The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC AG PKT 2004-01-26 #R AGENDA REPORT DATE: January 26, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: John B. Bahorski, City Manager FROM: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services SUBJECT: Approval of Comment Letters re "Destination 2030" — Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan and the Draft Program EIR SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Authorize Mayor to sign comment letters regarding the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft PEIR) and the Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan (2004 RTP), with any revisions determined appropriate. Instruct Staff to forward staff report and comment letters to the Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Control Board for information. BACKGROUND: State and Federal law requires the Southern California Association of Governments to prepare a long -range Regional Transportation Plan. In October 2003, the Southern California Association of Governments released the Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan, and commenced the public review period. As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the region including Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) must adopt a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) every three years. The document identifies long- term strategies to address mobility and air quality conformity during the following twenty -five year period. SCAG Regional Council adopted the current RTP in April 2001. The Draft 2004 RTP entitled, "Destination 2030 ", updates the 2001 RTP. The SCAG Regional Council will consider adoption of the 2004 RTP in April 2004. Please refer to Attachment 1 to review the draft comment letter and to Attachment 4 to review the "Executive Summary" of the Draft Program EIR. Agenda Item ,f Z.\My Documents \ SCAG Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report doc \LW\01 -20 -04 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 The Draft 2004 RTP forecasts transportation needs through 2030. SCAG must include all regionally significant transportation improvements for these projects to be eligible for Federal or State funding or to receive the necessary approvals for implementation. In addition, the RTP must identify reasonably available funding sources for all projects (financially constrained) and demonstrate conformity with the air quality requirements of the State Implementation Plan (SIP). SCAG released the draft conformity analysis in - December 2003. The analysis states the Draft 2004 RTP can meet conformity requirements. In December 2002, after coordinating with local jurisdictions, the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG), and transportation planning agencies, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of Directors adopted project nominations for the 2004 RTP, consistent with OCTA's "Directions 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan ". OCTA staff is continuing to monitor development of the RTP to ensure the plan reflects all of Orange County's transportation priorities. SCAG's Regional Council released the Draft 2004 RTP and the Draft Program EIR for public review with comments due to SCAG by February 9, 2004. Staff has reviewed both documents and has prepared comment letters for City Council consideration (Please refer to Attachments A and B, respectively). Discussion: The 2004 RTP projects that by 2030 the region will be home to 22.9 million residents and 10.2 million jobs. This represents a population increase of 6.3 million people between 2000 and 2030, a 38 percent increase. An employment increase of 2.7 million jobs between 2000 and 2030, a 36 percent increase, is projected. This projected growth in population and jobs will place an unprecedented demand on the current transportation and good movement systems of the region. The Draft 2004 RTP incorporates input of several SCAG task forces that met during the last year to develop policies presented in the plan. Several technical advisory committees also contributed to the development of the RTP. OCCOG and OCTA participated throughout this process and maintained a cooperative relationship with SCAG staff and regional stakeholders during the development of the Draft 2004 RTP. Orange County Projects and Programs: The draft document assigns transportation projects and programs to three program levels: Baseline Projects, Tier 2 Projects, and Plan Projects. 13 Baseline Projects include those projects listed in the 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) that had state and federal enviromnental clearance by December 2002. ❑ Tier 2 Projects are the remaining projects in the 2002 RTIP. From a long -range planning standpoint, the 'Draft 2004 RTP considers Baseline and Tier 2 projects funded and assumes implementation of these projects will occur. 2 • Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ❑ Plan Projects are those projects with identified funding sources in the RTP beyond Tier 2 and are considered the discretionary projects to address long -term mobility in the region. These three program levels in the document contain all of Orange County's transportation nominations included in "Directions 2030 ". Attachment 3 indicates select key Orange County projects in the Draft 2004 RTP. The following chart shows select key Orange County projects in the Draft 2004 RTP that have been identified by staff as impacting or potentially impacting Seal Beach Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan Program Mixed Flow • _Garden Grove Freeway /State • None Lanes . Route 22 (SR -22) from Beach Boulevard to 1 -5 High • Garden Grove Freeway /State • None Occupancy Route 22 (SR -22) from SR -55 Vehicle (HOV) to 1 -405 Lanes • San Gabriel River Freeway /Interstate 605 (1 -605) from 1 -405 to LA County Line HOV to HOV • SR -22/I -405 • 1- 405/1 -605 (2020) Auxiliary Lanes • None • 1 -405 SB from (Operational & Beach Boulevard Capacity) to 1 -605 Toll Roads & • None • None Toll to Toll Connectors 3 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan Program Transit • None • Bus Rapid Transit on Harbor Boulevard Westminster Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Edinger Avenue, Beach Boulevard, La Palma Avenue, and Fullerton to Brea Arterials /Interch • None • None anges /Grade Crossings Long -Range • None • None Planning Studies Truck Climbing • None • None Lanes The Draft 2004 RTP also includes highway and street maintenance, non - motorized and intelligent transportation system elements. The Draft RTP includes design of the direct HOV connector between the SR 22 and I -405 freeways but does not list construction of the connector. SCAG staff has informed OCTA staff that construction is assumed in the draft 2004 RTP modeling but is omitted from the project list. The comment letter requests SCAG to include construction of the connector in the long term project list. Land Use and the Transportation Plan: For the first time, the Draft 2004 RTP integrates land -use policies that influence transportation performance. During its planning for the RTP update, SCAG found that - changing the distribution of growth within the - region in future years (for population, households, and employment) impacted performance of the transportation system. SCAG undertook a growth visioning process that examined the effects on the transportation system of two patterns of growth for the region. The first pattern known as Planning for Integrated Land Use and Transportation (PILUT) I, accommodated future growth by intensifying land use (using infill and redevelopment for densification) in urbanized parts of the region. The second, PILUT II, allocated future growth to outlying areas such as North Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, and Eastern Riverside Draft 2004 RTP R. DEIR.CC Staff Report 4 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional - Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 County (Coachella Valley). Transportation improvements to support PILUT I focused on transit, while PILUT II required new roads. Both growth scenarios showed improvements to the performance of the transportation system, however, SCAG recognized these scenarios were unlikely to occur given existing local land use policies and patterns. SCAG developed a hybrid growth scenario that incorporates elements of PILUT I and II and results in a 2004 RTP that maintains transportation mobility air quality conformity in the region through 2030. This Growth Vision Alternative is the basis for the preferred 2004 RTP, and includes assumptions of the level and location of population, job and housing growth that will occur in the region by 2030. The Draft 2004 RTP growth assumptions are consistent with local General Plans through 2010. After this time, the SCAG Plan assumes an increase and shifts in growth patterns different from locally adopted plans. SCAG proposes to work with local jurisdictions between now and 2010 to modify their land uses for consistency with the Draft 2004 RTP, with a transition period of several years after 2010. While this approach of changing land uses to improve the transportation system will require considerable coordination between SCAG and local jurisdictions, the growth patterns the RTP proposes for Orange County households and population are close to the current pattern of development that already includes a significant infill component. Recognizing the region will need more discussion in deciding the merits of connecting planned growth and development to the patterns laid out in the Draft 2004 RTP after 2010, the plan suggests several specific approaches to accomplish the new Growth Vision pattern: . ❑ Identify implementation barriers, and develop policy strategies and decisions to guide change at the local regional, state, and federal levels, ❑ In 2004, host a series of "Policy Forums" with regional stakeholders, and ❑ Support legislation that provides incentives to public and private agencies that incorporate the Growth Vision Alternative strategies into development projects. Of particular concern is a recommendation in the Draft 2004 RTP to "align evaluation of projects within the RTP and the tenets of the Growth Vision as a method of funding decisions." This approach links funding for Orange County transportation projects to local land use decisions over which OCTA has no control. OCTA recommends removal of this language from the Draft 2004 RTP. Preliminary discussions with OCTA and SCAG staff indicate that SCAG staff will support this request. • OCTA staff, OCCOG staff, and the Center for Demographic Research staff worked extensively with SCAG staff to ensure the growth assumptions in the Draft 2004 RTP are consistent with the locally approved growth forecasts. The information reflected in these growth assumptions is consistent with information provided by City staff. A consistent set of growth projections between SCAG and Orange County is critical for major planning projects, environmental documentation, and transportation modeling efforts. 5 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report Janua,y 26, 2004 Financing the Draft 2004 RTP Funds for implementing the Draft 2004 RTP are severely limited for several reasons: ❑ Decline of gas tax revenues due to inflation, ❑ Sunset of existing local sales tax measures, ❑ Loss of revenues from reduced - gasoline consumption due to more efficient vehicles on the road and use of alternative energy sources, ❑ An aging society that could consume fewer taxable items, ❑ Escalation of operations and maintenance needs, given the aging transportation infrastructure, and ❑ State budget crisis diverting transportation dollars. In response, the Draft 2004 RTP outlines several public funding strategies, including: Cl Amend the constitution to remove the provision in Proposition 42 that allows diversion from transportation uses to the general fund by the Governor and legislature, ❑ Amend the state constitution to allow 55 percent voter approval for local - transportation sales taxes, ❑ Increase the motor vehicle fuel user fee five cents per gallon in 2010 and one cent each year between 2011 and 2015. Allow debt issuance guaranteed by a portion of this revenue stream to advance projects, and use a pay -as- you -go approach. (This strategy is carried over from the adopted 2001 RTP and is consistent with historical trends in gas tax increases.) The public funding component of the Draft 2004 RTP proposes investing $31.2 billion (2002 constant dollars) from public funding sources between 2002 and 2030 above the existing commitments of $120 billion. SCAG assumes approval of a sales tax extension in San Bernardino County, a sales tax backed transportation bond issue in Los Angeles County and an increase in the motor vehicle fuel tax of five cents to 2010 and a one cent increase annually between 2011 and 2015. Recent federal fund estimates and mid -year budget adjustments by the Governor suggest further reductions in available federal and state funds may occur. SCAG staff is currently assessing the impact this reduction of public funds could have on timely delivery of projects included in the 2004 RTP. SCAG staff is committed to working closely with all of the county transportation commissions to address potential impacts on specific projects and on the ability of the region to develop a conforming plan if these funding reductions occur. The public funding sources are not enough to pay for implementation of the entire Draft 2004 RTP. Therefore, the Draft 2004 RTP proposes using $60 billion in private funding including High Occupancy Toll lanes and user -fees for "one of a kind" major regional projects such as the proposed Maglev system. Total revenues projected for the Draft 2004 RTP are $211 billion and match the planned costs. Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 6 City Comment Letters re. Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 2004 RTP Revenue Sources 2002 — 2030, in billions (2002 dollars) Baseline Revenues $120 Public Funding $31 Private Funding $60. Total $211 2004 RTP Costs 2002 — 2030, in billions (2002 dollars) Committed Costs (Baseline and Tier 2) $115 Planned Costs (Funds identified but not $96 included in 2002 RTIP)_ Total $211 SCAG initially identified a program of projects, "Operation Jump Start," that could be funded through these private and innovative funding sources. SCAG proposed this concept as a way to expedite needed transportation projects and at the same time boost the Southern California economy with an infusion of jobs and economic investment in the region. Operation Jump Start includes the following projects: a dedicated truck way system, a freight railway system and the regional Maglev system. Subsequent to the preparation of the Draft 2004 RTP, SCAG's Regional Council voted to disassociate Operation Jump Start from the Drat 2004 RTP because of policy concerns about its timing and feasibility. Although Operation Jump Start is no longer part of the Draft 2004 RTP, the SCAG Regional Council wants these projects to remain in the plan with a designation of private funding as necessary for regional mobility and air quality conformity. Regional Issues The Draft 2004 RTP addresses several regionally significant issues that OCCOG and OCTA will continue to monitor for impacts to Orange County's transportation system: ❑ Air Quality Conformity The Draft 2004 RTP currently meets air quality conformity requirements by a narrow margin. The feasibility of implementing some of the components of the Draft 2004 7 Draft 2004 RTP & DE[R CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re. Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 RTP is unknown, such as required changes to local land use policies or securing significant private funding for major regional projects. However, without these components, air quality conformity will be difficult to achieve and key projects may be threatened. ❑ Investing in Existing Infrastructure Significant discussion occurred during the development of the Draft 2004 RTP about preservation of the existing state and local highway and arterial systems. As the region's infrastructure ages, significant cost savings occur with maintaining the system. The Draft 2004 RTP identifies $6.6 billion for infrastructure preservation - more than in previous years. ❑ Maglev System The SCAG - proposed Maglev system currently under study includes four major corridors: 1. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to March Inland Port in Riverside (Initial Operating Segment) 2. LAX to Palmdale • 3. Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal to Anaheim ( "Orange Line" proposal) 4. LAX to Orange County - Irvine Transportation Center (via San Diego Freeway /Interstate 405 Corridor) SCAG staff views the Maglev system as a critical component of the decentralized aviation strategy that follows. The California- Nevada High Speed Rail Maglev system is included in the Draft 2004 RTP as an unfunded long -range study. In addition, the California High Speed Rail Authority proposed routes through the SCAG region, including Orange County, should be included on the Maglev Map so that all future high speed rail project proposals traversing the SCAG region are visually represented. ❑ Regional Planning /Coordinating Agencies The Draft 2004 RTP includes multiple references to Joint Powers Authority type agencies for the implementation of regional_ projects (e.g., dedicated truckways, • freight railway system). The creation of such agencies will require further planning, and development of organizational structures will have to occur when the timing is appropriate. ❑ Aviation The adopted 2001 RTP assumed passenger aviation at the United States Marine Corps Air Station El Toro. Reflecting the sentiment of Orange County voters, the Draft 2004 RTP does not make that assumption and instead proposes a decentralized Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 8 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council January 26, 2004 approach. Available capacity at airfields in the Inland Empire and north Los Angeles County, along with a new passenger airport at Palmdale will serve the growth in demand for air travel. The proposed Maglev system is an integral component of a decentralized regional airport system. The Draft 2004 RTP also includes a number of freeway, arterial and transit improvements to address the ground access required to accommodate both passenger and cargo activities. Draft Program EIR: The Draft Program EIR evaluates the 2004 RTP and the regional impacts associated with the proposed major public infrastructure and transportation demand management projects and programs for the time frame of this plan, 2002 to 2030. The identified environmental impacts are not project specific, but evaluate the impacts on various areas of concern on the program level of evaluation. As staff has reviewed the proposed "mitigation - measures ", they appear to be reasonable and appropriate to respond to the identified impacts that this "program" level of analysis. As discussed above, the major impacts identified are due to the increases in population and jobs, and the resulting allocation of land to accommodate those projected uses over the project time period. The identified impacts are adequately outlined and appropriate mitigation measures have been set forth. Please refer to Attachment 2 to review the draft comment letter and to Attachment 5 to review the "Executive Summary" of the Draft Program EIR. - Next Steps: Overall, the Draft 2004 RTP includes all priority projects listed in OCTA's long range plan, "Destination 2030 ", and incorporates the population, employment, and housing projections that have been submitted by the Orange County Council of Governments. - Upon adoption of the Final 2004 RTP by the SCAG Regional Council, projects become eligible for federal and state funding as well as qualifying for necessary regional approvals. Staff will continue monitoring the impact on implementation of the adopted 2004 RTP including any federal or state funding reductions for transportation and outstanding issues between OCCOG and SCAG growth forecasts. Staff will also continue monitoring and addressing all of the various transportation projects identified that may have an impact upon Seal Beach, including the Maglev proposals. Public Comment Period: The public review and comment period for both documents will end on February 9, 2004 at 5:00 PM. Comments should be directed to the following parties: Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 9 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Draft 2004 RTP Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Bernice Villanueva Nancy Pfeffer Southern California Association of Southern California Association of Governments Governments 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Los Angeles, CA 90017 FISCAL IMPACT: - Adoption of the 2204 RTP will conform the regional transportation and air quality planning efforts to ensure the continued flow of appropriate federal transportation and air quality funds to the region. If the plan is not adopted, or if the region falls out of conformity with the required air quality management plans, the region would be faced with the loss of substantial federal funds. RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize Mayor to sign comment letters regarding the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft PEIR) and the Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan (2004 RTP), with any revisions determined appropriate. Instruct Staff to forward staff report and comment letters to the Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Control Board for information. NO i • N'► • ' PROVE I ,) j/, Whittenberg John : ahorski Director of Development Services City 9 anager Attachments: (5) Attachment 1: - Comment Letter re: "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" Attachment 2: Comment Letter re: "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Program Environmental impact Report" Attachment 3: Select Key Orange County Projects in the Draft 2004 RTP 10 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report Janumy 26, 2004 Attachment 4: Executive Summary — "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" Note: Entire document not provided due to length, 182 pages. A copy is available for public review at the Department of Development Services and the Office of the City Clerk. The document is also available on SCAG's website at www.scag.ca.gov. Attachment 5: Executive Summary — "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Program Environmental impact Report" Note: Entire document not provided due to length, 701 pages. A copy is available for public review at the Department of Development Services and the Office of the City Clerk. The document is also available on SCAG's website at www.scag.ca.gov. Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 1 1 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT 1 COMMENT LETTER RE: "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN" Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 12 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR • City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 January 26, 2004 - Bernice Villanueva Southern California Association of Governments 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Ms. Villanueva: SUBJECT: CITY OF SEAL BEACH COMMENTS ON "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN" DR AFT The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the Executive Summary of "Destination 2030 ", the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan ( "2004 RTP "), and has several comments and concerns relating to the subject document, in addition to detailed responses to specific issues which are attached as Attachment A, from the Department of Development Services regarding the remainder of the document. This document provides a clear and concise overview of the transportation problems, opportunities, and proposed programs and projects to meet the demands upon the transportation system, given fiscal and air quality constraints. Primary Concern of the City of Seal Beach — Long -Range Growth Projections: The primary concern of the City of Seal Beach is related to the issue of long - range growth projections that are not in conformance with local agency growth projections, particularly in the years after 2010. The issue of acceptable growth patterns in the region, and particularly at the local city and county level is an area of extreme sensitivity to the local residents of those particular communities. The Executive Summary states on page 2: "Accordingly, the proposed growth vision has been developed as follows: • utilizing in -fill where appropriate to re- vitalize underutilized development sites; focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes; providing housing opportunities near major job centers; providing housing - Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC StatT Report 13 • City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 opportunities to match changing demographics; preserving natural open space; incorporating decentralized aviation strategy proposed in the Plan; and respecting the local input and feed back process in the development of the growth distribution." These stated foundations for development of the growth vision are commendable. However, the implementation of these goals at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be 'hesitant to take on increasing populati ensities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. 111 After 2010, the 2004 RTP assumes an increase in and shifts of growth patterns different from locally adopted plans. SCAG proposes to work with local jurisdictions between- now and 2010 to modify their land uses for consistency with the Draft 2004 RTP, with a transition period of several years after 2010. While this approach of - changing land uses to improve the transportation system will require considerable . coordination between SCAG and local jurisdictions, the growth patterns the RTP proposes for Orange County households and population are close to the current pattern of development that already includes a significant infill component. The City of Seal Beach appreciates SCAG staff's willingness to work with the Orange County Council of Governments, the Center for Demographic Research, and OCTA to ensure that the growth assumptions for Orange County population, households and employment in the 2004 Draft RTP are consistent with - the locally approved growth . forecasts. A consistent set of growth projections between SCAG and Orange County is critical for major planning projects, environmental documentation, and transportation modeling efforts. That cooperation is greatly appreciated. However, as the future regional transportation plans are adopted, this issue will become more significant, and potentially more contentious. SCAG will be required to spend a considerable effort in achieving consensus of the many local jurisdictions in such a regionally significant change in land use and growth patterns over those envisioned by the local planning agencies within the region. Impacts of State Budget Decisions: The issue of adequate funding levels is of particular importance at this time given the position of the Governor regarding the state budget and the reduction of transportation projects already funded. The impacts of those budget decisions at the State level, and the resulting impacts to the ability to comply with the State Implementation Plan and the federal air quality conformity requirements, need to be clearly expressed by all interested parties. SCAG should work with all impacted state and local agencies in addressing this important transportation and air quality issue with the Governor and state legislators. Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 14 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 General Comments: We find the plan to be well written and SCAG's staff and consultants cooperative during the preparation and review of the Draft Plan. We understand that the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) indicates the document contains all of the regionally significant project priorities for Orange County as documented in OCTA's long range planning document, "Directions 2030 ". Land Use Policies: Regarding SCAG's strategies for implementing the land use policies in the 2004 RTP, the City of Seal Beach is concerned with the linkage made between land use and transportation projects in this particular strategy: "Align evaluation of projects within the RTP and the tenets of the Growth Vision as a method offitnding decisions." (Page 151, Draft 2004 RTP) The City of Seal Beach does not support a strategy whereby funding for Orange County transportation projects becomes tied to local land use decisions over which OCTA has no control. The City of Seal Beach recommends removing this language from the document. Regional Planning /Coordinating Agencies: - The Draft 2004 RTP includes multiple references to Joint Powers Authority (JPAs) type agencies for the implementation of various regional projects Maglev, dedicated truckways, freight railway system). The Final 2004 RTP should clarify these JPAs as conceptual implementing agencies, and acknowledge that further planning and organizational structures would have to be developed when the timing is appropriate. High Speed Rail/Maglev: The Draft 2004 RTP maps showing the Maglev system (Figure 4.9) should include all proposed state and regional projects in addition to SCAG's planned system to provide the reader with the regional context of multiple ongoing planning efforts. The Cal - Nevada High Speed Rail Commission has an adopted alignment that - Figure 4.9 should indicate in the Final 2004 RTP. There is also a "Major Investment Study" ( "MIS ") being conducted by OCTA along the 1 -405 corridor between the 1 -605 and SR -73. The MIS will be a comprehensive analysis of mobility issues to establish short-term and long - term transportation improvements that respond to current and future intra- county and inter - county travel needs. The City of Seal Beach strongly urges that the planning efforts for the Maglev Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 15 City Continent Letters re. Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report Januaiv 26, 2004 system and the MIS program be coordinated by the various planning agencies and that our city be kept informed during all stages of these important planning processes. Specific Projects: ❑ SR -22/I -405 HOV Direct Connector: Exhibit 4.1 of the Draft 2004 RTP shows HOV Direct Connector improvements at both the SR -22/I -405 and the I- 405/I- 605. The 2004 RTP list of projects includes both design and construction for the 1 -405/1 -605 connector. The list of projects defines however, the SR -22/I -405 project as "design HOV to HOV Lane Connectors" (Tier 2 ORA000193). Based upon discussion with SCAG staff, we understand that the Draft 2004 RTP includes construction of this HOV connector in the transportation demand modeling. In the Final 2004 RTP, please revise the language to clarify the project includes both design and construction. ❑ We also understand that the I -405/I -605 HOV Direct Connector is programmed for completion by 2020, as indicated in Table 4.5 on page 83 of the Draft 2004 RTP. Thank you for your consideration of the comments of the City of Seal Beach. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services, City Hall, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 90740, telephone (562) 431 -2527, extension 313 if you have any questions regarding this matter. In addition, please provide four (4) copies of the final "Destination 2030" plan to Mr. Whittenberg for distribution to the appropriate Commissions and the City Council when it is available. Sincerely, E. Campbell Mayor, City of Seal Beach ATTACHMENT A: Formal Staff Comments Regarding "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" Distribution: Seal Beach City Council . Seal Beach Planning Commission Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board City Manager Director of Development Services Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 16 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Orange County Council of Governments Orange County Transportation Authority Center for Demographic Research D9)51 . • • Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 17 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT A Formal Staff Comments Regarding "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" 1. Page 9 and Pages 104 -105, Maglev System - This system is set forth in the document as being necessary and critical to the success of SCAG's decentralized regional aviation system. The decentralized regional aviation system is needed due to the determination of Orange County voters to eliminate an airport at El Toro. The City requests to be informed of all planning studies to be undertaken by SCAG, OCTA, and all other future planning organizations of the proposed LAX to JWA segment of the proposed Maglev system. Potential impacts to the 8,300 person Leisure World senior retirement community, the residential communities of College Park East and College Park West, and the Seal Beach naval Weapons Station are of prime concern to the City. The City also requests that the planning efforts for the maglev system and the I -405 MIS be coordinated and that the Director of Public Works /City Engineer and the Director of Development Services be included on all public notifications and technical committee meetings on these • ' s e t lig studies. 