HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Min 1986-03-19
/
':'
~.
'.-
..".
--
\
\
: .
.-' -_.'.........
'il.'>. '1i.N' ....i-~:::\r -;~"I\.L BEACH'~t'ANNING.'coMMlssloN AGr.'-:~
. ':'j ~:j";:'..';'.' .'. . ~ . :. <:;:;' ." .'...' .. t;ity to~nC11':Cham~ers
;" .' ....: :-.. '. ... 21l."El'ghth Street..
.:1.:. ....... :."'I::'~ .... .'...'-' '.Sea" Beach~'.:'c~lif.(jrhia... ..,'
. .' . :~ '..:. . . . . ..... : . . ......: ." . .'.
..~~.~:..~~j::.:j~~~if~~~~f'ff.~.s;~cm':~i~...~~;~~~~1~~...eve;y first and ~1;d' Ji~~~sday of ~~ch
: '. .~~~J.~ :?::.3!:'1.:~:".~~~ .~~. u. '!'.1s~. ,-~o'. ..~~te.S/l.t-~~.~ -C011itiii.ssion on any part~cular public hea,r!ng
'. ,:tteJll; <-tlie::~l'1'llla;rjiJl11 . ':''10 ~.,: test1mony first for those in favor of . the pro)ect, '.
. 'liiJi:ji'see.dndi;~~:"~lllt. . l'l:f '.'f'avr;i~.:. ~Jihen- you .see that the speaker's Pas1tion 1n the '.
: ce'nt;ei:.~.~{:~~~,i.~~.~~4.:..,~~. .~/~~; '-ip/.~e. microphon~ and when recognized by ~e. : _ ..'.,.: '. -_
. C~~~~'~l;~I' r~~"~!-ffC!.~'1.,,:'1.1Jt~ ~;~~o~~'1~;:b!.'.:-:f~rst stahng your name ~nd address c~_~rly" .' :.: ..:.:..,
and..djst:i.ncf "t'o:t"..':t1;fi'trecori:flS~,.t.'Sf.t~v:go,u~:.bus~ness as clearly and succuwtly as poss~ble' . ..... ,.;;.
; ., . and' .ti$ii::~iI' .;:~.~12t-::~;;.iSeti"'- ":-dEr.'C~iS'ibners have any questions in regard to your' ,'. '.; \'.;
. .~'. ~iifs".C;i;'~$tiOhi~i:/:ij""'" ,~?G'::;;O'.btiier questions or COlIIIIIents, return to your seat
. . ~o! ~t:. th'.._~~y;::"'iieijfBon' 'fiiari<:a~~te~s :.~;~e.. C6miz!,i~~ion ~ .
. ". .., .:. t~l'l".:":':')'i=:",':' ':,,';.'.:/;: '.,~.. .~~ . .~-'...,'t..~' :~ ~,\':.,'.:.I ~"" ..:'....\.....
. . ~f:,.~~u ~~~:~~~,~~~~*~j,~~r.1ii<~n. *+;tt'irrother than public hearings, the agenda
. _' 'prot/'jdes,..M. 'tJiil.t ;.'t~inj(w1i(;!n ,'thlt. Clia1rIlJ/l1l,'.aSks for COlIIIIIents from the public. Address' the
. ." ..... .'C~'1ri#'~'ir'iiJ';~!'.''s&'~er;~':s.~;~W:;'~(P':'bli.c hear1ngs, alwalls stat1ag your name and
. ';dir.s.~~~~~~i'::_ ~~."~:'" .. ...... :..:' .:: ':;.;........:.,; . '.:... .
.;.;;-.; :'..;]~ J: . .
::'1':, ~,f
... : .,
"Ilia'rch '19:,' 1986
Next Resolution #1416
.. ~ 't.. ~
. ~.. .
.. . . 1 , . f!!~n'~2LA!i!l!!!nu
..' . .:. .
2 . : 'B'~!l~~~!.~~.': '.. .
":: :N:, ;; .:. .i~ioI~j~'~~;." s~c'~etarl
-- - .~. ~-----------
4. .' '~2i!'!!nL~!!!!Q.!t!!!:
. \ . . . . . \;' "\ . .~. f:" '. .
'A, Mi~~t~~..of' March 5. 1986,
0, . ., ri ", . I : \.: ~ . :
5. ~!!J!l,lLII!!![!nl!.
..~.:. , ::~ 'I ~..t
:"r t~. ~~ .~ .:
. . :. .'. .~. " " l' ': .
