The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC AG PKT 2010-06-14 #TAGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 14, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: David Carmany, City Manager FROM: Sean Crumby P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. FOR THE 2010 BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City Council is asked to adopt Resolution No. 6018 approving a professional services agreement for the 2011 Building /Facility Condition Assessment with Griffin Structures Inc. in the amount of $88,650. BACKGROUND: The City of Seal Beach owns and operates 37 facilities throughout the City. Some of the facilities include: City Hall, Old City Hall, the Police Station, City Yard Building, Library/Senior Center, numerous water facilities (wells and reservoirs), North S.B. Community Center, Marina Community Center, P.D. Safety Building, Lifeguard Headquarters, Lifeguard Garage, Lifeguard Zero Tower, Beach Yard Building /1st St. Garage, 1st St/ Beach Facility, Zoeter Building (Day Care), the Girl Scout House, Fire Station No. 44, Fire Station No. 48, and the Seal Beach Tennis Center. On June 28, 2004 the City Council adopted a Facility Condition Assessment Report. Since the adoption of the report, changes have been made with the City Facilities, and the finances of the City. Additionally, several updates to the American with Disabilities Act and the Uniform Building Code have gone into effect. Additionally, this report will corroborate the findings of the condition of the Pier Utilities compiled in 2009 by Moffatt and Nichols Engineers. Staff requested proposals from 14 firms to prepare the Building /Facility Condition Assessment. A mandatory pre - proposal meeting was held so that the City could communicate to the firms the facilities in Seal Beach and the expectations of the staff. Nine firms attended the mandatory pre - proposal meeting. Three firms responded with proposals submitted to the City. A panel comprised of four Agenda Item T Page 2 Public Works staff reviewed the proposals. The panel selected the firm of Griffin Structures, Inc. to be the most qualified firm. Griffin Structures, Inc. has provided a similar service to numerous Southern California agencies including the Cities of Newport Beach, Cypress, Fullerton, Buena Park, Santa Ana, and Tustin. A check of references indicates excellent performance on these studies. In addition to preparing Facility Assessment Studies, Griffin Structures has performed as construction manager for numerous large construction projects. The fee proposal of $88,650 is appropriate for the service being provided. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The amount of $88,700 will be transferred from fund balance designated for buildings and will be charged to 001 - 052 -44000 as requested in agenda item "I ". (Budget Amendment No. 11- 01 -01) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended City Council adopt resolution No. 6018 approving a professional services agreement for the 2011 Building /Facility Condition Assessment with Griffin Structures Inc. in the amount of $88,650. SUBMITTED BY: Sean Crumby P.E. Director of Public Works NOTED AND APPROVED: David Carmany, dity Manager Attachments: A. Resolution No. 6018 B. Agreement C. Proposal D. Fee Proposal RESOLUTION NUMBER 6018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AND GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC FOR THE 2010 BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Seal Beach and Griffin Structures, Inc. for the 2010 Building /Facility Condition Assessment in the amount of $88,650. Section 2. The Council hereby directs the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June , 2010 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: Council Members ABSENT: Council Members ABSTAIN: Council Members Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH } I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6018 on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of June , 2010. City Clerk PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT between City of Seal Beach 211 - 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Griffin Structures, Inc. 385 Second Street Laguna Beach, Ca 92651 (949) 497 -9000 This Professional Service Agreement ( "the Agreement') is made as of June 14, 2010, (the "Effective Date "), by and between Griffin Structures, Inc. ( "Consultant "), and the City of Seal Beach ( "City "), a California charter city, (collectively, "the Parties" RECITALS A. City desires certain professional services. B. Consultant represents that it is qualified and able to provide City with such services. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties' performance of the promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows. AGREEMENT 1.0 Scope of Services 1.1. Consultant must provide those services ( "Services ") set forth in the attached Exhibit A, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. To the extent that there is any conflict between Exhibit A and this Agreement, this Agreement must control. 1.2. Consultant must perform all Services under this Agreement in accordance with the standard of care generally exercised by like professionals under similar circumstances and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to Authority. 1.3. In performing this Agreement, Consultant must comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. 1.4. Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified in the Scope of Services unless the City authorizes such work in advance and in writing. The City Manager may authorize payment for such work up to a cumulative maximum of $10,000. Payment for additional work in excess of $10,000 requires prior City Council authorization. 2.0 Term This term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue for a term of 6 months unless previously terminated as provided by this Agreement. 3.0 Consultant's Compensation City will pay Consultant in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit A for Services but in no event will the City pay more than $88,650. Any additional work authorized by the City pursuant to Section 1.4 will be compensated in accordance with the rate schedule set forth in Exhibit A. 1 of 8 S7296.0001\ 10776000.doc 4.0 Method of Payment 4.1. Consultant must submit to City monthly invoices for all services rendered pursuant to his Agreement. Such invoices must be submitted within 15 days of the end of the month during which the services were rendered and must describe in detail the services rendered during the period, the days worked, number of hours worked, the hourly rates charged, and the services performed for each day in the period. Oty _w 111 pay Consultant within 30 days :of receiying`:Consultarit's: 'invoice: City will not withhold any applicable federal or state payroll and other required taxes, or other authorized deductions from payments made to Consultant. 4.2. Upon 24 hours notice from City, Consultant must allow City or City's agents or representatives to inspect at Consultant's offices during reasonable business hours all records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant in connection with this Agreement. City's rights under this Section 4.2 shall survive for two years following the termination of this Agreement. 5.0 Termination 5.1. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, or by Consultant based on reasonable cause, upon giving the other party written notice thereof not less than thirty 30 days prior to the date of termination. 5.2. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days' notice to Consultant if Consultant fails to provide satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement of comprehensive general liability insurance as required by this Agreement at least 20 days before the expiration date of the previous policy. 6.0 Party Representatives 6.1. The City Manager is the City's representative for purposes of this Agreement. 6.2. Roger Torriero is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of this Agreement. 7.0 Notices 7.1. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the following addresses: To City: City of Seal Beach 211 8th Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Attn: City Manager 2 of 8 S 7296- 00011107760W.doc To Consultant: Griffin Structures, Inc. 385 Second Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Telephone: (949) 497 -9000 Fax: (949) 497 -8883 Attn: Roger Torriero 7.2. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 8.0 Independent contractor 8.1. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. All services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the services. Any additional personnel performing services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shalt be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 8.2. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant's personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 9.0 Subcontractors No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any and all subcontractors. 3 of 8 S7296- 00011107760W.doc 10.0 Assignment Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of City. Any purported assignment without such consent shall be void and without effect. 11.0 Insurance 11.1. Consultant must not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that Consultant has secured all insurance required under this Section. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by the City if requested. All certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 11.2. Consultant shall, at its expense,. procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3) Professional Liability. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and if Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim /aggregate. 11.3. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by the City to state: (1) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City; (2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its directors, officials, officers, (3) coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage and that any insurance or self - insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's 4of8 57296- 0001 \1077600v7.doc insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it; (4) for general liability insurance, that the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (5) for automobile liability, that the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible. 11.4. All' insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions and shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. 11.5. Any deductibles or self - insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City. Consultant guarantees that, at the option of the City, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self - insured retentions as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 12.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend Consultant shall indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials (collectively "Indemnities ") free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any acts or omissions of Consultant, its employees, or its agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. With respect to any and all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Indemnitees, Consultant shall defend Indemnitees, at Consultant's own cost, expense, and risk, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award, or decree that may be rendered against Indemnitees. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and /or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive termination of this Agreement. 13.0 Equal Opportunity 5of8 S7296- 0001 \10776OOv7.doc Consultant affirmatively represents that it is an equal opportunity employer. Consultant must not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, or age. Such non - discrimination includes, but is not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 14.0 Labor Certification By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 16.0 Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 16.0 Severability The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. 17.0 Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 18.0 No Third Party Rights No third party shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party as a result of this Agreement. 19.0 Waiver No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a party shall give the other party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 20.0 Prohibited Interests Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor 6 of 8 S7296. 0001 \1077600v7.doc has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City has the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 21.0 Attorneys' Fees If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party all of its attorney's fees and other costs incurred in connection with such action. 