Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2009-03-23 #LAGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: David Carmany, City Manager FROM: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP SUMMARY OF REQUEST: After review and discussion, consider adoption of Resolution No. 5852, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, California, Reestablishing the Membership of the Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee. Receive and File Staff Report. BACKGROUND: The Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee (GP- LCP Committee) was established pursuant to City Council Resolution 5036 on July 22, 2002. Please refer to Attachment B to review City Council Resolution 5036. The adopted resolution indicates the following regarding its membership: ^ The City Council shall appoint one member, and the Environmental Quality Control Board shall appoint two members of the respective boards to the GP-LCP Committee (Section 2 of Resolution No. 5036); and ^ The GP-LCP Committee shall consist of thirteen (13) voting members: one City Council Member, two Environmental Quality Control Board Members; and ten additional Council appointees. Each Councilperson shall have two appointments to the Committee and shall have the discretion to appoint two alternates, and those appointments need not reside within the appointing councilperson's district. It is desirable that the members of the Committee have particular skills, background, and knowledge of land use planning, local coastal issues, transportation planning, or other related areas of urban development (Section 3 of Resolution No. 5036). Agenda Item L Page 2 The City Council minutes of July 8, 2002, reflect the initial discussion regarding this matter and that the initial proposal was to have one member of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Environmental Quality Control Board serve, along with ten additional appointees (2 by each Councilperson). During discussion on the matter the City Attorney requested the matter to be continued to the next City Council meeting to ensure that there were no conflicts with the City Charter provisions. Please refer to Attachment C to review the City Council Minutes of July 8, 2002. On July 22, 2002 this matter was reconsidered and extensive discussion and several motions were made regarding the matter. The ultimate action of the City Council was to adopt Resolution No. 5036, as summarized above. Please refer to Attachment D to review the City Council Minutes of July 22, 2002. That action was taken in response to recommendations of the City Attorney, in light of appointments made by then Councilpersons Yost and Campbell of Planning Commissioners Shanks and Hood to the GP-LCP Committee, resulting in the potential of having a third member of the Commission serving on the GP- LCP Committee (including the Planning Commission appointment). This would have required all meetings of the GP-LCP Committee being noticed as Planning Commission meetings, due to a quorum of the Planning Commission being in attendance at the CP-LCP Committee meetings. At this time there are no members of the Planning Commission serving on the CP-LCP Committee. The current appointees are provided as Attachment E for the information of the City Council. OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION RE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS SERVING ON GP-LCP COMMITTEE: If the City Council determines it is appropriate to have seated members of the Planning Commission serve on the GP-LCP Committee the following options are available to the Council: ^ Council may determine to replace current members of the GP-LCP Committee with no more than .a total of two Planning Commission members. This action would not require any amendment to the current provisions of Resolution No. 5036 - it would require the removal of two current members of the GP-LCP Committee, as would determined by the City Council and appointing two members of the Planning Commission; or ^ Council may determine to consider adoption of prepared Resolution No. 5852, which would reestablish the membership of the GP-LCP Committee to include one member of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Environmental Quality Control Board. This action would not result in the changing of the current membership, as the EQCB currently has a vacancy on the GP-LCP Committee, and there are no members of the Page 3 Planning Commission currently serving on the GP-LCP Committee. Under this option the Planning Commission appointment would replace the vacant EQCB position and all other members of the GP-LCP Committee would remain. The prepared resolution to accomplish this option is provided as Attachment A. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Minor. Future activities in reviewing the Draft Housing Element and Draft Local Coastal Plan will result in the allocation of existing staff resources as necessary to provide technical and clerical support functions for the Committee during those review periods. RECOMMENDATION: After review and discussion, consider adoption of Resolution No. 5852, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, California, Reestablishing the Membership of the Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee. Receive and File Staff Report. SUBMITTED BY: ee Whittenberg Director of Development Se 'ces NOTED AND APPROVED: ~' David Carma y, City Manager Attachments: (5) A. Resolution No. 5852, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, California, Reestablishing the Membership of the Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee B. City Council Resolution 5036, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, California, Creating an Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee C. City Council Minute Excerpt of July 8, 2002 D. City Council Minute Excerpt of July 22, 2002 E. ~ Current Members of the Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee Page 4 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 5852, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REESTABLISHING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION NUMBER 5852 