Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGMT - Griffin Structures Inc. (2010 Facility Condition Assessment) • • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE 2010 BUILDING /FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT between po City of Seal Beach 211 - 8th Street Seal Beach, CA 90740 Griffin Structures, Inc. 385 Second Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 This Professional Service Agreement ( "the Agreement ") is made as of July 12, 2010 (the "Effective Date "), by and between Griffin Structures, Inc. ("Consultant ") and the City of Seal Beach ( "City "), a California charter city, (collectively, "the Parties "). 1 of 9 87296- 0001 \1239878v1.doc RECITALS A. City desires building /facility assessment professional services. B. Consultant represents that it is qualified and able to provide City with such services. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties' performance of the promises, covenants, and conditions stated herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows. AGREEMENT 1.0 Scope of Services 1.1. Consultant shall provide those certain building /facility assessment services ( "Services ") set forth in the proposal dated May 11, 2010 ( "Proposal "), attached hereto as Exhibit A. To the extent that there is any conflict between Exhibit A and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. Consultant shall assess the city building and facilities listed on Appendix I to the Proposal. 1.2. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in accordance with the standard of care generally exercised by like professionals under similar circumstances and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to City. 1.3. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. 1.4. Consultant will not be compensated for any work performed not specified in the Scope of Services unless the City authorizes such work in advance and in writing. The City Manager may authorize payment for such work up to a cumulative maximum of $10,000. Payment for additional work in excess of $10,000 requires prior City Council authorization. 2.0 Term This term of this Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue for a term of six months unless previously terminated as provided by this Agreement. 3.0 Consultant's Compensation City will pay Consultant in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B for Services but in no event will the City pay more than $92,500. Any additional work authorized by the City pursuant to Section 1.4 will be compensated in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B. 2 of 9 87296- 0001\12398760.doc 4.0 Method of Payment 4.1. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such invoices shall be submitted within 15 days of the end of the month during which the services were rendered and shall describe in detail the services rendered during the period, the days worked, number of hours worked, the hourly rates charged, and the services performed for each day in the period. City will pay Consultant within 30 days of receiving Consultant's invoice. City will not withhold any applicable federal or state payroll and other required taxes, or other authorized deductions from payments made to Consultant. 4.2. Upon 24 -hour notice from City, Consultant shall allow City or City's agents or representatives to inspect at Consultant's offices during reasonable business hours all records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant in connection with this Agreement. City's rights under this Section 4.2 shall survive for two years following the termination of this Agreement. 5.0 Termination 5.1. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, or by Consultant based on reasonable cause, upon giving the other party written notice thereof not less than 30 days prior to the date of termination. 5.2. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon 10 days' notice to Consultant if Consultant fails to provide satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement of comprehensive general liability insurance as required by this Agreement at least 20 days before the expiration date of the previous policy. 6.0 Party Representatives 6.1. The City Manager is the City's representative for purposes of this Agreement. 6.2. Roger Torriero is the Consultant's primary representative for purposes of this Agreement. 7.0 Notices 7.1. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed 48 hours after deposit in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the following addresses: To City: City of Seal Beach 211 -8th Street Seal Beach, California 90740 Attn: City Manager 3 of 9 87296.0001 \12398780.doc • To Consultant: Griffin Structures, Inc. 385 Second Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Attn: Roger Torriero Telephone: (949) 497 -9000 Fax: (949) 497 -8883 7.2. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 8.0 Independent Contractor 8.1. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. All services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the services. Any additional personnel performing services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 8.2. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant's personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 9.0 Subcontractors No portion of this Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant is fully responsible to City for the performance of any and all subcontractors. 10.0 Assignment Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of City. Any purported assignment without such consent shall be void and without effect. 4 of 9 S7296- 0001 \1239878v1.doc • • 11.0 Insurance 11.1. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that Consultant has secured all insurance required under this Section. Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by the City if requested. All certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 11.2. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the City. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and, if required by the City, (3) Professional Liability: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and if Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either: the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) Professional Liability: $1,000;000 per claim /aggregate. 11.3. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved by the City to state: (1) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City; (2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its directors, officials, officers, (3) coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage and that any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it; (4) for general liability insurance, that the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the services or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (5) for automobile liability, that the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be 5of9 87296- 0001\1239878v1.doc • • covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible. 11.4. All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions and shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. 11.5. Any deductibles or,self-insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City. Consultant guarantees that, at the option of the City, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 12.0 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials (collectively "Indemnities ") free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any acts or omissions of Consultant, its employees, or its agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. With respect to any and all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Indemnitees, Consultant shall defend Indemnitees, at Consultant's own cost, expense, and risk, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award, or decree that may be rendered against Indemnitees. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and /or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. All duties of Consultant under this Section shall survive termination of this Agreement. 13.0 Equal Opportunity Consultant affirmatively represents that it is an equal opportunity employer. Consultant shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, or age. Such non - discrimination includes, but is not limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 6 of 9 87296 - 0001 \1239878v1.doc • • 14.0 Labor Certification By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 15.0 Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 16.0 Severability The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement. 17.0 Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 18.0 No Third Party Rights No third party shall be deemed to have any rights hereunder against either party as a result of this Agreement. 19.0 Waiver No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a party shall give the other party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 20.0 Prohibited Interests; Conflict of Interest 20.1. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code § §1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 7 of 9 87296- 0001 \1239878v1.doc it • • 20.2. Consultant further warrants and maintains that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Nor has Consultant paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 20.3. Consultant warrants and maintains that it has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable Taws as described in this subsection. 21.0 Attorneys' Fees If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party all of its attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in connection therewith. 22.0 Exhibits All exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as if set forth in full herein. In the event of any material discrepancy between the terms of any exhibit so incorporated and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control. 23.0 Corporate Authority The person executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Party and that by his or her execution, the Consultant is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 8of9 87296- 0001 \1239878v1.doc • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, through their respective authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF SEAL BEACH CONSULTANT B �'� B David Carmany, City Manager Name: p,0564 c a o Attest: Its: C G O By: 4kt.a.ii, 4)li/k/ Linda Devine, City Clerk By: , d i cry P e— Approved as to Form: Name: , fatly /e Its. evp By: j b 0u ' inn Barrow, City Attorney 9 of 9 87296- 0001 \12398780.doc • • EXIBIT A Proposal • ,ham �^..}-"i •..�'�• r� L .__,1��1� -� +. 111 ' 1}. E.'z • - 1:. s,, ,� .r !�i '11111 • •. . _.1. j- ". ' '. • . 111-14 !.. 7—'r-"It-:*.,0- '.'1'. '': t'±)r,.,,),s, '\ .„ ..- ' A„ .., ,,,,, Y Sy” ( !t . ;Z. 1F 1t. s F 7 J K fir, _ >a' iSt �� I a' • ; _ •:{ I " i� 1r, 14 '''t7:.� �tiS t�111 t:, t K� [` {`'�z E I S t ' .� '1� 1 ,Ka � � r � t ` / , \,;\,.; I 11�• r.++y tS � )} 1 � f 7 t 1 s. s , 01111•/,'.. f ftff j'- f'r i -` � 1,.-I�. �g�i Yes �4� 4� {Jt!/. `I E f ?` 1 �ri1} L" ' f ..,r I t S I 111';t�l f/ j 7-.r,j,S ''Yl.t"1~c ?•' ' r Ij r N X% )} �t1 Y7 ! 1 1.., r�Y - ,,Jl�1�r`�1 ��t jjJ y/ ±��',i � � , 'N.N -{.S iitz .F AI �;�•��+*, r i - I yy,S ,�1 1 Ir � -'v) 1 Cx I li:. IS .' ` ti 5 ,w r.Y t�h 6t� �" t i 4z4 � j \ �>� •' s'�'s �I �E �� f�{ e � " ' yf4`h r�� �:Y: vi iv j - j� 1�: F Y �� �' T �Jl'l,3•\ ( a, C6'� Y j` p�r��AN +� f �: `"r � `' t 4��} �1til �1� ! � } � r„ 11 � � , ��il�� -- � 17.- 1 ( +r 4 ,',.;=!. 3 t h Yz �' {� zg t � �� ��a1�ti r '" 1 t = °i ,. t i , t It 7.4 fr'-",,:i74,,-;;;-1.ft:7:'-'.: . . : ' ':'•. :','."-, ..''4'1;:7.:=*.':7t.V:',..i.4*,-;.",.T7'*i,7:77;"=7.:' Fr::,"4* :1W- ''.[_,?''', ,. .Nr..±,,i-'-'.*:•1:::',-.,:',":-M:-'.."".-;": :::,:,'::".*:.'",:7':',::.!eli[K-r"..fi'l*-- :,„J",V-:1,-7`".74.",".".',X.,. .,1,-.:',:.":,:"..,:,... -7 ',;."-:.,, '* , ,v- ' **-lit..'_,,-:4 .iliii ;L t i 4. t �,t r' I r . 4..? i 4 y �r ' ----- - - - - - .. . - . - ` SEAL/ � io eac ; t \ '":- Z r�. r— as 1�t . ILDING/FACILIIYASSSSM \1N• 4 64. ' • �p Proposal... ,.,,_ ,7 'T • • K ._�. A- `9 ` a ic - t i# ° ', � �.F� sp � f� ` �� f ` ) � I1; I 3 ti ti %�/ jl [� fi� t � r - r G�• � �� ' }C �i s 1 3 ;r i + E„ /J - ..�E t t L3 J . erg = .rs r - As - - _s x .8 F r P {E, 9 t_ --''..-.4--4,1r,f...„k,„5„4 11111 .4 1. . up,. .' i :•■••=,::.--•,,,,,,-;',;:_,-, -.:2",r1,f,f.._,_,-,.f.,-,:„.:;■,,-..-",.-.-L,-;.=,- ,A Y �� ����, 1113,A r_ 4 1 y f �� 1 u�.?rif,, 5 .