HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1997-10-27
10-20-97 / 10-27-97
Attest:
C'
o
I
Seal Beach, California
October 27, 1997
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
adjourned session at 6:30 p.m. with Mayor ProTem Brown
calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor ProTem Brown
Councilmembers Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
Absent:
Mayor Hastings
I
Fulton moved, second by Brown, to excuse the absence of Mayor
Hastings from this meeting.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
Also present: Mr. Till, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Fulton moved, second by Brown, to approve the order of the
agenda as presented.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were no Oral Communications.
I
CLOSED SESSION
Mayor ProTem Brown announced that the Council would meet in
Closed Session to confer with the City's labor negotiator
with regard to confidential/supervisory/professional/
technical employees as provided by Government Code Section
54957.6. The Council adjourned to Closed Session at 6:32
p.m. and reconvened at 6:56 p.m. with Mayor ProTem Brown
calling the meeting to order. The City Attorney reported the
Council had met with the City's labor negotiator, gave
direction, and no other action was taken.
10-27-97
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair,
to adjourn the meeting at 6:58
Attest:
consent of the Council,
clerk
I
Approved:
Seal Beach, California
October 27, 1997
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:02 p.m. with Mayor ProTem Brown calling the
meeting to order with the salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor ProTem Brown
Councilmembers Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
I
Absent:
Mayor Hastings
BroWn moved, second by Campbell, to excuse the absence of
Mayor Hastings from this meeting.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
Also present: Mr. Till, City Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development
Services
Mr. Dorsey, Assistant to the City Manager
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
AGENDA AMENDED
Councilmember Forsythe moved to amend the agenda to include a
presentation to members of Cub Scout Pack 116. Councilman
Fulton seconded the motion.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
PRESENTATIONS
CUB SCOUT PACK 116
Councilmember Forsythe noted that the Scouts are receiving
their Citizenship pin which is earned by learning how
I
I
I
10-27-97
government interacts with the public, what the public does
for the government, and what the government does for the
public. Councilmember Forsythe presented Citizenship pins to
Shawn O'Keefe, Zack Schultz, Thomas Lloyd, Reid Shoval,
Michael O'Toole, and Tanner Fist1er with congratulations.
SERGEANT GROOS - RETIREMENT
Chief Sellers described this as an opportunity to recognize a
fellow officer for his dedicated service to the City of Seal
Beach for a span of twenty-eight years. The Chief and Mayor
ProTem Brown presented a commending plaque to Sergeant Groos.
Sergeant Groos accepted the recognition with appreciation.
RESOLUTION NUMBER 4577 - RECOGNIZING VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS
Forsythe moved, second by Campbell, to adopt Resolution
Number 4577 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE SEAL BEACH
VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS" for their efforts in response to the
September 25th flooding incident and assistance whenever a
need arises. By unanimous consent, full reading of
Resolution Number 4577 was waived.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
PROCLAMATION - KOCE-TV ANNIVERSARY
Mayor ProTem Brown proclaimed November 20th, 1997 as the
"25th Anniversary Celebration of KOCE-TV."
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor ProTem Brown declared Oral Communications open. Mr.
Reg C1ew1ey, Catalina Avenue, said he had intended to request
that Item "I" be removed from the agenda. Ms. Adria Stoker,
Long Beach, stated a Petition for Writ of Mandate had been
served on Mr. David Bartlett for the Hellman Ranch this
evening and a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Request for
preparation of Administrative Records was served on the City.
Mr. Marty Mahrer, College Park East, inquired as to the
status of the slurry sealed College Park East streets since
the last ride-along. The Public Works Director reported
having met with the contractor, examined the product, looked
at the quality of such projects in other cities, at this
point the intent is to recommend that the project be finaled
and completed as to the contractor meeting the requirements
of the contract. He explained that the nature of slurry seal
is a somewhat rough texture yet it is a good product, and
that all specifications of the project have been met. Mr.
Mahrer voiced complaint with the quality of the project,
stating his preference to wait a year for better quality.
Ms. Sue Corbin, Seal Beach, noted the presence of
representatives of the designated Native American tribe of
Seal Beach and asked that they have the opportunity to speak
under the Research Design item. Mayor ProTem Brown advised
that the subject of the Hellman Ranch has been discussed a
number of times and offered that they present any comments
during oral communications. Ms. Vera Rocha said she is the
Chief of the Gabrieleno Shoshone, she did not understand what
tribe was being mentioned as the designated tribe for Seal
Beach. Ms. Rocha stated she has been working with the
Council for maybe the last five or six years, and was
disappointed because she has heard nothing from the Council
since she was last here. Mr. Stickle invaded their
territory, desecrated their graves, and insulted her people
and ancestors. Ms. Rocha said she was here because she is
.
10-27-97
designated as the most likely descendant, she could pick
anyone to be the monitor, and she does not want anyone from
any other tribe to tell her, on her territory, what she can
and can't do. Mr. Stickle and Moira Hahn harassed and
insulted her. Ms. Rocha commented further about the sites.
There being no further comments, Mayor ProTem Brown declared
Oral Communications closed.
I
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "D" thru "R"
Members of the audience requested Items "H", "I", and "H"
removed from the Consent Calendar, and Councilmember Campbell
noted a typographical error in Item "R", page thirteen of the
September 22nd minutes, the year of 1980 corrected to read
1880. Forsythe moved, second by Campbell, to approve the
recommended action for items on the Consent Calendar as
presented except Items "H, I, and K", removed for separate
consideration, and to approve Item "R" as corrected.
