HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 1474 - 1987-10-07
,
.
y
.
.
,
RESOLUTION NUMBER 1474
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR
87-1) FOR THE HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, BE
CERTIFIED AS A FINAL EIR (87-1), AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS: An Environmental Impact Report would be required due to
potential effects identified in an initial
questionnaire done for the General Plan Amendments and
Specific Plan for the Hellman Ranch area; and
WHEREAS: A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR 87-1) for the
proposed project has been prepared for the City of Seal
Beach by Michael Brandman Associates; and
WHEREAS:
Distribution of the Draft EIR was
public and private agencies with
comments and evaluation; and
made to interested
a solicitation of
WHEREAS: A public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on
the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS: The public review period for the Draft EIR ended on
September 8, 1987, and incorporated within the EIR are
comments of the public, staff, and other agencies, and
responses thereto, and;
WHEREAS: The Draft EIR is a program EIR and is subject to the
following provisions of the State Guidelines for the
California Environmental Quality Act: "That subsequent
activities shall be examined in the light of the
program EIR to determine whether an additional
environmental document must be prepared." The City
shall use an initial questionnaire to document the
evaluation of subsequent activities to determine
whether the environmental effects of the activities are
covered in the Program EIR, and;
WHEREAS: The Draft EIR was prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, State Guidelines,
and the policies of the City of Seal Beach, and;
WHEREAS: The Draft EIR including comments and responses has been
reviewed by staff, and represents their independent
evaluation and analysis, and;
WHEREAS: The Draft comments, responses, and attachments have
been reviewed and considered, and that mitigation
measures have been incorporated into the project that
eliminates, avoids or substantially lessens the
significant environmental effects thereof as identified
in Draft EIR, comments, responses, or attachments.
The environmental effects, and mitigating measures are
listed in the attached Exhibit "A". Mitigation
measures are specified as conditions in this
resolution, and;
WHEREAS: The Draft EIR (87-1) for the Hellman Specific Plan,
plus comments, responses, and attachments, constitute
Final EIR (8781) for the Hellman Specific Plan.
;.
~ .t-'"
#
.
.
,
.'
RESOLUTION NUMBER
1474
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does
hereby recommend to the City Council that Final EIR 87-1 for the
Hellman Specific Plan has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Seal
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 7fiL day of
~~ , 1987, by the following vote:
NOES: Commissioners
{ltnX~ V/~I ~a....p/ v~
J1~
/7mt-e
~~cr
AYES: Commissioners
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
ABSENT: Commissioners
Commission
.
e
MANDATORY FINDINGS
ON THE
HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
OCTOBER 1987
EXHIBIT A
e
.
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The Environmental clearance process for the amended Hellman Ranch Specific Plan
commenced formally with the circulation of a Notice of Preparation on 18 February
1987. Subsequently, three scoping sessions were held at the City of Seal Beach City
Hall. A Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was circulated for
public review on 17 July 1987. The Draft EIR review period officially ended 8
September 1987. The Final Subsequent Hellman Ranch Specific Plan EIR was
prepared in September and October of 1987, and includes responses to public
comments on the Draft EIR.
Based on an analysis of the proposed project and on public input, the EIR focused on
the following environmental impact areas:
. Geology and Soils
. Hydrology/Water Quality
· Cultural Resources
. Land Use
. Biological Resources
. Air Quality
. Noise
· Transporta tion/ C ircula tion
. Public Services and Utilities
. Aesthetics
In addition, the EIR considered three alternatives to the project, including the no
project/no development alternative, development of the site in conformance with the
e1f:isting general plan designation and the adopted specific plan for the site, and the
proposed project plus a hotel.
2
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
SECTION 2
FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
2.1 FINDINGS
The CEQA and the CEQA guidelines (Section 15092) require that:
No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which
an EIR has been completed that identifies one or more significant
environmental effects of the project unless the public agency
makes one or more written findings for each of those significant
effects accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for
each finding.
The following findings are made by the City of Seal Beach City Council in
accordance with CEQA requirements. The findings address potential impacts that
would result from the implementation of the proposed Hellman Ranch Specific
Plan. A detailed description of potential environmental impacts and proposed
mitigation measures is contained in the Final EIR which is on file at the City of Seal
Beach.
