HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGMT - Tetra Tech Inc. (Engineering Svcs-Westminster & SBB Intersection) 1 1 p to ��AJ WSW
•
. ov /v/ /9
ik F4 L eum.. • 4tiX 2 1.
2 4'
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
between
t f 14 , --
• 4
City of Seal Beach
211 8 Street
Seal Beach CA 90740
(hereinafter "City")
Tetra Tech, Inc.
600 City Parkway West, Suite 300
Orange CA 92868
(hereinafter "Consultant ")
for
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
665
Engineering Services for Westminster Avenue and
Seal Beach Boulevard Intersection Improvements
Contract No. 99003
• Y • •
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this � # day of 4/IA,Z, /9Q9by and
been th CITY OF SEAL BEACH (hereinafter celled "City "),' and
/ei 9 ,yc fsue, , , (hereinafter called "Consultant ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of
the State of California as a Charter City, with the power to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted under the Statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City requires the services of a Consultant to provide the professional services as
described in the Scope of Services;
WHEREAS, the Consultant is able and willing to perform the required services under the terms
and conditions of this Contract;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
SECTION 101
101.1 CONSULTANT SERVICES. Consultant, as an independent contractor, agrees to
perform during the term of this Agreement, each and every service set forth on the "Scope of
Services" attached to this Agreement as Exhibit "A ". The' initiation of service by the Consultant
will commence upon receipt of a written notice from the Designated Official authorizing
Consultant to proceed, and only to the extent of such authorization. The services of the consultant
shall include the making of all investigations, studies, and analysis required by the conditions
involved in each request of the Designated Official.
101.2 TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall complete all services set forth in
"Schedule ", Exhibit C, Schedule. The foregoing time schedule may be modified by the mutual
written consent of the parties hereto.
101.3 COMPENSATION. The City will pay for the services of Consultant as indicated on the
"Schedule of Compensation" which is set forth in Exhibit "B ". No payment for expenses or labor
shall be paid by City unless it is related to a service which is referred to in the "Schedule of
Compensation ". The total cost to the City shall not exceed ithe amount designated in Exhibit `B ",
without the written approval and authorization of the City Council.
101.4 PAYMENT. The City will pay for services of the Consultant through monthly invoices
according to the progress payments schedule established in the Schedule of Compensation. City's
payment to Consultant shall be made within thirty (30) days of the date the invoice was received.
1
• •
101.5 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Consultant and its subcontractor(s) shall act
hereunder as independent contractors, and shall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for
City. Neither City or any of its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of
Consultant, or any of Consultant's employees or subcontractor, except as herein set forth, and
Consultant expressly warrants no to, at any time or in any manner, represent that it, or any of its
agents, servants, subcontractors or employees, are in any manner agents, servants or employees of
City, it being distinctly understood that Consultant is and shall at all times remain to City a wholly
independent contractor and Consultant's obligations to City are solely such as are prescribed by
this Agreement.
101.6 ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of City.
101.7 DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. Each and every report, draft, instrument of service, map,
record, and other document reproduced, prepared, or caused to be prepared by the Consultant
pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of the City. City
acknowledges and agrees that all reports, drafts, instruments of service, maps, records, and other
documents prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be used exclusively on this
project and shall not be used for any other wotk without the written consent of Consultant. In the
event City and Consultant consent permit the reuse or other use of the reports, drafts, instruments
of service, maps, records, and other documents, City shall require the party using them to
indemnify and hold harmless City and Consultant regarding such reuse or other use, and City shall
require the party using them to eliminate any and all references to Consultant from the reports,
drafts, instruments of service, maps, records, and other documents. This paragraph shall not
restrict the duties of the City under the public records act.
101.8 CITY LIASON. Consultant shall perform under the general supervision of the Director of
Public Works of City or his designee, and all communications, instructions and directions on the
part of the City shall be communicated exclusively through the Director of Public Works or his
designee.
101.9 PERSONNEL. Consultant represents that it has, or shall secure at its own expense, all
personnel required to perform Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant may
associate or employ associates or subcontractors in the performance of it services under this
agreement, but all times shall be responsible for the completion of their services.
101.10 INSURANCE Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement
the following policies of insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work performed hereunder by
Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Such policies of insurance shall be placed
with insurers admitted to do business in California with a current A.M. Best's rating of A: VII or
better, unless an otherwise acceptable insurer is approved in writing, and in advance, by the City.
2
r .y
i
:r
101.10.1. Scope and Limits of Coverage: At a minimum, the policies of insurance required
hereunder shall meet the following specifications:
1. A policy or policies of Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum limits of one
million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of
wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent
contractors in performance of services under this Agreement. Such coverage shall be at least
as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence
form CG 0001). If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general
aggregate is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the services
performed under this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit.
2. A policy or policies of Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum limit of one million
dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage as a result of
wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and independent
contractors in performance of services under this Agreement. Such coverage shall be at least
as broad as Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability,
code 1 (any auto).
3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's
Liability Insurance with a minimum policy limit of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per
accident for bodily injury and disease. Such policies of insurance shall cover all persons who
provide services on behalf of Consultant.
4. A policy or policies of Errors and Omissions professional liability insurance appropriate to
Consultant's profession and approved in writing and in advance by the City. Such policy or
policies of insurance shall carry a minimum limit of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per
occurrence.
101.10.2 Other Insurance Provisions: All such policies of insurance shall, where applicable,
contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
add■ienal Men
1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall be covered as' insureds
with respect to liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant;
products and completed operations of Consultant, premises owned, occupied, or used by
Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by Consultant. The policy or
policies of insurance shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to
the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
2. For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance
with respect to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any
insurance or self - insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or
volunteers shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with Consultant's
coverage.
3
y • IP
f �\
i 1
3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of
warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees,
agents or volunteers.
4. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made
or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
5. Each policy of insurance required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that coverage
shall not be suspended, non - renewed, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or
in limits, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the
policy) except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt
requested. Consultant agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance
coverage without having first obtained replacement insurance that complies with the
requirements of this Agreement.
6. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials,
employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors and volunteers.
7. Consultant shall pay all insurance premiums when due, at Consultant's sole expense.
Consultant shall not be entitled to any reimbursement of insurance premiums as a reimbursable
expense under this Agreement.
101.10.3 Verification of Coverage Consultant shall submit to City (1) insurance certificates
indicating compliance with the minimum worker's compensation insurance requirements above,
and (2) original insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum
insurance requirements above, not less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under
this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on City's appropriate standard forms entitled
"Additional Insured Endorsement ", or a substantially similar form acceptable to the City Attorney.
Endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. Consultant's failure to comply with this requirement shall constitute a material breach of
this Agreement, for which City shall be entitled to seek all available legal remedies including,
without limitation, recision of this Agreement. The City shall not be required to compensate
Consultant for any services performed prior to the date certificates of insurance and endorsements
are presented to the City unless the City shall have first issued a written notice to Consultant to
proceed notwithstanding the requirements of this Agreement.
101.10.4 Deductibles and Self Insured Retention Any deductibles or self - insured retention
must be declared to and approved by the City prior to the commencement of work hereunder. At
the sole option of the City, the insurer may be required to reduce or eliminate such deductibles or
self - insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and
volunteers. Alternatively, the City may require Consultant to procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
4
• i
101.10.4 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its
policies, or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
101.11 NOT USED
101.12 INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT and CITY agree that City, its employees, agents and
officials should, to the extent permitted by law be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim,
lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other cost arising
out of or in any way related to the negligent performance of this Agreement by CONSULTANT.
Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity provision are intended by the parties to be interpreted and
construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to the City. CONSULTANT
acknowledges that CITY would not have entered into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of
CONSULTANT to indemnify and protect CITY as set forth here.
A. To the full extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless CITY, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration
proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind,
whether actual, alleged, or threatened, reasonable attorneys fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest,
reasonable defense costs including expert witness fees and any other reasonable costs or expenses of any
kind whatsoever incurred in relation to, as a consequence of, arising out of or in any way attributable
actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the negligent performance of this Agreement by
CONSULTANT. All obligations under this provision are to be paid by CONSULTANT as they are
incurred by the CITY. CITY shall select counsel of its own choice to defend it in any action brought in
connection with the Agreement. CONSULTANT shall pay all reasonable legal fees and costs incurred in
connection with the City's defense to the extent of consultant's negligence.
B. The obligations of CONSULTANT under this or any other provision of this Agreement
will not be limited by the provisions of any workers compensation act or similar act. CONSULTANT
expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to CITY, its employees, agents and
officials.
5
• •
J
101.13 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be terminated without
cause by City upon ten (10) days' written notice to the Consultant without further action by the
City. This Agreement may be terminated by the Consultant upon thirty (30) days' written notice
to the City. In the event the City terminates this Agreement as provided above, Consultant shall
terminate work at the earliest possible point, and complete all attendant reports and/or graphic
representations, conceptual plans, construction plan, or construction specifications. The City shall
compensate the Consultant proportionately for work, provided such work is in a form useable to
the City.
Notice. Any notice required to be given to the Consulant shall be deemed duly and properly given
upon mailing, postage prepaid, to:
6
• •
Tetra Tech, Inc.
600 City Parkway West, Suite 300
Orange CA 92868
or personally delivered to Consultant at such address or other address specified to the City in
writing by Consultant.
Any notice required to be given to the City shall be deemed duly and properly given upon mailing,
postage prepaid, to:
Attn: Director of Public Works
City of Seal Beach
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach CA 90740
or personally delivered to City at such address or address specified to the Consultant in writing by
the City.
101.14 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. The Consultant shall perform and require its
Subcontractors to perform the Services in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement
and in accordance with professional standard's of skill, care and diligence adhered to by firms
recognized for their expertise, experience and knowledge in performing services of a similar
nature. The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy,
completeness, and coordination of the Services, it being understood that the City will be relying
upon such professional quality, accuracy, completeness, and coordination in utilizing the Services.
The foregoing obligations and standards shall constitute the "Standards of Performance" for the
purposes of this Contract.
The Consultant shall carefully study this Contract, shall verify all figures in these Contract
Documents before performing the Services; shall promptly notify the City of all errors,
inconsistencies, and/or omissions that it discovers; and, in instances where such non - conformities
are discovered, shall obtain specific instructions in writing from the City before Consultant's
proceeding with the Services. Any Services affected which are performed prior to the City's
decision shall be at the Consultant's risk. The Consultant shall not take advantage of any apparent
non - conformity that may be found in this Contract. The City shall be entitled to make such
corrections therein and interpretations thereof as it may deem necessary for the fulfillment of the
intent of this Contract. Omissions or misdescriptions of any Services that are manifestly necessary
to carry out the intent of this Contract, or that are customarily performed, shall not relieve the
Consultant from performing such Services at no additional expense and/or delay, and such
Services shall be performed as if fully and correctly set forth in this Contract.
101.15 WARRANTY. The Consultant warrants that all Services shall be in accordance with this
Contract and shall comply with the Standard of Performance for a period of one year from final
acceptance of the Services. In the event of breach of this warranty, the Consultant shall take the
necessary actions to correct the breach and the consequences thereof, at the Consultant's sole
7
expense, in the most expeditious manner as permitted by existing circumstances. If the Consultant
does not promptly take steps to correct the breach upon notification thereof by the City, the City
without waiving any other rights or remedies it may have at law or otherwise, may do or cause
others to do so, and the Consultant shall promptly reimburse the City for all expenses and costs
incurred in connection therewith.
101.16 DATA AND SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY CITY. Consultant shall deliver to
the City the studies, plans, specifications, or other documents as are identified in the Scope of
Services; and Consultant shall upon completion of all work, submit to the City all information
developed in the course of the Consultant's services. Consultant shall, in such time and in such
form as the City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall, upon request by City and upon completion or termination of this
Agreement, deliver to the City all material furnished to Consultant by the City.
101.17 CONFIDENTIALITY. Consultant shall not disclose, publish, or authorize others to
disclose or publish, design data, drawings, specifications, reports, or other information pertaining
to the projects assigned to consultant by the City or other information to which the consultant has
had access during the term of this agreement without the prior written approval of the designated
Official during the term of this Agreement and for a period of two (2) years after the termination
of this agreement.
101.18 RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts, and other such information required by the City or the Designated
Official. The Consultant shall maintain adequate records on services provided in sufficient detail
to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible.
to
Consultant shall provide access to the Designate 00ffic or
lu the 1 right examine
such books and records, and gives the Designated
and audit such books and records and to make transcripts as necessary, and to allow inspection of
all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement.
