HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2010-07-12#AAAGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 12, 2010
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THRU: David Carmany, City Manager
FROM: Sean Crumby P.E., Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC. FOR THE 2010
BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution No. 6018 approving a professional services agreement for the
2010 Building /Facility Condition Assessment with Griffin Structures Inc. for
$92,500.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Seal Beach owns and operates 37 facilities throughout the City.
Some of the facilities include: City Hall, Old City Hall, the Police Station, City
Yard Building, Library/Senior Center, numerous water facilities (wells and
reservoirs), North S.B. Community Center, Marina Community Center, P.D.
Safety Building, Lifeguard Headquarters, Lifeguard Garage, Lifeguard Zero
Tower, Beach Yard Building /1 St. Garage, 1 St St/ Beach Facility, Zoeter Building
(Day Care), the Girl Scout House, Fire Station No. 44, Fire Station No. 48, and
the Seal Beach Tennis Center.
On June 28, 2004 the City Council adopted a Facility Condition Assessment
Report. Since the adoption of the report, changes have been made to city
facilities and to the finances of the City. Several updates to the American with
Disabilities Act and the Uniform Building Code have gone into effect.
Additionally, this report will examine the findings of the condition of the Pier
Utilities compiled in 2009 by Moffatt and Nichols Engineers to find out if they are
accurate.
Staff requested proposals from 14 firms to prepare the Building /Facility Condition
Assessment. A mandatory pre - proposal meeting was held so that the City staff
could communicate to the firms the facilities in Seal Beach and the expectations
of the staff. Of the 14 only 9 firms attended the mandatory pre - proposal meeting
Agenda Item AA
Page 2
and only 3 firms submitted proposals to the City. A panel comprised of 4 Public
Works staff members reviewed the proposals. The panel selected the firm of
Griffin Structures, Inc. to be the most qualified firm. Griffin Structures, Inc. has
provided a similar service to numerous Southern California agencies including
the cities of Newport Beach, Cypress, Fullerton, Buena Park, Santa Ana, and
Tustin. A check of references indicated excellent performance on these studies.
In addition to preparing Facility Assessment Studies, Griffin Structures Inc. has
performed as construction manager for numerous large construction projects.
The fee proposal of $92,500 is appropriate for the service being provided.
This item was brought to the City Council on June 14, 2010. The City Council
directed staff to revise the package and bring the item back to the City Council.
Four items have been revised and are as follows:
1. Add the conflict of interest disclosure language in the Professional
Services Agreement,
2. Add appendix to the proposal listing the facilities within the contract,
3. Attach a scope of work to the proposal, and
4. Add the McGaugh Pool to the proposal list.
The fee was increased from $88,650 to $92,500 to accommodate the added
requests from the City Council.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
On the June 14, 2010 City Council Meeting, Council approved a budget
amendment for $88,700 for this project. Now that the fee has increased by
$3,800 totaling the project cost to $92,500, a budget amendment is required to
add $3,800.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended City Council
professional services agreement
Assessment with Griffin Structures I
SUBMITTED BY:
Akat��' —
Sean Crumby P.E.
Director of Public Works
adopt Resolution No. 6018 approving a
for the 2010 Building /Facility Condition
nc. for $92,500.
NOTED AND APPROVED:
David Carma y, City Manager
Prepared by: Cesar Rangel, Assistant Engineer
Attachments:
RESOLUTION NUMBER 6018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GRIFFIN STRUCTURES FOR
THE 2010 BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the professional services
agreement ( "Agreement ") between the City of Seal Beach and Griffin Structures
Inc. dated July 12, 2010 for the 2010 Building /Facility Condition Assessment, for
a not to exceed amount of $92,500.
Section 2. The Council hereby directs the City Manager to execute the
Agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal
Beach, at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of July , 2010 by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAIN: Council Members
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
CITY OF SEAL BEACH }
I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of the City of Seal Beach, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number 6018 on file in
the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at
a regular meeting held on the 12th day of July 2010.
City Clerk
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR THE 2010 BUILDING/FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
between
City of Seal Beach
211 - 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
2
Griffin Structures, Inc.
385 Second Street
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
This Professional Service Agreement ("the Agreement"} is made as of July 12, 2010
(the "Effective Date " ), by and between Griffin Structures, Inc. ( "Consultant ") and the City
of Seal Beach ( "City "), a California charter city, (collectively, "the Parties ").
1 of 9
S7298- 000111239878v1.doc
RECITALS
A. City desires building /facility assessment professional services.
B. Consultant represents that it is qualified and able to provide City with such
services.
NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the Parties' performance of the
promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows.
AGREEMENT
1.0 Scope of Services
1.1. Consultant shall provide those certain building /facility assessment
services ( "Services°) set forth in the proposal dated May 11, 2010 ( "Proposal "), attached
hereto as Exhibit A. To the extent that there is any conflict between Exhibit A and this
Agreement, this Agreement shall control. Consultant shall assess the city building and
facilities listed on Appendix I to the Proposal.
1.2. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in accordance
with the standard of care generally exercised by like professionals under similar
circumstances and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to City.
1.3. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable
provisions of federal, state, and local law.
1.4. Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified
in the Scope of Services unless the City authorizes such work in advance and in writing.
The City Manager may authorize payment for such work up to a cumulative maximum of
$10,000. Payment for additional work in excess of $10,000 requires prior City Council
authorization.
2.0 Term
This term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall
continue for a term of six months unless previously terminated as provided by this
Agreement.
3.0 Consultant's Compensation
City will pay Consultant in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B
for Services but in no event will the City pay more than $92,500. Any additional work
authorized by the City pursuant to Section 1.4 will be compensated in accordance with
the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B.
2 of 9
87296- 000111239878v1.doc
4.0 Method of Payment
4.1. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for all services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement. Such invoices shall be submitted within 15 days of the end
of the month during which the services were rendered and shall describe in detail the
services rendered during the period, the days worked, number of hours worked, the
hourly rates charged, and the services performed for each day in the period. City will
pay Consultant within 30 days of receiving Consultant's invoice. City will not withhold
any applicable federal or state payroll and other required taxes, or other authorized
deductions from payments made to Consultant.
4.2. Upon 24 -hour notice from City, Consultant shall allow City or City's agents
or representatives to inspect at Consultant's offices during reasonable business hours
all records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by
Consultant in connection with this Agreement. City's rights under this Section 4.2 shall
survive for two years following the termination of this Agreement.
5.0 Termination
5.1. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, or by
Consultant based on reasonable cause, upon giving the other party written notice
thereof not less than 30 days prior to the date of termination.
5.2. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days' notice to
Consultant if Consultant fails to provide satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement
of comprehensive general liability insurance as required by this Agreement at least 20
days before the expiration date of the previous policy.
6.0 Party Representatives
6.1. The City Manager is the City's representative for purposes of this
Agreement.
6.2. Roger Torriero is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of
this Agreement.
7.0 Notices
7.1. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed
made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the United
States Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the following
addresses:
To City: City of Seal Beach
211 -8th Street
Seal Beach, California 90740
Attn: City Manager
3 of 9
S7296- 000111239878v1.doc
To Consultant: Griffin Structures, Inc.
385 Second Street
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Attn: Roger Tordero
Telephone: (949) 497 -9000
Fax: (949) 497 -8883
7.2. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice
occurred, regardless of the method of service.
8.0 Independent Contractor
8.1. Consultant is an Independent contractor and not an employee of the City.
All services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or
under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of
performing the services. Any additional personnel performing services under this
Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all
times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all
wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their
performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall
be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel,
including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding,
unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.
8.2. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages,
claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant's
personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a
result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or
indemnification arising under this Section.
9.0 Subcontractors
No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written
approval of the City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any
and all subcontractors.
10.0 Assignment
Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement whether by
assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of City. Any purported
assignment without such consent shall be void and without effect.
4of9
S7298- 000111239878v1.doc
11.0 Insurance
11.1. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has
provided evidence satisfactory to the City that Consultant has secured all insurance
required under this Section. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of
insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms
satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy
shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf,
and shall be on forms provided by the City if requested. All certificates and
endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work commences.
The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance
policies, at any time.
11.2. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of
the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
that may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Insurance
is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII,
licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City. Coverage shall be at
least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001);
(2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form
number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and, if required by the City, (3) Professional
Liability. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000
per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and if Commercial
General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either. -
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreementllocation or the
general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile
Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and
(3) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim /aggregate.
11.3. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant
shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by the City to state:
(1) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after 30 days
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City;
(2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including
breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its directors,
officials, officers, (3) coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand
in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying
coverage and that any insurance or self - insurance maintained by the City, its directors,
officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance . and shall not be called upon to contribute with it; (4) for general liability
insurance, that the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the services or
operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (5) for automobile liability, that
the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be
5of9
S7298- 000111239878v1.doc
covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance,
use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible.
11.4. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of
insureds provisions and shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of
protection afforded to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and
volunteers.
11.5. Any deductibles or, self - insured retentions shall be declared to and
approved by the City. Consultant guarantees that, at the option of the City, either:
(1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or
(2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses.
