HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC AG PKT 2003-05-12 #F f
AGENDA REPORT
DATE: May 12, 2003
TO: . Honorable Mayor and City Council
1
THRU: John B. Bahorski, City Manager
FROM: Lee Whittenberg, Director of Development Services ;
- SUBJECT: REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF COMMENT
LETTERS RE: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
- STATEMENT RE: "STATE ROUTE 22/WEST
ORANGE COUNTY CONNECTION"
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
❑ Authorize the Mayor to sign the draft comment letters after final review and approval of
any modifications by the City Council.
❑ Receive and File the Staff Report.
❑ Instruct staff to forward copies of approved comment letter to Planning Commission and
Environmental Quality Control Board.
BACKGROUND:
Overview of Project Changes Indicated in FEIR/EIS:
Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration ( "FHA ") (collectively "the lead
agencies ") have released the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact
Statement ( "FEIR/EIS ") for the "State Route 22/West Orange County.Connection ". The
FEIR/EIS indicates that the following changes have been made to the project, relating to
Seal Beach and Rossmoor, following circulation of the DEIR/EIS:
❑ The full acquisitions of six homes along Almond Avenue (Rose Circle, Oleander
Street, Pansy Circle, and Primrose Circle addresses) in the City of Seal Beach
' College Park East development, as well as the relocation of overhead power lines
and reconstruction of existing soundwalls, were avoided by:
❑ Shifting the I -405 Freeway centerline toward the south;
❑ Tightening the curvature; and
❑ Shifting the southbound I- 405 /eastbound SR -22 connector gore (divergence
point) further to the east.. This was achieved without changing the impacts to
the United States Naval Weapons Station facility on the south side of I -405
Agenda Item
Z: \My Documents \SR -22 DEIR - EIS \FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report doc \LW\05 -07 -03
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
❑ The right -of -way impact at the City of Seal Beach's reservoir was avoided by
. tightening the curvature of the Seal Beach Boulevard off -ramp while shifting the
exit nose further to the south.
❑ The I- 405/605 HOV connector has been realigned and lowered from the
DEIR/EIS proposal to reduce impacts to the community of Rossmoor and the City
of Seal Beach.
❑ The realignment reduces the height of the HOV connector by shifting the
previous alignment southerly such that the revised alignment runs parallel
between the eastbound SR -22 and the southbound I -605 to southbound I -405
connectors at the same elevation.
❑ The peak elevation of this connector has been reduced from approximately 95
feet to 72 feet where the minimum vertical clearance is required over the
eastbound SR -22 connector.
❑ The partial acquisitions of six homes along Martha Ann Drive in Rossmoor, as
well as utility relocation were avoided by tightening the curvature of the
southbound I- 405 /northbound I -605 connector while shortening the gore area
further to the south.
The above - discussed project modifications were the result of the strong position taken by
the City of Seal Beach and the community of Rossmoor in commenting on the Draft
EIR/EIS. During the preparation of the Final EIR/EIS, representatives of the City
Council and City departments met with representatives of Caltrans, OCTA, and
Supervisor Silva to review in greater detail the issues and concerns of the City and refine
alternative design features to the proposed alignments of the project to eliminate
acquisition impacts to Seal Beach and Rossmoor. Those meetings were successful in
accomplishing the primary goal of the City of eliminating acquisition impacts within Seal
Beach, as set forth above, and in more detail in the FEIR/EIS.
As identified in the FEIR/EIS, the project funding is uncertain for that portion of the
proposed project westerly of Valley View. Only the portion of the proposed project from
Valley View on the west to Glassel Street in the City of Orange to the east has funding
commitments at this time.
Provision of FEIR/EIS "Summary" Chapter:
Staff has included as Attachment 3 the "Summary - State Route 22/West Orange County
Connection Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement ",
dated _March 2003. The "Summary" provides an overview of the project changes
included in the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
( "FEIR/EIS ") for the "State Route 22/West Orange County Connection ".
Please note that the complete document is not provided due to length, 2,325 pages. It is
available for review at: the Los Alamitos/Rossmoor Library and the Mary Wilson Library
within Seal Beach; the Office of the City Clerk; and the Development Services Department.
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 2
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
In addition, a PDF version is available at the Caltrans website at www.dot.ca.gov /distl2,
along with additional information regarding the Draft FIR/EIS.
Overview of Proposed Comment Letter on the FEIR/EIS
Staff has reviewed the FEIR/EIS in detail and prepared a comment letter for City Council
consideration. The letter focuses on the changes made to the project by Caltrans in
response to the various comments received regarding property acquisition concerns and
other areas of concern identified in the City comment letter on the DEIR/EIS. This letter
recognizes the consultation process between the City, Caltrans, OCTA and Supervisor -
Silva's office to come to a mutually agreeable solution to the concerns of the City. It also
indicates the necessity for continued cooperation between the various agencies as this
project may move forward in the future to address construction- related impacts within
Seal Beach.
Overview of Issues Addressed by the City of Seal Beach in Commenting
on the Draft EIR/EIS:
When the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
( "DEIR/EIS ") was released in August 2001, the City raised strong objections to the
proposed alignments due to the identified acquisition impacts of private homes in College
Park East and potential acquisitions of City facilities at the I- 405 /Seal Beach Boulevard
intersection. Additional concerns related to noise, air quality and construction impacts
were also identified. The City Council directed staff to conduct a thorough review and
comment on the DEIR/EIS, and that review revealed numerous shortcomings in the
document, in the opinion of the City consultants and staff.
The City Council reviewed the Draft EIR/EIS and a draft comment letter on October 22,
2001 and authorized submission of the comment letter to Caltrans and OCTA. The
City's comment letter contained a significant amount of information (159 pages in
length) that was intended to help guide the decision - making process in a direction that
would lessen the significant impacts of the project on the City. The City's comment
letter addressed both CEQA and NEPA issues. •
Contained within the comment letter was extensive discussion regarding the
identification of additional project alternatives that were designed to avoid or reduce
significant impacts within the City of Seal Beach. The following identified alternative
was sPecifically identified and discussed within the City's comment letter and was
devel9ped to eliminate the necessity of acquiring any residential structures within the .
City.
❑ "Realignment of Proposed Project — Revised Design Criteria" Alternative.
The City's assessment determined that the project could be realigned to the south
with no impacts to College Park East. Further, this alternative design could be
accomplished within Caltrans right -of -way, i.e., no additional right -of -way would
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 3
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
be required for the project on the southerly side that would impact the Seal Beach
Naval Weapons Station. The alternative alignment considered pinch points at
Primrose Place and the Navy property line on the south for the southbound SR 22
ramp. The alternative alignment shifted the freeway to the south approximately
3.6 meters. This proposed realignment indicated it would miss the existing sound
wall along Almond Avenue. The FEIR/EIS incorporates the major design
features of this proposed alternative to eliminate acquisition impacts within the
City.
"Enclosure A" of the comment letter provided extensive and thorough discussion regarding
the requirements of NEPA and CEQA in preparing a DEIS/EIR document, indicated where
the document has fallen short of those requirements, and provided appropriate
recommendations as to the necessary corrective actions to bring the document into
compliance with the appropriate NEPA and CEQA provisions. "Enclosure B" of the
comment letter discussed technical corrections or concerns.
Previous Review by EQCB and City Council:
In May 1998 the City received the "Notice of Initiation of Studies/Notice of Preparation —
SR 22 and 1 -405 Improvements ". The City Council authorized the Mayor to sign a
comment letter regarding concerns of the City regarding the proposed project on June 22,
1998.
As indicated above, the City Council authorized submission of an extensive comment
letter to Caltrans regarding the Draft EIR/EIS for this project on October 22, 2001.
Comment Period re "State Route 22/West Orange County
Connection Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental
Impact Statement ":
OCTA and Caltrans released the "State Route 22/West Orange County Connection Final
Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement" ( FEIR/EIS) relative
to the proposed project on April 18, 2003. Interested parties may provide comments on the
FEIR/EIS for 45 days, or until June 2, 2003. After that date, the filing of a "Record of
Decision" and a "Notice of Determination" would occur and the final project designs could
be completed and construction could begin by early 2004.
. 3
Comments may be submitted by mail to:
Caltrans District 12
c/o Leslie Manderscheid
Environmental Planning
3337 Michaelson Drive, Suite 380
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 4
•
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
Irvine, CA 92612 -8894
Availability of FEIR/EIS:
A copy of the "State Route 22/West Orange County Connection Final Environmental
Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement" is available at the Department of
Development Services. Hard copies are available at the Los Alamitos/Rossmoor Library
and the Mary Wilson Library within Seal Beach and the Garden Grove Regional Library. In
addition, a PDF version is available at the Caltrans website at www.dot.ca.gov /distl2, along
with additional information regarding the Final EIR/EIS.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The revised project eliminates all property acquisitions within Seal Beach, and as such,
there are no identified fiscal impacts upon the community due to the loss of property tax
revenues of costs of relocating and re- establishing important public facilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
❑ Authorize the Mayor to sign the draft comment letters after final review and approval of
any modifications by the City Council.
❑ Receive and File the Staff Report.
❑ Instruct staff to forward copies of approved comment letter to Planning Commission and
Environmental Quality Control Board.
NOTED AND APPROVED:
�A,�'
e Whittenb -rg John B. Bahorski
Director of Development Services City Manager
Attachments: (5)
Attachment 1: Draft Comment Letter to Caltrans re: "Final Environmental
-4 Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (SCH
98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County
Connection"
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 5
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
Attachment 2: Draft Comment Letter to Supervisor Silva re: "Final
Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact
Statement (SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange
County Connection"
Attachment 3: "Summary - State Route 22/West Orange County
Connection Final Environmental Impact Report and
Environmental Impact Statement ", dated March 2003
Note: Complete document not provided due to length, 2,325
pages. It is available for review at: the Los
Alamitos/Rossmoor Library and the Mary Wilson Library
within Seal Beach; the Office of the City Clerk; and the
Development Services Department. In addition, a PDF
version is available at the Caltrans website at
www.dot.ca.gov /distl2, along with additional information
regarding the Draft FIR/EIS.
Attachment 4: "SR -22 West Orange County Connection — Final
Environmental Impact Statement Report (FEIS/R) ",
Caltrans web page information, downloaded May 5, 2003.
Attachment 5: "SR -22 West Orange County Connection — April 2003
Newsletter - Final Environmental Document Just
Released ", Caltrans, April, 2003
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 6
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
ATTACHMENT 1
DRAFT COMMENT LE'1"1'ER TO CALTRANS RE:
"FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SCH
98064001), STATE ROUTE 22/WEST ORANGE COUNTY
CONNECTION"
•
FEIR -EIS Review CC Staff Report 7
" '•: .',,'-;•? r . I "' k- 1 ' ;/a
•
r 3
, , - 'r t _ . } - t i* 1 , ' s { , i '' p er • . , It m h S 1W S , { f ' . N
LI
` { 1
'' y1 4h,,w_,"'i.` ® i k' . . j Q !
4 i i yr ! }
w� ' � , t���t �c �� ` ii (1,1,1-, a I \I I LI 1 �'I( I ITI I '-,,1 C�[r� I
r 1 ` ` +" .
•''' SI VI 1'1 \C H -C \I II Oh \I \ 90710
,. � -4(., ...... k_._. ,- ,.-:ai '(. . .'''.r ° '{. ' (�ih/ I 1 7 ;`��‘,`. i � it b` a II i'' .•
k , . yv ci .t L:
.x �r,. iri. �u.
May 19, 2003
Caltrans District 12
c/o Leslie Manderscheid
Environmental Planning
3337 Michaelson Drive, Suite 380
Irvine, CA 92612 -8894
Dear Ms. Manderscheid:
SUBJECT: CITY OF SEAL BEACH COMMENTS RE: "FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SCH
98064001), STATE ROUTE 22/WEST ORANGE COUNTY
CONNECTION" •
The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the above referenced document and is most pleased to
see that Caltrans and OCTA have taken the comments of the City of Seal Beach and the
Rossmoor community seriously and have responded in a very positive manner to our
legitimate and substantial concerns.
During the preparation of the Final EIR/EIS, representatives of the City Council and City
departments met with representatives of Caltrans, OCTA, and Supervisor Silva to review
in greater detail the issues and concerns of the City and refine alternative design features
to the proposed alignments of the project to eliminate acquisition impacts to Seal Beach
and Rossmoor
The FEIR/EIS now reflects the positive results of those meetings and indicates, in
accordance with the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative" preferred project, there will
be no property acquisition impacts in Seal Beach and that several of the design alternatives
suggested within our comment letter of October 22, 2001 on the Draft EIR/EIS relative to
the City - identified alternative of the "Realignment of Proposed Project — Revised
Design Criteria" Alternative as the City's "preferred alternative ", have been
incorporated into the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative" project. The City Council
and our citizens are sincerely appreciative of the cooperation evidenced by Caltrans and
OCTA in meeting with the City and responding in such a manner to our concerns.
Z:\My Documents \SR -22 DEIR- EIS\FEIR- EIS.CC Comment Letter.doc \LW\05 -19 -03 - --
City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
As indicated in our comment letter of October 22, 2001,
"If a cooperative environment, in fact, exists between the project sponsors
and the project's other stakeholders, such that the "build" project is
subsequently modified or another alternative formulated in response to the
City's concerns, Seal Beach is prepared to support a "build" project
scenario and provide whatever coordination and cooperation may be
needed to facilitate the proposed improvements to the SR -22 Freeway."
The City Council believes that "cooperative environment' has been developed during the
review and preparation of the FEIR/EIS, and stands ready to support the project, subject to
clarification and re- consideration of certain issues set forth below.
City Understanding and Support of the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative" Project Changes based on Comments Received during
DEIR/EIS circulation:
In reviewing the FEIR/EIS, the City is of the understanding that the following changes have
been made to the project, relating to Seal Beach and Rossmoor, following circulation of
the DEIR/EIS and as reflected in the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative" of the
FEIR/EIS:
❑ The full acquisitions of six homes along Almond Avenue (Rose Circle, Oleander
Street, Pansy Circle, and Primrose Circle addresses) in the City of Seal Beach
College Park East development, as well as the relocation of overhead power lines
and reconstruction of existing soundwalls, were avoided by:
❑ Shifting the I -405 Freeway centerline toward the south;
❑ Tightening the curvature; and
❑ Shifting the southbound I- 405 /eastbound SR -22 connector gore (divergence
point) further to the east. This was achieved without changing the impacts to
the United States Naval Weapons Station facility on the south side of I -405
❑ The right -of -way impact at the City of Seal Beach's reservoir was avoided by
tightening the curvature of the Seal Beach Boulevard off -ramp while shifting the
exit nose further to the south.
❑ Noise Barrier Cl (NB-C1) has been added to the project to reduce identified noise
impacts to the College Park West area of Seal Beach, as indicated in Table 4.9 -11.
NB -C1 will be up to 4.9 meters (16 feet) high and is projected to reduce the
predicted noise levels within College Park West between 6 and 9 decibels,
depending on the measurement location.
❑ The I- 405/605 HOV connector has been realigned and lowered from the
DEIR/EIS proposal to reduce impacts to the community of Rossmoor and the City
of Seal Beach.
❑ The realignment reduces the height of the HOV connector by shifting the
previous alignment southerly such that the revised alignment runs parallel
•
FEIR -EIS CC Comment Letter 2
City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
between the eastbound SR -22 and the southbound I -605 to southbound I -405
connectors at the same elevation.
❑ The peak elevation of this connector has been reduced from approximately 95
feet to 72 feet where the minimum vertical clearance is required over the
eastbound SR -22 connector.
❑ The partial acquisitions of six homes along Martha Ann Drive in Rossmoor, as
well as utility relocation were avoided by tightening the curvature of the
southbound I- 405 /northbound I -605 connector while shortening the gore area
further to the south.
❑ These project changes are reflected on the following "Layout ", "Profile" and
"Typical Cross Sections" pages, all indicating a date plotted of February 21, 2003,
prepared by Caltrans Design Branch B, Loanna Huynh, Project Engineer:
❑ "Layout" pages L -1 through L -7;
❑ "Profile" pages P -1 through P -3; and
❑ "Typical Cross Sections" pages X -1 and X -2.
The City Council strongly supports the above indicated design changes that have been
incorporated into the FEIR/EIS and encourages the adoption of the "(Enhanced) Reduced
Build Alternative" as described within the FEIR/EIS. The City also recognizes and
supports the use of "non- standard" design standards to be utilized in the project and as
discussed on page 2 -7 of the FEIR/EIS. These non - standard design features include:
❑ a non - standard inside shoulder on I -605 and I -405 at transition areas to join an
existing non - standard shoulder. Also on I -405 and SR -22 at spot locations where
California Highway Patrol enforcement areas are recommended.
❑ Non - standard lane widths 10.8 to 11.8 ft. (3.3 to 3.6 meters) on I -605 northbound
and southbound north of the HOV connector.
❑ Non - standard median widths on I -605 north of the HOV connector, on I -405 at I-
605, and on I -405 at SR -22.
However, the City still has several concerns that need to be further addressed by the
decision - making bodies prior to the approval /certification of the FEIR/EIS and the
issuance of the necessary "Record of Decision" ( "ROD ") and "Notice of Determination"
( "NOD ").
Areas of Remaining Concern regarding the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative" of the FEIR/EIS:
Prior to the lead agency's consideration of the appropriate actions to approve /certify the
FEIREIS and to issue of the necessary "Record of Decision" ( "ROD ") and "Notice of
Determination" ( "NOD "), the City wishes to express the following concerns and issues
for additional re- evaluation prior to those decisions being made.
1. What process is available to interested parties to address the decision - making
bodies or persons prior to the issuance of the necessary "Record of Decision"
( "ROD ") and "Notice of Determination" ( "NOD ")?
FEIR- EIS.CC Comment Letter 3
' City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
Throughout the FEIR/EIS, the Responses to Comments (particularly Response
80), the accompanying "Public Notice" and transmittal documents relating to the
FEIR/EIR, there is an indication that "the Federal Highway Administration will
issue a Record of Decision (ROD) ". The documents do not indicate how the
interested public may be involved with that ROD issuance process. Please
provide the appropriate public participation information regarding this issue to the
City of Seal Beach City Manager, John Bahorski. The City may still wish to
address concerns not addressed in the FEIR/EIS or the draft ROD, based on the
concerns and comments below. Please address this requested information to:
City of Seal Beach
Attn: Mr. John Bahorski, City Manager
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
•
2. Project Funding/Phasing:
Sections 2.6, Project Funding and Section 2.7, Project Phasing, discuss the funding
and phasing of the complete project. In Section 2.6 it is stated "Furthermore, the
2002 draft STIP did not include funding for construction of the HOV direct
connectors at I -405/1 -605 and I- 405/SR -22 freeways." and in Section 2.7 it is state.d
"Phasing scenarios for the remaining features of the proposed project have not been
determined, and would be dependent on such factors as funding availability,
environmental impacts, and mitigation requirements, coordination with other
projects, and operational considerations of the transportation system during both
construction and operation." The City of Seal Beach understands that the
"remaining features" include the HOV direct connectors at I -405/1 -605 and I-
405/SR-22 freeways, and the provision of the HOV surface lanes between these two
HOV direct connectors.
The City of Seal Beach is requesting clarification as to the "triggers" that would
require conducting subsequent environmental analysis of these "remaining features ",
specifically if these "remaining features " include property acquisitions that are no
longer identified as being necessary under the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative" identified in the FEIR/EIS as the preferred project at this time.
The last sentence of Response 98 states "Note right -of -way impacts could still
change between approval of the FEIR/EIS and approval of final design." This
language indicates that the ultimate determinations regarding property
acquisitions is still in flux. This is most disconcerting, to say the least. It seems
as though there is still the potential for property acquisitions along the entire
project route to change during the "final design" stage. This again raises
substantial concerns to the City of Seal Beach as to potential impacts within our
community. The City requests a clear statement from Caltrans and OCTA that if
FEIR- EIS.CC Comment Letter 4
City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
future property acquisitions are again contemplated within Seal Beach, even
though those potential property acquisitions were previously disclosed, discussed
and evaluated in the DEIR/EIS on this project, that a new environmental
evaluation will be conducted on those contemplated property acquisitions. This is
a substantial issue to the City Council, staff and property owners along the I-
405/SR -22/I -605 corridors of this project. Without that commitment from
Caltrans and OCTA, the City will continue to strongly and vigorously oppose the
potential to re- instate property acquisitions within Seal Beach.
3. Visual Resource Impacts of the Proposed I- 405/605 HOV connector:
The "(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative" preferred project indicates that the
proposed I- 405/605 HOV connector has been realigned and lowered from the
DEIR/EIS proposal to reduce impacts to the community of Rossmoor and the City
of Seal Beach. The City is most appreciative of the response of Caltrans and
OCTA to the concerns of the City. However, the City is disappointed that the
proposed reconfiguration of the I- 405/605 HOV connector does not fully reflect
the comments made by the City of Seal Beach and Rossmoor Community
Services District regarding the design modifications for this facility. It is
requested that the proposed alignment and height of this structure again be
reviewed and reconsidered by Caltrans and OCTA to incorporate more fully the
suggestions provided by the City of Seal Beach and Rossmoor Community
Services District.
The following comments on the design aspects of this connector have been
provided by Bill Zimmerman, contract Engineer to the City of Seal Beach:
1. Consideration should be given to realigning the I- 405/605 HOV Connector to
the south to minimize the height of the connector over the E22 Connector.
Realigning the ramp to the south would take advantage of the flatter section of
the E22 connector, before it begins to rise over the 405 freeway.
2. The design of vertical profile should consider a plan to be under the S405/-
N605 Connector. This would eliminate the need for a 19 -meter high structure
and allow the new structures to be no higher than existing.
4. Ability of City to Review and Comment upon certain Mitigation Measures
proposed in the FEIR/EIS:
The City of Seal Beach recognizes and appreciates the many mitigation measures
that are set forth within the FEIR/EIS to eliminate identified impacts to a less than
significant level. The City looks forward to working with Caltrans and OCTA in -a
cooperative manner to ensure that those mitigation measures are effectively designed
and implemented to reduce impacts to our community. In that cooperative spirit, the
City requests the ability to review and provide comments on aspects of any future
construction activities within the project area between Valley View and Katella
Avenue to ensure that there is sufficient coordination with the City's Public Works
FEIR - EIS.CC Comment Letter 5
City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
Department in developing and implementing traffic control plans, and other physical
impacts due to construction related activities such as equipment and supply yards,
etc. The City requests the cooperation of Caltrans and OCTA by allowing the City
to review and comment on final implementation plans or programs relating to the
following Mitigation Measures identified in the FEIR/EIS:
❑ GEO- (E)RB -8 — relative to haul routes on City streets of waste construction
material and soils.
❑ WET- (E)RB -1 — relative to the ability of the City to review and comment on
the necessary NPDES and SWPPP for potential wetland impacts due to the
construction of the I -405/I -605 Connector segment.
❑ NOI- (E)RB -9 — the City would request that a community meeting be held in
Seal Beach relative to the planned project noise impacts at the Valley View
western limit of the currently contemplated project prior to the initiation of
any construction activities from Valley View easterly, including construction
of Noise Barrier 3. The City would require a community meetings to be held
in Seal Beach prior to any construction activities related to the contemplated
improvements from the I- 405 /SR- 22/Valley View interchange westerly to
the end of the project at I -605 and Katella Avenue, including the
construction of NB -R1 adjacent to the Rossmoor community.
❑ VIS- (E)RB -12 — relative to the ability of the City to review and comment on
the highway planting plan relative to impacts due to the construction of the I-
405/I -605 Connector segment.
❑ CON- (E)RB -4 - relative to the ability of the City to review and comment on,
prior to final approval, of the traffic control plans, construction schedules
and detour route plans relative to impacts due to the construction from the I-
405/SR-22/Valley View interchange westerly to the end of the project at I-
605 and Katella Avenue.
❑ CON- (E)RB -5 - relative to the ability of the City to review and comment on
prior to final approval, of the construction schedule and detour information
relative to impacts due to the construction from the_ I- 405 /SR- 22/Valley
View interchange westerly to the end of the project at I -605 and Katella
Avenue.
Please respond to the above identified issues and concerns in writing to:
City of Seal Beach
Attn: Mr. John Bahorski, City Manager
211 Eighth Street
Seal Beach, CA 90740
The City of Seal Beach would be most willing to meet with the appropriate parties
representing Caltrans and OCTA to discuss these matters in greater detail in the formulation
of your responses to our concerns and the preparation of the Record of Decision. The City
FEIR -EIS CC Comment Letter 6
City of Seal Beach Comment Letter re:
"Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement
(SCH 98064001), State Route 22/West Orange County Connection"
May 19, 2003
Council believes that the Record of Decision should specifically address each of the issues
and concerns set forth in this letter.
Please contact Mr. John Bahorski, City Manager or Mr. Lee Whittenberg, Director of
Development Services, City Hall, 211 Eighth Street, Seal Beach, 90740 if you have
questions concerning these matters. Mr. Bahorski can be reached at (562) 431 -2527,
extension 300 and Mr. Whittenberg can be reached at (562) 431 -2527, extension 313.
Sincerely,
John Larson
Mayor, City of Seal Beach
Distribution: Supervisor James W. Silva, 2 District
City Council
• City Manager
Director of Development Services
Rossmoor Community Services District
FEIR -EIS CC Comment Letter 7
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
May 13, 2003
Supervisor James W. Silva, r District
Orange County Board of Supervisors
10 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Supervisor Silva: -
SUBJECT: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SCH
98064001) STATE ROUTE 22/WEST ORANGE COUNTY
CONNECTION
The City of Seal Beach has reviewed the above referenced document and is most pleased to
see that Caltrans and OCTA have taken the comments of the City of Seal Beach and the
Rossmoor community seriously and have responded in a very positive manner to our
legitimate and substantial concerns. The FEIR/EIS now indicates that there will be no -
property acquisitions in Seal Beach and that several of the design alternatives suggested
within our comment letter of October 22, 2001 on the Draft EIR/EIS have been incorporated
into the final project.
The City is responding directly to Caltrans regarding the FEIR/EIS and will forward a copy
of that letter for your information and files.
The City Council of the City of Seal Beach wishes to express to you a "heartfelt Thank
You" personally for your efforts and the efforts of your staff in meeting with our City
Council and staff and representatives of Caltrans and OCTA to resolve the acquisition issues
that were of concern to our community. The time and efforts of you and your staff were
instrumental in keeping the lines of communication open, which resulted in the positive
outcomes of the project design as reflected in the FEIR/EIS. .
Again, thank you for your efforts and we hope that this project will be completed in a timely
manner and that the efforts of yourself and your staff will continue to be directed to ensuring
the project is successful.
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 16
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
Sincerely,
John Larson
Mayor, City of Seal Beach
. i
•
Distribution: City Council
City Manager
Director of Development Services
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 17
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
' State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003 ,
I
ATTACHMENT 3
"STATE ROUTE 22/WEST ORANGE COUNTY
CONNECTION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT ", DATED MARCH 2003
NOTE: COMPLETE DOCUMENT NOT PROVIDED
DUE TO LENGTH, 2,325 PAGES. IT IS AVAILABLE FOR
REVIEW AT: THE LOS ALAMITOS/ROSSMOOR
LIBRARY AND THE MARY WILSON LIBRARY
WITHIN SEAL BEACH; THE OFFICE OF THE CITY "
CLERK; AND THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION, A PDF VERSION IS
AVAILABLE AT THE CALTRANS WEBSITE AT
WWW.DOT.CA.GOV/DIST12, ALONG WITH
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE
DRAFT FIR/EIS.
•
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 18
•
( , ‘,. ._ , \ .'t,., . . , ' . f•t'`=, 4 . • .., e-?,; •., . 0 ' "R''' . $' , -, ,, - —,. 4. •
4,iti 9
' ..z• , "''' ' %it ,-g: •-•'-' ' (J. ,• '.. IV ',.fh Z , ,., .
tit'".. '' ‘ 4111111."1".. ( 4: ' * ';' 1.411*. It...., .. ,.. • ....,,. ,....-,,,,,; ,, "'-SCHIslo:
'1: °';.1 .., ,,,,., ++-' 4.'''' . 4 ii*:,.., ;- T.,"‘ PtE4'"?.,k146 , , ... • . ,
14ii.' ,,.X . If"-`"i‘-<''''f,r1z:A-'5,.. — \ ' 4 AlliiiiMm UTE ' , -,-, 4 ,%). . . ' . ",
' ''' 22/ ' •';''..4 ' ''''' ' : • ."
't WESTiO._,.. ..p. ., ,,_ °k: :.-,.., r 7: ,.,..ittftf,..:- 7,,T47`i',7,0",' ,-.',,,,,-;,..':;.‘- ''„ -
s 5^ ' PI' ; 4 ''''' ' ' ' . ' ''' . . J:" ' ' '' ■ . * iith ' ' ; ' ' 7 , ' ' 4 :ik Z.kit '-'' - 5 , . : - 4,-. „ - .
'4. :...- ' . ., , - ,,,.„. : . - ....,- 0,r4k5 , ir , ;, , .,.,„„ „ . .„*. - 01 , :-., . ;...,,,,..„ .
:', ,, , „w, .,. , - . ,-, ' - ,, , , z 0 v.--. •• . .,' .• .4„ 4. ,, i '`I'i" ' 4104', ' 0 " ' . : ; • ', „' : :' ; . • '
*,
7-'7,4-:‘---t-A:': - ''' - 'Envi - ronme„,;141 :....„.. --•.•.. 1 . ii,44-.,- ,....-,:,-.",:f1.--..,:::-,cmtie:
.
— ' "I" ;' ' krill ' ' "\ '' — '"-: - 1 , 14.„-: :,---, ° : ...: : ,.,; ',... .'s - .. '4,:d. ,,t:,' 4..1... 44.% NZ, . 4, +, , ' ..''''," 1, k ' ''':',',4''' 4,-;•;'Eti,,,,,'—..