D. Approved the waiver of reading in full of
all ordinances and resolutions and that
consent to the waiver of reading shall be
deemed to be given by all Councilmembers
unless specific request is made at that
time for the reading of such ordinance or
resolution.
E.
Approved regular demands numbered 17407
through 17578 in the amount of $657,976.43,
payroll demands numbered 24329 through
24497 in the amount of $224,704.26, and
authorized warrants to be drawn on the
Treasury for same.
I
F. Received and filed the third quarterly
report relating to the Daytime Curfew
Ordinance.
G. Received and filed the staff report
relating to the Seal Beach Naval Weapons
Station Installation Restoration Program -
status report relating to All Installation
Restoration Sites.
J. Adopted Ordinance Number 1421 entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH REPEALING THE STATE LANDS
SPECIFIC PLAN." By unanimous consent,
full reading of Ordinance Number 1421 was
waived.
L.
Denied the claim for indemnification,
contribution and declaratory relief of
Super Saver Cinemas No.1, Ltd. and
referred same to the City's liability
attorney and adjuster.
I
M. Authorized the extension of the service
contract with Medix Ambulance Service
under the same terms and conditions as the
current contract until such time as the
Ambulance Service Request For Proposal
is completed by the Orange County Fire
Authority, not to exceed July 1, 1998.
10-27-97
N.
Approved the purchase from existing Local
Law Enforcement Block Grant funds, ink-less
fingerprint equipment for local residents,
Operation Safe Check crime prevention and
children's fingerprinting programs, and 460
MHz police radios for the Senior Volunteer
and Reserve Police Officer programs, the
total cost being $7,525.
I
O. Received and filed the Monthly Investment
Report for September, 1997.
P. Adopted Resolution Number 4578 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH OPPOSING THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT OF MILE SQUARE PARK (A REGIONAL
PARK FACILITY) AS LIMITED USE RECREATION.
By unanimous consent, full reading of
Resolution Number 4578 was waived.
Q. Approved the plans and specification for
Project Number 675, the 1997/98 Concrete
Maintenance Repair project, and authorized
staff to initiate the public contract
bidding process.
R. Approved the minutes of the joint
Redevelopment and City Council meeting of
September 22, 1997 as corrected.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
I
ITEM "I" - ORDINANCE NUMBER 1420 - HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN
Mr. Reg Clewley, 955 Catalina Avenue, stated his opposition
to the passage of Ordinance Number 1420, certification of the
final Environmental Impact Report, and General plan Amendment
97-1 relating to the Land Use Element, claimed that
information at the October 8th Planning Commission meeting
leaves in doubt some of the mitigation measures recommended
by the Archaeological Advisory Committee, the Environmental
Quality Control Board, and the Planning Commission. Mr.
clewley referred to the revocation of Variance 87-2 item on
that October 8th meeting that required the signing and
recording of an in-lieu parking agreement prior to the
issuance of building permits, however the staff report states
that the applicant never signed the agreement and the City
issued the building permit contrary to condition three of the
variance, to which he compared that building permit issuance
to the permit issued for 1733 Crestview last year while under
a stop work order. with regard to the relevance of Variance
87-2 to Item "I" Mr. Clewley asked that his oral
communication comments from the last meeting be included in
the record of this meeting. He questioned what would make
the advisory bodies believe that the required conditions
would be met prior to the issuance of building permits. Mr.
Clewley moved that Ordinance Number 1420 be removed and
returned to the Planning Commission, and returned to the
Archaeological Committee and EQCB to provide the opportunity
to reassess their recommendations.
10-27-97
Forsythe moved, second by Campbell, to adopt ordinance Number
1420 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING THE HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
(HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-10)." By unanimous
consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1420 was waived.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
I
ITEMS "H" and "K" - ORDINANCE NUMBER 1423 - AMENDMENT OF
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I ORDINANCE NUMBER 1422 - HELLMAN RANCH
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
It was noted for the record that the member of the audience
that requested Items "H" and "K" removed from the Consent
Calendar was not present in the Council Chambers. Forsythe
moved, second by Campbell, to adopt Ordinance Number 1423
entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH" and to adopt Ordinance
Number 1422 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AND HELLMAN PROPERTIES LLC, REGARDING
THE 'HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN' . " By unanimous consent,
full reading of Ordinances numbered 1423 and 1422 was waived.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
I
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - FRANCHISE AGREEMENT - COMCAST
CABLEVISION I ORDINANCE NUMBER 1418 - FRANCHISE REGULATIONS
Mayor ProTem Brown declared the continued public hearing open
to consider the renewal of a non-exclusive franchise with
Comcast Cablevision to operate the City's cable television
system and to consider first reading of proposed Ordinance
Number 1418, amending Chapter 23A of the Municipal Code. Mr.
Marty Mahrer, College Park East, stated that the Cable
Foundation had voted to place an announcement on the local
cable bulletin board of this meeting, it was shown on
Wednesday, was taken off on Thursday, on Friday the Comcast
General Manager told him that the announcement was taken off
because the wording was wrong, more specifically the words
'speak now or wait until 2007', also that the paperwork was
incorrect, which he claimed should not have been done as it
relates to First Amendment Rights. Mayor ProTem Brown
responded that he had been contacted by the General Manager,
the language was corrected for rebroadcasting as it is
believed that the City has a final say in that kind of
situation. Mr. Mahrer claimed this to be usurping, a First
Amendment Rights issue, and a breach of the contract.