22.0 Exhibits All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as if set forth in full herein. In the event of any material discrepancy between the terms of any exhibit so incorporated and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control. 23.0 Corporate Authority The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties and that by their execution, the Parties are formally bound to the provision of this Agreement. (Intentionally Left Blank) 7 of 8 57296 -0001 \1 0776000.doc INVITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF SEAL BEACH 0 David Carmany, City Manager CONSULTANT GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. a Calif ni Corporation By: Name: o ger.. To.rriero. Attest: Linda Devine, City Clerk Approved as to Form: By: Qj� &C" Quinn Barrow, City Attorney IfS: President By: Name : ::: Kelly: L...Boyle. its: : - *Sdcretary.' , 8of8 S7296- 000111077600v7.doc EXHIBIT A Proposal PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA FOR BUILDINGNACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED MAY I I TH, 2010 l � CONTACT: ROGER TORRIERO RTORRIER00GRIFFINHOLDINGS.NET GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. 385 SECOND STREET I LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 949 - 497 -9000 P 949 - 497 -8883 F VVW W.GRIFFINHOLDINGS.NET May 11th, 2010 Mr. Michael Ho, P.E. City Engineer City of Seal Beach – City Hall 211 8th Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Re: Request for Proposals for Building /Facility Condition Assessment Dear Mr. Ho: First of all, thank you for inviting the Griffin Structures team to respond to your Request for Proposal for Building/Facility Condition Assessment services. Our team recognizes today's inordinate financial pressures facing municipalities across the state of California. With that in mind, I am confident that you will be convinced that our team's response reflects that Griffin has the best interests of the city of Seal Beach in mind. Additionally, I invite you to speak with each of our references to hear for yourself how Griffin truly acts on your behalf and always strives to be exemplary stewards of your resources and investments. For more than three decades, Griffin has served as a Trusted Advisor to municipalities across Orange and Los Angeles Counties having successfully delivered more than 8 dozen Building/Facility and Needs Assessments. Our goal is to always do our best to help you maximize your investment and provide you with significant value as your partner. The alternatives presented in our proposal not only respond to your Scope of Work for the 33 different facilities as outlined in the RFP but also offer notable benefits to the City. Additionally, our team not only meets your needs, but also delivers a customized approach for the work product that you and your staff will be proud to present to your 24,000+ residents. The Griffin Structures Team has given considerable thought to the requirements of this project, and to how we add considerable value to our performance. Having toured each of the 33 sites, we are thoroughly familiar with the execution of these types of projects. Further, as you will hear from our past municipal clients, we understand the special needed services, which are essential to your projects success. As demonstrated by our relevant examples, Griffin brings several Strategic Benefits to this project, including: • Recent and Relevant Experience with Delivering Building Assessment Projects • Experience with All Municipal Components of Each of the 33 Projects • Success with Serving as an Extension of Staff • Three Decades as a Local Orange County Team with Experience Working Together These strategic factors distinguish our value -added service approach and are essential to—and which will provide success for —this project. In summary, the Griffin Structures Team is especially qualified to deliver this project to the city of Seal Beach. Based on the points noted above and the details presented in this proposal, I am certain that our Team is the best solution for the City: We are prepared to begin this project immediately! Best regards, GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. Roger Torriero, CEO GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. 385 Second Street, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 497 -9000 tel ■ (949) 497 -8883 fax email: rtoniero @griffinholdings.net California Nevada Arizona Italy STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS Q: MANY AGENCIES' BESIDE THE CITY MAY HAVE SOME LEVEL OF REGULATORY AND STATUTORY AUTHORITY OVER SOME OF THE BUILDINGS IN THIS SURVEY. HOW WILL THIS BE ACCOMMODATED? A: The Griffin team has a long history of dealing with various agencies and as such holds as our central role to keep the process moving forward while also keeping individual agencies apprised of findings. This process most recently proved successful with the City of Irvine Transportation Center project, involving extensive coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority, CalTrans, the Federal Highway Administration, MetroLink, the Metropolitan Transit Authority, the County of Orange, and the City of Irvine. With each of these agencies requiring regular input, our team maintained schedule and budget for the award - winning project. Q: SEAL BEACH HAS A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN TIM 2004 STUDY BY TEC ENGINEERING. HOW CAN THE CITY BE SURE THAT THE PROPOSED NEW REPORT LEVERAGES USEFUL VALUE IN THE EARLIER REPORT, AND ALSO MEETS THE TEST OF TIME AS THE CITY CIP MANUAL? A: Griffin's Team understands that there has been a considerable investment the City has made in the 2004 facility assessment. With that in mind, we propose several options, one of which uses much of the 2004 report as possible while incorporating it into a new assessment where it adds value. With this option, we propose to update all cost estimates and prepare summaries per building along with ongoing future maintenance costs associated. Griffin will then calculate the FCI and include a 20 yr capital projection. If the City chooses to do so, we will update this report every couple of years for a nominal fee. Q: THE CITY REQUIRES A COMPETENT STUDY, WHICH NOT ONLY ACCURATELY REPRESENTS FACILITY NEEDS BUT ALSO IS SENSITIVE TO CITY BUDGET CONSTRAINTS. WHY IS THE GRIFFIN TEAM BEST POSITIONED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL? A: The Griffin Team has no learning curve in this project; we will "hit the ground running..." Griffin's key Team members are already fully engaged in a wide range of buildings that identify with the proposed buildings, and thus the Team's working relationships and familiarity with the type of projects give Griffin the advantage to complete the tasks at hand efficiently. We understand that minimized operational disturbances are important, that's why we have suggested a review process to equip Griffin with the most directed plan possible for the building survey. Our background, experience, and project knowledge directly translates into project savings, which puts money back into the project, not wasting it unnecessarily on escalation and a slow "ramp -up" period. Q: THIS PROJECT INVOLVES MANY CONSTITUENT DEPARTMENTS AS STAKEHOLDERS. HOW CAN THE CITY BE ASSURED THAT THE INTERESTS OF THE WIDE VARIETY OF CITY FUNCTIONS ARE RECOGNIZED, ADDRESSED, AND MET? A: Griffin's Team has three decades of experience working with numerous municipal agencies. Most recently, we are currently under construction on a major Master Plan for the city of Hesperia. Having already built the city hall, city park, and library, and are now under construction with the city's police department and the County of San Bernardino's government center, our team has dealt with and continues to coordinate with a vast array of stakeholders. These include city and county agencies, special districts, utilities, Caltrans, and the Department of Fish and Game. Through all of these various stakeholders, each of our projects was and will be delivered on time, within budget, and also addressed each agency's needs and requirements. 1 These other agencies may include The California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Corps of Engineers, the Metropolitan Water District, The County (and State) Health Department, Other Orange County agencies, the Department of Fish & Game, the Division of the State Architect, and others. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I . PROJECT HISTORY .......................................................................................................... ............................... PROJECTHISTORY .......................................................................................................................................................... ............................... I SELECTED PROJECT PROFILES WITH EXTENSIVE BUILDING SURVEY COMPONENTS ................................................. ..............................2 SELECTED ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROFILES - CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ................... ............................... ..............................E 2 . COMPANY INFORMATION ......................................................................................... ............................... I GRIFFIN STRUCTURES FIRM BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. ............................... I I 3 . PROPOSED APPROACH ............................................................................................... ............................... 13 PROJECTUNDERSTANDING ........................................................................................................................................ ............................... 13 APPROACH................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... 13 WORKFLOWDIAGRAM .............................................................................................................................................. ............................... 19 PROPOSEDPROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................................. ............................... 20 4 . PROJECT TEAM .............................................................................................................. ............................... 23 WE PROPOSE AN INTEGRATED, EXPERIENCED TEAM .............................................................................................. ............................... 23 PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART, TEAM RESUMES .. .............................., 24 24 S . SUBCONSULTANTS ......................................................................................................... .............................37 SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS ..................................................................................... ............................... 37 6 . REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... .............................41 7 . FEES ..................................................................................................................................... .............................43 8 . SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT ............................................................................................ .............................49 9 . DISCLOSURE ................................................................................................................... ............................... S2 M Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers Table of Contents Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers Table of Contents Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal 3. PROPOSED APPROACH PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Seal Beach has a variety of buildings and facilities it owns and maintains. Over the years, maintenance and repairs have been deferred and only pursued on a reactive basis. This Project is intended to provide the City staff and Council with an independent assessment by technical experts of the present state of all the buildings and facilities, prioritization of deficiencies found, cost of remedying those defi- ciencies, and relative cost of building replacement. The Assessment is to cover all City facilities, including rating each facility's various components, evaluat- ing useful life, noting specific deficiencies, preparing budgetary remedial costs, ADA upgrades, replace- ment vs. renovation cost graphs, and various other items necessary for a proper evaluation. The completed report will include, as a minimum, the following: • Facility Condition Index (FCI) ratio for each building or facility. The FCI is the ratio of the cost of repairing all deficiencies in a building divided by the replacement cost of the building. • Studies on what -if scenarios to determine various future funding levels necessary to maintain various FCI levels. • A 20 year projection of capital renewal funding requirements, by year. APPROACH ALTERNATIVES There are several alternative approaches which will provide the City with these required materials, based on the degree to which the existing results of the TEC study may be utilized. We have offered the City three optional tiers of service to reflect these alternatives. Alternative I In this alternative, we recognize the considerable investment that the City has made in the 2004 study by TEC Engineering. Under this option, Griffin and the City accept the findings of the TEC study, including all data, pricing, and evaluations contained in the TEC report are valid and reliable. Griffin would then use this information as a base, and would format the specific elements in alignment with GSA Facilities Condi- tion Assessment (FCA) report guidelines. The format will be refined and adapted as required by the City in the orientation phase of work. With this information, we will then prepare a 20 -year Capital Projection Plan. In this alternative, the main activities are summarized as follows: • Accept as valid the TEC report (as of 2004). • Update changes to the report based on any City actions undertaken since 2004. • Confirm with the City its accepted FCA format for report information, and adapt the TEC data and updated results accordingly. • Update the result for building omitted from the earlier report (this appears only to be the new addition of buildings 7 and 10). Note that the scope is understood to be limited to buildings listed in the RFP. • Update costs presented in the TEC report by the application of escalation factors as reported by con- struction indexes, or by guidelines supplied by our team Cost Estimating resources. • Re- compute FCI values based on these updated figures and on the results of adding in the new build- ings to the list. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 13 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • Distribute the costs into appropriate prioritization categories, in cooperation with the City and its fa- cilities management staff, and prepare as 20 -year Capital Projection Plan (CPP) in concert with the CIP principals and guidelines of the City. Alternative 2 In this alternative, we assume the specific survey, conditions findings, and remedial recommendations of the TEC report may contain valid and acceptable data which may be reused in this project, if this informa- tion appears to be valid upon review of the respective facilities. We will undertake a reconnaissance survey first, and ascertain if and to what degree a subsequent and more detailed survey by our team is required to update or replace the earlier survey findings. Also, we will examine updates as may be required due to work undertaken by the City since that survey, and will investigate significant deteriorations which may have occurred and are apparent in our review. The information obtained by our Team, and information extracted from the earlier report if it is validated, will be prepared and presented in standard FCA report format. During project Orientation, this format will be presented to the City for review, and refined and adapted as required. With this information, we will then prepare a 20 -year Capital Projection Plan, based on prioritizations we will assess (in concurrence with City policy and guidelines, as applicable). In this case, the main activities are summarized as follows: • Consider and review the data in the TEC report as to its validity and use in this project. Make recon- naissance survey and subsequent update site review as needed. • For conditions listed in the TEC report, make an inspection of these areas. Focused evaluations will also be made where the City reports that it has made remediation efforts or changes. We will note and review conditions which are found to be notably different from the earlier report. • Survey, and otherwise obtain information for, buildings for which the earlier data is inadequate for this study, or for building omitted from the earlier report. The scope is understood to be limited to buildings listed in the RFP. • Establish with the City an accepted FCA format for report information, and use this format for report- ing survey and analysis results. • Where still valid, costs presented in the TEC report will be updated by the application of escalation factors as reported by construction indexes, or by guidelines supplied by our team Cost Estimating re- sources. Costs for other items, new data entries, and required updates will be estimated by our Team and included in the new report. • Compute FCI values based on these new or updated figures for buildings on the list. Costs for new construction will be identified, or updated where appropriate, by examination of costs per sq. ft. and the experience of our Team with regard to new construction of this type. • Distribute the costs into appropriate prioritization categories, in cooperation with the City and its fa- cilities management staff, and prepare as 20 -year Capital Projection Plan (CPP) in concert with the CIP principals and guidelines of the City. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 14 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal APPROACH PHASES AND WORK FLOW Except for the alternative levels of scope, the flow of work is essentially the same. The following work flow encompasses all of the alternatives noted above, and applies, therefore, also to the case in which noth- ing is retained from the old report, and all sites are surveyed in detail. In summary, regardless of Alterna- tive, the main activities of this project are broken down into the following project phases and task groups. Phase l: Project Orientation Data Collection Model and Baseline Phase 2: Building Survey Phase 3A: Assemble Building Survey Workbook in approved FCA format Analysis of Results: Projected Deficiencies and Costs Indexing and Prioritization: FCI Calculation and Graphic Presentation Phase 3B: Optional services: Civil Survey (Focus on Water and Drainage) Environmental Survey (Hazardous Materials Conditions) Functional Evaluation of Buildings City Review and Approval to Proceed Phase 4: Prioritization Preparation of 20 -Year Capital Plan Phase 5: Final Report (draft and final) Report Presentation (public meeting if desired) Phase I: Project Orientation The Orientation Phase has the purpose of introducing the Team to the City, and acquainting the Team with the existing reporting and documentation presently in place. The phase ends with the refinement of our baseline survey strategic plan. Critical elements of this activity include review of the 2004 TEC report, and meeting with key City staff to understand existing gaps and shortcomings in the results of that study, and also establishing current City expectations and any project goals which are not elaborated in the RFP. This includes the determination of City objections and concerns with the TEC report, validation of acceptable components, and identification of elements which may be reused from the old report allowing for a more efficient project plan and the fur- ther preservation of previous project results which remain accurate. For either alternative approach selected by the City, we will undertake a scoping session with the City to validate our assumptions of project scope, method, and activities as proposed. We have also identified three possible project options that the City may elect, and this will be discussed, presented, and decided in the Project Orientation Phase. These optional services are discussed under a sep- arate heading, below. Optional Services As noted above, we have also identified three possible project options that the City may elect, which will be discussed, presented, and decided in the Project Orientation Phase. These optional services are not essential to the project scope as identified in the RFP, but are of significant potential value and benefit to the City, should it choose to undertake them. The three optional services are: W Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 15 Seal each Building Condition Assessment Proposal • Water Quality Review and Associated Civil Engineering Survey. This survey, while high- level, is in- tended to examine pertinent sites regarding drainage plans, deficiencies, and potential problems which could be included in the review of site conditions. Those sites which are within the coastal planning zone are especially susceptible to remediation costs associated with drainage conditions, and this study would identify key areas of concern and would discuss areas which may need further ex- arnination in this regard. • Environmental Review and Associated Hazardous Materials Survey. This high -level survey is in- tended to examine potential considerations regarding environmental issues, and to flag areas where a more comprehensive environmental study may be called for. This will add to the information regard- ing budget estimates or potential cost ranges which might be considered in assessing long and short term costs of repair and renovation of existing facilities. • Building Functionality Review and Associated Space Utilization Survey. This survey would provide a quantitative measure of functional adequacy and overcrowding, based on national benchmarks and standards, and observations by highly experienced and qualified needs assessment professionals. This would then be an indicator of possible expansion space requirements (or space surpluses) which exist today or which may be projected in the future, and also would identify potential areas of recon- figuration in the future, to accommodate operational requirements or layout inefficiencies. Phase 2: Building Survey Phase 2 consists of the physical survey activities of the project. Our project plan is to conduct a Reconnais- sance of the existing buildings in the survey scope, and identify high -level issues and criteria. These will be provided to the survey team in advance of their activities, and the extent of this work will be dependent upon the selection, by the City, of Alternative 1 or Alternative 2. The selected survey model, which will be refined and adapted to the specific goals and objectives of the City, and which reflects the results of the Orientation Phase, will be executed by the respective proposed Team members. All surveys will be coordinated through the building maintenance and management staff of the City. • We also understand how to undertake this process with minimal disruption to existing city services and operations. We have proven experience in independently evaluating the condition of building fa- cilities for public agencies, including preparing accurate cost estimates for repair, documentation of recommendations, prioritization of repairs /upgrades within the allocated funding and developing a maintenance work program. • We will begin with a fixed schedule and agenda of actions for the survey, and will notify each respec- tive agency of the city at the end of the Orientation Phase as to the proposed timetable. The schedule will be adjusted as required to meet any particular overriding conflicts in any department, and will be coordinated into our master project schedule process. Upon arrival at each building, the Project Man- ager will contact the designated representatives of the respective departments or agencies affected by the survey process. After commencement of the survey, and overlapping with the survey process, all collected information will be assembled into a project Building Survey Workbook. This information will be checked for consistency and completeness, and through an established quality control review, the Project Manager will cause possi- ble revisits to selected sites, if and as required. If the City elects optional services, the associated data collection activities for them will also be undertaken in Phase 2. M . Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 16 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Phase 3: Analysis and Report on Building Conditions The analysis of the results of the survey will begin with information which has undergone quality control review and update as necessary, as noted above. The Building Survey Workbook data will be reviewed and assessed by system and building component, and costs for required remediation (excludes all items that fall under FF &E), where this has been identified, will be either updated from the previous report, where accept- able, or estimated by our Project Team. A matrix of remedial actions will therefore be generated by site and building, reflective of the category of work involved. These component categories will include such as the following: • Architectural elements and considerations • Structural elements and considerations • Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing systems elements and considerations • Site elements and considerations • Other component costs Each remedial action will be classified in terms of priority of remediation, such as the following. Note that all these criteria will be refined in the orientation phase of the project. • Issues related to immediate life and health safety (these are automatically of highest priority) • Critical issues of high functional or operational impact (for example, items which will become critical within a year, and which affect city operations or building system survivability) • Mitigate impending further damage, or items of cascading or imminent impact on other building components • Surviving building elements or systems which are beyond projected life, still functioning, but with undetermined remaining life expectancy • Code or policy upgrades, such as grandfathered conditions or upgrades which may be advised due to City policy or planning directives, but which otherwise are in functional and working order • Operational and within system life cycle With this information we will then prepare a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report (FCAR) that summa- rizes the results. This includes the calculation, by building or site of the Facility Condition Index (FCI, the ratio of remediation to new replacement), as well as other possible measures of deficiency and status. This numeric information will be presented in graphical format and will be supplemented by clear textual expla- nation and suitable documentation, in clear and understandable language. We understand the need to pro- duce a document that is lasting, usable, and practical, while also being reliable and technically sound. As a Phase 3B, if the City elects to include the Optional Services noted above, then the analysis phase will include the results of those surveys and the survey findings. At the conclusion of Phase 3, we will present FCAR information, including such information as the sum- mary of conditions, costs of remediation by appropriate component and building, respectively computed FCI's, other indexes and prioritization considerations as may be include, graphic presentations, and sum- mary information. City Review / Approval to Proceed The Phase 3 report will be a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report (FCAR), formatted with an executive summary and supplemented by backup data and analytics where appropriate. ,M , Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 17 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal The city will be provided with this information for its review and approval prior to our proceeding with the remainder of this project. Phase 4: 20 -year CIP Plan The information in the FCAR will include costs by system, component, and priority for each of the build- ings and sites in the survey scope. This information will then be assembled into a Capital Improvement Program, structured to address highest priority matters first, and distributed according to budget guidelines which will be discussed with the City. Annual budgets for a 20 -year period will be developed. It is important to note that this plan will include not only remediation to existing conditions, but also ad- dress allowances for ongoing repair and replacement of various systems based on system lifecycle consid- erations. It will also include construction of replacement facilities where this is projected due to our analy- sis, or where, based on the City's own policy considerations, any new facilities are anticipated. This allows for a complete CIP program which includes all known conditions to date. Phase 5: Final Report The results of this project — including the executive summary of building conditions, the FCAR, the 20 -year CIP, and appropriate supportive information —will be presented to the City at the conclusion of our project. If desired by the City, we are prepared also to present a summary of findings to the City in a public meet- ing, such as to Council either in a formal Council Session or in a Council Workshop. This presentation will be accompanied by supportive graphics and summary information, according to guidelines worked out with the City. = G riffin Structures, I nc. I P roje ct and C onstruc tion M anagers 18 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal WORKFLOW DIAGRAM _ Review � ; TASK I TEC Report City Staff Meeting PHASE I Review PROJECT TASK 2 yBuilding History ; City Staff Meeting City Goals end Policy ORIENTATION TASK 3 rt Refine Survey Plan Identify Deficiencies Reconnaissance Obtain City Approval efine ldaintenenceHistnty/ PHASE 2 TASK 4 Questionnaires 81dgUpgrndes BUILDING SURVEYS TASK 5' 'Building ` ' Team Identify Survey Deployment Optional Services llllllll Building Si Wnr4hni PHASE 3A BUILDING TASK 7 ANALYSIS, COSTS, & FCA REPORT TASK 8 PHASE 4 20YR PROJECTION TASK 9 PLAN M Identify Deficiencies Update Costs/ em lo Building Facility Condition Index(FCO W PHASE 3B- OPTIMAL SERVICES ci�n ' ; water Quality Survey $ Review Survey of Building User Functionality Density Study Hazardous Emrironmental Materials Survey Review Prioritization Component Assessment Cost Analysis DraftReport' Updnteas TASK I Required REPORT APPROVAL i Firial Report td ' Present City of Seal Beach Graphics Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 19 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE The following pages illustrate the proposed project schedule for the work proposed inthis submittal. This bar chart sh owscompletion timeline flee section of wok as wehave organized theproposed work /an. ALTERNATIVE \j /k� u� LL IW Grg,nSniculrslcn.|Pmect and Cnt do Mana 2 SaBah Building CnitionAsssmetPr l ƒ) ' )2 \{ / \ \ § k k e e g& e § e M a E ( � § � a 2! 2 2 2! 2 2 . 2 J ■ ■ 4 § ) f k § ! � � ` ) © • ! 2 & 2 .. IW Grg,nSniculrslcn.|Pmect and Cnt do Mana 2 SaBah Building CnitionAsssmetPr l ALTERNATIVE Z T m 7 Ow M yGl E 1° aW HIE Ow Z, a Q V k V U. LL 0 Eq I s e� I i I I -- o F rF � ~ i i i ~ rs t- 9 dt t� Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 21 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 22 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal 4. PROJECTTEAM WE PROPOSE AN INTEGRATED, EXPERIENCED TEAM Griffin's team members have outstanding technical expertise and capabilities with regard to the scope of work that is required for this project. To best serve the City of Seal Beach, Griffin Structures brings a team of sea- soned professionals to ensure your facility assessments are delivered successfully. The Team members are highly experienced in the scope of work required for this project and has worked together on various projects. The fol- lowing organization chart identifies the proposed team structure. Roger Torriero 29 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE CEO, Principal In Charge Griffin Structures, Inc. Deryl Robinson 30 PROJECT MANAGER Vice President Griffin Structures, Inc. Steve Gaffney, AIA 30 ARCHITECTURAL Principal SURVEYOR Steve Gaffney Architecture Mark Ellis, PE, SE 15 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Vice President Thornton Tomasetti Roger Torriero is the founder and CEO of Griffin Structures, Inc. He brings 29 years experience in providing project oversight for all Griffin projects and will continue as Principal In Charge for this project. Deryl Robinson will be the main point of contact for Griffin. He will manage and coordinate activities of all sub - consultants, and be re- sponsible for content and presentation of the final report. Steve Gaffney will perform the architectural survey, manage the activi- ties of the engineering consultants, and be responsible for producing the architectural and engineering segments of the report. Mark Ellis will perform the structural systems survey and report. William Zavrsnick 25 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER William Zavrsnick will perform the electrical systems survey and re- PrincipabProject Director port. FBA Engineering Larry Sun 24 MECHANICAL ENGINEER Larry Sun will perform the mechanical systems survey and report. Principal TKSC Consulting Mechanical Engineers Ashok Patel 20 COST ESTIMATOR Ashok Patel will be responsible for all cost estimating. Director of Cost Management Cumming Bob Hall 30 FUNCTIONAL Bob Hall will prepare the optional functional analysis. Vice President SURVEYOR Griffin Structures, Inc. Meredith Church, 7 ENVIRONMENTAL Meredith will perform the optional hazardous materials survey. PG SURVEYOR Project Geologist Leighton Consulting, Inc. Roy Roberson, PE 33 CIVIL ENGINEER Roy Roberson will perform the optional water quality review. Civil Engineer Land Strategies, LLC See the following organization chart for the proposed reporting relationships. Griffin Structures, Inc. l Project and Construction Managers 23 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART SEA[�e s� q C+ 2 i 7 �[ /PORN \P PROJECT MANAGER/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. Roger Torriero President & CEO 1 STEVE GAFFNEY ARCHITECTURE Steve Gaffney A/E Survey Engineering Team Systems Survey Structural Engineer I -- Electrical Engineer Mechanical/ Plumbing i Engineer t —~� Civil Engineer TEAM RESUMES Meredith Church Environmental Survey Please refer to individual resumes immediately following this page for more information. GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. Deryl Robinson Vice President CUMMING GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. Ashok Patel 11 Bob Hall Cost Estimation I Functional Survey Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 24 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal RO GER N.TORRIERO CEO, Principal In Charge Griffin Structures, Inc. Following his completion of the Architecture program at Syracuse University (B. Arch.) ROGER O , , , O and the Urban Planning Program at the Accademia di Belli Ard a Firenze, Italy (M. Arch.), Mr. Torriero first joined the family construction business in Pennsylvania. Subsequently, upon relocating to California in 1978, he was employed by Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company as its Director of Realty Development. In 1981, Mr. Torriero formed Griffin Realty Corporation, which has developed a number of significant and successful commercial real estate projects throughout California and E-,M Nevada. He subsequently formed Griffin Advisors, Inc., and Griffin Structures, Inc., which along with Griffin Realty Corporation were integrated into the Griffin Holdings organization. To date, the companies have been directly responsible for the completion of over $1.5 Billion in projects on a regional, national, and international basis. Mr. Torriero's extensive, successful involvement in virtually all aspects of real estate EDUCATION development, finance and construction provides Griffin Holdings with a special expertise Bachelor of Architecture Syracuse University, New York in both the conceptualization and the realization of complex and challenging projects. He is considered expert in forward planning, finance, entitlements, public/private ventures, Master of Architecture project delivery methodologies, and community -based participatory planning: all critical Accademia de Belli Ard a Firenze to success in today's complex political and economic environments. He also has a Italy considerable expertise in the adaptive re-use of historical structures. Mr. Torriero is a REGISTRATIONS registered architect and licensed contractor. Licensed Architect, 1978 State of New York Mr. Torriero is a member of the Urban Land Institute and its Public/Private Sector Development Council and the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. He is California Contractor License: also a member of the Associated General Contractors of America, the Construction #793600, Classes A & B Management Association of America, the Design -Build Institute, the US Green Building PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Council, and the Society for Military History. Mr. Torriero's public service has included U.S. Green Building Council, serving on the Board of Governors of the Bowers Museum of Cultural Art in Orange Member County, California, as the Chair of its Facilities Committee during its expansion and APWA, Member ULI, Member renovation. Design Build Institute of America, Mem- Relevant Experience ber Yucaipa Sheriff Facility and Branch Library Facility Assessment, Yucaipa, CA YEARS WITH FIRM Fullerton Community /Senior Center Facility Assessment, Fullerton, CA 29 Years Oceanside Police Department & Library Facility Assessment, Oceanside, CA Newport Beach City Hall Facility Assessment, Newport