HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 511 - 1971-01-06
.
.
.
-
.
RESOLUTION NO. 511
A RESOLUTION OF TIlF PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TIlE CITY OF SEAL BFACH DENYING USE VARIANCE
NO. UV-l-71 TO PERMIT RESTAURANT WITH
COCkTAIL LOUNGE IN A C-l, SERVICE C~MERCIAL,
ZONE. (SEAL BEACH C.ENTER/TRANA)
WIiliREAS, 1n the matter of Use Volr1ance App11cat10n No. UV-1-7l, the Planning C.omm1E.S10n
of the C1ty of Seal Beach does report as follows
1. SubJect app11cat1on was 1n1t1ated by Peter Trama, 1017 Pac1f1c Coast I11ghway,
the author1zed agent for Seal Beach Center, a l1mited partnersh1p.
2. qubJect property 1S located 1n the Seal Beach Center at 1017 Pac1fic Coast
H1ghway.
3. SubJect proposes operat10n of a restaurant w1th cockta1l lounge 1n the C-l,
SerV1ce ComAerc1al, Zone.
WHEREAS, the Plann1ng Commission f1nd1ngs are as follows
1. Plann1ng Comm1ss10n Resolut10n No. 382 which perm1tted a restaurant w1th
cockta1l lounge and enterta1nment to be operated 1n a C-l, Serv1ce Commercial,
Zone waq granted for a per10d of one year and subJect to renewal by
December 16, 1970. The Inter1m C1ty Attorney ruled that S1nce a request for
renewal had not been f11ed pr10r to the date of exp1rat10n Use Var1ance UV-1-7l
must be cons1dered as an or1g1nal app11cat1on.
2. S1nce expirat10n of Use Var1ance UV-11-69, Resolut10n No. 382, the operator
has cont1nued to sell l1quor w1thout proper mun1c1pal approval.
3. The enterta1nment perm1t for the establ1shment was revoked early 1n December
by the Inter1m City Manager for failure to comply w1th State and Munic1pal
regulat1ons.
4. The County Health Department had revoked the app11cant's Health Perm1t for
v10lations of County standards. The attorney act1ng on behalf of the app11cant
stolted that the lIealth Department had S1nce approved the operat10n, but no
substant1at1ng 1nformation was presented.
5. All provisions of the prev10us year's approval designed to insure that the
operat1on was conducted pr1marily as a restaurant and not as a bar were
v10lated.
6. Three oral protests were rece1ved and several people spoke 1n favor of the
proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVLD that the Plann1ng Comm1ssion of the C1ty of Seal
Beach does hereby deny Use Variance Apphcat10n No. UV-l-71 for the reaSOns noted
in F1nd1ngs 2, 3, 4 and 5
I () I T- it- tl~~ t!~ II~
.
.
.
..
..
Resolut1on No. 511 - 2
ADOPTED AND APPROVED th1S 6th day of January,
I hereby cert1fy that the forego1ng resolut1on was duly adopted at a regular
mE'et1ng of the Plann1ng Comm1SS1on of the C1ty of Seal Beach wh1ch was held on
Wednesday, January 6, 1971, and carried by the followinR vote
AYES
NOES
ABSENT.
Comm1ssioners
Commissioners
Conon1ss1oners
Dorr, Knapp, Lanning, O'Toole, R1ppE'rdan
None
None
1(' / 7-- /It- ~~ tk.4i1clA:.J/-