The Council invited the presentation of public comments with
a suggestion that responses be made at the end of the
discussion. Councilmember Campbell asked that responses be
made at the time of a question or concern. Mayor ProTem
Brown said his desire was that the public present data that
has not been previously addressed yet should be given
consideration, such as inconsistencies between the contract
and the ordinance, issues that can be further negotiated.
I
Mr. Marty Mahrer commenced his comments relating to the
regulatory ordinance as follows:
I
I
I
10-27-97
*
Page 3, Section 2, Findings, asked who, where, and what
department of the City will regulate cable television
and telecommunications franchises to the extent
authorized;
*
Page 7, Section 23A-6(1), questioned the toll free
telephone lines for weekends, if there is one; the not
to exceed wait time of thirty seconds, he has talked to
subscribers that have waited fifty-nine or more, there
is nothing if one calls the Seal Beach number at minutes
after 5:00 p.m.;
*
Mayor ProTem Brown responded that if these requirements
are not met, and someone reports that they are not, it
will be looked into, the City now has the ability to
address such complaints, where, in the past, the problem
has been that the City has not exercised that ability,
the intent is to have a City staff person log
complaints;
*
Page 8, Section 23-A6(2) and (4), Mr. Mahrer said to him
they are scrambled, could possibly be combined, his
feeling is that they conflict with one another; he does
not like the wording of (4) with regard to
...maintenance and repair staff capable of responding...
from his experience he would want people that 'would'
respond, 'capable' an interesting word and questioned
its meaning;
*
To the Mayor ProTem's suggestion for more definitive
wording, the consultant, Mr. Pilnick, said he did not
believe the key is the word 'capable', it is on a
twenty-four per day basis, essentially this clause is to
notify the cable company that they have the obligation
for emergencies, to have someone on call all the time,
middle of the night or not, other wording relates to
other situations, this relates to emergency situations;
* With regard to subsection (3), the Seal Beach office
open eight hours, five days a week, to which Mr. Mahrer
questioned when the half day will be, assumed to
possibly be a Saturday morning; with regard to "b", said
ninety percent is not tight enough, suggesting ninety-
five percent measured on a quarterly basis, his
preference would be ninety-eight or ninety-nine percent;
* Mayor ProTem Brown responded that there was considerable
discussion of "b", he did not expect that percentage to
change, that is industry standard;
*
Page 8, subsection 2(b), Service Standards, referred to
the words "normally capable', which he said is
inconceivable, why are those words used, his concept is
that this conflicts with subsection 1(2); subsection 2-
b(1), to '...affecting at least ten percent of the
subscribers of the system', questioned if anyone is
aware of the number of subscribers of the system, if
that includes Leisure World, described in other sections
as a gated community, yet this contract is exclusive of
Leisure World;
* At the request of Mayor ProTem Brown, Mr. pilnick
responded that Leisure World has a separate contract
however is considered part of the system where the ten
percent threshold applies;
10-27-97
*
To subsection 2-b(2), isolated outage, said it appears
that some of the service areas are being treated totally
different yet the people of Seal Beach and Leisure world
are paying for one hundred sixty-eight hours of service,
if they are treating areas differently he would like to
know why, describing an isolated outage as one or more
channels for three or more subscribers, on weekends an
outage that affects fewer than three that results in a
service call will be no later than the following Monday,
to which he claimed that this is a simple system and if
one customer is without service he would guarantee there
will be more than three;
I
* The Mayor ProTem responded that that seems reasonable
and if it is an emergency the cable company will take
care of it, explained that in Leisure World there have
been two or three sets without power because the lines
coming in can do that, again, if the company is held to
these provisions good service is expected;
* Page 9, subsection 2(3), inferior signal quality,
questioned who decides what is inferior - the response
to that was to use the 'reasonable man' concept,
defining 'inferior' is difficult, which in some cases
could require the services of an arbitrator - and in
response to that the comment was that there are
standards, a number of tests, anything that the
electronics world can provide, that is why he requested
definition of 'inferior', such language too broad;
*
Page 9, subsection 3-b, billing dispute, in such case
written response within thirty days, his desire would be
that a copy of the response be provided to City Hall;
I
*
Mayor ProTem Brown offered that that could be requested,
the feeling is that the company would be willing to
accommodate that, there will be no problem if there is a
response, if no response that is the problem - the
rebuttal to that was that it is another means of keeping
track of what is going on, note any patterns - the
response was that the cable company wants the City to
use their system, there is competition, and if the
system is not working, it will not be used, thus the
feeling that Comcast will periodically let the City know
what type of written complaints come to them;
*
Page 9, Billing and Information Standards, subsection 3-
c, with regard to credits or refunds for service
interruption for four or more hours, the comment of Mr.
Mahrer was that he does not pay for services if other
utilities are down, and if the cable system is down it
should not be paid either, contending that subscribers
should not have to wait four hours, and described a
recent downage of his service, the response to his call
was to check his television set, also that neither
College Park East or Seal Beach had a problem, even
though there was snow, etc.