Beach, CA Long Beach City Hall East Facility Assessment, Long Beach, CA Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard, Stanton, CA San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion, San Dimas, CA Santa Ana City Hall Renovation and Development Services Center (Ross Annex), Santa Ana, CA Buena Park Corporate Yard Facilities, Buena Park, CA Buena Park Police Headquarters, Buena Park, CA Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure (LEED Certified), Westminster, CA Laguna Beach Community /Senior Center and Subterranean Parking Structure, Laguna Beach, CA Cathedral City Fire Station Headquarters & Training Facility (LEED Silver), Cathedral City, CA Environmental Nature Center (0 LEED Platinum building in Orange County), Newport Beach, CA Lemon Grove City Hall Needs Assessment, Lemon Grove, CA Fullerton Main Library Expansion (LEED Certified), Fullerton, CA Fullerton Community / Senior Center (LEED Certified), Fullerton, CA Hesperia Police Department Headquarters (LEED Silver), Hesperia, CA County of San Bernardino High Desert Government Center (LEED Silver), San Bernardino, CA South Coast Water District Administration Facility and Maintenance Yard (LEED Silver), Laguna Beach, CA Watsonville Civic Plaza (City Hall, Courts, Library, & Parking Structure), Watsonville, CA Rancho Santa Margarita Civic Plaza (City Hall, Community Center and Park), Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Hesperia Civic Plaza (City Hall and Library), Hesperia, CA Cypress Community Center, Cypress, CA = Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 2 5 Seal each Building Condition Assessment Proposal DERYL ROBINSON Vice President, Project Manager Griffin Structures, Inc. While at Griffin Structures, Mr. Robinson has demonstrated leadership and an extensive understanding of the construction industry that has proven his ability to effectively manage projects, time and time again. Prior to joining Griffin Structures, Mr. Robinson served as Director of Preconstruction and Construction Management services for Snyder Langston in Irvine, California. Mr. Robinson personally managed the preconstruction and construction on several projects and has more than 30 years experience in the field. Mr. Robinson has managed some of the most prestigious projects in Southern California. During an 18 year tenure with Snyder Langston, Mr. Robinson managed construction services for the Irvine Spectrum Center Phases 1 & 2, Oakley, Inc. Headquarters, Pacific Club at Newport Beach, Tiger Woods Learning Center, Tarbut V'Torah High School, Marq *E Houston Entertainment Center, Pelican Hill Golf Club, Big Canyon Country Club, and the South Coast Repertory Theatre. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, California State University, Long Beach YEARS WITH FIRM 2 Years Relevant Experience INDUSTRY TENURE • Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard - Stanton, California - Con- 30 Years struction Manager for the City of Stanton's new 8,000 sf maintenance build- ing and a 6,000 sf administration building on 1.5 acres. The scope of work includes management of con- struction, constructability review of 95% PS&E, processing of all environmental and building permits, bid- ding process oversight and other construction related services. • Tustin Library - Tustin, California - Construction Manager to the City of Tustin for delivery of its new library. The new library is 32,000 square feet, which serves students from both the Tustin and Santa Ana School Districts and is currently one of the busiest Libraries in the OCPL system. It has private study and tu- toring rooms that separate the children and young adults for better concentration and quality learning, and it includes 223 additional reader seats and 99 technology stations. • Buena Park Police Headquarters — Buena Park, California - Construction Manager for the new two - story 66,000 sf Police Department Headquarters Facility, which includes a Type I jail, police dispatch cen- ter, firing range, kennel training center, Emergency Operations Center (EOC), evidence storage room, crime laboratory, full service locker room, physical training center, and secured police vehicle parking. • Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure — Westminster California - Program and Construc- tion Manager for the Westminster Police Facility project, a new facility consisting of a 90,000 sf three -story Police Building and an adjacent 590 stall Parking Structure to be shared between the WPD and the City for community parking. The new Police Department Building includes a Type 1 jail, EOC/'Training Room, Evi- dence, Forensics, Patrol, Investigations, Dispatch, Office of the Chief, and all related support services, and will be an Essential Facility. The total project budget is $80 million and is designed, constructed, and certi- fied to LEED certified standards. • The Boeing Company - Due Diligence & Adaptive Reuse Study- California - Mr. Robinson provided Program Management services for a due diligence and adaptive reuse study for The Boeing Company. The survey team consisted of architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical disciplines to review the current conditions of various buildings on their campuses in Long Beach, Seal Beach, and Manhattan Beach, CA to determine their potential for adaptive reuse. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 26 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • Grace Ministries International - Adaptive Reuse Study — Fullerton, California — Mr. Robinson provided Program Management services for a conditions assessment of an existing food manufacturing company headquarters for reuse into a worship facility. This assessment helped to identify the opportunities and con- straints of the old factory and offices, ultimately leading to the renovation and reuse of the facility for wor- ship purposes. • Long Beach Fleet Maintenance - Long Beach, California - Design management and preconstruction for this turnkey design -build project. The facility accommodates the City's Fleet Services Department, a garage maintenance facility for City vehicles, lien sales and towing administration, and the Public Works Integrated Resources Bureau Administration and Operations offices. Facility included offices, service bays and com- plete site redevelopment. • Pack Club - Newport Beach, California - Preconstruction and construction services for a new clubhouse building of approximately 30,000 square feet plus as associated site work and utilities. Clubhouse features extensive architectural millwork. • Tiger Woods Learning Center - Anaheim, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the 35,000 square foot, two - story educational facility features a 250 - seat auditorium, seven classrooms, a computer system, coordinating between the City of Anaheim as lead agency and County of Orange as lan- downer. • Tarbut V' Torah High School - Irvine, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the pri- vate school designed to accommodate more than 600 students in grades 7 -12. The two -story facility consists of 62,000 square feet and is built around a central courtyard, enclosed on three sides by buildings and open on the forth to nature and a view of the county beyond. Provided management, preconstruction, and general contracting for the project. Services included land purchase agreement with The Irvine Company; providing oversight of the entitlement process, establishing each of the consulting agreements. • Oakley Corporate Headquarters - Foothill Ranch, California - Preconstruction and construction services for this 413,000 square foot corporate headquarters facility featuring office, manufacturing, assembly, and distribution. Employee amenities include NBA regulation basketball court, fitness center, full service cafe- teria and 450 seat auditorium with state -of- the -art audio - visual equipment. The comprehensive scope of ser- vices included development management, design management, preconstruction and general contracting for the project. • The Irvine Spectrum Center Phase I - Irvine, California - Preconstruction and construction services for an entertainment center featuring a 21 screen Edwards Theater complex, restaurants, a food court, and sever- al entertainment related retailers. Phase I included construction of five, one -story retail restaurant buildings totaling 100,000 square feet at a cost of $13 million. Designed after a Moroccan marketplace, the Irvine Spectrum Center features 4 hand -set tile domes and two steel domes, extensive landscaping, outdoor cour- tyards inlaid with stone and tile, animated courtyard fountains, and extensive high end interior finishes. • Pelican Hill Golf Club - Newport Beach, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the clubhouse and site work, pro shop and driving range building. All facilities featured detailed Santa Barbara style architecture and extensive high end interior finishes. • Shady Canyon Golf Club - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for the upscale wood - framed golf club featuring a 50,000 square foot clubhouse, a driving range building, two entry guard houses, two comfort stations (restrooms) and a pump house, as well as extensive site work and parking lots. • Merage Community Center - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for this 130,000 square foot community center, which included and athletic club complete with gym, basketball court, and weight room; pre - school; various agency offices: a 500 seat performance hall; and a cafeteria serving the high school and banquet events. The comprehensive scope of services included development management, design manage- ment, and preconstruction for the project. • The Irvine Spectrum Center Phase H - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for the second phase of the Irvine Spectrum Center, which added 250,000 square feet of shopping, dining and entertainment ve- nues, doubling the project's original size. Phase II was designed after the Alhambra, a 13th Century Moo- rish palace in Granada, Spain. Griffin Structures, Inc. 1 Project and Construction Managers 27 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal STEV P. G AFFNEY, AIA, LEEP AP Architect Griffin Structures, Inc. Mr. Gaffney brings 25 years of experience in architectural design and project management. He is oversees all aspects of production management including construction documents, consultant contract negotiations and project administra- tion, scheduling, budgeting, staffing, quality control/ quality assurance, and spe- cifications for all projects undertaken by the firm. a4. For more than two decades, Mr. Gaffney has managed complex large -scale ur- ban, institutional, residential, industrial and municipal projects. His background includes well-honed skills in project conceptualization, definition, development, ' scheduling, and budget assessment. He is known for creating innovative solu- tions through application of emerging construction technologies, customized fi- nancing techniques, and construction management expertise. He is a skilled team EDUCATION leader managing a wide variety of consultants. Bachelor of arts, Urban Studies and Planning University of California San Diego Relevant Experience REGISTRATIONS California/Bermuda Licensed San Dimas City Hall Renovation / Expansion, San Dimas, CA Architect C19676 Brea Civic Center Renovation, Brea, CA LEED Accredited Professional American Institute of Architects Lemon Grove City Hall, Lemon Grove Construction Specifications Institute Cypress Community Center Expansion/Renovation, Cypress, CA International Conference of Building Orange County Social Services Department Expansion, Santa Ana, CA Officials Santa Ana City Hall Renovation, Santa Ana, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Phillips Block Building, Santa Ana, CA: 27,000 SF Tenant Improvements and U.S. Green Building Council, Member Historic Restoration ULI, Member DGWB Advertising, Santa Ana, CA: 35,000 GSF Tenant Improvements and INDUSTRY TENURE Historic Renovation 30 Years Tenth Street Place, Modesto, CA: 220,000 GSF, Retail, Government Offices, 6 Stories Gallo Arts Center, Modesto, CA: 85,000 SF Cultural Center Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Union Station, Los Angeles, CA: 640,000 GSF, 28 stories Family Law Court, Riverside, CA: 4, 000 GSF facility for the Gen. Services Admin., 5 courtrooms Stanislaus County Dist. Attorney's Office, Modesto, CA: 78,000 SF Office, 6 stories Boy Scouts of America Headquarters, Los Angeles, CA: 23,000 SF regional headquarters, 2 stories Homeboy Industries, Los Angeles, CA: 21,000 SF facility for youth rehabilitation, office, bakery Corona Pointe, Corona, CA: 10 tilt -up concrete office bldgs, Retail, Restaurant, Hotel,50 -acre parcel LA Fashion, Los Angeles, CA: 16,700 SF multi - tenant