101.19 ASSIGNM This agreement is personal to the Consultant and the Consultant's
Representative. Any attempt at assignment by the Consultant shall be void unless approved in
writing by the Designated Official. Consultants services pursuant to this Agreement shall be
provided by the Consultant's Representative or directly under the supervision of the Consultant's
Representative and Consultant shall not assign another of the City, b and through designated
of this Agreement without the prior written approval
Official.
101.20 SAFET REOUIREMENT. All work performed under this Agreement shall be
performed in such a manner as to provide safety to the public and to meet or exceed the safety
d
standards outlined by CAL -OSHA. The City reserves the right
are gtobserved restraint or cease
relative to
desist orders to the Consultant when unsafe or harmful
sites
the performance of the work under this agreement.
fro The its Consultant operations. hazardous and t on
free of hazards to persons and property resulting
8
1
• •
noted by the Consultant which is not the result of his operations shall be immediately reported to
the City.
101.21 NUISANCE. Consultant shall not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or
commission of any nuisance in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
101.22 PERMITS AND LICENSES. Consultant, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain
during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, licenses, and certificates that may be
required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.
101.23 CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that neither consultant, nor any
officer thereof, has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly which will
conflict with in any manner or degree with the performance of the Consultant services under this
Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person
having any such interest shall be employed by Consultant. Consultant further covenants that
Consultant has not contracted with nor is the Consultant performing any services directly or
indirectly, with any developer and/or property owners and/or firms, and/or partnerships owning
property in the City, and further covenants and agrees that Consultant and/or its subcontractors
shall provide no service or enter into any contact with the Developer and/or property owner
and/or firms, and/or partnerships owning property in the City prior to the completion of this
Agreement. . -
101.24 WAIVER. A waiver by the City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition
contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the
same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement whether of the same
or different character.
101.25 COST OF LITIGATION. If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision of
this Agreement or for damages by reason of any alleged breach of any provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and
expenses in such amount as the court may determine to be reasonable. In awarding the cost of
litigation, the court shall not be bound by any court fee schedule, but shall, if it is in the interest of
justice to do so, award the full amount of costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees paid or incurred in
good faith.
101.26 SEVERABILITY. If any part, term, or provision of this Agreement shall be held illegal,
unenforceable, or in conflict with any law of a federal, state, or local government having
jurisdiction over this Agreement, the validity of the reminding portions or provisions shall not be
affected by such holding.
101.27 INTEGRATED CONTRACT. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement
between the City and the Consultant and all preliminary negotiations and agreements are deemed
a part of this Agreement. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the
provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties to
this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns.
9
•
•,:
In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and any attached
Consultant's proposal, the provisions of this agreement shall control.
101.28 CHOICE OF LAW . The terms of this Agreement shall be interpreted according to the
laws of the State of California.
10
In recognition of the obligations stated in this Agreement, the parties have executed this
Agreement on the date indicated above.
CONSULTANT: CITY:
LLP
Name: M a y e IvlarStan Name: Keith Till
Title: VGe Pr d, ..•*- Title: City Manager
Attest: Approved as to form:
By: FJ1. ( By:
Name: 1 1„1 , ,se, I, c..sa.A. Name:
Title: 401 1 (� JIol +C I I nturla IL Title:
11
• .
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF
WORK
• •
200 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK
200.1 EXAMINATION OF RFP/RFQ DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall be solely
responsible for examining the City's RFP/RFQ documents, including any addenda
issued, and for informing itself with respect to any and all conditions which may in any
way affect the amount or nature of the proposal, or the performance of the Services in
the event the Consultant is selected. No relief for error or omission will be given.
200.3 E MAIL: The Consultant shall supply the City with individual Internet E — mail
addresses for each of the project managers and principals involved in the project and
other consultant personnel as the City deems necessary.
200.4 INVOICES: The Consultant shall submit not more than one invoice a month and
shall obtain a copy of the accounts payable schedule. The invoice will be in a format
that is acceptable to City Engineering Staff and shall detail individual personnel who
worked on the project, specific tasks performed, hours worked, billing rate, total costs,
and previous billing history, percentage of work completed, percentage of dollars spent.
The Consultant shall prepare invoices that show costs against each major milestone
task.
The Consultant shall notify the City when the cumulative compensation payable under
this Contract has reached 75% of the Contract not to exceed price. If at any time the
Consultant has reason to believe that the total cost to the Authority for the performance
of this Contract will be greater or substantially less that the Contract not to exceed
price, the Consultant shall notify the Consultant in writing to that effect and give its
revised estimate of the total cost for the performance of this Contract. The notice shall
state the estimated amount of additional funds required to continue performance for the
remainder of the contract term. In no event is the Consultant authorized to exceed the
"not to exceed price" without prior written approval from the City.
200.5 COMPUTER FILES: The Consultant shall supply the City with a digital and
editable copy of all files that are included in the hard copy of the report. The Consultant
shall use or transfer into the following formats: Word Processing: Microsoft Word 97,
Spreadsheets: Excel 97, Databases: Filemaker Pro, Microsoft Access, GIS: ArcView,
Drawings: Autocad 14. All final plans shall be submitted also on CD readable by City
computers. If the Consultant wishes to use another program that would increase
productivity, the Consultant will provide the City a licensed copy or transfer into a
format that is acceptable to City Engineering Staff. All digital files shall be submitted on
a "zip disk."
The City shall have the right to use, duplicate, modify or disclose the technical data and
the information contained
200.6 KEY PERSONNEL: The Consultant shall not reassign any personnel mentioned
in the RFQ/Interview process unless under extraordinary circumstances. The
13
• •
Consultant shall secure the prior written approval the City for any change or
reassignment of the key personnel, submitting written documentation of the new
individual's qualification.
The Consultant's project manager shall supervise and direct the services, and have
overall responsibility for the services in accordance with the Consultant agreement and
Scope of Work. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for implementation of all
services, means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for
coordination of all portions of the services.
All workers shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to
them. The City shall have the right, in its absolute discretion to require the removal of
the Consultant's personnel at any level assigned to the performance of the Services at
no additional fee to the City,,if the City considers such removal necessary and in its
best interest and request such removal in writing. Further, an employee who is
dismissed for any of the above reasons shall not be re-employed on this Contract.
Key Personnel
Marie Marston Principal in Charge
Joe Buckner . Project Manager
Jeff Heald Traffic/Wilbur Smith Associates
Jennifer Ekrami Roadway/Utilities/ROW
Rusty Francis Surveying
200.7 UNAUTHORIZED WORK: Any services not required by the terms of the final
scope of work or proposal that are performed without written authority from the City, will
be considered as unauthorized and at the sole expense of the Consultant. Services so
performed will not be paid for, and no extension in the period of performance shall be
granted on account thereof.
200.8 AUDITS: The Consultant shall keep and maintain full and complete records and
books of account of its costs and expenses relating to the performance of the Services,
in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices. Such records and -
accounts shall permit the Consultant to furnish the City, upon written notice, an
accurate written allocation of the costs to the various elements of the Services, as may
be required by the Authority. Upon reasonable advance written notice the City or its
representatives shall have the right to examine, any books, records, accounts, and
other documents of the Contractor directly pertaining to costs when such costs are the
basis of a claim or of reimbursement to the Consultant hereunder. The Consultant will
make reasonable efforts to assure that the any such representative is not a competitor
of the Contractor to which the disclosure of such cost information would have a
detrimental effect on the Consultant's business. The Consultant shall keep and
preserve all such books, records, accounts, and other documents for a period of at
least three years from after completion of the Services after Final Payment or if this
Contract is terminated in whole or in part after the final termination agreement,
14
• •
200.9 CONSULTANTS INTERACTION WITH MEDIA AND THE PUBLIC: The
Consultant shall refer all inquiries from the news media to the City. If the Consultant
receives a complaint from a citizen or the community, the Consultant shall inform the
City what action was taken to alleviate the situation.
200.10 SUBCONTRACTORS/SUBCONSULTANT: The City reserves the right of prior
approval of all subcontractors and retains the right to request the Consultant to
terminate any subcontractor, for any reason appropriate by the City, by so notifying the
Consultant in writing. Should said notification be submitted to the Consultant, it shall
terminate said subcontractor immediately.
The City shall have no liability to any subcontractor(s) for payment for services under
this Contract or other work performed for Contractor. Any subcontract entered into by
Consultant under the contract shall duly note that the responsibility for payment for the
technical services or any other services performed shall be the sole responsibility of
the Consultant.
200.11 DIRECT EXPENSES: It is expected that the Consultant has extensive
knowledge and experience performing this type of work. The Consultant shall prepare a
not to exceed budget for direct expenses,and breakdown costs for services such as
copying, blue prints, computer time, reproduction, delivery, and any other foreseeable
expense not covered in the Consultant's hourly rates. Therefore, the Consultant shall
receive no additional compensation beyond that which is detailed in their budget. The
City will not pay for mileage charges.
200.12 INSURANCE: The Consultant shall obtain a minimum of $1,000,000 worth of
professional error and omissions insurance prior to entering into an agreement with the
City. The insurance requirement is non-negotiable.
200.13 RETENTION FOR CALTRANS: For any task orders that involves Caltrans
oversight, the City will withhold ten percent (10%) of each progress payment to
Consultant. Upon request by the Consultant, and subject to the City's approval, the
Consultant may provide an alternate form of security for performance as a substitute for
City's withhold of ten percent (10%) of each progress payment. Acceptable forms of
security to be deposited in an approved escrow account at no cost to the City include
certificates of deposit, cash, securities, or bonds; the Consultant may also provide an
irrevocable letter of credit deposited with the City's Director of Finance.
The ten percent (10%) retention for Caltrans oversight related task orders shall be
withheld by the City until such time that all work for the respective task order is
completed and all deliverables are received by the City and Caltrans.
15
• •
201 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK
CONSULTANT'S PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Seal Beach desires to widen Westminster Avenue from approximately 900 feet
west of Seal Beach Boulevard to Kitts Highway which is approximately 850 feet east of Seal
Beach Boulevard. Included in the widening improvements would be the inclusion of an
additional southbound left turn lane on Seal Beach Boulevard to eastbound Westminster
Avenue. The City also desires to study the alignment of Seal Beach Boulevard south of
Westminster Avenue.
The overall project described above will be split into two distinct phases:
Phase 1 — Design for the widening of Seal Beach Boulevard to provide an additional
southbound left turn lane and traffic signal modification at Seal Beach
Boulevard/Westminster Avenue with an interconnect to the existing signal on
Westminster Avenue at Kitts Highway.
Phase 2 - Design for the widening of Westminster Avenue from 900 feet west of Seal
Beach Boulevard to Kitts Highway and preliminary engineering for the study of
Seal Beach Boulevard alignment south of Westminster Avenue.
The crossing of Westminster Avenue and Seal"Beach Boulevard is a major intersection in the
City and the purpose of the proposed improvements is to enhance the vehicular capacity and
improve safety.
The existing cross section of Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard is two through
lanes both eastbound and westbound with single left turn lanes. Westbound Westminster
Avenue also has a right turn lane to northbound Seal Beach Boulevard. Bike lanes are also
existing both eastbound and westbound within the project limits.
Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue is three through lanes both northbound and
southbound with single left turn lanes.
The proposed improvements to be designed at Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard will Include:
Phase 1
Y Providing dual lefts on Seal Beach Boulevard (southbound)
Y Traffic Signal Modification at Seal Beach/Westminster
Y Signal interconnect between the signals at Seal Beach Boulevard and Kitts
Highway
Phase 2(PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY)
•
Y Providing dual lefts on Westminster Avenue (both directions)
16
• . . _
•
Y Adding a third eastbound through lane on Westminster at Seal Beach
Also included in phase 2 would be the preliminary study of:
Y Improving the alignment of Seal Beach Blvd. south of Westminster Ave.
•
SCOPE OF WORK
The work specifically involves the preparation of base mapping, final design (plans,
specifications, and estimates) for the improvements on Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard north of Westminster Avenue, and preliminary engineering for the alignment of Seal
Beach Boulevard south of Westminster Avenue. The final design will be processed and
approved through the City of Seal Beach. The scope will include the following phases and
work tasks:
PHASE 1
• Task 1.1 Kick-off Meeting /Obtain Existing Information
• Task 1.2 Ground Survey
• Task 1.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 1.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 1.5 Preliminary Right-of-Way Study
• Task 1.6 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 1.7 Meetings, Coordination
PHASE 2 (PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY)
• Task 2.1 Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information
• Task 2.2 Ground Survey
• Task 2.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 2.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 2.5 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 2.6 Alignment Study
• Task 2.7 Meetings, Coordination
PHASE 1
Task 1.1— Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
The purpose of the kick-off meeting will be to clearly identify the lines of communication
between TUISG and the City, to assess the availability of data from the City, to clearly define
the scope of work, and to determine the design criteria for the final design.