In addition to the documentation of potential impacts identified in the Final EIR, the
following section also presents rationale in support of the findings made. The
mitigation measures proposed will be incorporated into the project prior to or
concurrent with project implementation.
2.2 SIGNIFICANT UNA VOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
There are no significant unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the Hellman
Ranch Specific Plan. Consequently, the City Council need not issue a "Statement of
Overriding Considerations," per Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines (as
amended).
3
JBX/270TM0513
e
e
2.3 SIGNIFICANT MITIGATED ADVERSE IMPACTS
Significant adverse environmental impacts that would be mitigated are listed
below. The City Council finds that these significant adverse impacts are mitigated
to a level not considered significant.
A. Geology and Soils
Statement of Effects:
1.
The site is traversed by
Newport-Inglewood Fault).
active.
the Seal Beach Fault (a segment of the
This fault is considered to be potentially
2. Liquefication is considered to be a significant potential hazard for
development of the site. Single family residences are proposed in areas
designated as having low-to-moderate potential for liquefaction.
Multiple family units are proposed in a potentially mOderate-to-high
liquefaction area.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: A1, A2
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
4
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
A1. a. The design of structures on the project site shall be in accordance
with the latest Uniform Building Code.
b. No human occupancy structures shall be placed within 50 feet of
either side of the 20-foot Seal Beach Fault zone (i.e., a 120-foot
corridor), as recommended in the 1981 Study by Medall, Aragon,
Worswick and Associates.
A2. a. No special earthwork measures will be necessary in the low
liquefaction potential areas. Single family structures will be
supported on conventional continuous wall footings and floor slabs on
grade.
b. In moderate liquefaction potential areas, single family structures
shall be supported on a rigid mat-type foundation constructed on a 3-
foot blotting layer. Also, a 6-foot compacted fill blanket shall cover
all lots.
c. In moderate-to-high liquefaction potential areas, the proposed
multiple family structures shall be supported on piles. The design of
the foundation piles shall be provided after final development plans
are completed.
5
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
B. Hydrology/Water Quality
Statement of Effects:
1. Three areas containing surface hydrocarbons may be decreasing the
quality of surface water runoff during storms and may be contributing to
the degradation of groundwater quality.
2. Two areas adjacent to the project site (one on the Seal Beach Naval
Weapons Station to the east, the other on the Oakwoods Apartments, to
the west) could potentially be classified as hazardous waste sites. If the
Oakwood site is so classified (under the State Superfund program), a
border zone could be established on the areas within 2,000 feet of the
sites; such a zone would include portions of the project site.
3a. The onsite storm drain system is sized to prevent flooding in the
proposed streets for a 10-year frequency storm. Also, for sump
conditions, the storm drains are sized for 25-year frequency storms.
Sumps are areas that fill during storms because there are no outlets.
The project site contains sumps in the central and southwestern portions
of the site. Under 24-hour flows within the drainage basin, and flows
within the drainage basin from 100-year frequency storms, flood
elevations would increase and inundation of on-site roads and golf-
course areas could occur; however, the proposed structures on-site
would be a minimum of one foot above the flood levels.
3b. The Orange County Los Alamitos Retarding Basin, north of the site,
receives drainage from areas north of the basin. This facility is sized to
contain up to 200 acre-feet of water, with a pump station designed to
divert water out of the basin and into the San Gabriel River at a rate of
450 cubic feet per second (cfs). The retarding basin levee elevation is
approximately 7 feet and the upstream watershed areas are approxi-
mately 3 feet. Therefore, flooding will occur in the upstream areas
before the levee is overtopped. It is not know what precise level of
flood protection is provided by this retention basin to upstream or on-
site areas under current development conditions in the watershed area.
6
JBX/270TM05I3
.
e
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: Bl, B2a, B3
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.: B2b
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
Bl. The three areas on the site that currently contain surface hydrocarbons
shall be cleaned up under the supervision of the State Department of
Health Services. In addition, at the subdivision level, the project propo-
nent shall further study the extent of groundwater contamination, if
any, on the project site. If necessary, a mitigation program should be
implemented to restore and maintain water quality standards in the
onsite groundwater basin.