retail showroom/merchandise warehouse Kaweah Delta Health Care, Visalia, CA: 64,587 SFAdministration Bldg, 5 stories Marbella Commerce Center, San Juan Capistrano, CA: 50,000 GSF, 2 stories 6060 Center Drive, Howard Hughes Center, Los Angeles, CA: 250,000 GSF, 10 stories Se Hotel, San Diego, CA: Luxury boutique hotel, 185 guestrooms, 23 stories Olive Court, Long Beach, CA: 58 eco-friendly low - income townhomes/loft apts. adjacent to Blue Line Long Beach Promenade, Long Beach, CA: 80 loft - condos over retail & subterranean parking. Gateway Walk, Alhambra, CA: 129 Condominiums over one -level parking garage. East Village Lofts, Santa Ana, CA: 40 -unit Live/Work community Cameo Pacific Headquarters, Irvine, CA: 2 -story 10,000 SF Tenant Improvement Oakley Headquarters, Foothill Ranch, CA: 80,000 GSF Office, 375,000 GSF Manufacturing, 2 stories Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 28 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal MARK ELLIS, P.E., S.E. Structural Engineer Thornton Tomasetti Mr. Ellis joined Thornton Tomasetti in 2002. In his professional career, he has , been responsible for a variety of structural/seismic analysis and design projects, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, Structural Engineers Associa- as well as numerous structural assessments and seismic risk studies. Mr. Ellis lion of California has more than 15 years of project experience including government, commercial EDUCATION industrial, manufacturing, and residential facilities, both in the United States and g Master of Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand internationally. Managers Pre - acquisition Structural/Seis Assessment, Approximately 15 low, medium Bachelor of Engineering and high -rise buildings in Southern and Northern California University of Canterbury, New Zealand Relevant Experience REGISTRATIONS University of California, Irvine. Seismic condition assessments of 70 bldgs Structural Engineer, California Structural Assessment Professional Engineer, Califomia Professional Engineer, New Zealand Roof Collapse Assessment, Hyundai Motors Building, Southern CA Water Damage Assessment, 12 -story Office building, San Diego, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, Structural Engineers Associa- Balcony Collapse Assessment, Single family Res, San Juan Capistrano, CA lion of California Bolt Failure Assessment, Roof Structure at MLB Stadium, United States Member, Earthquake Engineering Re- search Institute a Assessment, St Philip Benizi Church Buena Park, CA Fire-Damage p � Associate, Society of Risk and Insurance Fire Damage Assessment, Summerset Condominiums, Santa Paula, CA Managers Pre - acquisition Structural/Seis Assessment, Approximately 15 low, medium INDUSTRY TENURE and high -rise buildings in Southern and Northern California 15+ Years Pre - acquisition Structural/Seismic Assessment, Dodger Stadium, CA University of California, Irvine. Seismic condition assessments of 70 bldgs Structural Condition Assessment, Concrete Parking Structure, Ala Moana Shopping Center, Honolulu, HI Life - Safety Seismic Evaluation, Torre Del Angel Building, Mexico City, Mexico Damage Investigation, FDA office and laboratory building in Bothell, WA Damage Investigation, Service Center Building in Bellevue. WA Damage Investigation, Heavy Equipment manufacturing facility in Seattle, WA Risk Assessments Newport-Mesa Unified School District, Newport Beach/Costa Mesa, California. Earthquake risk assessments of approximately 300 buildings at 28 campuses, vintages ranging from 1930s to 1970s. Included structural and non - structural components. 101 Second St., San Francisco, CA. Seismic risk assessment for twenty-six story steel moment and braced frame office building. Commercial Property Developer, Atlanta, Georgia. Development of a Corporate Risk Policy Manual for ad- dressing seismic risk associated with property acquisitions and development projects in California. Commercial Insurance Building Owners Alliance (CIBA). Earthquake risk assessments for approximately 30 pre -1945 buildings in Southern California. FM Global. Earthquake loss control services for various insured's facilities_ in CA, Oregon, and Washington. Providence Health System, Torrance, California and Anchorage, Alaska. Earthquake risk assessments of struc- tural and non - structural components at four hospitals. Tribune Company, Los Angeles, Costa Mesa and Canoga Park, California. Pre - acquisition earthquake risk as- sessment of buildings and equipment at Los Angeles Times newspaper printing facilities. Siemens Ultrasound, Mountain View, California. Seismic Risk Assessment of buildings, equipment and business interruption for medical devices manufacturing facility. Frito Lay, Inc., Bakersfield, Rancho Cucamonga and Sylmar, California. Earthquake risk assessments of struc- tural and non - structural components at snack food manufacturing facilities. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Camarillo and Hollywood, California, and Memphis, Tennessee. Earthquake risk assessments of structural and non - structural components at video, CD and DVD facilities and film produc- tion facilities. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 29 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal WILLIAM ZAVRSNICK, P.E. Electrical Engineer Mr. William R. Zavrsnick has been active in the electrical engineering field since joining FBA in 1985. His experience includes the assessment and design of civic, municipal, senior housing, multi - family housing, educational facilities, office complexes, civic and corporate facilities, tenant improvement, warehouse support facilities, healthcare and laboratories, parking structures, recreational centers, wireless communication antenna sites, performing arts theaters, libraries and shopping centers. He is particularly experienced in the assessment, design, and development of power distribution, specialized lighting systems, firellife safety systems, as well as the interfacing of equipment for the control of lighting and mechanical sys- tems as they relate to the requirements of specific projects. Relevant Experience Anaheim City Hall West, Anaheim, CA City of Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks, CA Covina Civic Center and Police Facility, Covina, CA County of Orange, Sheriffs Facility, Santa Ana, CA El Cajon Civic Center, El Cajon, CA Fountain Valley Civic Center, Fountain Valley, CA Fred C. Nelles School, Security Additions, Whittier Fullerton Senior Center, Fullerton, CA Glendale Police Facility, Glendale, CA Huntington Beach Civic Center and Police Facility, Huntington Beach, CA Irvine Civic Center and Police Facility, Irvine, CA Irvine City Hall, Irvine, CA Irvine Valley Community College, Saddleback Community College District, CA James A. Musick Facility, (County of Orange), Irvine, CA Lake Forest II Sun and Sail Club, Lake Forest, CA Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Long Beach, CA Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, CA Los Angeles County Sheriff s Substation and Holding Cells, Monterey Park, CA Oasis Senior Center, Newport Beach, CA Old Buena Vista Library, Burbank, CA Orange City Hall/Administration Building, Orange, CA Orange County Saddleback Sheriff Station, Irvine, CA Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Riverside County Jail Annex, Riverside, CA Riverside County Jail and Sheriffs Station, Riverside, CA San Dimas City Hall, San Dimas, CA San Jacinto Civic Center, San Jacinto, CA Tustin Civic Center, Tustin, CA University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC), Orange, CA Walter D. Elhers Senior and Community Center, Buena Park, CA Westlake City Hall, Westlake, CA Western Municipal Walter District Headquarters Building, Riverside, CA Yorba Linda City Hall, Yorba Linda, CA FBA Engineering EDUCATION Bachelors of Engineering Mount Hood College, Oregon REGISTRATIONS Electrical Engineer, Califomia PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS LEED Accredited Professional, BD+C Illuminating Engineering Society Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers National Fire Protection Association INDUSTRY TENURE 25 Years ZN Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 30 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal LARRY SUN, P.E. Mechanical Engineer TKSC Consulting Mechanical Engineers For over 24 years Mr. Sun has been a vital part of carrying on the core values that have made TKSC a successful firm. Being involved in nearly all of the ma- jor market segments has helped him develop a keen awareness of client and project requirements, with a focus on details that make a project successful. As the first LEED Accredited professional in the firm, Mr. Sun recognizes the criti- cal nature of mechanical systems in supporting sustainable project goals, and en- joys the collaborative process in achieving these. EDUCATION Bachelors of Science, Environmental Engineering CaIllomia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Since promoted to principal in 1998, Mr. Sun has helped guide the firm toward REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer, CA, VA, AZ, HI, continued success. Understanding the need to remain an active participant in the Tx, Co #25633 HVAC Industry, both locally and nationally, he has served in numerous posi- PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS tions within ASHRAE and also serves as Co- Chairman of the HVAC Industry LEED Accredited Professional Advisory Board at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Member, Automated Procedures for Engineering Consultants Relevant Experience Co- Chairman, California Polytechnic State University, HVAC Industry Advi- Buena Park Community Center — Renovation, Buena Park, California sory Board Cypress Community Center — Renovation, Cypress, California INDUSTRY TENURE Northwood Community Center — Renovation, Irvine, California 24 Years Oak Creek Community Center, Irvine, California Chino Hills Government Center, Chino Hills, California Hesperia Civic Center (City Hall & Library), Hesperia, California Addition Company Experience Anaheim City Hall West (Utilities Division) — Anaheim, California. Mechanical Systems Evalation. Buena Park City Hall — Buena Park, California. Evaluation and upgrades of the existing mechanical systems serving the City Hall building. Buena Park Police Department — Buena Park, California. 66,000 SF Law Enforcement facility including an Emergency Operations Center, Community Center, Type 1 Detention Facility., Crime Lab, EvidencelProperty Storage and Firing Range. Buena Vista Children's Center / Mary Alice O'Conner Family Center — Burbank, California. Evaluation and up- grades of the existing mechanical systems in coordination with a complete renovation of the facility. Environmental Nature Center — Newport Beach, California. This 9,000 SF, single -story Community Education Center is the first LEED Platinum project in Orange County. Hesperia Police Department — Hesperia, California. 40,000 SF, two -story Law Enforcement facility. High Desert Government Center — Hesperia, California. 