HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1988-10-03
10-3-88
Seal Beach, California
October 3, 1988
The city Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:00 o'clock p.m. with Mayor Hunt calling the
meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Hunt
Councilmembers Grgas, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
I
Absent:
None
Also present: Mr. Nelson, City Manager
Mr. Stepanicich, City Attorney
Mr. Jue, Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Mr. Archibold, Assistant to the City Manager
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
WAIVER OF FULL READING
Wilson moved, second by Laszlo, to waive the reading in full
of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent to the
waiver of reading shall be deemed to be given by all
Councilmembers after reading of the title unless specific
request is made at that time for the reading of such
ordinance or resolution.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
PROCLAMATION
Mayor Hunt pr,oclaimed October 9th through October 15th, 1988
as "Fire Prevention Week." Captain Johnson, Orange County I
Fire Department, reported the theme for 1988 is "A Sound You
Can Live With", emphasizing the use of fire detectors, and
advised that the Orange County Stations will be holding open
house for the benefit of the public on Saturday, October
15th.
AGENDA AMENDED
Councilman Grgas requested that appointments to boards and
commissions be considered early in the agenda, explaining
the necessity that he leave the meeting early. Wilson
moved, second by Grgas, to consider agenda item "M" out of
order at this time.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
APPOINTMENTS - BOARDS and COMMISSIONS
proiect Area Committee
Councilman Grgas moved to appoint Mr. Leonard Raif as the
resident member and Mr. Robert Herron as the business member
of the Project Area Committee representing District One for
the unexpired terms ending July 1989. Councilmember Wilson
seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
I
Risner moved, second by Grgas, to approve the appointment of
the Seal Beach Historical Society nominee, Mr. Joe Kalmick,
to the Project Area Committee for the unexpired term ending
July 1990.
10-3-88
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
Councilmember Risner moved to appoint Mr. John O'Neil as
resident member of the Project Area Committee representing
District Three for the unexpired term ending July 1989.
Councilman Grgas seconded the motion.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
Department of Water and Power Advisorv Committee
Councilmember Wilson moved to appoint Mrs. Allene Harding to
fill the vacancy on the Department-of Water and Power
Advisory Committee from District Two. Councilmember Risner
seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
PUBLIC HEARING/PROPOSED ORDINANCE 1276 - BUSINESS LICENSE
TAX
Risner moved, second by Wilson, to postpone the public
hearing-to consider revision of the business license tax
until the regular meeting of November 2lst.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
I
PROPOSED ORDINANCE - BEACH ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
Councilman Grgas requested that this item be held over to
allow an opportunity to discuss the regulations proposed
with the residents ,along Seal Way, and given the schedule of
business -that is forthcoming to the Council in upcoming
weeks, moved that this matter -be postponed until the first
meeting in January. Councilmember Risner seconded the
motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
RESOLUTION NUMBER 3815 - HONORING CASEY RUSSELL BOWEN -
EAGLE SCOUT AWARD
Resolution Number 3815 was presented to Council and read in
full by Councilman Laszlo entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HONORING AND
COMMENDING CASEY RUSSELL BOWEN FOR ACHIEVING THE BOY SCOUTS
OF AMERICA EAGLE AWARD." Laszlo moved, second by Wilson, to
adopt Resolution Number 3815 as presented.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
I
RESOLUTION NUMBER 3816 - HONORING MICHAEL SCOTT TORNOW -
EAGLE SCOUT AWARD
Resolution Number 3816 was presented to Council and read by
Councilman Laszlo entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HONORING AND
COMMENDING MICHAEL SCOTT TORNOW FOR ACHIEVING THE BOY SCOUTS
OF AMERICA EAGLE AWARD." Laszlo moved, second by Risner, to
adopt Resolution Number 3816 as presented.
AYES:
NOES:
Grgas, Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
Councilman Grgas excused himself from the meeting at 7:29
p.m.
10-3-88
RESOLUTION NUMBER 3817 - AD HOC TRAFFIC IMPACT COMMITTEE -
TIME EXTENSION - DECEMBER 13. 1988
Resolution Number 3817 was presented to Council entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE FORMATION OF THE AD HOC TRAFFIC
IMPACT COMMITTEE." By unanimous consent, full reading of
Resolution Number 3817 was waived. Risner moved, second by
Wilson, to adopt Resolution Number 3817.
Councilman Laszlo stated that since the Committee commenced
their meetings in August, there has only been slight
concurrence on goals and objectives given the different
views of the members of the Committee, and noted the recent
defeat of a motion-to adopt a minimum level of service "D-
for all of Seal Beach and inclusion of a comprehensive list
of problem intersections. He voiced objection to a recent
news article and comments of a Committee member in support
of past traffic mitigation measures, stating his feeling
that Seal Beach citizens believe there are traffic problems
that need to be dealt with, and suggested that possbily
there should be direction from the Council as to whether
developers should be required to pay for improvements to
meet a level of service "D" whether or not they are the
entire cause ,of the problem. Councilmember Risner noted her
understanding that comments had been made by members of the
Committee that past traffic mitigation had been based on
traffic impact studies and all legal methods of mitigation,
also that it had been suggested that developers could be
required to participate in a t~affic impact fee program that
would assist the City in solving problems that may not have
been identified by a traffic analysis. Mayor Hunt spoke in
support of the time extension, also voiced optimism
regarding the ultimate solutions that will be forthcoming
from the Committee, noting that the community does demand
sensible growth and traffic controls, the Committee's task
being to develop comprehensive, sensible, yet simple
guidelines that can be placed in appropriate legal format
while avoiding violation of individual and property rights,
and with no special interests. Mrs. Elizabeth Ellis, 213 -
13th Street, co-chairman of the Traffic Impact Committee,
spoke in support of the Committee's progress to date in
meeting their goals, and also for the requested time
extension. Mr. Laszlo stated he did not feel traffic
mitigation has been successful in the past, and that any
large development that has a traffic impact should be
required to mitigate to a level of service "D", mitigation
versus traffic fees being a controversy of the Committee,
and that he felt traffic fees may be appropriate in some
areas however not in others. He reported comments at the
last Committee meeting that Pacific Coast Highway should be
widened, mitigated, and paid for by the State, which would
tend to hinder reaction to needs of other areas in the City.
Councilmember Risner noted that the Council has taken a
position against widening of Pacific Coast Highway, and
Councilmember Wilson added her feeling that any solution of
traffic problems is going to requi~e the cooperation of
other cities with Seal Beach, noting also that legislation
is being proposed dealing with traffic problems. Discussion
continued and the members of the Council voiced their
support for the efforts of the Traffic Impact Committee.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None
Grgas Motion carried
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS "G" THROUGH "K"
The City Manager requested that Item "G" be removed from the
Consent Calendar. Wilson moved, second by Laszlo, to
I
I
I
10-3-88
approve the recommended action for items on the Consent
Calendar, except Item "G", as presented.
I
H. Approved the minutes of the regular meeting
of September 19, 1988.
I. Approved regular demands numbered 71850
through 72034 in the amount of $551,747.72,
and payroll demands numbered 32057 through
32253 in the amount of $194,291.50 as
approved by the Finance Committee, and
authorized warrants to be drawn on the
Treasury for same.
J. Authorized the advertisement for bids for
six replacement police vehicles as approved
in the 1988/89 budget.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
K. Authorized a time extension-until November 21,
1988 for submittal of the annual audit report
by Diehl, Evans & Company, as the result of
the transition from cash basis to accrual
basis accounting.
Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None
Grgas Motion carried
I
MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 6. 1988
The City-Manager corrected a statement under Oral
Communications to read "...the City could negotiate with
Hellman over a possible condemnation and reduction of their
capital gains tax...", Councilmember Risner revised a
statement under the 2020 Plan discussion to read "...if
there was an action the City could take, perhaps through
condemnation, to assist with the purchase of this land...by
the Ports", and Councilmember Wilson corrected a
typographical error to read "...cubic yards of dirt
removal." Wilson moved, second by Risner, to approve the
minutes of the September 6, 1988 meeting as corrected.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None
Grgas Motion carried
I
REQUEST - AD HOC TRAFFIC,COMMITTEE
Mayor Hunt noted the request of the Ad Hoc Traffic Committee
that the Council support by resolution, Senator Bergeson's
proposal to form a committee to explore regional solutions
to traffic problems and regional coordination of land use
decisions to assist in such solutions. The City Manager
reported staff has had contact with the Senator's office and
it was suggested that -the Council may wish to postpone any
action at this time pending receipt of information as to the
appointments to and responsibilities of the committee.
Councilmember Risner pointed out that to date the appointed
members are mostly representative of central and south
rather than west Orange County, stating she felt there
should be League and city representatives on the Committee,
with equal representation between the Supervisorial
Districts. Risner moved, second by Wilson, that a letter be
forwarded to Senator Bergeson commending her efforts toward
the formation of such a committee, however expressing the
City's concerns with regard to representative membership on
that committee.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None
Grgas Motion carried
10-3-88
Mayor Hunt suggested that the City Manager bring the
previous item back to the Council for consideration at such
time as it is deemed appropriate.
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
It was the consensus of the Council that only those items
relating to the Mola development be placed on the November
7th Council agenda, unless an item is determined to require
immediate attention, as requested by Mrs. Risner. I
Councilmember Risner asked that information she has
accumulated relating to golf courses in Orange County with
regard to nine-hole, eighteen-hole, public, private,
yardage, acreage, etc. be provided to each member of the
Council, also that the Council receive copies of letters
from Mr. Lee Risner that were submitted to the Project Area
Committee and Planning Commission-regarding the Mola
project. Councilmember Risner asked that the Council
consider establishing guidelines for the conduct of the
November 7th meeting relating to-the Mola development
proposal, a reasonable time limit for the presentation by
the developer, possibly five minutes for individual members
of the audience and twenty minutes for group presentations,
with no decisions made afte~ midnight. The Mayor suggested
that the City Manager, in conjunction with the City
Attorney, establish a schedule for that meeting.
At the request of Council, the Mayor declared a recess at
8:11 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:19 p.m. with Mayor
Hunt calling the meeting to order.
Noting the interest in the proposed project, Councilman
Laszlo expressed support for as much citizen input as
possible,-within reasonable limits. Councilmember Wilson I
pointed out that during the Planning Commission
deliberations the developer had appropriately been allowed
to respond to questions of the Commission and public. She
also expressed her desire that members of the Traffic
Committee be referred to as such rather than pro-development
or pro-citizen members. Councilmember Risner again spoke
regarding the format for the November 7th meeting,
suggesting five minutes for individual presentations, twenty
minutes for a group, possibly an hour for the developer's
presentation, with developer responses allowed to Council
questions, that no new information be allowed after the
public hearing is closed, and questioned how the public can
comment on new information that is presented after the close
of a hearing as had occurred at the Planning Commission.
The City Attorney responded that when conditions are being
revised during deliberations, an issue is always whether or
not a developer is willing to agree to those conditions,
thus it would be necessary for the developer to respond. He
reported that during the planning Commission consideration
of the project the developer did respond to questions of the
Commission for technical clarification and whether revision
of certain conditions were acceptable. He added that the
public will have an opportunity to comment at the City
Council hearing on the 6.8 acres proposed at the Commission
meeting for Gum Grove park, the final decision as to the I
location of that acreage would be at the discretion of the
Council. Mr. Stepanicich explained that constitutionally in
California a developer has the right of final testimony or
response in this type of matter, however it is preferable
that questions be directed during the course of the hearing.
Discussion continued. Mayor Hunt pointed out that if
guidelines are established for the subject hearings, the
number of hours to be devoted for that purpose should be the
first consideration, that any limitations should apply to
the public as well as the Council, stating he would support
10-3-88
a four minute comment period as the Planning Commission had.
Councilmember Wilson added that she felt a restriction on
repeated comments and information would be equally as
important as a time limit.
Risner moved, second by Laszlo, to establish five minutes as
the period of time for public comments.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Laszlo, Risner
Hunt, Wilson
Grgas
Motion failed
To expedite the discussion, Councilman Laszlo moved to
establish a four minute limit on public testimony, with the
assumption that a final decision on this matter will not be
made until the November 7th meeting with Councilman Grgas
present. Mayor Hunt seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Hunt, Wilson
Laszlo, Risner
Grgas
Motion failed
I
Laszlo moved, second by Risner, that the meetings to
consider the Mola Development proposal be concluded sometime
between the hour of 11:00 p.m. and midnight, at the
discretion of the Mayor. Mayor Hunt again stated that if
such time restraints are adopted, the Council must likewise
adhere to such limitations, however it is quite possible
that the issues can be dealt with in a timely manner without
specific limits, ,and pointed out that if deliberations and
decisions are not concluded within the legal time frame, and
should the developer not choose to agree to a time
extension, the development would be deemed to receive
automatic approval by the absence of a final action.
Discussion continued. Councilman Laszlo indicated his
desire to withdraw the motion, and stated if the upcoming
meetings appr;oach midnight, he would be supportive of a
motion to adjourn. Councilmember Risner voiced support for
the motion and a vote thereon, with Mr. Laszlo's agreement.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
Hunt
Grgas
Motion carried
With regard to moving the hearings relating to the Mola
development proposal to McGaugh School, it was confirmed
that a conflict exists for the use of those facilities,
therefore the meetings would be held at Council Chambers.
I
Councilmember Risner reported that the Gum Grove Park group
had submitted a request to the Harbors, Beaches and parks
Commission to set aside an amount not to exceed $200,000 for
improvements in Gum Grove Park if the 10.5 acres become
available to the City, and advised that the motion
unanimously approved by the Commission was that they would
favorably consider the request, asked that the Commission
staff be kept apprised of the progress towards obtaining
this property, thereafter the staff would make
recommendations to the Commission for consideration. Mrs.
Risner also reported there are undesignated monies in
Supervisor Wieder's Urban Park Fund, and suggested that the
Supervisor be requested to set aside some of those monies
for urban park projects in Seal Beach. Councilmember Risner
spoke of the monies that would be forthcoming to the City
over a number of years should the Mola project be approved,
particularly through tax increment and Quimby fees, and
stated that based upon inquiries she has received, she felt
that the public should be informed as to how it may be
10-3-88
perceived that those monies will be spent and where. Mrs.
Risner referred to her support over the years for park
related issues by other members of the Council in other
areas of the community, and expressed her disappointment
that that support is not being reciprocated of her request
for retaining Gum Grove park, the only park in her area
which provides neighborhood as well as community benefit,
and requested that the Council consider what could be
accomplished in that area with minimal funds.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Hunt declared Oral Communications open. Mr. Galen
Ambrose, 613 Seabreeze Drive, asked that his remarks be made
part of the record and provided the Council at the next
meeting. Mr. Ambrose took exception to the procedures of
the Planning Commission in allowing Mr. Kirk Evans to speak
after the close of the public hearing, stated he hoped the
Council would not allow the Tract Map to vest by default,
and expressed his view that seeking monies for the Park
would not be of significance since the Redevelopment Plan is
amended each time a development is proposed. Mr. Ambrose
inquired if any information had been provided relating to
the Gion Dietz decision in relation to the Hellman property
and Gum Grove Park. The City Attorney responded that a
number of questions had been addressed in a recent report to
the Council, that the Gion Dietz case had not been
addressed, however would be if the Council so desired.
Councilmember Risner recalled that the request for
interpretation of the Gion case had been made through
Assistant City Attorney Ennes. Mr. Ambrose expressed his
opinion that the Environmental Impact ' Report should be
redone due to the major changes that will effect the
project, the wetlands issue, the pesticides, and amount of
water that will be used to maintain the golf course, etc.,
stating the EIR is not in compliance with CEQA, and,that it
does not address the traffic impact at the 405 Freeway and
Seal Beach Boulevard. Mr. Ambrose took exception to the
$20,000 expenditure to obtain a fiscal impact report on the
development, stating such report should have been part of
the EIR, paid for by the developer. Mr. Ambrose noted that
over three hundred persons have attended recent meetings in
opposition to the project as it currently exists, and stated
the Gum Grove Park and Wetlands Society is trying to do
anything possible to stop the project as it is not felt to
be in the best interest of the people. Mr. Ambrose referred
to a Los Angeles Times ar;ticle, which he later read in part,
regarding the loss of wetlands, in which he reported it was
stated that the State and Federal government does not look
over the public interest in that regard as has been stated
at recent City meetings, therefore it becomes the
responsibility of the City. He also-expressed his feeling
that any misinformation being circulated has been done by
the Planning Commission and City Council, not the Wetlands
group. Mr. Ambrose read various provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act specifically relating
to maintenance of high quality ecological systems, natural
resources, and the environment, which he stated their group
believes this project violates. Mr. Ambrose asked that the
Council look further into his concerns, consider the funding
sources that he had previously submitted with the
understanding that the land will need to be purchased in
order to remove this property from development, and with the
belief that a nature park and wetlands area ,Js of more
benefit to the citizens tba~,,~ondominium~, ~oise and a
stressful atmosphere. Mr. Ambrose aadea that, he would
support a limit on the length of upcoming"meetihgs, and that
he felt the development firm would agree to additional
sessions. Mr. Larry Wheeler, 142 - lIth Street, reported
I
I
I
I
I
I
10-3-88
attending the Planning Commission meetings regarding the
development proposed and expressed his feeling that the
Commission did not listen to the public input, and that his
neighbors do not want the Mola plan, the condominiums, the
congestion, the parking problems, nor a pitch and putt golf
course. Mr. Wheeler asked that this plan be given further
consideration, that public input not be limited, and that
the Council listen to citizen concerns. Mr. Mark Riley, 715
Carmel Avenue, agreed with the remarks of the previous
spea~er, and referred to comments earlier in the meeting
regarding traffic concerns in Orange County, then questioned
why consideration is being given to allowing the Mola
development that will bring more people to Seal Beach. Mr.
Ambrose again addressed the Council, requesting that the
Wetlands Restoration group be allowed to make a twenty
minute slide or video presentation during the Mola hearings.
Discussion continued regarding the request. Risner moved,
second by Laszlo, to allow the presentation by the Gum Grove
and Wetlands Restoration group at some time during the Mola
development public hearings.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Laszlo, Risner
Hunt, Wilson
Grgas
Motion failed
The City Attorney advised that the request of the group
could be consideIed at the time of-the public hearing.
There being no further comments, Mayor Hunt declared Oral
Communications closed.
CLOSED SESSION
The City Attorney announced the Council would meet in Closed
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to
discuss a claim of Walter Miller pending before the City and
the legal action of the Coastal Commission versus Surfs ide
Colony Homeowners Association and the City of Seal Beach
pending in the Orange county Superior Court. By unanimous
consent, the Council adjourned to Closed Session at 9:25
p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:40 p.m. with Mayor Hunt
calling the meeting to order, and the City Attorney
reporting the Council had discussed the matters previously
announced.
Councilmember Risner asked if the Surfs ide Redevelopment
Project Area would be dissolved if the Surfside debt no
longer exists. The City Attorney responded that the
question would be looked into.
ADJOURNMENT
Wilson moved, second by Laszlo, to adjourn the meeting at
9:42 p.m.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Hunt, Laszlo, Risner, Wilson
None
Grgas Motion carried
of the
Attest: '
Approved: