HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 216 - 1968-05-15
,
.
.
PJ::SOLU'l'lO:>l NO. --11<>_
A HKS(lI.IlTllJN 0),' 'J H); PI,ANNIllG CO~UiISSrON 01' 'rilE CITY
OF SF.AI. BEACH APPROVINC \'ARli.NC'I, V-9-68 ~'OR R1WUCTION
OF LOT AVf.IlAGE Fl:OH 55'30 SC}l!Altf. FM:'!' 1'0 AN AVERAGE
OF 5491 SQUAKI, n.ET FOR l'KN'J'ATrVK TRACT NO. 5699.
(l~OOVllI!:E CORI'ORATJO:;j
"'lIEREAS, in the "'atter of Variancl.' No. V-9-68, the. Plannj.lll! Cnmmhsion of the
City of Seal lIeach dr.cR report: nil fnlJowu:
1. Subject request initil!.ted hy '''oadhi1h! C:orrl!ration, 8857 Hest Ol)'.nl'ic Jllvd.,
lIeverly lUlls , Califorlliu.
,
2. Subjl.'ct property is ler.nlly deRcr.lbed all Tentativc Tract No. 5699.
J. Sub.1ect re,!uest ir. for reduction of lot l\vcl:age fl:om 5500 square feet tn an
average of 5'.91 R4uIlro feet per lot.
HIlEltEAS, thL! Plannilll; COImnission finding.. IJre as foll.m.s:
l.~ Subject rcque..!. will not adversely affect the Cenpra"l 1'11111.
2. .A more efficient layout will result by this millor ndjl1st.nnllt.
3. Subject. lot.s eXI:"cd the minimum aren and .:idth rC'll1ir<!Mcllts.
4. The r.rant ;nl-': of thi.. variance w:i 1 1 1I0t he detrjrn(mtal lo I:he I'"hlie wclfare
hecause it allows the homes to he I'ril:cd al a Im/Cr rHIlI\C! than would othm'wi8c
be "ollEib]('.
5. No oral or wrJ.ttr-n ohjections wc'r.e received.
NOH, TIlERl:FORI':, \lI~ rr RI!:;tlLVF.n that the Plannlnll ComrnisR[on or the CHy of Seal
lIeach docs hereby a""rove Vm:iance liD. V-9..68 reducinf, thc nverar.e lot Itrlla in
Tentntive Tract 5(,99 ham 5500 square feet lo 5491 square feet.
AI'I'Rovr:n MiD ADOPTEII this 15th day of tiny, 19(,3.
-
~....._.-, ::? e.-.___ j'.<:::1
Chain-Ian of the Plltnnin~ CommissiOn
I hereh)' certify th"t che forego:lng resolution lias duly ndopted at a relllllar
meetinll o{ the' Plann:lnr. COII'.miss:l,on of the City of Seal Beach whil:h waR held on
\~ednesday, Ha~' 15, 1960, and carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOI,S :
ABSENT:
Boeger, Crowley, Mur"hy, Peters
~tone
Lannin?
of thl!
is""iiiOn