HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 06-07 - 2006-02-08
RESOLUTION NUMBER 06-7 OI?l.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE G;jVfi I
CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING VARIANCE 06-1, A '1l...
REQUEST TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE
WITH EXISTING NONCONFORMING GARAGE SETBACKS
AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 318 14TH STREET
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND
AND RESOLVE:
Section 1. On December 14,2005, Benny Rapp, Jr, filed an applIcatIOn WIth
the Department of Development ServIces for Variance 06-1. SpeCIfically, the applicant IS
rcquestmg a vanance to allow a master bedroom, bath and laundry room addItIon to a reSidence
WIth existmg garage encroachments mto the required SIde and rear setbacks.
Section 2 Pursuant to 14 CalIf, Code of Regs, ~ l5025(a) and ~ II,A of the
CIty's Local CEQA Guidelines, staff has determIned as follows The applicatIon for Vanance
No. 06-1 IS categorically exempt from revIew pursuant to the California EnVIronmental QualIty
Act pursuant to 14 CalIf Code of Regs. ~ 15303(a) (New ConstructIon of Small Structures),
because the application IS for the construction of three (3) or less single famIly dwellIngs In an
urbanIzed area; ~ 15305 (MInor Alterations In Land Use LimItations) because the request IS for a
mInor alteratIon In land use limitatIOns In an area with an average slope of less than 20% and no
changes in land use or denSIty are involved; and, pursuant to ~ 15061 (b )(3), becausc it can be
seen With certainty that there IS no pOSSIbIlity that the approval may have a sigmficant effect on
the envIronment.
SectIon 3 A duly noticed publIc hearIng was held before the PlannIng
CommIssion on January 18, 2006 to consider the applIcation for Variance No 06-1
SectIon 4.
The record of the hearIng on January 18, 2006 IndIcates the
following:
(a) On December 14, 2005, BellllY Rapp, Jr. filed an applIcatIon WIth the
Department of Development Services for Variance 06-1. Specifically, the applicant is requesting
a VarIance to allow a master bedroom, bathroom and laundry room additIOn to a residence WIth
eXIstIng garage encroachments mto the reqUIred side and rear setbacks,
(b) The subJect property is located at 318 14th Street.
(c) The surroundIng land uses and zomng are as follows,
SOUTH:
Mix of SIngle family and multi-family residences m the ReSIdentIal
MedIUm Density (RMD) zone
Mix of SIngle family and multI-family reSIdences In the ResidentIal
MedIUm Density (RMD) zone
NORTH:
10f4
Plannmg CommISsIOn Re,olullOn 06-7
VaTlallCe 06-1 - 318 14" Street
February 8. 2006
EAST:
Across 12 feet wide alley, mix of SIngle famIly and multi-famIly
resIdences In the ResidentIal Medium Density (RMD) zone
Across 14th Street, mix of sIngle faJnily and multi-famIly reSIdences In the
ResidentIal Medium Density (RMD) zone
WEST:
(d) In response to the maIled and published notice of thIS hearmg staff has
rcceived one wntten letter In opposItion to this request.
Section 5. Based upon the facts contaIned in the record, IncludIng those stated
in ~ 4 of this resolution and pursuant to ~~ 28-2407, 28-2500 28-2700, and 28-2701(B) of the
CIty's Code, the Planning CommIssion hereby finds as follows:
(a) VarIance 06-1 is consIstent with the proVISions of the Land Use Element
of the CIty's General Plan, whIch provides a ''medIUm density residential" deslgnatIon for the
subJect property and permits residentIal uses, An addition to a single family detached resIdence
Will retaIn the medIUm density residentIal character while prOVIding addItIOnal optIOns to the
livmg accommodations to the residents, whIch is one of the goals of the Land Use Element. The
use IS also consIstent WIth the remainIng elements of the City's General Plan, as the poliCies of
those elements are consistent WIth, and reflected m, the Land Use Element. Accordingly, the
proposed use IS consistent WIth and shall not adversely affect the General Plan.
(b) Because the specIal cIrcumstances applicable to the property, includmg
SIze, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the stnct application of thIs chapter depnves
such propcrty of pnvIleges enjoyed by other property in the VIcinity and zone, SpeCIfically, the
lot IS partIcularly small, such that strict applIcation of the setback reqUIrements would restnct the
useable area of the lot.
(c) The granting of such VarIance shall not constitute a grant of speCIal
pnvIlege inconSistent with other limitations upon other propertIes In the same VICInIty and zone,
given that other propertIes In the vicmlty have simIlar nonconforming structures, and because the
variance allows the subJect property to have a useable area roughly eqUIvalent to that of more
conventionally-sized lots,
(d) The subject property IS unique phYSically in that It has all eXlstmg
structure on the property that is legal nonconforming to current zoning standards, The property
maIntains the reqUIred setbacks on all other sides, and the current nonconforming setback is
typical of existIng conditions on thIS block.
(e) The subject property is umque physically In that It has an older residence
on the property and the master bedroom, bathroom and laundry room addition IS a reasonable
request to make the residence more livable while maIntaInIng the character oftl1e property.
(f) The granting of thIS variance wIll allow greater access m the alley due to a
conditIon to relocate the eXIsting wall in the rear setback.
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing, the PlaJming CommIssIon hereby
approves Variance No. 06-1, subject to the following conditIOns:
I, Variallce 06-1 is approved for a master bedroom, bathroom and laundry room addItIon With
existing nonconforming garage setbacks at 318 14th Street.
2of4
Planmng Comm'SSlOn ResollttlOll 06-7
Varlance 06-1 - 318 14'h Street
February 8, 2006
2. All construction shall be In substantIal compliance wIth the plans approved through
Variance 06-1.
3 The existIng wall shall be relocated to 5 feet, 6 inches mInimum from the rear property
line,
4. Property owners shall continue to mamtaIn the garage for parking of two vehIcles,
5 ThIs Variance shall not become effective for any purpose unless an "Acceptance of
CondItIons" form has been sIgned by the applIcant m the presence of the Director of
Development Services, or notanzed and returned to the Planrung Department; and untIl tl1e
ten (10) day appeal period has elapsed.
6. If any claim, actIon or proceeding (collectively "actIOn") is InstItuted by a third party or
parties challengIng the validity of the this approval, Developer and City shall cooperate In
defending any such action, CIty shall notIfy Developer of allY such actIon against CIty
withm ten working days after City receives service of process, except for any petItIon for
injunctive relief, in wmch case City shall notify Developer ImmedIately upon receIpt of
notice thereof. Developer shall indemmfy, hold harmless and defend CIty, and any of ItS
officers, employees or agents for any action by a third party or partIes brought to challenge
the Project Approvals; provided, however, that if CIty faIls promptly to notify Developer of
any actIon against City, or If CIty fails to cooperate in the defense, Developer shall not
thereafter be responsible for City's defense, Developer shall reImburse all of City's defense
costs includmg, without lImitatIon, court costs, attorneys fees incurred by counsel selected
by the CIty, and expert WlIDess fees, Developer shall promptly pay all monetary awards,
Judgments, verdicts, court costs and attorneys fees that may be awarded in such action,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planrung Commission of the City of Seal Beach
at a meetIng thereof held on the 8th day of February 2006 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Shanks, Deaton, Ladner, O'Malley, and Roberts,
NOES: CommissIOners None
ABSENT CommissIOners None
~~-~o~~
ChaIrperson, Planning CommiSSIOn
30f4
.
Lee Whittenberg
Secretary, PlannIng Com
Plannmg CommissIOn ResolutIOn 06-7
VaTlance 06-1 - 318 14" Street
February 8, 2006
****
40f4