12.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, officers,
employees, volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city
officials (collectively "Indemnities ") free and harmless from any and all claims, demands,
causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to
property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to
any acts or omissions of Consultant, its employees, or its agents in connection with the
performance of this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all
consequential damages and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses,
except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of
the City. With respect to any and all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal
proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Indemnitees,
Consultant shall defend Indemnitees, at Consultant's own cost, expense, and risk, and
shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award, or decree that may be rendered against
Indemnitees. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers,
employees, agents and /or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred
by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.
Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any,
received by Consultant, the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or
volunteers. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
13.0 Equal Opportunity
Consultant affirmatively represents that it is - an equal opportunity employer.
Consultant shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for
employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex,
sexual orientation, or age. Such non - discrimination includes, but is not limited to, all
activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination.
S7296- 000111239878v1.doc
Sof9
14.0 Labor Certification
By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions
of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured
against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance
with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before
commencing the performance of the Services.
15.0 Entire Agreement
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or
agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.
16.0 Severability
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not
void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement.
17.0 Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of California.
18.0 No Third Party Rights
No third party shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party
as a result of this Agreement.
19.0 Waiver
No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach,
whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or
service voluntarily given or performed by a party shall give the other party any
contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
20.0 Prohibited Interests; Conflict of Interest
20.1. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided
in California Government Code § §1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.
7of9
8729" DOW
20.2. Consultant further warrants and maintains that it has not employed or
retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for
Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Igor has Consultant paid or agreed to
pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for
Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent
upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty,
City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement
without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the
full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
20.3. Consultant warrants and maintains that it has no knowledge that any
officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual,
financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant,
and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during
the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written
disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a
prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable taws as described in this subsection.
21.0 Attorneys' Fees
If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal,
administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing
party all of its attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith.
22.0 Exhibits
All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the
Agreement as if set forth in full herein. In the event of any material discrepancy
between the terms of any exhibit so incorporated and the terms of this Agreement, the
terms of this Agreement shall control.
23.0 Corporate Authority
The person executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants that he or
she is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Party and that by his
or her execution, the Consultant is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.
S7298- 000111239878vi .doo
8of9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized
representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above
written.
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
David Carmany, City Manager
CONSULTANT
By: L ' 10 U
Name: a.,� -t'ec a
Attest:
Its: CEO
in
Linda Devine, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
By:
Quinn Barrow, City Attorney
By:
Name:
Its: E'
9of9
S7296 -000M 239878v tdoc
EXIB IT A
Proposal
S
,I V.�,
> r
Y k G
ZIA
e 44
� t t r
d. r _ +
��t �` ►� �r�+r�� �� A� �
,.. •. ,r- Yg . 1 1 x '¢41
� 45
` f� Y-.� �j�� � � "' � `T� �ri� ��, - ` S CSr"'. Yr - e,1a..,a �-.� �� . �
kN
AA
UILDIN -:FACILITy CaNDITION ASSESSMENT
Proposal
-,
ilg y S ,rkl r�r Y, • '�i ,' y 1 at
n
_ tat +J 'Y '� -�� � /'� ,•
Nit
i 1
- ��
'h "+ y Y '4b. 1 ti - -' 3 a _ r'� ? �
`�ryw � "Ss � �- �`
1� y� •, ,o o� -
:.
i . a .
CITY
OF
BEAL
DEPAMENT
`(.sr i r5
Y �
r — X
w
{� a
ZIA
e 44
� t t r
d. r _ +
��t �` ►� �r�+r�� �� A� �
,.. •. ,r- Yg . 1 1 x '¢41
� 45
` f� Y-.� �j�� � � "' � `T� �ri� ��, - ` S CSr"'. Yr - e,1a..,a �-.� �� . �
kN
AA
UILDIN -:FACILITy CaNDITION ASSESSMENT
Proposal
-,
ilg y S ,rkl r�r Y, • '�i ,' y 1 at
n
_ tat +J 'Y '� -�� � /'� ,•
Nit
i 1
- ��
'h "+ y Y '4b. 1 ti - -' 3 a _ r'� ? �
`�ryw � "Ss � �- �`
1� y� •, ,o o� -
:.
i . a .
CITY
OF
BEAL
DEPAMENT
`(.sr i r5
Y �
r — X
w
PROPOSAL
PRESENTED TO THE
CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
FOR
BUILDING /FACILITY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
SUBMITTED
MAY I I TH, 2010
r - ll �
tic
CONTACT:
ROGER TORRIERO
RTORRIEROOGRI FFINHOLDINGS.NET
GRIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC.
385 SECOND STREET I LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
949 - 497 -9000 P
949 - 497 -8883 F
V W V W.GRIFFINHOLDINGS.NET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•..-
1 . PROJECT HISTORY .......................................................................................................... ............................... I
PROJECTHISTORY .......................................................................................................................................................... ...............................
I
SELECTEDPROJECT PROFILES ......................................................................................................................................... ..............................2
SELECTED ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROFILES ................................................................................................................. ............................... a
2. COMPANY INFORMATION ......................................................................................... ...............................
I I
GRIFFINSTRUCTURES FIRM BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... ...............................
11
3 . PROPOSED APPROACH ............................................................................................... ...............................
13
PROJECTUNDERSTANDING ........................................................................................................................................... .............................13
APPROACH.................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... 13
APPROACHPHASES AND WORK FLOW .................................................................................................................... ...............................
14
WORKFLOWDIAGRAM ............................................................................................................................................... ............................... 18
PROPOSEDPROJECT SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................. ............................... 19
4 . PROJECT TEAM .............................................................................................................. ...............................
21
WE PROPOSE AN INTEGRATED, EXPERIENCED TEAM ................................................................................................ .............................21
PROJECTORGANIZATION CHART ............................................................................................................................... .............................22
TEAMRESUMES ................................................................................................................................................................ .............................22
S . SUBCONSULTANTS ......................................................................................................... .............................31
SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS ........................................................................................ .............................31
6 . REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... .............................35
7 . FEES ..................................................................................................................................... .............................37
8 . SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT .......................................................................................... ...............................
39
9 . DISCLOSURE ..................................................................................................................... .............................41
APPENDIX1 ............................................................................................................................ .............................43
CITY BUILDING AND FACILITIES LIST ............................................................................................................................ .............................43
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers Table of Contents
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
3. PROPOSED APPROACH
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Seal Beach has a variety of buildings and facilities it owns and maintains. Over the years,
maintenance and repairs have been deferred and only pursued on a reactive basis. This Project is intended
to provide the City staff and Council with an independent assessment by technical experts of the present
state of all the buildings and facilities, prioritization of deficiencies found, cost of remedying those defi-
ciencies, and relative cost of building replacement.
The Assessment is to cover all City facilities, including rating each facility's various components, evaluat-
ing useful life, noting specific deficiencies, preparing budgetary remedial costs, ADA upgrades, replace-
ment vs. renovation cost graphs, and various other items necessary for a proper evaluation.
The completed report will include, as a minimum, the following:
• Facility Condition Index (FCI) ratio for each building or facility. The FCI is the ratio of the cost of
repairing all deficiencies in a building divided by the replacement cost of the building.
• Studies on what -if scenarios to determine various future funding levels necessary to maintain various
FCI levels.
• A 20 year projection of capital renewal funding requirements, by year.
APPROACH
In our approach, we assume the specific survey, conditions findings, and remedial recommendations of the
TEC report may contain valid and acceptable data which may be reused in this project, if this information
appears to be valid upon review of the respective facilities. We will undertake a reconnaissance survey first,
and ascertain if and to what degree a subsequent and more detailed survey by our team is required to update
or replace the earlier survey findings. Also, we will examine updates as may be required due to work un-
dertaken by the City since that survey, and will investigate significant deteriorations which may have oc-
curred and are apparent in our review.
The information obtained by our Team, and information extracted from the earlier report if it is validated,
will be prepared and presented in standard FCA report format. During project Orientation, this format will
be presented to the City for review, and refined and adapted as required.
With this information, we will then prepare a 20 -year Capital Projection Plan, based on prioritizations we
will assess (in concurrence with City policy and guidelines, as applicable).
The main activities are summarized as follows:
• Consider and review the data in the TEC report as to its validity and use in this project. Make recon-
naissance survey and subsequent update site review as needed.
• For conditions listed in the TEC report, make an inspection of these areas. Focused evaluations will
also be made where the City reports that it has made remediation efforts or changes. We will note
and review conditions which are found to be notably different from the earlier report.
• Survey, and otherwise obtain information for, buildings for which the earlier data is inadequate for
this study, or for building omitted from the earlier report. The scope is understood to be limited to
buildings listed in the RFP.
• Establish with the City an accepted FCA format for report information, and use this format for report-
ing survey and analysis results.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 13
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
• Where still valid, costs presented in the TEC report will be updated by the application of escalation
factors as reported by construction indexes, or by guidelines supplied by our team Cost Estimating re-
sources. Costs for other items, new data entries, and required updates will be estimated by our Team
and included in the new report.
• Compute FCI values based on these new or updated figures for buildings on the list. Costs for new
construction will be identified, or updated where appropriate, by examination of costs per sq. ft. and
the experience of our Team with regard to new construction of this type.
• Distribute the costs into appropriate prioritization categories, in cooperation with the City and its fa-
cilities management staff, and prepare as 20 -year Capital Projection Plan (CPP) in concert with the
CIP principals and guidelines of the City.
APPROACH PHASES AND WORK FLOW
The following work flow displays the main activities of this project broken down into the project phases
and task groups:
Phase 1: Project Orientation
Data Collection Model and Baseline
Phase 2: Building Survey
Phase 3: Assemble Building Survey Workbook in approved FCA format
Analysis of Results: Projected Deficiencies and Costs
Indexing and Prioritization: FCI Calculation and Graphic Presentation
City Review and Approval to Proceed
Phase 4: Prioritization
Preparation of 20 -Year Capital Plan
Phase 5: Final Report (draft and final)
Report Presentation (public meeting if desired)
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 14
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Phase I: Project Orientation
The Orientation Phase has the purpose of introducing the Team to the City, and acquainting the Team with
the existing reporting and documentation presently in place. The phase ends with the refinement of our
baseline survey strategic plan.
Critical elements of this activity include review of the 2004 TEC report, and meeting with key City staff to
understand existing gaps and shortcomings in the results of that study, and also establishing current City
expectations and any project goals which are not elaborated in the RFP. This includes the determination of
City objections and concerns with the TEC report, validation of acceptable components, and identification
of elements which may be reused from the old report allowing for a more efficient project plan and the fur-
ther preservation of previous project results which remain accurate.
We will undertake a scoping session with the City to validate our assumptions of project scope, method,
and activities as proposed.
Phase 2: Building Survey
Phase 2 consists of the physical survey activities of the project. Our project plan is to conduct a Reconnais-
sance of the existing buildings in the survey scope, and identify high -level issues and criteria. These will be
provided to the _survey team in advance of their activities. The survey model, which will be refined and
adapted to the specific goals and objectives of the City, and which reflects the results of the Orientation
Phase, will be executed by the respective proposed Team members.
All surveys will be coordinated through the building maintenance and management staff of the City.
• We also understand how to undertake this process with minimal disruption to existing city services
and operations. We have proven experience in independently evaluating the condition of building fa-
cilities for public agencies, including preparing accurate cost estimates for repair, documentation of
recommendations, prioritization of repairs/upgrades within the allocated funding and developing a
maintenance work program.
• We will begin with a fixed schedule and agenda of actions for the survey, and will notify each respec-
tive agency of the city at the end of the Orientation Phase as to the proposed timetable. The schedule
will be adjusted as required to meet any particular overriding conflicts in any department, and will be
coordinated into our master project schedule process. Upon arrival at each building, the Project Man-
ager will contact the designated representatives of the respective departments or agencies affected by
the survey process.
After commencement of the survey, and overlapping with the survey process, all collected information will
be assembled into a project Building Survey Workbook. This information will be checked for consistency
and completeness, and through an established quality control review, the Project Manager will cause possi-
ble revisits to selected sites, if and as required.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 15
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Phase 3: Analysis and Report on Building Conditions
The analysis of the results of the survey will begin with information which has undergone quality control
review and update as necessary, as noted above. The Building Survey Workbook data will be reviewed and
assessed by system and building component, and costs for required remediation (excludes all items that fall
under FF &E), where this has been identified, will be either updated from the previous report, where accept-
able, or estimated by our Project Team.
A matrix of remedial actions will therefore be generated by site and building, reflective of the category of
work involved. These component categories will include such as the following:
• Architectural elements and considerations
• Structural elements and considerations
• Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing systems elements and considerations
• Site elements and considerations
• Other component costs
Each remedial action will be classified in terms of priority of remediation, such as the following. Note that
all these criteria will be refined in the orientation phase of the project.
• Issues related to immediate life and health safety (these are automatically of highest priority)
• Critical issues of high functional or operational impact (for example, items which will become critical
within a year, and which affect city operations or building system survivability)
• Mitigate impending further damage, or items of cascading or imminent impact on other building
components
• Surviving building elements or systems which are beyond projected life, still functioning, but with
undetermined remaining life expectancy
• Code or policy upgrades, such as grandfathered conditions or upgrades which may be advised due to
City policy or planning directives, but which otherwise are in functional and working order
• Operational and within system life cycle
With this information we will then prepare a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report (FCAR) that summa-
rizes the results. This includes the calculation, by building or site of the Facility Condition Index (FCI, the
ratio of remediation to new replacement), as well as other possible measures of deficiency and status. This
numeric information will be presented in graphical format and will be supplemented by clear textual expla-
nation and suitable documentation, in clear and understandable language. We understand the need to pro-
duce a document that is lasting, usable, and practical, while also being reliable and technically sound.
At the conclusion of Phase 3, we will present FCAR information, including such information as the sum-
mary of conditions, costs of remediation by appropriate component and building, respectively computed
FCI's, other indexes and prioritization considerations as may be include, graphic presentations, and sum-
mary information.
City Review / Approval to Proceed
The Phase 3 report will be a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report (FCAR), formatted with an executive
summary and supplemented by backup data and analytics where appropriate.
The city will be provided with this information for its review and approval prior to our proceeding with the
remainder of this project.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 16
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Phase 4: 20 -year CIP Plan
The information in the FCAR will include costs by system, component, and priority for each of the build-
ings and sites in the survey scope. This information will then be assembled into a Capital Improvement
Program, structured to address highest priority matters first, and distributed according to budget guidelines
which will be discussed with the City. Annual budgets for a 20 -year period will be developed.
It is important to note that this plan will include not only remediation to existing conditions, but also ad-
dress allowances for ongoing repair and replacement of various systems based on system lifecycle consid-
erations. It will also include construction of replacement facilities where this is projected due to our analy-
sis, or where, based on the City's own policy considerations, any new facilities are anticipated. This allows
for a complete CIP program which includes all known conditions to date.
Phase 5: Final Report
The results of this project—including the executive summary of building conditions, the FCAR, the 20 -year
CIP, and appropriate supportive information —will be presented to the City at the conclusion of our project.
If desired by the City, we are prepared also to present a summary of findings to the City in a public meet-
ing, such as to Council either in a formal Council Session or in a Council Workshop. This presentation will
be accompanied by supportive graphics and summary information, according to guidelines worked out with
the City.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 17
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
WORKFLOW DIAGRAM
TASK 1
:`'' Z EN'
�•S i•J.+.i iT
PHASE 5
PHASE I
PRO ECT TASK 2
J
ORIENTATION
{R,<
' fi�
No
T �
L '
r- �k
TASK 3
e� :�Y ��4:� _��'�' -r
� • •+'���'•`�� T `'' -•h`�'
El
-a-na
TASK 4 .t a W A R R
rN
�c
PHASE 2 _ W
BUILDING
SURVEYS
TASK 5 . '
\I
FPHASE3
TASK 6
�•S i•J.+.i iT
PHASE 5
BUILDING
TASK 7
w o - 01
ANALYSIS,
S COSTS,
&
FCA REPORT
TASK 8
PHASE 4
20YR PROJECTION TASK 9
PLAN
TASK 10
g i?v
PHASE 5
REPORT
i
APPROVAL
TASK I I
t -e;• e^•"•:
; MIL
W Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 18
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following image illustrates the proposed project schedule for the work proposed in this submittal. This
bar chart shows completion timelines for each section of work as we have organized the proposed work
plan.
11
16§
I
14Grn SluusIn Project and Construction Managers 19 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
29
\\
—
'
�§
kj
kA
I
14Grn SluusIn Project and Construction Managers 19 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 20
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
4. PROJECTTEAM
WE PROPOSE AN INTEGRATED, EXPERIENCED TEAM
Griffin's team members have outstanding technical expertise and capabilities with regard to the scope of work
that is required for this project. To best serve the City of Seal Beach, Griffin Structures brings a team of sea-
soned professionals to ensure your facility assessments are delivered successfully. The Team members are highly
experienced in the scope of work required for this project and has worked together on various projects. The fol-
lowing organization chart identifies the proposed team structure.
Roger Torriero
29
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Roger Torriero is the founder and CEO of Griffin Structures, Inc. He
CEO, Principal In Charge
brings 29 years experience in providing project oversight for all Griffin
Griffin Structures, Inc.
projects and will continue as Principal In Charge for this project.
Deryl Robinson
30
PROJECT MANAGER Deryl Robinson will be the main point of contact for Griffin. He will
Vice President
manage and coordinate activities of all sub - consultants, and be re-
Griffin Structures, Inc.
sponsible for content and presentation of the final report.
Steve Gaffney, AIA
30
ARCHITECTURAL Steve Gaffney will perform the architectural survey, manage the activi-
Principal
SURVEYOR ties of the engineering consultants, and be responsible for producing
Steve Gaffney
the architectural and engineering segments of the report.
Architecture
Mark Ellis, PE, SE
15
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Mark Ellis will perform the structural systems survey and report.
Vice President
Thornton Tomasetti
William Zavrsnick
25
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER William Zavrsnick will perform the electrical systems survey and re-
PrincipabProject Director
port.