B2. a. If the Oakwood Apartments are designated as a State Superfund site,
the project proponent shall obtain a variance or have the border zone
classification removed from the project site by the State
Department of Health Services. The classification shall be removed
or a variance granted prior to developing the portion of the site that
7
JBX/270TM05I3
.
.
is classified as a border zone. Factors that would be taken into
account--both in assessing whether to designate an area as
Hazardous Waste Property and in considering a variance or border
zone classification removal--would include the hazardous
characteristics of the wastes, conditions influencing movement of
the waste constituents, and factors affecting exposure of humans to
the wastes.
B2. b. The Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station has indicated that
remediation will be accomplished for the underground fuel storage
tank located east of Seal Beach Boulevard.
B3. Prior to project approval, the project proponent shall submit final
drainage plans to the City of Seal Beach Public Works Department.
Such plans shall demonstrate that the on-site storm drain system is
adequate to prevent a) street flooding in a lO-year frequency storm; b)
sump flooding in a 25-year frequency storm; and c) structural flooding in
a lOO-year frequency storm event. Additionally, these plans shall
demonstrate that the site would be adequately protected from
overtopping of the Los Alamitos Retarding Basin under lOO-year storm
conditions.
8
JBX/270TM05I3
.
e
C. Cultural Resources
Statement of Effects:
1. Various archaeological sites are located on the project site.
Implementation of the project would have a potentially significant
impact on the archaeological areas.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: C1
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
Cl. Prior to initial implementation level approvals, a certified archaeologist
shall be retained by the project proponent to perform a subsurface test
level investigation and surface collection as appropriate. The test level
report evaluating the site shall include discussion of significance (depth,
nature, condition and extent of the resources), final mitigation
recommendations, and cost estimates. Prior to issuance of a grading
9
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
permit, and based on the report recommendations and city policy, final
mitigation shall be carried out. Possible determinations include, but are
not limited to, preservation, salvage, partial salvage or a finding that no
mitigation is necessary.
10
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
D. Land Use
Statement of Effects:
1. Several oil wells currently on the project site would need to be
abandoned.
2. An abandoned oil well is proposed to be covered by one of the multiple-
family complexes.
3. Project implementation would impact Gum Grove Park by eliminating
approximately half of the overall park acreage.
4. Southern California Edison electrical lines would require removal and
the SCE fee-owned right-of-way will be impacted from project
implementation.
5. The project proposes to retain active oil wells on the project site which
will result in noise and aesthetic impacts.
6.
The project proposes a golf driving range
during the evening and nighttime hours.
adjacent residents.
that would provide lighting
This lighting would impact
7. The project is not consistent with the city's land use, circulation and
open space elements.
8. The project may not be consistent with the Land Use Plan of the Local
Coastal Plan.
9. The project site contains characteristics of a wetlands and is influenced
by tides; these areas would be impacted by project implementation.
11
JBX!270TM05I3
e
e
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08a, 09a
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.: 08b, 09b
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
01. The project proponent shall comply with the California Division of Oil
and Gas procedures for proper abandonment of onsite oil wells and for
onsite inspection of all oil wells on the site.
02. If the foundation covers the abandoned oil well, the project proponent
shall provide venting of the well at least 15 feet away from the
foundation, per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Venting of the
well will prevent potential methane gas from building up under the
foundation.
03. The project will provide a lOS-acre golf course for public use. The
proponent shall work with the City of Seal Beach to develop a plan for
Gum Grove Park, including features to be added andl or retained, access
to the park, and jurisdictional responsibilities.
12
JBX/270TM05I3
e
.
D4. The project proponent shall obtain approval from SCE regarding
purchase of, or potential development within, the 100-foot-wide SCE
fee-owned right-of-way. In addition, the project proponent shall consult
with SCE regarding the relocation of the overhead electricity lines in
the 100-foot-wide easement and the relocation of the 6-inch line in the
central portion of the site.
D5. Measures to reduce noise impacts include converting oil well pumps
from gas to electricity, and/or construction of masonry block walls
around either the pumps or residences. The provision of mechanical
ventilation in adjacent residences may also be necessary to achieve
acceptable noise levels. Landscaping and/or decorative barriers shall be
provided to screen residents' view of the oil rigs.
