlshlng, malntalnlng and enforclng flre lane requlrements In accordance wlth the laws requlrlng them. Covlngton seconds. AYES: NOES: Covlngton, Hunt, Jessner, Perrln None Motlon Carrled ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no oral communlcatlons. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS There were no Commlsslon Communlcatlons. ADJOURNMENT It was the concensus of the Commlsslon and so ordered by Chalr to adJourn the regularly scheduled meetlng of the Plannlng Commlsslon at 10:16 p.m. ;;rUL~JJL ~ecordlng Secretary