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REESTABLISHING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, the City Council determined on July 22, 2002 through the adoption of City Council Resolution No. 5036 to establish a thirteen member Ad Hoc General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee ("GP/LCP Committee"), with ten members to be appointed by the City Council and such members shall serve without pay for a term not to exceed one year, unless re-appointed; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that one member of the City Council, and two members of the Environmental Quality Control Board should serve as members of the GP/LCP Committee; and WHEREAS, the City Council has now determined that the membership of the GP-LCP Committee should be reestablished to include one City Council member, one Planning Commission member, and one Environmental Quality Control Board member, in addition to the ten members appointed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach that: Section 1. The City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Quality Control Board shall each appoint one member of its respective body to the GP/LCP Committee. Section 2. The GP/LCP Committee shall consist of thirteen voting members: one City Council Member; one Planning Commission Member; and one Environmental Quality Control Board Member; and ten additional City Council appointees. Each Councilperson shall have two appointments to the Committee and shall have the discretion to appoint two alternates, and those appointments need not reside within the appointing councilperson's district. The additional Council appointments shall not result in a quorum of the City Council, Planning Commission, or Environmental Quality Control Board sitting on the GP-LCP Committee. Section 3. It is desirable that members of the Committee have particular skills, background, and knowledge in land use planning, local coastal issues, transportation planning, or other related areas of urban development. Section 4. The Director of Development Services or his designee will serve as staff support to the GP/LCP Committee. Section 5. The GP/LCP Committee shall be charged with participating in future Public Workshops for the "Housing Element Update" and the "Local Coastal Plan Preparation". Section 6. The GP/LCP Committee shall select from its membership a chairman and vice-chairman to chair its meetings. The GP/LCP Committee shall abide by the California Government Code, the Seal Beach Resolution Number 5852 Charter, and the Code of the Citv of Seal Beach, relative to open public meetings and conflict of interest regulations. Copies of the agenda and the minutes of each meeting and of any written reports or correspondence of the Committee shall be filed with the City Clerk and copies provided to the City Council. Section 7. The GP/LCP Committee shall serve at the will of the City Council. Section 8. The term of the members of the GP/LCP Committee shall be one year, unless re-appointed by the City Council. Section 9. Members of the GP/LCP Committee shall serve without pay. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach on this 23rd day of March , 2009 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 5852 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of March , 2009. City Clerk Page 5 ATTACHMENT B CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 5036, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION NO~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/I.OCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMIv1IT1'EE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, the Seal Beach City Council has detetmiiied to update and revise the General Plan and prepare n "Local Coastal Plan' ;and SAS, the City Council ties deterrmned to establish an Ad Hoc General P1an/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee ("GP/LCP Committee', to be appointed by the City Council and such members shall save without pay for a tam not to exceed one (1) year, unless n-appointed; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes one member of the Ctty Council, Planning Commission, and Environmental Quality Control Board to serve as manbeis of the GP/LCP Commmttee; end WI~REAS, the GP/LCP Committee shall meet in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Proposal submitted by Culbertson, Adams, and Associates regarding public meetings, provided as "Exhibit A". NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach that: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Seal Heach does hereby create an ad hoc committee to be known as the General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee ("GP/LCP Committee'. Sectio The City Council shall appoirrt one member, and the Environmental Quality Control Board shall appoint two members of its tESpective boards to the GP/LCP Committee. Section 3. Tlie GP/LCP Committee shall consist of thuteen (13) voting members: one Oily Council Member, two Environmental Quality Control Hoard Members; anil ten additional Counisil appointees Each Councilpetson shall have two appointments m the Committce and shalt have the discretion to appoint two alternates, and those appointments neat not reside within the appointing councilpeison's district. It is desirable that members of the Committee have particular slnlls, background, and lmowledge in land use planning, local coastal issues, ti>utsportation planning, or other related areas of urban development action 4 The Director of Development Services or tits designee ~nll serve as staff support to the GP/LCP Committee. Section 5. The GP/LCP Commmttce shalt be charged with participating in the Public Workshops as set forth in "General Plan Advisory Committee end Workshops" of the approved "scope of Work" for the "General Plan Review/Update and Local Coastal Plan Preparation", approved by the City Councal on June 24, 2002, provided as "Exhibit A". Resolution Number ~~ Section 6. The GP/LCP Committee shall select fivm its membership a chairman and vice chairman to chair its meetings. The GP/LCP Committee shall abide by the California Government Code, lire Seal Beach Charter, and thc Code of the Citv of 5ea1 Beach. relative to open public meetings and conflict of interest regulations. Copies of the agenda and the minutes of each meeting and of any watten reports or correspondence of the Committee shmll be filed with the'City Cleric and copies provided to the City Council Section 7 The GP/LCP Committee shall serve at the will of the City Council. Section S. The lean of the members of the GP/LCP Committee shall be one (1) year, unless re- appointed by the City Council. Section 9. Members of the GP/LCP Comnuttee shall serve without pay. PASSED PROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach at a meeting held on the o~G7rl~C. day of 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT• ABSTAIN: ~ ~~~ MAYOR ATTE CITY . STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } 1, Joanne M Yeo, City Clerk of Seal Beach, Californi ereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number O on file in the o$ice of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and ad.o~i~tec~~ b~ the City unci f e City of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of 2002. er Resolution Number o+FJ~ "EXHIBIT A" "GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY CONIlVIITTEE AND WORKSHOPS" OT THE APPROVED "SCOPE OF WORK" FOR THE "GENERAL PLAN REVIEWlUPDATE AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN PREPARATION", APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE Z4, 2002 Public Hearings The Planning Commission and the City Council will conduct public hearings oa the proposed General Plan and the Coastal Land Use Plan. In addition, the California Coastal Commission will conduct a public hearing regarding the review of the Coastal Land Use Plan. These opportunities for public input will be advertised and noticed as required by state law. General Plan Advisory Committee and Workshops CAA proposes the forasatioa of a General Plan Advisory Committee, or GPAC, to serve as the core group to work with the consultant team in review and development of the dram General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan documents The role of the GPAC will be to review and comment on proposed updated drafts of individual elements. We recommend the GPAC be comprised of approximately 10 people and include representatives ofthe Planning Commission and other standing commissions and committees, and representatives of the community ai large. The GPAC could also include a City Council representative. CAA proposes to conduct four GPAC workshops as follows: Workshopl ~, • ' `,~ .. Workshop 2•, .- lntrpduction Larid~FJse Element 'i,'~ ^tCirciiletit~n Element ' Crrowtlil~lanagement Element _, }. . ,_,~: Space Element Workshop 4 Coastal Land Use Plan Wrap Up For each workshop, CAA will provide copies of the existing element and preliminary draft element with any applicable supporting documentation in advance of each meeting. CAA will facilitate a discussion of each element and help identify issue areas and any proposed changes. Representatives from Mestre Greve Associates will participate in the Noise Element workshop, and a representative from Kunanan Associates will participate in the Circulation Element workshop. Of course, applicable City staff will participate in each workshop as well. Each workshop is assumed to be approximately three hours long. Requested changes and issues identified through the workshop process will be incorporated mto the preliminary draft General Plan and the Coastal Land Use Plan. Oae reproducible copy will be provided to staff for their review Based oa staff review sad coalmen[. a proposed draft document (one reproducible copy) will be provided forPlanaing Coauaission and City Council review, as well Resolution Number _~ as for copies requested by the public and copies needed for internal City use. Due to budge[ lunitations, all requested changes may not be accoaunodated within the proposed scope of work., such zs the collection of new data ar preparation of additional technical studies. However, information requests or changes that cannot be accommodated within the scope of work and budget will be documented and recommendations will be made for future or additional work efforts. Tn addition, CAA will document all comments and recommendations presented at the workshops for Ciry Council and Planning Commission information. CEQA Compliance Documeatatioa The proposed General Plan update is a considered a `project" under CEQA CEQA cotapliance documentation will be required to address the potential environmental effecu of the proposed General Plan and the Coastal Land Use Plan. As no changes m land use are proposed and the City intends to largely rely on the existing elements and available information, the Initial Study for the project may support the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. This section summanzes the tasks required for the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If significant adverse environmental effects are identified that cannot be mitigated, an Environmental Impact Report will need to be prepared In this evea~ a revised scope of work will need to be prepared to accommodate this expanded work effort Forpurposes ofthis proposal, an lnitial Study/MitigatedNegative Declaration (IS/MI~iD) is assumed to be prepared for the project which will include the following main components• Introduction/Statutory Authority Project Description Environmental Settiag/Potential Project Impacts/Mitigation Measures Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program A screencheck copy of the proposed IS/1vLND will be provided to staff for review Sased on any comments on the drag ISMIND, CAA will finalize the ISMII~ID document. City star with assistance from CAA, wiii prepare the proposed IS/MND distribution list. CAA will prepare all required notices with the City being responsible for any publishing costs. CAA will print and mail up to 20 i:opies of the proposed LSl1viND for public review. CAA w$1 prepare responses to comments received on the circulated ISMIND. It is assumed for the purposes of this proposal that approximately 5 comment letters with a total of 20 comments will requite responses. Upon project approval, CAA w~Fl prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for City signature and file the NOD with the State Office of Planning and Research and the County Clerk's office. One copy of the F'uial IS/MIVD vn71 be provided to City staff. ~ ~~., ` . /v' ., ti ~ '~~ ~,~ , a.•. pr a Page 6 ATTACHMENT C CITY COUNCIL MINUTE EXCERPT OF JULY 8, 2002 Seal Beach, California July 8, 2002 The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Larson calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Larson Councilmembers Antos, Campbell, Doane, Yost Absent: None Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager Mr. Barrow, City Attorney Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development Services Mr. Dancs, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Chief Sellers, Police Department Chief Cushman, Lifeguard Department Mr. Vukojevic, Deputy City Engineer Ms. Yotsuya, Assistant City Manager Mr. Zimmerman, Consultant Ms. Yeo, City Clerk RESOLUTION NUMBER 5036 - AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Director of Development Services noted that this item is returned for consideration based upon the direction of Council at last meeting and the determination to form a General Plan/Local Coastal Plan Citizens Advisory Committee, to that a Resolution has been prepared that is believed to reflect Council direction, it would be a thirteen member committee, one appointee from each of the Council, Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Control Board, each member of the Council will have two appointees, attached to the Resolution as exhibit A is the Scope of Work for the public participation program as adopted by the Council which indicates the meetings and the related topics of those meetings. Councilman Yost inquired if this Plan will be considered by the Environmental Quality Control Board, the Planning Commission and then the Council for approval, the response of the Director was that the General Plan and Local Coastal Plan are required to have public hearings before the Commission and the Council, the EQCB will review the environmental document which at this point is believed will be a mitigated negative declaration rather than an environmental impact report, they will review that document during the review period, make comments, and those comments will ultimately be forwarded to the Commission and Council. Councilman Yost then asked if it would be a conflict to have a member of the EQCB sit on the Committee. The City Attorney advised that there is no conflict under State provisions, and offered to review and determine if there may be a conflict with the Charter. As to the four workshops, Councilmember Campbell asked when they are presumed to start and end. The Director responded that a work schedule has not been developed as yet however noted that a meeting is scheduled with the consultant the following day, once the schedule is known Council will be advised, the workshops will be tied to the schedule of the consultant and dependent upon the appointments to the committee and schedules of those individuals. He explained further that the committee is set up to review the existing document for each Element as well as the revision document, that could be four to six months, once all of the Elements are in draft form the process should go fairly quickly. Councilman Antos said he would hope that the Local Coastal Program could be on its own track rather than wait until the end, once the changes that are necessary are dealt with in the Land Use Element and if any would affect the Coastal Zone then the LCP should be able to move forward, as there are a number of projects in the downtown area that are held up because of the ladk of a Local Coastal Program, therefore if the LCP can be processed through provided it is consistent with the Land Use Element it will then be consistent with the other Elements. Councilman Antos offered to serve as the Council appointed member of the committee, explaining that he is involved in planning and much of the coastal areas are in the First District. Mayor Larson noted that the committee Resolution allows each member of the Council to appoint two members, and inquired if it would be appropriate to have alternates so in effect there would be four members, the response was that that would be at the discretion of the Council, staff would have no opposition just so it is understood that the voting member would be either/or but not both. The City Attorney mentioned that staff is looking at whether or not members of the EQCB, Planning Commission, and Council can sit on this committee, noting however in the past there have been Council and board members that have served as ex-officio members of ad hoc sub-committees, his preference would be to look at the issue a bit further, Councilman Yost offered that his EQCB and Commission appointees would he his first choice in that they have the most experience with the General Plan, the history of the community, and environmental issues. Councilman Antos said if the Attorney determines that those persons could only sit as ex-officio members, he would still like to serve in that capacity. Given the fact that the Resolution cites members being appointed by the City Council, Planning Commission, and the Environmental Quality Control Board, the City Attorney recommended that both the Resolution and appointees to the ad hoc committee be held over until the next meeting. Doane moved, second by Yost, to continue this item until the next meeting. AYES: Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost NOES: None Motion carried Page 7 ATTACHMENT D CITY COUNCIL MINUTE EXCERPT OF JULY 22, 2002 Seal Beach, California July 22, 2002 The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Larson calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Larson Councilmembers Antos, Campbell, Doane, Yost Absent: None Also present: Mr. Bahorski, City Manager Mr. Barrow, City Attorney Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development Services Mr. Dancs, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Chief Sellers, Police Department Mr. Vukojevic, Deputy City Engineer Mr. Cummins, Associate Planner Ms. Yotsuya, Assistant City Manager Mr. Eagle, Public Works Department Mr. Bernard, Public Works Department Ms. Yeo, City Clerk RESOLUTION NUMBER 5036 -CREATING AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE -APPOINTMENTS The Director of Development Services made reference to the request of the Council at the last meeting that the City Attorney determine the acceptability of members of the Environmental Quality Control Board and Planning Commission serving on this Committee inasmuch as those bodies will eventually be reviewing environmental documents and drafts of the General Plan and Local Coastal Plan. He reported the City Attorney did research the Charter finding that there are no prohibitions, therefore it is possible for a member of the Council, Commission, and EQCB to serve on the Committee with each of those bodies making the appointment, the Resolution having been revised to reflect that. Campbell moved, second by Yost, to adopt Resolution Number 5036 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/ LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 5036 was waived. AYES: Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost NOES: None Motion carried With regard to appointments to the Ad Hoc Committee, Councilmember Campbell stated she had none at this time, Councilman Yost appointed Mr. Gordon Shanks, a member of the Planning Commission and held over the second appointment, and Councilman Antos noted that he had made his appointments in conjunction with the regular board and commission appointments, Mr. John Regnier and Mr. Joe Ribal, as well as alternates Mr. Dave Evans and Ms. Barbara Barton, these appointments were approved by Council, if the other members of the Council choose to make appointments of alternates it would be appropriate that they do so. He also mentioned that since there will be a member of the Council on the Committee he offered to serve in the capacity of a voting member or an ex-officio member if it is determined that the Council appointee can not vote, he has a planning background and was involved in most of the Elements to the current General Plan and Local Coastal Plan, the members of the Council agreed to Councilman Antos serving as the Council appointee. Councilman Doane appointed Mr. Mike Levitt as the District Five appointee as well as Mr. Phil Ladner, also a member of the Planning Commission. Concern was expressed with a potential conflict with the appointment of a third member of the Planning Commission, confirmed by the City Attorney, at which time Councilman Doane withdrew the nomination of Mr. Ladner and appointed Mr. Rallie Rallis to the Committee. Mayor Larson appointed Ms. Ruth Harrison and Mr. Tom Pontac. Councilmember Campbell noted having inquired as to when the Planning Commission was going to make an appointment, if the Commission does not intend to choose Dr. Hood she intended to appoint him as one of her two appointees. The City Attorney offered that with the two Planning Commission nominations the Council could reconsider the Resolution to reflect that the Planning Commission would not have the power to appoint a third member from the Commission. It was clarified that Planning Commissioners Shanks and Hood had been appointed. Yost moved, second by Antos, to reconsider Resolution Number 5036 AYES: Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost NOES: None Motion carried The City Attorney suggested the deletion of the Planning Commission from Section Two of the Resolution. Yost moved, second by Antos, to approve the revised language of Resolution Number 5036. Mayor Larson clarified that that would not include a second appointee by the EQCB. AYES: Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost NOES: None ~ Motion carried Councilman Doane suggested that the Environmental Quality Control Board make their own appointments. The City Attorney posed options that the EQCB make two appointments or the EQCB make one appointment and the Council make a second appointment. Yost moved, second by Antos, that the Environmental Quality Control Board make two appointments from that body. AYES: Antos, Campbell, Doane, Larson, Yost NOES: None Motion carried Councilmember Campbell mentioned that the Council has made appointment of two members of the Planning Commission, their background is known and they will work well, if the EQCB is allowed to make two appointments that takes away the ability of the Council to make two appointments. Councilman Doane countered that the EQCB knows its membership and they should have the ability to appoint the thirteenth member, argument was again made that that takes away an appointment by a member of the Council. The City Attorney offered that based upon the motion adopted the language of Section 2 is that the Council shall appoint one member to the Committee, the EQCB sha11 appoint two members to the Committee, if it is felt that needs to be revised again there could be another motion to reconsider, or if the EQCB does not actually make the two appointments this could be revisited once again. Confidence was expressed with regard to the EQCB making the two appointments. Mayor Larson clarified that each person named shall be a member of the Ad Hoc Committee including Councilmember Antos. Announcement was made of the names of the appointments made thus far, also clarified that Councilmembers Campbell and Yost each have a remaining appointment, and after some discussion it was determined that nine appointments had been made. Councilman Antos noted a listing of workshops, his presumption is that they would be with the consultant, he would imagine that the staff and committee would likely need to meet more than the four workshops proposed, the response of staff was that the schedule was proposed by the consultant in their scope of work. Page 8 ATTACHMENT E CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE AD HOC GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Appointee Council District John Regnier One Joseph Ribal One Joan M. Alderson Two Tom Pontac Two Robert Goldberg Three Bruce Monroe Three Richard D'Sa Four Eugene Balckmun Four Gayle Colden Five Rallie Rallis Five Charles Antos City Council Mario Voce EQCB (Vacant) ~ EQCB Dave Evans (Alternate) One Barbara Barton** (Alternate) One ** Also a member of the EQCB