HomeMy WebLinkAboutEQCB Min 1981-01-20
'. p~ .....
.......~. _..... ;-"'~_'r.... _ ..... * _~_""__'__'_____"h . .__.______ ..________. .
~ t -=--.....- - ~......... ... ----&<
.. .' '"
.
~.!!!!!E~
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD' < REGULAR MEETING. Jo/L
TUESDAY JANUARY 20, 198' 7: 30 P. M. ' ,J,:~~-;-=.;<
. . . -'. '::.~:~:~:J~~::;:. - -
The regular monthly meeting of the Seal Beach Env:1rol1lIlental~~Qua.lity Control" Boaxd.3:'~~{~,"~ ,
. was called to order by Chairman'Grayson at 7:40 p.m. in Room 28 of City Hall. . Jf
. . ..~
:,.. , ,e' ~
~o;;;e~ Gx;.~son. Kelb; LaBar. Potter. Willson. 'jfj[l~'
~~~~~... .'
":r~;t;~. .
MINUTES
Moved qy Kolb, seconded qy LaBar, that the minutes of the last meeting,held on
-;-'"'.-November-.18, . 1980.,be-approved-as.-...printed. Carried.
.. '.
. : :' :.... ".-
: ' '::".;': DISCUSSION ~ HE'd BUSINESS
..~ -
:. ). 0 I ~~.. ..' . : -'l.......
:: ,'Bolsa Chico .Wet Lands: .The' Chaiman suggested that this item be given attention_before-'
: .'..' 'the regular agenda was considered. He explained, that ver,r recently,a submission had,'
been received' concerning Em ftridfngs about proposed changes in the Bolsa Chico 'wet ,:..
,lands. This':,was, entitled"Balsa Chico Draft Em 81-250 Orange County Land Use Element _
Amendment 81-1" It consisted of two volumes. the second volUlDe being the Technical
Appendices. Grayson had made a quick, but rather thorough review of the data,and
posted the' Board-'on his impressions of it. Comments were solicited by Januar,r 26, 1981.
The three alternatives presented were given considerable attention by Board members.
The general conclusion reached was a.",mea.n.1nful "deCision on the completeness of the EIR
. data could not be reached by the January 26, 1981 deadline. '
The Board finally decided they would stay'aware of its existance and follow developments.
... -'.
r; _( -
'. .:t'
.... -,...
Review of Priorities:This scheduled agenda item was given overall consideration but
individual priori ties were not considered except for the Hellman propern. 'TThe ,:Boa-jU
were in agreement that it was not too early for the Board to make known some of the-
considerations that should be given attention in developing the EIR data.
Potter pointed out that the Em: s the Board sees are not always the same as in the
Seal Beach City guidelines.
Priorities,~ will again be considered at the next meet1ng~
ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Individual Board members reported on a few oral. and written communication,none of
which required action at this time.
:~;'~~\>.:,'
1981.. ":r:.~~~;,':,"'-
- ~~ ~ :tfj~;.,
'~ - '7-'":
~"':-:':' .
J?,~'*::,:
.~, . ..-
. ..... '-
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned. at 9: 17 p.m.., to reconvene again on Februar,r 17.
.. .,.....
.
,.....'. .
:~. :,: . .:~ .,:~f:~ ~~~'.. 4
4 ;I'" . ~ ';.,"":: ..,..' -
'_ .. .1 --:~~._:;,!. "_
'.-....~' ...
, ,: :,:,:7~~i,~;::~:':,"
. ,... ;,- .... \..... -~!.-;~..;~~t~~:i.~~~.
, '
, -
",,' 'i:.:.:~:-i: 1