D6. Screening shall be provided for the residences south of the site to reduce
impacts from night lighting of the golf driving range.
D7. Amendments to the city's land use, circulation and open space elements
shall be required prior to project approval.
D8. a. A determination of consistency with the Land Use Plan of the Local
Coastal Plan shall be made prior to project approval. A coastal
permit shall be obtained from the Coastal Commission.
b. Although the City of Seal Beach has conditioned project approval
upon the accomplishment of a Coastal permit, it is the authority of
the Coastal Commission to determine whether the permit shall be
issued.
D9. a. Upon project approval, the alteration of any coastal wetland will
require a Section 1600 agreement from the California Department of
Fish and Game and Section 404 permit from the Army Corps of
Engineers. A permit under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
may also be required from the Army Corps of Engineers.
13
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
b. Although the City of Seal Beach has conditioned project approval
upon the accomplishment of appropriate permits and agreements
from the California Department of Fish and Game and the Army
Corps of Engineers, it is the authority of these agencies to determine
whether the permits and agreements shall be issued.
14
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
E. Biological Resources
Statement of Effects:
1. The project as currently proposed would convert approximately 20 acres
of potentially restorable coastal wetlands to urban/recreational uses.
This would represent an incremental loss of biologically important
wetland areas in Southern California.
2. Project implementation would remove a portion of the eucalyptus trees
in Gum Grove Park and could adversely impact monarch populations.
Tree studies have identified serious infestation by the eucalyptus long
horn borer which may require tree removal regardless of project imple-
mentation.
3. The installation of water hazards on the golf course may generate
nuisance vector problems, such as mosquitos and snails.
4. Conversion of the site may result in the displacement of red fox into
adjacent areas, such as Anaheim Bay and the Seal Beach Naval Weapons
Station contributing to predation of clapper rails and least tern colonies
in these locations.
5. Construction activity would affect wildlife in the vicinity and could
displace and ultimately reduce on-site populations of rodents and small
mammals.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: Ela,b, E2, E3, E4, E5
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
15
JBX/270TM05I3
.
e
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.: E1c
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
E1. a. A Coastal Permit shall be obtained from the Coastal Commission.
b. Upon project approval, and prior to project implementation, the
applicant will obtain an agreement from the California Department
of Fish and Game (CDFG) pursuant to the California Fish and Game
Code, Section 1600, and a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In
addition, the Army Corps of Engineers may also require a permit
under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
c. Although the City of Seal Beach has conditioned project approval
upon accomplishment of the permit requirements indicated in E1a
and b above, it is the prerogative of the responsible agencies so
involved to determine whether the necessary permits and agreements
will be granted.
E2. a. Appropriate steps will be taken in Gum Grove Park to remove, at a
minimum, all eucalyptus trees and stumps infected with the
eucalyptus longhorn borer. In the event it is determined that some
portion of the remaining eucalyptus trees should be retained,
measures will be taken to minimize potential for reinfestation, as
well as to protect against injury from branch failure.
16
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
b. The city and applicant will review the tree studies and determine
what number of trees, if any, should be removed, retained or
replaced. The applicant will undertake a program for the restoration
and/or removal as determined through this review. If it is
determined that all or most of the trees shall be removed,
landscaping of the project site will provide a local increase in bird
habitat and may offset the potential impact on wintering monarch
butterflies.
c. The project proponent shall conduct a late Fall survey and an early
winter survey of the monarch use of the site to determine if the
monarch use of the site is a temporary or permanent winter roost.
E3. Insect problems potentially generated by the installation of open water
hazards shall be controlled through the introduction of mosquito fish
(Gambusia sp.) as a biological method of mosquito control, water
circulation through the use of pumps, and/or other acceptable mosquito
abatement practices. Any chemicals required for vector control, as well
as fertilizers applied in surrounding areas, shall be nontoxic to the
waterfowl that will also be attracted to these water hazards.
E4. To minimize the influx of red fox into adjacent areas, such as the Seal
Beach Naval Weapons Station, a preconstruction trapping and removal
program shall be accomplished.
