HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1984-09-17
9-17-84
Seal Beach, California
September 17, 1984
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
adjourned session at 7:00 o'clock p.m. with Mayor Brownell
calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Brownell
Counci1members Clift, Grgas, Risner, wilson
I
Absent: None
Also present: Mr. Parker, City Manager
Mr. Baucke, Director of Development Services
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
WAIVER OF FULL READING
It was the consensus of the Council that no action was
necessary on this item.
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Brownell proclaimed the period of September 17th
through September 23rd, 1984 as "Constitution Week."
Mayor Brownell proclaimed the month of September, 1984
as "KCET 20th Anniversary Month."
PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS NUMBERED 3410 and 34ll
Clift moved, second by Wilson, to hold over until the next
regular meeting proposed Resolutions Number 3410 and 3411
entitled RA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, A CHARTER CITY, ESTABLISHING
SALARY RATES, A SALARY AND WAGE SCHEDULE, AUTHORIZING THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FOR THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT AND REPEALING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATES SPECIFIED,
ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH" and "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
A CHARTERED CITY, ESTABLISHING SALARY RATES, A SALARY AND
WAGE SCHEDULE, AUTHORIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND REPEALING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATES
SPECIFIED, ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH."
I
AYES:
NOES:
Brownell, Clift, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
PRESENTATION - DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION STUDY
The City Manager reviewed the steps taken since 1982 relating
to the process for preparation and subsequent study of
the Downtown Revitalization Study. The Market and Business
Analysis and Parking and Urban Design Task Force Committees
Final Reports set forth the topics of discussion as follows
and set forth the consensus of opinions relating to those
matters: Image of Downtown; Market Area; Tenant Mix; Public
Events Bulletin Board; pier Restaurant; Entertainment; 1
Store Windows; Participating Merchant Program; Store Hours;
Credit Cards, Exchange and Refunds; Staffing (paid coordinator);
Bus Routes in the Downtown Area; Main Street Entry at Pacific
Coast Highway; Main street Right-of-Way (sidewalks, streets
and parkways; Use of Banners on Main Street; Usage and
Development of Eisenhower Park; Usage and Development of
the Electric Avenue Right-of-Way as it relates to Main
street; Private Buildings/Property Development; Private
Buildings/Property Architecture; Parking Meters on Main
9-l7-84
I
Street; Parking Time Limits along Main Street; Diagonal
Parking on the West Side of the 300 Block of Main Street;
and Public Restrooms. Mr. Parker presented a brief overview
of some of the issues addressed by the Task Forces such
as parking behind existing businesses, modification of
present parking requirements in relation to improvements
to existing structures or development of vacant lots,
potential for a parking structure on the Eighth Street
parking lot in the future, however not on the beach lots,
that current building height requirements be retained,
however supported mixed uses of Main Street buildings,
signing, street furniture, etc. The City Manager noted
that no minority opinion reports had been generated from
the committees. Mr. Parker stated that the intent was
to involve persons of varied interests on the Task Force
groups, which was accomplished through the participation
of members of the business community, residents and property
owners, and stated his feeling that this process was very
worthwhile. The City Manager and the Director of Development
Services made a slide presentation of Pacific Coast Highway,
Main Street, City entrance areas, business district alleys
and vacant parcels of land, and in addition, pictures of
shopping areas, street furnishings, signing, awnings, etc.
in other communities. It was pointed out that the Task
Force report deemed Pacific Coast Highway as a blighted
area with a need for signing guidelines and control; cited
the need for Main Street identity; more effective street
signage directed towards the downtown commercial area and
the pier; the need for street furniture such as benches,
litter receptacles, street signs, cross walks, pavement
treatment, landscaping, upgraded street lighting, and
encouraged development of vacant lots in the 300 block
of Main Street. It was noted further that the Reports
addressed parking concerns, supported flexibility in
regulations governing on-site and off-site parking, supported
cleaning and maintenance of areas to the rear of businesses
for a potential of additional parking, and encouraged parking
design for the 300 block consistent with that of the lOO
and 200 blocks of Main Street. The City Manager stated
that improvements will require joint cooperation between
the City and the merchants and property owners, as well
as between the merchants themselves, noting that the Task
Force recommended that a paid coordinator be retained to
assist the downtown businesses in such things as formulating
a proper mix of businesses, consistent hours of operation,
business promotion, etc. He also pointed out that the
recommendations favor the retention of an architect and
landscape architect to develop design standards and guidelines,
noting that the property owner then would be responsible
for improvements to their individual properties in conformance
with those guidelines. In response to Councilmember Risner,
the City Manager reported that $26,000 has been expended
to develop the Downtown Revitalization Study, that $25,000
is budgeted to cover consultant fees for the next phase,
architectural design and criteria, which will include working
drawings for any construction improvement, noting that
expenditure of that entire amount for consultant services
may not be necessary. He stated that at such time actual
improvements are to be initiated by the City, several means
of financing could be considered, as well as a Redevelopment
project area. He clarified that architectural standards
for the downtown area would not remove the individuality
of a particular merchant and could be permissive rather
than restrictive within established parameters. With regard
to the existing sign regulations, Mr. Baucke clarified
that the amortization period of the present sign ordinance
I
I
9-17-84
has been completed, that a survey is being made as to
compliance, and letters forwarded to those property owners
who are now in violation. He offered that in order to
accomplish the objectives of the Task Force recommendations,
it would be advisable to implement separate sign guidelines
for the downtown area and Pacific Coast Highway from First
Street to Seal Beach Boulevard, rather than city-wide.
The City Manager concurred with Councilman Clift's statement I
that implementation of the Task Force recommendations may
take several years, and additionally in that regard,
explained an in-lieu parking fee could be imposed and
accumulated in a special parking fund that could, if deemed
necessary, be used to construct a parking structure on
the Eighth Street lot at a future date. Discussion continued.
Ms. Debbie wooten of Glendale, addressed the Council as
a representative of her mother, inquired if a redevelopment
project area was being proposed for the downtown shopping
area. The City Manager responded that it is not being
considered at this time, however has previously been
discussed, and explained that should the need arise to
establish a downtown project area the City would waive
its right to eminent domain. Wilson moved, second by Risner,
to refer the Task Force findings to the staff as recommended.
AYES:
NOES:
Brownell, Clift, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
Risner moved, second by Wilson, to officially express
appreciation to the Task Forces for their efforts toward
Downtown Revitalization.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Brownell, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
None
Clift Motion carried
I
Councilman Clift abstained from voting as he was a member
of a Task Force committee.
Mayor Brownell distributed Certificates of Appreciation
to those Task Force members present in the audience.
Several recipients expressed gratitude to the Council and
the City for their efforts and cooperation relative to
the revitalization.
APPOINTMENT - CITIZENS PARTICIPATION COMMITTEE (H/CD Projects)
Councilmember Risner moved to appoint Mr. Rich Harbour
to the Citizens Participation Committee from District Three
for the short term of two years expiring 1986. Councilman
Clift seconded the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
Brownell, Clift, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were no oral communications.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the consensus of the Council that the September
24th regular meeting would be cancelled due to a conflict
with the League of California Cities Conference. Risner
moved, second by Wilson, to adjourn the meeting at 7:57
p.m.
I
AYES:
NOES:
Brownell, Clift, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
None Motion carried
9-l7-84 / 9-24-84 / IO-8-84
and ex-offic'
City Council
I
Attest:
?--A^';,~. ,~ - · ~
C).-.i>>J( 4
City Cle~
-'
Approved:
Notice of Cancelled Meeting
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the regular City Council
meeting of Monday, September 24, 1984 is hereby cancelled
pursuant to unanimous consent of the Seal Beach City
Council at their regular adjourned meeting of September
l7, 1984. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be
held on Monday, October 8, 1984.
THIS 18th day of September, 1984.
I
Seal Beach, California
October 8, 1984
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular
session at 7:00 o'clock p.m. with Mayor Brownell calling
the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor Brownell
Counci1members Clift, Grgas, Risner, Wilson
Absent:
None
I
Also present: Mr. Parker, City Manager
Mr. Stepanicich, City Attorney
Mr. Joseph, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Hemphill, Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Mr. Baucke, Director of Development Services
Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk
WAIVER OF FULL READING
Wilson moved, second by Grgas, to waive the reading in
full of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent
to the waiver of reading shall be deemed to be given by
all Counci1members after reading of the title unless
specific request is made at that time for the reading of
such ordinance or resolution.