17
• •
Tt/ISG will research and obtain from the City and County, information such as as-builts, survey
control records and mapping, utility locations through contacts with utility companies, drainage
information, traffic signal locations, lighting and power poles, oil and gas facilities, previous
materials/geotechnical reports, project-related reports and studies, and other information as
available and necessary for the final design.
Task 1.1 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
Task 1.2 —Ground Survey
Utilizing the information obtained in Task 1.1, we will perform a ground survey on Seal Beach
Boulevard, covering the proposed limits of construction. The survey will extend around the
northeast and northwest curb returns and approximately 50 feet beyond the BCRs on
Westminster Avenue. We will use the County of Orange datum for both horizontal and vertical
control unless the City of Seal Beach has their own datum.
We will cross section Seat Beach Boulevard at 50 foot intervals from Westminster Avenue to
approximately 600 feet north of Westminster Avenue. The cross sections will include: top of
curbs, flowlines, lip of gutters, back of walks, and shots 10' beyond proposed R/W.
The survey will include a topographic survey within the project limits for features such as: water
meters, fire hydrants, signal and lighting pull boxes, signs, driveways, parkway drains, and
other features which may be impacted by the s'freet widening.
Task 1.2 Deliverables:
• Field Survey on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 1.3— Utility Coordination
It is anticipated the utility as-builts within the project limits will be obtained from the City of Seal
Beach during Task 1.1. From the utility as-builts, Tt/ISG will determine the conflicts or impacts
the various alternatives may have with the existing utilities.
Tt/ISG will coordinate and perform related follow-up with the affected utility companies
regarding the specific impact locations throughout the project to identify design controls and
considerations necessary for final design. The existing franchise agreements with each
affected utility will determine whether the final plans and cost estimates indicate the necessary
modifications/relocations be performed as a part of the project or whether the utility company
must perform and pay for their own work. It is anticipated the City of Seal Beach will provide
this information to Tt/ISG.
Task 1.3 Deliverables:
• Utility Correspondence File
Task 1.4— Prepare Base Mapping
18
•
This task involves the combination of the information and products obtained in the first three
•
tasks. The base mapping will begin with the field survey data obtained in Task 1.2. Record
maps obtained in Task 1.1 will be used to determine the existing right-of-way lines. Utility
information obtained in Tasks 1.1 and 1.3 will also be added to the base map. Finally, we will
field walk the site to verify the base map is consistent with existing conditions.
Task 1.4 Deliverables:
• Base Map on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 1.5 — Preliminary Right-of-Way Study
Prior to starting PS&E, we will prepare a draft layout plan showing the phase 1 and phase 2
improvements for City review. Base mapping for phase 2 will be accomplished through the
use of as-builts, no survey for phase 2 is proposed at this time. Enough detail will be shown
such as lane widths, tapers, turn pockets, and parkway widths to verify the layout is adequate.
We will also show the right-of-way requirements for the phase 1 and phase 2 improvements.
We understand there are right-of-way concerns, especially at the northwest corner where the
existing gas station pumps are very close to existing right-of-way. We will propose a layout
that will minimize right-of-way related impacts.
This scope of work does not include the preparation of legal descriptions or accompanying
plats, title reports, appraisals, or acquisition.
Task 1.5 Deliverables:
• Layout plan (Phase 1 and 2) with proposed R/W impacts (hardcopy and on diskette)
Task 1.6 — Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
The phase 1 PS&E will be comprised of the following:
• Street Plans (Plan and Profile)
• Traffic Signal Modification Plan
• Signing and Pavement Delineation Plan
• Specifications
• Cost Estimates
Street Plans
We propose to prepare the street widening plans at a scale of 1"=20'. The plans will show
existing and proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveways. Limits of pavement removals and
construction will be delineated as well as the need for cold planing and overlay for smooth
joins and cross sections. Curb and median profiles will be designed and shown on the plans.
Also noted on the plans will be existing survey monumentation that may be obliterated during
construction. Direction will be given on both the plans and specifications for the contractor to
protect and/or restore all monumentation impacted during construction.
19
•
• •
In addition to the street plans, construction details will be part of the design documents for
storm drain modifications due to new curb locations. No drainage studies will be performed or
hydraulic calculations for sizing of drainage facilities. We propose to construct drainage
systems of similar size and capacity.
Traffic Signal Modification / Interconnect
In this task, Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) will prepare design plans for an upgraded traffic
signal at Westminster Avenue/ Seal Beach Boulevard. WSA will coordinate with the City of
Seal Beach for pertinent signal design standards. The signal design will take into account the
phase 2 improvements along Westminster Avenue, as approved by the City in Task 1.5, and
locate the controller cabinet and poles accordingly. The mast arms and head locations will be
reviewed to provide an operational signal for phase 1 and minimize modifications to the signal
during phase 2 construction.
The traffic signal plan will incorporate all aspects of the traffic signal including new and existing
signal standards, signal heads, loop detectors, proposed signal and interconnect conduits,
existing and proposed controller assemblies and service point locations.
WSA will also prepare a traffic signal interconnect between the signals on Westminster
Avenue between Seal Beach Boulevard and Kitts Highway. The interconnect will be included
within the signal modification plan and will terminate in a pull-box at Kitts Highway. The actual
interconnecting to the Kitts Highway signal will be completed by others when the existing
controller is upgraded. The signal modification plan will also provide "stubs"for future
interconnect in the remaining three directions.
Signing and Pavement Delineation
The signing and pavement delineation plans will be prepared at a scale of 1"=40' and will show
the existing striping, limits of pavement delineation removal, new striping, pavement markings
and markers. Existing signs conflicting with the new curbs will be relocated and noted on the
plan.
Sheet List
We anticipate the following sheets will be required for phase 1:
1. Title Sheet
2. Typicals / Details
3. Street Plan
4. Signing and Striping Plan
5. Signal Modification / Interconnect Plan
Specifications
We will prepare the "technical" specifications and bid list for City incorporation into their
boilerplate specifications. The specifications will follow the "Green Book" format. The various
20
• •
items of work and their specific payment clauses will also accompany the technical
specifications. We will provide the City with a master copy and on diskette.
Cost Estimates
A construction quantity and cost estimate will be prepared. The estimates will show quantities
and unit prices for each based on recent construction projects of similar nature and magnitude.
The estimates will be provided with each submittal to the City. The cost estimate will be the
basis for the preparation of the bid list.
Submittals
We will make three submittals of the phase 1 PS&E package to the City. These will include a
30%, 60%, and 90% submittal. After incorporating the City's 90% comments, we will provide a
mylar plan set for City signature. A master copy of the specifications and estimate will also be
provided along with all files on diskette.
Task 1.6 Deliverables:
• 3 submittals of PS&E, 4 sets each submittal
• 1 set of mylars at final submittal
• Drawings on diskette (AutoCad 14)
• Specifications, Estimates on diskette (Microsoft Word, Excel)
• Project Folder(utility correspondence, calculations, details)
Task 1.7— Meetings, Coordination
This scope of work provides for TUISG to attend meetings as needed to complete the final
design for phase 1 improvements. It is anticipated there will be a kick-off meeting with the
City, and two meetings during the PS&E preparation. We will prepare meeting minutes for
review and distribution for all meetings attended by TUISG.
Task 1.7 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
PHASE 2
The phase 2 improvements discussed earlier will be organized into the following tasks:
• Task 2.1 Kick-off Meeting /Obtain Existing Information
• Task 2.2 Ground Survey
• Task 2.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 2.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 2.5 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 2.6 Alignment Study
21
S
• Task 2.7 Meetings, Coordination
Task 2.1— Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
For brevity, this task is identical to Task 1.1 but relating to phase 2 improvements.
Task 2.1 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
Task 2.2— Ground Survey
Utilizing the information obtained in Task 2.1, we will perform a ground survey on Westminster
Avenue, covering the proposed limits of construction. The survey will extend around the four
curb returns and approximately 50 feet beyond the BCRs on Seal Beach Boulevard.
We will cross section Westminster Avenue at 50 foot intervals from approximately 1000 feet
west of Seal Beach Boulevard to the east side of Kitts Highway. The cross sections will
include: top of curbs, flowlines, lip of gutters, back of walks, and shots 10' beyond proposed
R/W.
The survey will include a topographic survey within the project limits for features such as: water
meters, fire hydrants, signal and lighting pull boxes, signs, driveways, catch basins, parkway
drains, and other features which may be impacted by the street widening.
Task 2.2 Deliverables:
• Field Survey on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 2.3— Utility Coordination
For brevity, this task is identical to Task 1.1 but relating to phase 2 improvements.
Task 2.3 Deliverables:
• Utility Correspondence File
Task 2.4— Prepare Base Mapping
This task involves the combination of the information and products obtained in the first three
tasks. The base mapping will begin with the field survey data obtained in Task 2.2. Record
maps obtained in Task 2.1 will be used to determine the existing right-of-way lines. Utility
information obtained in Tasks 2.1 and 2.3 will also be added to the base map. Finally, we will
field walk the site to verify the base map is consistent with existing conditions.
Task 2.4 Deliverables:
• Base Map on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 2.5— Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
22
••
•
The phase 2 PS&E will be comprised of the following:
• Street Plans (Plan and Profile)
• Traffic Signal Modification Plan
• Signing and Pavement Delineation Plan
• Specifications
• Cost Estimates
Street Plans
Same as discussion under Task 1.6.
Traffic Signal Modification
The signal modification plan prepared in Task 1.6 will take into account the street
improvements of phase 2 while ensuring the signal is functional for phase 1 improvements. It
may be necessary to modify the signal design of phase 1 to be functional for the phase 2
improvements. Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) will prepare signal modification plan to
configure the signal mast arms and heads to the phase 2 configuration.
Signing and Pavement Delineation
Same as Task 1.6.
•
Sheet List
We anticipate the following sheets will be required for phase 2:
1. Title Sheet
2. Typicals / Details
3. Street Plan
4. Street Plan
5. Signing and Striping Plan
6. Signal Modification / Interconnect Plan
Specifications
Same as Task 1.6.
Cost Estimates
Same as Task 1.6.
Submittals
Same as Task 1.6.
23
• i
Task 2.5 Deliverables:
• 3 submittals of PS&E, 4 sets each submittal
• 1 set of mylars at final submittal
• Drawings on diskette (AutoCad 14)
• Specifications, Estimates on diskette (Microsoft Word, Excel)
• Project Folder(utility correspondence, calculations, details)
Task 2.6 —Alignment Study
During this task we will obtain a digital photo of Seal Beach Boulevard south of Westminster
Avenue. The limits of the digital photography will extend from the intersection of Seal Beach
Boulevard with Westminster Avenue and will extend approximately 200 feet southerly of the
abandoned railroad crossing to cover potential alignment alternatives. We propose to use
Aerial Fotobank in Irvine to provide the digital photography, rectified, at a scale of 1"=40'.
We will prepare two alternatives to a conceptual level but will show pertinent features such as
proposed lane and parkway widths, lengths of tapers and turn pockets, curve radii, and
proposed RAN if needed. Major construction items such as utility relocations, drainage
modifications and significant on-site modifications will also be noted on the conceptual plans.
Task 2.6 Deliverables:
• Concept Plans (2) hardcopy and on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 2.7— Meetings, Coordination
This scope of work provides for Tt/ISG to attend meetings as needed to complete the final
design for phase 2 improvements. It is anticipated there will be a kick-off meeting with the
City, two meetings during the PS&E preparation, and one meeting to review the alignment
study alternatives.
Task 2.7 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
EXCLUSIONS TO SCOPE OF WORK
• Design surveys related to the alignment study for Seal Beach Boulevard south of
Westminster Avenue.
• Right-of-way acquisition maps and legal descriptions for any takings or easements.
• Preliminary title reports or appraisals.
• The preparation of signal warrant studies.
24
• •
• The preparation of capacity studies or Level of Service analyses.
• Construction services.
4.
25
•
4.
26
EXHIBIT B
Schedule of
Compensation
•
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
SUMMARY OF FEE ESTIMATE
PHASE 1
Task 1.1 — Kick-off Meeting /Obtain Existing Information $ 1,365
Task 1.2— Ground Survey 1,940
Task 1.3— Utility Coordination 720
Task 1.4— Prepare Base Mapping 3,920
Task 1.5— Preliminary Right-of-Way Study 2,200
Task 1.6— Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 16,900
(Wilbur Smith Associates) 7,150
Task 1.7— Meetings, Coordination 4,960
Reimbursables 845
Total Phase 1 $ 40,000
PHASE 2 IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPSOSES ONLY
4.
Task 2.1 — Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information $ 1,005
Task 2.2— Ground Survey 2,720
Task 2.3— Utility Coordination 720
Task 2.4— Prepare Base Mapping 4,580 •
Task 2.5— Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 19,820
(Wilbur Smith Associates) 4,950
Task 2.6 — Alignment Study 4,400
(Aerial Fotobank) 1,100
Task 2.7— Meetings, Coordination 4,960
Reimbursables 908
Total Phase 2 $ 45,163
Rate Schedule
Professional Services Hourly Rate ($)
Principal 130/115
•
Senior Project Engineer 100
Project Engineer 90
Staff Engineer/Senior Designer 80
Junior Engineer/CADD Designer 70
CADD Technician 60
Administrative Support 50
28
t
Survey Services
Two-Person Survey Crew 145
Three-Person Survey Crew 170
Senior Office Surveyor 90
Office Surveyor 70
Reimbursable Expenses
Reproduction Cost + 10%
Consultant Services Cost + 10%
Automobile Transportation 0.32/mile
Commercial Travel & Subsistence Cost
Agency Fees (Plan Check, Permits, etc) Cost
Outside Computer Services Cost + 10%
Computer Plots- BondNellum $3 ea
Color $10 ea
(Rates subject to revision after 1/1/00 upon mutual agreement of both the City and the Consulant)
29
' CLIENT: City of Seal Beach a • IWA Engineers
PROJ: Westminster AveJSeafBeach Blvd. - Phase 1 PROJECT RATE
"u I JOB No: XCACOSB.002 LABOR
. DATE: 03/04/99 _ PAGE 2 OF 4
Class Position/Name A B C D E F G H Hours Total
A Principal 0 0 $0
C Project Manager 41 41 $4,100
4 iy 74Si.tiieitt�i it r - P' t ..SAS-i
~ t." • i ..Y.20 14.-14e)
E Engineer/Seni or Desi.ner 64 64 $5,120
r :411-i irc � y , yw.on •i L >
G CADD Technician 0 0 $0
pis ve ppo
Totals 0 19 41 204 64 0 0 10 338 $30,265
`Task l
No. Function Description A B C D E F G H Hours Total
Task 1.1 -Kick-off Meeting!Obtain Existing Information
Kick-off Meeting 3 3 6 $645
Research at City, County 8 8 $720
Task 12 -Ground Survey
Survey Coordination 2 2 $200
Task 1.3 -Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination 8 8 $720
Task 1A-Prepare Base Mapping
Reduce Survey 1 8 16 25 $2,100
Utility Base 2 12 14 $1,140
Field review 4 4 8 $680
Task 1.5-Preliminary RAN Study
Prelim. Base Map Westminster 2 8 10 $920
Prelim. Layout Westminster 8 8 $720
Identify R/W 2 4 6 $560
Task 1.6 -Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Title Sheet,Typicals 2 12 14 $1,280
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Pavement Delineation 2 8 8 18 $1,560
Specifications 4 24 8 36 $2,960
Quantity/Cost Estimate 2 12 14 $1,280
Repsonse to 30%Comments 1 32 33 $2,980
Response to 60% Comments 1 16 17 $1,540
Response to 90% Comments 1 8 9 $820
Task 1.7-Meetings, Coordination
Meetings 6 6 2 14 $1,240
Coordination 8 12 20 $1,880
QA/QC 16 16 $1,840
L
CLIENT: City of Seal Beach IWA Engineers
PROJ: Westminster AveJSe each Blvd. -Phase 2 PROJECT RATE
•v JOB No: XCACOSB.002 LABOR
DATE: 03/04/99 PAGE 2 OF 4
•
Class Position/Name A B C D E F G H Hours Total
A Principal 0 0 $0
. e., T t c. '- 5 � :_ R1 x3'_2;;1 i)
C Project Manager 49 49 $4,900
l
E Engineer/Senior Designer 86 86 $6,880
:ii i.s 1 , o 317]-► - I{ ter 41:1 ...
G CADD Technician
1't . • . . ., . _ �. , 0 0 $0
a :mnish' ppo :• 4S,.. y.Y 51D
f
Totals 0 19 49 238 86 0 0 10 402 $35,885 ,
Task
No. Function Description A B CD E F G H Hours Total
ask 2.1 -Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
Kick-off Meeting 3 3 6 $645
Research at City, County 4 4 $360
Task 2.2 -Ground Survey
Survey Coordination 4 4 $400
Task 2.3 -Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination 8 8 $720
Task 2.4-Prepare Base Mapping
Reduce Survey 1 8 20 29 $2,420
Utility Base 2 12 14 $1,140
Field review 6 6 12 $1,020
Task 2.5 -Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Title Sheet,Typicals 2 12 14 $1,280
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Specifications 4 24 8 36 $2,960
Quantity/Cost Estimate 2 12 14 $1,280
Repsonse to 30% Comments 1 32 33 $2,980
Response to 60% Comments 1 16 17 $1,540
Response to 90% Comments 1 8 9 $820
Task 2.6-Alignment Study
Alignment Analysis 8 24 32 $2,960
Conceptual Exhibits (2) 16 16 $1,440
Task 2.7-Meetings, Coordination
Meetings 6 6 2 14 $1,240
Coordination 8 12 20 $1,880
QA/QC 16 16 $1,840
•
EXHIBIT C
Schedule
0
w w
s± 2
-X t co E d a
W N V v Iii E
UU co
- co 2,co ss.
0 a) E a 3 i _ g ea
V) - , ! w w
O '7 I.- 2 e - A I- p
N W b p
Z. Q .0 S�
—� a _ cc
o * r A 7
n $ " .+
V
mMr 2
'- N. w in
R a a a: — 4-
.V / I r, C
� ° s --
Q 8 a E
r
Y. O y m
o c a m
Cr s m• f
d N z ILL ,
Qr i 6 le, 1 .•
U, ♦ A
Q
_co
N
L a s a s tlai s_°'0) 00) a O a
co O) a)
r �y a a a J 4" > } Z Z Z J J J
co C) W T. Q Q Q —_) Q M 2
0 N CO N O ti r U) 00 N CA 14- r r
0 r r N N N '- N O N N r NN
t O) CA O CO CA CA O) O O a c) a C,
. J a = a a a a a - } Z Z Z m
>
CO so a a a a a a a Q Q
CO V wU) < < < < < < < 2 2 -3 -3 -3 -3 -a
c0 co Cr) CO M co c0 N CO O CO 0 in a)
0
O O r r N N N r N O N 01 r L
• 0 -0 V V V v v V -0 V v V '0 0 )
a 0 _ M M 10 N C7 O O O O M 0 U y
. L.
ala 00
me o)
Tow
m
CO 2 ..
> � o
Cd 6' c Y c d a
> a 0 s T x m e
E Y v c
o TA
Q a — `� w
N 0 m U a co d 03 a m •E
• +-� 0 Q .� e o o c > To E t
0 a m a) P Z 0 3 0 3 0 3 a) v w
d O Z a o m c� m co m a 4) is. i2 t
ila L ° c 0 2 U d a) 2 co c a5i �' a w V in LL co x co It co d o w y v y E a a a a Q
C Z° w LL m 5 a` a` c� a` 5 a` ci a. c.) I . ,
•
la TETRA TECH, INC.
INFRASTRUCTURE SOUTHWEST GROUP Tome*
600 City Parkway West,Suite 300, Orange,CA 92868 Simons,a&Associates,Inc.
(714)456-0166• FAX(714)456-0161 FLO Engineering.Inc.
CDC Engineering Inc.
March 30, 1999
City of Seal Beach
City Hall, Office of the City Engineer
211 8th Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Attention: Mr. Steve Badum
Subject: Engineering Services for Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard Intersection Improvements
Dear Mr. Badum:
Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for the engineering services of the proposed
improvements. The following outlines our understanding of the project, scope of work, and
estimated fee.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Seal Beach desires to widen Westminster Avenue from approximately 900 feet west
of Seal Beach Boulevard to Kitts Highway which is approximately 850 feet east of Seal Beach
Boulevard. Included in the widening improvements would be the inclusion of an additional
southbound left turn lane on Seal Beach Boulevard to eastbound Westminster Avenue. The
City also desires to study the alignment of Seal Beach Boulevard south of Westminster Avenue.
The overall project described above will be split into two distinct phases:
Phase 1 — Design for the widening of Seal Beach Boulevard to provide an additional
southbound left turn lane and traffic signal modification at Seal Beach
Boulevard/Westminster Avenue with an interconnect to the existing signal on
Westminster Avenue at Kitts Highway.
Phase 2 - Design for the widening of Westminster Avenue from 900 feet west of Seal
Beach Boulevard to Kitts Highway and preliminary engineering for the study of
Seal Beach Boulevard alignment south of Westminster Avenue.
The crossing of Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach Boulevard is a major intersection in the
City and the purpose of the proposed improvements is to enhance the vehicular capacity and
improve safety.
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 2
The existing cross section of Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard is two through
lanes both eastbound and westbound with single left turn lanes. Westbound Westminster
Avenue also has a right turn lane to northbound Seal Beach Boulevard. Bike lanes are also
existing both eastbound and westbound within the project limits.
Seal Beach Boulevard at Westminster Avenue is three through lanes both northbound and
southbound with single left turn lanes.
The proposed improvements to be designed at Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard will include:
Phase 1
> Providing dual lefts on Seal Beach Boulevard (southbound)
> Traffic Signal Modification at Seal Beach/Westminster
> Signal interconnect between the signals at Seal Beach Boulevard and Kitts Highway
Phase 2
> Providing dual lefts on Westminster Avenue (both directions)
> Adding a third eastbound through lane on Westminster at Seal Beach
Also included in phase 2 would be the preliminary study of:
> Improving the alignment of Seal Beach Blvd. south of Westminster Ave.
SCOPE OF WORK
The work specifically involves the preparation of base mapping, final design (plans,
specifications, and estimates) for the improvements on Westminster Avenue and Seal Beach
Boulevard north of Westminster Avenue, and preliminary engineering for the alignment of Seal
Beach Boulevard south of Westminster Avenue. The final design will be processed and
approved through the City of Seal Beach. The scope will include the following phases and work
tasks:
PHASE 1
• Task 1.1 Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information
• Task 1.2 Ground Survey
• Task 1.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 1.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 1.5 Preliminary Right-of-Way Study
• Task 1.6 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 1.7 Meetings, Coordination
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 3
PHASE 2
• Task 2.1 Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information
• Task 2.2 Ground Survey
• Task 2.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 2.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 2.5 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 2.6 Alignment Study
• Task 2.7 Meetings, Coordination
PHASE 1
Task 1.1 — Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
The purpose of the kick-off meeting will be to clearly identify the lines of communication
between Tt/ISG and the City, to assess the availability of data from the City, to clearly define
the scope of work, and to determine the design criteria for the final design.
Tt/ISG will research and obtain from the City and County, information such as as-builts, survey
control records and mapping, utility locations through contacts with utility companies, drainage
information, traffic signal locations, lighting and power poles, oil and gas facilities, previous
materials/geotechnical reports, project-related reports and studies, and other information as
available and necessary for the final design.
Task 1.1 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
Task 1.2— Ground Survey •
Utilizing the information obtained in Task 1.1, we will perform a ground survey on Seal Beach
Boulevard, covering the proposed limits of construction. The survey will extend around the
northeast and northwest curb returns and approximately 100 feet beyond the BCRs on
Westminster Avenue. We will use the County of Orange datum for both horizontal and vertical
control unless the City of Seal Beach has their own datum.
We will cross section Seal Beach Boulevard at 50 foot intervals from Westminster Avenue to
approximately 600 feet north of Westminster Avenue. The cross sections will include: top of
curbs, flowlines, lip of gutters, back of walks, and shots 10' beyond proposed R/W.
The survey will include a topographic survey within the project limits for features such as: water
meters, fire hydrants, signal and lighting pull boxes, signs, driveways, parkway drains, and
other features which may be impacted by the street widening.
Task 1.2 Deliverables:
• Field Survey on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 4
Task 1.3_ Utility Coordination
It is anticipated the utility as-builts within the project limits will be obtained from the City of Seal
Beach during Task 1.1. From the utility as-builts, Tt/ISG will determine the conflicts or impacts
the various alternatives may have with the existing utilities.
Tt/ISG will coordinate and perform related follow-up with the affected utility companies
regarding the specific impact locations throughout the project to identify design controls and
considerations necessary for final design. The existing franchise agreements with each
affected utility will determine whether the final plans and cost estimates indicate the necessary
modifications/relocations be performed as a part of the project or whether the utility company
must perform and pay for their own work. It is anticipated the City of Seal Beach will provide
this information to Tt/ISG.