2. Pages 79 -81, "Thinking Out of t e Box: The Land Use - Transportation Connection" - This section discusses several tenets that were developed through the "Growth Visioning" process as a "Reality Based Vision ". This "Vision" contemplated: ❑ Using infill where appropriate to revitalize underutilized development sites; ❑ Focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes to utilize available capacity; ❑ Providing housing opportunities near job centers; and ❑ Providing housing opportunities to match changing demographics. It is further indicated that the "Growth Vision Alternative respects local input through 2010 with adjustments occurring only after a ramp up period intended to achieve consensus on an implementation strategy." SCAG should work in a cooperative and open manner with OCCOG, OCTA, the Center for Demographic Research, and the local communities to ensure that the various local community "visions" and issues are thoroughly considered in future iterations of the RTP. 3. Page 89, Bus Rapid Transit - This program is proposed to include Westminster Avenue through Seal Beach. When planning this system special attention needs to be given to providing convenient and accessible stations in relation to the 8,300 person Leisure World senior retirement community located on the north side of Westminster Avenue west of Seal Beach Boulevard. If direct access from Leisure World to the Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 18 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 stations on this line cannot be provided, a convenient shuttle service should be provided to this major residential community that is very transit- dependent. Attention also needs to be given to the Boeing Integrated Defense Systems campus facility and the soon to be constructed "Pacific Gateway Center" project of approximately 1,000,000 square feet of business /research and development park development adjacent to the existing Boeing facilities. These facilities are located along the south side of Westminster Avenue, again west of Seal Beach Boulevard. 4. Page 108 -111, Aviation — The RTP indicates that Long Beach Airport is anticipated to expand from 1.4 million annual passengers (map) to 3.8 map between 2002 and 2030, with air cargo projected to grow from 58,000 tons to 137,000 tons during the same period. The direst impacts of this anticipated intensification of use needs to be adequately evaluated and appropriate infrastructure improvements must be programmed in future RTP's, and must be completed prior to the indicated future demand. Impacts to ground transportation, terminal facilities, flight paths and noise levels of increased flight operations must be adequately evaluated and mitied in future site - specific environmental documents. DR 5. Page 113 -116, Recommended Funding Strategy to Implement SCAG's RTP — The proposed funding strategies include measures that have been, and will continue to be, controversial throughout the region and statewide. SCAG will need to allocate significant resources and work closely with the Governor, state legislators, other Council of Governments, and interested agencies as it pursues the recommended legislative agenda regarding: ❑ Allowing 55% voter approval for imposition of additional local transportation taxes; ❑ Increase of 10 cents in motor vehicle fuel tax levels by 2015. The importance of these proposals is clearly set forth on page 116, where it is indicated that $21.7 billion is anticipated from the increase motor vehicle fuel tax, out of a total $31.2 billion of public funding strategy for the plan projects, being those projects not already have committed funding in the `Baseline/Tier 2" projects identified in the RTP. * * * * Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 19 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT 2 COMMENT LETTER RE: "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT" Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 20 City Comment Letters re. Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 January 26, 2004 Nancy Pfeffer - Southern California Association of Governments 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Ms. Villanueva: SUBJECT: CITY OF SEAL BEACH COMMENTS ON "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROGRAM - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT" DR AFT - The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the Executive Summary of "Destination 2030 — Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Program Environmental Impact Report ( "2004 RTP PEIR "), and has several comments and concerns relating to the subject document. This document provides a clear and concise overview of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed 2004 RTP. - The Draft Program EIR evaluates the 2004 RTP and the regional impacts associated with the proposed major public infrastructure and transportation demand management projects and programs for the time frame of this plan, 2002 to 2030. The identified environmental impacts are not project specific, but evaluate the impacts on various areas of concern on the program level of evaluation. As our staff has reviewed the proposed "mitigation measures ", they appear to be reasonable and appropriate to respond to the identified impacts that this "program" level of analysis. As discussed above, the major impacts identified are due to the increases in population and jobs, and the resulting allocation of land to accommodate those projected uses over the project time period. The identified impacts are adequately outlined and appropriate mitigation measures have been set forth. Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 21 • City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Page 3.1 -4. A review of the "active duty military facilities in the SCAG region" does not include the Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base. This facility should be included. Mitigation Measures 3.1 -3c, 3.1 -3d, and 3.2 -1a. (Page 3.1 -16) The City supports proposed Mitigation Measures 3.1 -3c, 3.1 -3d, and 3.2 -1a regarding working with member cities and counties regarding the long -term General Plan consistency issues set forth in the Draft PEIR. It is extremely important for SCAG to develop a transparent and accountable consensus building process regarding this issue. However, the implementation of these mitigation measures at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be hesitant to take on increasing population densities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. The issue of acceptable growth patterns in the region, and particularly at the local city and county level is an area of extreme sensitivity to the local residents of those particular communities. Table 3.4 -3, Criteria Pollutant Emissions by Nonattainment Area — Plan Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day). This table indicates substantial improvements in the levels of criteria pollutants will be achieved if the programs and activities of the 2004 RTP are fully implemented. The City of Seal Beach clearly recogjzes those substantial air quality benefits. Impact 3.4 -2: Long-term (Operational) Localized Impacts — Freeway operations under the Plan would be likely to exceed the locally acceptable cancer risk level of 1 in one million. (Page 3.4 -33) The City is very concerned regarding cancer risk assessment and cancer risk levels adjacent to freeways. In the case of Seal Beach, there is a heightened level of concern, since the Leisure World community comprises approximately 8,300 residents, with approximately 90% being over the age of 65. It is a concern to the City as to how the levels of cancer risk being discussed could impact this population group, particularly those individuals with respiratory or other related health concerns. Any projects along the I -405 corridor adjacent to the Leisure World community should contain a very detailed cancer risk assessment directly evaluating the specific ages groups that reside within Leisure World. Impact 3.4 -5: Cumulative air quality impacts — Under the Plan criteria pollutant emissions would be less than the applicable emission budgets. (Page 3.4- 37). The proposed funding strategies include measures that have been, and will continue to be, controversial throughout the region and statewide. SCAG will need to allocate significant resources and work closely with the Governor, state legislators, other Council of Governments, and interested agencies as it pursues the recommended legislative agenda regarding: 22 Draft 2004 RTP R. DEIR.CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re • Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ❑ Allowing 55% voter approval for imposition of additional local transportation taxes; ❑ Increase of 10 cents in motor vehicle fuel tax levels by 2015. The issue of adequate funding levels is of particular importance at this time given the position of the Governor regarding the state budget and the reduction of transportation projects already funded. The impacts of those budget decisions at the State level, and the resulting impacts to the ability to comply with the State Implementation Plan and the federal air quality conformity requirements, need to be clearly expressed by all interested parties. Impact 3.4 -6: Airport Emissions — Increased air traffic would increase emissions from aircraft and ground support equipment (GSE). (Page 3.4 -41 through 3.4 -44).. The City of Seal Beach supports the efforts of SCAG to support efforts of the California Air Resources Board to continue to propose concepts to the federal government for consideration to achieve emission reductions such as more stringent engine emissions, retrofit controls, cleaner fuel, etc. - Section 4.0, Alternatives, Introduction (Page 4 -1). This section discusses the various growth vision alternatives considered in formulating the 2004 RTP -and indicates that the proposed plan utilizes in -fill and transit - oriented development at levels greater than the General Plans of the various city and county agencies that comprise the region. These stated foundations for development of the growth vision are commendable. However, the implementation of these goals at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be hesitant to take on increasing po ul tion densities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. fir After 2010, the 2004 RTP assumes an increase in and shifts of growth patterns different from locally adopted plans. SCAG proposes to work with local jurisdictions between now and 2010 to modify their land uses for consistency with the Draft 2004 RTP, with a transition period of several years after 2010. The City of Seal Beach appreciates SCAG staffs willingness to work with the Orange County Council of Governments, the Center for Demographic Research, and OCTA to ensure that the growth assumptions for Orange County population, households and employment in the 2004 Draft RTP are consistent with the locally approved growth forecasts. However, as the future regional transportation plans are adopted, this issue will become more significant, and potentially more contentious. SCAG will be required to spend a considerable effort in achieving consensus of the many local jurisdictions in such a regionally significant change in land use and growth patterns over those envisioned by the local planning agencies within the region. 23 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR • City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Tables 4 -7 through 4 -12. These tables present the criteria pollutant emissions for each of the alternatives evaluated in the Draft PEIR document. It would extremely helpful to reviewers of the Final PEIR to provide to provide an 11" x 17" summary table of all of the projected emission levels in one convenient table. This would allow for a much clearer understanding of the air quality improvements that are projected for each of the analyzed alternatives. Thank you for your consideration of the comments of the City of Seal Beach. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services, City Hall, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 90740, telephone (562) 431 -2527, extension 313 if you have any questions regarding this matter. In addition, please provide four (4) copies of the final "Program Environmental Impact Report" to Mr. Whittenberg for distribution to the appropriate Commissions and the City Council when it is available. Sincerely, Patricia E. Campbell Mayor, City of Seal Beach Distribution: Seal Beach City Council Seal Beach Planning Commission Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board City Manager Director of Development Services Orange County Council of Governments Orange County Transportation Authority Center for Demographic Research 24 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Repoli City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT 3 SELECT KEY ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTS IN THE DRAFT 2004 RTP Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 25 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 SELECT KEY ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTS IN THE DRAFT 2004 RTP Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan • Program Mixed Flow Lanes • Santa Ana Freeway /Interstate 5 • SR -57 Northbound (1 -5) from Riverside from Orangethorpe Freeway /State Route 91 (SR -91) Avenue to Lambert to Los Angeles (LA) County Road Line* • SR -57 NB (4 through • Garden Grove Freeway /State lane at SR -91) Route 22 (SR -22) from Beach • SR -91 from SR -55 to Boulevard to 1 -5 Riverside County Line • Costa Mesa Freeway /State • 1-405 from SR -73 to Route 55 (SR -55) from SR -22 to Beach Boulevard SR -91 • - Corona Del Mar Freeway /State Route 73 from Birch to San Diego Freeway /Interstate 405 (I- 405) (Northbound [NB] only) • Ortega Highway /State Route 74 (SR -74) from Rancho Viejo to Antonio Parkway • Laguna Freeway /State Route 133 (SR -133) from El Toro Road to 1 -405 - High Occupancy • 1 -5 from SR -91 to LA County • 1 -5 Pacific Coast Vehicle (HOV) Line Highway /State Route Lanes SR -22 from Orange • 1(SR -1) to Avenida • Freeway /State Route 57 (SR -57) Pico to Lewis Street • SR -22 from Beach Boulevard to 1 -5 • SR -55 from SR -22 to SR -91 • SR -73 from Birch Street to 1 -405 • San Gabriel River Freeway /Interstate 605 (1 -605) from 1 -405 to LA County Line 26 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan Program HOV to HOV • SR -22/1 -405 • 1- 405/1 -605 Auxiliary Lanes • SR -55 from SR -22 to SR -91 • SR -91 from SR -71 to (Operational & • SR -73 from Birch to 1 -405 (NB SR -241 Capacity) only) • SR -91 Westbound • 1 -405 from MacArthur Boulevard (WB) from NB SR -55 to Culver Boulevard to WB SR -91 at Tustin • 1 -405 from Magnolia to Beach Boulevard • SR -91 WB from SR- 57 to 1 -5, WB only • 1 -405 NB from SR -133 to Culver Boulevard • 1 -405 SB from Beach Boulevard to 1 -605 Toll Roads & Toll • SR -73 from 1 -5 in San Juan • SR -91 from SR -241 to to Toll Connectors Capistrano to SR -73 add mixed SR -71 including toll flow lane connection at SR -71 Eastern Toll Road /State Route (Four Corners) • 241(SR -241) from 1 -5 to Oso • SR -91 /SR -241 (add Parkway direct toll -to -toll or High Occupancy • SR -241 from Oso Parkway to Vehicle connection, Eastern Transportation Corridor SR -241 to /from east • SR -241 from SR -91 to SR -91) Jamboree add mixed flow Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 27 City Comment Letters re • Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan Program Transit • The CenterLine, John Wayne • The CenterLine Airport to Santa Ana Extension (final Transportation Center alignment To Be West Orange County Transit Determined, north to • Guideway -Bus Rapid Transit Fullerton or west along Pacific Electric • Buena Park Commuter Rail Right of Way) Station • Bus Rapid Transit on • Yorba Linda Commuter Rail Harbor Boulevard Station Westminster • Metrolink to 2030 Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Edinger • Bus Service to 2030 Avenue, Beach • Bus Maintenance Facility Boulevard, La Palma Avenue, and Fullerton to Brea • Express Bus Arterials/lnterchan • Various arterials, interchange, • Orangethorpe Avenue ges/ safety, signal coordination, and and Orange -Olive Grade Crossings sound wall projects Corridor grade • Smart Streets crossings • Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Line, along Orangethorpe Avenue, at State College Boulevard Long -Range • SR -91 Regionally Planning Studies Significant Transportation Investment Study (Orange County to Riverside County Corridor) • SR -57 /Santa Ana River Corridor RSTIS • 1 -405 RSTIS • • California- Nevada High Speed Rail, Anaheim to Ontario Airport 28 Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report City Comment Letters re • Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 Project or Baseline /Tier 2 Plan Program Truck Climbing • SR -57 (Lambert Rd to Lanes TonnerCanyon) * * ** Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR CC Staff Report 29 • City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN" NOTE: ENTIRE DOCUMENT NOT PROVIDED DUE TO LENGTH, 182 PAGES. A COPY IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AT THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. THE DOCUMENT IS ALSO AVAILABLE • ON SCAG'S WEBSITE AT WWW.SCAG.CA.GOV Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 30 d % - ' ft'6' ,., _:,, tt lit r 1 . [,\,,, , , # , ...., ....,„-,,FI .t\1 /8,\ L '.-!-- ,ii5*, 4 -,,," EE :. t j\L u , .k..'' . . t '' 711‘ !_,,\'''''' :. Li el +:' i'*:, * :,.;,,,,,* r i'�c -, � -`i. .. �. , ' e y:�. -:,,,.,.. ,,,;-- 1-,g, .. IT f, F F v T V, ,.....,„.„,_ .4:. :.„ ,.,.,,, z y , . ,,,,,,,,,.. • ,, � s `"� , ." ,.r ` <u t:*.',*`,',.... w ..- • v .s,',11,,4','„, i M app iii g1 . -.3. .,. - Sou - *'.• ;:.--;:-7-- - tok,., 1,,_N-- - .. ,..,. ,1?..1.,i.1'. ti�u z•.: v , • - i f y@ .., nig . ' -'''. - .'r ' . fig * '' ski i CahI s.. �y * , ture . ' 'S ,.., . ...,'-'"'---7,‘,,:)." , . • i j k' ' J ' f' ' . ' s rta II° * ''' ''''4 , ... „ ..,... . . . . . . . i. , :::, Fu '. ' t Y# graft 20 Regional Trans PIan ? :t .., ,,,....04,, ,:;., ,. .,, ,. k r . ... gilt : "i 4y ,` Regional Council Members A' fact R OFFICERS: Leadership, PRESIDENT: Councilmember Bev Perry, Brea 6ibQd1$ shBF, .f:. "B`a and which FIRST VICE PRESIDENT: Councilmember Ron Roberts, Temecula promote economic growth, personal SECOND VICE PRESIDENT: Supervisor Hank Kuiper, Imperial County well - being, and livable communities for PAST PRESIDENT: Councilmember Ronald Bates, Los Alamitos all Southern Californians. IMPERIAL COUNTY: Hank Kuiper, Imperial County • Jo Shields, Brawley The ;4ssa:c•atk; r SV t -..FC€ °:`:lS, 4.1:5 M'.w'wiOn f.:y: Los ANGELES Comm: Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, Los Angeles County • Zev Yaroslaysky, Los Angeles County • Harry Baldwin, San Gabriel • Paul • Developing long -range regional plans and Bowlen, Cerritos • Tony Cardenas, Los Angeles • Margaret Clark, Rosemead • Gene Daniels, Paramount • Mike Dispenza, Palmdale • Judy strategies that provide for efficient movement Dunlap, Inglewood • Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles • Wendy Greuel, Los of people, goods and information; enhance Angeles • Frank Gurule, Cudahy • James Hahn, Los Angeles • Janice Hahn, economic growth and international trade; and Los Angeles • Isadore Hall, Compton • Sandra Jacobs, El Segundo • Tom LaBonge, Los Angeles • Bonnie Lowenthal, Long Beach • Martin Ludlow, improve the environment and quality of life. Los Angeles • Keith McCarthy, Downey • Llewellyn Miller, Claremont • Cindy Miscikowslci, Los Angeles • Paul Nowatka, Torrance • Pam • Providing quality information services and O'Connor, Santa Monica • Alex Padilla, Los Angeles • Bernard Parks, Los analysis for the region. Angeles • Jan Perry, Los Angeles • Beatrice Prot). Pico Rivera • Ed Reyes, Los Angeles • Greig Smith, Los Angeles • Dick Stanford, Azusa • Tom • Using an inclusive decision- making process Sykes, Walnut • Paul Talbot, Alhambra • Sidney Tyler, Pasadena • Tonia that resolves conflicts and encourages trust. Reyes Uranga, Long Beach • Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles • Dennis Washburn, Calabasas - • Jack Weiss, Los Angeles • Bob Yousefian, • Creating an educational and work environ- Glendale • Dennis P. Zine, Los Angeles ment that cultivates creativity, initiative, and ORANGE COUNTY: Chris Norby, Orange County • Ronald Bates, Los opportunity. Alamitos • Lou Bone, Tustin • Art Brown, Buena Park • Richard Chavez, Anaheim • Debbie Cook, Huntington Beach • Cathryn DeYoung, Laguna Niguel • Richard Dixon, Lake Forest • Alta Duke, La Palma • Bev Perry, Brea • Tod Ridgeway, Newport Beach RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Marion Ashley, Riverside County • Ron Loveridge, Riverside • Jeff Miller, Corona • Greg Pettis, Cathedral City • Ron Roberts, Temecula • Charles White, Moreno Valley SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Paul Biane, San Bernardino County • Bill Alexander, Rancho Cucamonga • Edward Burgnon, Town of Apple Valley • Lawrence Dale, Barstow • Lee Ann Garcia, Grand Terrace • Susan Longville, San Bernardino • Gary Ovitt, Ontario • Deborah Robertson, Rialto VENTURA COUNTY: Judy Mikels, Ventura County • Glen Becerra, Simi Valley • Carl Morehouse, San Buenaventura • Toni Young, Port Hueneme ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: Charles Smith, Orange Funding: The prep:natam glans repnrt MO financed in part through grants from the 1•ratad Staley County Department ofTrarsfwrtatirm — Federal HigbwavAtninrstatrou and the Federal Tlarsrt Admtnrslratmn — under prWnsrunsof the T 'raaspon'atron lgwi7'dct for tbe21.stCentu#y (TEA-21) Additional financial RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: Robin Lowe, Hemet assrstancc uanr pmcrded by the California State Department , f Transportation VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: Bill Davis, Simi Valley Rev. 12.23.03 Southern California Association of Governments 818 West 7th Street, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017 -3435 213. 236.1800 www.scag.ca.gov SCAG Planning Region Kern Co. Inyo 1} , y 'x ± ' Z y;i ,�• t $ 1.1 . . ,, ; N . 1 % ° Y - ' Nevada .. `•,. -. z w 1 r I° ��.i.� b" . ; »: ;: , '';1r;.1"-f,' , `w,•,• ' ' S` ;' :. SAN - BAG ,h - • :1. 4 . " .A... ° :;.; ro ;•• '?: *" fir'• • , :.. '-» Kern Co. y y °z > . 4 -., a ,v .1s - ,., ' . •' °.. , .,, Arizona ' on Nor - L. A Lco - ' . ` °... • fi r ; : r. •'_, C 'w ;::::-/':; . ..'F' • < •MS- , , e , ; , : . : „ : ,,,„, ,, ,,,,,,, ^ - , a.a San , t' ,` :...r. .: A - •_ '•. < <:• - Las Virgenes Matib ..; r ..tew. _ r':' . , g - i ' , ;: ; , ' ,,- COG Westside «»Citie , - �- .- w r .. ,,,t " Cities C « .M - _,:'s,Y ,-:r , . , , ;y : South Bay Cit' s COG '°' i «� & ,: Kam' San Diego Co. r. K,'- t r y • 4, . , Los Angeles Co. o ntasizim I■ w � " , ..` 1 '; , San Bernardino Co. I • , e" -- 'K " -• :_ >•' '•; Riverside Co. , : ' °<a 3 ; • Iayey« .k .�..L,vi Y.r .� - `t �. I ' � ' < 1 °�.i Imperial Co. I .� •� ., ,,, -' ',:7v,...,7 ' : -; :. Orange Co. P.0 ,. , "lt - .;:� - Mexico Ventura Co. I I SCAG is made up of 6 Counties which are divided into 14 subregions. Maps included in this report are produced in whole or in part from THOMAS BROS. MAPS digital data- base. These maps are reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. C" SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA :m"°°':4, ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS DRAFT 2004 Regional Transportation Plan October 2003 '4,.....A Southern California "'" of Governments TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1 A NEW DESTINATION 13 Why Update The Plane 13 Purpose And Need 15 Our Successes 15 What Adjustments Do We Need To Make? 18 Our Planning Approach 25 CHAPTER 2 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CHALLENGES AND TRENDS 31 The Shape and Pattern of Future Growth 31 Meeting our TDM Goals 43 Unprecedented Demand on Our System 44 Transportation Finance Challenges 55 Meeting our Air Quality Commitments 62 CHAPTER 3 OUR VISION 65 • Regional Goals ' 65 Guiding Policies 66 Performance Expectations 66 CHAPTER 4 POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS 69 System Management: Getting the Most Out of the System 70 Transportation Demand Management 75 Thinking Out of the Box: Land Use- Transportation Connection 79 Strategic System Expansion / Capital Investments 81 Transportation Finance: Meeting Our Needs 112 Recommended Funding Strategies to Implement SCAG's RTP 113 CHAPTER 5 PLAN PERFORMANCE: HOW WILLTHE PLAN PERFORM? 119 System / Investment Performance 119 Mobility Benefits Attributable to the Use of Land Use Strategies 132 Economic Impact Analysis 133 Transportation Conformity Analysis 136 Environmental Justice 137 CHAPTER 6 IMPLEMENTING OUR PLANS AND MONITORING OUR PROGRESS 145 Securing the Planned Funding 145 Embracing System Management and Operation 149 Integrating the Growth Vision Strategy - 149 Implementing the RTP 152 ' Monitoring Our Progress 154 CHAPTER 7 BEYOND THE PLAN 159 Corridor Preservation 159 - Unconstrained Projects — Our Unmet Needs 162 GLOSSARY 163 i Table of Contents LIST OF EXHIBITS Page CHAPTER 1 Exhibit 1.1: SCAG Region and Surrounding Areas 14 CHAPTER 2 . Exhibit 2.1: 2000 Population 37 Exhibit 2.2: 2030 Population 38 Exhibit 2.3: Population Increase 2000 to 2030 39 Exhibit 2.4: 2000 Employment 40 Exhibit 2.5: - 2030 Employment 41 Exhibit 2.6: Employment Increase 2000 to 2030 42 Exhibit 2.7: Commercial Service Airports 54 CHAPTER 4 - Exhibit 4.1: 2030 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane System 84 Exhibit 4.2: 2030 Mixed Flow Improvements 86 Exhibit 4.3: 2000 Activity Centers 92 Exhibit 4.4: 2030 Activity Centers 93 Exhibit 4.5: 2030 Transit Corridor System 94 Exhibit 4.6: 2030 User Fee - Backed Capacity Improvements 98 Exhibit 4.7: 2030 Mainline Freight Rail System Improvements 100 Exhibit 4.8: 2030 Grade Separations 102 Exhibit 4.9: Maglev System 106 CHAPTER 5 Exhibit 5.1: 2000 Base Year Freeway Speed PM Peak 123 Exhibit 5.2: 2030 Baseline Freeway Speed PM Peak 125 Exhibit 5.3: 2030 Plan Freeway Speed PM Peak 126 CHAPTER 7 Exhibit 7.1: Post 2030 Long Range Corridors 161 ii Table of Contents List of Figures Page CHAPTER 1 Figure 1.1: PILUT Process 28 CHAPTER 2 Figure 2.1: Travel Supply, Demand, and Population Trends 44 Figure 2.2: Productivity Results Aggregated by Time Period 45 Figure 2.3: Regional Transit Usage Trends 46 Figure 2.4: Regional Per Capita Transit Ridership 47 Figure 2.5: SCAG Region Truck Travel Trends 49 Figure 2.6: Trend in Regional Air Passengers Years 1960 -2002 53 Figure 2.7: SCAG Regional Baseline Revenues 57 Figure 2.8: SCAG Regional Revenues, County Shapes 57 Figure 2.9: Percentage Change in VMT, Personal Income, Population & Transportation Revenue Since 1970, Statewide Totals 60 Figure 2.10: SCAG Regional Revenues, Local Sources 60 CHAPTER 4 . Figure 4.1: RTP Projects and Strategies Structure 69 Figure 4.2: System Management Philosophy 70 Figure 4.3: Preservation Investment Distribution Over the Plan Horizon 71 Figure 4.4: Historical Increase in State Gas Tax 114 CHAPTER 5 Figure 5.1: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Average Daily Speed 120 Figure 5.2: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Average Daily Delay 121 Figure 5.3: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Average Daily Delay per Capita 121 Figure 5.4: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Average Daily Heavy Duty Truck Delays 124 Figure 5.5: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Auto and Transit Accessibility 127 Figure 5.6: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Planned Improvements in Highway System Productivity 129 Figure 5.7: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Preservation Expenditures Thru 2030 129 Figure 5.8: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Annual Costs Per Capita for System Preservation 130 Figure 5.9: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Accident Rates 131 Figure 5.10: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — RTP Total Mobility Benefits and Portions Attributable to the Growth Visioning Strategy " 132 Figure 5.11: SCAG Region Historical and Projected Annual Compound Employment Growth Rates 133 Figure 5.12: 2004 RTP Expenditures by Income Category 138 Figure 5.13: Share of 2004 RTP Expenditures by Ethnic /Racial Category 138 Figure 5.14: Share of System Usage, Tax Paid & Auto Travel Time Savings 139 Figure 5.15: Share of System Usage, Tax Paid & Transit Travel Time Savings 139 Figure 5.16: Share of System Usage, Tax Paid & Auto Travel Distance Savings 140 Figure 5.17: Comparison of Accessibility Improvements by Travel Mode for Income Quintiles 140 Figure 5.18: Regional Ethnic Composition Compared with Ethnic Composition in Aviation Noise Areas (2030) 141 Figure 5.19: Income Distribution Between SCAG Region & Aviation Noise Areas (2030) 142 Figure 5.20: Percentage Improvement in 2030 Air Pollutant Emissions for Income Groups (Plan vs. Baseline) - 142 Figure 5.21: Percentage Improvements in 2030 Air Pollutant Emissions for Ethnic Groups (Plan vs. Baseline) 143 iii Table of Contents List of Tables , Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1: Highway and Arterial Improvements 6 • CHAPTER 1 Table 1.1: Regional Plan Task Forces and Key Transportation Subcommittees 26 Table 1.2: Stakeholders in the Development of the 2004 RTP 29 CHAPTER 2 Table 2.1: Draft 2004 RTP Population, Households, Employment Growth in 2030 36 " Table 2.2: Transit Service Utilization in the SCAG Region 47 Table 2.3: Transit Subsidy in the SCAG Region 48 Table 2.4: East -West Corridor Train Forecast 50 . Table 2.5: Historical Air Cargo Tonnage 51 Table 2.6: Baseline Revenue Sources 56 Table 2.7: Committed Regional Expenses by County 58 Table 2.8: Committed Regional Expenses 58 Table 2.9: 2004 RTP Baseline Regional Balance by County 59 CHAPTER 3 Table 3.1: Performance Indicator, Measures and Outcome 68 CHAPTER 4 Table 4.1: Investment in System Preservation 71 Table 4.2: CMPs in the SCAG Region 74 Table 4.3: Non - Motorized, Rideshare, ITS & TDM Investments 76 Table 4.4: HOV Projects 83 Table 4.5: HOV Connector Projects 83 Table 4.6: Mixed Flow Projects 87 Table 4.7: Toll Corridor Projects 88 Table 4.8: Investments in Arterials 88 Table 4.9: Transit Corridor Projects 90 Table 4.10: Additional Toll Corridors 96 Table 4.11: Truck Climbing Lane Projects 97 Table 4.12: Grade Crossing Corridor Projects 103 Table 4.13: 2004 RTP Regional Maglev Milestones 107 Table 4.14: Existing Conditions and the Preferred Aviation Plan 108 Table 4.15: Aviation Related Economic Benefits 108 Table 4.16: Air Cargo Demand — 2030 Preferred Aviation Plan 109 Table 4.17: 2004 RTP Public & Private Funding Strategies 116 Table 4.18: 2004 RTP Regional Checkbook by County 117 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.1: RTP Goals and Related Performance Outcomes 119 Table 5.2: Variability of Travel Time: Hypothetical Illustration 127 Table 5.3: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Improvements in Travel Time Reliability 128 Table 5.4: SCAG Regional Performance Analysis — Benefit Cost Results 132 CHAPTER 7 Table 7.1: Post -2030 Long -Range Corridors 160 iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESTINATION 2030 is the Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for the six county Region in Southern California including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura and Imperial — home to 17 million people. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is the culmination of a three -year effort with a focus on improving the balance between land use and the current as well as future transportation systems. The Southern California Association • of Govemments (SCAG) is required to develop, maintain and update the RTP on a three year cycle. DESTINATION 2030 is a multi -modal Plan representing our vision for a better transportation system, integrated with the best possible growth pattern for the Region over the Plan horizon of 2030. The Plan provides the_ basic policy and program framework for long term investment in our vast regional transportation system in a coordinated, cooperative and continuous manner. Transportation investments in the SCAG Region that receive state or federal transportation funds must be consistent with the RTP and must be included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) when ready for funding. A New Destination - • Since the adoption of t: +0r, - • , •f 2001, there have been several new development • the - - • • + - , u(s&b, - - ted in the updated RTP; some are positive and some are no, • e • e s dc� =v= al new initiatives proposed in the 2001 RTP have come to fruitio i •in• •- ag- • Proposition 42 (which dedicates revenues generated from the gasolin- s. to I ansportation purposes) and the extension of the half -cent sales tax measure i R vers••e County. A 20 -mile segment of the 28.2 mile State Route 210 extension, a major ad•'ti• to our freeway system, became operational. The new Metro Gold Line began light rail service between downtown Los Angeles and Pasadena. Because rapid bus corridors proved to be highly effective, the implementation of several new corridors was , • expedited in Los Angeles County. On the negative side, the State budget crisis, which became evident after the 2001 RTP, has directly resulted in the partial suspension of the Governor's California Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP). This has not only jeopardized the timely implementation of critical transportation projects, but also has required SCAG to take a fresh look at its regional priorities and take a more pro- active role in securing future funding needs. Also, the events of September 11, 2001 (9/11) have severely impacted transportation planning, especially in the arena of aviation. In the process of updating the 2001 RTP, SCAG found that by changing the distribution of growth within the Region for future years, there were dramatic effects on the performance of the transportation system. In fact, by reducing population and employment estimates by 1 million, along with a reallocation of jobs to Los Angeles County from elsewhere in the Region, DESTINATION 2030 2004 Regional Transportation Plan 1 Executive Summary analysis showed dramatic improvements in air quality as well as mobility. As a result, SCAG initiated a comprehensive growth visioning process called Southern California COMPASS. This led to the development of a growth vision for the Region that best fits the existing and proposed regional transportation infrastructure, while respecting natural as well as policy constraints that are inherent in the Region. A notable feature of the growth visioning effort has been to engage the public in transportation planning in an interactive process to arrive at a shared conception of the Region's future. In order to develop this vision and meet all the challenges. the Region faces in a comprehensive and coordinated manner, SCAG developed an integrated planning process called Planning for Integrated Land Use and Transportation (PILUT) to update the 2004 RTP. The idea was to integrate the transportation planning, growth visioning, and State - required Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis into a single, unified process The objective is to eliminate redundancy, ensure close coordination, and optimize the use of SCAG's limited planning resources. Based on extensive public input, in May 2003, SCAG's Community, Economic and Human Development Committee directed staff to : ' -luate five growth scenarios. Three of the five scenarios involve technical adjustments ,• • •'ections based on local input and other considerations. The other two scenario c- ':d, 'I UT I and PILUT II, represent major policy shifts that would include much clo - int :1r. io of land use plans with transportation investments, while remaining cons stet t the g: er- plans of the many jurisdictions within the SCAG Region. PILUT I proposes i e .i i•-ti• • - n• use urbanized parts of the Region to accommodate future growth so that o - o o - e, undeveloped land is preserved at the same time the existing transportation s st- • is till -d more effectively, particularly our public transit system. PILUT II proposes accommo:ating future growth by encouraging the movement of people and jobs to outlying areas such as North Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, and Eastern Riverside County (Coachella Valley) so that we can achieve better balance between jobs and housing and minimize the need for long commute trips. The result of this visioning process is a hybrid growth scenario that incorporates elements of PILUT I and II based on a set of principles developed by the Growth Visioning subcommittee. Accordingly, the proposed growth vision has been developed as follows: utilizing in -fill where appropriate to re- vitalize underutilized development sites; focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes; providing housing opportunities near major job centers; providing housing opportunities to match changing demographics; preserving natural open space, incorporating decentralized aviation strategy proposed in the Plan; densifying new transportation corridors proposed in the Plan; and respecting the local input and feed back process in the development of the growth distribution. 2 - Destination 2030 Executive Summary • Goals, Policies and Performance Measures DESTINATION 2030 is a performance based transportation plan as were the 2001 RTP and the 1998 RTP. The goals of the Plan, as summarized in Chapter 3, are to maximize mobility and accessibility, ensure safety and reliability, preserve our transportation system, maximize productivity of our system, protect the environment and encourage land use and growth patterns that complement our transportation system. The associated policies were developed to guide the development of the 2004 RTP further and reflect the transportation priorities of the Region. Performance measures descnbed in Chapter 3 were developed to ensure that the adopted goals are achieved through the implementation of the 2004 RTP. Our Challenges Our challenges relative to devel • • i • so • nd transportation plan can be broadly divided into three categories: 1) addres • • gro h in population, employment and households, 2) preserving, expanding and ise 'li ='n• o infr- tructure, and 3) funding our Plan. If recent p• •ula '.n, • • - ol. e • •yment trends continue in the future, by 2030 the Region will •e •o 'e • 9 '.illio residents and 10.2 million jobs. This represents a population inc as: o 8 • - ent or 6.3 million people between 2000 and 2030 and an increase in empl. m- t o • percent, or 2.7 million jobs. This forecast is slightly different from the regional • owt. presented in the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan in that both household and popula ion growth are expected to be less than previously forecast. • Unprecedented Demand on Our System Each major mode in our transportation system faces challenges meeting the growth that is coming our way. While population more than doubled from 1960 to 2000, our freeway capacity increased by less than 30 percent. Consequently, our Region's congestion has increased dramatically affecting both person travel and goods movement. For year 2000, total daily delay due to congestion is estimated to be 1.6 million hours. If current trends persist, this delay is expected to more than double to 3.6 million hours of daily delay by 2030. Moreover, our infrastructure is aging and requires more investment in maintenance and preservation.. Both industry and residents are served by a vast transportation network that includes almost 8,600 lane miles of freeway, more than 36,000 lane miles of arterials, several large public transit systems, four major airports (including the world's fifth largest), as well as the second and third largest ports in the United States. Yet the Region's transportation system has not kept up with population and transportation demand. The Region has invested heavily in transit in the past thirty years and yet the transit ridership has not increased proportionately. It is evident that transit service utilization in the region is not optimal compared to similar regions in the nation as described in Chapter 2. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan > 3 Executive Summary • Crisis in Transporting Goods The Southern California region is facing a crisis in transporting goods, characterized by a dramatic growth in rail and truck traffic, scarce financial resources, and the high costs of infrastructure improvements. Forecasts of greater regional population and employment, and projections of increasing international and domestic trade volumes, all lead to worsening congestion and the potential of gridlock occurring within the Region's surface transportation system. Almost all of the short haul and significant share of medium and long haul movement of goods occur by truck. Severe congestion due to truck traffic is expected to worsen in the Region's major transportation corridors. Airports play an important role in goods movement, as air cargo is transported in either passenger aircraft belly -holds or in dedicated freight aircraft used primarily for high value, time sensitive shipments. In 2002, the Region's airports handled 2.6 million tons of air cargo. Regional air cargo has grown at an average annual rate of 6.6 percent since 1965. Los Angeles International and Ontario Int -rn: onal are the major cargo handling airports, transporting about 96 percent of all egi -I . cargo, with LAX alone accounting for 75 percent of the traffic. Ontario air cargo tr- ha increased by seven -fold since 1979, while LAX has doubled the amount of air - • ha∎dl.d • he same period. Burbank, John Wayne and Long Beach handle substanti. y 1- s - • • • Passenger Aviation The SCAG Region has 7 blii u e airports, including six commercial service airports, 45 general aviation, two rece ly •sed military air bases (one certified as a commercial service airport), two commuter airpo s and two joint -use facilities. In all, some 78 million annual passengers (MAP) were served in the Region in 2002, almost double the number served in 1980. The level of air passenger demand is forecast to double again before 2030. While none of the individual airports is the largest in the U.S., the Region's airports taken together make Southern California the busiest of all regions in the country. The need to accommodate future growth is clear and the economic costs of doing nothing are substantial. For every one million regional air passengers, it is estimated that there is a positive regional economic impact of $620 million (in 1998 dollars) and 4,475 jobs. In addition, the number of jobs created by air cargo and freight movement in the region is enormous and vital to the overall health of the regional economy. • Running Out of Financial Options - The baseline revenue estimate for the six - county SCAG Region is $120 billion over the 29- - year time horizon of the 2004 RTP. Local sources comprise 75 percent of the overall revenue 4 < Destination 2030 Executive Summary forecast, with state sources totaling 15 percent and federal sources making up 10 percent. On the other hand, the Region's total committed costs to maintain and operate the system as well as complete projects already committed, add up to $115 billion. The remaining balance provides a very small cushion with which to pursue transportation improvements critical to maintaining the Region's mobility and accommodating future growth. OUR PLAN Given the challenges we face, the SCAG RTP relies on a number of strategies to address the Region's transportation needs. These include an increased focus on operational, management and preservation strategies; land -use integration with transportation investments; and strategic system e ,, �ansion investments. • Preservation — Protecting our In ; - • • re A key aspect • = ste ; - -, - , en • • • ec g our investment in the current transportation infrastruct e. The - - • io ha • it v ,st- • • ions in developing its mufti-modal transportation system and u p •te• e e i vest ' -nts for current and future generations. The Draft 2004 RTP proposes .e • g =si - •.• bi ion of the additional funds for infrastructure preservation. • Operational Strategies - etting the Most Out of Our Existing System In addition to preserving the system, the Region has a responsibility to get the most out of the current system. This is especially true for the State Highway System. Small physical improvements (e.g., auxiliary lanes that extend the merging range) and technology deployments (e.g., advanced ramp metering) offer us affordable solutions to restore some of the lost productivity due to increasing congestion. These technology deployments are often referred to as Intelligent Transportation Systems or ITS. The combination of investments reduces delays and the duration of congestion, and improves the predictability of travel time. The Plan proposes an increase of $1.3 billion for operational strategies that improve the productivity of the State Highway System through 2030. The total amount of funding represents less than 1 percent of the overall RTP expenditures, but is expected to produce benefits that are almost an order of magnitude higher. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan , - 5 Executive Summary • Strategic System Expansion / Capital Investments DESTINATION 2030 is a multi -modal Plan which proposes a balanced investment in all of the Region's modes so that the system performs at the highest level possible. • Highways and Arterials The 2004 RTP contains approximately $21 billion in highway and arterial improvement projects in addition to already committed or programmed projects. This figure includes all capital improvements proposed on the highway and arterial network including mixed -flow lanes, high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, interchanges, truck climbing lanes, and grade crossings. A summary of expenditure by each category is provided in the following table. Table 1 • Highway & Arterial Improvements (In addition to Baseline & Tier 2) •Improvement Category Investmenf (in billion \ ' ` \ $ 2.4 ■ ixe o v $ 4.6 A -ri $ 5.9 Corn •or $ 1.5 O &M $ 6.6 Total li $ 21.0 • The Plan also proposes a number of high occupancy toll (HOT) lane facilities, including a capacity enhancement parallel to SR -91 to address east -west congestion in the Riverside County area. While additional work is in progress through the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) to identify and study the feasibility of specific alignments in this corridor, this Plan acknowledges the need for additional capacity in this corridor. Specific mode and project definition will require additional studies in the future. These corridor improvements are primarily anticipated to be implemented with user -fee backed funding mechanisms. Arterial roads account for over 65 percent of the total road network and already carryover 50 percent of total traffic. As it becomes more difficult to add lanes to existing freeways or build new freeways, maximizing the potential capacity of arterials becomes an attractive option to increasing overall system capacity in already - developed areas The Strategic Arterial Improvement concept could involve a combination of widening, signal prioritization and other Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) deployment and grade separation at critically high - 6 < Destination 2030 D Executive Summary volume intersections to enhance the flow speed and capacity of the arterial. In addition to the specific arterial improvements identified under the Smart Street Improvement Program, this Plan proposes a significant increase in funding for arterial improvements and capacity enhancements. • Public Transportation System The goals of public transportation services are to ensure mobility for people without access to automobiles and to provide attractive alternatives for drive -alone motorists or discretionary riders. Strategies include a significant increase in service availability, major expansion in the use of bus rapid transit (BRT) and some re- structuring of services to ensure efficient utilization of available capacity. Bus Rapid Transit Bus rapid transit is designed to 1•rov • - ..t, high quality bus service, operating in mixed traffic, utilizing low -floor bu , - s =dv: - • - of signal priority at intersections, boarding and alighting passenger: o • s -- e• • •cesses, and improving bus stop spacing at planned st- •ons.: •�:ine. t fl= iil'• of bus systems with some of the features of rail transit. It us: s - •'all 1 - 'fie' b = opping only at major intersections /destinations. Metrolink Co •m. - . -i Metrolink is the -gional commuter rail service that operates in six Southern Califomia counties. Southern ornia Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) provides and maintains Metrolink services and facilities. The Metrolink system consists of 53 stations, with one in San Diego County. It carries over 31,000 passenger trips and operates 137 train trips per day. SCRRA has developed a $1.1 billion long -range capital improvement plan that when fully ' implemented will effectively double the Metrolink System's passenger carrying capacity. The long -range capital plan includes selective double tracking on critical route segments, switching and signal improvements, communication system improvements, new stations and enhancements to existing stations. Land Use — Transit Coordination The regional transit program calls for increased and better coordination between transit and land -use planning. The Region must develop and adopt a long -term strategy for integrating the planning of commercial, residential and recreational land uses with the transportation system as well as increasing land -use intensities in areas with frequent transit services and good access. This integration would complement and maximize the use of the region's transit system resulting in increased ridership, reduced congestion, and improved air quality. • Transit- Oriented Development The regional transit program calls for the local and regional transit and planning agencies to- promote transit - oriented developments (TOD) cooperatively along the major transit corridors. Transit oriented development is a land -use planning tool that promotes pedestrian - friendly environments and supports transit use. It improves transit accessibility, promotes compact land patterns, walkable environments, and reduced auto use. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan > - 7 Executive Summary Transit Centers A network of transit -based centers and corridors, supported by in -fill development, maximizes the use of existing infrastructure, supports transit ridership, reduces air pollution and preserves green space and undeveloped areas. To encourage the use of transit and ridesharing further, new transit centers and park- and -ride facilities will be constructed in areas that provide access to the freeway HOV network, transit corridors and express buses. Existing transit centers can be upgraded for multi -modal uses that support restructured transit services. • Goods Movement Strategies The regional transportation system will be challenged to accommodate between 70 percent to 216 percent more truck trips by 2030 according to various estimates of total truck vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Regional strategies to address these capacity needs are discussed below. Regional Truckways System One strategy focuses on the concept o a• .. g c.. •acity to a corridor that has a high share of truck traffic. SCAG envisions workin• ' th I. a a • subregional representatives to create a system that would comprise up -rds • 4c c :nte • e miles of dedicated facility along alignments extendin• •m th; - ' - ,ro =- p• s, rough the East -West Corridor and out kl to strategic distri•. tion •01 - no e- t so, t , est of urbanized areas. Given the financial constraints in the -gi• e • -ve •p en • is strategy is proceeding with the assumption that all capital const ct • :n• -a operating costs associated with this system must be supported through the •Ile, .n of = -rfees. Regional Rail Capacity • provement Program The regional rail capacity improvement program recommended by SCAG would be financed with a revenue stream raised on corridor traffic hauled by the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroads. It is also recommended that discussions take place with other west coast ports regarding a similar revenue approach to minimize any potential for cargo diversion. In order to collect and distribute funds throughout the corridor for eligible capital improvement projects, it is recommended that SCAG create a subsidiary agency. The role of this agency, . here referred to as the Southern California Railroad Infrastructure Financing Authority (SCRIFA), would be limited to issuing and servicing debt, administering the revenue collection process, and distributing money for approved projects to the railroads and other implementing agencies. Similar agencies should be created for administering funds for rail projects in other regions along the west coast. The proposed capacity improvements would include a total investment of $3.4 billion in Southem California. $1.2 billion for railroad infrastructure projects and approximately $2.2 billion in grade separation projects. 8 < Destination 2030 ' Executive Summary • Maglev System The Intra- Regional High Speed Rail System, using magnetic levitation (Maglev) technology, would ultimately facilitate the development pf a regional airport system, and connect to major activity and multi -modal transportation centers in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. Without a regional airport in El Toro, the Region needs to further decentralize its future growth in air passenger traffic and air cargo to regional airports in the northem, eastern and southern portions of the Region. Therefore, the Maglev system becomes more important and critical to the success of SCAG's decentralized regional aviation system. ■ Aviation DESTINATION 2030 prop• es - •e • = - -lized aviation plan called the "Preferred Aviation Plan." is PI - ‘ Qul. . ,cc• ' o.'at- - otal regional passenger aviation demand of 170 millio -nnual • : . - • -rs M ). • • -r the Preferred Aviation Plan, rather than relying on expandi .• e • g • - air• • • - future demand for air travel will be largely served by using availab : c. • - . ity ie • located in the Inland Empire and north Los Angeles County where p o•e - q p•p - on growth will be best served. This plan calls for constraining the LAX at 78 M - in easing the Ontario International Airport to 30 MAP, and a new passenger airport at " - mdale that will accommodate 12.8 MAP. Cooperation between airport authorities is necessary to ensure efficient usage of capacity. Cooperation between airports would be accomplished through the integration of airport master plans, and the development of memoranda of understanding and contractual agreements between airports. These agreements would also identify complementary roles and market niches between airports to increase synergy in the system and maximize utilization of available airport capacities throughout the region. For example, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) would play a key role in integrating master plans for the three airports it operates, namely LAX, Ontario and Palmdale. Ground Access The recommended aviation strategy will have localized ground access impacts at a number of airports. Particularly, the Preferred Aviation Plan will result in dramatic increases in airport activities (people as well as cargo) at Ontario, Palmdale and a number of other airports. A number of freeway and arterial improvements and transitstrategies are proposed in the Plan to address the ground access issues as part of the overall transportation investment in the Region. Specific ground access improvements proposed in the Plan are identified in the Technical Appendix to the RTP. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan 9 Executive Summary • Transportation Finance: Meeting Our Needs - Critical and integral to this Plan is the development of a funding strategy that will result in additional funding over and beyond the baseline funds identified earlier. The development of the funding strategy is based on a set of guiding principles adopted by the Highway and Finance Task Force. These principles are: ❖ Maximize available resources 4 Ensure revenue is adequate to maintain air quality conformity ❖ Enhance regional and local choice in the selection of projects for funding ❖ Identify revenue sources that are reasonable and consistent with current funding practices and long -term trends in transportation finance - Within the framework of these principles, the Highway and Transportation Finance Task Force, along with various other SCAG committees, engaged in extensive debates concerning the adequacy and feasibility of various e = ue options available to respond to the SCAG Region's funding shortfall. On the ba- • - - =sk Force's actions and policy direction, the following funding strategies for the 200- " - = developed: Public Funding Strategy 4 Protect a r . stren • . = tin! ti s • • - .• n revenues, specifically Proposition 42 ❖ Amend th - • ti • • - allow 55 percent voter approval for local transportatio s- - to e - d continue local transportation sales taxes where necessary ❖ Maximize motor v: • e fuel user fee revenue through pay -as- you -go, and debt financing (assuming an adjustment to the motor vehicle fuel excise tax rate to maintain historical purchasing power) • s Review methods for collecting revenues from altemative fuel vehicles In addition to these strategies, currently, • the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is considering the feasibility of a development mitigation fee associated with the county's Measure I renewal program (sales tax extension program). Initial revenue estimates for some approaches identified for further analyses indicate that about $1.5 billion could be generated for arterials and interchanges in San Bernardino County. The total revenue that will be generated over the Plan period in 2002 dollars is about $31 billion. The Plan also proposes significant private funding based on user fee to support a number of region -wide initiatives including the Maglev system and major corridor enhancements.' 10 < Destination 2030 . / Executive Summary • System Performance DESTINATION 2030 is one of the best performing plans that SCAG has ever. developed. The preferred strategy or the Plan demonstrates superior performance over the Baseline or No- - Project option for every single performance criterion, including mobility, accessibility, reliability, safety and the environment. The performance is the result of the proposed growth vision and well targeted investment strategy that complement growth. The Plan, if fully implemented, will result in maintaining average freeway speed almost at current level (Base Year 2000) in 2030. In terms of cost effectiveness, every dollar invested in the plan will yield $3.25 in benefit. The preliminary regional emissions analysis has produced a positive finding for the most part of the Region. SCAG is working with the respective state and local air district agencies to complete the conformity portion for V tura County and the Southwest Desert modified ozone area. Conclusion DESTINA ION •3' • .vi es c 4r pr= sive and multi -modal regional transportation plan that is res. in il to • b . •ut ocal government input, and county transportation commission in. t. = P - m -ets the state and federal requirements and it reflects a vision for the region t' ..t • =Ian es land use with transportation investments in a way that is complementary to - xist - g investments. In addition, the RTP addresses the goals and objectives establishes by SCAG and is assessed based upon a number of key performance measures. In light of significant funding issues within the Region over the duration of the Plan, innovative funding concepts have been developed that would enable the Region to invest in programs and projects that will meet transportation needs over the next 27 years. The collaboration needed to develop a consensus on DESTINATION 2030 was unprecedented and reflects the growing realization that we must better integrate transportation and land use planning in ways that reflect public desires for maintaining the high quality of life that southern Californians expect and deserve. . 2004 Regional Transportation Plan 11 Executive Summary This page ' tionally lef : % 0 12 < Destination 2030 City Comment Letters re: Draft 2204 Regional Transportation plan and Draft EIR City Council Staff Report January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT" NOTE: ENTIRE DOCUMENT NOT PROVIDED DUE TO LENGTH, 701 PAGES. A COPY IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AT THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. THE DOCUMENT IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON SCAG'S WEBSITE AT WWW.SCAG.CA.GOV. Draft 2004 RTP & DEIR.CC Staff Report 31 iik:ss'..,:mi l gam''• l . ..FertisZ5,447 . 6,..„,r,,=,, -:,;�; ` ' . - - ,i ::1 ter ,•, Regional Council Members t$b,ax;t °FS `.sar.Ym:• •g J. :r./,+, K ' s ® t : � G . • . •, r ^,; '.4,: OFFICERS: , . °' ...a.:. .. PRESIDENT: Councilmember Bev Perry, Brea Leadership, ::_ slot- and ,;91 Wl11Ch FIRST VICE PRESIDENT: Councilmember Ron Roberts, Temecula promote economic growth, personal SECOND VICE PRESIDENT. Supervisor Hank Kutper, Imperial County well - being, and livable communities for PAST PRESIDENT. Councilmember Ronald Bates, Los Alamitos all Southern Californians. IMPERIAL COUNTY: Hank Kuiper, Imperial County • Jo Shields, Brawley The Ass:.: " ;aticrt wilt 3a.cort• ish this illiss#Oe by: Los ANGELES COUNTY: Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, Los Angeles County • Zev Yaroslaysky, Los Angeles County • Harry Baldwin, San Gabriel • Paul • Developing long -range regional plans and Bowlen, Cerritos • Tony Cardenas, Los Angeles • Margaret Clark, Rosemead • Gene Daniels, Paramount • Mike Dispenza, Palmdale • Judy strategies that provide for efficient movement Dunlap, Inglewood • Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles • Wendy Greuel, Los of people, goods and information; enhance - Angeles • Frank Gurule, Cudahy • James Hahn, Los Angeles • Janice Hahn, economic growth and international trade; and Los Angeles • Isadore Hall, Compton • Sandra Jacobs, El Segundo • Torn LaBonge, Los Angeles • Bonnie Lowenthal, Long Beach • Martin Ludlow, improve the environment and quality of life. Los Angeles • Keith McCarthy. Downey • Llewellyn Miller, Claremont • Cindy Miscikowski, Los Angeles • Paul Nowatka, Torrance • Pam • Providing quality information services and O'Connor, Santa Monica • Alex Padilla. Los Angeles • Bernard Parks, Los analysis for the region. Angeles • Jan Perry, Los Angeles • Beatrice Proo. Pico Rivera • Ed Reyes, Los Angeles • Greig Smith, Los Angeles • Dick Stanford, Azusa • Tom - • Using an inclusive decision- making process - Sykes, Walnut • Paul Talbot, Alhambra • Sidney Tyler, Pasadena • Tonia that resolves conflicts and encourages trust. Reyes Uranga, Long Beach • Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles • Dennis Washburn, Calabasas • lack Weiss, Los Angeles • Bob Yousefian, • Creating an educational and work environ- Glendale • Dennis P. Zine, Los Angeles ment that cultivates creativity, initiative, and ORANGE COUNTY: Chris Norby, Orange County • Ronald Bates, Los opportunity. Alamitos • Lou Bone, Tustin • Art Brown, Buena Park • Richard Chavez, Anaheim • Debbie Cook, Huntington Beach • Cathryn DeYoung, Laguna Niguel • Richard Dixon, Lake Forest • Alta Duke, La Palma • Bev Perry, - Brea • Tod Ridgeway, Newport Beach RIVERSIDE Cowart: Marion Ashley, Riverside County • Ron Loveridge, Riverside • Jeff Miller, Corona • Greg Pettis, Cathedral City • Ron Roberts, Temecula • Charles White, Moreno Valley - SAN BERNARDINO Cowry: Paul Biane, San Bernardino County • Bill Alexander, Rancho Cucamonga • Edward Burgnon, Town of Apple Valley • Lawrence Dale, Barstow • Lee Ann Garcia, Grand Terrace • Susan Longville, San Bernardino • Gary Ovitt, Ontario • Deborah Robertson, Rialto VENTURA COUNTY: Ludy Mikels, Ventura County • Glen Becerra, Simi Valley • Carl Morehouse, San Buenaventura • Toni Young, Port Hueneme ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: Charles Smith, Orange Frncding• rbe preparalrrm o !!ns repnrt tam financed in part Ibmugbgrants fmin the brerlad.'Iales County Dapdrtnreut r jTranspnrtnton — Federal d Ihgbum` Admnristrahmr and tbu Federal Ti ans#.tdmmrstration — ' wide) nrortstans of lbe Thinsportation Equay.ict for the 2.1.0 Country (TEA-21) .1dthtionalfinaucral RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: Robin Lowe, Hemet ainstanCC UM prorated bt• the Gtljnrnur State Department ofTr n. portalion - VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: Bill Davis, Simi Valley Rev. 12.23.03 . Southern California Association of Governments - 818 Wes: 7th Street, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, California 900 - 3435 213. 236 :boo www scag.cs gov - , SCAG Planning Region • Kern Co. In o , . • -. ::,‘"• - • 71 = ".-- - ---'''''". ; •-.,,- ,- \ 7 . ''' __-. Nevada : - - -... ', :-' - • ,:,-, ":;,''k .. 2: "- c, . . "- •-• - , • ■ • ‘'It' ' '' '....',,,.- - ; / -'''", -:19 0 .;s: -''''• • ., ' '- --'". ' i''' :\ ... l'; 7,1 ; ' ,'--:. "!...:. •.. '...‘.-....-• 7 r '''''''' '''' -...- • • ..' ' SAN BAG • ' --' ''.'•\ -,-.•-?..- -, -;4 ,...,- - .4•••-i!.: , --., • - ... 4, •-. •,..--, • -...• ..--% --„.--..v... : i. - - ,•t - z -,,,- .: -;.„-• ..,-,;:,,, ....„. ,,,, ; •,.;:tip , -,;, , ,, - ..i..,:•,1,2' 2 ,.. ; : ':-'.: -.;,,,,-, -, .., ..1...r11,, .- ',,,.,„ -1,, g k .- - l:•..:711 - 7,-,..„-- ,.,',..- ,.:-.„: r r... ,....„ ' z ' Ti ' .•.'',- ' -4 •0-1‘ :°,1.1YL, Kem Co. ''. - ...: 0-, e.t- .' IN ' - r '-'. "." : ''.'f '•"•k": '..- ',...l.' ,- ',..'