I
*
The question to Mr. Mahrer was if in the future he would
be reporting that occurrence to City Hall in addition to
the cable company, offering that if the company does not
do what the regulations provide then monies will be
taken from them, those in charge of the company also
want to know whether the service they are paying for is
being provided, and they will not know unless they are
I
I
I
10-27-97
told;
*
page 10, subsection 5-a, Complaints and Disputes,
procedures for, to which he questioned where are those
procedures, how do people know what they are supposed to
do, are they published anywhere, there should be a copy
at City Hall for public information - the response was
that a means needs to be developed for City Hall to
receive complaints and the cooperation of the cable
company is anticipated;
*
Subsection 5-b, the City has the right to review
subscriber complaints, as mentioned before - the
response was that the City plans to do that;
*
Page 12, Section 23A-B, Construction Requirements,
subsection l-d(2), questioned the amount of time it
takes the cable company to repair sidewalks, described
two sidewalks in the College Park East area that were
dug up then instead of concrete they were repaired with
asphalt, which took about six or more months, they also
start working in the City without any authorization, his
request would be that there be a specific time frame for
the work and repair before such work is commenced - the
response to this concern was that the City needs to be
notified which may even require closing down a job;
*
Councilmember Campbell noted that the sidewalk across
from Heather Park was repaired this date, a person
wearing an orange vest watched;
*
The Mayor ProTem again recommended that anytime someone
is digging up a street or sidewalk in the City that they
be closed down unless City permission has been granted;
* Question was posed as to the disposition of abandoned
equipment on or adjacent to private property - the
response was that after a period of thirty days it is
abandoned and can be disposed of - to which Mr. Mahrer
described a cable box and wire left at a property for
more than a year - to which the response was that that
is the fault of the City, should have been taken care
of;
* Page 14, Section 23A-9, Technical Standards, complaint
lodged that the technical standards should be defined
and contained in the ordinance, there is no reference to
where such standards may be found, testing, scheduling,
the language too generic;
*
Page 15, Section 23A-ll, Records Required, subsection
1(3), reference made to a summary of service calls if
requested by grantor, to which Mr. Mahrer said a summary
would not contain the same information that would be
transmitted by telephone, rather, a summary of someone's
idea, it should be the specific complaint, will the City
specify the detail of information requested, again asked
that the word 'reasonably' be deleted - the response was
that if the summary information is not felt to be
sufficient, the intent would be to return it and request
further detail of the complaint, the intent is to obtain
data as to the number of service calls, the nature
thereof, it is felt that the word 'reasonable' is
appropriate;
10-27-97
* Councilmember Campbell inquired if the actual complaint
records could be reviewed by the City - the response of
Mr. Mahrer was affirmative;
*
Page 17, subsection 3, Opinion Survey, suggested such
survey at least once a year for a better reflection of
what is going on - the response of Mayor ProTem Brown
was that this received considerable discussion, the
conclusion being that every two years would be adequate,
if it is done every two years;
I
* page 17, Section 23A-12, subsection 2, Special Review,
suggested that something be added with regard to
maintenance methods; given redundancy, possibly combine
subsections 'b' and 'c'; subsection 3, Special
Evaluation Sessions, Mr. Mahrer said he felt such public
forum would be beneficial to the public, Comcast, other
cable companies, to get ideas of the aspects of how to
talk to customers, how to treat and maintain them;
* The Mayor ProTem responded that his feeling is that if
people would come forward with constructive criticism
that would be well received, not so with a complaint
session;
*
Page 19, continuation of subsection 2-a, expressed
opinion that fifteen rather than thirty days would be
reasonable for remedying franchise violations - the
response too was that that issue received considerable
discussion but was not one of the highest points of
concern;
I
*
Page 20, Section 23A-15, Abandonment or Removal of
Equipment, subsection 'a', suggested that the time frame
should be thirty days - the response was that thirty
consecutive days should be considered to be abandonment
- question was raised as to the difference between
subsections 'a' and 'b';
*
At the request of Mayor ProTem Brown, Mr. Pilnick
explained that subsection 'a' is intended to cover major
items like the cable system itself, for example if it is
not operating and it would be unreasonable to take all
of the cable out, 'a' applies to any system condition,
'b' is different in that it relates to broken or
discarded equipment.
Mr. Mahrer requested that there be a public study session to
review in greater detail the provisions of this item, for
more specific definition of meanings, which may in turn bring
up additional questions.
Ms. Terri Quinlan, Seal Beach, presented her comments to the
proposed Franchise Agreement and Regulatory Ordinance:
I
*
The Agreement may not be the best offer, there are
specific items that have been overlooked therein, to
pass the ordinance may not be the best thing to do at
this time, the ten year agreement should be carefully
scrutinized, and asked that passage of the ordinance be
delayed;
*
With due respect to the consultant, there are things in
the ordinance that were not discussed at prior meetings;
I
I
I
10-27-97
*
Comcast has failed to meet the standards of the Group W
agreement that they assumed in 1982;
It is felt that Comcast is in arrears with their payment
of the $75,000, since the 1982 agreement has continued
on a month to month basis since March of 1997,
questioned why that has not been pro-rated and paid to
the City upon demand, it appears that they have held
back payment intentionally pending approval of the
franchise agreement;
*
*
The community bulletin board issue has been mentioned;
again, Comcast has failed to perform, an example being
the public access coordinator which there was none for a
period of six months, there are promises with no follow
through;
*
The franchise agreement does not define specific
procedures, with regard to accountability she referred
to pages 12, 13 and 24 of the franchise agreement, and
pages 7, 10, 11, 15, 17, 18 and 19 of the proposed
ordinance; made reference to the Comcast station in the
City of Buena Park, that City having a Community Cable
System Board that meets quarterly to evaluate complaints
and non-compliance issues of the subscribers, to which
Ms. Quinlan recommended that a similar board be
established in Seal Beach, and such regulatory entity
not to be determined by the Grantee as stated in the
proposed ordinance;
.