E5. The developer shall undertake a preconstruction trapping and removal
program to reduce thje population of rodents and small mammals on the
site. Grading activities would be preferable in a dry season such as fall
so that it does not coincide with the height of the rodent and small
mammal population cycle.
17
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
F. Air Quality
Statement of Effects:
1. An increase in total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the increased
consumption of electricity and natural gas by the site residents would
result in an increase in CO, NMHC and NOx levels. The project is
consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).
2. An estimated total of 176.4 tons of fugitive dust would be generated
each month of construction activity.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: Fl, F2
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
FI. The following measures shall be considered in project design to help
reduce both stationary and mobile source emissions.
18
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
,
.
a. Provision of a convenient bus stop location, subject to approval of
the city engineer.
b. Provision of bicycle storage facilities within the development that
relate to planned and existing bicycle routes.
c. Building design in compliance with the State Energy Conservation
Standards to help reduce stationary source (natural gas combustion
and power plant) offsite emissions.
F2. Fugitive dust shall be controlled by regular watering, paving of
construction roads and/or other dust palliative measures to meet South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403.
19
JBX/270TM05I3
..
.-
.
.
.
G. Noise
Statement of Effects:
1. Twenty-two single-family residences may not achieve the city interior
noise guidelines of 45 dB CNEL in habitable rooms.
2. Three oil wells adjacent to the proposed single-family units would
impact the residences. The dwelling unit closest to the oil wells is
projected to have an outdoor CNEL of 83.9 dB. This exceeds the
outdoor living area standard of 65 dB and would also substantially
exceed the interior noise criteria.
3. Single-family residences closest to the seven oil wells along Seal Beach
Boulevard are expected to have a CNEL of 68.6 dB.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: G 1, G2, G3
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
20
JBX!270TM05I3
e
e
Substantial Evidence:
G 1. Mechanical ventilation systems (enabling windows to be closed) shall be
provided within the 22 single-family residences to achieve acceptable
interior noise levels of less than 45 dB CNEL.
G2. Additional acoustical analysis shall be undertaken and mitigation
measures developed to ensure that noise from the existing three oil
wells in the northern portion of the property does not exceed residential
interior or exterior noise compatibility criteria. Possible mitigation
measures include converting the pumps from gas to electricity, and/or
construction of masonry block walls around either the pumps or
residences. The provision of a mechanical ventilation system may also
be necessary to achieve an acceptable interior noise level of less than 45
dB CNEL.
G3. Noise mitigation will be required for the seven wells along Seal Beach
Boulevard, and will include converting pumps from gas to electricity,
and/or construction of concrete masonry walls around the pumpsite.
21
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
H. Transportation and Circulation
Statement of Effects:
1. The project incorporates an extension of First Street as a public road
from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) to Seal Beach Boulevard.
2. The proposed project would impact the existing Seal Beach
Boulevard/Forrestal Lane intersection.
3. Project implementation would impact the existing First Street/PCH
intersection.
4. The First Street/PCH intersection, Seal Beach Boulevard/First Street
intersection and PCH/Westminster Avenue intersection would be
impacted from project implementation.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: H1, H2, H3a, H4
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.: H3b.
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
22
JBX/270TM05I3
e
e
Substantial Evidence:
HI. a. First Street should have an 80-foot public right-of-way through the
Specific Plan area from Pacific Coast Highway to Seal Beach
Boulevard. Initially, the 80-foot right-of-way for First Street can be
improved with one 12-foot travel lane in each direction, with an 8-
foot lane for emergency parking and/or bicycling. When travel
demand warrants, the road should be improved to provide for 2
twelve-foot travel lanes in each direction.
b. A stop sign shall be installed on the site egress driveways to First
Street; parking along the First Street extension shall be restricted to
maximize safety and carrying capacity.
H2. The existing signal installation at the Seal Beach Boulevard/Forrestal
Lane intersection shall be slightly modified when the First Street
Extension is constructed to create a 4-way intersection.
H3. a. The existing signal installation at the PCH/First Street intersection
should be modified when the First Street extension is constructed.