.:- -,--e.,•:..; ,A1-*. "...; , — ..,.. ...„-„,, , ..,-„,....r. -,. • ..v ,_ i . : . • : . --...c.. , k . • , 4.". • ' _ ' . 1 -,=7-w!".1. .. ..'t ..4,,,- 1. s.. Arizona al '' 'IN ' Otth L.A CO U rItY I, .....' 4. :.A.; : '-:„.': ; ' I •)•• .,-- • -:-. • `"g'h' --t• -f• /%'-'2 • -..- - -,. -- , .. , • - - s. - : .., .- :: 4 •= ,,:.-, :r-,14 ..., 7,4.,.-; ..'. -.• • ..,11.:.:1 . • , ; .1 • ' . 1. • ..,,,'"..,,,,... • ..' _,'%::, "I. , ...."' :sr, - , :.:,- .,,' ',',•-% :: • .. >1. '44.,,ird ' .....:71.. -. r".' ,, ' • . 1‘,:tF. '4, •,...4. ‘4,. .„..,.7 .. ;`,14, - ,1. ,,-,...`. _.;:r0, - '.; .. , ..--...::::' ''' VCOG `.4'/: ....o:f.11 4):: 4„k":'1'.:.' ' . % i'.-:'1 7:' 7:12; -'_ .,,q,, ;2-. ...... . . ..,,A .---,.: -...,.,;...- ?....-va . . ..z....,....;.s::- - - ‘.,... .....%1° 7 ;;:-.•-• ... 4c --.7„. - L' '''..:" ••■ q t ''' " :••• ' '''" • • ' . ........... I .. ''> 4 ,...,,,. ' f:',.. 'Ik ;:: -, 1 , ..... 4-, ,%''. , •,, ,- 1 1 , ' ‘' • , .;`,.,..., ...' , ": V.6r ugo '..., .-1. -;'; %-t: '";- i'.. :`, . 7 ...,...-YIX.-.. 5 4.-' 1 ..- ;., 5 -„_., : ---,,,,,,,, , ,N , : , i ...;.',...... , ..; ‘ , ,..,r...,v-,..0 ,,...;:-, 2. -; *-4,..,-, , ..,; 1 , 1 ,,,,,, r... I .......;;,-..........1,,, r ..s,. l'i:a51 ,.: ‘ .: 1 1 - ' - ..1,': ' .„.!„s'; .1:%,- ` i ,,, : - 1''' .- - 2 ,"'. 401tgitY'i, '''iS lel Valley CO . :11: - .. ';'- '':?:.1 ‘ ' ....:.;.‘:: :; : T';': '' : ', -7 .z . j 4"1 4 , Las Virgenes Malibu- f; , :',,,,' • ' 1 4.":‘, ',' ;>0 ' COG Westside A Cities :-.''' ...- .C96 4,.. 6 - ?K r yW .1 = - : Am 4 1 2crl '-'' r:: ... .-4: ••• -A; • • ' - .,,Ii-...',*. "*._ ' ..,,' •,-;:,•:-.'• 41....,.%.A.,..i.7. it& 4 , :,..- . 4;', ..,....; .CVAG„,"..- - , " .:Clounty;. ..i / .: Kr: -`1, - „`' ,:4 4- , South Bay Cities COG Y...J..v.;t1 , .. - ..t; /34 -..:;-' ; r: 1. 1: . --1 - 7 9i41 ''', ' . ; .• ',.. '',.. ", '-'n.". %,,,,,.... — - ..,1.' $•-,,,- •,,•• • = • •• • 4 . .4-, -•?: ....= -. ...,,. _ . , :TO , •:`,gza• 40 a,V,,,:rp,.* ,...,r f; 6, 0. - ` ' San Diego CO. - .7,......,;:,=!:...-, ,, ..k-.... - ..1".4,,• , .„ . . :. ,..,,,,,,4 Los Angeles Co. I Th-P7P74-=7"-lwg '''''''' ''''' 'WAG f 4t- San Bernardino Co. 1 • - Riverside Co. 1 ' ..' ' '-'4-1 A i. „:2: 4;',:.; ;1., .';.;".• ii.';'? , tefit*:r....,:t..7,,„: `-‘0,4, .1,:.., ';. - Imperial Co. t.: ."-- - -F: t O range Co. I x ,-1 - 0 ` ... - ' - Mexico . . . Ventura Co. 1 I . . SCAG is made up of 6-Counties which are divided into 14 subregions Maps included in this report are produced in whole or in part from THOMAS BROS. MAPS digital data- base. These maps are reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. . . ' .. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS ,,..s. . . TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -1 Introduction ES -1 Significant Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Monitoring ES -7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 -1 • Summary 1 -1 Scope and Methodology 1-1 Environmental Review Process - 1-5 Organization of the PEIR 1-5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 -1 Background and Location 2-1 Purpose and Need for Action 2 -1 Proposed Action 2 -3 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3 -1 3.1 LAND USE 3.1 -1 Introduction 3.1 -1 Environmental Setting 3.1 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.1 -6 Methodology 3.1 -11 Significance Criteria 3:1 -11 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 -11 3.2 POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT 3.2 -1 Introduction 3.2 -1 Regional Setting 3.2 -1 Methodology 3.2 -9 • • Significance Criteria 3.2 -10 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.2 -10 3.3 TRANSPORTATION _ 3.3 -1 Introduction 3.3 -1 Environmental Setting - 3.3 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.3 -19 Methodology 3.3 -20 Significance Criteria 3.3 -21 - Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.3 -22 „ Southern California 1 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.4 AIR QUALITY 3.4 -1 Introduction 3.4 -1 Environmental Setting 3.4 -1 , Regulatory Setting 3.4 -5 Methodology 3 4 -23 Significance Criteria 3.4 -25 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.4 -25 3.5 NOISE 3.5 -1 Introduction 3.5 -1 Environmental Setting 3.5 -1, Regulatory Setting - 3 5 -9 • , Methodology 3.5 -12 Significance Criteria 3.5 -13 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 -14 3.6 AESTHETICS AND VIEWS - 3.6 -1 Introduction 3.6 -1 Environmental Setting 3.6 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.6 -7 Methodology 3.6 -9 Significance Criteria 3.6 -9 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.6 -10 3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.7 -1 Introduction 3.7 -1 Environmental Setting 3.7 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.7 -16 - Methodology 3.7 -19 Significance Critena 3.7 -19 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.7 -20 - 3.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.8 -1 Introduction 3.8 -1 Environmental Setting 3 8 -1 , Regulatory Setting 3.8 -12 Methodology 3.8 -15 Significance Criteria 3.8 -16 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.8 -16 3.9 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY 3.9 -1 Introduction 3.9 -1 Environmental Setting 3.9 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.9 -13 Methodology 3.9 -15 Significance Criteria 3.9 -16 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.9 -16 Southern California it 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Govemments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 3.10 -1 - Introduction 3.10 -1 Environmental Setting 3.10 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.10 -4 Methodology 3.10 -6 Significance Criteria 3.10 -6 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.10 -7 3.11 ENERGY 3.11 -1 Introduction 3.11 -1 Environmental Setting 3.11 -1 Regulatory Setting 3.11 -8 - Methodology 3.11 -11 Significance Criteria 3.11 -12 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.11 -12 3.12 WATER RESOURCES 3.12-1 Introduction 3.12 -1 Environmental Setting 3.12 -1 Regulatory Setting 3 12 -15 Methodology 3.12 -21 - Significance Criteria 3.12 -21 Impacts and Mitigation Measures , • 3.12 -22 3.13 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 3.13 -1 Introduction 3.13 -1 ' Environmental Setting 3.13 -1 , Regulatory Setting 3.13 -7 Methodology 3.13 -8 Significance Criteria 3.13 -9 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.13 -9 4.0 ALTERNATIVES 4 -1 ' Introduction 4 -1 No Project Alternative 4-2 Modified 2001 RTP Alternative 4 -10 PILUT 1 (Infill) Alternative 4 -18 PILUT 2 (Fifth Ring) Altemative 4 -27 The Environmentally Superior Alternative 4 -36 5.0 LONG -TERM EFFECTS - 5 -1 Significant Unavoidable Environmental Changes 5 -1 Significant and Irreversible Impacts 5 -6 Cumulative Impacts 5-8 Growth Inducing Impacts 5 -11 t, Southern California ijj 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.0 REPORT AUTHORS, ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS CONSULTED, REFERENCES, AND ACRONYMS 6 -1 Lead Agency Personnel and Report Authors 6 -1 EIR Consultants 6 -2 Organizations and Persons Consulted 6 -3 References 6 -6 Acronyms 6 -18 7.0 TECHNICAL APPENDICES 7 -1 7.1 Notice of Preparation 7.1 -1 7.2 Responses to Notice of Preparation - 7.2 -1 7.3 Air Emissions Tables 7.3 -1 7.4 Biological Resource Tables - California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database (CNDD) 7.4 -1 ' 7.5 Water Resources Tables - 7.5 -1 7.6 Cultural Resources Data 7.6 -1 8.0 FIGURES . Figure 2.1 -1: The SCAG Region and Subregions _ Figure 2.1 -2: 2030 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane System Figure 2.1 -3: 2030 Mixed Flow Improvements Figure 2.1 -4: 2030 Transit Corridor System Figure 2.1 -5: , 2030 User Fee - Backed Capacity Improvements . Figure 2.1 -6: 2030 Mainline Freight Rail System Improvements Figure 2.1 -7. 2030 Grade Separations Figure 2.1 -8: Maglev High -Speed Rail System Figure 3.1 -1. Existing Land Use Patterns . Figure 3.1 -2: Open Space and Recreation Lands Figure 3.1 -3. City Boundaries Figure 3.1 -4: 2000 Household Density by Census Tract ' Figure 3.1 -5. 2000 Employment Density by Census Tract E„ ,„ Southern California IV 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 3 1 -6: Pnme Agricultural Farm Land and Grazing Land Figure 3.3 -1: 2000 Base Year Freeway Speed PM Peak (3pm to 7pm) Figure 3.3 -2: Existing (2000) Highway System Figure 3.3 -3: Existing (2000) Transit System Figure 3.3 -4: Major Airports Figure 3.4 -1: Air Quality Districts, Basins, and Monitoring Stations Figure 3.4 -2: Potentially Impacted Sensitive Receptors Figure 3.6 -1: Designated Scenic Highways and Vista Points Figure 3.7 -1: Vegetation Communities Figure 3.7 -2: General Locations of Known Wetlands Figure 3.7 -3: Known Sighting of Endangered, Threatened, or Rare Plant or Animal Species Figure 3.9 -1: Geomorphic Provinces in the SCAG Region Figure 3.9 -2: General Soil Types Figure 3.9 -3: Earthquake Faults and Peak Ground Acceleration • Figure 3.9-4: Areas Subject to Subsidence Figure 3.9 -5: Relative Landslide Potential , Figure 3.9 -6: Location of Soils with Moderate to High Erosion Potential Figure 3.9 -7: Areas Subject to Liquefaction • Figure 3.10 -1: Existing Freight Rail Lines Figure 3.12 -1: Average Monthly Precipitation for Selected Areas within the SCAG Region (1960- 2001) 3.12 -2 Figure 3 12 -2: Major Surface Waters Figure 3.12 -3: Impaired Water Bodies .r Southern California V 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 3.12 -4: Groundwater Basins Figure 3.12 -5. Areas Using Imported Water Figure 3.12 -6. Metropolitan Water District Service Areas Figure 3 12 -7: Federally Designated Flood Hazard Zones Figure 3.12 -8: Regional Water Quality Control Boards Figure 3.12 -9: Water Agencies in the SCAG Region Figure 3.12 -10: Comparison of Typical Urbanized and Non - Urbanized Hydrographs 3.12 -29 Figure 3.13 -1: Fire Threat LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 -1: . 2004 RTP Population, Households, Employment in 2030 (in thousands) 2-2 Table 2.1 -2: . Adopted 2004 RTP Goals 2-3 Table 2.1 -3: Adopted 2004 RTP Policies 2-4 Table 2.1 -4: 2004 RTP Performance Outcomes, Measures, and Plan Objectives 2 -5 Table 2.1 -5: New Regional Lanes Miles by County* 2 -7 Table 2.1 -6: 2002 and the 2030 Preferred Aviation Plan Air Passengers 2 -9 Table 3.1 -1: Statewide County Rank, Total Value of Agricultural Production, and Leading Commodities, 2001 3.1 -6 Table 3.1 -2: Land Uses Affected by Major Highway, Transit, and Freight Rail , Projects in the 2004 RTP 3.1 -17 Table 3.2 -1: SCAG Population and Share of U.S. Population, 1900 -2000 3.2 -1 Table 3.2 -2: _ Population Growth in the 10 Largest Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas, 1990 -2000 3.2-2 Table 3.2 -3: Population Growth for SCAG Counties, 1990 -2003 3.2 -2 Table 3.2-4. Ethnic Composition Comparison for SCAG Counties, 1990 -2000 3.2 -3 Table 3 2 -5 Age Distribution of the SCAG Counties, 1990 and 2000 3.2 -4 `:. Southern California • Vi 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3.2 -6: Building Permits Issued in the SCAG Region: 1990 -2002 3.2 -5 Table 3 2 -7: Owner and Rental Vacancy Rates in the SCAG Region, 2000 3.2 -6 Table 3 2 -8: Homeownership Rates 3.2 -6 Table 3.2 -9: Affordability Index (Percentage of Residents Who Can Afford Average Price Home) 3.2 -7 Table 3.2 -10: Average Persons per Household 3 2 -7 Table 3.2 -11: Total Wage and Salary Employment 3.2 -8 Table 3.2 -12: Unemployment Rate in the SCAG Region 3.2 -8 Table 3.2 -13: . Population, Households, and Employment in the SCAG Region, by the Subregion Year 2000 and 2030 Plan and No Project 3.2 -11 Table 3.2 -14: Residential and Business Land Uses within 150 -Foot Radius of 2004 RTP Freeway, Transit, and Freight Rail Projects 3.2 -12 Table 3.3 -1: Parties Directly Involved in the Development of a Regional Transportation Plan 3.3 -2 Table 3.3 -2: Summary of Existing (2000) Daily Vehicle Miles & Percent Vehicle Hours Of Travel 3.3 -5 Table 3.3 -3: - Summary of Delay and Work Trip Length, 2000 3.3 -5 Table 3.3 -4: Total Vehicle Fatalities, 2001 3.3 -7 Table 3.3 -5: Existing (2000) Travel Mode Split (% of County Total) 3.3 -8 Table 3.3 -6: Existing'(2000) Regional Freeway Route Miles and Lane • Miles by County 3.3 -9 Table 3.3 -7: Existing (2000) Regional High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Route Miles and Lane Miles by County 3.3 -9 Table 3.3 -8: Existing (2000) Regional Arterial Route Miles and Lane Miles by County 3.3 -10 Table 3.3 -9: Key Statistics for Major Transit Operators (2001) • 3.3 -11 Table 3.3 -10: Existing (2002) Activity at Major Commercial Airports in the SCAG Region 3.3 -17 Table 3.3 -11: Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in 2000 and 2030 (in millions) 3.3 -23 Southern California vii 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3.3 -12. Daily Hours of Delay in 2000 and 2030 (in millions) 3.3 -24 Table 3.3 -13: Percentage of Evening Work Trips Completed Within 45 Minutes 3.3 -26 Table 3.3 -14: 2000 and 2030 SCAG Regional Transportation System Accident Rates 3.3-27 Table 3 4 -1: Ambient Air Quality Standards for Cntena Pollutants 3.4 -7 - Table 3.4 -2: Air Quality Monitoring Data Summary 3.4 -14 Table 3.4 -3: Criteria Pollutants Emissions by Nonattainment Area Plan Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) 3.4 -27 Table 3 4-4. SCAB Cntena Pollutant Emissions by County (SCAB portion only) Plan Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) 3.4 -28 ' Table 3.4 -5: Criteria Pollutant Emissions by Nonattainment Area Plan Emissions in 2030 Compared to No Project Emissions in 2030 3.4 -29 Table 3.4 -6: SCAB Cntena Pollutant Emissions by County (SCAB portion only) Project Emissions in 2030 Compared to No Project Emissions in 2030 3.4 -30 Table 3.4 -7: PM10 Emissions for Heavy Duty trucks per County 3.4 -31 Table 3.4 -8: 2003 SIPs (Emissions Budgets) and Regional Emission Analysis 3.4 -38 Table 3.4 -9: South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Ozone Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Summer Temperatures - SCAB 3.4 -38 -Table 3.4 -10: South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Winter Temperatures - SCAB 3.4 -38 Table 3.4 -11: South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Winter Temperatures - SCAB - 3.4 -38 - - Table 3.4 -12: South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Particulate Matter (PM10) Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Annual Average Temperatures - SCAB 3.4 -39 Table 3.4 -13: Ventura County - South Central Coast Air Basin (VC /SSCAB) Ozone (tons /day) Summer Temperature - SCCAB- Ventura County 3 4 -39 Table 3.4 -14: Southeast Desert Modified Area Ozone (tons /day) Summer Temperatures Antelope Valley, San Bernardino in MDAB and Coachella Valley in SSAB 3.4 -39 Table 3.4 -15: Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB) Particulate Matter (PM10) Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Annual Average Temperatures MDAB San Bernardino County (excluding Searles Valley) 3.4 -39 Southern California viii 2004 RTP Program EIR r Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3.4 -16: Salton Sea Air Basin - Coachella Valley PM!) (tons /day) Summer Temperatures - Antelope Valley, San Bernardino in MDAB and Coachella Valley in SSAB 3.4 -40 Table 3.4 -17: Salton Sea Air Basin - Imperial County Ozone (tons /day) Summer - Temperatures - SCCAB- Ventura County 3.4 -40 Table 3.4 -18: Salton Sea Air Basin - Impenal County Particulate Matter (PM10) Emissions Analysis (tons /day) Annual Average Temperatures 3.4 -40 Table 3.4 -19: Emission Inventory - Aircraft/Ground Support Equipment in tons Per year (tpy) 3.4-43 Table 3.5 -1: Noise Land Use Compatibility Matnx 3.5 -2 Table 3.5 -2: Noise Levels Along Selected Freeways and Arterials in the SCAG Region 3.5 -4 Table 3.5 -3: Reference Noise Levels for Various Rail Operations 3.5 -6 Table 3.5-4: Demolition and Construction Equipment Source Noise Levels 3.5 -9 Table 3.5 -5: Types and Duration of Noise Produced by Proposed Projects 3.5 -15 Table 3.5 -6: Draft 2004 RTP Projects With Potential Noise Impacts 3.5 -18 Table 3.5 -7: Percentage of Roadways Where Noise Levels Exceed 66dBA* (Regardless of Land Use) 3.5 -26 Table 3.6 -1: Caltrans Scenic Highways Program - Examples of Visual Quality Intrusions 3.6 -2 Table 3.6 -2: Officially Designated State Scenic Highways 3.6 -3 Table 3.6 -3: SCAG Roadways Eligible for State Scenic Highway Designation 3.6 -4 Table 3.6-4: 2004 RTP Projects Planned on Roadways Eligible for State Scenic Highway Designation 3.6 -15 Table 3.7 -1: Natural Wetlands ' 3.7 -9 Table 3.7 -2: Characteristics of Major Coastal Rivers 3.7 -10 Table 3.7 -3: Special Status Species Reported in the SCAG Region (Technical Appendices) 7.4 -2 Table 3.7 -4: Special Status Communities Reported in the SCAG Region (Technical Appendices) 7.4 -12 Southern California ix _ 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3 7 -5: Large -Scale Protected Areas in the SCAG Region (Technical Appendices) 7.4 -13 Table 3.7 -6. Natural Communities Conservation Plans 3.7 -16 Table 3.7 -7 Special Status Habitat and Communities Occurring Within 150 feet of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project (acres) 3.7 -21 Table 3.7 -8: Natural Vegetation Occurring Within 150 feet of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project (acres) 3.7 -22 Table 3 7 -9: Natural Vegetation Acreage Occurring Within 0.25 miles of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project (acres) 3.7 -24 Table 3 7 -10: Wetland Acreage Occurring Within 150 feet of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project 3.7-29 Table 3.8 -1: Significant Fossil Localities in the SCAG Region 3.8 -3 Table 3.8 -2: Archaeological Site Distribution 3.8 -4 Table 3.8 -3: California Historic Landmarks (CHL) of the Spanish Period (1769 -1821) 3.8 -7 Table 3.8 -4: California Historic Landmarks (CHL) of the Mexican Period (1822 -1848) 3.8 -9 Table 3.8 -5: California Historic Landmarks (CHL) of the American Period (1849 to Present) - 3.8 -10 Table 3.8-6: , Number of Landmarks per County 3.8 -17 Table 3.8 -7: Undisturbed Areas Occurring Within 150 Feet of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project (acres) 3.8 -25 - Table 3.9 -1: Characterization of Major Faults in the Southern California Region 3.9 -5 Table 3.9 -2: Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale - 3.9 -10 Table 3.9 -3: Potential Impacts of Seismic and Geologic Hazards on Regional Transportation Projects (By County) 3.9 -17 Table 3.10 -1: Hazardous Material Shipment Rates in the SCAG Region 3.10 -2 Table 3.11 -1: Annual Transportation Energy Consumption in the SCAG Region for Base Years as Indicated 3 11 -5 Table 3.11 -2: Average Monthly Household Electricity Usage 3.11 -7 Southern California X 2004 RTP Program SIR Association of Governments December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 3.11 -3: Projected SCAG Region Transportation Fuel Consumption (thousand gallons per day) 3.11 -13 Table 3.12 -1: Average Total Precipitation for Selected Areas within the SCAG Region (1960 -2001, in inches) 3.12 -1 Table 3.12 -2: Water Balance Summary for SCAG's Hydrologic Regions (Technical Appendices) 7.5 -1 Table 3.12 -3: Factors Influencing Per Capita Water Use 3.12 -3 Table 3.12 -4: Water Supply Multiple Dry Year Projections for the MWD Service Area (acres -feet per year) 3.12 -6 Table 3.12 -5: Major Water Suppliers Outside the MWD Service Area 3.12 -7 - Table 3.12 -6: Wastewater Flow and Capacity in the SCAG Region 3.12 -9 Table 3.12 -7: Factors Influencing per Capita Water Use 3.12 -10 Table 3.12 -8: Major Surface Waters 3.12-12 Table 3.12 -9: Partial List of Targeted Watersheds in the SCAG Region 3.12 -19 Table 3.12 -10: California Adjudicated Groundwater Basins and Watermasters 3.12 -20 Table 3.12 -11: Pollutants Associated with Transportation 3.12 -23 Table 3.12 -12: New Regional Lane Miles by County 3.12 -24 Table 3.12 -13: Impaired Water Bodies (303(d)) Occurring Within 150 feet of a Freeway, Transit, or Freight Rail Project in the 2004 RTP 3.12 -25 Table 3.13 -1: Police Service Providers for Jurisdictions within SCAG Counties 3.13 -2 Table 3.13 -2: Fire Protection Service Providers for Jurisdictions within SCAG Counties 3.13 -2 Table 3.13 -3: Kindergarten through Grade 12 Enrollment and Teachers in the SCAG Region for the 2002 -03 School Year (SY) 3.13 -3 Table 3.13 -4: Construction Costs for New Schools 3.13 -3 Table 3.13 -5: Tons Disposed in the SCAG Region 3.13 -3 Table 3.13 -6: Permitted Active or Planned Solid Waste Landfills in the SCAG Region 3.13 -4 Table 3.13 -7: Diversion Rate Summary 3.13 -6 Southern California xi 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 J TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 4 -1' Characteristics of the 2004 RTP Alternatives 4 -1 Table 4 -2: Criteria Pollutant Emissions By Nonattainment Area No Project Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -5 Table 4 -3: Criteria Pollutant Emissions By SCAB County (SCAB portion only) No Project Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -6 Table 4-4: Criteria Pollutant Emissions By Nonattainment Area Modified 2001 RTP • Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -12 Table 4 -5: Cnteria Emissions By SCAB County (SCAB portion only) Modified 2001 RTP Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -13 _ Table 4 -6 2001 RTP Modified Alternative PM Emissions for heavy -duty Trucks per Nonattainment Area (Tons per Day) 4 -13 . , Table 4 -7 Cnteria Pollutant Emissions By Nonattainment Area PILUT 1 Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -21 Table 4 -8 Criteria Pollutant Emissions By SCAB County (SCAB portion only) . PILUT 1 in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -22 Table 4 -9 PILUT 1 Alternative PM Emissions for heavy -duty Trucks per Nonattalnment Area (Tons per Day) 4 -22 Table 4 -10 Criteria Pollutant Emissions By Nonattainment Area PILUT 2 Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) 4 -30 Table 4 -11 Criteria Pollutant Emissions By SCAB County (SCAB portion only) Pilut 2 in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day) . 4 -31 Table 4 -12 PILUT 2 Alternative PM Emissions for Heavy -Duty Trucks per Nonattainment Area (Tons per Day) 4 -31 . Table 7.6 Sites in the SCAG Region Listed on the National Register of Historic Places 7.6 -4 °r„ Southern California xii 2004 RTP Program EIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION • Purpose of the Environmental Impact Report In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has prepared this Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP or the "Plan "). The Plan addresses the transportation needs for the SCAG region through 2030 (including both specific projects and strategies that address transportation and urban form); the purpose of the PEIR is to identify the potentially significant environmental effects of implementing the projects, programs, and policies included in the Plan. The PEIR serves as an informational document to inform decision- makers and the public of the potential environmental consequences of approving the proposed 2004 RTP, and it includes feasible mitigation measures and alternatives designed to help avoid or minimize significant environmental effects. The PEIR includes a description of the existing regional environmental setting, a description of the proposed action (the Plan), a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed Plan, analysis and identification of significant impacts of the Plan and the alternatives, identification of the environmentally superior alternative, areas of known controversy, mitigation measures, and the expected level of significance after mitigation. The 2004 RTP PEIR fulfills the requirements of CEQA and provides a useful, regional -scale environmental planning tool that will support subsequent, site - specific analysis, and identifies appropnate measures to minimize adverse environmental effects in the SCAG region. Environmental Setting - The SCAG region is comprised of six counties Imperial, Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San - Bernardino, and Ventura and totals approximately 38,000 square miles in area. The region stretches from the state borders with Nevada and Arizona to the Pacific Ocean and from the southernmost edge of the Central Valley to the Mexican border. The region includes the county with the largest area in the nation, San Bernardino County, as well as the county with the highest population in the nation, Los Angeles County. This vast area includes millions of acres of open space and recreational land, a rich assemblage of natural resources, a wide variety of elevation, landform, soil and rock types, and climate zones, and a population of 17 million people. A detailed environmental setting is provided in each resource category in Chapter Three of this document. Proposed Action SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) under Title 23, United States Code (USC) 134(g)(1), for the six - county region. SCAG is required by state and federal mandates to prepare a RTP every three years. $" Southern California ES -1 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2004 RTP is a long -range regional transportation plan that provides a blueprint to help achieve a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. Transportation projects in the SCAG region must be consistent with the RTP in order to receive federal funds. The RTP includes: a policy element that includes goals, policies, and performance indicators; an action element that identifies projects, programs, and implementation In addition the RTP includes a description of regional growth trends to help identify future needs for travel and goods movement. Policy Element The goals included in the 2004 RTP are to: 1. Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region; 2. Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region; 3. Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system; 4. Maximize the productivity of our transportation system; 5. Protect the environment, improve air quality, and promote energy efficiency; and 6. Encourage land use and growth patterns that complement our transportation investments. The policies in the 2004 RTP include: 1. Transportation investments shall be based on SCAG's adopted Regional Performance indicators. - 2. Ensuring safety, adequate maintenance, and efficiency of operations on the existing multi, modal transportation system will meet RTP priorities and will be balanced against the need for system expansion investments. 3. RTP land use and growth strategies that differ from currently expected trends will require a collaborative implementation program that identifies required actions and policies by all affected agencies and subregions. 4. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) gap closures that significantly increase transit and rideshare usage will be supported and encouraged, subject to Policy #1. Performance indicators in the 2004 RTP include mobility, accessibility, reliability, safety, cost effectiveness, productivity, sustainability, preservation, environmental quality, and environmental justice. • Southern California ES -2 Draft 2004 RTP PER Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Action Element The programs, projects, and implementation actions of the proposed RTP focus on system management, transportation demand management, strategic system expansion, and the land use - transportation connection. System Management A key component of System Management is protecting the investment in the current transportation infrastructure. The 2004 RTP sets aside over $6 billion of additional funds for infrastructure preservation and a total budget for Operations and Maintenance of approximately $83 billion. System management includes operational strategies (getting the most out of the existing system) and the Congestion Management System (CMS). Transportation Demand Management Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is the all- inclusive term given to a variety of measures used to improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system by managing travel demand. TDM strategies encourage the use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle such as carpools, vanpools, bus, rail, bikes, and walking. Alternative work -hour programs, such as compressed workweek programs, flextime and work -at -home (telework and home -based • businesses) are also TDM strategies, as are parking management tactics, such as preferential parking for carpools and parking pricing. ' Strategic System Expansion / Capital Investments Highway and Arterial investments The 2004 RTP contains a total of approximately $39 billion in public funding for proposed, , committed, and programmed highway and arterial projects. This figure includes all capital improvements for the highway and arterial network, including mixed -flow lanes, HOV lanes, interchanges, truck climbing lanes, and grade crossings, but it does not include maintenance. Goods Movement The focus of the goods movement improvements in the 2004 RTP is on truck traffic and freight rail. The regional transportation system will be challenged to accommodate the projected doubling of truck tnps by 2030. The 2004 RTP acknowledges the need for strategies that will accommodate this future growth in truck traffic. While specific strategies and alignment determinations need further evaluation and consensus building, the Plan identifies corridor improvement needs for a number of corridors. The Plan also proposes adding a number of truck climbing lane improvements to the Region's highway system. The Regional Rail Capacity Improvement Program proposes rail capacity improvements that include a total investment of $3 4 billion in Southern California: $1.2 billion for railroad infrastructure projects and approximately $2.2 billion in grade separation projects. _ x •`^ Southern California ES -3 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Maglev System - ' The Maglev system is the name for an elevated monorail using advanced magnetic levitation technology to move people and goods at a very high speed (up to 310 miles per hour (mph)), with a high degree of safety, comfort, and reliability For the past four years, SCAG has been studying the feasibility of developing four Maglev corridors in the region: • Los Angeles Airport (LAX) to March Inland Port in Riverside • LAX to Palmdale • Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal (LAUPT) to Orange County (Anaheim) • LAX to Orange County (Irvine Transportation Center). If implemented as scheduled, the proposed system would include approximately 275 miles of ' Maglev corridors in the SCAG Region by 2030 that could move up to 500,000 riders a day. Marine Ports The ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Port Hueneme are planning to invest $6 billion over the next 25 years in infrastructure development programs. These efforts will include widening arterial streets, upgrading freeway ramps, separating railroad grade crossings, expanding rail yards, and adding intelligent transportation systems (ITS) to improve ground access management. 1 Inland Port . The 2004 RTP identifies an inland port that would serve as a cargo facilitation center where a number of import, export, manufacture, packing, warehousing, forwarding, customs, and other activities (with possible Foreign Trade Zone and /or Enterpnse Zone inclusion) could take place in close proximity or even at the same site. Aviation SCAG has developed a new aviation demand forecast and plan that maximizes airport efficiency on a regional scale. This new aviation plan, termed the "Preferred Aviation Plan," is a decentralized airport demand strategy to serve a forecasted regional demand of 170 million passengers in 2030, which results in an estimated economic benefit of $18 billion and 131,000 jobs over a constrained system. Public Transportation System The 2004 RTP contains a total of approximately •$25 billion in public funding for proposed, committed, and programmed transit projects, not including operation and maintenance. The goals of public transportation services are to ensure mobility for people without access to ' ""= Southern California ES -4 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY automobiles and to provide attractive alternatives for drive -alone motorists or discretionary riders. Strategies include a significant ihcrease In service availability, major expansion in the use of bus rapid transit, and some re- structuring of service to ensure efficient utilization of available capacity. • New rapid bus lines will be implemented on heavily - traveled corridors and many bus lines will be added or restructured to feed into the existing and 'proposed urban and commuter rail system. The 2004 RTP calls for and better coordination between transit and land -use planning to increase ridership, reduce congestion, and improve air quality. The regional transit program calls for the local and regional transit and planning agencies to promote transit- oriented development cooperatively along the major transit corridors. The 2004 RTP also supports development of a flexible transit system enabling a strong transit linkage to transit activity centers. Land Use - Transportation Connection The following tenets were developed through SCAG's Growth Visioning process to serve as the foundation for the land use strategies in the 2004 RTP: • Using in -fill where appropriate to revitalize underutilized development sites • Focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes to utilize available capacity • Providing housing opportunities near job centers, and job opportunities, when appropriate, in housing -rich communities • Providing housing opportunities to match changing demographics • Ensuring adequate access to open space • Changing land use to correspond to the implementation of a decentralized regional aviation strategy and its consequent short- and long -term job creation • Changing land use to correspond to the,implementation of regionally significant major transportation projects and their consequent short- and long -term job creation • Incorporating the local input and feedback on future growth received from 90 percent of the jurisdictions in the SCAG Region. Proposed Plan and RTP EIR Alternatives As stated above, the PEIR for the 2004 RTP is required to evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed 2004 RTP. The alternatives evaluated for the RTP EIR include: The Proposed Plan, which includes all of the elements summarized above, contains - transportation /urban -form strategies that encourage compact growth, increased jobs /housing balance, and centers -based development, where feasible, in all parts of the region. ;.