66,100 SF, 2 -story City HalllMunicipal Administration building at the Civic Plaza. Project is in construction. Irvine Ranch Water District Headquarters — Irvine, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Laguna Beach Senior Center & Community Center — Laguna Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Long Beach City Hall — Long Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. LA County Fire Department — Los Angeles, CA. Dispatch Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. LA County Office of Education (LACOE) — Downey, CA. Data Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Mission Viejo Interim City Hall — Mission Viejo, California. Remodel of 33,000 SF existing office building in- cluding replacement of mechanical systems. Newport Beach City Hall — Newport Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oak Creek Golf Clubhouse — Irvine, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oasis Senior Center — Corona Del Mar, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oceanside Police Department — Oceanside, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Griffin Structures, Inc. L Project and Construction Managers 31 Seal each Building Condition Assessment Proposal ASHOK PATEL, M Cost Estimator Cumming Mr. Patel has an extensive background in cost estimation with over 20 years in the construction industry. He has been involved with all phases of construction from master plan through occupancy, including estimation, quality control, quality assurance, and value engineering. Mr. Patel has been a proven leader in his industry providing accurate cost management services, including change a : , 7 order analysis negotiations, on projects ranging in value up to $1 Billion. With - experience in all aspects of civil, structural, and architectural disciplines, Mr. _ Patel has been worked on a range of projects included in the healthcare, educational, commercial office, industrial, public work, restaurant, government, retail, entertainment, and hospitality sectors. EDUCATION Relevant Experience Bachelor of Science, Quantity Surveying Greenwich University, London Alameda Park, New Park and Community Building, Alameda, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Big League Dreams Sports Park, Recreation Facilities & Parking, Perris, CA Member, Royal Institution of Chartered Buena Park Community Center, Renovation, Buena Park, CA Surveyors (MRICS) Buena Park Police Facility and Jail, Buena Park, CA Chino Hills Pipeline Avenue, Community Center, Chino Hills, CA U.S. Green Building Council, Member City of Cypress, Recreational Infrastructure Study, Cypress, CA INDUSTRY TENURE City of Moreno Valley, New Corporate Yard Facility, Moreno Valley, CA 20 Crestline Branch Library, New Facility, Crestline, CA Encinitas Public Library, Encinitas, CA Indio Police Headquarters, Indio, CA Inland Empire Transportation Management Center and CHP Emergency Response Operations, LEED- Certified, Fontana, CA Jerome Park Community Center Renovation, Santa Ana, CA John Ham Park, Lynwood, CA Laguna Niguel City Hall, Laguna Niguel, CA Laguna Niguel Community Center, Laguna Niguel, CA Lemon Park, Renovation Project, Fullerton, CA Los Angeles Hall of Justice, Feasibility Study, Los Angeles, CA Malibu Library, Renovation Project, Malibu, CA Mesa Marin Sports Park, Bakersfield, CA Mojave Water Agency, Corporate Yard, Mojave, CA Morgan Street Sports Park, Phase II, Perris, CA Orange Co. Vector Control, Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Garden Grove, CA Orange County Central Courts, Renovation, Santa Ana, CA Orange County Fair & Events Center, Administration Office, Costa Mesa, CA Orange County Fair & Events Center, Mall Plaza, Costa Mesa, CA San Diego Civic Center Complex, Estimates and Peer Review, San Diego, CA San Dimas City Hall, Renovation and Expansion, San Dimas, CA San Gorgonio Park, San Clemente, CA San Juan Capistrano Library, Renovation/Addition, San Juan Capistrano, CA Westminster Police Department, Westminster, CA Will Rogers Memorial Park, Refurbishment Project, Beverly Hills, CA IN Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 32 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal ROBERT D. HALL Vice President, Assessment Advisor Mr. Hall has extensive background in facility assessments, needs assessments, pre - architectural programming, facilities planning, operational modeling, functional analysis and interpretation, and projection of operations and facility requirements. Included in this experience is planning of recreational facilities, user interview an survey techniques, mathematical analysis of survey data, sport park needs assessment, and programming of recreational facilities. Mr. Hall has built an expertise in understanding how users of information restructure themselves to make use of the expanded power of their systems, resources, and support technologies. Facilities functionality is crucial to the effective implementation of re- engineering around better through -put, improved information systems, more focused customer awareness, or higher value operations. To this end, Mr. Hall has become a leader in understanding the linkages between smart facilities planning and business right- sizing. During his thirty years in the fields of organizational analysis and pre - architectural planning, Mr. Hall completed some seventy -five government or institutional projects and is experienced in the full-range of specialized facilities, including recreation (sport planning, community center planning, community workshop design), general government (City and County, including growth modelling, administrative facility planning, consolidation studies, and efficiency analysis), law enforcement (both City and County), fire departments (suppression, prevention, support), justice agencies (civil and criminal courts, detention facilities, and support facilities), corporation yards (including space needs analysis and site consolidation analysis), warehouse and materials handling facilities, and other facility types. Griffin Structures, Inc. ' 4 PA EDUCATION PhD Mathematics University of California IA Master Degree, Mathematics University of California LA Bachelor Degree, Mathematics University of California LA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS LEED Accredited Professional U.S. Green Building Council, Member YEARS WITH FIRM INDUSTRY TENURE 30 In these areas, in addition to developing needs assessments and traditional pre - architectural programs, he has evaluated organization and management systems, developed long -range projections of operations and facility needs, developed operational plans, evaluated service options, and developed and evaluated large -scale site master plans. Mr. Hall also has had experience participating in many other phases of services related to program implementation, including space planning, evaluation of architectural plans and specifications for program effectiveness and compliance, monitoring construction and interfacing with owners and/or tenants, providing post -move services and close -out, and assessment of ADA compliance. In 2004 Mr. Hall earned Accreditation as a LEED Professional. Representative needs assessment studies include: • City Halls and administrative offices for the California Cities of San Juan Capistrano, Newport Beach, Rancho Santa Margarita, Beverly Hills, Burbank, Orange, Upland, and others. • Community Center and related public facility Needs Assessments and facility programs for Laguna Beach Senior Center, Costa Mesa Senior Center, Senior and Community Center for Rancho Santa Margarita, and others • Law Enforcement Needs Assessments and facility programs for the California Cities of Buena Park, Oceanside, Hesperia, Ontario, Beverly Hills, Burbank. • Needs assessments or master plans for the Pasadena Federal Credit Union, Telephone Employees Federal Credit Union, various law firms, University of California (Los Angeles), and others. M . Griffin Stnictures, Inc. I Project and Construction M 33 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Relevant Experience Oceanside Police Headquarters Needs Assessment, City of Oceanside, CA Garden Grove Police Department Needs Assessment, City of Garden Grove, CA Brea Police Department Needs Assessment, City of Brea, CA Irvine Civic Center, PD and Operations Support Facility Capital Improvement Plan Validation, Irvine, CA Hesperia Police Department Needs Assessment, City of Hesperia, CA Buena Park Police Department Needs Assessment, City of Buena Park, CA Buena Park City Corporate Yard Needs Assessment, City of Buena Park, CA Ontario Police Department Needs Assessment, City of Ontario, CA Newport Beach Civic Center Needs Assessment, City of Newport Beach, CA Lemon Grove Civic Center Needs Assessment, City of Lemon Grove, CA Burbank City Hall, Police and Fire Needs Assessment, City of Burbank, CA Burbank Administrative Support Facilities Needs Assessment, City of Burbank, CA Laguna Beach Senior Center Needs Assessment, City of Laguna Beach, CA Rancho Santa Margarita Civic Center Needs Assessment, City of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Rancho Santa Margarita Sheriff's Office Needs Assessment, City of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA San Juan Capistrano Sheriff's Office Needs Assessment, City of San Juan Capistrano, CA Orange County Great Park, Sports Park Needs Assessment, City of Irvine, CA Lake Forest Civic Center: City Hall, Community Center, & Sports Park Needs Assessment, City of Lake Forest, CA Civic Center Master Plan (City Hall, Police HQ, Fire HQ), City of Beverly Hills, CA Campus Core Area Needs Assessment (Including Campus Police), University of California, Los Angeles Justice Facilities Needs Assessment, Benton County, Washington Comprehensive State -wide Courthouse Needs Analysis, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Comprehensive State -wide Courthouse Needs Analysis, State of Idaho Comprehensive Convectional Facilities Needs Analysis, State of Ohio Site Adequacy Analysis, Southern California Gas Company City Hall Needs Assessment, City of Upland, CA Headquarters Facilities Needs Assessment, Pasadena Federal Credit Union, Pasadena, CA Senior Center Needs Assessment, City of Costa Mesa, CA Headquarters Facilities Needs Assessment, Telephone Employees Credit Union, Pasadena, CA Headquarters Office Space Analysis, International Creative Management (ICM), New York and Los Angeles Surgi- Center Facilities Analysis, Center for Special Surgery, Los Angeles, CA Civic Center Facilities Needs Assessment and Master Plan, City of Orange Headquarters Facility Needs Assessment, Orange County Transit District, California Headquarters Facility Needs Assessment, Southern California Rapid Transit District Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 34 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal MEREDITH CHURCH, PG Project Geologist Leighton Consultants, Inc. Ms. Church's experience includes conducting hydrogeologic, geologic, geo- chemical, and hazardous waste investigations. Ms. Church has supervised all as- pects of environmental assessment investigations including asbestos, lead, and FS hazardous waste surveys, drilling soil borings, installing groundwater monitoring wells, oversight of Underground Storage Tank (UST) removals/installations and associated remedial excavations. She has managed numerous Phase I and Phase j II site assessments, as well as the design, installation, operation and maintenance of various soil/groundwater remediation systems utilizing vapor extraction and o multiple phase extraction. Ms. Church has utilized Risk Based Corrective Action to achieve regulatory closure with in -place soil and groundwater contamination. EDUCATION Master of Science, Geology Relevant Experience Loma Linda University, California Phase I ESA and Hazardous Materials Survey, Westminster Police Sta- Bachelor of science, Biology tion Westminster CA. Project Manager and Princ Investigator for a Chemistry Minor � � J g P g Southwestern College, Texas Phase I ESA conducted at the Westminster Police Station. A diesel AST, an active UST, and a historic diesel UST were identified in a database report at REGISTRATIONS the property. It was determined that the diesel AST had not appeared to California Professional Geologist -6326 have any releases and the active UST was identified as a domestic water sto- INDUSTRY TENURE rage tank. The local regulatory agencies reported that they did not have any 7 files regarding the historic diesel UST; however, Leighton was able to ob- tain the removal and soil sampling report following several interviews with the Police Station staff. It was determined that no recognized environmental conditions existed at the site. Leighton has also conducted a hazardous materials survey at the station to identify ACMs, LBP, and universal waste building materials. Demolition of the Police Station in order to construct a new facility is scheduled to occur early 2011 and Leighton will provide the oversight monitoring during abatement of the identified hazardous materials. Phase I, Phase H, and Asbestos, Lead, and Universal Waste Survey, Oasis Senior Center, Newport Beach, CA. Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the demolition and rebuilding of a new senior center. Potential creosote and arsenic- containing railroad ties were discovered in a garden area and soil sam- pling was conducted to assess for hazardous materials. In addition, asbestos and lead -based paint were iden- tified within the onsite structures, and oversight was provided during the abatement activities. The previous structures were demolished and the new construction is underway. Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Various Locations throughout the US. Project Manager and/or Principal Investigator for over 75 sites throughout the southern California region and over 20 sites throughout the United States within a 2 period. Activities included Phase I ESAs; drill- ing soil borings; performing well installations and groundwater monitoring; oversight of numerous geophys- ical survey and soil -vapor survey investigations; conducting methane surveys; soil remediation using soil vapor extraction; oversight of UST removals; and obtaining closure from regulatory agencies. Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint Surveys, Anaheim, CA. Project Manager for asbestos containing material (ACM) and lead -based paint (LBP) surveys conducted for the City of Anaheim, including two, three -story motel structures totaling 45,270 square feet in size where 127 ACM samples were obtained. In addition, two warehouse structures totaling 60,000 square feet in size were surveyed and 134 ACM samples were ob- tained. Samples were analyzed by PLM, TEM, and/or the point count method, as appropriate to determine the asbestos classification. The survey reports identified a hazard ranking for each material identified to contain asbestos, and included recommendations for handling and disposal during renovation/demolition. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 35 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 36 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal S. SUBCONSULTANTS The proposed sub - consultants for this project are identified in Section 4, and resumes of key personnel from these sub - consultant firms are presented there. These consultants are familiar with all applicable codes and regulations, which exhibit proven expertise in the area of work required. In summary, these firms are: • Steven Gaffney Architecture (SGA), designated architect for this project. Engineer sub - consultants will report through SGA, and include: - Thornton Tomasetti, Structural Engineering - Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter, Mechanical Engineering - FBA Engineering, Electrical Engineering - Land Strategies, LCC, Civil Engineering (an optional service) • Cumming, Cost Estimating • Leighton Consulting, Environmental Surveying Services (an optional service) SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS Steven Gaffney Architecture Steven Gaffney Architecture, Inc. (SGA) is an award winning architectural firm specializing in civ- ic, cultural, commercial, retail/mixed -use and high- density residential projects throughout California and the West. Based in Orange County, California, the firm continues to advance a determined "hands -on" approach for over a decade, incorporating extensive team participation experiences, to establish design direction and implementation in a logical and timely fashion. SGA's commitment to sustainability via energy efficient building systems, preserving appropriate selection of materials and form to maximize environmental conditions and long term performance has continued to diversify and expand the firms' services and project portfolio. To further demonstrate our commitment, all of the firm's personnel are LEED Accredited Professionals. SGA's work is widely known and recognized in the construc- tion industry as exemplary. Thornton Tomasetti F Tomasetti Thornton Tomasetti has seasoned staff proficient in all facets of building design and construction, uniquely qualifying them to provide clients with precise, timely evaluations and recommend appropriate repair measures based on their assessments. TT is a recognized industry leader in building assessment investigations. TT's professional engineers and archi- tects come highly trained to review drawings, specifications and reports, conduct visual inspections of building system components, including the building envelope and interior, and mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems for damage and deterioration, deferred maintenance, code compliance or other deficiencies. Information gathered through available drawings, specifications, and visual inspections are used to compile re- ports that identify repair measures and associated costs. FBA Engineering FBA Engineering was founded in 1968 with the mission to be an industry F�� :�`�� I �� F" 13 I �� leader by providing the highest of professional engineering consulting ser- vices to the client. FBA has gained this status by providing innovative, cost effective, state -of -the -art consulting electrical engineering design services. They are sensitive to the clients' ex- pectations and needs for a well functioning project. FBA's efforts bring into balance the project economics, client needs, constructability and long term functional operation of the complete design. The personal participa- Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 37 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal tion of management and staff results in cost effective, proven, practical engineering on each project. Continuing in -house education and training of staff insures up -to -date design capabilities, thereby insuring the standards of their original mission are maintained. FBA has provided services to a wide range of projects including: civic and municipal, needs assessment, parks, restaurants, recreational centers, golf courses, beautification projects, street lighting, educational facilities, health/fitness clubs and sports lighting projects. Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter is a Consulting Mechanical Engineering firm that draws upon 30 years of experience in a diverse variety of projects Ccnsul ?in3 Mechanical Engineers Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun ic Carter ranging from municipal, educational, retail, historical, commercial, health - care, hospitality, and sustainable facilities. Throughout its history the firm has maintained its core values of a proactive service - oriented attitude, while providing innovative, efficient and integrated design solutions for mechanical systems. TKSC specializes in the design of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning Systems, Plumbing Systems, and Fire Protection Systems. TKSC provides technical expertise and construction administration services with a commitment to comprehensive consulting towards progressive and practical design solutions. The firm has ex- tensive experience in a wide variety of projects both nationwide and internationally. Cumming Established in 1996, Cumming is a leader in providing project control services, CUMMING including cost and project management, planning and scheduling, and litigation support. In fact, Cumming's 250 expert professionals — located in 17 offices across the United States, as well as in Abu Dhabi — have provided these and other related services to clients in more than 25 countries around the world. Throughout its history, the company has remained focused on one goal: to assist its clients in managing the criti- cal issues of time and cost from conception through closeout. The ability to proactively resolve complex issues is and always has been central to the success of our clients. Foremost, Cumming provides unsurpassed services that enable you to achieve extraordinary results. With an understanding of your goals and expectations, a suite of so- lution- oriented services are provided to meet your unique needs. Our cost management group is one of the largest providers of cost estimating and management services in the U.S. Additionally, our strength and capabilities in providing project management services is evidenced by our ranking among the nation's top project and construction management firms. In 2009, Cumming ranked number 30 on Engineering News - Record's listing of the Top 100 CM- for -Fee Firms in the country. Leighton Consulting Leighton Consulting, Inc. provides engineering solutions to public agencies, property Leighton owners, and facilities. Our focus is the earth sciences encompassing the geotechnical and environmental disciplines. We provide a balanced team of licensed geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists experienced in identifying and mitigating geotechnical and geologic hazards. Founded in 1961, Leighton Consulting is a California corporation. Our office in Irvine, our company headquar- ters, will provide services to the City. Our successful completion of projects up to $1 Billion in construction val- ue, and over 35 awards for engineering excellence are a sound proof of our understanding of the importance of providing good service, on time and on budget for any size project, to sustain a long term relationship with our clients. Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 38 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal Experience with Team Partners Griffin Structures and Team have a long history of working together on a number of successfully delivered projects as shown in the representative projects below, some of which relationships have dated back to the mid 1990s. Additional relevant project experience can be found on each Team member's resume. Buena Park Police Headquarters ve Buena Park, CA Cathedral City Fire Station Headquarters & Training Facility (LEED Silver) Cathedral City, CA County of San Bernardino High Desert Government Center(LEED Silver) San Bernardino, CA Cypress Community Center ✓ V Cypress, CA DGWB Building Santa Ana, CA Environmental Nature Center (1" LEED Platinum building in Orange County) Newport Beach, CA Family Law Court Vol Riverside, CA Fullerton Community /Senior Center Facility Assessment (LEED Certified) V Fullerton, CA Hesperia Civic Plaza (City Ha// and Library) Hesperia, CA Hesperia Police Department Headquarters (LEED Certified) Hesperia, CA Irvine Civic Center Parking Structure Irvine, CA Laguna Beach Community/Senior Center and Subterranean Parking Structure Laguna Beach, CA Lemon Grove City Hall Needs Assessment Lemon Grove, CA Long Beach City Hall East Facility Assessment Long Beach, CA Mariners Library Newport Beach, CA Newport Beach City Hall Facility Assessment V Newport Beach, CA Oasis Senior Center ✓ Newport Beach, CA Oceanside Police Department & Library Facility Assessment Oceanside, CA Phillips Hutton Building V Vo Santa Ana, CA San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion ✓ ✓ ✓ V- 1 San Dimas, CA San Juan Capistrano Library Renovation/Expansion San Juan Capistrano, CA Santa Ana City Hall Renovation Santa Ana, CA Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure (LEED Certified) Westminster, CA in Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 39 , Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal V , Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 40 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal 7. FEES FEE REQUIREMENTS This fee is based on any and all reasonable costs necessary to provide a scope of services similar to those described in our Proposal to the City's RFP for the Building/Facility Condition Assessment. For this work, Griffin Structures, Inc., with its Team, proposes the below itemized menu of total Fixed Pro- fessional Services Fees: Alternative 1: $32,000 (Thirty Two Thousand Dollars), plus not -to- exceed reimbursable expenses estimated at $1,750 (One Thousand Seven Hundred & Fifty Dollars). In summary, this amounts to a total fee and reimbursable expense requirement of $33,750 (Thirty Three Thousand Seven Hundred & Fifty Dollars), per the following tabulation: Fixed Professional Services Fee $ 32,000 Not to Exceed Reimbursable Expenses $ 1,750 Total $ 33.750 Alternative 2: $85,000 (Eighty Five Thousand Dollars), plus not -to- exceed reimbursable expenses estimated at $3,650 (Three Thousand Six Hundred & Fifty Dollars). In summary, this amounts to a total fee and reimbursable expense requirement of $88,650 (Eighty Eight Thousand Six Hundred & Fifty Dollars), per the following tabulation: Fixed Professional Services Fee $ 85,000 Not to Exceed Reimbursable Expenses $ 3,650 Total $ 88.650 ASSUMPTIONS, INCLUSIONS, EXCLUSIONS This proposal is valid for 90 days from the submittal date, as required in the City's RFP. Invoices for work performed on a fixed -fee basis will be presented monthly based on the percentage of time spent and the amount of work completed. Invoices are considered due and payable on presentation. There will be no rate escalation during the time of project engagement, based on the proposed project schedule. Griffin Structures will invoice the City of Garden Grove on a lump sum basis based on a percentage com- plete for each of the tasks as they are completed on a monthly basis. 11M Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 43 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal DELINEATION OF TASKS & FEES Task 0 - Set Templates, Conventions, Etc 1,400 3,500 Task 1 - Review TEC Report 1,600 2,400 Task 2 - Review Building History -- 3,600 Task 3 - Refine Survey Plan 600 2,400 Task 4 - Obtain City Approval of Survey Plan 1,200 3,780 Task 5 - Building Surveys 4,200 37,200 Task 6 - Building Survey Workbook 4,400 9,000 Task 7 - Projected Building Deficiency Costs 5,000 8,920 Task 8 - Indexes and Prioritization 5,900 4,900 Task 9 - 20 year Capital Plan 2,700 2,900 Task 10 - Final Report 5,000 6,400 Subtotal 32,000 85,000 Reimbursables- Not to Exceed Amount: Insurance 250 650 Reproduction Costs 1,500 3,000 Grand Total 33,750 88,650 a Functional Assessment 16,200 16,200 Hazardous Materials Survey 8,800 8,800 Water Quality Review 22,000 22,000 Subtotal 47,000 47,000 Reimbursables- Not to Exceed Amount: Insurance 350 350 Reproduction Costs 1,500 1,500 Optional Service Total 48,850 48,850 Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 44 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal