HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Min 1971-01-11
1-11-71 .
~7
January 11, 1971
I
The Redevelopment Agency of Seal Beach met in regular session
on January 11,1971 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 211
8th Street, Seal Beach, California. The meeting was called
to order by Chairman Jay Cov~ngton with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Chairman Covington
Members Barnes, Jackson, Ljndstrom, Scheiblauer
None
Absent:
Also present: Dennis Courtemarche, Executive Director-Secretary
Jim Bentson, Legal Counsel
Bill Murphy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jim Van Derhyden, Administrative Assistant
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mrs. Scheib1auer requested the minutes of December 21, 1970, be
amended to show her opposition to the inclusion of'Section 2 of
Resolution 70-7.
Mr. Barnes moved, second by Mr. Covington, to approve the minutes
of December 28, 1970, as amended.
AYES:
NOES:
j arnes, Covington, Jackson, Lindstrom, Scheiblauer
None Motion carried
I
REPORT OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Executive Director-Secretary Courtemarche stated he had no formal
report; he stated the "white paper" dealing with the subject of
the Rede~lopment Agency will be complete and included in members'
packets for the next meeting.
Mr. Lindstrom inquired if parenthesis anound figures shown on the
financial report of the Agency denoted a deficit; Mr. Courtemarche
replied in the affirmative. Mr. Courtemarche also explained that
for clarification and accounting purposes the Redevelopment Agency
WQ!lld have a separate accounting system and a separate checking
account.
Mr. Barnes inquired as to the other taxing agencies within~the
redevelopment area; Mr. Courtemarche explained that will be
covered in his "white paper."
Mr. Covington inquired about the method of the trans~er of monies
to the Agency; Mr. Courtemarche explained that it is an automatic
operation. Mrs. Scheiblauer asked if monies are paid directly
to the Redevelopment Agency; Mr. Courtemarche replied in the
affirmative.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Chairman Covington called for any unfinished business; there was
none.
I
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution Number 71-1. Mr. Barnes suggested persons other than
agency members should be stipulated as originators if a resolution
is ori9inated by other than an agency member. Mrs. Scheiblauer
moved to adopt Resolution Number 71-1, as amended, second by
Mr. Barnes.
AYES:
NOES:
Barnes, Covington, Jackson, Lindstrom, Scheiblauer
None Motion carried
Resolution Number 71-2. Mrs. Scheib1auer questioned the use of
the word "validity." Mr. Jackson and Mr. Bentson commented.
Mr. Barnes moved Resolution Number 71-2 be approved with Section 1
. ~8 1-11-71
amended to read.. .."attesting to the approval of the Agency."
AYES:
NOES:
Barnes, Covington, Jackson, Lindstrom, Scheib1auer
None Motion carried
Resolution Number 71-3. Mr. Barnes moved Resolution Number 71-3
be approved with the word "environment" being substituted for the
word "inv.i,ron." Mrs. Scheib1auer seconded Mr. Barnes' motion.
AYES:
NOES:
I
Barnes, Covington, Jackson, Lindstrom, Scheiblauer
None Motion carried
Resolution Number 71-4. Mrs. Scheib1auer moved, second by Jackson
to adopt Resolution Number 71-4.
AYES:
NOES:
Barnes, Covington, Jackson, Lindstrom, Scheib1auer
None Motion carried
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Covington announced that this was the time for oral
commun4cations. There being no oral communications, oral
communications were closed.
Mrs. Scheiblauer asked how added water affects the sewage treatment
facility. City Engineer Murphy explained that added water decreases
retention time. Chairman Covington asked if different types of
water are discernible; Mr. Murphy replied in the negative.
Mrs, Scheiblauer asked if intrusion of this nature is common in
other areas; Mr. Murphy explained that tt is. Mr. Covington asked
if there is a possibility of extrusion of sewage; Mr. Murphy
replied that it would be highly unlikely for lines not under
pressure. Mr. Lindstrom asked if effluent tests on high flow days,
which might indicate inadequate treatment of sewage, would help in
securing federal funds. Mr. Courtemarche replied that all factors
are considered by federal authorities.
Mr. Courtemarche suggested consideration of alterations in the
Redevelopment Plan be an agenda item for the next regu1ar meeting.
Chairman Covington concurred, and suggested the following items be
studied:
I
1. What has already been done.
2. What is the Agency already committed~to do.
3. What is the status of other phases in the
Redevelopment Plan.
Mrs. Scheiblauer suggested a positive direction for the Agency
should be established.
On unanimous vote of the Agency members, the meeting of the
Redevelopment Agency was adjourned to 7:00 p.m., January lB, 1971,
for joint session with the City Council.
Chairman
I