FBA Engineering
Larry Sun
24
MECHANICAL ENGINEER Larry Sun will perform the mechanical systems survey and report.
Principal
TKSC Consulting
Mechanical Engineers
Ashok Patel
20
COST ESTIMATOR Ashok Patel will be responsible for all cost estimating.
Director of Cost
Management
Cumming
See the following organization chart for the proposed reporting relationships.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 21
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART
SEA( BF
c q [IFO RN tP
PROJECT MANAGER/
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GR IFFIN ST INC.
sT s ,
RIFFIN STRUCTURES, INC.
R og e r !Orr!
oger Torriero
P t&C
STEVE GAFFNEY ARCHITECTURE
Steve Gaffney
I AIE Survey I
Engineering Team
Systems Survey
F Structural
-
Engineer
Electrical
Engineer
Mechanical/
Plumbing
Engineer
TEAM RESUMES
7 GUMMING
A sho k Patel
Est imation
Cost Estimatio!
Please refer to individual resumes immediately following this page for more information.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 22
ft Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
ROGER NJORRIERO
CEO, Principal In Charge Griffin Structures, Inc.
Following his completion of the Architecture program at Syracuse University (B. Arch.)
_
and the Urban Planning Program at the Accademia di Belli Arti a Firenze, Italy (M.
e e e
Arch.), Mr. Torriero first joined the family construction business in Pennsylvania.
Subsequently, upon relocating to California in 1978, he was employed by Pacific Mutual
Life Insurance Company as its Director of Realty Development.
In 1981, Mr. Ton iero formed Griffin Realty Corporation, which has developed a number
�.
of significant and successful commercial real estate projects throughout California and
Nevada. He subsequently formed Griffin Advisors, Inc., and Griffin Structures, Inc.,°
'
which along with Griffin Realty Corporation were integrated into the Griffin Holdings
organization. To date, the companies have been directly responsible for the completion of
a
over $1.5 Billion in projects on a regional, national, and international basis.
Mr. Torriero's extensive, successful involvement in virtually all aspects of real estate
EDUCATION
development, finance and construction provides Griffin Holdings with a special expertise
Bachelor of Architecture
Syracuse University, New York
in both the conceptualization and the realization of complex and challenging projects. He
is considered expert in forward planning, finance, entitlements, public/private ventures,
Master of Architecture
project delivery methodologies, and community-based participatory planning: all critical
Accademia de Belli Arti a Firenze
to success in today's complex political and economic environments. He also has a
Italy
considerable expertise in the adaptive re -use of historical structures. Mr. Torriero is a
REGISTRATIONS
registered architect and licensed contractor.
Licensed Architect, 1978
State of New York
Mr. Torriero is a member of the Urban Land Institute and its Public/private Sector
Development Council and the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. He is
California Contractor License:
also a member of the Associated General Contractors of America, the Construction
#793600, Classes A & B
Management Association of America, the Design -Build Institute, the US Green Building
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Council, and the Society for Military History. Mr. Torriero's public service has included
U.S. Green Building Council,
serving on the Board of Governors of the Bowers Museum of Cultural Art in Orange
Member
County, California, as the Chair of its Facilities Committee during its expansion and
APWA Member
ULI, Member
renovation.
Design Build Institute of America, Mem-
Relevant Experience
ber
Yucaipa Sheriff Facility and Branch Library Facility Assessment, Yucaipa, CA YEARS WITH FIRM
Fullerton Community/Senior Center Facility Assessment, Fullerton, CA 29 Years
Oceanside Police Department & Library Facility Assessment, Oceanside, CA
Newport Beach City Hall Facility Assessment, Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach City Hall East Facility Assessment, Long Beach, CA
Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard, Stanton, CA
San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion, San Dimas, CA
Santa Ana City Hall Renovation and Development Services Center (Ross Annex), Santa Ana, CA
Buena Park Corporate Yard Facilities, Buena Park, CA
Buena Park Police Headquarters, Buena Park, CA
Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure (LEED Certified), Westminster, CA
Laguna Beach Community/Senior Center and Subterranean Parking Structure, Laguna Beach, CA
Cathedral City Fire Station Headquarters & Training Facility (LEED Silver), Cathedral City, CA
Environmental Nature Center (0 LEED Platinum building in Orange County), Newport Beach, CA
Lemon Grove City Hall Needs Assessment, Lemon Grove, CA
Fullerton Main Library Expansion (LEED Certified), Fullerton, CA
Fullerton Community / Senior Center (LEED Certified), Fullerton, CA
Hesperia Police Department Headquarters (LEED Silver), Hesperia, CA
County of San Bernardino High Desert Government Center (LEED Silver), San Bernardino, CA
South Coast Water District Administration Facility and Maintenance Yard (LEED Silver), Laguna Beach, CA
Watsonville Civic Plaza (City Hall, Courts, Library, & Parking Structure), Watsonville, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita Civic Plaza (City Hall, Community Center and Park), Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Hesperia Civic Plaza (City Hall and Library), Hesperia, CA
Cypress Community Center, Cypress, CA
M . Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 23
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
DERYL ROBINSON
Vice President, Project Manager Griffin Structures, Inc.
While at Griffin Structures, Mr. Robinson has demonstrated leadership and an
extensive understanding of the construction industry that has proven his ability
to effectively manage projects, time and time again. Prior to joining Griffin
Structures, Mr. Robinson served as Director of Preconstruction and Construction
Management services for Snyder Langston in Irvine, California. Mr. Robinson
personally managed the preconstruction and construction on several projects and
has more than 30 years experience in the field.
Mr. Robinson has managed some of the most prestigious projects in Southern
California. During an 18 year tenure with Snyder Langston, Mr. Robinson
managed construction services for the Irvine Spectrum Center Phases 1 & 2, <
Oakley, Inc. Headquarters, Pacific Club at Newport Beach, Tiger Woods
Learning Center, Tarbut V'Torah High School, Marq *E Houston Entertainment EDUCATION
Center Pelican Hill Golf Club Big Ca Count Club, South Coa the outoas Bachelor of Science,
Center a + g Y � Clb � California State University, Lang Beach
Repertory Theatre.
YEARS WITH FIRM
2 Years
Relevant Experience INDUSTRYTENURE
• Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard - Stanton, California - Con- 30 Years
struction Manager for the City of Stanton's new 8,000 sf maintenance build-
ing and a 6,000 sf administration building on 1.5 acres. The scope of work includes management of con-
struction, constructability review of 95% PS &E, processing of all environmental and building permits, bid-
ding process oversight and other construction related services.
• Tustin Library - Tustin, California - Construction Manager to the City of Tustin for delivery of its new
library. The new library is 32,000 square feet, which serves students from both the Tustin and Santa Ana
School Districts and is currently one of the busiest Libraries in the OCPL system. It has private study and tu-
toring rooms that separate the children and young adults for better concentration and quality learning, and it
includes 223 additional reader seats and 99 technology stations.
• Buena Park Police Headquarters — Buena Park, California - Construction Manager for the new two -
story 66,000 sf Police Department Headquarters Facility, which includes a Type I jail, police dispatch cen-
ter, firing range, kennel training center, Emergency Operations Center (EOC), evidence storage room, crime
laboratory, full service locker room, physical training center, and secured police vehicle parking.
• Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure — Westminster California - Program and Construc-
tion Manager for the Westminster Police Facility project, a new facility consisting of a 90,000 sf three -story
Police Building and an adjacent 590 stall Parking Structure to be shared between the WPD and the City for
community parking. The new Police Department Building includes a Type 1 jail, EOC/Training Room, Evi-
dence, Forensics, Patrol, Investigations, Dispatch, Office of the Chief, and all related support services, and
will be an Essential Facility. The total project budget is $80 million and is designed, constructed, and certi-
fied to LEED certified standards.
• The Boeing Company - Due Diligence & Adaptive Reuse Study- California - Mr. Robinson provided
Program Management services for a due diligence and adaptive reuse study for The Boeing Company. The
survey team consisted of architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical disciplines to review the current
conditions of various buildings on their campuses in Long Beach, Seal Beach, and Manhattan Beach, CA to
determine their potential for adaptive reuse.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 24
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
• Grace Ministries International - Adaptive Reuse Study — Fullerton, California — Mr. Robinson provided
Program Management services for a conditions assessment of an existing food manufacturing company
headquarters for reuse into a worship facility. This assessment helped to identify the opportunities and con-
straints of the old factory and offices, ultimately leading to the renovation and reuse of the facility for wor-
ship purposes.
• Long Beach Fleet Maintenance - Long Beach, California - Design management and preconstruction for
this turnkey design -build project. The facility accommodates the City's Fleet Services Department, a garage
maintenance facility for City vehicles, lien sales and towing administration, and the Public Works Integrated
Resources Bureau Administration and Operations offices. Facility included offices, service bays and com-
plete site redevelopment.
• Pacific Club - Newport Beach, California - Preconstruction and construction services for a new clubhouse
building of approximately 30,000 square feet plus as associated site work and utilities. Clubhouse features
extensive architectural millwork.
• Tiger Woods Learning Center - Anaheim, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the
35,000 square foot, two - story educational facility features a 250 - seat auditorium, seven classrooms, a
computer system, coordinating between the City of Anaheim as lead agency and County of Orange as lan-
downer.
