Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1990-01-08 12-26-89 I 1~8~90 NOTICE OF CANCELLED MEETING The regular City Council meeting of December 26, 1989, was cancelled by action_of the City Council on December 11, 1989. I Seal Beach, California January 8, 1990 The City Council of the ~ity of Seal Beach met in regular session at 7:03 p.m. with Mayor Grgas calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Grgas Councilmembers Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson I Absent: Councilmember Risner Wilson moved, second by Hunt, to excuse the absence of Mrs. Risner from this meeting. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried Also present: Mr. Nelson, City Manager Mr. Barrow, Assistant City Attorney Mr. Whittenberg, Director of Development Services Mr. Jue, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer Chief Stearns, Police Department Captain Garrett, Police Department Mr. Archibold, Assistant to the City Manager Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk WAIVER OF FULL READING Wilson moved, second by Laszlo, to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent to the waiver of reading shall be deemed to be given by all I Councilmembers after reading of the title unless specific request is made at that time for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried 1-8-90 I PRESENTATION - EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION Mayor Grgas introduced Sgt. James Groos of the Police Department, and Chief Stearns reviewed the achievements of Sgt. Groos throughout his employment career with the Department. Mayor Grgas presented Sgt. Groos with a commemorative plaque recognizing his twenty years of employment with the City. PRESENTATION - PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD Mr. Joe Casaletti, American Automobile Association, presented the City with the AAA Pedestrian Safety Program Award for 1988. He commended Seal Beach for having no pedestrian fatalities during the 1988 calendar year and being one of only sixty-three cities in Southern California to receive such recognition. PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Grgas proclaimed the week of January 15th through January 20th, 1990 as "SBTV Community Television Week.R It was the consensus of the Council to hold over the proclamation recognizing the Recreation Department staff and community volunteers for their efforts in providing a special 1989 Halloween celebration. I ~Q~~J~_~~~~ING_=_~OPTING CERTAIN_.CODES BY REFERENCE (BU!~PING and SAFETYl Mayor Grgas declared the public hearing open to consider adoption of certain Codes by reference relating to building and safety. The City Clerk certified that notice of the public hearing had been advertised as required, and reported no communications had been received either for or against this item. There being no comments from the audience, Mayor Grgas declared the public hearing closed. ORDINANCE NUMBER 1294 - ADOPTING CERTAIN CODES BY REFERENCE {BUILDING"and SAFETYl Ordinance Number 1294 was presented for second reading entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH RELATING TO BUILDING AND SAFETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS: THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, 1988 EDITIONf THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1988 EDITIONf THE UNIFORM SIGN CODE, 1988 EDITIONf THE UNIFORM SOLAR ENERGY CODE, 1988 EDITIONf AND THE UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE, 1988 EDITION." By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1294 was waived. In response to a question of Council, the Development Services Director explained that the City is required to adopt the new Building Codes, the amendments set forth by Ordinance 1294 being modifications to those Codes specifically applicable to Seal Beach and relate to referenced. sections within the Municipal Code, time frames, etc. He clarified that should the City not adopt the Uniform Building Codes prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials a State Code, which is less restrictive, would then take effect and under which the City would have no authority to make amendments for local conditions. Mr. Whittenberg confirmed that under the UBC, since 1985, a permit is required for window replacement, as does the replacement of a door and framework, and new electrical facilities, also that installation of tile in a residential unit would not require a permit however would in a commercial structure. He estimated the cost of a permit for window and frame replacement between fifteen to twenty dollars. I 1-8-90 Hunt moved, second by Wilson, to adopt Ordinance Number 1294 as presented. Mayor Grgas noted that fees for permits are established by separate Council action and do not relate to adoption of the Codes, the intent of the Codes being to insure that construction and improvements meet current building standards for the public safety. Councilman Laszlo added that he felt the inspections required in conjunction I with a building permit serves to insure that the work of a contractor is done properly and serves as a protection for a homeowner. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried ORDINANCE NUMBER 1296 - GENERAL PENALTIES - CODE VIOLATIONS Ordinance Number 1296 was presented to Council for second reading entitled RAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH RELATING TO GENERAL PENALTIES." By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number l296"was waived. The staff clarified that the Ordinance amends an existing Code provision by increasing the fines and penalties for infraction and misdemeanor violations of the MuniCipal Code. With regard to fines related to"not obtaining a building permit, the Development Services Director explained that the Uniform Building Code allows a penalty assessment of double the amount of a permit fee in the case of work being completed without the required permit. Hunt moved, second by Wilson, to adopt Ordinance Number 1296 as presented. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner I Motion carried ORDINANCE NUMBER 1297 - UMBRELLAS and TENTS_- PUBLIC PROPERTY Ordinance'Number 1297 was presented to Council for first reading entitled RAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH RELATING TO THE USE OF UMBRELLAS AND TENTS UPON THE PUBLIC BEACH AND " OTHER PUBLIC AREAS.R By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1297 was waived. The staff explained"this amendment to the Code would allow tents or umbrellas with side walls on public property at the discretion of the City Manager where it is now prohibited. Hunt moved, second by Laszlo, to approve the introduction of Ordinance Number 1297 and that it be passed to second reading. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3904 - RECYCLING and LITTER REDUCTION ACT - GRANT APPLICATION Resolution Number 3904 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, APPROVING THE" SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACToR By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3904 was waived. The City Manager reported that the proposed Resolution would authorize submittal of an application for grant funds to help offset local costs associated with establishing a recycling program pursuant to requirements of State law, specifically equipment and .1 1-8-90 I separation containers for each household and for public education programs. This being a State mandated program, Mr. Nelson noted that there will be considerable competition between the California cities for the grant funds and that there is no assurance that any monies will be received. He reported the application reflects the full estimated amount of $302,000, and that the staff is continuing to investigate all means of potential funding and the various methods to implement the program. Wilson moved, second by Hunt, to adopt Resolution Number 3904. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried I RESOLUTION NUMBER 3905 - SUPPORTING OCEAN PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 Resolution Number 3905 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF HR 3751 - THE OCEAN PROTECTION ACT OF 1990." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3905 was waived. The City Manager reported he and Councilman Laszlo had attended a session at the League of Cities Conference relating to off-shore oil leases during which they received a briefing from persons who have been closely monitoring the issue and that there were assurances that a three to five year moratorium would be imposed by the President. He stated they became aware of the Ocean Protection Act which would prevent off-shore oil drilling within a specified number of miles of the entire western coast, including Alaska, the eastern coastline, including the western coast of Florida, however does not include the coastal waters of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. He explained the Act calls for cancellation of leases and permits already in effect in certain areas and a study of cancelling leases sold in another area, however the Act would not affect leases that have been sold, developed and are producing oil. Mr. Nelson stated the Resolution is presented for consideration of adoption at this time, as is requested of all coastal cities, so that the Congress will be aware of the position of the cities when they consider House Resolution 3751 early in the 1990 session. Councilman Laszlo added that there appears to be concern regarding the environment and the coastal waters by all states, and that the Gulf of Mexico states may also change their position. In response to Councilman Hunt, the City Manager said he believed the position of the Department of Interior has changed with regard to off-shore oil leasing, specifically with regard to California and Alaska, and as a result of the possibility of a moratorium. Laszlo moved, second by Grgas, to adopt Resolution Number 3905 as presented. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried I RESOLUTION NUMBER 3906 - SUPPOR~ING STATE BOND ISSUE 1A~ l3l2! - WATER RECLAMATION PROJECTS Resolution Number 3906 was presented to Council entitled nA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE $200 MILLION BOND ISSUE ON THE 1990 BALLOT (ASSEMBLY BILL 1312) TO PROVIDE GRANTS AND LONG- TERM LOANS TO PUBLIC ENTITIES DEVELOPING WATER RECLAMATION PROJECTS." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3906 was waived. The City Manager presented a brief explanation AB 1312, supported by the Orange County Sanitation Districts, and Councilmember Wilson, representative to the Sanitation Districts, reported this 1-8-90 measu~e would provide a long term, low interest loan program; and that-the District has a "2020 Vistonn plan to -tecycle"water:for:agriculture, irrigation, landscaping, etc., which allows preservation of potable water for residential:and:human consumption. Wilson moved, second by Hunt, to adopt Resolution Number 3906 as presented. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried I CONSENT'CALENDAR-~,ITEMS nK" throuqh "On Councilmember"Wilson requested Item nO" be removed from the Consent Calendar, and Mayor Grgas stated he would abstain from approving the December 11th minutes as he was absent from that-meeting. Wilson moved, second by Laszlo, to approve the recommended action for items on the Consent Calendar, except Item nO", as presented. K. Approved regular demands numbered 77184 -through 77533 in the amount of $1,504,516.66, payroll demands numbered 37936 thtough 38115 in the amount of $237,876.96, and payroll demands numbered 38116 thtough 38288 in the amount of $192,314.69 as approved by the Finance Committee, and authorized warrants to be drawn on the Treasury for same. L. Approved the minutes of the December 11, 1989 regular meeting. M. Approved the specifications and authorized the City Manager to advertise for bids for one-Public Works Department vehicle and one Lifeguard Department vehicle. I N. Bids'were received until 11:00 a.m., December 26, 1989 for Project Number 601, Replacement of Water Line in Anaheim Bay Bridge, at which time they were publicly .opened as follows: Drainage Construction Co., Inc. $85,670.00 Changing Times Enterprises,- Inc. T. A. Rivard, Inc. 94,710.00 98,440.00 Awarded'the'bid for Project Number 601 to Drainage Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $85,670.00 and authorized the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City. O. Denied the claim for damages of Marjorie Dryer_and referred same'to the City's liability attorney and adjuster. P. Authorized the City Manager to discontinue Community Development Block Grant Rehabilitation Contracts C2645l, year six, C40005, year nine, C40l27, year ten, C40270, year eleven, and C40527, year thirteen, with a total balance of $80,810, and requested the County ,to redirect $75,000 from Contract C26642, year seven, to a city-wide rehabilitation fund. I 1-8-90 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion carried I ITEMS REMOVED-FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM "a" - RESIGNATION - SEAL BEACH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AUTHORITY Councilmember Wilson aCknowledged the resignation of Mrs. Jean Henry from the Seal Beach Administration Building Authority representing District Two, commended her service to the community and requested that a letter-of appreciation be forwarded to Mrs. Henry. Wilson moved, second by Hunt, to accept the resignation of Mrs. Henry and that the position be declared vacant. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson - 'None Risner Motion carried I PROPOSED CH~~~R_~M~~MENT - CITY COUNCIL COMPENSATION Councilman Laszlo' spoke for taking action to adjust the compensation of the City Council. He pointed out that the Council, as provided by the Charter, receives $125 per month, and $30 per month as a member of the Redevelopment Agency, which is reimbursement for expenses. He noted that Seal Beach is the second lowest compensated city in Orange County and reported the compensation amounts received by Councils in the other cities. Councilman Laszlo pointed out the numerous hours spent by members of the Council considering City business, as well as participating in various activities, and described in some detail the various meetings of other organizations and agencies that are attended on behalf of the City's interests. He noted that the Charter was adopted in 1964 as was the level of compensation, and pointed out the increase in the cost of living since that time. Councilman Laszlo urged that a Charter amendment to increase Council compensation be considered for submittal to the voters. Councilmember Wilson stated a number of persons have mentioned that Council compensation should be increased, however voiced her preference that those persons serving on City boards and commissions receive some compensation. Councilman Hunt acknowledged Mr. Laszlo's request and the fact that the current compensation is consumed through everyday expenses, and stated that if submittal of the Charter amendment is approved, he would suggest an alternate amendment. He said he felt the major problem facing the nation is narcotics, the second being ethics in government. Councilman Hunt spoke for the increase of Council compensation to $300, however suggested that Councilmembers receive no further expenses and that Seal Beach elected officials not be allowed to receive any form of gratuity with a value greater than three dollars. He explained that the $300 would provide an amount equal to current compensation including expenses. Councilman Hunt said an additional element of his proposed amendment would be that a specific sum, possibly $1500, be allocated for any additional Council expenses, to be designated by the Mayor and agreed to by the Council in public session, explaining that otherwise the expenses of a councilmember would be paid from their regular-compensation. Mr. Hunt clarified that his proposal would not affect any compensation that may be received as a result of serving as a representative on outside boards or commissions, and stated his goal-to adopt a model code of ethics for Seal Beach. Councilman Laszlo took exception_to a'possible restriction:of councilmembers attendance at various meetings, and said that if there is to be a code of ethics I' 1-8-90 it should be focused on election campaigns and financing, possibly imposing a one thousand dollar limit. Discussion continued. The City Attorney advised that the direction of the discussion was outside the scope of the agenda item, however offered that a campaign limit could be looked. into with regard to any conflict with State law and whether such limitation'would be imposed by Charter or Ordinance. Councilmember Wilson expressed concern with eliminating the I reimbursement for expenses, yet acknowledged that costs " 1, associated with attending certain meetings are greater than others, however, she pointed out that if members of the Council do not attend the various meetings considerable information that would be of benefit. to the City would not be gained. Councilman Hunt stated his preference that the staff, rather than the Council, attend such meetings, and that he felt he could gain any pertinent information from the literature that is the result of those meetings. He added that he was merely asking that the public be allowed to vote on both issues being discussed. Councilman Laszlo argued in support of Council attendance at any meeting that may be determined of value to the City. Mayor Grgas stated he ~ould support a ballot measure to increase Council compensation from $125 to $300, noting his personal experience of expenses exceeding the monthly compensation to perform what is necessary on behalf of the City, and added that he felt most residents would support a reasonable increase. He aCknowledged that Seal Beach is one of the lowest compensated cities in Orange County, and pointed out that most cities simply use the formula established by State law as a compensation base, plus expenses. Mayor Grgas stated he felt the question of ethics is more in line with general revisions of the Charter which, I as it presently exists, is inadequate in terms.,of purpose and language that is consistent with State law and case law. He said he believed the Council has upheld ethical practices and that the State Fair Political Practices Act and election laws quite adequately regulate campaign contributions and activities, however offered that the City may wish to look at those issues more closely from a local standpoint as a separate issue from Council compensation. He pointed out that a certain amount of money is allocated each year for Council attendance at various conferences and meetings, yet it is up.to the individual member of the Council to determine whether they feel a certain meeting is worthwhile. Mayor Grgas again expressed his support for pursuing an incr~ase of Council compensation through a Charter amendment, stated. ethical standards could be looked at as a separate issue, that he felt the present regulations regarding travel. and training should remain as they exist, citing the importance for Council members to gain all available information and knowledge of the many complex issues facing government, keeping abreast of what is occurring at the State and county levels, and obtaining data regarding programs that could be of benefit to the City, and that he felt certain Charter revisions should be made however considered separately at a future meeting. He I indicated that if it is desired to consider additional language or an ordinance setting forth ethical standards for conduct in office and campaigns, he could support such ' action, and suggested that the City Manager provide the procedure for' moving towards further Charter revisio~s. Councilman Hunt acknowledged and accepted the Mayor's position regarding the value derived from councilmembers attending meetings and the current policy for reimbursement of ~xpenses, yet reiterated his desire for a Council . commitment that no outside gratuities be accepted. 1-8-90 I Discussion continued. Councilman Laszlo restated his request to submit a Charter amendment regarding Council compensation for'the June ballot, and asked that a cost of living adjustment every four years be added. The Assistant City Attorney advised that the measure as drafted provides for a compensation adjustment in accordance with the Government Code, allowing a five percent annual adjustment, approved by the Council, every two years. He explained that the Code does not allow automatic adjustment in general law cities. Mr. Barrow offered that. language could be developed to provide a cost of living index increase to be considered by the Council' for adoption every two years. The Assistant City Attorney stated' his preference that such language be prepared for review by the Council prior to final action. Councilman Laszlo moved to direct that the recommended language of the proposed Charter amendment be changed from a five percent adjustment to a cost of living index increase and that said amendment be placed on the June ballot. Mayor Grgas seconded the motion. Councilman Hunt was advised that there would be adequate time to propose an alternate measure for the June' ballot if he so desired. ; The Assistant City Attorney stated he would request the opportunity to review the language that may be proposed as' an alternative measure. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None . Risner Motion carried I The Mayor again mentioned the need for review of certain Charter provisions, however stated he did not feel the entire Charter should be considered for revision. He offered the option for the Council to review and recommend certain Charter changes or appointment of an advisory committee to review and make recommendations relating to specific areas of concern of the Council. He emphasized the importance of Charter language that is consistent with State and case law from a legal standpoint. In response to Councilman Laszlo, the Assistant City Attorney clarified that by the previous motion the Council had agreed to place a measure on the June ballot, the wording of which provides for $300 monthly Council compensation, reimbursement for expenses in the manner that is current policy, and revised language to provide for compensation adjustment based on the cost of living index, and explained that the revised text of the measure'will be presented to Council for final action at next meeting at which time the amendment may receive final approval by three affirmative votes. Mr. Barrow confirmed that an ethics' code could be adopted by ordinance and would not require a vote' of the people unless the Council chose to include same in the Charter. He explained the process for citizens to submit Charter amendments by initiative, as well as by a more lengthy. process through an elected Charter Commission. Councilman Hunt suggested that members of the Council compile a list of Charter provisions that are felt to be in need of revision, that they be submitted to the Council for consideration and recommendations to the City Attorney for draft language. The Mayor concurred, also suggesting a'work'session may be desirable within six to eight weeks. Councilman Laszlo spoke for a Charter Review Committee appointed by the Council to allow citizen input. In