HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 114 - 1967-02-16
il
RESOLUTION NO.
114
RESOLUTION OF THE PLA~~ING CO~1MISSION OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A
VARIANCE \l1TH RESPEC'[ TO PROPERTY It-l
ANNEXATION 66-1 (VARIANCE ~O. V-3-67)
The Plann1ng Comm1ss1on of the C1ty of Seal Beach hereby finds,
determines and resolves:
Sect10n 1. The property w1th1n Anney.at10n No. 66-1 presently under
annexat10n to the C1ty of Seal Beach, ha~ been developed under the ord1nances of
the County of Orange app11cable to unincorporated terr1tory \11th1n ~a1d county.
Large expend1tures have been ~ade by the owners of sald property 1n develop~ng
same in accordance w1th sa1d county ordInances. Ord1nance No. 628 of the Clty of
Seal Beach has not heretofore bee~ appllcable to sa1d property, and th~ developers
of sa1d property hdve accordlngly developed the same 1n accordance wlth a plan of
develop~ent prepared pr10r to anne~ation of said property to the C1ty of Seal
Beach, and sub~tant1al expend1tures have been nade 1n develop1ng sald property
1n accordance w1th such plan.
.
Sectlon 2. There a~e e~ceptional or extraordlnnty Clrcumstance~ and
cond1t10n~ appllcable to sn~d property, that do not apply generally to other
property in the same zone. A var1ance 1S necessary for the preservatlon and
enJoyment of a qubstantlal property rIght posse~sed by other propert1es 1n the
same zone, but wh~ch woula be den~ed to the sub1ect property by vlrtue of Its
development to date under a dlfferent zon~ng ord~nance and regulatIons. The
granting of a Varlance as hereln provlded, wll1 not be materlally detrImental
to the publlc welfare or 1nJurious to the property or Improvements 1n the
vlcinlty In wh1ch the qubject property is located. 1he gtant1ng of the vallance
hereln prov1ded for wlll not advetsely affect thp comprehenslve general plan,
and IS necessary to prevent d1fflcultles, hntdshlpS and re&ults Inconslstent with
the general purpose of the zonlng ordinance of the Clty of Seal Beach. The
varlance hereln gtanted I s in har~ony wlth the geneL"al purpose and intent of
scud zonlng ordJnance, so th,llt the splrlt of &uch ordJnance shall be observed,
publlC safety and welfare secured and sub~tantlal Justl~e done.
Section 3. A varlanLe IS hereby grmlted from the lcquir~menls of
Ordlnance No. 628 wlth respect to parklng for commerclal arens, In th3t com~on
parklng facllltle~ may be provJdeu for all commerclal uses 1n the terrJtory to be
zoned C-2, wlth a tOlal gross area devoted to automoblle parklng (lncludlng trafflc
lanes and turnlng areas Incldent to palllng) equal to OIle and one half (1-1/2)
tlm~s the total of the gro&~ ~lleas of sald propecty occupled by bUIldlngs.
Section 4. A varldnce IS her~by granted WJth respect to the areas to
be zoned R-4 wIthIn saId anne~nt~on No. 66-1, from the rcqulrementq prescrIbed
by Ordlnance No. 628, so that
.
a. The ma~inum per cent of lot coveraBe withln saJd R-4 zoned areas,
shall be eiqhty per ceut (80~).
.
.
.
Resolut1on No. 114 - 2
b. Park1ng spaces requ1red w1th1n sa1d R-4 zoned areas shall be one
and one half (1-1/2) spaces for each dwel11ng unlt, and
c. No alleys shall be requ1red 1n sa1d R-4 zoned areas.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED th~~~~~ay(or ~~ary, 1967.
-4: . .b,"'r-c____
Cha1rman of the Plann1n~comm1~~1on
1 hereby certJfy that the forego1ng resolut1on was duly adopted at a rpgular
meet1ng of thp Plann1ng Comm1ss1on of the C1ty of Seal Beach Wh1Ch wa~ held on
February 16, 1967, and carr1ed by the follow1ng vote"
AYES.
NOES"
ABSENT"
C0Jlll111SS1oners:
COllUlt1SS1oners:
COmnl1SS10ner&:
Crowley, Lanning, Murphy, Boeger
None
Jones
,1 / 4~:: -_ _ p~
_-:.::.c-- ~,-~7- /;::'c>~f .'~ - ,?"
,~ecretdry of the Plann1~Conm1ss1on
./