Task 1.3 Deliverables:
• Utility Correspondence File
Task 1.4— Prepare Base Mapping
This task involves the combination of the information and products obtained in the first three
tasks. The base mapping will begin with the field survey data obtained in Task 1.2. Record
maps obtained in Task 1.1 will be used to determine the existing right-of-way lines. Utility
information obtained in Tasks 1.1 and 1.3 will also be added to the base map. Finally, we will
field walk the site to verify the base map is consistent with existing conditions.
Task 1.4 Deliverables:
• Base Map on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 1.5— Preliminary Right-of-Way Study
Prior to starting PS&E, we will prepare a draft layout plan showing the phase 1 and phase 2
improvements for City review. Base mapping for phase 2 will be accomplished through the use
of as-builts, no survey for phase 2 is proposed at this time. Enough detail will be shown such
as lane widths, tapers, turn pockets, and parkway widths to verify the layout is adequate. We
will also show the right-of-way requirements for the phase 1 and phase 2 improvements.
We understand there are right-of-way concerns, especially at the northwest corner where the
existing gas station pumps are very close to existing right-of-way. We will propose a layout that
will minimize right-of-way related impacts.
This scope of work does not include the preparation of legal descriptions or accompanying
plats, title reports, appraisals, or acquisition.
Task 1.5 Deliverables:
• Layout plan (Phase 1 and 2) with proposed R/W impacts (hardcopy and on diskette)
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 5
Task 1.6—Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
The phase 1 PS&E will be comprised of the following:
• Street Plans (Plan and Profile)
• Traffic Signal Modification Plan
• Signing and Pavement Delineation Plan
• Specifications
• Cost Estimates
Street Plans
We propose to prepare the street widening plans at a scale of 1"=20'. The plans will show
existing and proposed curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveways. Limits of pavement removals and
construction will be delineated as well as the need for cold planing and overlay for smooth joins
and cross sections. Curb and median profiles will be designed and shown on the plans.
Also noted on the plans will be existing survey monumentation that may be obliterated during
construction. Direction will be given on both the plans and specifications for the contractor to
protect and/or restore all monumentation impacted during construction.
In addition to the street plans, construction details will be part of the design documents for
storm drain modifications due to new curb locations. No formal drainage studies will be
performed for the project, we will however, evaluate the affected systems due to additional run-
off from the street widening. We propose to extend existing drainage systems to the new curb
locations. This scope of work does not provide for upgrading of deficient storm drain systems.
Traffic Signal Modification / Interconnect
•
In this task, Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA)will prepare design plans for an upgraded traffic
signal at Westminster Avenue / Seal Beach Boulevard. WSA will coordinate with the City of
Seal Beach for pertinent signal design standards. The signal design will take into account the
phase 2 improvements along Westminster Avenue, as approved by the City in Task 1.5, and
locate the controller cabinet and poles accordingly. The mast arms and head locations will be
reviewed to provide an operational signal for phase 1 and minimize modifications to the signal
during phase 2 construction.
The traffic signal plan will incorporate all aspects of the traffic signal including new and existing
signal standards, signal heads, loop detectors, proposed signal and interconnect conduits,
existing and proposed controller assemblies and service point locations.
WSA will also prepare a traffic signal interconnect between the signals on Westminster Avenue
between Seal Beach Boulevard and Kitts Highway. The interconnect will be included within the
signal modification plan and will terminate in a pull-box at Kitts Highway. The actual
interconnecting to the Kitts Highway signal will be completed by others when the existing
controller is upgraded. The signal modification plan will also provide "stubs" for future
interconnect in the remaining three directions.
I
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 6
Signing and Pavement Delineation
The signing and pavement delineation plans will be prepared at a scale of 1"=40' and will show
the existing striping, limits of pavement delineation removal, new striping, pavement markings
and markers. Existing signs conflicting with the new curbs will be relocated and noted on the
plan.
Sheet List
We anticipate the following sheets will be required for phase 1:
1. Title Sheet
2. Typicals/ Details
3. Street Plan
4. Signing and Striping Plan
5. Signal Modification / Interconnect Plan
Specifications
We will prepare the "technical" specifications and bid list for City incorporation into their
boilerplate specifications. The specifications will follow the "Green Book" format. The various
items of work and their specific payment clauses will also accompany the technical
specifications. We will provide the City with a master copy and on diskette.
Cost Estimates
A construction quantity and cost estimate will be prepared. The estimates will show quantities
and unit prices for each based on recent construction projects of similar nature and magnitude.
The estimates will be provided with each submittal to the City. The cost estimate will be the
basis for the preparation of the bid list.
Submittals
We will make three submittals of the phase 1 PS&E package to the City. These will include a
30%, 60%, and 90% submittal. After incorporating the City's 90% comments, we will provide a
mylar plan set for City signature. A master copy of the specifications and estimate will also be
provided along with all files on diskette.
Task 1.6 Deliverables:
• 3 submittals of PS&E, 4 sets each submittal
• 1 set of mylars at final submittal
• Drawings on diskette (AutoCad 14)
• Specifications, Estimates on diskette (Microsoft Word, Excel)
• Project Folder(utility correspondence, calculations, details)
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 7
Task 1.7— Meetings, Coordination
This scope of work provides for TUISG to attend meetings as needed to complete the final
design for phase 1 improvements. It is anticipated there will be a kick-off meeting with the City,
and two meetings during the PS&E preparation. We will prepare meeting minutes for review
and distribution for all meetings attended by TUISG.
Task 1.7 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
PHASE 2
The phase 2 improvements discussed earlier will be organized into the following tasks:
• Task 2.1 Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information
• Task 2.2 Ground Survey
• Task 2.3 Utility Coordination
• Task 2.4 Prepare Base Mapping
• Task 2.5 Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
• Task 2.6 Alignment Study
• Task 2.7 Meetings, Coordination
Task 2.1 —Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
For brevity, this task is identical to Task 1.1 but relating to phase 2 improvements.
Task 2.1 Deliverables: •
• Meeting Minutes
Task 2.2— Ground Survey
Utilizing the information obtained in Task 2.1, we will perform a ground survey on Westminster
Avenue, covering the proposed limits of construction. The survey will extend around the four
curb returns and approximately 100 feet beyond the BCRs on Seal Beach Boulevard.
We will cross section Westminster Avenue at 50 foot intervals from approximately 1000 feet
west of Seal Beach Boulevard to the east side of Kitts Highway. The cross sections will
include: top of curbs, flowlines, lip of gutters, back of walks, and shots 10' beyond proposed
R/W.
The survey will include a topographic survey within the project limits for features such as: water
meters, fire hydrants, signal and lighting pull boxes, signs, driveways, catch basins, parkway
drains, and other features which may be impacted by the street widening.
Task 2.2 Deliverables:
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 8
• Field Survey on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 2.3— Utility Coordination
For brevity, this task is identical to Task 1.1 but relating to phase 2 improvements.
Task 2.3 Deliverables:
• Utility Correspondence File
Task 2.4—Prepare Base Mapping
This task involves the combination of the information and products obtained in the first three
tasks. The base mapping will begin with the field survey data obtained in Task 2.2. Record
maps obtained in Task 2.1 will be used to determine the existing right-of-way lines. Utility
information obtained in Tasks 2.1 and 2.3 will also be added to the base map. Finally, we will
field walk the site to verify the base map is consistent with existing conditions.
Task 2.4 Deliverables:
• Base Map on diskette (AutoCad 14)
Task 2.5— Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
The phase 2 PS&E will be comprised of the following:
• Street Plans (Plan and Profile)
• Traffic Signal Modification Plan
• Signing and Pavement Delineation Plan
• Specifications
• Cost Estimates
Street Plans
Same as discussion under Task 1.6.
Traffic Signal Modification
The signal modification plan prepared in Task 1.6 will take into account the street improvements
of phase 2 while ensuring the signal is functional for phase 1 improvements. It may be
necessary to modify the signal design of phase 1 to be functional for the phase 2
improvements. Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA)will prepare signal modification plan to
configure the signal mast arms and heads to the phase 2 configuration.
Signing and Pavement Delineation
Same as Task 1.6.
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 9
Sheet List
We anticipate the following sheets will be required for phase 2:
1. Title Sheet
2. Typicals / Details
3. Street Plan
4. Street Plan
5. Signing and Striping Plan
6. Signal Modification / Interconnect Plan
Specifications
Same as Task 1.6.
Cost Estimates
Same as Task 1.6..
Submittals
Same as Task 1.6.
Task 2.5 Deliverables:
• 3 submittals of PS&E, 4 sets each submittal
• 1 set of mylars at final submittal
• Drawings on diskette (AutoCad 14)
• Specifications, Estimates on diskette (Microsoft Word, Excel)
• Project Folder(utility correspondence, calculations, details)
Task 2.6—Alignment Study
During this task we will obtain a digital photo of Seal Beach Boulevard south of Westminster
Avenue. The limits of the digital photography will extend from the intersection of Seal Beach
Boulevard with Westminster Avenue and will extend approximately 200 feet southerly of the
abandoned railroad crossing to cover potential alignment alternatives. We propose to use
Aerial Fotobank in Irvine to provide the digital photography, rectified, at a scale of 1"=40'.
We will prepare two alternatives to a conceptual level but will show pertinent features such as
proposed lane and parkway widths, lengths of tapers and turn pockets, curve radii, and
proposed R/W if needed. Major construction items such as utility relocations, drainage
modifications and significant on-site modifications will also be noted on the conceptual plans.
Task 2.6 Deliverables:
• Concept Plans (2) hardcopy and on diskette (AutoCad 14)
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 10
Task 2.7— Meetings, Coordination
This scope of work provides for Tt/ISG to attend meetings as needed to complete the final
design for phase 2 improvements. It is anticipated there will be a kick-off meeting with the City,
two meetings during the PS&E preparation, and one meeting to review the alignment study
alternatives.
Task 2.7 Deliverables:
• Meeting Minutes
EXCLUSIONS TO SCOPE OF WORK
• Design surveys related to the alignment study for Seal Beach Boulevard south of
Westminster Avenue.
• Right-of-way acquisition maps and legal descriptions for any takings or easements.
• Preliminary title reports or appraisals.
• The preparation of signal warrant studies.
• The preparation of capacity studies or Level of Service analyses.
• Construction services.
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 11
PERSONNEL
Tetra Tech, Inc Infrastructure Southwest Group
Marie Marston, P.E., Principal-in-Charge- QA/QC. Ms. Marston is a principal of Tt/ISG and
will be responsible for carrying out the quality control procedures for this project and verifying
adequate resources are allocated to the project. Ms. Marston has over 18 years experience on
numerous street, highway and freeway projects in southern California.
Joe Buckner, P.E., P.L.S. - Project Manager. Mr. Buckner has over 12 years experience in
civil engineering with particular emphasis managing street and highway design. His recent
project experience includes the Preliminary Engineering Report for the widening of Red Hill
Avenue at the 1-5 freeway, including four intersections, for the City of Tustin.
Jennifer Ekrami, P.E.— Project Engineer. Ms. Ekrami has over five years experience in street
and highway planning, design and construction administration. She has served as a design and
project engineer on major transportation projects. Her recent project experience includes the Dyer
Road Improvement project in the City of Santa Ana, Carson Street improvements in the City of
Long Beach, and street improvements to Antonio parkway in the County of Orange.
Wilbur Smith Associates
Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) is a multi-disciplinary consulting engineering and planning firm
which is committed to providing each client with a range of professional services customized to
meet specific needs. Located locally in Anaheim, California, WSA was organized in 1952 as a
firm of consulting engineers specializing in traffic engineering and transportation planning.
WSA is staffed with over 675 professional and technical support personnel serving the United
States from five regional and several subregional offices and international.clients from several
overseas offices. Engineering, planning and architectural services have been provided to
clients in all States of the U.S. and more than 50 other countries. In all, more than 15,000
technical studies have been successfully completed in WSA's 46-year history.
Jeff Heald, P.E. — Lead Traffic Engineer. Mr. Heald is the Associate in Charge of the
Anaheim office for Wilbur Smith Associates and will lead the efforts in the traffic analysis and
mitigation recommendations portion of the project. He has 10 years of transportation planning
and traffic engineering experience in Southern California. Mr. Heald has worked on numerous
traffic impact studies and provided consulting services on several transportation projects
ranging from parking demand analysis and design to the evaluation and planning of Intelligent
Transportation Systems to address traffic management and traveler information challenges.
SCHEDULE
Attached is a preliminary schedule for the phase 1 project, identifying key elements during the
preparation of the preliminary engineering report. The schedule is based on a notice to
proceed of March 22, 1999 and City reviews of 2 weeks.
• •
Mr. Steve Badum March 30, 1999
Westminster Avenue at Seal Beach Boulevard Page 12
Phase 2 project schedule is not included herein based on the uncertainty of a start date. The
magnitude of work for phase 2 is similar to phase 1, the schedule shown herein for phase 1 will
be close to hat of phase 2.
