Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2005-04-11 #I 153 16 6 )311 ' 2 6-0_ . AGENDA REPORT 9. riA kud 4 u DATE: April 11, 2005 V 3jjP' -7 L � TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: John B. Bahorski, City Manager FROM: June Yotsuya, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION OF AB 991 - (DEVORE) THAT WOULD ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF EACH CITY IN THE ORANGE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT TO APPOINT A MEMBER OF ITS CITY COUNCIL TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SUMMARY OF REQUEST: City Council is requested to adopt a resolution opposing AB 991 (Devore) that would eliminate City Council authority to appoint a member to the Board of Trustees of the Orange County Vector Control District. DISCUSSION: At the last City Council meeting, Council Member Mike Levitt requested that the City consider opposition to Assembly Bill 991. As the City's appointment to the Orange County Vector Control District's Board of Trustees, he expressed concern regarding the bill's intent to reduce the Board of Trustees to as low as seven members. The Orange County Vector Control District plays a vital role in abating mosquito and pests that can potentially expose our community to serious diseases. Eliminating City Council authority to appoint a member to the Board of Trustees would directly affect our ability to have a voice in such important decisions regarding the health and safety of our residents and property owners. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No projected direct fiscal impact to cities. Agenda Item T April 11, 2005 City Council Agenda Report- Opposition to AB 991 re: eliminating City Council appointment to Orange County Vector Control District Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: City Council to consider the adoption of Resolution No. opposing AB 991 that would eliminate the ability of each city in the Orange County Vector Control District to appoint a member of its City Council to the Board of Trustees. Submitted by: Olt " , .. a lhik, ii , J fee Yots , a, Assi ant City Manager • , NOTE P ' ND APP' +'ED: J. :. Bahorski, City Manager Attachment: Copy of AB 991 amendments Assemblyman Devore's Letter Resolution Opposing AB991 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 29, 2005 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE - 2005 -06 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 991 Introduced by Assembly Member DeVore February 22, 2005 An act to amcnd Scctions 2021 and 2022 of add Section 2025.5 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to public health. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 991, as amended, DeVore. Mosquito abatement and vector control districts. Existing law provides for the formation of mosquito abatement and vector control districts, provides for the appointment of a board of trustees of at least 5 members, and sets forth their powers and duties. Existing law requires appointment of the members by the county board of supervisors and the city council. This bill would : : members, notwithstanding these provisions, require the board of trustees for the district in the County of Orange to have 7 members, 2 selected by the board of supervisors, and 5 selected by a committee of the board from representatives of the various cities within the territory of the district. This bill would make certain findings and declarations regarding the inapplicability of a general statute within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State - mandated local program: no. 98 AB 991 —2 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Scction 2021 of thc IIcalth and Safcty Codc is 2 amended-to-reach 3 SECTION. 1 Section 2025.5 is added to the Health and Safety 4 Code, to read: 5 2025.5. Notwithstanding, any provision of law to the 6 contrary, in the County of Orange, the district board of trustees 7 shall be composed of seven members selected as follows: 8 (a) Two members appointed by the board of supervisors. 9 (b) Five members appointed by the City Selection Committee 10 of the board from representatives of the various cities within the 11 territory of the district. The committee shall ensure that as the 12 terms expire for these members, new appointments alternate in a 13 manner that ensures that representatives of each of the various 14 cities have an opportunity to participate. 