*
The Cable Foundation has done a good job, there is
currently $200,000 in an interest bearing account, the
function of a non-profit organization is to be the
governing agent to disperse funds, and the fact that
there is that amount of money shows that they have done
the job well; based upon the fact that the cable company
will back out of any arrangement for public access and
turn pver the equipment to the City, then the terms of
public access becomes similar to a small business, and
even with the $75,000 per year and the existing funds,
they will soon be depleted; there is also no mention of
payment for the public access coordinator in the
documents, that paid by Comcast to date, will that
position become an employee of the City, if those monies
come from the $75,000, that money will be depleted quite
fast;
* Recommends that the responsibilities of the Foundation
be more clearly defined, and possibly the membership
should be expanded, those members having a background in
law, accounting, and MBA experience;
*
with regard to facilities, it is understood that the
studio is the result of a lease arrangement made with
Group W, Comcast assumed the lease, yet at this point
Comcast is saying they will only pay the rent for
another three years, to which she questioned what
happened to the lease arrangement, is there a letter of
intent, isn't there a binding agreement with regard to
the studio arrangement, is it month to month, if someone
proposed moving it is there something that binds the
studio to stay there, is the area all of the upstairs of
the building, where will space for the coordinator, tape
storage, and edit bays be located, if the rental does
not incorporate those areas, where will they go;
10-27-97
* Nothing was found in the documents with regard to
playback, it used to be done in Seal Beach, then Comcast
moved that operation to Fullerton; nothing is said about
coverage of City councilor Planning Commission meetings
as well;
*
With regard to the van, the current contract states that
there shall be two vans available to public access, one
for Seal Beach and one for Leisure World; the current
proposal suggests that there be authority to use the van
twelve times a year, also, Comcast will no longer be
covering what they call local origination programming,
therefore public access will need to cover the events
for the whole year; Ms. Quinlan read sixteen categories
of events that are covered, noted that one producer has
covered about eight of the school events this past year,
those can be added to the sixteen listed; as to the
number of van shoots, in the past Comcast has charged
what they termed to be a reasonable fee for the van,
that being $400, it is unknown where that fee came from
or how it was decided; if the word 'reasonable' is used
in the documents it is suggested that it be stated what
reasonable means as it is too broad a term, especially
with regard to the van arrangement;
I
*
It is believed that based on failure to perform, there
is usually a fine to be paid, therefore the City should
ask, or recommend, that the City be given one of the
vans, doing so would make it possible for more programs;
possibly ask for some grant money for special projects,
shoots in other areas, and different subject matter by
having access to a van at any time; the City could also
rent the van to generate more revenue;
I
*
Ms. Quinlan noted a typographical error in subsection 6-
b, page 4, and a missing period in subsection 6-a; as to
a question of the coverage of the City, noted that page
24 of the ordinance refers to the entire geographic area
of the City of Seal Beach as it is now constituted,
which she suggested that language be incorporated in
other areas of the agreement.
*
Dr. Rosenman, Seal Beach, suggested that it might be
helpful for the audience and viewing public to explain
what is being paid for under the proposed agreement
relating to public access, will City Council and
Planning Commission meetings be covered, etc.;
*
Mayor ProTem Brown explained that the cable company will
have little to nothing to do with that, the City and the
Foundation will make that determination based upon the
money they have and how it is desired to be spent, he is
personally comfortable that the Council will encourage
the Foundation to do as much as is possible, however it
is realized there will not be enough money for
everything;
I
*
To the question will anything be lost, the Mayor ProTem
confirmed that the rent on the studio will be lost after
three years, the City will assume payment for the
coordinator; at the present time the $75,000 is
transferred to the Foundation, they in turn pay $50,000
to Comcast, Comcast pays the coordinator, and it is felt
that the Foundation can do a better job in determining
how the $75,000 is to be used;
I
I
I
10-27-97
*
Dr. Rosenman concurred with the previous speaker with
regard to a citizen board to oversee the adequacy of the
cable service, which may resolve a number of problems
and relieve staff of that responsibility;
*
Ms. Elaine Hamada, Los Alamitos School District, was
introduced to the Council; Ms. Hamada acknowledged that
the agreement proposed is between the City and Comcast,
however assured that the District is interested in
working closely with the City in this endeavor, in fact
for the past two years the District has been installing
infrastructure in all of their sites with the intention
of taking advantage of the cable system for an internet
access; Ms. Hamada was assured of the City's active and
cooperative efforts with the District;
Mr. John Unrath, College Park East, recalled sending a
letter to the Council some time back with regard to band
width, noted Section 4.1 of the agreement which calls
for the system to build up to 750 MHz bandwidth, which
he deemed would be one hundred twenty-five channels,
6MHz per channel - the response, in part, of Mr. pilnick
from the audience was that the statement was incorrect,
the channels do not start with zero, about eighty
channels of active bandwidth... - to the response Mr.