. ~:~'.: ~ONINt TEXT AMENDMENT 1-86
I. . --'.....-------------------------
A request .'to change the titles of zones
currenti,y class i f 1 ed as R-l. R-2 and R-3
to RLD.' (Residential' Low Density), RMD
.(~eside~~i~l Medium' Densityl, RHD
(Residential High Density),
.: '" .~..
'Environmental Review: Negative
Declaration 3-86 has been prepared in
lieu of an Environmental Impact Report.
Applicant: City of Seal Beach
"'('<"["0'"" t" ,,.'-'1: ~':,:
i'Z./ ~1... i:. :....~" 1:.. Io' ,~.)4 .~ 16.
!~lIg~Y'I~_!AIIgR~.
}. .~ .":, ,':
A.
A request. on procedures for
p~~ces~jng alcohol requests within
'the' ~i ty,
".' . \.
," ~ .~ :. .
., ..
~Q!!i!!!Q!_RlgYg!I!
QRA~_~Q!!YH!~AI!QH!
~Qi!!!!!QH_~Q!!YH!~AI!Q!~
A~lQYR!nHI
:~ :\
,,~P':
8', .
:fl.l!,.
;.>;!
9.
:~.;r.:~ !
','
10.
../
.
.
.
'-'
/ '
., .
/
"t
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MARCH 19. 1986
PAGE 2 .
A. YARIANCE 1-86 (CONT.)
Code Sections: 28-1402. 28-2311. 28-1403. 28-2500
Environmental Review: This project is categorically
exempt from Environmental Review [California Govern-
ment Code Section 15301(e)].
Applicant: Tom Schuveiller/Brian Kyle
Owner: Same
B. VARIANCE 3-86 (Watson) Resolu~ion #1414
350 Ocean Ave.
A request to allow a structural addition to a legal
non-conforming building to intrude into the required
sideyard setback.
Environmental Review: This project is categorically
exempt from Environmental Review [California Government
Code Section 15301(e)(I).
Code Section: 28-401(6). 28-2500
Applicant: James R. Watson
Owner: Same
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 19-85 Resolution #1416 & 1417
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-1002 (85-322)
210 8th Street
A request to convert an existing two-story duplex
into two condominium units. .
Environmental Review: This project is categorically
,exempt from Environmental Review [California Public
Resources Code 15301. Class I(K)].
Code Sections: 28-700(3)(b). 28-2503
Applicant: Wesley & Mercedes Cleary
Owner: Same
D.' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1-86 Resolution #1413
921 Pacific Coast Hwy.
(Seal Beach Center)
A request to permit a planned sign program for the
Seal Beach Center.
Code Sections: 28-1803. 28-2503
Environmental Review: This project is categorically
exempt fron Environmental Review [California Government
Code Section 15301].
Owner: Seal Beach Center
Applicant: Same
6. SCHEDULED MATTERS
7. COMMISSION REQUESTS
8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
9. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT
Agenda Forecast: April 16. 1986
-Variance 5-86. CUP 8-86 & 9-86
Corky's - 909 Ocean Ave.
-Variance 4-86 - Marsh - 209 14th St.
-Plan Review 6-86
Buckerfield/Allen - 1101 Seal Way
-.
-
e
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
MARCH 19. 1986
The Seal Beach Planning Commission met in !~gYl!! session at 7:30
p.m. with Chairman Jessner calling the meeting to order.
Commissioner Hunt led the Salute to the Flag.
RQ!:.!:._g,A!:.!:.
Present:
Chairman Jessner
Commissioners Covington, Hunt, Perrin,
Ripperdan
Absent:
None
Also Present:
John M. Baucke. Director of Development
Services
RgfQR!_ERQM_~gg,Rg!ARY
Mr. Baucke, Commission Secretary,
items to report:
indicated that there were two
Variance Request 3-86 for Jim Watson. Mr. Baucke requested that
this item be continued to the April 16th meeting at Mr. Watson's
request.
Mr. Ripperdan moved to
April 16. 1986 Planning
seconds.
continue Variance Request 3-86 to the
Commision meeting. Mr. Covington
AYES:
NOES:
Covington, Hunt, Jessner, Perrin. Ripperdan
None Motion Carried
The second item was Resolution #1411.
this item be placed on the agenda as
Matters.
Mr. Baucke requested that
item B under Scheduled
Mr. Ripperdan moved to place Resolution Number 1411 on the
agenda. Mr. Covington seconds.
AYES:
NOES:
Covington, Hunt,
None
Jessner, Perrin. Ripperdan
Motion Carried
g,QN~gN!_g,A!:.gNRAR
There was one item on the Consent Calendar:
1986 Meeting. Chairman Jessner asked
corrections.