SUMMARY OF FEE ESTIMATE
PHASE 1
Task 1.1 — Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information $ 1,365
Task 1.2— Ground Survey 1,940
Task 1.3 — Utility Coordination 720
Task 1.4 — Prepare Base Mapping 3,920
Task 1.5 — Preliminary Right-of-Way Study 2,200
Task 1.6 — Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 16,900
(Wilbur Smith Associates) 7,150
Task 1.7 — Meetings, Coordination 4,960
Reimbursables 845
Total Phase 1 $ 40,000
PHASE 2
Task 2.1 — Kick-off Meeting / Obtain Existing Information $ 1,005
Task 2.2— Ground Survey 2,720
Task 2.3— Utility Coordination 720
Task 2.4— Prepare Base Mapping 4,580
Task 2.5 — Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 19,820
(Wilbur Smith Associates) 4,950
Task 2.6 — Alignment Study 4,400
(Aerial Fotobank) 1,100
Task 2.7 — Meetings, Coordination 4,960
Reimbursables 908
Total Phase 2 $ 45,163
The above fee for phase 2 will be valid for a period of 90 days from the date of this proposal.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Marie Marston or me.
Sincerely,
.•e • Buckner, P.E., P.L.S.
Project anager
Attachments: Schedule
Manhour Estimate
Rate Schedule
Organization Chart
Resumes
N . • •
L CO E V a
� rn ro C O
L
M O p 6 U
Y� UO ; N .1 0 N
CZ N - d m U 13
r o z .0
O ` o t `O w
oc
4-• Co a ..._� ......a` _ 0 i-
t)
N a 0
to m r V
Z a 3
M c 0 W
ao C
c.et aa) 0 M 0
N 1) 0 y I A
>_ h 1 m` --_
a r 4 o a n
e
Y d c a 1
o d 0 r
CO o.._.._�__- °--_. _ ..a_ _. _ _....
N 0_ 0 m' m
cm
C I A .
8 m
CL N % LL-
r Z �, l I
ci N
>�L
a) a)00) 00) 0 0) 00) 0 0 0 a) CO
r 1 u) rY IY I J II } } Z Z Z J J J
d wji Q Q Q -o Q 2 2
(n N to N o f- r to co N 0) r r
i t r r N N N r N O N N r N N
.0 0) 0) 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
a 2 Q' Ce IX W IX 2 } } Z Z Z J d
> ' Aw a CL a a CL a a a Q
m W V) < Q < < Q Q Q 2 2 -) -
w 'C
U CO CO M 0 CO M 00 N CO 0 CO 0 tf) a)
d 00 r r N N N r N O N M r U
U 0 .a) = CO CO to N CO 0 0 0 0 LP) 0 in
co
^ O Q co r r r r r
tL C (T
CD w
a)
COG)) Y
O 9 •p d 0.
> Q. O U O >� CV =
Q
+' Y »• -0 C o
O. --- v « W w w E p Y
L V v CO (n 06 Co Co _C) N d
N0 m a) U W co co a cn as a °_. E
w ° :° > o a o @ a A E t
V a C a) 6 z. o 3 o 3 o 3 5 > >, u u)
•E O Z co O 06 M .92 CO (1) 0 N LL O` t !' as C_
N U c°)i •w -p m .—E Q cC co Q' a CC a Q W U N LL
.47-0 y to = ) a) a) w a) w in w Tu Z w u m 5 0_ 0 0 0 U 0_ U 0 0 ® •
• •
CLIENT: City of Seal Beach IWA Engineers
PROJ: Westminster Ave./Seal Beach Blvd. - Phase 1 PROJECT RATE
JOB No: XCACOSB.002 LABOR
DATE: 03/04/99 PAGE 2 OF 4
Class Position/Name A B C D E F G H Hours Total
A Principal 0 0 $0
.' f,? l yn,. '3' q 9#..k zr.'9 •` iiT r„=,:; 4-n -b''`i. �k1i 'r �..�7` a • "r v yf
``�s>�.r! 1' ! F�k�NJ t�-�f�-r ,v4?e4�-Tt'�:'rSy..." ;�<. �',,. ��r �+T.�.';.Ya�"'z�e: 's a `.�d,`)' �r;k^?:�; A:
C Project Manager p 41 41 $4,100 {
fi4k4i.t� .j4LW ee .rc.,=»r7e;, ` ;• t7; +.Xt". ,:t: e" :...:'s gii- ?gOit ?'i'' '�s.'"'t'�,'.:m,`ii 'e.A'Tr M i .°D I
E Eng�inwe:e��yrsr�/�Senior Designer 64 64 $5,120
f.iiitrat it-e!!`CAD D, DESl tier :„`; p„ i` "'`Y`a5..+a !'i _ 0 %bs. n. r�� ^°£�..`c',.'.�7J Y,.
G CADD Technician 0 0 $0
•"e wioi$tmbye .u.*Ort i &fix: t of ,r .g E :" ;c41;s '51 s;3 6 Der r, C A ti
Totals 0 19 41 204 64 0 0 10 338 $30,265
Task
No. Function Description A B C D E F G H Hours Total
Task 1.1 -Kick-off Meeting 1 Obtain Existing Information
Kick-off Meeting 3 3 6 $645
Research at City, County 8 8 $720
Task 1.2 -Ground Survey
Survey Coordination 2 2 $200
Task 1.3 -Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination 8 8 $720
Task 1.4 -Prepare Base Mapping
Reduce Survey 1 8 16 25 $2,100
Utility Base 2 12 14 $1,140
Field review 4 4 8 $680
Task 1.5-Preliminary R/W Study •
Prelim. Base Map Westminster 2 8 10 $920
Prelim. Layout Westminster 8 8 $720
Identify R/W 2 4 6 $560
Task 1.6 -Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Title Sheet,Typicals 2 12 14 $1,280
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Pavement Delineation 2 8 8 18 $1,560
Specifications 4 24 8 36 $2,960
Quantity/Cost Estimate 2 12 14 $1,280
Repsonse to 30% Comments 1 32 33 $2,980
Response to 60% Comments 1 16 17 $1,540
Response to 90% Comments 1 8 9 $820
Task 1.7 -Meetings, Coordination
Meetings 6 6 2 14 $1,240
Coordination 8 12 20 $1,880
QA/QC 16 16 $1,840
# 0 _ .
CLIENT: City of Seal Beach IWA Engineers
PROJ: Westminster Ave./Seal Beach Blvd. -Phase 2 PROJECT RATE
JOB No: XCACOSB.002 LABOR
DATE: 03/04/99 PAGE 2 OF 4
Class Position/Name A B C D E F G H Hours Total
A Principal 0 0 $0
,74 jiefi y* a iVl* 3 8 Pziatiu. :1' i-k W c''"---- ' t°v i-w 2.a P Xi?t.
C Project Manager ,rW�.���x x� 49 49 $4,900
:4. .. tgleib a .1#5. < '-' .CV,4hz' gie.'`a?Y.5`aZi).10i ZYS^4i' eiP,,: .0,Ali aRgi,
E Engineer/Senior Designer 86 86 $6,880
G CADD Technician 0 0 $0
', tir :$Mims,,- ,e'--Olio' r,V iKt-`a ,�� x ; � s".- .. r RI SS
Totals 0 19 49 238 86 0 0 10 402 $35,885
Task
No. Function Description A B C D E F G H Hours Total
Task 2.1 -Kick-off Meeting/Obtain Existing Information
Kick-off Meeting 3 3 6 $645
Research at City, County 4 4 $360
Task 2.2 -Ground Survey
Survey Coordination 4 4 $400
Task 2.3 -Utility Coordination
Utility Coordination 8 8 $720
Task 2.4 -Prepare Base Mapping
Reduce Survey 1 8 20 29 $2,420
Utility Base 2 12 14 $1,140
Field review 6 6 12 $1,020
Task 2.5 - Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Title Sheet, Typicals 2 12 . 14 $1,280
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Plan & Profile 4 24 24 52 $4,480
Specifications 4 24 8 36 $2,960
Quantity/Cost Estimate 2 12 14 $1,280
Repsonse to 30% Comments 1 32 33 $2,980
Response to 60% Comments 1 16 17 $1,540
Response to 90% Comments 1 8 9 $820
Task 2.6 -Alignment Study
Alignment Analysis 8 24 32 $2,960
Conceptual Exhibits (2) 16 16 $1,440
Task 2.7 -Meetings, Coordination
Meetings 6 6 2 14 $1,240
Coordination 8 12 20 $1,880
QA/QC 16 16 $1,840
• •
Hit
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Group
Rate Schedule
Professional Services Hourly Rate ($)
Principal 130/115
Senior Project Engineer 100
Project Engineer 90
Staff Engineer/Senior Designer 80
Junior Engineer/CADD Designer 70
CADD Technician 60
Administrative Support 50
Survey Services
Two-Person Survey Crew 145
Three-Person Survey Crew 170
Senior Office Surveyor 90
Office Surveyor 70
Reimbursable Expenses
Reproduction Cost + 10%
Consultant Services Cost + 10%
Automobile Transportation 0.32/mile
Commercial Travel & Subsistence Cost
Agency Fees (Plan Check, Permits, etc) Cost
Outside Computer Services Cost + 10%
Computer Plots - Bond/Vellum $3 ea
Color $10 ea
(Rates subject to revision after 1/1/00)
1M I<A UCN ,NC.
I
. SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD AND U
WESTMINSTER AVENUE INTERSECTION
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
City of Seal Beach
Public Works Dept.
Doug Dancs, P.E.
l
Project Manager Principal in Charge-
QA/QC
Joe Buckner, P E , P.L.S.
Marie Marston, P E A
h* :',:t�anTkFk4 r tfi.
a
Roadway/Utilities/ t, Traffic
R-O-W f Surveying Wilbur Smith r
Associates
Jennifer Ekrami, P E Rusty Francis, L S I.T i
Jeff Heald, P.E. I.
•
Marie Marston, P.E.
Principal-in-Charge
EDUCATION
B.S. 1980,Civil Engineering,Oregon State University
M.B.A. 1988,University of California,Irvine
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Registered Professional Engineer in California(#38798, 1984)
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Seventeen years experience in project management,engineering,planning,design and construction of freeway,highway,
and arterial street improvements,grading,hydrology and storm drains;utility modifications;retaining walls;and
Caltrans/FHWA planning and design.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
FREEWAY EXPERIENCE
• SR-126/Kimball Road Interchange,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation of
Project Study Report,Project Report,Project Approval Report,Fact Sheets,PS&E,soundwalls,right-of-way
acquisition,and construction engineering. 1988-Construction completed 1/94
• US-101/Victoria Avenue Interchange,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation
of value engineering,Fact Sheets,PS&E,and construction engineering. 1995-98
• I-605/Carson Street Interchange,Vestar Development,City of Long Beach,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager.
Preparation of Project Report-Project Study Report and Fact Sheets. 1994-
• 1-710/Firestone Boulevard Interchange,City of South Gate,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation of
feasibility study,Project Study Report,Project Report,and PS&E. 1991-98
• I-5/Valencia Boulevard Interchange,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7. Principal in Charge. Preparation of
PR,Environmental Document,Fact Sheets,PS&E. 1995-
• I-5/Magic Mountain Parkway Interchange,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7,County of Los Angeles,City of
Santa Clarita. Principal in Charge. Preparation of PSR. 1997-98
• Pacific Coast Highway(SR-1)/Newport Boulevard(SR-55)Interchange,City of Newport Beach,Caltrans
District 12. Project Manager. Prepared feasibility study,Project Study Report,Project Report and Fact Sheets. 1997
• I-10/Sierra Avenue Interchange,City of Fontana,Caltrans District 8. Protect Manager. Prepared Project Study
Report,Project Report,Categorical Exemption,and Plans Specifications&Estimates for interchange reconstruction,
retaining walls,and ramp reconstruction. 1989-1998
• US-101/Wagon Wheel Road Interchange,Oxnard Town Center. Design Engineer. Preparation of preliminary
geometrics. 1987-8
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Marie Marston, P.E.
