Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Res 1651 - 1991-12-18 . . . RESOLUTION NUMBER 1651 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 12-91, A REQUEST FOR AFTER- THE-F ACT APPROVAL OF ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE AT 1120 CENTRAL AVENUE THE PLANNlNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOL VB SECTION 1. On July 24, 1991, Bruce M Stark and Michelle A Brendel, owners of property located at 1120 Central Avenue, filed an apphcatJOn for CUP 12-91 to amend CUP 4-89 to legalize certain Improvements to that property constructed without the necessary permits and In VIOlation of the Code of the City of Seal Beach SECTION 2. A duly noticed pubhc heanng to consider thiS matter was held before the Planmng Commission on September 4,1991 and was continued to November 6, 1991 and December 4, 1991 SECTION 3. the follOWing The eVidence, both wntten and oral, submitted at the public heanngs indicated (a) The City granted CUP 4-89 to the apphcants pursuant to Section 28-2407 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach to allow a major remodel and addition of approximately 811 square feet of habitable liVing area and 1,620 square feet of garage, laundry and storage areas to the nonconforming duplex located at 1120 Central Avenue The total area added to the duplex pursuant to CUP 4-89 was 2,431 square feet Specifically, the breakdown of the project was as follows UNIT A' Floor Area Parking Umt Type 1,392 square feet Two standard, one tandem space 1 bedroom, l-Y. baths UNIT B Floor Area Parlang Umt Type 1,946 square feet Two standard, one tandem space 2 bedrooms, 2 Y. baths, and (b) The Planmng Commission granted the applicants CUP 10-90 to permit the conversIOn of the subject duplex to a condominIUm on September 19, 1990 The final parcel map for that conversIOn has not yet been submitted to the City for approval (c) The subject property IS legally descnbed as portIOns of Lots 45 and 47, Block 11, of the Bay City Tract as shown In a map recorded In Book 3, Page 19, of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of County of Orange, Cahfomla and IS also descnbed as Orange County Assessor's Parcel Number 1 99-D72-24 (d) The subject property IS flat topographically and nearly square In shape measunng 50' x 55' and 2,750 total square feet (e) The subject property IS located on Central Avenue, 92Y. feet west-northwest of the centerline of 12th Street and consists of a three-story, tWO-unit apartment (f) The subject property IS surrounded on all Sides by a mixture of Single family and multi-family reSidences In the ReSidential High DenSity (RHD) zone (g) The zomng ordinance presently permits a Single dwelling unit on thiS parcel Therefore the eXlstmg duplex exceeds the denSity permitted by the Code and the use IS subject to the regulations applicable to nonconfonmng uses set forth In SectIOns 28-2400 to 28-2408 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach C IAMlPROIDOCSICUPIR2-91-12 BCC be .. . . . . . Plannmg Commission Resolul1on No 1651 (h) The Improvements which are the subJect of this application for after-the-fact approval were Installed Without necessary permits and Violate the conditIOns Imposed pursuant to CUP 4-89, which authorized the expansIOn of the structure (I) The subJect property IS located In the Residential High DenSity zone of the City, where a chromc shortage of parkmg eXIsts due to the development of the area pnor to the Implementation of contemporary parking standards (J) EXisting sewer, water, electrical, and other utlhty Infrastructure In the area would be overtaxed If the properties m the zone were permitted to develop at greater denSIties than presently authonzed by the zomng ordinance SECTION 4. Based on the facts stated In Section 3 and the other eVidence presented, the Commission hereby finds as follows (a) The non-permitted addition of a kitchen, two (2) bedrooms (as defined In SectIon 28-210 of the Code of the City of Seal Beach) and two (2) bathrooIns to the garage area of the subJect property creates a new dwelling umt and, therefore, Violates Section 28-2400 of the City Code which prohibits the establish of addItional uses on a Jot which is presently nonconformmg, unless such adwtlonal use IS conforming and, In additIons, such additional use does not Increase the nonconformity, therefore, the application cannot be approved as presented (b) The non-permitted Improvements which are the subJect of thiS application are of a deSign that lends Itself to use as an non-permitted additIOnal dwelling umt on the property (c) Non-permitted use of these Improvements as an additional reSidentIal umt can be deterred by returmng the property to the condition authonzed upon ItS expansIOn pursuant to CUP 4-89 (d) The floor plan approved pursuant to CUP 4-89 makes an appropnate use of the first floor of thiS property and the nghts conferred by CUP 4-89 and CUP 10-90, permits the applicant substantial enJoyment of the property, and preserves the property's nonconformIng denSity (e) Occupancy of a non-permitted additIOnal dwelling unit would make the use of thiS property incompatible With surrounding uses and With the commuOlty In general because It would exacerbate eXisting parking problems and would contribute to the cumulatIve overtaxing of sewer, water, electrical and other Infrastructure (f) Enforcement of the City's denSity reqUirements IS necessary to protect the public healtli, safety and welfare and approval of the proposal would undermine efforts to do so by faCilitating the occupancy of a non-permitted umt SECTION 5. Based upon the foregOing, the Planmng Commission of the City of Seal Beach hereby denies ConditIonal Use Permit 12-91 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Plannmg CommiSSIOn of the City of Seal Beach at a meeting thereof held on the 18th day of December, 1991, by the foUoWIng vote AYES CommlSslOners Fife. Law_ Dahlman. Sham NOES Commlssloners Orsini ABSENT Commissioners . /.l ~ , J-~ Whittenberg, Secretary J Planmng Commission C IAMlPROIDOCSICUPIR2-91-12 BCC be