HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 1559 - 1989-11-15
.... ~,.:
..
.
e
RESOLUTION NUMBER 1559
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-89, A REQUEST
TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM FOR
A NEW COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED AT 1198
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (ZOETER PLACE)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
On October 5, 1989, Mark Frank of the San Pedro Sign Company
filed an application with the Department of Development Services
for CUP 15-89 on behalf of Zoeter Place Associates, requesting
to establish a Planned Sign Program for a new commercial center
located at 1198 Pacific Coast Highway, Seal Beach; and
The subject property, Orange County Assessor's map book 43 block
122 parcel 35, contains approximately 116,000 square feet of lot'
area; and
The subject property, additionally identified as parcel 1 of
Tentative Tract Map 87-131, the former Zoeter Elementary School
site as purchased by the Seal Beach Redevelopment Agency in
1987; and
The site is presently leased from the Redevelopment Agency by
Zoeter Place Associates, the petitioner of this request; and
Specifically, the applicant is requesting to institute a
comprehensive Planned Sign Program for the site (see Attachments
A and B) as permitted in Section 28-1803 of the Code; and
The surrounding land use and zoning are as follows:
NORTH
Across Pacific Coast Highway is the Seal Beach
Center in the Service Commercial zone, (C-l).
SOUTH
The City-owned Zoeter athletic facility in the
Public Land Use zone, (PLU) and two day care centers
in City-owned buildings.
EAST
A mixture of single and multiple family residential
uses in the Residential High Density zone (RHO) and
commercial uses in the General Commercial zone, (C-
2) .
WEST
A church and commercial uses in the C-2 zone; and
A duly noticed public hearing was held on November 15, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
Seal Beach does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 15-89, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Conditional Use Permit 15-89 is approved to establish a Planned Sign
Program for a commercial retail center at 1198 Pacific Coast Highway,
Seal Beach. (Zoeter Place)
.
.
~ 0 "
....
Planning Commission
Resolution No. 1559
Page 2 of 2
2. The sign for the east side of Suite B2 as identified in Attachment A
shall be a channel sign and may in no instance exceed 75% of the
lineal footage of the suite. Additionally the letters for said sign
may not exceed twenty-four (24) inches in height.
3. No awning sign may have a copy area in excess of 75% of the lineal
footage of the face of the suite it serves.
4. The color of signage for all awning signs, circular single face wall
signs and tenant signs located on either of the two monument signs
shall be subject to the same restrictions as those set forth for
channel signs in attachments A and B namely: Green, Yellow, Aqua
Blue, Red, Medium Blue and Orange. Special colors will similarly be
subject to Lessor's approval.
5. The copy area for any awning sign shall not exceed a maximum of
fifteen (15) lineal feet.
6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all proposed signage
shall meet the building requirements as set forth in the Uniform
Building Code and the Code of the City of Seal Beach, all applicable
fire codes and additional requirements as set forth in Attachment B.
7. All proposed signage shall be in substantial compliance with the
Planned Sign Program as approved through Resolution 1559.
8. Any amendments to this Planned Sign Program shall be subject to
reconsideration and the approval of the Planning Commission.
9. The sign area of the two monument signs shall not exceed thirty-eight
(38) square feet, and the determination of whether to utilize awning
signs along the western side of Building A shall be at the discretion
of the applicant.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Seal
Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November, 1989, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners
v
Whittenberg, Secretary
nning Commission
BCC:bc