• Tarbut V' Torah High School - Irvine, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the pri-
vate school designed to accommodate more than 600 students in grades 7 -12. The two -story facility consists
of 62,000 square feet and is built around a central courtyard, enclosed on three sides by buildings and open
on the forth to nature and a view of the county beyond. Provided management, preconstruction, and general
contracting for the project. Services included land purchase agreement with The Irvine Company; providing
oversight of the entitlement process, establishing each of the consulting agreements.
• Oakley Corporate Headquarters - Foothill Ranch, California - Preconstruction and construction services
for this 413,000 square foot corporate headquarters facility featuring office, manufacturing, assembly, and
distribution. Employee amenities include NBA regulation basketball court, fitness center, full service cafe-
teria and 450 seat auditorium with state -of -the -art audio - visual equipment. The comprehensive scope of ser-
vices included development management, design management, preconstruction and general contracting for
the project.
• The Irvine Spectrum Center Phase I - Irvine, California - Preconstruction and construction services for
an entertainment center featuring a 21 screen Edwards Theater complex, restaurants, a food court, and sever-
al entertainment related retailers. Phase I included construction of five, one -story retail restaurant buildings
totaling 100,000 square feet at a cost of $13 million. Designed after a Moroccan marketplace, the Irvine
Spectrum Center features 4 hand -set tile domes and two steel domes, extensive landscaping, outdoor cour-
tyards inlaid with stone and tile, animated courtyard fountains, and extensive high end interior finishes.
• Pelican Hill Golf Club - Newport Beach, California - Preconstruction and construction services for the
clubhouse and site work, pro shop and driving range building. All facilities featured detailed Santa Barbara
style architecture and extensive high end interior finishes.
• Shady Canyon Golf Club - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for the upscale wood -framed golf
club featuring a 50,000 square foot clubhouse, a driving range building, two entry guard houses, two comfort
stations (restrooms) and a pump house, as well as extensive site work and parking lots.
• Merage Community Center - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for this 130,000 square foot
community center, which included and athletic club complete with gym, basketball court, and weight room;
pre - school; various agency offices: a 500 seat performance hall; and a cafeteria serving the high school and
banquet events. The comprehensive scope of services included development management, design manage-
ment, and preconstruction for the project.
• The Irvine Spectrum Center Phase H - Irvine, California - Preconstruction services for the second phase
of the Irvine Spectrum Center, which added 250,000 square feet of shopping, dining and entertainment ve-
nues, doubling the project's original size. Phase II was designed after the Alhambra, a 13th Century Moo-
rish palace in Granada, Spain.
= Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 25
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
STEVEN RGAFFNEY, AIA, LEEPAP
Architect Griffin Structures, Inc.
Mr. Gaffney brings 25 years of experience in architectural design and project
management. He is oversees all aspects of production management including
construction documents, consultant contract negotiations and project administra-
tion, scheduling, budgeting, staffing, quality control/ quality assurance, and spe-
cifications for all projects undertaken by the firm.
�.
For more than two decades, Mr. Gaffney has managed complex large -scale ur-
ban, institutional, residential, industrial and municipal projects. His backgroundr`
includes well -honed skills in project conceptualization, definition, development,
scheduling, and budget assessment. He is known for creating innovative solu-
tions through application of emerging construction technologies, customized fi-
nancing techniques, and construction management expertise. He is a skilled team
EDUCATION
leader managing a wide variety of consultants.
Bachelor of Arts,
Urban Studies and Planning
University of California San Diego
Relevant Experience REGISTRATIONS
California/Bermuda Licensed
San Dimas City Hall Renovation / Expansion, San Dimas, CA Architect C19676
Brea Civic Center Renovation, Brea, CA LEED Accredited Professional
American Institute of Architects
Lemon Grove City Hall, Lemon Grove Construction Specifications Institute
Cypress Community Center Expansion/Renovation, Cypress, CA International Conference of Building
Orange County Social Services Department Expansion, Santa Ana, CA Officials
Santa Ana City Hall Renovation, Santa Ana, CA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Phillips Block Building, Santa Ana, CA: 27,000 SF Tenant Improvements and U.S. Green Building Council,
Member
Historic Restoration ULI, Member
DGWB Advertising, Santa Ana, CA: 35,000 GSF Tenant Improvements and INDUSTRY TENURE
Historic Renovation 30 Years
Tenth Street Place, Modesto, CA: 220,000 GSF, Retail, Government Offices, 6
Stories
Gallo Arts Center, Modesto, CA: 85, 000 SF Cultural Center
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Union Station, Los Angeles, CA: 640, 000 GSF, 28 stories
Family Law Court, Riverside, CA: 4,000 GSFfacilityfor the Gen. ServicesAdmin., 5 courtrooms
Stanislaus County Dist. Attorney's Office, Modesto, CA: 78, 000 SF Office, 6 stories
Boy Scouts of America Headquarters, Los Angeles, CA: 23, 000 SF regional headquarters, 2 stories
Homeboy Industries, Los Angeles, CA: 21, 000 SF facility for youth rehabilitation, office, bakery
Corona Pointe, Corona, CA: 10 tilt -up concrete office bldgs, Retail, Restaurant, Hotel, 50-acre parcel
LA Fashion, Los Angeles, CA: 16,700 SF multi- tenant retail showroom/merchandise warehouse
Kaweah Delta Health Care, Visalia, CA: 64,587 SF Administration Bldg, S stories
Marbella Commerce Center, San Juan Capistrano, CA: 50,000 GSF, 2 stories
6060 Center Drive, Howard Hughes Center, Los Angeles, CA: 250, 000 GSF, 10 stories
Se Hotel, San Diego, CA: Luxury boutique hotel, 185 guestrooms, 23 stories
Olive Court, Long Beach, CA: 58 eco friendly low- income townhomes/loft apts. adjacent to Blue Line
Long Beach Promenade, Long Beach, CA: 80 loft- condos over retail & subterranean parking.
Gateway Walk, Alhambra, CA: 129 Condominiums over one -level parking garage.
East Village Lofts, Santa Ana, CA: 40 -unit Live/Work community
Camco Pacific Headquarters, Irvine, CA: 2 -story 10,000 SF Tenant Improvement
Oakley Headquarters, Foothill Ranch, CA: 80, 000 GSF Office, 375, 000 GSF Manufacturing, 2 stories
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 26
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
MARK ELLIS, P.E., S.E.
Structural Engineer
Thornton Tomasetti
Mr. Ellis joined Thornton Tomasetti in 2002. In his professional career, he has
been responsible for a variety of structural/seismic analysis and design projects,
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, Structural Engineers Associa-
as well as numerous structural assessments and seismic risk studies. Mr. Ellis
bon of California
has more than 15 years of project experience including government, commercial,
EDUCATION
industrial, manufacturing, and residential facilities, both in the United States and
Master of Engineering,
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
internationally.
Managers
Pre - acquisition Structural/Seismic Assessment, Approximately 15 low, medium
Bachelor of Engineering
and high -rise buildings in Southern and Northern California
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Relevant Experience
Structural Assessment
REGISTRATIONS
Structural Engineer, California
Professional Engineer, California
Professional Engineer, New Zealand
Roof Collapse Assessment, Hyundai Motors Building, Southern CA
Water Damage Assessment, 12 -story Office building, San Diego, CA
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, Structural Engineers Associa-
Balcony Collapse Assessment, Single family Res, San Juan Capistrano, CA
bon of California
Bolt Failure Assessment, Roof Structure at MLB Stadium, United States
Member, Earthquake Engineering Re-
Fire- Damage Assessment, St Philip Benizi Church, Buena Park, CA
search Institute
Associate, Society of Risk and Insurance
Fire Damage Assessment, Summerset Condominiums, Santa Paula, CA
Managers
Pre - acquisition Structural/Seismic Assessment, Approximately 15 low, medium
INDUSTRYTENURE
and high -rise buildings in Southern and Northern California
15+ Years
Pre - acquisition Structural/Seismic Assessment, Dodger Stadium, CA
University of California, Irvine. Seismic condition assessments of 70 bldgs
Structural Condition Assessment, Concrete Parking Structure, Ala Moana Shopping Center, Honolulu, HI
Life -Safety Seismic Evaluation, Tone Del Angel Building, Mexico City, Mexico
Damage Investigation, FDA office and laboratory building in Bothell, WA
Damage Investigation, Service Center Building in Bellevue. WA
Damage Investigation, Heavy Equipment manufacturing facility in Seattle, WA
Risk Assessments
Newport-Mesa Unified School District, Newport Beach/Costa Mesa, California. Earthquake risk assessments of
approximately 300 buildings at 28 campuses, vintages ranging from 1930s to 1970s. Included structural and
non - structural components.
101 Second St., San Francisco, CA. Seismic risk assessment for twenty-six story steel moment and braced frame
office building.
Commercial Property Developer, Atlanta, Georgia. Development of a Corporate Risk Policy Manual for ad-
dressing seismic risk associated with property acquisitions and development projects in California.
Commercial Insurance Building Owners Alliance (CIBA). Earthquake risk assessments for approximately 30
pre -1945 buildings in Southern California.
FM Global. Earthquake loss control services for various insureds facilities in CA, Oregon, and Washington.
Providence Health System, Torrance, California andAnchorage, Alaska. Earthquake risk assessments of struc-
tural and non - structural components at four hospitals.
Tribune Company, Los Angeles, Costa Mesa and Canoga Park, California. Pre - acquisition earthquake risk as-
sessment of buildings and equipment at Los Angeles Times newspaper printing facilities.
Siemens Ultrasound, Mountain View, California. Seismic Risk Assessment of buildings, equipment and business
interruption for medical devices manufacturing facility.
Frito Lay, Inc., Bakersfield, Rancho Cucamonga and Sylmar, California. Earthquake risk assessments of struc-
tural and non - structural components at snack food manufacturing facilities.
Thomson Consumer Electronics, Camarillo and Hollywood, California, and Memphis, Tennessee. Earthquake
risk assessments of structural and non - structural components at video, CD and DVD facilities and film produc-
tion facilities.
Iq Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 27
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
WILLIAM ZAVRSNICK, P.E.
Electrical Engineer
Mr. William R. Zavrsnick has been active in the electrical engineering field
since joining FBA in 1985. His experience includes the assessment and design
of civic, municipal, senior housing, multi - family housing, educational facilities,
office complexes, civic and corporate facilities, tenant improvement, warehouse
support facilities, healthcare and laboratories, parking structures, recreational
centers, wireless communication antenna sites, performing arts theaters, libraries
and shopping centers.
He is particularly experienced in the assessment, design, and development of
power distribution, specialized lighting systems, fire /life safety systems, as well
as the interfacing of equipment for the control of lighting and mechanical sys-
tems as they relate to the requirements of specific projects.
Relevant Experience
Anaheim City Hall West, Anaheim, CA
City of Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks, CA
Covina Civic Center and Police Facility, Covina, CA
County of Orange, Sheriffs Facility, Santa Ana, CA
El Cajon Civic Center, El Cajon, CA
Fountain Valley Civic Center, Fountain Valley, CA
Fred C. Nelles School, Security Additions, Whittier
Fullerton Senior Center, Fullerton, CA
Glendale Police Facility, Glendale, CA
Huntington Beach Civic Center and Police Facility, Huntington Beach, CA
Irvine Civic Center and Police Facility, Irvine, CA
Irvine City Hall, Irvine, CA
Irvine Valley Community College, Saddleback Community College District, CA
James A. Musick Facility, (County of Orange), Irvine, CA
Lake Forest Il Sun and Sail Club, Lake Forest, CA
Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Long Beach, CA
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, CA
Los Angeles County Sheriffs Substation and Holding Cells, Monterey Park, CA
Oasis Senior Center, Newport Beach, CA
Old Buena Vista Library, Burbank, CA
Orange City Hall/Administration Building, Orange, CA
Orange County Saddleback Sheriff Station, Irvine, CA
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Riverside County Jail Annex, Riverside, CA
Riverside County Jail and Sheriffs Station, Riverside, CA
San Dimas City Hall, San Dimas, CA
San Jacinto Civic Center, San Jacinto, CA
Tustin Civic Center, Tustin, CA
University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC), Orange, CA
Walter D. Elhers Senior and Community Center, Buena Park, CA
Westlake City Hall, Westlake, CA
Western Municipal Walter District Headquarters Building, Riverside, CA
Yorba Linda City Hall, Yorba Linda, CA
FBA Engineering
EDUCATION
Bachelors of Engineering
Mount Hood College, Oregon
REGISTRATIONS
Electrical Engineer, California
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
LEED Accredited Professional, BD +C
Illuminating Engineering Society
Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers
National Fire Protection Association
INDUSTRY TENURE
25 Years
in Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 28
, Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
LARRY SUN, P.E.
Mechanical Engineer
For over 24 years Mr. Sun has been a vital part of carrying on the core values
that have made TKSC a successful firm. Being involved in nearly all of the ma-
jor market segments has helped him develop a keen awareness of client and
project requirements, with a focus on details that make a project successful. As
the first LEED Accredited professional in the firm, Mr. Sun recognizes the criti-
cal nature of mechanical systems in supporting sustainable project goals, and en-
joys the collaborative process in achieving these.
TKSC Consulting Mechanical Engineers
EDUCATION
Bachelors of Science, Environmental
Engineering
California Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, California
Since promoted to principal in 1998, Mr. Sun has helped guide the firm toward
REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer, CA, VA, AZ, HI,
continued success. Understanding the need to remain an active participant in the
Tx, Co 425633
HVAC Industry, both locally and nationally, he has served in numerous posi-
PROFESSIONAL. AFFILIATIONS
tions within ASHRAE and also serves as Co- Chairman of the HVAC Industry
LEED Accredited Professional
Advisory Board at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
chairman, AS
Member, Automated Procedures for
Engineering Consultants
Relevant Experience
Co- Chairman, California Polytechnic
State University, HVAC Industry Advi-
Buena Park Community Center — Renovation, Buena Park, California
sory Board
Cypress Community Center — Renovation, Cypress, California
INDUSTRY TENURE
Northwood Community Center — Renovation, Irvine, California
24 Years
Oak Creek Community Center, Irvine, California
Chino Hills Government Center, Chino Hills, California
Hesperia Civic Center (City Hall & Library), Hesperia, California
Addition Company Experience
Anaheim City Hall West (Utilities Division) — Anaheim, California. Mechanical Systems Evalation.
Buena Park City Hall — Buena Park, California. Evaluation and upgrades of the existing mechanical systems
serving the City Hall building.
Buena Park Police Department — Buena Park, California. 66, 000 SF Law Enforcement facility including an
Emergency Operations Center, Community Center, Type 1 Detention Facility., Crime Lab, Evidence/Property
Storage and Firing Range.
Buena Vista Children's Center / Mary Alice O'Conner Family Center — Burbank, California. Evaluation and up-
grades of the existing mechanical systems in coordination with a complete renovation of the facility.
Environmental Nature Center — Newport Beach, California. This 9, 000 SF, single -story Community Education
Center is the first LEED Platinum project in Orange County.
Hesperia Police Department — Hesperia, California. 40, 000 SF, two -story Law Enforcement facility.
High Desert Government Center — Hesperia, California. 66,100 SF, 2 -story City Hall /Municipal Administration
building at the Civic Plaza. Project is in construction.
Irvine Ranch Water District Headquarters — Irvine, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Laguna Beach Senior Center & Community Center — Laguna Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Long Beach City Hall — Long Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
LA County Fire Department — Los Angeles, CA. Dispatch Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
LA County Office of Education (LACOE) — Downey, CA. Data Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Mission Viejo Interim City Hall — Mission Viejo, California. Remodel of 33, 000 SF existing office building in-
cluding replacement of mechanical systems.
Newport Beach City Hall — Newport Beach, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Oak Creek Golf Clubhouse — Irvine, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Oasis Senior Center — Corona Del Mar, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Oceanside Police Department — Oceanside, California. Mechanical Systems Evaluation.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 29
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
ASHOK PATEL, MRICS
Cost Estimator Cumming
Mr. Patel has an extensive background in cost estimation with over 20 years in
the construction industry. He has been involved with all phases of construction
from master plan through occupancy, including estimation, quality control,
quality assurance, and value engineering. Mr. Patel has been a proven leader in
his industry providing accurate cost management services, including change
order analysis negotiations, on projects ranging in value up to $1 Billion. With
experience in all aspects of civil, structural, and architectural disciplines, Mr.
Patel has been worked on a range of projects included in the healthcare,
educational, commercial office, industrial, public work, restaurant, government,
retail, entertainment, and hospitality sectors.
EDUCATION
Relevant Experience Bachelor of Science, Quantity Surveying
P Greenwich University, London
Alameda Park, New Park and Community Building, Alameda, CA
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Big League Dreams Sports Park, Recreation Facilities & Parking, Perris, CA
Member, Royal Institution of Chartered
Buena Park Community Center, Renovation, Buena Park, CA
Surveyors (MRICS)
Buena Park Police Facility and Jail, Buena Park, CA
Chino Hills Pipeline Avenue, Community Center, Chino Hills, CA
U.S. Green Building Council, Member
City of Cypress, Recreational Infrastructure Study, Cypress, CA
INDUSTRYTENURE
City of Moreno Valley, New Corporate Yard Facility, Moreno Valley, CA
20
Crestline Branch Library, New Facility, Crestline, CA
Encinitas Public Library, Encinitas, CA
Indio Police Headquarters, Indio, CA
Inland Empire Transportation Management Center and CHP Emergency Response Operations, LEED - Certified,
Fontana, CA
Jerome Park Community Center Renovation, Santa Ana, CA
John Ham Park, Lynwood, CA
Laguna Niguel City Hall, Laguna Niguel, CA
Laguna Niguel Community Center, Laguna Niguel, CA
Lemon Park, Renovation Project, Fullerton, CA
Los Angeles Hall of Justice, Feasibility Study, Los Angeles, CA
Malibu Library, Renovation Project, Malibu, CA
Mesa Marin Sports Park, Bakersfield, CA
Mojave Water Agency, Corporate Yard, Mojave, CA
Morgan Street Sports Park, Phase II, Perris, CA
Orange Co. Vector Control, Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Garden Grove, CA
Orange County Central Courts, Renovation, Santa Ana, CA
Orange County Fair & Events Center, Administration Office, Costa Mesa, CA
Orange County Fair & Events Center, Mall Plaza, Costa Mesa, CA
San Diego Civic Center Complex, Estimates and Peer Review, San Diego, CA
San Dimas City Hall, Renovation and Expansion, San Dimas, CA
San Gorgonio Park, San Clemente, CA
San Juan Capistrano Library, Renovation/Addition, San Juan Capistrano, CA
Westminster Police Department, Westminster, CA
Will Rogers Memorial Park, Refurbishment Project, Beverly Hills, CA
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 30
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
S. SUBCONSULTANTS
The proposed sub - consultants for this project are identified in Section 4, and resumes of key personnel from
these sub - consultant firms are presented there. These consultants are familiar with all applicable codes and
regulations, which exhibit proven expertise in the area of work required. In summary, these firms are:
• Steven Gaffney Architecture (SGA), designated architect for this project. Engineer sub - consultants
will report through SGA, and include:
- Thornton Tomasetti, Structural Engineering
- Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter, Mechanical Engineering
- FBA Engineering, Electrical Engineering
• Cumming, Cost Estimating
SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS
Steven Gaffney Architecture
E A Steven Gaffney Architecture, Inc. (SGA) is an award winning architectural firm specializing in civ-
ic, cultural, commercial, retail/mixed -use and high - density residential projects throughout California
and the West. Based in Orange County, California, the firm continues to advance a determined
"hands -on" approach for over a decade, incorporating extensive team participation experiences, to
establish design direction and implementation in a logical and timely fashion.
SGA's commitment to sustainability via energy efficient building systems, preserving appropriate selection of
materials and form to maximize environmental conditions and long term performance has continued to diversify
and expand the firms' services and project portfolio. To further demonstrate our commitment, all of the firm's
personnel are LEED Accredited Professionals. SGA's work is widely known and recognized in the construc-
tion industry as exemplary.
Thornton Tomasetti
Thornton Tomasetti has seasoned staff proficient in all facets of building design
and construction uniquely uali m them to provide clients with precise, timely
q Yq �'� g P P � Y
evaluations and recommend appropriate repair measures based on their assessments.
TT is a recognized industry leader in building assessment investigations. TT's professional engineers and archi-
tects come highly trained to review drawings, specifications and reports, conduct visual inspections of building
system components, including the building envelope and interior, and mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire
protection systems for damage and deterioration, deferred maintenance, code compliance or other deficiencies.
Information gathered through available drawings, specifications, and visual inspections are used to compile re-
ports that identify repair measures and associated costs.
FBA Engineering
( FBA Engineering was founded in 1968 with the mission to be an industry
leader by providing the highest of professional engineering consulting ser-
��� ! ' \ { `! ", ' l \ (` vices to the client. FBA has gained this status by providing innovative, cost
effective, state -of -the -art consulting electrical engineering design services. They are sensitive to the clients' ex-
pectations and needs for a well functioning project. FBA's efforts bring into balance the project economics,
client needs, constructability and long term functional operation of the complete design. The personal participa-
tion of management and staff results in cost effective, proven, practical engineering on each project. Continuing
in -house education and training of staff insures up -to -date design capabilities, thereby insuring the standards of
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 31
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
their original mission are maintained. FBA has provided services to a wide range of projects including: civic and
municipal, needs assessment, parks, restaurants, recreational centers, golf courses, beautification projects, street
lighting, educational facilities, health/fitness clubs and sports lighting projects.
Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter
Tsuchiyama Kaino Sun & Carter is a Consulting Mechanical Engineering
firm that draws upon 30 years of experience in a diverse variety of projects
Tsuchiyama Consu':i V= nan:;al Engineers Sun &Garter ranging from municipal educational retail historical commercial health-
care, hospitality, and sustainable facilities. Throughout its history the firm
has maintained its core values of a proactive service - oriented attitude, while providing innovative, efficient and
integrated design solutions for mechanical systems.
TKSC specializes in the design of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning Systems, Plumbing Systems, and
Fire Protection Systems. TKSC provides technical expertise and construction administration services with a
commitment to comprehensive consulting towards progressive and practical design solutions. The firm has ex-
tensive experience in a wide variety of projects both nationwide and internationally.
Cumming
Established in 1996, Cumming is a leader in providing project control services,
CUMMING including cost and project management, planning and scheduling, and litigation
support. In fact, Cumming's 250 expert professionals — located in 17 offices
across the United States, as well as in Abu Dhabi — have provided these and other related services to clients in
more than 25 countries around the world.
Throughout its history, the company has remained focused on one goal: to assist its clients in managing the criti-
cal issues of time and cost from conception through closeout. The ability to proactively resolve complex issues is
and always has been central to the success of our clients. Foremost, Cumming provides unsurpassed services that
enable you to achieve extraordinary results. With an understanding of your goals and expectations, a suite of so-
lution- oriented services are provided to meet your unique needs.
Our cost management group is one of the largest providers of cost estimating and management services in the
U.S. Additionally, our strength and capabilities in providing project management services is evidenced by our
ranking among the nation's top project and construction management firms. In 2009, Cumming ranked number
30 on Engineering News - Record's listing of the Top 100 CM- for -Fee Firms in the country.
IN Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 32
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Experience with Team Partners
Griffin Structures and Team have a long history of working together on a number of successfully delivered
projects as shown in the representative projects below, some of which relationships have dated back to the
mid 1990s. Additional relevant project experience can be found on each Team member's resume.
Buena Park Police Headquarters
✓
✓
✓ Vo
Buena Park, CA
Cathedral City Fire Station Headquarters & Training Facility (LEED Silver)
✓
Cathedral City, CA
County of San Bernardino High Desert Government Center(LEED Silver)
V 41
V
San Bernardino, CA
Cypress Community Center
V
✓
✓
Cypress, CA
DGWB Building
V
r
r
Santa Ana, CA
Environmental Nature Center (V LEED Platinum building in Orange County)
Newport Beach, CA
Family Law Court•
Riverside, CA
Fullerton Community /Senior Center Facility Assessment(LEED Certified)
✓
✓
Fullerton, CA
Hesperia Civic Plaza (City HaH and Library)
Hesperia, CA
Hesperia Police Department Headquarters (LEED Certified)
V
Vo
Hesperia, CA
Irvine Civic Center Parking Structure
Irvine, CA
Laguna Beach Community/Senior Center and Subterranean Parking Structure
✓
V
Laguna Beach, CA
Lemon Grove City Hall Needs Assessment
✓
Vo r
Lemon Grove, CA
Long Beach City Hall East Facility Assessment
V
Long Beach, CA
Mariner's Library
✓
Vo
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach City Hall Facility Assessment
V
ve
Newport Beach, CA
Oasis Senior Center
Newport Beach, CA
Oceanside Police Department & Library Facility Assessment
✓
Oceanside, CA
Phillips Hutton Building
✓
I/
V ✓
V 11
Santa Ana, CA
San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion
✓
V
San Dimas, CA
San Juan Capistrano Library Renovation/Expansion
✓
ve
San Juan Capistrano, CA
Santa Ana City Hall Renovation
✓
Vo
Santa Ana, CA
Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure (LEED Certified)
Westminster, CA
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 33
oil
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 34
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
6. REFERENCES
Listed below are public sector references which can attest to Griffin Structures professional performance.
We invite you to call.
Mr. Steve Badum, P.E.
Public Works Director
Mr. Manuel Gomez, P.E.
Public Works Director
Mr. Doug Dancs, P.E.
Public Works Director
Ms. Cynthia Nelson
Deputy City Manager
Newport Beach, California
Irvine, California
Cypress, California
Santa Ana, California
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
(949) 644 -3335
6427 Oak Canyon
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 724 -7365
5700 Orange Avenue
Cypress, CA 95076
(714) 229 -6740
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92707
(714) 647 -5360
City Hall & Lifeguard Headquarters
Building Assessments
Police & Public Works Yard
Capital Improvement Plan
Cypress Community Center
Building Assessment & Renovation
City Hall
Building Assessment & Renovation
We have included a more extensive list of references, as an insert following this report, for your convience..
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 35
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 36
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
7. FEES
FEE REQUIREMENTS
This fee is based on any and all reasonable costs necessary to provide a scope of services similar to those
described in our Proposal to the City's RFP for the Building/Facility Condition Assessment.
For this work, Griffin Structures, Inc., with its Team, proposes the below itemized total Fixed Professional
Services Fees:
$88,500 (Eighty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars), plus reimbursable expenses /allowance of $4,000
(Four Thousand Dollars).
Fixed Professional Services Fee $ 88,500
Reimbursable Expenses /Allowance $ 4.000
Total 92 O
ASSUMPTIONS, INCLUSIONS, EXCLUSIONS
This proposal is valid for 90 days from the submittal date, as required in the City's RFP. Invoices for work
performed on a fixed -fee basis will be presented monthly based on the percentage of time spent and the
amount of work completed. Invoices are considered due and payable on presentation. There will be no rate
escalation during the time of project engagement, based on the proposed project schedule.
Griffin Structures will invoice the City of Seal Beach on a lump sum basis based on a percentage complete
for each of the tasks as they are completed on a monthly basis.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 37
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
DELINEATION OF TASKS & FEES
Task 0 - Set Templates, Conventions, Etc
3,500
Task 1 - Review TEC Report
2,400
Task 2 - Review Building History
3,600
Task 3 - Refine Survey Plan
2,400
Task 4 - Obtain City Approval of Survey Plan
3,800
Task 5 - Building Surveys
40,500
Task 6 - Building Survey Workbook
9,000
Task 7 - Projected Building Deficiency Costs
9,000
Task 8 - Indexes and Prioritization
4,900
Task 9 - 20 year Capital Plan
2,900
Task 10 - Final Report
6,500
Subtotal 88,500
Reimbursables /Allowance:
Insurance 1000
Reproduction Costs 3,000
Grand Total 92,500
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 38
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
8. SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT
Several facility evaluation samples have been selected and attached to this proposal to illustrate project ex-
perience and emphasize our experience with a diversity of building types. These surveys are specific to the
projects for which they were conducted, and were focused to the respective project goals.
Here, in this project for Seal Beach, we have proposed to conduct surveys with similar content, but focused
specifically to the needs of the City as outlined in the RFP. Our proposed approach includes coordinated
surveys which collect information using a consistent methodology, so that results can be compared, and the
computed indexes and ratios, including the FCI, remain consistent across the building population.
Results will be presented so that the City will have the ability to make an informed, executive and policy
driven decision regarding the nature of buildings and the priorities for remedy of deficiency. See Section 3
of this Proposal for a detailed description of our proposed approach and methodology.
NOTE: For convenience of proposal organization and ease in reading this document, we have attached four
sample building evaluations, all with their own page count, in the separately tabbed sections of this
document. These evaluations are
Example 1: City of Fullerton Senior Center
The purpose of this evaluation was to compare renovation and addition to new construc-
tion. The survey was followed by an extensive assessment of (a) design requirements for
renovation and additions to the existing building, compared to (b) design requirements for
construction of a replacement facility. The FCI index was close to 1.00 and consequently
the recommendation was for a replacement solution, which was accepted by the City.
Example 2: City of Oceanside Police Department and Public Library
The purpose of the evaluation was (a) to evaluate the current "essential services" com-
pliance of this adapted reuse of a strip center as a police facility, and (b) to form a basis for
computing costs of renovation and expansion to meet long -term space requirements of the
police department. The city branch library was located in an adjacent bay which also had
been designed to "essential services" standards.
Example 3: Newport Beach City Hall
The purpose of the evaluation of this building campus (several buildings were included)
was to assess long term reuse of those buildings for city hall functions, and to provided a
basis for comparison to a program of facility replacement.
Example 4: Yucaipa Police Department and City Library
Each of these buildings was evaluated for its ability to accept adaptation for long term use
by the police department, and in each case this was found not feasible due to structural li-
mitations and costs to upgrade those conditions. In addition, the survey was the basis for
an analysis of expanding the existing library building to meet projected future library re-
quirements. This option was affirmatively possible, and the survey further allowed for the
development of a cost estimate to upgrade and expand the facility for that purpose.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 39
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 40
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
9. DISCLOSURE
RFP: A disclosure of allpersonal, professional, or financial relationships with any officer or employee of the City.
Griffin does not, to our knowlege, have any continuing professional relationship with any officer or
employee of the City. Griffin has no work history with the City of Seal Beach, and has no related
professional relationship established.
We affirm that, to our knowlege, Griffin does not have any financial relationships with any officer or
employee of the City.
W Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 41
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 42
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
APPENDIX I
CITY BUILDING AND FACILITIES LIST
! 1
1 C
City Hall !
! 2118th Street I
I 1
13,112
2 O
Old City Hall 2
2018th Street i
i 1
11,170
1 3
3 I
I Police Headquarters 9
911 Seal Beach Boulvard 2
21,984
4 j
j City Yard -Office -
1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 3
3,100
! 4
4A C
- 1
f 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive '
' 6
6,200
J 4
4B I
I City Yard - Vehicle /Equipment Repair !
! 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 4
4,900 j
4C !
! City Yard - Vehicle /Equipment Carport ,
, 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 4
4,800
! 4
4D {
{ City Yard - Vehicle /Equipment Storage i
i 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive _
i ..._._ —
S L
Library/Senior Center 1
—.._. .
...
_5,250
J 6
6 F
Fire Station #44 1
- 1
I 3
3,500 !
1 7
7 S
Seal Beach Pier - Restaurant Building !
! 900A Ocean Avenue 2
2, I
i 8
8 {
{ North Seal Beach Community Center -
1 3333 St. Cl oud 4
4,550
9 `
- 1
151 Marina Drive !
! 4
4,600 l
10 !
! Seal Beach Pier Old Bait Shop i
i 900 Ocean Avenue !
i 5
!
i 1
10C 1
1 Lifeguard Tower 8
888 Ocean Avenue i
516
F
10D ;
; Safety Building j
j 900 Ocean Avenue J
J 8
842
10E ;
;Lifeguard Headquarters 1
1 888 Ocean Avenue 1
1,900
10F L
Lif eguar d G arage 8
888 Ocean Avenue !
! 2
2,250 i
10H S
Seal Beach Pier Restrooms 9
900 Ocean Avenue 1
1,089 J
13 !
! Beach Facility- Maintenance Building i
i 1st St. Parking Lot 3
3,150
I 1
13A I
I Beach Facility- Restaurant Building 1
15 First Street 1
1 8
850
I 1
13B (
( Beach Facility- Storage Bldg. 1
1 1st St. Pa rking Lot 3
350 j
13C B
Beach Facility - Restroom Building {
{ 1st St. Parking Lot 6
690
! 1
13D B
Beach Parking Lot 1
1st St. Parking Lot 6
68,085
1 1
1 _
_T 6
3333 Bolsa Chica Road 5
570
17 I
I Well & Pump House (Beverly Manor) 3
3101 Beverly Manor Road 1
1,040
29 1
1 Zoeter Building (Day Care) i
i 1198 Landing Avenue 1
1 7
7,454 ii
29B 1
1 Zoeter Bleachers 1
12th St. & Landing Avenue I
I 1
1,600
37 I
I Tennis Center Club House 3
3900 L {
{ 2
2,100
' 3
37A 1
1 Tennis Center Locke r /Showe /Restrooms 3
3900 Lampson -
j 3
3,200 ;
1 3
37B T
Tennis Center Workout Room -
3900 Lampson
- j
{ 3
37C -
- 3
Lampson
- )
- - 3900 L
38 1
1 Mcgaugh Pool Facility* i
i
- --J -,1169 698 Bolsa
* Note: The McGaugh Pool Facility, 1698 Bolsa Ave, is defined for purposes of this fee proposal as the build-
ing housing the pool electrical and mechanical equipment as well as the adjacent coach's office. This does not
include the school gymnasium, two swimming pools, the pool deck and associated fences and fixtures, or the
pool electrical and mechanical equipment. It is understood that the pool building shares a structural wall with
the school gymnasium. That wall is excluded from the scope of this review.
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 43
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 44
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
EXIB IT B
Fee Rate Schedule
7. FEES
FEE REQUIREMENTS
This fee is based on any and all reasonable costs necessary to provide a scope of services similar to those
described in our Proposal to the City's RFP for the Building/Facility Condition Assessment.
For this work, Griffin Structures, Inc., with its Team, proposes the below itemized total Fixed Professional
Services Fees:
$88,500 (Eighty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars), plus reimbursable expenses /allowance of $4,000
(Four Thousand Dollars).
Fixed Professional Services Fee $ 88,500
Reimbursable Expenses /Allowance $ 4,000
Total 92,500
ASSUMPTIONS, INCLUSIONS, EXCLUSIONS
This proposal is valid for 90 days from the submittal date, as required in the City's RFP. Invoices for work
performed on a fixed -fee basis will be presented monthly based on the percentage of time spent and the
amount of work completed. Invoices are considered due and payable on presentation. There will be no rate
escalation during the time of project engagement, based on the proposed project schedule.
Griffin Structures will invoice the City of Seal Beach on a lump sum basis based on a percentage complete
for each of the tasks as they are completed on a monthly basis.
in Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 37
. Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal
DELINEATION OF TASKS & FEES
Task 0 - Set Templates, Conventions, Etc
3,500
Task 1 - Review TEC Report
2,400
Task 2 - Review Building History
3,600
Task 3 - Refine Survey Plan
2,400
Task 4 - Obtain City Approval of Survey Plan
3,800
Task 5 - Building Surveys
40,500
Task 6 - Building Survey Workbook
9,000
Task 7 - Projected Building Deficiency Costs
9,000
Task 8 - Indexes and Prioritization
4,900
Task 9 - 20 year Capital Plan
2,900
Task 10 - Final Report
6,500
Subtotal 88,500
Reimbursables /Allowance:
Insurance 1000
Reproduction Costs 3,000
Grand Total 92,500
Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 38
Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal