HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 570 - 1971-09-15
.
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
570
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH DENYING VARIANCE NO. V-2l-7l
TO PERMIT CONSOLIDATION AND EXTENSIVE REMODELING
OF Two DUPLEXES IN THE R-3 ZONE. (GYLER)
WHEREAS, 1n the matter of Variance App11cat1on No. V-2l-7l, the Planning Comm1ss1on
of the C1ty of Seal Beach does report as follows
1. Subject case was 1n1t1ated by Emanuel Gyler, 3606 Parkv1ew Dr1ve, Lakewood.
2. Subject property 1S legally descr1bed as Lots 15 and 16, Block D, Tract No.
1009 and 1S more commonly known as 1005 and 1007 Seal Wq.
3. SubJect proposes the conso11dat1on of two duplexes 1nto a s1ngle complex
by j01n1ng the two bU1ld1ngs, requ1r1ng var1ance cODs1derat1on for s1deyards
of less than the prescr1bed w1dth, lot coverage exceed1ng prescr1bed max1mum,
less than the prescr1bed number of on-s1te park1ng spaces w1th less than the
requ1red turn1ng rad1us and w1th structural encroachments 1nto the rear
yard setback. Deta1led breakdown of var1ance requests 1S as follows
Prescr1bed
Proposed
S1deyard Setback
Lot Coverage
On-S1te Park1ng Spaces
Turn1ng Rad1us
Rearyard Setback
6'
75%
8
24'
9'
3'
80%
5
18'
3'
WHEREAS, the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on f1nd1ngs are as follows.
1. It was the app11cant's content1on that a number of var1ances of a nature
s1m1lar to the one's requested had been granted 1n the past on Seal Wq.
To 1llustrate th1s p01nt photographs were presented to the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on
for the1r rev1ew.
2. It was p01nted out that some of the photographs 111ustrated construct1on
wh1ch had occured pr10r to code reV1S1on Wh1Ch had upgraded the standards.
3. Two members of the aud1ence spoke 1n favor of the requested var1ances.
4. One 1tem of maJor concern was the fact that the app11cant was request1ng
a total of f1ve var1ances from the zon1ng ord1nance.
5. In the op1n1on of the majonty of the members of the Plann1ng COIIDll1SS10n, the
app11cant fuled to prove hardsh1p, and favorable cons1derat1on of the
var1ances requested could estab11sh an undes1rable precedent 1n cons1derat1on
of future var1ance requests.
/t?os- -)OO?--- x1e-J WtV;r
.
.
. ResolutJ.on No. 510 - 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the PlannJ.ng COIJDJ1J.ssJ.on of the CJ.ty of Seal
Beach does hereby deny VarJ.ance V-2l-1l.
AIX>PTED MiD APPROVED <>n. 1''''....,._~
Ch&J.rman of the P
J.ssJ.on
I hereby certJ.fy that the foregoJ.ng resolutJ.on was duly adopted at a regular
meetJ.ng of the PlannJ.ng COIJDJ1J.ssJ.on of the CJ.ty of Seal Beach whJ.ch was held on
Wednesd~, September 15, 1911, and carrJ.ed by the followJ.ng vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT.
COIJDJ1J.ssJ.oners.
CQIlUI1].ssJ.oners.
COIJDJ1J.ssJ.oners.
Dorr, LannJ.ng, RJ.pperdan
Knapp, O'Toole
None
S
Secretary of the
J.ng OIlIIIIJ.ssJ.on
.
a
.
IOO~-/607 - ~(j/~