,444. k ', , :',.1i14+°(°,' ' , , • . ,,,:'' 4:40114::k' y,,,srr . - "21-',:.' ''''*'.'"' g , ,'''• :,- l',1 , , *::' ! -,i';f„,4:'-‘,7-41:.,,,tt.-f>,;.
p''''
At
i:-.....,....-7:: !.,..,....\,,,,:... ,,•ti,,,,„..t4.2._,14.,_;...ft,:e4.,a.::..4,....44s:.,...4,..,4 .,....c---„y7.„..-.. ...,otit4...,.4...,..„,
..,,,_ ....,,,..,.....,...4.,,.....;4.,. ..„,...._„:„..,......,,,,,,,,,,7„: , .4,..,,,,,.....,„c1,..,„.,,....,::;.„,..7„5:,.....01......,..........,
.,:.- .....,.:,..,:t.:,.1:4,4.41.104.....,;..„4-.,.--,s74...,:;-.....: "• ,,,_.''';' - ' : l'" •' 0`1"°91;i5•41%,/:' . '.' "s - ' 4;4.; . t:.4114-:,--- - - ., ,-.4,,..
:+ '''' *- Pwr= 0 ,:i'+''' - '''''-'4,*':* ``, + ' ,forgr 4, - .:. ' +:.'?5,(11)t. :,...:,- .,,,.': - , 4., -.,,, k :R..,
` je., . tj?-7:14 i tc idr q i-u, : - .77 - "...";‘ - .. +Ar 4441Califoijinla.DIVISIOn %, Aicriv ;;,,-- ,,f,,, . ,. ,,,;,,,,
vr ,.„.:, . 41-4trA., -,- 4t, t1/.. ',.. .,..,, -,, , it.' t , 47 , : , , -.... , ... ,.
,iis,
~ /v".:\ - -- - "" (•,*"' 1 : '''' ". ...,$.,:, , CIO , . , , ,
' ',:' y . I i i A Irlw , 0' \ - , , ''. e,'+'4.1 ' -, ";,' :' 1 - -,'' 1"' , ' 4 e 4' -' ''',' ,-- - - -
,diari dra4
( 4.,
*:), :- ;,:‘,..„*,c' ;;;,, „, — - ii.,;('' . - , .1. . ',i,,;‘,:;,, 4 ',,.!,-, ,_,, '. ,,,,,,,A,74,'..,•'..P,.,''' '' . \ ':., ,, ,7,.., t. •
:i":.6` ' ‘. ;f4 '4 '3:P ''', ,-,,,r. ';,,..- ' , ',, ,.„. 4 t i..7.i. .. ,,k ,i).„.... ,:.., .._„,:,,,.... ,. • ., :- - ,
, —„,-,-,-; : . ,:-,:at.,t..,:)%34.:40„.: , : ,, , ,, ,:.:„:0', , ,,,-,,,,, 7 , ,-, .4 , ,,,;.„,..,',;(;. 7- 4,:ii 4r7.1, t';'..'r - „:: .: - .,„-:,;f4. '
e-,:. e '. -7; ; ' ' ' - . , .'!': '''' :. i; , c .... ,;;.. •'.... f ir‘ -' _ ' ; ..a,‘"' ";,.., ' fir 1 ..''' 'I 11V :IP' '• ;„ ' "
.,..., :,,-,,.... . ,, v ,,. . , %:: - 7. , ;tcli...-::: . ,_, -. 4,:i;-,:;;* .- :::o !:*,, ., .-:- , ';-; = , L. . „rj*/ .. - ,-•:. - - •,iii i i.1 4i
v ile'
::',4;1:', ' - . ''''' ' ' ' i, -4:'-'4"' ' ' ' ' ' ' - f;'' `-:- , C IIMPA,_/.1 ..4_,00v.;.: - , .;' ..-:,,-,m 1 '.: :: .:- . :. .'- ,
'" ' ' e - 4 -ft': . ' - ' ".0*--i ,74,4131 ' - - 4; - t .:'.. * -.-5, 4- ,.... : :' , ..tr4t,IV:tat4.1"?`' ‘, ,
* t,
'1'774", r?' ' ;11."*,.. '+:■:;t?':-* .'4ii,,. ,::„0,„ .' ' !I:. ,..f,ii,,'":, ‘.4,4=,:;.",,, '.-. 44?, z *'' -: ,,.. '4. ,Ni - ., -,-.:tr,' . 44 ' i. ' „ 2 ,,...:,„
,,,,
o tt
ir 7 l':i;..:':444r '7 ;,. `„;' ,, ' ::': t ?' : ',, 1: 41":"-' ' ':-;. : - - ''';',:::;' ,: . "i": : : : ' ',14.:g ::" ::: :' 1,1`...; ' si:::.' . 2 '4,-..:".!:,::::, ,„::;',*:.:::**,:l'..',...:,::' '44.„4
4
t .k.... - .. f:. , - - .'-' ....,...- ,, ..: .i:, : ::,,, 4.
.:: , 2 ; : ' . .. ' . +43; re, ,-+ :, -, ..c?,,,, / ' N..' 1 ;x: - *ff. 4 !'',` - '' - ,„.` '2' ,,''',7s7V. ,, ,,, , 'C;;" .-: ! :,x,;,$.+ '.'"
+ " ,- • ' -4.1'`.: 7 4,..- + ,e, ''‘'' ; . '''';'-,, f";:f1 ,i's.'" ' - ,---;; -' ' ' '" ' ' 14•Tig:.‘'Ir n ' ;" s *' '' "'I
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIE!R
S.0 SUMMARY
S.1 INTRODUCTION
This Final Environmental Impact Statement /Environmental Impact Report (FEIS /EIR) identifies the
purpose and need for the State Route 22/West Orange County Connection Project (S R-22/WOCC). This
document describes the alternatives that were considered, and identifies a Preferred Alternative. The
proposed project would widen and construct high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on SR 22 from the
Interstate 405/605 (1- 405/605) interchange to SR -55, along with other improvements. The other
improvements include direct HOV connectors to the 1- 405/605 and SR -22/l -405. The ranges of -
improvements were examined through two build alternatives. The impacts of the alternatives are
presented. This document was prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
Section 4(f), and California Environmental Quality Act I,CEQA). This FEIS /EIR is divided into four •
volumes: Volume I, which includes the analyses, Volumes 11 & 111, which include the comments received
during the public review period of the August 2001 Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement ( DEIR/EIS) and the responses to them, and Volume IV, which includes comments and
their responses that were received after October 30, 2001, and documentation of public notices and other
appendices that are part of the supplemental technical reports. The technical reports are under separate .
covers and are available for review at the same locations as the FEIS /EIR (See Table of Contents in this _
FEIS/EI R).
S.2 SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE PROJECT FOLLOWING CIRCULATION OF THE DEIR/EIS
The following sections briefly describe the changes that have been made to the project as a result of -
comments received on the DEIR/EIS and other refinements to the project features. .
S.2.1 (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative
The Reduced Build Alternative, as presented in the DEIR/EIS, has been modified and renamed the
(Enhanced) Reduced Build- Alternative. For more information, see Section S.6.3.1 and 2.2 (A).
S.2.2 Changes in Right -of -Way Acquisitions
The following displacements /acquisitions previously identified in the August 2001 DEIR/EIS would now be
AVOIDED. These changes are from either the Reduced Build or Full Build alternatives as presented in
the DEIR /S resulting in the identified Preferred Alternative, the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative:
Residential Displacements Residential Partial Acquisitions
11032 Trask Avenue (Garden Grove) 11801 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
11062 Trask Avenue (Garden Grove) 11821 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
*12841 Lewis St. (Garden Grove) 11831 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
12771 Lewis St. (Garden Grove) 11841 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
*13401 El Prado Ave. (Garden Grove) 11861 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
3541 Rose Circle (Seal Beach) ' 11871 Martha Ann Dr. (Rossmoor)
3510 Oleander St (Seal Beach) 9141 Enloe Way (Garden Grove)
3521 Pansy Circle (Seal Beach) 9151 Enloe Way (Garden Grove)
3520 Pansy Circle (Seal Beach) 9161 Enloe Way (Garden Grove)
3531 Primrose Circle (Seal Beach) 9171 Enloe Way (Garden Grove)
3530 Primrose Circle (Seal Beach)
'These two addresses have been changed to partial acquisitions under the Full Build, and it was added to the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative,
under partial
- Non - Residential Displacements Non - Residential Partial Acquisitions
- 13511 Euclid St (Garden Grove) 3101 Seal Beach Blvd. (Seal Beach)
13512 Euclid St (Garden Grove) 13261 Garden Grove Blvd. (Garden Grove)
Summary i March 2003
.A
State Route 22/West Orange County Connection FEIS /EIR
10932 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove)
10932 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove)
11162 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove)
11162 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 100 (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210A (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 106 (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 106 (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 200 (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 206 (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210B (Garden Grove)
•
11088 Trask, Ste. 210C (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210D (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210E (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210F (Garden Grove)
11088 Trask, Ste. 210G (Garden Grove)
11122 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove) -
The following are NEW acquisitions that have been identified in this FEIS /EIR. They are applicable to the
Full Build and (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternatives:
Residential Displacements Residential Partial Acquisitions
None 8692 Gloria Ave. (Garden Grove)
8802 Trask Ave. (Garden Grove)
- 13452 Sorrell Dr. (Garden Grove)
13332 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
• 13322 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13312 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13306 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13302 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13292 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13282 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13272 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13262 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13252 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13242 Dunklee Ave (Garden Grove)
13421 El Prado Ave (Garden Grove)
*13401 El Prado Ave (Garden Grove)
*12841 Lewis St. (Garden Grove)
*These two addresses have been changed to partial acquisitions
under the Full Build, and it was added to the (Enhanced) Reduced
Budd Alternative, under partial acquisitions
Non - Residential Displacements Non - Residential Partial Acquisitions
595* City Dr, Ste. 201 (Garden Grove) SCE Substation (Garden Grove)
595* City Dr, Ste. 205 (Garden Grove) SCE Substation (Garden Grove)
595* City Dr, Ste. 206 (Garden Grove) 3400 Metropolitan Dr. (Orange)
Bixby /Montecito Channel (Los Alamitos)
U.S. Naval Weapons Station (Seal Beach)
*Addresses listed as 505 City Dr. in the August 2001 DEIR/EIS Reduced and Full Build altematives were erroneously listed. They
should be 5 City Dr., as shown in this FEIS /R. Also, Suites 201, 205, and 206 should have been listed in the August 2001
DEIR/EIS, but they were also erroneous left out.
.1
See tables S.6 -2 and S.6-3, and Section 4.6 for more information regarding right -of -way acquisition
requirements.
Summary ii March 2003
, A
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS/EIR
S.2.3 Other Project Changes
Following the public comment period, modifications were made to the design plans and they led to
changes to some project elements.
S.2.3.1 Pearce Street Overcrossing
The DEIR/EIS stated that the overcrossing would be replaced in -kind. The FEIS /EIR proposes to replace
the overcrossing approximately 360 ft. (110 meters) east of the existing structure, with a structure that is .
compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act. See Section 2.2 (A) for more information.
S.2.3.2 1- 405/605 HOV Connector
In response to public comments, the alignment of the connector has been shifted south, and the height of
the connector has been reduced. See Section 2.2 (A) for more information.
S.2.3.3 Acc Changes at Trask Avenue /Sorrell Drive Intersection
Design refinements show that he widening of the SR -22 overcrossing of Trask Avenue would require
additional bridge columns in the median of Trask Avenue, through the intersection with Sorrell Drive.
Extension of the existing median on Trask Avenue westerly to protect the new columns would result in
limiting access at Sorrell Drive. See Section 2.2 (A) for more information.
S.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• SR -22 is an existing six -lane freeway in the north and central Orange County region that provides
connections to five major freeways: Interstate 605 (1 -605), Interstate 405 (1 -405), Interstate 5 (1 -5), State
Route 57 (SR -57) and State Route 55 (SR -55). Built in the 1960s, SR -22 is one of only two east/west
freeways in Orange County. As a result of its unique orientation, it crosses most of the major north /south
arterial corridors in the central county and has consequently become a vital link in providing mobility to
-- - Orange County residents, workers and visitors.
The SR- 22/WOCC project length is approximately 21 kilometers (13 miles) and extends from 1 -405 to
approximately SR -55. The SR- 22/WOCC passes through seven jurisdictions. From west to east along
SR -22, these jurisdictions are: Los Alamitos, Orange County (unincorporated community of Rossmoor),
Seal -Beach, Westminster, Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Orange. The study area is also located
immediately adjacent to the City of Tustin.
The following are the locations of the proposed SR-22 WOCC project study area (See Figures 2.2 -3 &
2.2 -6 for the location map of each build alternative):
Location shown as Freeway Kilopost (Postmile) Location in General Terms
12 ORA -5 KP /(PM) R53.6/54.5(33.32/33.85) 1 -5 and SR-22 interchange
12 ORA -22 KP /(PM) R1.1/21.2(0.66/13.17) SR -22 from Valley View to approx. SR -55
12 ORA -55 KP /(PM) R20.5/22.0(12.71/13.70) SR -22 and SR -55 interchange
12 ORA -405 KP /(PM) R33.1/38.6(20.56/23.98) 1 -405 from SR-22 junction to 1 -405/1 -605 junction
12 ORA -605 KP /(PM) R0.0/1.6(0.0/1.0) 1 -605 and 1 -405 interchange
The lead agencies for this environmental document are the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for
the NEP/2 documentation (EIS) and the California Department of Transportation (the Department) for the
CEQA documentation (EIR). The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is a responsible
agency. Jnder CEQA, and is a co-applicant with the Department for Transportation Congestion Relief
Program (TCRP) funding. In addition, OCTA has contributed with Measure M local funds for the Mainline
HOV portion of the proposed project.
The S R-22/WOCC build alternatives involve transportation improvements to the SR -22 corridor, including
portions of 1405 and 1 -605. During the early phases of the planning process, a Major Investment Study
Summary iii March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS/EIR
(MIS) was initiated by OCTA to identify numerous ways to best alleviate traffic congestion on SR -22.
After preliminary review of these alternatives and options, three alternatives were carried forward from the
MIS process for detailed analysis in the administrative internal version of the DEIR/EIS. The three
alternatives under initial consideration were: No Build Alternative, Transportation System
Management/Expanded Bus Service Alternative, and the Build Alternative. In January 2000, prior to
publicly releasing the DEIR /EIS for comments, the impacts to residential and non - residential properties,
as well as potential economic impacts from the Build Alternative, were recognized as potential adverse
impacts to the surrounding communities. Consequently, a fourth alternative was added. The Build
Altemative became the Full Build and the newly identified alternative was named the Reduced Build
Alternative. The publicly circulated DEIR/EIS included the four alternatives for consideration: No Build
Alternative, Transportation System Management/Expanded Bus Service Alternative, Full Build ,
Alternative, and Reduced Build Alternative. The August 2001 DEIR /EIS and the FEIS /EIR are available
on the web at: www.dot.ca.gov /distl2, Department and OCTA Headquarters offices, and various libraries.
See the Table of Contents for their physical locations.
After public circulation of the DEIR/EIS and extensive input from the public, other agencies, and groups,
the local communities, and the Project Development Team, the Preferred Alternative was identified. The
identified Preferred Alternative is the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative. Section 2.0 of this
document provides further detail on the identification of the Preferred Alternative and briefly describes all
of the alternatives considered in the DEIR /EIS. Table S.7 -1 summarizes the impacts and their proposed
mitigation measures. After public circulation /review of the FEIS /EIR, the Record of Decision /Notice of
Determination (ROD /NOD) will identify the Selected Alternative.
S.4 CURRENT OPERATING HOV FACILITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY
HOV lanes are currently available on portions of all freeways in Orange County with the exception of SR-
22.
In November 1985, SR 55 became the first freeway in Orange County to dedicate one lane of traffic in
each direction to high occupancy vehicles (HOVs). The HOV lanes extend 18.7 Km (11.6 miles) in each
direction for a total of 36.4 Km (22.6 miles) on SR -55.
On SR -57, there are a total of 37.7 Km (23.4 miles) of dedicated HOV lanes, which were opened in two
phases. The portion extending from the 1-5/SR-22/SR-57 interchange to Lambert Road opened in June
1992. In August 1997 the HOV lanes in each direction were extended to the Los Angeles County Line.
On 1-405, four phases of HOV lanes have been opened over a span of nine years. The first segment
from 1 -5 to SR -73 opened in May 1989. Three months later, the second segment from SR-73 to the I•
405/1-605 separation opened. By the time the fourth segment was completed in October 1998, a total of
78.2 Km (48.6 miles) of HOV lanes had been added to 1-405.
In October 1992, drivers of HOV vehicles began taking advantage of HOV lanes on E5. A seven -mile
HOV lane in each direction remained the only segment on the Interstate for four years until subsequent
segments opened in May and July 1996. Two more segments followed and the HOV lanes were
completed in September 2000. 1-5 has a total of 112.0 Km (69.6 miles) of HOV lanes.
S.5 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The purpose of the proposed project, the SR -22 /WOCC, is to improve both existing and future mobility
and enh20ce safety throughout the corridor while minimizing environmental and economic impacts. The
study area includes SR -22 bounded by SR -55 and the Los Angeles County line, and the interchanges
between and the connecting freeways within these same boundaries.
Under existing conditions, SR-22 does not meet either the existing or projected (Year 2020) capacity
needs of the area. Congestion, ligh accident rates and reduced travel speeds currently experienced on
SR -22 are a result of several contributing factors. The most significant causative factors stem from the
limited number of lanes to handle vehicle volumes, closely spaced on-and off - ramps, merging of multiple
Summary iv March 2003
PS
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
freeways, non - standard lane and shoulder widths, and non - standard weaving distances /auxiliary lanes.
Five key areas of concern are: 1) limited lane availability on SR -22 and the lack of continuity between
HOV and non -HOV facilities; 2) inadequate weaving distances along the freeway due to the close
proximity of on /off -ramps along the mainline; 3) high traffic volumes at the interchange where the 1-5, SR-
57 and SR -22 meet; 4) an outdated four - quadrant cloverleaf interchange configuration at Beach
Boulevard that creates a low- speed, low- capacity condition with short weave sections; and 5) non-
standard lane and shoulder widths at spot locations along the corridor. In addition, there is little incentive
or opportunity for individual drivers to switch from single- occupancy vehicles (SOVs) to carpooling or
•
transit without dedicated facilities for this purpose.
The project seeks to accomplish the following goals: ,
• Improve mobility and reduce congestion in the SR- 22/WOCC study area
• Maximize cost - effectiveness of the SR- 22/WOCC improvements .
• Minimize adverse and maximize beneficial environmental impacts to SR- 22/WOCC communities
• Minimize negative and maximize positive economic impacts to SR -22 /WOCC communities
Currently, the SR-22 corridor has insufficient capacity on both the freeway and major adjacent surface
streets to handle existing and projected 2020 travel demand between the SR-55 interchange and the Los
Angeles County line, and to and from destinations within the proposed project area. The situation is
aggravated by a lack of continuous parallel arterial routes and available arterial /intersection capacity, with
the exception of Westminster Avenue /2" Street at the extreme western end of the project study area.
There is little incentive or opportunity for individual drivers to switch from single- occupancy vehicles
(SOVs) to carpooling or transit without dedicated facilities for this purpose. That is, if SOV drivers cannot
decrease their commute times because there are no dedicated lanes for high - occupancy vehicles (HOVs)
or buses only, they are more likely to forego carpooling or using transit in favor of driving alone. In
addition, there are no other major programs in the SR -22 corridor to implement Transportation System
Management (TSM), Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Intelligent Transportation System
(ITS) strategies.
With projected population and employment growth trends indicating increased transportation volumes,
this situation is expected to worsen. The proposed SR -22 /WOCC improvements are anticipated to
• provide a higher level of operation for existing and forecast traffic volumes by incorporating up- to-date
technological traffic control systems and other transportation improvements, and offering additional travel
mode choices. Section 1.0 of this document includes additional information about the SR- 22/WOCC
purpose and need.
S.6 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
S.6.1 Alternatives Presented in the August 2001 DEIR/EIS
During the Major Investment Study (MIS) process for the SR- 22/WOCC project, a broad number and
variety of potential transportation strategies for addressing the project's purpose and needs were
evaluated and screened until the remaining four alternatives were carried forward for analysis in the
August 2001 DEIR/EIS. These four alternatives are briefly described below and are described in more
detail in Section 2.0 of the August 2001 DEIR /EIS, which also covers the alternative screening process.
The entire alternative screening process is documented in the MIS (available at Caltrans, OCTA, and
major libraries).
S.6.1.1 No Build Alternative
• a
Both CEQA and NEPA require environmental documents to consider a no- action or no-project alternative.
This alternative represents the status quo, or what would happen if none of the project elements included
in the other alternatives were implemented. The No Build Alternative for the SR- 22/WOCC project
represents the future baseline condition in the year 2020. The No Build Alternative encompasses only
improvements to the transportation network that have already been approved and funded. No capital
improvements for SR -22 are included under this alternative.
Summary v March 2003
State Route 22/West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
S.6.1.2 TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternative
The TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternative includes all of the improvements in the No Build Alternative
(outlined In Chapter 2 of this FEIS /EIR), such as OCTA's FastForward Long -Range Transportation Plan
(FFTP) Baseline Scenario. In conjunction with these improvements, the TSM /Expanded Bus Service
Alternative incorporates additional TSM and transit service strategies in the SR-22 corridor, such as more
buses, extended routes, and shorter headways (less time between buses). The TSM alternative
represents implementation of Tower -cost capital improvements, such as increased bus service with
associated arterial improvements. The TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternative does not include any
capital improvements to SR -22.
S.6.1.3 Full Build Alternative
The Full Build Alternative includes all of the elements contained in the No Build and TSM /Expanded Bus
Service Alternatives, as well as specific elements that address HOV system connectivity. This alternative
would add an HOV lane in each direction on SR-22. This alternative would also provide an additional
HOV lane in each direction on 1.405 between 1.605 and SR-22. It would provide direct freeway-to-
freeway HOV connectors between 1605 and 1-405, between 1-405 and SR-22, between SR -22 and 15,
and between SR -22 and SR -55. HOV connectors would allow the system to accommodate long distance
travel for carpools and buses, while enabling the smooth flow of vehicles between freeways to avoid
chokepoints at major interchanges. The Full Build Alternative would also construct a new arterial in the
former Pacific Electric right -of -way in Garden Grove and Santa Ana, on right -of -way currently owned by
OCTA. This arterial, which would connect SR-22 with both Santa Ana Boulevard and Civic Center Drive,
would provide direct access and from SR -22 and downtown Santa Ana. The Full Build Alternative also
includes selected design improvements to enhance the operational characteristics of the SR-22 facility in
certain locations that currently create bottlenecks for motorists. Under the Full Build Alternative, the
freeways within the SR -22 /WOCC project would be improved to full geometric design standards with
some exceptions, such as interchange spacing, weaving lengths, lane widths, shoulder widths, and
median widths, that must be approved by the Department.
S.6.1.4 Reduced Build Alternative
The Reduced Build Alternative includes all of the elements contained in the No Build and TSM /Expanded
Bus Service Alternatives, as well as some of the elements of the Full Build Alternative. The Reduced
Build Alternative was created by eliminating certain elements of the Full Build Alternative from the project
design. These elements were eliminated to reduce environmental impacts related primarily to right -of-
way acquisition. - The Reduced Build Alternative would include adding an HOV lane in each direction on
SR -22, and it would also provide an additional HOV lane in each direction on 1-405 between 1 -605 and
SR -22. It would provide direct freeway -to- freeway HOV connectors between 1-605 and 1-405, and
between 1-405 and SR -22. The HOV connectors allows the system to accommodate long distance travel
for carpools and buses, while enabling the smooth flow of vehicles between freeways to avoid
chokepoints at major interchanges. The Reduced Build Alternative also includes selected design
improvements to enhance the operational characteristics of the SR -22 facility in certain locations as
described in the Full Build Alternative.
S.6.2 Concerns Raised During the DEIR /EIS Process
The public comment/review period for the DEIR/EIS afforded the opportunity for governmental agencies
and concerned citizens to provide feedback on ways to improve and /or express their concerns on
environmental impacts resulting from the proposed SR- 22/WOCC project. Approximately 1,100 comment
letters were received during the 60 -day public comment/review period of the DEIR/EIS; about half of the
comments were non - duplicative. The comments consisted of a range of concerns for environmental
impacts resulting from the project, including air quality, noise, right -of -way, traffic and visual. The
comments along with the Department's responses are attached as Appendix A (Volumes II & III). The
comments and their responses that were received after October 30, 2001 are included in Volume IV.
Summary vi March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
Comments were received from various governmental agencies such as the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA); County of Orange; Cities of Garden Grove, Orange, Seal Beach and Tustin;
school districts; and concerned citizens from the cities along the SR -22 corridor. The comments
consisted of a range of concerns for environmental impacts resulting from the project. These included air
quality, noise, potential depreciation of property values, right -of -way, traffic and visual impacts. Many
residents were concerned with air quality and noise impacts to sensitive receptors such as schools, loss
of property value due in part to the project proposal to extend the freeway closer to their communities,
potential acquisitions, and visual impacts.
The majority of the comments were drawn from the westem portions of the project limits such as the Los
Alamitos /Community of Rossmoor and the City of Seal Beach. The primary concerns of citizens in the
Los Alamitos /Rossmoor area were the proposed 1.405/1 -605 direct HOV connector and the environmental -
impacts associated with it. Comments received from residents in the Los Alamitos /Community of
Rossmoor included exploring the option to shift the 1.405/1 -605 HOV connector to west of the 1 -605 near
the Los Alamitos Channel and the San Gabriel River. To address these and other concerns, multiple
sections of the EIR/EIS were reanalyzed to investigate ways to minimize harm. Among them, the air
quality, Historic Property Survey Report/Historic Architectural Survey Report (HPSR /HASR), noise,
relocation impacts, traffic and visual impact sections were reanalyzed to avoid and minimize
environmental impacts to the surrounding communities along the SR-22 corridor. Please see Section 4.0
(Environmental Consequences) to review the appropriate sections.
The City of Seal Beach's residents were primarily concerned with the proposed displacements of six
residential properties along Almond Avenue. Many had requested shifting the centerline to south of 1 -405 • -
towards the United States Naval Weapons Station. Prior to September 11, 2001, the United States
Department of the Navy allowed periodic public tours of the Seal Beach Wildlife Refuge, which is located
in the military base. Due to the events of September 11, 2001, the United States Department of the Navy • • - -
tightened security and temporarily ceased public tours of the Wildlife Refuge, but has since resumed the
tours as of October 26, 2002. A portion of the Naval Weapons Station was leased to a private entity for
use as farmland. The Navy contracts with entities to conduct farming activities in the outer perimeter of
- the weapons station to provide a safety shield to the public. As a result of farming activities the area •• - ' '
south of 1-405 was designated as prime farmland; however, the primary purpose of the farming activi ties
is to provide and maintain the safety shield area for public safety, and prevention of fires, and rodents.
Due to the overwhelming number of comments pertaining to the shifting of the centerline towards the
United States Naval Weapons Station, the Department solicited comments from the Department of the
Navy requesting permission to use this option to avoid impacts to the City of Seal Beach. Other -
comments also received from residents in the City of Seal Beach included exploring the option to shift the
1- 405/1 -605 HOV connector to west of the 1 -605 Los Alamitos Channel and the San Gabriel River. The
City of Seal Beach also sent comments regarding the SR -22 WOCC proposed project. The City hired a
consultant firm to review the DEIR /EIS, and it resulted in approximately 180 pages of comments. •
The residents from the City of Garden Grove were primarily concerned with SR-22 freeway noise and its .
impacts to school children. Approximately 188 petitions were received regarding the area near Euclid
Street and the need for noise barriers to reduce the noise levels at nearby elementary schools.
Since the Full and Reduced Build Alternatives were the only two build options with potential right -of -way
impacts, they were both analyzed during the final environmental documentation phase. In refining the
engineering plans, some of the proposed right -of -way displacements and acquisitions were avoided. The
refined engineering plans also helped to determine the location of possible landscaping and preliminary
determination of noise barriers.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Department and its partnering agency, the Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA), researched various methods to operationally improve the
corridor and enhance safety. This effort resulted in the addition of minor features to the Reduced Build
Alternative. The Reduced Build Alternative, together with these minor operational features, was renamed
the "(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative."
Summary vii March 2003
State Route 22/West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
S.6.3 Modifications to the Build Alternatives After Circulation of August 2001 DEIR/EIS
The following are discussions on the modifications to the build alternatives that occurred following the
public circulation of the August 2001 DEIR /EIS. A summary of the changes, including the impacted
areas, is provided (for more detailed information, refer to Section 4 of this FEIS /EIS) for each respective
impacted area. A more detailed description of the altematives can be found in Section 2 of this FEIS /EIR.
The modifications to the build alternatives are shown in Table S.6 -1 with added detail. Also, see Table .
S.6 -2 for a summary of the August DEIR /EIS and March 2003 FEIS /EIR residential displacements and
partial acquisitions addresses by alternative, and Table S.6 -3 for a summary of the August 2001
DEIR /EIS and March 2003 FEIS /EIR non - residential displacements and partial acquisitions addresses by
alternative.
S.6.3.1 Identified Preferred Alternative /(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative
The Reduced Build Alternative, as presented in the DEIR /EIS, has been modified and renamed the
(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative. The (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative includes all of the
Reduced Build Alternative's project features, as presented in the August 2001 DEIR /EIS, and two project
components from the Full Build Alternative: one is the freeway mainline section of the SR-22/SR-55 direct
HOV connector from the Full Build Alternative, without the freeway to freeway connecting structure, and
two: an auxiliary lane from GlasseIl Street to Tustin Avenue in the eastbound direction (approximately 1.8
Km [1.1 mile]). The extended portion of the Mainline is approximately 1.9 Km (1.2 miles) at the eastern
terminus of the project limits, which was analyzed as part of the Full Build Alternative. Further, the
geometrics of the project plans for the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative were refined as a result of
the comments generated during the public review and comment period of the DEIR/EIS, resulting in
reduced impacts throughout the project limits. The added feature to the (Enhanced) Reduced Build
alternative - extends the eastern terminus improvements in both directions from GlasseIl Street to
approximately SR -55, resulting in the modification of the Reduced Build Alternative.
