Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 1318 - 1984-10-03 . . RESOLUTION NUMBER 1318 A RESOLUTION OF THE SEAL BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE APPLICATION 3-84 A REQUEST FOR USE OF TANDEM PARKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MAJOR ADDITION TO TWO LEGAL NONCONFORMING DUPLEXES (1105 & 1107 SEAL WAY) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, an application was duly filed by John and Mary Louise Szcerban, 1107 Seal Way, Seal Beach, CA 90740; and WHEREAS, the property is described as, Parcel 15 & 16 of Tract No.2, a subdivision of a portion of Block F shown on a map recorded in Book 3, Page 16, filed in the office of the recorder, Orange County, California; and WHEREAS, the proposal is for use of tandem parking in conjunction with major additions to two nonconforming duplexes; and WHEREAS, the subject property contains 5,400 square feet and is located 110f feet south of the centerline of 12th Street (1105, 1105A and 1107, 1107 A Seal Way); and WHEREAS, the subject property has approximately 60 feet of frontage on Seal Way; and a depth of 90 feet; and WHEREAS, the property contains two 2,158 square feet legal non- conforming duplexes and two 420 square foot detached two-car garages. The duplexes are physcially connected by a second story enclosed deck and balcony. WHEREAS, the surrounding land use and zoning are as follows: North, east and south--a mixture of single-family residences, legal nonconforming fourplexes, triplexes, and duplexes. West--the Seal Way boardwalk, beach and Pacific Ocean; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1983, the Planning Commission heard a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 6-83) request by the applicant to add 25% to a legal nonconforming duplex at 1107 Seal Way. The Commission discussed its policy regarding additions to nonconforming buildings and it was felt that it was to upgrade lifestyle but not to increase building or population density; and WHEREAS, the Commission unanimously moved that CUP Application 6-83 was beyond the scope of its present policy statement and that this matter should come back to the Commission under a variance procedure at no additional cost to the applicant; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 1983, after the public hearing the Planning Commission recommended (Resolution #1297) an amendment to permit additions to nonconforming buildings by Conditional Use Permit provided the required number and type of parking spaces are provided on the site within the required setbacks; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 1983, the City Council held a public hearing on Ordinance 1150 amending Chapter 28, Article VII and Article VIII of the Municipal Code relating to non- conforming buildings in the R-2 and R-3 zones; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 1983, after public hearings the City Council adopted Ordinance 1150; and WHEREAS, adopted Ordinance 1150 R-3 provisions specifically reads: "Section 28-804, Nonconforming Buildings. Any additions to existing residential structures, rendered legal non- conforming by this Code, may be approved by the Planning Commission with the issuance of a conditional use permit, . RESOLUTION NUMBER 1318 . Page 2 provided that all the parking requirements imposed by Section 28-802 of this Article are satisfied. For the purposes of this section, the term "additions" shall include all attached, semi-attached, or detached structures o~ improvements; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 1984, John and Mary Louise Szcerban applied to the City of Seal Beach for a variance to construct an addition to a legal nonconforming duplex without providing the required number and type of parking spaces; and WHEREAS, on March 21, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Variance 3-84. After some discussion the Commissioners and staff and the applicant determined that if they do work on the request a little further and with improvements to the plans, a request more in line with City policy could be reached. The Commission then moved to deny the application without prejudice; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on resubmitted Variance 3-84. At that time the applicant's representative asked for a continuance so modifications to the plan could be considered; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on resubmitted Variance 3-84. At that time the applicant's representative asked for a continuance so to make the modifications as recommended in the staff report on Variance 3-84 dated August 10, 1984. The Commission then moved to continue consideration until the September 5th regular meeting; and WHEREAS, on September 5th the Planning Commission moved to continue the public hearing on Variance 3-84 until September 19th upon the request of the staff due to the fact the newly revised plans were not provided until the Commission's agenda packets had been distributed; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Variance 3-84 and it was determined and so ordered by the Chairman, that the applicant return at the regular meeting of October 3, 1984 with revised plans showing a garage with no variance requests except for the use of tandem parking (one set of plans showing removal of exterior stairs and one including stairway); and WHEREAS, on October 3, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Variance 3-84; and WHEREAS, specifically the applicant requested approval of the following: An eight-car garage, 54 feet wide with four standard spaces in the middle bounded on each side by two standard spaces in tandem. The proposed garage is setback the code required 9 feet. Above the garage is proposed to be a second story major addition to each duplex which contains a family room (440 sq. ft.); wet bar (14 sq. ft.); bathroom (83 sq. ft.); washer/ dryer area (20 sq. ft.) and a second story roof deck (450 sq. ft.) accessed by an interior stairs. The second story to be accessed by an exterior stair located adjacent to 1105 Seal Way, within the courtyard area between the two duplexes. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the variance: 1. The property is required to provide eight covered parking spaces by the Municipal Code. . . . RESOLUTION NUMBER 1318 Page 3 2. The property is of such width that this tandem parking variance is requested to provide the required parking. 3. Hardship due to lot width which was not self imposed by the applicant has been demonstrated which deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity and zone. 4. The variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. 5. The granting of such variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with other limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. 6. That the neighborhood presently has a significant parking problem. 7. That legal grounds for approval of a variance under Section 69506 of the California Government Code do exist for this application. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance 3-84 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the exterior stairs to the second floor be deleted. 2. That building plans when submitted for "City Approved in Concept" for Coastal Commission approval, be modified to show a 20' interior length dimension for the standard garage spaces. 3. That a deed restriction be placed on the titles of the two properties which state that these two duplex properties are developed as a unit and shall not be transferred, assigned or conveyance made in any separate manner. Such language to be approved by the City Attorney. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October , 1984 by the folloWing vote: AYES: Commissioners Covington. Goldenberg. Hunt. Jessner, Perrin NOES: Commissioners None ABSENT: Commissioners None