- 1 P CH . . s,, ,' a t { • • PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO THE • CITY OF SEAL BEACH,CALIFORNIA FOR BUILDING/FACILITY • CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUBMITTED MAY I ITH,2010 CONTACTI ROGER TORRIERO [ISO I,n_rt gwk1ORIPPINNOLDIMas.NvT GRIFFIN STRUCTURES,INC. 305 5000ND STREET j LAGUNA SHACK,CA 9265I 949497-9000 r► 949.497-0003 P WWW.GRIFFINHOLDINOs NBT • • May 111h,2010 Mr,Michael Ho,P.13. City Engineer City of Seal Beach--City Hall • 211 8th Street Seal Beaoh,California 90740 Be:Regnesl far Proposals for llrr!Idlnglitacill{y Condition Assessment Dear Mr,Bo: First of all, thank you far inviting the Griffin Structures team to respond to your Request for Proposal for Building/Facility Condition Assessment services.Our team recognizes today's Inordinate ilnanoitii pressures fitoing municipalities across the state of Callfomia.With that in mind,I am confident that you will be convinced that our team's response reflcots that Griffin has the best interests of the oily of Seal Beaoh in mind,Additionally,I invite you to speak with eaoh of our references to hear fbr yourself how Griffin truly ants on your behalf and always strives to be exemplary stewards of your resources and investments. For more than three decades,Griffin hes served as a Trusted Advisor to nauateipalitios across Orange and Los Angeles Counties having successfttlty delivered more than 8 dozen Building/Facility and Needs Assessments,Our goal is to always do our best to help you maximize your investment and provide you with significant value as your partner.The alternatives presented in our proposal not only respond to your Scope of Work for the 33 different faolllttes as outlined In tha RFP but also offer notable benefits to the City.Additionally,our team not only meets - your needs,but also delivers a customized approach for the work product that you and your staff will be proud to present to your 24,000+residents, The Griffin Sintotures Team has given considerable thought to the requirements of this project,and to how we add considerable value to our performance. Having toured molt of the 33 sites, we are thoroughly familiar with the execution of these types of projeots.Further,as you will hear from our past rmrotoipat clients,we understand the speolat needed sorvioos,which are essential to your projects success, As demonstrated by our relevant examples, Griffin brings several Strategic Benefits to this project,including; o Recent and Relevant Experience with Delivering Building Assessment Projects • Experience with AR Municipal Components of Each of the 33 Projects o Success withServing as an Extension of Staff o Three Decades as a Local Orange County'Teem 311fli Experience Working Together These strategic factors distinguish our value-added service approach and are essential to—and which will provide success for--this project. In summary,the Griffin Sinioturc+s Thom is espeolally qualified to deliver this project to the city of Seal Beaoh,Based on the points noted above and the details presented In this proposal,I am certain that our Team is the best solution for the City:We are prepared to begin this project immediately! Best regards, MUFFIN STRUCPURBS,INC. Roger Torriero,CEO GRIFFIN STRUCTURES,INC. 385 Second Street,Laguna Beaoh,CA 92651 (949)497-9000 tel■(949)497-8883 fax entail;rtorriaro@grifijtiltoidinga,not California !%eva'da . Arizona Italy • • STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS Qt MANY AGENCIESI IIESIDI THE CITY MAX HAVE SOME LEVEL OF REGULATORY AND STATUTORY AUTHORITY OVER SOME OF THE BUILDINGS IN THIS SURVEY.HOW WILL THIS BE ACCOMMODATED? A: The Griffin team has a long history of dealing with various agcnoles and as suoh holds as our central role to keep the process moving forward while also keeping individual agencies apprised of findings.This process most recently proved successfld with the City of Irvine Transportation Center project, involving extensive coordination with the Orange County Transportntion Authority, CalTrans, the Pectoral Highway Administration,MotroLink,the Metropolitan'transit Authority,the County of Orange,and the City of Irvine. With eaoh of these agencies requiring regular input,our team maintained schedule and budget for the award- . winning project. Qt Saar.}31¢ACH HAS A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN THE 2004 STUDY nY TEC ENGINEERING.How CAN Tim CITY INSURE TEATIME PROPOSED NEW REPORT LEVERAGES USEFUL VALUE IN'ritE EARLIER MwoRT,AND ALSO MEETS THE TEST OF TIME AS THE CITY CIP MANUAL? A: Griffin's Team understands that there has been a considerable investment the City has made In the 2004 facility assessment.With that in mind,we propose several options,one of which uses muolt of the 2004 report as possible while incorporating it into a now assessment where It adds value.With this option,we propose to update ell cost estimates and prepare summaries per building along with ongoing Altura maintenance costs associated.Griffin will then calculate the PCI and include a 20 yr capital projection,if the City chooses to do so,we will update this report every couple of years for a nominal fee. Q: THE CITY REQUIRES A COMPETENT STUDY,WHICH:NOT ONLY ACCURATELY REPRESENTS FACILITY NEEDS BUT ALSO IS SENSITIVE TO CITY BUDGET CONSTRAINTS.WILY IS THE ORME TEAM BEST POSITIONED)TO ACCOMPLISH'THIS GOAL? A: The Griffin Team has no Learning curve in this project; we will "hit the ground pinning..."Griffin's key Team members are already flinty engaged In a wide range of buildings that identify with the proposed buildings,and thus the Team's working relationships and familiarity with the type of projects give Griffin the advantage to complete the tasks at hand effloicntly.Wo understand that minimized operational disturbances aro Important,that's why we have suggested a review process to equip Griffin with the most directed plan possible for the building survey.Our background,experience,and project knowledge directly translates into project savings,which puts money back into the project,not wasting it unnecessarily on esonlation and a slow "ramp-up"period. Qt THIS PROJECT INVOLVES MANY CONSTITUENT DEPARTMENTS AS STAKEHOLDERS. HOW CAN TILE CITY BE ASSURED THAI'THE INTERESTS°ETRE WIDE VARIETY OF CITY FUNCTIONS ARE RECOGNIZED,ADDRESSED, AND MWr? A: Griffin's Team has three decades of experience working with numerous municipal agencies.Most recently, we are currently under construction on a under Master Ph imi for the city of Hesperia.Having already bnlit the city halt, oily park,and library,and are now under construction with the city's police department and the County of San Bernat'dino's government center,our team has dealt with and continues to coordinate with a vast array ofstakeholders.These Include salty and county agencies,special districts,utilities,Wrens,and the Department of Fish and Game.Through all of these various stakeholders,each of our projects was and will be delivered on time,within budget,and also addressed each agency's needs and requirements. I These other agencies may include The California Coastal Commission,the U.S.Corps of Engineers,the Metropolitan Water District,The County(and State)Health Department,Other Orange County agencies,the Department of Fish& Game,the Division of the State Architect,and others, • • TABLE OF CONTENTS POW I. PROJECT HISTORY I PROJECT HISTORY I SELECTED PROJECT PROFILES 2 SELECTED ADDITIONAL PROJECT PROFILES 8 2. COMPANY INFORMATION 11 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES FIRM BACKGROUND I I 3. PROPOSED APPROACH 13 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 13 APPROACH.. 13 APPROACH PHASES AND WORK FLOW 14 WORKFLOW DIAGRAM 18 PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE 19 4. PROJECT TEAM 21 WE PROPOSE AN INTEGRATED,EXPERIENCED TEAM 21 PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART 22 TEAM RESUMES 22 5.SUBCONSULTANTS 31 SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS 31 6. REFERENCES 35 7. FEES 37 8. SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT 39 9. DISCLOSURE 41 APPENDIX I 43 CITY BUILDING AND FACIUTIES UST 43 ------- -Griffin Structures, Inc. I Project and Construction Managers Table of Contents .ercl.Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • 3. PROPOSED APPROACH PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Seal Beach has a variety of buildings and faellilies it owns and maintains. Over the years, . maintenance and repairs have been deferred and only pursued on a reactive basis.. This Project is intended to provide the City staff and Council with an independent assessment by technical experts of the present state of all the buildings and facilities,prioritization of deficiencies found, cost of remedying those defi- ciencies,and relative cost of building replacement. The Assessment is to cover all City facilities,including rating each facility's various components,evaluat- ing usottti life, noting specific deficiencies,preparing budgetary remedial costs, ADA upgrades, replace- ment vs.renovation cost graphs,and various other Items necessary for a proper evaluation. The completed report Will include,as a minimum,the following: • Facility Condition Index(FCI)ratio for each building or facility. The FCI is the ratio of the cost of repairing all deficiencies in a building divided by the replacement cost of the building. • Studies on what-if scenarios to determine various future,funding levels necessary to maintain various FCI levels. • A 20 year projection of capital renewal funding requirements,by year. APPROACH • In our approach,we nsstntie the specific survey,conditions findings,and remedial recommendations of the TEC report may contain valid and acceptable data which may be reused in this project, if this information appears to be valid upon review of the respective facilities.We will undertake a reconnaissance survey first, and ascertain If and to what degree a subsequent and more detailed survey by our team is required to update or replace the earlier survey findings. Also,we will examine updates as may be required due to work un- dertaken by the City since that survey, and will investigate significant deterlorattons•which may have oc- curred and are apparent in our review. The information obtained by our Team,and information extracted from the earlier report if it is validated, will be prepared and presented in standard FCA report format. During project Orientation, this format will be presented to the City for review,and refined and adapted as required. With this Information, we will then prepare a 20-year Capital Projection Plan,based on prioritizations we will assess On concurrence with City policy and guidelines,as applicable). The main activities are summarized as follows: • Consider and review the data in the TEC report as to its validity and use in this project. Make recoit- naissance survey and subsequent update site review as needed, • For conditions listed in the TEC report,make an inspection of these areas. Focused evaluations will also be made where the City reports that it has made remediation efforts or changes. We will note and review conditions which are found to be notably different from the earlier report. • Survey, and otherwise obtain information for, buildings for which the earlier data is inadequate for this study,or for building omitted from the earlier report. The scope is understood to be limited to buildings listed in the RFP. • establish with the City an accepted FCA format for report information,and use this format for report- ing survey and analysis results, r t Griffin Structures Inc. Pro sot and Construction Man: ore 13 (C- Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • + Where still valid, costs presented in the MC report will be updated by the application of escalation factors as reported by construction indexes,or by guidelines supplied by our team Cost Bstimatirg re- sources. Costs for other items,new data entries,and required updates will be estimated by out Team and included in the new report. + Compute FM values based on these new or updated figunas for buildings on the list. Costs for new construction will be identified,or updated where appropriate, by examination of costs per sq. ft. and the experience of our Team with regard to new construction of this type. • • Distribute the costs Into appropriate prioritization categories,in cooperation with the City and its fa- cilities management staff, and prepare as 20-year Capital Projection Plan (CPP) in conceit with the CiP principals and guidelines of the City. APPROACH PHASES AND WORK FLOW The following work flow displays the main activities of this project broken down Into the project phases and task groups: Phase l; Project Orientation Data Collection Model and Baseline Phase 2: Building Survey Phase 3: Assemble Building Survey Workbook in approved FCA format Analysis of Results:Projected Deficiencies and Costs Indexing and Prioritization;FCI Calculation and Graphic Presentation . City Review and Approval to Proceed Phase 4: Prioritization Preparation of 20-Year Capital Plan Phase 5: Final Report(draft and final) • Report Presentation(public meeting if desired) Gratin Struotures,(no.i Pro pot and Conatwotlon Managers A Seat Beach Building Concfltlon Asseisrnent Proposal • • Phase I t Project Orientation The Orientation Phase has the purpose of introducing the Team to the City,and acquainting the Team with the existing reporting and documentation presently in place. The phase ends with the refinement of our baseline survey strategic plan. Critical elements of this activity include review of the 2004 TM'report,and meeting with key City staff to understand existing gaps and shortcomings in the results of that study, and also establishing current City expectations and any project goals which are not elaborated in the RFP.This includes the determination of City objections and concerns with the TEC report,validation of acceptable components,and identification of elements which may be reused from the old report allowing for a more efficient project plan and the fur- ther preservation of previous project results which remain accurate. We will undertake a moping session with the City to validate our assumptions of Project scope, method, and activities as proposed. Phase 21 Building Survey Phase 2 consists of the physical survey activities of the project.Our project plan is to conduct a Reconnais- sance of the existing buildings in the survey scope,and identify high-level issues and criteria. These will be provided to the survey team in advance of their activities. The survey model, which will be refined and adapted to the specific goals and objectives of the City, and which reflects the results of the Orientation Phase,will be executed by the respective proposed Team members, All surveys will be coordinated through the building maintenance and management staff of the City. • We also understand how to undertake this process with minimal disruption to existing city services and operations.We have proven experience in independently evaluating the condition of building fa- cilities for public agencies,including preparing accurate cost estimates for repair, documentation of recommendations, prioritization of repairs/upgrades within the allocated funding and developing a maintenance work program. • We will begin with a fixed schedule and agenda of actions for the survey,and will notify each respec- tive agency of the city at the end of the Orientation Phase as to the proposed timetable. The schedule will be adjusted as required to meet any particular overriding conflicts in any department,and will be coordinated into our master project schedule process. Upon arrival at each building,the Project Man- ager will contact the designated representatives of the respective departments or agencies affected by the survey process, . After commencement of the survey,and overlapping with the survey process,Ali collected information will be assembled into a project Building Survey Workbook. This Information will be checked for consistency and completeness,and though an established quality control review,the Project Manager will cause possi- ble revisits to selected sites,if and as required. -�..Otifltn Structures Inc. Pro cot and Construoilon Mans.ere iti 1. el Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • Phase 3:Analysis and Report on Building Conditions The analysis of the results of the survey will begin with information which has undergone quality control review and update as necessary,as noted above. The Building Survey Workbook data will be reviewed and assessed by system and building component,and costs for required remediatlon(excludes all items that fall under FMB),where this has been identified,will be either updated from the previous report,where accept- able,or estimated by our Project Team, A matrix of remedial actions will therefore be genertrted by site and building,reflective of the category of work involved. These component categories will include such as the following: • Architectural elements and considerations • Structural elements and considerations • Meohanical/Blectrical/Plumbing systems elements and considerations • Site elements and considerations • Other component costs Bach remedial action will be classified in terms of priority of remedlation,such as the following.Note that all these criteria will be refined in the orientation phase of the project. • Issues related to immediate life and health safety(these are automatically of highest priority) • Critical issues of high flunetional or operational impact(for example,Items which will become critical within a year,and which affect city operations or building system survivability) • Mitigate impending further damage, or items of cascading or imminent impact on other building components • Surviving building elements or systems which are beyond projected life, still functioning,but with undetermined remaining life expectancy • Code or policy upgrades,such as grandfatliered conditions or upgrades which may be advised due to City policy or planning directives,but which otherwise are in functional and working order + Operational and within system life cycle With this information we will then prepare a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report(FCAR)that summa- rizes the results, This includes the calculation,by building or site of the Facility Condition index(PCI,the ratio of remediation to new replacement),as.well as other possible measures of deficiency and status. This numeric information will be presented in graphical format and will be supplemented by clear textual expla- nation and suitable documentation,in clear and understandable language. We understand the need to pro- duce a document that Is lasting,usable,and practical,while also being reliable and technically sound. At the conclusion of Phase 3, we will present FCAR information,including such information as the sum- mary of conditions, costs of remediation by appropriate component and building, respectively computed PCPs, other indexes and prioritization considerations as may be include, graphic presentations, and sum- mary information. City Review/Approval to Proceed The Phnse 3 report will be a Facilities Conditions Assessment Report(FCAR),formatted with an executive summary and supplemented by backup data and analytles where appropriate. The city will be provided with this information for its review and approval prior to our proceeding with the remainder of this project. Ariffin Structures,inc.I Project and Conetruotlon Managers is Seal Beach Building Condiiidn Assessment Proposal • • Phase 4:20-year CIP Plan The information hr the PAR will include costs by system,component,and priority for each of the build- ings and sites in the survey scope. This information will then be assembled into a Capital Improvement Program,structured to address highest priority matters first,and distributed according to budget guidelines which will be discussed with the City. Annual budgets for a 20-year period will be developed. It Is important to note that this plan will include not only remediatlon to existing conditions,but also ad- dress allowances for ongoing repair and replacement of various systems based on system lifecycle consid- orations. It will also include construction of replacement facilities whore this is projected due to our analy- sis,or where,based on the City's own policy considerations,any new facilities are anticipated. This allows for a complete CIP program which includes all known conditions to date, Please 5: Final Report The results of this project—including the executive summary of building conditions,the MAR,the 20-year CEP,and appropriate supportive information—will be presented to the City at the conclusion of our project. If desired by the City,we are prepared also to present a summary of findings to the City in a public meet- ing,such as to Council either in a format Council Session or in a Council Workshop. This presentation will be accompanied by supportive graphics and summary information,according to guidelines worked out with the City. CGriiitn Structures Inc. Pro sot and Construction Managers 17 Seat Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • WORKFLOW DIAGRAM t •r- ••-• .cuw,s,«c%.vsh.wt11(- ' •avi •r P a n� :'• :• :•:'r=:'•..;:. li:•t::L.•i%-':ti - Yx t 1100'''.1 L1z f It S..,,,, :fist__ 1t;'a ;:J....,• S seRS.t,'t ti...,„.,• f�--,,Aa ` : • a --1 CC 12uport 7es � MiThflr?E.- i :1)%1Vikj'>.e•h) ,:1 j:.{.,f'.... +, ` aid. �� . :\..).'1••14-,4 117 t %%I 721(;1:Ja,c�„':t2 ii':'' s1. +;� r'f`:.. 4ii ;- 1al;.�\•t:lTli�i'Sgi t�aitiwfa i'leot� �.P..'•1; P/414E t•: 1,, ( R0V/111r t,:'''''' 1" 1(If 0.iiI ? j3 Ci_JYR,/{;.,6:40.1 �;s ).. tOJ[}CT r'+.; g;x 1Stfit iiW 11Ic1_oty i?`tr�7 f -11tiotIn 11 i ... 1hp114 ••;•' •J.QII1!ttTAjloni:':} , i t. 4 ` . �`�4J a2 ;:� - ;f 5i. -• - J ,, .-•` y'�i Sy t Iy�}al �Si� l,{;A .:�b •t- t + },�1.4.`•+.r tS �. Y 5�••�1y,,! U�{, . S�.t Lrrk•• • r{•+ki� 1 > .slt '1., F4 iti:h5'} :-AN 1. `! i°w15.R:i`s'SPK2+.. :1,17�ll,kRkc.k, firt.v. •�i'e.`. r. 1108„, ` a, tz I0011.uy ]ril,rgtbotia jilttrofict" :�}•: iE'• •SUncy plan � O011iblohbhi$ :'f r.• I ? �• i.1, s ._tJ� 5J "\ ti�4i1 ! i.. "4 9 OblilnClyhp ronY� - . Li, ,,-. 9 r,t .l1d04!n6 p.1i101Ly�l y., . ♦ / :`...3 o ih p0 Yr, I .1: '11,11 ' -1£t GY Plc � ,� �SZIZIi P)lnlilyd$�=� w� ' 1}l�jy Op. t: t�Mr.1QS 2:+}u t tir ti 401e....}:• �!�[7.1�1C •;.1,;;_ ;.: ' 71 !t: 1:. 14.4:11 +...:•r'• `r i i1,...i t.fit`1'•`•' 31,2,1 l •�i1- ~+ ar,�'.:5i1;1. •:};a:...,t;..�i•'`!. r 1;a ?rye•'• ._• ai.t. g.iii ,wt t• , r, y ..,sF 1\N e 4at::i%ti��i`�Mv :~i..L:. t.q;.�. -';:'1`$tiPV0.8;, ::�. " i �'e2ss�a, ••' 1-/.., �� .3 ,: r a ' i•. t:.t•...IR-,..tvrtt'i� :?l-i1 i L� .ZK1`.41:44:0.i.:7-•+,.;AikT\j Vl,,:t.:f. 4 :xt•QS1..,•.t.'' `k a Ilullrli119 -� <Toohl t r a „:?..\ SI.:, ';},;a e}. i�:: t.r`.:;'-:: :_ ou(l'oy D 'tb 1)11111 s: tt- ti _,::a - c..i''ti.:•'-2:%t g- `--•` - x --,,,r„:k . `. § �, A..4..i .L—,47-i f '.- �,t-• _ a ,sS� 6♦- ••i•:::5,:-.T,.s ,:,.= ..:v`:\ •• .Sy ' 1 l ,...w.,.....:.i. . ,..,;.y1`if: ;5 i' ?i... .• Z L 1 (s t r't tk r� apvoY I 3ti ' ltt6i111/yi�` \i , ; yfC: i . :'•;4-c--1 1 t, • n, , uS1nl:li0ok +krii 1; 1 _PT101 t , lyt i i�e 1 •..z;:• s 1 •:t' . '} 6 2 H:•` .e.S4i°41! .a .; 1 1 ti.. t.... 1:4: • +�.••i.-S.7 t +' . +.1 :: :=a.+4i y;:%..•a •X a •::iti•� C_`''Y."• $�. ta? 15 ta51N., y ix i1 t }1 ,•.;.i ,;;� ;• , , 1 sAltz3iwiiy i a�.••:':_ ;5.} 71• :'•`•lSlliVilig•ta,. - R(.)10 C1,0ti(11(!11 .1� Upllhlb CD:ZtdJ.." i a•(t%ti.: ;,,r++, .Y. •'•: :-,;` t w-'•-is( -is y, . POIIclenoy Co ,t D. - Syct0.la5_by P{211P#Iii b 1S,i.ti'.w,:;1,7:-:S\Sy:.L is:.;', }Tt,81 ":..a2 •;asa ”. ). t {`� ) r.:``??i`:�?i:4�.�•gv1.;1';'%t M CAF PORT• 'a•t,, a . it ire •..ai',:a, ,- .:., t\ t- :•.::i.: :'it .:r••:. ••r` •:...i �.:�i"• '.:=:r .1:.�} _ �.:• 1+1-n:: .'?,?\:-":1._ ••. t'-:•'sue_7ilst :ti._r`y.:_t.-,• ..:.a:•''..in;`---,:o ..4.3A...i.1:':".'1.', n 1, r, •' S;••::\-.., t , .e InIoKOStn� d 1st�1111y(sbhtJ11� 1i ": • Sz k N�..�:;'t N. •:::t4•:• rti NlI0rlUrntlai — IfIll(p c•J/-1 s`4'Y.• '-• ; +; =-••: (ity,coov,, ,1 t tip/1rri'at ::'_Al?.''..!:.‘:- 1. ..: 41iXi ta7 ¢•1 riv,..+eau ��Ai trr st, }ak<a ¢ r c3. ;: HA$114 +y,_ 7(1 yo?rCapilrtl 'Ji Yid i▪ iii-i{J}t4ir8)! i3 �in111 60 )11 -- •-•-I9/[aJCGTIO11:' .v1 9 1'rojcclionPhi) � � � , (isy-'9obilfer}C_- .k*Os si i1 d'1 1b_l�l��g .i wa'Jeff` 11 :a ..x.111(+ ,1. ��•4 I,Q l'. i..•\•*. . ; • • PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE The following image illustrates the proposed project schedule for the work proposed in this submittal. This bar chart shows completion timelines for each section of work as we have organized the proposed work plan. .R ,.315 ». .Y.�• .......... ......... .... N1 . ti V I Griffin Simetures fno. Pro eel and Consiruoiion Mona,era '19 t c Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • Griffin Structures !no. Pro sot and Construction Mona ere 20 a A Seal Seaoir Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • 4. PROjECTTEAM Wf;PROPOSE:AN INTEGRATED,EXPERIENCED TI AM Griffin's team members have outstanding lobules'oxperiise and capabilities with regard to the scope of work that is required for this project. To best serve the City of Seal Beach,Griffin Structures hrings a leant of sea- soned professionals to ensure your facility assessments are delivered successfully.The Team members are highly experienced in the scope of work required for this pitied did has worked together on various projects.The fol- lowing organization chart identifies the proposed team structure: Toni Member - Yrs, I10111 . on fi r Q D}"',: n:tFitl''f`$ P 110,04.4 g ldt i`;,��.e.i.QS iio 3 l 9lhby* ra i(0.0. i jp♦n.Si•CIULes,� :inQ 1 He •lellilflitigfilige-q-kORIW:;-":;!:-*■‘1. •=•: '":'1:`� k�lls2 9..Ottr ver l ce l rr n0 h roef ? $0h,l t►rO tU�) L t uug lno; : f; [' � ••'.. ?'••'::1}: pf�ocls pnd wlll konIinutl tePdttpt!Ij Cjaroe for ihis priijefl1 a-..; 4 y:•>,:Va-41 i ft iJi sS141011:'1 's,*::.:11:'•4:V�4: Y.'C" :i•-•:?•: • • PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART --,-,7-i'.;-•:' k:".r.:?c: : L;7:aa ::1 ate:iII.. • ; • v':PROJECTMANAGER! ''t:° PURRIP W9;RK".? 'AIratt k re '""1.19. - r . �NyYT 4 :Priitefpal In Charge -• il Pty: .5I)IIJ1 1 WYCf_ p 1 irtV 4 : ... ..jfi?1 q}d9l{l#QOQ•I'ZIl:,7 :: Project Mnnngor I i'-kl .0 t.."V .'k t^.`•. 71.f' t i3 +•r i:LQO{'rN tttO i k 3;y?r, El 2. 4 ` ArehltecUI:ncifncor Cost cstfnuallnit :.g[fii oA.��I c I or;,�; g5.:'...:::x`:��s n ,t is~ ;•;;:'•',i .`�.. ZStl�Q:�A�`I�I�Y•s?:s;;: h�.kt.i4�hP.S• .�t,�tf, �.° a, • '%il et;#PY z-':4°e,. .r :.,:4 +;SoNEt!hi a oq: :::;::: ':.t:: l'r'. • t :.... n ear q i4.9010;44 �;,, It i „ ::. _ fl ri.. 5.,, .T.4ura.;ti Cage"r: : �,zti �;+ Iogttloj... :`' E!9 fiber°°`t: f3 Qo urn eel - . tumblag _Engineer TEAM RESUMES please rofor to individual resumes Immediately following Ih►ls pogo for more information. Qrit(In Str�ures,Mo.I Proleot and Construction Mangers _ 22 Beat Beach Building Condillon Assessment Proposal • • ROGER N.TORRIEno CEO, Principal In Charge Griffin Structures,Inc. Following his completion of the Architecture program at Syracuse University(B.Amh,) ROGER 1-011111 Ei10 and 1118 Urban Planning Program at the Accademia di Belli Atli a Firenze, Italy(M. Arch.), Mr, Tordero first Joined the family constntciton business In Pennsylvania. ` ,- �ts.� SLY?,;;f{; a:ai:t.. Subsequently,upon relocating to California in 1978,Ile was employed by Pacific Mutual • Life Insurance Compauy as its Director of Rettig!Development. •` '', •� r r:t h,, . In 1981,Mk Torriero formed Griffin Realty Corporation,which has developed a number °� `_ of significant and successful commercial real estate projects throughout California and Nevada. He subsequently formed Griffin Advisors, Imo., and Griffin Structures, Me., which along with Griffin Realty Corporation were integrated into the Griffin Holdings organization.To dale,the companies have been directly responsible for the completion of over 81.5 Billion In projects on a regional,national,and International basis, p • . ;: ti��{��•{)s; r.:t;. j • :3.a! t1�91r1 ;tW�'�a',`,.a .Sts..:,.. Mr.Tbrrlero s extensive, successlLl Involvement hl virtual! all aspects of real estate �. ,�•_�=a•.�-•�•-�.���•�= development,finance and construction provides Griffin Holdings whit a speolal expertise t'=°! ; 74 " ti '''' in bout the conceptualization and the realization of complex and challenging projects.Ho ; fi�;;,v , z .1 is considered expert in forward pinning,finance,entitlements,public/private ventures, lc. a• .••.• :1 p g, ,P p '•�t!atstet� „_. • tro ect delivery ethodologies,and community-based participatory planning: ll critical "fdsR� o success in today's com complex political and economic environments. He also has a ° t t.rvrta, p a •:t•:, considerable expertise in the adaptive re-use of historical structures. Mr.'Ibrriero is a f i1g41.BAYro1s:rt: :l :e4; =ii registered architect and licensed contractor. Ott 11974 • Mr. Terriero Is a member of the Urban Lund Institute and Its Public/Privato Sector k, . '' l "y`'t• '-.-1:;1"= .cr. -:', Development Council and the National Association of Industrial and Office Finks. Hens , f ,,a.'`:_ •t also a member of the Assoeinted General Contractors of America, the Constnrclion r -!gat,r ? , .-;:.; •;. Management Association of America,the Design-Build Institute,the US Green Building L; ,Bog giQ Sh• 0..1410 s:}=: ; Council,and die Society for Military History.Mr. ortioro's public service has Included 1f11.1 Otg9lt�4olitwR.'n' serving on the Board of Governors of the Bowers Museum of Cultural Art in Orange tE c r`�:• 413(;c?c;�;4ia7 County, California, as the Chair of its Facilities Committee during Its expansion and Jul m/ r?'±.i , 1 ,;;,�;:; renovation• t•''Dasl1�tt�Gluta'91I ,item.•3 r...t' s,'tiy;1 •.:.�e to • 'a•' Relevant Experience Y�: ;:'f;;'�:••<;:�:'•;,:1:='-.:;:. Yucaipa Sheriff Facility and Branch Library Facility Assessment,Yucaipa,CA pvdmalyintrirpf Fullerton Coommunity/Senlor Center Facility Assessment,Fullerton,CA ?.2 '`=t;"'k' _...V..:4: a`•+ Oceanside Police Department&Library Facility Assessment,Oceanside,CA Newport Beach City Hail Facility Assessment,Newport Beach,CA Long Beach City Hall East Facility Assessment,Long Beach,CA Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard,Stanton,CA San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion,San Dimas,CA • Santa Ass City Hall Renovation and Development Services Center([toss Annex),Santa Ana,CA Buena Park Corporate Yard Facilities,Buena Park,CA Buena Park Police Headquarters,Buena Park,CA Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure(LERD Certified),Westminster,CA Laguna Beach Community/Senior Center and Subterranean Parking Structure,Laguna Beach,CA Cathedral City Firs Station Headquarters&Training Facility(LBHD Sliver),Cathedral City,CA BnvironmentalNaturo Center(L"LEBD Platinum building In Orange County),Newport Beach,CA Lemon Grove City Hall Needs Assessment,Lemon Grove,CA Fullerton Main Library Expansion(LBBD Certified),Fullerton,CA Fullerton Community/Senior Center(LEBD Certified),Fullerton,CA Hesperia Police Department Headquarters(L13BD Silver),Hesperia,CA County of San Bernardino Hight Desert Government Center(LEBD Silver),San Bernardino,CA South Coast Water District Administration Facility anti Maintenance Yard(LBBD Silver),Laguna Beach,CA Watsonville Civic Plaza(City Hall,Courts,L11'rary,&Pan*ing SYrrrcture),Watsonville,CA Rancho Santa Margarita Civic Playa(City Hall,Community Cenfer and Park),Rancho Santa Margarita,CA Hesperia CivlePlaza(City Hall and Library),Hesperia,CA Cypress Community Center,Cypress,CA Qriffin Struoturos Imo. Pro eel and Consiruotion Mena,era 23 Beal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • I DERYL ROBINSON Vice President, Project Manager Griffin Struoturee,lno. • While at Griffin Structures,Mr. Robinson has demonstrated leadership and an DERYL ROBINSON extensive understanding of the construction Industry that has proven his ability > .. ....,.t.�_..,..� to effectively manage projects, time and time again. Prior to Joining Griffin t• �; Est: i�� ,.4 L,:,� s; Structures,Mr.Robinson served as Director of Prieconstrnrction and Construction = Management services for Snyder Langston In Irvine, California. Mr.Robinson IS E�, �,•t> - , :: .•, personally managed the preconstruction and construction on several projects and ;. + , ,';,•i...'i;, :1 has more than 30 years experience in the field. Mr.Robinson has managed some of the most prestigious projects in Southern V`��. `' ,.S j v:=.1 California. During an 18 year tenure with Snyder Langston, Mr. Robinson managed construction services for the Irvine Spectrum Center Phases I &2, IN Oakley, Ina.Headquarters, Pacific Club at Newport Beach, Tiger Woods ':':0it; iirra + _•: Learning Center,Tar V'Torah High School,MargeB Houston Entertainment §•+ t?u90,K1. 4.. `•'; :: Center,Pollan Hill Golf Club,Dig Canyon Country Club, and the South Coast r Repertory Theatre, f i . } F'•'�' '• :lait:%Bi�tlY lTeetl 7 ;a '::., •1. fi ii s; :; y;s Relevant Experience tUt1 •, • Stanton Public Works Maintenance Yard-Stanton, Cnllfornin -Con- #:;V• 20;: i•^•:••'r:-':'; 'y°'•:' struction Manager for the City of Stanton's new 8,000 sf maintenance build- ing and a 6,000 sf administration building on 1.5 acres. The scope of work includes management of con- struotion,constructablitty review of 95%PS&B,processing of all environmental and building permits,bid- ding process oversight and other construction minted services. • Tustin Library•Tustin,California -Construction Manager to the City of Tustin for delivery of ha new library.The new library is 32,000 square feet, which serves students from both the Tustin and Santa Ann School Districts and is currently one of the busiest Libraries in the OCPL system.It has private study and tu- toring rooms that separate the children and young adults for better concentration and quality learning,and it includes 223 additional reader seats and 99 technology stations. • Buena Park Police Headquarters--Buena Park, California- Constnuction Manager for the new two- story 66,000 sf Police Department Headquarters Paclilty,which includes a Type'Urn,police dispatch cen- ter,firing range,kennel training center,Emergency Operations Center IOC),evidence storage room,crime laboratory,Anil service locker room,physical training center,and secured police vehicle parking. • Westminster Police Facility and Parking Structure—Westminster California-Program and Construc- tion Manager for the Westminster Police Paclilty project,a new facility consisting of a 90,000 sf three-story Police Building and an adjacent 590 stall Parking Structure to be shared between the WPD and the City for community parking.The new Police Department Building includes a Typo 1 jail,BOC/training Room,Evi- dence,Forensics, Patrol,Investigations,Dispatch,Office of the Chief,and all related support services,and will be an Essential Facility. The total project budget is$80 million and is designed,constructed,and certi- fied to LBBD certified standards. • The Boeing Company -Due Diligence &Adaptive Reuse Study- California -Mr.Robinson provided Program Management services for a due diligence and adaptive reuse study for The Boeing Company.The survey team consisted of architectural,structural, mechanical and electrical disciplines to review the current conditions of various buildings on their campuses in Long Beach,Seal Beach,and Manhattan Beach,CA to determine their potential for adaptive reuse. Griffin Structures,!no.I Protect and Consbaotion Managers 24 cl Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • • Grace Ministries International-Adaptive Reuse Study-•Fullerton,California—Mr.Robinson provided Program Management services for a conditions assessment of an existing food manufacturing company headquarters for reuse into a worship facility.This assessment helped to identify the opportunities and con- straints of the old factory and offices,ultimately leading to the renovation and reuse of the facility for wor- ship purposes. • Long peach Fleet Maintenance•Long Bench,California -Design management and preconstruction for this turnkey design-build protect,Tiro facility accommodates the City's I4eot Services Department,a garage maintenance facility for City vehicles,lien sales and towing administration,and the Public Works Integrated Resources Bureau Administration and Operations offices. Facility included offices,service bays and com- plete site redevelopment. • • Pacific Club-Newport Beach,California-Preconstructon and construction services for a new olubhouso building of approximately 30,000 square feet plus as associated site work and utilities. Clubhouse features extensive architectural millwork, • Tiger Woods Learning Center-Anaheim, California-Precoustnretloa and construction services fix*the 35,000 square foot, two-story educational facility features a 250-seat auditorium, seven classrooms, a computer system,coordinating between the City of Anaheim as lead agency and County of Orange as lan- downer. • Tarbut V'Torah High School•Irvine,California•Preconstruelion and construction services for the pri- vate school designed to accommodate more than 600 students in grades 7-12, The two-story facility consists of 62,000 square feet and is built around a central courtyard,enclosed on three sides by buildings and open on the forth to nature and a view of the county beyond. Provided management,proem:61ruction,and general contracting for the protect. Services Included land purchase agreement with The Irvine Company;providing oversight of the entitlement process,establishing each of the consulting agreements. • Oakley Corporate Headquarters•Foothill Ranch,California-Preconstructiori and construction services for this 413,000 square foot corporate headquarters facility featuring office,manufacturing,assembly,and distribution. Employee amenities include NBA regulation basketball court,fitness center,full service cafe- teria and 450 seal auditorium with state-of-the-art audio-visual equipment. The comprehensive scope of ser- vices included development management,design management,preconstruction and general contracting for the project. • The Irvine Spectrum Center Phase I- Irvine, Cnilfornta -Preconstrucilon and construction services for an entertainment center featuring a 21 screen Edwards Theater complex,restaurants,a food court,and sow• al entertainment related retailers. Phase I included construction of five,one-story retail restaurant buildings totaling 109,000 square feet at a cost of$13 million. Designed after a Moroccan marketplace,the Irvine Spectrum Center features 4 hand-set tile domes and two steel domes, extensive landscaping,outdoor coin+• tyards inlaid with stone and tile,animated courtyard fountains,and extensive high end interior-finishes. • Pelican Hill Golf Club -Newport.Beach,California -Preconstrttction and construction services for the clubhouse and site work,pro shop and driving range building. MI facilities featured detailed Santa Barbara style architecture and extensive high end interior finishes. ' • Shady Canyon Golf Club-Irvine,California-Prcconstruction services for the upscale wood-framed golf club featuring a 50,000 square foot clubhouse,a driving range building,two entry guard houses,two comfort stations(restmoms)and a pump house,as well as extensive site work and parking lots. • Morago Community Center -Irvine, California • Preconstruction services for this 130,000 square foot comnunnity center,which included and athletic club complete with gym,basketball court,and weight room; pre•school; various agency offices:a 500 seat performance hall;and a cafeteria serving the high school and banquet events. The comprehensive scope of services included development management,design manage- ment,and preconstruction for the project. • The Irvine Spoetriun Center Phase U-Irvine,California-Preconstruction services for the second phase of'the Irvine Spectrum Center, which added 250,000 square feet of shopping,dining and entertainment ve- mtes,doubling the project's original size. Phase I[was designed after the Alhambra,a 13th Century Moo- rish palace in Granada,Spain. �r Qrinrn Structures,Mo.(Preis!'and Construction Mat ere 25, 47 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • STEVEN FtGAFFNEY, AMA, LEEPAP Architect Griffin Structures,lno. Mr. Gaffney brings 25 years of experience In architectumi design and project STEVEN GAFFNEY management. He is oversees all aspects of production management including :, �� construction documents,consultant contract negotiations and infect administra- .f.`4x�"':inn,h11t� ;; ^t tion,scheduling,budgeting,staffing,quality control/quality assurance,and ape- l; '"':'<1='::',1. 1 L j4> ;•.-. cifications for all protects undertaken by the firm. e. - y ;-A- For more than two decades, Mr. Gafthey has managed complex large-scale ur- 'li{ ' ;" ';�; '''.':, ban,institutional,residential,industrial and municipal projects.His background t':' ' t=;. ,'::. ';j includes well-honed skills in project conceptualization,definition,development, t ''-°•'`•:•��~4 scheduling, and budget assessment. He is known for creating innovative solu 0 ' its::,�•:iz;••t lions through application of emerging construction technologies,customized 11- 1 "iisi 7t„ti,f, A s ;.• .. Waning techniques,and construction management expertise.He is a skilled leant f. Ail )I >%r:—.:z :':.;'s loader managing a wide variety of consultants, u:,- s4 +c:s .1 Relevant Ttperlence ;• FeislitATi te..::,,:,;-„::f; } San Dimas City Hall Renovation/Expansion,San Dimas,CA luiititndc ,:.:.:�.1•: Brea CIvle Canter Renovation,Brea,CA ' KQ `ay�o�"•:;:;.!-; Lemon Grove City Hall,Lemon drove .. ” Inrtime: i:''i Cypress Community Center Expansion/Renovation,Cypress,CA to ;.:,::�@ = ::.c Orange County Social Services Department Expansion,Santa Ana,CA .i;1 ;4rfr?;l' 0::: l :t•'4;;•. 1 Santa Are City Hail Renovation,Santa Ana,CA s'pft01ESs l♦at.l�fr I[�Ti4?ts.; s.;.I Phillips Block Building, Santa Ana, CA:27,000 SF Tenant Jmproveruents and I d$� ttirt$� .;� 9:':.'t• Meiotic Restoration r,t•4 .calgrt=. '-t:;:::• ..:,:•_:.:; DOWB Advertising, Santa Ana CA: 35,000 GSF Tenant Improvements and 1' '.►?yA4c1: �;''::::::::-;3:1; :::-:;:., Htstwlc Reuovaliorrg, I°{i PY_Trov um r.::.;,.. Tenth Street Place,Modesto,CA: 220,000 GSF, Retail, Oovermnerrt Offices,6 ........... .. .. - Stories Gallo Arts Center,Modesto,CA: 85,000 SF Cultural Center Metropolitan Transportation Authority,Union Station,Los Angeles,CA:640,000 GSF,28 stories Family Law Court,Riverside,CA:4,000 OSF facility for the Oent.Services Admin.,S courhroorrts Stanislaus County Dist.Attorney's Office,Modesto,CA:78,000 SF Office,6 stories Boy Scouts of America Headquarters,Los Angeles,CA: 23,000 SF regional headquarters,2 stories Homeboy Industries,Los Angeles,CA: 21,000 SF facility for youth rehabilitation,g9lce,bakery Corona Pointe,Corona,CA: 10 tilt-up concrete office bldgs,Retail,Restaurant,Hotei,50•acr'e parcel LA Fashion,Los Angeles,CA:16,700 817 multi•tenrrul retail showroom/ntervhandlse warehouse Kaweah Delta Health Care,Visalia,CA:64,587 SFAdmhtlstratlon Bldg,5 stories Marbella Commerce Center,San Juan Capistrano,CA:50,000 GSF,2 stories 6060 Center Drive,Howard Hughes Center,Los Angeles,CA:250,000 GSP,10 stories Se Hotel,San Diego,CA: Luxury boutigtte hotel,185 guestr oonus,23 stories Olive Court,Long Beach,CA:58 eco--friendly low-Income townironres/oft apts.adjacent to Blue Line Long Beach Promenade,Long Beach,CA: 8014t-condos over retail&subterranean parking. Gateway Walk,Alhambra,CA: 129 Coudominituns over one-level parking garage. East Village Lofts,Santa Ana,CA: 40-unit Live/Work community Cameo Pacific Headquarters,Irvine,CA: 2-story 10,000 SF''reliant improvement Oakley Headquarters,Foothill Ranch,CA:80,000 GSF Office,375,000 G1FMamttfacttring,2 stories - {- ,,Griffin Structures Ina. Pro eel and Conslruoilon Matta era 28 .z. A Seal Beach Building Oonditton Assessment Proposal • • MARK ELLIS, P.1,5.1 Structural engineer Thornton Tomaaetti Mr.Bilis joined Thornton Tamaselti 1n 2002.In his professional crater,he has h4AI1K ELLIS been responsible for a variety of structural/seismic analysis and design projects, as well as numerous siructurnl assessments and seismic risk studies.Mr, 5-2,;_ ,-,•.•. ,: `'•` " has more than 15 years of projcot experience Including overnment commercial, t;;1 ttUQA, 13.,,-•`•j t-•;-. ��i::F industrial,manufacturing,and residential fuellities,both in the United Stales and `� 1Q '"! :"`?i:::"::::.: Internationally. yLYF+ s`t:.•p','yry%:i`r'k:"tip:.:•,;� Relevant Experience "•.19oQts nD)1 ;:i� = :; g �e�r,�$etforrde-•vsp..*• StrucurmiAssessment x�P.cot g69glom Roof Collapse Assessment,Hyundai Motors Building,Southern CA �rl;.rol 00.,411,01/401w3 .4 Water Damage Assessment, 12-story Office building,San Diego,CA !; ripksglo4Art4tAYou$ Balcony Collapse Assessment,Single family Res,San Juan Capistrano,CAlo 44tc �,�,�y,� Bolt Failure Assessment,Roof Structure at MLB Stadium,United States lAiltcgatr,;ir r °.:5'YR+'1411//-Bel 1 pi Fire-Damage Assessment,St Philip Benizi Church,Buena Park,CA . i*P.11 t�`'' p�,y`"'`"`'•�,py�'' Fire Damage Assessment Surnmerset Condominiums Santa Paula CA Pre-acquisition Structural/Seismic Assessment,Approximately 15 low,medium iswy fin . LKS ,�. t and high-rise buildings in Southern and Northern California ti,XIN . 1ti 10.i,; ; ,,,r Pre-acquisition Slructtlm/Seismlo Assessment,Dodger Stadium,CA University of California,Irvine.Seismic condition assessments of 70 bldgs Structural Condition Assessment,Concrete Parking Structure,Ala Moaaa Shopping Center,Honolulu,HI Life-Safety Seismic Bvaluaiion,Torre Del Angel Building,Mexico City,Mexico Damage Investigation,FDA office and laboratory building in Bothell,WA Damage Investigation,Service Center Building in Bellevue.WA Damage Investigation,Heavy equipment manufacturing facility in Seattle,WA Risk Assessments Newport-Mesa Unified School District,Newport Beach/Costa Mesa,California.Earthquake risk assessments of approximately 300 buildings at 28 campuses;vintages ranging,ll from 1930 to 1970s. Included structural and non-structural components. 101 Second St.,San Francisco,CA. Seismic risk assessment for twenty-six store steel moment and braced,ranne office building, Commercial Property Developer,Atlanta,Georgia. Development of a Corporate Risk Policy Manua!for ad- dressing seismic risk associated wilh property acquisltions and development projects in Cal(lbr.1a. Commercial Insurance Building Owners Alliance(CIBA),Earthquake risk assessments for approxlaralely30 pre-1945 buildings In Southern California. PM Global, Earihquake loss control services for various insured's facilities in CA,Oregon,and Washington. Providence Health System, Torrance, California and Anchorage,Alaska. Earthquake risk assessments of struc- tam!and non-structured components at four hospitals. Tribune Company, Los Angeles,Costa Mesa and Canoga Park,California, Pre-acquis/tlohr eanlhquake risk as- sessment of buildings and equipment at Los Angeles Times newspaper printing facilities, Siemens Ultrasound,Mountain View,California, Seismic Risk Assessment of buildings,equipment and business interruption for medical devices maiu{facturing facility. Frito Lay,Inc.,Bakersfield,Rancho Cucamonga and Sylmar,California, Earthquake risk assessments of slrlhc- twrrl and non-structural components at snack food maur{facturbrg facilities. Thomson Consumer Electronics,Camarillo and Hollywood,California,and Memphis,Tennessee. Earthquake risk assessments of structural and non-structural components at video,CD and DVD facilities and film produc- tion facilities. Griffin Stnuoturosf Inc.1 Proieot and Oonslruotion Managers , 2y r.Seal Heaoh Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • WILLIAM ZAVRSNICK,P,E. Eleotrioni Engineer PEA Engineering Mr.WillintnR.Zavrsnick has been active in the electrical engineering field WILLIAM ZAVIISNICK since Joining Fl3A In 1985. His experience includes the assessment and design of civic,municipal,sonior housing,multi-family housing,educational facilities, _r n 1;xl:lf;+�;r,: ;i ti t : ,;x office complexes,civic and corporate facilities,tenant Improvement,warehouse 0 YIO?Js -?.+A'ttv '•tt�i support facilities,healthcare and laboratories,parking structures,recreational 1 OSt Jing;:;: s n 7; centers,wireless communication antenna sites,performing arts theaters,libraries t'+'� = ';•� � .'." ..:{ and shopping centers, wA t1Ariotts.t :.;•:,'' He is particularly experienced In the assessment,design,and development of ., ;;¢ ter: t:' ; 2;y :it::,.1 power distribution,specialized lighting systems,fire/life safety systems,as well .PROFSLIto LASF1.tJ.ATIOS•', " as the interfacing of equipment for the control of lighting and mechanical sys- :t a,r so T; :::i terns as they relate to the requirements of specific projects. #r�lr►�6AS ;Y 3st.a�:1~1�QaoQtG:l RitilytkPeNi Relevant Experience 0104MJ NMt Anaheim City Hall West,Anaheim,CA ¢�s�l}j"' ' City of Thousand Oaks,Thousand Oaks,CA Covina Civic Center and Police Facility,Covina,CA County of Orange,Sheriffs Facility,Santa Ana,CA El Cajon Civic Center,El Caton,CA Fountain Valley Civic Center,Fountain Valley,CA Fred C.Noires School,Security Additions,Whittier Fullerton Senior Center,Fullerton,CA Glendale Police Facility,Glendale,CA Huntington Beach Civic Center and Police Facility,Huntington Beach,CA Irvine Civic Center and Police Facility,Irvine,CA Irvine City Hall,Irvine,CA Irvine Valley Community College,Saddleback Community College District,CA lames A.Musick Facility,(County of Orange),Irvine,CA Lake Forest II Sun and Sall Club,Lake Forest,CA Long Beach Naval Shipyard,Long Beach,CA Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department,CA Los Angeles County Sheriff's Substation and Holding Cells,Monterey Park,CA Oasis Senior Center,Newport Beach,CA Old Buena Vista Library,Burbank,CA Orange City Hall/Administration Building,Orange,CA Orange County Saddleback Sheriff Station,Irvine,CA Itancire Cucamonga Civic Center,Rancho Cucamonga,CA Riverside County Jail Annex,Riverside,CA Riverside County Jail and Sheriff's Station,Riverside,CA San Dimas City Hall,San Dimas,CA San Jacinto Civic Center,San Jacluto,CA ►tlustin Civic Center,Thstin,CA University of California Irvine Medical Center(UCIMC),Orange,CA Walter D.Bikers Senior and Community Center,Buena Park,CA Westlake City Hall,Westlake,CA Western Municipal Walter District Headquarters Building,Riverside,CA Yorba Linda City Hall,Yorba Linda,CA .�� Qrlrrin 8truoluree,lno.I Protect and Construction Managers 28 ? Seal Beach Buildhig Cond;lton Assessment Proposal • • LARRY SUN,P,E, Mechanical Engineer TKSC Consulting Mechanical Engineers For over 24 years Mr.Sun has been a vital part of carrying on the core values that have madeTKSC a successful firm. Being involved in nearly all of the tna- jor market segments has helped him develop a keen awareness of client andr�=i�;� �:' ? ,- project requirements,with a focus on details that make a project successful. As u tiQ!!.T►Ah 4-9,4 t?'���:.�s.;:8;i i`_ the first LBW Accredited professional in the firm,Mr.Sun recognizes the oriti- k , ^,,, cal nature of mechanical systems in supporting sustainable project goals,and on-Pp $ p j g !�PoM@�►fo eie,�tbe,!�Y.,:•: joys the collaborative process In achieving these. a •-k"�. t ,9..3:4. '•;; 1 Since promoted to principal in 1998,Mr.Sun has helped guide the firm toward +:pf oltorcta,ya;A,iii .; continued success. Understanding the need to remain an active artlol ant in the !j, '''"`'==:cat _;:� : V p p I y�tf. ��•.,L7 ��•itl��}'�nt:�'+�ti ti. w} HVAC Industry,both locally and nationally,he has served in numerous osi- Y.>T•: �,� • y y �� p ,.PADFESSiQNAl.AFF�ti!l�tOt{8,1:':•��;�:} I lions within ASHRABand also servos as Co•Chairman of the HVAC industry r�. g gip�rg tedprofess�anel :;: . Advisory Board at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. '' ` `" "`''ys,..,::A Relevant Experience ii.. cttoaesrebit'plxrio• :`• Buena Park Community Center--Renovation Buena Park California 't9N u el? , ltdvl + Sri:=#:':•:. s:.:.: r.::. Cypress Community Center—Renovation,Cypress,California sral'Tetiu a Northwood Community Center—Renovation,Irvine,California 4'p�4yy�p'ft{ � ;a` ; 4`}.:_� Oak Creek Community Center,Irvine,California ,:.,.f:.rt•::.::+:• :.:,.�.„; �'.":; '• Chino Hills Government Center,Chino Hills,California Hesperia Civic Center(City Hail&Library),Hesperia,California Addition Company Experience Anaheim City Hall West(Utilities Division)—Anaheim,California.Mechanical Systems Bvalation. Buena Park City Hail—Buena Park,California.Evaluation and upgrades of the existing nrecltanicaisysstems serving the City Hall building. Buena Park Police Department--Buena Park,California.66,000 SF Law Entfolcement facility including an Emergency Operations Center, Community Center;'Ow 1 Detention Facility., Crime Lab,Evidence/Property Storage and Firing Range. Buena Vista Children's Center/Mary Alice O'Connor Family Center M Burbank,California,Evaluation and up- grades of the existing mechanical systems in coordination with a complete renovation of the facility. Bnviromnentat Nature Center—Newport Beach,California.This 9,000 SF,single—story Community Education Center is(hefty*JIBED Platinum protect in Orange County. Hesperia Police Department—Hesperia,California.40,000 SF,two-story Law Enforcement facility. High Desert Government Center--Hesperia,California.66,100 SF,2-story City Hail/Municipal Administration building at the Civic Plaza. Project is in construction. • Irvine Ranch WaterDlstrict Headquarters--Irvine,California.Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Laguna Beach Senior Center&Community Center—Laguna Beach,California.Mechanical 4sfems Evaluation. Long Beach City Hall--Long Beach, Cal(fornia.Mechanical AVs'terns Evaluation, LA County Fire Department—Los Angeles,CA.Dispatch Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. LA County Office of Bduoatlon(LACOB)—Downey,CA.Data Center. Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Mission Viejo Interim City Hall—Mission Viejo,California.Remodel of 33,000 SF existing office building In- cluding replacement of mechanical systems. Newport Beach City Hall—Newport Beach,California.Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oak Creek Golf Clubhouse—Irvine,California.Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oasis Senior Center—Corona Del Mar,California.Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Oceanside Police Department^Oceanside,California.Mechanical Systems Evaluation. Griffin Stntctures Inc. Pro eel and Consltuolton Man• ers 29 PC-il Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • ASHOK PATEL, MRICS Cost Estimator Cumming Mr.Patel has an extensive background in cost estimation with over 20 years in ASHOK t'/1TGt. the construction industry. Ho has been involved with all phases of construction from master plan through occupancy, including estimation, quality control, t,,z,;k x ft t: i�`r quality assurance, and value engineering.Mr. Patel has been a proven leader in '6 i - ,: li ,.• :; his industry providing accurate cost management services, Including char e -4 f, ' l , '{ ' ::-.".4:".i Y 1 g' g g .,.1.... .... order analysis negotiations, on projects ranging In value up to$1 Billion,With 4r tt fz::.;.r;s;•• experience in all aspects of civil, structural, and architectural disciplines, Mr, 1A rz•y::•_t:4 Patel has been worked on a range of projects included in the healthcare, rx f,?. , , 1 educational,commercial office,industrial, public work, restaurant,government, .,.. .. Vii;x�- - •:f• �:.,,.,r:'=r retail,entertainment,and hospitality sectors. `,�„ . ,"l _ y, 1,....p..-•::;.;.:t' -::, •.: le:':JE{JS�•• t{f t{• Relevant Experience 'Bleb,_ (. )W Alameda Park,New Park and Community Building,Alameda,CA a;• 4:."•"•:•..:.~•••.•. •.°: Y g �`1'�q�E�slQ?,t�!��1fft�V1.TI0N8:n:•,Yt;•� Big League Dreams Sports Park,Recreation Facilities&Parking,Perris,CA .zlrtan ►, kel Ivgt Not�:QI; ailkad , Buena Park Community Center,Renovation,Buena Panic,CA r: iv .0.4.I ri. k=•r� :rt Buena Park Police Facility and Jail,Buena Park,CA `:,..,;t s'`: �;' '••,••-,,r••..:: ; • Chino Hills Pipeline Avenue,Community Center,Chino Hills,CA 1 � kQ< ".~ ' , :' i 'k!,1:;i 4 City of Cypress Recreational infrastructure Study,Cypress,CA y :14,-sp-N1-z'•r `h's•`el r;.:g,:i1 ipiflin City of Moreno Valley,Now Co►PorateYard Facility Moreno Valley,CA t: 6'' -a~ '•, "' ~''{: Crestline Branch Library,Now Facility,Cresllhre,CA :;'t:, °::::w,�_ ::t`}:. •► Encinitas Public Library,Bnointtas,CA Indio Police Headquarters,Indio,CA Inland Empire Transportation Management Center and CHP Emergency Response Operations,LBIJD-Certified, Fontana,CA Jerome Park Community Center Renovation,Santa Ana,CA John Ham Park,Lynwood,CA Laguna Niguel City Hall,Laguna Niguel,CA Laguna Niguel Community Center,Laguna Niguel,CA Lemon Park,Renovation Project,Fullerton,CA Los-Angeles Hail of Justice,Feasibility Study,Los Angeles,CA Malibu Library,Renovation Project,Malibu,CA Mesa Mann Sports Park,Bakersfield,CA Mojave water Agency,Corporate Yard,Mojave,CA Morgan Street Sports Park,Phase II,Perris,CA Orange Co,Vector Control,Vehicle Maintenance Faelitty,Garden Cirovo,CA Orange County Contra!Courts,Renovation,Santa Ana,CA Orange County Fair&Events Center,Administration Office,Costa Mesa,CA Orange County Fair&Events Center,Mall PIaza,Costa Mesa,CA San Diego Civic Center Complex,Estimates and Peer ROVIew,San Diego,CA San Dims City Hail,Renovation and Expansion,San Dimas,CA San Gorgonio Park,San Clemente,CA San Juan Capistrano Library,Renovation/Addition,San Juan Capistrano,CA Westminster Police Department,Westminster,CA Will Rogers Memorial Park,Refurbishment Project,Beverly Hills,CA -% Griffin Structures !no. Pro eat and Construction Mane.era 30 z Beal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • 5.SUBCONSULTANTS The proposed sub-consultants for this project are identified in Section 4,and resumes of key personnel from these sub-consultant firms are presented there. These consultants are familiar with all applicable codes and regulations,which exhibit proven expertise in the area of work required.In summary,these firms are: • Steven Gaffney Architecture(SGA),designated architect for this project. Engineer sub-consultants will report through SGA,and include: - Thornton Tomasetti,Structural Engineering - Tsuohtyama Kahn)Sun&Carter,Mechanical Engineering - FBA Engineering,Electrical Engineering • Cumming,Cost Estimating SUBCONSULTANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS Steven Gaffney Architecture Steven Gaffney Architecture,Inc.(SGA)is an award winning architectural firm specializing in olv- lo,cultural,commercial,rotalUmixed-use and high-density residential projects throughout California and the West. Based In Orange County, California, the firm continues to advance a determined "hands-on"approach for over a decade,incorporating extensive team participation experiences, to establish design direction and implementation in a logical and timely fashion, SGA's commitment to snstainabitity via energy efficient building systems,preserving appropriate selection of materials and form to maximize environmental conditions and long term performance has continued to diversify and expand the firms' services and project portfolio.To further demonstrate our commitment,all of the firm's personnel are LBBIPr Accredited Professionals. SGA's work is widely known and recognized in the construe- lion industry as exemplary. Thornton Tomasetti Thornton Tommie;Thornton Tomasetti has seasoned staff proficient in all facets of building design and construction,uniquely qualifying them to provide clients with precise,timely evaluations and recommend appropriate repair measures based on their assessments, 'IT is a recognized industry lender In building assessment investigations.TT's professional engineers and archi- tects coma highly trained to review drawings, speolf cations and reports,conduct visual inspections of building system components,Including the building envelope and interior, and mechanical,electrical,plumbing and fire protection systems for damage and deterioration,deferred maintenance,code compliance or other deficiencies. Information gathered through available drawings,specifications,and visual inspections are used to compile re- ports that identify repair measures and associated costs. FBA Engineering a FBA Engineering was founded in 1968 with the mission to be an Industry FBA FNCINlt l?,1.AINtC leader by providing the highest of professional engineering consulting ser- vices to the client. FBA has gained this status by providing Innovative,cost effective,state-of-the-art consulting electrical engineering design services, They are sensitive to the clients'ex- pectations and needs for a well functioning project. FBA's efforts bring into balance the project economies, client needs,constructability and long term Motional operation of the complete design. The personal participa- tion of management and staff results In cost effective,proven,practical engineering on each project. Continuing in-house education and training of staff insures up-to-data design oapabilttios,thereby insuring the standards of radium Structures Inc. Pro ect and Construollon Mans are 3i < < Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • their original mission are maintained.Il3A has provided services to a wide range of projects including:civic and municipal,needs assessment,parks,restaurants,recreational centers,golf courses,beautification projects,street lighting,educational facilities,health!/fitness clubs and sports lighting projects. Tsuchlyama Kaino Sun&Carter la �� �r,�;�r Tsuchiyama Kahno Sun &Carter Is a Consulting Mechanical Engineering` , } , ,,y firm that draws upon 30 years of experience In a diverse variety of projects rsnotilymna:tank,sum&ceder twospaet9leeeAatrai Weans � educational,retail, �ranging hem municipal educational retail historical,COmmerolal health- care,hospitality, and sustainable facilities.'Throughout its history the firm has maintained Its core values of a proactive service-oriented attitude,while providing Innovative,efficient and integrated design solutions for mechanical systems. TKSC specializes in the design of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning Systems,Plumbing Systems,and Pine Protection Systems. 'TKSC provides technical expertise and construction administration services with a commitment to comprehensive consulting towards progressive and practical design solutions. The firm has ex- tensive experience in a wide variety of projects both nationwide and internationally. Cumming Established in 1996,Cumming Is a leader In providing project control services, L r V M I�d l N G including cost and project management,planning and scheduling,and litigation 1 V 1 1 support. In fact, Cumming's 250 expert professionals—located In 17 offices across the United States,as well as In Abu Dhabi—have provided those and other related services to clients In more than 25 countries around the world. Throughout its history,the company has remained focused on one goal:to assist its clients in managing the criti- cal issues of lime and cost from conception through closeout,The ability to proactively resolve complex issues is and always has been central to the success of our clients.Foremost,Cumming provides unsurpassed services that enable you to achieve extraordinary results.With an understanding of your goals and expectations,a suite of so- Intio►r•oriented services are provided to meet your unique needs, Our cost management group is one of the largest providers of cost estimating and management services in the U.S. Additionally, our strength and capabilities in providing project management services is evidenced by our ranking among the nation's top project and construction management firms.ra 2009,Cumming ranked number 30 on Engineering News-Record's listing of the Top 100 CM-for-Fee Firms In the country, • Aritfln Struotures,Inc.I Protect and Construction Managers 32 �. `t Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • I:xpariertce with Team Partners C3rlffin Strnetures and Team have a long history of working tagoptar on a numtwr of steccesstully delivered projects as shown In the refii�asentative projects below,some of which t�elatlonthlp• have dated back to the mid 1990x.Additional relevant project axpoiionce cau Ue fotmd ott ench Team rnetnber's resume. , .t+:: ;s 7 Y-t:�:ti�•s•:a••• •r.: ::;S::_:t:. •,tti:, �,, �.f s.•a1C�,.Q•.•.:'�S::.{}a y':t,f:ti:.hi r��t ti.s''::��•'.S:t:;'!�tit.<is1->:.t S\•i � 1 r -Kiser t D . f ie7 + � n@ i t,:::,$.. 1S0• 11 Yer ' {.' : . 7. La 4 L _�:}i,!ti:i y,:':=:i's.,'.:::�;:�s:Y'::::tt t.t•::•.:i .{.•:1•F .• ' z 2 }[l po F'!i.', -1lt �l fi:\:iii4;'`ti'R 1;,a;:}._l1� ^is SI tt 4'i;Y,. v.a ti tt rr .- i;;lg a q i' ••Li•.2 il3•.` 7:56tS:'rYt :? t3 G i it :•• ifi t Y: n :i'.t-+i•`;.: :a:::r R.: _+ i .1 tti ° i- is`t.•-_+. sa: " st•V: A t, •::Ati L^L t::s+!Lta, I �}' 7, in�M = 1 .ffn ..,..•;. =:�:h�fi� t ip.,. lvo> R i:rs-,.D;:l.`�S�. i\-{!L`: •F` ii 4:t; f:i, 1ss%'�, i n : L 0pp l.AAi:, '1-e:=:•• 'Y•••` : .1Y-t ttt k14 I:t i 1 Q iE;,L.Li:;i+; ,}i ;,ti -'tt R:i:t..:•.st:i_•:.:(.;:i ::ct: R i i i eFU,V1Y`g Mk:=r:4 ,:.,;..r.i.Y;'r::;. ..Y:�:! % u 110eJ F:;,:r.••::7+I.It:rt 1:•?`ti`L�F) ,`• .«)::_ti ;u •-v i•.:if v y 8 R.f(+i!:•i:7:••l. •' .,;,,:.;. �t.:•t w.t • ?a �.`.� =:t.:f:i:r ;.:• , '.ii•'•3: st.:::`. s•: ::)s?�,.q}.:Li„•�`; Q i R a ti.': r a s t!•:', = t s.!i.: .� 6\%:2 ti. iti*sisy:.': •'c.•.�,...ild `:.•y....: • it-!: •..•i.• r•.,ir:. . yl nt ,,Ig! %l.4°Z.•i{ff:1.iM1�:. ' _:!.d�..•'°i: S s}w.• tt°t +r s!::i:,. :- Z.I tt•4 i((I i':= ••i;.3.}.:;y••lt••1.i1:i rYl' a._'''w , I an > ��1t t I :j?�Rril.;.1••.-v:3;;,'4ir:.�}i:• :'t.•J?.�sf.:1L� +i , , iL y t:..`.?} :;?iJY•::�r•4 :r:. K .�S3 K t .i:•t .t:s•, ,s ',s ,+ lnt»•I?itll�tt ..i!'q'',.- ••1..�",}'f+.'Z:•L i .::..it•' :7:.ti •i.t.�. .��i:�.L�.'s�'s:'is i •: Y!?,:.-1 a K :`•: tini`i:s,• _l•�''i�.:i t:. '[:e•.t'' 't•%1�:• !.•' itj .- :i!oCo ,�3Y�:.�:„�..s:, •,: i'»: .....:,Jt::t.:'�'..s •.•:•": .;3 tf��Iot ,Dd) tJ es,nI91%QAtit9: QP:i f•. 4:•t:;i t• :i s'::�:"t•ji�s+::i4 •.,.ti:ys.:`::.:•>-ti=:::.:' : .. i,.;•;4;i':L` ti q•;� :,;i,:.�.: t i t cjv.;A}: :. =.:•+:.7:=Jt : ; yi/ 8tl N. 1 1i�t:\t r�."�•'+'. ii.•:r.a..h-t 2R :L s}•• je`i j,`i�:::: •:ii=.s•::•:1::1 > ' , . idpp i_ ��R !.N ?r u 'up f, �° :•1•:+ a•i.:` t .• Q tp fo.4 T i_ .' :?•�{,fi .:- i_:• }V.i}= :j.t' . a �t oI l:";;::.{r:`-`' ;•.'i = '° 4, i:L.:•g:. $•t:s;•`.�:=t r.;.:;::i:K+;=t•Y\=I:i5 K•t r t: '` T.. l.':•- �.^S � a �L •f s t:t i=;.' .•,::.,t.3'is•s i 5 •_:_.:: `_,.:::ti'Vii;.�;••:�•:>;i,::,i^- t`.:.:-::i: : . a;:::p a ': '`:}.:7.t:t 'i' si:.t� •t 1 i i - 1 ti • i V? lasW: II i Jti tie t�i i: :Y.,as;t•:is{:':::t :.!:`a.\.::{ • .i•.:L:t:: }:•.t=:�:e t.ii:�:C:-:'' -f� ,•':7/�t'•:..::•i,.:!:.• :r'`.•..:i ltthicl ;:m•.Pa.,, 4'L:.i; ) 7- �1 t-. t:.s§,*:::::i: S+3s..is:i•'::.:i�s'1� Ei:::.1t5 T•:i ' .• .. •is. '.• .•v} I �. s.s�t li rl��ut )::°.• t+: •.\ u . . ` .. :t:z Z t:t,'•...i•.;:;.,.•s • ,I }� ; ggliir a11115 2.`t• a`. i:' •:: _ ;14,•.:;t'i•.i:ti�S•i ' .: :� . .::.�f;+: +• : � 4ilnilinli •,.. >•• '•' * ' <..{.., :t.:='•r':L:�F c. '•': .L: : :: : .:::i• t Q : d ::r:.•+: ' :.iy ; . :_�:-•. . ...-•4:: - '�' , : :s •:i d ;;`:s' .:ni , j t::ad P, ,• :.. -.:.r .: : . i+ t i- f QF oA.' '' : s: T:::- lkIt►fr,$frgclltr� ?+.{:. :•i • 's.. ,ti-. :z . htlB ' ..:::: .!:-..1:4•;:.:j% •r :i :: c:.::•: : . :'i- i.y ; 3 f •, i.. . ,�1b1.-F ��il .t. � — .:?:s• • ,i i:;;;;.•:::::::•..;-.1::1•:::•e: l a :} ..;: :•;=' og./ �� ol(i a .}• -t�•�.:t:•\ +1�: ?•::'' 1: r. 2:: �` t :j>;`� yItiV 1 r Y• . :.., .'i L • arel•jSi� '"' S_;::it:•_:t.L•}'i• .f •': .:. . ti '= y/ • :.. :• •itevti : ,. tY i '+ ` -:l:s :° f• 's•' ,.: • • • _ s Griffin 8iruotures Ino. Pro eat and Construction Mann,era 34 (t ti Beal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • • 6. REFERENCES Listed below are public sector references which can attest to Griffin Structures professional performance. We Invite you to call. `Rororonco Location Contact ProlaGl Mr'Sieve Badu lr P,E, °Newport Beach,Caiifomip • $3Q0 tlQWport Boptoyard. •` . `.. ':City Hail&Ore9uard Headquarters • ;Pt k11c Works Director Newporti3each,QA • •": -Building Assessments - •• . . _ (949)844.3335 `:.lit,Manuel Gomez,P,E = Irvine,California • • ::` ' ;r 6417 Oak Canyon . Pcice&Pu61lo1Nodks Yard.""• Public Works Director: <Irvine.CA 92618 :: Gapltal Improvement Plan:• •.• • • - •- • " °_ - ?-(949)7247365 - :Mr,Doug panes,PEE, Cypress,California :5700 QraggeAyenue ::Cypress Community Center"•. . .• Prtblic Works Di(ectof.•- --Cypress,CA 9507¢ : :Buydfrig Assessment&Reaovatipn :: :.. {7•4)229.740::.: - Ms.;Cyri this Nelson Santa Ana,California .: :- .29 t ymo tenter Plaza :' • City Hall : • .- gepity pity Manager :: •.:•Santa Ma,CA 92707. - - ;°Buydfng Assessmnnf&Renovatipn -•. (7f4)84I-5360 .. . We have included a more extensive list of references,as an insert following this report,for your convience.. Griffin Structures,Inc. Pro ect and Construction Man:!ars 35 .Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • ��'Grifn Structures,Inc.)Plect and Construction Managers 36, Cl R Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • 7. FEES FEE REQUIREMENTS This fee is based on any and all reasonable costs necessary to provide a scope of services similar to those described In our Proposal to the City's RFP for the Building/Facility Condition Assessment. For this work,Griffin Structures, Inc.,with its Team, proposes the below itemized total Fixed Professional Services Fees: $88,500(Eighty Bight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars), plus reimbursable expenses/allowance of$4,000 (Four Thousand Dollars). Fixed Professional Services Fee $ 88,500 Reimbursable Exponses/Allowance $ 4.000 Total $ 92,500, ASSUMPTIONS,INCLUSIONS, EXCLUSIONS This proposal is valid for 90 days from the submittal date,as required in the City's RFP. Invoices for work performed on a fixed-fee basis will be presented monthly based on the percentage of time spent and the amount of work completed.Invoices are considered due and payable on presentation. There will be no rate escalation during the time of project engagement,based on the proposed project schedule. Griffin Structures will invoice the City of Seal Beach on a lump sum basis based on a percentage complete for each of the tasks as they are completed on a monthly basis. ado Griffin Structures,Inc.i Project and Construction Manager* _ 37 �i'c t Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • DELINEATION OF TASKS&FEES Approach Fee•Task 0-Set Templates,Conventions.Etc.. 3,500 Task 1 -Review TEC Report • 2,400 _ Task 2-Review Building klistory . . - . 3,600 Task 3-Refine Survey Plan 2,400 .'Task 4-Obtain City Approval of Sury e_y Plan . - - - . .3}800 Task 5-Building Surveys 40,500 Task 6-Building Survey Workbook 9,000 Task 7-Projected Building Deficiency Costs - 9,000 Task 8-Indexes and Prioritization 4,900 Task 9-20 year Capital Plan • • 2,900 I Task 10-Final Report _ 6,500 Subtotal . . . _ 88,500 Reltnbursables/A11owance: . . . _ . . .. . . .. Insurance - 1000 Reproduction Costs -3,000 Grand Total . 92,500 Griffin Structures,inc.I Project and Construction Managers 38 Pt cl Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • B. SAMPLE WORK PRODUCT Several faollity evaluation samples have been selected and attached to this proposal to illustrate project ex- perience and emphasize our experience with a diversity of building typos. These surveys are specific to the projects for which they were conducted,and wore focused to the respective project goals, Here,in this project for Seal Beach,we have proposed to conduct surveys with similar content,but focused specifically to the needs of the City as outlined in the RFP, Our proposed approaoh includes coordinated surveys which collect information using a consistent methodology,so that results can be compared,and the computed indexes and ratios,including the PCL,remain consistent across the building population, Results will be presented so that the City will have the ability to make an informed,executive and policy driven decision regaining the nature of buildings and the priorities for remedy of deficiency. See Section 3 of this Proposal for a detailed description of our proposed approach and methodology, NOTE: For convenience of proposal organization and ease in reading this document,we have attached four sample building evaluations, all with their own page count, in the separately tabbed sections of this document.These evaluations are Example 1: City of Fullerton Senior Center The purpose of this evaluation was to compare renovation and addition to new construc- tion. The survey was followed by an extensive assessment of(a)design requirements for renovation and additions to the existing building,compared to(b) design requirements for construction of a replacement facility. The FCI index was close to 1.00 and consequently the recommendation was for a replacement solution,which was accepted by the City. Example 2: City of Oceanside Police Department and Public Library The purpose of the evaluation was (a) to evaluate the current "essential services" com- pliance of this adapted reuse of a strip center as a police facility,and(b)to form a basis for computing costs of renovation and expansion to meet long-term space requirements of the police department, The city branch library was located In an adjacent bay which also had been designed to"essential services"standards. Example 3:Newport Beach City Hall The purpose of the evaluation of this building campus (several buildings were included) was to assess long term reuse of those buildings for city frail functions, and to provided a basis for comparison to a program of facility replacemrent. Bxamplo 4: Yucaipa Pollee Department and City Library Each of these buildings was evaluated for its ability to accept adaptation for long term use by the police department, and hi each case this was found not feasible due to structural li- mitations and costs to upgrade those conditions. In addition,the survey was the basis for an analysis of expanding the existing library building to meet projected Muse library re- quirements. This option was affirmatively possible,and the survey further allowed for the development of a cost estimate to upgrade and expand the facility for that purpose. GrIUln Structures.hie.I Pro(eot andConstruotten Mnnnfiere _ 39 _ Seal t3eacb Building Condition Assessment iropoaal • is • atGriffin Siraolures Mo. Pro sot and Construction Mane era 40 Seal Dearth Building CondIlion Assessment Proposal • • 9. DISCLOSURE R1'P::A disclosure of all personal,professional,or financial relationships with any officer or employee of the CO Griffin does not, to our knowlege, have any continuing professional relationship with any officer or employee of the City. Griffin has no work history with the city of Seal Beach, and has no related professional relationship established. We affirm that, to our knowlege, Griffin does not have any financial relationships with any officer or employee of the City. ---A r Griffin Structures ino. Pro sot and Construction Marta!ors' 41 c, A Seal Beach Building condition Assessment Proposal • • Griffin Siruolures,Ins.I Pro)eot and Gonetruotion Managers 42 11- 80a1 t3eaoh Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • APPENDIX i CITY BUILDING AND FACILITIES LIST Bldg. # Facility Address Sq. Ft. 1 City Hall _ 2118th Street 13,112 2 Old City Hall 201 8th Street 11,170 3 Police Headquarters 911 Seal Beach Boulvard 2.1,984 4 City Yard-Office 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 3,100 4A 1 City Yard-Vehicle/Equipment Storage 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 6,200 4B City Yard-Vehicle/Equipment Repair 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 4,900 4C City Yard-Vehicle/Equipment Carport 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive ( 4,800 4D City Yard-Vehicle/Equipment Storage 1776 Adolfo Lopez Drive 5,250 5 Library/Senior Ce_nt_e_r 707 Electric 12,286 6 Fire Station#44 718 Central Avenue 3,500 7 Seal Be_ach Pier-Raur estant Building 900A ue Ocean Aven 2,679 8 North Seal Beach Community Center 3333 St.Cloud 4,550 9 Marina Community Center 151 Marina Drive 4,600 10 Seal Beach Pler-Old Bait Shop 900 Ocean Avenue 10C Lifeguard Tower 888 Ocean Avenue 516 10D Safety Building 900 Ocean Avenue 842 10E Lifeguard Headquarters 888 Ocean Avenue 1,900 10F Lifeguard Garage 888 Ocean Avenue 2,250 10H Seal Beach Pier Restrooms 900 Ocean Avenue 1,089 13 Beach Facility-Maintenance Building 1st St.Parking Lot 3,150 13A Beach Facility-Restaurant Building 15 First Street 850 eac 13B Beach Facility-Storage Bldg. 1st St.Parking Lot 350 13C Beach Facility-Restroom Building 1st St.Parking Lot 690 13D Beach Parking Lot 1st St.Parking Lot 68,085 16 Well&Pump House Bolsa Chios 3333 Bolsa Chica Road 570 17 Well&Pump House(Beverly Manor) 3101 Beverly Manor Road 1,040 29 _ 7 454 Zoeter Building(Day Care) 1198 Landing Avenue , 29B Zoeter Bleachers 12th St.&Landing _ Avenue 1,600 , 37 Tennis Center Club House 3900 Lampson _ 2,100 37A Tennis Center Locker/Showe/Restrooms 3900 Lampson _ 3,200 3713 Tennis Center Workout Room 3900 Lampson _ 1,000 -- - ----- -- --- - ---- - - - ---- - - - - -- - -- -- - 37C Tennis Center Gate/Site 3900 Lampson Seal Beach Pier-Utilities 900 Ocean Avenue 38 I Mcgaugh Pool Facility* 1698 Bolsa Ave. *Note: The McGaugh Pool Facility,1698 Bolsa Ave,is defined for purposes of this fee proposal as the build- ing housing the pool electrical and mechanical equipment as well as the adjacent coach's office. This does not include the school gymnasium,two swimming pools,the pool deck and associated fences and fixtures,or the pool electrical and mechanical equipment. It is understood that the pool building shares a structural wall with the school gymnasium. That wall is excluded from the scope of this review. Griffin Structures,Inc. I Project and Construction Managers 43 Seal Beach Building Condition Assessment Proposal • • EXIBIT B Fee Rate Schedule 2010 Hourly Rates Schedule: Team Member Hourly Rate Roger Torriero $195 Principal-in-Charge Deryl Robinson $150 Project Manager Steve Gaffney, AIA tbd Architect/Principal Mark Ellis, PE, SE tbd Structural Engineer William Zavrsnick tbd Electrical Engineer Larry Sun tbd Mechanical Engineer Ashok Patel $145 Cost Estimator • • ACORV CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Date(mm/dd/yy) L i 7/13/2010 Producer THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS DOES NOT AEND, Kimbrell Insurance Agency COVERAGE CERTIFICATE FORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.D OR ALTER THE 950 E Katella Ave Ste 4 Orange, CA 92867 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER Great American Assurance Co. A 0619648 714-538-8723 INSURER RSUI Indemnity Company www.Kimbrell-Insurance.com 714-538-8724 B Insured INSURER Lexington Insurance Company Griffin Structures, Inc., Etal C 385 Second St. INSURER Hartford Casualty Insurance Laguna Beach CA 92651 D INSURER E COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. POLICY POLICY INSR EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER MM/DD/Y DAY LIMITS A 7 LIABILITY GLP1679428 3/1/2010 3/1/2011 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000.000 y COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIAB FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 50 QQQ ICLAIMS MADE IZIOCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) Excluded PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1.000.000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2.000.000 GEN'L AGG LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000.000 POLICY IVIPROJECT_ I LOC $ D AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 72 UEC KR8091 3/1/2010 3/1/2011 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 7 ANY AUTO $ 1,000,000 _ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS (per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ZANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC$ AUTO ONLY. AGG$ B EXCESS LIABILITY NHA225542 3/1/2010 3/1/2011 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4,000.000 OCCUR ❑CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ 4,000.000 DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION$ 10.000 $ WORKERS'COMPENSATION& (STATUTORY LIMIT I bTHER EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY EL EACH ACCIDENT $ EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ C Professional 042456343 3/1/2010 3/1/2011 $2,000,000 Per Claim Liability $4,000,000 Aggregate DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCAT ONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED E•Y ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Building/Facility Condition Assessment CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY WILLS MAIL 30* DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE City of Seal Beach LEFT,VitMitiOtV.V<POLUMOW1014WKWONSNMAYMNIMNN 211 8th St pCX Seal Beach CA 90740 �lVw •10 Days for Non-Payment of Premium. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25-S(7/97) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 1 of 10 0 • IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIM ER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend,extend or aker the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25-S(7/97) created at www.e CertsONLINE.com CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GREEN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 2 of 10 0 CERTIFICATE ADDENDUM D/13/2 10 7/13/2010 NAMED INSURED: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Griffin Structures, Inc.,Etal City of Seal Beach 385 Second St. 211 8th St Laguna Beach CA 92651 Seal Beach CA 90740 City of Seal Beach, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers are named additional insured per attached endorsement. Coverage is primary and non- contributory. ecertsonhinem CERTIFICATE ADDENDUM CLIENT CODE: GAFFS Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:29:02 PM Page 3 of 11 • • POLICY NUMBER: 72 UEC KR8091 COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 20 48 02 99 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement,the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by this endorsement. This endorsement identifies person(s)or organization(s)who are"insureds"under the Who Is An Insured Provision of the Coverage Form.This endorsement does not alter coverage provided in the Coverage Form. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Endorsement Effective: 3/1/2010 Named Insured: Griffin Structures, Inc., Etal SCHEDULE Name of Person(s)or Organization(s): City of Seal Beach 211 8th St Seal Beach CA 90740 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to the endorsement. ) Each person or organization shown in the Schedule is an"insured"for Liability Coverage, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an"insured"under the Who Is An Insured Provision contained in Section II of the Coverage Form. CA 20 48 02 99 © Insurance Services Office,Inc.,1998 CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 3 of 10 . GLP1679428 • • 3/1/2010 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY.PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY PRIMARY NON-CONTRIBUTORY INSURANCE ENDORSEMENT It is hereby noted and agreed that effective upon inception, this policy shall be considered primary to any similar insurance held by third parties In respect to work performed by you under written contractual agreement(s)with said third parties and other insurance which may be available to such other third parties will be non-contributory. Section IV.,Condition 4.,of this policy is amended accordingly. The third party to whom this endorsement applies is: AS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT • CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 4 of 10 .GLP1679428 • • 3/1/2010 GAC 3650CG • (Ed. 11 06) THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. PRIMARY INSURANCE ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OWNERS AND CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM This insurance is primary to any other insurance held by third parties with respect to work performed by you under written contractual agreements with such third parties. GAC 3650CG (Ed. 11/06) XS CERT NO. 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 5 of 10 • • POLICY NUMBER: 3/1 2010 428 COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILITY CG 24 0410 93 WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization:All clients of the insured where required by written contract. (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) The TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US Condition (Section IV — COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS)is amended by the addition of the following: We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or"your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the "products-completed operations hazard".This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the Schedule above. Page 1 of 1 CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GAFFE Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 6 of 10 • • POLICY NUMBER:GLP1679428 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 3/1/2010 CG 25 03 03 97 • THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS) GENERAL AGGREGATE LIMIT • This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Designated Construction Projects: City of Seal Beach (If no entry appears above,information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) A.For all sums which the insured becomes 3. Any payments made under COVERAGE legally obligated to pay as damages caused A for damages or under COVERAGE C by"occurrences"under COVERAGE A for medical expenses shall reduce the (SECTION I);and for all medical expenses Designated Construction Project General caused by accidents under COVERAGE C Aggregate Limit for that designated con- (SECTION I),which can be attributed only struction project. Such payments shall not to ongoing operations at a single designated reduce the General Aggregate Limit construction project shown in the Schedule shown in the Declarations nor shall they above: reduce any other Designated Construction 1. A separate Designated Construction Pro- Project General Aggregate Limit for any ject General Aggregate Limit applies to other designated construction project each designated construction project,and shown in the Schedule above. that limit is equal to the amount of the 4. The limits shown in the Declarations for General Aggregate Limit shown in the Each Occurrence,Fire Damage and Medi- Declarations. cal Expense continue to apply.However, 2. The Designated Construction Project instwd of being subject to the General General Aggregate Limit is the most we Aggregate Limit shown in the Declare- will pay for the sum of all damages under tions,such limits will be subject to the COVERAGE A,except damages because applicable Designated Construction Pro- of"bodily injury"or property damage" ject��Aggregate Limit. included in the products-completed op- B. For all sums which the insured becomes erations hazard",and for medical ex- legally obligated to pay as damages caused penes under COVERAGE C regardless by"occurrences"under COVERAGE A of the number of: (SECTION I);and for all medical expenses s. Insureds, caused by accidents under COVERAGE C b. Claims made or"suits"brought; (SECTION I),which cannot be attributed Z or only to ongoing operations at a single desig- c. Persons or organizations making nated construction project shown in the claims or bringing"suits". Schedule above: 1. Any payments made under COVERAGE A for damages or under COVERAGE C for medical expenses shall reduce the amount available under the General Ag- gregate Limit or the Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit,whichever is applicable;and CG 25 03 03 97 Copyright,Insurance Services Office,Inc., 1996 Page 1 of 2 0 CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14.05 PM Page 7 of 10 • 2. Such payments shall not reduce any Des- E.The provisions of Limits Of Insurance ignated Construction Project General Ag- (SECTION III)not otherwise modified by gregate Limit. this endorsement shall continue to apply as C.When coverage for liability arising out of the stipulated. "products-completed operations hazard"is provided,any payments for damages because of"bodily injury"or"property damage"in- cluded in the"products-completed operations hazard"will reduce the Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit,and not reduce --the-Gen gateiimit-not-the-Desig=- nated Construction Project General Aggre- gate Limit. D.If the applicable designated construction project has been abandoned,delayed,or abandoned and then restarted,or if the au- thorized contracting parties deviate from plans,blueprints,designs specifications or timetables,the project will still be deemed to be the same construction project. • • Page 2 of 2 Copyright,Insurance Services Office,Inc., 1996 CG 25 03 03 97 17 CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODS: GRFFN Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3.14:05 PM Page 8 of 10 Policy Number:GLP1679• • 3/1/2010 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 10 01 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifes insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: Any person or organization that the insured is required by written contract to name as an additional insured. It is further agreed that such insurance as is afforded by this policy for the benefit of the above Additional Insured(s) shall be primary insurance as respects any claim, loss or liability arising out of the Named Insured(s)operations, and any other insurance maintained by the Additional insured(s) shall be excess and non-contributory with insurance provided hereunder (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement,) A. Section II—Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an insured the person or organization 1. All work,including materials,parts or shown in the Schedule,but only with respect to equipment furnished In connection with liability arising out of your ongoing operations such work,on the project(other than performed for that insured. service,maintenance or repairs)to be B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these performed by or on behalf of the additional additional insureds,the following exclusion is insured(s)at the site of the covered" added: operations has been completed;or 2.Exclusions This insurance does not apply to"bodily injury" 2. That:portion of"your work"out of which or"property damage"occurring after: the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. CG 20 1010 01 CERT NO.. 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GAFFE Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 9 of 10 • • GLP1679428 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 3/1/2010 CG 20 33 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - AUTOMATIC STATUS WHEN REQUIRED IN CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH YOU This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these include as an additional insured any person or or- additional insureds, the following additional exclu- ganization for whom you are performing operations sions apply: when you and such person or organization have This insurance does not apply to: agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that such person or organization be added as an addi- 1. "Bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal tional insured on your policy. Such person or or- and advertising injury"arising out of the render- ganization is an additional insured only with re- ing of, or the failure to render, any professional spect to liability for "bodily injury", "property architectural, engineering or surveying ser- damage" or "personal and advertising injury" vices, including: caused, in whole or in part, by: a. The preparing, approving, or failing to pre- 1. Your acts or omissions; or pare or approve, maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your change orders or drawings and specifica- behalf; tons; or in the performance of your ongoing operations for b. Supervisory, inspection, architectural or the additional insured. engineering activities. A person's or organization's status as an additional 2. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring insured under this endorsement ends when your after: operations for that additional insured are com- pleted. a. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than ser- vice, maintenance or repairs) to be per- formed by or on behalf of the additional in- sured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or b. That portion of"your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontrac- tor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. CG 20 33 07 04 ©ISO Properties, Inc.,2004 Page 1 of 1 D CERT NO.: 7814344 CLIENT CODE: GAFFS Steve Walley 7/13/2010 3:14:05 PM Page 10 of 10