HomeMy WebLinkAboutAAC Min 2000-01-18
.
.
.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
Archaeological Advisory Committee
Minutes
January 19, 2000
The meeting of the Archaeological Advisory Committee (AAC) was called to order at 5:50 p.m.
on Wednesday, January 19,2000. The meeting was held in the City Council Chambers.!
I. Call to Order
ll. Roll Call
Acting Chairperson Willey
Members Fitzpatrick and Vesely
Members Basch and Eigenbrod
Present:
Absent:
Also
Present:
Department of Development Services
Lee Whittenberg, Director
Mr. Whittenberg stated that he had received a telephone call from Joyce Basch indicating that
she would not be in attendance at tonight's meeting He stated that he had not heard from Jake
Eigenbrod. Mr. Whittenberg recommended that a motion be made to excuse Member Basch.
MOTION by Vesely; SECOND by Fitzpatrick to excuse Member Basch from tonight's meeting.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ill. Approval of Agenda
3-0-2
Fitzpatrick, Vesely, and Willey
None
Basch and Eigenbrod
MOTION by Vesely; SECOND by Fitzpatrick to approve the Agenda as presented.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-2
Fitzpatrick, Vesely, and Willey
None
Basch and Eigenbrod
1 These Minutes were transcribed from audiotape of the meeting.
1
City of Seal Beach Archaeological Advisory CommIttee
Meetmg Minutes of January 19, 2000
.
IV. Introduction of New Member
Acting Chairperson Willey announced that the introduction of the new member could not take
place, as Member Eigenbrod was not present.
v. Oral Communications
.
Ms. Lisa Bosalet, Cultural Resources Coordinator for the Naval Weapons Station (NWS),
reported on the effort to obtain funding to replace the NWS fire station. She stated that the
current fire station was too small, and space is needed to accommodate female fire fighters She
provided a diagram of the NWS grounds and indicated one of several proposed sites for the fire
station. Ms. Bosalet stated that another option was to temporarily move the firemen out while
demolishing and rebuilding on the current site, which she stated would be quite expensive. She
noted that another proposed site was across the street. She stated that more information on this
project would be provided to the members of the AAC indicating the preferred alternative site
for the new fire station, which lies within the boundary of a significant archaeological site. She
indicated that this site had previously been developed, however, there has been a lot of
archaeological work within this area. She said that the NWS would be completing an
Environmental Assessment and doing the archaeological work up front. She noted that at this
point in time the NWS was not proposing to have any archaeological work done in this area
since they had already compiled a lot of information on this area already. Ms. Bosalet stated that
it was important to provide this information to the AAC as the NWS was hoping to acquire
funding for this project by next year. She stated that the proposed mitigation would be for
monitoring during the construction phase She said that no human remains or pottery had been
found in this area, only shells.
Member Fitzpatrick asked how this area was determined to be an area of concern. Ms. Bosalet
responded that between 1991 and 1997 there was an extensive amount of evaluation work done
in this area using standard tests. She said that they knew that there was a concentration in this
area to begin with, so the study began in this area and worked outward. Member Vesely asked if
the project was proposed prior to, during, or after the demolition of Buildings 206 and 26. He
wanted to know if this would be a quicker project. Ms. Bosalet responded that she could not say.
She said that it was funded this year and would start before the Bldg. 206 project. Mr.
Whittenberg commented that he was sure there would be some kind of environmental document
prepared and circulated for comment. Ms. Bosalet responded that the environmental assessment,
particularly 106, which addresses cultural resources, would be what the AAC would be most
interested in.
Member Fitzpatrick asked if the primary reason for the proposed new fire station was to
accommodate women. Ms Bosalet responded that this was just one reason. She said that the
building was in need of updating, as it is not a state-of-the-art facility. She stated that because
this was an emergency facility, the work must be completed in a timely manner, in order to have
the fire services available as soon as possible. Mr. Whittenberg asked if this was the original
station that was constructed back in the 1940's. Ms. Bosalet responded that it was.
.
2
.
.
.
City of Seal Beach Archaeological AdVISOry Committee
Meeting Minutes of January 19, 2000
VI. Consent Calendar
1. RECEIVE AND FILE Letter dated December 8, 1999, from Archaeological Advisory
Committee, City of Seal Beach to Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach re: "Draft Final
Historic Properties Evaluation Plan/or Sites 30-001502, 30-001503, and 30-001504,
Naval Weapons Support Facility, Seal Beach, California. JJ
2. RECEIVE AND FILE Letter dated January 10, 2000, from City of Seal Beach to
California Public Utilities Commission re: City of Seal Beach Comments re: "Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report - Bolsa Chica Water Transmission Line
and Wastewater Service Project, Southern California Water Company (Application
Nos. 98-11-003 and 98-11-015). JJ
MOTION by Vesely; SECOND by Fitzpatrick to approve the Consent Calendar as presented.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-2
Fitzpatrick, Vesely, and Willey
None
Basch and Eigenbrod
VB. Scheduled Matters
3. Approval of Minutes of December 8, 1999.
Recommendation: Approve Minutes with any corrections determined appropriate.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick; SECOND by Vesely to approve the Minutes as presented.
MOTION CARRIED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3-0-2
Fitzpatrick, Vesely, and Willey
None
Basch and Eigenbrod
4. APPRO V AL OF COMMENT LETTER RE: "Focused Site Inspection Phase II Work
Plan - Field Sampling Plan, Archaeological Clearance Request, JJ prepared by Seal
Beach Naval Weapons Station, dated December 28, 1999.
Recommendation: Authorize the Chairperson to sign the proposed comment letter with any
amendments determined appropriate by the Committee. Receive and File subject report.
Mr. Whittenberg commented that this documentation was received from the Navy. He said that
Staff had focused on the review of two separate discovery plans that the Navy had submitted
describing how they were proposing to monitor activities at the two sites involved to ensure that
3
City of Seal Beach Archaeological Advisory CommIttee
Meetmg Mmutes of January 19, 2000
.
any cultural resource issues that arose during the construction or evaluation of these areas were
properly monitored.
Acting Chairperson Willey stated that based upon the information in the report, it appeared that
several teams would be completing various samplings concurrently rather than in a sequential
manner. She asked Ms. Bosalet to clarify this. Ms. Bosalet apologized if her letter gave the
impression that there would be on-site full-time monitoring at both sampling efforts. She said
that the reason that the NWS had provided two different discovery plans was because Site 73, the
water tower project site, is at a known archeological site. She said that there would be full-time
monitoring by an archaeologist or a Native American at this location. She stated that at the
other sampling sites the NWS would be providing worker training, since at this point the entire
installation has been surveyed. She clarified that on the second discovery plan there would be 13
sampling points, which would be every other site other than the water tower, where worker
training will be provided, with on-call monitors for any potential discoveries. Ms. Bosalet stated
that this would be more than adequate for these sites.
.
Acting Chairperson Willey asked if there would be any chance of having one group do the water
tower while having the archaeologist and Native American monitor present at the same time.
Ms. Bosalet responded that this was possible but she was not sure of the timing schedule. She
said that the NWS wanted to get started as soon as possible. She indicated that the work at the
water tower was relatively simple sampling, as they would simply be going in and doing soil
samples at two depths at each site, as opposed to other sites where more extensive work would
be done. She said that the archaeologist assigned to the project is local, therefore, a rapid
response time is expected. Member Vesely asked if the different projects would be contracted to
different contractors. Ms. Bosalet responded that she was not sure but assumed that they would
probably use contractors that have worked at the NWS before.
Member Vesely asked how extensive the worker training would be and if AAC members would
be eligible to participate, as he was interested in attending. Ms. Bosalet responded that this
would not be a problem and the AAC members could be sent advance notification of the training
dates.
Mr. Whittenberg noted that a comment to this effect could be included in the letter. He also
stated that a comment could be included in the letter regarding attempting as much as possible to
coordinate the field work so that if there is a situation on the secondary sites, the archaeologist
for the water tower project would be on site and would be able to respond quickly. Acting
Chairperson Willey stated that perhaps a comment could be included to the effect that the AAC
would be more comfortable if the fieldwork were coordinated in this way.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick; SECOND by Vesely to Authorize the Acting Chairperson to sign the
proposed comment letter with the amendments suggested by Mr. Whittenberg. Receive and File
subject report.
.
MOTION CARRIED: 3 - 0 - 2
AYES: Fitzpatrick, Vesely, and Willey
NOES: None
4
~. . I .
.
.
.
City of Seal Beach Archaeological AdvISOry CommIttee
Meetmg Minutes of January 19, 2000
ABSENT:
Basch and Eigenbrod
VllI. Committee Concerns
None.
IX. Staff Concerns
Mr. Whittenberg indicated that the next scheduled meeting date was February 9, 2000. He
stated that he did not currently have any items for that meeting. Acting Chairperson Willey
reported that she would be out of town on that date. Mr. Whittenberg stated that Staff would
consider scheduling the meeting for another date in February.
x. Adjournment
There being no objections, Acting Chairperson Willey adjourned the meeting at 6: 17 p. m. to a
meeting date to be specified later.
~~ k~cV~
Acting Chairperson,
Archaeological Advisory Committee
Respectfully Submitted,
C\ ~"-....t\......^ ~~ _
Carmen Alvarez, Executive Secre~
Planning Department
APPRO V AL
The Archaeological Advisory Committee on Ara./L S , 2000 approved the Minutes of
the January 19, 2000 meetin~
5