15 SEC. 2. Due to the unique circumstances concerning the 16 mosquito abatement and vector control district in the County of 17 Orange, it is necessary that membership of the board of trustees 18 be considered separately, and the Legislature finds and declares 19 that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the 20 meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California 21 Constitution. 22 ' :: • ; . 24 • . : - - - • - ; • ; •••. • 25 • • • • • - • ; , . . ; . : : • -: - • 26 • . • • :::, • , 27 (b) In thc casc of a district that is locatcd cntircly within a 28 - • _- •• ::: • -: - • • ::• 29 30 (c) In thc casc of a district that contains tcrritory in morc than 31 - - : . : : : .. - .. - • • - : • ... • • • : ::• ' 32 :-- :::,:: : , : : ::: - -. 33 • - . ::: : V 34 35 . : : ' : - . - - - - - - - : , - .: ::,:: -. - - - i .- - - - - -. - . 36 . . -- . ; . • - 37 _n __ 98 -3 — AB 991 1 • . • • • :1141/ : : ::, :: - .. - . • • 2 :- -. .. ::, :. • :.. 3 , • . -- : • .: • , - • - -- 4 5 (b) 6 - - - • _ - •-, - : - :..• '- -. • • 7 1/::,:- • - - - . - .- • - :: -:. -. ': - g ;--•• • - - 9 - - - - - . - - - , -- • ,- :- 13 . .. ; •-• • ; 1/14 .1:: •.- • 14 - - - -. - • - . 1/1/:' • - - - 0 98 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE - 2005 -06 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 991 Introduced by Assembly Member DeVore February 22, 2005 An act to amend Sections 2021 and 2022 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to public health. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 991, as introduced, DeVore. Mosquito abatement and vector control districts. Existing law provides for the formation of mosquito abatement and vector control districts, provides for the appointment of a board of trustees of at least 5 members, and sets forth their powers and duties. Existing law requires appointment of the members by the county board of supervisors and the city council. This bill would delete the authority of the city council to appoint members. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State - mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 2021 of the Health and Safety Code is 2 amended to read: 3 2021. Within 30 days after the effective date of the formation 4 of a district, a board of trustees shall be appointed as follows: 5 (a) In the case of a district that contains only unincorporated 6 territory in a single county, the board of supervisors shall appoint 7 five persons to the board of trustees. 99 AB 991 -2- 1 (b) In the case of a district that is located entirely within a 2 single county and contains both incorporatcd tcrritory and 3 •,; - ... - ; -_ • -- :: :: • . • 4 : - •- • ::: .: . • :. - . 6 : - - : - - - : - • , - - ••• : : : ; : : : : - 7 .: ::, -:: - -- - -- - - -- . - - , --- ,theboard 8 of supervisors shall appoint - - :.: - • • : - ; : - - - - - : - - • - a 9 board of trustees of five members. 10 (c) In the case of a district that contains 11 territory in more than one county, the board of supervisors of 12 each county may appoint one person to the board of trustees. If 13 those appointments result in a board of trustees with less than 14 five persons, the board of supervisors of the principal county 15 shall appoint enough additional persons to make a board of 16 trustees of five members. 17 (d) In thc casc of a district that is locatcd in two or more 18 L.ountics and contains both incorporatcd tcrritory and 19 • • - ::: • :: :.:: • • • •• 20 -. ••••• • • : - ::.: • 21 council of cach city that is locatcd in wholc or part within thc 22 • • ::: :' : • • : : : :, :: :. ; - 23 ::::'- - - - - -, • - - - • • , -- : :: • : 24 . -: - . -- , • - -•:- :. - . ::: :• 25 :: • ': • • • • :::: :: • • ; 26 SEC. 2. Section 2022 of the Health and Safety Code is 27 amended to read: 28 2022. (a) Each person appointed by a board of supervisors to 29 be a member of a board of trustees shall be a voter in that county 30 and a resident of that portion of the county that is within the 31 district. 32 (b) • • • ••••• • •' • • • • • • 33 . : : : - : : , , : - , .; ,, ., 35 -.. -- . - . • : -- : ;. : . . - 36 - : - - - -; .:: • , • : -- ,; 37 incompatiblc officcs, a mcmbcr of a city council may be • : • ::: • • • 39 : ; ::: :: : .. ; • 40 chaptcr. 99 — 3 — AB 991 1 (d)—It is the intent of the Legislature that persons appointed to 2 boards of trustees have experience, training, and education in 3 fields that will assist in the governance of the districts. 