° ' Southern California ES -5 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The No Project Alternative includes only those programmed transportation projects that received federal environmental clearance by December 2002. These reasonably foreseeable projects fulfill the definition of the mandated CEQA No Project Alternative. The 2001 RTP Modified.Alternative is an update of the adopted 2001 RTP to reflect the most recent growth estimates and transportation planning decisions and assumptions. This Alternative does not include urban -form strategies. The PILUT 1 (Infill) Alternative includes transportation investments and land use strategies that encourage a substantial portion of future growth to be concentrated in existing urban centers through infill - and redevelopment. This alternative has been designed 'to reduce consumption of open space and habitat. Impacts of the PILUT 1 Alternative are less adverse than the Plan for each resource category, and, overall, the PILUT 1 alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. The PILUT 2 (Fifth Ring) Alternative includes transportation investments and land use /transportation strategies that encourage growth toward a more decentralized urban form and an improvement in the jobs /housing balance in the outlying areas of the region. Specifically, PILUT 2 focuses on improving and expanding infrastructure to efficiently utilize undeveloped land on the outer edges of the urbanized area. _ Table ES -1 below contains a summary of the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the 2004 RTP and alternatives, proposed mitigation measures, the level of impacts with implementation of the mitigation measures. Each alternative maintains a constant population total in 2030. The year 2030 growth projection for each Alternative differs from one another in two ways: 1) numbers of households and jobs and /or 2) distribution of people, households and jobs. The alternatives differ in terms of numbers of households and jobs because different investments in the alternatives would be expected to stimulate different levels of fob creation and household development. The alternatives differ in terms of the distribution because the different transportation investments and urban form strategies would be expected to support different regional distributions of population, households, and employment. - Analytical Approach The focus of the environmental analysis in this PEIR is on the potential regional -scale and cumulative impacts of implementation of the Plan and the alternatives. The long -range planning horizon of more than 25 years necessitates that many of the highway, arterial, goods movement, and transit projects included in the Plan and the alternatives are identified at the conceptual level, and this document addresses environmental impacts to the level that they can be assessed without undue speculation. This PEIR acknowledges this uncertainty and incorporates these 1 PILUT is Planning for Integrated Land Use and Transportation I ' "`' Southern California ES -6 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY realities into the methodology to evaluate the environmental effects of the 2004 RTP, given its long -term planning horizon. The proposed Plan and the alternatives were evaluated at an equal level of detail. Multiple methods, including spatial analysis, transportation, noise and air quality simulation modeling, and other quantitative, ordinal, and qualitative techniques, were employed to identify the potential environmental effects of implementing the Plan and the alternatives. Spatial analysis using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was employed to evaluate the potential effects of the major roadway, rail, and transit projects on numerous resource categones, such as land use, biological, cultural and water resources. Sophisticated transportation, noise and air quality _ simulation models were used to estimate the transportation and air quality impacts. Project and policy elements of the Plan and alternatives were incorporated into the modeling analysis and into the socioeconomics projections. All of the techniques used to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the Plan and the alternatives are fully described in each resource section in Chapter Three of this document. Baseline for Determining Significance The PEIR must identify significant impacts that would be expected to result from implementation of the 2004 RTP. Significant impacts are defined as "a substantial or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment" (Public Resource Code § 21068). Significant impacts must be determined by applying explicit significance criteria to compare the future Plan conditions to the existing environmental setting (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(a)), and the effect is determined to be either beneficial, less than significant, significant or to have no impact compared to current conditions. The criteria for determining significance are included in each resource _ section in Chapter Three of this document. Comparison with the No Project It is important to emphasize that urbanization in the SCAG region will increase substantially by 2030, with or without implementation of the 2004 RTP, and the CEQA - required environmental baseline of current conditions means that the impact assessment for many of the resources categones is cumulative in nature. Therefore, the analysis for each resource category also includes a direct comparison between the expected future conditions with the proposed Plan and the expected future conditions if no Plan were adopted. This evaluation is not included in the determination of the significance of impacts; however, it provides a meaningful perspective on the effects of implementing the 2004 RTP. A direct comparison between the proposed Plan and the No Project Alternative is included in each resource section of Chapter Three of this document. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND MONITORING As stated above CEQA requires identification of significant impacts and mitigation measures to avoid or reduce significant impacts. Table ES -1 below contains a summary of the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the 2004 RTP and RTP EIR Alternatives, proposed . mitigation measures, and the level of impacts with implementation of the mitigation measures. Southern California ES -7 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The table illustrates that substantial or potentially substantial adverse effects, compared to current conditions, would be expected to occur to. 1) Land Use; 2) Population, Employment, and Housing, 3) Transportation; 4) Air Quality; 5) Noise; 6) Visual /Aesthetic Resources; 7) Biological Resources; -8) Cultural Resources; 9) Geology; 10) Hazardous Materials; 11) Energy; 12) Water Resources; and - 13) Public Service and Utilities. The proposed mitigation measures included in Table ES -1 can be Incorporated as policies into the Final 2004 RTP and the updated Regional Comprehensive Plan, as appropriate and feasible. This integration of mitigation with regional plans would help ensure that feasible measures are implemented at the project -level (Public Resource Code § 21081.6). The project proponent or local jurisdiction shall be responsible for ensuring adherence to the mitigation measures prior to - construction. SCAG shall be provided with documentation of compliance with mitigation measures through SCAG's monitoring efforts, including SCAG's Intergovernmental Review Process (in which all regionally significant projects, plans, and programs are reviewed for consistency with regional plans and policies). Areas of Known Controversy Areas of known controversy about the 2004 RTP include concerns raised about growth projections, implementation of urban form strategies and mitigation measures, water supply reliability, aviation elements, the transportation funding strategy, and the potential alignments for capacity enhancement projects for travel and goods movement projects. The PILUT 2 (Fifth Ring) Alternative has sparked conflict over growth patterns that facilitate growth in the High Desert and northern LA County. ", Southern California - ES -8 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Acronym List • CEQA California Environmental Quality Act ` CMS Congestion Management System GIS Geographic Information Systems HOV High Occupancy Vehicle ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems LAUPT Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal • LAX Los Angeles Airport Maglev Magnetic Levitation Train MPH Miles per Hour MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization PEIR Program Environmental Impact Report PILUT Planning for Integrated Land Use and Transportation Plan 2004 Regional Transportation Plan • RTP 2004 Regional Transportation Plan SCAG Southern California Association of Governments TDM Transportation Demand Management USC - United States Code .4 Southern California ES -9 Draft 2004 RTP PEIR Association of Governments December 2003 1- LL J N CC) . 0 m ?� +. II d a r W • U Co C/) C Q J C �I C C/)' Ca C1 N 22 1 ..r m U CL N g 1 1 t- a ° E rx to OF o � Iv oO 0 W p N r C!) Cq N o I- .i O W m V W Z D o 0 v) X a 2a . W Z at 1 -a > o w0 03 3 1c c = W' U P. 03 1 = U to 1 C C 3 In C ii) u) F Q 0 N 'O 3= 03 s O O m O a p. m ' LL O A _ o N C O U C cc m U CO O Z c a O. N y ICI C m p W O C C 1 a m W E E 0. 03 .0 E - m 03 i N _ � > H 0 03 . 0 V) = U 4NyiA C «. L N O O. W (1) U.. W - Q ai I L U - ,' .o c - E� �o,mo U h 8 W 0 • ° O Q • C U 1 O U W p U C W O ° O W C C 0 1 tn 03 V> O O O y 0 0.N RS I iilEH fi a) Li c m ° U lii m 0.` 1 I! 0 ' U W N ! I ! • c` o C W - U U O. 3 `• L- 0.i O C C O C = Q U • U 2 o E U a) 2 cm es a C id ° a) O C O W u, U Z- a co =- 0 U 1 O L Z a) 0. 2 a) _ . W ° 1 O C U 0.o �- a'� o a a. w c -m v 2 Eu E. =a - c L.- -- a n c aU W cn-C >. L 2° m U a) m o • W c 2.0 E m u V) • N W . a 6 C rn w C O Q) y - . E E y W W U L y _ 0. .0 ` in °� 0. r) 1 N /V w O N N m m C C 'O W m m co co a W H U • E= U C L L W L 7 y N N V ) _ 0 O W - C m y U C 0 O m .° W a m W m u c c m u) N m= N C W m E y >s` = C m O- ... C O p O_ co' C CO O W C m N CO ' m > m W C W 0 w • E W U m3 a)00 . . 0 fc m W ca in -E L al c am cn a m iCa. •." C O y W (� W N m co Y .p W m m U W W U j m W Y N ° E = m W O � a Q E � c m in c L ya � u 9 rn0 C 0 0 c C O Z � c ... D (`-a" m In O U Cn C O.0 1 m p In W w m a co O 0 W co O 0 .= co 0.` di' ' y C) E C G > N C J @ 0 C h � f CO 0 0 0 O m 0 O 1 � H C° m N U C C 03 1 a L O o -o H fa in . E U W U 3 a O y 0. VI V • N m 7 V d m y 0 m 0 0. .e...0 W m U N C N E. C1) E E L oZ' �acn�0) a� m�oi w m )-0im� -C oma a,d Ec m 5 a� u o Ea 0. II UT 2 a) E tl N mT _ N0C`FyEcca ,0omEm Na u m v = _ 0 o° m cn C m am N m o E M O.= - C O) W O c - CO m -I V) 0. C -° U a c 0. W O o. °1 H W m g a o W o U 1 m CL am u m ,� 9 .. 0)m I m rn ° ii- .. 0 4 0. W o .. W N a 7 Q 0. 3 .0 fa 1- y 0 .0 O N .0 N Q y W W C p m C `t N `� a) e ms - N r t C • r U O N C N W -' cc cd o > c 0) ° c m ' - a) E 0. o� •.-. Er• p ` E� a h4. a E m a et c c a m d ma °`� c c = W � ° � ` ~ 'v a m cam f0`� v M ma W to .. S g o c m c d ca a 2'2. 2 00 0 o a in E U2 E £a H 6. r ° m a N .. W C ' O C W X m C O 2 w oQ W u)) • Ey W o d W c a N v �cc a0O • o ° - c o o f 0. rn 0 C N> °- ° to C O Cr 1 To N W 7 N = O L O y Oav y N - E _ 3 O 0 . W c co O C C mmc °" ° °°° co m> -c -5 c �`o - C3W '50 03 co H 1 cL ° 5. -o u) 0 0. c m W. -C 00 U c m al . 0 03 1 f U) ° m ° ,_-7 ' c o aic m = � _N� Q CO Up ° �L - E.�o E QVI _ m H mE Em �. w _W:°- m m 9o C ° m °'" cL a) C W O. 0 N 0 �_ N ' O. O O v 0.V = m Ifl W - - W ° m Q E > in ¢ m L 7 0 W .. c N o L y y 1 U O W to e- m 1 0 N .... O(3 M Q C aEn o mac - amiEy % : C 1 0.i a m 0 Q I•i 03 0 C7 N W -o I6 p C F- 10 u) 1 � ` J o @ � u� N > u -, m Y+ II , .� . C> O) m C N C r aoa E = o m Q EEM - N U F EW In - I- s rn J N tn C u) cn E. cc c. >- 1— = - -7 o CC -I r C co co d N a o a 2 a ce E a) tc .- a + o u W O N ix N ❑ > 2 = 0 y u) ,-- U Z O J to W X a W c - p o W a� ui x a � U F- N 7 0 ' $ o m O 1- C s o 6 ,1 N a) >, 0 CD N N a Z Q a o c a N a C d p a C N a-0 a C O co aa)) �Q(7 m 3 c u,v o )m c E m y c2 ' U F_ C O p) 00- c >, 0 0 ' 0 E >. O p O V o U ..- O CO • o u.. c 0. al a) m o C `) (-�C ;u E c oy o m a) al O N 0 W a) a O d o a a) C o N ? 0 'C O O a 0 a N C " u) LL U N E N C o n .O 7 O) O U _ 0 a) o 0 o L O c = o o N O L O p . U N O o N Q Q F- c,) O) c o a .� f- a n y C a) E co N c 7- 0 u uiQO F- . o o (=o as c c 3 0. w a° C ❑ ,� m p co C N L (a C a N y C E p- 0 0 (a a) E C O co 0 t O y C N c o o •- U 0) 07 E o N a N, C O o C a) O O N a) c Ul N > o c (0 0 N U .. c U a -C c a U W E a`) a E > a c N = m O. E , _ ' S E E= E O) a ° f° CO v c 0 U- o o o c o O . a - D - c a)E -,no g p a o c �" C U C C a) U C U N 7 C.0 a) 7 0 (� N p a a N N in Of in O) >. (a U • E 0 V o cc U r N O ° C O U C O N y N . .2 p p E C (a O C a y C U 6 O o> O o C c 3 0 a Y m - .c N o 7 _ - p) o o a) c 0• a) 0- U o@ c a _a) IN n• N a) N C Q C O - a a) a) Ecc N W w E O• C.3 a � CD 0 3 N t N C y in cc aa)) c a) c N ` 3 ▪ a) `" O1 . u G! U) N-o a) o U a m n ' c a i5) N i Tfo c r c c. 3c �' ._ ° o f° o 0 7 = a 7 y o a 6 a ) m > E o a Q N a) 2 N 0 0 0 la O) a o C • to w c ny m� o o E O nyOU LUvL m� N� Q r o 7 °) m ill (a Q o o N a c,) u) - as rn E o N 3 U c E C a) W p _ c C) m a) y c. n n o r 7u = 7 a o o N a) N N e . ' 7 a • c cn E o 'C co c Z C N N o a o N o N N y C C 0 L C t o w N 3 a 3 m.0 >a a • 'c c o c V) 0 - 0 O O O a) . c ' o O o a (0 o C - O o. V 7 a) d N c Tr, I- c N a) a) O • a N u a) N O n C ( P. c N rn 0 C7) O N O` c 0 ? > o _ U N En Q o a E N (a N O` U O a c 7 O c O y C Y 3 10 G 0 N 0 v a o 3 N p C N - v) CD Ea) a a 0 meo cm mam c0, a) � m U �.... oEo =7.3` m oc W F- o i' n 0 ° O' L rn w a) 7 c y a c y 3 N C Q N m J O) 0 E E m a o E- m) m m 0 o o( d 0 3 o' NN u a 3 �(7 c a o Il a in 1,2 E a O 0 .O H o O E U L" C ' = a N t O • Ol o c N P? o y y o cr m-I (n („7 E - _ )` 7 ' 0 0) N C o N 7 L N a c C N , C7 C R o O (` fa 7 N n o o. C N Ur N 0) (D N (7 c C O N = ,_ Q> O. a o N o y ° rn c ° Q _ - Q _ .0 3 c N c a) u o ( U t a) c E '--13'-° - 1 : 5 u E `o E 7 aQ U c oU c a U m e @ a o c .o 3 rn•c ci, ti 0 c a C 7 O O u. N - C O d� 0 .... C a co - o 2 c o O C io O- CL u _ „ c 0 )a 0' a , - a) ai ili .0 m X ,c N a7 N N D a) N N a) NE Q N E O N(ha 1-4 el o Mt))a(.7 O O 0 �0e -fa ( 0 r .= V r 0 C C O SP r • . i- r' a a= = r C O. C E r C - " c C O (+i " W - ac E" a C i or) ' d c E °) N .- N 0 C .- 2 - w N D ' 00 O - v o E ao 0 N 2 `m m2 w c ° mL c =2 ( -a c u u 22� rngc� o ° a2) -i E2Et u 7 ) 3 a • N o • N C a 0) o a a a) 0 0 'O 0 ce N -M c o f c 0 W m a a a ) ) a 0 0 F m N d N - O o \ C`,- 7'00 C N > 0 c c U o N Q N U ayO C = o O o .> OCe '0 N .0 0 2- N C - 0) O R w a) I- N L a (a N E •C V p y a 0 G E U a ) N O E v o) 7 o a m m o)o�.c m e a) m o N f`0 0 3 2- ° _N 0 ( p .c N o - V a L p (� (i U a) a) 6. m y O N c c c oo 'c m U C Q 0. O. CO C a C 'O • • c- 2 0 0 0 co L y F C fa O y .r ) u 16 U > . E U a U U L O .0 O a) o a) o O y N_ 0..c C as C j Y N? - G 7 N rot 3 a) a = o - a n m o ¢ E 0 r n < I- n3 m N o. E 3I- c = 3 3 ° m¢ O) N U ( 0 0 - N 7 c CO E ) r c 7 > WO' N d U CO a) ri 2 N a) a m 0 co a) F- o � { O J o a N •� N • 5 O N a C C 7 Y + 11 , (a N..- C CQ C O 0 c o 7U.0 5 o rnC U u) 1 - cc N1m ~ r to - JNan C CO CO F. "� LC o r ) .'. W O Q -i c to (1) a N 12 2 a v �a 0 a c V im ) °co Iv 1I c W QN CC to cn N 0 M 7 .2 - U U Z O J W . X a W O m - o c m '3 - m o W r a) E a o - o o ° - c T.5 c c >,� o co a Z Q 0 > N 0 >.,. (5 a C O323-e2 a c a H - y : ° C a) a ii o 0 a to I-QC7 a t 5 3 a1� 0 o a)� m y to _ y -c E C CU o:UF- c 6 0 (53 = : ° 0 c CD E o n�a rn U) in -O 0 co m 9 Q LL f6 0 o c U .p c -= .p tN - c 3 0 N a ) E I n 0 0 y 0 in 0 0- E C.c E to CD co ''' O O) E a u '50 0 0 0> 0 ( 0> O.c d O N 0 0) u) C Q t a F•- N V O . N N H N N a D L u°07) c O a 0 V) )6 N .0 o .� D N - iii >1,E,7,--0 1 N 0 0,-02)-c).0 .1.4 LL < a E'y ►- c H 0 1 � .0 aI Ef- - 0 u aI- 3 wZ .2 _a a) 3 c.o 3E aCC 3 w Q Q O - C co c O • 0 '45 )0 0 C 7 L 0 C C • = E 0 O O C S 3 y t U y C ` oy� (° 2 E y V °, 1 0u3 co ;n - (!) - a in 0 a) o_ z-1 V) C 0 y .- 0 ' FLOC f dE cN 'u 0 �3 co U O a1 E� - y C C= U O. Q _0 O. a.- ul 0 CO O y !: N y -. Q a L N T O C . 00 - Ea. 0 t0 0 C) , c (nit m 0 u ) m 0 = rn" C V - O y> 0 cc] C ' O C 0 U - a) P) 0 -0 O N a> 0 O Cr C to W 0 a E CO r 00 0 to E E> a 0 y Q in C = = c� o 0) t ai in • E m m o- y!fl o yQ ai c CO Cfl Q EE0= _ .co ua 9 C O 0 Y) y • 0 C 0 U 0 c C 2 L 0 C c 0 0 = 0 0 m c a 0 0 0 7.-., c (n O O 3 0 `� m t.w-c o'u N a) o ��rt Q: ao o • m Q ` o d= en °t;a .0c - • ya c )c` E 0 , R r C7 o t c a £o r o 3 dad y a c i Q 1 D - n c` a c u) g i= 3 m e E °)$ acc"ra5 y a1 0 0 `o m aEi mJ o) W �d m y_ E a 11 11 in r w o 5 2 t a) ay E `-° 0 u•- Z E (o a o o m y c 2 U 02 mm o o = m M O t °7 V U 0 0 "0 y 0 (2 °-' 0 y E U 0 c a� °� N y N D .o � ' v E NU cn O1cd y E a c U _ E a)a o ° o ova F- r ra c ▪ N y C c E E 0 N a) -0 n D O N gr Ny ONNy0 -OW N C '> C - N o o w m 0 ) 0 ) � c in c oL.o 5 � D n u, N 2 co .. E2� To 3 a m2 E. a_.- m5 a. a a O O c 00 cr u s , W I- a'L �,) N N O a) C , 7 3 vL x N - 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 1- y CO ,- E 0 O1 N O a s D al f- N O o •• G • o 0 p 0 c 0 a_ O a E L O F C N O C o 0 c o W a o 7 C y E •E 0 0 - 0 C O C at w co d C c 'C -c c.c y y a c 0 2 co E2'5 E y G 0 a j a7 a 0 Cr N y a N 0 ,J) t = E y0 Ea QE> ( cn 0 C 0 ra co = •o 0 C 4- to c N j a a1 la Q 0 .0 N- 0 N O in E N ~ E 5 ri � > ci 3 5 c 10 c7) 3 y U U 0 Y+ 11 ■ ∎ . c a ° taa m co c a) � ay) a� a a c ri � 3u E n3c • • J F- =a) v N N N •a — E tr } _ = Et -.1 .- 4 c � N CL 04 M a V I- 2 w oa I� v o 0 LU - 0N V) N N o 0 11 W Z O u) N V) a ` X _ C v _ >. W W N aN o O N ,,-0 c ° c -c a ) • E ° m> a) N U F- u 2. C C .0 a) O ' N w c .c y L N y N C O c m 7 a) C O >, 0 0 N 0 u) F a - Q( 9 F O E 0 c u E m m .2 4= = m :3 m a y�v d -• m = a ID t E u c u c L t c m ... • E m c UF_ CCa...o - ca)m o ucoiU) NC °mmc cN ° c oLL� oa > OivCy °.c>,m>.up° - ;� CD a) m oZ o N m.c. c °,, m a� m N E c u° m m a) o = -o = a) = m v m a i N0 � o m °? �ti m n °_ m E m o any a � ° n o 0 o d ao) ° 0 o c m (1C ) F- el N LL L .c ° C °-c E -c - m L �•- F X O O E N Q Q F CS"- CL CO N... - E F- m� m nt a) co E 3 co 'w E � m :?D� N C N N so- 0 s. C O 3 N m m a - 3 ° 01 a, p N a v c ° 7 N = v 3 N= ....-_• c > > N C a) = aci a) � 0 5' 5 0 ° ° a, a c-0 m RI o C a C m E n° O w o .c o al r o m E O m ` m U N 0 n N >. • co N as m C 2 -c CO U 3 as .- N m o o ° N p N C Q- `p - -p a v C cw a - p_ N a m rnE 0) `m m E „c E ° E C do o �oErn�mc oE d ° C > ° � o -a 3y,�ucoiaNim m m� =�m c cm •- C o M N c m� a; o " y y. - c o (a N o ,_0a)v, al c E c7 2Em = 07 ° �a� c m a i W o `a c'' a)c a x i°C. 0 m ` a o vi°mowo 3i m o ae p >, E m p na c m m u m o C� o in E:r> p)0) 2 o 'r c -) u m c u i to 0) N _cL-mn - - 2 0.oc-m to - u u) m m Q 2cm d . N m' ° o a im ° co m ° �' °- cm c C ►- RI C a) W - ° i ca O C 0 � - 0 m t C C o _ ff E .=- -> c C C G m L mz.°u 00c c a)N p `C O) in 0 O c c E -c _ co c « as �5 ° c EL c m L c m mo N a a dcc >rn N t 5 E m en RS as 0 am �OO��dy . Mm - � 3 �u c �ma) a)0c W ID ° o E�� m _ c v M E� c E y E c c o 0 0 mJ it - • Cn N+ ' E C 2 m u N .c E 13 r N N ° o co "- 0 l0 u a -o - CO J V) ) v a E a m c o °- rn� m r 8 2 a, w 3 c -o c o d o c- E c c a c m rn w � O. o.c c 0 E a w E m" m E = N N C 10 m rn 3 . •-• 0 2- a) 2 c • m M 0. C D t a) . o c a 0.. �,3 c E N,: ° N- Cp o E E ei 0 v) O1 w r o ff CC m V C N .a N E C O N f 20 N L O N U 3 3 ` C 2 M O N M > d F --0 M c m 7 F -o N a m v m . m m p-m m pa m a) o° N as o N•o o c _ _c c c co E -o 2 a m °ia 0 m� c ` Ng a N of a E�:� m m2 E °Iv 2 m2cG E a 2rt 2 E...412 i- x a O >, a) 0 -130 O O O F- 0 IX .0 C c7 m a) F- N et in W N 7 N C N y U ' a > 0 a N C N E a) C C N o y m o T a E me E 3 d m u o v h C 1- 0 _ to m N mc a ,5 -o cc E w c - o j: m c j w 3 .0 c c m N ` O .c '_ 7 = n, C N p-0 T 7 F- V O p V F- E m E 4 " C c c �) p U Q a m U CC tO Q o V N C m 0 0 V N m N a c • a C U o) en `) >, - C N >, A O a) u M - N m a) C V 0.0 a) 0 C d a C C m.c > m 0 = N To � m E E 3F- c m ` c c E o a, °3 `m¢ f') •O 0 N L.+ N 7 U a al >.. -• m N N c >5o N a r _ N>r a(nJ T m .... a) c a) c7 ° E m .m � ° c 0 X m - c � + II u O. E N 0 0Nm aw.- • o c F- m Nm o N 0 ° N EQ m? 7°- a_0 0 a� 0 h E 0 a O c U- O r) E° E o _L u m 0 e) F- - C N N 0 eh _ N F- M .0 01 J N c o C - Y. --E cn r 1- = et M Q (1) U) a N a `� a m I -0 n m r a a V) IS 0 1-- . p c . W 0NW U) (n N > 2 z= O U O. , + L1.1 Z ° (n (n X a W 0 a) a) C 7 U > y O N N L 'O' c U �. , L N csi 01- �o c 3 >.a) ~as E > a Eo� mEa -a -E mrndcoE aZ m nF- t a)2 0 . o u y.c a) m CO c m o CO >T >. o u v, t o a) > I n 1- Q (9 > a _m 1- _C > C •- a) m .0 > a) O a) >. m a) -° m E o d ca d tX oF- o a) " c c • c m . c °a ? E a) c � o- > v X c v.r • m om? E as y c 3 o m LL .O 3 p y 0 L> N a) N O CO CD y C E- 0 7 `a O a) In - a) '.2 a) L y 0 ca a) c in y y C E - w L ca oZ a) . M� en y E E 7 c c a) a) o °, ° - :o .o � _, 1- - y 3 E 0 c c d " S i a� a, o ✓ N 0 W 0 'r N 7 2 C 2 a) -a :` a y a) a) -- 3 y>)) E p 'O y T d >, a) (n a) a) :2 '. >. w U) LL X a) y X U 0 0 a N O m N F- 0 0 > H c�7 O L a 3 U a7 n ' N O m N - p a Q Q a)> 3-JD rna)F- c 3 a E- mw cm a) -oL «N 3 cn - vo-a u) Et m al dv Q C y ' CO a) m + y „ N O y y C a) U O 4- -2 Eo yEcy c 2 �m U c L O a) 713N= O E N p 0 p 7 a c F E� a) c L d m o E a 3 a�i a) co 07 U O L C° a) a) a) CO ` m a C ra H `O G a) o a u , E a) E a) ° c -L m n. .c to IX 3 ��.c >a'°r c a) .1:3 0 `ma) v cu o aa)i c u ° o rnno o. v, co U �'c a o y cn E c rn a)C 1n� m a) m E N >_ 7 - o y c . 7 • l u c L ( ` p ° N c 0 - L -p 7 V 713 n...1- y N O 0 W m e vi ..- y o c ai x ... - a a) Q' y O E 'O N O C L O C O CO C t • v O i v = i �a o) a01C C, 0 m-0 . . > E C C -'4 m o ° N a) W Q f0 d -6 .: N y E. 0 f” O) E° v a) U C U) N m O y L V d C co 03 VS 'O . O ' N E X aJ O U N C U) O O 1 a -- -c -E �� m c oc co Q V L y _'0 C Y C O r O p a) N O> N U L al c Tr c - 3 C F N C co a E E M - ° N r a) 'BOON y a) N N U e LL E J C W C a) m 9 , 0) � . O O C N 7. C w ` o m 11 U) 1.4 C O A` C MI O C a) y O u) a t J C C C O C O .‘al N II U) II ✓ .-. - 7 i y O C O N . E L C L CO J V) a a , L O a) a) E d `� C to c O N= a) O. C ' "' u 7 o 'a a> E O a) 0 CO o - E y c C o C ° u a' c%j O ` U 7 O „O„ N U - CO CO C c `) d C O> E C T N 0 O N p E C E y C 'a 1— y U a y y= p U .- C O O L C O .. IX u) F- C O N N 7 E ' C d O l . 7 y a . Tat =2 o O n a) y a u m a 0 m > p , m 7 O. C C 7 H .my a a a) i "a O) w O N EG �co -2u.-o g6u3G 110_o 1-- y a) m a) c m o et CD C � 0 .1:1 7 CO O 7 C C - y F la- N CO O -C -C , O 8 U ( 0 ) a y C t- 3 o 0 3 > c 5 o_ a E O a) C m N m a) O C N O E L a O N L W 7 L a O> u 1- y c c o Q) : C N � V O L p C7 H 01 Ofya' O a p c` a) C/1 p c` L 0. ` O - O 0 Q c al E L o a) O E �- N U o IL N ca > 0 a p _ N c C N a) m a E a) y E 'a E m .0 L C -= C O r L ... > 0 y O L C L [0 y a O cn in cn O = y n 0 Q E > (n Q N L O •e"� O) O N N N Q c'7 ' U a ca - c. o I+j N U C U 0 (n d a) C a) J u c ca c ac 3 um" l +II a) cA d a s 1- a aa 73. " u) c � E in-a- o 1- t rn J • N c m m m y F. `E cc r') � c m m m y aN - 2 a i--.o a m v a a) W O N ~ J - m m N N 0 > 2 W F- u v 0 U Z O J J m • W X a. m W ' O in T v 10 0. 9 tea) I a) v cdy vc uF- �°)c"i m N.0 - - p c co o � a m y 'w a f0>.c"i c a 75 0 . a) i - - .c - - v ? c mgr 3 E in d y 3 > 03 ai > tO m ` m c c U h' 3 >,— N a) C • c O N 0' a) m `+ as a) Ti y N L Z' o O 2) too O LL ^ 2 t . L •' o ' 3 E. p ) O 51 N C V u N c _c 8- y o d •V y y o O 2 y N o> .= I 7 c in • N y a) >. '° C d mom• " c m y 01 7 o o d y0 W y � m (9 W uac0>c—a amNacd>•". 0)' co''3 �c _ a)7ca)2c ° n�d=a)2r o )� a)c '� U7 LL .'' a) E in 0)a)F C 'O N yF- .0 N O 0 E .0 3 a F- ,ON 3 F- .0 3a f U Q Q ` a) a) o 8 O d N .c N E o to -` _ E to) v o w d F- L. 0 a) = . O. m y Cr Cr > o E 2 7 o 2 2 v 3 o u . N d d 2 0 m U -o c a3 co m 5 f y O A a L N 2 d j ('7 c 7 c y 7 7 N O N U d O t0 CO O N 7 U) W O. o'o E _ E c w c n c c ca) U) • u) co y Y 0 O N F 5 m a3 0 d W g G p O o c c o - - Ti = Z o cc E E o o rn m • o - c = c 2 co g) 2 ra cu - Nv Z Z CO ca it c r m < E m o co vc my- C1 H a) C .o " •V .0 a) co N J o7 W - c a) m Z- a m 2 0 c u v a 0 m mix a � � II V) - O ` N N ' a) Tr m JU1 R o to CD a .0 E o L. _ 'O N ~ U L -9 u _ O O y L 2 F- ; w u , 0. .- 0 - 3 M .T• pr m o U � 15 N N c U 1- 7 .0 co 0. O. O - 0 ra C �-C E E E aad o a02i:,~ c t .c .c u a N EL 41 > i- F .. F- I - C L ce a d� a o °' > ► a - = ° , i"7 Y °11 c tx u.1 cc _ f0 �'-'N c > N >, O 0 a v ° m a m da a) a) -o- o c oa)c c in F- RI o o ` o d ov o E a� c RI N O N y Nrn 3 y a) 7 C C O O Q1 CU .. L in = E a Nom` N co 1 1) F- = CL O C o c5 - ` in o o 2 o a > = co w •= _ — y 2 o m C7 C N O N j C O j C C O` O- U U' N O. L O_ al c O V =°�v' = °-3:�° 01 0) t- aa, Ea c c Q c c c� c o rn a)- 0 o > � y a c Q. a) 0 3 0 0 E m a) u) `' S ` CU t/ d r o • E o y yv n. x o•-. ' x u o c QE o -a a o y a'L E0 (0 a=E(0 > cn< 7 c > rn info dL io- dt E 3'o F- N- o ` •4: _co c I mo c c o Q °2 E y t ; > - E y i-i = a = in o O r i o 2 0 ) a . m o (9 m3 V 0 y N v v y CO u U N (00 3 m N Y+ u .f.,• - a 'O Y a) a) a)�'o O- C0_"O O- C Nr U)L C c • o 0 -� a u E °-o u o -o 0 0 o E 3 3 o E 3 m o u E 3 0 u U N 0 0 0 -C 05 J N cn C (n CO F. • r = _ -7 ' - © Q' Jam . ,.. co 11 8 2 E �, C/3 a N a a � � CO '5 o) F ±. m o 0 > o N IY f n N 0 I o m O 4: v 0 W Z ° N m X a Lt.! _ Z _ O 0 " o v CD m Vr' c a) '.2 CL Z CZ a re ap c m 0 m0 3r ca ° A UH _ N N w t7 LL a) o O O 0 u a O m m o Z a , EN 0o7A^ a U N W N a) al CO O) N G 0 a m 'C > N = m w u) LL a `''' a) U m N m o O) C „ N Q Q Q E m E E c E v E a 7 0 Q m 0 O ch C C A 1 N C 'o N C 01 • - T • 00 °o f0o a m° > To D a rn 0 m ` m o a E- 0 O o v" 0 CU .c ° m 0 rn - u_ o 0.o c c co 0 0 y m c .` co O L U C 0 Q O T U m m l ° O v ° ) ' c m LL V) -ta O. t y C N C 0) V 0 cc N Is- C^ a) N m E > , a c 0 0.c l0 = c 0 Y m C 0 ` ' -C 7 C` c 0 o f 9.1. m •-• F L D N ev ev m t > 0 0 O 'I= ... E 3 `� �' m a ) m v CD . sr ~ � 0 c2 m e p Ot mrnrnoo =Q m S m m U rn 0 aNv ) 0 2 a -rn rn00 ) - r ,, �c. 3 L f= in ' O '-' E o U y 0 c a C-- C 0 • c N c Q co L _t. 0 = C z if) o) co N c a > E a _ N ) c mo ..21- c c m cao mUou mo ` tn N y °: o - mc lu-0 - N 3 1 -- a) y 0 m ~m In CC N y -o m 0 0 7 0 m e 0 0 u O • 0 N j 7 CC 2 O N y C. m m e y` !n N N u) >. N U Q N y N c) m N N E N N N N V m N N - U _a a L i_ m c G) Q 0 a y Cl " N O ° E 0 C N m° rn m m E ^2 > m t o c a) m 0 M N N c O C CC co 2 2 oo a ci 0 o i �� O�E ��cmmoo� oaa)i °m ol > E c - 1 O O ��`v _ , L O�E "° ' Ey E ° � T �0 0 y a F a'm nc0 I 0'o yo �n p • a ,- C u c a- c a 0 �` = u o N E v o c E c c rn a ' ° 0 > m a �d c t 0 n M 77 L.- 0 u� g �N 5Lm to (7 __m c _o)• OC J 0 2aN- 07-0 - c CD Z DI o U N '7 cr) `2 1--- E f° ° °)yam > 0 d u *a ISt w W c N �.d a > o E c m �v Q Ucn d E o ° 0 •>, N d a ) 0 m J 0) m a > N m a) E— • 5 O c a N CO 7 N d-0 O 2 U > = N 0) 11 fn w U O m m t c c C -° U l m m o M CD U Yl -U . c U o c i o. o o E > c m 0 0 .2 c O i a N i � m m E E n L E m m y a a Q t u) 2. a > o L U - o o 0 3° co L 7 7 O en mi E L N o O m c a) E C m y N 1- C N = in .7CO F- a) y 0- o N L y m a) 0 0 E O C a m c c m m N E t- m m _rn a c` m 'O 0 - m m 0 > 0 Ct c N c co in ° N y N Q U m N N rn co N g N 2 = F - I - CO F- o- O m Mo oi4 U a m > d d o N E 0 m O N N - 0 y 0 N p — d • • • • • M O „o - N N C m @ N E N • • • • • • O to a Ea � m 0 ' - ° °U w°E O W a w cr a) aE .2 co N N 2 m 2 tn u) c) E E ° a) amU E H t o c F W 0 M 0 uj C N < O rn 0. 3c ` o ° ° o XI Et N O C a cu H N ca ^ c c 4 v 0 ° n a m c O �t N C4 N U m c m w C E c ° a N 2 E O to o 0 a) N ms a m N N L N > a3 � o c 0 0 N 0 C 0° CL o V mQ t) 0 ' ` `p . (� U O - 0 E o a_ I- aE o Q E c a) c y E am UC co a 0 00 = _ m N a C 2 m o ox `l ym c c c0 > o a) E o 0 R 0 E : 0 D a),. o N _ 'J c uj U O C Q C > w < • l o r 2 N r - N mQ 7 0 .-- a x 3 ea N i C7 a c 3 ri O a, C 7 N _ N _ o w o m ', Q u u — N m m ( j m Y+ u a , co ca v as `� E U r .c C0 + J N a5 C a -& cc n - Q J ° C cn (n a N 5 a a � � 5 ° IX E W O N rX r 2 I- U p m + .. W Z ` O v) u) • X a . p 0 a)0 p 0 m 05 c V F y v n. 0 t j - Y 0 U an 1 0) a�a ,° 030 .- ° c c 3 . ° m ° v X ;° Q E 7 0 E 3 - 0 • m m o 0 0 o 7 d 0.'"'• (1) a 7.1 oci o 0 m u - a) to m y 0 N v 3 X c ° ZNH a 0) NNW a) ° =0 0 C DCa� ya Q a Q E•C E'y 7 Q E m E E= a'O CO U a- a)- 20- U ,- L cc c 0 c m_ EE o c coc 0 a o 3 N y- C r y 0 0 y 0 --o 0 N 0 O a y C U N la t 0 A to .- to c> O ' ° c "C I- O a o 0 ' O O la 0 C O 0 t o n ' g LI E = u m E .c E = E E (U - y a 0 p m rn a) N m ° -' co U � d 0 c w 0 C a , a) y O y a > u) V m = a E — 3• m y ai o ° U 0) 'a 0- (/) m C N E A 3° 0 O u N o y w 0 C E„ ° a ° -° o a co L c= ai u) N � pS a ` E N p� 0) m c o S°y t c y ILI co N C u) C " a) O C 'O c „ O N ` p C 0 O) it IY = a) 0 0 0 - N _c c a) O) y y a) ca L p 7 = U -c -o y u) N V to > „o U C . p E 0 'O C to F c m o as ° y'a ` _ a y -� CO Q C N a 0) O) = O t U a N N 0 .c N U C a) W O U O) 7 V a) 4 l = > 0 a t0 C C N C a C t c C- 7 0 C ' 7 C r') N al a -, h - 2 p in Z N 0 0 3 ) d v CO 0 o 0- 0 N 01 ' O N N U o O o 0 y m 2 > c N - o� •0 0 m m c o H 0 c v 0. a) ° a) w rn a v a) m to a= 0 p ) Q .- N a) al .c c 0 0 0 ( a o` 0 U 7 C 0 0 N 0 ° N y . U0 F.: v ia5�M u E N° c° ° c c F E c N d N Q ` to Q N 0 d > _ rn 3 > c m °7 rn W y 0 0 p C 0 W - y C . 0 m a > .o '0 m c� o) O 0 m° 50) 77) 1°- ti 11 �fn V if) N p = 0= cow to Q E a N L 0 fa C Y 0 E N E 0 a7) J u) m o N .c 0 ° c a E i c p i _ cc0 - as �o E� F? �3 Um w e odN • 0. 0 t C O L N a) E _ "' c c> 0 >. tri N .y. > U d E m a $ m� T y 3 a) c Hoy 0 CU ac- -- v m y - � :? E1- c pv a ff� E y ° 3 m at CO co Q ° �- �Q y y " c�Q N CL 1- C O 0 c N 0 N • C 7 0 'O O)a o•(0 y .Q O)Ua.C;= `'C -.0 N y O O ~ C 0 •a• c � E m - -= 2 S V O V yvs � .2 • Cr N a N c • • • • • a) O- c - a) •O t• 7 O ` ri a) P' N .0 O y N cnE N I- _.X m Q a) u ) U o a- To' UJ2 U2 N 22 N ..... ta2 N o 1- a .4- F- - 0 a w 0 = 0 W 0 = O 0 N N m m 0 0 am 3 daN U 0 c CC N p F � N 1- J 3 0 as C N • O •0 N d co m °) -° > a_0 o. E N O E o d m o m. to -oa 0) m > t ` 0 = y N C C — N C C O a) -. o- C O O v a t ` i' a m Q 0 y ` 2 m Q O -o 2 E E. a V o 2 N 0 0 0 O N N 0 E 0 N - U to 0 5 0 . U C 0 p E j G O ca _ o ° c r c m Q E> C/3 Q o m m Ai o E v d z 2 E N `" 4. el T a) C M r a) a J O N m O O 0 V 0 Y t II i Ar fO a o m >'•E a o v d E E Ii c E E 5 c • = L III Iv JN)1Y C CC m - 1I W co Q - . y a N M a v a m a) = E F u) � O 1 " c c 0 i w p N CC 0) N a) I V f` . D o y Iv p U w Z `O co X a w Z c w a) - O p m e U . V �c = o a)c m 30 a) a aZ< 7 c�c,o c m > E O ;C co O) N co O • a) a L t - f0 aa) I.- Q U~ C ? 2 3 E a E o m m O co c m ICI cLL - F a' � m o� am o ` o d o 3 > ° ° c m oZre cc co cc a E u) " °a p - ° • = N O 7 j0 C N U O m _ CD N H O> a a G .c C0 07.0 a) w m w 0 M d M N O d O Q Q N L a) - 01 Q O E m E -O a Y . M) 7 0 6 C y Ia a) 10 N C 3 C O Z' N o 0 C go N L 0 0 c O a) a) U '� d a -. 7 co C in 7... L a CO to X 7 • 0 - 0 N N a) O N Ch w c a w 3 co rn a) a) —O o `mL CT) 0 a o ;� O N U E N O N a to C . E 0 tT ?. N V) C a d am 3 ?� CI f0 a) yL aC — t lD Cy— ? a O va. U "E 5 .- 3 mco L u3 73 CO L.) - U- L ' ..0 0) 1:1 N -- • T L -a) a to y L t d Cr) a) m 7 N ° rn 3 _ 7 N cn w • ¢� -�o� O ND ur w a > o a�0 j O u °�Z' ° o v i i rn m 1 2, w E 0 > m o.a w o c" Qh > > L L a� ° m c p E 8 c a c a) c m w cs L i° N E ° E _ a 0) a - a ,s -- am ° 3 a 7 m m " 0 c w ° —o CU a) rn a) m y a 7 To o 10 w c w a i ? 12 O ai c c)) -- 7'" E c o L w m — O O a co m N`— a r t y o Y m 3 c- m o c m c co Q co °co = w U ' 1 c o W oCO -0 a)oa .,a E �Lm CO �7 y E p o o p p o a) 0- a w o �c co o a c y th C F- a w ' n ▪ N N C •� C c ^2 `� a) " C N O O U d . ° ) .- L f 0 ° V C > X N C X a a) - CO J O7 w a) a) D O m C a 0) N 3 0 C) l0 O a) O a7 a) t_ 11 U) w N a U p C N y C y > VJ ° N a O N o o N 11 11 ✓ to ° ° m to " C a) 0) a) l0 N L a) a) co •_o Of CO J fn • E L' 3a ow E 7 N m O " > (� J > N co " N N a a > U N CL co '5' U �°-� w a 2 y0- o E a E co 0 7 17, N c „ c a) " o U rn 1.- f" 1 ° C rl .c c -0 1" 1 a) 7 1 ") O th O 1+1 v"l C w co cn • • 3 C re To -o • O) a >• j . V .4. L.) v O C U° I j O " 4- E M L a g m m (%,-,c2 a) .o o t c O o c . 2 .0 a g a 5 N EG3 *La)cDEgc c oZE O2 a) c c o2 5 w I CC a ch o ce w L 0 N O co • c.) O o E p ~ y co f0 U a) a) a a1 f..• 0 7 X C 0 2 8 C a) E - ma) aoa E C C N 2 E . ° Y : L a) a 10 > Ta L— o N- C O 1 0 y U a L O CD V o 7 ` G U '� O Q d d co ( c a E 3 0)) w a _ m m E— N o f0 C w O C N - 1 ° n d co > m O L O N _ y = O Q E a) O N a > Q v -o A m w \` et r c8 c E '7 C h M U` to J " 0) o >, Y + II U a . a t ` O U H a O — • J N in c 0 N fA > - v or) - Q - C C/3 N N d N I g a m E _'oI_ v Iv )v o 0 W ON N N N N O > 2 1- T.) W Z O N m CO X 0. W Z _ a 0 O O a) a ca ' O O O X O o a O. - > •p ._.+ CD CO to FZ< a) c w� m �n > E c00 > yo ° c E m o 0 0 3 c o ° cn > Q' 0 F- a7 U 1I! IIIJ 11 1UU k 00 ' > C > c V O ° a -�.orn� � � a c i �2�'� L N C7 w Ix a O O • C f .- a a) O O a C O •c rn ." v °Z m d 3 h m o a H E E I- U 3'm a Q Q 4- 0 2 °- r O C C O aJ c ° a) N. ° o r- O m 0 0 O CO O. p co =If.) _ w . o y o -tea m �' ALL ' N 3 u w a - a7 L O o ui :C ca Q) O O • U . 0 ,n 'i O a) Q N C a) co U O O H a) CL E c U) V) V 0 0 N a L L c a) O 7 O O n: Q a) D. U ff O L ` E C . rn •5 �C am o d c E it a) E o c_o m= . A E Na >o cof ECm c°)U N to °) ° a o i m ac c c co in o� 0vo E w r a .c U Q ,.. E -a c., v V rt O - N O N O c O N E y E )n u) l • E• n N V) a) y C < ° N w a 0 N C U a N a= 0 C N . CO Q -C m c n . m ii m Q) ° 4) W O VI N y N a Z N O O) . a O) au c - O L a O ro m °- E coyOn ocE>• a in o O c y c o c.o c c E ,Z, � mE c `° E° u, c H'N U . O O)' 7 7 • aY O O C O C 0 co Q �_ fa u! N 9 N U O 0 a) _� N a) O` C O C U y ( 07 07 E co ? E oo a)N I •c ° C ° c m O co y = 0 N y d 0 a � . U C N Co 07 'C W g • y �E� - ° � w yc a)y a a) i nEtO 0 0 0co a)E m a in C O O` rn C c w 3 C 2_ - C 'o C E II co II V) y � Z t OE °) a c io d ° E >Ua)Ea), m -I v3 U ° a) cm -. 'F oa) 3 0 E y co u) 0. hi a)E` m � c 0 0a d N O N> ■w N O N >° O co 0 7 la u i a) E on �_ ° w O - - C O ) d o C o W - CL C c C w > 3 0 I- U m a) o E E o• a) E � Ti O i ma c �- Li m k 0 a o a Ce E d m 7. •- c o '— a i o y u 0. ° ° MI 2 o2 oc2 m a) o c ` a • N ° c Mcn d d � i n m Q cu m O 2 U U m2� in cn I- a a- mr N R>.a O CC c C t0 O= C O W O O° j a) N.- O c N 8 d w $ w 0 r a) ° a O) c O N n. N U V1 a ) O) as co y E U U N p~ a w fa 0. MI C O a a c T N O 7 Ov a) c Q) E V/ Di d `` O U 3 a C O a) a d N O C C E O w a a) a O O C TO- ° a ` N y C a) E N .c N C C o v - oaa c ) °r o� .5.9. E m u o a) o a _ ° a) - O o° > CD 10 a m ° U y o ca -coo Ea oc a > 0..0 0 Ow m aor. m 0 N o E E . 2 _ N U O a) M. O. C H v a a a) Z. H w - > a) y -.F., O E -a c m o U)) t > > a) m a a� U y a a 0 c cu 2 c Cfl E Q E> tnQ N i o ) n E m a) a) O to ? .- Q L''' 3 gv a m c O m o Q w ei a) c ° c Z E 1 0 2 E 05 a a i °° y 0 '6 O > o N C a) J N u1 Z U N C )a t II , CO U N N M a) 0. a 0 C a C - U a ._ ... a Ul m E E C w _ r) F a) CO CC co 2 - u) • n L 0 J N C r F" _ F, IX -J r. c - a w N Q a r� M ' v�o m w ONA= NO • ? m F' ` U Z O W :Cr x a w Z w0 CA F- 4 0 Q > HUH m o Z r _ E N 0 W w N LL a Q _ O U m m m C m N L a m yr O = m > 3 m. 0v m o- `-° E ° ao v, c aa)i m ° .- o ° s 0' m o >' • N O V -e) o c1) c W m N a1 m w N o o 17 Q) 0 O V L J1 E 2 U .5 5 0 m c C a t -00 -` .0 E '0 E o m= c 5 3.0 W o U m L. ) c (1) m m 7 v 0 3 CO 0 -6 O m o m E Q � ° am m'at m' E o a U °° o c c > c o y c is m 0 N ui N N m y a "_c m 0 N `� C 0 U O =° m E E m° Lam= m d o h a) c N . u N 7 _ o a1 rn . O > $ m 0r 3> m Son 0 ` a c `1 E u F.J. m E U ca 5 a) U as w 13 0 aa) d 0 c u) a3 aa) ma g� c a '° m =o ca °- c E c 0 N T Ts C 7 L 7 . � N U G E U c N O. N° U m w N a C I° m m3 ° 3 c a ,a ° 3a 3 _Q)t m = ° v-° c1 E2 ° ° __ ° - N 7 )° O O _ Y U co W E C j � . N a O y O c.c >` u) U m c a) 0 2 p 0) o 0 u c° o - N 3 cn cu L Q' m '0 y a m V1 _ :... u) N C O a1 C 0 3 )A m a) d 't �. y a) O u) 0 U m a >., @ m V1 m U C L C C h • N L ` a) O ° 3 m a m m N U C0 O. m a O) T m u! m V gym p y N 0 - 0 0 C . C a) W U 1.13 r U 0 3 >. a d Cr C N N m 0 . - 0 = C m 0 >. L y C N C 7 C a) a) '0 ,-co G O a E 7 0) O m rn m y 3 7 E a) a c O m t ° .... _° 0 C C m a) m •0 O) 0 Z - „U„ H m ` L N O 0 a) .� C O) 0 m° O C 0 ,0 C m V O C L 0 0 a s 4 in O O U O C X m u Q O. O) C -° E n .._ N O) C O D U U m u) C a+ F- °r a) O. a 0 • L CO E C. h C 0 m �. m o C C N C cO • a a of ;:°0.°) m ca ._ i° Q • a X_ uJ ' O y X N O_ C V/ D. O a C= U° V) C uJ N V N N 0� 0 c a m E m 01 >N m aci m m E w m ° c °)� o m ;a1 0 0 _ a1 c m ° ;Zs P E dET�t� a� .E m c e a° ) m� a1 yc� d o m >- caa)ic w O ° L ? E m O L a� c ° ~ • h ~ 0 NL m m ° £ ` 0n CO c d v v1 c °) ° c o _I Ur 0 o) 3 , d m a t6 U - 7 X N E N "O Cr U .0 CO O O. U O V 0 1 Q) O. C >. y - c O C Ia. N E w a. N o a) CO J N a 0.., a) O a U N C N C Q O O a c a U u Z p y a) -o • O� U C C N Q m V .2 a) Z a E . 0 0. ° LO.. m L m O a w a H m O > C •• >, o a a o? --° c a C C O a1 a) a' aa) 5i .. 2 c r Oaa0 . ▪ �°". .0do2 ._ oc• : .0 0 .x �' V) N g • 0 L a 0 ) 0 y m "O .v7 0 -0 N m - C y ° (00---0,i- L 0 Iii O U N= C m 7 V) 6 C o c U y N m :a N w C O) N N U u7 H 'O ,.. " 1 C C7 • et N 2 m a ° 3 E o 0 8 m 2 ° c- E2 c 1L c m ca o E u) -a' Z E ° c w ma ° c2a 32 3 3 a a. r y o a w N < °7 0 O _ N .0 O cn cc • O en I- G a w C CL p a E C N O C m '0 d m a) L r I- ° n C O T1 a a 0 Q Ea o 0 a :IA ca W .. L U j a y 7 N o U3 Q E > cn Q a) L 1 0 I + II . F L CD + J N to C Cn a — } _ _ 2 o co C. iv o 0 C./) r n o W 0 N (A > 2 _ m )= o U U o a; W Z o C0 X a t W Z 0R—° - oEN a) WU� m Ey _ °.r c o �g L ai 0 000 o .-3 co N0� c� a a) ) E� - �% �� Q E E� 2 c mL N . ' Q a L. u� - 0 a) a C a m �� y� ENV = c�Em �� to a'i C N - O — C N L ` N 7` N m N N L ... Ia 7 ° O m a N N 7 c c 3 c O n O N L) ` O a C N a a >'� m 3 O V m U N N u) >c -o C U c N ` m a L a N N 7 Si- c V C j-. N c O fa co .bc ro c > w >> v m .c 3 N N N u c E°° O. ¢ w >' 5 ai °° 7 N - 0 y o;� x > a c Y y w 0 , m� N o C y N — N CI) a s N O C O 7 N N w a O 0 CO O C o. 7 N O >. C - > N 2 n U a s 0 3 ` O. N j C .o y ar U C N 5 N° L y L C c • °a a� LL cE a > CD NEcv 0 .0 `ay ,_�7 C N 150 N O o -- 0 0 _ — cm CO m w a N .- E .- _ ° U y a a • m N O a� c j m O m a c c .c C C- m C c N c , _ -o m j L Ca N E N y W C N N C N U N C 3 N C N m C N :-- N O N y_ i^ N L ct ° °' - m a)° O C a E a) N N N N C C N m c y � , T C c E U) v E� ; >NQ"N HS) o2 c . °a ��a U = a w � E a> Z 7= = > m o > j " a a c i � c= m o we N c E E E. °o ` o m N r x 3 y L m a E O) — C E c m rn m 0 __ c o n° c x N y C ° '" a o C °I m m;- o o° ac>.m = N ma cc) U in Z '° C U a) N `7 N m O m � C C U M N a y m C 0' c 0 7 a . O O c c c O N .0 N N 0 _, L O C . m N N O N ,,, _ C N N m . a 0 0 c N a N E a , C . r+ F.. m . il ' ° a C 'C m N N a) Ci m N :Iii a .r ra m N N ,p N m .p U E N N .- •, U L m N CO CD ( E 0 . n m o m c � y a a> m E E °) E 2-- ` a)—,., °c - o— a" -0- 2 2 0 6 5 al w ei) O� 0p > A a) U O.N�d U co N E 0. dc O N N O` 0 EN N' ° c N N U u; C COJO o- a .o -o N o c N mL N d ° y w Na N N c a> E N n co to- �LO a)d > oo m z X a tEo°m - '' oa>i � c a0 m -J C0 o o N N . > 'a C a N N ,n uu, N N •-• C a U O N a 0 m N N L U , ■ 9) N V E c a a y N ` 0 C N N 0 O ".9- -C C N N E >. 3 •� ` CO -0 N .-• O. 7 w L N C L y - OI V L N O c 8 a U = O m C > c CL N N O O 2 0 7 C ° w t m N 0 . E L va2 a ° c N m in N ca a� N d o � N `F- • • C .° E N 3 x W C a Q u) N m m .c b al ' °] L m c• U j p Q7 N r m N _ a N N C N O L N ,- ° O Vn 0 -o V N L N N N C N c W C If 7 c O a ELL] N l0 N O u?, U N 19 m c ,� C ` j t[1 too J lq m t° N a c .-. p a , . ; _'cM N r0 W Na 0m cr) aCm C- 1 cyl N V c= m o N �'� o c o u� � Em c2 a ° 1 � En o c u2 c 2-2 o 5 .....a c d x: 2 a Csi . �a� c N Na N� m = 5 cE CO E ; N N . m - 2 CO m 32 �v)U Na m N a N o2 Ce a W v F V) :0.. T N N N O O O c p 7 m N a N N N N v a) U E 2 m m > �a a) C C X c a N N O CL N C 7 0 m p _ m C U O 0 NO N a - N w C a y w CL0 o. E C N C C - >. C N E m N + 0 C am m cL mvCL m > N „a) L i n 10 O. '-' co c C O > aao)Eal �° ay o C� N a.= _-- m — ^ U m 0 o ►- w ° 0 m a 2 i m U c c o a 2- 3 N y a Ea m V o a N n, m - c c d o 2,J, m E m - — y° N O E a u+ - -2., U > Ti„, N 7 N 0 en Z �E> u) < - N o 00) N o` 0I N m Q �ic d m — N c N C�fn J u x c ai u 3 m m � Y� n a N N c C `- L 3 D. 0. U N U m N X .00._ 0......0000 �' I- J N r C - + a — k w V) >- = r - II v W O Q —I 5 N v) u) a N g c) I .0 d �a CE C/) E F- I v - - Iv O 0 U a, j p N IY La co Ca N a - F- V N D p m O U W Z `O to Cn C!) X a W w O ° Y C y D O y y a °g 0 o ai v ° CO H - -7 °',_ 0 p E 0 � o °) � Q°°- c c 0 a ° i " B CD a - m a >+ ,i, �? C a , a w @ 0 3 10 D O > o E w aci.c o d - i) � E w aci- w °' rn ti u m m 'E' L � N N y H L E d O a E •C L ca O E >, r 0 0 en E w w w c -� D, �.+ LL C` E N O N L U CU C6 E 2 O > a1 o C LA m = Q Q Q w Q E � E 0 D?.LD I- c,'wn 3 wpm > a m a CO 0 a ,0 c U w A- >+ O D> w E 0 a, C N > y C N N N .0 d O 3 w CO w a CO a, D D rf . a) D D rf _° w y 47 H a, en O O O c 3 w O w O O O. 0 co ea rn u v `� y, a� c Nam E y p.) c 0 0 E 0. > •� a y O W N U ' C co ' 7 C 9 a, 2 a c o c i r n m � E In w :a Ew —�' w C U w .. U t0 N - .0 C C 0 ' O a, v w N U w n p a H CA -c l0 , O O C LLI w w y 0 U w 0.- w 7 0- w C1 o c0 0 O re .=. a, C >, C 3 lD H O C C E w C C F w a, C0 w 0 u Q v A - U - 1 C O - en p in O H a) E ' C7 a, N o a) a) W O N O ' > a, ni N w t C a, O L C O N O C ,n E E O > a)5dccc �. v ~c = cE cEcm3 0 c z c,`,cpc w c 2 0 _ c a) �acd 2mo co • O O d '- E N C w p y F- O f a'y O 10 _ C w > O C 0 O o C C 0 0 0 N O 0 0 E CU CL a C N 0 a) N 0 N ~ C N 3> w O co a N G a N C O a, [0 7 E E y N C W w a ) m �� m d° . c ALL m dL a`, m E a i 5 a y ° ° n v u ) CJ �.._ m L. OS c c c c a rn a w _ ..- f E . 0 C L y b O y 2° u- E cn ° I y E 0 O a U N CO J II V) a) U co C C _ N N = a7 N O a p a) t0 E c cm � y w � _ � ` a � a n U Waif a E'n d ° a, O C.0 U =< — 0 d 0 O w co N • - M a, 0 4, - - O a a O IL C 0 . p - N 6 .• U a E m y E p y -c 2 N d o ID cc C7) U V O N N O C N p, C N C w ,,A, m w C) - co `c c' c n• ` o , nc >-- ° - -o3 , r o - 3t p) r-) •••• O d y 2 Y M M ' 5 % ri C y p, O- C= 7 � O. C B 7 D � M w 0 =c el22Qmg 0 pp �' o N °c � �', oi, �� rn°�° 1-- ct 0 0) 'O E Ca 2 O C w a X O 2 C 3 N= m 3 a O c ° U x ao - 3 c E 0 -. ° a o m= m o , a 2, CU w H \ - U • O ' c 0 O w coy ■ = o° ,n c � E L)�. w E m o a) c y .r a, >, O ` Q O ` off° acv � a, v, ��w, c a � a° E Q C C C >` co U w C co O O y C w . CO E O C N O a. N O — O C_c N y w 3 w co ` - C O. w f0 a a. C d U a, D w L a w ~ a9 U M a) N m 2 C U L to C C O y X 7 a, - 0, E O c C m U c U w a CO U 7 c) a L 0 ( 7 Cfj o. Q o m ° a, 3 -,u,- 3 a� ° °c c o D o me ma °- o CD o ca U c a • 'E �, , f o , a .c - a o c c w v; U c O - p `o o m > ` ° h in E E C O > 0 3 f0 a M to a, w C w 0 8 „ w "0 a w ~ CO a) a, a, U L U - �D O l0 N 5 _ co 10 w a N C> 7 C ra O w a CS w 7 w 0a --0 _05-°stayxi.) °3 ur Uo aE> i M O y 0) w U ... CO F O V U ° C a, N U U O N 47 a p C CI) c E a, w C w ,!l U C O - c w '� N 3 co- w 9, en �"' a, w 0 O o 03 'r c >,> C CO w C U • N y W �a a, 2 E w M D co - w C ""' N ' ,N C '_' w f0 C t w M 13 0 CT) J U y a N O 0 w cn O 7 c N w O O O w co w H U Q U j t o i m o 3 %= 3 a p p a„ P x ° c 0 , 0 c mE 'a 3 , 'X a 7 E -- U O Ea , Uc • c . - m CO o: r c a, 0 U m c w o t 3 0 - ri = o 0 J = L CO 11 N N C N N cn a — E >- _ I � "" ... aN Q -J = N U) cn . E. Fa 2 " a z E o a) W O N a' w - cn NO > 2 m ~ U Ci W Z O` J u CO X a . G W w N p w � A m ac>' a) ac>. a.) aG � d =m r to a z < E� m o aYa _rn a) o0s m in O a) ° F f v ) � a cu �Q(7 mEma - '� ;. E a - LU 3 =y- L"Ema) 3 cmE .6 >70 m o c Z� >��U E C U) N O - - U)U E Cu)— c 0 c7)° _ w C - )o m m O C- to CO CO ' CO j G C O Q1 7 7 l 9 i _ )n U E C1) cn LL L m d1 • L E U 0 7 N )0 O) L N t H N p 01 L 0 O y° L Q Q 3u° "ah-!L f- a >ti. -w H aE3 _V .c �" J N a>. N n a) U ?+ a a) 01 C c _ Uj O) a) C a ' 0 a C 3 0) y '5 O L a) C a) O- C C L 0 01 7 C L O C as C O y C �a .` N O o a 0 O V O O ° N- w- ' r 0 m O N y 0 •3 '> A - Q 7-00E 0 ° N N ° a s O C> a ° 2 0 U T N C u CO t L -0 0 .0 .=>, a o am a E ° y c m o Lb' m' tn co 0) in `' � E m rn � w @ E o v, ° °� a) -0 m n° m o @ c m • CO .r o v m >. _ N m L 7 m d m u L v c o n a� f0 N Of C CL E ` m m • o: m om 3 m o 3 0 as d � I „9_, �a o rnc o d o m h .c L 'n U ca N m E m in V 0 in U 0) N U dHrn m5 a � = t 5c mEzd°? U � f0 00 — c C. C ? c v 7 i c TS In C ' y E E: u p a) a °_' 0 L O C a _ a) ° a= y 0 _ a) 6.-2 C a) _ 3 O�.y. ° cnCy 0 __77U L m y L yL 0 d. ` 0 7CU) O O a CO Z U — U m N a U .0 U N O` c °' C E 7 _0 E `" N --0- — ` ` N w L U m L Low ° 0= 7 C •0 a 0° O N L . C y L ...... CO F. LU • C y U) CO L 0 ) E = n .' a) C U U L a) 0 C L a) O •O N C `' H U a v u E` - y oa a) _ - E c m a c i yE��aa) 20 `a N O N U m 0) 7 N w m 0 �p C a) W o L C Q N .` n C N E ?' )0 -0 U) h O j a) G m n 0 O y E N a) m O p N E 0 Q a7 E c E 0 O C 0) O a) U C CO °-) >, a) _ "' •° U 1.00 U E > E m rn . 0 . C • ) > 3 ' CO m O. N O)[n E= w> .. O ` E a N a) _ U- O= 0 .0 O m (n l C rn > CO p) m = c. �p 0. i0 p) > a . m a o a • . N t acc p drnE °�ooa = ° �Y G �E 10 � =m � u 07 i m ` n ca- @ 0 E a ° - a = im `°tom co 0 CD 0 O Ua a) _ N c O v CV Cn 0 m e) c omc m = � �10 u) 0 co co CO L E �mUE o 3c cyc m m �ypEoTE �UPi c a 3 a�m°E cL 3- m aa `L am E = rp. .c cw •0 .,_ a � cn ii a 0' c o E w •p mJCn u 113 c c a ` ) u 2' _co ` a) a • . E w = m m c 0) >_ � $ m m m O U C L 0):r n C L co a) p U to U p 0 = p a) — 0 ° o in C U 0 . RS C ▪ C 0 c O U C 0 0 an 0 p2 = a1 N Ul d a) C o.o f0 C > c a C c d O a U 0.--.0.0 y G a 8:55131:i O. O m C _ a) a N d c N cn 3 c a > cn a U) U 'n C .. N O ' a !0 M N 7 C N 0 C co rz O N y 0) _ m U 0) 0 7 N O- C 2 L E N O 0 N 9- U > ° N° C 0 co. E a) n m a 7 t 0 = 2 7 CO N C 0 m 4. -> .4- Na a)c 8 C C °5a'"'ao0No1- u)E= �F -OC7r) 7'Uu) _ CY o a) mNN2 m 0 2 am3w m u) y v N� co a )cd gcaaci n tv w rn • y ° ) 0 0 a m E d a7 rna� 1 E . E E w ca 02 ° 3 I- "� a� m >a o rn.. a r cd o a m a c i o Tr I- et W m c m CO ai 2 c p 0 a) c° N C U .7 a 0 ' a) m 0 c m a- 0) 0 A o a ta f0 E a 0) 0 E 7 N C N N _ O< y C d ~ a o o E o 3> d m c m a O o a E E3'aw E>, °y c� m v a a T N - 0 a' O l C °— L ton E ta O c N `_ c L .. U m m V L O C9 c 7 O ° y � . m 0 .� _ CO p a= m N m m O m m o N 0 - _ a 2 u U L E a ° i 3 c ET.,-51 . E E - a) `° a) 0) y a) ° m L .. U C O a1 L C E u) y L x 9 O O • ` 7 N c �c - a V 0 O 0 N O L p 0 N Q 6 . ac°iv co ow o '? 3 ° m 2 E u) �. 0 r) • F) O C N l'Y E C >-. N O N J C7 0 °� 0. cr) co E - '- E 0. a O m a _ O H U 0. O N = L01 Z v J N i C u) In C/) a E r F" - _ --- m o W o d N a�� In a. 8 °` ° a + Iv Iv o ° W � N � CO CO ' N ❑ _r t1 0 0 p a) Iv 0 W Z ° Er) U3 X a W L a) a y O D U co c -a w O 0 L C L O O O 7 l0 0 0 N O_ 0 m > C O, l0 O C U In m > a O w m a o 3oLN c c m - m `° ci C 0 E ° ° a � ' rn° ° f a s o . ai i-<0 - R. d ol c� r �° °� c= rn c 0 2- o- m o E > `YLL c � C'IL oa 0 c � > -o - co E Na a o o ai w co m- u) E o 3L la O o) a N N r O C co O O T O 0 0 V j >+ N t0 N co 0 C O. N a) y L 0 a) a) N �� N c ° 7 y °E� o a, EE rnu O fn W co 0 E u a o E p a 0 0 E . = 0 y a) a C L O) 0 w E o C cm 0 ' O s4.-... V) .. a LL s iL 0 a 0 O c 0 i _c v 3 c a u Q E aa E ° >° 2 CC E F u o E a' Q Q - 8 �'• N a) N N N a) w N U m C O O > • 0 l0 -� a) l0 > N O O L ? s a7 7 L I n N O` 13 al N Q ° in ? "L 0 c N C . 0 ' . L d 2O 3 U i E u m o,o CL a) m 0 ar p . 7 ° c N m co 0 C L N N C o Fri.. j a •7 0 O. , O. a)wmo CL hc NZ a L° O 'O O .1 U = a) am y l0 r 0°- :a a L a) a) 0 7 L N Y C O U L a a �� a 7 m E y f0 0 o c a n w m° O N a) O L L l0 I D l h N E 07 `7 N= 0 0 O C H co t 7 N 0 07 C la 0 C a O 0 a w W N m rn — c c O 0 0 0 7 7 0 m o re c' u p> c m E w U> � al rn0, ai 5 a II o C ° O_ L y - 0 A la 0 I O .0 r r L 7 0 O. U U) N U U y c° al O -° > U 0 0 c -- 0 E O CO 0 C to - Q Y to C 0 o a 0 N 0 0 0 U 7 O a O co ¢ a) W O N y c a) @ > 'O = d O. C O O_ ._ ..- _ c r_ E Z U,_ 0 7 ca ' a 0) a • a) > C O. C p .O a) E O a O in = o r 0)c o m o °. 3 o c o - 0 O@ a a o c >> c o _ E ° o y d CO i= c d c 7 u o o a) c 0 0i u m c m.° o= o -L c Mr m m 01 a > o"y S c -° y L m Oa° o ° c A N C (13 CO Csal "a+ F . E "a 0 O C C I)) L 0 C c 0 : w >.°--9 13 c o C a) C W E E m � v d Ct) VI l-° -° - 203->--0 O7 ` c d C 0 r u r m u In w 0 O 0 ? • N t0 C) t � 0 [ 0 CO.- ; °� O 0 0 ° O CO II In II > m . m cL 7 mJ(n R c o 7 N A CO L C C 0° N a 7 N N 2 . t 0 y N m C. 0 O. > •y 7 01 N N 0acl 0 o E a �' •? a' 3 C w 0 a E _ 0 )0 E w oc 5- a • ioEc ° u c d a aa, O 01'7 0 0 .. 0 0.0 0 0 o C O y y a N u f. W o ff N .- ° Ol h - 0 0 O aj > a P N N N y C L G l +i 0) E n Tr 6 5 - rf a O C r) � La lh r 0 ) r) C � c� 7 0 .- U C 0 M 0 co C a) c a� m mt 2 aa)) m m a .- c � o o m 2-s.2 o o m a N °m - ELL v) >2 alc0Z 0 .- 2uL °a 2uu2 1- a y m o a u j 0 0 a) CD C a a a) ?• .. r, y c l a O Q ' O. W r7 co N 03 a CO Of •_-• as - o �. ._ O E N g 0 C N y 0 0 '00 - C C C .0 f 'O r0 'C a co - >" T l0 ° 7 N a 7 0 13 0 0 d L L 3 0 0 N H N ) C L= 0_ L U N C U .0 N a C Ol 07 O a p a ce w > , 0 E N C 0 0 U C ° N C @ O N O_ 0) O 0.0 -p N Z. 0 p O F a. 0 a. . N . E C C E c, U- N N C> N 0 0 C ... N 0 L d CO 0 0 0 L C co CD j co p_ 0 ■ a, 0 C H a) IA d o N `) C L N C O 0_ C H a N Q - CM a L N 0 0 C C ' 0 O. ` O 0 r : ° a) P a m U c Q a Ic mo� c `o0 2 0 2) 1E o o0c0 o- -ma c ° l" ` ca) 0 a ` ) 7 0 l -a3 ( 2 oE o ` f°E yr_m L ° U L a) m u >, U to _ 0 a v ° ) 0 0 N p) d a ) C >. 01 > u l a7 >m m `ooa)Q = ci 0c �a� oN _ 7 m Ern a ) cL= E 3 0 c 7 u u To ~ f ° m N r co m 0 0 ° m Q N Q 0 o .0 0 E l0 '7 cc L .. ° >+ = y N G ` a > E Q p N n- U y • [' • O 0 _ C r) 0 0> O y C O fn 3 c a) I- > O •0 N La) 0 - O) [� V O O. O N t .o 0 U N p o Y+ II 7 j V O 0 C 0 N a N o 0 0 C a f0 .La . Cr) P o p U(n ri F °3t u'oouFL -uE v LE J J EL' =r) 1- o- , --7- - o Q J� = 0- CM -- J a ' �n Iv =- o0 W ON l/) J co NO r V 0 U o W Z O V) J X a ` W Z c y m E C a) O o m y ° c o `° 2 o mw = E ° - ° U � `� c E oa O 1 Q � 5- c-c -'o 2 y 3 n1 - o a) - o y m N 21 a ° � ° o cv c ai c o� o °� m a a > E c o� �� a a, 0 m C C.) ° TT; c °` � 1° � � _c m o m a) O - > o c c `° i c m E o o ,— 3 3 o c �.� c o T.,- °= C C O 0 y y . N N m C m C -0 U r >. m 3 U 3` 9 - O O m C O y, co i u o. L .- m 0-2 co o L. N �7 w m E E �C a u N el d m E o E. ° m 2 rnm m T. a m 3 0 •o c a m 5 co m TO as, a) u) I- L DI -� ? o aa2 uL m 0) ( 7 , m 2,8 c . c o- a) — ? >> a Um m o u H rn o II" o a c o a E� c5 E 2 ,- a1NL E co- c E o m E2 co- a 2-o E'N 3 u- o E Q Q 1 - al a)alyoc `mom cpo W. _ = =� �c u po = m y . m m 7 N := L. A o L m 3 o 7 c y u 3 y E m y y C y a) y m m o y N O O E > L > -oo o E -o p CO L. . co O c T 7 a N N r C C t C - �• m CL 'C m_ U • N .- E y y m a) r O l9 y F O d L C L N E E O U y L Q 0 an d p + p „ C t N 7 d 2 y 3 C) m -C p y to L E 7 OI O O C En d y U 'p a CO a ut - c o m; o o c 61 2 = y C O T .r. m p O- N Y C O CO o �L - o� ° m o 0 E c_o L 7 m o. co Ill W in 'O y m w U w p c 2 C •c o T .O m LS 3 m U N U m y U m E O p d N N O C C O m m 2 a '5 ° N N O. y N O L U Q) W �E3oL07 a..crm cU3o a) c • c o°oa)m o =rn m ° c :° '2 m � = Z • c a m - v cau ° m c mm o O c 0 a d .°. `° . G) �m mLL m CO i+ F- 2 C m c U p c c y L In y > L y U r E N Q n o c c at (a m y 7 L m - ' o da U � C C O U N f .- m > To G p a V N L L a a a m .0 -c y a v, m -� c o a) m - ° II in C '= ` 2 C L >. - y L O 7 O CD 5 m - O> •� E ca J fA IC 7 E r.c y 7 m j p 7 o. y d O- 'O O_ y C 9 O. , n-E g - ,2 cwc°�E C � .00' 0 w - 0C o - o c W ca m co - o o m W -� W O m m D_ 70 °Eoo � o .CO i.o ie et ° m 1'7 m a c n w E ri o y ri 7 E r, C y 7 c o 's-o rn. ov 2 u 0 2 n y f �� w a. .. 3 m5 3 E 3 m 2 m m2 m o2 c E ° Qv . a L- 3 >, 2 C"a y 4 d O IX N y o m m 7 L in o ° .Q W C• ✓L p O m N O N C U te 7 3 0 o L 0 a 0 d y C N a O r N O. y - p C 0 m C C G a1 C 7 m m 7 m a 9 O. y m F- c� c o m) o g m` d° c c m C am c 2 • p L'o m y mLd m a7 � 3� m m O ) O C L N C E c my o y CC > y . co -o 1- a - vm� Ear 1 " 0 m -u o m V p CO D. NyEo_m N 0 011 CO in Em - m 7LLE m cm o a�om Lo >` r a1 v 7 > y 7 y L U a p1— 'O -0 2 O y r m .. m 0 ' - r N N Q E> cnQ jy r m O m p m Q 1.--. o a) am m t Cl. c E a �. r i m c E ? 2-' . ...: N. 'D 'din m .. o 0) C I S � m m o m m ..J u am o uoo E �+ n ...- co m == ac E ° a t ° I— . = L rn + J N = N a " � fn (n Jam= CC Q .E ( n N f /) d N 2 a am n a, r E u) V 0 0 �a.. __ Iv :v o O V W 0 N fr fn N N m 2 • N ❑ i V m D O m ❑ W Z O CO to fn X d' W -° Z co O N 0 C C C r 0 L N C m v) N O L W O co L fa 0) O U m N m m 7 VF' a a, ° ° f 0 ca` 0 � mm cu N F a- Q - m c c 3 v ` y m E c 0 9 c c C/1 a i o a) Le ., c c m c' C w _ c 7 0) C -O N E 1 > 0 a w p LL ^2 a) 5 . 1 U Ti— 'O V V la 0 , t c 0 N CO m O 1a N o C C N Z � N2w mN Em= -a )ma) a) � E:c_ Ec 3c CL . 0 L O W C en t' 'C CU co — c c L E m N U 1 j N U U j N m . Q) « m _ 7 m _ °) o c a c N v a) co w a) m co Q Q Ec °w Q E E c ° ) v a , ° c c o u a i w�d1- 7)1- -- u oE 0 a o 0 -0 C 43 0 v c 0 0 m C 01 m w Cad CU 0 C .7 M 0 N 'O a) m C m m m N O • C M .c... .7 O ` O m m 0 c- to 3 E O w --> L a a ) O C al — C m a O 5 m N o.-° a) C N O m V L L v a C - o a C 8 ! • L a . C c z-, E m c U Q E o m O m > 0 — O N Si N H . 47 n , E U - 3 y O d N 1 M O P 0) a O> O 7 1n N: C E C 1` a) v) p = 7) 0 act a> 0 5 ` 0 > ° E ` w _� o� m - E 7L ` V U m 0 W a 0) C H« O N m v to 0 E �, m >. a m L m a) CO O U ... o y C >) C O U C 0 c c m C L U 3 O , C C > Y U _ 3 E C 7 m N Cif L C m m m o. m a o1 'n 0 3 0 co m m E O O v v L a 'O O a) 'O 7 N a) N a) w w 01 C O C O p `' v m a U) LLI Q' 0 E? 1 ° n in C C y V 3 °) O« m 0 0 a m n3, m C- 0c9-07- N ❑ Y ° 'O O 1° m U m a) d O. C 0) N C O m m ,0 C N to > c a) - c ' ° H- L H C in a) j L y > _ N m m to > a) 7 d e C m us co - co < CD W m m co a 0 ) > a) L a) m to E ` 2 C L ° 7 m m L N ^ 2 N E c 2 2 7 a) - E L a) O p N y 0 m 'O L U 0 N 0 U a C 7 CO c m 0 E c Z N C O ' U - a > , U - t 0 3 0 • 0 0 U y C >, 0 0 ' U m 0 "' co 0 O O •_ al >' L m N a L m O 0 . o C « L C> N 2 )n C .>-. a O U T a+ F N O m to 0 7 L. N ° L N a a) 0 0 C O O 7 y m 0 C Q - U O Z' C O C « a to C C j N 0 °f C L O C to V y W.c o V m N i+ L o m C O .7. U « a) a) al °.- m> O -. 1 a . O O O U a m 01 C 0 - fn F- H u L 0 C a ° a) u`0 -- c mt2 m -v, m E o 0 m 0 m c a) a) c W U O C m 0 a O a) a O c a) o o• V ` o m O - 00 a) d y O ` ° m 11 CO N ca C a — w 0 y co a U 0. = a 11 cn O N 2 E E O a m a) N C to a, a) c a w N sa > m L m , t a) w 11 so a a1 a. N 0 m N.0 L 0 en U L L -. co U N L C C ca 0 O j f7 t' 0 O1 m J fn L m C _ _ U C Cs t N y L C L _ >> d d 0 • C 3 L O L U C C L> m C y V) � j ` 0W co CD >� 3 i) c E c= o 0 m — m 01 m M a) .c . ca . 0 v 3 w m m 0 :0 w a-a W- ca 0. Of f.7 C N m C O man w f U o Ti1 7 m w co L °) c C 0 C al I — v S _c m.n d 0 c hi ° a) _c = 0 m13 a)v� • `o m .L 10 ,,, gip E c m M• N. 0 l'7 C 1'7 0 1? .- 1'9 N L E N M 0 pj L l'7 m a) N I.; m O n 7 c U ri 0) a) m y mu N Cc �2 m 2 c m obi) y m 0� a �L� to E� aa - a.2 m e � 2 m e m a a) ) a E...2 ag 7 c o2 mvv .=2-° 2 w 2 r- E E2 2 ` o a) 22 m >a 1- cC a r N 'O >+ 01 O Cr V) 4! j o c U C - a) C O W 0 0 a) N m N a) 3 .. my o a 1 3c c ° o N « N 0. 0 a) - 0 0 N C m L c m at u ° i O w Q1 _ 7 �j O m o m m acs E m a y u ' c ° E YCZ•o ca 3m0 sc m > ;co ~ ° v o. a m d m a o m c`o- F' 0 0) (1) cr m = 0 0 0.2- - `o 0 m Q m 8 o o o ID c Q w Tr - E N a V o • n 3 0 N O L O 0 'O O N 7 yOj O E � • l a a; ›. c 0 N >. N O O a1 N U O ,C U 1nm .c w mm d a° -a� 7 y a ~ mum F L -c h L - o a x i > <E> c - « C a) E 0 N .'7 ° 0 1 ii � m a � 0 �m � `mQ °. a .0 C A a ri y c m E ■ w , a) u ) o l" >,__.c pj '° r) to O O fn J a) O U . � v C V o ' , u U 3 :d + 11 L -O c = 0.a a.ro m a d ° C O L m U an :2 E0.0 E . . m c - EE 2 c°, • J N �, J U) U) a } M = Iv LL1 O CL J'' C N U) a N Q a J a N 2 -o IX e-' s' a 1 . v II ,t1' p cOi W O N E J cn U N❑ > 2 c O W Z 0 U) U) 1/) X G. J W Z N a N m 9 T v W a o 0 ° L u o o> cco u a za C ! o 2 m -0 mL NN o,. a n d N 0 al N C N O N rQC9 ° v 2. Ncv o`oa mp) o- i- ca ) in > �U - E c ao L c E ° m ° °) a� ° � c� m o o E E c cu To cLL� �� as a ° - gd EEa�'oo� - - m._ cri L N� LU co E E c 17) E'cno-c°“35>cnEgc0 mom arn3a u a°Q c E a > c c 0 "0 E a) ca E w V) L ~ L °- CD LL L 0 O° N a - O� u a - UO 0 7 E L O o o LL O O 0 Q Q . E 'H H.. F- .0 v rn ca ELCC ca m E u u - - .c u u a- 3 N - 0 C '° O O L L a) c -N C y Evil y U y; O . .O ._. N .- a O U LL. c 0 O r'-' ° a c t E-0 U a U O O a N ' c G U) a C E C H y DI c co ° E a c oc o co a, mcr au)y wa ° w colE o )E E y V G O C — O CU = t0 N a o U m E M r E t °r en c ° -0 a) O N '° u V) _ C N MI CV ' CO N a) y E L O .- O co N fa _ ` L T o L M N O C C) - C t0 c a n d W O C 0 ,00 O . 3 fa c.0 O' Q' U 2 y V N N 0 a a) U o N a n U) al CD .. -• = L C C C H N co C 0 al co Q C 13 a , ` O) D N ,_13- .- U co U a) C a O C "' ,—� 0 111 C 2 - N > a) ,..1. CI 3.3. o al a) l C a U U a1 c) M O G C O — U 6 t m L 01 ca, Z D N o O la - room O L a7 U' L y Q C ` U) 0 oL 0-o a) °1 m ° N m N� v o g aa, m c O Q °- N d 6 a1 U - L a 3 G m c U ° - a m N ti L m N 01 0 N y d a) ° - C ° O acQw a ca C d yFE c. N U C L L l0 U) O U a) m o C 2 g 0 a) u C C d o 3 0 E c a ul - ° m = E m� a W Y m rn v d a H .. N U N E C o h dl C 7 Q < 11 , N u cj O la L O t6 to a O y CO J U) 10 C RI v w E o v N 7 O L ' C ELL CO a U Q o $ c o al ■ C O L E ) co LL O C E U Q O. y CL m aE a ,° - ��mEca ° �Yd v r.: > L °-) E a E c ..c - C N 6 m vi 0 C .-°' eh y c N E V N 0 3 c ' j 7 0 _ L (7 M 0 !n N N 2 a 0 C 0 E ° L a '0 * L N "C O Z H '0 N .r 2 -.. CC W N co 2 0 - ° 1- a T I- CI_ C u a) o v y j la V o O 2' N sr o a) 0 0 C N O N O N d O. R Z N IC O C O L O C T >. O a y C E. a)'v N ca E E o' t' 52 a° E L oa U'c C c N 01 a) C a) N O E O a C Z O C fa L o L a) a l > 0 N m a a y c E o ocmm ?jOOO ° ca CI �C7 U W O a ^ 0 U N L y a 0 E a A U c Q C L N C y C C `• - � .. s — U C � u)) a) 0 > i N ) > M /a 0 a U N )a ? �" V) a) O V a a N O N E C � N a- 0_ - 5' N O o y Q E U) Q C o E3 - c a) a .. a2 CO. v co c9 -° (..)° c y Ti , - o c aa< ri c c m a rn a y i = vi c d t + 11 E to - 03 3 V . N 2-50 N ' -O C 0 C) •: U Y a O 7UL ,-. a E C N E 3 mU c 5 c°) mL 1- -= j N t C a — IY cn = m CO tY J W o 2 a (r) a N D d r R F U) "- oH II V -5 c3 W ° NIX N 0 I-' r) m U W Z o (n x 0. W Z › O �; .. v y W E. N U c ca O Z Q r7 ° m 3 c 2 m CO m N N F m o mE N E) m m in a ) C r o p w -.0(002_0.- N O ) c- 00 m G LLE N -2 -0 - N m l9 c U d p O 'p C N Z re d o ' c C O O ?` m m O d i W 2 ,., 3 E N m .- c - O m m E L U ? 3 Q v7 aE-5 o °uL d•y c IL' ° 2 c ` ,� a yet ° c m � L o � o mc� �o c ° �aic rn c D 0w IU c a 2 T m _ O y a >,.c m c inL o c a)E? m 5 0 2 N m� o > ° a) -0 ca o c m W m m u ° ) d m _ v L H LL `p a ° y E o y O O- cr v .� c m E a E m � s y @ y m U m° m r °o° - �m E CO m r y U cu 3 al hi c m ? T o n o u m ° o� c av 05 -0 m u o E m y c c °? co a -a d �.o)m o f c c • 1 . c N m 0 '- i °', oU ; 3 °' al -` 0 O a > c Ea a) o o° o se 0 o ° E y2 d a) -C E m . - ° >> nE m V m U .•. E o C tan) r U O 0 O) T - - O ca C O) m - O y y = ° m C m ' „ O U C ° . E 3 ` o m C fa N OIL N -- C N C E L O N m �"' la U L = O ` "3 ca 0. c c m m m 0 m o m L E D o y c y d c m - E E 2 0 N W m' ° -'° E m 3 N> EZ t m u in . -a ' - °' o . c rn E E r 0 " = m m 2 )= a) C m N U 0 E L N ~ C o ' y N = O N C C N p O en h 3 y m > -q m C 2m c m c o cti o E m 0 m E E E m m 0 a (6 Q t N c ff y m m m rn el) t c ° o d c °i m c m L o c c U y ° ' °) m m W m° >• m t c m ma cm CO a)Ir o - ii o a) c u > o a) L u U m m . 0 C O d C ra ca C C !`) 0 jz C v C 0 0 - Co . _ m m m w 1V- ° SE-00 m m (n • - C m o _ ° 3L o O1 c m m E C Z 3 N C= y m c- N m E f0 C t m m ,n _� j gy m , - U C- C N U C fn a+ O C `) O j c. C C> O -- O) . . 0 . c a) N- . E m m. C U ° O- N Q O ca m m e Q EL 2 m c c O1 E = m a) .c 2.c E z U° c ` - -c E m m .= o m 2 m y y °v �� m co I I U C 1 0 t tij 1 u1 ij flI 1 ° .r ∎- a m y ca 3 m m m c a c E m c o m c�L . _ m T0-0 o ` o E 0 E o n) m a R m'a ° m 1 -0C2. o - - 0 m= m e o m (n m c� E E c N o rnr � t< c m� Le U > N V C L ° m 2 a N 0 C 2 C t0 m= m N S 2 m 07 = y a N 9 > 6 E 0. m y To m= mo m °-m z'?tn U oL co E o o o y o O v < c o w .— o - m m m c '> > c m o - C 7 O y U to N i Z . U 7 p ca m 5 0° t L m m~ W U O ° y T Q 2 m Z f0 cn CL o I- 0 Te C L O H C o m e ) •. N 2 01 0 I- E 2.c 3 CC 7 c 'O y °' • a) N C- m N ' V1 m mao m o m m E m y c )7 E ai o a) E-- - y d m c .j E 1 m O E m a ? N 2 E ai m aD C C > U r i ma y ' m m CO. m p o y o m o E oeh 0 ° c . o ono ° `)ri y m - m`'' N r ° o' o m ��c a) a) a CD N a ., > m m L.- o ° m o� a a 0 2� - U< 2 0 = CO m- C -2 m o. c m 3 a n °a a E m F- m a to 0) >, o Ir w '> m N O m ° >W ma C 0 p 1- N O rt A 2 cs. 0 C I- y O y m °)� a ° o 2 E • > o y c N O 2 CO U L c C G O 1- C CO C h - m O. L p (� U o > d 0. E m ° 0. E Q) _ o rn H E ` -- m - C N 0 m m m L O U CO y a ° o en v m < E > m < N 13 N E, U N N Q • cO m m E H ri c o a) (.1 (n J u > 0 Y + II A• ba c c X c - 0 m , = L o1 = 1 N iii C >- 1-. - - O Q J ' ` _c - c v3 aEEN 2 4' 2 - a m P 03 w o a o u W O (n N > 2 _ to ec I- 0 W Z o m U X O- W Z w O u ° c V C c to U_ V aZa a- o au W o 1 m a) W 0 O N C N �Q U a3 o u - �m v W a 3 a1 > H UH 13 ° 1--' o to 0> - 0 - a.0 U) t w o o c a� rL 2 o-° 0 c m- "-• c 0 c _ ... L N�W E m `acm ° Wa�E2„c'D°Evl Nt~i uE a) o m o °too W m Oy d E Q ¢ a c a a v L. >+ C C C m y O Y W 'O W w W C= � o w V ja "' W W V N y t7 O W .0 [a `7 o L O C L O c V1 o _ W 0 o C L L O W 7 C h m 7 = O y O m L -cc C O _ � to p y 0 0 0 ` V > N a p O U . = lo U In W a _ O W O m en 3 `) W.. 9 w 7 L U O C y C W in 0 0 c Cr y V c t C L W •L L a ° L C >. O o to - V C 7 C o O L N L .2 C O N 0 U u1 O O y to N W Q to C O . V N O N m u1 t1 Q� t �tOy Z o� yt yai� 19 y � a 3 a mt°'n 3c 0 0O 8 To o v c m W m m o ` ° to ..• E y W W O N L .r m> >, y •O s V c O O .° y a3 .0 N to W V u) V N 0 y a H m ID E r U a C L O 0 N O O 0 N 0 0 o N- h L O - 0 ° - U N c to C `) O 0 C - �� t ` 0 a no ao m o 2 0 - d y d s N L3 c t rn s c a) 3 C m N to V O 7 O W a U w a W N C m m O U C W y m W y ° C O y m Ol > v_� ILI 7 = ... V to ° fa m w L o t o > c a m C° N c c 0 • 7 2 c_ m - O o L C C L C C N N r N •- C U 0 L 0 j ° to O1 U m 0 to 3 9 U W > W a a � m 0 to 'O to co a G L ° a U •C G y f 0 E C N N N U m O O L L . m 0 m a1 N ,-=E01/20 E C Z L O C y -p y O .- C` to "- - W y m O) W O 3 C CO R- 1 d ... W ° W to - taw - c C w O m E r. = - W to 0 to m "' F U 07 y O- c Z to a? L to o c W .a E af O CO C O1'O to a C W > >• C to a1 N •V L C a) 01 0 c o'2 0 13° 6 6" `m� ? E °mEcw ta - aL c .-' y rij F.') 1- O L 7 C u U a a) O ° > U 2 'O W 1 N W C O to - 0 t ri aI W o 3 tu N c W , to0 o .0mcy y EE 0 m _0mL mvi o- 5tmi -a y taoaa� c �d m orn W ya1 W� W o m g c Ey E - Ec k W o ain fa L1 cn E W y 2a ° o W o to W e to c c ° i c tao a a R c E L C on A L C,- a) _ 5 y i o m° W a ° > O= 0 'd t0 0 y. O c a N m J N a E a) a)L 'n m . O a , O = W W W LD) `Xm a g S� c U a m i0 - - ° 2 W m a 3Qot ° WW` m _rtornao E = � O. ¢ t>'-....-"` _ > °> • H 2 m r4 • E z in c-o w tn 'o O� W W °a E§ : N W m 2 = n t ri c L -� v c N o a . -6 a 0. a r > , (.1 E d L .5 N U co c N N in 0 ° V C m 0 o N e 2 w °° - c -ea of co o O W N RI • •fr CO Cs! L C m E ` m m u m d `o o• og m E a 2° E E a E5 m m et 2 Er o o . ° am2 ! o m w o C a N myo o x W '> c c N ci v _ O W > o c a/a st C C co to y to W in a- W H to 0 o a c ) F j to y C 173 O E - E to -0 a m > - V N .c W C O to ea V O O H o. 2 r F O Q fl_ Enna c.) 0 c a ?Lm t' co m. a 5 o W V L U 0 W m -0 O. N 7 y U o E ¢E > u c -° ih to 03 m `m ¢ all rn 11_3Em aU E x m c - W a.= L a) + Et Q J C u) V) CL N ct = co a -et. a) CO I - o u W 6 N N ti) W > g = I2 o d )v o C.) Z o cn - cn X a. W Z `° - 0a w c 0-z--, -0._ a ca O 0 y o N N p V d Q C7 O O O w O C O L L y W@ )n 0 UF- ? C .. a -- _ u a R LL E c L O 0 0 C C a) = U a, C = `7 = N Z (r a) •a• a) U a a7 V V h E ' ..r E EL) - L. C7W m rn E v E aE it w e °- 0a" Q o d ID rn F L - E- _u0.� a -c E F --c a a to > Q , C a >+ = C N a) 0 C C U) N 17, O CO 0 CO a C a) O N C a) a) O C a) V- 7 - N a) C o y " l0 L .r c a U l0 C O L '_' - 0 " a) > U p w d ca - E - > d ~ E .0 a7 >` a) a) a a) a a �' . L O C N c o U-2 0 ci2 •0 i- a c i � aa� c E� 0 E E o . c o a °u) o a 1-6 0 7 •L. o f a L E x a 0 o a E CL u Vii• 0 ° CO "6 L0 0 o mym CCE o c w tD t ° >_ ' ocm E a) - 2 E 3 p o L C O > a1 U c u L O o a O W p C 0 co t0 0 a) C L" 0> m c. 0 y .... 3 ° N E 3 0 c 0�Z 3 U1 _ ° To E m 0 a) 0 ` w O ° E U U E y la __ a O a) C c) - 0 u C C C u p L E N U L O L a= C ¢ a) N a 0 a C •caa -- o a1 0 a, f CD .0 w U a) O C O a N )a O 0 = . o C C En a ca L O) o N y c C O 0 0 a) s N C a) L cu r cn N - O G 7 m Ca C ` > O E C y o L.L F C y L N L > O y E �� y -o 0 W ECU 0 0 ca. � 0ocnca 00 aL 2mmd -8 ° cam o 7 = 5 V) O) O a a7 a) o) - Z 0 w `) O >. m U a) O O CO C -0 L `° v) N 0 O N - N N > u C T O N E y E) 0 C . � N a) a a ca a) ca 3 ..... Z ' •-- C a) a 2 a• fa r 0 Q c U j C a) a) E L C o c a) - fa 7 a) - _ O U = F- 0 C a) W a) -0 o o > a) C ¢ " ' C CY co O y ° a = N `6 .0 Or c - O V . 0 U a) a 7 a) o , C . G 0 ._ O L - 0 O O7 c rT U N "• 0 C E O - O C a uU m'a m a) v c cri ,- Z a ) a) cn a) O o > U a) U Q a a) 0x = ''t E N O :2 C d O- fn N - tea O to m - O o. o l C- a N U a U C Z c a7 L d N C O >., C N U) co - E O O 0 a) a) L L O N C ++ x N L a) F- O r . N 01 y a) C a) S C L" r N d '8 O C ? O co C co Q O. ° 0 G U O E c a _ U C L 0 12 C° co a) O G L t co M 2 a) 0 3 a) _ t L U 0a C w 7 U L = CI • r- m0 O 5 aE c d _ o ° ° ° a) c 3 ,) Ea 0. m ao u� Cy cif E 5 t a) m- - - > c y 3 a) f o Q u c 3 c E m o co u - C 3a C c 3 m� W U M >, `- - - a , a w a) ma - c U a) CL = .sii c o ° U a) a u C.) °• - L 3 y c 0 d E c c cc EL 0 ? a-O O c 3 d> `a" ¢ 0 c_ E C f ca CO a. ca a, c Q) a ` ° i o 0 a �' ` Nc CO 0 � 2 — Z f0 O', =' ° w 0 0 0 0= `—° E o C. C N 0 U w. 0 m y E U a C L L L U¢ a) . _ w v + ° 0 0 `= m 0 � _ m O B E E � >� m _ to �i- ` oF- �Z � > m ¢ a 0 0 L ° a a= 0 E U Y C >...0 € C O E 0 E C€ ( O. a) w e cu C C L O p 0 0) a) U a) u L a) > 7 O) U 0 0 F- iu -cc as 0.0 f0 F- U a°3•oE`c = 1 2 �o)- Z.o.c5 o ) ) 0 a u - u) Z` o E CC a) a> > a) c CO 0 0 Ca * O U • U a N 0° c- * L a, O- N 2 n2 a 1 u c.c c d F--0 1- a a) N r - r 0 0 ce W 5 c o p N c CD 0 0 C N '0 a co C 0 o. p cca m N o N T O a) c O O "' ca C C c N O C EE . " in Lo a ° U - co D -0 N C C O U g Iii a) aok To .5 0 Ea m U c E m m N a. `L co d y0E ac0 1 C w U C >a) - O U 0 . = QE` c 0 0 c a E 3 (/) ¢ a7 CO C C N L. ¢ Oil to 0 0 N E ui �• o a) �� N C7 (n J .) ; me Y + it i v ra O. U =a).c 0 rn JNvC J c) F. CC r • >- 1-- _ W o 0 CC J y a U) Cfl MN < O. ` " J IL d 2 a _ CC P °-' moo li Iv o$ W 0 N J N O > 2 E F- .0 1- 0 0 O 0) 0 zQ � "' - X Cl. a W p m w ° a o c Co . W F- y N L c 7 O O c N 3 O C U a rn Na c °� ° a ° o O. Z Q m -.N 2,-.am ' d U) 1-<0 cv o o °7 m > n a) O E O. Tm m Ta rn° > vLL rno�oc~ o a) »0m >E c m ycT -°O 0 o=2 zm m .co -5 -°> (0 E 7, 20, 02 °-== E 3 m m c rno °O ` N U t W a c 0= co O teO N .+ ' m m r E N c .. ' a) o 0 '° V 1- rnF' m dr 3 a• U at' mcc c 10 E - in n ) d a, Li. U . < a 0) m co E L o m CO O _ N t U I U N U C _111 3 w a) E c Q a L a) L N a) a) -0-0=c cc- C i O N— w - O) 1- C 7 H � 0 ea O D17 = O 7 H — 0) O m N a) O O O O c co o c y � a 3 a mm° aao N C L N t to o -6" U N U m a a ) O c t U l r. m m 7 _ 0 � U o o " e w ELoY 0 0 U )a m a N E O .0 N —. to O N O O) a) c C to m . E c S � U Z H�y u E C L 0 'a) C yO � E O •. a O ° V ° a7 m C to m a a) m c o U o 0 a a) a� �° U a 7 67 p c O- a - O m • c >? U m 0 H ? C = M N C a -coop) a) M U C 6 d y ` U V o N a E E O CO U) W 0 as o 0 m N N y j a O )vi c N c n ` m a y N m 7 N a ` ) a ` ) oo) ac m r e o N c` c N 7 7 ' o 2 O U m o c o c m E d 7 M - L ern - 1 cd'- Em ca U oa c ) m �o > CO RI ,- 0 o C ` ° a1 C O co 'C a) L a1 ° 0) C N m a) -= w m a) w ti m mv�c° m3��c =0 maoo c 2 ° T U c U f0 U fa L T �' °3 a1 > m c C N N 0) O z u 7 m d0 m m = N o m Ea ° a_' m o 0a m e c in m C a) U a1 to . O O c d r QI O O m m C _ 17- e° Q E � � E d o y o f0 c a c ) N V) N 2 a O O - 7 O ° ° o. 0 H` th 01 p m m m o ao_mc a a �o a E N O m L m a) Jo w ch ° u t 77 Q 0 a O- = 0. 7 on 0 -a ca a) U c7'- U) a) ° a) m II f n a m c U U -O C 7 O m "- C O - y 0 w U 7 U N .N II II ✓ m E m L N N c U to L d 5 O' � d y m p m m E m J cn co a) d E m y : m= 7,-c3; ~ c ma o c L m y d '5' m `�° 0. 7 ° O a) Of d 3 a r L O Gin a• m i- C o t a) U a) E N 7 U -§.=2506 m,1--m-E2 m N = c_ c_ 2 0 0 ~ m V-, N U L a N m -' c a o' a m c)- m a) o Q 7 -- t„ 0• m o- a a) 1- manioc _ m r a a1 C r to 0 en O C N N O. m cc VL a) E m d 7 O m U N N U 0I E c a:, m 2 o c m o o Z ri c n Q7 c c to • 0 07 0� as o 0 m e a E c - m m - . o - 2 a cm ° N o o 2 U 0 o 0 2 = — m m c Ule 0 V) m� rna E tn . o I a. a N .... c L U U r T a) 0 0 >. '� m m a a N j U a c ui m U to o m rnU c m Q = a) a) - d0)m o W d1- N 0 c u°7 i 0O m CO m U CO ma a c u i c - ° - o N o a7 a)Mo m ES ,3E2o.'a - c Nom a U O a) a) N .0 m N d m a) N L a N c C-0 O C c U I C °) • 0 0 en F d' a N a7 >.E5147,2°-2- a 01 m 0 7 0 m a) ' d N C I = C O o 0 1 , l a N 07 T a) V) m Q' O p`. 0 0 2 E O O V m a = .+ U a7 U U m a) O C c C U C N O C E - OLD N N L 7 E 0.-0 O m 0 7 N L o 4- m m 7 t r E - Q N N - O c - O 8 U .... N C C O C N O O U N . N > a 0 O f� Y d m O U O L o C7 H N N .2 0) N V d to a O) 3 a, 2 >. C 3 0 0 a o.° U R° ✓ m C C 7 a) y C C L N N E a m (� c Q m 0 0 U U C mi U` O °1 > o f CO O m 0 N (-) C O o c tnc m E f m 0uN >ma,c v °7 )mE _ m 2 N E O>.m u) o- y NLV � d0 m 3 a) u c1 tea) d a) T 7 d C N c N ( c n I N CO m to U m _c C E Y a a a N o en o N .- E cu m c 0.w m u-0 c co c ` c m N o = c � E ¢ c u< m C 7 0 a '.. C O c c c y en N C O.c L co Q 0 W =E a a7 O Of O fa 0 0 C 0) — F - a) E ta $ ch m . to d N 0 th m m - d O c M N c W O co a d N 67,0 C C N a) 4) m N 7 N m tan N >,;.= N m N a) 7 t II �., .. a) O a> O. c a C c m C O. O 7 1- E C N m a) 7 m N t'7 ± ` m N N E N C m _ w to • S L ±r + . J N c N N • a LC J F- _ Cr r' J C , '' W O cc Q - J Cr) V ) a N 2 a — a. a ° Cr c n o a) II 1 . +^ .. y LU 0NCC J ca ca N p 5 = H E. 1.1 O p a' :r ' � r ❑ .V W Z N CI) X 0. W Z - --- p t D N to 0 O r c 3 O Z O F- 0 =Ca i m 0 ' a o ' -° a Q o 3� m v'0 a E cc a? u o ° > 00 d LYV1 o� a).8 0 > �3 '+ �> � p W E o c N tp 0 L C _° N ° o CO a p O N o O1!n > L) a) to L N O O N a a C O a- N ill N a Q a3 N '= y C a N 7 p • C N j 0 0)-0-- N N CD ILI �LL a) .c a �J N o c aE U N I- -c ti) 3 a i C O C E t -C a a w O 7 U O y N C O C O O C O C ..o ° m C C T O - c - L - a) N O a' Y C CO p a) C N 3 rC- a) m N O_ 7 C >' c O N y m a1 O a t a) C N C E y y 0 ° f0 N U a Ca) C U O. N E 0= t > C U t o a) E a c ac? c oQ o O. m a' c c u E • O O O N a) �O U N N a ° U Q Q O' E W .�. - N , 2 2 3 _ E a 0 0) (0 U C C O L p N L 0 0 0 0(_ a' L p ° S O ° N N C L O N C7 a 3 fh U tp U ' E -- C L N U 1p C V cn V -0'0 -° o a 2 a C N a � -° N aa) - U- E ..= N o a � c -0 > 0m0 `0 »° -? gxg'm0 0o3t O >c E CD CO N N tn a) O a) C C • a' a) O N O c O y c 3 N - - 0 C 0 > W C L N O r tp a)- V y O - O c t0 p V CC 0 � i a o N N N - a) E L m a' Q U O O I- O' • H f O - ° E o' c �' ° ' ai 07 Q a °� -� d m O2 u O v' N v) - mar m a) E0 a' t >E.c mt ` p Oc C a) W N =calm N 'O U N f H to N O O N h 0 3 2 y o o N m U O Sip C 2 N N y 7 N S N N ? j N ' a1 O L c a N N C n y p a N O O C C Z N C 7 ` U 7 N N to 'O >` N en C O `� RI td L N L v i m O N a' �' . 'CO O 0 U o co = C a'a'it ° v, m o m c0a'3c CO rn rn ; o c F y J a'�omNUO c� a' 2c me ip CA to Q O' y O' a' A N C O' a' "0 c O N 6' a' N 0 c N N ID U o 0 7 N a U o c? - O >, .c, p> N a N p E C N m r N t � ' ` V Cr) N U N C C H `-- v) H Ql jp V y 2la N E L N c. U L 2 C O O O >, N C = C tp y a' C W E C 0' C N C a) O' — — N O 01 -p O N to - ' a) CO J _Of c C u O C 0 16 u Cp - or:— O U y ' y Q "O C C C - c a' - N II U) C a) C a 0 a' C- ip ;Cp .- L a) CO L N f` 0) 0 0 CA E aao E C c o o '° CO rn v? o E a v E L m y m -Iu) il E E m L a' = ° m ac. u E 0 rn � o f co N L c c ° ) CO U ac aa ) U 17 E C to f0 y a ° E t ri , > tp to c 0 a' d � -- u ) to as > N U U c 0 N a m "c a en d O d a' 0= 'p "O O' a) 0 0' I UC • 9 - c oo E n cn c 0 0ca7)a ,- ` • N co f0 _ CC °' a T c °' y m T O "O N a N a) O 0- C N C ° N E A r o N `"� . '" ' a' N j a' a �. u to n L a O • •- y O -° N r .0 c` >. ri L o (7) E y u) - E a) as >- 3a - o a Z a m - N c�CE> 0 a' �o L'Lm °op��a 5o °m2 c a 5 fay a5 c 2 tn.0 a ta∎ a 0) CC u �= L^ ca 0. 5v) 0- en F- cr a . W N me _ U T C O O .rL o;) .0 ' � O O O et w m m O w �_ N O co - O N O d a m N N U a c- H 3 N a 0 u) c N t c 0 N Q °- a' L L a' O N t p ac - o N co C U V ›...s Q) a a a) C o o 2 U I- c a O a) -6 0-= .c a.) E� aoa E N I -.L-O-0 C C p N p E .0 0I W m o > N C N N �'' p CO . a, a t0 > -a o ° ma ° ` c L o �? o to E ° o �a�c t m o a' L o o N may �O I- cn a) a' o • ri a C N N E m- N C a o 7 ° Q � o O c -o . E a1 U o a. i_N c f° i ` a 3 0 03 0 E N co E E CC to 0 p ti) I O U a E O C O V a1 L U a J N � p a N T a ^ L L f0 C N 0 a a` 7 to °o E)>c N �moQ QE> i N t r' c a C y > ip d > p o d c O N o C tC Q a'c o' y ° a= @ ° U ° °E m H ts r _ E =C M�ouc ∎y 0o ' m M o o m ° o '. E ° C7in 3 ° co U O. U O a a p O c = 113-€0,c C - � + a i a) L C E ° a c � 0 a E c c - v o 0 Q) 0 a' `0 ' a' to F .� v im ' U ` Q U U o.. ri - CL O O C -c n F- tot ±, )v )v + J N 1n C N J cn • a ...x J 1- ^ MO al >- = to 1n a N J �' .= V) 2 - J J F- 2 a M E 0 W O NCC to J N❑ > 2 J m 1— .aui v 0 W Z 2 J J X a O cu 'p Z _ o a). c Q y c m o CO C y @ @ N L a O O W C y g y 3 u= • c nN N- ~ m a a Z a . a @ 7 G C 3 ° 0 7 -0 N of E w w f0 0 o 0 C a cc .- c w ` o E g0• p - �aa,rn O a) a) y Ep n >.c• y om > Ui= �u a tnp.0en> m3m @ tn -c° a) cc. tcuE y 0 LL 'N 0 tn o c y to a) `7 L C p C C @ O@ V O N o � a- - c c E .c= 3' la 41 N cn H E a) 0 a) N+ _ d E n o a) y y c p O n Y E y > C n � ) w 01 @ - 0) O LL .- Hr 3 E m E ca H E m t o .? m:°L t1 c E 0 W E d a t. C . > 7 N O U 0 O@ la N C @ . a)E E E >' o m et 0 En 'p 0 > ° y o n 2 a) o- E L M N y " S U p a) -° @ C y a E E - �� W - U -,9- y < C O .0 O U @u,5 n O L 0 '0 "D @ @ U 'O n a) N M C in c U O @ ne c C 0� . M a) p O a) p u O to , C y U ' a a) 03y 0. o m � 0,-c F-c c O"E c -0 E �Y m —cc._ - Uw = m co `i) 0 to > a u i -0 ya m c a)L� >• m 2 (n O C a) a) .O U y 7 C • N C y W 1-a u 0 O@ c ..r. CC y >, °. E O � a • O c o O to a rnw .rs C I U . C L N c t (n a.- : co->, 0 0 m R Q m— F- A C C @ c a) 01 ` > E- Q) W y ° N a) 7 y Y c a @ Y N C ° c Z p 7 0 d O N y 0) r . > ` O O ' u @@ V (n O O D) • m co -0 . o - m a m 7 c , CO 3 0 2 c c CO H 7 0 O. 7 y 0 0 0@ C en E O @ O a) w v C co Cn CD 3 to v t @ M VI Q O U O n N u-0 ° n u C N E c 0 'p y N rn U U a) U X m > n y @ U CO C y to C �.'' F :. C C N` O Ia 0) Q@ fa C n 7 N y Q1 Q) C an W C rowan, a@ y a y C N O y n C F @> 5 N E a J 1) II CS) 0 i= 0- N O y E N 2...... - 0 U° °' y CO et C m J v) R C� m o O E - o y 2 O- co rn -0 0 o a) a) @ E 0 E n Q V C Q 8 n y n . @ a) 0 n 7 N t o O N 7 E ti U a) U E ' c u .) to @ • - P.. c c Oct N 0 ' O U ' co V V - a C L @ .. a) V 0 10) S 7 1'7 @ C M M '> 3 "' CL, U C N@ C xi d O T y E O T .- N as 0 C C p el @ C O C - E O of •Cr y c c u >vi ° -E N C. . C4 Z t in noi2 °c m 0as2 E 9 2 E°t p ) H I- a T t y a c 0 0 N V' U 0 O a `p o o p 7 o a' W O- is @ 0 CC u c fa 0 C to N O N 7 y '0 O ` 7 'p p .O L a) t1 0 O N w O n U U 0 H CO C F' y t0 y ' n a) c ... "' U N CO L O N a) y C CG co E O ta a) `o ° E • y N p U ID .0 w C@ et •••-• d o o O n E C 'O 0 y N a) y - O to u OO @ c 0 C N O E O Q7 C _ _ y o 01 N O CO 'O a @ a) re N 7 U U O to y 0 12 . C a) C ca a) L N c 'E O c CU C t a) C O N E O N L C y I- 0 0 (,9 Q a w o y n O E.. O E- :11! 1'r yQ U 10 T C a a N c c- N . c ' T-7p 0 O a)@ N N 0. C O g a E?)a �LrO the y UE Lu a) @ m e aam ° @ m u, ca ny y FL 0 _— .c a�o acm0 ¢E> cnn i�im E'ao aicE @E°� u) E"E - ° E< C E - L Q) C' ia. x O 0 O U O @ O N >@ y 7 2 E y r) >> 7 N t'1 N t N> C L _. 0 (D c 5 J v oa, 0 0 a c i o „ m °- 5aaCD Y I+ u , �:.. a) -p @ -to @ 0. N- ° o m n o c e o u - o m 7 o E re osE E3E E3 -c uc12 0 uLu • ~ L a) Iv J N to, c cn E. `� J J cn r ~ = v cc � Q J r I / ) V n. N d J J F _ a) r 1 I I y W 0 N M J co C0 N 0 1- E U U o G) .� + W Z ° J J N _ a W Z c c — CO m , L 0 m m N IO 'n C ZQ C++ al C N � .1: 3? C ` p a) co I u) m N CO C • 0 3 437 I-QC7 a) y aa, >, ) N 3 N� C O m cO p)c o. a c CO ° ZQ' . w -c'C N / O.0 _ m N N 2 > , ° Fes' C U N L. W C L v O E c c „1 N C a) c y ° a O m a CO aa N W 07 ' t V' m U U ' N E I- w ra I C a) N E N a) E m Q Q - N w 0° d N a) L o 0 L.L. •L° m( 0 1 c L O.c Q) c 0 U w ` C . • C N m 7 j N - w a) p m 2 0 m N U C m m Q1.0 E Q c O a) d 0 O c a a ` a =.�a E.g > ,W V N o oc ta. m C O) N cc L. - a CU 0 c E ' o 0 43 � 43 c 1:1.172 43 '„ 2 E E m co 'O U - U C '_O C U O 6. U y @ L G E O O O) a) e) " - ° O O- C N 43 7 a _ O 3 d L L a U 7 c o m O V c a0- c E u) 433 j •= v, u, w n U 243 = ` o U m y C g Y 0 m 3 - = m E g d E i m w° 0 m E 0 0 0 o o r — ° a a) N a m al N N of c- a) o -0v c a' m— N QN `� E c ° a m W O 0' u) 43 3 cai N m m y m a)— 0 c o ° o u. m Q' c >, � a) o o) E ca N y E ^ N O L 2 >, U co N E a to N 7 = L U y U ` co w L Q .8 as c w m .° ° m CV CM w C d a > a)- m o E c o m y 433 Can) a yr E C rnro - ,� L m ' m z c ° ° y mdm mc omap,n CL.- CD a a`n i C Z mc 2 ca)E c > , �mcu �° u CD L. +_ a ° �° c m cr c c o m ° ...COW ° ' u 0 .0 Ti m c 10 Ca Q L ' „ 437 C O a O _ N m U y 0 C U m et H 2 U L ° . E 437 C E `O L C m y y r a a a ) m c 437 c W tn 2 g a,,3 c °-awl a,a°oa E.„'o c ° ) 08 ca co Cel N a a, W O ) c N 10 O V m m ?. C. 0 C a C 7 ° II II ri, V 3 0 0 43 s. N .`r r t0 U a V N C lC0 E E d N c y Q w m J to C0 u) >o c E ' a) 43 > oL oa C.) .0 N a) N p c ri O V a _) a) O N V 0..._ m V) U Qv 4343 ..c in o� E d E m o 01 0 .... °~ A c ac) m 3 c a �� aN a := a3 U cN a) 437 `) ° o N w a) . CC O> C° y o f° y E r O al r L j _ Z' • co C r r C - '7 r- a) E m r ... Io a) ui . 0 r m 0 u) r O - a N N a) o U N m M m .° a C r7 a) C 'a yr ai '�" 3 V P') f0 o. N 2 ° 0 ° ° c o E m c a) - 0 cs c m c E ID CL a � 3 i o� aO7i a 2 to U 3 a Z 2 m m 4371 - °mac w 2 c,_ a 2 1- a ch W 2 2 ° ►- Ca c) CI 0 En -C O.0 C N N N N L C Q' V N a 0 .� N ° m u O d O a) C O O a) co a N m Q. N cn .C) m "Jr, ° C y m C w u) m >, C) N F to C D a m al = - O 0 > 43 M O D E N a) d _ , C O o a N C E a) -2 0 43 O C m c O C 0 O) O N ° N _ °a c > a c — a)a) m y ao n E ■ a „ O y N N O › ,.,5 - ° O N L N a m a) ° . m + U — o c a) w ui w C C O I-- io m o m cn c E m c m a. E� c 343•° u ao - o V ° L N y c u) d N T a) �° a E d m o C Q r a r)a�> oi`i)C u2iva) u) y ia o 0 a) u u C D L = 7 L O a) 0 C D > m u) 7 N 0 -0 a y a C 0 C I ° C'C I a) c ° '" .c Q E > fn Q - C m E '�) L r T y U a 0 O U D < N E N O N 3 ` T d° o c r Y c ` O O a) co ° s i5 ac • lo > � y E CI W V N C cu C C J- E _ E a) Y+ II 7 -° O a) •„ .... CO E 7 =2°0 r = 1- m a 437 a H O N a) N 5 F L D) '� . J N C (/� V) F. "� >- F _ C) 0 Q J c y cn a N 2 a - �a 2 a cc E °) W ON cn NO D O m Iv O U W Z O N cn x a W z c W C g u, O a u C.ZQ To' E j m m °)o C E- . ] y a) c m mo c aa)) m0r Em - ° - > v r =m rc - w 14 E 6c o`m ~w o >• is - m m : : N wr E a IL- ,„n5 .2 Q>'o aw m a ¢ LO O d C c N En O )L ° N d y m w e c > C N w m e > C C ° 1 m C P. f H 3 L C N w U O m O r O C m o 3 c m LI ca. - o m v E c O o 7 E x 2 p a a) = c a ? m is m � ° ° a 20 cc mo o u cn N p 0 O m a a 01 V E y y C U m O a) 0 m O n y o �_ w - O > O. N a a) > N N p >' j O o N 2 N C1 O C ca - O a) •= • O E o C • a ? ( ) v_,_ o .� E Nc oc• a « oc3,NO Z o o f . E mutes ^ Uw rn 3°c'coi aa)._2 e yo cm as 0 2 1 .a mo uU E my E > . a) ° � ci >. pm a) co .4. m r m c p S. o m CO 0 a) u c y co -= aN 2 oa>.� u N E. a) N O O.M IL) 3 c C_c L m O U E w N w m O w e a L C O O S ° C In W 1- ix o 0. c o c w 3'0 ° m u na)a c a? O a) o m o c CO v) ` 0c -o>+c° • y wmm2ac)6Odw a 1p i 3 ca ° d m ` m u y - c f a) w -o0 a)c 3 � n a`)t� c3�mmc m °cai�'7caoifLnE Zoe " -_ m E O c m m c E 5 m u+ y d • E fri m 0 cn O 0 a) . U c >, 1 0 0 7 M a '� a : C ' O m 0 w p w V C U U C P C �- N m m - m m N y6-o c ouEM g 0 . o) ay •-• 2rn -cEE y M CO C7 m n— c w uW 5, u a -c a) ^ - v c E d w o 3 3 ES c w- m 0 !- H > C a) C— M a) n C O c C m 0 - a �0 rn 4? m O N a) a)'L C a O) c 0) E j N J m W M c E- m °- C aE °- O C w a m 11 d) Ta t q � 0 u)- 0 am m y ° w ma c . a a t oEa a ama 85 wci a) 0M ° N u V m w m 3a m° 01 Ca ti n c" Zr) a) m > , •3� °'Ea o m aO c c > a ' a � mJ fn CC n O nO ¢ >> c C c' w O N O a) N - m 0 11 a C .0 ; a C `) O. 01 n - ya N m� a) m m ma o a m O oa co u ac m c -caa m o� 12 c n. � Em> y sa coa c ° > >mi ca_ - 0 0 2 r a)o . I-- a) a)� = O. o o E > >CC o E E�aw c o S 0c- y a m 3 m- c w ■ a) c CL >- 2 E c n - U N Ia w :r O ,_ 0 >+a ,- w O N a) N m 3 - O N CO r W > O C = v �') m m anU a a)M o 3 mM m e a`r . 3 cy E S M u ° M� 0 W m U = 'O • a) c rL c C N CO 0 0 V m a) ` c 0 m ` U 0 •(a .c c N N 2 f U- o c N d N c �2-m2OEE°u m 5 c ` o2mrin22:a- a3 _a 2 r. maSv =2m> o e- 6 4 6 CL ma v >.>.. m 0)c o IX W c X2Eo 0 3 � °3 LN= - o 7 N 3 a c a N X u) 1:1 l C"O >.O -• a) a) N HFN w A C p w 0 C = 0 G N C i'•• a) N p U m a U 0 N 9 _ O v w a) E a) p io cy u ; y E= o aN o c NL >,O C ca a) U m ° m - pd E E • C > a C U 3 C p m 0. 1 L - o c C O cc. m oC7 • F- ih�3pa c> a v a ) > w o al �`o ¢ oOO w 'tal �° -a 0 o a ai O.° c a) N�= w E c 3 y y m E y m • uc c m i �> m a a c p > �m a m - ' E °)w 0 p y .0 O w o -o c o w - y m N d J a ITa C . > N¢ E m a c —° a m . CO m ° m 0 2 E in O. ' u) O N� 0 U m aI al cc u c>-5 ■ m 'm m c Y+ II E- N- w ay N y - c_ =Woo E p ,..•-• O m p N U 3 c cI- ' i E O- 5 3 aa` w ~ L C7 N ,7 0 V) f/) p J J r _ n - O J r- "- " W O Q C CO CO d N M a v F a - a a i� fv E < a) 0 N re J J N 0 OS f- m D p m O W Z o J J W x. a W Z _ c o V UO ° -oco-c m ovoom m aZ a y H C9 °° o d y a) a) 3 > E a) LC U F m m 3 a) E m - - %)L _ 0) to _ rn CO o LL 0 E N -. t.) a E a" E CO u E. w (1) 1-- a a a) ) a m ) v a - a f - 0) (I) c Q a E L E d = m Q ` o E� a_ m a) a) LI 0 L y y C_0 O N C a) -0 y a ) N 17 C C ..... L a N H j - -It 0 N O m L O (Dm � L ... m 0) d tn L C Y j N O C y O C m o (1) p y 3 E` C a) - O ) • t0 N m y m A` 'O c in m y> 73 'o 0 d 0. 0 , � L .. c O. • C V ) . = L -' C y U N C ° a) ° C O N 0 - 0 O • 1.. in O C C . y . ,� N O) N E C y y E m m V X c L. u) - - -o CO a lL .- c a 0)" _a) o O ° av y ° a (0 v E � 0 '0 0 c d rn E y p m Y 0) y > y m d o c � rn c a)3 8Ec`8N m a ' L c =v ? 2 , c a m U m m -0 o O -° E = m m m o o y :° 3 m m U m c o m a m 0 E - °? o a) ° w o s y a -o ° oo c o) - o -n= �, wao a m °` t)) N t m a 0 T3 U y , L O 0 .... • ' y E - p 0 Ern n CO E 'a L C)� E m - C c 3 0 c 0) p w 3 y m a m$ 0..- 0 C •- c CO 3 N C ° 0 L m E m .c -al E L. . U E >. •y O� 0) a y ° T C CO "o a- L E y C E U -. co U i m a • - 0 "O a) O D C 'O N a U U 7 _ y O m a 3 C O p y m C D' N E re O y> 0 0 . y y c - ° a C O l(1? a y y •O m 7 N • U) m m 9 u • O L a) -2 ° O 0 y C ° U O a) C y y y 7 � N O N D V C E >. d U) N - d 4) O N m C a) d° C M 0)w m L U N m m y >' y" O U m a) W C y O E m lT = v O L r7 V O rn w y m u) N m (T O m m m ry- o E o 0 d y m u a) 0) -- f0 c m`� g m - L y L a E ° :S c L. d C O m CO U C t - y 3- y O to O O m ° -c tu) w)ocr oa m c�rn m oa) d U) 3 3 �L ai = ° y c as co ;n� a'3 U3 ° t c � p c �c ?) c mm A 0 co c 0 as - CD > TS C C � ° C L U N 0 0 •- • C O � � d N • E •° L N c y C M 0c7)-0"6- c 2 m . - m 2 g oL J L N 2 - 7, 2= E m mw' ( C , O O p 1 > ?a jr) N s zC N y 3 0) mJ ,_,,c W . m ca m m - a ?EmE>2 c..- , , c ° )m o m a)3 .° °ctto a a • j m._ t d3�c -cc?aME , - o ° c " y3,u•m�2 co C . ca o °) op o m ° o rn ` o_ o m ° m = ° cCc mvv3 C O) Q. N U L. may„ 4) C O a) p ,0 N N y E N 17 13 =p ' o . '- 13 2 m o c ° m E �- o U c 0 Z y a o o o ° a m o - o o °~ ° a ° °- ' E . 0 . = m e 0... U •0--0 m ism a a m c o u ...... m e . 1— 0 L O N C N 0) E 0 N 7 a) C m M M C E Q M N C c C M y m CC N N 0 C N U N �7 ° E y y t` C E N y 0) N N .� C N w E r . .. w 0) E • T•• C O N m U C rn ° O M N 5, ,13, U C M O a 7 E r C m m y E N M m m m m C rn 0, M M m ) Y M y M _n M y a) - E= •O > y c p m y U y tT 3 0 0 > 7 7 . c C O N a) a-- o y cE" � m e mT 0 CD t- 0 U N a i�L orL m a) o m a� - - - � c c m d E-o m S� =2 N g - m E ma n2 U c 5 E2 3 u2 a)a > c2 a) o m m2 mw� d t h In 0 p 0) U a) > L 0) = 0 C p U = W f0 7 0 C a) °` w N 0 a) C 0) U m y m N 3 x y d N ° 2 m a) m y F- A y 'O o. y O m O) a) L° y d 0) C c� E vy O p tT - ._ N � L. a P c 3 o s, c N X y C° m T C N O C m y U y m •O d > a) 3 md a La) m> 0. u a a FL 0Eoc y co E a) F amo ma•� `oO V y a � ,�c °v E = - m Ea.m U � Q y O � 3 -- -0 -0 - y a p 2 m N m oov�°c o om N mE c m d C m f LL' o o a) a m 7 y 0= L. I tT O w • p U 0)'O F Q E > CO t'. N , ° M 17 C L O y 0 O D m Q .-m c N yOij m °y O M 3 M N y a) y O C . C (n J • ▪ ° m m m o E c- o Y+ a O 2 L y a au 0= co 0 -mo a uoc o a E-a o) E v to. 2 ,nm 3 ` 1- .- J N ` C F. E CO } 1- _ CC r) +L' = - = W o Q - - u) In a N a 2 v Fa a D 0 E v) = o a �. - c u I- . 0 ° , a ° ^ , II II 0 W Z O CO 'n X a W Z y O y W O o a C C C v C C y u O a, U I- Q '> c° O O) 0 j w 0 ° o .c a ro c T u `7 C a Z Q N a, 0 �'O a). E y O N ° 7 a O E N N a) .° 7 O In WUP c >,o� 0c05 a) �a ,0 m a 0m _ c>,c = a �UF- c a,a 0 ya m 5 1:3 76 y 3 n o c c ,a - o� E m a�ly �° > • co o Z re a a) u ff a o 0 C C° , o to L a .0 w O N C • o) O rn O, E • N E a) yF m>=7.4, 5 m2 a o uccrn 0 >aoayoc <L F -ooa rnmc a " a)30 o)2 Q a -r, -0 al ' O C u j 3 C O O L N In y o is c C O) v, a1 "O y a c a o o d° a) 0 a, > ; a) u 0 a, C ' L c ' c C �? 0 = y- - e m a wi- E 0 ofi a 0-p 0- 0 0 °. C 0 c- vi E c = = 3 � 3 To Q o c v =_ v a" -° 0 o, �t c N � o - a)= c� E w �( a y co m c co o y 0 c CO a c f0 To > a S m c y a E m a .12 a Q > o) ° al y y 4- y l L t o C C. c 0 y C 3 c v 0 c a ` ) E= t•-.1- 0 v o c c u) 0 o > N y td o .T y m E °- L' >� t U l ' 0 0 N la N E a, a, 0 0 y O y O o m la .02 o ° u y n c. ov a -°Q� o)o y ac o 0 ° E U o -v = 0 0 3 cn c =� c U 0 = o. - 0 0 3 ` o L a 0 0 To - = C 3 c -§ fa E c d U _ O a CO Cr j a) in y L ° m _a� p y - > U O O ° - o Eo 0 - a.. c 0 O N y CO 0>. �E u - o i o 0 0 . 0 ..0 �co m avEoc oa, cn N W c _ C L a7 N co L O LL 3 N a) C CO CO O a1 L y co C o a, L 0) 0 E y 0 -. y C IT O L N 0 u L a O ca E N o L a) 0 c c ) ... C 0 ° E 0 3 c = o t u c u) i 7) oa) ao. N f- oo0 3 0 U ° oc X 3 0 -C 3 E u- rn w m Q O O y 3 N -: 2 . a Y U_ a) C ° w m w d aa_ o a) c a, o e l ` o 0 E2. 0 c 0 e'i o oY a0 c 3 a c _ v u 0 my 0 `m z 3 y 0)C , a 0 2 CD o _ O ooc a u i " � E>o o� °a o�a ,> , c 0 U " Y= c c o° c a+ a C = 'O ° y d = "' C a) ( U /) Y L ` .. a, = - i , J _O W C U. y � a �j j = t r y m = L Q, C a y L 2 L O O y N >> d O C O N V N m II fn .- ° 'O > a) - a) t co 75 o 0 y m~ ri , a L> a) 0 0 V E o 0 11 N II c.) O C 0 O °' V) pi > N y y 0 y c a) N O) L - .c u) y 0 o) O a) LL w CO J U 0. O y 0 E E I- 7 y C y O V v) O O` p C = 0 ° C y O V OI ° 0 C o c m ° c Z • y ` C N y O.Cn a) a) a a c -` .. 0 C y a cn O C ° O > a) U N a T CL o > L O , M 0 = N y u N y O O C°7 a, O ca y y 7 Q) i [ 0 `. 0 a) ". c u C Ce alp °r a) > ° O G ▪ aa ° N 6 L C N a) ~ C a, C a r a, O a,"0 N u. o' G a) a N M ,- lii p C o c/) O N M •- o a 0 n U 0 3 a a, r3 C= a C 13 a a '6 N N o 'c aC m > , 0 a a, , ,, = c C O Ti o c 0 a G N> 0 0 0 n. v=u�= OL(n O{ L - ID E'020 >3 F- d r a) 'd a, N C a, >. vi N a) C .4. I- Er W ... r) co �� 7� co ... r] N � L co c N v a) C N a C = C y c = 3 O C .0- y O o O C Ia a) O C ° E N I- N en a7= C la= = N-° c E C E E la 0 Q 0 -2 0 O N O O° a N O E 0 m • rno-2 3 0 m E" 3 -.- rn m-oa a - C = L o. 0 y -c= L 0. . - a) C a l > = m ° y 3° 0 = C 0. 3 0 ( I u u co G 0 0 3 _ u, 0 m E - CO o-- U c a) v en O, ID -° N m a) 5 s_ O) a) a G a 0 a1 C a •- occ� � -`oc o �y2 Vo E ri�,>,7Eo=cua ri�,SN �_ 3 ` 0E dm u v c E u c o > co c y 3Hc ao o F 3a o a o m Q Ea u E - cc 0 0 c .' v, - c I- m c N= -° ° `0 y Ca _ y • > y0 Q)a) O u Op C a O O C 1017) C U N O 0 U •= CD N L c � • a) - - =0N y a, a) l` Y+ II ., = U L u 0 a) = U.c V 7 O 61 - cn UcnF— C CN = Ucn F• C c N O a c F- ..7" J N C[7 c - II F. "Fi N Ca . >- 1- .. CC cn CL JT E Iv WO Q — cn cn d N 2 a v a a) D 0) R F CL v )? < F) c o F LU O N CC CO CD N O cc F— S E U O ^ Iv I v p W Z CO to X a W Z c o y -o a W ` p C m a m m 4 ) u,oa -O- u mrn UF' c _ ` L) al E c") - y? cm m 3 CO o a) Q) - s c 0- Za u y °'n - �? m o° m o 'a ca U o 3 0 ° 5 a a') F- Q C7 C > d C c E O N to N d O L O N F— N C C O c 0 = > rZ0H f t 0 c c c x-00 °s: 3 y > c a cL m - �� 3 , c o — ° • m *.;11 O CL rL ` to U rt O (0 7 0) co c N a) ' O O N N N RI s m O N _ H to O a) O C H t0 0) N L N CO oZ c n � ° to 3 o rn� O `'o a) ac a C a mt o 1° tr ac in a r• = L N CD W to E O N N U E ca 0 `7 I ca a) = .r U N .• ca E y . > U O L U U . E ' a 3 ; m LPL 3 0 ..a_3 o C y C y X OO y E-- ° O a) o. ° o c N V 0 c . f— E -c O 0 c ' Q Q = U a) U1 N U to O a) 3 m 3 u_ a) :- L to N O m U L N O L , CO co Q C N ° N m Eta ca O 0 0. la E N > C as ✓ ca c.) y U X a) a) O a) N = N N co co c a 3 f0 d ce N O r.) U y U C N N a) W T d co 0) U co t7 ' L co C Z 7 o >. _U Of o tn C CO 1— Q .L .+ SP- y y C c9 L co C CO L C O O ` ■ t0 C? 0 co to O CO U 2 a) CO F. • F- H in u c ` O a, E W cn CO f A �v C m II in N ✓ a) N ca a) m _...1 Cn Ca N . U 7 a) to CI. L 3 U N-Oj A J 0 C 7 C yn _ ca — d .a H U °�� CC N o f cj t N T E • io O • C'1 7, w th O - t > N a E- c 5 H = a • Fn CU C w L 0 _C ( .9 .0 N O Q' W 0 an d 0 .o N c a) C N t C O C N C u) O O N ° O ° .�,. CL CO O~D to CO CO _ > , a E- O E o. a) c I fo = O N 'O C to co = — G C C a) N to E C 3 CO a N co L d O d E C C c O O E c C O C C ' E m ca rno9 3-0 Al R E o m-o a) .12 n a _ t, y30` m D .0 ca° o - E� O O O N 7 O O O O Q N N C C 0) o L N O O N .... d N C.) C a) y O. ' • m m ° c c c ' . c U ` ca O. ° - 5 t) N T C O 7 M N C �" N O C U L N O O U 6 ` U L U U C to + U o 0 U C >` N > CO N O al TZ in co - ! O a C ca — d 7 L O.6. O v) a - n v a� o c 3 d C • �> cn< ccratD - c I- Ca ° a) O to > -0 a) O W N G y i > o)a y a c > > a y .� ND 0) a)i_ U w = NO a U C7 Cn 3 CQ' a) - C Y t tt ..r. N -,f L N o U L U C N H 0 0 , 0 U cnF— E EN 9. 7 U u) 1-- F. F- t CO JNU7 C fn cc ri ell 0 Q J C Q- N a v �a 2 -0 cc E =o o u W o NCC V) N 0 > 2 m i= D O a) Iv 0 W Z O` cn X a c >. d c >. W Z C m • c a H u) 0 0 G W > CO a) V C C a7 w U O a d d; _C C C 2 a U F- 3 j a) > E a) C 7 O Y L a a) co u) a) 3 F- N co - o" - Q O L G u) a Z Q a) 3 N a N E N O o E C m a) -o a - C Q L a) Q' Q 0 a) ° O a) a ) c) 07 ) E >, en - a) .. o o C 3 d a) Q C to a) C W N° a) C- > UF- U o c_ c- a) c- E `° E m v� o a) ° w , o C U- o U c o 3, aLL cc m c=' > >m mW3coa) - CU" Eo a E c c CO NZ� E m uJO ree a°'i o)y - 3 � a� u E m as 9 arc oa o -> N c uD m u) - C L E>, - m `-'v a ° ^_ ' CD N W m m m a � d� a � E c c � u� - ) o - ° ' o � � c ca o ) L C o m m 2 0 0 E 0 'al, � � o x L N X C a) C a3 7 0 0 Q Q �� C- ° ca U= U UU( "oE3 m us > ca a3 a) ca r.2 vwa L L. _ O m CO m v m 0) o -0 a - a) c en a) al . a7 L C C1 L � N = L Q E O C N O C O o C CO O" O O in C O o V O L m "� 0 3 0 CO o C E-0 0) -X x `) t c° °v m a) _c mt c D. g = 0 a) ma; cd m> o o cn u o > om m-° = rn� Evc E m r � dov c0> °1a a L 4: a7 U 'C U . O ` y o p E 0 N -° C a) o a > a) o a C o U ov U Eo m °' L 0 c 3 c • C a .0 o c a)U c m w u o C m d c c o � E La d ° ° y °-' °,o E „3..... U ,g; c m �� c m m CO O a)C� o CO _ `� °' �) m c n c0 •uco� o c co c m a 3-0 c H en ca L V a E C •° ` ` ° 0)y ` j p ) u) L 0 o - C 7 c d 01 o c N a) c W 7 M a °f C O N O C a) co IO O O 'C c L 0 E Q O L o u) > U a ' U O) c) ' U) N • C D a) °. E a) o 2 U a; cu O m 3 T f` U W O) G o a) c= O coo a0) • W 0) .0 ° c= c o y 3 3 0o m c rn a m � w C' > `° d y C `—' N ? O O a. N O U E 3 N C O - O E 22 c .o.. L t E o N as j O c` a) o `O °` a) u) d N q N N a) >, a) >, G co y CO • Z O. ea w o) > 3 U c • -a 't o am o E ) in _ O 0 .. U L c V! > O u O C a) a) .2c 1-0 ...• u) a l` 0.E C • ..r F- Q CIS U . C E o a C a' 2c „,21: .2 (") a) 3 U a) 5, a u+ G y 0 o U v L ca C O Q C t0 N of 0 N 3 a 7 N N ca C 1 N :. - V) O C N .0 45 U c 2' O - F a) U U C -5 > a) O N U 7) a n- U N U c ° w a) ° u- a3 O C as a) o U C O C y N C W E a) ° 0 0 h a± 7 a) ca C N C _ C _ p @ • cn O u) 3 ' > 3 O L N- N a) O m I ») vi o a a 0 3 c o , ° n a L c Z E C t nEo a) H c m o as .... m u II n a o C 3 _ O N N V a) a) in V cn C 7 T ca U C CO o m J U) C co -a) 0 ) � CD Ti > 3 C.9 •- wmC7 0.2-L_Ea`)` 'c a ° 0E _ a ` ;— ° m -o 6. E 00a) 3 - a .0 ,... VtItmULOUcc3o1°a�Nrn- 20.c3goo N CO j � C O) � ° � ° co o C2 V) O O V). 0 60 u c� a? v J� N.V'O — a) o o] Q o o Q A E C" c C a) a 7 N o a) N i. 7 O a 13c-c°- O O a U > a) E C C I- O O ) m o - 0 O y N 3 0 4 7 7 Q N C L N C-0 N U > N as o u '" C C c 'O > E c of • V' N C a) • • E as X 0 )n a) O CO .'- V N .- 3 C.- C o r N a) ° 2 O o C O a C O. 0 c a) _ :co -0 a) 0 - a > U . @ . a) r7 N a) P9 0 'O M C 0 Q C v . o X CO O o2 a r2 N ab EE'IDOE ° o oU ° a N d o C7 a � v, E 0=E.m o- E U mcr) °� " m • i- a �, �, o cc E h - W ,_ O a) .. o �O O N N N N a a E L u a) a a) o m ° o > m c) 3 ° a 70 o c CO c > . a o ~ c m 3 o.E cu o cu 4) 0 - N U �-' - >,, a) - U QO � --.0 cn en y C E O w a) 03 0 N o O N O C C 6 T E a) j o a • c 2 C a) N O v) O n. O a C ca 0 al LE 3 N 000-0 c o c c 3 d w O i 0 1a N 0 A L a a7 > L us co -2 a E m -2 Eo aO C m y ;-z a c - 0 E ( 0 F. L O >i N = u„ a N O 3 O 0 V __,E0,_ C cA V O ) p r.:- . O U rn o yyvrLm0U' -C) aoo F U c Q O c o N ° ° c C o a' a C C ai a) ' � _ M N a C O 2 c ° o C r N N �` ° O C 7 O c C T C >' o N ca a) E a) T. L. a) a) 0 e i U C a) ea 1-9 in a) O a) 2 � LAC o V o L U N U U U C V C E O C a `� C > a O a 7 C y = O ' O o 0 -) o N N a Ti p C Q > i Q en mc°�3 °)RQ cn - O C a) O Et L._ - 0 a) C o 0 C 7 04 u3 _•, O 'op a) E ca �� N f c . R1 N o C V .- U (0 •D ° d N N N 3 y a�) J C o U O 0 N UJ c C C U a7 C U C U a a) in U, Y + II I L c o = EQ ° a a) )-o a >` • .0 N 0 [ ) U U7 F- C C N as •O N as a) 1 C a) I- —.1 I,I.. J N Ev, C u) E. ""k J r H = ^ C M Q J a- C U) d 00 _ N a J a era Iv M F c a) o N C6 J N O C 1 m CI O d W Zi J x a w Z — ° c.9 .0 = a) w 0 p c - a) o> m cc v a Za � "- o m o 41 ama 3 ? 0 3 m -- a oo to 1-< 2 a a i f m >,o 2, •'" > , d$ co c rn E a, _ - 3 3 .= V LL F - N Q m a c E p , N a U _0 C p O r C LI N 0 0 C 0 C O m as O) 7 a) _ 7 ` m _, N .c Q m 7 U a m U o co N Z �. . .- c X C w O a v) c 0 m O m C m O) O m a — E M ._ i w _ a) m c 0 o m O N 0 0 L a. 7 c ` m N Y to 'c O a C • O, w N LL C C N C .... L O O = m 0 7 0 m L C O m 0 0 L d � < m ma 0 3 7 3N U 3 5 C fn ndt- o E u u w I w E L O m T C C to 0 7a, ° cu E o v o a o O C Q'O U p 0 O 7 m U N N C c a ' - m in .c) N a) -.c N 3 E 0,C a O a to a) m 0 L m �+ 7 O y c 0 o N 8 O O U y ry m m c N m O' n c U V E "c5 U O la Q C N l a) ,O a) L V, L 7 C m _c Mi v a) !n m n CL C 0 C m E C c E m O a c O C m . 7 _ — C N U y 7 co c 'D O to `O C a � Q to N U 0 co L - t ` o) m m U ,_ L c 0 m y W m>. mFEvu to a go Et — 8 m E o • 3 E C m c m a p m 3 c 3 u a 7 M 0 7 a , c -p - ' O U to o o m c c el R Q O. 0O7N t 07 O oQ a C C O �U N COL U Ny > md Y m E _c a 0) a) W p v o m to c a) E L C U N - 0 E 7 cn c Z . a, , a, E d ~ u) m ° o o n` > m ° mL � in O 0 y c7�tcu�m cv mcen of to - 7 ., m - 3 o c u m e ac in 3 o m m — n3 0 >, C C o `p C E `° a) m N o Li c C U N c a) to O.) c_) L 0 ° v ID • ( � a� ° °� � cy ` = u) E 1= m a CD � m Ey rnm E o a o o� m — a- C) � m J w r o o 8Y . o ` o n r; a " i o a ~ m N m 0 E m �� CO it d H Q m y a, a V U c to E O N O m J C.1) CL N mm > Uum m m °�U ° o) a, c F in 3 ucno 7 c 0 L — mJa 2 o`- • o mc C m - o 0 0 �� m o Co a y o ct m > o rn a i H >d E ;_aoEa ^oc) 0 3 co Et o m o m'ct to m a, ah m m c 2 8 - a 3 a f u m m rn E O— c u y m et m - o ? C ri m N c - - N O O m N C E t > O)— L n 7 O C X O a) O O C U a N • • • H o o nm d 2 0 n3 rnu m e i- a (A o O N C L O CE N O w N U _ m 0 O 12 O a w C m u l N I— N - ca E ■ o = o a te a) c H m m c o o a w a) In E C a:° aN o E • v U a) U V L -0 a m > c N N C L y C c 0 7 to a °) a. p. L o 2 Q c �,>>Er Eat oC a m 0 0 a a) 0 0 W a C - 2 m 3 a) 0 E a) m m U a w m > N — U C - 0 O O U en L. O '0 -0 O. 7 0 m V CC a)ma QE> to ul U �' C U to' C Q) mQ N) O O - N O la y \ a r0 o-0rn (2 Etn C7) 7 t•) N° _ . . n a� � {C_7 C7) vi "I 0. U m c. m a 0 Y+ n 4. r) o m a m • ~ L 0 7 I ! I . �., J N iii C % u) Cr) E. a. J J ct Ih Cr J `' . 0 J J a N < a =. a a� F a ❑ a e-a _ , Iv o u . W O N J J N ❑ > M _ _ N I- ti ❑ n U Z ° to to W J J X a W Z a a W • v v N I--Q0 3 m 3 > 14 UH - c u +r et c,_. am U 0 0 w 0Z F .. .. m Ey C N W N C 07 N d fns L N = t N Q Q f - 0_'.NEi -d L = .Z• C N N • O N O N 4... 1p .c C C >. N a ) C O ca N = 01 0 > , v N flij 03 ° ?` n a -0 a) @ 0,y'0 N a1 O O y C 0 N ff .c L N C as O. a) C O N V o cv L ` o E L L °-o N `1 a E E c N 'O V N O m m c x o •.. 3 F - a d ° CO v o a N c c H u m 9 E 0 a1 N O C C O N 0 C .? d c N` O C 8 O_ U N 07 C 13 a) - N 10 U c' N o U co0Oy�m >> caz. 0._ .° 0 , 2 o .D ° c y ado a� c ��v o rnE la O o Z o E o co N �� N "0 N *co r 14,' - U a) 2 - .. N O- . co y E 7 ac N D a i _ c U y U C V C 0 G -0 ` p ` V N a) T U O O C Cl- d W Y O N p o V "" V N C C C N T N o L a) 1 - ° y L Y - 07 to N N 0 N f0 0 N � 0 O 9 c T O N c `- � 0 c E c 0 N M a N 7 'O N 7 p a] L U N Z V = 0 c N C �= °' E N c • Q o ` C ch 10 Q O O '�" N C O N C N F- o E ° U N a) N O D C a) a? C N E co o 7 co d W N 07 C N U > m -- N N N O O a3 @ C C w a N O :C t N O. w - C N V U a C U : � a 0 3 4 O y N y N C d 3 a) C U N N I- a) V co g n G Z c 1=1 ...%= >0� O ICN NL O a) � E Ip °a c y C a O N E L c. H > 0 0 C E N° N d C ... N O- O a) C N C al o Las I- N N o_ O m u _ u c° m c 3 E o m va o L .�L 10 Q O. E O >. 0 0. C O. 0 c .0 C O a) - N O N 0 N C7 0 L c 0 C_ U• c N _,. _ co v a N u c � N 1° ` °� o ° � u o ' aoo �_ 10L 2, c _L a' H E w 2 7 U 0 L 7 d ` C y 0 C L O .- L O E U 0 - t6 C O C 7 V c 3 m a) a J _ 01 W 2 y O N 0 U C N 0 '.. •L E a) - N U C 3 N V 0 C d a O V ° Ol 2 '''''W II f!7 w O D N 09 O .° O C C C t 3 N 0 a C U C 0 O N N O C U > 0) O ' C N C CO CO J fn . C L L n ° >• C N O E N L "0 C O°° O o a ..... , 0 p ` N x V N 'O C N 0. E 5 = o C C N -" E` 0> C O O Y N .- 7 N N ot C w L -„ 0 0 o O N 0 .. 8 C L C 0 O c 0 =° O _ C > C O > j C c C N O O d IL Z• ca) y • a 2.. co 0 a C.7 0 . CL c F- ru rn u J D -c o. 0 0 0 a vi a ' C o u c ° i (n U M v� N al y V m c N o w n C a' �o o va,. °'' m °) r v r •- N c0 1- aD W ,- M N V N O U @7 ° F1 0 N 43- 0 ' O. O E L a) . M- 0. N E � E a i v E m v* t 7 U - CC a N OC U OL o a' W N V - N O CO a) a 10 N y a N CO • N O N N G y` c N a) c = - c a ao o > c , = C 0" m— 0 L y a O> oE 0 3 c i c o E 0 8.2 U ` I - >F c ° - m ° m� O w rx = m U c d c 2, c O N O E co 0 a) o v w m E m - Uov U o mu as .c g oc N aa c N ° N 7 O O N N a) y th N ¢ ! n Q N > 0 M L d r." 0 01r'•' NQ N � O N r i m r n E N u c -oc E Y _I + u mdCC 0 ti aa92v as • j L O) v v II - J N - = fn to V) a --E2 Q = C) fn N a N M a V J �a Ix E U.1 o N z 0 to c0 N o j D ° 0 v } Iv O w Z o u) N v) X a - w z C c a N o T LLl - -o as -(a oL z, -c ° -c ° a Z Q 2 O N H o w 3 N > E O T v 7 'c a reaC7 - 3 > a) rn 3c cCUt - 0 m u C m3rn > - - c u c - me 15 a) m _ rnicc « m o E N Y G LL. ' o a 7 a) a) a N N a C L a E C E a c a) '' ° r- c ° a 0 IX „- - E E -0_. E 5 c o,_ m o d m xo c c c L (, LLI fa - 7 N "d co l y - O O '0 O O 0 0 0 0 H C_w a) °c m U> u > m a)vO 0 U3 U3 O LL _ ' a) E F- L u 3 N F- N J a o CO L- F- a3 a) N 0 0_ . d N Q a a) a) a) - a) fn = a) 'O C "7" () m L a) ,?. U = Z` C , 0 _C .0 r >� 3° m r m = c 3� aLma) C aI 0 Z N U Cr C- ? � C >. 0 . � O O ICa a N y F O -0 a u) a a C 3 y N O C ` a) o ) 7 U) m u) N C U �- N U • - ° of L N 'U a) Ct a) C_ O C - N 7 C to Cr 2a) 29 0) > a wom c c m ca _ a a) CL O V) 0-- 0 a7 al C p N N N O O aI N N fa u) - p a ) T v C a) G a) a 0 N O - V O c in C > CO C U 0 U N U 0 U m� `� 43 c 1 E, y� H o)n ° m 0 cu CO > a) c ° a) m U a E '"' 3 `) C _N N N N E 0 a) = E to Y -0 C L O o C U u) .x a) U L C O N u) E a) a) T 7 U • p a) C E L ao° ca o 2 ° a; - t m ° o ° V) �a �Y �a m � ° �d o y tR E ix 3 L r c .- t 0 y 'O co C w `_ `` N V l c ° a C n N rn- Wv c ° n C �a n c n C o 0 C a) -C L CD= E 0 c CO 0 co _ _ _ 0 m" a) LLJ 0 U 0 ! U -0 0 a) C fa U • 7. 7 m N cn )n 0 ° m _ ° - Z d E 2 u a)c a ° )o m m a)Hc N ▪ � tL 0y� N .N. . > rn C Z - m 0 E a d c C I ,- co N -o a C a) on a) 0 0 a) ) p - 4) a 'O CO N fn O O CO 7 N a � ° O ° 3 C �' ..�a a s m 0 0= n 0 0 u o - 0 C 76 C N U O E. "O a) < N° o U N C O O 7 0 7 7 7 a) N N n " U a? 'n ° U U m N 17 78 a) 2 L) N n y n O O C N N C N C la C 7 0 . ' L ° a U C N C W E o i= N 1` C n 7 ` C N O C C — a) a) d L y L O U - C _ > N N cc) m J _Of C N C = y N N 0 y 7 U ° L CO a7 0 a) 7 a7 N C C L U II 11 - N U O V N o O . Z N N N y N L N N o c E C O O in c - d C3 J CO U 7 C 0 .O U 7 (7 O O Q N 0 O 0 to o . c ;n - - c f° i m c m ca ` o - N m Q $ Q a ° � o a a — �•°- ° 0. a U CO o I ° a 'aL— o - ° U U oU ea o - a) N = c c c d W o. >. E f- °- 7 .0 N `) u) a U) O C N CO3 > c _° c a o f 0 - v, o.0 0 a a ) i c-0 a) c w a)a o) Li m c o °- c'� 0 7 a E H x= a) . -e7 m �u7 ccn c mug N yco a� E mt c o R a 0 m N C7 3 2 u j r) E � och uc� E Q�> m,- 0)° N - 0) aa) CD N 0 _ r >, 0 •r - a) .c c r 7 r L C a) c 2. �e+) CL E • �M m N M �v) u ) ° a) c E " j a) `• ' Y 3 N r c co cM 3 C.) m2 D-J E 2 82- E-D E aG u 3 m u) i a r W - Q a) 6 c ai �c a o o CD �� ° U o v W c 0I U .c O LOE C N ' a yo C N w N O 01 L O O •C/) CN u7 N a) ..0 >, - 00 7 L C >, N 7 N a) NF a) N T- N N N "" L- a) -L... d- a) � V a , p N fa L C L C C= C C ->,-5E113.'' O .) E d O E p a a) C I' - o T O y 2 .o o fa ° N C 2 a1 T O N C n 0 8 O p a) c m �p 0 m ... w a N !a E ' o .= N cI E E � E o a ` c) n E N N N c a) U C c c a) O C C c a7 C C N O c co C c.5 E C U a t r6 01 o E c L C m co 0) O -2 L a" CO 'O n. O d a) 0 1V la N c 7 7 d a) > U E C L L a) N y `a 3 CO N O N N a1 3 a) ° N C C o O c = N c O N 0 a) O) c O N O N U a L ` o H- N y C N N U N `) a L O ) N a) N `7 a L on - 0 'O G. ° a o an a a) chv , —mo � _ r� Ew a U g a) r C O O E a) 1"'! N T .� U C a) U Pf N T . C aI U U N co E a) a1 e") U N C N E U L N + ° �' U U L N QI ° _ — 07 U O L° ca) 3 U C C i cu C C 0 U C N a) > a) U C N a1 0 0 > a N 7 N -O T N O - a7 ca _ f6 > n 'a o N a = a N m 0 u c a - ac ii a -a- o. =--- Q E 1 N u) < u - - y 'c 1° c= c a' m r c � - c IX 0 E u o m.- Q a) O - c1-2.c -- 0060 N 0 p +� fn - c a) O N E > a) E y G > aI N N L y 0 1 O N a V° 7 C N a U a) � U a) 'D )a N O 0 F" O U a' )a o C1 U a) a '..- CC `- N C U @ 01 YI t II J c c C7 m� o 0 °0 a o 7� � c c - E rn oU� 0Q co aU =0 c 2 „, >a) 0 o c u = o)m "0 N 0 cn 1- c E N c u O c n 0 c n H= c N N 'O 0 0 c ' 1 N y = L O) I- Iv II - J N 171. _ (/O d „ Ei ul J d F1 >- _vim • Iv W O J IL N < a co J m 2 a m E I- . 0 . CQ. II I ... II O N W O N rr CO co m N O > 2 M n O d Iv Iv It 0 W Z o (� J u) X a W Z 2 aI -° = c 0 d O N O) N Ca I m m 5 CO d E Z 3 w - u., _ E N N� N o a N - O N ▪ 0 07 C c p U F• C 0 X O N M 1 U c C O . 2 N C : C N ..m.. C C a+ 7 u... O O 0 C 0 M U M M N • 0. U M N 7 M m N Z W Ea aC O.O 7 °' L•` 0 " a) 7 co 1a T 0. co co � z d o E ... _ u m m _ y N LL °' L j •- cl C O O D1 C L N l' mm 0 7 M O ,, O7 Q < _ F- U °.— to 3'V1 o F- ° N U .0 U 0 3 o co w � c o o m o � pL � 3 2 oc - c c 2 a) a) • .c o c o- 3 co o v M ,E E c a d C H c O O Of U 5 d p N m L ° 0 0 • N duEL O' 2 0Em �° o >v (6 To a) y= n u a) O . L 7 7 c D N •° M W V Q O °- N ' cc L E N O 7 o' -. M N CO C ° 3 co - 00 a E L U ° U U N C _ N C E .c •° d C a O G V U M --- c — C DI U 0 . CO M N 1.--— " : 2 ( : ) °(-)c (13--c U J 0 O) CO N N _ a) N C 0 ra c O 2 9 0 C N W M N O L 0 m >. -r p O co N L a C U L U E "O d LC m a)cUO��cmmE Do 5 • °y > c uc w_ IR 7 c ri Z E N� N E mu co) C) U a) >.c M �,U3 c V) N m co to Q • 1 m� M U ° E a c c 6 m ,:, CO E ._, E E v ) au u 0 c� 0I- m o 3 E �S tea) 01 co O O r°aNi?a� o CD ••- N ai RI 0 � m Ica ::+ F- C co 0 N L -o N O C O r N N O U to d = 0 d v 10 Q a) - C 0 .c 7 ~ > 1 7 i ) U U N O O) ED. al N 'O N D1 (.9 E 5 M= N .G O to ` c c 0 U o CO c 1 c N CO ta C 17- a V �O y C ° y N r ° 0 M N N 7 >Z a C 0 co O) W C c LL C° E C N c C U O) = t N m C a U 0 V U "co II (n w a a) C c a) m - c a N E c 3 d E tit CO II U 0 a) a) 7 g ov a) N_rnO N o C7 ccm2 7 °'N N .co O. np` o> c -E - .0�Q E ° o c Q u) U a 0 o � 3 — N Er mU a s o N 7 _ (n c aiu_ -o jO M d:. N to M N i 0 - OD ti cN—. CL A N O C C in CO C 0 Q) W O) .° 0 0 W ▪ E N O C d a) H) 0 e •7 N 17 N ° r) 0 E 0 0 m �' �• u U� ,uc .- M ,- Earr4 'Cr U ° C (0 ° 1 C ("� O M N E 0 a E o 2a)>0o.°- a 0 a) >•2 a) _ 2 - 2o to — c > Mo a N 2y -c 5 °N2o32 a r v I N 0 0 > N j 0 0 0 - O (7 C j >,-,3 0 • 0 _ vi 0 co "O O Q W - NF L ICO C 10 c � 0) N CO H na N v .a C co N O c " N • O 0 a 0 N c L >-, O ° 0 O p L • - ° co ° >, E N C 0. .c.._ 0 L a c Ia. >° E N C) L d O � ° 0 f," M o C C § c 7 N m E C a 0 Oa C E U 3 0 C c -co O N cr) a o � ° E - 7= M co E c- 0 O N m O 0 O U O .0 0 - n C C ra O N 3 o c a — C N D12 N M 3 M ° CD c C a y E 0 N= M N>, M 7 M y E 0 M ° ,` O F- C N u) C L 0) - O -0 N W C N 7 0 N U Nat a E 0 co O Q 01 N 2 C C L L L _ C M in 1n Sc O U- C N a V O M d 0 co U 0 0 U .... E 0 C r M M C 0 0 M E' 2 CC M 2 2 6 c 0 U 0' ci U 0 O C 1) d T" E 7 � 0 ` U E L U (-9 U N U T O) C O. M U L 0 y 0 U CO CO 0 '-' ° ,83 Q U C .� 0 N co C O c . 0 co C 7 C y )- Q E° y U a= C a l O 0 a y CO a— d j a C y > co Q V) E -§ a_ m M _ c - EFL-= aa) E 3� m 0 v1 ( ° ) a) a) m¢ y pd' o� N E o ) o y � o o a- • p � d > a E N n � '. N f0 0 0 0 cc N ° M co 0 C M N C U fa a :l + II , V 7 O N N C C c C C ° 7 N O) - 0 - 7 0 -O 7 0 1, 0 7 (..) N U 7 0 a) 7 0 0 7 0 t 0 E V t V 7 p N N U UJ H .0 C N C.- CC L U 3 7 U co H C C N U PLANNING of sEai' DEPARTMENT e � * ` . y Memorandum To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Attention: John B. Bahorski, City Manager From: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services. G) Date: January 26, 2004 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM R — REVISION TO COMMENT LETTER TO SCAG RE: "DESTINATION 2030 — DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION • PLAN" Mayor Campbell has discussed with staff revisions to the language of the "Land Use Policies" portion of the proposed comment letter, as provided on page 15 of the City Council Staff Report. The letter has been revised by Staff and Mayor Campbell is in agreement with the language as proposed by staff for revision to more accurately set forth the position of the City regarding any future capital improvement projects, • particularly those involving acquisition of public or private properties within the City. The revised language in the letter is indicated by bold, italicized, and underlined text for language to be added. There are no deletions proposed. A copy of the revised page is attached for review by the City Council. Attachment: Letter to SCAG re: City of Seal Beach Comments on "Destination 2030 — Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan ", revised page 3 * * * * Z \My Documents \SCAG \Draft 2004 RTP.Revised Letter CC Memo.doc \LVV\01 -26-04 • City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 General Comments: We find the plan to be well written and SCAG's staff and consultants cooperative during the preparation and review of the Draft Plan. We understand that the Orange - County Transportation Authority (OCTA) indicates the document contains all of the regionally significant project priorities for Orange County as documented in OCTA's long range planning document, "Directions 2030 ". Land Use Policies: Regarding SCAG's strategies for implementing the land use policies in the 2004 RTP, the City of Seal Beach is concerned with the linkage made between land use and transportation projects in this particular strategy: "Align evaluation of projects within the RTP and the tenets of the Growth Vision as a method offending decisions." (Page 151, Draft 2004 RTP) The City of Seal Beach does not support a strategy whereby funding for Orange County transportation projects related to operating and maintenance of existing facilities becomes tied to local land use decisions over which OCTA has no . control. The City of Seal Beach recommends removing this language from the document. However, the City of Seal Beach wishes to clearly state that capital improvement projects, particularly those involving acquisition of public or private properties, will be evaluated independently by the City. The City has strenuously objected to the previous proposals for right -of- acquisition for improvements along the I- 405 /SR 22 freeway corridors and will continue to do so if those proposed acquisitions are viewd by our City in a detrimental light. Regional Planning /Coordinating Agencies: The Draft 2004 RTP includes multiple references to Joint Powers Authority (JPAs) type agencies for the implementation of various regional projects (e.g., Maglev, dedicated truckways, freight railway system). The Final 2004 RTP should clarify these JPAs as conceptual implementing agencies, and acknowledge that further planning and organizational structures would have to be developed when the tuning is appropriate. High Speed Rail/Maglev: - The Draft 2004 RTP maps showing the Maglev system (Figure 4.9) should include all proposed state and regional projects in addition to SCAG's planned system to provide the reader with the regional context of multiple ongoing planning efforts. The Cal- Nevada High Speed Rail Commission has an adopted alignment that Figure 4.9 should indicate in the Final 2004 RTP. Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 3 a S 1 - v� a� °a POR4 4-9° 4 *, C y h C FR Z7 g p oUNTV 1 - CITY HALL 211 EIGHTH STREET SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90740 (562) 431 - 2527- w NA, \ ci. seal-beach .ca.us fa January 26, 2004 Bernice Villanueva 'Southern California Association of Governinents 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Ms. Villanueva: SUBJECT: CITY OF SEAL - BEACH COMMENTS ON "DESTINATION 2030 - DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN" The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the Executive Summary of "Destination 2030 ", the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan ( "2004 RTP "), and has several comments and concerns relating to the subject document, in addition to detailed responses to specific issues which are attached as Attachment A, from the Department of Development Services regarding the remainder of the document. This document provides a clear and concise overview of the transportation problems, opportunities, and proposed programs and projects to meet the demands upon the transportation system, given fiscal and air quality constraints. Primary Concern of the City of Seal Beach — Long -Range Growth Projections: The primary concern of the City of Seal Beach is related to the issue of long - range 'growth projections that are not in conformance with local agency growth projections, particularly in the years after 2010. The issue of acceptable growth patterns in the region, and particularly at the local city and county level is an area of extreme sensitivity to the local residents of those particular communities. The Executive Summary states on page 2: "Accordingly, the proposed growth vision has been developed as follows: utilizing in -fill where appropriate to re- vitalize underutilized development sites; focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes; providing housing opportunities near major job centers; providing housing opportunities to match changing demographics; preserving natural open space; incorporating decentralized aviation strategy proposed in the Plan; Z. \My Documents \SCAG \Draft 2004 RTP CC Comment Letter 2 doc \LW \01 -26 -04 City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 and respecting the local input and feed back process in the development of the growth distribution." These stated foundations for development of the growth vision are commendable. However, the implementation of these goals at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be hesitant to take on increasing population densities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. After 2010, the 2004 RTP assumes an increase in and shifts of growth patterns different from locally adopted plans. SCAG proposes to work with local jurisdictions between now and 2010 to modify their land uses for consistency with the Draft 2004 RTP, with a transition period of several years after 2010. While this approach of changing land uses to improve the transportation system will require considerable coordination between SCAG and local jurisdictions, the growth patterns the RTP proposes for Orange County households and population are close to the current pattern of development that already a significant infill component. The City of Seal Beach appreciates SCAG staff's willingness to work with the Orange County Council of Governments, the Center for Demographic Research, and OCTA to ensure that the growth assumptions for Orange County population, households and employment in the 2004 Draft RTP are consistent with the locally approved growth forecasts. A consistent set of growth projections between SCAG and Orange County is critical for major planning projects, environmental documentation, and transportation modeling efforts. That cooperation is greatly appreciated. However, as the future regional transportation plans are adopted, this issue will become more significant, and potentially more contentious. SCAG will be required to spend a considerable effort in achieving consensus of the many local jurisdictions in such a regionally significant change in land use and growth patterns over those envisioned by the local planning agencies within the region. Impacts of State Budget Decisions: The issue of adequate funding levels is of particular importance at this time given the position of the Governor regarding the state budget and the reduction of transportation projects already funded. The impacts of those budget decisions at the State level, and the resulting impacts to the ability to comply with the State Implementation Plan and the federal air quality conformity requirements, need to be clearly expressed by all interested parties. SCAG should work with all impacted state and local agencies in addressing this important transportation and air quality issue with the Governor and state legislators. Draft 2004 RTP CC Comment Letter 2 2 • • City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 General Comments: We find the plan to be well written and SCAG's staff and consultants cooperative during the preparation and review of the Draft Plan. We understand that the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) indicates the document contains all of the - regionally significant project priorities for Orange County as documented in OCTA's long range planning document, "Directions 2030 ". Land Use Policies: Regarding SCAG's strategies for implementing the land use policies in the 2004 RTP, the City of Seal Beach is concerned with the linkage made -between land use and transportation projects in this particular strategy: "Align evaluation of projects within the RTP and the tenets of the Growth Vision as a method of funding decisions." (Page 151, Draft 2004 RTP) The City of Seal Beach does not support a strategy whereby funding for Orange County transportation projects related to operating and maintenance of existing facilities becomes tied to local land use decisions over which OCTA has no control. The City of Seal Beach recommends removing this language from the document. However, the City of Seal Beach wishes to clearly state that capital improvement projects, particularly those involving acquisition of public or private properties, will be evaluated independently by the City. The City has strenuously objected to the previous proposals for right -of- acquisition for improvements along the I- 405 /SR 22 freeway corridors and will continue to do so if those proposed acquisitions are viewed by our City in a detrimental light. Regional Planning /Coordinating Agencies: The Draft 2004 RTP includes multiple references to Joint Powers Authority (JPAs) type agencies for the implementation of various regional projects (e.g., Maglev, dedicated truckways, freight railway system). The Final 2004 RTP should clarify these JPAs as conceptual implementing agencies, and acknowledge that further planning and organizational structures would have to be developed when the timing is appropriate. High Speed Rail/Maglev: The Draft 2004 RTP maps showing the Maglev system (Figure 4.9) should include all proposed state and regional projects in addition to SCAG's planned system to provide the reader with the regional context of multiple ongoing planning efforts. The Cal- Nevada High Speed Rail Commission has an adopted alignment that Figure 4.9 should indicate in the Final 2004 RTP. There is also a "Major Investment Study" ( "MIS ") being conducted by OCTA along the I -405 corridor between the I -605 and SR -73. The MIS will be a comprehensive Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 3 City of Seal Beach Continent Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 analysis of mobility issues to establish short-term and long -term transportation improvements that respond to current and future intra - county and inter - county travel needs. The City of Seal Beach strongly urges that the planning efforts for the Maglev system and the MIS program be coordinated by the various planning agencies and that our city be kept informed during all stages of these important planning processes. Specific Projects: ❑ SR -22/I -405 HOV Direct Connector: Exhibit 4.1 of the Draft 2004 RTP shows HOV Direct Connector improvements at both the SR -22/I -405 and the I- 405/I- 605. The 2004 RTP list of projects includes both design and construction for the I -405/I -605 connector. The list of projects defines however, the SR -22/I -405 project as "design HOV to HOV Lane Connectors" (Tier 2 ORA000193). Based upon discussion with SCAG staff, we understand that the Draft 2004 RTP includes construction of this HOV connector in the transportation demand modeling. In the Final 2004 RTP, please revise the language to clarify the project • includes both design and construction. - CI We also understand that the I -405/I -605 HOV Direct Connector is programmed for completion by 2020, as indicated in Table 4.5 on page 83 of the Draft 2004 RTP. Thank you for your consideration of the comments of the City of Seal Beach. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services, City Hall, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 90740, telephone (562) 431 -2527, extension 313 if you have any questions regarding this matter. In addition, please provide four (4) copies of the final "Destination 2030" plan to Mr. Whittenberg for distribution to the appropriate Commissions and the City Council when it is available. Sincerely, v Patricia E. Campbell Mayor, City of Seal Beach ATTACHMENT A: Formal Staff Comments Regarding "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" Distribution: - Seal Beach City Council , Seal Beach Planning Commission Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 4 • - City of Seal Beach Continent Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan - Januaty 26, 2004 City Manager Director of Development Services Orange County Council of Governments Orange County Transportation Authority Center for Demographic Research • • Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 5 • City of Seal Beach Continent Letter re. Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 ATTACHMENT A • Formal Staff Comments Regarding "Destination 2030 - Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan" 1. Page 9 and Pages 104 -105, Maglev System - This system is set forth in the document as being necessary and critical to the success of SCAG's decentralized regional aviation system. The decentralized regional aviation system is needed due to the determination of Orange County voters to eliminate an airport at El Toro. The City requests to be informed of all planning studies to be undertaken by SCAG, OCTA, and all other future planning organizations of the proposed LAX to JWA segment of the proposed Maglev system. Potential impacts to the 8,300 person Leisure World senior retirement community, the residential communities of College Park East and College Park West, and the Seal Beach naval Weapons Station are of prime concern to the City. The City also requests that the planning efforts for the maglev system and the I -405 MIS be coordinated and that the Director of Public Works /City Engineer and the Director of Development Services be included on all public notifications and technical committee meetings on these important planning studies. 2. Pages 79 -81, "Thinking Out of the Box: The Land Use - Transportation Connection" - This section discusses several tenets that were developed through the "Growth Visioning" process as a "Reality Based Vision ". This "Vision" contemplated: ❑ Using infill where appropriate to revitalize underutilized development sites; ❑ Focusing growth along transit corridors and nodes to utilize available capacity; ❑ Providing housing opportunities near job centers; and ❑ Providing housing opportunities to match changing demographics. It is further indicated that the "Growth Vision Alternative respects local input through 2010 with adjustments occurring only after a ramp up period intended to achieve consensus on an implementation strategy." SCAG should work in a cooperative and open manner with OCCOG, OCTA, the Center for Demographic Research, and the local communities to ensure that the various local community "visions" and issues are thoroughly considered in future iterations of the RTP. 3. Page 89, Bus Rapid Transit - This program is proposed to include Westminster Avenue through Seal Beach. When planning this system special attention needs to be given to providing convenient and accessible stations in relation to the 8,300 person Leisure World senior retirement community located on the north side of Westminster Avenue west of Seal Beach Boulevard. If direct access from Leisure World to the Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 _ 6 J • City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 stations on this line cannot be provided, a convenient shuttle service should be provided to this major residential community that is very transit - dependent. Attention also needs to be given to the Boeing Integrated Defense Systems campus facility and the soon to be constructed "Pacific Gateway Center" project of approximately 1,000,000 square feet of business /research and development park development adjacent to the existing Boeing facilities. These facilities are located along the south side of Westminster Avenue, again west of Seal Beach Boulevard. 4. Page 108 -111, Aviation — The RTP indicates that Long Beach Airport is anticipated to expand from 1.4 million annual passengers (map) to 3.8 map between 2002 and 2030, with air cargo projected to grow from 58,000 tons to 137,000 tons during the same period. The direst impacts of this anticipated intensification of use needs to be adequately evaluated and appropriate infrastructure improvements must be programmed in future RTP's, and must be completed prior to the indicated future demand. Impacts to ground transportation, terminal facilities, flight paths and noise levels of increased flight operations must be adequately evaluated and mitigated in future site - specific environmental documents. 5. Page 113 -116, Recommended Funding Strategy to Implement SCAG's RTP — The proposed funding strategies include measures that have been, and will continue to be, controversial throughout the region and statewide. SCAG will need to allocate significant resources and work closely with the Governor, state legislators, other Council of Governments, and interested agencies as it pursues the recommended legislative agenda regarding: ❑ Allowing 55% voter approval for imposition of additional local transportation taxes; , ❑ Increase of 10 cents in motor vehicle fuel tax levels by 2015. The importance of these proposals is clearly set forth on page 116, where it is indicated that $21.7 billion is anticipated from the increase motor vehicle fuel tax, out of a total $31.2 billion of public funding strategy for the plan projects, being those projects not already have committed funding in the `Baseline/Tier 2" projects identified in the RTP. * * * * Draft 2004 RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 7 . .%\. SEAL eN C % �� OORPOP4 q ) o Qa. v �roQ • C�!' B F H 27 �5 ��4 ( C�UNV C\ CITY HALL 211 EIGHTH STREET SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90740 (5621431-2527 - w WV, .ci. seal-beach .ca.us January 26, 2004 Nancy Pfeffer Southern California Association of Governments 818 West 7 Street, 12 Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Ms. Pfeffer: SUBJECT: CITY OF SEAL BEACH COMMENTS ON "DESTINATION 2030 — DRAFT 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT" The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the Executive Summary of "Destination 2030 — Draft 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Program Environmental Impact Report ( "2004 RTP PEIR "), and has several comments and concerns relating to the subject document. This document provides a clear and concise overview of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed 2004 RTP. The Draft Program EIR evaluates the 2004 RTP and the regional impacts associated with the proposed major public infrastructure and transportation demand management projects and programs for the time frame of this plan, 2002 to 2030. The identified environmental impacts are not project specific, but evaluate the impacts on various areas of concern on the program level of evaluation. As our staff has reviewed the proposed "mitigation measures ", they appear to be reasonable and appropriate to respond to the identified impacts that this "program" level of analysis. As discussed above, the major impacts identified are due to the increases in population and jobs, and the resulting allocation of land to accommodate those projected uses over the project time period. The identified impacts are adequately outlined and appropriate mitigation measures have been set forth. Page 3.1 -4. A review of the "active duty military facilities in the SCAG region" does not include the Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base. This facility should be included. Z \My Documents\SCAG\Diaft PEIR.2004RTP.CC Comment Lettei doc \LW \01- 26 -04, City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft Program EIR — 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 Mitigation Measures 3.1 -3c, 3.1 -3d, and 3.2 -1a. (Page 3.1 -16) The City supports proposed Mitigation Measures 3.1 -3c, 3.1 -3d, and 3.2-la regarding working with member cities and counties regarding the long -term 'General Plan consistency issues set forth in the Draft PEIR. It is extremely important for SCAG to develop a transparent and accountable consensus building process regarding this issue. However, the implementation of these mitigation measures at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be hesitant to take on increasing population densities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. The issue of acceptable growth patterns in the region, and particularly at the local city and county level is an area of extreme sensitivity to the local residents of those particular communities. Table 3.4 -3, Criteria Pollutant Emissions by Nonattainment Area — Plan Emissions in 2030 Compared to Current Conditions (Emissions in 2000) (in Tons per Day). This table indicates substantial improvements in the levels of criteria pollutants will be achieved if the programs and activities of the 2004 RTP are fully implemented. The City of Seal Beach clearly recognizes those substantial air quality benefits. Impact 3.4 -2: Long-term (Operational) Localized Impacts — Freeway operations under the Plan would be likely to exceed the locally acceptable cancer risk level of 1 in one million. (Page 3.4 -33) The City is very concerned regarding cancer risk assessment and cancer risk levels adjacent to freeways. In the case of Seal Beach, there is a heightened level of concern, since the Leisure World community comprises approximately 8,300 residents, with approximately 90% being over the age of 65. It is a concern to the City as to how the levels of cancer risk being discussed could impact this population group, particularly those individuals with respiratory or other related health concerns. Any projects along the I -405 corridor adjacent to the Leisure World community should contain a very detailed cancer risk assessment directly evaluating the specific ages groups that reside within Leisure World. Impact 3.4 -5: Cumulative air quality impacts — Under the Plan criteria pollutant emissions would be less than the applicable emission budgets. (Page 3.4- 37). The proposed funding strategies include measures that have been, and will continue to be, controversial throughout the region and statewide. SCAG will need to allocate significant resources and work closely with the Governor, state legislators, other Council of Governments, and interested agencies as it pursues the recommended legislative agenda regarding: ❑ Allowing 55% voter approval for imposition of additional local transportation taxes; ❑ Increase of 10 cents in motor vehicle fuel tax levels by 2015. Draft PEIR 2004RTP.CC Comment Letter 2 City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft Program EIR — 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 The issue of adequate funding levels is of particular importance at this time given the position of the Governor regarding the state budget and the reduction of transportation projects already funded. The impacts of those budget decisions at the State level, and the resulting impacts to the ability to comply with the State Implementation Plan and the federal air quality conformity requirements, need to be clearly expressed by all interested parties. Impact 3.4 -6: Airport Emissions — Increased air traffic would increase emissions from aircraft and ground support equipment (GSE). (Page 3.4 -41 through 3.4 -44). The City of Seal Beach supports the efforts of SCAG to support efforts of the California Air Resources Board to continue to propose concepts to the federal government for consideration to achieve emission reductions such as more stringent engine emissions, retrofit controls, cleaner fuel, etc. Section 4.0, Alternatives, Introduction (Page 4 -1). This section discusses the various growth vision alternatives considered in formulating the 2004 RTP and indicates that the proposed plan utilizes in -fill and transit - oriented development at levels greater than the General Plans of the various city and county agencies that comprise the region. These stated foundations for development of the growth vision are commendable. However, the implementation of these goals at the local level will be a long and difficult process for those agencies that are responsible for preparing and implementing their local "General Plan" and implementing ordinances. Many of the goals will be seen as counter- productive in the many communities in the region that are mature, urban, and built -out, and that would be hesitant to take on increasing population densities and the suggested urban in -fill programs. After 2010, the 2004 RTP assumes an increase in and shifts of growth patterns different from locally adopted plans. SCAG proposes to work with local jurisdictions between now and 2010 to modify their land uses for consistency with the Draft 2004 RTP, with a transition period of several years after 2010. The City of Seal Beach appreciates SCAG staff's willingness to work with the Orange County Council of - Governments, the Center for Demographic Research, and OCTA to ensure that the growth assumptions for Orange County population, households and employment in the 2004 Draft RTP are consistent with the locally approved growth forecasts. However, as the future regional transportation plans are adopted, this issue will become more significant, and potentially more contentious. SCAG will be required to spend a considerable effort in achieving consensus of the many local jurisdictions in such a regionally significant change in land use and growth patterns over those envisioned by the local planning agencies within the region. Tables 4 -7 through 4 -12. These tables present the criteria pollutant emissions for each of the alternatives evaluated in the Draft PEIR document. It would extremely helpful to reviewers of the Final PEIR to provide to provide an 11" x 17" surnrnary table of all of the projected emission levels in one convenient table. This would allow for a much clearer understanding of the air quality improvements that are projected for each of the analyzed alternatives. Draft PEIR.2004RTP CC Comment Letter 3 Cnty of Seal Beach Comment Letter re: Draft Program EIR — 2004 Regional Transportation Plan January 26, 2004 Thank you for your consideration of the comments of the City of Seal Beach. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services, City Hall, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 90740, telephone (562) 431 -2527, extension 313 if you . have any questions regarding this matter. In addition, please provide four (4) copies of the final "Program Environmental Impact Report" to Mr. Whittenberg for distribution to the appropriate Commissions and the City Council when it is available. Sincerely, Airiteigir2 7 a1JU Patricia E. Campbell Mayor, City of Seal Beach Distribution: Seal Beach City Council Seal Beach Planning Commission Seal Beach Environmental Quality Control Board City Manager Director of Development Services Orange County Council of Governments Orange County Transportation Authority Center for Demographic Research Draft PEIR.2004RTP.CC Comment Letter 4