Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Min 1981-06-08 6-1-81 / 6-8-81 nl:l/r!:.;. .~' lerk and ex-offic1o lerk of Seal Beach City Counc11 I APproved:c>-~~ .f'. ~~ Mayor ,? Attest Seal Beach, California June 8, 1981 The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular session at 7:00 o'clock p.m. with Mayor Laszlo calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag. I ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Laszlo' Councilmembers Kredell, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay Absent: None Also present: Mr. Parker, City Manager Mr. Coughlan, City Attorney Mr. Johnson, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Mr. Romaniello, Planning Director Mr. Antos, Associate Planner Mr. Thomas, Finance Director Mr. Joseph, Assistant City Manager Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk WAIVER OF FULL READING Vanderstaay moved, second by Kredell, to waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading shall be deemed to be given by all Council members after reading of the title unless specific request is made at that time for the reading I of such ordinance or resolution. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried PRESENTATION Councilman Kredell presented a plaque to Mr. Bill Gill, Seal Beach resident, commending him for twenty-two years of dedication to track 6-8-81 (26' and field amateur athletics. Mr. Gill expressed appreciation to the Council for the honor. AGENDA AMENDED Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay, to consider Resolution Number 3070 out of order at this time. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay I NOES: None Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3070 - TRIBUTE TO MEMORY OF CHARLOTTE SHUMAN Resolution Number 3070 was presented to Council and read in full by Mayor Laszlo entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PAYING TRIBUTE TO THE MEMORY OF CHARLOTTE M. SHUMAN." Vanderstaay moved, second by Kredell, to adopt Resolution Number 3070 as presented. AYES: Kredel1, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried A copy of Resolution Number 3070 was presented to Miss Kay Shuman by Mayor Laszlo. Miss Shuman expressed her appreciation to the Council for this tribute to the memory of her sister, Charlotte. I PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDING GENERAL PLAN and ADOPTING HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN Mayor Laszlo declared the concurrent public hearing open to consider amendments to the General' Plan and the Hellman Specific Plan, said amendments bringing the City's General Plan into conformance with the proposed Specific Plan and the Hellman Specific Plan would be the basic plan approval for the one thousand unit development. The City Clerk certified that notices had been mailed to residents adjacent to the project site and published as required by law, that no communications had been received either for or against the matter. The Planning Director presented an indepth staff report setting forth the pTocedures as required by law to adopt the proposed Specific Plan and to amend the I City's General Plan accordingly. Mr. Romaniello reviewed the environ- mental findings as amended and adopted by the Environmental Quality Control Board and the Planning Commission and presented the recommen- dations of those bodies to the City Council. Mr. Romaniello explained each of the amendments proposed to the Land Use Element, Open Space/ 6-8-81 ~ I Recreation/Conservation Element and the Circulation Element of the General Plan, as set forth in the staff report. The Planning Director reported comments had been received from the State Clearinghouse regarding the Environmental Impact Report, and that those comments along with the city's responses are incorporated as part of the E.I.R. Councilmember Vanderstaay asked if there was any provision for develop- ment of a golf course in conjunction with the project. The Planning Director stated there had been no direction to request inclusion of a golf course, however that would not exclude the possibility of a golf facility in the area at a future time. Mayor Laszlo invited members of the audience wishing to speak to this item to come to the microphone, state their name and address for the record. Mr. George Putnam, Senior Vice President of Ponderosa Homes, 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, provided an illustrated site plan of the proposed project and explained the various areas designated thereon. Mr. Putnam clarified the conceptual site plan is only for location reference, that no specific development plans or maps have been prepared at this time. Mr. Putnam responded to numerous questions posed by Council, described the single family lots as being between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet, stated that the condominium square footage would range from 700 to 1300 square feet, some elderly project units may be as low as 400 square feet, described the spread of afford- able units, required compliance with state law regulations for affordable housing, funding of the elderly housing portion of the project, the development procedures for grading and terracing specific areas, noting the grade Change on the easterly portion of the project would be twenty- five to thirty feet to a ten to twelve foot change at the westerly portion of the project site near Pacific Coast Highway, explained the necessity to construct no less than one thousand units, and discussed the estimated time frame for the project. Mr. Putnam affirmed that the grading of the south-easterly project site would not affect the Marina Hill homes abutting the project, and reported the buffer zone near Seal Beach Boulevard would be approximately sixty to eighty feet. Mr. Putnam also stated a soil erosion plan will be prepared for the project and that any structural failure of the grading and terracing I I ~ 6-8-81 or damage to homes abutting the bluff will be the responsibility of the developer. CoUncil discussed criteria of the affordable units, estimated costs, and requirements of state law for affordable housing and distribution of those units within the project. Mr. Putnam affirmed that Area Eight would be HUD funded, guaranteeing the loans and establishing rental schedules for the duration of the loan,'that Areas Six and Seven are expected to be marketable without HUD funds. Council questioned the number of children estimated to be generated from the project with Mr. Putnam reporting the School District had provided the figures shown and explained that children would be entering the system gradually during the extended period of project development. Mr. Putnam was questioned as to whether a developer ever allocates funds to a school district when the number of children impacts the school system's capabilities, to which he responded, only under state law whereby the district finds a deficiency exists in the educational opportunities due to the additional student population. Council asked if an alternative to HUD funding could be used. Mr. Putnam stated Section 8 funds provide the only viable means of providing the low income units. Concern was expressed regarding upkeep and aesthetic maintenance of the low income development. The City Attorney stated the Council can require any assurances for development and maintenance of the project at the time subdivision documents are considered. With regard to noise and safety provisions for the condominium development adjacent to Seal Beach Boulevard, Mr. Putnam stated the units would be lower than the noise generating level, that a berm and/or wall may be constructed in that area and that the developer must also meet all state regulations. Mr. Richard Gunnarson, 965 Catalina, was duly sworn by the Clerk, and stated he had not seen the amendments to the Plan subsequent to the Environmental Quality Control Board and Planning Commission meetings, stated he felt questions had been raised at those meetings which are yet unanswered, expressed his objection to the densities proposed for the project, suggested the local press should have provided more publicity of the E.Q.C.B. and Planning Commission hearings, stated alternatives with a financial analysis of each should have been I I I 6-8-81 11_~~~ I presented for consideration, objected to use of the wetlands area, referred to the eighteen acre parksite as the only additional dedication other than Gum Grove Park, the legal requirements for dedication by population, questioned the number of school age children anticipated, and the ability to provide an adequate level of safety services. Mr. Gunnarson continued and referred to the legal require- ments for development near an earthquake fault, questioned the mitigating measures in the area of liquefaction, expressed concern that City streets will be damaged due to truck transportation of heavy loads, and suggested Council further investigate these concerns, and spoke for a compatible development with the wetlands and wildlife remaining intact. Gordon Shanks, 215 Surf Place, expressed concern with certain points contained in the E.I.R., tax increment funding of safety services, streets and maintenance of public areas. The City Attorney stated maintenance is an allowable expenditure if based upon specific findings, that police and fire personnel salaries are not a function of the Redevelopment Agency except in rare cases where it has been shown there was a direct affect on providing those services. Mr. Shanks stated he did not feel the E.I.R. adequately addressed the liquefaction problem, that this development was not the best plan for the city and that the E.I.R. document was not complete. Mr. Doug Armfield, 1737 Crestview Avenue, stated he resides adjacent to the proposed Area Six and opposed construction of condominium units within fifty feet of his property, suggested they be placed elsewhere, and stated he felt the plan was not in the best interest of the community. It was noted a buffer zone is proposed between the Marina Hill properties and the condominium complex. The City Attorney clarified the Specific Plan only deals with location and density of the specific areas of the proposed development. Dr. George Jeweler, 1709 Crestview Avenue, expressed concern with removal of the Marina Hill bluff area and potential problems in the event of heavy rainfall and requested a concrete retainer be constructed. The Planning Director explained that the Specific Plan is similar to a zoning document, that it does not approve the development or provide specific criteria for walls, slopes or engineering conditions. The City Attorney stated that I I \. ~30 6-8-81 ~ -fa ~ adoption of the Specific Plan commits development of the areas denoted for specific use in the densities so designated and can be changed only through the amendment process based on additional information or specific findings. The Planning Director reported at least nine , development plans have been reviewed during the past two and one-half I years that have been found to be incompatible for that area based on physical constraints of the property, city and state regulations and marketability, and noted the