Minutes of March 5.
for any additions or
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19. 1986
Page 2
~r. Hunt pointed out that on page 3. paragraph 4. second line of
first sentence. that the word "variance" should be "various".
Chairman Jessner requested that the following words be inserted
on page 8. last sentence of the first paragraph after "Chairman
Jessner": "with Commission concurrance directed staff to take
this suggestion into consideration for the Study Session.".
Mr. Covington moved that the minutes be approved with the changes
indicated. Mr. Hunt seconds.
AYES:
NOES:
Covington. Hunt. Jessner, Perrin, Ripperdan
None Motion Carried
e
~Y~~!Q_HgAR!N~_=_!QN!N~_I~~I_A!~NQM~NI_l=~~
This matter concerns a request from staff to change the title of
zones currently classified as R-1. R-2 and R-3 to RLD
(Residential Low Density), RMD (Residential Medium DenSity) and
RHD (Residential High Density). Mr. Baucke stated that this
request was being made because of confusion as to what the
present designations mean. In one instance. a serious situation
developed when an out-of-town realtor misinterpreted the
designations and this resulted in a lawsuit. He stated the only
change would be in the abbreviations not in their meaning.
Chairman Jessner declared the public hearing open. As no members
of the audience spoke in reference to this item. Chairman Jessner
closed the public hearing.
A discussion followed concerning what designations other cities
use. Mr. Baucke pointed out that often persons assume they know
what R-1. R-2, and R-3 mean which adds to the confusion. He
suggested that by renaming the classifications. people would be
more likely to call the City in order to have the deSignations
explained and this would cut down on confusion. Mr. Covington
questioned whether a term such as "Residential Medium Density"
wasn't just as confusing as R-2. Chairman Jessner asked if it
would be possible to add the minimum number of square feet
required after each deSignation. Mr. Baucke stated there are
different standards within the same deSignation and that there is
no square foot limitation in R-1. for example. just one unit per
legal lot.
e
Mr. Ripperdan pointed out that there are lots zoned R-2 and R-3
with Single families on them. He questioned whether or not the
General Plan should be changed. Mr. Hunt stated that R-l. R-2
and R-3 have been traditionally used and that people don't expect
them to mean exactly what they say. He believed we should stick
to the terms that at least some of the people understand. Mr.
Ripperdan said that if the new designations were used that people
.
e
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19. 1986
Page 3
would call and inquire. Mr. Covington questioned whether it was
appropriate to do this before the General Plan Review
presentation and whether or not it should be a part of the
General Plan study material. Mr. Baucke stated that it was
staff's opinion that approval now would have no affect on the
General Plan and actually makes the zoning designations
consistent with land use designations of the General Plan.
Mr. Hunt asked which system would be more economical for the
City. Mr. Baucke stated that he believed the City would, in the
long term, receive fewer phone calls if the designations were
changed as recommended.
Mr. Covington moved that Negative Declaration 3-86 be approved as
presented. Mr. Hunt seconds.
AYES:
NOES:
Covington. Hunt, Jessner, Perrin, Ripperdan
None Motion Carried
Mr. Covington moved that Zoning Text Amendment 1-86 be approved
by the adoption of Resolution #1415, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF
SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING AND RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 1-86. A REQUEST
TO CHANGE THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THE CITY.
Mr. Hunt seconds.
AYES:
NOES:
Covington, Hunt, Jessner, Perrin, Ripperdan
None Motion Carried
~QH~Q~~~Q_MAII~R~
The first scheduled matter was a report on procedures for
processing alcohol requests within the City. Mr. Baucke stated
that the City Council had adopted a 45 day moratorium in February
on the issuance of any new Conditional Use Permit for sale of
alcohol in the City. A few applications have been placed on hold
pending recommendation from the Planning Commission to the
Council regarding whether our process is sufficient. The City of
Seal Beach presently does it on a case-by-case basis. The
application must provide detailed information such as hours of
operation, method of service, menu, distance from schools.
churches, and residential property. All alcohol uses within 100
feet of a residential area require a Conditional Use Permit but
off-sale uses, such as liquor stores, are required to be 100 feet
outside of residential property, churches and schools and are not
required to come before the Planning Commission.
-
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19, 1986
Page 4
Mr. Baucke stated that he had checked with other cities regarding
how they handled alcohol permit requests. There are two
approaches: 1) to handle these requests as a strictly
administrative matter, and 2) a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
requirement which is what the City of Seal Beach presently has.
Staff also discussed the matter with the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Board (ABC) and with the City Attorney. There is a
question of pre-emption by the State of California in two areas:
limitations on the hours of sale of alcohol and limitations on
the number of licenses in a specific area. The CUP procedure has
been upheld in the courts.
Mr. Baucke then explained how the ABC determines how many alcohol
licenses should be granted in a particular area. The ABC takes
the approach that each applicant has to justify that it is
addressing a separate need or market.
Chairman Jessner opened the meeting to public comment.
e
M11!!_MQ~lQn, 153 13th Street, distributed materials to the
Commissioners: police reports on crime in Seal Beach, a map and
the formula used by the ABC to determine the number of alcohol
licenses issued in an area without a special review. She pointed
out that presently there are 25 on-sale permits in Old Town while
the recommendation is for only 9 on-sale permits.
Mr. Ripperdan asked why so many more permits were issued than the
recommendation. Mr. Baucke explained that when there are more
than the recommended automatic number the applicant just goes
thru a different review system. Ms. Morton stated that the ABC
goes along with the City if it uses the CUP process and the City
is in favor of the license. The ABC can't do anything about it
as long as the City grants CUP's. The City must set rules and
guidelines. She also pointed out that the Marketing Task Force
does not recommend more liquor establishments in their reports
but did recommend more eating establishments.
Mr. Covington commended Ms. Morton for gathering the information
she presented. Ms. Morton also stated that the Chief of Police
would be happy to attend a Planning Commission meeting and
discuss the matter. The ABC is also willing to attend a meeting
on this subject.
e
RQQ~~!_~QQ!. 441 Central Avenue, stated he believed all liquor
licenses should be restricted to commercial zones. He was
concerned about issuing additional licenses and the potential of
liquor license establishments moving into residential zones. He
was also concerned that someone could make a daily request for a
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19. 1986
Page 5
one-day permit in a residential zone. Mr. Perrin asked whether
on-sale permits were allowed in residential areas. Mr. Baucke
stated they wer~ not. A discussion followed concerning the fact
that the City had no input into the granting of one-day permits.
Mr. Covington questioned whether the City would have the right to
have applicants for one-day permits apply to the City as well as
to the ABC. Mr. Perrin pointed out that asking applicants for
one-day permits to go through the Cup would be unfair to service
organizations such as the Lions Club. Mr. Covington suggested
that there may have to be a separate category for service clubs.
Mr. Hunt stated that the City may not be legally entitle to ask
one-day permit applicants to go through the CUP process. He
suggested a legal opinion be sought from the City Attorney before
further discussion.
e
~Q~m~_~1~Qm~I~r, 209 Seal Beach Boulevard, expressed her concern
that the large number of establishments with alcohol licenses was
contributing to problems at community events such as the
Christmas parade. ~~gQ~_~1~~~, 204 Ocean, stated that presently
there are no guidelines. He suggested that the moratorium remain
in effect indefinitely until the number of permits comes within
the guidelines of the ABC. Mr. Stark also spoke with the ABC.
He was told it was up to the City to determine how many licenses
they are going to approve. He stated the City was not following
ABC guidelines. He also suggested that the City go on record
with the ABC as opposing the one-day licenses without the City's
approval.
~h~~1~~_An1Q~, 316 10th Street, presented some figures on liquor
licenses: he estimated that there is one liquor license for each
519 people in Seal Beach and one liquor license for each 171
people in the downtown area. He was also concerned about the
issue of parking especially in the area of Main Street and the
reduction in the number of police. He suggested the Commission
hold more public hearings to develop criteria. Mi1~1_MQ~lQn
stated that there is a formula for what constitutes a restaurant,
e.g. 50% food sales, 50% liquor sales. She questioned whether
during the CUP process any accounting is requested to see if an
establishment's liquor sales are greater than their food sales.
She recommended that this be done.
.
~h~l~lQ~h~~_M~~~. 109 1/2 Seal Way, expressed his concern about
persons with open containers drinking on the streets and in
alleys on St. Patrick's Day. He also expressed his concern about
the length of time it takes to have burned out streets light
replaced. stating that the average length of time is two to three
weeks. He urged that the liquor license moratorium be continued.
Mr. Mara stated his objections to the re-application of Senor
Corky's for a liquor license. He complained about dirt. noise
and parking problems in connection with this business.
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19. 1986
Page 6
gQ!~~_Qi!!. 909 Ocean Avenue. owner of Senor Corky's stated that
he was going through the process of re-opening his business. He
said he had received no complaints from neighbors concerning Mr.