Page 1
• US-101/Rose Avenue Interchange,Oxnard Town Center. Design Engineer. Preparation of permit construction
documents. 1987
• Route 710 Fact Sheet,Port of Long Beach,Caltrans District 7. Principal in Charge. Prepared fact sheets for Route
710 from Ocean Boulevard to Pacific Coast Highway for purposes of relinquishment from the Port to Caltrans. 1997
• US-101 Hollywood Southbound Access Study,Universal Studios. Performed feasibility study to review potential
new access points and improvements to existing access points. 1997
• SR-103/Henry Ford Road Intersection,Port of Long Beach,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation of
preliminary engineering,PEER report,Fact Sheets,and PS&E. 1995-98
• Off-Ramp from I-405 NB to SR-55 NB Connector,County of Orange,John Wayne Airport. Proiect
Manager/Engineer. Performed feasibility study for new off ramp to access directly into airport parking lot. 1994
• SR-110/Ninth Street Off-Ramp,City Centre Development,City of Los Angeles,Caltrans District 7. Principal in
Charge. Preparation of Project Study Report,Fact Sheets,and Supplemental Project Study Report. 1989-93
• I-10/Pepper Avenue Interchange,County of San Bernardino,Caltrans District 8. Proiect Manager. Preparation of
alternatives analysis,technical studies for Caltrans District 8 on Project Study Report,and Fact Sheets. 1993-5
• SR-91 Program Management,City of Anaheim,City of Fullerton,Caltrans District 12. Project Manager.
Assistance to City including value engineering,plan review,coordination with Caltrans. 1993-6
• I-5 Program Management,City of Anaheim,City of Fullerton,Caltrans District 12. Assistant Proiect Manager.
1992-97
• US-101/California Street Off-Ramp,City of San Buenaventura. Project Manager. Preparation of alternatives
analysis and feasibility study for off-ramp improvements. 1991
• SR-91,from I-5 to SR-57,Orange County Transportation Authority,Caltrans District 12. Project Manager.
Preparation of PR. 1990-92
• SR-73—San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor,MacArthur Bison Section,-Transportation Corridor
• Agencies. Design Engineer. Preparation of 35%plans. 1989-92
• SR-73/Campus Drive Off-Ramp and Overcrossing Widening,John Wayne Airport, County of Orange,Caltrans
District 12. Project Manager. Preparation of PAR and PS&E. 1987-1992. Phase 1 constructed 1990,Phase 2
constructed 1992
• I-405 Freeway Access Improvement Study from SR-5S to Brookhurst Street,City of Costa Mesa,Caltrans
District 12. Project Engineer. Preparation of alternatives analysis,Project Study Report,and Fact Sheets. 1986-89
• 1-405/South Coast Drive/Hyland Avenue On-Ramp,City of Costa Mesa,Caltrans District 12. Proiect Engineer.
Preparation of Project Study Report,Project Report,and FHWA new connection report. 1988-91
• SR-91,from I-605 to SR-55,Orange County Transportation Authority,Caltrans District 12. Project Manager.
Preparation of PSR. 1987-89
• McGaw Overcrossing at SR-55,Griffin. Project Engineer. Preliminary horizontal and vertical analysis for
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Marie Marston, P.E.
Page 2
overcrossing to facilitate MacArthur Place office development. 1987
• I-5 Freeway Access Study,Valencia Company. Proiect Engineer. Preparation of conceptual interchange
improvements at Magic Mountain Parkway,SR-126,and Hasley Canyon Road. 1987-9
• SR-55/MacArthur Boulevard Interchange. Project Engineer. Preparation of PSR. 1987-8
• I-405 Freeway Access Improvement Study from SR-55 to Culver Drive,City of Irvine. Project Engineer.
Preparation of alternatives analysis. 1986-8
• OCTA Transitway,SR-57,SR-55,I-405,Orange County Transportation Authority. Design Engineer. Preparation
of feasibility plan and study. 1986
• US-101/Universal Center Drive Interchange,Universal Studios,Caltrans District 7. Design Engineer. Preparation
of PS&E. 1985-6
• I-105/1-710 Interchange,Caltrans District 7. Design Engineer. Preparation of preliminary engineering and
geometries and hazardous waste handling alternatives for PS&E. 1985
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
• SR-126/Wolcott Way New Intersection,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation of
PR and final construction documents. 1993. Construction completed 1/94
• SR-126/Commerce Center Drive New Intersection,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager.
Preparation of PR and final construction documents. 1993-94
• Victoria Avenue Widening, City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager. Preparation of plans
for street widening. 1995-98
• Valentine Road New Alignment,City of San Buenaventura. Project Manager. Preparation of new street alignment
construction plans. 1995-98
• Kimball Road Widening,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Proiect Manager. Preparation of plans for
street widening from Thille Street to Telegraph Road. 1991-92
• Mammoth Lakes Bicycle Trails,Town of Mammoth Lakes. Project Manager. Prepared preliminary engineering
and PSR bicycle trails extension for funding through CTC. 1997
• Old Mammoth Road,Town of Mammoth Lakes. Project Manager. Prepared preliminary engineering and PSR
street improvements for funding through CTC. 1997
• Airport Access Road,Town of Mammoth Lakes. Proiect Manager. Prepared preliminary engineering and PSR for
new road extension from airport to Benton Lane Road for funding through CTC. 1997
• Lake Mary Road,Town of Mammoth Lakes. Project Manager. Prepared preliminary engineering and PSR for
street improvements and bicycle lanes for funding through CTC. 1997
• Meridian Boulevard Bicycle Undercrossing,Town of Mammoth Lakes. Principal in Charge. Prepared final
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Marie Marston, P.E.
Page 3
engineering and construction documents for bicycle undercrossing beneath Meridian Boulevard. 1997
• National Avenue/Firestone Boulevard,City of South Gate. Project Manager. Performed feasibility study for new
intersection access. 1997
• Magic Mountain Parkway at I-5 Quick Fix Improvements,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7. Project
Manager. Development of preliminary engineering for near term improvements. 1996
• Magic Mountain Parkway(SR-126),Valencia Company,County of Los Angeles,Caltrans District 7. Program
Manager. Provided oversight of County's design. 1996-98
• Harbor Scenic Drive,Port of Long Beach. Project Manager. Preparation of preliminary and fmal engineering and
construction documents for realigned and widened street. 1995-98
• Red Hill Avenue at I-5,City of Tustin,Caltrans District 12. Principal in Charge. Prepared preliminary engineering
report and alternatives analysis for street widening and ramp improvements. 1994-7
• Sierra Avenue Widening,City of Fontana. Project Manager. Prepared final engineering and construction
documents for street widening from Stover Avenue to Valley Boulevard. 1995-96
• Beach Boulevard/Artesia Boulevard Intersection,City of Buena Park,Caltrans District 12. Principal in Charge.
Prepared preliminary and fmal design for intersection improvements. 1994
• Harbor Boulevard/South Coast Drive at I-405,City of Costa Mesa,Caltrans District 12. Project Manager.
Preparation of preliminary and fmal engineering for roadway widening,realigned on-ramp,and intersection
improvements. 1993. Construction 1998
• Pepper Avenue,San Bernardino Avenue,Linscott,Law&Greenspan,City of Colton. Project Manager.
Preparation of preliminary engineering and cost estimates for street widening. 1992
• Irvine Avenue Improvements and New Off-Street Bicycle Trail,City of Newport Beach,County of Orange.
Project Manager. Preparation of preliminary and final engineering. 1991-2
• Lincoln Avenue/La Tijera Boulevard,1DM Corporation,Caltrans District 7. Project Manager/Engineer.
Preliminary engineering and PEER for intersection improvements. 1990
• Campus Drive Widening,County of Orange,John Wayne Airport. Project Manager. Preliminary and final
engineering for street widening improvements. 1987-1992. Phase 1 constructed 1989,Phase 2 constructed 1992
• Dwiggins Street,et al Improvements,County of Los Angeles. Project Manager. Preliminary and final engineering
for street widening improvements. 1987-90
• Center Avenue Improvements,City of Huntington Beach. Project Engineer. Preparation of PSR and preliminary
and final engineering for street widening improvements at I-405 ramps. 1987-91
• Euclid Avenue Improvements,City of Upland. Design Engineer. Preliminary engineering for street widening and
drainage improvements. 1986
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Marie Marston, P.E.
Page 4
Joe Buckner, P.E., P.L.S.
Project Manager
EDUCATION
B.S.,1986,Civil Engineering,California State University,Fullerton
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Registered Civil Engineer,State of California(#45531, 1989)
Professional Land Surveyor, State of California(#7206, 1995)
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Twelve years experience in planning and design of commercial,industrial and residential site development;design of
freeways,highways,and arterial streets,right-of-way engineering,grading,sewer,water and storm drains.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
• US-101/Victoria Avenue Interchange,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Assistant Project Manager.
Preparation of value engineering,Fact Sheets,PS&E,and construction engineering. 1995-98
• SR-126/Kimball Road Interchange,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Desivs En ineer. Preparation of
Project Study Report,Project Report,Project Approval Report,Fact Sheets,PS&E, soundwalls,right-of-way
acquisition,and construction engineering. 1988-Construction completed 1/94
• SR-126/Wolcott Way and Commerce Center Drive,City of San Buenaventura,Caltrans District 7. Project
Engineer. Included a Project Report,geometric plans,and plans,specifications and estimates for two new
intersections. Project included street widening,new signals,drainage modifications,staging plans,and a fast-track
schedule.
• I-5/Magic Mountain Parkway Interchange,Valencia Company,Caltrans District 7,County of Los Angeles,City of
Santa Clarita. Project Manager. Preparation of PSR. 1997-98
• US-101/Kanan Avenue,City of Augora Hills. Project Manager. Preparation of Project Study Report for
improvements to the interchange to mitigate existing deficiencies and to accommodate the future Riverwalk
development in the northeast quadrant.
• Red Hill Avenue Widening,City of Tustin. Project Manager. Project involved preparation of a preliminary
engineering report consisting of geometries,profiles,cost estimates,and recommendations for a preferred alternative.
Analyzed existing and future traffic operations,impacts to existing businesses,and construction costs for each
alternative.
• I-10/Sierra Avenue Interchange,City of Fontana,Caltrans District 8. Project Engineer. Prepared Project Study
Report,Project Report,Categorical Exemption,and Plans Specifications&Estimates for interchange reconstruction,
retaining walls,and ramp reconstruction. 1989-1998.
• I-l0/Pepper Avenue Interchange,County of San Bernardino,Caltrans District 8. Project Engineer. Preparation of
alternatives analysis,technical studies for Caltrans District 8 on Project Study Report,and Fact Sheets. 1993-5
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Joe Buckner, P.L.S., P.E.
Page 1
•
• San Joaquin Transportation Corridor,Orange County. Project Engineer. Preparation of preliminary and final
engineering for the SR-73/Bison Avenue and SR-73/Ford Road interchanges and mainline for the Transportation
Corridor Agency of Orange County. Included geometric plans, fact sheets, final plans, specifications,and estimates
for alignment,grading,and drainage improvements.
Pavement Rehabilitation
• Muirlands Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation,City of Irvine. Project Manager. All utility appurtenances such as
water valves,sewer and storm drain manholes were adjusted to grade as well as the replacement of all affected traffic
loop detectors and traffic striping. Preparation of plans,specifications,and an engineer's estimate of probable cost.
• Culver Drive Pavement Rehabilitation,City of Irvine. project Manager.The rehabilitation consisted of cold
planing the unsuitable areas of paving a minimum of 2". Utility items such as water valves and electric vaults were
adjusted to grade as well as the replacement of the affected traffic striping and loop detectors. Project included
preparation of plans,technical specifications,an engineer's estimate of probable cost.
• Edinger Avenue Street Rehabilitation,City of Santa Ana. Project Engineer. Ten cross street intersections were
joined and improved. The plans included pavement rehabilitation,intersection detail plans,a major 54-inch storm
drain addition,new sewer line,new water line,and traffic loop replacement.The scope also included a hydrology
report,survey,field investigations,field potholing of utilities,preparation of plans,and cost estimates. Survey
included centerline location,cross-sections at every 50 feet,topographic survey of all intersections,the location of all
utilities within the right-of-way,and obtaining elevations for potholing.
• Fairview Avenue Street Rehabilitation Improvements,City of Santa Ana. Project Engineer. Included in the
design were pavement rehabilitation,traffic control,curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements,and miscellaneous
improvements.
• Bloomfield Avenue Reconstruction,City of Cerritos. Project Engineer. The design includes pavement
reconstruction,curb repair,drainage,utilities,reclaimed water line,traffic control,and construction staging. The
project involves coordination with outside utility companies,County of Los Angeles Public Works Department,
Southern Pacific Transportation Company,MTA,businesses and residences.
• Edwards Street Rehabilitation,City of Westminster. Project Manager. Project involved removal and replacement
of unsuitable sections of roadway,cold planing along the gutters,the placement of pavement reinforcing fabric and a
2"AC overlay. Included plans and engineer's estimate. The plans consisted of roadway rehabilitation and striping.
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Joe Buckner, P.L.S., P.E.
Page 2
Jennifer Ekrami, P.E.
Project Engineer
EDUCATION
B.S., 1993,Civil Engineering,California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo
PROFESSIONAL DATA
Registered Professional Engineer, State of California(#055271, 1996)
EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW
Over five years experience in highway design and construction administration. Highway related experience includes design
and inspection of culverts,retaining and sound walls,roadway geometrics,and computer-aided design. She has served as a
design and project engineer on major transportation projects. She is also knowledgeable in writing bridge and roadway
specifications in conformance with Caltrans'standards.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
• Valencia Avenue/Interstate 5 Interchange improvement project, in Ventura County,CA. Project Engineer for the
preparation of the project report,environmental documents, fact sheets and PS&E.
• 1-605/Carson Street Interchange Improvement, Long Beach,CA.Proiect Engineer responsible for coordinating
stage construction,traffic handling,and detour plans with subconsultant. Coordinated with the landscapeing
subconsultant and kept them informed of changes in grading and geometrics that affected their plans. Met with
Caltrans to discuss safety issues on the project relating to traffic control,staging, signing and striping in conformance
with Caltrans standards. In addition,she wrote the contract special provisions and prepared the estimate for the
project.
• Childs Avenue Improvement Project,Merced,CA.Project Engineer responsible for the preparation of the project
report,plans,specifications,and estimate. This project involved the widening and pavement rehabilitation of Childs
Avenue near Route 99 including signing,striping and utility relocation. The project also included a cooperative
agreement with the City of Merced.
• Route 132 Widening and Rehabilitation,Caltrans,District 10, Stockton,CA.Project Engineer responsible for the
preparation of the project study report and preliminary design for the widening and pavement rehabilitation of Route
132 near Modesto,California. She coordinated with the City of Merced on the project and discussed environmental
mitigation measures to protect the San Joaquin River and environmentally sensitive areas.
• 1-10/Central and Mountain Interchanges,San Bernardino Associated Governments,Claremont,CA. Design
Engineer responsible for GAD and PS&E package for this diamond interchange. Project involved widening of I-10 at
Central and Mountain Avenues,replacement of the two-span undercrossing structure on Central Avenue and
replacement of the single-span undercrossing structure on Mountain Avenue,as well as modifications to ramps. She
was responsible for PS&E to Caltrans standards of roadway design that included signing,striping,lighting,stage
construction,and traffic handling.
• I-10/Sepulveda Boulevard Undercrossing to Corning Undercrossing Approach Slab Rehabilitation,Caltrans,
Los Angeles,CA. Design Engineer with Caltrans responsible for preparation of layout sheets,typical cross section
and construction details for the project utilizing MicroStation. She performed field investigations to determine
roadway damage and structural damage to the bridges on I-10 and SR-101.
Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group Jennifer Ekramt, P.E.
Page 1
tin i Wilbur Smith Associ�tes
\a M WW
�VV.7 k
•
JEFFREY B. HEALD
Associate In Charge
EDUCATION responsible for over four miles of interconnect and fiber-
B.S./Civil Engineering/Michigan State University/1988 optic trunk line from the intersections to the City's Traffic
Management Center. This project will provide the City of
Santa Ana with real time traffic information at the
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION specified intersections as well as potential future uses of
Civil Engineer: California • the fiber-optic trunk line.
Electric Trolley Bus, Long Beach, California - Mr. Heald -
TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES acted as Project Manager for the modification of three
Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering, and traffic signals along the proposed ETB route on Anaheim
Intelligent Transportation Systems Planning and Boulevard, as well as a traffic signal installation In front of
Deployment the Long Beach Transit Facility. Two of the intersections
involved Pacific Coast Highway and working with Caltrans
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE and the City of Long Beach. All four signals involved
special overhead contact system poles for EIB catenary
January 1998 to present wire loading requirements. Specific foundation details
Wilbur Smith Associates were part of design plans.
January 1995 to January 1998
National Engineering Technology Corporation City of Santa Ana On-Call Traffic Engineering Services,
April 1988 to January 1995 Santa Ana, CA-Mr. Heald is the project manager and lead
Linscott, Law&Greenspan, Engineers design engineer in providing the City of Santa Ana with
On-Call Traffic Engineering services. Work assignments
Mr. Heald has ten years of professional transportation have included conceptual design and cost estimate
planning and traffic engineering experience. Selected preparation for traffic signal and street improvements at
project experience is presented below. various locations within the City.
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Freeway Alternative
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/SIGNALSTUDIES/PS&E Access Project, Burbank, CA - Prepared 20 traffic signal
Los Angeles Co. Metropolitan Transportation Authority - • plans associated with the widening of Hollywood Way.
Southeast Subregional Traffic Signal System Coordination- Plans Incorporate the installation of interconnect
Responsible for the inventory of the traffic signal system, throughout the corridor using fiber-optic cable and
which Includes over 1700 intersections. Coordinated the upgrades of traffic signal controllers.
analysis of existing traffic signals and transit/roadway
facilities. Selected focus corridors. Accountable for the City of Costa Mesa CCIV Design and Installation, Costa
development of potential signal systems and Mesa, CA - Mr. Heald is the project manager and lead
transit/roadway projects which will improve mobility design engineer for the preparation of PS&E for the
through 26 different jurisdictions in the Southeast Los installation of CCTV at four locations along the SR-55
Angeles County area. Corridor.
Harbor Blvd. and First Street Traffic Management Project,
Santa Ana, CA - Responsible for the preparation of the State Route 152/Badger Flat Road, Los Banos, California -
PS&E for the Installation of three closed circuit television Mr. Heald acted as Project Manager and Lead Design
cameras and four system loop detector locations at Engineer for the evaluation and design of a four way
various intersections in the City of Santa Ana. Also traffic signal on SR-152, a four lane rural facility with typical
PAGE 2 JEFFREY B.HEALD
travel speeds of 65 mph. Evaluation included analysis of Century City Center, Los Angeles, CA - Lead Engineer for
flashing yellow operation during road improvements to the evaluation of Initial traffic circulation analysis of the .
Badger Flat Road, as well as the final design alternatives Century City area to determine potential site access issues,
for fully actuated signalization. Design utilized safety as well as multiple transportation Impact analyses for
treatments including deceleration and acceleration lanes, different project scenarios through the project
as well as advanced warning signalization for motorists on development stage. Prepared a traffic impact study for a
SR-152 approaching Badger Flat Road in both directions. one-million sq. ft. commercial office, including conceptual
mitigation plans for over 30 Intersections.
Universal Studios Signal Design, Los Angeles, CA -
Responsible for the design of plans, specifications and 818 Block. Los Angeles,CA-Lead Engineer responsible for
estimates for one traffic signal modification and three evaluation of the traffic impacts associated with three
new traffic signal installations, on and adjacent to adjacent developments between Figueroa, Flower, 7^and
Universal Studios. Designs included camera intersection 8^ streets in downtown Los Angeles. The three projects,
detection for hook-up to City of Los Angeles' Advanced Hotel Macklowe, Halekulani Hotel and the Ahmanson
Traffic Surveillance and Control System, and Caltrans' Office development, required a coordinated traffic
encroachment permit processing. improvement plan in order to mitigate the project Impacts
for each project. Worked with the client to receive
Pasadena Light Rail Project - Prepared seven bridge approvals from the Los Angeles Department of
seismic retrofit construction detour designs, two Transportation for the three projects.
pavement delineation and one street lighting plan on
arterial streets adjacent to the proposed Pasadena Light John Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA - Prepared a
Rail. The project involves coordination with the Los traffic impact study and mitigation for an auxiliary office
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,the facility on-site. Worked to receive approval from the Los
City of Pasadena and Caltrans, as much of the right-of-way Angeles Department of Transportation on the traffic
is in the median of 1-210. The plans address future vehicle impact study, as well as the mitigation plans. Led the
drop-off zones, bus transfer points, and pedestrian traffic design team in the preparation of plans,
interface with station access points at Lake Avenue, Allen specifications and estimates for traffic signal
Avenue,and Sierra Madre Villa. improvements in two locations, as well as associated
geometric improvements to the 1-405 interchange at
I-10/Sierra Avenue Urban Interchange, Fontana, CA - Sepulveda Blvd.
Project Manager responsible for the preparation of 60
sheets of temporary traffic signal, ramp metering, PARKING STUDIES
pavement delineation, roadside and overhead signing
• and staged construction traffic control plans for Caltrans County of Riverside Parking Assessment, Riverside, CA -
District 8 in San Bernardino County. Project Manager for the evaluation of parking issues in the
Justice District of downtown Riverside. Mr. Heald is
Harbor Boulevard Traffic Signal Design, Costa Mesa, CA - leading a team which is developing short and long term
Mr. Heald acted as design group leader on the parking recommendations for the County in this
preparation of PS&E for traffic signal modifications and congested area where the number of recently constructed
upgrades associated with roadway widening along Harbor courthouses in downtown Riverside have created
Boulevard between Gisler Avenue and Baker Avenue. challenges to adequately park the juror population, as
well as County employees and visitors doing business with
the County.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC
IMPACT/CIRCULATION ANALYSES/CORRIDOR STUDIES California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton,CA-Project
City of Vernon Corridor Studies Report, Vernon, California Manager for the evaluation and feasibility of the
- Mr. Heald is the Project Manager for the analysis of two construction of a parking structure on campus. The
corridors within the City, 26^Street and Soto Street, which project will provide recommendations to address the
will address roadway improvements necessary to supply and demand balance during the construction of
accommodate the expected vehicle and heavy truck traffic the facility, as well as defining the long-term parking
demands associated with the Alameda Rail Corridor needs for the university, validation program, Intelligent
improvements. parking system applications and circulation Issues which
may Impact the university's roadway masterplan.
Jbh-mslr
PAGE 3 JEFFREY B. HEALD
planning document for the Los Angeles and Ventura
Other Parking Projects County Region. The SDP will provide a guide for future
In addition, Mr. Heald has prepared supply and demand Investment in Intelligent Transportation Systems
evaluations for private developments including Home technologies by all agencies involved in a coordinated
Savings of America and various commercial office effort. The SDP will address all modes of transportation
developments in the cities of Beverly Hills and Los and develop an implementation plan which maximizes
Angeles. Mr. Heald has assessed parking facility the use of existing and proposed Intelligent
operational issues, parking control strategies including Transportation Systems infrastructure.
physical facility layout, signing and valet parking
operations as well as shared use strategies to meet hourly Yosemite Area Traveller Information (YA11), CA - The YATI
and daily peak demand. system integrates and disseminates local and regional
traffic and traveller Information over the 11,000 square
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS(TN PLANNING miles of Yosemite National Park and the surrounding
AND DEPLOYMENT counties of Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Mono and
Tuolumne. Mr. Heald was the Project Engineer
responsible for the design and deployment of the
LAX Computerized Parking Control System, Los Angeles, multimedia kiosks and internet web page utilized to
California - Mr. Heald acted as Deputy Project Manager disseminate multimodal schedule Information, local
for WSA in the design of a new parking control system to accommodations, events and attractions, as well as real-
meet the expected future needs of the Los Angeles(LAX) time weather and roadway conditions in the region.
International, Ontario (ONT) International and Van Nuys
(VNY)Airport. The project involves evaluating the current Southern California Priority Corridor "Showcase" Project,
computerized parking control system hardware and CA-Mr. Heald acted as one of the lead engineers on this
software in order to determine the opportunities of re- high level intelligent Transportation System deployment
using certain technologies, definition of user needs and strategy for the Southern California Priority Corridor. The
system design elements in producing specifications for scoping phase of the project entails identifying the needs
system implementation by mid-2001. The system will and requirements of the ITS system, including the
serve the parking facilities at all three airports and involve identification of ITS applications and projects, identifying
a significant amount of integration of new technologies potential early deployment candidates, inventorying
such as AVI, credit/debit systems and facility monitoring existing infrastructure and systems throughout the
capabilities. corridor and prototyping system architecture into a
functioning model. The final system design will adhere to
DISNEY Campus Master Plan - Lead Transportation Open Standards ensuring compatibility and flexible future
Engineer for developing the mitigation strategies through growth potential.
the application of ITS technologies and public/private
partnerships for the 5.8 million sq. ft. master plan
transportation element. The ITS transportation mitigation PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
program will provide overall reduction in congestion by . American Society of Civil Engineers
managing the demand through the dissemination of Institute of Transportation Engineers
traveler information and will improve the traffic circulation
system capacity.
Constellation Place, Los Angeles, CA- Lead Transportation
Engineer in developing mitigation strategies through the
application of ITS technologies for this one-million sq. ft.
office project. The ITS mitigation program is being
reviewed by the Los Angeles Department of
Transportation as a potential neighborhood protection
program.
Los Angeles/Ventura Counties Intelligent Transportation
Systems Strategic Deployment Plan - Project Manager for
the preparation of this 20-year horizon ITS master
)bh-mstr