densities proposed are approximately one half that which is currently allowed in the city. Mr. Putnam again addressed the Council noting the total number of dwelling units to make a feasible project had been discussed with Council and the Planning Commission during two study sessions, referred to concerns expressed regarding soil slippage and reported no slope failures have occurred since the 1970 grading standards became effective and assured the Council this project would abide by the most stringent of the grading codes. Mr. Putnam stated that in actuality the condo- minium development will be approximately one hundred feet from the I Marina Hill properties, and with regard to overload trucks on city streets, he assured Council all city regulations will be met. Mr. Putnam stated further that construction near the inactive earthquake fault will be dealt with as required by law, reported citizens attending the Planning Commission meeting had opposed any highrise development adjacent to Seal Beach Boulevard, and stated that the liquefaction problem is solvable and will be to the satisfaction of the Gity prior to any development. Mr. Putnam again referred to the two study sessions held with the Council and Commission, stating that the proposed plan reflects concerns expressed at those sessions and addresses the needs of the city. Mr. Armfield asked if it would be his responsibility to obtain legal representation if problems should arise from the grading and terracing. The City Attorney stated the I State of California Department of Real Estate would be the agency responsible for handling legal complaints and if unsatisfied with the determination, the property owner could then seek private counsel. Mr. Gunnarson referred to the Coastal Commission jurisdiction of the wetlands. Mr. Putnam responded that the wetlands issue would be 6-8-81 431 addressed when the project is submitted for Coastal Commission considera- tion. There were no other oral communications, Mayor Laszlo declared the public hearing closed. The City Manager referred to the financial aspects of the proposed I project, noting funds to be generated to the Redevelopment Agency, repayment of the Agency debt to the City, and the possible use of some Agency funds for certain general fund purposes in the future. RESOLUTION NUMBER 3066 - ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS - HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN Resolution Number 3066 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF THE HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN RELATED THERETO." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3066 was waived. With reference to Resolution Number 3066, item 2, Councilman Seitz suggested a provision requiring conversion of oil drilling apparatus to electric units. The Planning Director stated item 2 deals specifically I with noise, that the developer has no authority over the OE designated land and that a noise ordinance will be forthcoming for Council consideration. Mr. Romaniello also suggested the Council may also wish to review the current oil drilling regulations. Councilman Seitz requested item 3 be amended to include the words "at builders expense", that "a copy of the final geological report be available to each purchaser" be added to item 4, "at the builders expense" be included in item 5, that item 6 be amended to read..." the erection of fencing around oil operations, the type height and materials of said fencing to be determined by the City", and an item 8 be added to read "Developer shall comply with all mitigating measures as identified in the EIR." Council discussed their right to impose conditions prior to final I development approval and provisions for architectural design. The City Attorney clarified that the Council can not impose requirements on this development that would not be imposed on other developments in the city, that architectural requirements could be imposed if they related specifically to fire danger and affirmed that information regarding environmental issues not addressed in the EIR under consideration 4'32- 6-8-81 could be requested at a later time. Seitz moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Resolution Number 3066 with amendments to items 3, 4, 5, 6 and new item 8. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried I RESOLUTION NUMBER 3067 - AMENDING LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN - HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Resolution Number 3067 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN DEALING WITH THE HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3067 was waived. Mayor Laszlo requested page 32, paragraph 2 of the Land Use Element be amended to read "however the city recognizes there still remains a shortfall of twenty-four acres or more for this neighborhood and determines that a continued effort will be made to correct this deficiency", and the last sentence of the third paragraph, page 32, under "Proposed Parks and Open Space" read "The County of this facility as long as the City can afford to fund the program." It I Orange has signed an agreement with the City to allow joint use of was noted clerical errors within that paragraph would also be corrected. Laszlo moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Resolution Number 3067 with amendments to page 32 as requested by Mayor Laszlo. AYES:' Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3068 - AMENDING OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/CONSERVATION ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN Resolution Number 3068 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/CONSERVATION ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3068 was waived. included as an open space recreation area for Seal Beach and requested I Mayor Laszlo expressed displeasure with Sunset Aquatic Park being page four be amended stating Sunset Aquatic Park "provides little or no benefit to the residents of Seal Beach since it is accessible only through the City of Huntington Beach and offers no open space to Seal Beach residents." Councilman Kredell requested city staff investigate 6-8-81 {33, de annexation of the Sunset Aquatic Park area. Mayor Laszlo referred to page seven of the Element, suggested neighborhood parks be listed first, that a sub-total of that acreage be included, and objected to designa- tion of fifty-two acres of beach as a regional park. The Planning I Director clarified that all beaches within the State of California are designated as regional parks. Laszlo moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Resolution Number 3068 as amended with the additional statements as requested by Mayor Laszlo. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3069 - AMENDING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN Resolution Number 3069 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3069 was waived. Mayor Laszlo expressed concern regarding traffic flow and the safety of children I entering and leaving the proposed parksite and suggested a signal or stop sign be installed in that location. Councilman Seitz suggested an overpass might be considered. The City Manager explained that specifics relating to public improvements would be condition of approval when final development documents are considered. Mayor Laszlo also suggested a wider roadway width from the development area to Westminster Avenue. The Planning Director stated the General Plan would indicate an eighty foot roadway and affirmed there would be no access to the proposed project or streets within the development area from Avalon Avenue. Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Resolution Number 3069 as presented. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay I NOES: None Motion carried ORDINANCE NUMBER 1097 - HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN Ordinance Number 1097 was presented to Council for first reading entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN, ESTABLISHING A ZONING DISTRICT ENTITLED "THE HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT ZONE,",AMENDING ARTICLE 3, SECTION 28-301 "-A.<;'I4 6-8-81 ...~,~ OF ORDINANCE NO. 948, KNOWN AS "THE SEAL BEACH CITY ZONING ORDINANCE," BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP, AMENDING SECTION V OF THE CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, KNOWN AS THE "RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, BY CHANGING THE REDEVELOPMENT MAP AND ADOPTING THE HELLMAN SPECIFIC PLAN AS A PORTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH LOCAL COASTAL PLAN." By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1097 was waived. Councilman Seitz referred to page 9, number 4-b of the Specific Plan regarding details or issues not covered by the Plan. The Planning Director explained that nUmber 4-b is a safeguard for the'city in'the event some development regulation is inadvertently overlooked. Councilman Seitz referred to page 10, number 4-j regarding specific uses for parcels 10 through 13, stating he felt it would be appropriate if park area plans were prepared for review prior to final development plan approvals. The Planning Director stated areas 11 - 13 are not proposed for development however are an unusual type of use adjacent to the development site and must be addressed as required by State law, that areas 1 through 9 are proposed for development and area 10 is the proposed community parksite for which plans have been considered by staff and could be provided Council if desired. The City Manager stated a series of negotiations will be taking place with the developer, one item to be discussed will be the eighteen acre parksite, the dedication of which will be formalized by development or disposition agreement, that park development funds will most likely be with park dedication fees or tax increment funds, also that the Park and Recreation Commission will be considering and making recommendations for use of the parkland. The City Attorney suggested Council may wish to request staff to provide a preliminary parksite proposal, financing and development information prior to consideration of development tract maps. Councilman Seitz referred to page 14, number I-b regarding permitted uses for attached dwelling units and moved that number I-b refer to Planning Units 6 through 7, number b-l be amended to read "Attached dwelling units including condominiums" and that l-c be added, referencing Planning Unit 8 to read "Attached dwelling units including apartments and condominiums." Councilman Kredell seconded the motion. Councilman Supple inquired if the Redevelopment Agency I I I 6-8-81 .J!'O" ,fi.e 5 Plan documents also require amendments. The City Attorney affirmed that they do, the initial action to be considered by the Agency at their next meeting. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay I NOES: None Motion carried Councilman Kredell left Council Chambers at 10:54 p.m. and returned at 10:57 p.m. Councilman Seitz referred to page 15, number 3-f regarding minimum lot requirements. The Planning Director stated that lot size will be set forth: in the final plans, that proposals for development will have been reviewed by staff as to conformance with existing zoning and building regulations and at which time conditions of approval will be recommended. Mayor Laszlo left Council Chambers at 11:05 p.m. and returned at 11:09 p.m. Councilman Seitz referred to page 16, item 6, regarding parking spaces for Units 6 and 7 and suggested they be covered and enclosed. It was the recommendation of staff that specific parking area design I remain flexible at this time. Mr. Seitz recommended the valid approval period of time be changed to one year rather than two. The Planning Director reported it will take a minimum of eighteen months to obtain necessary approvals subsequent to the Specific Plan, therefore the two year period would be more appropriate. Seitz moved, second by Kredell, to delete reference to "Avalon Drive and First Street with a collector" from page 22, Section H-l-d. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay, to approve the introduction of Ordinance Number 1097 as amended and that it be passed to second reading. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay I NOES: None Motion carried It was the order of the Chair with consent of Council to recess the meeting at 11:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 p:m. with Mayor Laszlo calling the meeting to order. PUBLIC HEARING - MOBILE HOMES ON R-l SINGLE FAMILY LOTS Mayor Laszlo declared the public hearing open to consider implementing ,..g . . 436 6-8-81 Senate Bill 1960, permitting mobile homes on permanent foundations on lots which would allow single family residences. The City Clerk certified notices had been published as required by law and that no communications had been received either for or against the matter. The Planning Director presented the staff report, stated Senate Bill 1960 I is effective as of July 1, 1981 and is mandatory for all cities and counties. Mr. Romaniello reviewed the requirements and conditions for mobile homes on R-1 lots, and presented the recommendations of the Planning Commission. There were no communications from the audience; Mayor Laszlo declared the public hearing closed. ORDINANCE NUMBER 1098 - MOBILE HOMES ON R-l SINGLE FAMILY LOTS Ordinance Number 1098 was presented to Council for first reading entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE SEAL BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE 10 RELATING TO MOBILE HOMES ON R-l SINGLE FAMILY LOTS." By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1098 was waived. Seitz moved, second by Vanderstaay, to approve the introduction of I Ordinance Number 1098 and that it be passed to second reading. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried ORDINANCE NUMBER 1093 - AMENDING BUILDING CODE - 1981 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE and UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE Ordinance Number 1093 was presented to Council for second reading entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH RELATING TO BUILDING AND SAFETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1981 EDITION, THE UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE, THE 1981 ACCUMULATIVE SUPPLEMENT AND 1980 CODE CHANGES TO THE 1979 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE." By unanimous consent, full reading of Ordinance Number 1093 was waived. Councilman Supple expressed his I opposition to provisions of Section 5-6 of the proposed ordinance relating to Permits. Seitz moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Ordinance Number 1093 as presented AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Vanderstaay NOES: Supple Motion carried {r.<<J."'" '6:8-81 ,...:1, ... "./ft-" RESOLUTION NUMBER 3060 - MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS Resolution Number 3060 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING I APPOINTMENTS MADE BY THE MAYOR OF REPRESENTATIVES TO VARIOUS BOARDS, AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS, ASSIGNING CERTAIN DUTIES TO COUNCILMEMBERS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 2975." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3060 was waived. Mayor Laszlo reported his appointments, which were duly noted in Resolution Number 3060. Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay, to adopt Resolution Number 3060 as presented. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3071 - COMPLETION - PROJECT NUMBER 512 - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM Resolution Number 3071 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH DECLARING WORK TO BE COMPLETED AS TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROJECT #512, SIDEWALK I REPAIR PROGRAM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN FLEMING ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED AND THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3071 was waived. Kredell moved, second by Seitz, to adopt Resolution Number 3071 as presented and set June 22, 1981 as the date to conduct a public hearing to hear protests and confirm charges to be assessed for sidewalk repair, and direct the City Engineer to notify the affected property owners in accordance with the Improvement Act of 1911. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried RESOLUTION NUMBER 3072 - APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 80-1002 - 1107 OCEAN AVENUE Resolution Number 3072 was presented to Council entitled "A RESOLUTION I OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP 80-1002 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER TO CERTIFY THE MAP ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH." By unanimous consent, full reading of Resolution Number 3072 was waived. Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay to adopt Resolution Number 3072 as presented. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried 4~8' 6-8-81 ~ CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Supple requested Item "J" removed from the Consent Calendar. Vanderstaay moved, second by Kredell, to approve the recommended action for items on the Consent Calendar except Item "J" as presented. I. Approved the minutes of the regular meeting of I May 26, 1981 as presented. K. Authorized payment in the amount of $1,000 to cover the City's cost for the deductible in the $6,000 settlement of Irene and Henryk Warno claim for damages, subject to receipt of the appropriate release by the City. L. Denied the claim of Maureen O"Brien (Automobile Club of Southern California) for auto damages and referred same to the City's insurance adjuster. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried Items Removed From the Consent Calendar I ITEM "J" - DEMANDS Councilman Supple stated that pursuant to Council policy Agency demands require separate action to approve and moved to approve the payment to Burke, Williams & Sorenson in the amount of $1529.90. Councilmember Vanderstaay seconded the motion. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple" Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried Kredell moved, second by Vanderstaay, to approve regular demands numbered 40239 through 40358 in the amount of $196,554.47. payroll of June 4, 1~81 plus demands numbered 33001 through 33021 in the amoUnt of $147,487.02 as approved by the Finance Committee and that warrants be drawn on the Treasury for the same. NOES: None Motion carried I AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay REPORT - SUMMER BUS SERVICE - MAIN AT ELECTRIC TERMINAL The City Engineer reported that the summer bus service schedule will begin June 14, 1981, implementing ~he new routes and utilizing Electric 6-8-81 0:189.. I Avenue at Main Street as the downtown terminal. Mr. Johnson stated no restroom facilities are available at this location and recommended Council consideration of temporary facilities, the approximate cost for the three month summer period to be $2,000. Mr. Johnson also suggested Council may wish to consider establishing a permanent restroom facility at this location, the cost estimated between $7,700 and $10,300. No action was taken, it was the order of the Chair with consent of the Council to receive and file the report. COUNCIL REPORTS and REQUESTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Councilman Supple reported receipt of notification of a Coastal Commission hearing June 16 through 18, which included consideration of the Seal Beach Restoration Plan for the Department of Water and Power property. Councilman Seitz questioned the need for the Action Calendar; other members of the Council spoke for retaining the Action Calendar. Councilman Seitz questioned the legal implications to rezone the Trailer Park R-l; The City Attorney stated the City has the right to rezone property, noted however there may be difficulties arise regarding low income housing and legal commitments in the Trailer Park. The City Manager stated he would investigate the request and report to Council. Councilman Kredell referred to a 1500 square foot permanently constructed cabana in the Trailer Park; the City Manager stated he would look into the matter. Councilman Kredell stated he would like the Planning Commission to look into rezoning the downtown area of the City R-l, requested an ordinance be prepared prohibiting parking of,tractors and trailers on vacant lots and requested more Police Department enforcement of the law prohibiting commercial vehicles from parking on city streets. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Laszlo declared oral communications open from the audience. Joyce Risner, 845 Driftwood Avenue, referred to the Open Space/Recrea- tion/Conservation Element to the General Plan and spoke in favor of reporting all open space and parkland within that document, inquired if the meeting between the City, Coastal Conservancy and Coastal Commission had been scheduled and expressed opposition to the Council- members attending that meeting. The City Manager reported that meeting I I 4l~l 6~8~81 / 6-15-81 is scheduled for Wednesday of this week, that the City Manager and City Attorney will attend. It was the consensus of the Council to set Monday, June 15th at 7:00 p.m. as the time for a budget workshop. Joyce Risner also suggested that a consultant be retained to prepare a financial feasibility study of the Department of Water and Power I property. There were no other oral communications, Mayor Laszlo declared oral communications closed. ADJOURNMENT Vanderstaay moved, second by Kredell, to adjourn to Monday, June 15th at 7:00 p.m. AYES: Kredell, Laszlo, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay NOES: None Motion carried The meeting adjourned at 12:10 a.m. ex-offic'o clerk of Ci ty Couilcil I Approved: ,~ ~A..".~r- ayor Attest Seal Beach, California June 15, 1981 The City Council of the City of Seal Beach met in regular adjourned session at 7:00 o'clock p.m. with Mayor Laszlo calling the meeting to order with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Laszlo Councilmembers Kredell, Seitz, Supple, Vanderstaay I Absent: None Also present: Mr. Parker, City Manager Mr. Joseph, Assistant City Manager Chief Hutain, Fire Department Mrs. Yeo, City Clerk