Note, the modifications in the project limits to create the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative would not
contribute to any new environmental impacts because all of the improvements are within the existing
- roadway. Potential environmental impacts from this added portion have been previously analyzed as part
of the Full Build Alternative (SR-22/SR-55 HOV connector) in the August 2001 DEIR /EIS and determined
not to be substantial. See Figure 2.2.3 for the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Altemative map.
- • The (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative is divided into three segments for analysis purposes:
▪ I -405/1 -605 Connector — Katella Avenue south to Seal Beach Boulevard a distance of 3.7
. - - - - kilometers (2.3 miles) [Modified from original proposed alignment]
• 1-405/SR-22 Connector — Seal Beach Boulevard east to Valley View Street, a distance of 3.7
kilometers (2.3 miles)
• SR -22 Mainline — Valley View Street east to approximately GlasseIl Street, including The City
Drive improvements, a distance of 17.9 kilometers (11.1 miles). [Refer to the previous text
regarding extension to SR -55]
During the development of the final document, and comments received on the DEIR/EIS, the Department
further analyzed multiple sections of the SR-22 corridor to refine right -of -way limits and reduce
environmental impacts for the proposed project. Additional design modifications to the Reduced Build
Alternative, as presented in the August 2001 DEIR /EIS, were made to avoid right -of -way acquisitions and
to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining the design standards. These efforts resulted in
avoidance of acquisitions at the following locations:
7
• The partial acquisitions of six homes along Martha Ann Drive in the Rossmoor Community as
1 well as utility relocation were avoided by tightening the curvature of the S405/N605 connector
while shortening the gore area further to the south;
• The 1- 405/605 HOV connector was realigned and lowered from the original DEIR /EIS proposal
to reduced impacts to the communities of Rossmoor and City of Seal Beach;
• The right -of -way impact at the City of Seal Beach's reservoir was avoided by tightening the
curvature of the Seal Beach Boulevard off-ramp while shifting the exit nose further to the south;
Summary viii March 2003
A
State Route 22/West Orange County Connection FEIS /EIR
• The full acquisitions of six homes along Almond Avenue in the City of Seal Beach as well as the
relocation of overhead power lines and reconstruction of existing noise barriers were avoided
by: 1) shifting the 1-405 freeway centerline toward the south; 2) tightening the curvature; and 3)
shifting the S405/E22 connector gore (divergence point) area further to the east. This was
achieved without changing the impacts to the United States Naval Weapons Station (USNWS)
utility easement or facility on the south side of 1-405;
• The partial acquisitions of four homes along Enloe Way in the City of Garden Grove were
avoided by shifting the ramp alignment closer to the freeway mainline and shifting the gore area
(convergence point) further to the west; and
• The displacements of two residential units (along Trask Avenue) and eighteen businesses
(along Euclid and Trask Avenue) at the Euclid interchange in the City of Garden Grove are no
longer necessary due to design refinements.
In refining the engineering plans and with the availability of more detailed design level surveys, a total of
nineteen new partial acquisitions were identified in this FEIS /EIR that were not previously included in the
August 2001 DEIR /EIS. These include partial acquisitions at Yockey Bridge, along Dunklee Avenue on
the north side of the freeway, and at El Prado Avenue on the south side of the freeway in the City of
Garden Grove. A comprehensive listing of displacements and partial acquisitions can be found Section
4.6. Please see Figure 2.2 -6 for the Full Build Alternative features, as presented in this FEIS /EIR and
Figure 2.2 -7 for the Full Build Alternative features, as presented in the August 2001 DEIR /EIS.
In addition, further engineering studies identified potential conflicts with the location of proposed bridge
columns and existing traffic conditions, primarily in left-turn lanes. One involves Sorrel Drive in the City of
Garden Grove local streets. As result, the traffic team met with the City of Garden Grove to discuss these
issues.
-
Due to further design refinements following the August 2001 DEIR /EIS, it was noted that the widening of
the existing SR -22 overcrossing of Trask Avenue, west of Harbor Boulevard, would require additional
bridge columns in the median of Trask Avenue. These additional columns in the median supporting'the
westerly bridge widening will extend through the intersection of Sorrell Drive. Sorrell Drive, a north -south
residential street, one block long, presently forms a "T-intersection" with Trask Avenue, an east -west
arterial. Extension of the existing median on Trask Avenue westerly through the intersection to protect
the new columns will result in limiting access at Sorrell Drive. Access would be limited to westbound right
turns from Trask to Sorrell, and southbound right turns from Sorrell to Trask. At this time, the Department
is recommending a right -turn only access from Sorrell Drive to westbound Trask Avenue design; a final
decision will be made at the design stage. A public meeting was held at the City of Garden "Grove City
Hall with the City Traffic Engineer and one of his assistants to solicit public input on how best to modify
Sorrel Drive. The Department and OCTA will continue its coordination with the City and the affected
residents.
1- 405/605 HOV connector
The /- 405/605 HOV connector alignment presented in the DEIR /EIS was proposed over three existing
facilities: the 1-405 freeway, the connector from eastbound SR-22 to northbound 1-405, and the connector
from southbound 4405 to northbound 1-605. The peak elevation of the proposed connector occurred at
approximately 95 ft. (29 meters) high where the minimum vertical clearance is required over the existing
southbound 1-405 to northbound 1-605 connector. During the public review period of the August 2001
DEIR /EIS, which included a 60-day public comment period and two Public Hearings, concerns from the
Rossmoor residents arose regarding traffic noise, visual, air quality, and traffic issues. In an effort to
address these concerns, several different design variations have been studied. Among them, one design
solution significantly reduced the height of the HOV connector by shifting the previous alignment southerly
such thatrthe revised alignment runs parallel between the eastbound SR -22 and the southbound 1 -605 to
southbound 1-405 connectors at the same elevations. The peak elevation of this alignment occurs at
approximately 72 ft. (22 meters) high where the minimum vertical clearance is required over the
eastbound SR -22 connector. See Figure 2.2 -1 for more detail on the 1- 405/605 HOV connector
realignment.
Summary ix March 2003
, FS
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
Pearce Street Pedestrian Overcrossing
Refined engineering plans and the availability of more detailed design level surveys have identified that
the Pearce Street pedestrian overcrossing is in need of replacement since it would conflict with the
proposed widening of the SR- 22/WOCC project. The original Preliminary Engineering plans for the SR-
22/WOCC pedestrian overcrossing assumed it would be replacement in kind. The Pearce Street
pedestrian overcrossing is located between the Fairview Street and Harbor Boulevard exits on SR -22, just
east of Harbor Boulevard. The Pearce Street pedestrian overcrossing is an existing pedestrian
overcrossing that is not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The replacement of the
pedestrian overcrossing would have to comply ADA standards. The refined engineering plans also
allowed determination of the proximity of setback for possible landscaping and determination of
preliminary noise barriers. The plans for the Pearce Street pedestrian overcrossing will be finalized at the
design stage of the project. The August 2001 DEIR /EIS assumed the Pearce Street pedestrian
overcrossing would be replaced in -kind at the same location as the existing facility. The replacement
Pearce Street pedestrian overcrossing proposed in this FEIS /EIR is ADA compliant, and would be 110
meters (360 ft.) east of the existing overcrossing. Please refer to Figure 2.2 -2 b for a schematic of the
replacement proposal.
S.6.3.2 Full Build Alternative
The Full Build Alternative, the "build" alternative identified by the OCTA Board on November 9 1998,
includes all of the elements contained in the No Build and TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternatives, as
well as specific elements that address HOV system connectivity. This alternative would provide HOV
lanes on SR -22, thus furthering the countywide HOV system and fulfilling an important transportation
goal. The SR-22 HOV connectors were added in September 1997 with the expansion of the project, -
which included the West Orange County Connection. This element was incorporated in response to 7 -
public outreach, which identified completion of the HOV system as a high priority. In particular, HOV
connectors were perceived as important, especially in regards to the safety and efficiency of the system.
- The HOV connectors allow the system to accommodate long distance travel for carpools and buses,
while enabling the smooth flow of vehicles between freeways and avoiding chokepoints at major - - - -
interchanges. The Full Build Alternative's route was divided into six segments for analysis purposes. -
This was done to enable separate consideration of the impacts of each segment and facilitate subsequent
planning and implementation decisions. These segments are as follows: - --
1. 1-405/1-605 Connector — Katella Avenue south to Seal Beach Boulevard a distance of 3.7 -- -
kilometers (2.3 miles) [Modified from original proposed alignment] - -
2. 1-405/SR-22 Connector — Seal Beach Boulevard east to Valley View Street, a distance of 3.7_ - -
kilometers (2.3 miles) -
3. SR -22 Mainline — Valley View Street east to Glassell Street, including The City Drive -
improvements, a distance of 17.9 kilometers (11.1 miles) .
4. I- 5/SR -22 Connector — SR -22 and The City Drive to 1-5 and Broadway, a distance of 2.3 - -
kilometers (1.4 miles)
5. SR- 22/SR -55 Connector — SR -22 and Glassell Street to SR -55 and Chapman Avenue to the
north and Fairhaven Street to the south, a distance of 3.9 kilometers (2.4 miles) -_
6. Pacific Electric Arterial — Taft Avenue at SR-22, southeast to where it joins Santa Ana
Boulevard at Raitt Street, a distance of 5.1 kilometers (3.2 miles)
In addition to the improvements outlined in the No Build and TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternatives, the
Full Build Alternative includes the elements listed in Table 2.2-4.
During the final documentation phase, and as a result of comments received during the public review and
comment of the DEIR/EIS, the Department further analyzed multiple sections of the SR -22 corridor to
refine right -of -way limits and reduce environmental impacts for the proposed project. Additional design
modifications to the Full Build Alternative, as presented in the August 2001 DEIR /EIS, were made to
avoid right -of -way acquisitions and to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining the design
standards. These efforts resulted in avoidance of acquisitions at the following locations:
Summary x March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
• The partial acquisitions of six homes along Martha Ann Drive in the Rossmoor Community as well
as utility relocation were avoided by tightening the curvature of the S405/N605 connector while
shortening the gore area (divergence point) further to the south;
• The right -of -way impact at the City of Seal Beach's reservoir was avoided by tightening the
curvature of the Seal Beach Boulevard off -ramp while shifting the exit nose further to the south;
• The 1- 405/605 HOV connector has been realigned and lowered from the DEIR /EIS proposal to
reduce impacts to the community of Rossmoor and the City of Seal Beach (Please refer to Figure
2.2 -1 for the modified plan);
• The full acquisitions of six homes along Almond Avenue in the City of Seal Beach as well as the
relocation of overhead power lines and reconstruction of existing soundwalls were avoided by: 1)
shifting the 1 -405 freeway centerline toward the south; 2) tightening the curvature; and 3) shifting
the southbound 1-405 to eastbound SR -22 connector gore area (divergence point) further to the
east. This was achieved without changing the impacts to the United States Naval Weapons
Station (USNWS) utility easement or facility on the south side of 1 -405; and
• The partial acquisitions of four homes along Enloe Way in the City of Garden Grove were avoided
by shifting the SR -22 eastbound Magnolia on -ramp alignment closer to the freeway mainline and
shifting the gore area (convergence point) further to the west.
S.6.4 Identification of the Preferred Alternative
The formulation of the identified Preferred Alternative took into consideration multiple forms of feedback:
1) refined engineering for the project plans; 2) comments received during the public review period of the
DEIR /EIS from Federal and local agencies, community associations, and concerned citizens; and 3)
planning analysis to determine operational and cost effectiveness of the alternatives under consideration.
With modifications to maximize operational and cost efficiency, the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative
was identified as the Preferred Alternative. See Section 2.1.3 for further discussion on the formulation
and identification of the Preferred Alternative.
As discussed in S.4.1, the-two "build" alternatives along with the no build and TSM /Expanded Bus SerVice
altematives were considered in the DEIR/EIS and were the subject of the public review and comment
process. Additional analyses were conducted on the "build" options along with the TSM /Expanded Bus
Service Alternative to determine the maximum benefits to the SR-22 corridor while reducing the
environmental and economic impacts to the surrounding communities. Through these analyses, the
Reduced Build Alternative was determined to meet this criterion. '
During the final documentation phase, and as a result of comments received during the public review and
comments of the DEIR/EIS, the Department re- analyzed multiple sections of the SR-22 corridor to refine
right -of -way limits for the proposed project. Since the Full and Reduced Build Alternatives were the only
two build options with potential right -of -way impacts, they were both analyzed. In refining the engineering
plans, some of the proposed right -of -way displacements and acquisitions were avoided. The refined
engineering plans also allowed determination of the proximity of se tback for possible landscaping and
determination of preliminary noise barriers.
During the development of the final environmental document, additional planning efforts were utilized in
the process to find the best solution in alleviating traffic congestion and improving safety on the SR-22
corridor. The Department, and its partnering agency, the OCTA, in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), examined various methods to operationally improve the corridor and enhance
safety. These methods included incorporating a component of the SR-22/SR-55 direct HOV connector,
which was previously analyzed under the Full Build Alternative during the August 2001 DEIR/EIS. The ,
SR- 22/SR:55 direct HOV connector feature of the Full Build Alternative included the extension of HOV
lanes on the Mainline (in both directions) from Glassell Street to the eastern terminus of SR-22 at Tustin
Avenue /SR -55. The added feature to the Reduced Build Alternative extends the improvements (in both
directions) from Glassell Street to approximately SR-55, resulting in the (Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative. In addition, there are other improvements that were made to the (Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative: these include realignment of the 1-405/605 HOV connector, replacement /realignment of the
Pearce Street pedestrian overcrossing to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards, and modifications of Sorrel Street. Please refer to Section 2.2 for a discussion on the
Summary xi March 2003
, fS
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
identified Preferred Alternative, (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative, and the Full Build Alternative for
specific discussion on how they affect each of the build alternatives.
The identified Preferred Alternative, (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative, was determined to be the
environmentally preferred option due to its lessened impacts to residential and non - residential properties,
the local economy, and preservation of a historic resource. Specifically, the (Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative has fewer right -of -way impacts, when compared to the Full Build Alternative. The identification
of the (Enhanced) Reduced Build as the Preferred Alternative would result in fewer right -of -way impacts,
when compared to the Full Build. The large number of right -of -way impacts for the Full Build Alternative
can be attributed to the Pacific Electric Arterial and direct HOV connector features at 1 -5 and SR-55. Due
to fewer right -of -way acquisitions, the local economy vould not be as negatively impacted with the
(Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative. This would result in the affected jurisdictions' ability to retain
existing property and sales tax revenues, when compared to the Full Build Altemative. With the proposed
Pacific Electric Arterial included as a feature of the Full Build Alternative, the former Pacific Electric Bridge
(eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places) would be eliminated.
The absence of HOV lanes on the SR-22 freeway is a missing link in the Orange County HOV system.
The (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative would provide for HOV system continuity and connectivity,
tying to 1.605 and 1405, thereby helping to improve congestion locally. The traveling public has little
incentive or opportunity to switch from single- occupancy vehicles to carpooling or transit, as there are no
dedicated facilities for this purpose on SR-22. The identified Preferred Alternative, by providing
connectivity for the HOV system while meeting the goals and objectives of the project, would provide the
infrastructure needed to encourage high vehicle occupancy on the region's roads. This would indirectly
relieve traffic congestion in the region, both by removing HOVs from general - purpose lanes and by
encouraging single occupant vehicles ( "SOV ") to shift their modal choice from drive -alone to carpool.
•
Summary xii March 2003
• FS
c a m m o E a c; >c � � m y -oct= m
U ` . -0 2 CO C LL 0 0 0 . N 0 c
CC ill o� 0 0 a m o a cn O o= o a ) ° o w c m � ° o
CD n E m is
CC '� a) p O a) 2= y 2 O = `� - C m O C N Q N
U.. O 0 a' >, C .. '� CO 0 m O ur U 7 O W uJ O O
p . 0 c0 0 p C ,O C CN V > 0 +' m a) U a m a7 477, C d a) a) O U 3 CO E o N N CN tea a) O c 1-0. - L m
CO V) C a) y 0)` 'O m 0 U (0 CL .0 E ;_ m O c • a ~ ) a) m
O L fn C 47 - m O U L > ur
w >��� - y ° c m"w ° —
-E C c� 2
p c . . L . m N a a) u) 0 -5 a - C T 7 E 0 U
c E m 5 L ' - c ' - o fa ' §- a O O C U "co E O C
C U 3 a) O E a) -a c
E SQ _� Y w o)=
U ` - O ; 3�� O - O a) o ca p 0 O C •
3 a) C•mL Q N • a) s 0�n o o '-- " U) O •
c 7� C ,-L 0 0 0 m O'ON w a).- -0 3 y al .c T.in 0
N m - 5 j> A = E L ` o := N O) 'C t E 0 a > C U ' C t
V
7:3 CO E m c °? 0
m c•� '
03 `= ° 0
O )n m m C 'd �
c U m c..) u) Q c - is � a)sis c O6 cn
D E o o c 32 "iii c_m co o.°? a) o 5 CD E o `
13 a) a) m Q c O • L E > 3 N • E W L o a) > C L a)
• a) `, �_ H O_ E o m c m 0 2 c U :0 c.) a) 0 2 0) - 2 N
O L E 7 o c z . O O m >, ' V m L U O' C o te N y (n
o m ��°? mw � L O ) nn E
Q E
C O y m 6 .N � N E Q _p C = aCL = N O 0) ∎ 7 m m
a) u)0 co co �m � o aN �a) cn y 7 . c a) p _ ...€.
m 0 m' o c H y o ' 3
a c o m c °o v) a Cm 3 yo v € c o m a 0 c o m
L a ) U. T3 0 ` m '0 o m -a a) ca-D
cn c O o U) m 0 C a) O 0 0) N L 3 L c ;' o. E C O L 7 p c.
ai w • Uw OLL.- 0 c'O L >, O C p) O N
W > U ` w w = p ` a)� c a m > C N a -C u) y 0 m U ) . O 'p
0
c�m � ccD�E w o E c0a = >'
•‘-• a W p L a o o ao c a .c 0 > ` o a)v 0 2 a• T.) L,1- o c m 2
o C'- 3 0) o p ` U) C _ � o cn - o m E - y
yat c m ° E Qo c E E m m a m )
d O C = O O ca a) o C a_ C c c o . - m `
m 7 c o m 73 f0 C c m "' O O) U w X
C • m C _ ` p >+ '- U w 0.- m co m 0 W m m C O a; C O]
W O O m CO X w O .- C - O ' O L C a) _ L
1- n C N (/) c) X C Q (n a) N O N_ C W w C 0 > 3 0 o - U` m O
a) U W N X a) m O W j E .--:6.. 0 C, p m U m> a c p -a o Cr O O
N N ' 'O a) m C - E m cn 'O 0) U ca • m O O •r C m c w •O
• o n C I L .. 3 E . y m w ' > 3 o'o 0 E �
0 m CO
m 0 00 co O L -o 0 O C m 7 N 'G O 0_ m f0 c0 0 E ...
m •p IY U 0 a) O m W = o > U ca U � 0 0 0 0
a) a) �p co O a 3 j O C n m O_ 0 a) L m O C y c 7 c C a) 0
> a) C aN N 3 E m p= 7 o L ��p c 0 v L m C o •Q �'C
.._ Ui = o o W n a)I o-p• c U, E iii
a) L E t �� m y 0.c) C m N� C C 0� ca p) ,
c c ca p la_ C U N Q' a) m . -- O U C O
I.. W 7 C� O17 r .c C a) • 2 > O w m 0) ' `
ao o E r,coi a09 c E DE 0 0 0 c'~ cZ^ c c a 0 0 i
C v H a) � 0 6 CO 0 0 c � m� O L D . o c 13 - c = o y a) c � L O . c m o o
V 7 -.CU ,-ac - >, U O O uJ C n C @L C
c m > CO 3 w WE ; _ _ o L o c>Nc0O oQ 'C�00<CQ
0 U C m • 0 - 0) c p O C E E o o C c c C m c 0 a) -7c...=
••••
O m c C E C O • X 0 '•- p 0) 0 o 3 E 0 o a) •
0 m 0 o ' •X 7 . co c 0 . C O U '. cp C a o> w 0) - E o
o = v 92 ' c c� c y 3 W a o � a) Q m Q ai ` o r... a 2 m c 2 a
U m- a ,_ C nE c_ m • o 3 m a c a n� 3 > $ • °? U 13 '� Cl.
w II-- maE ° Z c_c o im Qm o .cEo < c ',i 0
e
O
d 7
m m
y U ai
> > V
N 0 C >
� w
. ._ , c
ix v Q o m 0
C 'd :~ = E
. 2 C m 0 Q
W -0
R
CO °em a) —aa) c� °v) = m •". . 0 0 m v c
U m U w
-- E u) C N N a j 0 a o m Z O) m m U D to o
W . m E 6- > E m E m ��m c O W m c c o
Eri Ot E E E 10 co f CO a .0 w O w= L c o N • 7 W N
1-_. _ _ w m U t
1.1. cn CV M O U co m C C m m U ° m m c w U +' - C m m to m
-O :-. m o 7 m i 0 > m c L > 7 W
w 0.
c Q 3 v CO @ p mF'Q .2
m Ca E co c U co o) N w.c m .- •p W m m C 0 m 0
0 o co co c �W m L 3 ui � E
E u m s >. ' $ Z u ) rn 0 -0 a) "0 m
2 _ E 3 m m c c 5 > v o • u � a c c.
r- :Y omw E a 3 a s c m ' - c c 0 i _ m
v.; r- • sue = o E u ' ° v, N c m em u ' m CO .c o m m c
o mo a • co m ° °� a c m� 3 3N� co 0 )
u) m ° F- c m m o U 3 - CI) U _0 N > > cp NL CA (NI CO m O ul o c c c 0 co L m . D ns o `O co v W Z o O 3 a 0 CD ' aa) •
a z 0 :5c c o E r.) m-g In u) ` L U O Z Ca 3 U W
7 E N _ 7 X 'C D O O p N C 0 >. Co p C m C m C C N 7 N m U �
a U m c :_ O C
y m L m >9 0 6 L y ¢ a� n W
O C rn -0 - c o w U c N m O m m m w L a C > • . L '5 >. = a� m a) c o -,-,- Q 2 a ., .6, :co . o E 0 C_ co •) o E a� ..- . . 0 a 0
c> d co U U U Q a� c 0 f > 9 o . .. 3 c . 5 ° c ` o v o C O) c° m N
N _ ' O m C >
m - a
o8 3 _ u ±p> m m o . mL m la)- V p o ` an d = "iii 0 '
w L m w X cci Em c •�� E 3 � a) = co E °U L mw 7
c > m 0 m m C 3 O m o o° c c) o .0 L c> m m C o <
co co m(� Ew�o O CL w Z m m mom c " > °m >. c c aLm.
0) CO _ >, O o w- •t/) > C .+ m L 7 0 a7 U c Q C9 L . D to m m 'O
a7 O mt m Q ,- N C • >,. .. 7 L L
CI) > a) m � U O c o m U E w m e a) a j W C -O m O N 7 C
m m m E CL O CO . "0 L N p m u) u) Q c 7 E N D c ° m O 0. 03 ate) L.
a) w L O O . E y m 2 > 7 m c o 13 m 0 c - O w> L O co O C O) 0 as a 7 CD U L.L. a)
c` " O L 0 n o 2 u) . m m - c 0 a) ° d 0� W co p o > O O m Q m u '
�) c o ° a te m mQ o� �� ° cn m m E,� m c O O,c �gYo
_ m U
v Q w fa o m as v p m .c rn >. a) = a c rn m o . F3 U m > w ▪ co o . o co
p v m e o m " m p) C • c L w ca c m is r� Y ` K
cc C O C E m N O m O m m E C O° w. m 2 2 ° m >. m 0 co 7 C N
0) w u) » .c c N a m N o C 0 C E u) S L p O E 3 - m .. O N ..
a °o' L L m a)as u, mc�LCno3Cm.� - � rn� m m
ar
.73 '1 a m a E a) >, E CO v F - X 3- m E o . m` a) - c° L w c as h
O H N (0 ' O m (n r 7 N !A d u) ' 6°_c :E .c N N 3 7 `�� W m t rn f O � O) > • F "' m c o o) To 3 v O 0) O W - 4- >, U m 3 X m 0 O L " U c 3 W O LL.
0 YaN m '° co o.0 a) co E o o.1, ) c o> o o m m c "1- o c
G I - o > To - -E a C W C m o ° 3 c� 6U u m
1 C . - >, a -g.c 0 a s o-o c � m m ° u) ° 0 •v c ts w- , - m
o m m m C am — u) o o °.4L u) a) as co 0 N ° -- c m c m L u)
m c a o m o c ' 5 c 0 m E� 0' m o.y 0 • C = C-
-O a c m 7
'O C ' C C .) ..-E6 •C N ' V N O = E m m .) Zr) 0 3 C 0- C m m o c .. U O >, d CO
a) c° O m rn .. co y m m u) m u' co 7 3> '5 3 3 m° m E _ c «. >_
m
7 °EUc.• „a 3m E.� o °ot E mE 3 mC 3 •
e ° U moan m w� 0 7 U a .. � m c m m a) LL. CV
•
1 c) O N O O o m E Q O) O O U m O o C 13 C y N N m y m U C c m C - c w
C - o .--. (n U >". . C a U L . ' U ' L d m l'... °" a - ° C C _C m m _ w O O
O U tOb�N CV � al . C•f6 L �� L mL > m m — L EL > 0 0 3 y O m1.-
0 c o ° off H W c' C F- 2.2F -S F- mi- O U.L. 7F- ca -c U E C Q ° C • C L .L IX E a) 5 c o
C o .O 'O n'
7 W O) W C C E • • • • • • N N 7 m
V • • • C O y m m ' o L 0 7
m ' j I- O" 7
d L 7 m c L U m o m Q
c F- 0 m a 3 c m acn LL
co
O -a
y V N %-
> V
N m4C w >
= m m >
a) d C a. W
o V Q C d 1 07 ) co
tY co c 13 c.) — E
:o c0 •- C Q E
0) W m ' 0)
v
,a
Ek ,
% • '- k
m ° • t
@ 2 $
c
§
� 0
&£
2 2
k • .
//
a0
\ \
0
to
�2
fc�
. k §
3.c
= . ■° )
ID_
2 0 ( 0
2 7 $ §
\ 0 >
�
e
' f R 7 -
c — o
C 2M .
§ a,
\ �/
iii 41.
c
.c
>, f
0) •
c c E3
@
a) -c a
E
E $ k §
C.) lea
2
0 • o e
7 £/
\
k 0>
2 g 0 •
is,- § 2 ±
m e as
0 0 < a
k k \ k
�m 2 /
a)
U a) cc a)mmE c) ' - O ° - w a) - 0 Too
N US 2 .5 as •- -- `) ° Nv C aa,,N - ` a1 > C C a•
� co N w .-- (n N E O o_ N N 03 a) E 0 f0 c0 E CI
W 6 7 O 2 N a) O d U E n. N° E 7 p E U N o • O N ° N C U a) O c c9 o > y 47 N
111 N 3 C ° a . c0 .L.+ a as ` O -o a) a) Q d Q 2 O j 7 V
LL = a3 0) N as N �. O C O C y > O Y m m co
a 5 caa)m Q , a) s- co � a)� v
• a) a) • N E a) s a? o cn � 3 m 0
-C � m.--• aa) o a u ) E a co a cacti o a) m ti c -o
� 8 ° c
C p y C C Ti ,� co j , 'X C Q 3 .a. E z° ° p a a) X . as CC
-C ons 3as° � oa) w � c> F a - -o = o X a)
- 0 -E C °)°) ..u1 10 mw p a ° ` a) °w -C r 3 m m cw
° m o°� asm QU ° E m
°
o•• o_ � ,_ a o g o
Q o a) co u)
o a t w c .� w° ' ° m o v Z I° c F_ C
a) 3 ` a) o m I -0'y -p U cn 5 °a a- a) c a) a)
•
> O O c >_c m s- 0 3 .. Q CO O V • 0 a s .= :. c w y p_ >
N O 0 N co O N Z _ E a)
L
as fA co C V = .'C. a) a) C C O - a) (n t w
T a N N Q a• 0) (1) w N 7 w . c ai U C H N N .c
a)a) _0in0 2 ° ° a c Z a) a) - --a)cicE °
a) a) p) •- Q a) a) a) >
-o O O Q c p C as L cn C (0 O ° L- N o . . N > O
N ,c a w a) • C.c O a cn E m N~ a W . cA ' a O a)
m 3 U �Q c m~ o o CO a I) E > . 0 ,u_ m m C 'E a E 11 • t a) �' c 5 - n p c > a) °) m0 a) a) E E a) co
C C N� .0 .
O E a) E Q o O_ C N > > N > CO o .
> E C O N a) ID a) En VN � V 5 0 d 00_0 WN w E a, as mE O> d�d' C C 0.
C > a •
a)
-p 'o ± w CO D_ C `t CO a) .. N a J p c0 m E (4 :� as a)
O 0) a - 4 ' - O.0 _c IX c0 f0 ?� o o C a) •O 4)
O a) E m t E.D. p 0 w E y cn L a- w u) ° a,N s
a) • C 3 E. a) L L .0 a) f6 O) 0 > N 2 O) -- Q D a) 5 •.) t L 'C
3 °' oF' 31-.5 m C wLL To mso C - w1- 0 a
_ ° ° ° � Oa - M po w _ - N o a
•" N C y` 0 y 7 O m m(0 •C
C • co a) c0 as ch C C -' m LL CI) • 3 . 0 . L N o f0
0 O - c . r ` 'a N _rn ..L. C CO cc u cn O c0 1- t .. a 0
E
c .
�, a) ° ��, a) L ". c oot' c 0) 0 °o 3� ,
° E co m cp ° Q a) c c o � m m co 0_m •° -- co a) c c N a) m m Ti 0.)
a o. a) n ° a) tut, _ o •�� c v y °> 0
a) O 0 ) N C O C: ` O.Q Z N a) Q ° - C O > ' C m . N ° y N
m a° a) • Q ' aco m o 0 5 F' , m ' a O N co E m
c c' mmc `2YQ - �ao) vaE c om c ° =a y ' °
F - ' y > o Lc - 3 2,16 n a) - c ' Q b -0 m O 1- c a a) c r n a) ° :° ca
a) 5 o N O m A c a) 2 L y E co 3� a C 0
m y c c m O n . U O a) co U a) d p C-5 a j •. ° m > c`0 C a) m e To'
c
> c a . 5a - yam >E a - Z a ) 2 ma) Ec
p c0. E ° ^p O v > o m a ) ' y N a) c)2•- 0 m �v
c Hc_i °m Cba) CO c Ua> ( n(n rn 5-0 Q uaff
co •` CO 0) N 0 W` o` . O N E c E cn a) co - ' 7 m o)) • cn o N CO
1n -0-..= n co t '0 N > .c .X C as a) C m > C m C C v a . c a O
C O d O cn _C C N ' Y a) O a)- O ` a) N v a`- 'O -0 co O L p 1-• m
U te . O 'O) Y C 7 a3 L- .c C O N" L a) oO m ' 0 6 a1 = > . 7 C Q t rn
C 4. a) ` O C W O` a w C . ` « > U C m C c0 co cn a)
a) - ca 3 a a) • 2 as 3 a) m cn
O ▪ C p 0 0 °) of N O y a) in C U n "" C a) ° o X" cn as C 0 0 >
U • 1 ` • C c ~ N • p C- p C ' .`. as o • y 2 m O o m °- w LL a; .c o ° C
N m E v` a i _ co 0) C a ••,- ° a v) `m 6 % • >_ m p a)
d 'o a) > 0 0 ... a) La p p a) C N L O > as m a c )) Q
0 I- ca`)a mmi-E Z 7 a)U > >o ~ F Q -- �roE da)v
m � 'p 'O a' a) a) o -o ° a) z O 0 U ) 0 -) a) s U U L a w ` o N 7
0) ILIX aa203 o o a E H c0 • c c 1-O c cn EQ LL'��
La F_ a a)
O U co s
j 'C m a) •p E -o
S V > L � ' c .- ce
> > �. (0 m
-- a) d Q m
N NSA a) m d a) ~-- I-
m CL N C ,t- . 0 w C • LL m
3 'O = C Q c0 0) C >
o a) Q C a) -o K d - o .io m
C . O +— - w N - c - IA
W • •� C a m ��I� co L N E
(/) I C m -p 0 / - N Q y
..... 1
P R
• E c 0 co O C co C 0 ) _ p C c0 C L U C m T CO m
m• y m C y m . . = m -
W o "V cn > m >.c m E c t a) m ° � .C.D. 3 = m o 0 cn CD to co
F15 — cu 111 y
co m _ m m . 0 y d 0 7 OI N O m LL LL m C@ @ 0) ..... •C
m W
`L -° ' ' C a -" y y y CO c •t0 = E y O. E 0. m C E
co a� CC as - -J U E co' y yrn E
CD • to 6 CD c = m a) c • y t co vi -° = 0 a c co c
OD a cI's C 0 Co 3 °' m — ° o f m e E > m� CI) m U
Co i0 o
r) °��a�iNOyx ti do E. a) °L m
� -- m' ri Ma ° o m > . Lo Ey O
" m o ac ca) c a ° 0 m N m 0•C_ m o UL m
-0 co o >o> E
o w U> .mac < C.) o °mo L 3 0
`C D CD C ) o,a) 0 cco17 ° Co O .c , - ° o o a
O) C c c �O o ?_ ._ C c m _c LL m m m n
Z . � 3 N w ° U CO () N CO CO y o m O C u)
C O CO O m _ U m 0 0 m CO ""' _ '° C1 E y m C° "' O C U W
= N C= 0 3�. 3 m♦- f0 p •C - 0 O p co a .
-2 m m En ~ Em ° > �. ) o) m U . . a •° y c ° u - - - o
y W
O •- N - a m ) C E m 3 y d c c(5 p y C •D U O y '7 C z 0
m m� a) Q) ° c ° a o 3c 3 c 1 m m C o-
Q a) (/) 3 y y Z y a m m U .0 )C > N .0 0 CO 0 G oo 0 -a
. m e =. N c m E _ > c O u 3 W U ='ww Nr
U Q 0 o O m • > y 0 m co ° N� O.7 O Om E
0
m 3 m m
m y N C a) O. O m T .o� CO F - C y . W E c.) 0 c _c O
m .Z C C O . - N ... O m : m o co CO L co C
C CO co
°
In
>, U m= Q y m— C E O .N Co 0 Co 0 m
- -o y0 m C 3 o o m a, u o �� o m o co 3 m '0 m 3
m v °2 O y m 5 o m co vy � _ . ' U C _
U O O C CD 0.c
C w CO 2 O CD (13 '5 m tic co m L. Cli y = E m . — y N O O m m
_ ++-0 •pN y >' , E.� y -� I- m LN lY ) m ° O m
C Cm ". C mm > > C O D y m. y . U
O C C O ` Q' O N = LL C m in---,, C >. m N Z d y '-o O 7 o m c0
Qa cm ma OO p . . mN �°.Qa m ma '>
OD W 0= m> T m H m y C C m m m, .- m .�. m m 7 y al CO p x
. (0 I- O O.• CO N m m t = C O y E 1-5 C _ C O
(/) E M C 2 ..m. O '- W > U m H m O C y C= c0 m O O E •C . m . >' .
m � H us as m O y ° °)Q m 'ocou) °N > E a c n am m = _ U �
R m > a) m c y — m 0. c C co >. -o N x 0) o - o
e C N C y p U co W y N 3 N m w N = O (0 m co m y U C
I- c0 m m� o ° o E'° o Y o �> a � °i �� m► - � o y m 2 o E � o c c�
'm 7 co o .c m y> C a a) ) N 1 °` L co ' m 0 1 y d 4) O N u c C C oo s E
m m y O... a -p CO , m ` f0 O 1 U CO m c 5 c = C1 3 "E O C E cn
-' O� c 0 E ` m: o_o _c a)>.- o c m m E � m oa m m : o = > u))
z ~ ,_-00a0 mmm o m.CC 1 �mow�— cu ;o «Y ° ciCt
ai
• m C m N E c= 0 OC ° O m` C U O V o a) C C 4 W `� U ° 0- .'"
CO "�' CO c = C .. 0 C E U C m C Cn 0 ' n . m m '
E c Q-' 0 y O o
C m.c U O L C> , -- y y a) In O N • C d 0 L . � E-c 7 o v W _ 3 -C c0 a)
O ° m C1 .V m m °) C m O CO E N 4' ° y m p C m 0 . C O Q '
m C = .o c ° 3 CO m 1) O N (n O cu- m m E m O
a) Q C o E 3 = O C1 Co E �:= YtN U C C 0 E o m w et
C .- O U co - y I___ Y O Lc O O N O ? N N U m O U co m To N E m o= w E
U m o E o) m "
= m ca o C d• ., .a. I� In � CO C 'C C ,., = m 3 = O
° m c• 3 ° c m m.- C/)(1 a) )d c.a) m m y c F- 2.2 F- U
c — y_ E L C ° a) o) O� CV 0 • - � C 7 OC CO 0 I.L. C N . ° 'U CO E Cy C 1•••: CO •
CA e•r -° • CO • •
o m 3 m co co V O E C O C -0E C c t ,- Q C
. m2 CO o O CO m 0. a CQ OD m
m
O •a)
co
N m
w
m Q
, gy m m j
co
co
u.
.a
m > o a, E O c o m a a
a ° f � � 2U• o 'o -c
cn c a� � p cQ .—• T as c a )
W
CC a o a)- c � � � aE °. >_ ° CO w a) ''5 0 � a j a x 3' a m °
_ N
W p 0to .- N N Q O C CO C m U e.
o
W a a
ED. O T a O y a c .c >
co
a3 :- L 0_ u N a a Z
a a3
a .... r.. � Cn a -C . 0 C (n •° j
rn a 'c W m
° `o c ° C z ° =�'O ,BacL—
m a) 0. 0_ a 0 .. c o w
w LL
0 a) o 3 a CS) .0 3 E o
3 v a� o .E
U a y3my° caocco0
C 0 T Cl > > L .. C to N Cl)
O) e _W Z O O a t N . L N CD C/3 03 0 Ca CO a I.0 to a a 3 p ) • to
7 CD
0 a) O d V ' a L L O y Q y Q N w
> - 2 -0 y aC a) _ w a
a a 7 >' m O > N a)
o : L O aw.° a �"C C L
a ' C fa _
0 3 v 0 L - y 0 c y co y c o °
o C c Q) rn
U3
CO a CO := = — T ' a m • 3 a 0) m d a) a-0 N
co .c U 0 w i)C N - 5. c ` a °c C AN - -
0 C O C O C N �_ E o 0
a ° y • C y o ` L1
t C W 0@ T c ' - 0 CD > • C • 0 L a)
a w a a a. t0 v _• -° 7 C O c L' a 0 '" a
a) N a Q c 7 E y N 3 . E C e c O m 0 in
c U c-0 u) a a 0 0 cn -° c = a N s E d a IO
w+ a C---X C. L C C a a y C 0 +.' O e
C -. 0 a 7 a) a t= N O C a iii
a C O
a Q .-S. o) a) C- L-.-co to a O a' Q a)
r as C O C °) L 0 a a) >
C
co co rn c • ° - s Fl 0 a ,— op `o a) i- 0 3 Y o 5
- 6 .c o„ • E 0 .c cn E ° E a E N ca > m c0 x
a °-4 a .,. �a 7 e T T a L fn C 0 a7 Y= c
w L y y L 0 co 0 3 _ H O 0 0 •
ca to a C °) s L a .o a s .L.. CC "0 O
10.2 a O U "" ,3 = ` E to N . y m L W 00 N
m _
. L L N N-0 C O 0 > a a a -0 .3 u) 0 75
w. a 0 0 -- 0 U W a O
a) O y a ° > T ° ° a 'D m O) 03 C C LL CO , .
.� O "". 0 c .. : °
O y - y
� a a a3 y '
ca ..- a ) a c o p as N ' ° c V) c C - CO a
E O C - o • y O a . ) a) w ca 0 C 0
3 >••) 3 3 y c U 6 a 0 , 0 m t) .`F o„
._ a) ca0 L E m E a.N-c a '9 m a a� a)
O t o a) C a) • (e0 N p) C p o c-) c a C :° y a
C •C .0 . ' o) a C w
C
Cp C U L o a _T d a a s y a to a a
o s ays >m s m o0 E oa L o
F- mH 0 U =H L- C a ' y'7
b., a c0 3 - o o c�a
@ - c oU °
o • • • a) . - - L 0 'c . a) y
o c a) 0 °• CO ' a)
-° . E - L_ a• 'C 0
C
CC o. 0. Y 0 t S. 0 0. U) 0
CD
O
17, > v'1
m • .'
c
N •a
N ..... 3
m Q C
o 'a C
O 0
m m V j
co
3 u)
LL
rn
c 5
TA C1) o
'x
iii a) N N
'O Q c
lL a) cp
N
c a)
E P.
7 g
O —
U a)
• O O
O) — ,
'O y
O
.
a)
N c
O a)
a
O °
a m
O »-
c O
o
m U .
0
0 m
L
a) " +
_c c
_c a)
N
U a)
a) y _
• d c O
a) o N
3 !0 o h ..
C a) > •
C CI) C O a)
O — d > .k
V Q p C y •k
r C • 0. 0 -(DS . = k _.
• 0 ..= - -
C
co • N W f _ -
0 E L5
y >,
c �0 -
c_
c
'El m Z -
c • E 3
c
c a)•c
O.
0 t U)
c c
c p - m
0 - a: _
C O O U
O V
U -a c `
m ` . p
o) c w
c
La
O
t) >
3
N c ▪ :3
N w 7
lb Q C
O 'p C as
CC O E
co y U
LL
aimaSas m mofaSmaia> ,A
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
'in > >0 m m m m a) a) m co m m a) o 0--
• -a m a) m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U y - C c c c c c c c c c c c CL C L 3
a, O y ca 0 m 7 7 0 7 7 7 7 3 7 7 - m
3- m00000000oO0W
m (.9 I -N N N N C0 N N N N N N N r r r Q)
C7 I= J NNCO r)Nr CD CD W OD PCDOa NOa C
T r CC m 0 O
Oa 0 a O O O OD r) r) 01 r) r) CO C) 0) r) r) r) r) r) r) N 0
W 3 N N
m
0 i . 1%.: - ...,-: , - k r-' : &• ,:. <{ . .. - , 0 m m m.m _0.m m V
W L• ,. • 0 0 g. T -' • •,• �. • '‘',•• y e . - -• .0 C C C C C C C m m' m C C C O
UL 3 co r '' '`T 00 ... TT ; w ' x co mm m,mmm CCCm ta•a0
LL M d > �'> > O C O f
S "�� > N m C ">,Cn ,•, _ u ) 6 3 JJJ =JJJJ JJJJ JJ.O • y •
� a - c _ c c:� 01 3.--- •::C 0 4 -% d_ o o,� 0' 0 0 0 o avvv v p •°v 0 • V
ID N O C N C H m >' m m C C C y` a) >, N C + ' ', Z N O O O O O E 0.0 -0 0 S,
m' tammwm� m�co •S,S
o`m m mOES.: : mcO:m' a maim m0co .- 2c'•E• m m -0
a. I.- 22 "J-1CY)• -.Ca CO JI •'CL L L LLL.CL.Cmm.m LLLw
_ H ',s'• "Zf/)(nO[Af/)CnOt
rN 0 O NN NN OO "Nr N'
0 r) OO N CO O CO r O) CO r W ti �• O) C O 0) Z r - 0) 0) O O) to r t0 0 0) 0 ) Cn 1 c
7
• CO , F) CV '01 N to LO 10 O C CC)+ N i O O N to ",- - N 0.01 N N r O 0 10 m O 0 0 C 0)
r C7 r)•r r 1- 01 CO gO CO -CO.01 M r M 01.01 r ° ,1' O m O.0 0 0 0 0 0 a 10 Nr a O 0 ' 0 m
. r r.r =r•r r r - T r-, --, r r r, z , OO N W m m•• r r N
c m m m m a) 0 m m a) a) m m 0
o • > > > > > > > > > > > > >
a m •QaaaaaaaQaa •
• • 'n > >0o mm m0 000 mmO O
w .0 •gaa— mmmmmmmm
O 3 c 1Oy , _c c ccc ccc ccc
w m _ Eu,000 WJ
H 0 1- N N N N CO N N N N N CV N r r r N
' d — NNlo O) Nr00 COO t` C010aN 0 vr C
() 0 0) 0 et 01 r) r) r) r) N N N N N N e• a OD
U 3 N 0 62 UD OD a m OD 0) 0) r) 0) 0) M r) r) r) 0) M 0)C) 0) N Z
is ' • ', • ,)+ , : - ::: ;�: -e, ; " =', ; 1---;.:''' " c;,�: :b, 0.:1-‘,°'!:- '
el. C a Y -,.•••=.1.- p "3; •'` : 4 „ , , ,- ‘,"›,,,,,.c i- ••, ' � • ` y .,z: ck• i ` • ao
w C . H = , i,A ' • .- ., " > a+, • ),.w a !s` y„ ? _ ,:Sw'� -.� .
V
CO CD
N CO - a
N G .— mmmm,°
w S$mma
1-.
CO d ▪ T a cCCC
c c c c w 3
- 0 m T!9 W W W W r J N
= O Ca et CO I- N O 0
(1 ) 0
2 '3 N rnrnrnrn O Z
in w
c W W
• 3 Oh' h+ m r ' ' '� ;x.a ' 4 , " , * r ,,,� L» f " ',>m m.m m m m- m " a) m m m
m _ r ' ,,, " * .•.. »; -1C .:C C C C C C. C/2 C C c
1L 3 • " " ';'s'> ' ` ' ' ' ' ' >. p W , -›- >. +'�' " Ca" m • W Ca m la C • .Ca a) •
H Q C, co °•: < " " " ' 0'� m�"m• m . 0 O. •0 -- "� m Ca,tfl m • :C ; - c: , - . . 9 J: JJO
to m > .... p• > > > to O - ` > > 3 > m > 4: 'o, v)"O - o -o; O
" E,a'N� -0 ..a ca•ca = Ice Fr, d`0, S . 'S . S i 8SSS.�o:o "S00SS
N m N_ tl1 • E co Y',_ Y ._ Y•-m T m m; m m Y >,Y y
V a ' • 3 3 a% to c m C H • > > • C C' C.CU CO N m e Z C C -�� - C ,'>C S 2- C 2 3
'0 m m corm ca m m "� m `� (0E'
a ta:ta "S'S m� �' mm °m m m m m m m m �•m m 'E
Q O. F-JJW"f- I•- JI 1 J 2 -OD. CO 1 -p1-J •L-c = L L L L L, mmm L t L',m
• r r N N' ) CV NNN N r N N N N N' N r N'r Z Z f/) U) fl) C/) U) , U) (.0 ca - � , � W Cn CJ) LL ,
y•. 0. 01 C- O' 00.0) N' CD 0 00 r W O co r m OD P• r m CO OD .t W r, CI W N MAW.- • t0 r ' A • r1 ti 4
,...co 0,C- d•' 10 0 10 N 0) N 10 to CO 1010 10 10 N•to 1C) 0 10 N 10 N 0 0) N N r r r 0 0 1o•W 10 a 0) .
0
C o Cl N 0) co r r r C')C9`0) 0) C) C) C) -•0) c) r r) .- CO 0- m0000- 0'0 +10;' - O'OOm
O T i CO C4',-- x _r r y- r r W m m r v-,0 N
U 0
c E c
o
O E
0 N - iTammm
m m
U . 0
O CC .—_ . w w w `
w
m 3 OL' rrrr
O O W a an CD Is-
c m c4 EL rr 0
O -a �, W m m Z
j C ,, ; .., x % .. • _ y + y - , u °` `` 5> ,.'�� ; . as
S . 3 o >: ' .s _ , . CYn r - ' .b I : • ec + • • ' ' w P - .," " ,& ": cis
N '9 r4 a a ¢ , `" ,, . , "...4,;',„ . N •. r m°.;.i., ; = ,
N m y " 3 ' , x -,;,'„.7_,:_,...„
•• ,. « V , • s rp, -,- t "
Z m ca t` y a ,< `°" r 0>, II ` kY .k: ''P- ' -, ' :`T , . s .; s: •'_• , •
l6 , s' r r • CY,+, • T ° ,^ y. . , - , F . • Z • •'� • ' .r ' • 3'�, v , '�` E
V) (i)
>+ CO > 4 0 .. CO
C C
0 V' c Q
Q a) 0 m 0 0 CD 0) 0) 0 0) 0) y . G3
FO J J CO CO CO CO CO CO J CO CO CO J
. CO a)oa) a)a)a)a) oa)a)a).c
7
o' E 'E C C E E E E E E E E co
V C C C C C C C C c C C C c
< a) a) a) o a) a) co a) a) a) O a) .
a -) _)_)•-) -» -, 0
MC Cn CnmmcnCnN Cn mCnmm cn
cc - ci O CO �OCDN O Bco cO CD OOD N
p Cr) 1n IO F- co O
W 3N C c9 a) r) co co cov °ver�aaN N
W = e �,Cr ca co'cococo co•cacoco atom comcocci oscommx`nmcoca'coCocom ' m co := ._'' " -'';<; Ltl;:' i
°SSSS SSS •SS.0 o 0 0•-0 0 0 0 0.0 0 SSSSS a 0 S a 0 SS' .0 _ ,a, I a ,t • 'N CO • a aaaaaaa
d Ca CO CO CO • • CO ,C0 • O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO Al CO CO, CO CO CO CO c0 co co • C >„;•>, p co
- 3 0m• mooa0aomoacacO camm[Omtn °r3mo:io3amcaa1a3 Om71Mo3M'c c ,-. • -'
V co ca CO c0 CO CO CO CO CO c0 CO CO co c0 CO t0 CO CO co •c0 •c0 CO c0 16 CO CO N ci CO CO l0 c0 > ' ,_ C7 :> m S : • -
as • an. d a a a a a a a a :• co a a a a a a a a n aa CL: a CO' 'a a mt1LL o ct Q A Q - Q4.)•
. ,.: 3 ' , �� � �� § § §'3 ,W;WWN',aN flay" ,
C]Z, ,-10()I-C9 . LOAD) 10rnne- �,- n�rnr) rnrI ,—cn .—cnr)'r-r)•r-,r) ■
r d'
N N N a- O O c9 CI N N N O e-• O f7 N NN O
sr rn • a- a- .O C7 7 _ N N N N '
. • 0 CO OD O r- CO OO CO OO )- n n F.- ti A P co 11•••• CO CO•CD CD CO CO CD CO•CD CO to to M In in 0) O co O.O co C ca . •. '
co co Co 07-09 co: r) co co co co co co co co 0? co co co r) C7.c).M co co M• 1') co, r) r) e+) r) 1') in N N' N' N a M"-.1:, e
C
0 •
s
4, W_
N .0 .
C
i
I/R� d _ d '` a• - < °. " , r -`� < •. 't-: g =n,, • _ •
" , : r a'.A i,� x._ , , • C v d : ." . 'C: ▪ . N - ;='. ° g ' h . , .' ( r !.,C` ;s ) s .Y - 1• ". , "�Y" f
ers co u .y
c a t` « ▪ 0 , ,s,•' , x" 3° , : ; - ,s".>,..,44..‘,. ' 1 '',;'�' , %1",:r .. if' r ° *x-f" .
C 0 < •• ''4s^e • ; . • • .. " • , z • ' - " ` •: ' ,. S'•• q• . ' til •<�" "- '''. - —J-- '''",r::
'•i ''' :X - :
v
N , C a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) N --
CG ' 0 C C C c C c C C C c C C -
co c0 CO c0 CO c0 CO c0 c0 CO co Co CO -
co 0 E y J -
CD 5 a)a)a)a) a)wa)a) a)a)a) co .c X
m co u 'E c •E 'E E E •E 'E 'E E 'E 'E E - . - - " x
•a+�Q c c c c c c c c c c c c o - - --
c0 C . a)Oda) mma)a) a000 0
~ :2 m ,a C 'f cA c4 cA vi co N cA to W cA u) c4 ,. -
() p N It O CO N 0 qv N (0 COCOOCO -
d
rt 3Na MM C � +)c � 7 aaaaa aN
CO w - • -
_ '- • ° W . : • m - :• ...:3.7. ' a, ":':. , • `" C • _ O , $. ? C la•al0 C a Ca l6 l0 0 f0 Ca CO CO < Ca Ca l0 Ca Ca " Ca Ca Ca,f6 Ca Ca " Ca•f0 CO•f0 t a'CO CO CO ,e0 •:,...., i a , s, . � > , " r ' ' 4 mo w`? , • ,..•• " • CD O p O.O O O O O 0 0 O'O* 0 0 0 0 0 '•f• .:e.,••• - > <..
m 7.. ' SSaaa S a 2.0 2 a 2 aa 2a�S •SS a .a a• S.S$S *aa .o m m•m.ak,
to E 3 mmmmmmmm • mm°mmmmmmmmm mcomcomm > m • mm ' mm;m o ^ Q • `a � "t • cn Z
v ccocaco,cc.m co mco c o , c o c o c o c o mcaco co 0 m,m'.ca m:mcacoalm >..>. ->. c9
co a" aaa aaa. a ,la•aaaaaaaa•aaaaaaaa > a,aaa a im LL•' " EE'E~J,Q,
De lL ICE CO's . N
Q III ���'� ��i���< .W.LLiLL
O O ' N Z N LO'.- O c7 N. co h In CA'IO`0) 1s'. -. 1- •-• f-- . O) C7.0) co .- CO r taco /- 07 P• •_ co co Nr'N .- C`9'CO Lt N
N .— .—, O O eh d' 7 N N .K 0 .- •d• 0 07 , T 0 0 cr• - C
— 7 C7'N N' N N N=
C O OO OO cD CD CD co h r--'1-• 1 -.1� 1.-1.- 1- h` ti CO•P• co 10 N CD C') N N c0 CD: CO CO CO CO CO cn CO LO Il) 0) O O O O.O 0) c
O ?. • tD M M c7'0) 1') C7 c•) P) 1') N ^c•) M Cr) C•) C7 .. C2 0) rye") , C.") r) c') c9 c7 C7 f7•C+) r) Cr) C7 ;C+)t v) In N •N N N N N r <
ti
O7
C E C
0 O
0 3 y
N c
s g •
co 7 p .0 C
C mNa. z
CD m to) O n
CD • C 7 w ..,_ ° - , 3 ; ' ' " ; :. R .'
'1" , ^" ", . , ? ' ,{ • : :;C' ,e) •` ' : " ,i,, • > ' 1 , 1 "ity =• ' ' • " - ti. •
N
xs 7,••• •
Cr p V co
° y i .• ,.FJ. • i " . . 3, f <. " K r g ' .. ",,. k - �, x � , . -'M rsx.' Y .. ,. " , � - E
, � <.,? - • - a,\ r >, " y _ :s .:" >• :, t 9.,xs "y. >.. „, "" 4 _ �'• E
" Cn
d
w co
V co
V
0
C ies
0
7
Q
o
Q
l0
-0 c0 a 0 0 c)
EL M N
Z Z O
C L , , s a gi
ll 7 07 f ; _� ~ „ . .....1-,•... ~ m 00
LL e >•-,> .',• M •, i - r y a c C .e
m rr , . 5 ^� \ 0)
m (,:c> • • ' • . : ' - ” "
" _) ... Z :Z• .,
tD c
e o ` .
o m Q
M 'd . v E
C
w m Q cn d
w a
y -0 M m d m LL -
0. V p c 0
0 o w
o �Na Z Z N c
15 = J • , c.. • y C
CL
of C 0 m >; • .. ---c L •; AC•- • •k . i` c p .
c w y � . ; - •m > l N .,�, it- • 7
d Q -C ;e - r°' <.C. H
E 3 • Z � " a ` . - - ` Z - r m ca Nc
o
0 0, d LT
ca as
co Q . ' 4 > , o 000000 o Ti LT:
N R = c c c c c c o crj 0
V1 D E w d` d`Qd`d`d` 2 • .k
0) — ; - 0) CO CO � l0 l0 t p X •
R C Q 0 co C C C C C N m y a N .
m —a)
H as >' .- - • 222222 a `S
'C m C W v
a) . - N O, Z c m a w
N
.1- y
m c T °�E m m
'a . ,,;;, m 01 C,c E 2 y,.y E d m m
�.T. .v,
4- 0 , A C ; :I... 1,...0 a o • a c) c v7 a 92 ic
C O .'a• = ; O'er: •1 '•> a in %IiII'S,' r01-2 D
Q ` 3 s ,,. Z ° yV • M C7 f'7 C7 C7 f7 y W
c0 Uo m
e E c 000000 Q -
.e v rn
Q
+ m- ° , C C C C C C 1 m a'
y E d m L mo
m m m m m m a _ m
✓ rrc 4ir�i' c >>o
o - 0--. a 222222 yLI
r �0 m y
c m c 0 coccoc o m y 3 3
c Na Z mc l e26-88 C D
.e .....‘,.,z, . c • 0 4.7., c
... 0) . t••
? A , . °• y C c E -E m M
O 0. "' ° ) E 0 m
m " - O . :'.. = : . 110 U) 10 110 10 L' 0 E
as 0
- z (/)
L.
n' O L .
y = E d R CD
V J el N CO m -
Q O
0'
,
•
c c --
co co (1)
c •c •c ;7; >
co CD ••••• ,...," 6 6
o 73
c c en en = eZ 0 0 C
co co at .-
= u. 1 co ts
co = 0 ,T i = c
tt. a* • u_ 0 co g
a ,- a, fa. 0- CI. o
< t > . o (NI co c ,c .c 8 Ir. 0 1 =
) r0)
C) 3 c' c,2
c n a) N N 0 0 • a co
0000CO o
LIJ - 0 0
*- 0 ,- CO -.I CO olc.411 et 2 v) 2 0
cNi
C71 7 t•Ni , - .- . . . ,
‘.., 4: ' ,, „,• .,-
1:17.1 L..
„Lo
14.. 0
.2
= 0 , ' Y' t - F t - c4 0.1.CSI N , N N ,, • ' - : , . ,.• • - • CO CO •,c; 0 0
• ., •-••• '• • e -
"g , j
a i' a i 1 i i a s 6'6 ai 'ai 6 6 Si 6 cii ili 6 '‘-',' - :.. •• ' "•-"' - " 65 63 ti ii) iii 45 ' : . x : - -.•- ,, , - • -
---' •E ' -; >`'>„>•..>
coco cn '
" > • ' ' . . - • '‘, 4 " ' 3 --- ti5 . ;';,..,'",,,: •. P. Li '
, . , •
' k „e., CD .2 .92 .2 0 O• 0 m , s •-•0") CO.
,. MI .y ..V -V al _ii -NI k-1E -NE -4 -41-Y " _v..12.. ' -. ...a, -- ... , 3, ? in iii ,:- ,
co' •„- co co c o co ((c in (n co co co co (n An en en en ,'- - •-- ''. ',---, - +.- --- u_ - • -- 6-0,6
11 0 0 .4 E F. . E. E E E E V. E - E E E F. El_3 -I! E E *, - .‘• . ! . - -T, ' :a co ca co 03 , .
u_
O . ,-
.4 Lo 1- 1-1- I-1-- 1-1- 1- I- I- I- I- I- 17 - kf.', ‚' • - ',- ' ' 1 ' • • •'•••,., .1,;- Z"..Z" LIZ' •
I N N. N SO OD OD CO CO CO OD CO OD CO OD CO fs'l e' • - -" . - i r 0,5 55
•r• CO CO CO CO 03 CO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CON „2 ',' e
,. ' •',• ° ' •-'‘-01,1")
' • 10 Cr) 0) e- ,- 0,0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 ,-,„: ' -,- N,N 0 0 NIel4' "- ,, ••••„ -• e ‘- WO
, • „1, CO
00 • • • •„:. ,, " • , ,',., ,,,' s 2 EN N al o •ct . • . , 10 co a) , o) r- N N N CSI • , , 1.0 O LO
" - : , , . , , ' , • ": '''' ' • : `'"' r'' . - r '
In
u) u) c C em co
7.) 0 CD
CL CL g g
▪ 0 0 Cr a) c
a en en CD 0
10 in - o. c 0 ell 2 M mi 1 :i
ra
CO = = 2 > >
< 13 .•-• TO 0 0
§ § C°c13 ,
73 0 0 r .7- -c-q ,.
0 N 0 a•- ,--
0 0 0 o a)
_i CO CO Tt CI .•-• a-
CO )I) r
„
•••• ' I -, „,„,i,; ', - ..,-,•:. i' r, • ' , -- :••-• -.. -;:.! .-.: , -'• : v •-•,-' ,"; "•• -, . k e •‘ -,..,-,. 0 , 0
ad r as ..- f tv x• - k: !‘ ; - „ ...-.;„ ..:--1. " -•,...-.- ". '.. 4.1, a
..... 0 ■-• "g„ 3 .:,,,, .1 •^ ',„, s: f >4 °.••• . -;, .,:t1 .:<, ,\:„.e: ' : 7 ' ;;; „ L.,' ,,.9;?so ,4„ ,,Ii
c c ,••••• ,' ,- -,.... :-...:3 :,'"L' . -' • -',, „....;-"j" ` ,..' " ei ''..-' '''. , ' , •• !. .." r • ' ' -- , ..,, • ' " 5. C O (I)
02 (0 " - - `-t ` -- - '...-‘ ': :'' ',' - , - • . • : ' - • ';-• ,'" , !- - -... -'' - - :: V :Y.: '''' . -.. =• ' ' . - - ' --' i . - -'' • t '' q - - ,
a , c 0 z , .„, i e • '...„„ , . , • , ..,,,17 2.,1;• „„ ,, - ' .---- • • • '...", F .‘ , • • • „ . ‘., '..., • ;,..•, i „ ; 2 . .
c.) us 11 - -‘q" ' „-.5 .0 '..-.-.. > .... 1---, „ , „. - •
ca ai '- = • ' j`:„-K` /';'). • " , ' • ' ';, ..11, '''' `'' ; '',..' '' 4 •; ' 0. • ''''.. -,, ' ' t 0000
•0 ; c --, - . -,•0 - - . ---'.., .;: -'--' '''' - ,ta.. - • - c ,...-,:!?„ v ,,,- ,... - , • ' ' in co ,
11 cy - • cf, .`"• ;,:„.:."4,..",--; • - > , . -, , , -,,,, 4 • .....2,, •,---• • '': ' ' 0 ' - - , b ,:
in > :.....: >,. z ,,- • , ." ,,,, !,„ t„,.. • „... „ :,,,, , • (..-. 1 ,., ' Z , ,:- .., • ...!..,2: ..jr 111 a> '0 '1)
(ID ..r.
co
vi Ta E
co 7 - 1 cp c c c co - - -
,...._ ■_ .._ ._ GI '0
C o 0 0 - - e 000 c c
Tti F.' 1 - E mi c c it To' R 0 6 co co
:•-• :t•
„,... Li_
as CO a. Cr N- 0 .-• fp . Z ep Z fp 5. i 0_ a 0_
IX .--. < CI 2 01 2 C D ' C ci) ° ° .F3 . fT) 'CI 0j0
a T)
o
- co 2 co i c•s, rs. co 2 2 2 •t- M co M
0 = a
z = cNi ", uil < A ..:•:' • ' ' ., ■ '''' ' Z, . • , 2 !' ' '
- ,v , .
!, ---.- • ..... img c> coo c,c' 0 0 0 -',
i' - ' --- " ' • • : ',41'''
'‘Via nr ' * '
■• • - = •.: .... -, ,.. .; :" I ' • • 0 4_-, 0 0 0 0- 4- Z.; 4-.4-.4- g., - ••-• ..,, „.., ".• . „::, : 7. . , =,-.„.... • :i: ,..e.- 1 ..;, • :0 61
(0 c r. -, , :., 41 );,:,', r ,.r,7,..N.,:51 ('4 ('1 -•- CNI N IN '1 .' , -;* g ' ...:, ..: cd.th' ° ' :0,1:, a ,
O u_ =, 5 : , .ai '6 ai GS ai a3 ai o ai ai 5, ai .2.', "ai ai ai , a31., , . •.'F , 4 .,,t,' , , ,,,, CO 'CO CirCi) U) Cd15,.,,,f, k2!=•.,"<-• , , •:10 „ . .4.
cn < E e .. :> > > > co co u) co co co co co u) co co co . >:,.. ,:,,---p-w....... -4.,- 3 3 . - - --r, - Ur- ,:' • P ,'„t -5 Ef.
to - .<, ,,,zi .co .co .co .co 73‘o .-- - „- .- : ... .. co co _
(13 c . ) : c , - be= ae _Nc-:. _' .• . . 4 - _)e _NE ' - ' _ s i .ti , - , - •-s-, -4' Z E.EL'a ra .(7), , • .1-1.- - - ,
.12 • ,.., en en en u) 0 CA CA CA CA CA CA CA FA CO fA CD CA p „J ..., :., ,_ ,_ ,_ ,- .c c c ,- . ,... , t ....,
c)- „,.. 1,--
. , i f -,2 it L T .
•13 ' .e un-- I- I- I- 1-'I-",1- 1- I- F- I- I- I- I- I- 1-1- 1.-- • .:.'4,,,„, ' • • • • . . Z1‘,• .a
< 0 ' <- c.: cv NT)) CO CO CO CO-CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CS! s e .. 4 - •,., • ..Z.Z:Z •• • : 0 0.0'
C 4... • „. 4-: CO CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO. CO c0 00 CO CO CO N .„..;^: , ' ',-, '• ,„ ,
0 .1 100)0) • , ,,,,, , • cs•vc.4.0 c:3 .4.- "34' ,- "
•-,, •
......- 0 ..-,„.,,,, >•'. o, o, ,-- ..- .1-,-; ........ , a- e- .- . ',.: , ,, ,,• % .• 0-0 Cal CV 0) 0) 0) cl• , . t CO D 01.0•0•
•-e- a-- v- 4- •- 7 " "1" , ' -", CO 'CO r- Fs. CsI N'N N• ...• '," • LC) 40 41') 10
.
>•:.••,- • •" ' • '
(5
o
0 E c c c
0) 0 CD 00
Ns 0 To p E -ci E -ci • c c
(s) :E . 11) CO 2 (0 2 c C
C al 5 OcoOm as co
.e -c
o
0 Z 0 Z co § 1.§ .'- c`i.
o 2
(..) _ Cr 4- ID 4- 02.)
.0 a 4- > co > 0 0- c4 a 8 -b 0
-
0) r- < g), 2 pl, 2 t-.1 w c., 0
0000 co a) ca
oa = o - CD .-- CD
co 03 cp
.... . C•
0 -0 , - " , ... , • , • . -
,-- .., .- „ , ,, :..--_, - u_ k , ,.
,.,..: , ,,, ,.1, ;•,,,,,„;., , ,,
, , ,,,_
-' .. ; , 4 ,•„,,,,
DA ,. es- '.,, „„'..y'f- c,,,: (ea co ' 4 „
,, .‘ -.,- . ''", . ,.7 ,,:,,o, ,; 5 ?. I " ... -,..; ,,,. 3 ,i•I
I; ' 23 = -..- .-' :.itt-F- -:- . ° :2 gi : • .' . • - f-' fr 4' c7,- ' --- '".. - - - . — A . ' ' ' . ' i; '.1 ‘ 0 0 '
,a)
....,Ct ID 0 0 0 0 2 0) CD ID el) . a) ar. .....2 .. S) •.9 .. 1. 1 - • '.
- . • , a. -; a' - , ,a ,... ty 15
•-• > > ''> >
i■i ,1 . . . „ ,
CD < ,E 6') (J) <,< < < co c.o.: ca CO 01 UTM ' CO •-.Dit•-•.- so , : - : w co- _ < , -.. , i .,..... 1 . . . ..
..
-
: - - . . ,.
-'. - '''' ' , •-• I -sec; -' : -4 si _lc • •,.. ... ' t -
0 ' (13 M Z . 5 , .. , 5(0 ectscuale- .co- 5-5'5.5- qu - , ,. . 6
z OD CO '03 (0 Lo.u.J I-I-- I- 1-- I- I-4 CD CO -4-- I-: 1-,,,:„1- ...,1 :...fr CO - ", - fr.1-„ I- - •,,, • - •" • - -„, .
0 1•01
o ' ,:- 0 CV MTVCO 03 " • ° ' CO' ' " 's CO-05 cai (1) i: - 0. - ",,...; „,„ , ' -0 co
CC 0) .,. ,.-. ‘.- c..) COCO'CO<COODODOD-COCOOD0000 COAU CO' co' oo 0 cc'- " , , ,..;-- . ,....
ID • - .„,,,, , u ., to • E
....i c O al in a) .- 4- 040 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o :- - , ...• , P „:- ,...; . .,. - y„ r,. 0 .. 0 x
-
, n cs, 0-0 0-0 -, ' • a E
as -.4 -.4 ." tr. a-• t ...-- cal a-••.- a-• a- a•- Cs! a- N.,. ral'a-• CV .-• a- Cal - •e Z. • 4 • , -; , 1 - 1.0 10 10 •
. , . . • • • Z
Cl)
C')
en
C w
>s 0 > 2 PS EA
13 0 C c c
i.3 ea i-
en 0 .3j
(s) as
0 -
1 .
T.)
•
. a
C CM
C
•
C C C � C O
p j U) o o O d m ca
CL V m0m0 • co-u) U O co C
Q � ' - , « • - mo o E W W a C Z c C.1 c U °U °ov 5 00 x 0 U) m p m 0
1-1:J .- wit r 4tcO M 2 C)U) m2 ��; L N
O
o
" 000 a co co a V • • , . E .0
2 c , N'N•NN NN U)U CO u)CA .kw. ._ m m
rs 0- U) CO U) U) W 0) :C - C C C C " ; : •
U•UU UU'UU) U) U)U)•U) , c A . c c `: , o Lo
>
7,- to co tf) twin LO 0 0'0 0 0 ` '• 0 • O al ca
a) p) rn•rn.rn,rn o•o o.0) o to E
CO' LO to )n to to r.-4.- 1. Z , Z m
tfJ
O o CO C W .0 m To a L.I. CI)
7 7 o m a 0 0 0 co m 0 C m m a
_ .. C L 3 O F c n •0
V m Q 3 g ID fay m U m N '0 O p ,M cp
Q a) a" J 0 7 U C3 O"'C c0 O. N C a)
c0 0 M O r co U) co > a Z p p
70 m r0 WW ac o ?• m m
C L III 11-1 x 0 _. 0 m m
c0 d N co c o 0 co U) m 22 D U) L a = 0 L-•
CI. CL 0 � ,• C E m c0 O
L.� " N °M �LO co' .. x ".- no. c 00 2 m
U) N 000000 i .. ,. O t 0 C
y y g NNNN N N)• „ ",; _ .'• - a) O
. 0 - y m' ) m m m , • -'Y` 4. ... -': " a m d . >, h
CD cc0 a E i . U) U) U) 00 U) U) ` : ; I .,, a g m 2 a
CC c O a U U U ▪ U U U' ' ".. % • • ,`Cdr C'. CO _ co 00 7
a >,- tr >.' .1x, "0., M Ew c.;
y d 0a)p)O) " " r - O E.
M . :.n. tO'tO 0 to LO LO.„ 71. • Z - • Z • c ca a v
CO 0 m e 613 LT U
0 - - . c0 5 0 cA O
a) + L c — 0 co • 0 CO O W Lm )C
c p � m m a� x
c0 � O Q 3 , y > .0 N m W m O LL H m
I— w >, l = m m '� o ay 3 c go
ca
a) m a � _ U o o 0 m � C7 m
IX .••. Q VOV 0 O > NCO m � N a CV CL
C 13 � XkT - it c co o Z im w', = _ 6 , .c y ai
c O 7 >
O — 0 ;s =c m
Z 0 N , ' ;aP , r. ;
.. _
y D; o $"$ ai ai hind -ai , ;:' " ' -'. o O'1 - a
C N -N 0 -U)U)C U) .. ”. • '" E o.0 a) C .p a ' s co Q . : -E , m m 'm 65 fA•(�'fA fn .- c 0 Y W a
ff) 0 U co U) t o C c C C' C- l '; . " .' C Q' m m ....2
L A; r , •: :t 0 • (/) 0 > U) to)
cr . `000C0 U )U ).U),U) m' c + >, j_ m N = .. m
O 0 LO u, to '1)00-000 0 e „.” 0. O0 C O). >.e
m Z, Lo o , Z " r. c. • Z,,_ m 3 " m
f . mo m•
c co f 2 m 2 ° cV L m
0 E in m aoya� in >, 3 mw m m cc O CO m y
r U1 min , > CD m m >mOocS
c0 7 -1 m .:3 f .7 �_ N y CO
V _ 0- Cl. Z` 0 ›"0 � C m d C V- an d
a) � � Uo
a U°o 0 o a, 3 RoN . .
0 00 — Ftr• atcp Z M cD aaci 03 o
d N . - - %-" w ,c g s. a • ,., ' . ; ro � : -4 - > O ,. m P-m
S 3 0 4,t 'V .g- : .`r ',." - %_ : , = � Z m � ,- CO
''b a U U`U Y e " `>" • •c' - - C ; • .- cV M a cn E. CO
Z.
cu ° pt ° p t ° ' " .. . � R m E •
co ° z co
L
,... co o =
> co
C y =E �oR
m
. Q 0 te
co
co
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
S.7 PROJECT IMPACTS /MITIGATION
Table S.7 -1 summarizes the potential environmental impacts anticipated for the identified Preferred
Alternative, organized by topic. The impacts discussed in this Table are meant as a quick reference
guide, these topics are fully discussed in Sections 3.0 and 4.0, and in the technical analyses. The
proposed SR- 22/West Orange County Connection project has potential impacts, including those related
to cultural and biological resources, community cohesion, residential and non - residential displacements,
transportation and circulation, noise, parks, and visual resources. The community impacts would ,
generally be addressed with relocation assistance. Noise barriers are proposed to abate the impacts of
increased highway traffic noise. The removal of existing vegetation would be associated with visual
impacts, and all efforts would be made to preserve existing landscaping. Where possible, new
landscaping would be placed where it can be sufficiently maintained and irrigated. These impacts and
their mitigation measures are further discussed in Section 4.0 of the FEIS /EIR and the technical reports
for the identified Preferred Alternative.
The other alternatives not identified as the Preferred Alternative are briefly summarized, and they are
discussed in detail in Section 4.0 of the August 2001 DEIR/EIS. Additional supplemental analyses that
accompany this FEIS /EIR are quality, historical properties, initial site assessment, natural environment
study report, noise, traffic, relocation and visual impacts. These supplemental reports are summarized in
Section 4.0 of the FEIS /EIR.
S.8 PERMITS /COORDINATION WITH RESOURCE AGENCIES
During the early phase of the SR- 22/WOCC proposed project, the Department initiated coordination with
several resource agencies to determine the possible required permits. The regulatory agencies were
contacted as part of the coordination and consultation efforts:
A. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): As part of the coordination and consultation efforts, in
June 2000 the Department contacted USFWS requesting information on sensitive /listed species
that may occur within the limits of the SR- 22/WOCC study area. The "Federally Listed and
Proposed Species and Critical Habitat" list provided by USFWS was used as an inventory list for
surveying the project study area to determine if any of these species were present. Upon
surveying the project study area, it was determined that none of these species was present at the
time of the surveys.
B. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG): A Section 1601 Streambed /Lake Alteration
Agreement from CDFG will be required if there is diversion or obstruction in the natural flow or
change of the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream or lake, or use of any material from a
streambed designated by CDFG as an existing fish or wildlife resource. The appropriate permit, if
required, would be obtained following approval of the FEIS /EIR by the lead agency.
C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE): the Department, OCTA and the SR- 22/WOCC
consultants have informally consulted with the Corps regarding permitting for the various project
elements. Specifically, a draft NEPA/Section 404 Permit Process Determination Preliminary
Information Package was prepared. The Section 404 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
process was not applied because of the anticipated applicability of a Nationwide 404 permit.
D. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO): the Department has provided the Historic Property
Survey Report (HPSR), Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR), and the Negative
Archaeological Survey Report to FHWA for transmittal to the State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO). The SHPO concurrence on the HPSR and Determination of Effect Finding of Adverse
Effect (DOE /FOE) documentation is as follows:
• SHPO concurs that the Reduced Build Alternative, if selected as the Preferred Alternative,
would have no Effect on properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic
Places. SHPO also concurred with the finding that the Full Build Alternative (with the
Summary xxv March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FE!S/EIR
proposed Pacific Electrical Arterial component) would have an adverse effect on the Pacific
Electric/Santa Ana River Bridge.
• As part of the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative, a Supplemental Historic Property Survey
Report (HPSR) was prepared to ensure all of the properties identified in the FEIS /EIR are not
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The potential displacement of
properties (residential and non - residential) will not be finalized until the approval of final
design. The properties identified in the FEIS /EIR are preliminary and are subject to change.
SHPO concurs that the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative properties are not eligible for
listing on the National Register of Historic Places. See Appendix B (Volume IV) of the
FEIS /EIR to review the SHPO concurrence letter.
E. During the public review period of the DEIR /EIS, the California Air Resources Board was solicited
for comments on the environmental document. Although not required by the California
•
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a letter was sent to CARB on October 22, 2001 in accordance
with Chapter 3, section 21104 (b) of the CEQA Statute: "the state lead agency shall consult with,
and obtain comments from, the State Air Resources Board in preparing an environmental impact
report on a highway or freeway project, as to the air pollution impact of the potential vehicular use
of the highway or freeway." However, no comments were received from CARB on the SR -22/
WOCC proposed project's DEIR /EIS.
•
0
Summary xxvi March 2003
u)
C-o `c `e 2 2 2 `c 2 R
m L e .2
° m ,0 a m a a
e go a
m
om c c c c c c
!'2 2 ,t 2 2 x
C Q m m m m m m w a
E W J J J 2 2 2 2 D.
V
ai 0 m
W
c E o 0
o r m 1 1 a m
m 1 an d — m
g W
E aE m E - a
"a m o
o a N 2m m m
I m C m To m 9 5
m y ° m 3 v W .. ,
m m C m m .c m 3 G m
m
N m 9 m 2 O h ° a
> ? m J 2 m g5)12-.1 -6.8'45 N 2 v
m ° m
i0 m o
m m `vi 3 o w m �? c s
m c m V m m v 2 .c o m =2 m
2 m u .5 ° n E ag mc m °m a m
C a m m m m d Q n t 3 U 2 f a
m E �� m L = ma II m c
m m c
v c =5
o � m J $ 3 -57 a c m m 2=2 m o > E g 3 >
o ' m E c .. a E m o .o c a s E y
E c a' m m m m m m 1c g m
9 m m �• m d m 0 m m C m m
. a O E 12 ; ' 2= G = a . C G 9 m C m 0 C
a=8 m 5 m 3= v 1 m. a 3 a Qt a m m - a
w m E m o .2= c E m m i0 _ ` v m E ao crf
` m a " 2 d w` o? ° v a m m a o. E m m o
o c m m 'c m 0 2 . t a 3 o m
y m V° O E O 0,052m559-0'8,02 2 m C
m m yv m-° .c . J` . - m E J °c c a'" is m2 E
o 2=2 8884, n3 2258 - E 3TE�i kg 2 2a
c Fig iW_ m i E o a m ami O aJi u c m m c i> a o y E
0 2= c W mmw mm< R 'v w cwom goi8c E m mm
m m E m m
G MN 122 m =0
..- m m j o y o mo o. m .
W N _ y m C O m 0 C= ED
° w 2 m > Q m y 2 n m m
V C C
d 2 2 E c E m m == o E c 3 n m> 3 m
w2 -- a °- m+m 9 6m m 5
30- .-0 v ay `? m o `o 'm E;, cy o
I- c A m' `� Wm m 9 82E mu d a mm
g _ m 2 _
u 2 2 m 2 = a 2° m 5 a ° 'o m
m c ° t )
a �` c 0 a o a �c3 g! ` O 1 a
a ° ° b
m a . m m
N
w 7^
o TO
m m
E °
m
E ° m c n a a a a a E
y m Z E E E E E E E m
u)--
it- z ° z z z z z z
oz n 0 0
11- `
O m
0 ' d_
i 0 m m
Q— ill
A
1
C O 2
m m m m m m w m
3:i
< E E 0. 0. E E E - �= m .
3 1 -
7
z 2 2 Z 0 2 z 202
0 E O C
2 n a. m
m m m
Z m C
9 Wm q 'MOW
° m c 'o c v 1 2.5g m N> O m ° W O C= m y
m m m O d
o r m 2 Q m m i m q m
° m v F m c m m = m m m
E c J m o 3 a m ; m 9 m
m� m 2 u v; y m Ed Em CJ a
3 m S ` m g Ti 3..
t a 3 Tam 82 O° E
m .2 m v Wm • O - m m 3 m 'E Emo
< c m 2 0 m y a
T 2 T9 2 m ?: c a _
•:6 2 w 2 2 t of c m e _
.c C p 2 0 O m J O_ 2 m v
w a m o a ° a °i a. w . E o
m o v
0
020
w a
b m
m .c m
0 m C r .
O m a
m a-
d
'o ..
0 s8
0 a
u c c
m m o3
M 0 0
E T
m
m
m _ E. d W v v
C0 c m m c m m 3 c * A 5
m L c = C_ u t 5
C1 0 C C C C C C 8¢ 'C 01= G
C m a n n ° a a , v e c m a u- u_ __
L W 5 'N N b N C m 5 O 'a
L7 • C C C C c C p a m 0 C >
C d N V 0 m 0
C Q N a N a N N 0 a .% 0 N I C = 03
ma ell N N a a a .c C m 0 C C 0
ra W J J J J J J N 23 _ J n n a
C3 m a ° LL u) y
J ti
E c E 0 E
_ r
as W m 2 C c 3
OI L
m
C E J
m a 0 0 0 a 3
U m b £ 0 c m m u E ° vm " m Y
W c W m m 2 o 7. a
Q m ° 0 W m N'C a m d E 2 p g N u� > a E a n "c m 3 o 2 a m
iz c n = aa g e t m ; ° m c 9 p" p a
O a m � a p
°v c w 3/1 c -. ) ma � W= g (0 p i d N
O W E a L o 3 0+ E a o a= ss o ° y E v g u. v y C O
o E S` ° y E N %° o ' ° U c m 2
to • O z E m m m E asti nE u g o 0 t m e c � mr 2
U p W` 0 v 0 0 C W E m p n 003 m p n ., 0.
V .0 0 7 9 01 0 0 L . 0 03 0 sag 2 y h W 1 c
! m v 9 0 d V O - s- 1 2-0 30 m 0 0 n C O W E W U 8 0 0
c > A N 0 y C a > >.'13213E c m c Z: ; 3 O m 0 0 1 ° p = d
O v EE vac EEOEEo —5 h°� °c°aW mE o= .
cr
,_ (9 E a` mma Q w>,,gtc m ui°n Q2280._3 ig It o Q
as ta. 13) l 0
. a o - ° m ° m a o2 - E i`_ mc�EEU aEE - c ,m
� _ > > _ E "aE c a E o m m -0 0
5 8 aim ;' 2 : `o_ o ; Z a a E E E _
!° m m v 0 3 > 0- m 3 0
o m Em c qa a $ m Ev c � ocPw mo o ' = a � d u v °t o m
• U.3 m ° -c m wm - °c a . ° ' � . d 3 w 03 og c E
N m is E m Y a m ° E m m E c Q ; m € > E t y c v 3 J N m c
C N
m o cc mm$vz 02, I$Eos N o m ° mEOCo°'o a E
m w t v> poi ma >�o W cm o m� c W
a me cvm Et'm °`° o v
5 . u o y
0 0 Q CI m ea-2,2 se. cDm W 3tya , 32.2.=s=2= `09 E CO
d EE .65.=
> u ° E2 > a $ u m m m ; _m E c a 3 2. 7„ m E � � m 0
2 3 v W N m o m 0 � m o " a m o v v w� O a m m 0 2 o E 'W e d B Y Y - 28 2
C T > N > 0 C > c . m r c o x D 5 3 a O m 2 .W 5 f O p a 2 j m C
0
C E . C 2-1 5. o a = Uw ug mlia E 3 Q E a¢ I LL c N° o ` m c. . 0
03 0 c. cc 0 w
-0 v d c > o m c
r m • 0 c - c a K y N 0 C W 7 m 0 m m
N > a m > C >Cm not T 0, r0 L Wm
ra m' ma m ` E Q m EE WS c 0'u om z
d 0 m o° c n 2U °co a . �m = u8. 2 2 00 ;m S
m
as a yv c c Wmn .co c c m HI' mWm m!^ a
m a p n m y m y o E 2 3 c 0 m a v. m e v
al - 0 E w a x ° W a m c m �a v -,..E o a m 0,,,.= E Ep $ a , y
~ t C O 7 E 8 m S N m a W c c ... v= 9 N
m N N a .a. W m c y O a 30 W C p 'O c jp a ° W V
to V 5 m m T N i a ` � m axim �o o °c ox m E E >N v
m U. a m E o � Wm cv a s m m 0o. E ep
E E E a p E m w ; a a ¢ N
w T
0 c
a CO
7
E
1 1 U W
C 0 0 ▪ { ,1 ( C 1.1 U V O 1 .1 C1 0.
CO 03 co E
co m t E E E 0. E 0. E 0. 0. E To
x W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 > C
„, W z 2 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z '
m 2 Ec
0 m 22
•m~ .7C5-
v m m
ill
m m
*Ili ao2
I 0 0 v 0 0 0 t u p a c
W 0 0 0 W 0 W m 0 0 1-2i
0. E 0. 0. 0. 0. E 0. 0. E
v °
0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a
g z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z v_ 2
CO 0x9
0 m
2 C T a
m N 2
> m c
m
c > c Z d M E to El co
m ▪ 03 30 C N • N W W L 's W 0 2 x 0 or
,° a r 0 p > C m 0� n T` OI _p.. V C V Q m C
m I c Via ° c m o c� c W� v lo
>> a W c 2 m O 3 mm E a c ° a a cC 3y
O R m E S C U O m C m a c-C N m C 0 W 0 a a m C
�?c mm an d $ ° n mma u ` ;, 392 mmm E E do m
a S a v8 a v W 0PE
S 2 _ a ° E c ar m r j a m c. • • 'm ;E mcct Z Z 9 m
•
- 9 a V N 0 130 W C C a 3 C 2 m C m E I S 4 2
IC 3 E
t 0 W CO CO m m W V O O C O Y t2
w E E E o f am oc a ' a use
a s E W m N v
c ° a o
wat
. .--.0 0
m
L W
o c m r ,_
0) N P.
m T m 0
m N
ci , 3� z
m °° m
CO 9
a m
E `mom U
an d Q < 47 2 . 2 c< a v
'- -a d 2. v 9 : W V C 7 C , ∎,
mLa` °° u CO m� .3 "S-
N � m E m m 0
c- 'c co
C m LL c vLL Z v , av LE te J Ll. a LL a
m = OI m c' 'C m C a ' n ` n x
U. ,O <2 C `w ` am O m2 a `p C c x
'C Q c m c W W y c m c c m c V Y ... q
W V a 0 �� . a i : W t m I n m1
ii) W c d n c n d C a . rn a
V , on _I O co m _ m a g co co
U) N CO J W J n
v
0
0
m .0
2
y 5
m ;
L _
t .n..
m
m 0 C g
m E al a.
m O a
C 7 ,
so c 3 W a
E m
C b
gm
O
.W W a m
0) v c W a.- d ,
z c
c t >
ex • m O` m Ill v
C a - W m
ai E m c a° E c
L .Y D W O` m
en a
O q 'u . E a q m v
d c ` m m < l I 3 m m a to 0
e
E W > O C 7 C > C .2 O _
c U a co m m 2 q co O a
o W H 0 G a m a 0 .- 0 0 -
m m 'o o d 0 E o v v o 0
a , a Z Z K OU U Z a Z Z
T m m E m v 0 0 m N N y v 3 a c
0 _ q m a . 0 W
r O a ay, `_ ac 015 W OcH m SN r
O. E o• Eoa c a
m .m n - Qc n 111 mm 2 mm= a°a -c o E aru=iE a.vWO o ca Eo E3 E ` W�o u Z g • q o imv o 0
W m ` p v 3 -pm.— -. f C 3 t _ m N m y m
{p m n
16
1,42 U. W a a g l a a O.2 m , N d p 00
v
O. a o q O Z i�0 M L b 'C L C ' 1 N C 3 2 .0
J p m U m C a v
_ C > M N
W T
O W
Z 0 E� q
m m NW v= v
E O - W z W y a 0 W R W N V p q a
N a E E c m 2 E E E E E !.9 = m
m w0) z z° e a z° z z z Z 9 g ° a m a
>0 g a 'o Ec
m
16 c-) 3W a w
E v m m
I'
>° co c m m a m
Q- R a v i m m
m 2
v u r a `u v Ti v m � 9 a°
2 W W W W W W a W U C O
a a 3- 0 a a a a a I .2 1 m m
< E E E E E E E E • 0 ���
v z z ' z z z z z c o ° a 2 m i'
9
m cg 3a may
o W 3 c
w cJ 3E nTa
m n u
W e
o w 1 0 m
c e 0 a t o a c
E6 c
O Sec 1 c oa m y W m m
p O m c q m q m
m a i0 U v N W t„ $ p 0
U q y m O m c$ v g a v a - _ m U
C W n W E m W 5 m
la
1 • q t - 0 • 0. .9 W m 0. 0 a Y a m C
�c 0 3 E c:: mE E o E x c mcm
• N m m o p C W p g1 O m U U s E
3 a Q n W Z W p Pro Z n Z c Q v 0 0
.c ` o c m i . 1 m . _m v __
t 01 W a o ? cm m c 9" v W
• m
w • J n a n m ,T, m 3 a c o v
W a
c o 0
0 Way
m m m
C m L L y
O x u • f-
m
CV p U �•
' U ' T,
✓ 0 a
E
o. E a a
- U 0
W
1-
to 9
0 13 C C C C C C C 7 C / PI
V • N a, ccm 9 m 9' 0 ) a LL 9
61 r0 71 171 0 d 0
c t c 0 c e c c c c x
F = W « L m. a L W , z
IryY « m m
OJ N S mN N N mN O1 C N co
N V J J o J J J J a J a in
22
d
m m U f' —
W
e m
E ai TIN
o b m 7 m 0 i- c
0 0 m E . `m a
N E 9 c b
0 jp m 0 0 b T
° a m c E S ¢ g 2-a
8 c c o v
b b U m 3 o3.. u 9
` v c m O —.1„.
a U
O ° -0 0• ° e. y a a
d t m ° y cam `o E v °= C7
.o 7 .4. y m� b °3 W Z ° m
m m > C` b m 0 a b m L
ca _ c W m • 9 m
m1 b N d C N .�� w C E ° m
c 2 z u m u m m a° 2 o O a W g
v m
OA m e c a — 2 0 1
a 2 m a m m 3 0 m m >
w
0 m m a C G m ' 5 3 O T O V W 9
m u m e `a m 5 t 3.(3 2 ' m w
c
0 macr 'mE
o c c b am ma
p 9 > c« c W
• c m—a .m. Q $ m o O' W O c O `° m e
• � b tll m C E m a p O L ° b 9 m
p d O C O b o E m . m. m 3 9 0 W G
m 50 Ti c. d m 0 L .o 0 c W b E W
b 9 a m c E O v O =MO
c '> m S W ° 0 m a C W . O 8. 3° 3 O L
• c t E U ° m 3 = ;m b c c b h.= 3
7 o W L" Ev` . o ma «« m a
A m o 'c m m 3 fi m E m o E g m 3 3 c a
d m E « Wa m a. Of T o g Ea m NC ` `° m .0 �.�.am
E 3 a E 0 5 T a=e as g
a m a. «bm m
r =E m 9m a 0E w3a co oE00
G 1 w a Z Z m E U 0 m= Z m c J 0 g -2 W (Jo LL a
m
• N O O O V O y t 1 `p O o p
O ) Z Z U m • • • • • • • Z Q3.o09o. Z • • • •
'0 b m m b _m W m ° _T
m 1 � umi ae
• y i m 1st b m m 7 g N W m 7
m f°, o b E N 5 N • a E c -E- im mb ° c E2 E ° °b c
0 V 2 m ` m E O V c ° 2 O m C z'F V T o m
.Qa < c E.1 —5 n o mma 0; a32° c
2 v
C ▪ 7 W T � W 3 5 b a m a C o o W C a b p
W m c Le as N c o Ed E oc cQ °rnw c
r c m • E o 0 Z o y m ' v
G a y 0. U c o ° Z` m C a o Ni
z o. a m
N
W T
O W
t• b W
o
Iv aG m
7 c u m 0 11 m m m m m a E
co W 2 E E E E E E E E E m
x y 0 0 0 0 O O O O O i C
�w z Z z z z z z z z W m
H m 2
r H " E R I c 10 d
Bg m y m
E ao�
v u Ti u ' u is u S I a c
LI W m W m W m W W m m m °
< E E E E E E E E E `«
a `ems a
0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o m o=
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z $ b f
03 a) O « o c
W
2 b E b
m m Y
a W C
9 d N W C W Q
7 -
m W O p — 2 {cp '5 m m m
9 d c O m N .7E2
O
C-5 c
Y Ni -s a N b W b c V °- U C ,
III "9 °0 .9 0 o a a 9 y a y0 o 2 3 c
` c6 = 7 € 0 — 0 ic b «0 v E E F. E 2 Z mcm
S2 — b b 2 c mg m 9 E
m _ m , 2 o o l' o m c
G Q C W° V p C Z Z m W Z
A c S a o
: °. a —c o EQ w
r b 0 E o U m m>
c 2 c
c° o c." m o m ew
� ++ N a co a U o
0 ov
a
W O. g
m t 0
L
N
O °
01 W
d m
10 y ° d
0 Z .0 7
b
R Y
a
"
E a
6'' c c c c c c c c • A
W 0
S ' �. ° c . 0 '°c 9
✓ 2 a m 01 a a a 9 rn
c m
o f c c 0 0 c 0 0 0 %
Ea 2
ma m m m m m m m m a
a U J J J J J J J J
.i m E
c T m 2 C O N
2 m 2 TO N 2'- m
W
O! 0 0 N C 0 —821 L 2 9 L
2g 0 o m 2080 a m o
> m a v ° °° m E° v c 9
a! C 2 O s 2
S =.8 m c s ° — o V° m u2' E v°
m 32 c a a 0 3 m m c
m c ` 2
2 m L
m 2. 2 d E 1 2 ?, a g m 2 = o
c .c E — j am ,, . E 0 2 a ° 0 0' m d.0 m m ..2.- 1
O -p O L 2 01 l.1 0. 0 . 2 7, 7— c 0 C m
O C Ti m m y C .2 c 7 m 0 2 m C m ` 2
r. iE`o m m ? a m 0'E 0
m w G
m c 2E0 c 1 c m m v= ! p m .Q E . .
m 0. y O
c m u a 9 E m c - m '2 a< u° o E m m m 3
c • A i E m o .0 m W W o a 2= = 0 .21
C m E m c p m „, =dam ,1 m m c ;IF
c
O L 2 m 9
T 0' .t 3 2 2 0 V j
• a ..E m .O m 3 c 0 Ci .'22—' NV m o 8 >e
2 a g m m v o v ° '08122 c* m v_ 2 m
m 0' 9. c = c 0 m m 5 m O m 2
2 tog T O ' C 2 a2 : *( 2.2.,' - m 3 ac
.2 9 =a m 3 `p Y m w O.L m 0 . 0O 2 m 2 v t
= m m c E m c $ w 8- 2 2 2 2 2 m 1 2
W 1, O ' s C 0 C m T O G O m O m L W O 0 3
co m 13 a 2 u a c w a c a m m o 0 c U = p o m 9 v
b 52:1§%= < 0 1 3 0 L E ° C E m H c 2 E v L m `O 0 2 E > >
m Ti a v' i y m m c o f = 1 a m •°. 0 •° . ... -5:a m`
c. m c m w °. m a > '0 m o_ 8 :21 m e
o U' -om.0 a 9 ° me a ` < u.. oZ . = =2v a `Ea 22
.`p m a E el
0, • • a E K 0.-0 . . .. • •
v a
c c
m � 2 s
�d 1m m�
n p • E- 00 E 0 0 0 8 E m
gi c N c o °o cE m ' 52 mm
O ` m CO o OE m' is m gm n' . F1 5 1. 2 9
0, r L 0 6'L-' 2C -0. L= mg ma c
W < G 0 0 9 'E W cm m 0 -90. O m Ma 0
0
I-- W 1 cE ev N0 0a c 13 mv
E 2^ E L 0
o _ ° o o m oE
.) • m (9,= 10 E m a o c o m N m m a
c y.° 1 m 2 2 m
0 . u. wm .93 m 'o -' . 0 m = a°L
E E y a < < N
W T
O
r m
W 7 m
E
E 2 2 0 O O O O O 0 0 a
c j m Z E E E E E E 0 E m
W w W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m > c 2
> c o 2 2
F
W 1°2
2. m m
Q > ` m m m
act
E ' ° o °m W m °2 m 11 a °' o
Q E 9 E E E E E E 42-1
1_
2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 9 m
M O .
o
Z 0 T m
2 2 2
C
2 m C
V c 2 c Y -as 2 m N g
7 .. u 2 2 c 2 m .0 y E m c
CO 9 9 E = mm 9 ° S. m d 2 `111
2 _ 3 0 m c- 0' E 9 E c m 7
>> m m Cp p c m `° E 0 m w=
ow 2.2 U
m 4 L U ` L.. O C L C t G m O1 c 2 9 2 2
` � w .c 0 0 . 0 m.. t4 811.g ` 0 E 7, 0 ' E) N m m c 2
'0 r m 7 O . m . m 2 r ? m 22' .k L m E o 2 E
• m m 1 m o - E
0
L 2 v 'm o
° < 1� E m 3 m o c E E m E 2 0
a a _
i ° O T Y a 7 < c m m N m N 2 w
0 m 9
w LL CO r'3 0 E <a = d 0S0 E m
c v
• y c Q o
m w a
2 m 2 L N
O — H~
0) m
d W
W P.
C.) m
2
IS m
W o
O. E 9
I I
x
A
a g < `
a °� c ° a ° ,•R
O '0 1 m W m c a= { c p c { 1 5 c c
..-7.10 m= °- 0 C G O m 3 0 c) V W N 0
CD .0 U O 1 G 7 w: 3 0 01 C . c Ir U U !:.
C/ N C C la C a C 1C -= 0 C C C C 1_= 5 a C
C O °i C.0 a tl C�LLb = O) O O O 1 C j C O)
A y Ol w m n U 1/! N N Ol O N
CIA - T= G N W C C G C W- N- C X
wr W �.Q �Q 1p C Qar W W W W >.5 7.j W
C Q - an d c m - 201 ` E m LL m LL £ m
N W N G 0 .m. m y q N N C C N W
J d` O` J w a C 0 J J J m 'm' J 0.
V a m a � co C..)
a ° a
a 0. rn
a y
N
> `o
a O
m m E c m c
a N W >. K ° N W
a m 3 ° m a
0 m m_] m N q Q
m 8 • W= i . U O m 3
s on co E E m U m
N O1 C W ._ �'� C C W 0
m
a o n T2'2 ; o o m
m ° c m > c v E 8 c
cn I l ? E a E t N m a
7 `m a m = c - c
m W m m m D 3 m m ; m •
d 2 >° . d L W 0 m o C m
m > m a = a Ea moo a a m
m c
.2 p c z 8 2 rn v 6m N mE8 u E a
a m W 2 a m m c E w c o coi O_ A a °
N m C O a C m C U W W
Of o w m N W d m N c m E a 2 c m pi 3 m
a c w a v E E. v c E E o a „ `°
c L A = N 5
o N o d> Et m1 ° o c `o
i O 3a m a a a °m a° m m c 2 r m
m D) m W - m - a01 W m a w Ol d m
c ° ' 0 a m m5 mm ? < _
w a m_ m m m = 1 ° LE m 5=5 `o c m c
�3 `1E m m 3 c m3$ m ° - v 6
7 p c m N N o c d c c c Q a 3 > m m - 3" a `01
to ma � = m m 5 1 3§2 Eca 2 w O1a m N
0 c Zc� - 3 0 a mc mc m°l5 mE > c a
2 m N o m c a°i5° -' °'v w ino �m rnm '
C m d C m W C N G m °' m m° m a 3 L' C y 01
C v aJ 70 o v m 0) 0 JQ m m U 5 a O 1 aci`° o
1 0 m 5 a G1 G 5 t Nm 1.1z' E q
0� • • • •
U 0 0 • • • co E a .E a ca O 7
E
N
c o 0I c °1 5 1 N > 3 N S o 3 i
c c N u m m 0 O 0
o 0 - w u 0. at - 5 > > 1.. m m W ° 'E y 4 V
▪ W a N 0 8° a m c c c c p 3 > w
N0 0 is � U a Omi7 c p m� a E
1.0 5 coo N
vi 0. E P t m c c N 2 `- o m v 0 . W C m cc t d w°
SEC d r 4
y o 2 2 -. m m � a m �. b > � 3 m E 0 ° a c
2i a < •>.m m °'Wtm � ° O 5 ▪ �° �.a 3c E-'mr 21 o °O a
1- lgo = !E m Eaw °0 ° ym mw .co 8 € �� E =
« m O W O '° w `m 3 W` V > E N> O m T >. W O` 7 5 m U
a _ o 3 ° NE c p
0 > tm 6 m m a ° Q
to o• o N c N7,
LL m g e, J a m a _ E a U J z m > m m
i. v v v v v W W W W m a a a • a a a E E E E E E 0 0 z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
> 0 m Q
.� - r
a m m
V m
.+ T, d m m
R - m
C V U V V V V V V V V 0 11 m a c
W m W W m W W m W W 0 co m m 0
a a n o. a a a a a a a a , y
< E E E E E E E E E E E E �`
9 O O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 0 m 0
• Z Z Z Z Z 1 Z Z Z Z Z Z P. N 5
co O 6 O G
W
Z w 1. N
m t
m N m
> m C
a . W m m
: a 5 5 mm t. e 2 • cW c a 1° E ` m c
m m °o E m a W a l 9 n m c m c 4 m m m
a o v _ o c
m Q •O m 0I a .20e "' l0 C 7 2 U >. O a C 9 w O
2> - m L E 5 m m m 3 E m 0 0-.6 =? a m m
1 m o c o ' d m
m_ a ° i °itm >. Wae 112 ; m 3a Wm a a a aU m� c
�_ >c m °tm �A° mW >- 3c E E E Q> mc m
.° a c O > E m 0 0
0 ° '0 ° ° E
Y< C 0 m 3 E a m l 0 ° O a ' o ; N y 3 m; N Z z Z y= D m p
A N m .�
'5 -2 E `o 2 c 8 m 7 m c w o m �g c
c a ' m ° H g L m m E d o N y v a
1 m ` 8 0 3 w .. = ! C J m c N 0
>f0 m O R
n
C ° O
W
m L
y
O m H •
07 U
W N
✓ .
0 m
W 7
0. N
E
•
a
0 u
u • m c m a m c a a
c m 'm w co m m ' 0 m •
v F m m T c m m m x
m - - .c
m
Ofl N N m N N N 2 W
to W J 0 o J J J J O.
U a
.c 8
W
° m E
a. o. 5 `o
E o `c_
°u
m o
3 `m
`m 3
o m
5/ m m m m
N
m
V m C M To
10 "v E o .c 1 A 0
15 m > > O 2
0 `0v o c N
E°..*' m
'L • a . v a c a o
• u m m 0 ' ' N
.� 'D m C N m N m
2 2 W
0 mil j. O ' p
m m 0 O Y=
mU c m 0_ . 0
ro m ` m f 3
me 5 0' 0 1A a m a
m N C m 2
E 2 0
3 E ' m 0 $ `01 . v
w m m c w E 2 o c o
a Q c m m m N
7 m W 0 3 0. a c 5 c� N ,
W E 0 m 2 c >. . i m o
E W C c 8
c m m 8 m o m a c
c m W
E 8 g v m SE
c 3E 0. m m S ` 5, OZ
10 O m a = N O` C
CO Z O m f/) J w a.
y g = 2 5 E m c m
C C
m ' m ' p O- E c a a a N 5 r; 5 W o t c 5 2 9 m c c — c m E
N 2 0 'coo c m E
via E E mp W a e2 c v -21R
C N m v um `0° m2
7-
N C O .N. O O Y
d a 2 a o.0 5 2 n` am u of 5
my a E�d E d n 2mm' a ,` g 0
I-.
c
A s 7 o G W � -. 2 N c m m G m c m E V o W Z. wm m 8 0 om c ' O mco • N
0
M m c a. g eo, $ u `uE 0� m e w
_ c m — 5
1! g m 0 = E N m Ego � ° .° Z
01 a m 03 o C S 3 F- H 2 c m m 0
S c m o
E a ° c 5 8 E a m
_T
0
10
C
m m
E W
E 00 0 0 m m N N N 0 o.
y Z E E E E E E E E W m
co w Z Z Z Z 2 Z. 2 2 > c
m
w `m Q
F
1 , v 1°2
15
m
d o Ili
Q 2
m d 0 2
m m m m m m m m m -00.5 0
el EE E E E E E E "=
Ilig
3 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z 9 m
m r o c
0 c m
5 , 00
'0 O = C N N 0 6 1 7
W •0o2 Ec o+ a 2-2 2 m 0 0
m r c c o o c c o c E m
y N m 2 1 g N > j 0 0 c m s Q r C
m Em 8. s c m m vm 132 mt vNV
7 t W 'm o m o.c c il _ H ro mZ an m 14 a N 2 c o m g 2 u E O N E i.? E u m 2 y W v E 8 0 2 E Q ° o o.m tm ?�Z N N c u o m o- Z_3 m m 8 vo om c m y_
BR v i m o u v— E _
1 o c v E. `0 E E g o 0 0 ma K >
m 2 C 0 . E N ` m 2 ° a g w
e a'� c d 3 H F= m °c m „cm, m y
v m C m O. O V m 0
a > 8 E 0. goo.
0 c c
N w o..4
a LtM
O E
01 '0
d m
a2
0 OI m
O c `
TS w o
W U
a 2
- I c
0
U
.R
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS /EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I
COVER SHEET
Section Page
S.0 SUMMARY i
S.1 Introduction i .
S.2 Summary of Changes to the project following circulation of the DEIR/EIS i
S.3 Project Description iii
S.4 Current Operating HOV facilities in Orange County iv
S.5 Purpose and Need for the Project iv
S.6 Project Alternatives v
S.7 Project Impacts /Mitigation xxv
S.4 Permits /Coordination with Resource Agencies xxv
1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED 1 -1
1.1 Purpose of Project 1 -1
1.2 Need for Project 1 -2
1.3 Planning Context 1 -11
1.4 Conclusions 1 -15
2.0 ALTERNATIVES 2 -1
2.1 Development of the Identified Preferred Alternative 2 -1
2.2 Alternatives Under Consideration 2 -5 .
2.3 Alternatives Withdrawn from Further Consideration (preliminary planning phase) 2 -35
2.4 Alternatives Considered for Further Analysis (preliminary planning phase) - 2 -38
2.5 Status of Other Projects and Proposals Within the Area 2-44
2.6 Project Funding 2-46
2.7 Project Phasing 2-47
3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 -1
3.1 Geology and Soils 3.1 -1
3.2 Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality 3.2 -1
3.3 Biology 3.3-1
3.4 Wetlands and Waters of the United States 3.4-1
3.5 Cultural Resources 3.5-1
3.6 Community Characteristics 3.6-1
3.7 Transportation and Circulation 3.7 -1
3.8 Air Quality 3.8-1 .
3.9 Noise 3.9-1
3.10 Parks and Recreation 3.10 -1
3.11 Utilities 3.11 -1
3.12 Hazardous Materials and Waste 3.12 -1
3.13 Visual Resources 3.13 -1
4.0 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 -1
4.1 Geology and Soils 4.1 -1
-4.2 Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality 4.2 -1
4.3 Biology 4.3-1
4.4 Wetlands and Waters of the United States 4.4 -1
4.5 Cultural Resources 4.5-1
4.6 Community Impact Assessment 4.6-1
Table of Contents xxxiv March 2003
,fi
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
4.7 Transportation and Circulation 4.7 -1
4.8 Air Quality 4.8-1
4.9 Noise 4.9-1
4.10 Parks and Recreation 4.10 -1
4.11 Utilities 4.11 -1
4.12 Hazardous Materials/Waste 4.12 -1
4.13 Visual Resources 4.13 -1
4.14 Energy 4.14 -1
4.15 Construction - related Impacts 4.15 -1
5.0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 5 -1
5.1 (Enhanced) Reduced Build Altemative 5 -1
5.2 No Build Alternative 5-2
5.3 TSM /Expanded Bus Altemative 5-2
5.4 Full Build Alternative 5-3
6.0 LOCAL SHORT -TERM USES AND LONG -TERM PRODUCTIVITY 6-1
6.1 Methodology 6 -1
6.2 Analysis 6 -1
6.3 Conclusions - 6-4
7.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES 7 -1
7.1 Methodology 7 -1
7.2 Analysis 7 -1
8.0 GROWTH INDUCEMENT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 8 -1
8.1 Methodology - Growth Inducement 8 -1
8.2 Methodology - Cumulative Impacts • 8 -3
9.0 FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION 9 -1
9.1 Introduction 9 -1
9.2 Section 4(f) Resources 9 -2
9.3 Uses of Section 4(f) Properties 9 -5
9.4 Avoidance Alternatives 9 -9
9.5 Measures to Minimize Harm 9 -12
9.6 Coordination with Public Agencies and Property Owners
Regarding Section 4(f) Properties 9 -12
10.0 COMMENTS AND COORDINATION 10 -1
10.1 Overview 10 -1
10.2 Consultation and Coordination with Public Agencies 10 -2
10.3 Public Involvement Program 10 -6
10.4 Issues Identified 10 -10
10.5 NEPA/CEQA Summary of Public Involvement Process 10 -17
11.0 CONTACTS 11 -1
12.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 12 -1
13.0 ' BIBLIOGRAPHY 13 -1
14.0 D ISTRIBUTION LIST - 14-1
15.0 GLOSSARY AND LIST OF ACRONYMS 15-1
15.1 Glossary 15 -1
15.2 List of Acronyms 15 -6
Table of Contents xxxv March 2003
R
State Route 22I West Orange County Connection FEI SIEI R
TABLE OF CONTENTS
16.0 TITLE VI POLICY STATEMENT 16 -1
17.0 INDEX 17 -1
VOLUME 11 (under separate cover)
APPENDICES ,
Appendix A Response to Comments
A.1 Public Hearing Comments from October 3, 2001
A.2 Public Hearing Comments from September 26, 2001
A.3 Public Comments for Electronic -mail
A.4 Public Comments from U.S. Postal Mail
VOLUME 111 (under separate cover) _
A.4 Public Comments from U.S. Postal Mail (continued)
VOLUME IV (under separate cover)
Appendix (continued): Comments Received After October 30, 2001
Appendix B: Cultural Resources
Appendix C: Community Resources
Appendix D: Notice of Availability & Public Hearings Notices
Appendix E: Letters to Government Entities and Stakeholders
E.1 Federal Agencies
E.2 State Agencies
E.3 Local Agencies
E.4 Citizens
E.5 Utility Companies .
Appendix F: Visual Impact Assessment
Appendix G: SCAG RTP /RTIP Letter
Appendix H: Orange County Public Facilities Letter
Appendix I: Resources Agencies Coordination Letters
Appendix J: Preliminary Noise Abatement Analysis
Table of Contents xxxvi March 2003
. R
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TECHNICAL REPORTS
The following Technical Reports are summarized in Sections 3 and 4 of this FEIS /EIR and are available
for review at various locations *:
Air Quality Technical Report & Air Quality Technical Report Reduced Build Alternative Addendum ) ,
(January 2001) & Air Quality Technical Report Reduced Build Alternative (Revised) Addendum
(June 2002)
•
Draft Relocation Impact Report & Reduced Build Addendum (December 2000) & Final Relocation
Impact Report (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative (March 2003)
Floodplain Evaluation Report & Floodplain Evaluation Report Reduced Build Addendum (December
2000)
Initial Site Assessment & Initial Site Assessment Reduced Build Alternative Addendum (June 2002) &
Supplemental Initial Site Assessment (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative (December 2002)
Natural Environmental Study Report & Natural Environmental Study Report Reduced Build
Addendum (December 2000) & NES Reduced Build Alternative (Revised) Addendum (December
2002)
Traffic /Circulation Impact Report & Traffic /Circulation Impact Report Reduced Build Alternative
Addendum (May 2001)
Traffic Noise Impact Report & Traffic Noise Impact Report Reduced Build Alternative Addendum
(Parsons Brinckerhoff, December 2000) & Traffic Noise Impact Report Reduced Build Alternative
(Revised) Addendum (December 2002)
Visual Impact Assessment & Visual Impact Assessment Reduced Build Alternative Addendum
(December 2000) & Visual Impact Assessment Reduced Build Alternative (Revised) Addendum
' (December 2002)
*NOTE: If the reader is interested in obtaining copies of the FEIS /EIR (Volumes I -IV) and technical
reports, copies are available for reviewing at the following locations:
Caltrans District 12 Office Orange County Transportation Authority
3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 550 South Main Street
Irvine, CA 92612 Orange, CA 92863
(949) 724 -2089 (714) 560 -5923
Seal Beach — Mary Wilson Public Library The Los Alamitos /Rossmoor Branch Library
707 Electric Avenue 12700 Montecito
Seal Beach, California 90740 Seal Beach, CA. 90740
(562)431 -3584 (562) 430 -1048
• Garden Grove Branch Library Santa Ana Public Library
11200 Stanford Avenue 26 Civic Center Plaza
Garden Grove, California 92840 Santa Ana, California 92701
(714) 530 -0711 (714) 647 -5250
Table of Contents xxxvii March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS /EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS -
The engineering document and the MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY EVALUATION REPORT are also
available for review at the same location as the FEIS /EIR & DEIR/EIS.
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille,
large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of
these alternate formats, please call or write to Leslie Manderscheid, 3337
Michelson Drive, Suite 380, Irvine CA 92612; (949) 724 -2122 Voice, or use
the California Relay Service TTY number, (530) 741 -4509.
Table of Contents xxxviii March 2003
. R
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS/EIR
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
S.6-1 Description of Alternatives (identified Preferred Alternative) xiii
S.6 -2 Summary of Addresses of Residential Displacements and Partial Acquisitions xx
S.6 -3 Summary of Addresses of Non - Residential Displacements and Partial Acquisitions xxiii
S.7 -1 Summary of Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures xvii
1.2 -1 Population Projections and Growth Trends 1 -7
1.2 -2 Employment Projections 1 -8
2.2 -1 (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative Elements • 2 -18
2.2 -2 OCTA's FastForward Long -Range Transportation Plan Baseline Scenario 2 -26
2.2 -3 TSM /Expanded Bus Service Altemative Elements 2 -27
2.2-4 Full Build Alternative Elements 2 -31
2.4-1 Summary of Alternative Evaluation Results 2 -43
3.2 -1 Orange County Flood Control Facilities 3.2-4
3.2 -2 Flood Flows, Elevations, and Zones 3.2 -6
3.3-1 Plant Species Observed in the Study Area 3.3-1
3.3-2 Animal Species That May Occur or Known to Occur in the Study Area 3.3-2
3.3-3 Sensitive Species Reviewed for Potential Occurrence in the Study Area 3.3-4
3.5-1 Historical Highlights of Study Area Cities 3.5-1
3.6-1 1990 & 2000 Population Estimates for Cities Along the SR -22 Corridor 3.6-8
3.6-2 2000 Race /Ethnic Distribution in the Study Area 3.6-9
3.6-3 2000 Age Distribution in the Study Area 3.6-9
3.6-4 2000 Mode Choices for the Work Commute in the Study Area 3.6-10
3.6-5 Summary of Housing in the Study Area 3.6-12
3.6-6 Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks Within 0.8 Km. (0.5 mi.) from the SR -22 WOCC Corridor 3.6-12
3.6-7 Incomes in the Study Area 3.0-15
3.6-8 Fire Stations Within 1.6 Km. (1 mile) of the Study Area 3.6-16
3.6-9 Public Schools 3.6-17
3.7 -1 SR -22 Corridor No Build Screenline Summary 3.7 -1
3.7 -2 SOV and 3+ HOV Travel Times in Minutes - Year 2020 - No Build AM Peak Period 3.7 -3
3.7 -3 Year 1996 and Year 2020 Traffic Demands 3.7-4
3.7-4 Freeway Mainline LOS Criteria 3.7-4
3.7 -5 Freeway V/C Ratio and Level of Service - Year 1996 and Year 2020 Peak Hour 3.7 -6
3.7 -6 Freeway Connector V/C Ratio and Level of Service - Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour
(No Build) 3.7 -7
3.7 -7 Arterial LOS Criteria 3.7 -7
3.7 -8 Arterial and Freeway Connector Level of Service - Year 2020 (No Build) 3.7 -7
3.7 -9 Intersection LOS Criteria 3.7 -8
3.7 -10 Intersection ICU Ratio and Level of Service - Year 2020 Peak Hour (No Build) 3.7 -9
3.8-1 State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards 3.8-4
3.8-2 Air Quality Summary for Study Area Monitoring Stations 3.8-5
3.8-3 Air Quality Summary for PM2.5 Monitoring Station Closest to Project Study Area 3.8-6
3.9-1 Existing Noise Levels At Garden Grove, Westminster, Santa ana, Orange, and Seal Beach 3.9-2
3.9-2 Existing Noise Levels at Rossmoor Area Sites 3.9-7
3.9-3 Existing Noise Levels at Additional Garden Grove Area Sites 3.9-8
3.10 -1 City /Regional Parks and Golf Courses 3.10 -1
3.10 -2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails 3.10 -4
3.10 -3 Schools with Recreational Facilities 3.10 -7
3.12 -1 . I ,Regulatory Agency Listings Potentially Affecting Project Limits 3.12 -1
3.13 -1 Comparative Viewer Sensitivity 3.13 -1
3.13 -2 Important Visual Resources 3.13 -7
3.13 -3 Visual Resources Designated by Policy Documents 3.13 -8
4.2 -1 Changes in Floodplains - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.2 -6
4.4-1 Potential Impacts to Waters of the United States - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.4-3
Table of Contents xxxix March 2003
. R
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
4.6-1 Residential Displacements by City - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-9
4.6-2 Residential Displacements by Address - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-9
4.6-3 Partial Residential Acquisitions - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-9
4.6-4 Partial Residential Displacements by Address - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-10 .
4.6-5 Non - Residential Displacements by City - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-10 '
4.6-6 Non - Residential Displacements by Address - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Altemative 4.6-11
4.6-7 Partial Non - residential Acquisitions - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative • 4.6-12 '
4.6-8 Non - residential Displacements by Address - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Altemative 4.6-13
4.6-9 Residential Displacements By City - Full Build Alternative 4.6-20
4.6-10 Residential Displacements By Address - Full Build Alternative 4.6-21
4.6-11 Partial Residential Acquisitions - Full Build Alternative 4.6-23
4.6-12 Partial Residential Acquisitions by Address - Full Build Alternative 4.6-23
4.6-13 Non - Residential Displacements By City - Full Build Alternative 4.6-24
4.6-14 Non - Residential Displacements By Address - Full Build Alternative 4.6-25
4.6-15 Partial Non - Residential Acquisitions - Full Build Alternative 4.6-26
4.6-16 Partial Non - Residential Acquisitions By Address - Full Build Alternative 4.6-27
4.6-17 On -Site Parking Impacts - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-28
4.6-18 On -Site Parking Impacts - Full Build Alternative 4.6-30
4.6-19 Employment Impacts - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-35 .
4.6-20 Annual Property Tax Impacts - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-36
4.6-21 Employment Impacts - TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternative 4.6-37- -
4.6-22 Employment Impacts - Full Build Alternative 4.6-38
4.6-23 Annual Property Tax Impacts - Full Build Altemative 4.6-39
4.6-24 2000 Race /Ethnic Distribution For Displacement, Partial Acquisitions & Temporary - -
Construction Easements - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-49
4.6-25 2000 Incomes for Displacements, Partial Acquisitions & Temporary Construction
, Easements - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.6-49
4.6-26 2000 Race /Ethnic Distribution For Displacement, Partial Acquisitions & Temporary
Construction Easements - Full Build Alternative 4.6-51
4.6-27 2000 Incomes for Displacements, Partial Acquisitions & Temporary Construction
Easements - Full Build Alternative 4.6-52
4.7 -1 Time Savings for Trips Beginning and /or Ending in SR-22 Corridor 4.7 -2 -
4.7 -2 SR -22 Corridor VKT (VMT) and VHT Summaries - Year 2020 - Average Weekday • 4.7 -5
4.7 -3 Year 2020 PM Peak Period Performance Peak Direction Speed 4.7 -6
4.7-4 Year 2020 - PM Peak Period Screenline Comparison (Both Directions) 4.7 -7
4.7 -5 Projected SOV and HOV Travel Times in Minutes - Year 2020 PM Peak Period 4.7 -9 • -
4.7 -6 Freeway V/C Ratio and Level of Service - Year 2020 Peak Hour 4.7 -12
4.7 -7 Freeway Connector Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hour 4.7 -14
4.7-8 Arterial and Freeway Connection Level of Service - Year 2020 4.7 -17
4.7 -9 Intersection V/C Ratio and Level of Service - Year 2020 PM Peak Hour 4.7 -20
4.7 -10 Mitigated V/C Ratio -Year 2020 Peak Hour 4.7 -24
4.8-1 Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Analysis Sites 4.8-3
4.8-2 Predicted One -Hour PM Peak Worst -case 2020 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations 4.8-7
4.8-3 Predicted Eight -Hour PM Peak Worst -case 2020 Carbon Monoxide Concentrations 4.8-8
4.8-4 • Predicted Worst -case Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Year 2020 - PM Peak (Site F) 4.8-8
4.9-1 FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) 4.9-2
4.9-2 - Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.9-3
4.9-3 Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels at School Building Interiors - (Enhanced)
Reduced Build Alternative 4.9-5
4.9-4 Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels - Rossmoor Study Area 4.9-6
4.9-5 Existing and Predicted Worst -Hour Future Noise Levels at School Building Interiors
Table of Contents xl March 2003
State Route 22/West Orange County Connection FEISIEIR
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Rossmoor Study Area 4.9-6
4.9-6 Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels- Garden Grove Study Area 4.9-7
4.9-7 Existing and Predicted Worst Hour Future Noise Levels at schools (Garden Grove Area) 4.9-8
4.9-8 Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels - Full build Alternative 4.9-9
4.9-9 Existing and Predicted Future Noise Levels at School Building Interiors - Full Build 4.9-9
4.9-10 Construction Equipment Noise Levels 4.9-10
4.9-11 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels - (Enhanced) Reduced Build 4.9-13
4.9-12 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels at School Interiors - (Enhanced)
Reduced Build Alternative 4.9-17
4.9-13 Local Noise Ordinance Construction Abatement / Mitigation 4.9-18
4.9-14 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels (Rossmoor Study Area) 4.9-20
4.9-15 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels Garden Grove Study Area 4.9-23
4.9-16 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels at School Interiors (Garden Grove
Study Area) 4.9-24
4.9-17 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels (Full Build Alternative) 4.9-25
4.9-18 Existing, Predicted and Abated Future Noise Levels at School Interiors (Garden Grove
Study Area) 4.9-26
4.12 -1 Non - Acquisition Sites Associated with the (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative That
May Have Contamination That May Migrate 4.12 -6
4.12 -2 Non - Acquisition Sites Associated with the Full Build Alternative That May Have
Contamination That May Migrate 4.12 -11
4.13 -1 Impacts to Important Visual Resources - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.13 -8
4.13 -2 Impacts to Important Visual Resources - Full Build Alternative 4.13 -9
4.13 -3 Visual Policy Documents Applicable to the Viewshed 4.13 -10
4.13 -4 Impacts to Visual Resources Identified in Policy Documents - (Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative 4.13 -11
4.13 -5 Impacts to Visual Resources Identified in Policy Documents - Full Build Alternative...,.. 4.13 -12
4.14 -1 Energy Consumption Factors 4.14 -1
4.14 -2 Construction Energy Consumption Factors - 4.14 -2
4.14 -3 Annual 2020 Direct Energy Consumption 4.14 -3
4.14 -4 Indirect Energy Consumption 4.14 -5
6.3-1 Benefit/Impact Comparison - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative - 6-5
6.3-2 Benefit/Impact Comparison - TSM /Expanded Bus Service Alternative 6-5
6.3-3 Benefit/Impact Comparison - Full Build Alternative 6-6
8.2 -1 Projects Included in Cumulative Analysis 8 -5
9.4-1 Comparison of Avoidance Alternatives at the Pacific Electric Right -of -Way Trail 9 -14
9.4-2 Comparison of Avoidance Alternatives at the Pacific Electric Santa Ana River Bridge 9 -15
10.2 -1 Steering Committee Members 10 -4
Table of Contents xli March 2003
.a
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEI S1E1 R
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1.2 -1 Regional Location Map 1-4
1.2 -2 Project Study Area Map 1 -5 ,
1.2 -3 Levels of Service 1 -6
1.2-4 District 12 HOV Lanes in Orange County 1 -17
2.2 -la 1- 405/605 HOV Realignment Plan 2 -11
2.2 -1 b 1- 405/605 HOV Realignment Plan 2 -12
2.2 -1c 1- 405/605 HOV Realignment Plan 2 -13
2.2 -2a Pearce Street Pedestrian Overcrossing Survey Results 2 -14
2.2 -2b Pearce Street Pedestrian Overcrossing Plan (Alternative 5B) 2 -15
2.2 -3 March 2003 FEIS /EIR (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative Map 2 -19
2.2-4 August 2001 DEIR/EIS Reduced Build Alternative Map 2 -20
2.2 -5a (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative Typical Sections 2 -21
2.2 -5b (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative Typical Sections 2 -22
2.2 -5c Reduced Build Alternative & (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative Cross - Sections 2 -23
2.2-6 March 2003 FEIS /EIR Full Build Alternative Map 2 -33
2.2 -7 August DEIR/EIS Full Build Alternative Map 2 -34
3.1 -1 Faults 3.1 -2
3.1 -2 Areas Susceptible to Liquefaction 3.1 -3
3.2 -1 Major Surface Water Resources 3.2 -3
3.2 -2 Groundwater Recharge Basin 3.2 -5
3.2 -3 Flood Control Channels 3.2 -9
3.2-4 FEMA - Defined Floodplains 3.2 -11
3.4-1 Wetlands and Waters of the United States 3..4-5
3.6-1 Community Impact Study Area 3.6-3
3.6-2a Existing Land Use 3.6-5
3.6-2b Existing Land Use 3.6-6
3.6-3 Farmland 3.6-7
3.6-4 Study Area Minority Population 3.6-1 1
3.6-5 Study Area Major Activity Centers 3.6-14
3.6-6 Affected Area Community Facilities 3.6-19
3.6-7 Elementary Schools and Affected School District Boundaries 3.6-20
3.6-8 Intermediate Schools and Affected School District Boundaries 3.6-21
3.6-9 High Schools and Affected School District Boundaries 3.6-22
3.7 -1 Screenline Locations 3.7 -2
3.9-1 Noise Measurement and Modeling Sites 3.9-9
3.9-2 Noise Measurement Locations 3.9-10
3.9-3 Noise Measurement Locations 3.9-11
3.10 -1 City /Regional Parks and Golf Courses 3.10 -3
3.10 -2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails 3.10 -5
3.10 -3 Schools With Recreational Facilities 3.10 -6
3.11 -1 Utilities 3.11 -3
3.12 -1 Potential Hazardous Waste /Material Sites 3.12 -3
3.13 -1 Suburban Key Viewpoint 3.13 -3
3.13 -2 Urban Key Viewpoint 3.13 -4
3.13 -3 Open Key Viewpoint 3.13 -5
3.13 -4 _View From the Freeway 3.13 -6
4.6-1 Displacements - (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative March 2003 FEIS /EIR 4.6-6
4.6-2 Displacements - Full Build Alternative March 2003 FEIS /EIR 4.6-7
4.6-3 Caltrans Relocation Assistance Program 4.6-15
4.8-1 Air Quality Sites 4.8-4
4.8-2 Constrained Project List - 2001 RTP . 4.8-15
4.8-3 Baseline Projects Governor's Traffic Congestion Relief Plan -2001 RTP 4.8-16
Table of Contents xlii March 2003
State Route 22 /West Orange County Connection FEIS/E!R
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
4.8-4 Baseline Projects, State Highways —2001 RTP 4.8-17
4.8-5 Constrained Project List — 2001 RTP 4.8-18 .
4.8-6 Final 2002 RTIP 4.8-19
4.8-7 Final 2002 RTIP 4.8-20
4.9-1 Proposed Noise Barriers — (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.9-29
4.9-2 Proposed Noise Barriers —Full Build Alternative 4.9-39
4.12 -1 Former Unocal 76 Service Station, view looking South 4.12 -1 -
4.12 -2 Former Unocal 76 Service Station, view looking East 4.12 -2
4.12 -3 Firestone Store, North Elevation View 4.12 -4
4.12 -4 Firestone Store, South Elevation View 4.12 -4
4.12 -5 Arco, 13511 Euclid Avenue 4.12 -8
4.12 -6 Arco, 2940 North Bristol Street 4.12 -9
4.12 -7 OCTA, 11790 Cardinal Circle • 4.12 -9
4.13 -1 Suburban Key Viewpoint — Existing and (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative View 4.13 -2 -
4.13 -2 Proposed Suburban Key Viewpoint — (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative 4.13 -3
4.13 -3 Existing Views From the Freeway — Mainline SR-22 4.13 -4
4.13 -4 Views From the Freeway — Proposed (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative View 4.13 -5
9.2 -1 Pacific Electric Santa Ana River Bridge 9-4
9.3-1 Full Build Alternative - Pacific Electric Arterial 9 -10
9.3-2 Full Build Alternative on Pacific Electric Ana River Bridge 9 -11
9.4-1 Arterial to the North and South — Avoidance Alternative 9 -12
Table of Contents xliii March 2003
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
ATTACHMENT 4
"SR -22 WEST ORANGE COUNTY
CONNECTION - FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT REPORT (FEIS /R) ",
_CALTRANS WEB PAGE INFORMATION,
DOWNLOADED MAY 5, 2003
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 19
A
SR -22 West Orange County Connection Page 1 of 3
California Home Monday, May 5, 2003
• Y .4s r ':fir f' :'. , - -' `
�TS�4i.psrl {. to � '�"L y , T, tr^ �e i ,i.43,;.1-,. � ., R i x r _+.1 r �
_..'. ... :.'. "0_ "Sn it ... ' ..w.. __ a 1 . .-.T . _, • - . .:+',f y :
Caltrans Home District 12 Orange County - search I
District 12 Home r My CA r This Site
District 12 Overview
Press Releases
Community Events Caltrans > Local Sites > D12 internet > SR - 22 FEIS - Introduction '
Local Assistance
Program SR -22 West Orange County Connection
Orange County
Construction Activity
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REPORT (FEIS /R)
OC Construction Projects .
Seven Day Road Closure Introduction
Plan
Orange County Traffic The Department of Transportation (Department), in partnership with the Orange County Transportation Authority
Information - (OCTA), has just released the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report (FEIS /R) for the State Route 22/ West
Orange County Connection (SR -22/ WOCC) project proposing improvements from Interstate 405/605 (1 -405/1 -605)
Statewide traffic • to State Route 55 (SR -55). The purpose of the project is to improve existing and future mobility and enhance safety
Information along SR -22 in the cities of Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, Westminster, Garden Grove, Orange, Santa Ana, and Tustin.
The (Enhanced) Reduced Build Altemative is the identified Preferred Alternative and is divided into three major .
Statewide Right of Way
components:
Excess Land Program
Contact District 12 1. SR -22 Mainline — widening the freeway to construct a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction
from Valley View Street to approximately SR -55, including The City Drive improvements, a distance of 19.7
kilometers (12.3 miles);
• ,p 2. 1 -405/1 -605 Connector — constructing a new HOV direct connector structure from Katella Avenue south to Seal
' album + Beach Boulevard a distance of 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles). The alignment of this connector has been modified from
the original design (see below); &
3. I- 405/SR -22 Connector — constructing a new HOV direct connector structure from Seal Beach Boulevard east
to Valley View Street, a distance of 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles).
Currently, this freeway does not meet either existing or projected (Year 2020) traffic demand. The proposed project
will help to alleviate high peak traffic volumes and limited lane availability, inadequate weaving distances near on-
and off - ramps, high traffic volumes at the interchange of I- 5 /SR- 22/SR -57 (the "Orange Crush "), the outdated
cloverleaf interchange at Beach Boulevard, and some non - standard lane and shoulder widths throughout the
corridor.
Background on DEIR/EIS (released Aug 2001)
In August 2001, the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement ( DEIR/EIS) was issued.
Public hearings were held after the release of the DEIR/EIS, and the document was available for review at public
libraries in cities along the corridor and on the Department's and OCTA's websites. The Department received over
1,100 comments, most of which were concemed with air quality, noise, and community impacts, particularly effects
on property values and removal of homes. Both build alternatives required acquisition of businesses and private
properties. The Reduced Build Alternative would have displaced ten households and 26 businesses; displacements
' '0 under the Full Build Alternative would have been 189 and 35 respectively.
-4 In response to these comments, the Department has further analyzed multiple sections of the SR -22 corridor to
refine right -of -way limits and reduce environmental impacts. Additional design modifications to the Full Build and
Reduced Build alternatives, as presented in the August 2001 DEIR/EIS, would avoid nght -of -way acquisitions and
reduce environmental impacts while maintaining the design standards.
Background on FEIS /R (released April 18, 2003)
The Final Environmental Statement/ Report (FEIS /R) was released for public review on April 18, 2003. The 45 -day
public review period for the FEIS /R is from April 18, 2003 through June 2, 2003..
http:/ /www.dot.ca.gov /distl2 /sr22FEIS Intro.htm 5/5/2003
L-22 West Orange County Connection Page 2 of 3
Once the environmental documentation is completed with the filing of the Record of Decision and Notice of
Determination, final design may begin. The Record of Decision, in compliance with the National Environmental
Policy Act, will include any responses to comments that we may receive during the upcoming 45 -day public review
period of the FEIS /EIR. Caitrans anticipates the ROD will be adopted by FHWA sometime in late Summer 2003.
Information on SR 22/WOCC
• SR -22 Notice of Availability
• SR- 22/WOCC Newsletter
• Executive Summary
• Estimated Construction start date on the first phase is anticipated for early 2004
• Estimated completion date for the first phase is anticipated for early -2007.
Contents of the FEIS /R
• Cover Page
• Signature Page
• Errata Sheet
• Summary & Table of Contents
o Table of Contents
o Table S.7 -1
• Section 1.0 - Purpose and Need
• Section 2 0 - Alternatives
o Section 2.0 - Altemative - pages 1 -16
o Section 2.0 - Altemative - pages 17-48
• Section 3.0 - Affected Environment
o Section 3.1 - Geology and Soils
o Section 3.2 - Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality
o Section 3.3 - Biology
o Section 3.4 - Wetlands and Waters of the United States
o Section 3.5 - Cultural Resources
o Section 3.6 - Community Characteristics
o Section 3.7 - Transportation and Circulation
o Section 3.8 - Air Quality
o Section 3.9 - Noise
o Section 3.10 - Parks and Recreation
o Section 3.11 - Utilities
o Section 3.12 - Hazardous MAterials and Waste
o Section 3 13 - Visual Resources
• Section 4.0 - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures
o Section 4.1 - Geology and Soils
O Section 4.2 - Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality
O Section 4.3 - Biology
o Section 4.4 - Wetlands and Waters of the United States
so 0 Section 4.5 - Cultural Resources
• o Section 4.6 - Community Impact Assessment
- • Section 4.6 - CIA Pages 1 -7
• Section 4.6 - CIA Pages 8 -20
• Section 4.6 - CIA Pages 21 -44
• Section 4.6 - CIA Pages 45 -52
o Section 4.7 - Transportation and Circulation
O Section 4.8 - Air Quality
O Section 4.9 - Noise
o Section 4.10 - Parks and Recreation
ttp:/ /www.dot.ca.gov /distl2 /sr22FEIS Intro.htm 5/5/2003
SR -22 West Orange County Connection Page 3 of 3
o Section 4.11 - Utilities .
o Section 4.12 - Hazardous MAterials and Waste
o Section 4.13 - Visual Resources
o Section 4.14 - Energy
o Section 4.15 - Construction- related Impacts
• Sections 5 - Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts
• Sections 6 - Short-Term Uses and Long -Term Productivity
• Sections 7 - Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
• Sections 8 - Growth Inducement and Cumulative Impacts
• Sections 9 - Section 4(f) Evaluation
• Section 10.0 - Comments and Coordination
• Section 11.0 - Persons and Organizations Contacted
• Section 12.0 - List of Preparers
• Section 13.0 - Bibliography
• Section 14.0 - Distribution List
• Section 15.0 - Glossary and List of Acronyms
• Section 16.0 - Title VI Policy Statement
• Section 17.0 - Index
The document will be available at local libraries, at County Planning office and City Clerk offices along the SR -22
corridor, and on the Department's District 12 (Orange County) Internet site on April 18, 2003 at
http: / /www.dot.ca.gov /distl2. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats
upon request. To obtain a copy, please call or write to Leslie Manderscheid, 3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380, Irvine
CA 92612; (949) 724 -2122 Voice, or use the California Relay Service TTY number, (530) 741 -4509.
The FEIS /R can be reviewed at the following locations:
Caltrans District 12 Office Orange County Transportation Authority Garden Grove Library
3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 550 South Main Street 11200 Stanford Avenue
Irvine, CA 92612 Orange, CA 92863
(949) 724 - 2089 (714) 560 - 5422 Garden Grove, CA 92840
www.dot.ca.gov /distl2 www.octa.net/ (714) 530 - 0711
Seal Beach — Mary Wilson Public The Los Alamitos /Rossmoor Library Santa Ana Public Library
Library 12700 Montecito 26 Civic Center Plaza
707 Electric Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Santa Ana, CA 92701 -
Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 430-1048 (714) 647 -5250
(562) 431-3584
Back to Top of Page
2000 State of California. Gray Davis, Govemor. Conditions of Use Privacy Policy
http : / /www.dot.ca.gov /distl2 /sr22FEIS Intro.htm 5/5/2003
City Council Staff Report re:
Consideration of Comment Letter re:
State Route 22/West Orange County Connector
Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
May 12, 2003
ATTACHMENT 5
"SR -22 WEST ORANGE COUNTY CONNECTION -
APRIL 2003 NEWSLETTER - FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT JUST RELEASED ",
CALTRANS, APRIL, 2003
FEIR -EIS Review.CC Staff Report 20
SR 22 /West Orange County Connection °'ST"'`T
April 2003 Newsletter
adfirins
PTI
Final Environmental Document Just Released!
State of California - OCTA
Department of Transportation U.S. Deperhtlerrl e! rraieporta@an
Federal Highway Administration
The Department of Transportation (Department), in partnership with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), has just
released the Final Environmental Impact Statement /Report (FEIS /R) for the State Route 22 (SR -22) West Orange County Connection
(WOCC) project proposing improvements from Interstate 405/605 (1 -405/I -605) to State Route 55 (SR -55). The purpose of the project is,
to improve existing and future mobility and enhance safety along SR -22 in the cities of Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, Westminster, Garden
Grove, Orange, Santa Ana, and Tustin. The (Enhanced) Reduced Build Alternative is the identified Preferred Alternative and is divided into
three major components:
1. SR -22 Mainline — widening the freeway to construct a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction from Valley View
Street to approximately SR -55, including The City Dave improvements, a distance of 19.7 kilometers (12.3 miles);
2. I -405/I -605 Connector — constructing a new HOV direct connector structure from Katella Avenue south to Seal Beach Boulevard
a distance of 3.7 kilometers (23 miles). The alignment of this connector has been modified from the original design (see below); & -
3. I- 405/SR -22 Connector — constructing a new HOV direct connector structure from Seal Beach Boulevard east to Valley View
Street, a distance of 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles).
Currently, this freeway does not meet either existing or projected (Year 2020) traffic demand. The proposed project will help to alleviate
high peak traffic volumes and limited lane availability, inadequate weaving distances near on- and off - ramps, high traffic volumes at the •:
interchange of I- 5/SR- 22/SR -57 (the "Orange Crush "), the outdated cloverleaf interchange at Beach Boulevard, and some non - standard lane
and shoulder widths throughout the corridor.
CHANGES TO THE PROJECT FOLLOWING CIRCULATION OF THE DEIR /EIS
In response to comments on the August 2001 Draft Environmental Impact Report /Environmental Impact Statement (DEIR /EIS), the
Department further analyzed multiple sections of the SR -22 corridor to refine right -of -way mitts and reduce environmental impacts... -
Additional design modifications to the Full Build Alternative and Reduced Build Alternatives, as presented in the DEIR /EIS, were -made to- -
avoid right -of -way acquisitions and to reduce environmental impacts while maintaining the design standards. These efforts resulted in -_-
avoidance of acquisitions and reduction in impacts at the following locations:
• The partial acquisitions of six homes along Martha Ann Dr. in Rossmoor, as well as utility relocation were avoided by tightening the -
curvature of the southbound I- 405 /northbound I -605 connector while shortening the gore area further to the south;
• The right -of -way impact at the City of Seal Beach's reservoir was avoided by tightening the curvature of the Seal Beach Blvd. off -ramp
while shifting the exit nose further to the south;
• The I- 405/605 HOV connector has been realigned and lowered from the DEIR /EIS proposal to reduce impacts to the community of
Rossmoor and the City of Seal Beach;
• The full acquisitions of six homes along Almond Avenue (Rose Cir., Oleander St., Pansy Cir., and Primrose Cir. addresses) in the City of -
Seal Beach College Park East development, as well as the relocation of overhead power lines and reconstruction of existing soundwalls,
were avoided by 1) shifting the I -405 freeway centerline toward the south; 2) tightening the curvature; and 3) shifting the southbound I- -
405 /eastbound SR -22 connector gore (divergence point) area further to the east. This was achieved without changing the impacts to the --
United States Naval Weapons Station facility on the south side of 1 -405;
• The partial acquisitions of four homes along Enloe Way in the City of Garden Grove were avoided by shifting the ramp alignment -
closer to the freeway mainline and shifting the gore (convergence point) area further to the west;
• Displacement of two residential units (along Trask Ave.) and eighteen businesses (along Euclid /Trask Ave.) at the Euclid interchange in -
the City of Garden Grove were avoided by excluding the Pacific Electric arterial connection and shifting the ramp alignments toward
the freeway mainline. (applicable to the (Enhanced) Reduced Build only);
• The residential prop. rty at 12771 Lewis St. in the City of Garden Grove is no longer identified as a displacement; and
• 12841 Lewis St. and 13401 El Prado Ave. in Garden Grove have been changed from residential displacements to partial acquisitions
under the Full Build, and added to the (Enhanced) Reduced Build as residential partial acquisitions.
In addition to the reduction of impacts discussed above, refined engineering and the availability of more detailed plans led to the following
changes.
• The Preliminary Engineering plans in the DEIR /EIS for the Pearce St. pedestrian overcrossing assumed it would be replaced in -kind at
the same location as the existing facility. The pedestrian overcrossing is located between the Fairview St. and Harbor Blvd. exits on SR-
22. The existing pedestrian overcrossing is not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and is required to comply if
it is replaced. The new alignment for the replacement Pearce St. pedestrian overcrossing proposed in this FEIS /R is approximately 360
Page 1 of 8
A
feet (110 meters) east of the existing overcrossing The plans will be finalized at the design stage of the project. During the development
of the FEIS /R, the proposed ADA compliant pedestrian overcrossing identified three residential displacements that were not previously
identified during the DEIR /EIS. As part of the environmental documentation process, the Department's right -of -way staff contacted
these potential displacees, and it led to concerns raised by them. As a result, the Department elected to survey the usage of the facility.
A Public Meeting was held on December 17, 2002 to present the different replacement plans for the Pearce St. pedestrian overcrossing,
including the elimination option. The purpose of this Public Meeting was to supplement the usage survey by providing information to
the community and solicit their input on the replacement of the pedestrian overcrossing Approximately 50 people attended the
meeting. Comment forms were available at the meeting and 42 of them were returned completed. The recommended replacement
option 5B, as presented in the December 17, 2002 public meeting, would not have any impacts to residential properties.
• The I- 405/605 HOV connector alignment, as presented in the DEIR /EIS, was proposed to cross over three existing facilities: the I -405
freeway, the connector from eastbound SR -22 to northbound I -405, and the connector from southbound I -405 to northbound I -605.
The peak elevation of the proposed connector was approximately 95 ft. (29 meters) high where the minimum vertical clearance is
required over the existing southbound I -405 to northbound I -605 connector. During the public review period of the DEIR /EIS,
concerns from the Rossmoor residents arose regarding traffic noise, visual, air quality, and traffic issues. In an effort to address these
concerns, several different design variations have been studied. Among them, one design solution significantly reduces the height of the
HOV connector by shifting the previous alignment southerly such that the revised alignment runs parallel between the eastbound SR -22
and the southbound I -605- to southbound I -405 connectors at the same elevations. The peak elevation of this new alignment is
approximately 72 ft. (22 meters) where the minimum vertical clearance is required over the eastbound SR -22 connector.
• Several locations were identified as potential conflicts with the location of proposed bridge columns and existing traffic conditions. The
widening of the existing SR -22 overcrossing of Trask Ave., west of Harbor Blvd., would require additional bridge columns in the median
of Trask Ave. These additional columns in the median supporting the westerly bndge widening will extend through the intersection of
Sorrell Dr. Sorrell Dr , a north -south residential street, one block long, presently forms a "T- intersection" with Trask Ave., an east -west
arterial. Extension of the existing median on Trask Ave. westerly through the intersection to protect the new columns will result in
limiting access at Sorrell Dr. Access would be limited to westbound right turns from Trask to Sorrell, and southbound right tums from
Sorrell to Trask. The City of Garden Grove is studying the possibility to cul -de -sac Sorrell Dr. at Trask Ave., and the Department and
OCTA will maintain coordination with the City.
• With the availability of more detailed engineering, seventeen additional residential partial acquisitions were identified for the (Enhanced)
Reduced Build Alternative in the City of Garden Grove. A complete list is located in Table 1 of this Newsletter.
- PROJECT GOALS CITY OF ° �',l. BEACH
The project seeks to accomplish the following goals:
• Improve mobility and reduce congestion in the SR -22 /WOCC study area; APP 1 8 2UU3
• Maximize cost - effectiveness of the SR -22 /WOCC improvements;
• Minimize adverse and maximize beneficial environmental impacts to SR -22 /WOCC communities; and C:PARTMENT OF
• Minimize negative and maximize positive economic impacts to SR -22 /WOCC communities DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEIS /R
The FEIS /R will be released following the April 18, 2003 announcement in the Federal Register and availability in the State Clearinghouse
distribution list. The FEIS /R will be available to interested parties for a period of 45 days. Three of the four alternatives discussed in this
document include the No- Build, TSM /Expanded Bus Service and the Full Build, as described in the DEIR /EIS. The Reduced Build
Alternative, as described in the DEIR /EIS, has been renamed the (Enhanced) Reduced Build, and is the fourth alternative. The (Enhanced)
Reduced Build Alternative includes all of the Reduced Build Alternative's project features, as presented in the DEIR /EIS, plus two
additional components from the Full Build Alternative: 1) One is the freeway mainline section (HOV lanes in each direction from Glassell
Street to approximately SR -55) without the HOV freeway -to- freeway connecting structure; and 2) an auxiliary lane from Glassell Street to
Tustin Avenue in the eastbound direction approximately 1.8 Km (approximately 1.1 mile).
The FEIS /R is available at the following locations:
Caltrans District 12 O ffice Orange County Transportation Authority Garden Grove Branch Library
3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 550 South Main Street 11200 Stanford Avenue
Irvine, CA 92612 Orange, CA 92863 Garden Grove, CA 92840
(949) 724 -2089 (714) 560 -5923 (714) 530 -0711
www ant ra gov /dict12 www.octa.net/
Seal Beach — Mary Wilson Public Library The Los Alamitos /Rossmoor Library Santa Ana Public Library
707 Electric Avenue 12700 Montecito 26 Civic Center Plaza
Seal Beach, CA 90740 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Santa Ana, CA 92701
(562) 431 -3584 (562) 430 -1048 (714) 647 -5250
Page 2 of 8
All of the elements contained in the No Build and TSM/Expanded Bus Service Alternatives are included in the (Enhanced) Reduced Build
Alternative. This alternative also includes design features to improve the operational characteristics of the SR - 22 facility in certain locations,
such as interchange spacing, shoulder widths and median widths. It also includes the following design modifications to improve the
operational characteristics of the facility in certain locations that currently create bottlenecks (choke - points) for motorists:
• Continuous lane in each direction from Beach Boulevard to I -5.
• Auxiliary lanes between interchanges at various locations
• Interchange improvements at Beach Boulevard and Brookhurst Street
• A collector /distributor road along the eastbound SR -22 at the SR- 22/I- 5/SR -57 confluence
Tables 1 and 2 of this Newsletter list the addresses of residential and non - residential displacements and partial acquisitions by alternative.
Please note the (Enhanced) Reduced Build and Full Build Alternatives in the March 2003 FEIS /R constitute the most up -to -date right -of-
way information for the SR- 22/WOCC project. For more detailed information on property impacts, refer to the Executive Summary and
Section 4.6 of the FEIS/R.
Once the environmental documentation is completed with the filing of the Record of Decision (ROD) and Notice of Determination, final
design may begin. Barring unanticipated delays and funding shortfalls, construction may begin by early 2004.
If you have any questions regarding the SR- 22/WOCC FEIS /R, please contact Ms. Leslie Manderscheid at (949) 724 - 2122.
Caltrans District 12
Environmental Planning
3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380
Irvine, CA 92612 - 8894 -
BACKGROUND ON DRAFT EIR /S
In August 2001, the Draft Environmental Impact Report /Statement (DEIR/S) was released for public comments. The document described
four project alternatives:
' • No -build Alternative. There would be no work done on the SR -22;
•
• Transportation System Management (TSM) /Expanded Bus Service Alternative. There would be no major construction done on SR -22;
instead, traffic - handling modifications such as ramp metering, closed circuit television monitoring and message signs would be deployed
in an effort to manage existing traffic. At the same time, expanded bus service along arterial streets would be added to attract drivers
away from the road;
• Full Build Alternative. The SR -22 corridor road would be widened to add a carpool (High Occupancy Vehicle, or HOV) lane in both
directions, and direct HOV lane connectors between SR -22, SR -55, I -5, I -405, and between I -405 and I -605. There would also be a
direct arterial between SR -22 and downtown Santa Ana along the old Pacific Electric Arterial right -of -way all elements of the
TSM/Expanded Bus Alternative would also be included; and
• Reduced Build Alternative. This alternative is identical to the Full Build except direct HOV connectors would be added only between
SR -22 and I - 405, and the I -405/I -605 junction, and there would be no arterial along the Pacific Electric Arterial right -of -way.
Public hearings were held after the release of the DEIR/S, and the document was available for review at the Department and OCTA offices
and websites and public libraries in cities along the corridor. The Notice of Availability (NOA) letters for the DEIR/EIS were sent to the
County of Orange, Rossmoor Community Services District (RCSD) », the cities of Cypress, Garden Grove, Los Alamitos, Orange, Santa
Ana, Seal Beach, Tustin, and Westminster on August 29, 2001. Public hearings were held on September 26 (Garden Grove) and October 3,
2001 (OCTA).
The proposed SR- 22/WOCC project information was placed on the OCTA and the Department websites. Copies of the DEIR/EIS and
Technical Reports were available at the following libraries: Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Rossmoor /Seal Beach, Mary Wilson Library (Seal
Beach), the Orange City Library; and the Department and OCTA offices. The following public entities also received two copies of the
DEIR/EIS: County of Orange, Rossmoor Community Services District, the Cities of Cypress, Garden Grove, Los Alamitos, Orange, Santa
Ana, Seal Beach, Tustin, and Westminster.
Note: the Rossmoor Community Services District (RCSD) was the entity notified during the public review process since they are the only
recognized governmental body in the community of Rossmoor.
The Department received over 1,100 comments, most of which were concerned with air quality, noise, and community impacts, particularly
effects on property values and removal of homes. Both build alternatives required acquisition of businesses and private properties. The
Reduced Build Alternative would displace two households and ten businesses; displacements under the Full Build Alternative would have
been 144 and 39 respectively.
Page 3
o
•
6
t4
.- > - al 0., cl.) 0) G.) 4.7 CI) , U 4) cU cl) CI) 0 0 1..■
'5 . <4 ... Q., o.) 0., CU a) (1.) (u a..) 0, CU 0.)•"9 •1; C/1
.-igliasF.,==5,15sss=a.a.
8 .-.. 5 4 uo m m 45 6 ca 4i m 6 4 6 T4 41 a
el • . , . el el el el NO el el el el el el el •-... .-.
"'-' el el Lel rel rsi 0 0 0' 00 e
•-■ s N0 .fl •41 e4 0 - 0
1-
-5 • .1 0. 0 ,.- ...,-, ..., ,--, ., ..., el el el el el el nt nt 00 0
• CD NO 00 vn 0'1 en en en en on en en el en en en en e4
r,1 N. oo oo Z
• 4 *
10 al al • * ' „ , , . . ,:. " , -
= , • >1 >1 S1 . • • • i: ••
• = • 4: • 1.5 • . - 8 • , ,. . el cct cl2 . ,; ' 'ti;* ' 6j 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 . 1 .1 4 Q '
F.T. CA .-W ..e, -, ...% • I r-A k'
E 1: a E ,•..,
I
i :-- . ::.;,:."
.. F. F. F. F-t P=1 ,--1. ..4 Pel F-■ PI gel .--1 E" " ' ' ' . ,
i ll " f7- I o s o i ' ( ill 8 V " V. 8 Vo " ec.' 00 f: ' - . F.' 7c: ; 1 ii r.'''
00 un Le. re en c•Lh Ln ,r■ -..o .1% an un 'fl N4 un•.n un NI Let • ,. ..• „ „ • Ni 0 en el el .. , ...... - I 00 U1 os An 43- -1- en 41- re
Z -4 levers un 0' Un .. un .. Un en un F .,.....„.., I..., e l. A.
, v. (fl v. v. v. en en' en en en.en.en en en en... en 00 0 C) 0 0 0 0 c) un ,r ..e.C> 0 0 CN 0
1 , 00 el ONCN 0' ...v. .v (‚4 00 .
I:. .........
.6. ..$ =
• .4 .-,
• .‹
1.. C.J •/. 1... PA Pv
TEi 51 ,Iti
ey ey el el JD el ('1 r4 el r4 ey el v. .. .. cll
el ('4 fl en (-4 .. 0 0 0. oo N. JD If nt ('1 0 v-
. 9. • g! T, 0 X gD, ;.'"; .v; ;;?, r,1 ;:
;4 ;1 ;4 ,' ;4 F.4 A A 'f-?. 0
.6. 0
z
'7, = ,
C"' 4 ' : . '.;"•:$. -,,' . s: •; .:. - --',-;• '''', ,,' -.;::i ;:''-', .:••:''. , :: '‘ , ' ''• ''. -f , , . .;:l'''''s :''' '' ''"X '' '?"1 ;,.. "A'f 'Zo:'
.e4 -0 = u- - -, \ '•:' , - :: • .'„ ,s,. " ' ,„' g , ; ,„:-• •",', • , ' ..- '' 1 ,:, - ' ' ' „t : „, ',' ". •-,:ta , „. >,, , -t. ,-.;' •,
_ .3,) eLL >. ° :..,1',. '..2 .....- .:: .i., /r. ' ..: - 4'„ ., ^,- .,,„'••.••: -' :: ',': -- -'. ' '' ' 4 ' `r -;" • ' . - ..;,,,`: ' ,, ,„al'-' - ,' '. -'" -
-e ----• 8 -?, - :':, ▪ ' f ,- - ..",';', =',i3 '4;4 J '' ..,..' „?,;.-- - 2, , P , t '"r- -.. 7, .., , - ' ' ,' -.: ' 1,1 't ' ' ' ,, - , ' :';'.-,, L':',. -,-,
a - CI vs vs , .. , g ' ... ' '- ; '-'. . ' = l'i - '''. ' " • .--- ' ,P ' 'I ' ''. i , - i , . , ':',..;-: ,; 1% -, , .1.1. "2 ' .. N-,.... ly....1.1.,
O w t- a c5,, F=.. • s • , - -` • ; t - • , • , -' • - ' s''"," , 2 ' • ""`"' 't " " ; " • "` ‘""," • ' f • ■ o: :2,, • , „ ;?: , t • „ .•.- .4 1, -T, e -N,,f t
, • - - ;r .,-, - : -' ' , "t- ' , - - , .- - -‘ " : ..,.., t' ,, .. :,., -- - _ • -,.,!. -1 -- •:, '
,,, o co- ' .,-; ,.' , 4: - v.° . ' ;:, '; • '3'. ' .: " ''''''.* '''',, ' ',' ',' ^4:1 70 ''' - ''' - "", ''",.'".;• ': '' 4: - "- ,T It :, ' '. -.."Jv 1 (:<,. ';',..
cu . .. 1
e
. . . 0.
. .
" ea .-. > o
,-, ..,-, < 'tt
a. 41 >-. >, >-, >-.
.., ..- -1 (v. -c mi
, 0 eu
-
tt
00
..'-'. U
0000 ..
.6.■ r.i 5
= ,...• k•-14•1444 4,_, 9 u
a
▪ ca = 0 a as c• L- N. Z
Ca et -
v-- 'CI • . ..- -• ''.• . A ' ., ''' • . - CI $ , -' 4 .' ...' '',';' ° - ° . A " 2. ''• „f...:: •t ....: •, - ::'''.i - . ' 1'
0 •:= - ,.......?'' ::, 71.).- 7-, ; - 4..,:. ,- ,t - '
cA = LA - .. '''',.: .> ''';" .. , ';''` . - .;g 0 , -g .:>.-- • , c,>i ri: - -,, . - ',' ,2; 4,-.....; :4 4 4 A :4 4•4.,„_,-.,i... .3., op.:4,-
Wl Aj > r '',,,, 0 . ,••■:■•4. q Y V , ) 4. P'' 5 - 5 et) In .• .A. 6) 3 ,...., c„, . ..,- - - .: ..- ,-.,_.,-;:34, -- ...- ... 1 .--. - - , .
.,...- > ....., ......„, , 7 6
1 2 g
1
.3
^c) T i., • .nt a ,. , a.. .- ,..-, - ia. :e ,41 • ce c _ . E at ce A , 5A , rj ,.. gcl Ai cu 4) '4, ci,) • 0 U.: tu . n-- „ •. u, '„u Wi
" A E.4 ,--. - .-. -" ,-; 44 ,-; H t-4 . •••-■ el E r - :, f:Q r4 ' 7:-. el i-l eni 1-4 N4 Pl c44 ' (••.1 P9 .-: PCI L-. %'-'- c•-4 .-. s- e.4,-1 Z alg CI CI e EA a
n . -C ' Ig
O I con 44•• I44. 000 en•cv,..o ID 00, •0 00 , 0' 00 I.. . 00.'.O o0 •a, , cen'as. un Q. .€1 , U '.--, . ,,,. N...•cn r...,
00 00,t, 'l U1 0 Un el 01 el un un so U. un un U1 Un,U• CD .c el un el CD en el'el v. - . c? clp a: ..4, T s1. 7 1 - c9
,-... .
i..4 4 .... en 1...... ... V1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 en v. en en Eg CN 0 CD CD.CD CD,CD ar. , 2 ,-„, 00 ..i., 21 Lg
,Na
•
.
i =
=
Cl) ..a
t. ,
...
• .
el e et 0 0 0 0
-1
'a -r-i wwwsla
z
--- cr. cr. os 0
•-• . .. -'-
1
= r, ..• , . • .,?.• , .. :
„ ,
- . • • -.- .-, •.. • . . , •' , „ - --. • .,•
.4
m _ s. , „. .. • . . ,
-a v. c.i a; a.i , ' ' ° ' • , „. , „
. „ .
aLL kl ›. ›. ,.• . " , „ . . , " , , „
,
,
Z
4 4 „ . -
,, • - .,,
.
, „ •
: --- ... , •, , ' • „ . : . .
c : ° 4 • .11 a. : - '.-*/ - ' -'• ' ' . '-, • - . • ,
.,.
• • . '
'
4 ' .. .t.• * t - . ,
•... I-c el el • .' •Il • U , .„ , • , J ‘: :-...
,
0000 , ' . - . . 8 . ,
• . „ . .. '
,4 •-1 1.-.1 Z ,
I. •••••• e. „ •
!•
0 1)
tS U
0
ct
ci)
. - . 5 e c c
..: 4 4 4 4 4 L 4 4 4 4 4
CT W " v , ` W
w � " v � � v eu •
o d ' v v v v a'. a v v v v v v v
N .-, .--, -, - n - c-, ,•-, . -, , -, ,-, 1-'s A •
s 5 eriun un eriun eriun un eriun un un ,, v
i M O � N � 000 0 O ••+ N 0n u u1 - O �iO
R cc") col en e•1 e+1 col et et et e V• et N z z
"CS «e R N .13 R e0 R •et R el R R R eK R R a R 0t ea , ta ' • " ,
..-= ..-= 0000000000000 o ` o ` 000L000000 ' elf .:
d a..ca.nan .0 - - - a a.. o .a.n - 0 an ..c _o a - .0� - - �a.n -0 -0 � ` � g gA � . - N` . ; , . '; ; :z.::. .. - Gs = E a1 PQ PQ 00 Pg00 PQC404 W P:101 0G0100P7 W 00 00 00 01 00 00 0:1 0:10.10C102 0.l107.14 W W I RN,. '" • -
.I 4., P., a. P4 a•04 a c. 0000000. 0000004. .aae- 1ac t4.,J..1., w 4 d -d• .. s:'
'
1 .,' ' :r :' -:,': :: : ':: W°PU N ON :•<'tls;gr .,, f.5,' ,
.-+ LA .•+ ef7 M n 01. N. u1 01 u1 01 N. .- 1. "•H N. 0-. 01 e+1 01 H1 ^.-- 141 •-. . M h •
en en N. 0• d N ,...7 :
'.0 ' •• y' •••••;.7, , 0
N N .-+ ••-+ 0 0 et et 01 01 N N .-+ N O; re ' O •e+1 et N 01 N N -+ r•• O O et et en. en«N C4 N N et a > 0 O '• r 1 '•• 0
• - 00 00 00 00 00. M M 00 N. N. n M M N. n n n 0n M en en. n M M '0 1. ' N. t.- N .O . O M VI M en en en M N N N N P..) O .O .O . .O .O NO .O .O. u1.,v1 en u1 01 0 0 0 0 • eQ �j
e en en e , en en en en en en en en en e e en ' P..) , )4' . - -/r tom, - `' z
0. “1 ..,
L".
• - O - y
c
c 0
d
0 O O
:y P� Co z z
CS ; s " y., 01''',:c",. •J: :, ,`4,,,,‘ & a ,r ' "NA"r . 'a; `i - ",,,°.: - ' 1,, ,,,• ''
to u �' "^ ' A mz`': - "" •a- ° " .r s -,;.n..','1•24 ' n 5, :,: ;s- ; • :e }< - ,�,., :, ;•.a `� . �, . - . y'» .: • ' •
vs •a .� J. .:e u 'n• e' w ° • ,. '.: • °,1..i''"' 1. ... . i i, W ' ..g r 1y
a ;: • '~ '$:, • : �, ••:', < -5 .v;
0V R H CA 1C. , ° a''^ ; „< x <� ' -,' - - . '. : t " ,'d, - -y =- ,K :.';\ y; . y
.0
>z -'1,. ,.two , =; � .. . a , .. . �91 -r;,
rn A " - ,ie: . '� - . sr " V � � ^?'�,`: a,"-" • = ' - „" < `'*" �` � ' •�j • �j
L4 een , - , s ,n � . °. ",....'1 '‘,$:.` , r , ""',, . • , "'. 141 .,'; / r" '1 ;• F - i ' t4
L
00
01 . • • d A AAA A A
a . 1 A Al
•5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
-H 1I111I11II1ii
° [ + .., •. ti V) ., 0 - e ■"■ ..-2 0 --■ . ti' .-, ti .-- A _ !r /-. F.. F. rC y
tu is V N OA N 0A VI
I CA CA V7 V) VI N et .
-10 O R a• O N O e
00 t ,• 0 JD 00 O a N 00 • 0 en et .0 N. O
• 4c,.., M an en 1. 00 01 O .N 01 u1 to 44 CO 00 Co 00 00 00
r CA O col en en M M rn et T . 4 - et <1 et N z • e0 R• R R R R, ' • 06 , :R 00• • R • R; 8 R - 0 Y R - R 8 ''c- . i : : • 'Ny <- • . ,a
o o b`: n " ' o o o ts-,o ^ a'o 0 0 0 0 0 0.o o•• -:'b° o b°" .: ,' ; ` : , - 'r` :
+r a.. a .n �•.n .a ..a a-.a :.o an. an an a•� _a a a.a .a a a.:a an ..a .n'. �.�• � ...a ' q.q,•A `' • ai •v .. ; r .� -
PQ i -
i yv- o ' e - 4c• " 'de ' "'tea 'c - e g e'� e� -- '4e - 0-
1 aa 1 A ems. c^1 e"Q ' e� '� P:1 7 -c1 ' k.--P > <., ar w r. lr l . :. -.
:', � � W W ' C4 ' PR f1q P4 frt D�,p4 W - P4s ' P0 P� W :' W P4 Pa P4 PO sYl Pq fYi - P4 CA tY1 " C1�Pa W W P7 • P�.e O �• �'> :�,.> :d�s` :: :oa.a�_ 4 �� � -. -
-0 .:-.; '(4 P4 P4 P4 P4" P4 04 04 P4.04 04.0+ P• 04.04 04. P4. At P4 Al Ai P-1 .Fr P4 04 '04 P. 04 04 04 `04 -t: py (4, w 1 ' 4-4 4 - , . t :Cet , - 4.. V
4 d ,,, � � � � � 'i. � °.• 3 ° W' W W .'P4 P4 P`4.41 r s 4 °ai' eq= -
0 A r. eel ,-. 10 • N. en N. u'1" 01 en •a 1..-+ N. ••• 1..-+ 01 M eT • en .L. u•1 .•r en• fn •n 0+1 N. '.-• .en s " .0 .. N ■-• M u'1 •A• e , > • 0 .-a
N N •-• ••+ 0 et et 01 01,N N .-+ N 0 ••• 0 M V• N rn N N .•+ .•+ 0•0;7;V• en , 1' N N N.I. NJ et,•et `et•N °= • r • •• et
00 00 00 00 00 00 N N. N. N N. t. :t.•t. N. r.... ••.0 N. ,.0 .O .D .O .O .0 .D .D .0 .0 en ,n e/1 °eA 0. O.O O O "O 01.i-, • v en
en .01 10 e•1 e•1 01 fn 01• 0) 10 01 0n M 0) en 01 en en' en e•1 01 rn en en en eel to M e+0, 0n M en'u1c N N N: N r 4 .-• -✓ kY •z'. N1'
E c AAA
to N
d
Ot , v
��4 z °00co00000 z
. 0 ,. - - .. .. ,. ,. i 'F� en
O 0 eC
U v
3
•5 H
Q' C
E
O E
N 7
.� 0
r• ". U
L . °
rs y
c . C
...—j O
- 0 d
co
O a+ ., d
•
U a C
'rte = 0 O
wa ' _ -
•
. , ..u• E
•
a0
> d
et MO C c
o . � of
N in
L
a t7 t ° C
N w c: Q
O= r. m
y I: .
u , ,d er Y v _
0 y' , .'", >' ` C c
U y
C v1
a
N vU_j
u O v 0 co 8 U)
to - b
Q ' O ,_ IL p0
. A , - . • C r C f7 M Q4
IQ O ' 2 co 0
a • yVl • Ts
+J• C
l ., U N MI ODI1 ^ N 7
IV N Of
y 5 Y . : „ S",• Y ..>. d
:8 m -..
•••• AN el M, M N
t ► + • v1 Lt-1 .n. .n .f1 1 = w
.c MF M• r n . .M•M 2 .O d Lo
c a -
ra
o
C/) •a+ U 0 C - N
~ co CO O ▪ • =
6J N - T
CI NQ :
F h� - m - c
0 . • cam O
CO
'O � N W CI 3
= UW CDi m
0., ° mpi
L L U L O N
-p • U O ° t of
u� •n wg Cm
n '.a —•:g eg'1' ° m ama,-
H CYO, L:, Pr• C� N > a
p— p .- -i O E N. r
.7.- .• N •f4 M M 0 U}
• V1 cf1 u1 in v1 CI) d i s
M M M M M
N
O
Z
U 1)
• -A
c
> _
g g oo §
as Y, a
o
• �• C N . , Q L L L 2 — 2 > 3 ' >3 ' e 2 o o u s v
.. d - E r xxu nAAA -1 7. t 3 s o -a . s
U w
0 0 " U Co . - g mma>3• 1� U s e •n
K r•1 a NN oo • a a a L0 UU .ca W -0 v O •'n
u - i•. _— v o o en �+ �••. g.'; - U
-. Ca .3 e•sr1 N. G ..- AA--- ..oe.lQC/ I) 00 Aen .
' ' - " .-.‘,7*,.-..--, .. -0000 E W
N N ' N N "
' < " " p - o < ' o: •00 ,:w: u aii aZ3a't3a3dt3U ' W •
= C •. " ; • , 'O , O O;S ":1. N• a ,. • -. v1 eh' • 8 O .. 0 0 -4 u ti .4 a Q
O ' ,n, N ' • • al ,n • v1 fn fn N in •N .•r N N N cn vl fn.Vl N• .°
W., a 3 - V • • > > > • > a ol + ai ai ai ai 5 ai ai ai ,�3 > q q — f n ai" ai • 6 ai N , " . • ,
v `.1 d d d d f/l en vl fn•fn'en !n vl v ? fn "rn yr d t ` ..6 ,� : ex fi1 vi en et, en vl vl, 2
›. L e L -, -. L e L 'e eF �°< ww IL' ... a r�w AAAAAA o � , =• -
A' W HFHFF E- F Eq.. yyyyyyyyzzz'� ��ya �'�y • �� �FFF.H F '
CIS .. ^• e l el . N D . N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 coo 0 CO o h o co CO C 00 0 0 , • f. f. F. f. r . .. O V �. V U. U' fn f/1 V7'fn C• , ' <' C
T p. .•• 00000 OOO OOOO r• , N NO O.1- r• V1,n ars O OOOO a'
H 1< c
en 0 O O ' N C 0 0' 0 ' . D T T T a. 0' OO :, F �jO z
CO 00 "n ^ e--4,5-, N N to un 1n V1 tn'V1 N n ..-N. 1'- ' .f� .. f. . E
a o a
> V C f N C _ W
i4 O a 8 g 5 O O O — O O a
y N O 0 C'C a a.% a. a C C i a C o s
- a 'la C 0 O.d 0 g>3 >3 LX Q , O co v a, 4
: y • e y s x x "> ; t :' s 5 • e
$ T.
"' u C7 U z z ,3�w l U ' 2 ti o
�•� N >, z
d •'o k r•1 a N N 0 0 V U g - ( ( w ) X O (n '° N
' �M./�•� � � 0O � n �elC) W ;D 4:1 u AL
t
y.� .a; ptt .• ,44, . Y = . -a.. .J °- '. Y .•,..11-:.«D O :O O'•b. - ,. ,,.. o 0 >
L V .tg'''' ; ' - .,X: :1::;:t ' k "E ;. e ? �: ; ' ., ' -.N N ;N • " '> ' " 0' •A
"d +' • r; 1 ; b % , R " . « - .. .v c a ' .. ; .,,t1,,,„, •','� a�3.a�3• 0 S.Z ,a te,• A. v L.
.t "`r^' . ^� yea R • p?" 4. N N N h
y 1 P ' ;e ; ' ; ' • r • 'r.9t: •'<P . V V "a). y • .wa°. ; i '+ .a : 9. 3 T . w t . •
ri �Q / � 3 - • ' , '' A % • ;, - ,;,s.:.. C] A A A A• A . : _ . • . �n F •o
w 3" ' F-1 . 1 ' ,;1,,,, „,'„,.Z.,.., r'7` ,,, i., v p.,y. 1..” 'Z''' 4 4, s"'- T °.;,`• '. < f i�." 41 -
y f., .. . . Fy'• < • • 1lt• �!1 1n V1 en sn Yx• F•r., • r •• z ` .G
A y C .. .
CC,.� CC,� O O ,••••%0 0' > 0. CC C § § O O > u e C2
++ S•'.. O L C7 OL A g . VI O O a a r0 - '� . 0 a.
r~ o C7 •v -u 3 a n c 1 .0 a, . 0
a) :? C C a n.x .� a g Q et 1 4 a 5t
. •" - v v •.0 t A A Q v w o- ... W u o > °o - .72 N e9 x x w'e3 ?{ >> u ' a 5 0 .0
, , o � � - — ZZ.7;'e;O,Fi 3 3 wawa ,n g v
C' y -. -0 ,0 - O N 00 z � • C m ii -a Hi
F-. z ...cq r 5; Pi r: ? A ° ; A - -- z o Z�w
d .•-. w. f1 C 5 os c4 L
p 'y, ::: ' =, ,,z, • ---,,:s..--;-:-. « , ..., W •,: ` :^:''•' ?: ',". '1;,�r .` as w E'
y b • . : ' '' "', "- ;:u r _, i
• Aca C7. , •,. < ° 3: • -. '"" :
, - " ;,'- ° .,;Y:.. q .. . 14 Q.., ..
y y s, _;� - o ,' . c 'g : o o ° 0 0 0 ; ' 02••=x-.. N, S ai ai •
. eCJ.A d c4 f � . :' w' 8
v) N 8 N N N N N ',• ' ci ai S N • N N• , • a ........ ' 1ai'ai• � 3 "
3s
i : ,n • a 5 ; , �
a .
Q► H,vf NT t % , vf' fA,V] V] N .s ' 3
of . ai•: t v
i . a ai ai i , rn W
u ai ai" u ai ai• ai ai• ai" ti .�.. ' f, o
�• 'u . u • ai tu' ai .i
3 NQdddfnfnti vlfnv1 v1 v1yv1v1`n ' d � _ � ' o 0 0 cn q av 7
w E l e e e e 2 E e e e e E Z .[ . LL. Z l ti 4 4 ; 0 ' ; , ❑ r.y g ,. .- g A,i
N. a .� • www P� 1 fs i •WwA AAAA•A A ' 7 E .,
WHHFHFHHFHFFF.HHHFH: - : zzz �.'u' E -HHE'F , =-s w
O A'. r•. N N (--4 o0 00 00 00 00 0o 0o 0o oo oo 00'00 fV `- y y � yy. ^ ^ 0 0�y 0 y �„ y
.-1 ..1 e^. ••.° 0000 00 0000 8 n0 00000.N. F 0 10. . ..; O..-. U V C3 n r, llC''V HN,n - Q• C •�' ' . 0 /~ s u
- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O•.O 0 N N O O V• a• ICI •n , V1 tr •n p O " p•) p a {,,1 t
' y; t h O. 0 0 N N` 0. 0` C. V• . o o. O O O O O O. S. S (=Pa ° • y .- �
" 00 00
y ° c A. 2
Ps. N.-CA N N N ,f1 1n V1 Vt ..o an v1 n n r ,... ) ... fr. ~' ` - ' f. y
L o > 4 ,
A .. C ,.
N A
N .. C C v v A A ,n �,
7! • .=. . .4 b v o. n. v 3 � .4 t
H L 'd •° u a, «. - - Fri �' F O)
.L1 O p a n ? x x :o > > Q bo F - •
ea N = C7 c a C7 c ° • p w w 1 �` a, __ '
E-' t% u as a) Z � p Q_ � b 0 O N 0) N r = ' . Av •
`� e•1 Q N Q N N O W O b (� O v 0 0 O , C O A v ' � - a
r �C7=C7 00 O � .4 n .4 .-* a....a z col ` a nix
a v+ u 7
' ^ c0.11 al
O ▪ ' V . Y O 0 "' 8 ' 8 q in"
Pa O N OO .•. O N NN NN;NNN , • '' S N NN .•. �• ' � .n v
• C ai ai ai ai ai a i a i a i • ai ' a vi ai ai ai ai ai 41. " ' ' q
aAU
u > > > > > ai V) u ai ai z r
u ` ` � . , l v ) cn.vlv } scnvscn vlrnvlv � l d' vI NN Vl ° ▪ y.
te a, 1 Tae l e e �: a V e a a , ' AAAQAAA l o f
PG A ww FFFFFFHFFFFHH.FFHH '�'b',,'b � 'L'i�' < 2 ns tn i -
.•. N N N N N 000000000000000000000.0000 N 0 N a) • n
at e
en el .O .0 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N C 0 a)
en ••. 10 000000 000000.. 0 . •-■ ....1 U 'n 311 •• 0 0 • f" ei -r4e;
e+1 el 0 0 .00.000 0 0 ryry
y O
Z
U 0 C L to .-i ti y N PQ
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE ROUTE 22 WEST ORANGE COUNTY CONNECTION (WOCC)
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
and
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIS /EIR)
•
THE FOLLOWING IS A NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED STATE ROUTE 22 WEST
ORANGE COUNTY CONNECTION IMPROVEMENTS.
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12, has conducted an environmental review process
pursuant to Federal and State environmental laws. The result is a document that serves as a Final Environmental
Impact Statement and an Environmental Impact Report (FEIS /EIR). The FEIS /EIR provides descriptions of the
environmental conditions in and around the project study area, the potential environmental impacts of the
improvements associated with each alternative, mitigation measures to address potential impacts, and other
information required by Federal and State environmental laws.
PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT - The FEIS /EIR will be released for public review on Friday, April
18, 2003 and will be available for review and comment until close of business on Monday, June 2, 2003.
The document will be available for review at the following locations:
Caltrans District 12 Office Orange County Transportation Authority
3347 Michelson Drive Suite 100 550 South Main Street
Irvine, CA 92612 Orange, CA 92863
(949) 724 -2000 (714) 560 -5422
Santa Ana Public Library Garden Grove Regional Library _
26 Civic Center Plaza 11200 Stanford Avenue W • ` ° -
Santa Ana, CA 92701 Garden Grove, CA 92840 ._.,
(714) 647 -5250 (714) 530 -0711
The Los Alamitos /Rossmoor Branch Library Mary Wilson Public Library
12700 Montecito 707 Electric Ave
Seal Beach, CA 90740 Seal Beach, CA 90740
(562) 430 -1048 (562) 431 -3584
If you have any questions regarding the SR- 22/WOCC FEIS /EIR, please contact Ms. Leslie Manderscheid at (949)
724 - 2122 or write tcaMs. Manderscheid at the address below.
Caltrans District 12
c/o Leslie Manderscheid CITY OF SEAL BEACH
Environmental Planning
3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380 APR 1 8 2UU3
Irvine, CA 92612 -8894
L. PARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Page8of8