HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1992-12-14
11-23-92/12-14-92
manufacturer, yet it may be possible to identify a class of
vehicle. Councilmember Hastings reported on a recent meeting of
the Save Our Beach Committee at which Chief Miller and Captain
Davis of the Long Beach Marine Department made a presentation '
relating basically to the nearly year old artificial reef off of
a portion of the Long Beach coastline. She noted that there is
insufficient information at this time to determine if such a reef
would aid Seal Beach in its sand erosion problem given the
difference in tidal flow and wave action, yet there was a
consensus that a means to replenish sand on the east beach must
be found. Councilmember Hastings mentioned that a question was
raised as to whether the new Long Beach dredge, in conjunction
with the Navy barge, could be rented to dredge the San Gabriel
River as a source of beach sand. She suggested that more time be
given an evaluation of the Long Beach reef prior to a
presentation before this City Council.
I
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Forsythe declared Oral Communications open. Mr. Mario
Voce, 730 Catalina Avenue, requested that the staff report
relating to recycling be forwarded to the Solid Waste Committee
for their review and comment. The City Manager noted that the
Committee function ceased upon adoption of the Source
Reduction/Recycling Element, however offered to meet with the
former members and to forward the rate increase report as well.
He noted that the concept of the type of recycling program and
once versus twice per week refuse collection had been combined
with the hearing relating to a refuse rate adjustment for
calculation purposes, however indicated those issues could be
separated if so desired, also that January 1st is the deadline
for adoption of a recycling program. There being no further
comments, Mayor Forsythe declared Oral Communications closed.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council, to
adjourn the meeting until Monday, December 14th at 6:00 p.m. to
meet in Closed Session.
I
The meeting was adjourned by u
'mous consent at 7:34 p.m.
erk and ex-of
of Seal Beach
Approved: _ ~I_./ ~ AyA..J'
Mayor
I
Attest:
Seal Beach, California
December 14, 1992
The regular adjourned meeting scheduled for 6:00 p.m. this date
was cancelled due to the lack of Closed Session business items
for discussion.
I
I
I
12-14-92
Jo
ci
Seal Beach, California
December 14, 1992
The city Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session
at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Forsythe calling the meeting to order
with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Forsythe
Councilmembers Brown, Doane, Hastings, Laszlo
Absent: None
Also present: Mr. Bankston, city Manager
Mr. Barrow, City Attorney
Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development
Services
Mr. Osteen, Director of Parks and Recreation
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
WAIVER OF FULL READING
Brown moved, second by Doane, to waive the reading in full of all
ordinances and resolutions and that consent to the waiver of
reading shall be deemed to be given by all Councilmembers after
reading of the title unless specific request is made at that time
for the reading of such ordinance or resolution.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Forsythe declared Oral Communications open. Ms. Seretta
Fielding, 223 Seal Beach Boulevard, spoke regarding the impact of
the recent storm on the easterly portion of the downtown area.
She requested that the City consider establishing a fund to which
donations could be made to assist persons who lose their
belongings in the event of a disaster and are uninsured. She
offered her business location as a contact for donation of
material items. In lieu of sending holiday greeting cards,
Councilmember Hastings offered a $100 donation to the fund. Ms.
Reva Olson, Seal Beach, questioned the time frame to hear the
appeals to the Planning Commission approvals of extended hours
and entertainment for two Main Street eateries. The city
Attorney noted that the Municipal Code provides a period of forty
days for the Council to hear an appeal, however mentioned there
is no provision of State law governing such time frame nor is
there a penalty cited in the local Code should the forty day
period be missed. Given the indication to cancel the Council
meeting of December 28th, discussion followed with regard to
setting the hearings on an alternative date to the January 11th
regular meeting and within the forty day time frame. Agreement
to a January 4th adjourned meeting was indicated. Further
consideration of the date of the appeal hearings was postponed
until later in the meeting. Mr. Richard Jackson, Seal Beach,
also spoke regarding the recent rain storm and the flooding of
the easterly portion of downtown, which he cited as not a unique
12-14-92
problem to that area. Mr. Jackson mentioned receiving an abrupt
conclusion to his call to the Police Department at the time of
the storm even though he understood a number of emergency calls
were incoming, and expressed some concern with the availability
of only three pOlice officers on a Monday evening, as on the
night of the storm, in the event of other emergency situations.
He reported there is no contact information on the flood control I
facility on Seal Beach Boulevard that is operated by the County,
the Police Department did not notify the County of a potential
overload problem at that facility, and no emergency response
procedure was activated. He suggested that all citizens become
familiar with the various types of facilities, whether it be gas,
electricity, sewers, etc., the jurisdiction of same, and the
appropriate contact telephone number, and as mentioned at the
community meeting subsequent to the storm, all persons need to be
capable of dealing with resulting problems in the event of
emergency situations and where there are numerous calls for
assistance. Mayor Forsythe said she had become aware that
College Park East has held several seminars to make the
neighborhoods aware of how they can help themselves in the case
of a major event. Mr. Bruce stark, Seal Beach, claimed that
clogged drains caused part of the storm flooding problem and
suggested they be cleaned periodically. In reference to a news
article regarding the recent automobile/bus stop accident, he
noted a proposal that the Police Department commence a Leisure
World patrol and issuance of warning notices to drivers for motor
vehicle violations, which he alleged is for public relations
purposes, and asked why such a program would be initiated rather
than having the officers patrol other areas of the community
where crime exists. Mr. Mark HotChkiss, Old Town, expressed his
belief that the City is out of compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act by the granting of certain Conditional I
Use Permits, stating that CEQA provides that any discretionary
action, including a CUP, is a project and if there is a potential
for cumulative impact it is not categorically exempt, in which
case an initial study would need to be prepared to determine if
an impact exists, which in turn would require either a negative
declaration or environmental impact report for those conditional
use permits for intensification of use on Main Street. Ms.
Marilyn Dewitt read a December 14th communication from the League
of Women Voters, Seal Beach Unit, in support of adoption'of
policies that enhance and preserve the unique identity of the
community and its human and natural resources, recognizing the
need for an environmental impact study of the cumulative impact
of granting conditional use permits for the sale of alcoholic
beverages on Main Street. There was further discussion as to a
date certain to consider the appeals filed to the Planning
Commission approval of entertainment and extended hours for the
two Main Street eateries.
RESOLUTION NUMBER 4192 - HONORING JASON PAUL SAKOWSKI - EAGLE
SCOUT AWARD
Resolution Number 4192 was presented to Council and read in full
by Mayor Forsythe entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HONORING AND COMMENDING JASON
PAUL SAKOWSKI FOR ACHIEVING THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAGLE I
AWARD." Laszlo moved, second by Forsythe, to adopt Resolution
Number 4192.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
APPOINTMENTS - ARCHAEOLOGICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Councilman Laszlo appointed Mr. Bruce Fitzpatrick, 4401
Candleberry Avenue, as the District Four representative to the
Archaeological Committee, and requested that the second District
Four appointment be held over. Councilman Doane asked that the
I
I
I
12-14-92
District Five appointment be held over until next meeting pending
acceptance by his nominee. Mayor Forsythe appointed Ms. Jean
Frietz, Santa Ana, as the second District Three appointee to the
Committee. Hastings moved, second by Laszlo, to confirm the
appointments to the Archaeological Advisory Committee.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
APPOINTMENT - ORANGE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT
By unanimous consent of the Council, Councilman Laszlo was
reappointed as the City's representative to the Orange County
Vector Control District Board of Trustees for the two year term
expiring at the end of 1994.
,
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "D" thru "H"
Brown moved, second by Doane, to approve the recommended action
for items on the Consent Calendar as presented.
D. Approved regular demands numbered 89901
through 90074 in the amount of $895,369.63,
payroll demands of November 24th in the
amount of $192,575.76, and payroll demands
of December 8th in the amount of $233,332.07
as approved by the Finance Committee, and
authorized warrants to be drawn on the
Treasury for same.
E. Approved the minutes of the regular adjourned
and the regular meetings of November 23, 1992.
F.
Bids were received for Project Number 630,
Resurfacing of Guava, Fir, Elder and Dogwood
Avenues and Rose Street until December 7th,
1992 at 1:30 p.m. at which time they were
publicly opened by the City Clerk as
follows:
Boral Resources
R. J. Noble Company
Sully Miller
Silvia Construction
Excel Paving Company
Industrial Asphalt
$110,702.00
117,847.75
119,395.00
119,771. 60
125,755.00
126,039.05
G.
Awarded the bid to Boral Resources as the low
bidder in the amount of $110,702.00 and
authorized the City Manager to execute the
agreement on behalf of the city.
Adopted Resolution Number 4193 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH PERTAINING TO SEVERANCE AND
SEPARATION BENEFITS." By unanimous consent,
full reading of Resolution Number 4193 was
waived.
H.
Adopted Resolution Number 4194 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH PROVIDING FOR CLOSURE OF
SPECIFIED CITY OFFICES AND FURLOUGH OF
DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES." By unanimous consent,
full reading of Resolution Number 4194 was
waived.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
12-14-92
As a point of clarification, the City Manager explained that city
Hall and the City Yard will be closed December 21, 22 and 23 in
conjunction with the December 24th and 25th holidays, the
employees furloughed for the three day period, the result being
an approximate $40,000 salary and benefit savings. He noted also
that the employee bargaining unit agreed to the furlough, that
the Police Department, with the exception of Police I
Administration, will not be participating, and that emergency
services will be available.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - REFUSE COLLECTION RATES / RECYCLING
PROGRAM
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council, to
continue the public hearing until the next regular meeting, as
requested by staff.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - FEES/CHARGES - GOODS and SERVICES
Mayor Forsythe declared the continued public hearing open to
consider the adjustment of fees, rates and charges for goods and
services provided by the city. The city Manager presented the
staff report, noted that such fees are required to be in
compliance with State guidelines, equivalent to or below the cost
of providing the service, pointed out that while some degree of
subsidy remains for many of the goods and services the adjustment
reduces the percentage of subsidy or recognizes a general public
benefit in providing the service, and that the gain to the
General Fund from reduced subsidy and direct revenue is estimated
between $40,000 to $45,000 on a fiscal year basis. Councilman
Laszlo spoke to and made recommendations with regard to Building
Valuation Fees, Special Service Fees relating to aircraft hangers
where no repair work is done, Recreation Fees for the use of
parks by resident youth groups, and Beach Parking Fees for buses, I
motorhomes, and other vehicles over twenty-five feet. There
being no public comments, Mayor Forsythe declared the public
hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NUMBER 4195 - FEES/CHARGES - GOODS and SERVICES
Resolution Number 4195 was presented to Council entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH
ESTABLISHING FEES, RATES AND CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES
PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS
NUMBERED 3960, 4083, AND 4116." By unanimous consent, full
reading of Resolution Number 4195 was waived. After further
discussion, Brown moved, second by Doane, to adopt Resolution
Number 4195 as amended to include the requests of Councilman
Laszlo as follows: 1) that the Building Valuation Table for the
category of $1.00 to $500.00 be ten percent of the permit
valuation rather than $50.00; 2) that the beach parking fee for
buses, motorhomes, and other vehicles over twenty-five feet be
increased from $10.00 to $20.00 in the 8th and 10th Street lots
for the period May 1st through October 1st, the $8.00 weekday and
$10.00 weekend rates for the 1st Street lot to remain unchanged;
3) that the charge for use of city parks (Edison, Zoeter,
Gummere, College Park), without lighting, by resident youth
groups be reduced from $5.00/hour to zero with a clarification
that youth groups are defined as persons age sixteen and under I
and shall consist of a minimum of twenty-five percent Seal Beach
residents. The City Manager recommended that the Electrical Fee
for aircraft hangers remain in the Resolution in the event an
application for such use is submitted at some future time, and
noted that there has been a direct General Fund subsidy of Parks
and Recreation in excess of $90,000 over and above park
maintenance costs. with regard to requiring out-of-town buses to
parking in the lots rather than on the streets, the City Attorney
cautioned that could pose an enforcement problem or an ordinance
would need to be in place that would subject the parking of all
buses in the City to a fee. with regard to the issue of safety
12-14-92
for bus loads of children being left at the beach, particularly
during the summer months, the Manager mentioned that staff is
looking into a program similar to that of Bolsa Chica state Beach
where persons accompanying a group of a certain size is required
to participate in a safety training program for a specified
number of hours, and a fee is charged for that program.
II Vote to adopt Resolution Number 4195 as amended:
I
I
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council, to
declare a recess at 8:12 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:21
p.m. with Mayor Forsythe calling the meeting to order.
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1363 - RECOVERY - CRIMINAL JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION FEES
Ordinance Number 1363 was presented to Council entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE
RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION FEES, AND AMENDING
THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH." By unanimous consent, full
reading of Ordinance Number 1363 was waived. Doane moved, second
by Hastings, to approve the introduction of Ordinance Number 1363
and that it be passed to second reading.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
AGENDA AMENDED
Doane moved, second by Laszlo, to consider Item "M" at this time.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
BEACH and MARINA PARK TOT LOTS
The City Manager reported that the Parks and Recreation
Commission recently met to receive input and consider the
replacement of playground equipment at the Beach and Marina Park
Tot Lots. The recommendations of the Commission were to approve
the plans for the Beach Tot Lot as presented by the Junior
Women's club and direct staff to take the necessary steps to
implement the project, also that the Quimby monies now available
be used to enlarge the existing Marina Park Tot Lot area,
purchase and install new playground equipment, install a wall
along Marina Drive between the tennis courts and the community
center building, and that the Marina Park Trust Fund be kept open
to receive donations to complete the community center
repairs/improvements consisting of new doors, heating system,
enclosure of the patio area with a higher wall, and construction
of a dumpster enclosure that were originally scheduled for
completion with the Quimby funds, also that a Council appointed
committee be created to work on fundraising programs, the
selection of playground equipment and other amenities for the
Marina Tot Lot. The Recreation Director noted that the Beach Tot
Lot plans were modified somewhat after considerable review and
resulted in the reinstatement of four standard parking spaces and
the addition of two compact spaces, also that the equipment
recommended by the Juniors is the best available. The Mayor
pointed out that the Juniors have raised the funds for the Beach
Tot Lot improvements, the area will be enlarged, a new wall will
be constructed, and the equipment is accessible to the physically
challenged. Representatives of the Junior Women's Club provided
a sketch of the Beach Tot Lot to Councilman Laszlo for his
information.
12-14-92
Doane moved, second by Hastings, to accept the recommendation of
the Parks and Recreation Commission for improvements to the Beach
Tot Lot.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings
None
Laszlo
Motion carried
The Recreation Director explained that sufficient Quimby Act
monies exist to purchase and replace the deteriorated playground
equipment and construction of a wall at the Marina Park Tot Lot,
those funds initially intended for other improvements at the
Center, and that the Junior Women's Club and other organizations,
through the assistance of a Council appointed committee, will
continue to raise funds for donation to the trust fund for the
improvements and replacement of the Quimby Act monies.
Councilman Laszlo questioned the need to replace the Quimby
funds. It was clarified that the intent of the Juniors was to
raise sufficient funds for both projects, that the need to
replace the playground equipment in a more timely manner is
urgent, and at such time as the Quimby monies are replaced the
other improvements to the Center can be made, also it is felt
that fund raising for the Tot Lot rather than building
improvements will be more successful. Councilman Doane suggested
that appointments to the committee not be limited to the
councilmanic districts, and offered to relinquish the District
Five appointment to other interested persons. Mayor Forsythe
indicated her intent to appoint Ms. Tina stevenson to the Tot Lot
Committee.
Hastings moved, second by Doane, to accept the recommendations of
the Parks and Recreation Commission for the Marina Park Tot Lot
and that a committee be created to direct fund raising programs
and selection of playground equipment.
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
CLOSED SESSION
The city Attorney announced that the Council would meet in Closed
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) to discuss
an issue of potential litigation. It was the order of the Chair,
with consent of the Council, to adjourn to Closed Session at 8:46
p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:18 p.m. with Mayor Forsythe
calling the meeting to order. The city Attorney reported the
Council had discussed the item previously announced, and that no
action was taken.
I
I
MAIN STREET CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The Director of Development Services presented the recommendation
of the Planning Commission, the result of public comments
suggesting that the City should consider the cumulative impacts
that might arise from the expansion or intensification of uses on
Main Street. The Commission recommended specifically that 1)
staff be directed to prepare an environmental assessment pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act regarding I
expansion/intensification of uses along the Main Street
commercial corridor between Pacific Coast Highway and the ocean;
and 2) that the establishment of a moratorium be considered for
expansion/intensification of uses in the same study area pending
completion of the Environmental Assessment and implementation of
appropriate measures to mitigate any significant environmental
impact revealed by the analysis. He noted that the requests for
extended hours and entertainment considered and approved,by the
Planning Commission have been appealed to the city council, in
those cases the major areas of concern expressed by the public
were conflicts between commercial and residential land uses such
I
I
I
12-14-92
as late night impacts of noise, disturbances, public safety, and
inadequate parking, and potential intensification of commercial
uses without adequate environmental review as part of the
decision-making process. The Director reviewed the staff report
that set forth in some detail the history of zoning provisions
and alcohol sales in Seal Beach, land use and zoning conflicts,
previous General Plan/Environmental Impact Report findings, the
Main Street Specific Plan, additional Main Street studies, the
request for a Cumulative Impact Analysis/Environmental
Assessment, the request for a moratorium during consideration of
the CUmulative Impact Analysis, and the estimated fiscal impact
of various stages of additional environmental review. The city
Attorney explained it is within the discretion of the council to
require an environmental assessment for all expansions or
intensification of uses along Main Street or adoption of an
interim ordinance prohibiting the issuance of permits without the
environmental documentation, or both, provide direction to staff
with regard to the four pending applications, and/or provide
additional direction to staff and the Planning Commission
regarding the issue of concern. With regard to Alcoholic
Beverage Commission criteria for the issuance of alcohol
licenses, the Director made reference to ABC Rule 61.3 relating
to undue concentration of licenses, that based upon the number of
on-premise and off-premise liquor licenses to census tract
population. He noted that in the event a community does not have
a conditional use permit process, ABC can deny a license if it is
located in a census tract that has an over-concentration of
licenses and a crime rate that exceeds twenty percent of that of
the community overall, and where there is a CUP process, as in
Seal Beach, each application is reviewed on its own merit, taking
into consideration the concentration and crime issues, with the
ability to approve or deny a request, also experience has shown
that ABC usually does not over-ride a denial under the CUP
process. He mentioned that probably between eighty-five to
ninety-five percent of cities have a CUP process, particularly
for on-premise establishments, and in the case of an off-site
premise where a CUP is not required and is a permitted use
through zoning, a business license and compliance with building
and fire code requirements is basically all that is necessary to
open, without any concentration consideration. He recalled the
concentration criteria for on-premise establishments to be one
per approximately one thousand persons, and one per about twelve
hundred persons for off-site. In response to Councilman Brown,
the City Attorney confirmed that the Council could direct that
the categorical exemption no longer be used for intensification
of use applications, that further environmental assessment could
be required if it is felt there is or may be a cumulative impact
even if an application were categorically exempt, and in such
case the applicant would assume the cost of the assessment. The
Director mentioned that under the current process applications
such as those currently under appeal are considered by the
Planning commission, however applications of a general
environmental nature with communitywide impact are reviewed by
the Environmental Quality Control Board as well as the Planning
Commission if so directed, and the issue of cumulative impact
could be such an issue. He clarified that should the categorical
exemption not be used in the future, each project application
would require preparation of an initial study, review, and
determination as to whether a negative declaration or
environmental impact report should be prepared. Councilmember
Hastings expressed concern that a directive that the categorical
exemption not be used could be changed at some point in the
future and suggested that a provision prohibiting use of the
exemption be placed in the Municipal Code. The city Attorney
mentioned that the Council could establish such directive by
various methods, a policy statement, minute order, or resolution
being sufficient, that once an initial study of cumulative
12-14-92
impacts is completed future applications would require either a
negative declaration or environmental impact report based upon
the information derived from the study as well as the need to
establish findings, and given the possibility of a differing
Council policy in the future without a study, the city could be
open to potential litigation, thus an ordinance would not be
recommended. He noted that should a directive be established by I
one of the means previously mentioned, each application could be
heard under public hearing to review the environmental analysis,
and likewise a public hearing could be required to chanqe the
council policy with regard to categorical exemptions. Discussion
continued and it was noted by staff that should be moratorium be
considered, it would be in effect for a period of forty-five
days, could be extended, would apply to future applications for
expansion or intensification of use, and could, if desired, apply
to those applications presently on appeal. It was also mentioned
that environmental issues are typically set forth by resolution,
that there could be difficulty in addressing environmental issues
in ordinance form, and reiterated that any future consideration
of relaxing a Main Street environmental review policy could
require a public hearing to do so, either for a specific project
application or in general, likewise the CEQA guidelines allow for
review where it is felt there are cumulative impacts. Mayor
Forsythe stated her understanding of the Council comments to be:
1) that all projects that come before the City involving
intensification for Main street be required to have an
environmental review; 2) that no such permits shall be issued
without an environmental assessment; and 3) that no projects are
to receive a categorical exemption as allowed by CEQA. with
regard to Councilmember Hastings concern relating to an
application for the previous Green Pepper location, staff
indicated that an application was recently filed, also that the 1-
applicant has been requested to provide the basic information
from which an initial environmental study can be made. The city
Attorney confirmed that an environmental assessment could be
required of those applications currently in the process and/or on
appeal if desired, even though there had been a categorical
exemption at the time of the initial hearings. Councilman Brown
indicated concern with placing additional requirements on the
applications previously filed. Mayor Forsythe inquired as to
Council support for the guidelines previously mentioned, as well
as an exemption from those guidelines for the four projects
currently in process.
staff noted that the Green Pepper location is proposed for a
pizza restaurant, beer, wine, and variance from parking
requirements. After further discussion and amendment of the
initially proposed moratorium ordinance, the City Attorney
recommended a proposed Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH DIRECTING STAFF TO REQUIRE AN INITIAL STUDY
FOR THE EXPANSION OR INTENSIFICATION OF CERTAIN NONCONFORMING
COMMERCIAL USES." It was clarified that the Resolution would
require additional environmental assessment of all applications
filed after December 14, 1992 for the intensification or
expansion of any nonconforming use on Main Street or Ocean
Avenue, as set forth in Exhibit A thereto, elimination of the 1
categorical exemption for same, and requirement for public
hearing for any change to the Resolution. Councilman Brown moved
to adopt Resolution Number 4196 as amended. Councilman Doane
seconded the motion. As a point of clarification with regard to
the previously mentioned Main Street restaurant site, it was
noted that there would be an intensification of use if an eatery
replaced a non-restaurant business, however if there were simply
a transfer of ownership it would not be considered
intensification provided that all conditions remained the same.
I
I
I
12-14-92
Vote to adopt Resolution Number 4196:
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Doane, Forsythe, Hastings, Laszlo
None Motion carried
COUNCIL CONCERNS
Councilman Doane indicated concern to a citizen's objection to
the use of the Police Department to correct a situation in
Leisure World where persons should likely no longer be driving,
brought to the attention of the driver through the issuance of
warnings, which he said is not a public relations program.
Councilman Doane expressed regrets with regard to a recent
traffic incident involving a Leisure World driver that resulted
in a fatality. Councilman Brown wished all a Merry Christmas and
a prosperous New Year. Councilman Laszlo reported that the cost
of cable service will increase as of January 1st with a charge to
the consumer for the tax assessment on Comcast, which they claim
is unfair. He expressed his objection to the tax assessment, the
franchise fee charge, and suggested citizens voice their
objection to the General Manager of Comcast. Councilman Laszlo
commended the college Park Neighborhood Association for their
recently held annual winter event, as well as those who
performed, the neighborhood participants, and the Lions Club for
their participation and assistance. councilmember Hastings
concurred with the criticism of Comcast Cable, and added her
displeasure with rescheduling of City Council and Planning
Commission rebroadcasts. with regard to the recent storm, the
city Manager reported that arrangements have been made with the
refuse disposal service to pickup storm debris from certain
downtown areas upon special request, and if determined to be a
result of the storm the City will assume the pickup costs.
Councilmember Hastings wished all a Merry Christmas and Happy
Hanuka. Mayor Forsythe announced the Christmas tree recycling
program, the dates and times that the trees may be delivered to
the City Yard. The City Manager indicated belief that the
recycling program may continue through January 2nd. The Mayor
also commended the recent College Park East festivities,
acknowledged their Christmas decoration contest, suggesting other
areas do the same next year, and announced the commencement of a
disaster preparedness program after the first of the year similar
to that in College Park East. with regard to safety concerns
expressed regarding the bus stop at 5th Street and Marina Drive,
the City Manager said it was his understanding that the City
Engineer would be on-site Wednesday morning at 7:30 a.m. to
observe the area. Councilman Brown announced that a horse drawn
carriage would be transporting carolers throughout Leisure World
on December 20th. The city Attorney reviewed the specific
changes to Resolution Number 4196, previously adopted.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Forsythe declared Oral Communications open. Mr. Charles
Antos, 17th Street, spoke regarding the Main Street cumulative
impact item, and stated that the action of the Council did no
more than require an environmental analysis at the time of a
request to intensify a use. He said that studies from the mid-
1970's may no longer be applicable given the changes that have
taken place over time, that recommendations of the Downtown Task
Forces were never fully implemented, nor has the parking
situation been dealt with, citing the use of in-lieu parking as
an example. He offered that the city must conduct a master
assessment of Main Street, all of the identified problems and
uses, not just alcohol and parking. Mayor Forsythe responded
that the City is aware of the concerns, however pointed out that
funds are not available to conduct a master environmental study
at this time, yet in the interim everything possible will be done
to help the people in the area. Ms. Reva Olson, Seal Beach, said
she felt the issue of in-lieu parking had not been addressed, nor
12-14-92/12-28-92
is there an adopted Main street plan, voiced her opinion tha~
cumulative impacts of intensification on Main street and in-lieu
parking have already created an impact on the adjacent
residential neighborhoods, and complained that there has been a
lack of planning for the Main street area. Mr. David Rosenman,
Seal Beach, disagreed with the Main street issue conceptually,
stating that since the restaurant on Main street (Green P~pper) I
ceased business there has been entertainment permits, new
businesses with alcohol, and on-site alcohol requests approved,
and in his opinion it would be less costly to remediate the issue
properly rather than through another more costly means such as
litigation. He voiced his concern with the actions of the
Planning Commissioners representing Leisure World, alleging their
approval of requests without due concern for the adjacent area or
its residents, such actions often leading to appeals to the
Council and the potential for litigation. Mr. Bruce Stark, Seal
Beach, stated his perception that Main street is doomed to
twenty-one liquor establishments in perpetuity. with regard to
an expressed safety concern for the vicinity of 2nd Street and
Marina Drive, Mr. Stark suggested that parking be eliminated for
at least one hundred feet to resolve the problem. He also
mentioned the announced retirement of Parks and Recreation
Director, Jack Osteen, commended his services to the community,
and suggested an appropriate celebration be planned in his honor.
The city Attorney clarified that the Council made no decision nor
took any action with regard to the application for the prior
Green Pepper restaurant site, that application to be processed in
the usual manner. There being no further comments, Mayor
Forsythe declared Oral Communications closed.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the consensus of the Council to cancel the regular meeting I
of December 28th. It was the order of the Chair, with consent of
the Council, to direct that the December 28th meeting be
adjourned until Monday, January 4th, 1993 at 7:00 p.m.
The meeting adjourned by unanimous consent at 10:53 p.m.
C erk and ex-off1C10
f Seal Beach
the
Approved: ~I" / ~ ...>~L' -' ,
Ma or
(l
Attest:
NOTICE OF CANCELLED / ADJOURNED MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the city of Seal
Beach did, at their regular meeting of December 14, 1992,
determine that the regular City Council meeting of December 28,
1992 is hereby cancelled.
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the regular meeting of
December 28th, 1992 is hereby adjourned until Monday, January 4,
1993 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, 211 - 8th Street,
Seal Beach.