4 (e- 5 (c) All trustees shall exercise their independent judgment on 6 behalf of the interests of the residents, property owners, and the 7 public as a whole in furthering the purposes and intent of this 8 chapter. The trustees shall represent the interests of the public as 9 a whole and not solely the interests of the board of supervisors or 10 the city council that appointed them. 0 99 03/17/2005 12:41 FAX 916 319 2170 CHUCK DEVORE 4J 001 • STATE CAPITOL P.O. 80X 942849 y 1 SACRAMENTO. CA 94249-0070 (91S) 319.2070 xCYfnrn � Ixfurle k .. A4 o DISTRICT OFFICE 1 "'! '', , >e JAMBOREE CENTER • 3 PARK PLAZA. SUITE 275 ( D EVOIiE' IRVINE, CA 92614 1 • ,,, IC (949) 863.7070 ASSEMBLYMEMeER;SEVENTIETH 0.1SiRICT E '' t I:II't ossemblymemberdevore@assembly.ca.gov 17 March 2005 The ilonorablc City Councilmember Ray Ybaben 211 8 Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Dear City Councilmember Ybaben, I have recently introduced AB 991, legislation that would reduce the Orange County Vector Control Board from its current 35 board members to seven board members. In Orange County, our Vector Control District has responsibility for controlling pests such as mosquitoes and red fire ants. The problem is that the oversight body for the district has grown so large that it imperils the effective management of the district. There are 35 board members overseeing 50 fulltime employees. Imagine if you needed 18 votes to change policy in your city. • The current version of AB 991 will allow the Board of Supervisors to have two appointments to the Vector Control Board, and the city selection committee to appoint five members. This apportioned among the supervisorial districts. As the lead donor county in the lead donor state, it is incumbent on us to offer ourselves as an example of government reform and efficiency. I trust you may find AB 991 worthy of your support. A he best, CHUCK DEVORE Assemblyman, Seventieth District CC: Councilrnernber Levitt Councilmember Antos Councilmember Yost Councilmember Larson Printed on Recycled Paper MAR -17 -2005 12:55 916 319 2170 96> P.01 k 'f , M /-,;:,-,L- n { ,-a ♦ rt. fi r:' a „- r ter, : , f 0 B f r � ea k > ;� ' y 1 t F • A. = c s b ° :! C1TX. HALL :? I 1 ETGHTH,STREET; SEAL 13EACH CALM ORNIA 907Q ,t . _ _- -1. , 1, q ), -);431 --- x,, w",\\ u seal beach ca u s ' 'a _i4= .,. .� 14i7 . .. R .E'' ' it '.... U �`4 r e 6 ;:at V T . '= • • 5k , $Q * A s• � z " P. ' x'd% ` 62?PW W Y'r.4i -v-._ _r` ai - .?-.61 . e ' ,.... ��.#.' . �' •- . . _ . • 5.; _ _sr. `.1.". ..4. = .," ; .c. April 11, 2005 The Honorable Tom Harmon State Assembly, District 67 . State Capitol, Room 5158 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblyman Harmon, Assembly Bill 991 (Devore) is currently in the Assembly Committee on Local Government for review. The City of Seal Beach opposes the bill as drafted and amended. This bill specifically targets the structure of the Orange County Vector Control District by severely reducing appointments to the Board of Trustees. Presently, all the Orange County cities have an equal voice in the decision making process of the District. Our city actively participates in all board decisions through our appointed City Council representative. This is very important to a small community such as ours. This bill would eliminate our city's ability to be directly involved in the decision making process on health and safety issues that concern our residents such as the West Nile Virus and the Red Fire Ant infestation. These and other important vector control issues should not be decided by only a handful of city representatives. Orange County is a diverse region with highly urbanized areas as well as rural and coastal communities. The present composition of the Board insures that the different needs of the region are adequately addressed. The City of Seal Beach respectfully requests that you oppose Assembly Bill 991 if passed through committee. Sincerely, 7 Paul Y Mayor cc: City Council Orange County Vector Control District (" ' F r Afi Z s. r -. t : - £'- .v t y."- ? v ,F + k. r x.'t . 1�.� k ' $ V . a ` ,..f.,-4:,--k.: d a "' :4 "-,V:.-7-, *` i :, :f, H-... I'! ' _ RPOR < q� 4 ° i' if r : �I � .:� �T c .. "tR ;_1 f i T r h kt, } ' � h :� � * 1 5 to I 5, t C Fq ,, , 9'`' �O t SK ` yi t , i , ' ' ' VOUNT`l -R `� ' ,:. 4. ;. - C 1TY NAT i 21 1 OIGHTH STREET f + N 4 S> AL B AC1 . CALIFORNIA 90740 ;�• ,`. ' ■ • - ,. .�s _ rk � s t `s .�� f ,.-� .'.. r g?tx� T -,'',,-x, t � x �?"t ° ;,.;,, r. k - ,. , .}w °. A ,562) ,4 -2527,1' w1,1\ .ciseal c ,. _ :'Z • °� •...::".:g-1.1.;:::2N; . £ .. ° fi g-- ' 'X- `e ••• «fr."a_.' w a,s�[' o:a} v p ,av� � . :+° r .$. a_,.� f . `'c � � . -. !.,:?. :.-��: �v.f t yX <'"Fi � _l -l� .S .1 `� 'S f ' .9 , 3 T _ - F `^. iff. s.. e S� i.` - "E . ' ... ^!495 .s �.f� ��� ' �-�� � : .c.'s i� .a�'s�_.;:i.;'r.. . ��=a:• •�ww- ` ?Q"t;T?'� -e -'�a� -" _ =:... .4h: :d• . ^ -`,•- t-'isr�•- April 11, 2005 The Honorable John Campbell State Senator, District 35 State Capitol, Room 3056 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Campbell, Assembly Bill 991 (Devore) is currently in the Assembly Committee on Local Government for review. The City of Seal Beach opposes the bill as drafted and amended. This bill specifically targets the structure of the Orange County Vector Control District by severely reducing appointments to the Board of Trustees. Presently, all the Orange County cities have an equal voice in the decision making process of the District. Our city actively participates in all board decisions through our appointed City Council representative. This is very important to a small community such as ours. This bill would eliminate our city's ability to be directly involved in the decision making process on health and safety issues that concern our residents such as the West Nile Virus and the Red Fire Ant infestation. These and other important vector control issues should not be decided by only a handful of city representatives. Orange County is a diverse region with highly urbanized areas as well as rural and coastal communities. The present composition of the Board insures that the different needs of the region are adequately addressed. The City of Seal Beach respectfully requests that you oppose Assembly Bill 991 if passed through the Assembly. Sincerely, -- PC(..19 --- Paul Yost Mayor cc: City Council Orange County Vector Control District RESOLUTION NUMBER J d ) S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL'S OPPOSITION TO ASSEMBLY BILL 991 (DEVORE) THAT IS SPECIFIC TO THE ORANGE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT AND WOULD ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF EACH CITY IN THE DISTRICT TO HAVE DIRECT REPRESENTATION ON THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES WHEREAS, existing law provides for the formation of mosquito abatement and vector control districts and provides for the appointment of a board of trustees of at least five members: and WHEREAS, existing law requires that the appointment of the members of the respective district board of trustees be made by the county board of supervisors and the city council of each city located within the district; and WHEREAS, these trustees are empowered to make decisions on the health and safety welfare of residents, property owners and public served by the district regarding the abatement and control of mosquitoes and other pests; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 991 specifically targets the Orange County Vector Control District; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 991 would reduce the Orange County Vector Control District Board of Trustees to seven members, two selected by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and five from a city selection committee, thus eliminating a member of the Board from each city within the District; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 991 would eliminate the City of Seal Beach's ability to directly appoint a member of its City Council to the Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 991 would eliminate our city's ability to be directly involved in the decision making process on health and safety issues that concern our residents such as West Nile Virus and Red Fire Ant infestation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH HEREBY OPPOSES ASSEMBLY BILL 991 AND URGES ITS CALIFORNIA LEGISLATORS TO OPPOSE ASSEMBLY BILL 991. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Seal Beach on I / 4 day of , 2005 by the following vote: , ¢ AYES: Councilmembers p i}1 Q 2-ia -I ,� t{ ) vairm, !I NOES: Councilmembers 1 1 :1,b ABSENT: Councilmembers 7 C° "" May ATTEST: d City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF SEAL BEACH I, Linda Devine, City Clerk of Seal Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is the original copy of Resolution Number ° 5.3J on file in the office of the City Clerk, passed, approved, and adopted by the Cit Council of the City of Seal Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1/ ` day of , 2005. it Clerk