response to Mr. Laszlo, Councilman Hunt assured that his proposal for ethics standards were not related to Charter revisions and his understanding was that the only action at this meeting is to place the Council compensation measure on the June ballot, further amendments to be considered for a I 1-8-90 ,future ballot. The Mayor confirmed that to be correct unless Mr. Hunt were to propose an alternative amendment prior to the March 9th deadline to consolidate-the election. JULY 4th FIREWORKS The City Engineer noted the Council's conceptual approval of the Business Association's plan to provide a July 4th fireworks display, however reported the Business Association has since decided not to provide fireworks for that holiday, and are now'planning a parade and picnic. He advised that subsequent to the action of the Council the staff notified Los Alamitos.and Cypress that Seal Beach would not be participating in the tri-city fireworks in 1990. Mr. Jue stated the staff now recommends the City's participation in the tri-city event at an anticipated cost of not to exceed $4500, an amount:that would be included in the 1990-91 budget. With regard to the City's 75th birthday celebration, Mr. Jue reported the Business Association has not as yet determined the events that will take place, however stated he felt that if a fireworks display is planned the Association may request some financial assistance. Councilman Laszlo suggested the tri-city participation be limited to $3,000 and.~he remainder used for the birthday celebration. In response to Council, the City Manager advised that the only organization that has come forward with proposed 75th birthday plans to date is the Seal Beach Business Association. Mr. Laszlo suggested that a citizens committee be formed to plan the celebration with the Business Association, and that formation of such committee be scheduled for a future agenda. Councilmember Wilson expressed her feeling that consideration of participating in the tri-city fireworks display should be postponed until further information is forthcoming regarding the birthday celebration. Mayor Grgas stated he would support participating in some fireworks display, noting the enjoyment derived from the tri-city fireworks show in recent years and pointed' out that the birthday celebration will involve various activities over a period of months. ~ I I Hunt moved, second by Grgas, to continue consideration of participating in the July 4th fireworks program until the adjourned mid-year budget review meeting of January 9th. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Wilson None Risner Motion car r ied CITY COUNCIL ITEMS There'were nO'Counci.l items proposed for discussion. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Grgas declared Oral Communications open. Galen Ambrose, Wetlands Restoration Society, Seal Beach, stated he had been informed by the Administrator of the Golden Rain Foundation that he would not be allowed to campaign door-to- door in Leisure World, however he was told he could be invited to speak at various meetings, which he said was not (' what he wanted to do'as a candidate. He complained that certain members of the Council have not returned his telephone calls. Mr. Ambrose stated he was in possession of a copy of the Coastal Commission staff report recommending denial of the Mola development, that he was heartened by the report, and said that if the Commission supports the staff recommendation and if the City's General Plan is amended to what it was previously it will then be feasible for other agencies to participate and make it possible for Seal Beach to have beautiful wetlands. Ms. Carolyn Lindberg, 385 Mira Loma Place, Costa Mesa, said she could confirm that the Seal 1-8-90 I 1-9-90 I" Beach Police Dep~rtment is the focus of an investigation by the Orange County Grand Jury, reporting she is one of several that has testified. In response to Council, the City Manager advised he could not respond to the previous comments, however the City had been advised by a Grand Jury committee that they were inquiring into matters brought to them however there is no investigation. Mr. Bruce Stark, Seal Beach, made reference to the agenda item relating to State mandated recycling and litter reduction, suggesting that free enterprise be encouraged to make proposals to the City and that the program not be automatically turned over to the City's refuse contractor. He said he understood one proposal has been submitted for pickup of recyclable items at no cost to the citizens. Mr. Stark commended Mr. Hunt's proposal for'ethics standards, noted the inevitable loopholes to such proposals, and charged that the regulations of the Fair Political Practices Act have been ineffective. He predicted that if the two ballot measures proposed were approved they would then be declared in conflict with each other, and questioned if ethics extend to Leisure World'and'access by candidates to that area of the City. Mr. Charles Antos, 210 - 8th Street, spoke in favor of an ethics coder one that applies to elected and appointed officials, staff, police personnel at the level of sergeant and above,'and the City Attorney, and that there should be agreement prior'to adoption of such code that violations will be referred to and prosecuted by the District Attorney. There being no further comments, Mayor Grgas declared Oral Communications closed. .1 CLOSED SE~~lQ~ No Closed Session' was held. ADJOURNMENT It was the order of the Chair, with consent of the Council, to adjourn"the-meeting until'Tuesday, January 9th at 6:00 p.m. for a mid-year budget review. The meeting was adjourned at 9:27 p.m. '1 Attest: ,'Seal.Beach;.California January 9; 1990'"" The City Council of' the City of Seal Beach met in regular adjourned session at 6:00 p.m. with Mayor Grgas calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.