HomeMy WebLinkAboutEQCB Min 2000-11-29
"
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
.22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
.44
45
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
Environmental Quality Control Board
Minutes
November 29,2000
The Environmental Quality Control Board (EQCB) meeting of November 29, 2000 was
called to order by Chairperson Porter at 6:30 p.m. The meeting was held in City Council
Chambers.
Pledge of Allegiance
II Roll Call
Present:
Absent:
Chairperson Porter, Members Hurley, and Voce
Member Jones
Mac Cummins, Assistant Planner
Also
Present:
Department of Development Services
Lee Whittenberg, Director
Mr. Whittenberg noted that Member Jones had indicated at the last EQCB meeting that
he would not be present at tonight's meeting. He reported that the City Council has
declared a vacancy for the remaining position of EQCB and will be making an
appointment some time in the future.
III Approval of Agenda
Vice-Chairperson Hurley recommended moving Item 11 to come before Item 10.
MOTION by Hurley; SECOND by Voce to approve the Agenda as amended.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
-.
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
IV Oral Communications
Chairperson Porter opened oral communications.
Mr. David Rosenman stated that during his tenure as a member of the EQCB there had
been a commitment in principal to post on the City's website agendas of all meetings of
all boards, including EQCB, as well as any relevant documents. He said that he had
checked the City website and not only was the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the Boeing project not available, but the EQCB Meeting Agenda had also not been
posted. He asked that this oversight be corrected for future hearings.
Chairperson Porter closed oral communications.
V Consent Calendar
1. RECEIVE AND FILE - "Receipt of Responses to Comments RE: Proposed
Negative Declaration RE: Reuse of Lead Contaminated Soil - California
Department of Toxic Substances."
2. RECEIVE AND FILE - Letter to California Coastal Commission Re: Coastal
Permit 5-97-367 -A 1, Hellman Ranch Reserve Project - City of Seal Beach
Concerns Re: Special Conditions
3. RECEIVE AND FILE - Memorandum: Status Report - Pacific Coast Highway
& Seal Beach Boulevard Contamination. Memo dated October 5, 2000
4. RECEIVE AND FILE - Memorandum: Status Report - Pacific Coast Highway
& Seal Beach Boulevard Contamination. Memo dated October 25, 2000
5. RECEIVE AND FILE - City Letter to California State Lands Commission: Re:
City of Seal Beach comments Re: "Draft EIRlEIS for the Bolsa Chica Lowlands
Restoration Project." Letter dated October 9,2000.
6. RECEIVE AND FILE - Memorandum: Re: Seal Beach Installation Weapons
Support Facility - Installation Restoration Program - Status Report Re: RAB
project update.
7. RECEIVE AND FILE - Draft Environmental Impact Report and Application
Summary Report: Carnival Cruise Lines, Port of Long Beach
8. RECEIVE AND FILE - Receipt of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Westminster
Mall Expansion - City Of Westminster
Member Voce stated that on Item 7 although the Carnival Cruise boarding area is only
to be moved from the Los Angeles Harbor to the Long Beach Harbor, this will affect
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
2
~
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
Seal Beach because this type of movement does create substantial pollution of both the
water and air. He cited incidences of cruise ships dumping photochemicals, garbage,
and other hazardous waste into the ocean. He also noted that pollution from the cruise
ship smokestacks also affects the air quality. He said that the Draft EIR does not
provide any means of ameliorating pollution caused by cruise ships within the Long
Beach Harbor.
MOTION by Hurley; SECOND by Porter to approve the Consent Calendar as
presented.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
VI Scheduled Matters
9. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 25,2000
Recommendation: Approve Minutes subject to any corrections determined
appropriate.
Vice-Chairperson Hurley noted a correction to Page 3, Line 26, which was duly noted by
Mr. Whittenberg.
MOTION by Voce; SECOND by Hurley to approve the Minutes of October 25, 2000 as
amended.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
11. REVIEW OF DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
00-1 (PACIFIC GATEWAY BUSINESS CENTER - BOEING REAL TV
CORPORATION)
Recommendation: Board review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration 00-1 for Parcel Map 2000-134 (the Pacific Gateway Business
Center project), receive a presentation from City staff, receive public
comments and provide Board comments to staff regarding the adequacy of
subject Draft Mitigated Declaration.
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
3
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
Mr. Whittenberg stated that the purpose of tonight's session was to receive public
comments regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared by the City for
the proposed subdivision of portions of the Boeing property. He said that the Board
members could also comment on the information provided in this document. He explained
that the project was initiated when the Boeing Company submitted a parcel map to
subdivide portions of their property at the corner of Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard. He said that this property is currently zoned for industrial use, as it has been
for approximately 30 years. He stated that because the property has been vacant and
underutilized, the Boeing Company has made the decision that they will not need this area
to continue to function and are proposing to subdivide the property, build a new roadway
system from Westminster Avenue through the vacant area on the property to Seal Beach
Boulevard and create 9 parcels for subdivision purposes for future sale. He noted that the
total acreage is approximately 41-42 acres of industrial land. Mr. Whittenberg reported
that it is anticipated that the future size of the industrial development will be a little over
800,000 square feet. He described the procedure for processing a request of this kind and
noted the reasons for electing to complete a MND instead of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR). He stated that the 30-day public-comment period for the MND began on
November S, 2000 and will end on December 6,2000. He noted that the Archaeological
Advisory Committee met yesterday afternoon to receive public comments on the Cultural
Resources section of this document. The Director of Development Services stated that
once all comments are received, Staff will prepare a response to comments document,
which will be provided along with the MND to the Planning Commission for review as they
consider whether or not to approve the parcel map. The Planning Commission will then
make a recommendation to City Council and City Council will hold a public hearing to
determine whether to approve the MND if they believe it to be appropriate. He said that if
impacts were brought forward that cannot be reduced to a less than significant impact, the
City would then prepare an EIR and circulate that document for public review and
comments. Member Voce asked when the MND was expected to go before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Whittenberg reported that this item was scheduled to appear before the
Planning Commission on January 3,2001. He said that the date for a City Council hearing
had not yet been determined. He emphasized that after agreeing to the mitigation
measures with the project applicant, Staff believes that all environmental impacts have
been reduced to less than significant levels and that the MND is the appropriate document
to present at this time. He noted that when an MND goes to the State Office of Planning
and Research, they determine which state agencies will be reviewing the document, and
recently reported via correspondence to the City that currently 22 state agencies are
reviewing this document. Mr. Whittenberg then reviewed the environmental section of the
MND.
Public Comments
Chairperson Porter opened for public comments.
Mr. David Rosenman stated that in past hearings copies of the documents under
discussion were available for review and distribution to the public. He said that because
there were no copies available at tonight's meeting, the deadline for public comments
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
4
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
would have to be changed to allow for the public to review the document. He stated that
this omission "gave the appearance of impropriety." He said that somehow noticing to the
public and media coverage has "fallen through the cracks," and as a consequence he was
the only member of the public present tonight. He stated that he had significant problems
with the traffic mitigations. He said that it appeared that we are "counting the work from
the Bixby Project toward mitigating this project, and it is very hard to weed that out in
reviewing the document." Mr. Rosenman stated that he was very concerned about
installing additional traffic lights on Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue and
noted that the City was already close to "gridlock" from approximately 4:30 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. as well as during the morning rush hours. He said that he could not believe that it
would not have been worthwhile to have representatives from Linscott, Law & Greenspan
present tonight to do a full presentation subject to inquiry. He stated that the discussion in
the document was not clear enough so that a non-professional could reasonably
comprehend it. He said that he was also concerned about the applicant coordinating with
the City to complete this project. He stated that because multiple jurisdictions were
involved, repeat verifications would be necessary as in Seal Beach enforcement tends to
"fall between the cracks." Vice-Chairperson Hurley asked for specific examples. Mr.
Rosenman asked Member Voce to provide an example. Member Voce referred to the
joint mitigation issues for the City of Long Beach and Seal Beach for a project along
Pacific Coast Highway and 2nd Street. Vice-Chairperson Hurley confirmed with Mr.
Rosenman that his concern was with "tighter delineation and monitoring" of the applicant's
responsibilities on the part of the City.
There being no other persons wishing to address the Board, Chairperson Porter closed
the public comment session.
Board Comments
Member Voce referred to the section on Project Objectives on Page 8 of the MND. He
recommended that the term "underutilized" be deleted. He noted under the Biological
Resources Section on Page 12, Sections E and F are marked as having no impact. He
said that the Boeing property has had people come in and "top the hell out of their trees."
He said that Section 53067 of the Government Code makes this practice illegal. He
questioned whether Boeing would abide by the City ordinances if they have violated them
in the past. Mr. Whittenberg clarified that the MND discusses the environmental impacts
on a property that is currently vacant land with no trees on it. He cautioned that comments
should be restricted to the actual property in question. Member Voce expressed his
concern for future trees and the need to ensure that the law for trimming trees is followed.
He quoted from Section F, which states:
"Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan..."
and stated that this referred to existing plans and not to future plans because the City
could only deal with what exists now. He asked if the wetlands restoration on the Hellman
Ranch property could be considered in a Habitat Conservation Plan, and how to prevent
the possibility of bright lighting reflecting onto the habitat area. Mr. Whittenberg responded
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
5
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
that this would have to be an adopted plan that is already in place, since there would be no
impacts as there is no existing plan with which it might conflict. He stated that the potential
of a plan being adopted in the future is not something that can be considered at this point.
He said that if a Habitat Conservation Plan were to be approved as part of a future
restoration of the Hellman wetland area, then any projects proposed after the adoption of
this plan would be evaluated in light of the provisions of that plan. However, this cannot be
done before adoption of a plan. He also noted that wetland restoration could proceed
without adoption of any type of Habitat Conservation Plan. Member Voce asked what
would happen if after the Boeing project is built, a restoration plan is approved and there
are aspects of the Boeing project that end up affecting the restoration of the wetlands
area. Mr. Whittenberg referred to the map of the project and demonstrated that it is
separated from the Hellman property by the City yard, the Seal Beach Police Department,
and a 60-foot wide public roadway. At Member Voce's request, Mr. Whittenberg also
pointed out the bio-swale areas for both the Hellman Ranch and the Boeing property.
Member Voce asked if the lighting in this light industrial project could affect the future
residents of the Hellman Ranch housing development. Mr. Whittenberg stated that
specific mitigation measures provide for cut-off lighting for both the Hellman housing
development and the Boeing project.
Member Voce then referred to Page 14, Sections A, B & D and stated that although the
types of light industrial uses were yet to be determined, he felt that this leaves the issue of
hazards open to question. He said that because this property already had a history of
pollution from industrial processes and is designated for light industrial use, there should
be the expectation of environmental impacts that may involve some hazardous materials
in some quantity. Mr. Whittenberg pointed out that the Boeing property itself had not been
polluted by industrial practices from the past. He emphasized that the issue now was to
look at what steps are in place now to prevent future hazardous waste contamination on
this property. He noted that the MND is dealing with the land subdivision only with no
construction, which should not create hazardous impacts. He said that proposed future
plans for building on the property would be reviewed by the Department of Development
Services, and depending upon the use, might require a MND or an EIR. Member Voce
clarified that at this point all that the Board would be reviewing was the proposed
subdivision of the property. Mr. Whittenberg confirmed that this was the case. Member
Voce inquired that if the industrial use is defense contract work that would be considered
confidential, would this interfere with the ability to acquire future knowledge or
determination. Mr. Whittenberg stated that to the best of his knowledge even if a use is
defense related, the storage of any hazardous materials on site must still be reported to
the Fire Authority, Department of Toxic Substances Control, and the Environmental
Protection Agency.
Member Voce referred to Page 28, Item D, and noted that it might be helpful to the reader
to provide the names of the actual stabilizers and binders to be used for roadways. He
expressed this concern because with the Bixby Project dust suppression measures were
supposed to have been incorporated, but it appeared that this was not being done as he
had observed large dust clouds when driving along Seal Beach Boulevard near the area
being graded. Mr. Whittenberg reported that the provisions listed in the MND were those
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
6
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
required by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) in order for grading permits to be
issued. He said that complaints had been received regarding the dust from the Bixby
Project and the City had contacted AQMD who came out to inspect the site and required
that additional water trucks be brought to the site.
Member Voce noted that although mitigation measures were discussed on Page 29, if new
traffic signals are added to both Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard, the
stopping and re-accelerating of cars would tend to offset the other mitigation measures for
air pollution. Mr. Whittenberg indicated that there would be one new street created with a
new signal along Westminster Avenue and a new signal placed at Adolfo Lopez Drive.
Both signals would be synchronized to the traffic flows on Westminster Avenue and Seal
Beach Boulevard. He said that although there would be more traffic, the mitigation
measures show that with the signals, traffic flow will actually be improved along
Westminster Avenue. Vice-Chairperson Hurley asked who requires that the traffic signal
be installed. Mr. Whittenberg responded that the City requires it.
Member Voce referred to Item P on Page 30 and stated that he did not understand why
local landscapers would not use native species of trees when completing landscaping
within the City. He asked if there were some way to "require" that native species be used.
He then referred to Page 71 and asked how adequate enforcement of improvements could
be ensured. He also inquired about the improvements to the 1-405/Seal Beach Boulevard
overcrossing. He asked if this was already a Cal- Trans project. Mr. Whittenberg
responded that this project and the Bixby Project are making an impact at that location,
therefore, both projects have the obligation to share in reducing the impacts. He stated
that funds from both projects would be used to deal with the improvements at that location.
Member Voce asked if the Director of Development Services had any idea of when work is
scheduled to begin. Mr. Whittenberg said that there has been a lot of discussion on this
project. He reported that as conditioned by the City in approving the Bixby Project the
widening of the bridge to 3 lanes in each direction over the bridge is required. He stated
that currently the discussion with both Orange County Transit Authority (aCTA) and Cal-
Trans is the lengthening of the bridge and moving the abutments back from the travel
lanes in each direction to allow for future installation of an additional travel lane on the
northbound side of the freeway and for a potential on/off carpool lane directly onto Seal
Beach Boulevard. He said that there has been much discussion by both the City Manager
and the Public Works Director with these agencies to strongly encourage them to provide
funds to allow for the lengthening and the widening of the bridge to occur at the same time.
Mr. Whittenberg noted that the impact to the City would be to provide the 3 traffic lanes.
He said that the other issues are related to projects under consideration by Cal-Trans and
aCTA in the right-of-way of the 1-405 Freeway that will not impact Seal Beach other than
the eventual reconstruction of the bridge at some point. Vice-Chairperson Hurley stated
that it appeared that Member Voce's concern was the placing of two projects under one
document. Vice-Chairperson Hurley asked if the phrase "a proportionate share of the
funding for the widening of the bridge" could be added. Mr. Whittenberg stated that
because the establishment of traffic fees is not based on a fair share basis, but on a dollar
amount per square foot of building area constructed, and because these funds are used
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
7
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
for projects that are necessary to deal with traffic impacts, it would not be appropriate to
include such a phrase.
Member Voce asked if there would be a new signal installed to enter the Hellman property.
Mr. Whittenberg stated that the existing signalized intersection at the entrance to the Naval
Weapons Station would be used to enter the property. Member Voce asked if the traffic
light coming out of the Boeing parking lot would be removed. Mr. Whittenberg reported
that all of the existing signalized entrance points into the existing Boeing parking lots would
remain. Member Voce commented that at Road A, when one car is waiting to exit that
parking lot, 30 cars traveling along Seal Beach Boulevard must stop and then re-
accelerate creating more exhaust fumes. He asked if synchronization of the traffic lights
would include all existing lights along Seal Beach Boulevard. Mr. Whittenberg responded
that this was correct.
Vice-Chairperson Hurley recommended adding the following sentences to the end of the
first paragraph of Page 3:
"Seventy-two of these housing units are located directly across Westminster
Avenue from the proposed Parcels 1, 2, and 9. Of the approximately 8,300
residents in Leisure World, approximately 90% are over the age of 65. "
He stated that he wanted to emphasize the special nature of the housing units, which are
closer to the parcel than the Island Village housing. He also noted minor corrections to
Pages 28 and recommended that for clarification actual quoted material from the various
agency and/or legislative handbooks referred to in the MND should be included. Mr.
Whittenberg reminded the Board that tonight they were essentially reviewing any short-
term impacts from a grading operation. He noted that any health impacts from long-term
exposure would be evaluated along with the individual building uses for the subdivided
property. Vice-Chairperson Hurley expressed his concern for the effect on the nearby
residents of Leisure World during what he referred to as "two weeks of heavy road
building." Mr. Whittenberg responded that relevant text would be added to include this
issue. Vice-Chairperson Hurley then made recommendations for changes to Page 58 in
paragraphs under the section entitled Short-Term Construction. He questioned the
Director of Development Services on the noise level projections listed within this section.
He also requested that more specific times for the hours when construction could take
place be included within this section. Vice-Chairperson Hurley suggested that it would be
helpful to incorporate a section on the environmental checklist pages to include discussion
on each impact item as opposed to having this discussion appear in later pages. He also
suggested that the specific topic for each page could be included in the page header. Mr.
Whittenberg stated that this could be done in future documents. Vice-Chairperson Hurley
also stated his preference for having the table of contents reflect chapters rather than
sections delineated by decimal numbers.
Member Voce suggested adding an additional mitigation measure to adopt the most
appropriate CNEL criteria for light industrial. Mr. Whittenberg noted that this appears at
the top of Page 60 and reads:
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
8
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
"All structures shall be sound attenuated against the combined impact of
all present and projected noise from exterior noise sources to meet an
interior noise level of 60 CNEL. 11
He stated that this sets in place a mitigation measure for the future construction of
buildings and establishes for this project specific interior noise levels. He said that the
same thing was done for the commercial structures on the Bixby Project, and the City is
beginning the process of establishing standard requirements for CNEL levels on the
interior of commercial and industrial buildings. Member Voce questioned whether this
would make interior noise levels 15 points higher for commercial than for residential
development. Mr. Whittenberg responded that currently there is no set level, and City
Council has set a level of 55 CNEL for commercial. Vice-Chairperson Hurley asked if
once construction begins, should noise levels exceed CNEL levels and complaints be
received, would different mitigation measures be incorporated at that time. Mr.
Whittenberg stated that because the existing Boeing facility was constructed in the early
60s, before EIRs were introduced, Staff could not be sure whether consideration was
given to noise levels at that time. He noted that concrete block walls along property lines
do contribute substantially to minimizing outside noise from traffic or construction. He said
that as this project proceeds, depending upon the types of developments, sound walls
might be constructed along the south side of Westminster Avenue to help minimize noise.
Public Comments
At the request of a person in the audience, Chairperson Porter re-opened for public
comments.
Mr. Gene Vesely stated for the record that he loves Seal Beach and dreads
encroaching development. He recommended moving the checkmark on Item 2.1, C on
Page 10 from "Less Than Significant Impact" to reflect "Less Than Significant With
Mitigation Incorporated." He referred to Vice-Chairperson Hurley's comment regarding
listing specific times for construction activity and noted that this was done on Page 58.
Chairperson Porter closed the public comments session.
Board Comments
Chairperson Porter asked if any trees were to be planted on this property. Mr.
Whittenberg stated that because no building plans have yet been submitted, Staff could
not provide this information at this time. In responding to Mr. Veseley's comments, Mr.
Whittenberg referred to Page 22 where Mitigation Measures are designated for handling
of future construction on this property. He stated that because the land is already
zoned for industrial use, Boeing could construct buildings on that property without
subdividing it, and they would simply have to follow the building permit process to do so.
He stated that the Mitigation Measures listed on Page 22 would reduce the capability of
having a development that might be detrimental to the overall esthetic nature of the city.
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
9
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
Vice-Chairperson Hurley asked if there were height limitations to the buildings that can
be constructed on this property. Mr. Whittenberg reported that there is a height limit of
70 feet in an M-1 Zone, but he also believes the individual lot has to be a certain size in
order to permit this. He said that he did not know that the lots would be large enough to
allow this. Member Voce asked if Staff knew the height of the current Boeing main
building. Mr. Whittenberg stated that this building is approximately 83 feet tall and was
built under an older set of standards that allowed a height of 150 feet in that zone.
Mr. Rosenman asked if any decision would be made tonight regarding having Linscott,
Law & Greenspan (LLG) present a traffic analysis. Chairperson Porter stated that tonight's
meeting was simply to receive comments from the public and that no action would be
taken tonight on any comments made. Mr. Rosenman expressed his concern that this
issue would not be addressed with sufficient time to have data ready when this project
comes before the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Whittenberg responded
that CEQA allows for a certain comment period on this MND, which ends on December S,
2000 and it cannot be extended by the EQCB. He stated that Mr. Rosenman's comments
about meeting with LLG could be included in the comment letter. He said that if the EQCB
elected to meet with LLG before December 6 they could do this or Staff could have
consultants from LLG available at the Planning Commission meeting to address these
issues. Chairperson Porter agreed that EQCB would like to include a comment that the
Planning Commission have LLG available to deal with questions on traffic impacts.
MOTION by Voce; SECOND by Hurley that the Board request that Linscott, Law &
Greenspan provide a presentation on traffic circulation issues for the Boeing subdivision at
the January 3, 2001 Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
10. RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR - Selective
Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Installation Project, AES Los Alamitos, Long Beach -
SCAQMD
Recommendation: Instruct Chairman to sign proposed Response Letter,
and instruct staff to forward to Planning Commission and City Council for
information purposes. Receive and File Staff Report.
Member Voce asked what the initials AES represent. Mr. Whittenberg responded that this
was the acronym for the firm that has purchased the power plant from Southern California
Edison and he was not certain what the actual name is. Member Voce complimented
Staff on the research done and the disclosure, particularly given the ammonia tanks that
are scheduled to be a part of the clean-up process. He also commended Staff for
addressing concerns about the Leisure World area. Vice-Chairperson Hurley provided
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
10
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
.45
46
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
recommendations for changes on Pages 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the comment letter, which
were noted by Mr. Whittenberg. Chairperson Porter noted that the signature notation on
Page 12 of the letter should reflect his name as Joseph E. Porter.
MOTION by Voce; SECOND by Porter to have Chairperson sign proposed Response
Letter with board-approved amendments, and instruct Staff to forward to the Planning
Commission and City Council for information purposes. Receive and File Staff Report.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
VII Staff Concerns
Mr. Whittenberg reported that the next scheduled meeting was for December 27, 2000.
He asked if the Board would prefer to wait until the first scheduled meeting of January
2001. The Board asked the Director of Development Services if there were any items
pending for discussion during December. Mr. Whittenberg reported that currently there
was nothing, but should an item of importance come up, he could call a special meeting
of the Board. The Board agreed to next meet at the scheduled meeting for January
2001.
VIII Board Concerns
None.
IX Adjournment
MOTION by Voce; SECOND by Hurley to adjourn to the scheduled January 2001
meeting date.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-1
Hurley, Porter, and Voce
None
Jones
Chairperson Porter adjourned the meeting at 8:04 p.m.
Q:\EQCB\11-29-Q0 EQCB Minutes.doc
11
.~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
.
.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~
Carmen Alvarez, Executive Secretary
Department of Development Services
City of Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board
Meeting Minutes of November 29, 2000
The Board on January 24, 2001, approved the Minutes of the Environmental Quality
Control Board of Wednesday, November 29, 2000. ~ .
Q:\EQCB\11-29-00 EQCB Minutes.doc
12