Unrath said it was less bandwidth than he was quoting,
and inquired as to HDTV that will use digital
compression, use one entire channel - again in part, Mr.
Pilnick responded that HDTV is questionable at this
point, this type of agreement can not project what type
of technology will take place in the next ten years; Mr.
Unrath said his point is the eighty channels of analog
bandwidth, 6MHz channels, right now digital compression
is promising one hundred seventy-five channels with
satellite TV, there are many things that will take more
bandwidth, expansion of the bandwidth needs to be
written into the agreement or call for future
renegotiation to do so, 750 bandwidth will not do it;
* It was suggested that Mr. Unrath then go with satellite
TV, the hope is that pressure from the people will cause
Comcast to provide the kind of service that the City
expects, if they do not they will not be in business;
*
*
Ms. Dar Brown, 6th Street, concurred that the agreement
may need further review; reinforced the opinion as to
the importance of public access, important that the
Council, Planning Commission, and the School Board be
agendized for public access, many things may be left out
if the agreement is entered into as written; if the
studio were to close, what is going to be used for
public access, if the van is available only twelve times
a year will the rental payment be required; even though
Comcast has not been the best service she has
experienced, if agreement is going to be entered into
with Comcast there has to be agreement also with the
City, the residents, and public access so that messages
can be gotten to the community;
* Mr. Gordon Shanks, Surf Place, expressed his opinion
that public access is a primary weakness of the proposed
agreement; said twelve years ago the City signed a
contract for $75,000, now there is $75,000 for ten years
out, the City is covered for inflation by a flat five
percent, it is quite certain that Comcast will raise
10-27-97
their rates over the next ten years, so if it is said
there is interest in keeping and improving local
programming he can not see that happening unless the
City is willing to take something from their five
percent, which he does not foresee~ with regard to the
van, it is understood that Comcast claims it was not .
being used twelve times, then reasonable cost to use ~t
over twelve times, to which he suggested that the
contract reflect a use of thirty-six times a year, if
used only eleven times Comcast has lost nothing, and
what is a reasonable cost for the van~ also, when there
is a ten year contract and a Foundation, it seems that
the ordinance should reflect that ten years from now a
representative of the Foundation and/or review board
should be included in the negotiations~
* Mayor ProTem Brown noted that the city will have total
control with regard to public access, the number of
channels, will have the equipment, etc., the public
access issue lies with the City Council and the Cable
Foundation; some type of inflationary coverage became a
serious consideration of the contract negotiation1 the
cost for use of the van will be provided by sideletter
before closure of the contract1
I
*
Ms. Donna McGuire, College Park East, said her comments
dealt more with customer satisfaction and in the spirit
of keeping cable given her interest in public acceSS1
upon having cable installed they found there were
horizontal lines through the picture, the boxes did not
work, there were charges for programs that were not
ordered, special programs would broadcast in one area of
the house and not the other, letters were sent to the
cable provider, phone calls were made, the company
suggested the problem was in-house, after some years her
husband determined the bills would not be paid until the
service was fixed, a service representative arrived a
week later to determine that the system had been hooked
up to old rather than updated cables1 when the service
rep was asked to look back at her records, that could
not be done because the records had been purged,
communications sent with a bill had been delivered
elsewhere~ her concern is that there is no means of
tracking customer satisfaction1 the major component of
keeping Comcast is watching local programs like Council
meetings~ entering into a long term contract where
technology is doubling every nine months is worrisome,
the contract wording needs to be tightened and a means
for tracking customer satisfaction1 willing to pay more
money for Comcast and satellite if receive good service
and public access1 a line of communication is needed so
that people can call in their complaints, they can be
tracked and fixed1
I
*
Ms. Pedigo, President of the Leisure World Video
Producers Club, noted the many hours that their members
spend producing public access programs1
I
Mr. Peter Anninos, Seal Beach, presented his comments as
follows:
*
The playback headend equipment used for locally produced
programs used to be housed at the Old City Hall -
question was raised if that would not be what would
happen once the City owns the equipment and is in
I
I
I
10-27-97
control - response was that it is understood that
Comcast will continue to handle playbacks from their
facilities in Fullerton, the equipment was taken there
and has not returned;
*
Understand there is no prov1s1on for an increase of PEG
funding in the agreement - Buena Park contract provides
for $10,000 in the first year, increased slightly each
year for life of agreement - a response, in part, from
Mr. pilnick in the audience, was that that comment was
incorrect, the estimate had nothing to do with the CPI,
the anticipation is $60,000 over the first year of the
contract because the company is offering internet
services which will mean more revenue, in turn more
franchise fees; Mr. Anninos suggested that a CPI
provision from Comcast would be a small amount and a
nice gesture - as to a CPI provision with other cable
companies Mr. pilnick noted there are on-going
negotiations with Time Warner in Garden Grove, their PEG
support is zero - Mayor ProTem Brown said all agree that
public access is essential for Seal Beach, all else can
be obtained through satellite;
*
Cable Agreement, page 22, Section 6.2(b), maintenance of
Grantee's PEG access facilities and channels, the studio
is to be handed over to the City to operate, is Comcast
going to continue to maintain those facilities, the
interconnects between here and the headend, otherwise
the studio may get moved at some point in the future -
Mr. Pilnick responded that the key word is 'channels',
they are still Comcast channels;
*
with regard to Exhibit B-3, 4, PEG Access Channels, the
concern is with the wording, 'up to three video
channels' available for PEG access use, that wording
could mean zero, he would request the wording changed to
provide that there 'will continue to be three PEG
channels' - Mayor ProTem Brown stated he had no problem
with the 'up to' three PEG channels, that means there
are three available if there is programming to put on
the three channels;
*
It continues to say that the three channels are
exclusively for PEG access use, the next sentence then
says that the Grantee, Comcast, may use any portion of
these channels during any time that they are not
scheduled for PEG access use - Councilman Brown
cautioned that if there is nothing on Channel 3 as an
example that is of interest between programs the viewers
will not watch that channel, Comcast will help bring in
things of interest, which in turn will help the
Foundation - Mr. Anninos said he did not feel it would
be difficult to have programming for at least eight
primary viewing hours a day, therefore the word
'exclusively' is not correct - Mr. Pilnick responded in
part, from the audience, that the word 'exclusively'
does not mean twenty-four hours a day, it is common
practice to say that if the channel is not being used
for PEG access that the grantee can use it - Mr. Anninos
expressed concern that there would be programs that are
of no interest and that would harm the PEG channel
programming;
* Page B-4, reference was made to the provision of one
additional channel for PEG use upon completion of the
10-27-97
system rebuild to 750 MHz, yet the prior paragraph
states there will be up to three channels, question is
how many PEG channels will there actually be......and,
once there is eighty hours per month of unduplicated
video programming, access of another channel could be
offered, which in turn could be a total of two channels
rather than four, his concern is with the wording should
Comcast or someone else buyout the system at some point
in the future and try to take advantage of some wording
that may not be completely clear - the Mayor ProTem
noted the importance of understanding pages B-3 and B-4,
the language needs to be tight as it is the key to the
PEG access provisions;
I
* At some point the City may want to have a channel
dedicated to a bulletin board, new character generators
not only provide text but audio and video messages,
informational data that could run twenty-four hours a
day - the suggestion was made that the City review pages
B-3 and B-4 again and that the Foundation do so as well,
so that there is clear understanding of these provisions
_ also, the intent is that insignificant programming not
be placed on channel three to merely fill it up, the
Foundation should have the opportunity to review what is
being aired on that channel so that people will watch;
*
Page B-4, the last paragraph under item 4, reads
portions relating to the designation of channel 3 - the
response"was that at some point in the future that
channel may not be known as 3 as the cable company
begins to bring channels together and group them - Mr.
Anninos noted the language that states the grantee shall
make every good effort to maintain channel 3, his
opinion is that 3 is important to Seal Beach, it would
seem reasonable for the City to insist that channel 3
remain as one of the three PEG channels - response was
that channels will eventually be grouped, it would not
be good to be locked into channel 3, channel 3 will
remain as it is now for as long as possible, but in the
future the reference may change;
I
*
Page B-4, paragraph 5(a), PEG Access Equipment and
Facilities, comment was that Comcast will be raising
their rates, increasing their revenues, there has
already been a rate increase; to take advantage of the
new digital service a new digital box will be necessary,
that box will be $10 extra per month, looking at about
two percent PEG access grants or fees, as the company's
revenues increase and inflation goes up, percentagewise
the ability to operate will potentially be restricted,
therefore he would urge Comcast to adjust the $75,000 by
the CPI - question was posed as to if the CPI goes down
can the $75,000 be adjusted accordingly;
*
Page B-5, paragraph 5(a) continued, the wording that
....Grantee agrees that any such funds may be used for
any and all PEG purposes.... - Mayor ProTem Brown
cautioned that under the law these monies may not be
spent for operating expenses or capital equipment, the
company is being generous by allowing the City to do
this - Mr. Anninos noted the language 'non-capital
expenditures' to which he questioned if that would mean
cameras could not be purchased - the response was that
the monies can be spent for anything that is wanted so
long as the City Council agrees with the budget, the
I
I
I
I
10-27-97
monies come to the Foundation through the Council, the
Council will expect the Foundation to come up with an
operating budget and plans as to what to do with the
money, that will either be approved or not approved,
there will be control over the Foundation to a certain
degree;
*
Page B-S, paragraph SIb), with reference to good faith
to connect McGaugh School to any network, the comment
was that it sounds like good faith if someone else pays
- the response was that good faith is trying to get Time
Warner to also work towards that goal, they are key to
that effort, the intent is not only coverage of the
School Board but activities at McGaugh, football games
and various activities of Seal Beach residents on
channel 3 - as to what is delaying this effort, Mr.
Pilnick said his information is that Time Warner is not
being cooperative - Councilman Brown expressed his
belief that contacts in Los Alamitos can help to
encourage this effort, this is a family project, it is
believed that representatives in Los Alamitos will help,
and that Comcast will cooperate and assist the City in
this effort, competition is a factor, the company wants
their cable to be the best it can, which was not the
case five years ago;
Page B-S, paragraph (c), relating to the availability of
the production van at no cost for a minimum of twelve
times per year, with a reasonable charge for any
additional usage - Mayor Pro Brown advised that the
charge will be discussed and determined what will be
reasonable, discussed with the Foundation as well, that
will be done by a side letter, noting also that the van
may be busy for a particular shoot, not be available, as
has been the case in the past;
* Page B-7, Section 9, Relocation of PEG Channels, Mr.
Anninos noted that relocation happened before, the City
objected, that was it, it is hoped that will not happen
again, and inquired what the City can do to at least
assure channel 3 - the response was that it is a win/win
situation so long as it is a benefit to both parties and
it keeps people from buying a satellite;
*
*
As far as cable service goes people have spoken
regarding picture quality and service in general,
supposedly some assessments were done of the system from
various tap points around town, and although it is said
to have checked out, channels 2, 4, and sometimes S are
not good, yet when a service call is made the response
is that it is probably one's TV set; with the changes in
weather the connectors get loose, collect moisture, etc.
and need to be redone periodically, that occurs at the
connection to the house; suggested that at some point
the City should hire someone to accompany a cable
technician to check the signal strengths and signal
noise ratios as there are some doubts.
* Mr. Jim Clow, Seal Beach, noted that there has been a
problem with channel 2 for some time, the company
General Manager said she would have it checked some six
months ago, when a service call was made to verify that
it was not his equipment the technician said it was not
his equipment, then whose equipment is it?
10-27-97
Mayor ProTem Brown declared the public hearing closed,
however suggested that there be additional discussions with
the consultant, Mr. Pilnick, as well as with other members of
the Cable Foundation. He clarified that no further public
hearings will be held.
RECESS
It was the 'order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to declare a recess at 9:20 p.m. The Council reconvened at
9:30 p.m. with Mayor ProTem Brown calling the meeting to
order.
I
PUBLIC HEARING - WATER RATE ADJUSTMENT
Mayor ProTem Brown declared the public hearing open to
consider a water rate adjustment and a water commodity
adjustment clause, approved by the City Council on June 9,
1997. The City Clerk certified that notice of the public
hearing was advertised and mailed to each property owner in
the city of Seal Beach, and reported one communication
received from a Walter Miller, Seal Beach Boulevard, copies
of same provided the Council. The City Attorney clarified
for the record that the public hearing notices were mailed
within the time period prescribed by law. The city Manager
reported there was a presentation at length on June 9th
relating to the deficit situation with regard to water
services, the deficit recommended to be corrected pursuant to
the water rate study as provided by the City's consultant,
Willdan Associates, which protects against a future deficit
as a result of water cost increases. There being no public
comments, Mayor ProTem Brown declared the public hearing
closed.
The City Attorney stated for the record that there has not
been a majority protest on this matter, and that a finalizing
document will be prepared for Council action at the next
meeting. Fulton moved, second by Forsythe, to approve the
water rate adjustment and commodity adjustment clause as
presented.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
RESEARCH DESIGN - HELLMAN RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
Mayor ProTem Brown announced this item as the Research Design
for the Evaluation of Archaeological Sites Within the Hellman
Ranch Specific Plan. Councilmember Forsythe commended the
manner in which the Design was compiled and the sensitivity
created by the document. Forsythe moved, second by Fulton,
to approve the Research Design as presented.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Brown, Campbell, Forsythe, Fulton
None
Hastings Motion carried
I
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
The City Manager reported that a training session was held
last week at the EOC, hosted by the -Orange County Fire
Authority, a practice session to further refine the ,emergency
response plan in preparation for the upcoming winter season,
and that preparations are continuing for the import of sand
as well. He reported also that the City has been enforcing
its sign ordinance, particularly with regard to real estate
signs placed in the public right of way, that prior to
commencing enforcement letters were written to the real
10-27-97 I 11-10-97
I
estate offices, the brokers, and Board of Realtors in an
attempt to obtain' their cooperation, at this point there has
been no prosecution efforts. Mayor ProTem Brown questioned
how much notice there would be of an EI Nino situation. The
City Manager noted that a participant in the training session
was the weather forecaster for the Fire Authority, depending
upon the size and direction of a storm there could be several
days warning, that information would be provided by the Fire
Authority and other sources. Mayor ProTem Brown said he
would hope Leisure World will be provided the same detail of
information as the City, which will allow some preparation
time. Councilman Fulton noted that there is a Leisure World
resident that checks the weather scanner every day.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were no Oral Communications presented.
I
COUNCIL CONCERNS
Councilman Fulton said when there is notice of an approaching
EI Nino he would hope it would not be like Denver that went
from a light snow prediction to four to eight feet.
Councilmember Campbell reporeed that the Halloween Haunt,
hosted by the College Park East Neighborhood Association, was
held this past Saturday, was very successful, predicted to be
bigger and scarier next year, and next Saturday the
Association will be sponsoring a paper drive at Almond Park.
She inquired of the Public Works Director if tree trimming
has been scheduled for the south side of Lampson Avenue, to
which the Director reported they are private property trees
overhanging onto the street, a letter is being forwarded to
those homeowners requesting that their trees be trimmed.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council,
to adjourn the meeting until Monday, November 10th at 6:30
p.m. By unanimous consent, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45
p.m.
Approved:
~.~...
liay"r
P m
cle'rk
Seal
Attest:
I
Seal Beach, California
November 10, 1997
\ l
The City Council of the citY~fdial ~r~h'met In regular
adjourne~ session at 6: 30 .:p. ~J!!'.i:tl~~ P'I.M ~ f"~~li:tilngs calling
the meet~ng to order w~th~~he~i ~~~ 0 ~h~'Fla9.
"~ "'....
.