Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Min 1969-12-22 12-22-69 46 Seal Beach, California December 22, 1969 The Redevelopment Agency of Seal Beach met in regular adjourned session at 6:00 p.m., December 22,1969, in the Council Chambers, 211 8th Street, Seal Beach, California, with Chairman Gummere presiding. called to order with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL The meeting was I Present: Chairman Gummere; Members Anderson, Dreis, Fuhrman, Hamilton Absent: None Also Present: Lee Risner, Executive Director - Secretary James Plooster, Deputy City Attorney APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Hamilton, second by Gummere, the minutes of the meetings of November 17, 1969, and December 1, 1969, were approved as corrected. AYES: NOES: Anderson, Dreis, Fuhrman, Gummere, Hamilton None Moti on carri ed. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Gummere announced that now was the time for oral communications, There being none, oral communications were closed. I AGENCY ITEf4S . The proposed development of R & B Development Company of a 564-apartment complex within the Riverfront Redevelopment Project was outlined by Risner, together with the recommendations, in writing, of the staff's proposals for amendments to the participation agreement with the developer, Resolution No. 385 of the Planning Commission approving Precise Plan PP-1-69, as schematic and preliminary plans and for zoning purposes. In addition, Risner reviewed the proposed development and the requirements and conditions of the participation agreement as indicated in a report to the Agency. Mr. Cline Martin, Assistant Vice President, and Mr. Robert Skinner, Architect, representing R & B Development Company, answered questions of Agency members concerning the proposed development as to parking, size of apartments, covered parking requirements, provisions and rules of their management concerning the number of occupants in each apartment. Risner answered questions of agency members relating to financing of the First Street extension indicating an application had been made to the County for assistance, the remaining money would be primarily gas tax construction funds or general funds advanced to the Agency by the City, with subsequent reimbursement by the Agency to the City. In response to questions con- I 12-22-69 ft7 I cerning a traffic signal at First Street and Pacific Coast Highway, it was explained by Risner and City Engineer John Stratford that it was needed -- attempts to have the State Division of Highway participate financially would be made -- and that allowances in estimates of costs included funds for either total city financing or cooperation with the State. Risner introduced by title and explained the proposed resolution approving PP-1-69 as schematic, preliminary plan approval and containing conditions of approval. In response to a question concerning the construction of First Street being financed by the Agency or City as being against city policy, Risner and City Engineer Stratford replied that they knew of no such policy, the City had participated in financing and constructing Lampson Avenue as a condition of development; that the land being acquired for First Street does not belong to the developer, and it is a proper and required condition to achieve proper development, and is in keeping with the General Plan. Further discussion and questions followed. I Gummere moved to adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING PRECISE PLAN NO. PP-1-69, FOR A PORTION OF THE RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, Resolution Number 69-13, with the inclusion in Section 2 of said resolution as follows: 1. Approval is granted subject to the acceptance by R & B Development Company of the following changes in the Participation Agreement (covering the land which they will develop): a) The requirement of undergrounding or removal of First Street utilities at no cost to the developer be eliminated from the agreement; b) The developer to dedicate ten feet (10') of property along the projected First Street extension and ten feet (10') of property along Pacific Coast Highway without cost to the City or Agency at or near the time of approval of working drawings; c) Provis~ons relating to the relocation of the city's sewage treatment plant are to be eliminated from the participating agreement; d) The developer and Agency and City to enter into an agreement for the life of the project whereby the adjacent property in the City of Long Beach is to be used exclusively as shown on the preliminary plan; I 12-22-69 A8 e) The provision of the participation agreement relating to the developer not being required to commence construction if First Street and the relocation of the sewage treatment plant were not financed be eliminated; f) The Participation Agreement provisions relating to developer termination of agreement if financing not available be eliminated or modified to provide commencement of development within~six (6) months of approval of working drawings; g) That the City/Agency is to proceed with acquisition of First Street right of way adjacent to development with all deliberate speed, to construct one-half of street as soon as possible after receipt of deeds to the property, City/Agency to use best efforts to secure remaining right of way and construct two lanes of street for balance of First Street to Marina Drive, City to request 'right of entry' and permission for construction road from Marina Drive to Coast Highway for use of developer, and City/Agency to have ,the option of constructing to either an ultimate 100' or 120' roadway and to have the option of constructing two lanes complete between Marina Drive and Coast Highway, or a full highway section adjacent to the proposed development. 2. The acceptance of the 32 covered parking spaces as a permitted variance and minor modification of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. The acceptance of the proposed 842 parking spaces, plus 37 tandem spaces, plus parking facilities for boats, trailers, and motorcycles as meeting the Redevelopment Plan provisions for off- street parking of tenants and guests. 4. The acceptance of the size of parking spaces proposed, 630 spaces at 8~' x 20' and 212 spaces at 7-3/4' x 20' , was a minor modification and variance to the Redevelopment Plan and was accepted and approved. 5. That Sheet IB of the proposed plan as adopted and approved as Precise Plan PP-1-69 was added thereto and approved with said plan. The motion was seconded by Dreis. AYES: NOES: Anderson, Dreis, Gummere, Hamilton Fuhrman , Motion carried. I I I ADJOURNMENI Anderson moved, second by Dreis, to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. AYES: NOES: Anderson, Dreis, Fuhrman, Gummere, Hamilton None Motion carried. I /f,.rt: L_o. - · airman . I I 12-22-69 r: ," !to tiel ,~