Additional poles and mast arms will be required. These
improvements will require a permit from Cal Trans.
b. Although the City of Seal Beach has conditioned project approval on
the accomplishment of the improvements listed above, it is the
authority of CalTrans to determine whether to issue the necessary
permits.
H4. The following improvements shall be provided to mitigate the impact to
the subject intersections: (1) a southbound right-turn lane and left-turn
lane at First Street/PCH intersection; (2) a northbound left-turn lane at
the Seal Beach Boulevard/First Street intersection; and (3) an additional
northbound left-turn lane at the PCH/Westminster Avenue intersection.
23
JBX/270TM0513
e
e
I. Public Services and Utilities
Statement of Effects:
Police
1. The proposed project will impact the police department and will require
additional officers and equipment.
Schools
2. The project would generate 181 elementary students, 102 middle school
students and 122 high school students.
Electricity
3. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the relocation of
existing electricity line.
Parks and Recreation
4. The proposed project would eliminate approximately half of the overall
Gum Grove Park acreage including a portion of the eucalyptus trees and
the parking lot.
Water
5. 8. The proposed project is expected to consume 0.56 million gallons of
water per day, and 1.75 million gallons per day during peak hour
demand.
b. An 18-inch water main would need to be upgraded and relocated.
c. Adequate fire flow would be needed for the proposed project.
24
JBX!270TM05I3
e
e
Natural Gas
6. Implementation of the project would result in the relocation of existing
gas mains. Project implementation is expected to consume 0.5
therms per year.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
11. a. Prior to development approval, the City of Seal Beach Police
Department shall evaluate the number of additional officers and
equipment needed to adequately serve the project.
b. To enhance police service on the site, adequate street lighting and
clearly marked street names and house numbers shall be provided by
the applicant.
25
JBX!270TM0513
e
e
c. The applicant shall provide "neighborhood watch" signs and shall
provide the funds necessary to establish a neighborhood watch
program on the site.
12. The project proponent shall provide funding to the Los Alamitos School
District in accordance with State Assembly Bill 2926. AB 2926 allows
school districts to obtain up to $1.50 per square foot for residential
structures and $0.25 per square foot for commercial structures.
13. The project proponent shall develop a plan with SCE regarding the
relocation of electricity lines and towers that are currently on the
project site.
14. The project will provide a lOS-acre golf course for public use. The
proponent shall work with the City of Seal Beach to develop a plan for
Gum Grove Park, including features to be added andl or retained, access
to the park, and jurisdictional responsibilities.
15. a. The project proponent shall submit detailed drawings of the proposed
water system on the project site to the Seal Beach Public Works
Department prior to project approval. To reduce water demands,
water conservation measures such as low-flush toilets and low-flow
showers and faucets, shall be implemented. At the subdivision level,
the developer shall fund a master plan water study to ensure that
adequate water capacity exists to serve the development.
b. Approximately 2500-feet of the existing lS-inch water main on the
project site shall be upgraded.
c. The project proponent will install fire service lines on the site in
accordance with County standards.
16. a. The project proponent shall consult with Southern California Gas
regarding the relocation of gas mains that are currently on the
project site.
26
JBX/270TM0513
.
.
b. Building construction shall comply with the energy conservation
standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Administrative
Code. Energy conservation tactics, such as the use of solar water
and space heating technologies, insulated water lines and energy
efficient lighting, shall be incorporated into project design.
27
JBX!270TM05I3
e
.
J. Aesthetics
Statement of Effects:
1. Night lighting from the golf driving range would impact residents
adjacent to and south of the driving range.
2. Oil rigs onsite and offsite could generate significant visual impacts to
the future residents of the site.
Findings:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effect as identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.: Jl, J2
Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such
changes have been adopted by the other agency or can and should be
adopted by such other agency.
Finding for Effects No.:
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Finding for Effects No.:
Substantial Evidence:
J1. Screening shall be provided to reduce the visual impact of night lighting
for the driving range on residences in the southern portion of the site.
28
JBX/270TM05I3
e
.
J2. To reduce the visual impacts on future residents of the site, landscaping
and/or other decorative barriers shall be provided to screen the
residents' view of the oil rigs.
29
JBX/270TM0513