Mara's complaints. He also stated the Seal Beach police have no
record of problems at his establishment and that he had no
problems with his liquor license, selling liquor to minors, open
containters, etc.
Mr. Covington made a motion that the Commission request the City
Council continue the present moratorium due to Planning
Commission discovery of many related issues:
l' One-day permits with no input presently being made to the
City
2) Liquor sales occurring in residential areas
3) Impact on immediate neighbors from isssuance of such
additional licenses
4) Responsibilities of both Council and Commission for public
health. safety and welfare
5) Necessary legal findings for the denial of a CUP application
6' Administrative review process in the event that appears to
be warranted
e
and that they authorize taking advantage of a
moratorium to authorize the Planning Commission and
develop appropriate material and hold public hearings
sessions regarding this issue.
continued
staff to
and study
Chairm~n Jessner asked if there was any other public input at
this time. There was none.
Mr. Ripperdan seconded Mr. Covinton's motion. Mr. Hunt stated
that he did not believe that the moratorium should be continued.
He stated that several applications are pending. Any licenses
that would be really offensive should be required to appear
before this body. The persons who are waiting are being hurt.
Mr. Covinton stated that off-sale licenses outside of 100 feet of
a church. school or residences do not require a CUP. Mr. Hunt
pointed out there are no applications for off-sale licenses at
this time. Mr. Covington stated that persons being hurt by the
moratorium must put their private profit interests after the
public good. Mr. Ripperdan asked whether there was anything in
state law about the length of moratoriums. Mr. Baucke stated
that with public notice the moratorium could be extended for an
additional 10 months. Mr. Covington stated that guidelines
needed to be established before more licenses were issued.
.
Mr. Covington made an addition to his motion that the Staff
should pass on to the mayor a request that an official from the
ABC be invited for a study session that hopefully this body would
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19. 1986
Page 7
be authorized to conduct and that the police chief also be
invited to such a study session. Cnairman Jessner asked whether
the one-day licenses come under the moratorium. Mr. Baucke
stated they did not. Off-sale licenses outside of 100 feet could
also be granted despite the moratorium. Chairman Jessner asked
whether the City had officially written the ABC to request that
the ABC not grant any of these licenses during the morat~ium.
Mr. Baucke stated that it used to be that the ABC would grant
permits as long as the City didn't object. That has changed.
They will not grant licenses now without something signed by the
City saying that the applicant has met our requirements.
e
Chairman Jessner stated that something was needed in the motion
that if the Council does impose a moratorium they do whatever is
in their power to request ABC not to issue any liquor licenses,
one-day permits, off-sale, etc. until we establish guidelines.
Mr. Covington pointed out that it could be 90 to 120 days before
the Council decides on guidelines. There would not be a major
impact on the City if the one-day permits were granted. It would
hurt the service clubs if they could not have their events during
that time. Chairman Jessner suggested that this should be an
item of discussion for the Council. There may be ways to review
each one that comes up. Mr. Covington suggested that the City
Attorney look at what has been discussed at this meeting.
Mr. Covington modified his motion to include making the Council
aware that the present moratorium does not prevent the issuance
of one-day permits or off-sale licenses outside of 100 feet of
schools, churches, rewsidential areas. Mr. Ripperdan seconds.
AYES:
NOES:
Covington, Hunt, Jessner, Ripperdan
None
Motion Approved
~~n~Q~~~Q_MAII~R_=_R~~Q~~IIQN_!!!!
Resolution No. 1411 concerns application for Conditional Use
Permit 3-86 for re-establishment of a walk-on/take-out restaurant
at the Shore Shop complex. Staff recommends adopting the
findings with the conditions noted in the resolution.
Mr. Covington made a motion to approve Resolution 1411 embodying
all points made at the previous meeting of February 19. 1986.
Mr. Hunt seconds.
e
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
Covington, Hunt, Jessner
None
Perrin. Ripperdan
e
e
e
Planning Commission Meeting of March 19, 1986
Page 8
~QMM!~~!QN_R~2~~~I~
There were no Commission Requests.
QR~&_~QMMY~l~~IIQ~~
MiS~i_MQ~SQn requested that Mr. Baucke look into what the City of
Long Beach is doing about alcohol licenses. lQ~_Ri~~!, 1215 Seal
Way, commented concerning the height restrictions discussed at
the March 5th meeting. He stated that he was very concerned
about divergent heights and that a study should be done as soon
as possible.
aQlQR~M~~I
It was the consensus of the
to adjourn the regularly
Commission at 10:15 p.m.
Commission and so directed by Chair
scheduled meeting of the Planning
------------------------------
Recording Secretary